^ \ O N A L ^ Pages 6231-6268 FEDERAL REGISTER

VOLUME 29 1934 NUMBER 93 5 ^ a/iteo ^ Washington, Tuesday, May 12, 1964

Contents Houston-New Orleans local serv­ FEDERAL HOME LOAN THE PRESIDENT ice investigation; prehearing conference______6263 BANK BOARD EXECUTIVE ORDER Rules and Regulations J. Edgar Hoover; exemption from COMMERCE DEPARTMENT Federal Savings and Loan Insur­ compulsory retirement for age— 6233 ance Corporation; operations; See Maritime Administration. premiums, charges, and credits regarding mortgage loans------6254 EXECUTIVE AGENCIES COMMODITY CREDIT FEDERAL MARITIME CORPORATION AGRICULTURAL MARKETING COMMISSION Rules and Regulations SERVICE Notices Flaxseed, Texas; purchase pro­ Proposed Rule Making grams; 1961 and subseqent Agreements: Dates, domestic, produced or crops; miscellaneous amend­ Inter-Island Shipping Corp. and packed in designated area of ments______6245 Sea-Land Service, Inc.; ter­ California; handling______6257 mination______6265 Port of Seattle and Olympic FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY Steamship Co., Inc.; filed for AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION Rules and Regulations approval___z______6265 AND CONSERVATION SERVICE U.S. Atlantic & Gulf/Australia- Airworthiness directive; Piper New Zealand Conference____ 6265 Rules and Regulations Model PA-24-250 aircraft______6253 Wheat, 1964-65 marketing year; Control areas; alteration______6246 FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION determination of county nor­ Federal airways; designation and Notices mal yields______6235 alteration______6246 Federal airway segment; revoca­ Lakeland Petroleum Corp. et al.; tion______6246 hearing, etc______6266 AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Federal airway segments, revoca- FOOD AND DRUG See also Agricultural Marketing cation; and alteration of control Service; Agricultural Stabiliza­ area extension______6246 ADMINISTRATION tion and Conservation Service; Standard instrument approach Rules and Regulations Commodity Credit Corporation. procedures; miscellaneous amendments.______6247 Pesticide chemicals in or on raw Notices agricultural commodities; tol­ Agricultural Marketing Service Proposed Rule Making erances and exemptions; chlo- and Agricultural Research Serv­ Certain positive control areas; rophenoxyacetic acid______6253 ice; proposed transfer of assign­ lowering of floor; extension of ment of functions and delega­ comment period______6260 HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND tions of authority______"6262 WELFARE DEPARTMENT FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS See Food and Drug Administra­ ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION COMMISSION tion; Public Health Service. Rules and Regulations Rules and Regulations INTERIOR DEPARTMENT Standard contract clauses; as­ Maritime Services; stations on See Land Management Bureau; signment of claims______6255 shipboard; exemption from National Park Service. Notices compulsory radio provisions____ 6256 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ^r>s~F Palmers Manufacturing Public Safety Radio Services; fre­ Co-; issuance of construction quencies available to Local Gov­ Rules and Regulations authorization amendment_____ 6262 ernment Radio Service______6256 Taxes, excise: Notices Liquor dealers; records of dis­ Hearings, etc.: position______;______6255 CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Manufacturers and retailers; Notices Dover Broadcasting Co., Inc., and Tuscarawas Broadcast- sales of motor vehicles to DeJia to* Lines, Inc.; petition for ing Co______6264 State Department and related agencies; exportation______6254 i Stment °T international Minnesota Microwave, Inc_____ 6263 service mail rate______6263 Spartan Radiocasting Co______6264 ( Continued on next page) 6231 6232 CONTENTS

INTERSTATE COMMERCE Notices PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE COMMISSION Alaska; small tract classification Notices cancellation; correction______6262 Proposed Rule Making Arizona; filing of plat of survey— 6262 Licensed biological products_____ 6264 Railroad box cars commonly called “Hy-Cube” cars; safety appli­ ance standards______6260 MARITIME ADMINISTRATION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Notices Notices COMMISSION Fourth section application for American Mail Line, Ltd.; appli­ relief______6267 Notices cation______6262 Motor carrier transfer proceed­ Northern Insurance Company of ings------6267 New York; application for ex­ emption.— ,------6267 LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Rules and Regulations Proposed Rule Making Public domain leasing under 1920 Yellowstone National Park, W y­ TREASURY DEPARTMENT Act; definitions______6245 oming; fishing______6257 See Internal Revenue Service.

Codification Guide

The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since

3 CFR 41 CFR E xecutive O rders: 1 9-7...... — ...... 6255 Now Available 11154 _ ____ 6233 7 CFR 43 CFR 3100______6245 CODE OF FEDERAL 728______6235 1421______6245 4 7 CFR REGULATIONS P roposed R u l e s : (As of January 1, 1964) 987______— 6257 83______6256 89— ______6256 12 CFR The following revised book and pocket supplements are now available: 563______6254 49 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 14 CFR Title 26 (Parts 170-299) (Supp.) 131______6260 $0.60 71 [New] (4 documents)______. . . 6246 97 [New]______. . . 6247 Title 41 (Part 2—1 to end) (Rev.) 507______— 6253 $2.25 P roposed R u l e s : 71 [New]—...... 6260 Title 44 (Supp.) $0.50 21 CFR Title 45 (Supp.) $0.65 120______6253 26 CFR A cumulative checklist of CFR issuances for 1964 appears in the first issue of each 48______. . . 6254 month under Title 1. 194______— 6255 Order from Superintendent of Documents, 36 CFR Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402 P roposed R u l e s : 7______. . . 6257

E E V U T D A f D C i ' ' I t T E D Published dally, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, o f r.nr.nm Vi r.H on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, Nat CL n If) AArchives maVi 4 »Tfto n and n /l TD Records nnnv/1 c .Gomrino Service, General QomriServices noo Administration A d W 1 t ctTQ "H OTl ( (mailTV) 9.11 QiddTCSSaddress xvdiU Area Code 202 Phone 963-3261 Archives Building, Washington, D.C. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained n Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., ch. 8B), under regulations prescribed by the Aamx istrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved———« 1 by the President ii (1 <-

Title 3— THE PRESIDENT Executive Order 11154 EXEMPTION OF J. EDGAR HOOVER FROM COMPULSORY RETIREMENT FOR AGE W H EREAS J. Edgar Hoover, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, will, during the month o f January 1965, become subject to compulsory retirement for age under the provisions of the Civil Service Retirement Act, unless exempted therefrom; and W HEREAS, in my judgment, the public interest requires that Mr. Hoover be exempted from such compulsory retirement: NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of and pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 5 o f the Civil Service Retirement Act, 70 Stat. 748 (5 U.S.C. 2255), I hereby exempt J. Edgar Hoover from com­ pulsory retirement for age for an indefinite period of time. Except as the authority vested in the President by section 5 of the Civil Service Retirement Act is specifically exercised in this Order, nothing contained in this Order shall be deemed to limit or restrict in any manner the exercise of such authority by the Civil Service Commission under authority delegated to the Commission by section 2(c) of Executive Order No. 10530 of May 10, 1954, as amended by Executive Order No. 10682 of October 22, 1956.

L y n d o n B. J o h n s o n T h e W h i t e H o u s e , May 8, 1964. [F.R. Doc. 64-4778; Filed, May 11,1964; 10: 27 a.m.]

Rules and Regulations

county in the United Stated for the 1964 malities and trends in yield. The extent -AGRICULTURE crop except for counties in Alaska, Ha­ of such adjustment was limited, however, waii, and New Hampshire for which no to that amount which would result in Chapter VII— Agricultural Stabiliza­ apparent need for such yields exists. a yield, on a national average basis, tion and Conservation Service The county normal yield for 1964 shall approximately equal to the “expected (Agricultural Adjustment), Depart­ be determined on the basis of the average yield” for 1964 (as referred to in ment of Agriculture of the yields per harvested acre of wheat section 333 of the Agricultural Adjust­ for the county during the 5 calendar ment Act of 1938, as amended), SUBCHAPTER B— FARM MARKETING QUOTAS years, 1958 through 1962, adjusted for used in converting the national market­ AND ACREAGE ALLOTMENTS abnormal weather conditions, other ab­ ing quota into a national acreage PART 728— WHEAT normal conditions affecting yields, and allotment. Such expected yield was de­ trends in yields. In adjusting for ab­ termined to be 25 bushels per acre. To Subpart— 1964-65 Marketing Year normal weather conditions and other accomplish the necessary adjustment, abnormal conditions affecting yields: (1) therefore— and taking account of the Determination op Co u n t y N ormal If on account of drought, flood, insect need to limit the adjustment as just de­ Y ields pests, plant disease, or other uncontrol­ scribed— the yield as otherwise computed The regulations contained in § 728.8 lable natural cause, the yield for any for each county was increased, where are issued pursuant to the Agricultural year of the 5-year period, 1958 through necessary, to equal 95 percent of the Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, 1962 is less than 75 per centum of the county average yield established for the and govern the county normal yields of average, 75 per centum of such average 1963 wheat stabilization program. While wheat for 1964. The regulations include was substituted therefor in calculating yields established under the 1963 wheat the appraisal of yields for years in the the normal yield per acre; (2) if on ac­ stabilization program were based upon past 5-year period used in determining count of abnormally favorable weather average yields for 1959 and 1960, they county normal yields for which the data conditions, the yield for any year of the were carefully adjusted to correct for are not available, or in which there were 5-year period was in excess of 125 per abnormal weather and trends affecting no actual yields. It was necessary to centum of the average, 125 per centum of yields, and constitute the most recent appraise county yields in the New Eng­ such average was substituted therefor calculation of yields developed for pro­ land States and for counties in the State in calculating the normal yield per acre. gram purposes. The “95 percent fac­ of Florida because official estimates are (b) The adjustment for trend in tor,” in effect, constitutes that neces­ not available. Such appraised county yields shall be made by averaging the sary to keep adjustments within the lim­ normal yields were made in collaboration 5-year average of the annual yields as itation above described, inasmuch as (i) with State Statisticians of the Statistical adjusted for abnormal weather and other the national weighted average of 1963 Reporting Service. For the States of abnormal conditions as _ described above stabilization yields was 25.8 bushels per Vermont, Connecticut, and Rhode Is­ with the average of the annual yields for acre, or somewhat higher than the con­ land, the same yield was determined as the 2-year period, 1961-62, inclusive, ad­ version yield of 25 bushels previously applicable in all counties in the respec­ justed for abnormal weather and other referred to, and (ii) application of the tive States because on the basis of the abnormal conditions as described above, wheat normal yield formula, including appraisals • it was determined that the giving equal weight to each. No adjust­ the trend adjustment described, resulted county normal yields should not vary. ment for trend was made where the in the calculation of some county normal County normal yields will not be deter­ 2-year 1961-62 adjusted average was yields which were higher than compara­ mined for the States of Alaska, Hawaii, less than the 5-year 1958-62 adjusted ble 1963 stabilization program yields. or New Hampshire, since wheat acreages average. (3) Normal yield computations as just have not been reported for the last four (c> If for any year of the 5-year made were then submitted to State ASC years (1959 through 1962), and there is period, 1958 through 1962, yield data committees for their review and recom­ no apparent need for county yields for was not available, or there was no actual mendations. State committees were au­ such States. yield, the yield for such year was ap­ thorized, where the situation warranted, Prior to the preparation of the regula­ praised, taking into consideration the to recommend additional adjustments tions contained in § 728.8, public notice yields for years for which data are avail­ of county normal yields to compensate (28 F.R. 1059) was given in accordance able and the yields obtained in surround­ for abnormal weather and trend, based with the Administrative Procedure Act ing counties in which the production of upon specific and detailed knowledge of (5 U.S.C. 1003). No data, views, or wheat is similar. yield conditions in local areas. Yield recommendations pertaining to the regu­ (1) In those counties in which the adjustments recommended by State lations in § 728.8 were submitted pur­ production of wheat is partially on ir­ committees were submitted to the Policy suant to such notice. County normal rigated land, partially on summer-fal­ and Program Appraisal Division, Agri­ yields are required to be taken into con­ low land, and partially on continuous cultural Stabilization and Conservation sideration under certain circumstances cropping land, a normal yield computed Service, for final checking and approval. , determination of farm normal in accordance with the method described (d) The approved county normal yields yields. Accordingly, it is necessary that above was determined for the land de­ are as follows: these regulations be made effective at voted to irrigation, summer-fallow and once, and it is hereby determined and W h eat: Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for U se continuous cropping cultural practices, U nder the 1964 W heat Program mind that compliance with the 30-day respectively. The normal yield for land effective date provision of section 4 of devoted to each of these practices was ALABAMA the Administrative Procedure Act (5 averaged to obtain a county normal yield, Normal Normal ■S.C. 1003) is impracticable and con- using for weights the latest data avail­ County yield County yield District 1: District 2—Con. the public interest and these able of the acreage devoted to each Colbert___ __ 26.5 Morgan_____ 25.8 regulations shall be effective upon filing practice. Payette___ __ 23.4 District 2A: with the Director, Office of the Federal (2) After completion of the foregoing Franklin_ __ 22.9 Bibb 22.2 Register. computation, it was apparent that addi­ Lamar 22.2 B lo u n t____ 23.1 tional adjustment in yields for a num­ M arion___ __ 24.2 Chilton_____ 23.5 § 728.8 Determ ination o f the county ber of counties was necessary, particu­ District 2: Cullman____ 23.8 normal yields for the 1964 crop o f larly over wide areas of the Great Plains Lauderdale _ 26.3 Jefferson___ 22.0 wheat. Lawrence ___ 25.2 St. Clair____ 22.0 where crop production is subject to great Limestone __ 26.2 S h elby _____ 23.9 tJ *¡ A county normal yield shall be de- weather hazard, in order to more ade­ Madison___ 26.6 W alk er_____ 22.6 hted for each wheat-producing quately take account of weather abnor­ Marshall____ 27.2 Winston____ 23.0 6235 6236 RULES AND REGULATIONS

W h e a t : Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for U se W h e a t : Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for U se W h eat: Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for Use U nder the 1964 W heat Program—Con. U nder the 1964 W heat P rogram—Con. U nder the 1964 W heat Program__Con.

Alabama—continued california— continued GEORGIA Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal County yield County yield County yield County yield County yield County yield District 3: District 6—Con. District 2—Con. District 5a: District 1: District 5—Con. Macon Calhoun___ 22.6 20.4 ♦Siskiyou 1- 30.2 ♦Fresno____ 48.0 B artow ___ _ 24. 2 Newton____ 20.8 Cherokee ___ 24.6 Randolph __ 21.6 Trinity ____ 20.4 ♦Kern _____ 21.4 C atoosa____25.2 Peach------32.8 Cleburne _ 22.2 Russell_____ 21.6 District 3: ♦Kings ____ 47.2 Chattooga_19.7 Pulaski____ 28.8 De Kalb___ __ 24.4 Talladega___ 22.1 ♦Lassen____ 20.0 ♦Madera____ 23.5 D a d e ______19.2 Putnam ___ 24.9 Etowah __ 24.4 Tallapoosa_ 21.0 ♦M od oc____ 42.3 ♦Merced____ 36.9 Floyd ______22. 6 Rockdale__ 22.9 Jackson __ — 25.6 District 7: Plumas ____ 22.1 ♦San Joaquin 41.6 Gordon_____22.4 Taliaferro __ 21.4 District 4: B aldw in____ 22.8 District 4: Stanislaus —..32. 2 M urray_____23. 4 Treutlen___ 19,4 Greene___ — 22.8 Clarke 22. 5 A lam ed a___ 32.8 ♦Tulare____ 21.8 P auldin g___22. 2 Twiggs------28.2 Hale — 22.3 Mobile _____ 21.3 Contra Costa. 47.2 District 6: Polk ___ :__ 22. 0 Washington. 26.6 Marengo___ 20.0 Washington _ 23.0 L a k e ______28.1 Alpine ____ 30.0 W alk er_____23. 5 Wheeler___ 25.0 P ick en s_— 21.0 District 8: Marin _____ 23.3 A m ador____ 29.3 W hitfield___22.2 Wilkinson __ 23.3 Sumter___ — 22.3 Butler _____ 21.4 ♦Monterey__ 21.9 Calaveras__ 21.4 District 2: District 6: Tuscaloosa __ 21.4 Conecuh____ 21.4 Napa __ _ 27.6 I n y o ------20.6 Barrow _____21. 2 Bulloch__ _ 24.8 District 5: Covington__ 21.9 San Benito_ 27.6 M ariposa___ 31.0 Cherokee___21.0 Burke ______19.7 Autauga _ 22.8 Crenshaw___ 19.6 ♦San Luis Mono ______20. 0 Clarke _____27.8 Candler___ 25.6 D allas____— 21.6 E scam bia_ 23.0 O bisp o___ 16.4 ♦Placer ____ 26.9 C o b b ______20.6 Columbia 17.2 Elmore — 24.3 Monroe_____ 23.9 San Mateo_ 20.0 Sierra _____ 18.4 D aw so n ____20. 5 Effingham __ 20.1 Lowndes _ 20. 3 District 9: Santa Clara. 25.8 Tuolumne__ 20.4 De Kalb_____ 23.0 Emanuel__ 25.6 Montgomery 20.2 B arbour____ 21.4 Sonom a____ 22.4 District 8: Fannin_____19. 7 Glascock__ 22.3 Perry — 21.6 Bullock ____ 22.2 District 5: ♦Im perial__ 59.4 Forsyth ____22. 5 Jefferson___ 25.9 W ilc o x ___ __ 22.6 Coffee______22.0 ♦B u tte_____ 34. 7 ♦Los Angeles 14.9 F u lto n _____25.4 Jenkins___ 18.9 District 6: Dale______20.8 ♦C olusa____ 31.1 Orange ____ 19.8 G ilm er_____ 20.2 McDuffie__ 20.4 Chambers __ 21.0 Geneva _____ 22.0 ♦Glenn ____ 32.2 ♦Riverside__ 18.8 Gwinnett___23. 3 Richmond_18.7 Clay------__ 22.4 H enry______22.1 ♦Sacramento 42.2 San Bernar- H a ll______21.0 Screven___ 21.3 C oosa______19.2 Houston ___ _ 22.7 ♦Solano____ 42.9 dino______28.5 Jackson____23.4 Warren ____ 24.8 Lee______21.1 Pike ______20.1 ♦S u tte r____ 43.7 San Diego_ 29.4 Lum pkin___23.8 District 7: Oconee_____ 25.0 ARIZONA ♦Teham a___ 23.0 ♦Santa Baker ______29.9 Pickens_____21.1 District 2: District 7: ♦ Y o lo ______44.9 B arba ra_ 17.4 C alhoun__ 25.8 Towns ______22.9 Clay ______24.5 Apache_____ 17.0 ♦Y u m a_____ 38.4 Yuba ______30.3 Ventura ____ 25.8 U n io n ______23.6 Decatur___ 25.0 Coconino___ 20.2 District 9: W alton _____23.4 COLORADO Dougherty_28.0 ♦M ohave___ 28.5 ♦Cochise___ 34.0 W h ite ______20.2 Early______26.2 N a v a jo _____ 18.9 ♦Gila ____ 33.2 District 1 : District 6—Con. District 3: Grady_____ 23.8 ♦Yavapai___ 30.3 ♦Graham ___ 30.9 ♦Chaffee ____26.2 ’ Y u m a_____ 24.9 Banks______21.8 Lee______27.6 District 5: ♦Greenlee__ 34.7 ♦Eagle 43.5 District 7: Elbert 23.8 M iller_____ 26.3 ♦Maricopa__ 45.8 ♦Pim a______35.4 ♦Grand ____ 21.8 ♦Archuleta _ 22.4 F ran k lin ___22. 8 Mitchell ____ 23.7 ♦Pinal _____ 41.2 ♦Santa Cruz_ 34.6 ♦Jackson___ 17.3 ♦Delta______34.2 Habersham _ 23.3 Quitman__ 28.4 ARKANSAS ♦M offat____ 18. 7 ♦D olores___ 14.0 H a r t ______24.4 Randolph_28.2 ♦Pitkin L in co ln ____20.2 District 1: District 5: 37.5 ♦Garfield___ 21.5 Seminole__ 26.0 ♦Rio Blanco. 22.8 ♦La P la t a __ 21.7 Madison____23.4 Stewart___ 27.9 Benton _____ 23.6 C on w ay____ 24.8 Oglethorpe .2 3 .6 Boone ______25.8 Faulkner___ 22.7 ♦R o u tt_____ 22.6 ♦Mesa _____ 27.8 Sumter ____ 28.1 ♦Teller_____ 27.5 ♦Montezuma 17.0 Rabun _____20. 6 Terrell _____ 27.8 C arroll_____ 19.0 G arlan d ____ 16.6 Stephens___22. 7 M adison____ 22.0 G ra n t______12.9 District 2: ♦Montrose_ 36.4 Thomas___ 26.3 ♦Boulder___ 33.8 ♦Ouray_____ 23.8 Wilkes ______21.4 Webster _____21.8 Newton_____ 21.6 Hot Spring_ 15.3 District 4: Washington _ 24.9 Perry ______21.2 •Jefferson___ 32.1 ♦San Miguel- 16.1 District 8: ♦Larim er___ 27.9 District 8: Carroll ______25.4 Atkinson__ 24.5 District 2: Pulaski_____ 30.3 C layton ____21.4 Baxter _____ 23.6 Saline______18.3 ♦Logan ____ 23.8 ♦Alamosa___ 31.3 Ben Hill___ 23.6 ♦M organ ___ 25.9 ♦Conejos___ 28.7 Coweta_____22.1 Berrien____ 25.7 Cleburne___ 18.6 District 6: D ouglas____19. 8 F u lto n _____ 19.6 Arkansas ___ 30.3 ♦Sedgwick__ 27.3 ♦Costilla___ 26.4 Brooks____ 25.2 ♦W eld______25.9 ♦Rio Grande. 35.9 Fayette_____19. 6 Clinch _____ 20.0 Izard______13.6 Crittenden_ 30.6 H aralson___24.3 District 6: ♦Saguache_ 31.9 Coffee_____ 24.5 M arion_____ 13.8 Cross ______27.4 H arris______22.6 ♦A dam s____ 27.9 District 9: Colquitt-----24.2 Searcy _____ 14.4 Lee ______27.8 H eard ______25. 6 S h a rp _____ 18.6 Lonoke _____ 22.3 ♦Arapahoe __ 27.3 •B a c a ______21.0 Cook------24.4 ♦Cheyenne _ 24.0 ♦Bent 31.3 H enry______24.8 Stone ______19.4 Monroe_____ 30.8 Lam ar______23. 8 Crisp ______27.1 Van Buren_ 17.4 Phillips ____; 30.4 ♦Douglas___ 26.9 ♦Crowley___ 20.7 D ooly_____ 27.6 ♦Elbert _____ 23.3 ♦Custer____ 31.9 Macon _____ 31.5 District 3: P rairie_____ 22.6 M arion_____23.4 Echols - 21.0 Clay ------25.0 St. Francis__ 31.6 ♦El P a s o ___ 20.0 ♦Frem ont__ 24.4 Irwin ______23.6 ♦Kiowa ____ 20. 5 ♦Huerfano _ 20.1 Meriwether _ 23. 0 Craighead__ 28.4 W oodruff___ 28.5 Muscogee___24.0 Jeff Davis— 23.0 ♦Kit Carson- 25.8 ♦Las Animas- 15.4 Lanier ------29.3 G reene_____ 24.6 District 7: Pike ______24.0 Independ- Hempstead_ 29.8 ♦Lincoln___ 22.9 ♦O tero_____ 36.8 Lowndes — 24.3 ♦Ph illips___ 29.5 ♦Prowers___ 24. 7 Schley ______25.9 ence _____ 28.9 Lafayette ___ 23.9 Sp alding___24.2 T elfair____ 23.2 ♦Washington 25.1 ♦Pueblo____ 23.9 Jackson ____ 27.2 Little River- 25.4 Talbot ______23.7 T ift ______24.6 Lawrence___ 22.2 M ille r______20.8 T a y lo r____25.4 Turner------25.2 Mississippi_ 31. 8 Montgomery- 18.2 DELAWARE T ro u p ______23.4 W ilcox------22.1 Worth — — 24.5 Poinsett ____ 27.8 District 8: District 2: District 8: U pson______21. 8 Randolph___ 23.1 Bradley ____ 14.0 District 9: New Castle- 30.4 Sussex _____ 26.4 District 5: r __ 26.7 19.2 Clark ______19.0 W h ite ______District 5: B aldw in____20.1 I ___ 28.2 District 4: D allas______19.5 K e n t______26.7 B i b b ______29.8 Crawford___ 28.1 Ouachita___ 18.5 Bleckley____25.2 V — 20.0 F ra n k lin ___ U n io n ______20.0 I___ 22.0 25.6 FLORIDA Butts ______25. 2 a ___20.0 Johnson____ 28.0 District 9: Crawford___30. 9 .n — 20.0 L o g an ______24.3 Ashley _____ 24.0 District 1 : District 3: D odge______23. 7 m __ 20.8 Polk ______23.0 Chicot _____ 24.7 Calhoun____ 22.5 Baker ______18.4 G reene_____19.8 _____ 22.4 P o p e ______22.0 D esh a______29.6 Escambia___ 26.5 Columbia___ 24.6 Hancock____22.2 " ______20.0 Scott ______25.5 D rew ______26.4 Gadsden____ 23.4 Hamilton___ 2 1 .6 Houston____31.5 Sebastian___ 26.8 Jefferson______20.0 27.4 Holmes_____ 22.5 Lafayette___ 16.4 Jasper______23. 7 Y e ll______24. 5 L in c o ln ____ 18.8 ___ 20.0 Jackson____ 24.5 Madison____ 23.3 Johnson____19.8 17.4 s h __ 20.0 CALIFORNIA Jefferson___ 23.0 Suwannee___ Jones ______19.0 L e o n ______20.7 District 5: __ 21.0 District 1 : District 2 : Laurens __— 26. 6 Liberty_____ 21.0 A lachua____ 21.0 ¡r :~ - 23.1 H um boldt__30.0 Sbasta ______20.4 Okaloosa____ 24.5 Gilchrist__ 18.6 Monroe_____ 20. 8 aa n Mendocino__25.4 Santa Rosa__ 25.5 Levy ------22.0 Mont­ * Indicates counties having special wheat W alton_____ 22.5 M arion _____ 21.5 gomery ___20. 8 . cultural practice yields. See tables below. Washington . 22.5 Sum ter_____ 21.0 Morgan------22.4 Tuesday, M ay 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6237

