Postcopulatory Sexual Selection: Darwin’S Omission and Its Consequences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Postcopulatory Sexual Selection: Darwin’S Omission and Its Consequences Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin’s omission and its consequences William G. Eberhard1 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and Escuela de Biologia, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Jose´, Costa Rica In one of his few major oversights, Darwin failed to appreciate that Table 1. Different types of competition among males for access male–male competition and sexual selection can continue even to conspecific females and their gametes (types of sexual after copulation has begun. The postcopulatory equivalents of selection) that occur before and after copulation both direct male–male battles (sperm competition) and female Time Intrasexual selection Intersexual selection choice (cryptic female choice) occur within the female’s body. Recognition of this hidden, but intense, sexual competition pro- Before copulation Male–male battles Classic female choice vides new insights into a variety of fields. These include the During and after Sperm competition Cryptic female choice hyperdiverse and paradoxically elaborate morphology of both copulation sperm and male genitalia, the equally puzzling and elaborate morphology of nongenitalic male structures that are specialized to grasp and stimulate females, powerful manipulative effects of have initiated copulation. Simply stated, Darwin missed the fact substances in male semen on female reproductive physiology, that not all copulations result in insemination, and that not all paradoxical male courtship behavior that occurs after copulation inseminations result in fertilization of the female’s eggs. Any has already begun, variability in parental investments, and the male ability to improve the chances that his copulations will lead puzzlingly complex and diverse interactions between sperm and to fertilizations of eggs will give him an advantage in competition female products that surround animal eggs and between male with other males who mate with the same female. gametophytes and female tissues in flowering plants. Many bizarre traits are involved, including male genitalia that are de- It was not until 99 years after Darwin’s 1871 book that Geoff signed to explode or fall apart during copulation leaving behind Parker (2) awakened evolutionary biologists to the evolutionary parts within the female, male genitalia that ‘‘sing’’ during copu- importance of processes that occur after the male has already lation, potent seminal products that invade the female’s body achieved genital coupling (conventionally called, somewhat im- cavity and her nervous system to influence her behavior, and a precisely, postcopulatory processes; they include processes dur- virtual Kama Sutra of courtship behavior performed after rather ing copulation). Parker saw that they, too, like the precopulatory than before genital coupling, including male–female dialogues events emphasized by Darwin, can result in sexual selection on during copulation. a male by affecting his success in competition with other males. There are postcopulatory equivalents inside the female of cryptic female choice ͉ sexually antagonistic coevolution Darwin’s precopulatory male–male struggles and female choice (Table 1). If a female copulates with Ͼ1 male, and if one of these icture a pile of freshly-cut weeds at the sunny edge of a males is better than others at, for instance, removing sperm Ptropical forest. Metallic green flies dart and circle over it, stored from previous males (3), this male will stand to sire more chasing one another in short dashes. Your eye is caught when a offspring and win out over the others. Appreciation that female chase ends as one fly grasps another in midair and the pair biases can also have postcopulatory effects on male reproductive immediately lands on the pile of weeds. Their genitalia are success, and thus exercise the postcopulatory equivalent of already coupled, and the male immediately turns to face away female choice among males, lagged behind (4, 5), and was not from the female. After a few seconds, paradoxically (because he presented as a general theory, however, until 1996 (6). After an is already securely attached), he begins to court, rhythmically initial period of negative reactions (7–9), CFC is now routinely waving his colorful hind legs and tapping the female’s abdomen. included as a possible factor in studies of possible postcopulatory The courtship continues for a few minutes as the pair remains sexual selection (10–12). Because important postcopulatory coupled, and then the flies separate. The female walks down into events are played out inside the female’s body, where she is the pile where she lays eggs (her larvae will feed on the rotting largely in control of what happens, female choice seems a priori vegetation), while the male rejoins the frenetic chases above more likely to be important after copulation than it is leading up the pile. to copulation. There is a surprisingly long list of female- Why would a male fly wait to court a female until after he has controlled processes that must be executed if insertion of the