DOCSLIB.ORG

Letter Denouncing Attacks-Final with Signatures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Letter Denouncing Attacks-Final with Signatures To: Attorney Kathleen A. Brost, President, Wisconsin State Bar Attorney Cheryl Furstace Daniels, President-Elect, Wisconsin State Bar Patience Drake Roggensack, The Honorable Chief Justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court We, the undersigned members of the Wisconsin State Bar, call upon the leadership of the State Bar of Wisconsin and the leadership of the Wisconsin Supreme Court to publicly and immediately denounce the vicious personal attacks on Justices Dallet, Karofsky,1 and Hagedorn2 for their decision in Trump v. Biden, 2020 WI 91 (12/14/20). The attacks are particularly vehement towards Justices Dallet and Karofsky, focusing on their religious affiliation. As reported these vile attacks include: • Calling Justice Jill Karofsky “hooked-nosed” and posting a corresponding anti-Semitic caricature of her. Another called her a “terrorist” and said she should “have a massive fatal heart attack on live TV.” • Calling Justice Rebecca Dallet a “traitor,” with the warning that “the best case scenario for you is that you actually get a trial. When the people rise up that won’t happen.” • The Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi publication, published an article about Justices Dallet and Karofsky on Sunday, calling them “an elite Jew sitting next to another Jew determining the course of our government.” • A caller told Justice Karofsky, “You are the tyrant bitch who allows cheating and fraud to put a socialist puppet of China in the White House.” • Justice Hagedorn has “been called a traitor…, a liar…, a fraud.” He’s “been asked if [he’s] being paid off by the Chinese Communist Party.” He’s “been told [he] might be tried for treason by a military tribunal.” Such attacks threaten the independence and safety of the entire judiciary and threaten the rule of law. Moreover, the judicial branch’s power rests in the public’s respect for our judges. Failure by the leadership of the Wisconsin State Bar and the Chief Justice to address these attacks is tantamount to accepting them as routine or normal. As members of the Wisconsin State Bar, we refuse to normalize these attacks on our highest court. In conclusion, these attacks need to be met with swift and forceful condemnation by the Wisconsin State Bar and the entire judiciary, led by our Chief Justice. An unanswered threat to one or more Supreme Court Justices is a threat to all members of the judiciary, the Bar, and to the rule of law. Sincerely, 1 https://wisconsinexaminer.com/brief/antisemitic-misogynist-attacks-on-wisconsin-supreme-court-justices-after- trump-ruling/ 2 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/20/us/politics/wisconsin-justice-brian-hagedorn.html 1 The undersigned: Beth L. Cox, Municipal Judge, Oregon, Wisconsin Jeffrey Spitzer-Resnick, Systems Change Consulting, Madison, Wisconsin Keith Wessel, Wessel, Lehker & Fumelle Inc., Madison, Wisconsin Nicole (Nicki) Vander Meulen, Vander Meulen Law Office, Madison, Wisconsin Deborah Mulligan, Madison, Wisconsin Waring Fincke, Kewaskum, Wisconsin William B. Turner, Madison, Wisconsin Kelda Helen Roys, State Senator-elect, Madison, Wisconsin Daniel J. Krause, Krause Estate Planning & Elder Law Center, Oregon, Wisconsin Joel Ehrlich, Madison, Wisconsin Clifford E. Blackwell III, Madison, Wisconsin Andrea Lea Olmanson, Madison, Wisconsin LuAnne Purdy, Grafton, Wisconsin Paula Bezark, Madison, Wisconsin Linda Roberson, Hollywood, Florida Greg Fumelle, Sun Prairie, Wisconsin Leslie Shear, Madison, Wisconsin Beth Whittemore, Oregon, Wisconsin Stephen R. Hawk, Racine, Wisconsin Betty A. Biernat, Arden Hills, Wisconsin Linda S. Balisle, Balisle Family Law Legal Counsel, S. C., Madison, Wisconsin Michael Rude, Racine, Wisconsin Myrna Solganick, LCSW, Middleton, Wisconsin Anne Colville, Belleville, Wisconsin Arthur K. Thexton, Thexton Law Offices, Madison, Wisconsin Gene R. Rankin, Madison, Wisconsin Jim Wrich, Madison, Wisconsin Kristina Rasmussen, Madison, Wisconsin Kathryn Bush, Madison, Wisconsin Tom Hirsch, Madison, Wisconsin Richard Alan Ginkowski, Municipal Judge, Village of Pleasant