Wheat: Co u n ty N ormal Y ields for U se W h e a t : Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for U se W h eat: Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for U se Under the 1964 W heat P rogram— Con. U nder the 1964 W heat Program—Con. U nder th e 1964 W heat Program— Con. IDAHO iow a—continued Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal County yield County yield County yield County yield County yield County yield District 8—Con. District 1: District 5—Con. District 5—Con. District 8: •Benewah — 36. 5 ♦Cassia____ _ 34.2 Benton_____ 41.4 Johnson___ _ 35.2 Tama ______27.9 Appanoose__ 23.8 •Bonner —— 25.4 ♦Gooding___ 50.7 Jasper _____ 37.9 Madison____ 38.3 W ebster____ 30.5 Clarke _____ 21. 7 ♦Boundary _ 43.8 ♦Jerome___ _ 65.1 L a k e ______39.9 M arion_____ 35.0 District 6: , Decatur ____ 24.9 •Clearwater _ 36.9 ♦L in coln _ _ 53.5 La Porte____ 33.5 Morgan ____ 33.6 Benton ____ 26.5 L u c a s ______21.8 •Idaho 36.2 ♦Minidoka __ 53.6 N e w to n ____ 40.9 R u sh ______28.5 C e d a r______33.2 Madison____ 25.6 •Kootenai — 32.6 ♦Twin Falls _ 67.4 P o r te r_a.__ 38.0 Shelby _____ 30.0 Clinton ____ 30.5 M arion_____ 25. 8 •Latah_— 41.7 District 9: Pulaski_____ 34.2 T ip to n _____ 42.6 I o w a ______29.2 Monroe_____ 22.4 •Lewis ___4_r41.9 ♦Bannock __ 24.5 Starke _____ 31.2 District 6: Jackson___ 31.0 Ringgold___ 20.9 •Nez Perce_ 43.3 ♦Bear Lake _ 21.2 W h ite ______40.5 B lackford_ 35.7 Johnson ___ 25.4 U n io n ______20.6 District 7: ♦Bingham __ 52.0 District 2: Delaware___ 35.6 Jones ______30.7 Warren _.___ 24. 3 24. 7 •Ada -JiSiHS 51.6 ♦Bonneville _ 28.2 Carroll _____ 38.4 Fayette------. 29.5 L in n ______27.4. Wayne _____ •Adams IfiSH 29.4 ♦B u tte----- _ 32.1 C a s s __ :____ 35.9 H enry____— 33,5 Muscatine__ 27.9 District 9: •Boise 29.6 ♦C aribou_ _ 26.3 E lk h art____ 31. 7 Jay ------31.8 Scott ______32.4 Davis ______25.0 •Canyon-----. 61.4 ♦C la r k ____ _ 24.8 F u lto n _____ 32.6 Randolph___ 35.7 District 7 : Des Moines _ 31.3 ♦Elmore —— 35.3 ♦Custer _ 42.8 Kosciusko — 31.2 U n io n ______30.0 A d a i r _____ 25.8 H enry______27.0 1 *Gem 44.2 ♦Franklin __ 27.9 M arsh all___ 33.2 Wayne — — 29.4 Adams _____ 23.1 Jefferson___ 26.2 •Owyhee — 61.6 ♦Fremont __ 32.6 M iam i______37.6 District 7: Cass ______27.0 Keokuk _____ 26.2 ♦Payette___ 47.3 ♦Jefferson __ 47.4 St. Joseph_ 32.5 Daviess_____ 31.6 F rem o n t_—-28. 9 Lee ______28.7 •Valley 23.4 ♦L e m h i__ _ 44.5 W a b a s h ____ 34.9 D u bois_____ 25.6 M ills ______28.4 Louisa _____ 33. 3 i »Washington. 30.5 ♦Madison __ _ 30.4 District 3: Gibson _ — 31.4 Montgomery 27.2 Mahaska ___ 25. 5 District 8: ♦Oneida__ _ 23.5 A d a m s_____ 35.8 Greene_____ 29.2 P a g e ______25. 2 Van Buren_ 25. 5 •Blaine 38.4 ♦Power ___ _ 22.4 A ll e n ______36.8 K nox______34.4 Pottawat- W apello____ 25.2 •Camas____ 21.1 ♦Teton____ _ 25.5 De Kalb_____ 32.0 M artin _____ 28.2 ta m ie ____ 28.1 Washington 27.7 Huntington. 36.9 Pike ______27.9 Taylor _____ 21.3 Lagrange___ 32.3 Posey ______29.5 District 1: ' A District 4a—Con. N o b le ______30.6 Spencer____ 26.2 Bureau 1MH 36. 3 Calhoun___ _ 29.4 Steuben____ 33.3 Sullivan____ 31. 5 District 1 : District 8: Carroll flHH 36.0 Cass______34.6 Wells ______36.4 Vanderburgh 28.9 ♦Cheyenne _ 30.4 ♦Barber ____ 25.5 Henry____$? 35.6 Christian —_ 37.3 W h itley ----- 36.4 W arrick __ 28.1 ♦Decatur___ 31.9 ♦Comanche _ 21.4 Jo Daviess__ 29.8 G reen e____ _ 34.2 District 4: District 8: ♦Graham ___ 25.6 ♦E dw ards__ 24.9 Lee____ 37.7 Jersey ______34.2 Clay ____— 33.0 Brown ------23.9 ♦Norton____ 28.4 ♦Harper____ 26.4 Mercer -iljpp 30.8 Macoupin __ 34.7 Fountain___ 36.0 Crawford — - 23.7 ♦Rawlins___ 31.9 ♦Harvey____ 27.1 Ogle------36.4 Madison____ 31.6 Montgomery. 37.8 Floyd ------— 27.0 ♦Sheridan__ 32.3 ♦Kingman__ 21.9 Putnam____ 37.6 Montgomery- 34.0 Owen ______25.8 Harrison____ 26.1 ♦Sherman__ 33.0 ♦Kiowa_____ 24.0 — Rock 'Island. 30.6 Morgan____ _ 37.3 Parke ______36.3 Jackson____ 27.2 ♦Thom as___ 33.0 ♦Pawnee___ 25.5 Stephenson _ 33.1 Pike ______*1.4 Putnam ____t 32.6 Lawrence___25.6 District 4: ♦Pratt______23. 4 Whiteside_36.0 Sangamon__36.8 Tippecanoe _ 38.9 Monroe ____25.4 ♦Gove 31.7 ♦Reno______25. 6 Winnebago _ 33.1 Scott____>__ 33.8 Vermillion__36.7 Orange_.__ 26.4 ♦G reeley___29.4 ♦Sedgwick __ 27. 3 Districts: District 6a: Vigo ______34. 6 Perry ______21.6 ♦L an e_____,_ 30.0 ♦Stafford___24.3 , Boone__ _ _ 35.3 Clark _____— 31.3 Warren _____ 38; 2 Washington- 25.7 ♦Logan_____ 31.6 ♦Sum ner___28.7 Cook______38.4 C lay______26.6 District 5 : District 9: ♦N e ss______24.2 District 3 : De Kalb_____ 38.5 Coles___ ;__ _ 35.6 Bartholomew 30.0 Clark______27.6 ♦S c o tt_____ 34.8 Atchison___26. 8 Du Page_____40.1 Crawford___28.1 Boone______38.4 Dearborn___23. 9 ♦T rego_____ 28.1 Brown______29.4 Grundy____38.0 Cumberland. 31.6 Clinton ____39.2 F ran k lin ___23.6 ♦Wallace____ 27.9 Doniphan___28. 8 Kane ______40.4 Douglas ____ 40.0 D ecatur__!__28.2 Jefferson___26.4 ♦Wichita !__ 32.2 Jackson____27.6 Kendall__ 40.2 E d g a r______36.8 G ra n t______38. 6 Jennings___24.8 District 7: Jefferson____26.8 Lake______38.0 Effingham .__ 31.2 Hamilton___38.6 O h io _____J_ 23.8 •C la rk _____ 23.3 Leavenworth- 26.2 La Salle_____88.4 Payette _,__ ._ 30.4 Hancock — _ 36.1 Ripley _____ 25. 4 ♦Finney____31.1 Marshall ___28. 4 McHenry____36.7 Jasper _.__.__ 30.3 Hendricks __ 37.4 Scott______24.4 ♦F o rd ______24.9 Nemaha _;__ 29.0 'Will ______38.8 Lawrence___28. 4 Howard. ____41.0 Switzerland _ 25.4 ♦G rant__*__30.9 Pottawatomie 26.8 District 4: Marion __.__ 28.4 ♦Gray ______26.1 R iley______29.1 Adams______30.2 Moultrie ____36.6 IOWA ♦Hamilton „ 29.6 Wyandotte _ 32. 2 Brown_____30.2 Richland___26.0 ♦Haskell____26.6 District 6 : Pulton _____32.1 Shelby _____ 34.7 District 1: District 3—Con. ♦Hodgeman _ 23. 5 Anderson___28. 5 Hancock 30.6 District 7 : Buena Vista. 27.1 Clayton -____ 28.4 ♦Kearny __ 31.4 C hase______28. 6 Henderson __ 31.6 Alexander __ 28.1 Cherokee ___ 84.7 Delaware___ 29.4 ♦Meade___ .u 23.5 Coffey______27.0 Knox______33.6 Clinton____ _ 29.0 Clay ------• 30.4 D u buque___ 34.1 ♦Morton ___24. 2 D ouglas____28.4 McDonough _ 32.8 Jackson _;__ 27.8 Dickinson __ 21.4 Fayette _ _ ~ 26.0 ♦S e w ard ___23.8 Franklin____27. 6 Schuyler_32.7 Johnson _ ___23.9 Em m et_____ 25.9 Howard ____ 26.0 ♦Stanton___30.0 Geary ______30.3 Warren _____ 33.2 Monroe_____32.0 L y o n ___ .__ . 24.5 Winneshiek 26.5 ♦Stevens___26.1 Johnson____28. 9 District 5: Perry______25.4 O'Brien ____ 24.9 District 4: District 2: L in n ______25.6 De Witt___34.9 Pulaski^____26.2 Osceola 25.0 Audubon ___28. 9 ♦Clay ______28.5 L y o n _1____ 27. 3 Logan__ _ 36.4 Randolph___28.1 Palo Alto ___ 26.4 Calhoun ___ 28.7 ♦C loud_____ 25.7 Miami _____ 27.0 McLean ____36.2 St. Clair_____31.6 ■ Plymouth __ 25.9 Carroll _____ 29.9 ♦Jewell_____24.9 Morris_____ 25.4 Macon______39.2U n io n ______29.6 Pocahontas _ 26.6 Crawford___ 28. 6 ♦M itchell__22. 5 Osage______27.4 Marshall_36.7 Washington _ 30.0 S io u x ______28.7 Greene _.____ 26.1 ♦O sborn e__22.6 Sh aw nee___28. 4 Mason___ 32.2 Williamson _ 26.8 District 2: Guthrie ____ 24.7 ♦Ottawa____24.6 Wabaunsee _ 26.4 Menard__ 34. 5 District 9 : Butler „ _____ 29.9 Harrison ___ 29.3 ♦Ph illips___ 25.1 District 9: Peoria___ 35.0 Edwards____25.5 Cerro Gordo- 29.9 Ida ______28.9 ♦Republic 25.6 A llen______27. 6 Stark--- 35.6 F ra n k lin ___ 26.5 F lo y d _____ 25.7 M onona____ 25. 6 ♦Rooks__ 23.1 Bourbon____24.2 Tazewell_33. 7 Gallatin ____ 30.6 F ran k lin ___ 31.9 S a c ______35.2 ♦Smith_____25.0 Butler______26. 0 Woodford__ ( 34.9 Hamilton___ 25.1 28.8 S h e lb y __.___33.8 ♦Washington 28.6 Chautauqua- 28.3 District 6: Hancock ___ Hardin _____ 25.2 H um boldt__ 29.9 W oodbury___ 26. 7 District 5: Cherokee___28. 8 Champaign 37.4 Jefferson___ 27.2 ♦Barton____ 23. 0 Cowley______29.0 Ford ______Kossuth____ 32.2 District 5; 34.5 Massac _____ 26.2 M itc h e ll__* 27.4 • B oone____ 27.1 ♦Dickinson _ 26.8 Crawford ___ 25. 2 Iroquois___ _ 35.4 P o p e ______25.0 Winnebago _ 27. 9 Dallas — 24.4 ♦Ellis Ss____ 21.7 Elk _____ 26.5 Kankakee_39.0 Saline _._____27.0 Worth _____ 26.6 Grundy ____ 29. 4 ♦^Ellsworth__24.7 Greenwood _ 26.4 Livingston __ 35.2W abash_____ 28. 4 ♦Lincoln___24.7 Labette_____ 26.4 Piatt------35.9 W rig h t____ 27.5 H am ilto n ___ 31.4 Wayne _____ 25.6 District 3: Hardin ______29.3 ♦McPherson. 25.7 Montgomery 28.5 vermilion_37.2 White ______26.4 ♦Marion____25.8 Neosho_____27.2 District 4a: Allamakee_ 29.7 Jasper ______24.9 33.0 M arsh all_____28.2 ♦Rice ______25.4 W ilso n _____ 28.7 ®°û4 — _28.8 Black Hawk. Bremer ___- 29.6 Polk _____ 28.3 ♦Rush______23.5 W oodson___25.1 pnH11<*1iCa*'es counties having special wheat Buchanan __ 27. 2 Poweshiek __ 27.3 ♦Russell____20.9 ural practice yields. See tables below. Chickasaw__ 31.3 r Story ______30.7 ♦Saline_____26.7 6238 RULES AND REGULATIONS

W h e a t: Co u n t y N ormal Y ields fob U se W h e a t : Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for U se W h e a t: Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for Use U nder the 1964 W heat P rogram—Con. U nder th e 1964 W heat Program—Con. U nder the 1964 W heat Program— Con. Minnesota KENTUCKY MARYLAND — continued Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal County yield County yield County yield County yield County yield County yield District 4—Con. District 6—Con. District 1: District 4—Con. District 1: District 8: A llegan y___ 22.8 Anne Arun- Stevens____ 25.2 Washington. 25.9 B allard_____ 23.4 Bracken ____ 26.1 Swift ______22.9 District 7: Calloway___ Campbell —_ 25.2 Garrett ____ 26.1 d e l______18.5 23.0 Traverse ___ 25.0 Cottonwood. 23.4 Carlisle_____ C arroll_____ 22.0 District 2: Calvert _____ 21.0 23.0 W ilk in _____ 25.6 Jackson___ 23.4 G allatin____ 25.6 Baltim ore_ 28.5 Charles ____ 20.4 P u lto n _____ 27.1 Yellow Lincoln ___ 23.3 Grant ______25.8 C arroll_____ 27.2 Prince Graves _____ 25.8 Medicine -..22. 6 Lyon 23.4 H enry______25. 8 C ecil______30.4 G eorges__ 18.2 H ickm an___ 26.2 District 5: Murray ___ 22.4 Livingston__ 22.4 Kenton ____ 23.6 Frederick___ 25.9 St. M arys___ 22.0 District 9: Benton ____ 21.3 Nobels 22.9 L y o n ______25.2 O ldh am ____ 27.4 H arfo rd ____ 31.4 Carver _____ 27.2 Pipestone __ Owen______23.4 Caroline____ 26.0 23.3 McCracken _ 24.5 H o w a rd ___- 27.7 Kandiyohi_ 24.7 Redwood __ 23.4 21.4 Dorchester _ 27.4 M arsh all___ 21.7 Pendleton__ K e n t______30.0 McLeod ____ 27.7 R ock______23.6 Trigg ------27.7 T rim ble____ 23.4 Somerset___ 25.9 Montgomery- 27.0 Talbot _____ 26.8 M eek er____ 25.9 District 8: District 2: District 5: Queen Annes_ 27.6 M orrison___ 20.3 Blue Earth.. 28.1 Caldwell____ 27.3 Anderson__ 21.1 W icom ico__ 25.0 Washington. 27.2 Worcester __ 24. 7 Renville ___ 25.1 Brown ____ 24.4 Christian___ 29.8 B a t h ______23 0 Scott ______27.2 Faribault __ 30.5 Bourbon _. — 25.2 Crittenden__ 23.9 MICHIGAN Sherburne__ 21.0 Freeborn__ 30.6 Daviess_____ 26.4 Boyle______22.4 Sibley _____ 27.1 Le Sueur___ 28.2 Hancock____ 23.0 Clark ______26.3 District 1: Districts: Stearns ____ 22.4 Martin 26.4 Henderson_ 29.8 Payette_____ 27.0 Alger ______22.6 C lare______32.3 Todd ______22.2 Nicollet ____ .26.9 Hopkins ____ 24.4 Flem ing____l 22.5 B ara ga_____ 23.2 Gladwin____ 32. 5 W a d e n a ____ 20.7 Rice ______26.0 Logan ______30.6 F ran k lin ___ 23.0 Chippewa___ 21.8 Gratiot_____ 38.7 W rig h t_____ 27:2 Steele_____ 31.0 M cL ean ____ 24.0 Garrard 23.2 D elta______19.5 Isa b e lla ____ 33.2 District 6: Waseca ___ 31.3 Muhlenberg- 23.6 H arrison___ 24.0 Dickinson__ 21.1 Mecosta____ 32.6 Aitkin _____ 20.5 Watonwan _ 23.4 O h io ______22.3 Jessamine_ 21.7 Gogebic ____ 17.6 M idland____ 37.5 Anoka _____ 19.8 District 9: Sim pson___ 29.4 L in c o ln ____ 21.6 H oughton__ 21.0 Montcalm __ 30. 8 C a rlto n ____ 20.5 Dakota____ 27.1 Todd ___ 29.4 Madison ___ 24.0 Iron ______19. 6 Osceola_____ 27.8 C hisago____ 23.4 Dodge_____ 28.4 U n io n _____ 27.2 Mason______22.7 L u c e ______14. 8 District 6: Crow Wing__ 19.4 Fillmore__ 25.7 W ebster____ 25.0 M ercer_____ 21 5 Mackinac___ 23.4 A ren ac_____ 32.0 H ennepin__ 24.5 Goodhue ___ 26.0 District 3: Montgomery- 23.8 Marquette__ 19.1 B a y ------36.7 Is a n t i_____ 20. 2 Houston ;__ 25.6 Adair ______24.2 Nicholas____ 21.3 Menominee 25.5 Huron______37. è K an a bec___ 24.9 Mower ____ 27.3 Allen ______22.3 Robertson__ 21.4 Ontonagon _ 17.2 Saginaw ____ 37.8 Mille Lacs— 21.9 Olmsted __ 27.7 B a rre n _____ 24.4 Scott__ :____ 24.7 Schoolcraft - 17.9 Sanilac_____ 34.8 Pine ______20.6 W abasha__ 26.2 Breckenridge 22.8 S h e lb y _____ 24.0 District 2: T u sco la____ 37.7 R am sey___- 20.3 _ Win o n a___ 26.2 Bullitt _____ 24.4 Spencer____ 21.1" Antrim _____ 26.2 District 7: Butler______21.9 Washington . 21.2 Benzie _____ 18.0 Allegan ____ 33.5 MISSISSIPPI Woodford__ _ 26.3 Casey ______22.2 Charlevoix_ 23.8 Berrien_____ 32.0 District 1: District 6: Clinton _ — 23.0 District 6: Em m et____ 27.1 Cass______31.6 Bolivar_____ 27.1 Chickasaw_ 21.5 23.0 Cumberland. 20.5 B o y d ______Grand Tra- Kalamazoo . 33.8 Coahoma___ 28.2 Clay ------22.0 Carter______23.6 Edmonson_ 21.7 verse____- 24.6 K e n t______31. 8 Q uitm an___ Kemper____ 22.8 19.4 27.0 Grayson____ 20.9 Clay _ ----- Kalkaska___ 17. 4 y Ottaw a_____ 33.0 Tallahatchie. 26. 5 Lowndes__ _ 21.4 22.6 G reen ______23.4 Estill ______Leelanau___ 21.6 Van Buren_ 32.3 T u n ica_____ 27.0 Monroe____ 21.1 Greenup____ 23.4 H ard in _____ 24.4 M anistee___ 23.8 District 8: District 2: Neshoba_— 19.0 H a r t ______24.2 Jackson___- 22.3 Missaukee_ 31.2 B a r r y __<___ 33.0 Noxubee ___ 22.8 22.2 Benton_____ 21.9 Jefferson____ 29.3 Knox ______W exford____ 21. 8 Branch_____ 30.8 Calhoun____ 21.4 Oktibbeha — 20.4 Laurel______22.2 Calhoun____ Larue ______24.6 District 3: 33.3 De Soto____- 28.1 Winston___ 19.2 20.7 M arion_____ 24.2 Lee______Alcona _____ 27.2 . C lin to n ____ 35.4 22.8 District 7: 22.9 Grenada ____ Mead ______24.8 Lewis______Alpena _____ 30.6 E ato n ______37.5 Lafayette ___ 20.5 Adams------22.1 20.0 Metcalfe —- 22.0 Morgan_____ Cheboygan _ 22.4 H illsdale___ 30.8 Marshall____ 22.6 A m ite------18.6 22.4 In g h a m ____ 36.8 Monroe - - — 20.6 Powell _____ Iosco ______24.5 P a n o la _____ 26.0 Claiborne — 23.1 Pulaski_____ 23.7 Io n ia______38.0 Nelson _____ 23.4 Montmoren- Tate ______28.2 Copiah------21.4 21.0 Rockcastle_ 23.6 c y ------28.1 Jackson____ 32.2 Bussell------Yalobusha__ 20.3 Franklin — 18.0 25.6 R o w a n _____ 22.6 Ogemaw____ 29.7 St. Joseph___ 31.8 Taylor______District 3: H in d s----- — 21.2 Wayne _____ 24.2 Oscoda _____ 29.2 Shiawassee . 36.1 Warren __ 28.0 Alcorn______22.3 Jefferson___ 24.2 District 4: W o lfe ----- — 18.3 Otsego _____ 20.4 District U: Lincoln____- 21.4 Genesee____ 33.4 Itaw am ba_ 21.8 Boone ______21.4 Presque Isle. 26.4 25.2 W arren------28.0 Roscom- Lapeer _____ 35.7 Lee ______Pontotoc___ 22.0 Wilkinson — 17.9 LOUISIANA mon _____ 27.6 Lenawee____ 34.8 Livingston__ 33.2 Prentiss____ 23.8 District 8: District 4: Tippah _____ 20.6 Covington — 20.9 Normal Normal 26. 6 — Macomb__ _ 32.0 Jefferson Monroe ____ 32.2 Tishomingo _ 21.2 Parish yield Parish yield Mason______29.9 U n io n ______21.8 Davis — - 19.7 District 1: District 5: Oakland____ 32.7 Lawrence — 20.0 M uskegon__ 33.0 St. Clair____ 32.0 District 4: Bossier------23.5 Avoyelles___ 23.0 Humphreys _ 28.4 Marion —— 19.6 23.5 N ew aygo___ 31.0 Washtenaw _ 34.2 Caddo ------23.5 Catahoula — Issaquena__ 29.4 P ik e _____— 21.4 Concordia__ 23.0 Oceana_____ 28.8 W a y n e _____ 28.3 De S o to ____ 17.0 Leflore _____ 28.4 Smith ------20.0 Evangeline . 18.0 Red R iv er_ 20.8 Sharkey____ 30.4 W althall----- 21.4 21. 5 MINNESOTA W ebster____ 17.0 La S alle___ Sunflower___ 29.4 District 9: District 2: Pointe Coupee 23. 0 23.8 District 1: District 2—Con. Washington _ 29.4 Clarke------B ien ville___ 16.0 Rapides____ 23.0 B ecker_____ 25.7 Koochiching. 23.4 Y a z o o ______27.6 Forrest------21.2 C ald w ell___ 22.0 St. Landry _ 18.0 21.3 Clay ------27.7 Lake of the District 5: George ------C laiborne__ 17. 0 District 6: 19.0 Clearwater_ 24.9 Woods____ 24.4 A ttala______20.0 Jackson - — Jackson ____ 17.0 East Baton Kitts to n ____ 25.4 District 3: ‘ C arro ll_____ 24. 5 Jasper ------19.2 Ouachita___ 23.5 R o u g e ___ 19.4 Mahnomen _ 26.9 St. Louis____ 25.8 Choctaw____ 18.4 Jones — 20.0 District 3: District 7: Marshall.____ 27.0 District 4l . Holm es_____ 24.4 18.3 East Carroll- 24.9 A c a d ia _____ 19.0 Lauderdale - 27.4 Bigstone____ 23.8 Leake ______22.2 F ran k lin ___ 21.0 A llen ______18.0 N orm an ____ Newton ----- 21.1 Pennington _ 26.6 Chippewa___ 22.9 Madison__— 22.2 Madison____ 23.5 Jefferson Pearl River - 16.6 27.1 Douglas ___ 24.4 Montgomery. 22.4 Morehouse _ 23. 1 Davis_____ 17.0 East Polk___ 18.2 25.6 Rankin____ . 19.0 Perry------Richland___ 21.0 Vermillion _ 16.5 West Polk___ 28.2 G ra n t______19.0 Lac Qui Scott ______19.5 • Wayne------T ensas_____ 24.1 District 9 : Red Lake____ 26.6 P a rle_____ 21.5 W ebster____ 23.0 West Carroll 21.0 Saint James. 20.8 Roseau_____ 23.4 - ' ■ District 2: East Otter District 4: MISSOURI. B eltram i__ _ 22.4 Tail — 24.1 Natchitoches- 20. 8 District 1—Con. Cass ______19.9 West Otter District 1: 29.7 H u b b ard ___ 21.6 Tail _____ 24.8 Andrew_____ 27.1 Buchanan — ♦Indicates counties having special'wheat Caldwell----- 30.3 cultural practice yields. See tables below. Itasca _____ 23.2 P o p e ______22. 9 Atchison___ 25.8 Tuesday, May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6239

h e a t o u n t y ormal ields for se Wheat: Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for U se W h e a t: Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for U se W : C N Y U U nder the W heat Program N ew Under the 1964 W heat P rogram— Con. • U nder th e 1964 W heat Program—Con. 1964 — England States Missouri—continued Montana— continued MAINE Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal County yield County yield County yield County yield County ' yield County yield District 1—Con. District 5—Con. District 5—Con. District 8—Con. '■ Clay ——-----29. 7 O sage______28.5 •Judith •Carbon ___24.2 District l : District 3: Clinton ----- 30.4 P e ttis_____28.5 B a s in ___24.4 •Park ______24.0 Aroostook __ 27.2 Androscoggin 23. 0 Daviess_____27.9 P h e lp s _____ 26.2 •Lewis and •Stillwater _ 22.3 District 2: Cumberland- 23. 2 Penobscot __ 27.4 De K alb----- 29.7 P o lk ______28.0 -Clark ___ 20.9 •Sweet F ran k lin ___22. 0 •Meagher __ 24.0 G r a s s ___21. 6 Somerset 26.4 Gentry------29. 3 Pulaski____- 21.4 Y o rk ______24.8 Harrison----- 28. 5 Saline__ .___28.1 •Musselshell. 20.2 •Treasure_22. 6 Waldo _____26.8 Holt------27.3 District 6: •Petroleum _ 15.7 •Yellowstone 24.6 Washington- 22. 0 Nodaway — 29.4 Crawford ___ 22. 8 •Wheatland- 20.2 District 9 : VERMONT Platte —----- 30.1 Franklin____29.5 District 7: •Carter —_14. 5 All counties— ______30. 0 Ray------32.0 Gasconade__28.4 •Beaverhead- 24.1 •Custer ____18.3 Worth _____- 26.0 Jefferson___26. 8 •Gallatin __ 30.8 •Fallon 14.0 MASSACHUSETTS District 2: L in c o ln ____30. 9 •Jefferson__22.0 •Powder Berkshire ____32.3 Hampshire 32.8 Adair----- ,— 30.1 Montgomery. 33.0 •M ad iso n __26.3 River ___ 21.8 Bristol — — 28.7 Middlesex . 27.0 Carroll_- __30. 0 Perry______30.1 •Silver Bow_ 22. 2 •P rairie____16.1 Essex______30.2 Plymouth . 25.6 Chariton__ 29.3 St. Charles-_ 32. 3 District 8:. •R osebu d_18.5 Franklin _— 32.5 Worcester . 26.5 Grundy ------26.8 St. Francois. 28. 4 •Big Horn __ 24.6 •Wibaux ___ 16.7 H am pden__— 32. 5 Linn______29. 5 S t e. Gene- _ Livingston__29.6 vieve_____ 29.0 NEBRASKA RHODE ISLAND Macon—____27.3 St. Louis----- 32.0 All counties______28. 5 District 1 : District 6 : Mercer_____29. & Warren ___ 31. 0 CONNECTICUT Putnam ____26.8 Washington. 28.1 •Banner ___ 28. 5 •Butler — 32.2 Randolph_28. 5 District 7: •Box Butte- 29.4 •Cass _____ 33.0 All counties--______- 30. 0 Barry...... 26.4 •Cheyenne _ 28.6 ♦Colfax —. 32.8 Schuyler ___28.7 W h eat: Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for U se B arto n _____26.0 •D a w e s ____ 27.5 "Dodge 31.7 Sullivan____27.5 U nder the 1964 W heat Program District 3: Christian___24. 4 •D eu el_____ 29.4 •D ouglas___31.6 Audrain____33.2 D a d e ___—__ 27.9 •G a rd e n ___28.2 •Hamilton_27. 0 N E W JERSEY Clark_____26. 2 Greene ,_____25. 9 •Kimball — 25.6 •Lancaster__27. 7 Knox ______28.9 Jasper _____ 28.2 •Morrill ____26.4 •Merrick —._ 26. 6 District 2 : District 5—Con. Lewis __ 26.2 Lawrence___26.2 •Scotts Bluff 28.4 •Nance ;_____30.0 B ergen__ ___29. 6 Middlesex __ 33.7 Marion_____29. 6 M cDonald__25. 0 •Sheridan__26. 7 •Platte _____ 31.2 Essex______29. 8 Monmouth » 34. 0 Monroe _____ 28. 9 Newton _____ 25. 8 •S io u x _____ 24. 4 •Polk _____ 31.7 Hunterdon _ 30. 8 Ocean ______31. 4 Pike ...... 28.3 Stone ___ . 24.2 District 2: •S a rp y _____31.4 Morris___ _ 31.0 District 8: Ralls______30. 6 Districts: Arthur _____ 19.7 •Saunders __ 29.8 Passaic_____ 29.7 Atlantic____26. 8 Scotland _26.0 Bollinger___26.4 Blaine ______12.0 •Seward____27.8 Somerset___29.4 Cam den____28. 0 Shelby_____28.1 Carter______24.4 • B o y d __- — 20.2 •Washington 31.2 S u ssex_____ 29.4 Cape May___27. 2 District 4: D e n t _- ____20.6 •B ro w n ____25.0 •York ______25.2 U n io n ______29. 2 Cumber­ Bates__ __25.3 Douglas _.__ 18.5 •C herry____23.6 District 7: W arren_____33.2 land _____32. 0 Cass______26.5 Howell «__ _ 19. 5 •Garfield ___ 23.6 •C hase_____26.7 District 5 : Gloucester_28. 6 Cedar ______24. 6 Iro n ____ 20.1 • H o lt ___-__ 20.0 •D u n d y ____28.0 Burlington _ 33.4 Salem ______34. 2 Henry ______25.1 Madison____21.2 Hooker_____12.0 •Frontier___25.4 Mercer ._____33.4 Jackson__ _ 29. 6 Oregon _____ 24. 4 •Keya Paha_ 22. 5 •Hayes _____ 27.5 Johnson____26.4 O za rk ______21.4 •Logan_____25. 7 •Hitchcock _ 27. 6 N E W MEXICO Lafayette___ 29.9 Reynolds ___ 24.5 Loup ______29.0 •K e ith ____ _ 27.9 District 1 : District 3—Con. St. Clair____ 23.3 Ripley______21.1 •McPherson- 21.7 •L in co ln _ _ 25.2 •Bernalillo _ 18.2 •San Miguel- 19. 5 Vernon 24.4 Shannon ___ 23.6 R o ck ______20.2 •Perkins ■___ 26. 6 •McKinley__ 10.2 •Torrance_ 15.0 District 5: Taney____ _ 20.0 Thomas ____ 15.4 •Red Willow 30.7 •Rio Arriba _ 14.2 •U nion_____ 16. 0 Benton 24.9 Texas______21.6 W heeler___- 21.8 District 8: •Sandoval_ 16.6 District 7" Boone a ™ * 28.1 Wayne______24.4 District 3: •Adams :__ - 25. 5 •San Juan— 24.4 •C atron____ 19. 0 Callaway___ 32.4 W ebster____ 21.7 •Antelope__ 29 1 •Franklin —_ 24.1 •Santa Fe___ 18.0 •G ra n t_____ 31. 5 Camden____ 23.2 W rig h t...... 23. 6 •Boone ____ 30.3 •Furnas _ 28. 0 •T a o s _____ 19.0 •Hidalgo 35.0 Cole 29.9 District 9: • B u r t ______32. 3 •G osper__ _ 27.5 •Valencia — 23.3 •Lim a______30.0 cooDer mem 30.4 Butler______31.0 Cedar ______22.8 •H arlan __ _ 29.3 District 3 : •Sierra_____ 28. 7 Dallas ,;r 23.2 Cape Girar- •Cuming ___ 32.3 •Kearney —_ 25.0 •C o lfa x ____ 19.6 •Socorro___ 16. 5 Hickory____ 25.5 deau _____ 31.1 D akota_____ 29.9 •P h elp s__ _ 28.9 •C u rry _____ 25.2 District 9: Howard___ 28.7 Dunklin____ 31.2 D ix o n ______27.7 •Webster __ _ 23.4 •De Baca____ 30.0 •Chaves____ 36.2 Laclede 26.5 Mississippi_ 35r8 Knox ______27.1 District 9: •Guada- •Dona Ana_ 34.2 Maries__ _ 24.9 New Madrid- 35.4 •Madison___ 3Ò.7 •Clay------_ 24.0 lupe ___ _ 17.0 •Eddy _ ___ 35. 4 Miller 26. 5 Pemiscot___ 35.0 Pierce______30.0 •Filmore _. _ 23.8 •H arding___ 13. 8 •Lea ______18. 2 Moniteau_ 27.9 Scott ______33.9 Stanton____ 30.2 •G age______25.7 •M ora______18.8 •Lincoln _;_ 18. 0 Morgan 27.1 Stoddard___ 34.5 Thurston___ 29.1 •Jefferson __ 24.0 •Q uay------16.0 •O te ro __ 29. 7 W a y n e _____ 29.6 •Johnson _- 25.0 •Roosevelt _ 18.1 MONTANA District 1: District 2—Con. •Buffalo ____28. 0 •N uckolls_24. 2 N E W YORK *Deerlodge _ 32.6 •Teton ___ 25.7 •C u ster___ _28.1 •O to e _____._ 29.4 “Flathead __ 33.5 •D aw son _27.2 District 2 : District 5: •Toole _____ 22.4 •Pawnee '___ 26. 6 Jefferson___ 29.0 Cayuga___35. 4 “Granite__ 28. 7 District 3: •G reeley _28. 9 “Lake ______27.1 •Hall ,___ 27.4 •Richardson 29.4 Lewis ______28.6 Chenango _ 33.0 •Daniels __ 16.1 St. Lawrence- 29.2 C ortland _34.0 “Lincoln ___ 26.1 •Dawson __ 15.4 •H o w ard _‘_ 28.0 •sSïïiûT_____26.2 “Mineral__ 25. 2 •Sherman __ 28. 9 •Thayer — 23.8 District 3 : Herkimer _31.4 •Garfield __- 13.4 C lin to n ____ 26.0 Madison___ 32.9 “Missoula 27.3 •M cCone_ •Valley ____30.6 14.7 Essex _____ 31.3 Oneida__33.4 “Powell ______26.6 •Richland U 18.0 “Ravalli____30. 7 Frafiklin ____ 26. 0 Onondaga _34. 2 •Roosevelt 16.5 District 4: Oswego ____29.0 “Sanders__ 26.0 •Sheridan _ 18. 5 District 1: District 3—Con. E r i e ______31.0 * Otsego _____ 30. 4 District 2: •Valley ___ 15.3 “Blaine ____17. 5 Churchill __ 35.7 Eureka_____ 20.0 Genesee____ 34.4 District 6: District 5: D ouglas____30.0 Lander_____22.1 Livingston _ 33.4 Albany _____ 27.4 “Chouteau _ 25. 8 •Broadwater. 24.0 Humboldt __ 35.2 White Pine__ 29. 3 Monroe ____ 34.6 Fulton - _26.9 “Glacier ___23 4 - * Cascade 25. 9 'Hill ______21! 6 Lyon _____36.8 District 8 : Niagara ____ 32.8 Montgomery- 31.4 •Fergus 25.5 O rm sby ____33.8 Clark—_____28.2 O n tario ____ 34. 9 Rensselaer _ 28.3 Liberty ___ 23.1 •Golden Pershin g___ 37.2 Esmerelda__33.8 O rlean s___!_ 35.2 Saratoga__30.8 “Phillips___16.9 Valley 20.6 “Pondera __ 25.3 Storey______33.8 L in co ln ____20.0 Seneca ------34.3 Schenectady- 26. 0 Washoe_____31.1 M in eral____28.0 W a y n e _____ 31. 5 Schoharie !_ 29.4 f>ni+,^lca^es counties having special wheat District 3: Nye ____— _ 29.1 Wyoming___ 31.7 Washington _ 29.1 ral Practice yields. See tables below. . Elko______31.2 Y a t e s ____’_ 35.0 No. 93------2 6240 RULES AND REGULATIONS

