DOCSLIB.ORG

Country Report: Romania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Country Report: Romania Country Report: Romania 2020 update Acknowledgements & Methodology This report was written by Felicia Nica with support from the Jesuit Refugee Service (JRS) Romania and was edited by ECRE. The information in this report draws upon statistics provided by the General Immigration Inspectorate (IGI), interviews throughout 2020 with relevant stakeholders at IGI and civil society organisations, including legal counsellors providing services in the different Regional Centres for Accommodation and Procedures for Asylum Seekers of the country (Timișoara, Şomcuta Mare, Rădăuţi, Galaţi, Bucharest and Giurgiu), as well as visits to the Public Custody Centre of Otopeni on 5 February 2021 and the Public Custody Centre of Arad on 9 February 2021. Permission requests to visit Timișoara, Bucharest and Giurgiu Regional Reception Centres were refused by IGI-DAI due to the pandemic situation. However, interviews were held with the directors of Bucharest and Timisoara centres remotely, as for Giurgiu answers were provided via email. The information in this report is up-to-date as of 31 December 2020, unless otherwise stated. The Asylum Information Database (AIDA) The Asylum Information Database (AIDA) is coordinated by the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE). It aims to provide up-to date information on asylum practice in 23 countries. This includes 19 EU Member States (AT, BE, BG, CY, DE, ES, FR, GR, HR, HU, IE, IT, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SE, SI) and 4 non-EU countries (Serbia, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom) which is easily accessible to the media, researchers, advocates, legal practitioners and the general public through the dedicated website www.asylumineurope.org. The database also seeks to promote the implementation and transposition of EU asylum legislation reflecting the highest possible standards of protection in line with international refugee and human rights law and based on best practice. This report is part of the Asylum Information Database (AIDA) funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM), a collaborative initiative of the Network of European Foundations, and the European Union’s Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF). The contents of the report are the sole responsibility of the author, JRS Romania and ECRE and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of EPIM or the European Commission. Table of Contents Glossary & List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................... 6 Statistics ................................................................................................................................ 7 Overview of the legal framework .......................................................................................... 9 Overview of the main changes since the first report .........................................................11 Asylum Procedure ................................................................................................................13 A. General ....................................................................................................................................... 13 1. Flow chart ................................................................................................................................. 13 2. Types of procedures ................................................................................................................ 14 3. List of authorities that intervene in each stage of the procedure ............................................. 14 4. Number of staff and nature of the first instance authority ........................................................ 14 5. Short overview of the asylum procedure .................................................................................. 16 B. Access to the procedure and registration .............................................................................. 18 1. Access to the territory and push backs .................................................................................... 18 2. Registration of the asylum application ..................................................................................... 28 C. Procedures ................................................................................................................................ 31 1. Regular procedure ................................................................................................................... 31 2. Dublin ....................................................................................................................................... 54 3. Admissibility procedure ............................................................................................................ 62 4. Border procedure (border and transit zones) ........................................................................... 63 5. Accelerated procedure ............................................................................................................. 67 D. Guarantees for vulnerable groups .......................................................................................... 70 1. Identification ............................................................................................................................. 70 2. Special procedural guarantees ................................................................................................ 74 3. Use of medical reports ............................................................................................................. 