Prairie; President, Wisconsin Municipal Judges Association, Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin Carol Gehl, Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin Aaron Tarnutzer, Prairie du Sac, Wisconsin Kristen Zorbini Bongard, Janesville, Wisconsin Linda Hoyt, Elk Mound, Wisconsin Greg Rosenberg, Madison, Wisconsin Steve Eisenberg, Eisenberg Law Offices, Madison, Wisconsin Jim Youngerman, Madison, Wisconsin Alicia Diehl, Dripping Springs, Texas George Relles, Goleta, California David Lasker, Lake Delton, Wisconsin 2 Stephen Youngerman, Youngerman & McNutt LLP, Santa Monica, California Stephanie Robinson, Madison, Wisconsin Constance Chesnik, Madison, Wisconsin Denorah Burns, Madison, Wisconsin Jeffrey A. Mandell, Stafford Rosenbaum, Madison, Wisconsin Mel Barnes, Madison, Wisconsin David Strauss, RiseKit, Chicago, Illinois John Greene, Madison, Wisconsin Daniel Evans, Reuter Whitish and Evans, SC, Madison, Wisconsin Aaron Abramson Seligman, Madison, Wisconsin David D. Relles, Reuter, Whitish & Evans, Madison, Wisconsin Carrie Santuli Schudda, Santulli Schudda & Cox Law Office, Oregon, Wisconsin Cc: Justice Ann Walsh Bradley Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley Justice Rebecca Frank Dallet Justice Brian Hagedorn Justice Jill J. Karofsky Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Call Script Hi, My Name Is__And I’M a Volunteer with Jill Karofsky for the Wisconsin Supreme Court
    Campaign Questions: [email protected] ​ Volunteer/Call Questions: [email protected] ​ Call Script Hi, My name is__and I’m a volunteer with Jill Karofsky for the Wisconsin Supreme Court. May I speak with__, please? I’m calling about the Wisconsin Supreme Court general election on Tuesday, April 7th. Have you heard about the ​ election? (Have conversation – What issues facing Wisconsin and Supreme Court are important to you?) Let me tell you why I think Judge Jill Karofsky is the best choice. Judge Jill Karofsky is the only candidate who is or ​ has ever been a trial court judge. She served as Wisconsin’s first statewide Violence Against Women Prosecutor and ​ the Director of the WI Office of Crime Victim Services. She also taught at UW Law School and worked as a civil attorney for a national nonprofit. She has the right experience, including almost 30 years in Wisconsin courtrooms, and she shares our Wisconsin values. Jill will always uphold the rule of law. That's why she's earned the support of Justice Rebecca Dallet, the last three Democratic governors, and hundreds of judges, attorneys, district attorneys and sheriffs of both parties, and local elected officials and community leaders. For me, the choice is clear. Jill Karofsky is the best choice to serve on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Can we count on your vote for Judge Jill Karofsky for the Wisconsin Supreme Court? [YES] – Thank you so much. You can vote on April 7th and find your polling place at myvote.wi.gov. ​ (Proceed to Volunteer Ask) [Undecided] – Proceed to Additional
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Judiciary Address 2018
    STATE OF THE JUDICIARY ADDRESS 2018 JUDICIAL EXCELLENCE Chief Justice Patience Drake Roggensack Wisconsin Supreme Court P.O. Box 1688 Madison, WI 53701 (608) 266-1888 Annual Meeting of the Wisconsin Judicial Conference October 31, 2018 Lake Geneva, Wisconsin JUDICIAL EXCELLENCE 2018 Judicial Conference COLOR GUARD POSTING OF COLORS Pledge of Allegiance –Sheriff Kurt Picknell Captain Dave Gerber (in charge of Color Guard) Welcome to the 2018 Judicial Conference. During the Judicial Conference, we will focus on judicial excellence, which is promoted by the judges and administrative staff who comprise our court system. We have made significant strides this year in moving our courts forward to meeting the many challenges we face in serving the public. Jean Bousquet expressed the concept of judicial excellence to which we aspire when she said, "The Wisconsin Court System protects individuals’ rights, privileges and liberties, maintains the rule of law, and provides a forum for the resolution of disputes that is fair, accessible, independent and effective." Through my remarks, and throughout the Judicial Conference, we will talk about judicial