W h eat: Cou nty Normal Y ields for Use W h eat: Co unty Normal Y ields for Use Wheat : Co unty Normal Y ields for Use Under the 1964 W heat Program— Con. Under the 1964 W heat Program— Con. Under the 1964 W heat Program—Con. new york—-continued north Dakota— continued Oklahom a—continued Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal County yield County yield County yield County yield County yield County yield District 7: District 9—Con. District 3—Con. District 7: District 2—Con. District 6: Allegany — 29.4 Delaware___ 31.2 ♦Ram sey___ 22.2 ♦Adams • __ 16. 0 N o b le ______25. 7 Adair ____ 21.2 Cattaraugus- 31.8 Dutchess — 28.6 ♦Towner;___ 23.0 ♦Billings_;__ 16.0 ♦W o o d s____ 23.9 Cherokee__ 22.2 Chautauqua. 31.0 Greene _____ 30.8 ♦W alsh_____ 26.3 ♦Bowman 17.0 ♦Woodward _ 19.3 Haskell__ 26.4 Steuben____ 30.2 O ra n g e ___ 27; 9* District 4: ♦Golden Val- District 3: Hughes ___ 23.3 District 8: Rockland___ 27.5 ♦ D u n n _____ 16.8 l e y ------18.0 Craig ______22.9 McIntosh __ 23.0 Broome____ 30.5 S u lliv a n ___ 27.6 ♦McKenzie__ 17.5 ♦Hettinger__ 18.9 Delaware ___ 23.8 Muskogee__ 24.4 - Chemung___ 29. 7 Ulster _____ 28.9 ♦M cLean___ 18.4 ♦Slope______18.0 M ayes______22.0 Okmulgee __ 21.6 Schuyler___ 30.6 Westchester _ 30.9 ♦M ercer____ 17. 0 ♦Stark 17.6 Nowata_____ 23.3 Pittsburg__ 19.4 Tioga ______29.5 District 9A: ♦Oliver_____ 15.7 District 8: Osage ______26. 5 Sequoyah ___ 24.8 Tom pkins__ 33.0 Nassau'_____ 29.2 District 5: ♦Burleigh__ 16.4 Ottawa_____ 24.0 District 7: District 9: Suffolk_____ 32.5 ♦Eddy ______21. 6 ♦Emmons ___ 15.8 Pawnee_____ 24.9 ♦Caddo ____ 25.0 C olu m bia__ 28.5 ♦Foster_____ 24. 5 ♦G ran t_____ 15.5 R o gers_____ 22.0 ♦Comanche _ 21.7 ♦K idder____ 15.8 ♦Morton____ 16.0 Tulsa 25.4 ♦Cotton 22.3 NORTH CAROLINA ♦Sheridan_ 17.4 ♦Sioux______15. 0* Wagoner ____ 23.1 ♦G reer____ 24.6 ♦Stutsman__ 21.4 District 9: Washington. 25.3 ♦Harmon District 1: District 8—Con. 24.8 ♦Wells______22.0 ♦Dickey ____ District 4: ♦Jackson Alleghany_ Cabarrus__- 21.4 20.6 26.1 24.6 District 6: ♦La Moure_ 20. 0 ♦Beckham_ 22.7 ♦Kiowa Ashe 25.2 C leveland__ 23.3 25.6 ♦Barnes___ 24.4 ♦Logan_____ 16. 0 ♦B la in e ____ 23.7 ♦Tillman__ Avery G aston _____ 22.7 26.1 24.0 ♦Cass ______26.0 ♦McIntosh_ 15.1 ♦C uster____ 23.6 District 8: C ald w ell___ 22.3 L in c o ln ____ 24.4 ♦Griggs------26.3 ♦Ranson____ 20.1 ♦D ew ey ____ 20.6 Atoka _____ 23.8 Surry ______25.3 Mecklenburg 22.6 ♦Steele _____ 28.5 ♦Richland__ 24.4 ♦Roger Mills- 19.2 B ryan_____ Montgomery 23.0 W a tau ga___ 24.7 18.8 ♦Traill______3Ö. 5 ♦Sargent___ 22. 5 ♦W ashita___ 24.3 Carter_____ Wilkes _____ Moore 21.0 23.3 23.4 District 5: Coal______21.4 Yadkin_____ 23.2 Richmond__ 18.8 OHIO ♦Canadian__ 26.8 G arvin ____ 25.7 S t a n ly _____ 22.8 District 4: Cleveland___ 21.5 Jefferson___ 22.5 Buncombe_ 23.9 U n io n __ ___ Y4. 8 District 1: District 5—Con. Creek 17.0 Johnston__ 21.3 B u rk e______District 3: Allen ______33.2 23.3 / Knox ______27.0 ♦Grady 28.0 Love ______17.7 Cherokee___ 22.0 B ertie______30.0 Defiance ___ 30.0 Licking ,,_- 27.2 ♦Kingfisher _ 24.3 M arshall__ 19.4 Clay ______Cam den____ 33.0 F u lto n _____ 33.6 21.6 Madison ___ 33.4 L in co ln ____ 19.7 Murray 27.3 C h ow an ____ 33.4 H an cock___ 33.0 G raham ____ 18.1 M arion_____ 33.3 Logan 25.9 Pontotoc__ 23.8 Haywood — 22.1 C urrituck_ 32.8 H en ry ______34.7 M o rro w ___2 29.4 M cClain____/27.3 Stephens__ 23.7 Henderson _ 24.2 Edgecombe - 30.0 Lucas ______35.5 Pickaway___ 28.2 Okfuskee___ 20.2 District 9: Jackson ____ 21.0 Gates ______28.1 P au ldin g___ 29.7 Ross 25. 6 Choctaw__ 22.7 Oklahoma __ 26.2 M cD ow ell__ 21.1 H alifax_____ 28.3 Putnam ____ 32.2 Union 29.8 Latim er___ 18.5 Payne Macon _____ 22.4 Hertford____ 27.8 Van W e r t _ 35.6 District 6: 22.6 fcLe Flore___ 25.8 Madison___- 21.4 M artin __ ___ 28.4 Williams — 31. 6 Belmont ___ 30.0 Pottawatomie 27.0 McCurtain _ 26.4 M itchell____ 19.0 N a s h ______30.8 Wood ______33.8 Carroll 30.2 Seminole___ 21.0 Pushmataha 19.0 Polk ______20.8 Northampton 27.0 District 2: Coshocton _ 27.1 Rutherford - 24.1 Pasquotank - 32.6 Ashland ____ 29.8 H arrison ___ 28.4 OREGON Sw ain ______20.0 Perquimans- _ 31.8 Crawford___ 31.2 Holmes ____ 30.2 District 1: District 3—Con. Transylvania 22.2 Tyrrell_____ 28.8 Erie ______34.1 Jefferson___ 30.4 ♦B en ton ___ 31.2 •Umatilla — 38.6 Yancey_____ 21.6 Washington _ 31.8 Huron _____ 32.5 Tuscarawas _ 30.2 ♦Clackmas _ 32.1 ♦Union____ 41.0 District 2: District 6: L o r a in ____ .30.1 District 7: ♦Columbia _ 31.1 ♦Wallowa__ 30.5 Alam ance__ 24.1 Beaufort___ 29. 6 Ottawa ____ 31.7 Butler _____ 25.9 ♦Lane _____ 32.4 District 7: Caswell_____ 22.4 Carteret____ 31.8 Richland___ 30.5 Clermont___ 23.7 ♦ L in n ______29.7 D ouglas___ 21-7 D urham ____ 25.1 Craven _____ 29.2 Sandusky__ 33.8 Clinton ____ 28.6 ♦Marion____ 36.9 ♦Jackson__ 33.0 Forsyth ____ 23.8 G reene_____ 31.7 Seneca _____ 31.7 Greene 30.0 Multnomah. 36.7 Josephine__ 26.9 Franklin____ 24.8 Hyde ------34.2 W yan do t___ 32.1 H am ilto n _ 26.4 ♦ P o lk ______37.2 District 8: Granville___ 22.5 Johnston___ 29.4 District 3: Mont- ♦Washington 36.9 ♦Crook____ 44.2 Guilford____ 23.4 Jones______28.6 Ashtabula__ 30.0 g o m e ry __ 29.4 ♦Yam hill___ 36.9 ♦Deschutes _ 34.7 Orange __ 23.0 Lenoir _____ 30.1 Columbiana 31.9 Preble 29.6 District 2: ♦G rant____ 26.0 Person _____ 22.4 Pam lico____ 31.8 Cuyahoga __ 28.7 Warren ____ 26.0 ♦G illia m ___ 30.4 ♦Harney___ 20.0 Rockingham- 24.2 P i t t ______29.9 Geauga __ 30.3 District 8: Hood River_ 25.2 ♦Jefferson_ 34.3 Stokes______23.3 Wayne _____ 30.8 L a k e ______28.6 Adams _____ 21.4 ♦M orrow ___ 29.4 ♦Klamath — 34.5 V ance______23.4 W ilso n _____ 32.8 M ahoning__ 32.6 Brown _____ 20.6 ♦Sherman__ 34.6 ♦Lake ______22.1 W arren_____ 22.7 District 9: Medina ___- 30.2 G a llia ______25.0 ♦Wasco ____ 33-5 ♦Malheur — 49.5 District 5: ~ B la d en _____ 29.0 Portage ____ 30.1 Highland — 23.8 District 3: ♦Wheeler__ 25.8 Alexander__ 22.3 Brunswick__ 29.5 Stark ______32.5 Jackson__ 23.3 ♦B aker_____ 36. 6 Catawba____ 24.8 Colum bus__ 28.4 Sum m it____ 30.2 L aw ren ce__ 28.2 Chatham ___ 22.4 Cumberland- 25.1 T ru m b u ll__ 30.0 Pike ______24.5 . PENNSYLVANIA Davidson___ 22.8 D u p lin _____ 28.0 Wayne _____ 33.2 Scioto _____ 26.4 District 1: District 4—Con. Davie ______24.9 Harnett - ___ 28.8 District 4: District 9: Crawford ®__26.6 Beaver ------29.0 Iredell _____ 24.1 H oke______24.4 Auglaize ___ 34.0 Athens _____ 25.6 Erie ______27. 3 Butler ------29.4 Lee______25.6 New Hanover- 26.5 Champaign _ 34.8 G u ern sey __ 26.8 Forest______25.3 Clarion ------26.7 Randolph___ 24.6 v Onslow_____ 25.8 Clark ______35.1 Hocking____ 24.8 M ercer_____ 29.2 In d ian a------26.8 R o w a n _____ 26.6 P en der_____ 26.4 D ark e______34.4 M e ig s ______24.6 Venango____27.6 Jefferson — 24.6 W ake______27.2 Robeson____ 27.4 H ard in _____ 33.0 Monroe ____ 25.9 Warren _____26.1 Lawrence — 30.9 District 8: Sam pson___ 27.4 Logan _____ 32.9 Morgan ____ 25.9 District 2: - District 5: A nson______22.2 Scotland____ 29.8 Mercer _____ 33.8 Muskin- B radford___27. 0 Blair ------30.8 Miami _____ 34.8 gum ------25.5 Cameron — 22.2 Cambria------26.3 NORTH DAKOTA S h e lb y _____ 33.8 Noble ______26.0 C lin to n ____29.7 Centre ------28.2 Elk ______25.1 Clearfield — 25. o District 1: District 2—Con. District 5 : Perry ______25.2 ♦Burke_____ 17.8 ♦McHenry__ 17. r Delaware___ 30.4 V in to n _____ 24.4 Lycoming___27.2 Columbia — 28.5 •Divide_____ 16.0 ♦Pierce_____ 17.1 Fairfield ___ 26.6 Washing- M cKean____31.4 Dauphin — 29.2 Potter ____27.7 Huntingdon. 27.3 ♦Mountrail _ 17.0 ♦Rolette____ 20.0 Fayette ____ 31.8 ton ______25.2 ♦R en ville__ 19.7 District 3: F ran k lin ___ 29. 6 Sullivan____23.8 Juniata 28- 1 T io g a ______30.2 Mifflin ------29. < ♦W ard______20.2 •Cavalier___ 23.8 OKLAHOMA ♦Williams __ 16.0 •Grand District 3: Montour------24.0 District 2: Forks_____ 29.1 District 1: District 2: Lackawanna- 30.4 Northumber- ♦Beaver ____ 18.9 ♦Alfalfa____ 26.8 Susquehanna 31.4 la n d ------j/J- ♦Benson____ 20.2 ♦Nelson____ 24.1 34 4 P e r r v ___- — 20. < ♦Bottineau _ 19.0 ♦Pembina___ 27. 5 ♦Cimarron_ 18.7 ♦Garfield ___ 25.9 ♦Ellis ...... 18.0 ♦G ran t_____ 25.8 “Indicates counties having special wheat ♦H arper____ 18.0 Kay ------28.4 cultural practice yields. See tables below. ♦Texas _____ 19.4 ♦M ajo r_____ 24.1 Armstrong__26 .1 Tuesday, May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6241

Wheat: Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for U se W h e a t: Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for U se W h e a t : Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for U se Under the 1964 W heat Program—Con. U nder th e 1964 W heat P rogram— Con. U nder th e 1964 W heat Program— Con. Pennsylvania—continued TENNESSEE texas— continued Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal County yield County yield County yield County yield County yield County yield District 6: District 8: District 1: District 4—Con. District 2—Con. District 5—Con. Carbon------27.4 Adams _____26. 6 D y e r ______27.0 Su m n er___ 21.4 Stonewall___ 16.5 Red River__ 18.6 LeHigh------31.2 B edford____27.1 L a k e ______34.7 Trousdale 18.0 Taylor______16.3 Van Zandt__ 17.8 Luzerne----- 27.0 Cumberland- 27. 5 Lauderdale - 29.5 Williamson 21.6 •W heeler___ 17.9 Walker 14.5 Monroe------27.2 F ran k lin ___27.0 O bio n ______26. 6 W ilso n ___ 17.1 Wichita_____ 20.4 Waller 15.6 Northampton 34.3 F u lto n _____24. 0 S h elby _____ 23.5 District 5 : Wilbarger___ 20.3 District 6: Pike ------26.4 Y o r k ______29.6 T ip to n _____ 25.8 Bledsoe ___ 20.2 District 3: Culberson_ 20 0 Schuylkill — 26.4 District 9: District 2: Coffee____ 24.2 Archer______17.0 Hudspeth___ 20.0 District 7: Berks ______28. 8 C arroll_____ 20.4 Cumber- Brown______15.0 Pecos 20.0 Allegheny ___ 27.7 Bucks______30.1 Chester_____ 21.4 l a n d ___ 19.6 C allahan___ 15.8 Presidio____ 25.0 Payette------28.1 C hester____32. 9 Crockett ___ 24.2 Fentress__ 20.4 Clay------18.8 Reeves 20.0 Greene_____26. 9 Delaware___32.0 Fayette _____ 23.7 Franklin __ 27.8 Comanche__ 15.2 Ward ______15.0 Somerset ,— 27.6 Lancaster_34. 2 G ibson _____ 20.3 Grundy ___ 26.6 Eastland____ 14.8 District 7: Washington _ 28.3 Lebanon —_ 31.4 Hardeman__ 26.3 M arion___ 22. 2 Erath______15.3 Bandera_ 18.0 Westmore­ Montgomery- 29.4 Haywood___ 22. 0 Morgan___ 19. 6 H ood______18.5 Blanco 16.3 land ______27. 7 Philadelphia-. 29.4 Henderson_ 21.7 Overton__ 21.2 Jack _ ___ 16.9 Burnet 16. 7 Henry ______23.4 Pickett___ 20.2 Mills SOUTH CAROLINA 15.1 Coke 17.1 McNairy____ 22.3 Putnam __— 20.4 M ontague__ 18.6 Concho 16.1 District 1: District 4: Madison___ 23.0 Sequatchie _ 20.6 Palo Pinto___ 16.4 Edwards__ 15. 5 Anderson___22.9 Abbeville — 22.7 Weakley____ 20. 8 Van Buren__ 22. 0 Parker 15. 6 G illespie___ 17.5 Cherokee___21. 6 A ik en ______22. 8 District 3: W a rr e n ____ 22. 8 Shackelford _ 16.6 Irion 15.2 Greenville 21. 5 Edgefield___24. 6 Benton _____ 20. 6 White — 23. 6 Somervell___ 15.8 K en d all____ 17.9 Laurens____25.0 Greenwood - 22.3 Cheatham__ 24.4 District 6: Stephens___ 15.2 Kerr 16.2 Oconee_____20. 7 McCormick _ 20.5 Decatur ____ 15. 8 Anderson __ 20.4 Throckmor- Kimble 15.3 Pickens____20. 5 Newberry___25.8 Dickson____ 19.4 B lo u n t___ 23.4 ton 18.2 Lampasas___ 17.1 Spartan­ S a lu d a_____23.7 H ard in _____ 18.3 Bradley ____ 21.0 W is e ______20.0 Llano 15.7 burg _____21.7 District 5: Hickm an___ 18. 6 Campbell ___ 21.6 Young______18.0 McCulloch__ 16.6 Union______20. 5 Calhoun____28. 6 Houston____ 20.9 C a rt e r___ 22.9 District 4: Mason 17.1 __ District 2: . Clarendon__24.9 Humphreys _ 19.6 Claiborne 21.6 B e ll______16.1 Menard ____ 15.7 Chester __ 23.1 Lee 25.4 Lawrence___ 22.4 Cocke ____ 22.2 Bosque 18.5 Reagan _____ 15. 0 Fairfield__ 24.2 Lexington__21.1 Lewis ______17.2 Grainger __ 23.0 Collin 20.9 San Saba____ 16.4 Kershaw____25.0 Orangeburg _ 24.1 Mont- Greene___ 20. 6 Cooke . 20.9 Schleicher_ 15.9 Lancaster___23.6 Richland_- 28. 2 gomery__ 28.9 Hamblen __ 26.1 Coryell _____ 16.4 S terlin g____ _ 15.6 York______21. 8 Sumter_____24. 3 Perry______16.2 Hamilton _ 20. 6 Dallas .... 20.6 Tom Green__ 16.2 Hancock __ 20.4 District 3: District 8 : Robertson_ 26.4 Delta 20.0 Uvalde 16.0 Chesterfield _ 24. 8 Allendale___25.6 Stewart ____ 20.9 Hawkins___ 23.2 Denton ____ 19. 8 District 8: 18. 7 Jefferson _ 24. 0 Darlington _ 25. 2 B am berg___24. 6 Wayne _____ Ellis ______19.0 Bastrop ____ 15.2 Dillon _____26.0 B arnw ell___23.4 District 4: Johnson____ 23.8 F a lls ______15.3 Bee Bedford ____ 18.4 K nox_____ 23.0 15.7 Florence____24.4 Beaufort____26. 2 Fannin ... 21.0 Bexar 16.6 Cannon ____ 19.2 Loudon ____ 21.5 Georgetown _ 22.3 Berkeley____25. 4 Grayson____ 20.7 Caldwell____ 17. 6 Charleston_27.6 C la y ------19.4 M cM inn__ 20.4 Horry______26.8 Hamilton___ 15.1 Colorado ___ 15.2 Colleton____24.5 Davidson___ 21. 4 M e ig s ____ 20.4 Hill 17.8 Marion_____26. 0 Comal 15.5 Dorchester _ 25.6 De Kalb_____ 20.2 M o n ro e____ 22.8 H u n t______19.8 De Witt Marlboro__ 26.9 G iles______20.4 Polk _____ 20. 7 15.0 Hampton___28. 6 Johnson____ 18.6 Gonzales___ 16. 6 Williamsburg 25.1 Jasper______24. 2 Jackson ____ 15.4 Rhea ____ 17.8 Kaufm an___ 18.8 19.2 Guadalupe _ 16.2 Lincoln ____ 19.5 Roane ____ L a m a r __ __ 20.8 Hays SOUTH DAKOTA Sevier____ 21.9 15. 8 Macon _____ 18. 8 Limestone__ 14.9 Karnes District 1: District 5—Con. Sullivan____ 22.0 14.7 M arsh all___ 17. 6 McLennan_ 16.8 Lavaca ‘Butte_____20.0 •Hyde______19. 7 M aury______22.4 Unicoi____ 23.6 15.0 M ilam ______15.2 Medina ____ ‘Corson____14.8 •Jerauld __ 16.8 M oore______20.0 U n io n ____ 20.2 18.2 ‘Dewey___15. 5 N avarro____ 18.0 Travis _____ 16.4 •Sully______21.3 Rutherford _ 21.3 Washing- Rockwall___ •Harding — 15. 0 21.7 Washington 15.0 District 6: Sm ith_____ 16.6 t o n ____ 23.6 Tarrant____ 21.7 ‘Perkins__ 14. 8 Wilson 18.0 •Brookings _ 19. 6 Williamson _ 15.4 ‘Ziebach__ 15.5 D avison____20. 6 TEXAS District 9: District 5:. Jackson____ 15.7 District 2: Hanson _____ 20. 5 District 1—N: District 1-S— Con. ‘Brown____17.9 Bowie ____ 22.9 Victoria ____ 14.2 •Kingsbury _ 18. 5 •Armstrong _ 20.9 •Lamb 27.0 21.0 ‘Campbell _ 16.4 Brazos _____ W h arto n ___ 17.4 L a k e ______20.0" •Briscoe----- 20.1 •Lubbock __ 26. 9 Cherokee___ 15.0 ‘Edmunds __ 16.6 McCook — _ 20.5 District 10: •Carson____ 20.9 L yn n _____ 21.5 Henderson 15.8 Atascosa ___ 15.6 ‘Paulk_____18. 0 M in e r______17. 6 •Castro _____ 28.9 M artin ___ 17.9 *Po.„er ___ 19.1 Hopkins____ 20.0 D im m it____ 15.0 Minnehaha - 20. 0 •Dallam ___ : 16.5 M idland____ 17.5 Houston____ 15.0 ‘Spink_____17.2 Moody _____21. 8 F rio ______16.0 •Deaf Smith. 26.8 •Terry____ 21.7 Leon _ ____ 16.0 Live Oak____ 14.6 ‘Walworth _ 17.8 Sanborn____16. 5 •Floyd______24.9 Yoakum __ 18.8 District 3: District 7: Madison____ 15.6 Maverick___ 15.0 •G ra y ______21.2 District 2: Rains _ — - 19.1 Z a v a la _____ 15.4 ‘Clark_____17.2 •Bennett___31.4 • H a le ______31.6 Baylor----- 18.4 •Codington. 17.9 •Custer_____18. 6 Borden ___ 15.3 UTAH *Day------19. 0 •Hansford_ 19.5 •Fall River__24.9 •H artley ___ 17.8 Childress _ 20.0 ‘Deuel_____19. 4 District 1: District 6—Con. •Shannon_28. 9 •Hemphill__ 17.2 Coleman_ 15.4 •Box Elder _ 21.4 D aggett____ 31.4 ‘Grant ___ 19. 5 •Washabaugh 30.2 •Hutchinson. 22. 1 Collings- ‘Hamlin__ 19. 0 •Cache_____ 28.4 •Duchesne__ 40.0 District 8: •Lipscomb_ 19.8 w o rth _ 19.6 •D a v is _____ 56.1 •E m ery ____ 33.8 ‘Marshall „ 19.6 •Gregory___24. 4 •M oore_____ 22.3 Cottle____ 19.0 Morgan ____ 33. 1 Grand _ _ _ 22.1 ‘Roberts__ 20. 0 •J o n es____ 25. 7 •Ochiltree_ 21.2 D icken s_ 18.1 •R ic h ____- 21.9 •San Juan__ 14.6 District 4: •Lym an____27.4 •O ldham ___ 18. 6 •Donley___ 19. 4 •Salt Lake_ 26.2 Sum m it____ 31.6 ‘Haakon__ 27. 5 •Mellette ___ 25.7 •Parmer____ 34.3 Fisher____ 15.9 •T ooele____ 14.2 •U intah____ 28. 6 ‘Jackson__ 28. 0 •Todd______26. 5 •Potter_____ 20.2 F o a rd ___ 18.5 •W eber_____ 47.7 Wasatch____ 46.4 ‘Lawrence _ 21.0 •T rip p _____28.4 •R an d all___ 22.2 G a rz a ___ 16.9 District 5: District 7: ‘Meade____19. 0 District 9: •Roberts____ 19. 9 H a ll______19.2 •Juab ______15.5 •Beaver ____ 37.3 ‘Pennington. 22. 0 Bon Homme. 18. 8 •Sherm an__ 18.4 Hardeman __ 21.1 •Millard____ 17.9 Garfield____ 39.8 ‘Stanley__ 26.1 - ’ Charles Mix 20. 9 •Sw isher___ 26.0 Haskell__ 17.4 •Sanpete___ 23.6 •Iron ______23.6 District 5: C lay______22. 4 District 1-S: Jones ____ 17.4 •Sevier_____ 53.4 K an e______29.3 ‘Aurora___ 20. 2 •D ouglas___20. 9 27. 4 K e n t , ... 16. 2 •U ta h ______32.0 Piute ______39.0 ‘Beadle----- 16. 5 Hutchinson _ 18. 8 Cochran ____ 21.8 K in g ------18.0 District 6: •Washington 20.4 Brule „ — 23.2 Lincoln ____19. 9 •C rosby____ 24.8 K nox_____ 18.9 •Carbon____ 36.2 W a y n e _____ 39.4 Buffalo____21.1 T urn er_____20.5 ‘H and_____19.7 D aw so n ____ 17.8 Mitchell __ 14.7 •U nion_____22. 0 19.2 VIRGINIA ‘Hughes__ 20. 7 G ain es_____ 18.2 M otley__ Yankton____ 19. 8 Glasscock___ 17. 2 N o la n ____ 15.5 District 2: District 2—Con. cu]i?tliiCates counties having special wheat Hockley____ 22.4 Runnels __._ 15.2 Clarke _____25.4 Fairfax ____ 26.8 rai practice yields. See tables below. Howard------17.0 Scurry___ 14.7 Culpeper___26.7 Fauquier___ 26.3 6242 RULES AND REGULATIONS

W h e a t : Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for U se W h e a t : Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for UisE W h e a t : Co u n t y N ormal Y ields for Use U nder th e 1964 W heat P rogram—Con. U nder the 1964 W heat Program U nder the 1964 W heat P rogram—Con. virginia— continued WEST VIRGINIA Wy o m in g — continued Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal Normal County yield County yield County yield County yield County yield County yield District 2—Con. District 6—Con. District 2: District 4—Con. District 5: District 5—Con. Frederick__25. 0 M athew s___ 25.6 B arbour____ 23.3 Lincoln_____ 21.5 ♦Converse__19.0 ♦Niobrara ___ 20.0 L ou dou n ___26. 6 M iddlesex__ 26.2 Brooke _____ 26.8 Mason _____ 24.2 ♦Goshen____23.4 ♦Platte____ 24.0 Madison ___ 25.2 New Kent _1 24.8 Doddridge__ 23.5 M ercer_____ 26.8 ♦Laramie___25.4 P a g e ______25.8 Northamp- Hancock ___ 26.6 Mingo ______21.9 Prince ton ______28.9 H arrison___ 24.1 Nicholas___ 25.0 ♦Indicates counties having special wheat W illia m _24.6 Northum- Lewis ______23.6 P u tnam ____ 21.8 cultural practice yields. See tables below. Rappahan­ b e rla n d __ 27.1 M arion_____ 23.0 Raleigh_____ 20.1 nock _____ 25. 0 Richmond__ 27.1 M arsh all___ 24.7 Roane ______20.4 (Secs. 301, 375, 52 Stat. 38, as amended, 66* 7 Rockingham- 26. 6 Newport News 25.0 Monongalia _ 25.0 Wayne _____ 21.2 U.S.C. 1301, 1375) Shenandoah- 26. 0 Westmore- O h io ______27.7 Webster____ 21.4 Effective date. Upon filing with the Pleasants ___ 24.8 Stafford *___26.4 land _____ 27.4 Wirt ______24.7 Director, Office of the Federal Register. W a r r e n ____24.5 York _____ 25.9 Preston_____ 27.6 Wyoming___ 20.4 District 4: District 7: Ritchie_____ 23.4 District 6: Signed at Washington, D.C., on May 17, A lleghany_22. 6 B la n d ______24.8 Taylor _____ 24.9 Berkeley____ 26.0 1963. Augusta ___26.4 Buchanan __ 22.9 Tyler ______25.0 Grant _____ 27.0 G odfrey, Bath ______22.8 Carroll ____ 24.5 Upshur_____ 22.7 Greenbrier _ 25.8 H. D. B otetou rt__26.4 Dickenson__ 22.5 W e tz e l_____ 25.5 Hampshire _ 26.6 Administrator, Agricultural Sta­ Craig ______25. 8 Floyd ______27.6 W o o d ______21.0 H ardy______27.6 bilization and Conservation Highland___25.2 G iles______23.5 District 4: Jefferson___ 24.6 Service. R oan ok e___26.4 Grayson____ 25.0 Boone ______21.0 Mineral____ 23.7 Rockbridge _ 24. 2 Lee ______24.4 Braxton____! 24.4 Monroe_____ 27.6 N orm al Y ield or W heat for Special Cultural District 5: Montgomery. 26.0 Cabell______25.0 Morgan_____ 20.2 P ractices Albem arle_24.3 Pulaski ____ 24.7 Calhoun____ 24.3 Pendleton__ 26.0 ARIZONA A m elia_____ 26. 5 Russell ____ 23.3 Clay ------23.8 Pocahontas _ 28.3 A m h erst___22.2 Scott ______21.8 Fayette ____ 24.5 R an dolph__ 27.8 Smyth _____ 25.0 G ilm er_____ 24.8 Summers - __ 26.0 County Irrigated Summer Continuous Appomattox. 23.9 fallow cropping B ed fo rd ____24.2 T azew ell___ 24.5 Jackson ____ 20.5 Tucker _____ 23.7 Buckingham- 24. 2 Washington. 24.1 Kanawha ___ 23.3 C a m p b e ll__23.6 Wise ______22.5 WISCONSIN District 2: 17.0 Caroline ___25.5 Wythe 25.6 CñfiOTÍiTIO _ 20.2 District 8: District 1: District 5—Con. Chesterfield- 24.6 B arro n _____ 26.8 Green Lake_ 27.5 28.5 Charlotte __ 25.9 18.9 Cumberland- 24.9 Bayfield____ 25.8 Juneau_____ 23.7 F lu v a n n a __24.9 F ran k lin ___ 24.8 3a 3 B u rn ett____ 22.0 Marquette__ 21.5 District 5: Halifax ____ 23.8 Goochland - 24.3 Chippew a__ 26.0 Portage _____ 22.9 45.8 Henry _____ 22.4 G reene_____ 22.7 D ouglas____ 21.9 Waupaca___ 23.7 41.2 Lunenburg _ 25.2 38.4 H a n o v e r___ 25.0 Polk ______27.0 W aushara__ 22.4 H enrico____25.2 N o tto w ay __ 26.4 District 9: Patrick R u sk ______25.0 Wood ...... 26.2 34.0 Louisa _____24. 7 23.9 Sawyer_____ 22.3 District 6: Oila 33.2 Nelson _____ 21.1 Pittsylvania. 23.5 Washburn _ 24.2 Brown _____ 30.0 District 9: 31.5 34.7 O range______25.6 District 2: Calumet ___ 35.1 Brunswick _ 35.4 Pow hatan__24.8 25.6 Ashland____ 22 9 D o o r ___- ___ 29.6 34.6 Prince Dinwiddle__ 26.4 Clark ...... 25.8 Pond du Lac_ 34.4 E d w a rd __25.5 Greensville _ 25.2 Iron ______22.0 Kewaunee__ 33.6 Isle of Spotsylvania- 23.3 L in c o ln ____ 27.3 Manitowoc _ 34.1 CALIFORNIA District 6: Wight ___ 26.8 M arathon__ 28.3 Outagamie _ 33.2 Mecklenburg. 24.2 Accomack__28.5 O neida_____ 23.8 Sheboygan _ 34.8 District 2: Charles City- 27. 9 Nansemond- 26.4 Price ______23.0 Winnebago _ 35.0 57.7 20.6 20.4 Hampton __ 25.0 Norfolk ____ 29.0 District 3: Taylor _____ 23.7 District 7: 21.2 E s s e x ______25.5 Prince V ila s ______22.4 Crawford___ 34.4 30.0 19.2 G eorge___ 26.6 Modoc 56.0 20.2 15.2 Gloucester _ 24.6 District 3: G r a n t______32.3 District 4: James City__29.3 Princess Florence____ 22.4 I o w a ______31.8 22.2 19.7 15.2 King and A n n e __ 30.1 Forest ______22.8 Lafayette __ 31.8 16.5 Q u e e n ___ 25.0 Southamp- District 5: Langlade___ 26.6 Richland___ 29.6 38.8 31.8 King George. 26. 7 ton ______25.9 M arinette__ 26.1 S a u k ______30.2 33.6 28.8 King Surry ______26.0 Menominee _ 28.0 Vernon ____ 32.0 38.8 28.8 28.4 51.8 32.0 40.2 William __ 27.0 Sussex _____ 25.8 Oconto____- 27.2 District 8: 44.4 Lancaster__27.2 Solano... - 58.5 30.0 Shawano ___ 28.6 Columbia___ 33.5 49.2 24.2 43.0 District 4: D a n e ______36.0 23.0 18.2 WASHINGTON Buffalo_____ 28.4 Dodge ______35.0 Yolo 43.5 39.1 49.2 Dunn District 5a: District 1: District 2—Con. 27.6 G reen ______32.2 53.6 22.8 21.0 C lallam ____43.9 ♦Klickitat __ 28.4 Eau Claire_ 26.2 Jefferspn___ 37.8 38.7 12.6 13.4 Jackson ____ 26.2 Rock 36.4 47.2 Clark______30.0 ♦Okanogan . 24.4 16.8 La Crosse__ 27.8 District 9: 36.0 20.2 C o w litz____31. 7 ♦Yakima____37.5 47.4 27.0 23.6 Grays Harbor 29.8 District 3: Monroe ____ 28.2 Kenosha ___ 38.2 52.5 36.2 42.2 Island _____48.7 ♦F e rry _____ 26.9 Pepin 27.7 Milwaukee— 35.2 Tulare..*______35.1 17.2 12.8 Jefferson — 38.5 ♦Pend Oreille 22. 5 Pierce ______25.8 Ozaukee ____ 34.0 District 6: 27.4 21.9 K in g ______33.6 St. Croix____ 27.4 Racine 39.3 ♦Spokane___37.6 District 8: Lewis ______33.4 ♦Stevens___34.6 Trempealeau- 28.4 Walworth___ 37.6 Pacific______34.0 District 5: District 5: Washington _ 36.7 28.6 10.9 7.9 Adams _____ 22.7 W aukesha__ 35.4 30.2 13.5 12.1 Pierce______29. 5 ♦Adam s____31. 2 16.0 13.9 San Juan___41.3 ♦Douglas___25.1 WYOMING Skagit______52. 4 ♦Franklin__32.9 District 1: District 2—Con. Skamania___20.0 ♦G ran t_____30.7 COLORADO Snohomish _ 40. 6 ♦Lincoln___36.4 ♦Big Horn___ 36.8 ♦Weston____ 19.8 Thurston___30.5 District 9: ♦Fremont___ 37. 1 District 3: Whatcom___37.6 ♦A sotin ____33.6 ♦Hot Springs- 35.6 ♦Lincoln___ 18. 1 District 1: ♦ P a rk ______39.8 •T eto n _____ 37.0 Chaffee______26.2 District 2: ♦Columbia_46.9 Eagle______43.5 ♦B en ton ___26.3 ♦Garfield __ 45.8 ♦Washakie__ 37.9 ♦U in ta _____ 23.2 29.6 16.0 15^ District 2: District 4: 17.5 16.0 ♦Chelan____21.1 ♦Walla Walla 42.0 15.0 ♦Kittitas___41.5 ♦Whitman __ 43.4 ♦Campbell__ 16.2 ♦A lbany____ 14.7 Moffat...... 32.6 17.6 ♦Crook_____ Pitkin______20.0 ♦Carbon____ 13.6 22.2 ♦Indicates counties having special wheat ♦Johnson___ 18.9 •Natrona___ 22.7 32.0 17.8 Routt______32.4 22.9 cultural practice yields. See tables below. ♦Sheridan__ 23.3 ♦Sweetwater- 23.8 Teller______33.0 20.0 Tuesday, May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6243