already achieved his evolutionary objective of copulating with male’s genitalia into the female is to result in siring her offspring her? The answer (recently worked out by a Brazilian graduate (Table 2). Other things being equal, any male better able to student, F. Barbosa, personal communication) had to wait for induce the female to carry out one of these processes more Ͼ100 years after Darwin’s great book on sexual selection (1) that explained so many other aspects of male–female sexual inter- completely than she does when mating with other males stands actions. to produce more offspring. The Puzzle of Darwin’s Omissions This paper results from the Arthur M. Sackler Colloquium of the National Academy of Darwin was uncannily on target about most of the topics he Sciences, ‘‘In the Light of Evolution III: Two Centuries of Darwin,’’ held January 16–17, 2009, discussed, and he seldom missed general phenomena that had at the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center of the National Academies of Sciences and important consequences for his ideas. Strangely, however, there Engineering in Irvine, CA. The complete program and audio files of most presentations are ࿝ is a major missing piece in Darwin’s thinking on sexual selection. available on the NAS web site at www.nasonline.org/Sackler Darwin. He discussed at length how competition between males for Author contributions: W.G.E. wrote the paper. sexual access to females leads to sexual selection (1), but failed The author declares no conflict of interest. to realize that sexual selection [sperm competition and cryptic This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. female choice (CFC) in Table 1] can also occur even after males 1E-mail: [email protected]. www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.0901217106 PNAS ͉ June 16, 2009 ͉ vol. 106 ͉ suppl. 1 ͉ 10025–10032 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 Table 2. Female-controlled processes that occur in different sperm competition explains a number of hitherto paradoxical species and are known to increase the chances that a given observations. A male can dilute the sperm from previous males male will sire her offspring with his own voluminous ejaculate, engaging in what is called 1. Permit penetration deep enough to allow sperm deposition at the ‘‘raffle competition’’ (8). This tactic is apparently common in optimum site for storage or fertilization vertebrates, where testes size (and thus ejaculate size) correlates 2. Refrain from terminating copulation prematurely with the degree of female polyandry (13, 14). Behavioral traits 3. Transport sperm to storage and fertilization sites of males to prevail in sperm competition include transferring 4. Modify internal conditions (e.g. pH) inside reproductive tract to larger ejaculates when more males are in the vicinity (15) and reduce defenses against microbial invasion that kill sperm performing ‘‘retaliatory’’ copulations when the female with 5. Nourish or otherwise maintain sperm alive in storage site which a male is paired copulates with another male (14). 6. Refrain from discarding sperm from current male Another tactic involves the behavior and morphology of the 7. Discard sperm from previous male sperm themselves, with the sperm from a male linking together 8. Move sperm from previous male to site where current male can so that the group can swim more vigorously (16). The male can remove them also use his own genitalia or a spermatophore to physically 9. Accede to male manipulations that result in discharge of his displace sperm from previous males that are present in the spermatophore female (10, 17). Waage‘s classic study of sperm removal in a 10. Grow more immature eggs to maturity (vitellogenesis) damselfly (3) showed that during the first portion of copulation 11. Ovulate the female’s sperm storage organs (spermathecae) gradually 12. Produce eggs with more nutrients become depleted of sperm as the male moves his genitalia in and 13. Oviposit all available mature eggs out, snagging sperm on thick arrays of spines on his genitalia. 14. Prepare uterus for implantation Then after the spermathecae are nearly empty, the male ejac- 15. Refrain from removing copulatory plug produced by male ulates and fills them again with his own sperm. 16. Aid male in the formation of copulatory plug The male can also increase his chances of winning out in sperm 17. Modify morphology following first copulation to make competition by using defensive strategies, such as reducing the subsequent insemination more difficult danger of competition for his own sperm by guarding the female 18. Refrain from removing spermatophore before all sperm are from copulation with additional males (by staying with her after transferred copulation, physically plugging her genitalia, or inducing non- 19. Abort previously formed zygotes receptive behavior). Several other competitive mechanisms have 20. Refrain from aborting zygotes from current sperm been proposed, including ‘‘kamikaze’’ sperm that kill or disable 21. Allow germination of pollen grains the sperm of other males (18), and douche-like flushing out 22. Promote growth of pollen tubes and guide them toward ova stored sperm from the female with a jet of water (5), but they 23.
