Special Edition: Litigation 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Honorable L. Yves Fortier PC, CC, OQ, QC, Ad. E., LLD
The Honorable L. Yves Fortier PC, CC, OQ, QC, Ad. E., LLD Quebec Bar 1960 On December 31st, 2011, Mr. Fortier severed his long-time relationship with Norton Rose OR, (formerly Ogilvy Renault) “the Firm”. He was then Chairman Emeritus of the Firm. From 1992 until 2008, he was Chairman of the Firm. Since January 1st, 2012, Mr. Fortier practices law in Montréal as an independent The Honorable mediator/arbitrator. He also has offices in Toronto and London. He is recognized as one of L. Yves Fortier the top arbitrators in the world. PC, CC, OQ, QC, Ad. E., LLD Mr. Fortier has served as Chairman or party-appointed arbitrator on more than 300 arbitral Cabinet Yves Fortier tribunals, either ad hoc or constituted by different arbitral institutions, including the Place Alexis Nihon / Tour 2 International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (Paris), the 3500, Boul De Maisonneuve O, London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), the Hong Kong International Arbitration Bureau 1400 Court (HKIAC), the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), the China International Montréal, (Québec) H3Z 3C1 Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC), the American Arbitration T : (514) 286-2011 Association, the Court of Arbitration for Sport, the Zurich Chamber of Commerce, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the Canadian Commercial F : (514) 286-2019 Arbitration Centre, the British Columbia International Commercial Arbitration Centre and the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague. He has served as Chairman or party- appointed arbitrator on more than 50 Investor-State International Tribunals. Mr. Fortier has also served on more than 50 panels of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Lausanne and the Sport Dispute Resolution Centre of Canada (SDRCC). -
Canadian Taxpayer Vol41 No10-1Stproof 1..8
Editor: Arthur B.C. Drache, C.M., Q.C. Pages 73-80 May 17, 2019 Vol. xli No. 10 Minister come to the Island during the election would be P.E.I. Election Produces Minority ªcounter-productiveº. Government ThesurgeoftheGreenswasnosurpriseaspollsformonths had suggested that they were running ahead of the two For the first time since the 19th century, voters in Prince traditional parties and might actually form the govern- Edward Island have abandoned their traditional embrace ment. In the event, the Conservatives finished with 37 of the Island's two-party system, electing a Tory minority percent of the popular vote, followed by the Greens at 31 government and handing the upstart Green Party official and the Liberals at 29. The NDP received just 3 percent. opposition status for the first time. Voter turnout was 77 percent, a five-point drop from the With all polls reporting the Tories had won 12 seats, the 2015 election. Greens held eight, and the incumbent Liberals, led by The election campaign was in stark contrast to that in Premier Wade MacLauchlan, had won six. But MacLau- Alberta. Civility was the rule of the day and even in the chlan lost his own seat. He subsequently announced his leaders' debate, there was more consensus on issues than resignation as head of the party. real debate. The Liberals were seeking a fourth term in office, having Premier-designate Dennis King now faces a task that has repeatedly reminded Islanders that the province's econ- never before been faced by a P.E.I. premier. He needs to omy remains the strongest in the country. -
Quarterly Update Volume 26, Number 1 First Quarter, March 31, 2021 Quarterly Update