Normal Yield of W h e a t fo r Sp e c ia l N o r m a l Y ie l d o f W h e a t f o r Sp e c ia l N o r m a l Y ie l d o f W h e a t fo r Sp e c ia l Cu l t u r a l P r a c t ic e s :— Continued C u l t u r a l P r a c t ic e s — Continued C u l t u r a l P r a c t ic e s — Continued

colorado— continued KANSAS Mo n t a n a — continued

County Irrigated Summer Continuous County Irrigated Summer Continuous County Irrigated Summer Continuous follow cropping follow cropping follow cropping

District 2: District 1: District 3—Continued 36.3 31.1 25.2 28.8 20.9 McCone______32.8 12.7 36.6 31.5 24.0 29.5 22.4 Richland.:______37.6 16.2 35.2 27.2 22.7 27.8 23.4 - 17.6 Roosevelt ______26.0 16.5 26.9 23.2 18.3 27.0 20.2 Sheridan______27.6 18.4 34.9 24.3 20.9 30.8 22.3 Valley...... 25.2 13.9 30.2 27.2 23.2 30.0 30.4 22.4 District 5: Weld ______34.0 25.5 20.4 34.0 27.1 18.9 Broadwater______36.8 20.1 District 6: 31.6 30.1 20.5 33.7 25.7 37.0 27.5 25.1 District 4: 28.1 25.5 36.8 27.2 24.1 36.0 30.7 21.8 Golden Valley____ 26.8 20.6 35.8 22.8 18.3 34.1 26.0 20.0 Judith Basin_____ 31.2 24.4 33.4 26.9 21.3 35.0 29.6 20.4 Lewis and Clark__ 25.6 20.5 Elbert . ^ 33.7 23.4 18.8 29.4 21.0 Meagher______25.2 20.7 30.6 19.1 13.1 31.4 25.8 18.5 Musselshell...... 25.2 18.4 32.6 20.0 18.0 Scott . . 38.4 32.9 23.1 27.3 15.7 36.2 22.4 17.2 26.2 19.5 26.1 19.9 30.4 22.4 16.3 35.4 25.3 19.1 District 7: 27.5 20.0 40.3 29.3 22.0 Beaverhead ------34.2 18.9 32.6 23.2 16.8 District 7: 43.3 27.7 33.9 24.9 16.6 26.1 18.5 Jefferson______31.9 20.9 District 7: 37.4 29.0 20.8 33.3 21.5 31.2 18.5 15.7 30.0 27.0 19.2 Silver Bow______24.7 17.7 38.0 16.2 13.0 36.8 29.3 20.4 District 8: 35.0 14.5 12.6 29.8 27.2 18.7 30.9 23.3 36.3 17.3 15.6 33.9 25.4 16.4 Carbon... ______34.1 22.4 29.9 16.2 14.4 32.0 26.2 17.8 Park______28.6 23.3 34.0 14.8 12.3 30.8 26.6 17.8 Stillwater______39.4 22.0 34.0 18.6 15.0 37.8 32.0 22.2 Sweet Grass______32.1 20.4 40.1 15.8 14.4 27.8 24.9 17.7 Treasure______36.0 18.5 35.6 16.4 13.4 Morton______35.6 24.8 16.8 Yellowstone______38.4 21.7 32.7 14.5 13.8 32.2 24.2 18.3 District 9: District 8? 41.2 29.8 20.1 14.5 31.3 35.4 27.3 18.5 36.2 16.9 28.7 District 2: Fallon...... 14.0 26.4 30.6 28.0 Powder River____ 24.4 19.4 35.9 Clnnri 29.2 29.4 24.6 Prairie______31.6 14.9 31.9 Jewell______27.8 22.9 Rosebud______32.0 17.3 District 9: 25.8 20.5 16.7 30.8 19.8 14.7 38.0 25.0 20.0 36.9 17.0 13.6 28.0 23.9 Crowley 34.0 16.0 12.2 25.6 18.6 NEBRASKA Custer’ . .. 31.9 14.5 13.1 28.5 24.5 Fremont 32.3 16.6 13.2 23.8 18.7 Huerfano . .. 29.5 19.2 14.3 26.2 19.8 District 1: 30.8 15.4 12.4 33.2 27.2 Otero _ 38.4 16.7 District 5f Banner______32.5 27.9 13.7 Prowers___ 35.4 19.6 15.5 Box Butte______28.4 26.4 13.0 34.1 25.6 21.4 Cheyenne______Pueblo____ 35.6 21.0 15.4 29.2 26.6 28.1 27.3 14.4 Filia ______Dawes______30.0 26.2 13.8 23.1 17.7 Deuel______29.2 28.6 16.5 27.2 22.9 Garden______30.0 27.6 16.6 IDAHO 26.6 23.8 Kimball______31.0 25.5 14.4 M cPherson______29.4 25.0 Morrill______28.2 26.0 12.1 28.9 25.5 Scotts Bluff______34.9 26.5 12.8 District 1: 28.7 28.4 24.0 26.4 Sheridan______34.0 26.3 13.7 Benewah...... ?7.9 26.6 32.8 19.1 Sioux------28.6 24.1 13.8 Bonner_____ 38.8 28.4 20.8 23.8 18.1 District 2: Borndarv .. 49.4 44.4 29.2 26.3 25.0 16 2 Clearwater____ 40.1 26.4 District 8: BroWn______30.2 23.6 21! 6 Idaho____ _ 36.1 25.4 28.0 25.2 27.0 1 ft 6 Kootenai__ *iv 34.0 33.4 24.2 25.4 18.4 30.0 17 3 Latah______41.8 31.0 32.6 27.2 21.8 Holt______28.2 20.0 16.0 Lewis...... 43.2 34.4 35.0 31.0 26.0 25.0 17 9 Nez Perce 43.4 43.2 36.0 31.6 30.7 26.6 Logan------... 27.6 22.0 18.6 District 7: 26.9 21.3 22.0 17.5 Ada____ 56.7 25.0 21.2 34.7 26.6 18.9 District 3: Adams_____ 30.6 28.4 22.0 43.6 23.7 Pratt______Antelope...... 30.0 30.0 21.0 Boise . 36.7 22.6 29.4 26.4 20.6 Boone______32.0 30.0 21.8 Canyon____ „ 64.8 21.8 31.0 28.3 25.2 30.0 26 9 Elmore__ 47.5 20.0 14.3 30.0 27.1 30.0 25 3 Gem____ 60.4 21.5 31.8 26.8 22.1 30.0 23.4 Owyhee.. 63.8 18.0 32.1 28.4 District 5: Payette....*., 51.6 18.5 Buffalo______31.7 23.8 19.1 Valley. 33.0 17.3 Custer______27.1 26.9 20.9 Washington______48.8 26.2 22.6 MONTANA Dawson______29.2 26.0 19.2 District 8: 22.7 19 7 Blaine___ 40.5 17.2 15.5 Hall..:______26.9 24.2 22.0 Camas... 34.6 19.8 17.6 Cassia__ District 1: Howard------28.7 24.2 20.6 60.0 19.9 20.2 Deerlodge. _ _ 31.3 18.0 Sherman______27.4 22.8 19.1 Gooding 53.6 19.0 16.0 38.8 33.0 Valley______29.2 24.6 20.5 Jerome 65.4 13.1 37.6 21.2 District 6: Lincoln 54.0 15.2 30.6 26.5 Butler______30.9 30.2 29.5 Minidoka 57.8 9.6 8.8 25.1 21.6 30.2 27.7 Twin Fails__ 70.8 15.7 16.6 District 9: 33.3 21.9 Colfax______30.0 27.7 27.8 36.2 26.0 Dodge------30.4 24.8 27.7 Bannock 49.6 21.7 18.4 32.4 22.2 31.8 29.3 Bear Lake 37.6 19.9 17.4 Bingham.. 44.2 19.5 Hamilton______28.9 26.2 24.4 58.4 16.5 16.2 33.4 23.8 26.9 25.7 Bonneville 53.3 Butte.. 19.6 18.6 District 2: Merrick______32.2 23.6 22.3 8.6 7.0 29.1 16.0 Nance______30.3 27.4 23.3 Caribou... 44! 6 Clark. 22.8 19.9 31.8 25.4 Platte— ...... 35.0 29.0 26.6 20.7 16.2 37.2 23.2 Polk______31.6 32.2 29.3 Custer 49.4 Franklin 15.0 H ill 31.8 20.6 28.3 28.2 47.6 24.9 23.7 23.1 Saunders------35.3 27.4 27.9 Fremont 44.9 Jefferson 26.1 20.0 29.6 13.8 Seward______31.2 29.0 26.0 Lemhi 64.0 17.6 12.9 34.9 24.4 27.2 28.2 44.5 36.3 24.8 York______32.4 27.8 24.6 Madison 60.1 Oneida. 23.6 20.2 22.4 District 7: Power 21.1 19.8 District 3: Chase______30.1 26.7 17.4 Peton 18,8 16.2 16.1 Dundy______32.0 28.0 15.5 38.2 25.9 25.2 30.2 13.4 Frontier______29.9 25.4 18.8 Garfield.. ______29.2 11.8 Hayes______32.2 27; 6 18.4 6244 RULES AND REGULATIONS

N o r m a l Y ie l d o p W h e a t fo r Sp e c ia l N o r m a l Y ie l d o f W h e a t fo r S p e c ia l N o r m a l Y ie l d o f W h e a t for Special C u l t u r a l P r a c t ic e s —Continued C u l t u r a l P r a c t ic e s —C ontinued C u l t u r a l P r a c t ic e s — Continued

N e b r a s k a — continued n o r t h Da k o t a — continued SOUTH DAKOTA

County Irrigated Summer Continuous County Irrigated Summer Continuous County Irrigated Summer Continuous fallow cropping follow cropping follow cropping

District 7—Continued District 6: District 1: 29.0 27.5 20.6 25.6 19.8 13.6 18.4 Keith ...... 31.6 26.5 17.2 29.0 23.4 14.2 11.0 26.2 22.4 18.0 27.5 20.3 Dewey______15.4 11.4 31.0 25.7 17.2 30.8 24.3 15.2 11.8 34.2 27.0 20.3 32.2 27.1 Perkins______14.8 10.6 District 8: District 7: 13.0 9.8 31.1 26.0 22.5 16.4 11.7 District 2: 35.0 22.7 18.9 19.0 13.0 Brown______20.8 17.2 29.1 24.9 19.0 16.8 12.5 19.1 13.0 30.6 23.9 19.2 17.4 13.0 Edmunds______18.2 13 4 35.0 26.0 21.2 18.7 12.6 18.0 14.4 29.6 25.4 19.9 17.3 13.4 McPherson 19.0 12.6 32.4 27.6 20.1 18.6 13.8 Potter______18.4 16.1 28.4 23.0 20.4 District 8: Spink______20.0 14.9 District 9: 20.0 14.2 Walworth . 19.7 13.9 31.6 26.4 23.0 18.8 14.2 District 3: 35.0 25.2 22.2 16.2 12.8 Clark...... 20.0 16.0 28.6 25.4 18.6 13.2 21.8 17.2 25.7 23.4 17.5 13.0 23.0 18.1 25.9 25.0 District 9: 20.3 19.2 28.8 27.2 24.2 17.6 Grant...... 22.5 18.9 32.8 25.4 23.6 22.9 15.3 20.5 18.2 27.4 26.3 20.5 13.5 Marshall 23.5 18.4 25.0 24.6 22.2 14.2 Roherts ...... 23.8 18.2 25.8 27.1 21.8 19.0 District 4: 28.9 27.8 24.3 26.5 19.9 21.7 14.6 30.2 26.1 22.4 25.0 19.5 21.0 13.7 19.7 14.2 OKLAHOMA 18.5 11.2 NEW MEXICO 20.4 12.0 22.7 14.5 District 1: District 1: District 5: 28.2 . 8.0 29.2 22.1 16.6 19.4 15.1 33.0 19.0 13.4 20.0 14.4 18.2 8.0 Ellis ______22.7 16.4 Rio Arriba______20.2 11.6 9.3 20.0 15.0 19.6 9.0 25.1 23.2 17.5 19.3 16.0 28.6 9.0 33.0 19.7 16.7 22.0 15.6 23.6 12.0 District 2: 18.7 16.2 9.0 Alfalfa 33.6 26.6 19.7 15.8 19.0 30.6 25.8 20.1 15.6 25.0 10.0 28.0 26.7 21.5 17.0 District 3: - 30.0 24.0 District 6: Colfax______28.2 16.1 12.1 30.7 23.3 18.4 Curry------39.4 20.1 16.0 21.5 30.0 30.8 25.8 18.9 22.2 16.4 District 4: District 7: 17.0 22.2 21.2 27.9 15.0 Harding*------30.8 16,4 13.0 27.8 23.6 17.9 16.4 25.4 10.0 31.6 25.6 21.8 19.5 12.4 Quay------30.8 16.6 13.6 27.8 24.7 19.9 23.8 12.6 Roosevelt______32.6 • 19.4 14.6 * 15.3 24.0 12.0 Rofmr Mills 21.4 18.8 26.6 12.3 33.0 25.2 21.7 District 8: Torrance______25.6 14.8 District 5: 24.4 16.3 Union______30.8 17.3 14.6 26.5 26.0 20.5 12.5 District 7: 28.2 28.0 20.2 13.4 29.4 12.0 14.4 32.2 12.0 25.3 22.9 22.9 District 7: Trwiri ___ 22.9 14.3 35.0 15.2 30.0 33.2 25.4 25.0 Tripp 23.5 20.3 19.5 District 9: 28.7 25.1 21.2 20.2 15.5 26.6 10.0 32.5 26.1 21.4 20.5 15.3 District 9: 19.9 36.2 30.4 27.0 20.2 20.0 34.2 29.9 26.1 22.9 35,4 27.8 22.3 30.0 10.0 33.4 27.2 22.0 TEXAS 18.0 29.7 10.0 District 1-N : Armstrong...____ 26.9 19.1 16.9 18.7 15.8 27.8 17.2 NORTH DAKOTA 26.9 20.9 Summer Contin­ Seeded 18.7 16.1 County Irrigated follow uous after 34.2 14.6 cropping legumes 23.8 16.9 31.9 18.3 16.2 District 1: 31.6 18.8 14.2 Burke._____ 18.0 12.0 22.0 20.4 14.8 11.2 District 1: 27.6 15.7 Divide_____ TTaln 32.8 18.0 Mountrail___ 16.8 12.2 Benton____ 41.9 30.4 36.9 17.7 15.1 Renville____ 19.0 13.0 Clackamas— 35.0 30.5 38.2 26.5 15.6 45.6 32.9 27.6 18.3 Ward-_____ 21.0 15.4 Columbia.— 25.9 18.0 16.1 Williams___ 36.0 '15.6 11.3 Lane...... 46.2 33.6 39.3 16.0 32.0 29.6 27.0 19.8 District 2: Linn______41.7 29.0 19.3 17.0 Benson------21.5 15.7 Marlon___ 46.8 36.2 42.0 18.2 Bottineau---- 19.9 13.8 Polk______43.6 37.4 43.8 29.0 -17.6 38.2 42.2 31.2 20.0 McHenry___ 19.0 12.1 Washington__ 43.0 29.3 16.2 14.0 Pierce______18.7 13.1 Yamhill___ 52.0 37.0 42.1 17.7 35.6 19.8 16.6 Rolette_____ 20.6 15.2 District 2: 28.8 18.4 District 3: Gilliam___ 39.0 30.1 16.0 24.3 29.0 17.9 18.9 Cavalier------24.6 19.4 Morrow___ 35.7 27.7 26.1 20.5 Grand Forks - 31.0 25.8 Sherman__ 34.4 24.7 14.4 35.1 34.2 23.1 28.4 16.7 16.3 Nelson_____ 26.9 19.1 Wasco------29.9 17.5 Pembina___ 28.3 25.0 District 3: Ramsey------23.1 16.0 Baker_____ 40.9 23.0 15.0 District 1-S: 14.3 32.7 16.4 14.8 Towner____ 24.3 18.4 Umatilla— 42.7 36.3 29.1 39.8 30.2 18.8 Walsh______26.8 24.7 Union____ 41.6 39.4 29.4 42.1 21.0 18.9 District 4: W alio wa__ 39.2 31.2 19.4 27.6 32.0 18.7 32.7 20.1 14.4 Dunn______18.5 15.0 District 7: 26.2 16.0 McKenzie.,.. 38.7 17.0 12.0 Jackson----- 38.6 31.1 42.5 District 2: 16.6 McLean___ _ 19.6 14.0 District 8: 25.0 19.5 Mercer_____ 19.3 14.6 Crook------55.8 22.1 21.2 19.7 17.1 36.4 25.0 21.5 25.0 Oliver______17.9 13.8 Deschutes.. -- - — District 5: Grant_____ 26.1 20.0 -- Eddy______23.5 16.5 Harney___ 15.4 21.9 14.1 Foster______25.0 20.1 Jefferson___ 52.6 27.5 16.0 Kidder_____ 20.5 13.4 Klamath__ 41.4 21.8 15.8 19.3 13.2 Lake______28.9 22.0 16.6 Sheridan___ District 1: 16.6 Stutsman___ 22.9 16.2 Malheur___ 52.6 22.8 18.8 48.7 16.6 Wells...... 23.4 17.2 Wheeler___ 37.0 27.8 23.7 Box Elder. Tuesday, May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6245

normal Yield o f W h e a t fo r S p e c ia l Chapter XIV— Commodity Credit Cor­ Signed at Washington, D.C., on May Cu l t u r a l P r a c t ic e s — Continued poration, Department of Agricul­ 7, 1964. H. D. G odfrey, u t a h — continued ture Executive Vice President, SUBCHAPTER B— LOANS, PURCHASES, AND Commodity Credit Corporation. County Irrigated Summer Continuous OTHER OPERATIONS fallow cropping [F.R. Doc. 64—4721; Filed, May 11, 1964; 8:48 a.m.] [C.C.C. Texas Flaxseed Bulletin, Arndt. 1] District 1—continued 49.0 20.3 20.7 PART 1421— GRAINS AND SIMILARLY 60.0 28.7 29.2 33.4 20.1 HANDLED COMMODITIES Title 43— PUBLIC LANDS: 61.6 14.8 13.8 36.6 13.0 12.8 Subpart— Provisions of 1961 and Sub­ 62.9 29.7 29.9 INTERIOR District 5: sequent Crop Texas Flaxseed Pur­ 29.8 14.4 13.6 Chapter II-—Bureau of Land Manage­ 33.8 13.8 13.6 chase Programs 35.7 16.4 11.8 ment, Department of the Interior 63.4 M iscellaneous A m endm ents Tit oh O 'iS fj 60.0 17.7 18.1 SUBCHAPTER C— MINERALS MANAGEMENT District 6: 36.2 The regulations issued by the Com­ [Circular 2140] 40.0 modity Credit Corporation published in 33.8 PART 3100— PUBLIC DOMAIN 21.9 14.4 13.6 26 F.R. 3979 and containing the specific 28.6 requirements of the 1961 and Subsequent LEASING UNDER 1920 ACT District 7: Crop Texas Flaxseed Purchase Programs 37.3 Definitions 40.1 22.6 21.1 are hereby amended as follows : 32.0 19.5 18.6 1. The first sentence of § 1421.627(a) A new § 192.43a (now § 3100.0-5( a ) ), and the last sentence of § 1421.627(b) added to Title 43 Code of Federal Regu­ lations, which was published in final form WASHINGTON are amended to read as follows: in the F ederal R egister of January 29, § 1421.627 Administration. 1964, at page 1437, is hereby amended as County Irrigated Summer Con­ Seeded (a) The Farmer Programs Division hereinafter set forth. follow tinuous after When the new proposed § 192.43a (now cropping peas will administer the provisions of the reg­ ulations in this subpart under the gen­ § 3100.0-5(a )) was published as a pro­ posed rule making on page 2283 of the District 2: eral supervision and direction of the 42.4 24.1 22.4 Deputy Administrator, State and County F ederal R egister of March 8, 1963, it Chelan___ _ 36.4 20.9 21.4 did not contain the parenthetical matter Kittitas___..Jj 46.2 26.8 27.5 20.0 Operations, in accordance with program Klickitat___ _ 42.4 29.0 23.0 18.1 provisions and policy determined by the included in the last sentence of that Okanogan___ _ 34.0 23.1 14.9 CCC Board and the Executive Vice Presi­ section nor the statement “pursuant to Yakima___ 48.3 30.4 20.0 any agreement or understanding exist­ District 3: dent, CCC. In the field the regulations Ferry___ i, 36.4 31.6 20.0 in this subpart will be administered by ing at the time when the lease is issued.” Pend Oreille... 22.4 20.7 In the circumstances, since no oppor­ 8pokane____ „■ 49.8 38.2 30.7 36.2 the Texas Agricultural Stabilization and Stevens 40.0 37.7 24.8 28.8 Conservation State committee and by tunity was afforded to interested persons District 5: designated Agricultural Stabilization and to comment thereon, it is hereby deleted Adams___ .. 60.8 30.7 25.4 and § 3100.0-5(a) which now reads as Douglas____ _ 41.3 24.8 22.0 22.0 Conservation county committees (here­ Franklin. 47.2 29.3 20.6 follows, is hereby approved: Grant..-____ 44.0 27.5 18.6 inafter called State and county commit­ Lincoln... T 49.4 36.4 32.2 20.4 § 3100.0—5 Definitions. District 9: tees), the ASCS commodity office, Asotin 30.7 30.5 Kansas City, Missouri, and the ASCS (a) Sole party in interest; statement Columbia____ 49.4 44.6 36.7 47.8 of interest. A sole party in interest in a Garfield___ 49.0 44.1 34.6 42.7 Data Processing Center. * * * Walla Walla__ 47.1 39.9 30.2 49.4 (b) • * * The State committee, lease or offer to lease is a party who is and Whitman... 44.4 42.6 37.0 40.4 county committees, county office mana­ will be vested with all legal and equitable rights under the lease. No one is, or gers, the commodity office and the Data WYOMING shall be deemed to be, a sole party in Processing Center do not have authority interest with respect to a lease in which to modify or waive any of the provisions any other party has any of the interests County Irrigated Sum m er Continuous of this subpart, as amended, or supple­ fallow cropping described in this section. The require­ mented. ment of disclosure in an offer to lease of an offeror's or other parties' interest in District 1: 2. Section 1421.630(c) is amended to Big Horn. __ a lease, if issued, is predicated on the de­ 36.8 change the grade requirements of flax­ Fremont 37.1 partmental policy that all offerors and Hot Springs 36.6 seed eligible for purchase so that the Park 39.8 other parties having an interest in Washakie... 37.9 amended paragraph reads as follows: District 2: simultaneously filed offers to lease shall have an equal opportunity for success Campbell 16.6 10.3 § 1421.630 Eligible flaxseed. Crook 27.3 20.2 12.9 in the drawings to determine priorities. Johnson 27.3 16.0 11.3 * . * * * * Additionally, such disclosures provide Sheridan 31.9 20.8 14.6 Weston 19.4 11.8 (c) The flaxseed may be of any grade, the means for maintaining adequate rec­ District 3: ords of acreage holdings of all such Lincoln. 27.0 18.6 12.4 but must be merchantable for crush­ Teton parties where such interests constitute 37.0 ing into oil and feed as determined by _ Uinta.. 23.2 chargeable acreage holdings. An “inter­ District 4: CCC and must not contain mercurial Albanv 14.7 est” in the lease includes, but is not Carbon. . 26.4 12.2 compounds or other substances poison­ limited to, record title interests, over­ Natrona 22.7 ous to man or animals. ^Sweetwater 23.8 riding royalty interests, working inter­ district 5: ***** ests, operating rights or options, or any Converse 23.1 Goshen 17.9 11.6 agreements covering such “interests.” Laramie 27.6 23.6 13.2 (Sec. 4, 62 Stat. 1070, as amended, sec. 5, 62 30.3 25.5 15.8 Any claim or any prospective or future Niobrara 24.7 Stat. 1072, secs. 301, 401, 63 Stat. 1053, 1054, Platte. 18.8 11.6 claim to an advantage or benefit from a 28.8 24.2 as amended; 15 U.S.C. 714 t> and c, 7 U.S.C. 11.6 lease, and any participation or any de­ •------1447, 1421) fined or undefined share in any incre­ [Pä . Doc. 64-4618; Filed. May 11, 1964; Effective date: Upon publication in the ments, issues, or profits which may be 8:45 a.m] F ederal R egister. derived from or which may accrue in any 6246 RULES AND REGULATIONS manner from the lease based upon or F ederal R egister (29 F.R. 1694) stating making through submission of com­ pursuant to any agreement or under­ that the Federal Aviation Agency was ments. All comments received were standing existing at the time when the considering amendments to Part 71 favorable. offer is filed, is deemed to constitute an [New] of the Federal Aviation Regula­ In consideration of the foregoing, the “interest” in such lease. tions which would revoke segments of following action is taken: ♦ * * * * VOR Federal airways Nos. 12 south alter­ Section 71.123 (29 F R . 1009) is The amendment is effective upon pub­ nate, 14 north alternate, 97 east and west amended as follows: In V-154 all after lication in the F ederal R egister. alternates, 171 west alternate and 227, “to Savannah, Ga.” is deleted. and alter the Indianapolis, Ind., con­ S tewart L. U dall, trol area extension. This amendment shall become effec­ tive 0001 e.s.t., July 23,1964. Secretary of the Interior. Interested persons were afforded an M ay 6,1964. opportunity to participate in the rule (Sec. 307(a), 72 Stat. 749; 49 U.S.C. 1348) [F.R. Doc. 64-4701; Filed, May 11, 1964; making through submission of comments. Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 4 8:46 ajn.] All comments received were favorable. 1964. In consideration of the foregoing, the D aniel E. B arrow, following actions are taken: Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations 1. Section 71.123 (29 F.R. 1009, 2336, and Procedures Division. Title 14-AERONAUTICS AND 2692, 3225, 3226) is amended as follows: a. In V-12 “Shelbyville, Ind., including [F.R. Doc. 64-4698; Filed, May 11, 1964; 8:45 a.m.] SPACE an S alternate via IN T of Lewis 087° and Shelbyville 235° radials;” is deleted and Chapter I— Federal Aviation Agency “Shelbyville, Ind.;” is substituted there­ [Airspace Docket No. 63-SW-108] SUBCHAPTER E— AIRSPACE [NEW1 for. pa r t 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL b. In V-14 “Indianapolis, Ind., includ­ [Airspace Docket No. 64-WA-27] ing an N and an S alternate” is deleted AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL and “Indianapolis, Ind., including an S AND REPORTING POINTS [NEW] AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, alternate” is substituted therefor. Designation and Alteration of Federal c. In V-97 “Shelbyville, Ind., including AND REPORTING POINTS [NEW] an E alternate via IN T of Cincinnati 321° Airways Alteration of Control Areas and Shelbyville 110° radials, and also On February 11, 1964, a notice of pro­ The purpose of these amendments to a W alternate via IN T of Cincinnati 290° posed rule making was published in the Part 71 [New! of the Federal Aviation and Shelbyville 172° radials;” is deleted F ederal R egister (29 F.R. 2350) and Regulations is to alter the descriptions and “Shelbyville, Ind.;” is substituted stated that the Federal Aviation Agency of Control 1418, Control 1419 and Con­ therefor. was considering amendments to Part 71 trol 1420. These control areas are d. In V-171 “Danville, 111., including [New] of the Federal Aviation Regula­ bounded in part by the Seattle Oceanic a W alternate;” is deleted and “Dan­ tions which would designate VOR Fed­ Control Area. The Seattle Oceanic ville, 111.;” is substituted therefor. eral airway No. 212 from San Antonio, Control Area has been consolidated with, e. In V-227 “From IN T of Louisville, Tex.; to McComb, Miss., and alter VOR and renamed, the Oakland Oceanic Con­ Ky., 310° and Indianapolis, Ind., 185° Federal airway No. 222 from San Antonio trol Area. Accordingly, action is taken radials via Indianapolis;” is deleted to Round Top Intersection. herein to reflect this change of name in and “From Indianapolis, Ind., via” is Interested persons were afforded an the descriptions of Control 1418, Control substituted therefor. opportunity to participate in the rule making through submission of comments. 1419 and Control 1420. 2. Section 71.165 (29 F.R. 1073) is amended as follows: In the Indianapolis, All comments received were favorable. Since these changes are editorial in In consideration of the foregoing, the nature and will impose no additional Ind., control area extension “V-14” is burden on any person, notice and public substituted for “V-14N” wherever it following actions are taken: procedure hereon are unnecessary, and appears. Section 71.123 (29 F.R. 1009) is amended as follows: they may be made effective immediately. These amendments shall become effec­ 1. V-212 is added as follows: V-212 In consideration of the foregoing, ef­ tive 0001, e.s.t., July 23,1964. From San Antonio, Tex., via INT of San fective, immediately, the following ac­ (Sec. 307(a), 72 Stat. 749; 49 U.S.O. 1348) Antonio 074° and College Station, Tex., tions are taken: 202° radials (Round Top IN T ); College Section 71.163 (29 FJl. 1068) is Issued in Washington, D.C., on May Station (increasing in width in graduated amended as follows: In Control 1418, 4,1964. steps of 1 mile for every 5 nmi from 45 Control 1419 and Control 1420 “Seattle D an iel E. B arrow, nmi from San Antonio to 80 nmi from Oceanic Control Area” is deleted wher­ Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations San Antonio, thence 18 miles wide to ever it appears and “Oakland Oceanic and Procedures Division. Round Top I N T ); Lufkin, Tex.; Alex­ Control Area” is substituted therefor. [F.R. Doc. 64-4697; Filed, May 11, 1964; 8:45 ajn.] andria, La.; to McComb, Miss. (Secs. 307(a) and 1110, 72 Stat. 749 and 800; 2. In V—222 “IN T of Austin, Tex., 109° 49 TJ.S.C. 1348 and 1510, and Executive Order and College Station, Tex., 202° radials; 10854, 24 F.R. 9565) [Airspace Docket No. 63-SO-86] Houston, Tex.;” is deleted and “INT of Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 4, Austin, Tex., 109° and College Station, 1964. PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL Tex., 202° radials (Round Top INT); D aniel E. B arrow, AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, Houston, Tex. (increasing in width in Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations AND REPORTING POINTS [NEW] graduated steps of 1 mile for every 5 nmi and Procedures Division. from 45 nmi from San Antonio to 80 nmi Revocation of Federal Airway [F.R. Doc. 64-4696; Filed, May 11, 1964; from San Antonio, thence 18 miles wide 8:45 ajn.] Segment to Round Top I N T );” i s substituted On February 15, 1964, a notice of therefor. [Airspace Docket No. 63-CE-133] proposed rule making was published in These amendments shall become effec­ PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL the F ederal R egister (29 FJl. 2508) tive 0001, e.s.t., July 23,1964. stating that the Federal Aviation Agency (Sec. 307(a), 72 Stat. 749; 40 UA.O. 1348) AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, was considering an amendment to Part AND REPORTING POINTS [NEW] 71 [New] of the Federal Aviation Regu­ Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 4, Revocation of Federal Airway Seg­ lations which would revoke the north 1964. D aniel E. B arrow, ments and Alteration of Control alternate segment of VOR Federal air­ way No. 154 from Lotts Intersection, Ga., Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations Area Extension to Savannah, Ga. and Procedures Division. On February 4, 1964, a notice of pro­ Interested persons were afforded an [F.R. Doc. 64-4699; Filed, May H. posed rule making was published in the opportunity to participate in the rule 8:45 a.m.] Tuesday, May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6247

