DOCSLIB.ORG

Memorandum To: City Council From: Teresa Mcclish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Memorandum To: City Council From: Teresa Mcclish MEMORANDUM TO: CITY COUNCIL $ FROM: TERESA MCCLISH~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: UPDATE ON THE DRAFT INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN. AND DRAFT REGIONAL RECYCLED WATER STUDY DATE: JULY 8, 2014 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council receive the update on the draft Integrated Regional Water Resources Managem_ent Plan (IRWMP) and draft Regional Recycled Water Study (RRWS). FINANCIAL IMPACT: No Fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP) The IRWM Plan presents a comprehensive water resources management approach to managing the region's water resources focused on strategies to better the sustainability of the current and future· needs of San Luis Obispo County. This plan was written to meet the latest IRWM requirements while balancing the needs of the participating agencies with the State's need to have a full, well though-out plan to base implementation of future water resources projects/programs. The County of San Luis Obispo (County) is the lead agency in the development of the updated IRWMP for the Region. The City is a signatory to the San Luis Obispo County Region Memorandum of Understanding for the IRWMP program. Water Systems Consulting, the consultant for the Northern Cities Management Area (NCMA) prepared the attached technical memorandum to provide a brief introduction of the Public Draft SLO County IRWMP and provide prioritized sections, as attachments, of the IRWMP (Attachment 1). The NCMA is comprised of the Oceana Community Services District and the cities of Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach and Pismo Beach. The NCMA Technical Group prepared comments for the July 7, 2014 deadline comment deadline (not available at time of agenda preparation). The deadline for submitting the IRWMP to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) is July 21, 2014. The Regional Water Management Group (RWMG) and The Water Resources Advisory Committee (WRAC) will vote to adopt the document at the August 6, 2014 meetings. Item 8.m. - Page 1 CITY COUNCIL JULY 8, 2014 DRAFT INTEGRATED. REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. AND DRAFT RECYCLED WATER STUDIES PAGE2 The IRWMP is scheduled on the County Board of Supervisor's agenda on August 12, 2014. Individual agencies will be asked to adopt the IRWMP in September. The link to the IRWMP document is: http://www.slocountywater.org/site/Frequent%20Downloads/lntegrated%20Regional%2 0Water%20Management%20Plan/IRWM%20Plan%20Update%202014/ Regional Recycled Water Strategic Plan (RRWSP) The 2007 SLO IRWMP (County, 2007) identified recycled water as one of the key strategies from providing long-term water supply reliability for the region in addition to diversifying water supply portfolios, reducing reliance on surface water imports, eliminating the discharge of treated wastewater to the ocean, and reducing conflicts associated with limited regional water sources. The Regional Recycled Water Strategic Plan (RRWSP) is one component of an update to the SLO IRWMP and is funded by a Round 2 IRWM Regional Planning Grant from the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). The RRWSP covers region wide recycled water opportunities and has focused evaluations within four study areas: 1. Morro Bay 2. Nipomo (Nipomo Community Services District (CSD)) 3. Northern Cities (Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach, Pismo Beach, Oceano CSD, and South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD)) 4. Templeton {Templeton CSD) The study identifies opportunities and constraints and recommends next steps for each of the study areas. The Executive Summary is attached and the co-mplete report can be accessed at: http://www.slocountywater.org/site/Frequent%20Downloads/lntegrated%20Regional%2 0Water%20Management%20Plan/Recycled%20Water/. ANALYSIS OF ISSUES: Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP) The objective of the 2014 IRWM Plan Update is directed at building upon the changes that have occurred since 2007, summarized as follows: • Build on the successful collaboration and planning presented in the 2007 IRWM Plan • Incorporate and consider the four Proposition 50 planning studies • Address the enhanced IRWM planning standards Item 8.m. - Page 2 CITY COUNCIL JULY 8, 2014 DRAFT INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AND DRAFT RECYCLED WATER STUDIES PAGE3 • Consider changed regional conditions (i.e., groundwater/surface water availability • and increased agricultural and urban water demands) and enhanced planning approaches, including a revised governance approach • Address the