arXiv:astro-ph/0701154v1 5 Jan 2007 ocoayh2 004Cao,Poland Cracow, 30-084 2, Podchorazych est,Es asn,M 48824 MI Lansing, East versity, ot ag,S nrw Y69SS KY16 Andrews St Haugh, North ebr,Germany delberg, od abig B H,UK; 0HA, CB3 Cambridge Road, a hei,Pse n e seeg,Gee 2001), and Grebel Galaxy e.g., the (see from . distances M31. T comparable A Leo at Leo are it particu- and which call in Pisces to known, Phoenix, propose are lar we galaxies dwarf – dIrrs transitional dwarf Other and the dSphs between As intermediate of galaxies. – those (dIrrs) properties associated characteris- irregular transitional are still dwarf possesses properties ev- the cloud These of is gas today. tic there neutral object and the compact, past, have with a recent therefore the of must in idence It gas an some for a star-formation. evidence contained has recent is also which of stars, T epoch blue Leo bright, However, dwarf of Group population Local galaxies. other (dSph) population. by spheroidal shared stellar are intermediate-age properties These majority the from distance heliocentric influence. a of At sphere Way’s Group. Local of this the of in purpose galaxy The 2006a,b; al. 2007). et ter 2006a, Zucker al. 2005; et al. Belokurov glob- et Way extended (Willman Milky unusually clusters new 2 ular 8 with of Digital together up Sloan galaxies, made the dwarf is from This (SDSS). data Survey in Sky satellites Way Milky new Jr. .T Hodgkin T. S. .J Irwin J. M. 7 6 5 4 3 2 rpittpstuigL using typeset Preprint to submitted 1 isopleths circular roughly with faint is dwarf The faint, 10 of discovery the seen have years two last The ∼ eiiOsraoy 7 .AoouPae io I96720 HI Hilo, Place, A’ohoku N. 670 Observatory, Gemini t uoaOsraoy rcwPdggclUiest,ul University, Pedagogical Cracow 88349 Observatory, NM Sunspot, Suhora 59, Box Mt. P.O. Observatory, Point Apache eateto hsc n srnm,Mcia tt Uni- State Michigan Astronomy, and Physics of Department colo hsc n srnm,Uiest fS Andrews, St of University Astronomy, and Physics of School a lnkIsiuefrAtooy ¨ngth 7 91 H 69117 K¨onigstuhl Astronomy, 17, for Institute Planck Max 1 nttt fAtooy nvriyo abig,Madingle Cambridge, of University Astronomy, of Institute st nonetedsoeyo nadtoa dwarf additional an of discovery the announce to is .I Wilkinson I. M. , 2 p,ti sa h eyotkrso h Milky the of outskirts very the at is this kpc, 420 ICVR FA NSA WR AAYI H USIT FTEM THE OF OUTSKIRTS THE IN GALAXY DWARF UNUSUAL AN OF DISCOVERY F/] 16 oehrwt on ouaino lesaso age of stars mass blue with of hydrogen population neutral young fi of a from cloud judged with As together of -1.6, distance stars. [Fe/H]= a massive Dat at young, features, Survey lies of well-defined Sky it sequence two Digital a shows Sloan and T the branch Leo in of overdensity diagram stellar color-magnitude a as found was odt ihrcn trfrain tapast eatransition lowes a smallest, be the to is headings: appears dwarf. T Subject It Phoenix Leo the star-formation. than, maps. recent luminosity channel with HIPASS date the