SUBCHAPTER F— AIR TRAFFIC AND GENERAL OPERATING RULES [NEW] [Beg. Doeket No. 4095; Arndt. 372] PART 97— STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES [NEW] Miscellaneous Amendments The amendments to the standard instrument approach procedures contained herein are adopted to become effective when indicated in order to promote safety. The amended pro cedures supersede the existing procedures of the same classifi­ cation now in effect for the airports specified therein. For the convenience of the users, the complete procedure is republished in this amendment indicating the changes to the existing procedures. As a situation exists which demands immediate action in the interests of safety in air commerce, I find that compliance with the notice and-procedure provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act is impracticable and that good cause exists for m a k in g this amendment effective within less than 30 days from publication. In view of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (24 F.R. 5662), Part 97 [New] (14 CFR Part 97 [N ew ]) is amended as follows: -/ 1. By amending the following low or medium frequency range procedures prescribed in § 97.11(a) to read:

liF R Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure

Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet M S L . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type fc conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized b y the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minim um altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and 2-engine, From — T o — altitude Condition distance more than (feet) 66 knots M ore than 66 knots or less 66 knots

OME VOR ...... OF, L F R ______D irect______2300 T -d n 300-1 300-1 200-54 O -d n ...... 500-1 600-1 500-1)4 S-dn-27*______400-1 400-1 400-1 A - d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn S side È crs, 069° O utbn d, 249° In bn d, 2100' w ithin 10 miles. N onstandard. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1100'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 264°— 3.0 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.0 miles after passing O E LF R , turn left, climb to cross OE L F R at or above 1000', continue clim b to 2100' on E crs of O E L F R . Caution: *Straight-in minimums not authorized unless approach lights are in operation. High terrain all quadrants N . City, Nome; State, Alaska; Airport Name, Nome (F A A ); Elev., 37'; Fac. Class., SBR AZ; Ident., OE; Procedure No. I, Arndt. 6; Eff. Date, 16 M ay 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 6; Dated, 14 Dee. 63 2. By amending the following automatic direction finding procedures prescribed in § 97.H(b) to read: AD F Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure

Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes áre in feet M S L. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, Dín Í an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches snail be made over specified routes. M in im u m altitudes shall correspond w ith those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility m inim um s S i

2-engine or less M inim um M ore than Course and From — T o - altitude Condition 2-engine, distance more than (feet) 66 knots M ore than or less 65 knots 66 knots

§ | g | | I T -d n * 300-1 300-1 200-54 C -d n * ______700-154 700-2 700-2 S -d n ...... NA NA NA A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure# turn W side of S crs, 141° O u tb d , 321° In bn d , W00' within 10 miles. Nonstandard due to terrain, wmimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 800'. ursana distance, facility to airport, 123°— 1.4 miles. nn iseoT , C0Iitact nQt established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 miles of A N N L F R , turn left, climb to 4200' “H1®? bearing from A N N L F R w ithin 20 mfies. : Terrain1000' within 1.9 miles N through E. Davison Mountain 2882', 2.9 miles E. Tamgas Mountain 3691', 6.1 miles E N E of airport* below 3900' not authorized until 3 miles beyond A N N L F R on 141° bearing. takeoffy 2-20: ^ igb t operation not authorized. R u n w a y 2: T d restricted to 600-1 due to high terrain N through E ; 1006' w ithin 2 miles. M a k e Immediate left turn

City, Annette Island; State, Alaska; Airport Name, Annette Island; Elev., 119'; Fac. Class., SBR AZ; Ident., A N N ; Procedure No. 2, Arndt. 2; Eff. Date, 16 M ay 64; Sup. Arndt. N o . 1; D ated, 2 Sept. 61 '

No. 93- 6248 RULES AND REGULATIONS

A D F Standard I nstrument Approach Procedure— C o n tin u e d

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimum«

2-engine or less M in im u m More than Course and From — T o — altitude Condition ^engine, distance (feet) 65 knots M ore, than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

ATT, v o n T.OM 2400 T-dn 300-1 300-1 200-)* m t »tt v o n ______. LOM (final)...... 2300 C-dn ____ 400-1 500-1 500-1U LOM ___ . ______2700 S-dn-33...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 LOM ...... 3000 800-2 800-2 800-2 LOM ...... D ire c t.. ______3000

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Prooedure turn E side of crs, 149° Outbnd, 329® Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles. M inimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2300'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 329®—4.8 miles. If visual oontact not established upon descent to authorized landing mlnlmums or if landing not accomplished within 4.6 miles after passing A Z L O M , turn right, climb to 2500' and proceed to R E G V O R via R E G R-269. C aution: Tank 1185'; Ji-mile W of airport. City, Atlanta; State, Ga.; Airport Name, Atlanta; Elev., 1024'; Fac. Class., L O M ; Ident., AZ; Prooedure No. 2, Arndt. 5; Eft. Date, 16 M ay 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 4; Dated 24 A u g . 63

B P T V ^ R _____ l o m ...... - ...... 1400 T -d n ______300-1 300-1 200-)* Mitchell Int ...... - ...... LOM (final)...... 1000 C -d n ...... 400-1 600-1 600-1)* S -d n -ll ______400-1 400-1 400-1 A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn S side N W crs, 293° O u tbn d , 113° In b n d , 1500' w ithin 10 miles. B eyon d 10 miles not authorized. Minimum altitude over L O M on final approach crs, 1400'. Crs and distance, L O M to airport, 113®— 4.8 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing hot accomplished within 4.8 miles after passing L O M , climb to 1500' on crs of 113® w ith in 20 miles. City. Beaumont; State, Tex.; Airport Name, Jefferson County; Elev., 16'; Fac. Class., LO M ; Ident., B P; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 5; Eft. Date, 16 M ay 64; Sup. Amdt. N o . 4; D ated, 18 N o v . 61

■pY A V ftB . H Y L O M ...... D irect______1500 T -d n * ______300-1 300-1 200-H C -d n ...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)* S-dn-24...... 600-1 600-1 500-1 A -d n .______800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar vectoring from Otis R A P C O N authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure tu rn S side of crs, 066° O u tbn d , 246° In b n d , 1500' w ith in 10 miles. M in im u m altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1200'.

^visual crat^^note^abiisheiupon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.8 miles after passing H Y L O M , make a left climbing turn to 1500' and return to H Y LO M . J^fid N E of H Y LO M , 246° Inbnd, 1-minute, left turns. ♦Takeoff minimum« of 300-1 required for R u n w a y 24. M S A : 000®-360°— 1700'. - City Hyannis; State. Mass.; Airport Name, Barnstable Muncipal; Elev., 52'; Fac. Class., L O M ; Ident., H Y ; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 1; Eft. Date, 16 M ay 64; Sup. Amdt. v No. Orig.; Dated, 25 Jan. 64

300-1 200-M Nashville Int*. T .O M ...... _ Direct . _ _ 2900 T -d n ______300-1 500-1 500-1K EOS VOR.... L O M ______3000 C -d ______400-1 C -n ______400-1)* 500-1)* 600-1H S-dn-13______400-1 400-1 400-1 A -d n . ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn N side of crs, 310° O utbnd, 130° In bn d , 2500' w ithin 10 miles. * M in im u m altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2100'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 130®—3.8 miles. .... « • T m ur clim b to 280*0' on 130° If visual oontact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.8 miles after passing LO M , crs, proceed to Granby Int or, when directed by A TO , make left turn, climbing to 2500', and proceed to L O M . N o te: Approach from holding pattern not authorized. Procedure turn required. Caution: 2049' tower, 11 miles W N W of airport. ♦Nashville Int: Int EOS VO R R-S51 and C N U V O R R-001. M S A : 000°-090°— 2400'; 090®-180°— 2700'; 180®-270°— 3000'; 270®-360°— 3000'. 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 8; City Joplin; State, Mo.; Airport Name, Joplin Municipal; Elev., 980'; Fac. Class., LO M ; Ident., JL; Procedure No. 1, Amdt. 9; Eft. Date, 16 M ay ' ^ D ated, 9 N o v . 63

NA T -d n ______300-1 300-1 Argyle Int*.. D ire c t.. _ 2300 NA C -d n ...... 600-1 600-1 Galland Int* TCOTC R B n 2300 NA A -d n ...... NA NA

Procedure turn W side of crs, 305° O utbnd, 125° In bn d , 2300* w ithin 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1200'.

^visu al contact*not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile of E O K RBn, climb to 2300' on crs of 1 Within 10 miles and return to E O K RBn. Other change: Deletes transitions from Alexandria Int and M oCall Int. ♦Argyle Int: Int O TM VOR R-125 and B LR VOR R-240. ♦♦Galland Int: Int 360® bearing from EOK RBn and BRL VOR R-240. ,- ' Amdt City, Keokuk; State, Iowa; Airport Name, Keokuk Municipal; Elev., 671'; Fac. Class., M H W ; Ident., EO K ; Prooedure No. 1, Amdt. 2; Eft. Date, 16 M ay 64, P N o . 1; D ated, 9 N o v . 63 Tuesday, May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6249

3. By amending the following very high frequency omnirange (VO R ) procedures prescribed in § 97.11(c) to read:

V O R Standard I nstkumbnt Approach P rocedure

Bearings headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations mid altitudes are In feet MSL>. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, nnless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized b y the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. M inimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less M inim um M ore than Course and 2-engine, From — T o — altitude Condition distance more than (feet) 65 knots M ore than 65 knots or less 65 knots

A R O V O R ...... D irect______5000 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 300-1 A R O V O R ...... D irect______5000 G -d n ______500-1 600-1 500-13^ A -d n NANA NA

Procedure turn E side of crs* 183° O utbnd, 003° In b n d , 5100' w ithin 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility cm final approach crs, 4700'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 003°— 3.2 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing m inim um s or if landing not accom plished w ith in 3.2 miles after passing A R O V O R , turn left, clim b to 6000' on R-241 A M A V O R w ith in 20 miles. Caution: Towers 3929' and 3994' 2,1 miles N E of airport. Silver painted water tower approximately 3800,2 miles N W . N otes: Radar vectoring authorized. N o weather service at airport. Air carrier use not authorized. M S A : 000°-360°— 6400'. City, Amarillo; State, Tex.; Airport Name, Tradewind; Elev., 3642'; Fac. Class., V O R W ; Ident., AR O ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 2; Eff. Date, 16 M ay 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 19 M ay 62

T -d n ______300-1 300-1 200-)4 C -d n ______400-1 600-1 600-1)4 A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn S side of crs, 236° O utbn d, 056° In bn d , 1500' w ith in 10 miles. B eyon d 10 miles not authorized. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 056°— 4.6 miles. I f visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.6 miles after passing B P T V O R , climb to 1500' on B-067 within 20 miles or,, when directed b y A T C , clim b to '1500' on R-050 w ithin 20 miles. City, Beaumont; State, Tex.; Airport N am e, Jefferson C oun ty; Elev., 16'; Fac. Class.. B V O R ; Ident., B P T ; Procedure N o . 1, Arndt. 6; E ff. D ate, 16 M a y 64; Sup. Arndt. N o . 5; Dated, 18 Nov. 61

T -d n * 300-1 300-1 200-H C -d n ______500-1 500-1 600-1)4 S-dn-24______500-1 500-1 600-1 A - d n ______800-2 ■ 800-2 800-2

Transitions to final approach course b y Otis R A P C O N radar authoilzed in accordance w ith approved patterns. ¿Procedure turn S side of crs, 062° O utbn d, 242° In bn d , 1500' w ithin 10 miles. N o t authorized beyond 10 miles. N onstandard. M inimum altitude over fatality on final approach crs, 1000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 242°— 3.2 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.2 miles after passing H Y A V O R , make left climbing turn to 1500' returning to the H Y A VOR. Hold N E of H Y A VO R on R-062,1-minute, left turns, 242° Inbnd. jFinal approach from holding pattern at H Y A V O R not authorized, procedure turn required. ‘ Takeoff minumums of 300-1 required for R u n w a y 24. M S A : 000°-360°— 1700'. City, Hyannis; State Mass.; Airport Name, Barnstable Municipal; Elev., 62'; Fac. Class., V O R ; Ident., H Y A ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 2; Eff. Date, 16 M ay 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 26 Aug. 61

T - d n ______500-2 N A - NA O -d n ______800-2 NANA A -d n ______800-2 N A NA

Procedure turn W side crs, 320° O utbn d, 140° In b n d , 3600' w ith in 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3300'. crs and distance, facility to airport, 140°-5.7 miles. tj , H ™ contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 6.7 miles after passing JC T V O R , climb to 3700' on K-140 within 20 miles.

City, Junction; State, Tex.; Airport Name, Kimble County; Elev., 1729'; Fac. Class., B VO R ; Ident., JCT; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 4; Eff. Date, i6 M ay 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 15 Sept. 62 6250 RULES AND REGULATIONS

4. By amending the following terminal very high frequency omnirange (TerVOR) procedures prescribed in § 97.13 to read:

T erminal V O R Standard I nstrument Approach Procedure

Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet M S L . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agenoy. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. M inimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimum«

2-engine or less M inim um More than Course and T o — altitude Condition 2-engine, From — distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots t .s r - v o r Midway Tnt ...... _ ... Direct . .. 2400 T ^ . . . . . ______*400-1 *400-1 #400-1 O N A V O R D irect______2800 T - ^ _ ...... *400-114 *400-114 Î400-1H ODT VOR . Midway Tnt D irect. 2400 O -d ...... 600-1 600-1 600-114 Midway Tnt (final). _ _ __ .... Direct...... 2100 O -n ...... 600-2' 600-2 600-2 S-dn-13______400-1 400-1 400-1 A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn W side of crs, 318 O utbn d, 138° In bn d , 2400' w ith in 10 miles of M id w a y Int. Minimum altitude over M idway Int on final approach crs, 2100'. Facility on airport. Crs and distance, M idway Int to V O R , 138°—5.1 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile after passing LSE V O R , make immediate right climbing turn, climb to 2400' on LSE V O R R-318 within 10 miles. N ote: Procedure authorized only for aircraft equipped with dual emni receivers operating simultaneously. M S A : 000®-360°— 2800'. *300-1 authorized on R u n w ay s 31 mid 36. #200-14 authorized on R u n w ays 31 and 86. ¿When weather is below 800-2 aircraft departing Runways 3,13,18 and 21, flight below 1900' beyond 2 miles of airport is prohibited between radials 040° and 270°, inclusive of the LSE VOR. City, La Crosse: State, Wis.; Airport Name, La Crosse Municipal; Elev., 653'; Fac. Class., L -B V O R ; Ident., LSE; Procedure No. TerV O R -13, Arndt. 4; Eft. Date, 16 May 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 11 Apr. 64

L S E R B n _ . T.SR VOR 2900 - . *400-1 *400-1 #400-1 ODI-VOR- L S E V O R . 2900 T -m t______•400-114 *400-114 #400-114 W e stb y Int. L S E V O R . 2000 C - d ______600-1' " 600-1 600-1)4 O -n ______600-2 600-2 600-2 S-dn-36______600-1 500-1 500-1 A - d n ______... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn E side of crs, 181° Outbnd, 001° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles of Ronnie Int.** Minim um altitude over Ronnie hit** on final approach crs, 2600'. ■ :-s F acility on airport. Crs and distance, Ronnie Int** to VO R , 001°-6.4 miles. . . . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized lauding minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile after passing LSE VO R , make left cum Ding turn, climb to 2400' on L S E R-318 within 10 miles. N ote: Prooedure authorized only for aircraft with dual omni receivers operating simultaneously. M S A : 000°-360°— 2800'. _ , *300-1 authorized on R u n w ay s 31 and 36. #200-14 authorized on R u n w ay s 31 and 36. **Ronnie Int: Int ODI VOR R-131 and LSE VOR R-18L - . V;.. ¿When weather is less than 800-2 aircraft departing Runways 3,13,18 and 21, flight below 1900' beyond 2 miles of airport is prohibited between radials 040° and 270 inclusive Of the L S E V O R . x City, La Crosse; State, Wis,; Airport Name, La Crosse Municipal; Elev., 653'; Fac. Class., L -B V O R ; Meat., LSE; Procedure No. TerVOR-36, Arndt. 7; Eft. Date, 16 May 64; Sup. Arndt. N o . 6; D ated, 11 A p r. 64

T -d n ______300-1 300-1 200-H O -d n . ______500-1 500-1 500-1H S-dn-36______500-1 500-1 500-1 A -d n * ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn E side of crs, 174° O utbn d, 354° In b n d , 2100' w ithin 10 miles. M inim um altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1300'. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized lauding minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile, climb to 2400' on R-307 OSH-VOR within 15 miles. C a u t io n : Runway lights on E/W, N/S runways only. ' Air Carrier N ote: Alternate minimums authorized 24 hours daily for air carriers with weather reporting service at the airport. •Alternate minimums not authorized when control tower not in operation. M S A : 000°-360°— 2700'. City, Oshkosh; State, Wis.; Airport Name, Winnebago County; Elev., 795'; Fac. Class., BVO R ; Ident., OSH; Procedure No. TerVOR-36, Arndt. 2; Eft. Date, 16 May 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 27 July 63

n n a v o R 300-1 300-1 200-H Potom ac In t______2000 700-lH Herndon VOR;____ TiflA VOR _ _ _ 2000 O -d n 15,18, 21,3. 700-1 700-1 500-1 600-1)4 Andrews L F R . ___ DO A VOR 1600 C-dn-33##...... 500-1 500-1 800-1H Nottingham VOR. TiflA VOR 1600 S-dn-36______500-1 809-2 A -d n -_____ 800-2 800-2

Radar transitions and vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Prooedure turn W side of ers, 186° Outbnd, 006° Inbnd, 1500' within 10 miles of Washington RBn. Nonstandard due to traffic. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 500'. Maintain 1400' until passing Alexandria Int.#* Crs and distance, breakoff point to approach end of Runway 36, 003*—0.5 mile; Alexandria Int# to approach end of Runway 36, 003®— 4.6 mues. . __ __ _ Drac. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0.0 mile, make a left climbing turn as sou v tical, climb to 2000' on R-320 D C A VO R, and proceed to Potomac Int. Hold N W on D C A V O R R-320,1-minute, right turns. C a u t io n : Washington Monument 596', 1.6 miles N of airport; 193' stack, 1.3 miles S W of airport; 316' stack, 1.5 miles E of airport. •Descend to landing minimums after passing Alexandria Int#. #Alexandria Int: Int 270® bearing from D C SA B H and R-186 D C A VOR. ##Circling to Runway 33 not authorized beyond the D C A V O R R-157. M S A : 000®-090°— 1800'; 090®-270®— 1600'; 2r0®-360°— 2000'. City, Washington, D.C.; Airport Name, National; Elev., 15'; Fac. Class., B V O R ; Ident., D C A ; Prooedure No. TerVOR-36, Arndt. 8; Eff. Date, 16 M ay 64; Sup. Amdt. 7: D ated, 22 June 63 Tuesday, May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6251

5. By amending the following very high frequency omnir ange-distance measuring equipment (VO R-DM E) procedures orescribed in § 97.15 to read: ^ VOR-DME S t a n d a r d I n s t r u m e n t A p p r o a c h P r o c ed u r e Bearings headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet M SI». Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shaUbe made over specified routes. Minim um altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less M ore than M inim um Course and 2-engine, T o — altitude Condition From — distance more than (feet) 65 knots M ore than 65 knots or less 65 knots

O M A V O R ...... D irect.. A ______2900 T -d n # ...... *300-1 *300-1 **200-H D irect______2500 O -d ______700-1 700-1 700-1)6 D irect______1900 C - n ...... 700-1)6 700-1)6 700-1)6 A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2

, Radar vectoring to final approach rare authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn E side of crs, 129° O utbn d, 309° In b n d , 2900' w ithin 10 miles. Minim um attitude over-facility on final approach crs, 2900'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 309°— 10.2 miles. If visual eontact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished at 10.2-mile D M E fix R-309, climb to 2900' on O M A V O R R-309, turn right and return to O M A V O R or, when directed by A T O , make right turn climbing to 2900', proceed to Neola VO R . Notes: 1. Aircraft executing missed approach may be radar controlled after radar identification. 2. When authorized by ATO , D M E may be used via 10-mile D M E arc at 2900' altitude between O M A V O R R-071 clockwise to R-130 to position aircraft for a straight-in approach with the elimination of the procedure turn. Air Carrier N otes: *No reduction in 2-engine-or-less aircraft takeoff minimums authorized except on Runways 14L, 32R, 17L and 35R. **300-1 takeoff minimums required for more-than-2-engine aircraft except on Runways 14L, 32R, 171» and 35R. ' Caution: B lu ff 1339', 1.3 miles E . Tow ers 1739', 4 miles W N W , and 1746', 3 miles S W o f airport. — iUnless radar vectored after takeoff, climb to 2200' before proceeding in a westerly direction. M S A : 000°-360°— 2700'. City, Omaha: State, Nebr.; Airport Name, Eppley Airfield: Elev., 982'; Fac. Class., B V O R TAO ; Ident., O M A; Procedure No. VO R/DM E No. 1, Arndt. Orig.; Efl. Date« 16 M a y 64

2500 T - d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-)6 C -d n ...... 400-1 500-1 500-1)6 S-dn-12______400-1 400-1 400-1 A - d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn S side of crs, 294° O utbnd, 114° In bn d , 2500' w ithin 10 miles. M inimum altitude over 3.0-mile D M E fix R-114 on final approach crs, 1200'. Crs and distance, 8.0-mile D M E fix R-114 to airport, 114*— 3.0 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished at 6.0-mile D M E fix R-114, make left turn, climb to 2500' and proceed to R F D V O R or, when directed by A T C , make right turn, climb to 2100' and proceed to R F L O M . Note: When authorized by A T C , R F D D M E may be used to position aircraft for straight-in.approach at 2500' between R-234 clockwise to R-012 via 6-mile D M E arc with the elimination of procedure turn. City, Rockford; State; El.; Airport Name, Greater Rockford; Elev., 735'; Fac. Class., B V O R T A O ; Ident., R F D ; Procedure No, VO R /D M E No. 1, Arndt. 1; Eff. Date, 16 M ay > ‘ 64; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 8 Feb. 64 6. By amending the following instrument landing system procedures prescribed in § 97.17 to read:

ILS St a n d a r d I n s t r u m e n t A p p r o a c h P r o c e d u r e Bearings, headings, courses and radiate are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet M SB. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities w hich are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. M inimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less M ore than M inim um Course and 2-engine, From — T o - altitude- Condition distance more than (feet) 65 knots M ore than 65 knots or less. 65 knots

ATL VOR...... 1 .5 M - 2400 , 300-1 300-1 200-)6 MDU-VOR’ TAM (final) 2300 O -d n ...... 400-1 r 500-1 600-1)6 Stone Mt. Int ! T .O M . ' ______2700 S-dn-33*______200-)6 200-)6 Tucker Int . T .O M ______. 3000 A - d n ...... 600-2 600-2 600-2 Harrison Int.. T .O M ...... 3000 -_____M

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn E side S E crs, 149° O utbnd, 329° In b n d , 2400' w ith in 10 miles. > ^.JBimum altitude at glide slope interception In bn d , 2300'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at O M , 2257'— 4.6 miles; at M M , 1173'—0.5 mile, pvri i/suai contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, turn right, climb to 2500', and proceed to R E G V O R via r a u R-269"or, when directed b y A T C , clim b to 4000' and proceed to M argaret In t v ia F T Y V O R . 1185' tank %-mile W of airport. 400-% required when glide slope not utilized. °lty, Atlanta; State, Ga.; Airport Name, Atlanta; E lev- 1024'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-A Z A ; Procedure No. ILS-33, Arndt. 5; Efl. Date, 16 M ay 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 4; D ated, 24 A u g . 63

Beaumont VOR T.OM 1400 T -d n ______300-1 300-1 2OO-14 Marsh Int___ T.OM 1400 C -d n ______400-1 500-1 500-1M Mitchell Int. " T.OM ffinalT 1400 8 -d n -ll# ______200-J4 200-H 200-H A -d n ______600-2 600-2 600-a

f f S “ 18 to m 8 side N W crs, 293° O utbnd, 113° In bn d , 1500' w ithin 10 miles. »HlWSim altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd,1400'. IfÌriSì y slope and distance to approach end of runway at O M , 1323'—4.8 miles: at M M , 202'—0.6 mile, bv ì t o T c°ntact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 1500' on SE crs IL S within 20 miles or, when directed M i S , ; ufn W * . clim b to 1500' on R -«67 B P T - V O R . required when glide slope not utilized. ®ty, Beaumont; State, Tex.; Airport Name, Jefferson County; Elev., 16'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident, I-B P T ; Procedure No. ILS-11, Arndt. 7; Eff. Date, 16 M ay 64; Sup, Amdt. N o . 6; D ated, 25 Jan. 64 6252 RULES AND REGULATIONS

ILS Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less M in im u m M ore than Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, From— To— distance (feet) 65 knots M o re than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots

Marsh Int.. Groves Int* (final) Direct. 1000 T - d n . „ . 300-1 300-1 200- BPT-VOR. Groves In t*— . ____ Direct. 1400 C -d h —; 400-1 500-1 600-1U I L S L O M . Groves Int*______D irect 1400 S-dn-29 400-1 400-1 400-1 A - d n ... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn E side SE ers ILS, 113° Outbnd, 293° Inbnd, 1500' within 10 miles of Groves Int.* N o glide slope. Minimum altitude over Groves Int* on final approach crs, 1000'. C rs and distance, Groves In t* to R u n w a y 29, 293°— 3.7 miles. I f visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing m inim um s or if landing not accomplished w ithin 3.7 miles after passing Groves In t*, climb to 1600' on N W crs B P T -IL S within 20 miles or, when directed by ATO , turn left and climb to 1600' on R-247 B P T -V O R within 20 miles. •Groves Int: lut SE crs ILS and R-083 BPT-V O R . City, Beaumont: State, Tex.: Airport Name, Jefferson County; Elev., 16'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-B P T ; Procedure No. ILS-29 (back course), Arndt. 4; Eff. Date, 16 May 64; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 12 M ay 62

Boston V O R ... B f l T .O M 2000 T -d n % ¿ _ ...... 300-1 300-1 200-% M illis I n t ______ILS SW crs (final) — 2000 C -d n # ...... 600-1 600-1 600-1% W h itm a n V O R ILS SW crs (final)------346°— 8.8 m iles____ 2000 8 -d n -4 R *# # ...... 200-% 200-% 200-% A - d n ______600-2 600-2 600-2

Radar vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn E side of crs, 215 O utbn d, 035 in b n d , 2000' w ithin 10 miles. M in im u m altitude at glide slope int In bn d , 1900'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to displaced threshold of runway at O M , 1821'—5.3 miles; at M M , 270 — 0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.3 miles after passing B O L O M , climb to 2000' on R-029 BOS VOR to Ipswich Int, hold NE, 209° Inbnd, right turns, 1-minute. - Caution: 370' stack, 1.2 miles W , 505' building, 1.7 miles W , 772' B uilding, 3.1 miles W , 1349' antennas, 10 miles W of airport. N otes: ILS touchdown point approximately 3500' in from approach end of runway to allow clearance over ship channel. Nonstandard approach light system serving Runway 4R. Displaced threshold lights 2523' from end of Runway 4R. Other change: Deletes transition from Franklin Int. It , „ „ , „ , . , ■ . . , , *ILS ceiling 200' and runway visual range 2600' also authorized for landing on Runway 4R provided all components of the ILS and all related airborne equipment are in satisfactory operating condition...... _ ...... ¿Runway visual range 2600' is authorized for takeoff on Runw ay 4R in lieu'of200-% when 200-% authorized, providing associated high-intensity runway lights are operational. % D epartures from R u n w a y 27 make left turn to crs 260° as soon as practicable after takeoff. - #No circling S W of airport authorized from centerline extended Runway 4L to centerline extended Runway 15, when ceiling is less than 800'. ##100-% required with glide slope inoperative. City. Boston; State, Mass.; Airport Name, Logan International; Elev., 19'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident. I-BO S; Procedure No. IL8-4R, Arndt. 15; Eff. Date, 16 May 64; Sup. Arndt. N o. 14; Dated, 13 July 63

T - d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-% C -d ...... *600-1 600-1 600-1% O -n ______*500-1% 500-1% 600-1% S -d n -1 3 R *...... 300-% 300-% 300-% A - d n ______— 600-2 600-2 600-2

Radar vectoring to final approach crs required in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn not authorized. M in im u m altitude at glide slope interception In b n d 2500'. ^ Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at L O M , 2255'—5.0 miles; at L M M , 868 —0.6 mile. .... - , . ,,AM If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, make right turn, climb to 2300 and proceed to r u in v urv In b n d on RrrOOl. . , , . . „ ~ * N ote: Aircraft executing missed approach may, after being reidentified, be radar controlled.

*5(XHi required w ith ^ lid e^ lo p e inoperative, 400-1 m inim um s authorized provided descent b elow 1100' not m ade until past A D F bearing 020/200 of M D W R B n . City, Chicago; State, 111.; Airport Name, Chicago-Mid way; Elev., 619'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-M D W ; Procedure No. ILS-13R, Arndt. 20; Eff. D ate, 16 M a y 64, Sup. Arndt. No. 19; Dated, 26 Jan. 64

T - d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-% L O M ...... - ...... D irect______2200 600-1% LOM ...... D irect______2200 O -d n ______500-1 500-1 200-% 200-% Via FRA-VOR 2000 S-dn-29#...... 600-2 R-159. A - d n ______600-2 600-2 S E crs I L S (fin a l)...... Via FRA-VOR 2000 R-159.

