DOCSLIB.ORG

Fabian Policy Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fabian Policy Report FABIAN POLICY REPORT INEQUALITY 2030 Britain’s choice for living standards and poverty, by Andrew Harrop and Howard Reed ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS First, thank you to all the partners who made this project Acknowledgements ii possible: Child Poverty Action Group; the Dartmouth Street Trust; Oxfam GB; and the TUC. Their material and Summary 2 intellectual support are hugely appreciated. We are also Introduction 4 indebted to a large number of people who contributed at 1 Inequality 2030 7 various stages of this project, including the attendees of two seminars we held during the project: Vidhya Alakeson, Kate 2 Can ‘predistribution’ reduce inequality? 13 Bell, David Coats, Declan Gaffney, Alison Garnham, Chris 3 A lost decade? 19 Goulden, Kate Green, Andrew Hood, Ruth Jackson, Robert Joyce, Lindsay Judge, Stewart Lansley, Neil Lee, Ruth Lister, 4 Recommendations 22 Duncan Melville, Rachael Orr, Minesh Patel, John Philpott, Endnotes 24 Rachel Reeves, Sam Royston, Dave Simmonds, Paul Sis- sons, Holly Sutherland and Nicola Smith. A particular thanks to three people who made special contributions to the project: Fran Bennett, Graham Stark and Rob Tinker. And finally, thank you to the incredible staff team at the Fabian Society, especially Anya Pearson, Richard Speight and Ed Wallis. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Andrew Harrop is general secretary of the Fabian Society. He leads the society’s Next State and Next Economy pro- grammes and was secretary to the Fabian Commission on Future Spending Choices. Howard Reed is director of the economic research con- sultancy Landman Economics. He was previously chief economist at the Institute for Public Policy Research. Cover illustration: © Leonie / Designed by Soapbox, Flikr.com www.soapbox.co.uk [email protected] Like all publications of the Fabian www.fabians.org.uk Society, this report represents not General Secretary, the collective views of the Society, Andrew Harrop but only the views of the individual Deputy General Secretary, writers. The responsibility of the Marcus Roberts Society is limited to approving its FABIAN SOCIETY Editorial Director, Ed Wallis publications as worthy of consider- 61 Petty France Assistant Editor, ation within the labour movement. London SW1H 9EU Anya Pearson 020 7227 4900 (main) First published in February 2015 020 7976 7153 (fax) Report Authors Andrew Harrop and Howard Reed Inequality 2030 Britain’s choice for living standards and poverty by Andrew Harrop and Howard Reed 1 / Inequality 2030 low and middle income households. If, by 2030, the UK were to match the highest SUMMARY levels of employment in the developed world today, then poverty and inequality would still rise, but by less than we oth- erwise project. This rise in employment could only be achieved by significantly Inequality 2030 just 2 per cent (GDP per capita will rise improving support and opportunities HIS REPORT TAKES a long view of living by 32 per cent over the period). for parents, carers, disabled people and Tstandards and economic inequality, people in their 60s. With very high levels looking over a timeframe of 15 years. Its • The incomes of high income house- of employment, we project: focus is on the incomes of low and middle holds will rise 11 times faster than the income households, which means looking incomes of low income households. • Household incomes would rise slightly fast- at both poverty and at inequality (including er over the next 15 years. Real median net the gap between the middle and the top). • High earnings will rise twice as fast as incomes would rise by 14 per cent, rather It reports on new quantitative modelling, low earnings. than 9 per cent as previously projected. based on official projections, first examin- ing the prospects for inequality and poverty These projections could even be opti- • Poverty would rise by a little less, but in under current policies; and then assessing mistic: they are based on Office for Budget 15 years’ time there would still be 3.1 the extent to which market reforms could Responsibility (OBR) assumptions for the million more people in poverty than deliver better outcomes. economy, which may be too positive; and today, including 970,000 extra children. The research shows that in 2030 living they also ignore the possibility of further standards and the extent of inequality will social security cuts or tax changes in the Action to tackle low pay and reduce be determined by political choices rather 2015 parliament. wage differentials would have a significant than by unstoppable economic forces. The There are two main causes of this rising impact on earnings inequality, which is report presents a plausible and affordable poverty and income inequality – social important for its own sake. But it would strategy for significantly improving living security policies and growing earnings have a surprisingly small effect on living standards and reducing poverty. So this disparities. The first is more important with standards, income inequality and poverty, study restores hope. respect to the gap between the middle and when measured in terms of net household the bottom (and therefore the incidence incomes. With a radical package of reforms Economic inequality will be higher in of poverty); the second is more important including a high minimum wage and 2030 than today, unless we act with respect to the gap between the middle widespread uptake of the living wage: Unless the next government takes dra- and the top. Both are amenable to govern- matic action, the UK will be much less ment intervention. • Earnings for low paid workers would rise equal in 2030 than it is today: the living over the next 15 years by 49 per cent (in standards of low income families will Some labour market reforms can real terms) compared with 16 per cent stagnate; middle income