to in visible object nti etr eanuc h icvr fanwdafglx,L galaxy, dwarf new a of discovery the announce we Letter, this In 1 .Belokurov V. , srpyia ora Letters Journal Astrophysical 1 .Gilmore G. , 1. INTRODUCTION A T 1 .Harvanek M. E .M Bramich M. D. , tl mltajv 08/22/09 v. emulateapj style X aais wr aais niiul(e)—LclGroup Local — (Leo) individual galaxies: — dwarf galaxies: mike,vasily,[email protected] 1 1 .Prema P. , .W Evans W. N. , ∼ 2 p n a nitreit-g tla ouainwt metallicit a with population stellar intermediate-age an has and kpc 420 5 .Krzesinski J. , umte to submitted 1 .Vidrih S. , 1 .Hebb L. , 1 .V Ryan-Weber V. E. , ∼ 10 5 M 3 1 5,6 Let- ABSTRACT .Begum A. , .W Rix H.-W. , srpyia ora Letters Journal Astrophysical ⊙ ei- .Long D. , y . n ailvlct 3 kms +35 = velocity radial and mt ta.20;Pe ta.20;Ieice l 2004) covers (1998). al. al. primarily Ivezi´c et et (DR5) Schlegel 2003; 5 of al. Release help 2002; et the Data Pier with al. properties et de-reddened 2002; Stoughton and astrometric al. 1999; et and Smith Szalay & photometric Gunn, pipelines (Lupton, through measure processed 2006). automatically al. to et are Gunn data 2006; The al. et Adelman-McCarthy 2001; z DSppln ssasi edl iil ntelf panel left the A in visible Leo. readily is of the stars by iden- constellation as classified we pipeline the objects SDSS 2007), of in overdensity 2006b, candidate spherical roughly al. new et a (Belokurov tified DR5 in sities (NGP). Pole Galactic North the around degrees htmti ad,namely bands, photometric spr forsseai uvyo tla overden- stellar of survey systematic our of part As DSiaigdt r rdcdi five in produced are data imaging SDSS Fkgt ta.19;Gn ta.19;Hg tal. et Hogg 1998; al. et Gunn 1996; al. et (Fukugita 1 5 2 .Fellhauer M. , .Nitta A. , .C Beers C. T. , 1 .T .d Jong de A. T. J. , odate to b A reddening, shown. foreground Galactic mean the for ue r cuaeto accurate are tudes a oriae J00 93:34+17:03:05 09:34:53.4 (Galactic) Coordinates (J2000) Coordinates oiinAngle Position Ellipticity r A (m µ V M v M rmH aa oselrvlcte measured velocities stellar no data, HI From h ufc rgtessaditgae magni- integrated and brightnesses Surface ⊙ tot 0 V tot HI , − b V Pumr 1 (Plummer) M) , V rpriso h e Dwarf T Leo the of Properties Pumr 26 (Plummer) st h oo-antd diagram, color-magnitude the to ts Parameter 2. betsmlrt,btmc lower much but to, similar object 7 0 hc eitrrta e giant red a as interpret we which .A Snedden A. S. , ∼ AAADDISCOVERY AND DATA 4 oT,i h oa ru.It Group. Local the in , T eo ees SS R) The DR5). (SDSS 5 Release a .C Barentine C. J. , 0 y.Teei compact a is There Myr. 200 1 .C Hewett C. P. , uioiyglx found galaxy luminosity t a AL 1 TABLE 2 .Koposov S. , − ± ∼ 1 onietwt the with coincident 0 m . ℓ 5 214 = n r corrected are and 3 u 3 kms +35 , 1 10 5 . − .C Kennicutt, C. R. , LYWAY ILKY 16 23 ≈ 9 .Brewington H. , 0 ≈ 5 2 ◦ 7 m . . m m m ′ .B Zucker B. D. , g . . . M m b , 0 . 4 0 1 , ◦ 0 9 1 1 ⊙ 43 = ∼ − 1 r of y 00square 8000 , . 7 V ◦ , i and , 1 5 , , 2 Irwin et al.