75 4. Legal representation of unaccompanied children .................................................................... 78 E. Subsequent applications ......................................................................................................... 82 F. The safe country concepts ...................................................................................................... 85 1. Safe country of origin ............................................................................................................... 85 2. Safe third country ..................................................................................................................... 86 3. First country of asylum ............................................................................................................. 87 G. Information for asylum seekers and access to NGOs and UNHCR ..................................... 87 1. Provision of information on the procedure ............................................................................... 87 2. Access to NGOs and UNHCR.................................................................................................. 92 H. Differential treatment of specific nationalities in the procedure ......................................... 92 Reception Conditions ...........................................................................................................94 A. Access and forms of reception conditions ............................................................................ 94 1. Criteria and restrictions to access reception conditions ........................................................... 94 2. Forms and levels of material reception conditions ................................................................... 98 3. Reduction or withdrawal of reception conditions.................................................................... 101 4. Freedom of movement ........................................................................................................... 103 B. Housing .................................................................................................................................... 105 1. Types of accommodation ....................................................................................................... 105 2. Conditions in reception facilities ............................................................................................. 106 C. Employment and education ................................................................................................... 111 1. Access to the labour market................................................................................................... 111 2. Access to education ............................................................................................................... 112 D. Health care ............................................................................................................................... 115 E. Special reception needs of vulnerable groups .................................................................... 117 F. Information for asylum seekers and access to reception centres .................................... 122 1. Provision of information on reception ..................................................................................... 122 2. Access to reception centres by third parties .......................................................................... 123 G. Differential treatment of specific nationalities in reception ............................................... 124 Detention of Asylum Seekers ............................................................................................ 125 A. General ..................................................................................................................................... 125 B. Legal framework of detention ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Medical University Pleven Lnternational Prospectus Application and Enrolment І
    Medical ~ University Pleven lnternational Prospectus Non Sibi 5ед Omnibus Not for oneself but for aII ~ ::.• Ул • ~~ ~ ~ J~~ v г Gл'1 VERS~1~ www.mu-pleven.bg ~ 0 r Т \ .г. l~ j~ - . i . ~l е ~ ' ~~• ~ ~ 1 в ~ ..-,° п ' 4 1 _ _ и _ Г ~ ~ ~счi ЈІіј ,~;~I ~1i ^ .r'.~• л ,i Fуч . а 1 . .I : f f ~ ;~.~'' ~ А■ ~ ~ i - ~::---- -__.,.-.... U. -'...4 - --- ,. ~ ~ ч л ~ .~ ' „ ~^-~------•- ..+.. ._-.— 1,г n...i~.._ г п тч 4 ? - -s i~ оі и і і h v іi и ~ ~ - П П Л . 1.._. • _'- ~ I , ~ i ~ Lt.~ j J~ 1LП iI І / ~~+ ~• . .' — _- —. ~, ✓„~ --- "пг—~ -- - . ~ ' ;~ ~ . ., ~ ;~~ ~ ~ , м ф ~ : i.. , . ~ с i @j~ э ~ fY , $ ~ г 9 I +Х 1 ~ .i _ --_.'!~ i1 ..-~ : — _~~ -7л',•а — - _ _ - . -, l ' ~ . - л •i. ,.,jrd4~~ ~ \ . - '\ . ~ .~ 1Ь' -. г ~► . ~ K~.S - i м,. 1 Т ~' •r-~;~.~ 1 Si7 ~ . П - ' ,. ' : `` ~-~.~~.~ _....1•- . r . .>- _ , Т~ 4 . , -• .. 1 г . . J .. _ л .~"j~~~ у д ~ ~ ~~ - ~ . -- +.." . .i~!►.. - . ~. Mëdical University - Pleven lnternational Prospectus Welcome ј WELCOME TO YOUR FUTURE 1N MEDICINE 1 want to express my satisfaction that you are interested in studying at Medical University - Pleven, which is one of the most dynamic and advanced higher medical educational institutions in Bulgaria. Choosing the right р lасе to study is one of the most important steps in a person's 1ife. 1t is with pleasure that 1 welcome you to our academic community. Our members from а11 over the wогlд , are united by the desire to learn, discover, create and make a difference. Medical University - Pleven is an institution of academic ехсеllепсе, having a community of distinguished scholars and professors with high standards and personal responsibility in teaching and research.
