Special Section

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Special Section SPECIALOPENING SECTION EYES SPECIALOPENING SECTION EYES telling stories of secret US military warfare that the film fo- ual devices born in Hollywood that are becoming more and Take me cuses on: Afghanistan, Yemen and Somalia. more common in contemporary documentaries. All three are tales of black ops, where the US military The opening sequence could have come out of the to the front played a central role in acts of war against civilians, by Bourne series. The post-production grading of the video committing them or, in the case of Somalia, facilitating creates an effect audiences will recognize as a kind of half- them. As Scahill says, in the opening montage, “This is a way house between entertainment and documentaries. Call RICHARD GIZBERT story about the seen and the unseen. And about things hid- it cinéma (slightly less) verité. den in plain sight.” The narrative winds through dusty roads in the Mid- In the documentary Dirty Wars (directed It seems rather easy nowadays, given what has hap- dle East, Central Asia and the Horn of Africa, pauses for by Rick Rowley) Jeremy Scahill shines a pened to the news industry, to hide such things. Jingo- breath at the reporter’s apartment in Brooklyn and fol- ism still mars a lot of the coverage of foreign policy coming lows Scahill into a congressional committee room in Wash- light into the darkness of America’s secret out of the US. Despite the mea culpas (or kinda culpas) we ington, DC. There, his shocking findings on an American wars, and on the culture of apathy and heard after all those anchor people helped cheerlead Amer- war crime are presented to a half-empty committee room ignorance that enables it. ica, indefensibly, into Iraq, they are basically singing from that just grows more empty as Scahill delivers his evidence. the same song sheet on Iran. One of the narrative threads the film relies on And with the economics of the news industry collapsing is Scahill himself, and he is uncomfortably prominent Dans le documentaire Dirty Wars de Rick budgets and Justin Bieber running amok and attracting those in the presentation of the film. “Uncomfortable” is his Rowley, Jeremy Scahill fait la lumière sur les coveted clicks, what sensible North American news outlet word, not mine. He told me in an interview that he had sombres guerres secrètes de l’Amérique. Et would devote its dwindling resources to chasing stories from to be convinced to front the story for marketing purposes. sur la culture d’ignorance et d’apathie qui which most North Americans would rather avert their eyes? Scahill despairs at that uncomfortable truth: that the best chance his documentary had to succeed with mostly white, les rend possibles. irty Wars gets at those stories through a combination Western audiences would be if he presented it, rather than Dof dogged journalism, thousands of miles travelled, allowing the participants — and victims — of the story to exceptional access and good storytelling, as well as the vis- tell it themselves. uring the national anthem at the recent Super Drones are the weapons of choice in more and more Bowl, the television audience got the now cus- conflicts these days. This is because they are the perfect Dtomary military component of the pregame pres- tool to fight the new kind of war, the asymmetrical con- entation: an Army colour guard on the field, live images of flicts that confound conventional armies. They also usually troops saluting from some base in Afghanistan followed by confound modern news outlets, which haven’t yet learned the customary fly-by, the strutting of overhead weaponry how to cover them. 1/2 page horizontal that Americans somehow find reassuring. These are the kind of conflicts Jeremy Scahill covers This year’s fly-by, however, was different. No jets. In- in Dirty Wars, the timely documentary that goes where stead, we got Apache helicopters, which makes sense when much of the Western world’s news media does not and tells QUEENS you think about it. Given what the US military seems to be important stories that usually go untold. up to around the world these days, it’s not really about jets. Getting into the shadowy areas around modern warfare It’s about close air support. is not easy. Doing it with a video camera is harder. And What would have made even more sense would have turning it into a watchable, Academy Award-nominated been a fly-by of drones. The skies over the stadium in documentary is harder still. New Jersey should have been filled with pilotless Preda- Scahill made his name and learned