Procedure turn S side of crs, 108° O utbnd, 288° In b n d , 2200' w ithin 10 miles of L O M . N on standard d u e high terrain N . Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1700'. _ ., Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at O M , 1451'—4.0 miles; at M M , 536 — 0.6 mile. within 15 miles or, when If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landtag not accomplished, climb to 2000 on W cts of ILS m th ta 15 m u ^ o directed by A T C , climb straight ahead to 1000' on localizer crs, then make left climbing turn to F A T R B n. Continue climb to 2000 on crs 215 from F A 1 RBn wiwuu Other change: Deletes transition from F A T SA BH ...... ■ . . , . ______#400-% required with glide slope inoperative. 400-1 required when only localizer and either the outer marker or outer compass locator operative. City, Fresno; State, Calif.; Airport Name, Fresno Air Terminal; Elev., 332'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-F A T ; Procedure No. ILS-29, Arndt. 16; Eff. Date, 16 May 64, Sup. Arndt. No. 15; Dated, 21 Deer63 _ ' * , _____

200-% Direct. T - d n # ... 300-1 300-1 H yan n is V O R . Hyannis LOM . 500-1 600-1% C-dn.___. 600-1 800-% S-dn-24*. 300-% 300-% 600-2 600-2 A - d n . . . . 600-2

Transitions to localizer crs by Otis RAPCON radar is authorized in accordance with approved patterns. . Procedure turn S side of crs, 066° O utbnd, 246° In bn d , 1500' w ithin 10 miles. N o t authorized beyond 10 miles. Nonstandard. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1400'. Minim um altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1400'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1314'—3.8 miles; at M M , 264 —0.6 mile. _ „ t t v t d m make a left climbing If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.8 miles after passing tx x b u i , turn to 1500', returning to the H Y L O M . H o ld N E of H Y L O M , 246° In bn d , 1-mtaute, left turns. #Takeoff m inim um s of 300-1 requiied for R u n w a y 24. *400-1 required w ith glide slope inoperative. ■■ ' ' . " -r «4-gup. City, Hyannis; State, Mass.; Airport Name, Barnstable Municipal; Elev., 62'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-H Y A ; Procedure No. ILS-24, Arndt. 3; I?fl. Date, A rndt. N o . 2; D ated, 3 N o v . 62 Tuesday y May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6253

ILS Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure— Continued

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums

2-engine or less M in im u m M o re than Course and 2-engine, From — T o — altitude Condition distance more than (feet) 65 knots M o re than 65 knots or less 1 65 knots

t.otW ______D irect______2700 T - d n ...... 300-1* 300-1 200-)$ T.OM ______. D ire c t.______2900 C - d ...... 400-1 600-1 500-1)$ L O M ______D irect______.... 3000 C - n ...... 400-1)$ 500-1H 500-1)$ S-dn-13 . _ 300-5$ 300-5$ 300-5$ A-dp . . 600-2 600-2 600-2

Procedure turn N side N W crs, 310° O utbn d, 130° In b n d , 2500' w ith in 10 miles. M inim um altitude at glide slope int In b n d , 2200'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of ru n w a y at L O M . 2132'— 3.8 miles; at L M M , 1158'— 0.4 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 2800' on SE crs ILS, proceed to Granby Int or, when directed b y A T C , m ake left turn, clim bing to 2500', and proceed to L O M . Note: Approach from holding pattern not authorized. Procedure turn required. C a u t io n : 2049' tower, 11 miles W N W of airport. ♦Nashville Int: Int EOS VO R Rr351 and C N U VO R R-091. # Gran by In t: In t S E crs J L N I L S a n d E O S V O R R-05JL Oitv JoDlhr State. M o .; A irport N am e, Joplin M un icipal; E le r., 980'; Fac. Class., IL S ; Ident., 1 -J L N ; Procedure N o . IL S -1 3 , Arndt. 9; E ff. D ate, 16 M a y 64; Sup. A m d t. N o . 8; " v * D ated , 9 N o v . 63

Andrews L F R . . _ — — ...... OM 1500 T - d n * * ...... 300-1 300-1 200-)$ Andrews L F R via crs 273° D irect______¿1500 O -d n , 15,18, 700-1 700-1 700-1)4 Herndon V O R ______DM Direct ... ' .... 2000 21, 3. Potomac In t_____ — ______OM Direct . 2000 C -dn-33##...... 600-1 500-1 500-1)1 Nottingham V O R ------OM . . . ______Direct...... 1500 8-dn-36*______$200-)$ $200-)$ $200-H Ironsides I n t .______OM ______D irect______1500 A-dn...... 700-2 700-2 700-2

Radar transitions and vectoring authorized in accordance with approved patterns. Procedure turn W side 8 crs, 183° Outbnd, 003° Inbnd, 1500' within 10 miles of O M (nonstandard due to traffic). Minimum altitude at glide slope int Inbnd, 1400'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at O M , 1397'— 1.6 miles., at M M , 209'—0.5 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished at L M M , make climbing turn to left as soon as practicable and climb to 2000', proceed to Georgetown M H W . H o ld N W G T N on bearing 144°, 1-minute, right turns. Caution: Washington Monument 596', 1.6 miles N of airport. 193' stack, 1.3 miles SW of airport. 316' stack, 1.5 miles E of airport. ♦Runway visual range 2600' also authorized for landing on Runway 36; provided all components of the IL S , high-intensity runway lights, approach lights, condenser-dis­ charge dashers, outer compass locator, and all related airborne equipment are in satisfactory operating condition. Descent below 216' shall not be made unless visual contact with the approach lights has been established or the aircraft is clear of clouds. ♦♦Runway visual range 2600' also authorized for takeoff on Runway 36 in lieu of 200-)$ when 200-)$ is authorized, providing associated high-intensity runway lights are operational. ¿After interception of localizer crs In b n d , descent on glide slope to cross outer m arker at 1397 on final is authorized. $500-1 required when glide slope not utilized. u ##Circling to Runway 33 not authorized beyond the D C A V O R R-157. v City, Washington, D.C.; Airport Name, National; Elev., 15'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-D C A ; Procedure No. ILS-36, Amdt. 17; Eft. Date, 16 M ay 64; Sup. Amdt. No. 16; D ated, 22 June 63 ^ These procedures shall become effective on the dates specified therein. These amendments are made under the authority of sections 307(c)^313(a), and 601 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348(0, 1354(a), 1421; 72 Stat. 749, 752, 775). Issued in Washington, D.C., on April 9,1964. G. S. M oore, Director, Flight Standards Service. [F.R. Doc. 64-3745; Filed, May 11,1964; 8:45 a.m.]

Chapter III— Federal Aviation Agency § 507.10(a) Of Part 507 (14 CFR Part 507), is hereby amended by adding the Title 21— FOOD AND DRUGS SUBCHAPTER C— AIRCRAFT REGULATIONS following new airworthiness directive: [Reg. Docket No. 5039; Amdt. 728] Chapter I— Food and Drug Adminis­ P iper. Applies to Model PA-24-250 aircraft. tration, Department of Health, Edu­ PART 507— AIRWORTHINESS Serial Numbers 24-1477 to 24-3646. Compliance required within 50 hours’ time cation, and Welfare DIRECTIVES in service after the effective date of this AD. SUBCHAPTER B— FOOD AND FOOD PRODUCTS Piper Model PA-24-250 Aircraft In order to prevent portions of the carbu­ retor air box deflector vanes from breaking PART 120— TOLERANCES-AND EX­ Several instances have occurred whf loose and lodging within the carburetor EMPTION FROM TOLERANCES FOR portions of the deflector vanes ha throat, remove the deflector vanes from the broken loose and lodged within the c$ air box, P/N 21943-03, in accordance with PESTICIDE CHEMICALS IN OR ON Piper Service Letter No. 420. Upon removal RAW AGRICULTURAL COMMODI­ buretor on Piper Model PA-24-250 a: of these vanes, the air box P/N becomes craft, causing sudden power loss. 1 21943-05. TIES correct this condition an airworthin< (Piper Service Letter No. 420 dated March directive is being issued to require t 5,1964, covers this subject.) Subpart A— Definitions and removal of the deflector vanes from t Interpretative Regulations carburetor air box. This amendment shall become effec­ tive May 12,1964. F urther Extensio ns of Effective D ate ; As a situation exists which demands C hlorophenoxyacetic A cid Immediate adoption of this regulation, (Secs. 313(a), 601, 603; 72 Stat. 752, 775, 776; t is found that notice and public pro­ 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421,1423) Under the provisions of Public Law 86- 139 (73 Stat. 388, as amended 75 Stat. cedure hereon are impracticable and Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 5, good cause exists for making this amend­ 42; 7 U.S.C. 135 et seq.), and under the 1964. authority delegated to the Commissioner ment effective upon publication in the G. S. M oore, of Food and Drugs by the Secretary of federal R egister. Director, Health, Education, and Welfare (21 In consideration of the foregoing, and Flight Standards Service. CFR 2.90; 29 F.R. 471), the Commis­ Piusuant to the authority delegated to [FR. Doc. 64-4700; Filed, May 11, 1964; sioner has further extended the effective Dy the Administrator (25 F.R. 6489), 8:46 a.m.] date of this statute as it affects section 6254 RULES AND REGULATIONS

408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos­ (e) and ( f ) of the said § 563.23-1, as and section 4(a) of the Administrative metic Act for certain specified uses of follows: Procedure Act, and, for the same nematocides, plant regulators, defoliants, 1. Paragraph (e) of S^S^S-l isreasons, the Board hereby finds and de­ or desiccants. The list previously pub­ hereby amended by striking the last termines that deferment of the effective lished in § 120.37 (21 CFR 120.37) is sentence thereof. date of such amendments under section amended by changing the item listed to * 2. Paragraph (f ) of § 563.23-1 is here­ 4(c) of said Act is unnecessary since such read as follows: by amended by striking the words “para­ amendments effect technical changes not graph (c) of” from the second sentence § 120.37 \Further extensions of effective requiring any change in the operations of date o f Public Law 86—139 as it a f­ thereof. institutions insured by thé Federal Sav­ fects section 408 of the Federal Food, As so amended, paragraphs (e) and ings and Loan Insurance Corporation, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. (f) of § 563.23-1 read as follows: and, accordingly, the amendments shall be effective upon publication in the * * * * * § 563.23—1 Premiums, charges, and credits with respect to mortgage F ederal R egister. Effective loans; sale o f real estate owned; and By the Federal Home Loan Bank Product Specified uses or re­ date of - related items. Board. strictions statute ex­ * * * * * tended to— [ seal] G renville L. M illard, Jr., (e) Credits not deferred. If, during Assistant Secretary. p-Chlorophe- O n caneberries to pro­ June 30,1964 any fiscal year, in connection with the noxyacetic duce larger fruit. [F.R. Doc. 64-4714; Filed, May 11, 1964; making or acquisition of any mortgage 8:48 a.m.] acid. loan, any acquisition credits are not de­ ferred in the manner provided in para­ * * * * graph (d )"o f this section, an insured Notice and public procedure are not institution shall credit from its net in­ Title 26-INTERNAL REVENUE necessary prerequisites to the promul­ come for such fiscal year, to a reserve gation of this order, and I so find, since account that shall be established for Chapter I— Internal Revenue Service, extensions of time, under certain condi­ losses and entitled “Reserve for Losses— Department of the Treasury tions, for the effective date of the Nema- Insurance Regulation 563.23-1”, an SUBCHAPTER D— MISCELLANEOUS EXCISE TAXES tocide, Plant Regulator, Defoliant, and amount equal to the amount of acquisi­ Desiccant Amendment of 1959 were con­ tion credits applicable to such loans. PART 48— MANUFACTURERS AND templated by the statute as amended, as Credits to such reserve account shall be RETAILERS EXCISE TAXES a relief of restrictions on the agricultural in addition to and not a part of reserve industry. credits required to be made by § 563.13; Exemption From Tax on Sales of Motor Effective date. This order shall be­ and such reserve account shall not be Vehicles to the Department of State come effective on the date of signature. considered a part of such institution’s and Related Agencies Where Such Federal insurance reserve account, shall (Public Law 86-139 (73 Stat. 388, as amended Vehicles Are To Be Exported 75 Stat. 42; 7 U.S.C. 135 et seq.) ) not receive credits from any source other than that provided in this paragraph By virtue of the authority vested Dated: May 7, 1964. (e), and shall not receive any charges in me by section 4293 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (68A Stat. 511; 26 Jo h n L. H arvey, except as set forth in paragraph (f) of U.S.C. 4293), exemption is hereby au­ Deputy Commissioner this section. thorized from the tax imposed by section of Food and Drugs. (f) Application of credits not deferred. In each fiscal year one-seventh part of 4061(a) of such Code with respect to [F.R. Doc. 64-4722; Filed, May 11, 1964; the credits required to be made during sales of motor vehicles by the manufac­ 8:49 a.m.] such fiscal year and during prior fiscal turer or importer, or by the manufacturer years to the reserve account provided for or importer to another person for re­ in paragraph (e) of this section shall sale, to the Department of State, the Title 12— BANKS AND BANKING become available for credit from such Peace Corps, the Agency for Interna­ account to such institution’s Federal in­ tional Development, or the United States Chapter V— Federal Home Loan Bank surance reserve account. Without limi­ Information Agency for use by such Board tation on the generality of the foregoing agencies in foreign countries if the provisions of this paragraph (f), any vehicles are exported from the United SUBCHAPTER D— FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN credit made pursuant to said provisions States by the above-named agencies INSURANCE CORPORATION shall, for the purposes of any provision of within a period of six months from the [No. FSLIC-1,802] § 563.13 for credits from specified date of delivery of the vehicles to such agencies, notwithstanding any use made PART 563— OPERATIONS sources, be regarded as having ' been made from such sources. Charges for by such agencies of the vehicles within the United States during the six-month the purpose of absorbing losses may be Premiums, Charges and Credits period: Provided, That (1) there is in­ Regarding Mortgage Loans made in any fiscal year to the reserve account provided for in paragraph (e), cluded in each contract of sale for the vehicles a statement to the effect that M a y 4,1964. provided the Federal insurance reserve the sale of the vehicles is made for* the Resolved, That the Federal Home Loan acount of such institution and all its exclusive use of the. United States and is Bank Board, upon the basis of consider­ other reserve accounts established for the intended to qualify for exemption under ation by it of the advisability of amend­ purpose of absorbing losses shall first this order, and (2) the manufacturer or ment of § 563.23-1 of the. rules and reg­ have been exhausted by losses. importer receives and maintains prooi ulations for insurance of accounts (12 * * * * * that the vehicles have been exported as CFR 563.23-1) for the purpose of de­ (Secs. 402, 403, 48 Stat. 1256, 1257, as required. - leting cross-references to § 563.13 of amended; 12 U.S.C. 1725, 1726. Reorg. Plan In the event that proof is not received said regulations so as to conform to No. 3 Of 1947, 12 F.R. 4981, 3 CFR, 1947 Supp.) and maintained that a vehicle, which has changes in § 563.13 of said regulations as Resolved further that, since these are been sold without payment of the tax im­ amended by Federal Home Loan Bank posed by section 4061(a) as provided py Board Resolution No. FSLIC-1,712, in the nature of technical amendments to delete cross-references to a section of this order, was exported within the six- dated December 30, 1963, effective Feb­ the regulations which has been revised, month period, the tax shall be reported ruary 3,1964, which resulted in the revi­ the Board hereby finds and determines by the manufacturer or importer of tne sion and renumbering of § 563.13 of said that notice and public procedure with vehicle in his excise tax return for tne regulations and rendered cross-refer­ respect to said amendments are unneces­ calendar quarter in which the six-mon ^ ences in § 563.23-1 no longer applicable, sary under the provisions of § 508.12 of period terminated and paid with su and for the purpose of effecting such the general regulations of the Federal return. If proof of exportation of tne amendment, hereby amends paragraphs Home Loan Bank Board (12 CFR 508.12) vehicle within the six-month period is Tuesday, May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6255 received by the manufacturer or im­ ments attached thereto. The completed it is necessary in the filling of an order porter subsequent to the filing of his ex­ order forms of the dealer, or copies of to transfer distilled spirits from the re­ cise tax return, in connection with his invoices of sale, will be acceptable tail department to the wholesale depart­ which tax on the vehicle has been re­ as “Records of Disposition” if such docu­ ment, a record showing receipt in the ported and paid, the manufacturer or ments provide all of the required infor­ wholesale department shall be prepared importer may claim a credit or refund. mation, and are preprinted as prescribed as prescribed in § 194.225, and the entire This authorization shall be effective in § 194.228. If copies of order forms wholesale sale shall be entered on a rec­ with respect to sales on or after May 6, or invoices of sale are maintained as ord of disposition in the same manner 1964, of motor vehicles by the manu­ “Records of Disposition,” case or pack­ as any other disposition from the whole­ facturer or importer. age serial numbers need be entered on, sale department. The provisions of this or attached to, only the copies retained subpart relating to submission of reports [ seal] D ouglas D il l o n , as such records. The dealer may elect on Forms 52A and 52B are applicable to Secretary of the Treasury. to use any one of the above types of all transfers between wholesale and re­

M a y 6 , 1 9 6 4 . record, but may not change from one tail departments. The retail department [F.R. Doc. 64r-4713; Filed, May 11, 1964; type to another without prior approval need not be maintained in a separate 8:48 a.m.] from the assistant regional commis­ room, or be partitioned off from the sioner. Entries on records of disposi­ wholesale department but the retail de­ tion shall be completed by the close of partment shall in fact be separate from SUBCHAPTER E— ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, AND the business day next succeeding that on the wholesale department. Where a OTHER EXCISE TAXES which the spirits are removed. Where wholesale dealer in liquors does not [TJD. 6729] the dealer so defers the preparation of maintain a separate retail department, such records he shall keep memorandum all distilled spirits received and disposed PART 194— LIQUOR DEALERS records, prepared at the time the spirits of at his premises shall be accounted Records of Disposition are sent out, or prior thereto, which shall for on records of receipt and disposition, show the data needed to prepare the pre­ and on Forms 52A and 52B when sub­ In order to liberalize the provisions scribed records. Each record of dispo­ mitted, regardless of the quantity of regulations relating to records of dis­ sition shall be supported by a corre­ involved. '

position of spirits prepared by whole­ sponding delivery receipt (which may be ♦ * * * * sale dealers (other than proprietors of executed on a copy of the “Record of (72 Stat. 1342, 1345, 1395; 26 U.S.C. 5114, distilled spirits plants, who are subject Disposition”) fully describing the spirits 5124, 5555) to the recordkeeping requirements of 26 and signed by the consignee or his agent, CFR Part 201), 26 CFR Part 194, Liquor or by a copy of a bill of lading indicating Because this Treasury decision merely Dealers, is amended as follows: delivery of the spirits to a common car­ liberalizes the provisions of the regula­ Paragraph 1. Section 194.226 is rier. Documents supporting records of tions respecting records covering physi­ amended to provide that the assistant disposition shall have noted thereon the cal disposition of spirits to retail dealers regional commissioner may relieve serial number of the corresponding or at retail, it is found that it is unneces­ wholesale dealers from the requirement “Record of Disposition,” or the page sary to issue this Treasury decision with for recording serial numbers of cases of number of the machine record or record notice and public procedure thereon spirits disposed of to retail dealers or at book, as the case may be. Variations in under section 4(a) of the Administrative retail (to persons other than dealers). the format or in the methods of prepara­ Procedure Act, approved June 11, 1946. As amended, § 194.226 reads as follows: tion may be authorized, as provided in This Treasury decision shall became ef­ § 194.229. fective on the first day of the first month Every wholesale dealer shall prepare which begins not less than 30 days fol­ a record covering the physical disposi­ (72 Stat. 1342; 26 U.S.C. 5114) lowing the date of publication in the tion of each individual lot of distilled P ar. 2. Paragraph (a) of § 194.238 is F ederal R egister. spirits, which shall show (a) name and amended to provide that a wholesale address of consignee, (b) date of disposi­ (Sec. 7805 of the Internal Revenue Code (68A dealer need not record serial numbers of tion, (c) kind of spirits, except that this Stat. 917; 26 U.S.C. 7805)) cases of spirits transferred to his retail may be omitted if the dealer keeps avail­ seal ortimer a p l in department if he has been relieved, under [ ] M M. C , able for inspection a separate list or rec­ the provisions of § 194.226, from the re­ Commissioner of Internal Revenue. ord identifying “kind” with the brand quirement for showing serial numbers of Approved: May 5,1964. name, (d) brand name, (e) number of cases of spirits disposed of to retail deal­ packages, if any, and number of cases by S ta n ley S. S ur r ey, ers or at retail (to persons other than size of bottle, and (f ) serial numbers Assistant Secretary of the dealers). As amended, paragraph (a) of the cases or packages: Provided, That Treasury. reads as follows: upon application, the assistant regional [F.R. Doc. 64-4705; FUed, May 11, 1964; commissioner may relieve a dealer, until §194.238 Requirements when wholesale 8:47 ajn.] otherwise notified, from the requirement dealer in liquors maintains a retail for recording serial numbers of cases department. disposed of to retail dealers or at retail (a) When a wholesale dealer in (to persons otjier than dealers), when liquors maintains a separate department Title 41— PUBLIC CONTRACTS the assistant regional commissioner finds on his premises for the retailing (to per­ Chapter 9— Atomic Energy that such recording is not necessary to sons other than dealers) of distilled law enforcement or protection to the spirits, he shall, except as provided in Commission revenue. Additional information desired paragraph (b) of this section, keep the PART 9-7— CONTRACT CLAUSES by the dealer may also be shown. Rec­ records and render the reports pre­ ords of disposition shall be prepared by scribed in § 194.221 with respect to all Subpart 9—7.50— Use of Standard entering each individual lot of distilled distilled spirits received on his premises, Clauses spirits either (1) on an individual loose- and of all distilled spirits disposed of to leaf “Record of Disposition,” preprinted other dealers or transferred to his retail A ssignm ent of C laim s as Prescribed in § 194.228, (2) in chron­ department. At the time distilled spirits Section 9-7.5004-6 Assignment of ological order on records prepared by are transferred to the retail department, claims, is deleted and the following sub­ tabulating or other mechanical office a record showing such disposition shall stituted therefor: equipment, if such records are preprinted be prepared as prescribed in § 194.226, as prescribed in § 194.228, or (3) in except that such record need not show § 9—7.5004—6 Assignment o f claims. chronological order in a bound record the serial numbers of cases if the dealer See § 1-7.101-8. ook, provided all pages of such book has been relieved, under the provisions N ote: The last sentence of subparagraph j.eQ. Prenumbered as prescribed in of § 194.226, from the requirement for (a) of the clause set forth in § 1—7.101-8 shaU s »4.228. Case and package serial num- showing serial numbers of cases of spirits be omitted in all contracts for transportation ®r®.ma,y be shown either on the record disposed of to retail dealers or at retail services and may be omitted in other con­ 01 dlsP°sition or on supporting docu- (to persons other than dealers). Where tracts when appropriate. No. 93------A 6256 RULES AND REGULATIONS

(Sec. 161, Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 5(d)(1), and 303 (r) of the Communica­ Islands for the mobile services any fre­ amended, 68 Stat. 948, 42 U.S.C. 2201; sec. tions Act of 1934, as amended, and in quencies in the band 154.040 to 154.460 205, Federal Property and Administrative § 0.261(a) of the Commission’s rules: Mc/s, and that Part 89 should be amend­ Services Act of 1949, as amended, 63 Stat. It is ordered, This 7th day of May 1964, 390, 40 UJ3.C. 486) ed to conform to Part 2 in that respect; that effective May 15,1964, Part 83 of the and Effective date. This amendment is ef­ Commission’s rules is amended as set It further appearing, that amendments fective upon publication in the F ederal forth below. ordered herein are editorial in nature, R egister. (Sec. 4, 48 Stat. 1066, as amended; 47 U.S.C. hence, the prior public notice and effec­ Dated at Germantown, Md., this 5th 154. Interpret or apply sec. 303, 48 Stat. tive date provisions of the Administra­ day of May 1964. 1082, as amended; sec. 5, 66 Stat. 713; 47 tive Procedure Act are not applicable; U.S.C. 303,155) and For the U.S. Atomic Energy Commis­ It further appearing, that the amend­ Released: May 7,1964 sion. ments adopted herein are issued pur­ James S cammahorn, F ederal C ommunications suant to the authority contained in sec­ Acting Director, C o m m issio n , tions 4(i) and 303 of the Communica­ Division of Contracts. [ seal] B en F. W aple, tions Act of 1934, as amended, and in [FJEt. Doc. 64-4716; Filed, May 11, 1964; Secretary. § 0.261(a) of the Commission’s rules. 8:48 a.m.] Part 83 is amended as follows: It is ordered, This 7th day of May 1964, Section 83.803(b) is amended to read that effective May 15, 1964, Part 89 is amended as set forth below. as follows: (Sec. 4, 48 Stat. 1066, as amended; 47 U.S.C. Title 47— TELECOMMUNICATION § 83.803 General exemption orders is­ 154. Interpret or apply sec. 303, 48 Stat. sued exempting ships from compul­ 1082, as amended; sec. 5, 66 Stat. 713; 47 Chapter I— Federal Communications sory radio provisions. U.S.C.303,155) Commission * * * * * Released: May 7, 1964. PART 83— STATIONS ON SHIPBOARD (b) Order, April 22, 1964, granting IN THE MARITIME SERVICES exemption, pursuant to section 383 of the F ederal C ommunications Communications Act of 1934, as amend­ C o m m issio n , General Exemption Orders Issued ed, from the provisions of Title m , Part [ seal] B e n F. W aple, Exempting Ships From Compulsory H I of the Communications Act of 1934, Secretary. Radio Provisions as amended, to all United States vessels In § 89.259, the entries for 154.040 to subject thereto which are of less than 50 154.115 Mc/s in the table in paragraph In the matter of amendment of Part gross tons and are navigated not more (f) are amended, and a new paragraph 83 of the Commission’s rules for the pur­ than 1,000 feet from the nearest land at (g) (10) is added, as follows: pose of making editorial changes therein mean low tide. § 89.259 Frequencies available to the to make current the list of gen­ ***** eral exemption orders issued by the Local Government Radio Service. [FJt. Doc. 64-4726; " Filed, May 11, 1964; ***** Commission. 8:49 am.] Order. The Commission having (f) * * * under consideration the desirability of PART 89— PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO making certain editorial changes in Part Frequency Limita­ 83 of its rules; SERVICES r d Class of statlon(s) tions Mc/s It appearing, that the amendment Frequencies Available to the Local adopted herein is editorial in nature for • * * the purpose of making current the list Government Radio Service * * * • • • 154.040 5,10 of general exemption orders issued by In the matter of amendment of Part 154 055 6,10 6,10 the Commission, and, therefore, compli­ 89 of the Commission’s rules governing 154.085 154.100 5,10 ance with the public notice and rule the public safety radio services for the 154.115 5,10 making procedures prescribed by section purpose of making certain editorial * * * • • • * • • 4 (a) and (b) of the Administrative Pro­ changes therein. cedure Act is unnecessary; and Order. The Commission having under ***** It further appearing, that since the consideration amendment of Part 89 of amendment herein ordered is non­ the rules governing the Public Safety Yellowstone River for a dis­ not limited to salmon eggs, for bait is DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR tance of 250 yards on either side of the prohibited in all Park waters. center of LeHardy Rapids; and from the (ii) Only artificial flies, with a single National Park Service confluence of Alum Creek with the hook, may be used as lures in the Fire- [ 36 CFR Part 7 1 Yellowstone River upstream to the Sul­ hole River, Madison River, Squaw Lake, fur Caldron. and that section of the Gibbon River ex­ YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, (ii) Mammoth water supply including tending from the mouth of the stream WYOMING Indian Creek, Panther Creek, and the to the crest of Gibbon Falls. The use Gardner River above their respective of any other lures in these waters is pro­ Fishing water supply intakes; Glen Creek above hibited. Notice is hereby given that pursuant the Mammoth Water Supply Reservoir, (7) Waste of edible portions of fish. to the authority contained in section 3 and the Mammoth Water Supply Reser­ No person shall wantonly or needlessly of the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. voir. allow any edible portion of a fish to go 535, 16 U.S.C. 3), 245 DM-1 (27 F.R. (iii) West Thumb water supply con­ to waste in the park. 6395), National Park Service Order No. sisting of Duck Lake. L e m u e l A. G arrison, 14 (19 F.R. 8824), Regional Director, (iv) Old Faithful water supply con­ sisting of that section of the Firehole ' Superintendent, Midwest Region, Order No. 3 (21 F.R. Yellowstone National Park. 1494), as amended, it is proposed to River from the Old Faithful water supply amend § 7.13 of Title 36, Code of Federal intake to the Shoshone Lake Trail cross­ January 1964. Regulations as set forth below. The ing above Lone Star Geyser. [F.R. Doc. 64-4715; Filed, May 11, 1964; purpose of this amendment is to estab­ (v) Canyon Village water supply con­ 8:48 a.m.] lish a suitable management program for sisting of Cascade Creek. j waters of the Park in the interest of (vi) Obsidian Creek, except that por­ conservation and protection as recom­ tion between its confluence with the mended by research findings of the Gardner River and a point one mile up­ DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE United States Fish and Wildlife Service. stream. It is the policy of the Department of (vii) Winter Creek from its confluence Agricultural Marketing Service the Interior whenever practicable, to with Qbsidian Creek upstream to the 17 CFR Part 987] afford the public an opportunity to par­ Howard Eaton Trail crossing. ticipate in the rule making process. Ac­ (viii) Bridge Bay Lagoon and the con­ [Docket No. AO 269-A3] cordingly, interested persons may submit necting channel with Yellowstone Lake. DOMESTIC DATES PRODUCED OR