excellence, achieving it and continuing to maintain it in our ever-changing world. However, before we begin that conversation, this morning we continue a long tradition of recognizing those judges who have passed since the last Judicial Conference. Accordingly, we honor and remember: Justice William Callow Judge James Carlson, Walworth County Judge Dennis Conway, Wood County Judge Allan Deehr, Sheboygan and Manitowoc Counties Judge Richard Greenwood, Brown County Judge Patrick Madden, Milwaukee County Judge Hugh Nelson, Calumet County Judge Timothy Vocke, Vilas County 1 Although those judges who are no longer with us leave an emptiness, we are gladdened by each new judge who has joined our judicial team and by those who have accepted new judicial responsibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19, Opportunism, Pretext, and Subnational Democracy
    Calling in “Sick”: COVID-19, Opportunism, Pretext, and Subnational Democracy Matthew Stenberg, Philip Rocco, and Safia Abukar Farole August 3, 2021 As governments sought to manage the Coronavirus pandemic, many pursed a temporary increase in centralized authority, a general tactic of crisis management. However, in some countries, centralization in the name of public health was not the only motive. The COVID-19 response coincided with broader worldwide trends towards democratic backsliding and authoritarian consolidation. Some of these efforts happened while the world was preoccupied with responding to the pandemic without concretely referencing Coronavirus; however, in other cases, public health rationales are clearly and explicitly invoked as a pretext for actions that instead aid the consolidation of regime authority. This has been especially pernicious in subnational democracy, where efforts have been made to undermine the ability of opposition parties to fairly contest in local and regional politics. This paper looks at four cases in which political actors either opportunistically used worldwide distraction from the COVID-19 pandemic or explicitly invoked public health while seeking to undermine long-term domestic contestation in their jurisdictions: Hong Kong, Hungary, Uganda, and the United States. We examine the use of public health as a pretext or opportunity for undermining opposition parties, recentralizing political authority in dominant actors, and inhibiting the fair contestation of elections. We would like to thank Nisha Bellinger, Kai Yui Samuel Chan, Lucas Dolan, Laura Jakli, Brad Kent, and Todd LaPorte for helpful comments. Introduction Organizational theory posits that even in the most horizontal organizations, a crisis will centralize decision-making in the hands of a small group of leaders (Hermann 1963; Holsti 1972; ’T Hart, Rosenthal, and Kouzmin 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • More Than 500 Wisconsin Community Leaders Back Judge Jill Karofsky for Supreme Court
    For Immediate Release Contact: Alanna Conley December 19, 2019 (262) 293-6692 More than 500 Wisconsin community leaders back Judge Jill Karofsky for Supreme Court MILWAUKEE — Judge Jill Karofsky, candidate for Wisconsin Supreme Court, announced today the endorsement of more than 500 community leaders from across Wisconsin. “The people of Wisconsin deserve judges who will fairly apply the law, making sure the legal system treats everyone equally and humanely,” said R everend Dr. Alex Gee, a community, social and racial justice activist. “Judge Jill Karofsky is committed to protecting the rights of everyone, no matter their background, and she’s clearly the best choice to be our next Supreme Court Justice.” “Judge Jill Karofsky has a statewide reputation as a strong, fair, impartial, and independent jurist,” said Barbara Zack Quindel, a partner at Hawks Quindel, who serves on the Wisconsin Federal Judicial Nominating Commission and is a co-founder of the Wisconsin Employment Lawyers Association.“With her experience on the bench and her history of being an advocate for victims and the rights of all of us, Judge Karofsky is the best and most qualified candidate in this race.” “We need Supreme Court Justices who see the dignity and value in every Wisconsin resident, and who will uphold the law to protect our communities from Ashland to Kenosha, and that’s who Judge Jill Karofsky is,” said Ryan Greendeer, a Ho-Chunk Nation activist and U.S. Army veteran who formerly served as Executive Director of the Great Lakes Inter-Tribal Council. “She will do right for Wisconsin and I’m proud to support her.” “I’ve known Jill Karofsky for decades, and there is no one better suited to sit on Wisconsin’s Supreme Court than her,” said Hannah Rosenthal , former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nextgen Wisconsin Activated the Youth Vote Record Absentee Turnout Amongst Young Voters Shift Political Landscape