his way around the tors and Reapers. And the video feed shouldn’t have come nooks and crannies in and around the US military when he from Bagram. It should have been from a secret location in wrote Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mer- 1 0 0 Nevada or upstate New York, at one of the many military cenary Army, his 2008 book on the giant military contract- bases where pilots do their remote control thing. ing firm that made billions during the American invasion 9 5 and occupation of Iraq. Like drones, Blackwater does most of its work in the 7 5 dark, off screen (and off the books, as far as Pentagon spending is officially concerned). Scahill’s reporting on Richard Gizbert hosts Listening Post, on Al Jazeera English. Blackwater prepared him well for Dirty Wars and the three 2 5 5 22 OPTIONS POLITIQUES POLICY OPTIONS 23 MARS-AVRIL 2014 MARCH-APRIL 2014 0 2 0 1 4 I R P P P M P A a d _ r e v _ b l e e d D e c e m b e r 9 , 2 0 1 3 1 1 : 5 8 : 5 8 A M RICHARD GIZBERT OPENING EYES There are a few moments where the filmmakers do o the nomination of Dirty Wars for a best documentary seem to take it a bit too far: the freeze-frames, with a tele- SOscar was welcome. As a story, the War on Terror Inc. Known unknowns photo effect and the machine-gun text across the bottom and its growing subsidiaries in the shadows will continue of the screen capturing a man heading into a meeting in to be a tough sell on the evening news and in the papers, SHERIEF GABER Jalalabad. The technique would have been more effect- let alone with cinema audiences. ive had the target of the lens been a Bin Laden courier or But Jeremy Scahill and his production team have suc- an American operative, rather than Scahill himself. ceeded in doing just this. They have bucked some of the Most of the Egyptians fighting and dying But that’s showbiz. And I’m quibbling. disturbing trends in contemporary journalism, such as the in the country’s ongoing revolution are Because journalism, like warfare, has changed. There devotion to simple narratives of good vs. evil that reduce the anonymous to the outside world. In Jehane are techniques filmmakers rely on to attract audiences that struggles in the Middle East and other “foreign” places to a car- were unnecessary just a generation ago. Complaining about toonish grammar seen through the prism of domestic politics. Noujaim’s documentary The Square, we that is as pointless as moaning about the technology that Punching through that corrupted vision is the film’s meet some of the people who made the has driven the change. true achievement. It has taken us to the stories we are not revolution. Journalists have always had to fight to get their stories shown, or choose not to see, even though those stories lie, on the air. All that has changed is the rules of the game. as our reluctant narrator tell us, hidden in plain sight. n La majorité des Égyptiens qui luttent et meurent au nom de la révolution en cours dans leur pays sont totalement inconnus du monde extérieur. Le documentaire The Square, de Jehane Noujaim, en tire “This is a story about things quelques-uns de l’anonymat. hidden in plain sight.” Scahill in Somalia. RICHARD ROWLEY n August 14, 2013, as Egyptian police were in the end to oppression, to impoverishment, to marginalization middle of perpetrating the largest single massacre and the abusive neglect of the state. Even after the initial Oin modern Egyptian history, Mahmoud Abdel 18-day uprising that saw the generals and tycoons abandon Hakim wrote on his Twitter account: “Tomorrow we’ll President Hosni Mubarak, Mahmoud continued to take to die the same death.” Three months later, during a protest the streets, fighting for the fall of a regime that promised commemorating the second anniversary of the battle of him no future. Mohammed Mahmoud Street, which marked a decisive Amidst the graffiti that has filled the walls of Egypt, moment in our revolutionary struggle, Mahmoud was shot been erased and been written again over the past three and killed by police in Cairo’s Tahrir Square. years, two tags in particular are repeated, hastily scrawled A charismatic, intelligent 22-year-old engineering in freehand: “Glory to the unknown” and “Freedom for the student, Mahmoud could have easily been a character in detained whose names we do not know.” Indeed, how can The Square, Jehane Noujaim’s street-level documentary we keep track of so many names, of the over 2,000 killed that takes us past the wide shots of drifting tear gas and and the 20,000 arrested just since the July 3 coup last year inside the personal struggles over Egypt’s fate.