Fig. 1.— The Leo T Dwarf: Left: The spatial distribution of all objects classified as stars in the vicinity of Leo T . ∆α and ∆δ are given in arcminutes. Middle Left: Binned spatial density of all stellar objects. The inner circle marks a radius of 3′, and the outer circle a radius of 12′. Bins are 4.′ × 4.′, smoothed with a Gaussian with a FWHM of 6.′ Middle right: CMD of all stellar objects within the inner 3′ radius circle; note the red giant branch (RGB). The inset shows a control CMD with all stellar objects in an annulus between 12.′0 and 12.′4 of the center. Right: A color-magnitude density plot (Hess diagram), showing the inner CMD minus a larger area control CMD, appropriately normalised. The red giant branch is clearly seen, along with another blue feature discussed in the main text.
Fig. 2.— Goodness-of-fit contours of CMD fits using the method of de Jong et al. (2007) for two different populations with ages 4-5 Gyr (dotted) and 8-10 Gyr (solid). The levels correspond to Fig. 3.— Color image covering a 6.′5 × 6.′5 region centered on the 0.5, 1 and 2 sigma uncertainties. The inset shows the improvement Leo T dwarf made from INT WFC data in the g and r bands. N in the maximum-likelihood goodness-of-fit parameter Q (Dolphin is to the top and E to the left. 2002) with circles representing the two populations. of Figure 1. Plotting these stars in a color-magnitude diagram (CMD) and using it to construct a Hess dia- 2007) together with isochrones from Girardi et al. gram (right panels of Figure 1) reveals a clear red gi- (2004), model stellar populations with fixed age range, metallicity and distance were fit to the g−r versus r data ant branch (RGB). Although sparsely populated, the ′ CMD looks like those of the dwarf irregular or tran- for all stars within 6.0 of the center. The background was sition galaxies with detected young, blue populations, estimated using stars located suitably far from the ob- such as Phoenix (Mart´ınez-Delgado et al. 1999) and Leo ject. Figure 2 shows the goodness-of-fit contours for two A (Tolstoy et al. 1998). The bright, blue sequence in the different age bins, namely 4-5 and 8-10 Gyrs. The in- CMD may be a nearly zero-age main sequence or blue set shows the improvement in the maximum-likelihood loop, or even blue straggler stars. Some of the stars may goodness-of-fit parameter Q (Dolphin 2002) for the ages even be blue horizontal branch stars scattered into this probed with respect to fitting a control field CMD. While region of the CMD by photometric errors. Precise in- the age of the stellar population is not well-constrained, terpretation needs deeper photometry, but the general the best-fit metallicity and distance values do not change conclusion is clear – the Leo T dwarf contains a popula- significantly. These fits imply a rather metal-poor stel- tion of young, recently formed (< 1 Gyr) stars. lar population with [Fe/H]∼-1.6 at a distance modulus The distance, metallicity and age of the object were of ∼23.3 magnitudes, corresponding to a heliocentric dis- constrained by applying a colour-magnitude diagram tance of ∼ 450 kpc. The fits are heavily weighted towards (CMD) fitting technique to the SDSS photometry. Us- the most numerous population in the CMD, in this case ing the MATCH software (Dolphin 2002; de Jong et al. the RGB population. Leo T Dwarf 3
Fig. 4.— Left and middle left: CMDs in g −r versus r and g based on INT imaging data within a radius of 1.′8 of the center of Leo T . The light grey boxes enclose the RGB and young blue candidate stars. Overplotted are isochrones from Girardi et al. (2004) for [Fe/H] = −1.7 and age 200 and 500 Myrs. Middle right: The density contours of the RGB candidates in a box 18′ × 18′ centered on Leo T , together with the locations of the possible young blue stars. Right: The g band luminosity function within the dotted circle (black) compared to the background (grey). There is a clear detection of the horizontal branch at g ∼ 23.8.
+
Fig. 5.— Radial density profile of the Leo T dwarf based on INT data (all stellar objects with g − r < 1.0 and g < 25.0) together with a Plummer law fit.