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 3, 2020 CONTACT: Kade Walker, 605-838-5146 ​ or [email protected] NextGen Wisconsin Activated the Youth Vote Record absentee turnout amongst young voters shift political landscape NEXTGEN WISCONSIN 2020: BY THE NUMBERS TOTAL SPEND: $5,661,641.22 ​ TOTAL STAFF ON THE GROUND: 39 ​ TOTAL VOLUNTEERS: 1,015 ​ ​ TOTAL CAMPUSES WITH PROGRAM: 18 ​ TOTAL PLEDGE TO VOTES COLLECTED: 49,571 ​ TOTAL YOUNG VOTERS REACHED WITH DIGITAL ADS: 536,961 ​ TOTAL TEXTS SENT: 1,402,997 ​ ​​ TOTAL CALLS MADE: 959,110 ​ TOTAL PIECES OF DIRECT MAIL SENT: 305,307 ​ MADISON, WI — Today, young Wisconsin voters will head to the polls to vote in the most ​ consequential election in recent history. NextGen Wisconsin’s pivot to digital organizing played a central role in mobilizing young voters and ensuring they practice their right to vote safely amid the coronavirus pandemic. “Young people have paid the price of Trump’s failed administration, and are more motivated than ever before to make their voices heard,” said Christina Carvalho, the State Director of ​ NextGen Wisconsin. “Young activists from across the state have spent the last four years ​ leading protests and activating to their friends about the importance of their vote. The stakes have never been higher, and we know young voters understand their role in this election.” In 2016, Wisconsin voted for a GOP presidential candidate for the first time since 1984; Trump’s victory was secured by a margin just over 22,000 votes. Following his win, the Badger State became the center of attention for both parties. In 2018, young voters voted democrat Tony Evers to the governorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy in the Age of Pandemic – Fair Vote UK Report June 2020
    Democracy in the Age of Pandemic How to Safeguard Elections & Ensure Government Continuity APPENDICES fairvote.uk Published June 2020 Appendix 1 - 86 1 Written Evidence, Responses to Online Questionnaire During the preparation of this report, Fair Vote UK conducted a call for written evidence through an online questionnaire. The questionnaire was open to all members of the public. This document contains the unedited responses from that survey. The names and organisations for each entry have been included in the interest of transparency. The text of the questionnaire is found below. It indicates which question each response corresponds to. Name Organisation (if applicable) Question 1: What weaknesses in democratic processes has Covid-19 highlighted? Question 2: Are you aware of any good articles/publications/studies on this subject? Or of any countries/regions that have put in place mediating practices that insulate it from the social distancing effects of Covid-19? Question 3: Do you have any ideas on how to address democratic shortcomings exposed by the impact of Covid-19? Appendix 1 - 86 2 Appendix 1 Name S. Holledge Organisation Question 1 Techno-phobia? Question 2 Estonia's e-society Question 3 Use technology and don't be frightened by it 2 Appendix 1 - 86 3 Appendix 2 Name S. Page Organisation Yes for EU (Scotland) Question 1 The Westminster Parliament is not fit for purpose Question 2 Scottish Parliament Question 3 Use the internet and electronic voting 3 Appendix 1 - 86 4 Appendix 3 Name J. Sanders Organisation emergency legislation without scrutiny removing civil liberties railroading powers through for example changes to mental health act that impact on individual rights (A) Question 1 I live in Wales, and commend Mark Drakeford for his quick response to the crisis by enabling the Assembly to continue to meet and debate online Question 2 no, not until you asked.