Preliminary statement. The public tion whenever such extension would pro­ to establish special grade, size, container, hearing on the record of which the pro­ vide the availability of additionally and identification requirements for re­ posed amendment of the order is formu­ needed storage facilities for dates. This stricted dates for export according to lated was held in Indio, California, on authority would give the Committee variety, and by country or group of March 9, 1964, pursuant to a notice flexibility in solving any shortage of date countries. Special grade, size, container, thereof which was published in the F ed­ storage facilities which might develop and identification requirements that eral R egister on February 26, 1964 (29 in the future, and would make it un­ recognize (and thus would provide for F.R. 2701). The notice of the hearing necessary to go through amendatory supplying) the special demand or needs included proposals submitted by the Date proceedings solely for the purpose of of any country or group of countries for Administrative Committee (hereinafter remedying a shortage of storage. Any any variety of date's would tend to maxi­ referred to as the “Committee”) , the ad­ modification of the exception so as to mize sales of restricted dates to such ministrative agency established pursuant extend the storage area would involve export outlets and to enhance overall to the order. the same considerations as those for returns to producers. Material issues. The material issues adding Imperial County. Before propos­ Also, the said section should provide presented on the record of the hearing ing a modification to make the exception that the Committee may, to promote involve amendatory action relating to: applicable to any other adjoining area, orderly marketing and facilitate sales in (1) Broadening the exception con­ the Committee would be expected to export of restricted dates (as well as tained in the definition of handle to make a careful survey of available stor­ other dates eligible for export as herein­ permit dates to be moved to storage age, the requirements therefor, and the after discussed), act as an intermediary within specific areas outside of the area availability of storage in the other area. between handlers and a foreign importer of production: Also, the Committee would need to de­ and, in connection therewith, shall ex­ (2) The application, if any, - of the termine that location or other conditions tend an opportunity to all handlers to withholding requirements with respect pertaining to the storage facilities in participate in all such sales and distrib­ to dates delivered to a surplus removal such area would not cause undue com­ ute the returns therefrom to participat­ program of the Secretary; pliance or surveillance problems if the ing handlers. The Committee, acting (3) Encouraging and facilitating the exception were made applicable to that in such capacity, could ascertain the exportation of dates; and county. terms and conditions on which a sale of (4) Extending the assessment base to (2) Section 987.45(a) should be such dates could be made to the prospec­ include all dates certified as meeting amended to specifically exclude from the tive importer (e.g., a foreign government, the requirements for marketable dates, withholding requirement prescribed in syndicate, or other foreign buyer) inter­ including the eligible weight (i.e., mar­ § 987.45(a) dates delivered to an excess ested in purchasing California dates. ketable portion) of field-run lots. supply removal program of the Secretary. Operating experience under the order Findings and conclusions. The find­ Such an excess supply removal program indicates there may be instances where ings and conclusions on the aforemen­ is one which provides dates for distribu­ a sale of restricted dates of particular tioned material issues, all of which are tion through, or to, other than normal grades or sizes or meeting other specified based upon the evidence adduced at the trade outlets for dates. These non­ requirements could be made to satisfy hearing and the record thereof, are as normal outlets include, but are not lim­ all, or a large segment, of the demand of follows: ited to, so-called section 32 programs an entire country. Whenever possible, (1) The definition of “handle” (pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 612c). Dates for such sales should, of course, be negoti­ (§ 987.9) should be amended so as to ex­ such non-normal outlets are not con­ ated and consummated entirely by han­ cept from “handling” the movement of sidered as part of total trade demand, a dlers themselves. However, there may dates by a handler for his account to significant factor in establishing free be circumstances when it may be de­ storage within Imperial County. At and restricted percentages. The with­ sirable or more advantageous for the present, date storage facilities in the holding requirement prescribed in Committee to act as intermediary for area of production are inadequate. § 987.45(a) is designed to provide such such sales, with all handlers permitted However, storage is available in Imperial quantities of whole or pitted dates to be to participate in furnishing the dates. County which is outside of, but adjoins, handled as free dates as will adequately Such circumstances may arise from time the area of production. The distance supply total trade demand. Since dates to time during a crdp year. For instance, from Indio, center of date production, to for these non-normal outlets are not a in the spring of the year no single han­ nearby Imperial County is less than the part of total trade demand, nor are they dler may have a sufficient supply of dates distance to many storage facilities within used for the purposes of free dates, the to satisfy such demand. The Com­ the area of production, such as those in withholding requirement should not be mittee should, therefore, be authorized Los Angeles County. Any movement of operative with respect to dates delivered to perform this function in sueh in­ dates by a handler to storage for his to any such removal program. stances, and thereby facilitate the con­ summation of sales which might other­ account within the area of production is (3) As set forth in the notice of hear­ wise be lost. All handlers should, of now excepted as an act of handling and ing, proposals 4, 6, 7, and 8 relate to course, be given the opportunity to par­ dates may be so moved without having amendatory action regarding the encour­ ticipate in an equitable manner in each met the certification, withholding or as­ agement and facilitation of date exports. such export sale by supplying propor­ sessment obligations of the order. No All of these proposals are considered to­ tionate shares of the dates involved in compliance or surveillance problems gether in this issue. have been encountered by allowing dates the sale and sharing in the returns ac­ Section 987.55 authorizes disposition of cording to their respective contributions to be moved to storage within Los restricted dates through exportation and Angeles County, or other storage within to approved countries or by diversion of dates. Because such action by the Committee the area of production, without such into certain date products. Section would involve handlers and foreign pur­ movement being construed as handling, 987.40 authorizes the establishment of chasers, the Secretary should be ap­ nor are similar problems foreseen if additional grade or size requirements for dates are permitted to be so moved to ad­ prised of the contemplated Committee’s restricted dates of any variety; and cur­ participation in each such proposed sale joining Imperial County. Handlers rently § 987.55 expressly authorizes the should, therefore, be permitted to freely in export. If the Secretary concludes Committee, with the approval of the that the circumstances warrant Com­ use the nearby storage in Imperial Secretary, to establish such grade, con­ County. mittee participation in a particular sale tainer, and identification requirements and that the sale (including the man­ The definition of handle should also be for restricted dates for export as are ner in which it is to be effected) will amended to provide that the Commit­ deemed essential to the promotion of tend to effectuate the declared policy tee, with the approval of the Secretary, orderly marketing. To facilitate the ex­ of the act and would otherwise be in may modify the exception so as to extend portation of restricted dates and promote accordance with law, he should approve its applicability to similar movement of orderly marketing, § 987.55 should be such proposed sale and the Committees dates to storage in other counties (in­ amended so as to add size to the require­ participation in the sale. cluding that portion of San Bernardino ments specifically authorized therein, The third sentence of § 987.55 now per­ County not included in the area of pro­ and expressly to authorize the Commit­ mits dates other than restricted dates to duction) adjoining the area of produc­ tee, with the approval of the Secretary, be disposed of through exportation to Tuesday, May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6259 approved countries or by diversion in the applicable export requirements pre­ come. Thus, the assessment rate would the form of date products if the dates are scribed pursuant to § 987.55, it would be not depend, in part, as at present, on inspected and certified as meeting the appropriate for the Committee to par­ the number of countries included in trade requirements for marketable dates. This ticipate in sales of any such dates in demand. Moreover, employing the new sentence should be revised so as to recog­ export on the same basis as previously base for the establishment of the assess­ nize the aforementioned special require­ discussed in connection with the pro­ ment rate for each crop year would tend ments proposed for export by providing posed amendment of § 987.55. The pres­ to minimize the fixing of different rates that dates other than restricted dates ent requirements of the order as to the from year to year regardless of the num­ may be disposed of in an outlet (i.e., ex­ disposition of cull dates would not be ber of countries included in trade de­ port or diversion) prescribed in § 987.55, changed by this amendatory action, nor mand for a particular year. The new as proposed to be amended, if they are would the disposition of substandard base, therefore, would provide a more inspected and certified as meeting the dates be changed except as specifically practical and realistic method for com­ applicable requirements for the outlet. provided in the amendments hereinafter puting handlers’ pro rata shares of All special grade and size requirements set forth. expenses. prescribed pursuant to § 987.55, as pro­ It was proposed in the notice of hear­ Section 987.72(a) should also be posed to be amended, would be, as at ing and testified to at the hearing that amended by deleting in the last sentence present, fixed at a level equal to or the first sentence of § 987.45(f) should be “shipping weight” and substituting better than those for marketable dates amended by deleting the section sign therefor “weight of such dates”. The since all restricted dates, as such, are preceding “987.56” and inserting in lieu proposed broadening of the assessment required under the order to meet the thereof “§§ 987.55 and”. The proposed base as heretofore discussed, would in­ m i n im u m requirements for marketable inclusion of § 987.55 was for the purpose clude some pitted dates which may be dates. of providing that the provisions of converted into products and thus not be Experience also indicates that a for­ § 987.45(f) would apply with respect to shipped in the form of pitted dates. eign country approved pursuant to field-run dates (i.e., substandard dates) Also, sometimes additives are used to § 987.55 for exports of marketable dates disposed of in any export outlets which maintain product separation and the may desire, in addition to, or in lieu of might be authorized for such dates pur­ shipping weight of such date products such dates, field-run (ungraded) dates suant to § 987.55 if such section were may exceed the date weight. Thus, or unprocessed dates to be graded or amended to authorize such disposition. shipping weight would be inappropriate processed, and packed, in the foreign As discussed hereinabove, the export out­ as a weight for computing the assess­ country. A part of the dates in some of lets for certain field-run dates should be ment weight for all pitted dates. The the lots exported may be substandard authorized by amendment of § 987.56 actual weight of any pitted dates can dates; and disposition of such dates for rather than by amendment of § 987.55. readily be determined at the time of human consumption is prohibited by It is concluded, therefore, that the pro­ certification. § 987.56 except for use in certain prod­ posed change in § 987.45(f) is unneces­ Proposals abandoned at the hearing. ucts and under certain conditions pre­ sary and should not be made. Proposals 3, 5, and 11 in the notice re­ scribed therein. In order to utilize every (4) Section 987.72(a) should belating, respectively, to withholding and possible opportunity to market Califor­ amended (by deleting the first sentence assessment obligations with respect to nia dates, the proviso in § 987.56 should and substituting therefor two new sen­ dates certified after June 1 of a crop be amended so as to permit, under pre­ tences) so as to expand the assessment year, removing the withholding obliga­ scribed conditions, the use of certain base and include all of each handler’s tions on dates exported to countries in­ substandard dates in exports. Such dates that are certified as meeting the cluded in trade demand, and considera­ amendment should provide that, when­ requirements for marketable dates as tion of changes in inspection and certifi­ ever the Committee concludes and the well as the eligible portion (i.e., eligible cation requirements, were abandoned at Secretary finds that the disposition of weight) of field-run dates which a han­ the hearing. substandard dates of any variety through dler sets aside or disposes of, pursuant Ruling on proposed findings and con­ export outlets would tend to effectuate to § 987.45(f), to satisfy any of his obli­ clusions. The period during which in­ the declared policy of the act, the Secre­ gation to withhold restricted dates. terested parties might file briefs with the tary shall specify such export outlets, Currently, assessments are levied only Hearing Clerk of the Department with and dates of such variety that are in­ on free dates handled or certified for respect to testimony presented at the spected and certified as meeting any handling or for further processing, sub­ hearing and the conclusion to be drawn grade, size, container, or identification ject to the adjustment of assessment therefrom expired on March 27, 1964. requirements which may be prescribed obligation authorized by § 987.45(c). It No briefs were filed. by the Committee with the approval of is intended that such adjustment of as­ General findings. (1) The findings the Secretary for such outlets may be so sessment obligation should continue in hereinafter set forth are supplementary, exported. This would permit the Com­ effect. and in addition, to the previous findings mittee to recommend and the Secretary Until the present crop year, most of and determinations which have been to authorize, if the required finding is the major countries were included in made in connection with the issuance of made, exports of such substandard dates trade demand and exports to such coun­ the marketing agreement and order to any particular outlet if the dates are tries were assessable as free dates. Cur­ and subsequent amendment thereof; and certified as meeting the prescribed rently, all countries other than Canada all of the said previous findings and de­ requirements. are approved as export outlets for re­ terminations are hereby ratified and The requirements with respect to ex­ stricted dates; hence date exports to affirmed except insofar as such previous port outlets should be designed to provide Canada are the only exports now as­ findings and determinations may be in oates to meet the demand or needs of the sessed, dates exported to other countries conflict with the findings set forth here­ Particular country or export outlet being in the category of restricted dates in (for prior findings and determina­ which, in most instances, would mean and not subject to assessment under the tions see 20 F.R. 5056; 23 P.R. 6904; and oates meeting all, or substantially all, of present provisions of the order. Such 27 P.R. 6817); requirements for marketable dates. a change in regard to the exclusion of (2) The marketing agreement and or­ ¿Ts oottes eligible for export pursuant countries from trade demand tends to der each as amended and as hereby pro­ s 987.56, as proposed to be amended, increase the assessment rate applicable posed to be further amended, and all of would be of better quality than that of to free dates to provide the same income. the terms and conditions thereof, will the minimum quality of field-run dates Including more countries in trade de­ tend to effectuate the declared policy of mand would tend to lower the rate. The s dot1?118 a handler could, pursuant to the act; 3 987.45(f), use such dates to satisfy all relation between free and restricted dates (3) The marketing agreement and or­ ony part of his obligations to withhold is constant for all handlers. Hence, the der, as amended and as hereby proposed restricted dates. amount payable by any particular han­ to be further amended, regulate the dler would not be changed materially Moreover, Mn.ce any such substandard handling of domestic dates produced or by broadening the assessment base, as packed in a designated area of Cali­ ito n lE rS * be eliglble pursuant to hereinafter set forth, and the assessment fornia, in the same manner as, and are trv a export an approved coun- rate on the new basis could be fixed at applicable only to persons in the respec­ ' we^ 85 restricted dates meeting. a lower level to provide the necessary in­ tive classes of industrial or commercial 6260 PROPOSED RULE MAKING activity specified in, the marketing vided further, That whenever the Com­ sidered by the Agency before action is agreement and order upon which hear­ mittee concludes and the Secretary finds taken on the regulatory action proposed ings have been held; that the disposition of substandard therein. (4) The marketing agreement and or­ dates of any-variety through any export Communications should be submitted der, as amended and as hereby pro­ outlet would tend to effectuate the de­ in triplicate to the Chief, Airspace Regu­ posed to be further amended, are limited clared policy of the act, the Secretary lations and Procedures Division, Federal in their application to the smallest re­ shall specify such export outlet, and Aviation Agency, Washington, D.C., gional production area which is practi­ dates of such variety that are inspected 20553. and certified as meeting such grade, size, cable, consistently with carrying out the This amendment is proposed under container, and identification require­ declared policy of the act and the issu­ section 307(a) of the Federal Aviation ments as may be prescribed by the Com­ ance of several orders applicable to sub­ Act of 1958 (72Stat. 749; 49 U.S.C. 1348). divisions of the area of production would mittee with the approval of the Secretary not effectively carry out the declared for such outlet may be so exported.” Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 7, policy of the act; 5. Delete the first sentence of § 987.72 1964. (5) There are no differences in the (a) and substitute therefor the follow­ D aniel E. B arrow, production and marketing of domestic ing: “Each handler shall pay to the Com­ Acting Chief, Airspace Regulations dates in the production area covered by mittee, upon demand, on all dates he has and Procedures Division. the marketing agreement and order, as certified as meeting the requirements [F.R. Doc. 64-4735; Filed, May 11, 1964; amended and as hereby proposed to be for marketable dates including the eli­ 8:50 a.m.] further amended, which would require gible portion of any field-run dates cer­ different terms applicable to different tified and set aside or disposed of pur­ parts of such area; and suant to § 987.45(f), his pro rata share (6) All handling of dates produced or of all expenses which the Secretary finds packed in the designated area of produc­ are reasonable and are likely to be in­ INTERSTATE COMMERCE tion is in the current of interstate or for­ curred by the Committee during each eign commerce or directly burdens, ob­ crop year.” COMMISSION structs, or affects such commerce. 6. In the last sentence of § 987.72(a) Recommended amendment of the delete “shipping weight” and substitute [ 49 CFR Part 131 1 order. The following amendment of the therefor “weight of such dates.” (No. 34398] amended marketing agreement and order Dated: May 7, 1964. is recommended as the detailed and ap­ RAILROAD BOX CARS COMMONLY propriate means by which the foregoing C larence H. G irard, CALLED “HY-CUBE” CARS Deputy Administrator, conclusions may be carried out; Proposed Safety Appliance Standards 1. In § 987.9 insert “or Imperial Regulatory Programs. County” after the second occurrence of [F.R. Doc. 64-4707; Filed, May 11, 1964; At a session of the Interstate Com­ the word “production”, and change the 8:47 a.m.] merce Commission, Division 3, held at its period at the end of the sentence to a office in Washington, D.C., on the 24th colon and add “Provided, That the Com­ day of April A.D. 1964. mittee, with the approval of the Secre­ Notice is hereby given pursuant to tary, may modify the exception as to FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY provisions of section 4(a) of the Admin­ movement to storage but only as to istrative Procedure Act (60 Stat. 237, 5 movement to any such storage as may E l 4 CFR Part 71 [New] ] U.S.C. 1003), that the Commission, in be in counties (including that part of {Airspace Docket No. 64-WA—9] response to a joint petition dated Febru­ San Bernardino County not included in ary 5, 1964, filed on behalf of The the area of production) adjoining the CERTAIN POSITIVE CONTROL AREAS Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway area of production.” Company et al., has under consideration 2. After the first sentence of § 987.45 Proposed Lowering of Floor; Extension amendment of the United States Safety (a) insert the following sentence; “The of Comment Period Appliance Standards (49 CFR Part 131) prescribed by the order of March 13, withholding requirement shall not apply In a notice of proposed rule making to dates certified for delivery directly to 1911, as amended, pursuant to the provi­ published in the F ederal R egister on sions of the Safety Appliance Acts, to an excess supply removal program of the March 28, 1964 (29 F.R. 4100), it was authorize and approve the addition to Secretary.” stated that the Federal Aviation Agency 3. In § 987.55 revise the second and the safety appliance standards pre­ (FAA) proposed lowering the floor of scribed thereby, of a new type box car third sentences to read as follows: “With positive qontrol area from flight level the approval of the Secretary, the Com­ commonly called a “Hy-Cube” car which 240 to 18,000 feet MSL within an area in effect would not require roof running mittee may establish, by country or that would generally coincide with the groups of countries, such special grade, boards and would provide for other safe­ high altitude boundaries of eleven air ty appliance modifications, as more fully size, container, or identification require­ route traffic control centers. In ac­ ments for any variety of restricted dates set forth below. cordance with the terms of the notice, for export as are deemed essential to the Any interested person may on or before the time for public comment was to ex­ promotion of orderly marketing and May 27, 1964, submit written verified pire on May 12,1964. facilitate sales of such dates in export, statements containing views, arguments A supplemental notice of proposed and may for such purposes participate or suggestions to be considered in this in or negotiate, the sale of such dates rule making was published in the F ed­ connection. Consideration will be given to meet all or a substantial part of the eral R egister on April 22, 1964 (29 F.R. to the proposed amendment of the United needs of a particular country, and, in 5395), which made minor changes to the States Safety Appliance Standards or connection with each such sale, the Com­ southern boundaries of the Washington some revision thereof in the light of tne mittee shall extend to all handlers an and Indianapolis Air Route Traffic Con­ statements so received. opportunity to participate therein, and trol Center areas wherein the floor of One signed copy and 14 additional positive control would be lowered. No shall distribute the returns therefrom to copies of such statements shall be fur­ change was made in the expiration date nished for the use of the Commission by participating handlers according to their of the comment period. mailing to the Secretary of the Inter­ respective contributions of dates. Dates The FAA has received requests from state Commerce Commission, Wasn- other than restricted dates may be dis­ interested persons that additional time ington, D.C. No oral hearing is con­ posed of in outlets prescribed pursuant be allotted for the submission of com­ templated, but any request for sucn to this section if they are inspected and ments on this proposal. The Agency hearing shall be supported by an ex­ certified as meeting the requirements considers an extension of 20 days to be planation as to why the evidence to De for marketable dates or special require­ adequate in this case. Accordingly, no­ presented cannot -reasonably be sub­ ments for export, as applicable.” tice is hereby given that all comments mitted in the form heretofore Provided. 4. At the end of § 987.56 substitute received on Airspace Docket No. 64-W A- The Commission, thereafter, will deter­ a colon for the period and add “And pro­ 9 on or before June 1, 1964, will be con­ mine whether or not assignment oi Tuesday, May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6261 matter for oral hearing is necessary or (if used) at full buff. End-platform nor more than sixty (60) inches above desirable. shall be made of running board material tread of end-platform, with clearance at Notice of this proposal shall be given as specified for “Box and Other House each end of not more than four (4) to the general public by depositing a copy Cars.” inches from side of car, supported by an thereof in the office of the Secretary of Sill steps. Same as specified for “Box extra leg near center of handholds. the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Other House Cars.” Manner of application: Same as spec­ Washington, D.C., and by filing a copy End-ladder clearance. No part of car ified for “Horizontal End Handholds” with the Director, Office of the Federal above end-sills within thirty (30) inches for “Box and Other House Cars.” Register. from side of car, except buffer block, Vertical end handholds. Number: (Safety Appliance Acts, 45 U.S.C. 1-16) brake-shaft, brake wheel, end-platform, four (4). horizontal end handholds, or uncoupling Dimensions: Minimum diameter, five- By the Commission, Division 3. lever shall extend to within twelve (12) eighths (% ) of an inch, wrought iron or [ seal] H arold D. M cC o y , inches of a vertical plane parallel with steel. Minimum clearance, two (2), Secretary. end of car and passing through the in­ preferably two and one-half (2Y2) , side face of knuckle, when closed with inches. Amend § 131.1 by adding “ (Does not the coupler horn against the buffer Location: One (1) on each side of each ihclude cars with roofs 16 feet 10 inches block or end-sill and cushioning device end of car, not more than four (4) or more above top of ra il)” following (if used) at full buff, and no other part inches from side of car, extending down­ the words “Box and Other House Cars”, of end of car or fixtures on same above ward from end of horizontal end-plat­ in the heading. end-sill, other than exceptions herein form handhold to within eight (8) Add new classification, as follows: noted, shall extend beyond outer face of inches above tread of end platform. Box and other house cars with roofs buffer block. One (1) continuous handhold with two 16 feet 10 inches or more above top of Side handholds. Number: Sixteen (2) right angles, or two (2) right angle rail—Hand brakes. Number: Two (2). (16). handholds, may take the place of two One (1) on each end of car. Each “Box Dimensions: Same as specified for (2) specified vertical end-handholds and and Other House Car with the -Roof 16 “Box and Other House Cars.” one (1) horizontal end-platform hand­ Feet 10 Inches or More Above the Top Location: Horizontal— Four (4) near hold, provided the dimensions and loca­ of the Rail” shall be equipped with effi­ each end on each side of car spaced not tions coincide, and extra legs at points cient hand brakes which shall operate in more than nineteen (19) inches apart of angle and center are provided and harmony with the power brake thereon. and with the bottom handhold located securely fastened to car. The hand brakes may be of any effi­ not more than twenty-one (21) inches Manner of application: Same as spec­ cient design, but must provide the same from top tread of sill step, and top hand­ ified for “Box and Other House Cars.” degree of safety as the design shown hold shall coincide in height with hori­ Uncoupling levers. Same as specified in Plate “A.” zontal end-platform handhold, a varia­ for “Box and Other House Cars.” Dimensions: Same as specified for “Box tion of two (2) inches being allowed. Painting and stenciling. That portion and Other House Cars.” Spacing of side handholds shall be uni­ of each end of car more that fifteen (15) Location: Each hand brake shall be form within a limit of two (2) inches feet above top of rail shall be painted located so that, it can be safely operated from top handhold to bottom handhold. with contrasting reflectorized paint and from the end-platform. Each brake Clearance of outer ends of handholds shall bear the words “NO R U N N IN G shaft shall be located on end of car to shall be not more than eight (8) inches BOARD” to the left of center and “EX ­ left of center and not more than twenty- from end of car. CESS H EIG H T C AR ” to* the right of four (24) inches from left side of car. Manner of application: Same as speci­ center. Lettering to be not less than Manner of application: Same as speci­ fied for “Box and Other House Cars,” ex­ three (3) inches high. On each side- fied for “Box and other House Cars.” cept each bottom handhold shall have sill near end comer there shall be painted Erid-platforms. Number: Two (2). foot guard or upward projection not less a yellow rectangular area with a three- Dimensions: Width: Not less than ten than two (2) inches in height near in­ fourths (% ) inch black border contain­ side end. (10) inches. Length: Full width of car. ing the words “THIS CAR EXCESS Number: Location: One (1) on each end of car Horizontal end handholds. HEIGHT—NO RUNNING BOARD.” Four (4) . not more than eight (8) inches above Lettering to be not less than one and one- center sill, Dimensions: Same as specified for half ( l 1/^) inches high. When car is “Bex and Other House Cars.” Manner of application: Each end- equipped with center sill or underframe Location: One (1) near each side of Platform shall be securely supported by cushioning device having m ore,than each end of car on outer edge of end plat­ not less than four (4) metal braces hav­ twelve (12) inches longitudinal impact form projecting downward with clear­ ing a minimum cross sectional area absorbing travel, and a part of the un­ ance of outer end not more than sixteen three-eighths (% ) by one and one-half coupling device and/or brake pipe is lo­ (ly2) inches or equivalent which shall (16) inches from side of car. Manner of application: Same as speci­ cated parallel to the exposed end of the be securely fastened to body of car with center sill, such part shall provide at not less than one-half (% ) inch bolts or fied for “Box and Other House Cars.” least two (2) inches of clearance near rwets. The outside edge of each end- Horizontal end-platform handholds. the coupler of sufficient length to permit Platform shall be not less than six (6) Number : Two (2). use as an emergency handhold during inches from a vertical plane parallel Dimensions: Same as specified for air hose coupling operation and the top with end of car and passing through “Horizontal End Handholds” for “Box and Other House Cars,” except length Of exposed ends of sliding center sill shall Ihside face of knuckle when closed shall extend across end of car. be coated with anti-skid paint,. with coupler-horn against the buffer- Location: Extending across each end ock or end sill and cushioning device [F.R. Doc. 64-4755; Filed, May 11, 1964; of car, not less than forty-eight (48) 8:50 am .] N otices

tive June 4, 1953 under the provisions of corporated in its contract which pre­ DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR the Reorganization Act of 1949, as cludes the lifting of other than copra, amended (5 U.S.C. 133z), and in order sugar, nil cake, fertilizer, ore, logs and Bureau of Land Management to afford interested persons and groups lumber from the Philippine Islands to [Classification Order 102] an opportunity to place before the De­ California ports on the twelve sailings partment their views with respect to the now permitted to make inbound calls ALASKA proposed transfer, the Department is at California en route to Washington- Small Tract Classification giving advance public notice of proposed Oregon. transfer of assignment of functions and Any person, firm or corporation hav­ Cancellation; Correction delegations of authority. ing any- interest in such application and M at 5,1964. On the basis of operating experience desiring a hearing under section 605(c) F.R. Doc. 64-3617, appearing at page and recent assessment of means for fa­ of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as 5089 of the issue for Tuesday, April 14, cilitating research effectiveness in the amended, 46 U.S.C. 1175 should by the 1964, is hereby corrected as follows: ft. areas^of utilization research, farm re­ close of business on May 26, 1964, notify The title “Recreation and Public Pur­ search and marketing research, it has the Secretary, Maritime Subsidy Board poses; Cancellation” should read “Small been determined that the following or­ in writing in triplicate, and file petition Tract Classification Cancellation”. ganizational adjustmént will provide for leave to intervene in accordance with The last sentence of paragraph 1 opportunity for concentrating available the rules of practice and procedure of should read “I hereby cancel ‘Small scientific talent, equipment and facilities the Maritime Subsidy Board. Tract Classification Order 102’: * * * ” on the critical problems which are basic In the event a hearing is ordered to be to the interests of all three research held on the application under section Ross A. Y oungblood, areas. It is proposed to transfer from 605(c), the purpose thereof will be to District Manager. the Agricultural Marketing Service to the receive evidence relevant to il) whether [F.R. Doc. 64-4702; Filed, May 11, 1964; Agricultural Research Service the follow­ the application is one with respect to a 8:46 am .] ing functions and related delegations of vessel to be operated on a service, route authority: or line served by citizens of the United States which would be in addition to the TGroup 399] Marketing research including handling, transportation and storage of agricultural existing service, or services, and if so, ARIZONA products, together with investigation of in­ whether the service already provided by sect infestations on off-farm stored products vessels of United States registry in such Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey and related cost and efficiency evaluations. service route or line is inadequate, and M a y 6, 1964. (2) whether in the accomplishment of These functions are presently per­ 1. Plats of survey of the lands de­ the purposes and policy of the Act appli­ formed in the Market Quality Research cant’s vessels should be operated with­ scribed below will be officially filed in the Division and the Transportation and out cargo restrictions. Land Office, Phoenix, Arizona, effective Facilities Division of the Agricultural If no request for hearing and petition at 10:00 a.m., June 11, 1964: Marketing Service. It is proposed that for leave to intervene is received within G ila and Salt R iver Meridian these divisions be transferred, to and re­ the specified time, or if the Maritime T.7N..R. SE„ tained intact within the Agricultural Subsidy Board determines that petitions Secs. 27 to 34, inclusive. Research Service pending further studies for leave to intervene filed within the of program relationships involved. specified time do not demonstrate suffi­ The areas described aggregate 5,044.42 Should the proposed transfer become cient interest to warrant a hearing, the acres. effective, there will be published in the Maritime Subsidy Board will take such 2. The soil is sandy to gravelly consist­ F ederal R egister an appropriate amend­ action as may be deemed appropriate. ency made up of decomposed sandstone ment of the Secretary’s Order dated De­ and granite. cember 24,1953 (19 F.R. 74), as amended. Dated: May 7,1964. 3. All of the above described lands are In order to be considered, views and By order of the Maritime Subsidy embraced in the Tonto National Forest comments of interested persons and Board. by Proclamation 1672 of August 14,1923. groups must be received by the Secre­ In view of the above, the described tary within 30 days after publication of James S. D aw son, Jr., Secretary. lands will not be subject to disposition this notice in the F ederal R egister. under the General Public Land Laws by [F.R. Doc. 64--4733; Filed, May 11, 1964; reason of the official filing of the plat. Done at Washington, D.C., this 4th 8:49 a.m.] day of May 1964. R o y T. H elmandollar, Manager. O rville L. F reeman, ! Secretary. [F.R. Doc. 64-4703; Filed, May 11, 1964; 8:47 ajn.} [F.R. Doc. 64-4708; Filed, May 11, 1964; ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION 8:47 a.m.] [Docket No. 115—5] ALLIS-CHALMERS MANUFACTURING DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE CO. Office of the Secretary DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Notice of Issuance of Construction Authorization Amendment AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE Maritime Administration AMERICAN MAIL LINE LTD. Please take notice that no request AND AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH for a formal hearing or petition to in­ SERVICE Notice of Application tervene having been filed following puo- Notice of Proposed Transfer of Assign­ lication of the notice of proposed action Notice is hereby given that American in the F ederal R egister, the Atomic ment of Functions and Delegations Mail Line Ltd., has applied for amend­ Energy Commission has issued Amend­ of Authority ment of its Operating-Differential Sub­ ment No. 1 to Construction Authoriza­ In accordance with Reorganization sidy Agreement Contract No. FMB-76, tion No. CAPR-5. The authorization Plan No.-2 of 1953, which became effec- so as to remove a restriction now in-* authorizes Allis-Chalmers Manufact 6262 Tuesday, May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6263 ing Company (“Allis-Chalmers”) to con­ ami and is entitled to an additional ter­ [Docket No. 13508] struct at Genoa Station in Vernon Coun­ minal charge. The Postmaster General HOUSTON-NEW ORLEANS LOCAL ty, Wisconsin, a forced circulation, di­ points out that should the Board adopt rect cycle, boiling water nuclear reactor the rate proposed by Delta, 34.0302 cents SERVICE INVESTIGATION1 designed to operate at thermal power per ton-mile, such action would result Notice of Prehearing Conference levels up to ,165 megawatts and desig­ in a rate for Delta lower than the rate* nated as the LaCrosse Boiling Water Re­ presently applicable to service by its Notice is hereby given that a prehear­ actor (“the reactor”) , The amendment competitor in the San Juan-New Orleans ing conference in the above-entitled authorizes Allis-Chalmers to make market. The Postmaster General would proceeding is assigned to be held on changes in the shielding of the reactor have no objection to the adoption of the June 11, 1964, at 10:00 a.m., e.d.s.t., in by (1) eliminating the concrete which 37.8907 cents per priority ton-mile rate. Room 725, Universal Building, Connecti­ lines the hemispherical top head of the Eastern, by a filing on April 23, 1964, cut and Florida Avenues NW., Washing­ containment building, and (2) reducing states that it has no objection to the re­ ton, D.C., before associate Chief Ex­ the thickness of the concrete which lines vision proposed by the Postmaster Gen­ aminer Thomas L. W renn., the interior of the cylindrical portion of eral, and Delta, by a filing on April 29, In order to facilitate conduct of the the containment building from two feet 1964, amended its petition in this docket conference interested parties are in­ to nine inches, subject to the condition to substitute the rate of 37.8907 cents structed to submit to the examiner and that the control room and other areas for the originally requested rate of other parties on or before June 3, 1964, which must be inhabited following the 34.0302. cents per priority ton-mile. (1) motions pertaining to the scope of occurrence of any accident which would Upon consideration of the foregoing, tiie proceeding; (2) proposed statements release substantial quantities of fission the Board proposes to amend its Show o f issues; (3) proposed stipulations; (4> products to the containment building Cause Order E-20677 of April 10, 1964, requests for information; (5) statements will be shielded as provided in the orig­ to substitute 37.8907 cents per priority of positions of parties; and (6) proposed inal application (ACNP-62574, dated Oc­ mail ton-mile in lieu of the rate pre­ procedural dates. scribed in such Order. tober 1962). Dated at Washington, D C, May 7, Accordingly, pursuant to the Federal 1964. The amendment issued is as set forth Aviation Act of 1958 and particularly in the Notice of Proposed Issuance of sections 204(a) and 406 thereof, and [ seal] F rancis W . B r o w n , Construction Authorization Amendment pursuant to the regulations promulgated Chief Examiner. published in the F ederal R egister on in 14 CFR Part 302, April 2, 1964, 29 F.R. 4748. [F.R. Doc. 64-4732; FUed, May 11, 1964; I t is ordered That: 8:49 a.m.] Dated at Bethesda, Md„ this 5th day 1. Order E-20677 is amended to sub­ of May 1964. stitute the rate of 37.8907 cents per pri­ ority mail ton-mile for the rate of For the Atomic Energy Commission. 34.0302 cents per priority mail ton-mile FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS E. G. C ase, in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the findings Acting Director, and conclusions and in ordering para­ COMMISSION Division of Reactor Licensing. graph B. All other findings and conclu­ [Docket Nos. 15167, 15168; FCC 64M-387] [F.R. Doc. 64-4717; FUed, May U * 1964; sions remain unchanged; _ 8:48 a.m.] 2. Further procedures herein shall be MINNESOTA MICROWAVE, INC. in accordance with 14 CFR Part 302, and if there is any objection to the rate pro­ Order Scheduling Prehearing posed herein, notice of objection shall be Conference CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD filed within 7 days, and written answer In re applications of Minnesota Micro- [Docket 14862; Order E-20792] and supporting documents shall be filed within 15 days, after the date of service wave, Inc., Willmar, Minnesota, for re­ DELTA AIR LINES, INC. of this order; newal of the license for station KAY61, 3. If notice of objection or answer is a facility in the Domestic Public Point- Petition for Adjustment of Interna­ not filed, as specified in 14 CFR Part 302 to-Point Microwave Radio Service at tional Service Mail Rate; Amend-? and this order, all persons shall be Willmar, Minnesota, Docket No. 15167, ' ment of Order To Show Cause deemed to have waived further pro­ File No. 2868-Cl-Rr-63; for construction cedural steps herein before an order fix­ permits to establish stations in the Point- Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics ing the final rate, and the Board may to-Point Microwave Radio Service in or Board at its office in Washington, D.C., near Roseville, Rockford, Cold Springs, enter an order incorporating the findings on the 6th day of May 1964. Little Falls, Willmar, Benson, and Mon­ and conclusions proposed herein and fix­ The Board, on April 10, 1964, adopted tevideo, Minnesota, Docket No. 15168, Order E-20677 directing all interested ing and determining the final rate herein specified; File Nos. 1845/1846/1847,1848/1849/I850> persons, and particularly Delta Air Lines, 1851-C1-P-63. 4. If any answer is filed presenting Inc., Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Pan Ameri­ Upon the Hearing Examiner’s own mo­ issues for hearing, the issues involved can World Airways, Inc., and the Post­ tion and pursuant to agreement of coun­ thereafter in determining the fair and master General, to show cause why the sel: I t is ordered, This 5th day of May Board should not adopt the proposed reasonable final rate shall be limited to 1964, that a further hearing conference findings and conclusions therein, and those specifically raised by the answer, in the above-entitled proceeding will be fix, determine and publish 34.0302 cents except insofar as other issues are raised held on May 14, 1964, at 10:00 a.m., in Per priority mail ton-mile as the fair and in accordance with 14 CFR 302.307; and the offices of the Commission in Wash­ reasonable rate of compensation to be 5. This order shall be served upon ington, D.C., for the purpose of con­ Paid to Delta for the transportation of Delta Lines, Inc., Eastern Air Lines, Inc., sidering the remaining issues in such mail by aircraft, the facilities used and National Airlines, Inc., Pan American proceeding and fixing hearing schedule useful therefor, and the services con­ World Airways, Inc., and the Postmaster relative thereto. nected therewith, between San Juan and General. Released: May 6, 1964. New Orleans. This order will be published in the - response to that Order, on April 17, F ederal C ommunications F ederal R egister. Co m m issio n , ■1964 the Postmaster General filed an By the Civil Aeronautics Board. [ seal] B e n F. W aple, J ec~on and answer showing that the Secretary. rate to which Delta’s rate should be [ seal] H arold R. S anderson, [FJt. Doc. 64-4729; Filed, May 11, 1964; equalized is equivalent to 37.8907 cents Secretary. 8:49 ajn.] er ton-mile because the competing car- [F.R. Doc. 64^4731; FUed, May 11, 1964; r makes an intermediate stop at M i- 8:49 ajn.J 1 See Board Order E-20759. No. 93------5 / 6264 NOTICES

[Docket Nos. 15429, 15430; PCC 64M-391] It further appearing, that counsel for Service Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 262), the Broadcast Bureau, the only other and regulations issued thereunder (42 DOVER BROADCASTING CO., INC., party to this proceeding, has informally CFR Part 73)* the following establish­ AND TUSCARAWAS BROADCAST­ consented to a grant of the instant mo­ ment license and product license actions ING CO. tion; have been taken from January 16, 1964, I t is, therefore, ordered, This 30th day to April 15,1964, inclusive. Order Continuing Hearing of April, 1964, that the mdtion for con­ These lists are supplementary to the In re applications of Dover Broadcast­ tinuance of the further prehearing con­ lists of licensed establishments and ing Company, Inc., Dover-New Philadel­ ference be and it is hereby granted products in effect on April 15,1963, pub­ phia, Ohio, Docket No. 15429, Pile No. and the further prehearing conference lished on July 2, 1963, in 28 P.R. 6792, BPH-3560; The Tuscarawas Broadcast­ in the above-entitled proceeding pres­ as amended by three lists, one of license ing Company, New Philadelphia, Ohio, ently scheduled for May 1, 1964, be and actions taken from April 16, 1963, Docket No. 15430, Pile No. BPH-4196; it is hereby continued to a date to be through July 15,1963, published on Aug­ for construction permits. fixed by further order not later than 14 ust 7,1963, in 28 P.R. 8050, one of license days after disposition of Spartan Radio­ The Hearing Examiner having under actions taken from July 16,1963, through casting" Company’s ' Motion to Enlarge consideration communication dated May October 15,1963, published on November 4,1964 from counsel for The Tuscarawas and Change Issues and its Petition for 14, 1963, in 28 F.R. 12141, and one of Broadcasting Company requesting that a Reconsideration and Grant Without change be made in the prehearing con­ Hearing. license actions taken from October 16, 1963, through January 15, 1964, pub­ ference and hearing dates heretofore Released: May 1, 1964. scheduled; lished on February 15, 1964, in 29 F.R. It appearing, that good cause exists F ederal C ommunications 2514.-- C o m m issio n , why said request should be granted and Establishment L icenses I ssued counsel for Tuscarawas alleges that [ seal] B e n F. W aple, Secretary. counsel for Dover Broadcasting Com­ Establishment License N o. Date pany, Inc., the only .other applicant in [F.R. Doc. 64-4730; Piled, May 11, 1964; this proceeding, has consented to a 8:49 a.m.] The Community Blood Bank of change of said dates; Norton, Inc., Norton, V a _____ 263 1-27-64 Accordingly, it is ordered, This 7th The American National Red Cross, Washington, D.C. (for day of May 1964, that the prehearing 190 2- 3-64 conference now scheduled for May 27 Volk Radiochemical Co., Sko­ DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDU­ kie, H I...... 323 : 2-14-64 is hereby rescheduled for June 16, 1964, T h e Wellcome Foundation Lim­ 9:00 a.m.; and, the hearing now sched­ CATION, AND WELFARE ited, Wellcome Research Lab­ uled for June 25, is hereby rescheduled oratories, Beckenham, Kent, England...... ______.... 129 3-24-64 for July 20, 1964, 10:00 a.m„ both in the Public Health Service Community Blood Center of Commission’s Offices, Washington, D.C. Chicago, Inc., Chicago, 111____ 367 4- 9-64 Dunklin County Memorial Hos­ Released: May 7,1964. LICENSED BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS pital, Kennett, M o...... 368 4- 9-64 Belle Bonfils Memorial Blood Notice is hereby given that pursuant Banks, Denver, Colo ______166 4-15-64 F ederal C ommunications to section 351 of the Public Health C o m m issio n , [ seal] B e n P. W aple, P roduct L i< I ssued Secretary.