Recommended publications
  • The Occurrence of Stalk-Eyed Flies (Diptera, Diopsidae) in the Arabian Peninsula, with a Review of Cluster Formation in the Diopsidae Hans R
    Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 160 (2017) 75–88 The occurrence of stalk-eyed flies (Diptera, Diopsidae) in the Arabian Peninsula, with a review of cluster formation in the Diopsidae Hans R. Feijen*, Ralph Martin & Cobi Feijen Catalogue and distribution data are presented for the six Diopsidae species known to occur in the Arabian Peninsula: Sphyracephala beccarii, Chaetodiopsis meigenii, Diasemopsis aethiopica, Diopsis arabica, Diopsis mayae and Diopsis sp. (ichneumonea species group). The biogeographical aspects of their distribution are discussed. Records of Diopsis apicalis and Diopsis collaris are removed from the list for Arabia as these were based on misidentifications. Synonymies involving Diasemopsis aethiopica and Diasemopsis varians are discussed. Only one out of four specimens in the D. elegantula type series proved conspecific with D. aethiopica. The synonymy of D. aethiopica and D. varians is rejected. A lectotype for Diasemopsis elegantula is now designated. D. elegantula is proposed as junior synonym of D. varians. A fly cluster of more than 80,000 Sphyracephala beccarii, observed in Oman, is described. The occurrence of cluster formations in the Diopsidae is reviewed, while a possible explanation is indicated. Hans R. Feijen*, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. [email protected] Ralph Martin, University of Freiburg, Münchhofstraße 14, 79106 Freiburg, Germany Cobi Feijen, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Introduction catalogue for Diopsidae, Steyskal (1972) only re- Westwood (1837b) described Diopsis arabica as ferred to Westwood and Hennig as far as Diopsidae the first stalk-eyed fly from the Arabian Peninsula. in Arabia was concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Bushhopper Stalk-Eyed Fly Coconut Crab Periodical Cicada
    PIOTR NASKRECKI PHOTO BANNERS HANGING IN CHANGING EXHIBIT GALLERY Bushhopper Stalk-Eyed Fly Phymateus viridipes Diasemopsis fasciata Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique A nymph of the bushhopper from Mozambique Like antlers on a deer’s head, the long can afford to be slow and conspicuous thanks eyestalks on this fly’s head are used in maleto- to the toxins in its body. These insects feed male combat, allowing the individual with on plants rich in poisonous metabolites, the largest stalks to win access to females including some that can cause heart failure, so most predators avoid them. Coconut Crab Periodical Cicada Birgus latro Magicicada septendecim Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands Annandale, Virginia The coconut crab is not just another land Periodical cicadas spend seventeen years crab; it is the largest living terrestrial underground, feeding on the roots of plants. invertebrate, reaching a weight of nine After that time they all emerge at the same pounds and a leg span of over three feet. time, causing consternation in people and Their lifespan is equally impressive, and the a feeding frenzy in birds. A newly emerged largest individuals are believed to be forty to (eclosed) periodical cicada is almost snow sixty years old. white, but within a couple of hours its body darkens and the exoskeleton becomes hard. BIG BUGS • Dec. 31, 2015 - April 17, 2016 Virginia Living Museum • 524 J. Clyde Morris Blvd. • Newport News, VA 23601 • 757-595-1900 • thevlm.org PIOTR NASKRECKI PHOTO BANNERS HANGING IN CHANGING EXHIBIT GALLERY Dung Beetles Lappet Moth Kheper aegyptiorum Chrysopsyche lutulenta Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique Dung beetles are very important members of At the beginning of the dry season in Savanna communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera, Diopsidae) in Sri Lanka with Descriptions of Two New Species and a Review of the Other Stalk-Eyed Flies from the Island
    ZooKeys 946: 113–151 (2020) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.946.53108 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A revision of the genus Teleopsis Rondani (Diptera, Diopsidae) in Sri Lanka with descriptions of two new species and a review of the other stalk-eyed flies from the island Hans R. Feijen1, Cobi Feijen1 1 Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Corresponding author: Hans R. Feijen ([email protected]) Academic editor: R. Meier | Received 10 April 2020 | Accepted 27 May 2020 | Published 6 July 2020 http://zoobank.org/CFC2300D-4E2C-44BF-B2A4-E11E406B5A0F Citation: Feijen HR, Feijen C (2020) A revision of the genus Teleopsis Rondani (Diptera, Diopsidae) in Sri Lanka with descriptions of two new species and a review of the other stalk-eyed flies from the island. ZooKeys 946: 113–151. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.946.53108 Abstract The literature on Sri Lankan Diopsidae is reviewed. Eight Diopsidae are now known to occur in Sri Lanka, five species in the genusTeleopsis and one species each in the genera Sphyracephala, Diopsis, and Cyrtodiopsis. The presence of Cyrtodiopsis requires confirmation to exclude the possibility of mislabelling. All five Teleopsis species are endemic, as are the Diopsis species and probably the Cyrtodiopsis species. Only Sphyracephala bipunctipennis Senior-White has a larger distribution as it also occurs in India. A key is pre- sented for the Diopsidae of Sri Lanka. Three Teleopsis species were already known to occur in Sri Lanka: T. ferruginea Röder, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names
    Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus-group names. Part V Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart Evenhuis, Neal L.; Pape, Thomas; Pont, Adrian C. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Evenhuis, N. L., Pape, T., & Pont, A. C. (2016). Nomenclatural studies toward a world list of Diptera genus- group names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart. Magnolia Press. Zootaxa Vol. 4172 No. 1 https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Zootaxa 4172 (1): 001–211 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4172.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22128906-32FA-4A80-85D6-10F114E81A7B ZOOTAXA 4172 Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names. Part V: Pierre-Justin-Marie Macquart NEAL L. EVENHUIS1, THOMAS PAPE2 & ADRIAN C. PONT3 1 J. Linsley Gressitt Center for Entomological Research, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817-2704, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] 3Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by D. Whitmore: 15 Aug. 2016; published: 30 Sept. 2016 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 NEAL L.