GROUP SAVINGS AND RETIREMENT Quarterly Update Volume 26, Number 1 First Quarter, March 31, 2021 Quarterly Update Group Savings Contents and Retirement Economic and Financial Environment . 4 Global Fixed Income (PIMCO) . 70 Floating Rate Bank Loan (AlphaFixe) . 71 Market indicators . 14 Diversified Funds Investment options . 16 Diversified Security . 72 Our Investment Advisors . 17 Balanced Moderate Index (BlackRock) . 73 ATTITUDE portfolios . 23 Diversified . 74 Balanced (Beutel Goodman) . 75 Group Investment Funds . 27 Balanced (Jarislowsky) . 76 Target Date Funds Balanced Growth (MFS) . 77 LifePath Retirement Index I (BlackRock) . 28 Balanced (PH&N) . 78 LifePath 2025 Index (BlackRock) . 29 Diversified Opportunity . 79 LifePath 2030 Index (BlackRock) . 30 Fidelity Canadian Asset Allocation . 80 LifePath 2035 Index (BlackRock) . 31 Canadian Equity Funds LifePath 2040 Index (BlackRock) . 32 Canadian Equity Index (BlackRock) . 81 LifePath 2045 Index (BlackRock) . 33 Dividend . 82 LifePath 2050 Index (BlackRock) . 34 Canadian Dividend (Beutel Goodman) . 83 LifePath 2055 Index (BlackRock) . 35 Canadian Equity Value (PH&N) . 84 LifePath 2060 Index (BlackRock) . 36 Canadian Equity (QV) . 85 Fidelity ClearPath Income . 37 Fidelity Canadian Focused Equity . 86 Fidelity ClearPath 2020 . 38 Canadian Equity Growth . 87 Fidelity ClearPath 2025 . 39 Canadian Equity Q Growth (CC&L) . 88 Fidelity ClearPath 2030 . 40 Canadian Equity (Fiera Capital) . 89 Fidelity ClearPath 2035 . 41 Canadian Ethical Equity Fossil Fuel Free (Fiera Capital) . 90 Fidelity ClearPath 2040 . 42 Canadian Equity (Jarislowsky) . 91 Fidelity ClearPath 2045 . 43 Canadian Equity Fossil Fuel Free (Jarislowsky) . 92 Fidelity ClearPath 2050 . 44 Canadian Equity (MFS) . 93 Fidelity ClearPath 2055 . 45 Fidelity True North® . 94 Fidelity ClearPath 2060 . 46 Responsible Canadian Research Equity (MFS) . 95 Asset Allocation Funds Canadian Equity Small Cap . -
Canadian Tax Journal, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2008
canadian tax journal / revue fiscale canadienne (2008) vol. 56, no 3, 661 - 707 The Dividing Line Between the Jurisdictions of the Tax Court of Canada and Other Superior Courts David Jacyk* P r é c i s Le droit fiscal est sans aucun doute l’une des branches du droit les plus exigeantes et les plus complexes au Canada. On pourrait penser qu’en matière de droit fiscal, la question de la juridiction des tribunaux se pose très simplement en ces termes : quel tribunal peut statuer sur les affaires qui concernent l’administration de la législation fiscale? Pourtant, cette question à elle seule a fait l’objet d’un grand nombre de litiges depuis des décennies, devant différents tribunaux de première instance et d’appel partout au Canada, ce qui montre bien la complexité de la question de la compétence des tribunaux dans un état fédéral, et ce, même dans un domaine de droit comme la fiscalité qui est pourtant bien circonscrit. L’abondance de jurisprudence sur la question de la juridiction est particulièrement importante depuis quelques années, et elle comporte plusieurs décisions des cours d’appel qui ont contribué à éclaircir davantage cette question. Ce nouvel éclairage a donné lieu à des développements très appréciés. En reconstituant l’évolution du droit dans ce domaine, le présent article brosse un portrait détaillé et complet du droit et propose une analyse qui s’appuie sur les étapes suivantes : n l’examen de la structure des tribunaux fédéraux et en fiscalité; n la reconstitution de l’évolution de la jurisprudence aussi bien avant qu’après la réorganisation au fédéral du réseau des cours d’appel en fiscalité de 1991; n la prise en compte des décisions des tribunaux provinciaux qui se sont penchés sur cette question de façon indépendante du réseau des tribunaux fédéraux; n la prise en compte de l’ensemble des décisions en matière de rectification, un domaine qui a donné lieu à mon avis à des anomalies, mais des résultats tout de même gérables et prévisibles; * Of the Department of Justice, Ottawa. -
Inondations 3 Mois ANG-V3.Ai
Three-month Action Report 2017 SPRING FLOODS IN QUEBEC AN IMPRESSIVE HUMANITARIAN COMMITMENT In the spring of 2017, record rainfall caused extensive flooding in several Canadian provinces, when thousands of people had to flee their homes and neighbourhoods. In all instances, the Canadian Red Cross rose to help individuals and families in need. In its role as partner to the Quebec government in assisting disaster victims, the Red Cross helped the Quebec ministère de la Sécurité publique (MSP) and municipalities in managing the effects of the floods on people. The more heavily impacted regions were the Montreal metropolitan area, Outaouais, Montérégie, Mauricie, Lanaudière and Laurentides. At the height of the crisis, the official tally evidenced the extent of the disaster: 261 municipalities stricken in 15 administrative regions; 