highest priority data gaps and planning needs as determined through a public solicitation and review process Resolution of conflicts is identified as a 9ritical task in the implementation of the IRWM Plan. The plan identifies that conflicts and issues within the SLO Region have historical, geographic, technical, and institutional components, and center around three main areas: 1) groundwater management; 2) environmental stewardship while fostering planned urban growth; and 3) needs within low income and disadvantaged communities. Groundwater and its sustainability amongst a multitude of active groundwater basins is noted as the center of much conflict resulting in various forms of groundwater management and governance bodies. The intent stated in the plan is to continue to address conflict and foster local control of groundwater where resolution policies and programs are based on the use of high quality data for groundwater elevations, quality and sustainability. Conflicts involving fisheries and habitat are also addressed through programs that involve education and coordinated implementation for both uses throughout the SLO Region. Finally, the cost of water and decreased availability is addressed with respect to disadvantaged communities. The plan includes measures and criteria to address these issues iri project selection. According to the plan, a list of specific implementable projects and programs was selected through a series of Sub-Region workshops, electronic notifications, and Regional Water Management Group meetings. Each project and program was prioritized within the context of this IRWM Plan, with the intent that all projects meet the Goals and Objectives described fully in Section E- IRWM Goals and Objectives. All eligible projects and programs are incorporated in the IRWM Plan (see Section G - Project Solicitation, Selection and Prioritization) and described briefly in Table G-1. Projects specific to the NCMA area that were identified in the Long Form (initial list) include: • Oceana Drainage Improvement Project - Hwy 1 & 13th Street - South County Flood Management $1 M-$5M • Lopez Water Treatment Plant Membrane Rack Addition - South County Water Management $500K-$1 M • Lopez Lake Spillway Raise Project - South County Water Supply >$5M • NCMA_NMMA Salt and Nutrient Management Plan (SNMP) - South County Water Supply $250K-$500K • Pismo Beach Recycled Water Project - South County Water Management >$5M Item 8.m. - Page 3 CITY COUNCIL JULYS, 2014 DRAFT INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AND DRAFT RECYCLED WATER STUDIES PAGE4 To reduce the list and ensure the highest priority projects, the Long Form projects were filtered by criteria including readiness-to-proceed, level of satisfying IRWM Goals and Objectives, gauged level of meeting State RMS based on applicable Objectives, and a rough equivalence of Sub-Region representation. The Lopez Spillway and the NCMA Salt and Nutrient Management Plan were excluded from the Final IRWM Project Short List due to a low readiness to proceed ranking, but are still included in the full project list and included in the IRWMP. The Oceano Drainage Improvement, Lopez Water Treatment Plant Membrane Rack Addition and Pismo Beach Recycled Water Projects were selected as the highest priority projects for inclusion in the updated IRWM Plan and likely future IRWM Grant applications. Regional Recycled Water Strategic Plan (RRWSP) The South San Luis Obispo County Sanitation District (SSLOCSD) Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) currently discharges approximately 2.6 mgd of disinfected secondary effluent through a jointly owned ocean outfall (shared with Pismo Beach). Approximately 1.1 mgd of disinfected secondary effluent from Pismo Beach WWTP is discharged through the same ocean outfall. SSLOCSD has the largest volume of effluent considered in the RRWSP and one of the largest opportunities for large-scale reuse; however, landscape irrigation projects are expensive ($3,000+/af) and the more cost effective reuse opportunities - agricultural irrigation, industrial reuse, groundwater recharge, seawater intrusion barrier, and surface water augmentation - will require institutional, legal, outreach, and financial planning to be feasible. Next steps recommended include: • Complete planned treatment plant improvements and re-evaluate facilities needed to implement tertiary treatment upgrade. • Track regulatory drivers and their impacts on reuse opportunities from SSLOCSD WWTP. • Address institutional issues and potential funding mechanisms for regional projects. • Incorporate salt and nutrient management planning into water, wastewater, and recycled water planning. ALTERNATIVES: The following alternatives are provided for the Council's consideration: 1. Receive and file the update on the IRWMP and provide comments for staff to forward to San Luis Obispo County on the RRWSP; 2. Receive and file both the IRWMP and the RRWSP; 3. Provide direction to staff. Item 8.m. - Page 4 CITY COUNCIL JULY 8, 2014 DRAFT INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Maria Project