    [Show full text]
  • New Species of Rhizomyces (Ascomycota, Laboulbeniales) Parasitic on African Stalk-Eyed Flies (Diptera, Diopsidae)
    European Journal of Taxonomy 474: 1–13 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.474 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2018 · Rossi W. & Feijen H.R. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Research article New species of Rhizomyces (Ascomycota, Laboulbeniales) parasitic on African stalk-eyed flies (Diptera, Diopsidae) Walter ROSSI 1,* & Hans R. FEIJEN 2 1 Sect. Environmental Sciences, Dept of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Coppito (AQ), 67100 Italy. 2 Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] Abstract. Three new species of Rhizomyces Thaxt., parasitic on African stalk-eyed flies, are described. These are R. forcipatus W.Rossi & Feijen sp. nov., parasitic on various species of Centrioncus Speiser from Ivory Coast, Kenya and Malawi and Teloglabrus Feijen from South Africa; R. ramosus W.Rossi & Feijen sp. nov., parasitic on Diopsina nitida (Adams, 1903) from Uganda; R. tschirnhausii W.Rossi & Feijen sp. nov., parasitic on Diopsina africana (Shillito, 1940) from Uganda. All previous records of species of Rhizomyces are presented in tabulated form with updated host names. A key is presented to all species of Rhizomyces. The occurrence of Rhizomyces and other taxa of the Laboulbeniales Lindau in the genera of the Diopsidae Billberg is discussed. Keywords. Afrotropical, Diopsidae, Laboulbeniales, Rhizomyces, taxonomy. Rossi W. & Feijen H.R. 2018. New species of Rhizomyces (Ascomycota, Laboulbeniales) parasitic on African stalk- eyed flies (Diptera, Diopsidae).European Journal of Taxonomy 474: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2018.474 Introduction About 10% of the approximately 2100 described species of Laboulbeniales Lindau, parasitic fungi of arthropods, is associated with the Diptera Linnaeus, 1758.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Aspects of the Evolution of Reproductive Parasites
    1 Theoretical Aspects of the Evolution of Reproductive Parasites by Jan Engelstaedter A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London December 2006 Department of Biology University College London UMI Number: U592750 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592750 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 2 Declaration This dissertation represents, except where specifically mentioned in the text, the results of my own research. The dissertation is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted for a degree or other qualification at this or any other university. No part of my dissertation has already been or is currently submitted for any such degree or other qualification. Jan Engelstaedter Dr. Gregory Hurst teandidate Supervisor 3 A bstract Reproductive parasites are maternally inherited endosymbionts that manipulate the reproduction of their hosts in a way that enhances the transmission of the parasites, but is deleterious to the hosts. In the present thesis, I try to resolve some ques­ tions concerning the evolution of reproductive parasites and their hosts by means of theoretical modelling, using a variety of approaches including recurrence equations, optimisation, and stochastic modelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Finnegan Thesis Minus Appendices
    The effect of sex-ratio meiotic drive on sex, survival, and size in the Malaysian stalk-eyed fly, Teleopsis dalmanni Sam Ronan Finnegan A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University College London 26th February 2020 1 I, Sam Ronan Finnegan, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Acknowledgements Thank you first of all to Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) for funding this PhD through the London NERC DTP, and also supporting my work at the NERC Biomolecular Analysis Facility (NBAF) via a grant. Thank you to Deborah Dawson, Gav Horsburgh and Rachel Tucker at the NBAF for all of their help. Thanks also to ASAB and the Genetics Society for funding two summer students who provided valuable assistance and good company during busy experiments. Thank you to them – Leslie Nitsche and Kiran Lee – and also to a number of undergraduate project students who provided considerable support – Nathan White, Harry Kelleher, Dixon Koh, Kiran Lee, and Galvin Ooi. It was a pleasure to work with you all. Thank you also to all of the members of the stalkie lab who have come before me. In particular I would like to thank Lara Meade, who has always been there for help and advice. Special thanks also to Flo Camus for endless aid and assistance when it came to troubleshooting molecular work. Thank you to the past and present members of the Drosophila group – Mark Hill, Filip Ruzicka, Flo Camus, and Michael Jardine.