Recommended publications
  • Media Analysis of Julian Assange's Superseding Indictment
    defend.wikileaks.org Media analysis of Julian Assange's superseding indictment The precedent Glenn Greenwald: The indictment of Assange is a blueprint for making journalists into felons The argument offered by both the Trump administration and by some members of the self- styled “resistance” to Trump is, ironically, the same: that Assange isn’t a journalist at all and thus deserves no free press protections. But this claim overlooks the indictment’s real danger and, worse, displays a wholesale ignorance of the First Amendment. Press freedoms belong to everyone, not to a select, privileged group of citizens called “journalists.” Empowering prosecutors to decide who does or doesn’t deserve press protections would restrict “freedom of the press” to a small, cloistered priesthood of privileged citizens designated by the government as “journalists.” The First Amendment was written to avoid precisely that danger. Most critically, the U.S. government has now issued a legal document that formally declares that collaborating with government sources to receive and publish classified documents is no longer regarded by the Justice Department as journalism protected by the First Amendment but rather as the felony of espionage, one that can send reporters and their editors to prison for decades. It thus represents, by far, the greatest threat to press freedom in the Trump era, if not the past several decades. … The vast bulk of activities cited by the indictment as criminal are exactly what major U.S. media outlets do on a daily basis. The indictment, for instance, alleges WikiLeaks “encouraged sources” such as Chelsea Manning to obtain and pass on classified information; that the group provided technical advice on how to obtain and transmit that information without detection, and that it then published the classified information stolen by its source.
    [Show full text]
  • And Jeremy Scahill (USA) Win Human Rights Award
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Marina Garde February 9, 2016 [email protected] / www.alba-valb.org Tel. 212-674-5398 Fearless, Border-Crossing Journalists Expose Corruption at the Highest Levels: Lydia Cacho (Mexico) and Jeremy Scahill (USA) Win Human Rights Award New York—On Saturday, May 7, 2016, the Abraham Lincoln Brigade Archives (ALBA) will present the ALBA/Puffin Award for Human Rights Activism to journalists Lydia Cacho and Jeremy Scahill. One of the largest monetary awards for human rights in the world, this $100,000 cash prize is granted annually by ALBA and the Puffin Foundation to honor the International Brigades and connect their inspiring legacy with contemporary causes. “Cacho and Scahill both shine as rare examples of investigative journalists who place human rights at the center of their work,” said ALBA board member and 2012 award recipient Kate Doyle. “Their reporting not only affects government policies, but seeks to champion and protect the lives of the world’s most vulnerable citizens. ALBA is proud to honor them.” Working on both sides of the volatile Mexico-United States border, Lydia Cacho and Jeremy Scahill have dedicated their careers to exposing the corruption, violence and abuse of power which go routinely unchallenged in the mainstream media. Cacho’s and Scahill’s work exemplifies the intersections of expository reporting and human rights activism. Their commitment to breaking the most profound silences has prompted investigations into the United States’ shadow wars across the Middle East and Africa as well as Mexican authorities’ use of censorship, torture and corruption. Part of an initiative designed to sustain the legacy of the experiences, aspirations and idealism of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, the ALBA/Puffin Award for Human Rights Activism supports current international activists and human rights causes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civilian Impact of Drone Strikes
    THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS Acknowledgements This report is the product of a collaboration between the Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School and the Center for Civilians in Conflict. At the Columbia Human Rights Clinic, research and authorship includes: Naureen Shah, Acting Director of the Human Rights Clinic and Associate Director of the Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School, Rashmi Chopra, J.D. ‘13, Janine Morna, J.D. ‘12, Chantal Grut, L.L.M. ‘12, Emily Howie, L.L.M. ‘12, Daniel Mule, J.D. ‘13, Zoe Hutchinson, L.L.M. ‘12, Max Abbott, J.D. ‘12. Sarah Holewinski, Executive Director of Center for Civilians in Conflict, led staff from the Center in conceptualization of the report, and additional research and writing, including with Golzar Kheiltash, Erin Osterhaus and Lara Berlin. The report was designed by Marla Keenan of Center for Civilians in Conflict. Liz Lucas of Center for Civilians in Conflict led media outreach with Greta Moseson, pro- gram coordinator at the Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School. The Columbia Human Rights Clinic and the Columbia Human Rights Institute are grateful to the Open Society Foundations and Bullitt Foundation for their financial support of the Institute’s Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, and to Columbia Law School for its ongoing support. Copyright © 2012 Center for Civilians in Conflict (formerly CIVIC) and Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America. Copies of this report are available for download at: www.civiliansinconflict.org Cover: Shakeel Khan lost his home and members of his family to a drone missile in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremy Scahill: Two Degrees of Separation from the Dirty Wars Dragnet