5 371 main residences flooded; and almost 400 highways damaged. PROVIDING ASSISTANCE IN A TWO-STEP PROCESS Following the Red Cross fundamental principles All Red Cross programs abide by fundamental principles to preserve the dignity of beneficiaries while offering just and appropriate assistance. « Thanks to the generosity of our donors and to the support of the ministère de la Sécurité publique, the Canadian Red Cross was able to provide disaster-impacted people with assistance at various levels: immediate emergency help; direct respite assistance; support toward recovery. We are extremely grateful! » Pascal Mathieu, Vice-President, Canadian Red Cross, Quebec region. Immediate emergency help “It’s been three months now since we were flooded. My house is a total loss. My wife and I are no longer With the financial support of ministère de la Sécurité young and we provide for our son; the three of us have publique, the Red Cross coordinated immediate been living in a hotel room since May. -
Carissima Mathen*
C h o ic es a n d C o n t r o v e r sy : J udic ia l A ppointments in C a n a d a Carissima Mathen* P a r t I What do judges do? As an empirical matter, judges settle disputes. They act as a check on both the executive and legislative branches. They vindicate human rights and civil liberties. They arbitrate jurisdictional conflicts. They disagree. They bicker. They change their minds. In a normative sense, what judges “do” depends very much on one’s views of judging. If one thinks that judging is properly confined to the law’s “four comers”, then judges act as neutral, passive recipients of opinions and arguments about that law.1 They consider arguments, examine text, and render decisions that best honour the law that has been made. If judging also involves analysis of a society’s core (if implicit) political agreements—and the degree to which state laws or actions honour those agreements—then judges are critical players in the mechanisms through which such agreement is tested. In post-war Canada, the judiciary clearly has taken on the second role as well as the first. Year after year, judges are drawn into disputes over the very values of our society, a trend that shows no signs of abating.2 In view of judges’ continuing power, and the lack of political appetite to increase control over them (at least in Canada), it is natural that attention has turned to the process by which persons are nominated and ultimately appointed to the bench. -
The Rt. Hon. Antonio Lamer, Chief Justice of Canada and of the Supreme Court of Canada, Is Pleased to Welcome Mr
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA PRESS RELEASE OTTAWA, January 8,1998 -- The Rt. Hon. Antonio Lamer, Chief Justice of Canada and of the Supreme Court of Canada, is pleased to welcome Mr. Justice Ian Binnie to the Court. He stated: “I am very pleased that in the legacy of our late colleague, John Sopinka, another member of the Court has been selected directly from the legal profession. It is important that this Court always be aware of the realities of the practising Bar so that we do not lose sight of the practical effect of our judgments. I am sure that Mr. Justice Binnie, who is counsel of the highest standing in the profession, will make a very valuable and lasting contribution to this Court.” Chief Justice Lamer spoke to Mr. Justice Binnie this morning to congratulate him on his appointment. Mr. Justice Binnie has indicated that he will be available to commence his duties at the Court as of the 26th of January. However, he will not be sitting that week, nor during the two following weeks as the Court is in recess, in order that he may prepare for the Quebec Reference case which will proceed, as scheduled, during the week of February 16th. Mr. Justice Binnie’s swearing-in will take place on February 2, 1998 at 11:00 a.m. in the main courtroom. Ref.: Mr. James O’Reilly Executive Legal Officer (613) 996-9296 COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA COMMUNIQUÉ DE PRESSE OTTAWA, le 8 janvier 1998 -- Le très honorable Antonio Lamer, Juge en chef du Canada et de la Cour suprême du Canada, a le plaisir d’accueillir M. -
Transgressing the Division of Powers: the Case of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement
Transgressing the Division of Powers: The Case of the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement Christa Scholtz and Maryna Polataiko Abstract In 1975, the Bourassa government received legal advice that the James Bay Northern Quebec Agreement exceeded provincial jurisdiction. Legal counsel advised the constitutionality of the Agreement be secured through formal constitutional amendment. No such amendment was sought. Based on authorized access to Premier Bourassa’s archived dossier on the Agreement’s negotiation, this article sets out the following: 1) why the provincial government sought to encroach on federal juris- diction; 2) the strategic means employed to insulate the Agreement from s. 91(24) litigation; and 3) provincial negotiators’ views on how judges would approach the Agreement going forward. This article confirms theoretical expectations about when governments might coordinate to transgress federalism’s division of powers: a high probability that courts would find a transgression occurred, and a high political cost should governments not coordinate on a transgression strategy. Keywords: federalism, James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement, constitutional law, division of powers, judicial politics, bargaining Résumé En 1975, le gouvernement de Robert Bourassa a reçu un avis juridique qui stipulait que la Convention de la baie James et du Nord québécois transcendait les compétences provinciales. Le conseiller juridique a donc recommandé de garantir la constitutionnalité de cette Convention au moyen d’un amendement constitutionnel -
Fund Facts Booklet Dated December 31, 2020
RIDER TO THE ECOFLEX FUND FACTS BOOKLET DATED DECEMBER 31, 2020 Ecoflex Contract issued by Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc. 1080 Grande Allée West, PO Box 1907, Station Terminus Quebec City, Quebec G1K 7M3 1-844-442-4636 [email protected] On August 31, 2021, the Fund Facts booklet (hereinafter the “Booklet”), which forms part of the Information Folder related to the Ecoflex Contract is amended to reflect the following change: — The investment strategy of the following fund has been updated: - International Equity LIST OF AMENDEMENTS Effective August 31, 2021, this rider amends the Booklet in accordance with the following provisions: 1. The investment strategies have been updated as below: 1.1 International Equity: The Fund is composed of a selection of quality international equities with good growth potential and attractive value, in companies located outside North America. CERTIFICATION Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc. certifies that the Booklet, as amended by this rider, briefly and simply discloses all material facts relating to the variable nature of the Funds offered under the Individual Variable Annuity Contract – Ecoflex. Denis Ricard Jennifer Dibblee President and Chief Executive Officer Vice-President, Legal Services Corporate Secretary This rider, dated August 31, 2021, forms an integral part of the Fund Facts Booklet and the EcoflexInformation Folder. iA Financial Group is a business name and trademark of Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc. ia.ca ACC F14-3A-5(21-09) INVESTMENT FUNDS / As 31, December at 2020 Ecoflex Fund Facts TABLE OF CONTENTS FOCUS FUNDS CANADIAN EQUITY FUNDS Focus Prudent . 2 Strategic Equity Income . -
Thesis Submitted in Conformity with the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Laws (LL.M) Graduate Department of the Faculty of Law University of Toronto
“The Life of a Reserve”: How Might We Improve the Structure, Content, Accessibility, Length & Timeliness of Judicial Decisions? by Jon Khan A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws (LL.M) Graduate Department of the Faculty of Law University of Toronto © Copyright by Jon Khan (2019) “The Life of a Reserve”: How Might We Improve the Structure, Content, Accessibility, Length & Timeliness of Judicial Decisions? Jon Khan Masters of Law Faculty of Law University of Toronto 2019 Abstract This thesis explains how judicial decisions may impact access to justice and how might we make decisions a better source of data while also making them more timely, concise, accessible, and consistent. It examines the historical and theoretical underpinnings of Canadian decisions and