United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ______
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 12a0104p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, X - - Plaintiff-Appellee, - Nos. 10-2330/2331 v. - > , ALLISON LENORE COSS (10-2330) and - SCOTT EDWARD SIPPOLA (10-2331), - Defendants-Appellants. - - N Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Marquette. Nos. 10-00021-001; 10-00021-002—R. Allan Edgar, District Judge. Argued: March 9, 2012 Decided and Filed: April 16, 2012 Before: MOORE, SUTTON, and DONALD, Circuit Judges. _________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: Sarah E. Henderson, Marquette, Michigan, for Appellants. Phillip J. Green, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Sarah E. Henderson, Marquette, Michigan, for Appellants. Kathleen G. Sample, Maarten Vermaat, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, Marquette, Michigan, for Appellee. _________________ OPINION _________________ KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. This direct criminal appeal concerns the conviction of defendants Scott Edward Sippola (“Sippola”) and Allison Lenore Coss (“Coss”) for extortion of a celebrity. Sippola and Coss challenge the sufficiency of the indictment forming the basis for their convictions, as well as the constitutionality of the 1 Nos. 10-2330/2331 United States v. Coss et al. Page 2 extortion statute under which they were charged. They also appeal the district court’s determination that they were not entitled to a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to § 3E1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”). Because the indictment was sufficient, the extortion statute is constitutional, and their sentences were properly imposed, we AFFIRM the defendants’ convictions and sentences.
[Show full text]