[F.R. Doc. 64-4728; Piled, May 11, 1964; Product Establishment License No. Daté 8:49 am .] .1-17-64 Single Donor Plasma (Human) Knoxville Blood Center, Inc______- ____ 254 Anti-Rb Typing Serum, Anti-Rho (Anti-DE). Spectra Biologicals, In c. ______i______— 844 2-27-64 [Docket No. 15322; PCC 64M-374] 159 2-27-64 Anti-S Serum ------— . . . . — ------Blood Grouping Laboratory of Boston, Inc. 2- 27-64 Packed Red Blood Cells (Human)...... Beverly Blood Center, Inc____ .... ______269 SPARTAN RADIOCASTING CO. National Bio Serums, Inc______g ______349 3- U-64 Anti-Rh Typing Serum, Anti-Rh' (Anti-E)... 3-13-64 Anti-Le* Serum (Anti-Lewis)------.... ------Dade Reagents, Inc..____. ______. — ______179 Order Scheduling Prehearing Anti-s Serum.------— ------— ■ _____d o ______------'£ühä A n ti-L e b Serum — ------—• _____d o ______— ------— Conference The Wellcome Foundation Limited____,___ 129 3-24-64 Tetanus Antitoxin...... - - - * - 349 3- 26-64 Anti-Rh Typing Serum, Anti-Rho (Anti-DE). National Bio Serums, Ino_____ :— — ------4- 1-64 In re application of Spartan Radio­ Anti-Rh Typing Serum .Anti-Rh» (Anti-C»)_. Specific Serums, Inc— 2------343 367 4- 9-64 Citrated Whole Blood (Hum an)..— : ------— Community Blood Center of Chicago, casting Company, Asheville, North In c ; 368 4- 9-64 Carolina, for construction permit for Citrated Whole Blood (H um an)....------—— Dunklin County Memorial Hospital.!_____ Beverly Blood Center, Inc____ ... ------269 4-13-64 new Television Broadcast Translator Heparinized Whole Blood (Huniaii)...... 344 4-15-64 Anti-Kp» Serum (Anti-Penney)...... Spectra Biologicals, Inc . ____ ...... Station, Docket No. 15322, Pile No. Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc______- 164 4-15-64 Single Donor Plasma (Human) ------349 4-1564 BPTTV-1996. Anti-Rh Typing Serum, Anti-Rho' (Anti-OJJ). National Bio Serums, Inc_.______The Hearing Examiner having under consideration a motion- filed on April Establishment L icenses R evoked W ithout 29, 1964, by Spartan Radiocasting Com­ P rejudice pany, requesting that the further prehearing conference in the above- Establishment License D ate entitled proceeding, presently sched­ N o , uled for May 1, 1964, be continued un­ til 14 days after disposition by the Com­ Clark-West Division, Syntex mission of (1) the Motion to Enlarge Laboratories, Inc., Jersey C ity , N . J______- 311 1-27-64 and Change Issues and (2) the Petition The Community Blood Bank, for Reconsideration and Grant With­ N orton . V a ------263 1-27-64 The American National Red out Hearing, filed on March 2, 1964 and Cross, Washington, D .C ------190 2 -3 -6 4 March 13, 1964, respectively, by Spar­ V o lk Radiochem ical Co,-, C h i- cago, 1 1 1 .....-.---.------323 2- 14-64 tan Radiocasting Company; and Chek-Lab Inc., Chicago, HI------257 3 - 24-64 It appearing, that substantial policy Wellcome Research Labora­ tories, Beckenham, Kent, matters are involved and action upon 3-24-64 E n g la n d ------129 such pending pleadings may (1) render The Belle Bonfils Memorial unnecessary a hearing, as well as a fur­ Blood Bank, Denver, Colo— 166 4-15-64 Holy Cross Hospital Research ther prehearing conference or (2) sig­ Foundation, Salt Lake City, 4-15-64 nificantly affect the nature and scope of U t a h ...... 232 the proceeding; and Tuesday, May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6265

P roduct L icenses R evoked W ithout P rejudice provide conference jurisdiction over rate agreements and freight contracts con­ Product Establishment License No. Date cluded by any line(s) operating from Canadian ports (excluding Pacific Coast Bacterial Antigen with Antihistaminic— . -/-.~ Merck Sharp & Dohme, Divisionof Merck 2 1-9-64 ports) although the range of ports served & C o « Inc. by the Conference, as described in the Measles Immune Serum (Hum an)...... Michael Reese Research Foundation______113 1-21-64 Poliomyelitis Im m une Serum (H u m a n )------____ d o ------preamble of the basic conference agree­ Scarlet Fever Immune Serum (Hum an)------____ d o ...... « .. . . ______: ...... ment, as amended, does not include Poison Ivy Extract Alum Precipitated------Clark-West Division, Syntex Laboratories 311 1-27-64 Inc. Canadian ports; and would amend Arti­ Poison Ivy-Poison Oak Extract------Pitman-Moore Co., Division of The Dow 110 3-13-64 cle 8 with respect to conference voting Chemical Co. procedures; Anti-A Blood Grouping Serum ...... C h e k -L a b , In c ______267 3-24-64 Anti-B Blood G rouping Serum ------_____d o______J______Whereas, Agreement No. 6200-B, be­ Anti-Rh Typing Serum, Anti-Rhe' (Anti-CD). _____d o ______tween A/B Atlanttrafik, a regular con­ Anti-Human Serum ...... _____d o ______Anti-A Blood G rouping Serum ...... H oly Cross Hospital Research Foundation. 232 4-15-64 ference member, and Montreal Australia Anti-B Blood G rouping Serum ...... _____d o...... New Zealand Line (M.A.N.Z.), an asso­ Anti-Rh Typing Serum, Anti-Rho (A nti-D )... _____d o ______Anti-Rh Typing Serum, Anti-Rho' (Anti-CD). _____d o ______:______ciate member of the conference, appar­ Anti-Rh Typing Serum, Apti-hr' (Anti-c)------_____d o ______ently would establish those two carriers Anti-Human Serum ______»Y _____d o______..... ______as Canadian Lines within the purview of the aforesaid Article 2, and would cover Approved: Canadian ports (excluding Pacific Coast R oderick M urray, ports) as well as the United States ports Director, Division of Biologies Standards, National Institutes of Health, covered by the scope of Agreement No. Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. 6200, as amended, and by the proposed Approved: amendment, No. 6200-B; Whereas, notice was published of the , J. S tewart H u nter , Assistant to the Surgeon General for Information, Public Health Service, filing of Agreements Nos. 6200-7 and U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. 6200-8 in the F ederal R egister on Sep­ tember 5 and 20, 1963, respectively, and [F.R. Doc. 64-4670; Piled, May 11,1964; 8:45 a.m.] of Agreement No. 6200-B on September 20, 1963; Whereas, pursuant to such notices a participant in Port’s terminal tariff. protest and request for hearing were filed Port agrees that before making any FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION on behalf of the Dow Chemical Company changes in its tariff, Terminals will be and Dow Chemical International, S.A. INTER-ISLAND SHIPPING CORP. AND notified and afforded an opportunity to objecting to approval of Agreement No. SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC. confer thereon with Port. 6200-8, and also requesting that approval Interested parties may inspect the Notice of Termination of Agreement of Agreement No. 6200-B be delayed agreement and obtain copies thereof at pending resolution of the question intro­ Notice is hereby given that effective the Bureau of Domestic Regulation, Fed­ June 1, 1964, Agreement No. 8859 be­ eral Maritime Commission, Washington, duced during the course of hearings in tween Inter-Island Shipping Corpora­ D.C., 20573, or may inspect a copy at the Docket No. 1043 as to whether the scope tion and Sea-Land Service, Inc., is being offices of the District Managers of the of a dual rate contract increases concur­ terminated in accordance with its terms Commission in New York, N.Y., New Or­ rently with an expansion of the geo­ by Sea-Land Service, Inc. leans, La., and San Francisco, Calif., and graphical scope of a conference’s range Agreement No. 8859 covers a through may submit to the Secretary, Federal so as to be co-extensive in coverage with billing arrangement for the transporta­ Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C., the conference agreement; tion of general cargo and controlled 20573, within 20 days after publication of Whereas, in connection with a pro­ temperature cargo in the trade from this notice in the F ederal R egister, writ­ posed modification (Agreement No. the Virgin Islands to U.S. North Atlantic ten statements with reference to the 6200-6) of the basic conference agree­ ports with transhipment at San Juan, agreement and their position as to ap­ ment, A/B Atlanttrafik filed a protest P.R. proval, disapproval, or modification, to­ against expansion of the geographical scope of the conference’s range and re­ Dated: May 7,1964. gether with a request for hearing, should a hearing be desired. quested a hearing with respect thereto, By order of the Commission. which was assigned Federal Maritime Dated: May 7, 1964. Commission Docket No. 1113, and the T homas L is i, Caterpillar Tractor Company, Peoria, Il­ Secretary. By order of the Federal Maritime Commission. linois, filed a protest without requesting [F.R. Doc. 64-4723; Piled, May 11, 1964; T homas L is i, a hearing, which was assigned Docket No. 8:48 a.m.] Secretary. 1125 and consolidated for hearing with [FH. Doc. 64-4724; Filed, May 11, 1964; the proceedings in Docket No. 1113; PORT OF SEATTLE AND SALMON 8:48 a.m.] Whereas, A/B Atlanttrafik became a conference member, and the conference TERMINALS thereafter, pursuant to agreement of its Notice of Agreement Filed for [Docket No. 1166] members, withdrew Agreement No. Approval U.S. ATLANTIC AND GULF/AUSTRA- 6200-6 for approval and filed a motion to dismiss the proceedings in Docket Nos. , NQtice is hereby given that the fol- LIA-NEW ZEALAND CONFERENCE 1113 and 1125, which motion the Com­ f l i  . î escribed agreement has been Amended Order of Investigation mission granted; * , the Commission for approval Whereas, upon consideration of the to sectlon 15 of the Shipping Whereas, pursuant to section 15 of agreements and protests, the Commission the Shipping Act, 1916, Agreements Nos. is of the opinion that an investigation UB.C. su/-9 Stat- 733’ 75 Stat 763^ 46 6200-7 and 6200-8, between the member should be undertaken to determine Porfr^ J1on^ N° - T - 196, between the lines of the U.S. Atlantic & Gulf /Aus­ whether such Agreements should be ap­ Steam«™ S®attle (Port), and Olympic tralia-New Zealand Conference, as listed proved, disapproved or modified under T e S S P £?mpany- Inc., d/b/a Salmon in the Appendix attached hereto, would section 15; (term inals), provides for the modify the basic conference Agreement Whereas, the question of whether or No. 6200, as amended, to enlarge the Prefer^tf^k^vîfnnInal Pr°Perty and not the conference may utilize its form and J?erthlng rights at Piers 24 geographical scope of the range served of dual rate contract within the ex­ will Washington. Terminals by the conference to include Great Lakes panded scope of the conference being marine6^ 6-**1? Premises as a general and St. Lawrence River ports of the sought herein is properly at issue in this terminal and agrees to become a United States; would amend Article 2 to proceeding; 6266 NOTICES

Therefore, in order that a record may Inc., General Agents, 26 Beaver Street, the Examiner’s decision for the rationale be developed upon which the Commission New York 4, N.Y. of our determination. In this connec­ Bank Line, Ltd. (The) (American & Oriental tion, see the Examiner’s decision issued may determine to approve, disapprove Line), Boyd, Weir & Sewell, Inc., 17 Bat­ or modify Agreements Nos. 6200-7, 6200- tery Place, 16th Floor, New York, N.Y., September 4, 1962, therein ( ------f p c 8 and 6200-B; in order that protestants, 10004. ------), mimeo. pages 29 and 30. Con­ the Dow Chemical Company, Dow Chem­ A/B Atlanttrafik (Atlanttrafik Express Serv­ sistent therewith, in the suspension order ical International, S.A., may be afforded ice), Garcia & Diaz, Inc., General Agents, in Docket No. RI64-363, we treated the an opportunity to publicly participate in 25 Broadway, New York 4, N Y . subject rate filings as seeking approval the proceedings; and in order that the United States Lines Company (American Pio­ of 14.0 cent per Mcf rates, i.e., 13.0 cents question of the use of the conference’s neer Line), United States Lines, 1 Broad­ per Mcf plus 1.0 cent per Mcf mim'mnni way, New York 4, N.Y. guarantee for liquids. dual rate contract in the expanded Port and Associated Lines—Joint Service, agreement sought herein may be de­ Flinch, Edye & Company, Inc., Agents, 25 Lakeland in its motion points out that termined ; Broadway, New York 4, N.Y. the 1.0 cent minimum guarantee provi­ I t is ordered, That pursuant to sec­ Hamburg - Sudamerikanische Dampfschef- sion in its contract is operative only a tions 14b, 15 and 22 of the Shipping ffharts-Gesellschaft, Eggert & Amislnck, portion of the time. When the value Act, 1916, an investigation is hereby Columbus Line, Inc., General Agents, 26 of the extracted liquids exceeds 1.0 cent instituted to determine whether: Broadway, New York 4, N.Y. per Mcf of the wet gas stream, Lakeland (1) Agreements 6200-7, 6200-8 and Montreal Australia New Zealand Line, Ltd. is compensated pursuant to the liquid (M.A.N.Z. Line), Coristine Building, Mon­ settlement tables in its contracts. Under 6200-B should be approved, disapproved treal 1, Canada. or modified under section 15; and these circumstances we think it appro­ (2) The conference’s form of dual [F.R. Doc. 64-4725; Filed, May 11, 1964; priate to shorten the suspension period 8:49 a.m.] rate contract should be permitted for to the date of issuance of this order, as use in the expanded conference sought hereinafter provided. herein under section 14b; The Commission finds: The motion for I t is further ordered, That the parties FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION reconsideration filed by Lakeland on March 20, 1964, in the proceeding in to these agreements as listed in the [Docket No. RI64-363] Appendix attached hereto be made re­ Docket No. RI64-363, sets forth no new spondents in this proceeding; LAKELAND PETROLEUM CORP. facts or legal considerations which were It is further ordered, That this matter ET AL. not fully considered prior to the issu­ be assigned for hearing before an exam­ ance of our order of December 4,1963, or iner of the Commission’s Office of Hear­ Order Denying Motion for Reconsid­ which now having been considered war­ ing Examiners at a date and place to be eration and Shortening Suspension rant any modification of the said order, hereafter determined and announced by except that we shall shorten the suspen­ Period sion period as hereinafter provided. the presiding Examiner; M a y 5,1964. It is further ordered, That notice of The Commission orders: On March 20, 1964, Lakeland Petro­ (A ) The motion for reconsideration this amended order be published in the leum Corporation (Lakeland) filed a mo­ of the Commission’s order of December F ederal R egister and that a copy tion for reconsideration of the Commis­ 4, 1963, filed by Lakeland Petroleum Cor­ thereof and notice of hearing be served sion’s order issued December 4, 1963, in poration on March 20, 1964, is hereby upon respondents; the above-designated proceeding, pro­ denied. I t is further ordered, That action with viding for hearings on and suspension (B ) The suspension periods for the respect to Agreements No. 6200-7, 6200-8 of the proposed changes in rates desig­ proposed rates contained in Supplement and 6200-B be held in abeyance pending nated as Supplement Nos. 3 and 5 to Nos. 3 and 5 to Lakeland’s FPC Gas Rate the Commission’s decision and order in Lakeland Petroleum Corporation (Op­ Schedule Nos. 2 and 3, respectively, are this proceeding; erator), et al., FPC Gas Rate Schedule hereby shortened in Docket No. RI64- I t is further ordered, That all future Nos. 2 and 3, respectively.1 363 to the date of issuance of this order, notices issued by or on behalf of the In support of its motion Lakeland and thereafter until made effective as Commission in this proceeding, including states that it was improper for the prescribed by the Natural Gas Act: Pro­ notice of time and place of hearing or Commission to consider the minimum vided, however, That the above supple­ prehearing conference, shall be mailed guarantee of 1.0 cent per Mcf for liquids ments to the rate schedules filed by Re­ spondent, shall become effective subject directly to all parties of record. as part of the increased rate for the sale of natural gas in interstate commerce; to refund on the date and in the manner I t is further ordered, That any per­ therefore, the Commission should mod­ herèin prescribed if within 20 days from sons, other than respondents, who de­ ify its order of December 4,1963, by per­ the date of the issuance of this order sire to become parties to this proceed­ mitting Lakeland to charge and collect Respondent shall execute and file under ing and to participate therein, shall file the subject rates without such rates be­ the above-designated docket number a petition to intervene with the Sec­ ing subject to suspension. with the Secretary of the Commission retary, Federal Maritime Commission, In Opinion Nos. 390 (------FPC ------) its agreement and undertaking to com­ Washington, D.C., 20573, with copies to and 390-A (------FPC ------), El Paso Nat­ ply with the refunding and reporting respondents, on or before May 18, 1964. ural Gas Company, et al., Docket Nos. procedure required by the Natural Gas And it is further ordered, That Order G-17849, et al. we held that a contractual Act and § 154.102 of the regulations of Investigation served December 23, provision providing for a minimum thereunder, accompanied by a certificate 1963, in this proceeding, and the guarantee for liquids should properly be showing service of copies thereof upon considered as a component of the rate Amended Order of Investigation, served the purchaser under the rate schedules for the jurisdictional sale of gas in de­ involved. Unless Respondent is advised April 21, 1964, are hereby cancelled and termining whether the rate was in excess to the contrary within 15 days after the superseded. of the applicable ceiling. Dealing spe­ filing of its agreement and undertaking, Dated: May 5,1964. cifically with this question in Opinion No. 390-A, mimeo. page 2, we referred to such agreement and undertaking sha [ seal] T homas L i s i , be deemed to have been accepted. Secretary. 1 Also suspended in the above-designated By the Commission. A ppend ix proceeding were proposed increased rates des­ ignated as Supplement Nos. 5 to Lakeland [ seal] Joseph H. G utride, U.S. Atlantic and Gulf/Australia—New Zea­ Petroleum Corporation (Operator), et al. Secretary. land Conference (6200) FPC Gas Rate Schedules Nos. 7, 8 and 9. Lakeland’s motion does not pertain to these [F.R. Doc. 64-4719; Filed, May 11. 1964: American & Australian Steamship Line— 8:48 a.m.] Joint Service, Norton, Lilly & Company, rates. Tuesday, May 12, 1964 FEDERAL REGISTER 6267

No. M C-FC 66817. By order of May SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE INTERSTATE COMMERCE 4,1964, the Transfer Board approved the transfer to Kreitz Motor Express, Inc., COMMISSION COMMISSION Reading, Pa., of the operating rights in [Pile 2-8497] Certificate in No. MC 115703, issued Jan­ FOURTH SECTION APPLICATION uary 26, 1960, to Warren C. Kreitz and northern in s u r a n c e c o m p a n y FOR RELIEF Robert E. Kreitz, doing business as Mor­ OF NEW YORK ris Kreitz and Sons, Reading, Pa., au­ M a y 7,1964. thorizing the transportation, over irreg­ Notice of Application for Exemption Protests to the granting of an applica­ ular routes, of: Such commodities as tion must be prepared in accordance with M ay 6,1964. contractors equipment, heavy and bulky Rule 1.40 of the general rules of prac­ Notice is hereby given that Northern articles, machinery and parts, and ar­ tice (49 CPR 1.40) and filed within 15 ticles requiring specialized handling, be­ insurance Company of New York, a days from the date of publication of this tween points in Berks County, Pa., on the corporation organized under the laws of notice in the F ederal R egister. one hand, and, on the other, points in New York (“Issuer”) has filed an appli­ New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, cation pursuant to Rule 15d-20 of the L ong- and-S hort H aul Connecticut, Rhode Island, Delaware, general rules and regulations under the Maryland, Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) FSA No. 39008: Liquid caustic soda to and the District of Columbia, and Gen­ for an order exempting the issuer from Augusta, Ga., and points in South Caro­ eral commodities, with the usual excep­ the operation of section 15(d) of the Act lina. Filed by Traffic Executive Asso­ tions, between Reading, Pa., and points with respect to the duty to file any re­ ciation-Eastern Railroads, agent (E.R. within 10 miles. James W. Hagar, Post ports required by that section and the No. 2718), for interested rail carriers. Rates on liquid caustic soda, in tank-car Office Box 432, Harrisburg, Pa., attorney rules and regulations thereunder. for applicants. Rule 15d-20 permits the Commission, loads, from points in Michigan, New upon application and subject to appro­ York, Ohio and West Virginia, also No. M C-FC 66823. By order of May 5, Newark, N.J., to Augusta, Ga., Clear­ priate terms and conditions, to exempt 1964, the Transfer Board approved the water, Graniteville and Langley, S.C. an issuer from the duty to file annual transfer to J. Bernard Gagnon, doing Grounds for relief— Market competition. and other periodic reports if the Com­ business as A. H. Gagnon & Son, Central mission finds that all outstanding se­ Tariffs: Supplements 133 and 49 to Falls, R.I., of the operating rights in curities of the issuer are held of record, Traffic Executive Association-Eastern Certificate in No. M C 94403 (Sub-No. 1), as therein defined, that the number of Railroads, agent, tariffs I.C.C. C-102 and issued May 13,1940 to Alfred H. Gagnon, C-334, respectively. such record holders does not exceed Central Falls, R.I., authorizing the fifty persons, and that the filing of such By the Commission. transportation, over irregular routes, of: reports is not necessary in the public Household goods, between Central Falls [ seal] H arold D. M cC o y , and Cumberland, R.I., on the one hand, interest or for the protection of investors. Secretary. The application states with respect to and, on the other, points in Rhode Island, the request for exemption, as follows: [F.R. Doc. 64-4709; Piled, May 11, 1964; Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, 1. All the securities of the issuer are 8:47 a.m.] New Jersey, New Hampshire, and Maine. held of record by 13 persons. James Cardono, 188 Main Street, Paw­ 2. Maryland Casualty Company owns tucket, R.I., attorney for applicants. 779,429 shares of common stock and the [Notice 982] No.MC—FC 66851. By order of May 4, 1964, the Transfer Board approved the remaining 2,226 shares are held by 12 MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER other record holders; and transfer of Certificate of Registration 3. The financial statements of the PROCEEDINGS No. MC 120845 (Sub-No. 1), issued De­ cember 10, 1963, evidencing the right of issuer are consolidated with those of M a y 7 , 1 9 6 4 . Maryland Casualty Company and are the holder thereof to engage in inter­ Synopses of orders entered pursuant state or foreign commerce, correspond­ furnished to the shareholder of the to section 212(b) of the Interstate Com­ issuer. ■ ’ ing in scope to the service authorized merce Act, and rules and regulations by the Certificate of Public Convenience Notice is further given that an order prescribed thereunder (49 CFR Part granting the application upon such and Necessity No. 9409 MC, dated De­ 179), appear below: cember 18, 1957, issued by the Illinois terms and conditions as the Commission As provided in the Commission’s spe­ may deem necessary or appropriate may Commerce Commission, from John cial rules of practice any interested per­ Stancel, doing business as Reliance Spe­ be issued by the Commission at any time son may file a petition seeking recon­ on or after June 9, 1964, unless prior cial Delivery Service, Chicago, 111., to sideration of the following numbered Reliance Special Delivery Service, Inc., thereto a hearing is ordered by the Com­ proceedings within 20 days from the mission. Any interested persons may, Chicago, 111. Charles G. Lind, 173 West date of publication of this notice. Pur­ Madison Street, Chicago 2, 111., attorney not later than June 3,1964, at 5:30 p.m., suant to section 17(8) of the Interstate for applicants. e.d.s.t. submit to the Commission in Commerce Act, the filing of such a peti­ writing his views or any additional facts tion will postpone the effective date of No. M C-FC 66859. By order of May 4, bearing upon the application or the de- the order in that proceeding pending 1964, the Transfer Board approved the sirability of a hearing thereon, or request its disposition. The matters relied upon transfer to Earl P. Fontaine, doing busi­ . e Commission in writing that a hear­ by petitioners must be specified in their ness as Liberty Movers, Leicester, Mass., ing be held thereon. Any such commu- petitions with particularity. of Certificate of Registration No. MC jueataoii or re^uest should be addressed No. M C-FC 66738. By order of May 85505 (Sub-No. 1), issued December 18, the Secretary, Securities and Ex- 4, 1964, the Transfer Board approved 1963, to Alfred J. Liberty, Paxton, Mass., Commission, Washington, D.C., the transfer to Richard Lee Klavuhn, evidencing a right to engage in transpor­ tnw should state briefly the na- doing business as City Transfer and Stor­ tin» °* În^eresb of the person submit- tation in interstate or foreign commerce age, Cumberland, Md., of the operating within the State of Massachusetts, to the hoQ\.iSU(T,- information or requesting a rights in Certificate in No. MC 104116, tv,« . “ *6 reason for such request, and issued by the Commission September 25, extent authorized by the Massachusetts a n n S ? S of facts or law raised by the 1956, to William J. Meders, Cumberland, Department of Public Utilities in Certif­ trovert^1011 Whlch he desires to con- Md., authorizing the transportation, over icate No. 2111 dated July 10,1962, issued irregular routes, of household goods, be­ by that Commission. Arthur A. Went- safprf Commission (pursuant to dele­ tween Cumberland, Md., and points with­ zell, 539 Hartford Turnpike, Shrewsbury, gated authority). in 10 miles thereof, on the one hand, Mass., representative for applicants. and, on the other, points in West Vir­ [ s e a l ] O rval L. D u B o is, ginia, Virginia, Maryland, and Penn­ [ seal] H arold D. M cCo y , „ Secretary. sylvania. Robert H. Reinhart, 610 Me­ Secretary. •R- Doc. 64-4704; Piled, May 11, 1964; morial Avenue, Cumberland, Md., repre­ [F.R. Doc. 64-4710; Piled, May 11, 1964; 8:47 am.] sentative for applicants. 8:48 am.] 6268 FEDERAL REGISTER

CUMULATIVE CODIFICATION GUIDE— MAY The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during May.

1 CFR Page 14 CFR—Continued page 31 CFR Page CFR Checklist______5783 P roposed R u l e s : 500______5870,6010,6011 40 ______5805, 6202 505______------6012 3 CFR 41 ______5805, 6202 32 CFR P roclamations : 42 ______- 5805, 6112, 6202 3298 (amended by Proc. 3587) _ 5933 46______;______6048 861______5789 3586 ______5931 71 [N ew ]______5806, 1001______— 5789 3587 ______5933 5807, 5908, 5909, 6260 1002______5790 3588 ______5935 73 [N ew ]_____ !______5908,5909 1003______5790 3589 ______5937 75 [N e w ]______5807 1007______5791 3590 ______5939 121 [N e w ]______6202 1012______5792 1013______Executive O rders: 123 [N ew ]______6202 5793 11154______6233 125 [N ew ]______6112,6202 1016______5794 127 [N e w ]!______6048 1057______5794 5 CFR 171 [N ew ]______6017 32A CFR 213______5825, 6001, 6147 407______6017 OEP (Ch. I ) : 410______5869 507______5958, 5959 DMO 8500.1 5796 430____ 5870 530______6147 16 CFR 33 CFR 733______6061 13______6149-6152 204______5946 7 CFR 17 CFR 36 CFR 270______6152 43______5870 7______5887,6155 P roposed R u l e s : ______5881 P roposed R u l e s : 58______6163 ______6001 239 ______7______6257 301______6163 _____5941, 6147 240 ______722______6163 ______6235 249 ______39 CFR 728______6089 ______5831 43______i 905______19 CFR 6089 5832, 5941, 6148 ____ —— ____ 5788 151______908 ______6090 909 ______5783 5870 162______„. 10------168______6090 910 ______5833, 5881, 6148 ______6001 21 CFR 980______5944 41 CFR ______5833 17 1201______6253 8-6______6155 1421______5833, 6245 120 6255 121______5788, 5887, 5945 9-7______P roposed R u l e s : 5946 50- 204______6091 52______6156 146______6062 51- 1______5796 728______5804 146a______147— ______5946 P roposed R u l e s : 987______6257 60-80______5909 5838 P roposed R u l e s : 1001______6016 5838 20______42 CFR 1006______5958 1007______5838 120______54______5947,5951 1014 ___ _ 5838 22 CFR 43 CFR 1015 ____ 5838 5826 207______3100______6245 8 CFR 25 CFR 46 CFR 242______- ______6002 21 5828 510______5887 22 ______- ____ 5828 523______5797 9 CFR 31 5828 534______5887 74______6149 32 _ 5828 34______!______5828 47 CFR 10 CFR 31______- 6012 _ 6012 30______5882 26 CFR 33 ______70 ______5883 l ______5855, 6062 34 ______” 11' _ 6012 6012 31______5865 35 ______I ____ 5798 12 CFR 48______6254 81______208______6061 194______6255 5798,5800,6256 83______5798 330______- ______6003 301______6087 85______III„ 5829,6256 563______6254 P roposed R ules 89______P roposed R u l e s : 31______5889 P roposed R u l e s : 508______5838 175______5905 5958,6023 1______6023 563______5838 250 ______5907 73______251 ______5907 14 CFR 49 CFR 5801 40 — ______5941, 6003 29 CFR 2a______6014 41 ______5942, 6004 516______5829 95— ______- 42 ______5942, 6004 1501 ______6089 P roposed R u l e s : 6260 71 [N ew ]______5784-5787, 1502 ______6089 131______— 5825,5885, 6149, 6246 1503 ______6089 50 CFR 73 [N ew ]______5787, P roposed R u l e s : 5801,6014,6015 5826,5885,5886, 6061,6062 657______„. 6092 33______5801 97 [N ew ]______6247 60______295______6005 30 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 5957 399______- 5787 222______5946 10______6158 507_____ 5826, 5886, 5887, 5942, 5943, 6253 P roposed R u l e s : 280______6158 514______5943 222______5805 281______