    [Show full text]
  • “Geothermal Energy in Ilfov County - Romania”
    Ilfov County Council “Geothermal energy in Ilfov County - Romania” Ionut TANASE Ilfov County Council October, 2019 Content Ilfov County Council 1. Geothermal resources in Romania 2. Geothermal resources in Bucharest-Ilfov Region 3. Project “Harnessing geothermal water resources for district heating the Emergency Hospital «Prof. Dr. Agrippa Ionescu», Balotesti Commune, Ilfov County” 4. Project “The development of geothermal potential in the counties of Ilfov and Bihor” 5. Project ELI-NP (GSHP) 6. Possible future project in Ilfov County Romania Geothermal resources in Romania Ilfov County Council • The research for geothermal resources for energy purposes began in the early 60’s based on a detailed geological programme for hydrocarbon resources. • The geothermal potential - low-temperature geothermal systems • porous permeable formations such as the Pannonian sandstone, and siltstones specific (Western Plain, Olt Valley) or in fractured carbonate formations (Oradea, Bors and North Bucharest (Otopeni) areas). • First well for geothermal utilisation in Romania (Felix SPA Bihor) was drilled in 1885 to a depth of 51 m, yielding hot water of 49°C, maximum flow rate 195 l/s. • Since then over 250 wells have been drilled with a depth range of 800- 3,500 m, through which were discovered low-enthalpy geothermal resources with a temperature between 40 and 120°C. • The total installed capacity of the existing wells in Romania is about 480 MWth (for a reference temperature of 25°C). UCRAINE Ilfov County Council MOLDAVIA HUNGARY SATU-MARE CHIŞINĂU Acas
    [Show full text]
  • High-Performance Green Port Giurgiu
    TEN-T Multi-Annual Programme High-performance Green Port Giurgiu Member States involved: 2012-EU-18089-S Romania Part of Priority Project 18 Implementation schedule Start date: July 2013 End date: August 2015 EU contribution: €326,505 Additional information: Coordinator’s Report of the Priority Project: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/ infrastructure/ten-t-policy/priority- projects/european- coordinators_en.htm European Commission, DG MOVE http://ec.europa.eu/transport/ index_en.html Innovation and Networks Executive This Action addresses Priority Project Nr. 18 “Waterway axis Rhine/Meuse- Agency (INEA) Main-Danube” of the TEN T network. The Action aims at the development https://ec.europa.eu/inea of an eco-efficient Danube engineering and operation port system, in line with the principles of the “Joint Statement on Guiding Principles for Beneficiaries and Implementing Development of Inland Navigation in the Danube River Basin” (ICPDR, bodies: Danube Commission, Sava Commission, 2008). ILR Logistica Romania S.R.L. www.ilr.com.ro The overall objective of the Action is therefore to turn the port of Giurgiu into the first “Green Danube Port” based on integrated energy-efficiency Industrie-Logistik-Linz GmbH & Co KG concepts and comprehensive environmental measures for intermodal ports. www.ill.co.at It will first take stock of the current situation by undertaking a technical and operational analysis, a market analysis and an environmental S.C. Administratia Zonei Libere Giurgiu assessment. Then the Action will develop concepts that will support the S.A introduction of innovative technology in the port through a series of www.zlg.ro studies. The Action will eventually design the new port and define its business model.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice and Home Affairs Background
    February 2006 JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS BACKGROUND As stated in the 2005 Comprehensive Monitoring Report, “Romania has taken significant steps to address some of the issues within the political criteria which were highlighted in the 2004 report as requiring further improvements, such as the reform and independence of the judiciary. (…) The fight against corruption should receive high priority. Efforts should focus on the effective enforcement of anti-corruption legislation and on preventive measures, fighting high-level corruption and corruption within law enforcement bodies”. Justice system In March 2005 the new Government adopted an ambitious revised Strategy and Action Plan 2005-2007 to reform the justice system. These documents represent a significant step forward in the plans to create an independent, professional and effective justice system and now need to be internalised by the relevant actors. The Action Plan is being implemented according to schedule, with comprehensive monitoring mechanisms consisting of an inter-institutional commission co-ordinated by the Ministry of Justice and a series of working groups within the Superior Council of the Magistracy. The full and effective implementation of the Action Plan should continue without delay. The availability of financial and human resources and comprehensive training as well as accurate and standardised management statistics will largely determine the success of this operation. Following consultation with stakeholders a revision of the so-called three-law package on justice reform (Laws on the Superior Council of the Magistracy, on the Organisation of the Judiciary and on the Statute of Magistrates) was submitted by the Government to Parliament in June 2005 and adopted after a vote of confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Fight Against Trafficking in Human Beings