    MP Region Public Affairs, 916-978-5100, http://www.usbr.gov/mp, February 2016 Mid-Pacific Region, Santa Maria Project Construction individual landholders pump water according to The Santa Maria Project, authorized in 1954, is their needs. The objective of the project as located in California about 150 miles northwest authorized is to release regulated water from of Los Angeles. A joint water conservation and storage as quickly as it can be percolated into flood control project, it consists of the the Santa Maria Valley ground-water basin. Twitchell Dam where construction began in With this type of operation, Twitchell July 1956 and was completed in October Reservoir is empty much of the time. For this 1958.The Reservoir was constructed by the reason, recreation and fishing facilities are not Bureau of Reclamation, and a system of river included in the project. levees was constructed by the Corps of Engineers. Twitchell Dam Twitchell Dam is located on the Cuyama River about 6 miles upstream from its junction with the Sisquoc River. The dam regulates flows along the lower reaches of the river and impounds surplus flows for release in the dry months to help recharge the ground-water basin underlying the Santa Maria Valley, thus minimizing discharge of water to the sea at Guadalupe. The dam is an earthen fill structure having a height of 241 feet with 216 feet above streambed, and a crest length of 1,804 feet. The dam contains approximately 5,833,000 yards of Twitchell Dam and Reservoir material. The multi-purpose Twitchell Reservoir Water Supply has a total capacity of 224,300 acre-feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Status of California Monarchs
    The Legal Status of Monarch Butterflies in California International Environmental Law Project 2012 IELP Report on Monarch Legal Status The International Environmental Law Project (IELP) is a legal clinic at Lewis & Clark Law School that works to develop, implement, and enforce international environmental law. It works on a range of issues, including wildlife conservation, climate change, and issues relating to trade and the environment. This report was written by the following people from the Lewis & Clark Law School: Jennifer Amiott, Mikio Hisamatsu, Erica Lyman, Steve Moe, Toby McCartt, Jen Smith, Emily Stein, and Chris Wold. Biological information was reviewed by the following individuals from The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation: Carly Voight, Sarina Jepsen, and Scott Hoffman Black. This report was funded by the Monarch Joint Venture and the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. For more information, contact: Chris Wold Associate Professor of Law & Director International Environmental Law Project Lewis & Clark Law School 10015 SW Terwilliger Blvd Portland, OR 97219 USA TEL +1-503-768-6734 FX +1-503-768-6671 E-mail: [email protected] Web: law.lclark.edu/org/ielp Copyright © 2012 International Environmental Law Project and the Xerces Society Photo of overwintering monarchs (Danaus plexippus) clustering on a coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) on front cover by Carly Voight, The Xerces Society. IELP Report on Monarch Legal Status Table of Contents Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................v I. Introduction .........................................................................................................................1 II. Regulatory Authority of the California Department of Fish and Game ..............................5 III. Protection for Monarchs in California State Parks and on Other State Lands .....................6 A. Management of California State Parks ....................................................................6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic P U B Lic W Ork S P Roje Cts on the Ce N Tra L