    [Show full text]
  • Wet Woodland Report
    23 December 2011 An Exploratory Survey of Invertebrates of Wet Woodland in the Bure Valley and the Muckfleet Valley Final Report - December 2011 Prepared by P Lee and C M Drake Prepared for Broads Authority ARACHNE Invertebrate Information Services 33 Lawford Place, Lawford, Manningtree CO11 2PT Tel / Fax: 01206 394538 email: [email protected] ©Broads Authority Terms and Conditions for use of maps in this document i) You are granted a non-exclusive, royalty free, revocable licence solely to view the licensed data for non-commercial purposes for the period during which the Broads Authority makes it available. ii) You are not permitted to copy, sub licence, distribute, sell or otherwise make available the Licensed Data to third parties in any form iii) Third party rights to enforce the terms of this licence shall be reserved to Ordnance Survey CONTENTS SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 METHODS .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Sampling of invertebrates ............................................................................................................... 5 Selection of wet woodland compartments ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Digest
    Dipterists Digest 2018 Vol. 25 No. 2 Cover illustration: Palloptera usta (Meigen, 1826) (Pallopteridae), male, on a rotten birch log at Glen Affric (NH 28012832), 4 November 2018. © Alan Watson Featherstone. In Britain, a predominantly Scottish species, having strong associations with Caledonian pine forest, but also developing in wood of broad-leaved trees. Rearing records from under bark of Betula (3), Fraxinus (1), Picea (18), Pinus (21), Populus (2) and Quercus (1) were cited by G.E. Rotheray and R.M. Lyszkowski (2012. Pallopteridae (Diptera) in Scotland. Dipterists Digest (Second Series ) 19, 189- 203). Apparently a late date, as the date range given by Rotheray and Lyszkowski ( op. cit .) for both adult captures and emergence dates from puparia was 13 May to 29 September. Dipterists Digest Vol. 25 No. 2 Second Series 2018 th Published 27 February 2019 Published by ISSN 0953-7260 Dipterists Digest Editor Peter J. Chandler, 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL (E-mail: [email protected]) Editorial Panel Graham Rotheray Keith Snow Alan Stubbs Derek Whiteley Phil Withers Dipterists Digest is the journal of the Dipterists Forum . It is intended for amateur, semi- professional and professional field dipterists with interests in British and European flies. All notes and papers submitted to Dipterists Digest are refereed. Articles and notes for publication should be sent to the Editor at the above address, and should be submitted with a current postal and/or e-mail address, which the author agrees will be published with their paper. Articles must not have been accepted for publication elsewhere and should be written in clear and concise English.