    Progress Report - 17 July – 17 August 2006 - - Fight against Trafficking in Human Beings - 1. Legal framework The Law no. 300 from 11 July 2006 for ratifying the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human beings, adopted on 3 May 2005, open for signature and signed by Romania in Warsaw on 16 May 2005, was adopted. The law was published in the Official Gazette no. 622 from19 July 2006. Through the Government Decision no. 1083 from 16 August 2006, the Government Decision no. 1584/2005 on the setting up and functioning of the National Agency for Preventing the Trafficking in Human Beings and for Monitoring the Assistance provided to the Victims of the Trafficking in Human Beings was amended. The amendments mainly aim to increase the number of the personnel, both in the central structure and in the territorial structures and to strengthen the role that the Agency plays in coordinating the activities developed against trafficking in human beings, according to the recommendations of the EU Monitoring Report from May 2006. Thus: o The new name of the Agency will be The National Agency against Trafficking in Human Beings; o The number of the regional centres of the Agency has been increased from 8 to 15, which will be placed in the counties where Courts of Appeal function; this will ensure a better collaboration with the law enforcement agencies (police, border police), whose coordination structures function in the same counties, in order to take and refer the victims with maximum promptness to the specialized assistance
    [Show full text]
  • En En Working Document
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Committee on Petitions 17.7.2012 WORKING DOCUMENT on the fact-finding mission to Romania, 24-25 November 2011 Committee on Petitions Rapporteur: Erminia Mazzoni DT\916874EN.doc PE483.803v05-00 EN United in diversity EN The delegation The Delegation which visited Romania was made up of seven official Members and four ex officio Members of the Committee on Petitions. Members Ms. Erminia Mazzoni (EPP, IT), Leader of the delegation Mr. Zoltán Bagó (EPP, HU) Ms. Inés Ayala Sender (S&D, ES) Mr. Csaba Sándor Tabajdi (S&D, HU) Mr. Roger Helmer (ECR, UK) Mr. Gerald Häfner (Greens, DE) Mr. Nikolaos Salavrakos (EFD, GR) Ex-officio Members Ms. Elena Băsescu (EPP, RO) Mr. Cristian Dan Preda (EPP, RO) Mr. Victor Boştinaru (S&D, RO) Ms. Adina-Ioana Vălean (ALDE, RO) Objective of the visit The objective of the visit was to obtain a better insight into the concerns raised by several petitioners regarding: a large-scale gold mining project situated in Roșia Montană1, windmill park projects situated in the Dobrogea region2, animal welfare3, international adoptions4 and the detrimental impact of a shopping centre built in the vicinity of a historic cathedral5. The delegation also sought to achieve an enhanced cooperation with the two Romanian Committees on Petitions and the Romanian Ombudsman, with a view to raising awareness about the sphere of competences of the Committee on Petitions in the European Parliament. Background of the main petitions The Rosia Montana petitions were received in 2010, respectively 2011 and drew attention to 1 Petitions 0622/2010 and 0628/2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint Mechanisms in Border Management and Expulsion Operations in Europe
    COMPLAINT MECHANISMS IN BORDER MANAGEMENT AND EXPULSION OPERATIONS IN EUROPE EFFECTIVE REMEDIES FOR VICTIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS? Sergio Carrera and Marco Stefan COMPLAINT MECHANISMS IN BORDER MANAGEMENT AND EXPULSION OPERATIONS IN EUROPE EFFECTIVE REMEDIES FOR VICTIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS? SERGIO CARRERA AND MARCO STEFAN CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES (CEPS) BRUSSELS The Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) is an independent policy research institute in Brussels. Its mission is to produce sound policy research leading to constructive solutions to the challenges facing Europe. The views expressed in this book are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed to CEPS or any other institution with which they are associated or to the European Union. Prof. Sergio Carrera is Senior Research Fellow and Head of Justice and Home Affairs Programme at CEPS, Brussels. He is also Part-Time Professor at the Migration Policy Centre (MPC) in the European University Institute (EUI) in Florence (Italy) and Visiting Professor at the Paris School of International Affairs (PSIA) in Sciences Po, Paris (France). Dr. Marco Stefan is Research Fellow in the Justice and Home Affairs Programme at CEPS. Cover illustration by LeStudio / Shutterstock.com. Cover design Margaita Minkova. ISBN 978-94-6138-677-9 © Copyright 2018, CEPS All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior permission of the Centre for European Policy Studies. Centre for European Policy Studies Place du Congrès 1, B-1000 Brussels Tel: (32.2) 229.39.11 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.ceps.eu Contents Preface .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ioana Giurgiu Cognitive Computing and Industry Solutions IBM Research - Zurich Curriculum Vitae Saumerstr