    SHTOIRICHISTORIC SHTOIRIC P U B LIC W ORK S P ROJE TSCP ROJE CTS P ROJE TSC ON THE CE N TRA L OCA STCOA ST OCA ST Compiled by Douglas Pike, P.E. Printing Contributed by: Table of Contents Significant Transportation P rojects......2 El Camino Real................................................... 2 US Route 101...................................................... 3 California State Route 1...................................... 6 The Stone Arch Bridge ..................................... 11 Cold Spring Canyon Arch Bridge..................... 12 Significant W ater P rojects...................14 First Dams and Reservoirs................................ 14 First Water Company........................................ 14 Cold Spring Tunnel........................................... 15 Mission Tunnel ................................................. 16 Gibraltar Dam ................................................... 16 Central Coast Conduit....................................... 18 Water Reclamation In Santa Maria Valley....... 23 Twitchell Dam & Reservoir.............................. 24 Santa Maria Levee ............................................ 26 Nacimiento Water Project................................. 28 M iscellaneous P rojects of Interest.......30 Avila Pier .......................................................... 30 Stearns Wharf.................................................... 32 San Luis Obispo (Port Harford) Lighthouse..... 34 Point Conception Lighthouse............................ 35 Piedras Blancas Light ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Pacific Coast Breeding Window Survey
    2011 Summer Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2005-2010 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. Total Adults 2011 Adult Breakdown REGION SITE OWNER 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 male fem. sex? Date Primary Observer(s) Grays Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27-May Warren Michaelis Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27-May Scott Harris Damon Point/Oyhut S. Parks, D. Nat R. F & W 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-Jun Cyndie Sundstrom County Total 50 0 00 0 0 00 0 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 23 25 22 12 16 18 22 8 13 1 23-May Cyndie Sundstrom, Scott Harris, Warren Michaelis Graveyard Shoalwater Indian Tribe 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18-May Cyndie Sundstrom, Scott Harris, Steve Spencer Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 9 42 28 29 26 20 12 5 6 1 24-May W. Ritchie, C. Sundstrom, S. Pearson, W. Michaelis, S. Harris, M. Fernandez South Long Beach Private 00000 County Total 32 67 50 42 42 38 34 13 19 2 Washington Total 37 67 50 42 42 38 34 13 19 2 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 0 0 0 0 00 0 23-May Kathy Roberts, Andrea Barry Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 27-May Dave Nuzum County Total 00 0 00 0 0 00 0 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23-May Herman Biederbeck Bayocean Spit ACOE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27-May Charlie Bruce, Michelle Schuiteman Netarts Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-Jun Liz Kelly, Fran Recht Sand Lake Spit (S) USFS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27-May Jeff Everett Nestucca Spit OPRD 0 0 0 0 0 County Total 00 0 00 0 0 00
    [Show full text]
  • W • 32°38'47.76”N 117°8'52.44”
    public access 32°32’4”N 117°7’22”W • 32°38’47.76”N 117°8’52.44”W • 33°6’14”N 117°19’10”W • 33°22’45”N 117°34’21”W • 33°45’25.07”N 118°14’53.26”W • 33°45’31.13”N 118°20’45.04”W • 33°53’38”N 118°25’0”W • 33°55’17”N 118°24’22”W • 34°23’57”N 119°30’59”W • 34°27’38”N 120°1’27”W • 34°29’24.65”N 120°13’44.56”W • 34°58’1.2”N 120°39’0”W • 35°8’54”N 120°38’53”W • 35°20’50.42”N 120°49’33.31”W • 35°35’1”N 121°7’18”W • 36°18’22.68”N 121°54’5.76”W • 36°22’16.9”N 121°54’6.05”W • 36°31’1.56”N 121°56’33.36”W • 36°58’20”N 121°54’50”W • 36°33’59”N 121°56’48”W • 36°35’5.42”N 121°57’54.36”W • 37°0’42”N 122°11’27”W • 37°10’54”N 122°23’38”W • 37°41’48”N 122°29’57”W • 37°45’34”N 122°30’39”W • 37°46’48”N 122°30’49”W • 37°47’0”N 122°28’0”W • 37°49’30”N 122°19’03”W • 37°49’40”N 122°30’22”W • 37°54’2”N 122°38’40”W • 37°54’34”N 122°41’11”W • 38°3’59.73”N 122°53’3.98”W • 38°18’39.6”N 123°3’57.6”W • 38°22’8.39”N 123°4’25.28”W • 38°23’34.8”N 123°5’40.92”W • 39°13’25”N 123°46’7”W • 39°16’30”N 123°46’0”W • 39°25’48”N 123°25’48”W • 39°29’36”N 123°47’37”W • 39°33’10”N 123°46’1”W • 39°49’57”N 123°51’7”W • 39°55’12”N 123°56’24”W • 40°1’50”N 124°4’23”W • 40°39’29”N 124°12’59”W • 40°45’13.53”N 124°12’54.73”W 41°18’0”N 124°0’0”W • 41°45’21”N 124°12’6”W • 41°52’0”N 124°12’0”W • 41°59’33”N 124°12’36”W Public Access David Horvitz & Ed Steck In late December of 2010 and early Janu- Some articles already had images, in which ary of 2011, I drove the entire California I added mine to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Document