    JEREMY SCAHILL: TWO DEGREES OF SEPARATION FROM THE DIRTY WARS DRAGNET Congratulations to Jeremy Scahill and the entire team that worked on Dirty Wars for being nominated for the Best Documentary Oscar. This post may appear to be shamelessly opportunistic — exploiting the attention Dirty Wars will get in the days ahead to make a political point before the President endorses the dragnet on Friday — but I’ve been intending to write it since November, when I wrote this post. Jeremy Scahill (and the entire Dirty Wars team) is the kind of person whose contacts and sources are exposed to the government in its dragnet. To write his book (and therefore research the movie, though not all of this shows up in the movie) Scahill spoke with Anwar al-Awlaki’s father (one degree of separation from a terrorist target), a number of people with shifting loyalties in Somalia (who may or may not be targeted), and Afghans we identified as hostile in Afghanistan. All of these people might be targets of our dragnet analysis (and remember — there is a far looser dragnet of metadata collected under EO 12333, with fewer protections). Which puts Scahill, probably via multiple channels, easily within 3 degrees of separation of targets that might get him exposed to further network analysis. (Again, if these contacts show up in 12333 collection Scahill would be immediately exposed to that kind of datamining; if it shows up in the Section 215 dragnet, it would happen if his calls got dumped into the Corporate Store.) If Scahill got swept up in the dragnet on a first or second hop, it means all his other sources, including those within government (like the person depicted in the trailer above) describing problems with the war they’ve been asked to fight, might be identified too.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremy Scahill Shaun King
    JEREMY SCAHILL &SHAUN KING “Reporting on Racial Conflict at Home and Wars Abroad in Wed, March 28, 2018 6:15 - 8 p.m. the Age of Trump” College Avenue Academic Moderated by Building, Room 2400 Juan González, Professor of Professional 15 Seminary Place, Practice, School of Communication and New Brunswick, NJ Information, and co-host of Democracy Now Jeremy Scahill is an investigative reporter, war correspon- dent, and author of the international bestseller Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army. He has reported from armed conflicts around the world, including Af- ghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen, Nigeria, and the former Yugo- slavia. He is a two-time winner of the prestigious George Polk Award and produced and wrote the movie Dirty Wars, a doc- umentary that premiered at the 2013 Sundance Film Festival and was nominated for an Academy Award. He is one of the founding editors of the investigative news site The Intercept, where he also hosts the popular weekly podcast Intercepted. In addition, Scahill is the national security correspondent for The Nation and for Democracy Now. Shaun King is nationally known as a civil rights and Black Lives Matter activist, and as an innovator in the use of social media for political change. He currently works as a columnist for The Intercept, where he writes about racial justice, mass incarceration, human rights, and law enforcement misconduct. He has been a senior justice writer at New York’s Daily News, a commentator for The Young Turks and the Tom Joyner Show, a contributing writer to Daily Kos, and a writer-in-residence at Harvard Law School’s Fair Punishment Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Chilling Effects on Free Expression: Surveillance, Threats and Harassment
    chapter 16 Chilling Effects on Free Expression: Surveillance, Threats and Harassment Elisabeth Eide Professor of Journalism Studies, Oslo Metropolitan University Abstract: This chapter addresses global surveillance as revealed by Edward Snowden in 2013 and discusses the effects such surveillance – and indeed its revelation – may have on freedom of the press and investigative journalism. The chilling effect – an act of discouragement – has proven to be an effective way of deterring public intel- lectuals and other citizens from voicing their opinions in the public sphere. This chapter presents some examples of how it works on practicing freedom of expres- sion for both groups and individuals, as well as how it may affect relationships between various actors in the public sphere, particularly the state and the media, and journalists/writers and politicians. Finally, it discusses consequences for the future of investigative journalism. Keywords: chilling effect, investigative journalism, surveillance, freedom of expression Rarely it is mentioned, in this regard, that surveillance fundamentally questions journalistic work as such – at least in its form of investigative journalism that requires confidential communication with sources. —Arne Hintz (2013) Introduction This chapter addresses the chilling effect on freedom of expression and free- dom of the press. As a case study, it discusses how investigative journalism, Citation: Eide, E. (2019). Chilling Effects on Free Expression: Surveillance, Threats and Harassment. In R. Krøvel & M. Thowsen (Eds.),Making Transparency Possible. An Interdisciplinary Dialogue (pp. 227–242). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.64.ch16 License: CC BY-NC 4.0 227 chapter 16 revealing modern global surveillance helped by whistleblower Edward Snowden (in June 2013), may be hampered by this effect, oftentimes in the form of a tight relationship between state power and the media.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirty Wars: Peace Psychologists and the Need to Confront Reality a Review of Dirty Wars: the World Is a Battlefield Jeremy Scahill Reviewed by Trudy Bond
    Dirty Wars: Peace Psychologists and the Need to Confront Reality A Review of Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield Jeremy Scahill Reviewed by Trudy Bond Author’s Note. This essay has been published in Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology (Copyright, American Psychological Association; DOI: 10.1037/a0034614). This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record. It is the responsibility of intellectuals to speak the truth and to expose lies. -- Noam Chomsky (1967, p.1). The dominant narrative is that wars happen and that a peaceful but powerful nation such as the United States responds to the aggression of other nations or groups using military force when diplomacy or other efforts at persuasion are not successful. This view presumes decisions to engage in war emanate from decisions by democratically elected officeholders to protect us. -- Marc Pilisuk and Ines-Lena Mahr (2013, p.3). Jeremy Scahill's recent book, Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield, is an incisive and disturbing documentation of U.S. covert actions outside the realm of the U.S. Constitution. With 528 pages of penetratingly detailed accounts, Scahill's investigative reporting covers a range of critical topics that do not support the dominant narrative: the U.S. government's engagement with the internal politics of foreign countries, including Somalia and Yemen; the targeted assassinations and kill lists that include U.S. citizens; the vast escalation in drone strikes that have killed civilians and children; and the continuing lies to the public regarding all the above.
    [Show full text]
  • City Research Online
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Kalpouzos, I. (2017). The assination complex: Inside the US government's secret drone warfare programme (Book review). The British Journal of Criminology, 57(6), doi: 10.1093/bjc/azx025 This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/18678/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azx025 Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Jeremy Scahill and the Staff of the Intercept, The Assassination Complex: Inside the US Government’s Secret Drone Warfare Programme (Serpent’s Tail, 2016, 234pp.) Literature on armed drones has spread almost as fast as the drones themselves. They seem to embody an irresistible combination of violence and progress, promising war both total and limited, and precisely administered. Dumbfounded by the bluntness of the recent political transition, we don’t have a full picture of how the new US administration will use this weapon of choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirty Wars Discussion Guide
    www.influencefilmclub.com Dirty Wars Discussion Guide Director: Rick Rowley Year: 2013 Time: 87 min You might know this director from: The Fourth World War (2003) Black & Gold (2001) This Is What Democracy Looks Like (2000) FILM SUMMARY DIRTY WARS unveils the clandestine war that the United States is waging, with the world as its battlefield. Jeremy Scahill, a national security and war correspondent, serves as the film’s narrator and guide. His investigation begins with the mysterious tragedy surrounding a night raid in Gardez, Afghanistan in February 2010. Several civilians were killed, including an American-trained Afghan police commander and two pregnant women. The U.S. government claimed that the two women were victims of a Taliban honor killing, but family and friends who were in the house on the night of the raid give a different account. Footage captured on their cell phones reveal the bodies and the gruesome aftermath, and how U.S. soldiers examined the corpses in order to devise their own version of events. This cover-up leads to the discovery of others, as Scahill delves into the attacks carried out by Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), a covert military unit that operates in Afghanistan and other countries in which no war has been declared, including Indonesia, Yemen, Somalia, and The Philippines. The film argues that the war isn’t restricted by ethical or legal boundaries either. The film documents how U.S. citizen Anwar al-Awlaki was killed by a drone attack in Yemen on September 2011. He was executed without being tried in court.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremy Scahill on the Military Industrial Complex, US-Airbase in Ramstein & Anti- War Movements This Transcript May Not Be 100% Accurate