the relationship of decision-writing to decision-making. It then discusses the results of an original empirical study of the evolution of British Columbia trial decisions over the last forty years and a survey of Canadian courts. It argues that the current process for writing and issuing Canadian judicial decisions likely does not further the goals of access to justice and may even hinder them. To improve access to justice, it suggests that governments, academics, and judiciaries should rely on human-centered design to design standardized structures and templates for decisions, and it provides a design plan for such reforms and examines the ways judicial independence may impact such reforms. ii Acknowledgments To my advisor—Professor Andrew Green—I would have been rudderless without your direction. Thank you for motivating me to continually think about why judges do what they do and to persistently explore my intuitions about the law and what data can reveal. -
Mcgill's FACULTY of LAW: MAKING HISTORY
McGILL’S FACULTY OF LAW: MAKING HISTORY FACULTÉ DE DROIT FACULTY OF LAW Stephen Smith Wins Law’s Fourth Killam Comité des jeunes diplômés : dix ans déjà! Breaking the Language Barrier: la Facultad habla español Boeing Graduate Fellowships Take Flight Une année dynamique pour les droits de la personne CREDITS COVER (clockwise from top): the 2007-2008 Legal Methodology teaching assistants; three participants at the International Young Leaders Forum (p. 27); James Robb with friends and members of the Faculty Advisory EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Board (p. 10); Killam winners Stephen Scott, H. Patrick Glenn and Roderick Macdonald (p. 22); announcement of the Boeing Fellowships (p. 13); Human Rights Working Group letter-writing campaign (p. 6). Derek Cassoff Jane Glenn Diana Grier Ayton Toby Moneit-Hockenstein RÉDACTRICE EN CHEF Lysanne Larose EDITOR Mark Ordonselli 01 Mot du doyen CONTRIBUTORS 03 Student News and Awards Andrés J. Drew Nicholas Kasirer 06 A Lively Year for the Human Lysanne Larose Rights Working Group Maria Marcheschi 06 Seven Years of Human Rights Neale McDevitt Internships Toby Moneit-Hockenstein Mark Ordonselli 08 The Career Development Jennifer Smolak Office and You WHERE ARE OUR Pascal Zamprelli 09 Dix ans déjà! ALUMNI-IN-LAW? CORRECTEUR D’ÉPREUVE 10 The James Robb Award Peter Pawelek 11 Les Prix F.R. Scott de service PHOTOGRAPHERS exemplaire Claudio Calligaris Owen Egan 12 New Hydro-Québec Scholars Paul Fournier in Sustainable Development Kyle Gervais 13 Boeing Gives Legal Lysanne Larose Maria Marcheschi Scholarship Wings -
Panel Discussion on Canada's Campaign for a UN Security Council Seat
Panel Discussion on Canada’s Campaign for a UN Security Council Seat DATE/DATE: June 19, 2009 3:00 p.m. LOCATION/ENDROIT: Westin Hotel, Governor-General Ballroom III, Ottawa, Ontario PRINCIPALS/PRINCIPAUX: Former Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Yves Fortier Former Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Paul Heinbecker Nancy White, Executive Director, United Nations Association of Canada Nancy Wildgoose, President, United Nations Association of Canada Allan Gotlieb, Senior Advisor, Bennett Jones Steven Edwards, Correspondent, CanWest SUBJECT/SUJET: Allan Gotlieb chairs a panel discussion on Canada's Campaign for a UN Security Council Seat. Nancy Wildgoose: Good afternoon et bienvenue à tous et toutes. This is an important event for us, the first event in our 64th annual general meeting. The United Nations Association in Canada is just one year younger than the UN itself and we’re part of a family of organization sin other UN countries that sometimes called the people’s UN. So we’re glad to see people here to engage in this debate. We’re going to have speakers, panelists present their views and engage but there’s going to be ample opportunity and I invite all of you to participate this afternoon. Je continuerais en anglais mais je vous invite de poser vos questions, de faire vos remarques soit en anglais soit en français. Welcome to everyone. One of the ways we set about fulfilling our mandate which is to engage and inform Canadians about the UN itself and about international issues particularly as they touch upon the interests of Canada. We do it about by fomenting debate.