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Permittee: California Department of Wildlife; Attention: Timothy Chorey Project Name: Regional General Permit No. 78 Reauthorization for the California Department of the Fish and Wildlife Fisheries Restoration Grant Program Permit Number: SPL-2019-00120-CLH Issuing Office: Los Angeles District Note: The term "you" and its derivatives, as used in this permit, means the permittee or any future transferee. The term "this office" refers to the appropriate district or division office of the Corps of Engineers having jurisdiction over the permitted activity or the appropriate official acting under the authority of the commanding officer. You are authorized to perform work in accordance with the terms and conditions specified below. Project Description: To reauthorize the implementation of salmonid habitat enhancement and restoration projects conducted under the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Fisheries Restoration Grant. Program (FRGP) in various coastal streams within Los Angeles District from San Luis Obispo County to San Diego County, California, implemented through the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW) Fisheries Restoration Grant Program (FRGP). Projects would be identified on an annual basis and would apply one or more of the habitat restoration treatments described in the California Salmonid Stream Habitat Restoration Manual (CDFW Manual). Projects may include • In-stream habitat improvements, including cover structures (divide logs, digger logs, spider logs, and log/root wad/boulder combinations), boulder structures (boulder weirs, vortex boulder weirs, boulder clusters, and single- and opposing-boulder wing- deflectors), log structures (log weirs, upsurge weirs, single- and opposing-log wing- deflectors, and Hewitt ramps) and placement of imported spawning gravel may be utilized in certain locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Water Quality Through California's Clean Beach Initiative
    Environ Monit Assess (2010) 166:95–111 DOI 10.1007/s10661-009-0987-5 Improving water quality through California’s Clean Beach Initiative: an assessment of 17 projects John H. Dorsey Received: 4 September 2008 / Accepted: 13 May 2009 / Published online: 3 June 2009 © Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract California’s Clean Beach Initiative These findings should be useful to other coastal (CBI) funds projects to reduce loads of fecal states and agencies faced with similar pollution indicator bacteria (FIB) impacting beaches, control problems. thus providing an opportunity to judge the effectiveness of various CBI water pollution Keywords Water quality · Fecal indicator control strategies. Seventeen initial projects bacteria · Beach pollution · BMPs were selected for assessment to determine their effectiveness on reducing FIB in the receiving waters along beaches nearest to the projects. Introduction Control strategies included low-flow diversions, sterilization facilities, sewer improvements, pier The US Congress demonstrated that having good best management practices (BMPs), vegetative water quality at recreational beaches is a national swales, and enclosed beach BMPs. Assessments priority when they amended the Clean Water Act were based on statistical changes in pre- and in 2000 by passing the Beaches Environmental As- postproject mean densities of FIB at shoreline sessment and Coastal Health (BEACH) Act. This monitoring stations targeted by the projects. Most legislation addressed the problem of pathogens low-flow diversions and the wetland swale project and pathogen indicators in coastal waters by: were effective in removing all contaminated runoff from beaches. UV sterilization was 1. Requiring new or revised water quality stan- effective when coupled with pretreatment dards for pathogens or their indicators filtration and where effluent was released 2.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Beaches 2004 (PDF)
    National List of Beaches March 2004 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-04-004 i Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama ............................................................................................................... 3 Alaska................................................................................................................... 6 California .............................................................................................................. 9 Connecticut .......................................................................................................... 17 Delaware .............................................................................................................. 21 Florida .................................................................................................................. 22 Georgia................................................................................................................. 36 Hawaii................................................................................................................... 38 Illinois ................................................................................................................... 45 Indiana.................................................................................................................. 47 Louisiana