    Jeremy Scahill on the Military Industrial Complex, US-Airbase in Ramstein & Anti- War Movements This transcript may not be 100% accurate Introduction Text: Jeremy Scahill is one of the three founding editors of The Intercept. He is an investigative re- porter, war correspondent, and author of the international bestselling books Dirty Wars: The World Is a Battlefield and Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army. He has reported from Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Yemen, Nigeria, the former Yu- goslavia, and elsewhere across the globe. Scahill has served as the national security corre- spondent for The Nation and Democracy Now!. Scahill’s work has sparked several congressional investigations and won some of journalism’s highest honors. He was twice awarded the prestigious George Polk Award, in 1998 for foreign reporting and in 2008 for Blackwater. Scahill is a producer and writer of the award- winning film Dirty Wars, which premiered at the 2013 Sundance Film Festival and was nominated for an Academy Award. Zain Raza (ZR) Jeremy Scahill, thank you so much for joining us today. Jeremy Scahill (JS) It’s great to be with you guys. ZR So I want to start off with the farewell address from President Eisenhower. In his last speech he talked about something called the military-industrial complex. I want to quote a passage from that speech: “In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Targeted Killings: “Lawful but Awful”?
    CROSS-BORDER TARGETED KILLINGS: “LAWFUL BUT AWFUL”? ROSA BROOKS* Since September 11, the United States has waged two very open wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. These two wars have killed nearly 7,000 U.S. military personnel and left some 50,000 Ameri- can troops wounded; they have also left an unknown number of Iraqi and Afghan soldiers and civilians dead or wounded.1 But alongside these two costly and visible wars, the United States has also been waging what amounts to a third war. This third war is a secret war, waged mostly by drone strikes, though it has also involved a smaller number of special opera- tions raids.2 I call this third war a secret war, because though its existence is widely known, it remains officially unacknowledged by the government of the United States: In court filings, for in- stance, the United States continues to state that it will neither confirm nor deny its involvement in drone strikes outside of tra- ditional battlefields.3 * Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center, and Senior Fellow, New America Foundation. This essay was adapted from remarks given at the 2014 Federalist Society Annual Student Symposium at the University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida. 1. DEP’T OF DEFENSE, http://www.defense.gov/news/casualty.pdf [http://perma.cc/ TE3M-UNT2] (last visited July 25, 2014); David Pogue, Iraq, Afghanistan War Wound- ed Pass 50,000, HUFFINGTON POST (Oct. 25, 2012, 12:36 PM) http://www. huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/25/iraq-afghanistan-war-wounded_n_2017338.html [http://perma.cc/3RDZ-ZGRQ].
    [Show full text]
  • WAR on DEMAND the Global Rise of Drones ROSA LUXEMBURG STIFTUNG NEW YORK OFFICE by Medea Benjamin Table of Contents
    WAR ON DEMAND The Global Rise of Drones ROSA LUXEMBURG STIFTUNG NEW YORK OFFICE By Medea Benjamin Table of Contents Magical Weapons, Futuristic Warfare. By the Editors....................................................................1 War on Demand The Global Rise of Drones...............................................................................................................2 By Medea Benjamin 1. The Evolution of Drones.........................................................................................................2 2. Justifying a Dirty Business.......................................................................................................4 Drones Are a Humane Way of Waging War...............................................................4 Drones Are Effective Against Terrorists.......................................................................5 Drone Strikes Are Legal.................................................................................................7 Drones are cheap and easy to use..............................................................................7 3. The Players and Their Targets.................................................................................................8 United States..................................................................................................................9 Israel.............................................................................................................................14 United Kingdom...........................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]