Fig. 6.— Integrated HI flux density map centered on the co- ordinates of the Leo T dwarf. Significant HI is detected in two 3. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES AND STELLAR adjacent velocity channels of data from the Northern HI Parkes All Sky Survey (HIPASS, Wong et al. 2006). The above map is POPULATION the sum of these two adjacent velocity planes. The velocity channel 1 Follow-up observations of Leo T were made on 30 separation of the HIPASS data is 13.2 km s− . The integrated flux density within the 15.5′ beam centered on this source is 4.9 Jy km November 2006 (UT) using the 2.5 INT telescope with s−1. The detected point source, which has a flux-weighted helio- the WFC mosaic camera. This contains 4 2k×4k pixel centric velocity of 35 km s−1, does not appear to be connected to EEV CCDs with a field of view of roughly 30×30 ar- the undulating HI emission belonging to the Galactic interstellar cminutes and a scale of 0.33 arcseconds per pixel at the medium. field centre. Leo T was observed with single exposures of 1200s and 900s in SDSS-like g, r bands, and calibrated on the SDSS AB system. Data were processed in Cam- Figure 3 shows an INT image derived from the g and bridge using a general purpose pipeline for processing r band data. The Leo T dwarf is clearly visible, to- wide-field optical CCD data (Irwin & Lewis 2001). Im- gether with its population of blue stars. The left panels ages were de-biased and trimmed, cross-talk corrected, of Figure 4 show the CMD within a 1.′8 radius of the and then flatfielded and gain-corrected to a common in- centre. Even though the giant branch is sparsely popu- ternal system using clipped median stacks of nightly twi- lated, the tip must be as bright as i ∼ 19.8 (see Fig. 1), light flats. For each image frame an object catalogue was which corresponds to I ∼ 19.3, using the transformations generated using the object detection and parameterisa- given in Smith et al. (2002) and allowing an extra 0.06 tion procedure discussed by Irwin et al. (2004). Objects mag for extinction in the i-band. Using the calibration in the catalogues were morphologically classified as stel- ITRGB = −4.03 (Bellazzini et al. 2001), we find that the lar or non-stellar (or noise-like). The detected objects distance modulus is therefore at most 23.3. in each passband were then merged by positional coinci- The rightmost panel of Figure 4 shows the luminosity dence (within 1 arcsec) to form a combined catalogue. functions of stars detected in the g-band image (see Fig- 4 Irwin et al. ure 3), which is complete to g ∼ 25. The black line shows ure 3 the number of stars within a circle of radius 4.′2. This is Finally, Figure 6 shows an HI flux density map centered compared with the grey line, which shows the appropri- on the coordinates of the Leo T dwarf using data from ately normalised luminosity function for the background the Northern HI Parkes All Sky Survey (HIPASS, Wong region. There is an obvious excess of counts peaking at et al. 2006). Located at the same spot is a significant g ∼ 23.8, which is where we would expect to see the hor- HI overdensity. At a distance of ∼ 420 kpc, the HI mass 5 izontal branch. This unambiguous detection, which is of this cloud would be 2 × 10 M⊙. Its flux-weighted readily apparent in the CMDs shown in the left panels, heliocentric velocity is 35 km s−1, corresponding to a allows us to improve on the distance estimate. Assum- Galactic Standard of Rest velocity of -61 km s−1, con- ing MHB =0.6 in the g-band at g − r ≈ 0 after allowing sistent with gentle Galactic infall. It is clearly isolated for extinction implies a distance modulus of 23.1 ± 0.1, from the filamentary foreground of HI clouds, which have consistent with the sparsely populated RGB near the similar velocities. The stellar center of Leo T lies within tip. The middle left panel of Figure 4 shows overlaid the same 4′ × 4′ HIPASS pixel that contains the cen- isochrones from Girardi et al. (2004), corresponding to troid of the HIPASS gas cloud. This suggests that there stellar populations of age 200 and 500 