    [Show full text]
  • Petitioner, V
    No. __________ In The Supreme Court of the United States ♦ DEBRA K. SANDS, Petitioner, v. JOHN R. MENARD, JR., MENARD THOROUGHBREDS, INC., MENARD, INC., WEBSTER HART AS TRUSTEE OF THE JOHN R. MENARD, JR. 2002 TRUST AND RELATED TRUSTS, ANGELA L. BOWE AS TRUSTEE OF THE JOHN R. MENARD, JR. 2002 TRUST AND RELATED TRUSTS AND ALPHONS PITTERLE AS TRUSTEE OF THE JOHN R. MENARD, JR. 2002 TRUST AND RELATED TRUSTS, Respondents. ♦ On Petition for Writ of Certiorari To The Wisconsin Supreme Court ♦ PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ♦ Mel C. Orchard, III Daniel R. Shulman THE SPENCE LAW FIRM, LLC Counsel of Record 15 South Jackson Street Richard C. Landon Post Office Box 548 GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, Jackson, WY 83001 MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A. Telephone: (307) 733-7290 500 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: 612-632-3000 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner i QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a State from depriving any person of property without due process of law. For more than nine years, the Petitioner in this case, Debra K. Sands, litigated a claim for un- just enrichment against her fiancé, John R. Menard, Jr., reported to be the richest man in Wisconsin and a major contributor to organizations supporting the candidacy of multiple Wisconsin Supreme Court Justices. During those nine years, which never re- sulted in a trial, the sole issue contested by the parties was whether Sands’ claim was barred by a Wisconsin Supreme Court Rule of Professional Responsibility. On December 29, 2017, the Wisconsin Supreme Court, finding for Sands on the ethical issue, nevertheless ruled that Sands’ complaint failed to state a claim for unjust enrichment, an issue never raised, briefed, or previously argued.
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Michael Screnock Continues to Pull in Impressive Endorsements and Engages His Community Proactively
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 3, 2017 Contact: Nathan Conrad [email protected] ICYMI: Judge Michael Screnock continues to pull in impressive endorsements and engages his community proactively [Reedsburg, Wis.] – In recent weeks Judge Michael Screnock has made waves with an impressive list of statewide endorsements in his bid to replace Justice Michael Gableman on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Along with the majority of county sheriffs throughout the state he has also garnered the support of many notable conservative legal thinkers including sitting and retired Supreme Court Justices, Appellate Court Judges and a growing list of circuit court judges as well. His support is growing and his non-stop crisscrossing of the state has made quite an impression on grassroots activists as well. Please see below some highlights of not only his impressive list of endorsements, but the coverage of the first graduating class of the Sauk County Drug Court that Judge Screnock helped establish. On Judge Michael Screnock’s impressive and growing list of endorsements: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel - Michael Screnock gets endorsements from conservatives in Wisconsin Supreme Court bid State Supreme Court candidate Michael Screnock on Thursday announced the endorsements of three current justices, two former justices and two appeals judges — the clearest sign yet that conservatives are clearing the field for him. …“Judge Mike Screnock is the voice of fairness, law and common sense and would be the best next justice of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin,” Gableman said in a statement Thursday…. Associated Press - Supreme Court Justice Candidate Screnock Nets Endorsements From Conservative Justices Sauk County Circuit Judge Michael Screnock Hoping To Replace Justice Michael Gableman Sauk County Circuit Judge Michael Screnock has won endorsements in the race for the Wisconsin Supreme Court from three conservative sitting justices and a host of other conservative judges.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Wisconsin State Senators Endorse Judge Jill Karofsky for Wisconsin Supreme Court
    For Immediate Release November 5, 2019 Contact: Alanna Conley (262) 293-6692 Western Wisconsin State Senators endorse Judge Jill Karofsky for Wisconsin Supreme Court MILWAUKEE -- Judge Jill Karofsky, candidate for Wisconsin Supreme Court, announced today she has been endorsed by three state Senators from Western Wisconsin, including Senate Minority Leader Jennifer Shilling (D-La Crosse), Sen. Jeff Smith (D-Brunswick) and Sen. Patty Schachtner (D-Somerset). “We must get our constitutional democracy back on track, and ensure that the Supreme Court is truly an independent third branch of government,” said Sen. Shilling. “Judge Jill Karofsky is by far the best choice to restore the reputation of the high court and ensure they return to the era of a nonpartisan judiciary. She has hometown values, broad and deep legal experience, strength of character, and the necessary wisdom and judgement.” “I appreciate the support I’m getting across the entire state of Wisconsin, and especially from those who represent Western Wisconsin,” said Judge Karofsky. “As I travel across the state, people in every community express concern about the direction of the Supreme Court. We need to take the partisan politics out of the Supreme Court chambers and restore the rule of law and a sense of justice. I work every day to apply the law in my trial courtroom, and I’ll keep working every day to earn the votes of citizens across Wisconsin.” Judge Karofsky currently serves as a circuit court judge in Dane County, and also has the public support of Justice Rebecca Dallet, Governor Jim Doyle, and 20 other legislators.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Visit Our Website At