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Maria Project History
    Santa Maria Project Thomas A. Latousek Bureau of Reclamation 1996 Table of Contents The Santa Maria Project ........................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Prehistoric Setting .................................................3 Historic Setting ...................................................4 Authorization...........................................................6 Construction History .....................................................9 Post-Construction History................................................10 Settlement of the Project .................................................12 Uses of Project Water ...................................................13 Conclusion............................................................13 Bibliography ................................................................15 Manuscripts and Archival Material.........................................15 Project Reports, Santa Maria Project..................................15 Government Documents .................................................15 Books ................................................................15 Interviews.............................................................15 Index ......................................................................16 1 The Santa Maria Project The beautiful, broad Santa Maria Basin opens eastward from the Pacific Ocean toward the Sierra
    [Show full text]
  • Sanitary Disposals Alabama Through Arkansas
    SANITARY DispOSAls Alabama through Arkansas Boniface Chevron Kanaitze Chevron Alaska State Parks Fool Hollow State Park ALABAMA 2801 Boniface Pkwy., Mile 13, Kenai Spur Road, Ninilchik Mile 187.3, (928) 537-3680 I-65 Welcome Center Anchorage Kenai Sterling Hwy. 1500 N. Fool Hollow Lake Road, Show Low. 1 mi. S of Ardmore on I-65 at Centennial Park Schillings Texaco Service Tundra Lodge milepost 364 $6 fee if not staying 8300 Glenn Hwy., Anchorage Willow & Kenai, Kenai Mile 1315, Alaska Hwy., Tok at campground Northbound Rest Area Fountain Chevron Bailey Power Station City Sewage Treatment N of Asheville on I-59 at 3608 Minnesota Dr., Manhole — Tongass Ave. Plant at Old Town Lyman Lake State Park milepost 165 11 mi. S of St. Johns; Anchorage near Cariana Creek, Ketchikan Valdez 1 mi. E of U.S. 666 Southbound Rest Area Garrett’s Tesoro Westside Chevron Ed Church S of Asheville on I-59 Catalina State Park 2811 Seward Hwy., 2425 Tongass Ave., Ketchikan Mile 105.5, Richardson Hwy., 12 mi. N of on U.S. 89 at milepost 168 Anchorage Valdez Tucson Charlie Brown’s Chevron Northbound Rest Area Alamo Lake State Park Indian Hills Chevron Glenn Hwy. & Evergreen Ave., Standard Oil Station 38 mi. N of & U.S. 60 S of Auburn on I-85 6470 DeBarr Rd., Anchorage Palmer Egan & Meals, Valdez Wenden at milepost 43 Burro Creek Mike’s Chevron Palmer’s City Campground Front St. at Case Ave. (Bureau of Land Management) Southbound Rest Area 832 E. Sixth Ave., Anchorage S. Denali St., Palmer Wrangell S of Auburn on I-85 57 mi.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report of Hydrogeologic Conditions, Water Requirements, Supplies and Disposition
    2016 Annual Report of Hydrogeologic Conditions, Water Requirements, Supplies and Disposition Santa Maria Valley Management Area Luhdorff and Scalmanini Consulting Engineers April, 2017 Landsat 5 Satellite Image taken November 14, 2008 2016 Annual Report of Hydrogeologic Conditions Water Requirements, Supplies, and Disposition Santa Maria Valley Management Area prepared by Luhdorff and Scalmanini Consulting Engineers April 27, 2017 Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Physical Setting .................................................................................................1 1.2 Previous Studies ................................................................................................2 1.3 SMVMA Monitoring Program .........................................................................2 1.4 Additional Monitoring and Reporting Programs ..............................................4 1.5 Report Organization ..........................................................................................4 2. Hydrogeologic Conditions .................................................................................................5 2.1 Groundwater Conditions ...................................................................................5 2.1.1 Geology and Aquifer System ..............................................................5 2.1.2 Groundwater Levels ............................................................................8
    [Show full text]