Myrs at a distance is a high probability that the cloud is physically associ- modulus of 23.1. Blue stars brighter than g = 23 and ated with the dwarf. Although HIPASS does not have blueward of the giant branch are therefore most likely adequate velocity resolution to measure the dispersion to be helium burning blue loop stars associated with a directly the non-appearance of the compact HI cloud in young component. Two zones from the color-magnitude adjacent channels either side of the two detection chan- diagram, indicated by the gray boxes were used for the nels constrains the velocity dispersion to be less than spatial analysis. The RGB candidates were used to pro- ∼ 13 kms−1, which is within the realm of low luminosity duce the density contours in the middle right panel of dwarfs. 4 the figure. The object is seen to be almost circular in The stellar luminosity of Leo T is ∼ 4 × 10 L⊙, which 5 the inner parts. The young blue stars are shown as filled corresponds to a mass of ∼ 10 M⊙, assuming a stellar circles in this figure and are concentrated near the cen- mass-to-light ratio of ∼ 2 − 3. This gives a ratio of mass tre, thus confirming that they are physically associated in HI to mass in luminous material MHI/ML of about with the Leo T dwarf. unity, consistent with that found in dIrrs in the Local To estimate the properties in Table 1, we use the INT Group. The source is unresolved in HIPASS, however the data to derive the centroid from the density-weighted inferred average column density of HI within the Plum- first moment of the distribution and use the second mo- mer radius is ∼ 2 × 1020cm−2. Although this average ments to investigate the ellipicity. Athough circular in is slightly below the threshold required for star forma- general appearance the ellipicity at different contour lev- tion (Elmegreen & Parravano 1994), the surface density els averages ∼ 0.1 but has a position angle that varies by of HI is likely to contain local peaks (van Zee et al. 1997). 90 degrees. The radial profile shown in Figure 5 is derived from all stars with g − r< 1 and satisfying 20
REFERENCES Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., et al. 2006, ApJS, 162, 38 Ivezi´c, Z.ˇ et al., AN, 2004, 325, 583 Bellazzini, M., Ferraro, F. R., & Pancino, E. 2001, ApJ, 556, 635 Lupton, R., Gunn, J., & Szalay, A. 1999, AJ, 118, 1406 Belokurov, V. et al. 2006a, ApJ, 647, L111 Mart´ınez-Delgado, D., Gallart, C., & Aparicio, A. 1999, AJ, 118, Belokurov, V. et al. 2006b, ApJ, 642, L137 862 Belokurov, V. et al. 2007, ApJ, 654, 897 Pier, J.R., Munn, J.A., Hindsley, R.B, Hennessy, G.S., Kent, de Jong, J. et al. 2007, ApJ, submitted S.M., Lupton, R.H., Ivezic, Z. 2003, AJ, 125, 1559 Dolphin, A. E. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 91 Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, Elmegreen, B. G., & Parravano, A. 1994, ApJ, 435, L121 525 Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., Smith, J. A., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 2121 & Schneider, D. P. 1996, AJ, 111, 1748 Stoughton, C. et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 485 Girardi, L., Grebel, E. K., Odenkirchen, M., & Chiosi, C. 2004, Tolstoy, E., et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 1244 A&A, 422, 205 van den Bergh, S., 2000, The Galaxies of the Local Group, Grebel, E. K. 2001, Astrophysics and Space Science Supplement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 277, 231 van Zee, L., Haynes, M. P., Salzer, J. J., & Broeils, A. H. 1997, Gunn, J.E. et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 3040 AJ, 113, 1618 Gunn, J.E. et al. 2006, ApJ, in press Willman, B., et al. 2005, ApJ, 626, L85 Hogg, D.W., Finkbeiner, D.P., Schlegel, D.J., Gunn, J.E. 2001, Wong, O. I., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 1855 AJ, 122, 2129 Zucker, D. B., et al. 2006a, ApJ, 643, L103 Holtzman, J. A., Afonso, C., & Dolphin, A. 2006, ApJS, 166, 534 Zucker, D. B., et al. 2006b, ApJ, 650, L41 Irwin, M.J., & Lewis, J. 2001, New Astronomy Review, 45, 105 Irwin, M. J., et al. 2004, Proc. SPIE, 5493, 411