    Address: AI for Services and Industry Research Ioana Giurgiu Cognitive Computing and Industry Solutions IBM Research - Zurich Curriculum Vitae Saumerstr. 4, CH-8803 Rueschlikon, Switzerland Email: [email protected] Phone: +41 78 748 90 70 March 2019 Nationality: Romanian Permit: B Research Interests I am a research scientist in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. My current research spans over several intersecting AI directions: explainable and robust AI, multi-task learning, anomaly detection and predictive analytics based on multivariate sensor temporal data. In all lines of work, my main focus is on deep learning methods. Depending on the use cases, in addition to a deep knowledge of AI and ML, domain knowledge – such as IT systems management – is essential. I am in the excellent position of having extensive systems and optimization expertise - acquired during my Ph. D. studies -, as well as deep machine learning and AI knowledge from having spent the last 6+ years focusing on this research domain at IBM Research - Zurich. My research work has been put into production and applied to hundreds of IBM customers. Personal page at IBM: https://resedit.watson.ibm.com/researcher/edit.php?person=zurich-IGI Experience Jul 2015 - Present IBM Research Zurich, CH, Research Staff Member / Team Lead in AI/ML Nov 2012 - Jun 2015 IBM Research Zurich, CH, Postdoctoral Researcher in ML Explainability for classification and anomaly detection models with a focus on multivariate time and event series data Deep learning models (AEs, VAEs, LSTMs,
    [Show full text]
  • Bucharest Metropolitan Area and Its Regional Hinterland Case Study Report
    BUCHAREST METROPOLITAN AREA AND ITS REGIONAL HINTERLAND CASE STUDY REPORT Authors: Daniela-Luminita Constantin – project scientific coordinator and WP6, Task 6 responsible Team member contributors: Zizi Goschin, Dorel Ailenei, Cristina Alpopi, Constanta Bodea, Ion Stancu, Constantin Mitrut, Amalia Cristescu, Bogdan Ileanu, Raluca Grosu The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement “Growth-Innovation- Competitiveness: Fostering Cohesion in Central and Eastern Europe” (GRNCOH) Bucharest University of Economic Studies WP 6, Task 6 Final, July 31, 2014 Abstract. This research has examined the relationship between Bucharest metropolitan area (conventionally considered Bucharest-Ilfov region) and its external hinterland (also conventionally considered South-Muntenia region), focusing on a series of issues such as: examples of links between BMA and surrounding region, examples of positive and negative influences of the metropolis on its surrounding region, changes in regional settlement system and its drivers, changes in regional production system and main drivers, labour commuting patterns and drivers, policies with significant impact on metropolis – region relationship, how external interventions address the needs of the metropolitan area and its external hinterland, to what extent the metropolitan area can contribute to the external hinterland regeneration, what actions are taken in order to increase the positive influence of the metropolitan centre on its surrounding region, future prospects. The research has been based on both desk research (collecting, processing and interpretation of statistical data and various analyses, reports) and in-depth interviews (20), carried out in 2013 and 2014 with representatives of local, county and regional authorities, RDAs, higher education institutions, implementing authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Report: Romania
    R3L+ Quality Framework For Learning Regions 504475-LLP-1-2009-1-DE-GRUNDTVIG-GMP Background Report: Romania ODIP Dr. Magda Balica, Dr. Ciprian Fartusnic, Dr. Mihaela Jigau, Dr. Irina Horga Disclaimer: This project is funded with support from the European Commission. This communication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. R3L+ National Background Report ‐ RO R3L+ Country Report ROMANIA Research Team: Dr. Magda Balica Dr. Ciprian Fartusnic Dr. Mihaela Jigau Dr. Irina Horga 1. General information on the region, main decision-making structures and learning region approach In Romania the regional level emerged in the public policymaking only after 1989, when escaping a hyper-centralised system of government and under the influence of the accession process to EU. The regional development is regulated by Law 315/2004, stating the way regional policies are put in place and the specific functions and the roles of different bodies in this area. Eight development regions were defined, partly following historical regions of Romania (see map below). The main regional development structures in Romania were created: the Regional Development Board and Regional Development Agency (at region level) and National Council for Regional Development and Ministry of Regional Development and Tourism (at national level). This report is focused on a network acting in the Regional Development Agency Bucharest-Ilfov. As all other regional agencies, this is a non- governmental and not for profit public utility institution, with legal personality. It is the executive body of the Council for Regional Development Bucharest-Ilfov (CDRBI), in whose coordination is.