    [Show full text]
  • Sperm Storage in Caecilian Amphibians Susanne Kuehnel1 and Alexander Kupfer1,2*
    Kuehnel and Kupfer Frontiers in Zoology 2012, 9:12 http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/9/1/12 SHORT REPORT Open Access Sperm storage in caecilian amphibians Susanne Kuehnel1 and Alexander Kupfer1,2* Abstract Background: Female sperm storage has evolved independently multiple times among vertebrates to control reproduction in response to the environment. In internally fertilising amphibians, female salamanders store sperm in cloacal spermathecae, whereas among anurans sperm storage in oviducts is known only in tailed frogs. Facilitated through extensive field sampling following historical observations we tested for sperm storing structures in the female urogenital tract of fossorial, tropical caecilian amphibians. Findings: In the oviparous Ichthyophis cf. kohtaoensis, aggregated sperm were present in a distinct region of the posterior oviduct but not in the cloaca in six out of seven vitellogenic females prior to oviposition. Spermatozoa were found most abundantly between the mucosal folds. In relation to the reproductive status decreased amounts of sperm were present in gravid females compared to pre-ovulatory females. Sperm were absent in females past oviposition. Conclusions: Our findings indicate short-term oviductal sperm storage in the oviparous Ichthyophis cf. kohtaoensis. We assume that in female caecilians exhibiting high levels of parental investment sperm storage has evolved in order to optimally coordinate reproductive events and to increase fitness. Keywords: Reproduction, Sperm storage, Amphibians, Caecilians Background sperm storage has also evolved in the third group of ex- Animal reproductive strategies include variable modes of tant amphibians, the limbless caecilians [5,6]. sperm transfer, fertilization, and type of offspring devel- Caecilians perform internal fertilization with the aid opment.
    [Show full text]
  • F. Christian Thompson Neal L. Evenhuis and Curtis W. Sabrosky Bibliography of the Family-Group Names of Diptera
    F. Christian Thompson Neal L. Evenhuis and Curtis W. Sabrosky Bibliography of the Family-Group Names of Diptera Bibliography Thompson, F. C, Evenhuis, N. L. & Sabrosky, C. W. The following bibliography gives full references to 2,982 works cited in the catalog as well as additional ones cited within the bibliography. A concerted effort was made to examine as many of the cited references as possible in order to ensure accurate citation of authorship, date, title, and pagination. References are listed alphabetically by author and chronologically for multiple articles with the same authorship. In cases where more than one article was published by an author(s) in a particular year, a suffix letter follows the year (letters are listed alphabetically according to publication chronology). Authors' names: Names of authors are cited in the bibliography the same as they are in the text for proper association of literature citations with entries in the catalog. Because of the differing treatments of names, especially those containing articles such as "de," "del," "van," "Le," etc., these names are cross-indexed in the bibliography under the various ways in which they may be treated elsewhere. For Russian and other names in Cyrillic and other non-Latin character sets, we follow the spelling used by the authors themselves. Dates of publication: Dating of these works was obtained through various methods in order to obtain as accurate a date of publication as possible for purposes of priority in nomenclature. Dates found in the original works or by outside evidence are placed in brackets after the literature citation.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual of Nearctic Diptera
    539 The history of dipterology at the Canadian National Collection of Insects, with special reference to the Manual of Nearctic Diptera Jeffrey M. Cumming, Bradley J. Sinclair, Scott E. Brooks, James E. O’Hara, Jeffrey H. Skevington Abstract*The history of Diptera research at the Canadian National Collection of Insects is briefly outlined. Short biographic sketches of the coordinators of the Manual of Nearctic Diptera are given and the development of the Manual project is presented to provide background on their achievements. Lists of publications by each of the coordinators and of patronyms honouring them are provided. This Festschrift honours the remarkable contributions of the coordinators, J. Frank McAlpine, Bobbie V. Peterson, Guy E. Shewell, Herbert J. Teskey, J. Richard Vockeroth, and D. Monty Wood. Re´sume´*On de´crit brie`vement l’histoire de la recherche en dipte`re a` la Collection nationale canadienne d’insectes. On pre´sente de courtes biographies des coordonnateurs du Manuel de dipte`res ne´arctiques, ainsi que le de´veloppement du projet du manuel pour fournir de l’information sur leurs re´alisations. On fourni des listes de re´fe´rences publie´es par chaque coordinateur et des noms patronymiques en leur honneur. Ce nume´ro est en l’honneur des contributions remarquables des coordinateurs J. Frank McAlpine, Bobbie V. Peterson, Guy E. Shewell, Herbert J. Teskey, J. Richard Vockeroth, et D. Monty Wood. Introduction been taken from personal accounts, archived sources housed in the Diptera Unit, and This historical review treats the development publications on the history of systematic of the Diptera collection at the Canadian research in Canada and publications from the National Collection of Insects, Arachnids Research Branch of AAFC, including Gibson and Nematodes (CNC) and the individuals and McSwaine (1920), McDunnough (1926), responsible for its growth and curation.
    [Show full text]