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page County Government Telephone Directory .................. 2-3 County Government Addresses .................................. 3-4 Federal and State Officials ......................................... 5-7 Elective County Officers/Dept Heads ............................ 8 County Board Supervisor .......................................... 9-12 County Board Committees ...................................... 12-14 Town Officials……………………………………………… …..15-21 Village Officials………………………………………………. 21-28 City Official ............................................................. 29-31 County Email Addresses ......................................... 32-34 Iowa County Department Information .................... 34-36 Census of Iowa County IOWA COUNTY Total Precincts…………………………………..29 Townships…………………………………………14 Village………………………………………………13 Cities………………………………………………....2 Land Area………………………761 square miles 2010 Population…………………………..23,687 Please visit our website at: www.iowacounty.org 1 TELEPHONE DIRECTORY Area code (608) Aging & Disability Resource Ctr .......... 930-9835 ...................................... Fax: 935-0355 Airport ................................................... 987-9931 Bloomfield Healthcare & Rehabilitation 935-3321 ...................................... Fax: 937-0553 Child Support ........................................ 935-0390 ...................................... Fax: 935-0382 Clerk of Circuit Court ........................... 935-0395 ...................................... Fax: 935-0386 Coroner ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Save It for the Judge? a Case Study on the Effects of Big Money on State Judicial Elections and the Call for Stronger Recusal Rules
    Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality Volume 8 Issue 2 Article 3 6-14-2020 Save it for the Judge? A Case Study on the Effects of Big Money on State Judicial Elections and the Call for Stronger Recusal Rules Gustavo A. Jimenez Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijlse Part of the Law Commons Publication Citation Gustavo A. Jimenez, Comment, Save it for the Judge? A Case Study on the Effects of Big Money on State Judicial Elections and the Call for Stronger Recusal Rules, 8 Ind. J.L. & Soc. Equality 268 (2020). This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENT Save it for the Judge? A Case Study on the Effects of Big Money on State Judicial Elections and the Call for Stronger Recusal Rules Gustavo A. Jimenez* Abstract Elected judges take an oath to be impartial in upholding the law. This is easily called into question when judges hear a case from parties that contributed large amounts of money into their judicial campaigns. The Wisconsin Supreme Court was once considered a model of an impartial and non-partisan state court system. However, state politics and U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence have led to developments that have damaged the court’s reputation, politicized the court, and undermined the legitimacy of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Wisconsin
    2020 WI 42 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP765-OA COMPLETE TITLE: Wisconsin Legislature, Petitioner, v. Secretary-Designee Andrea Palm, Julie Willems Van Dijk and Lisa Olson, In Their Official Capacities As Executives of Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Respondents. ORIGINAL ACTION OPINION FILED: May 13, 2020 SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT: May 5, 2020 SOURCE OF APPEAL: COURT: COUNTY: JUDGE: JUSTICES: ROGGENSACK, C.J., delivered the majority opinion of the Court, in which ZIEGLER, REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, and KELLY, JJ., joined. ROGGENSACK, C.J., filed a concurring opinion. REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which KELLY, J. joined. KELLY, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J., joined. ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which DALLET, J., joined. DALLET, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which ANN WALSH BRADLEY, joined. HAGEDORN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which ANN WALSH BRADLEY, and DALLET, JJ., joined with respect to ¶¶198-258. NOT PARTICIPATING: ATTORNEYS: For the petitioners, there was a petition and reply filed by Eric M. McLeod, Lane E.B. Ruhland and Husch Blackwell LLP, Madison and Ryan J. Walsh, John K. Adams, Amy Miller and Eimer Stahl LLP, Madison. There was an oral argument by Ryan J. Walsh, Madison. For the respondents, there was a response filed by Colin A. Hector, Thomas C. Bellavia, Colin R. Stroud, Hannah S. Jurss, Steven C. Kilpatrick, assistant attorneys general, and Joshua L. Kaul, attorney general. There was an oral argument by Colin Thomas Roth, assistant attorney general. An amicus curiae brief was filed on behalf of The Tavern League of Wisconsin by James A.
    [Show full text]