    [Show full text]
  • European Political Analysis Group
    SVISHTOV MUNICIPALITY Agenda International Conference First Part: Regional cooperation of Danube local authorities: key factors for economic growth and sustainable development of local economies Second Part: Regional funding programs dedicated to help entrepreneurs th 25 April 2014, Svishtov, Bulgaria Supported by: Co-Operation Partners: Initiator of the Initiator of the conference: Nadezhda Neynsky, MEP President of SME Europe Member in Parliamentary Committee of Budget Honourable Guests: Dr. Wolfgang Streitenberger Adviser in Directorate General "Regional and Urban Policy”, European Commission Lecturer in European Integration at Hogeschool Universiteit Brussels Dr. Erhard Busek Chairman of the Institute for the Danube and Central Europe Co-ordinator of the Southeast European Co- operative Initiative (SECI), a project created in 1996 to enhance stability in Southeastern Europe through the development of economic and environmental co-operation Former Vice Chancelor of the Republic of Austria, 1991 - 1995 2 Official guests: Johannes Hahn, Commissioner on Regional Policy, Honorary President of SME Europe, represented by Wolfgang Streitenberger, Adviser in Directorate General "Regional and Urban Policy”, European Commission Nadezhda Neynsky, Member of the European Parliament, President of SME Europe Erhard Busek, Chairman Institute for the Danube Region and Central Europe, former Vice Chancellor of Austria Jovana Majstorovic, Acting Director of the Association of Serbian Employers Janković Milan, President of Belgrade Chambers of
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 22 No 140/5.07.2020 July, 2020 to the European
    Asociația Procurorilor din România A.P.R. No 140/5.07.2020 July, 2020 To the European Commission The National Union of Romanian Judges (NURJ), legally represented by Judge Dana Gîrbovan, as President, The Romanian Magistrates’ Association (AMR), a professional and national, apolitical, non-governmental organization, stated to be of „public utility” through the Government Decision no. 530/21 May 2008, member of the European Association of Judges (EAJ-AEM) and the International Association of Judges (UIM-IAJ) since 1994 - – with the headquarter in Bucharest, Regina Elisabeta Boulevard no. 53, District 5, e-mail [email protected] , tax registration code 11760036 -, legally represented by Judge dr. Andreea Ciucă as interim President, The Association of Judges for the Defense of Human Rights (AJADO), legally represented by Judge Florica Roman as President, The Romanian Prosecutors’ Association (APR), legally represented by Prosecutor Elena Iordache, as President, send the following Report on the State of the Justice System and of the Rule of Law in Romania Summary: I. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Rule of Law and on Judicial Activity II. The Status of Judges and Prosecutors. Its Deterioration by Hasty Legislative Changes Not Accompanied by Any Minimum Consultation of the Magistrates. Attacks of the Government Against the Judges III. The Status of Prosecutors. Appointments to Management Positions despite the Negative Opinion of the Section for the Prosecutors IV. The Section for the Investigation of Offences Committed by Magistrates V. The Abusive Request for the Dismissal of the Romanian Ombudsman. The Precedent From 2012 VI. Tireless and Constant Attacks Against the Constitutional Court.
    [Show full text]