families will not directly slow the pace of rising without any intervention; median earn- share in rising prosperity; and inequality inequality ings would rise by 34 per cent instead of and poverty will grow worse. Our projec- ‘Predistribution’ is a new word for an old 26 per cent. The proportion of workers tion is that: idea – that inequality and poverty should with low pay would be flat over the next first be tackled by reforming markets (for the 15 years, rather than rising. • Between 2015 and 2030 an extra 3.6 purpose of this report, we mean the labour million people will fall into poverty, market, as our modelling does not consider • Household incomes for a median income including 1.2 million children. the cost and quality of housing, goods and household would rise by 13 per cent services). over the next 15 years. • The real disposable income of middle One change to the labour market income households will rise by 9 per – achieving very high levels of employ- • Poverty would be unchanged, compared cent over the next 15 years; for low ment – would have a noticeable impact to taking no action (since median as income households the figure will be on inequality and the living standards of well as low incomes would be higher). 2 / Fabian Policy Report But the main benefit of we examined the consequences of weak 2030 and acts to improve employment predistribution is that it can growth in productivity and employment. opportunities, support and incentives pay for redistribution We found that weak employment growth for mothers, disabled people and Successful predistribution interventions would be bad for both living standards people in their 60s. will generate significant resources for the and inequality. In contrast, weak earnings exchequer. If this money is recycled to growth would be bad for living standards 5. Raises the national minimum wage to low and middle income households, the – there would be virtually no improve- 60 per cent of median earnings, ideally proceeds of predistribution could have a ment in real median incomes by 2030 – by 2020, with advice from the Low Pay much greater (indirect) effect on families but would lead to poverty and inequality Commission on implementation. than the original (direct) market effects. rising less. Ambitious but plausible reforms to bring 6. Legislates for all public sector jobs to about full employment, a high minimum Unless the next government pay the living wage; and forms a new wage and widespread take-up of the living takes dramatic action, the partnership with business with the wage would generate sufficient funds to aim of halving the number of private make huge inroads into poverty in Britain. UK will be much less equal sector jobs paid below the living wage. To illustrate this point we show that: in 2030 than it is today 7. Develops a radical cross-government • The proceeds of the minimum wage Political action can still make a big dif- strategy on pay and productivity, and living wage policies (£8bn com- ference. Even under pessimistic economic focusing on the middle of the labour bined) would cover most of the costs scenarios it will be possible to significantly market. of doubling the real value of child ben- increase living standards, reduce inequality efit by 2030, lifting 900,000 people out and tackle poverty by introducing predis- 8. Rejects major cuts to benefits that of poverty. tribution interventions and then recycling would reduce the living standards of the proceeds into social security. low and middle income households, • The proceeds of very high levels of following the 2015 election. employment (£30bn) would almost pay Recommendations for benefits to be uprated by earnings Although this report takes a 15-year 9. Institutes a ‘Prosperity Fund’ to re- not inflation, lifting 3.2 million people outlook, action is essential in the next distribute to low and middle income out of poverty. parliament in order to prevent inequality households the proceeds arising each from rising.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • One Nation: Power, Hope, Community
    one nation power hope community power hope community Ed Miliband has set out his vision of One Nation: a country where everyone has a stake, prosperity is fairly shared, and we make a common life together. A group of Labour MPs, elected in 2010 and after, describe what this politics of national renewal means to them. It begins in the everyday life of work, family and local place. It is about the importance of having a sense of belonging and community, and sharing power and responsibility with people. It means reforming the state and the market in order to rebuild the economy, share power hope community prosperity, and end the living standards crisis. And it means doing politics in a different way: bottom up not top down, organising not managing. A new generation is changing Labour to change the country. Edited by Owen Smith and Rachael Reeves Contributors: Shabana Mahmood Rushanara Ali Catherine McKinnell Kate Green Gloria De Piero Lilian Greenwood Steve Reed Tristram Hunt Rachel Reeves Dan Jarvis Owen Smith Edited by Owen Smith and Rachel Reeves 9 781909 831001 1 ONE NATION power hope community Edited by Owen Smith & Rachel Reeves London 2013 3 First published 2013 Collection © the editors 2013 Individual articles © the author The authors have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Design and Patents Act, 1998 to be identified as authors of this work. All rights reserved. Apart from fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, electrical, chemical, mechanical, optical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Performance and Leadership Persona
    This article is a contribution to an emerging scholarship on the role of rhetoric, persona and celebrity, and the effects of performance on the political process. We analyse party leader Ed Miliband at the UK Labour Party Conference in Manchester in 2012. Our analysis identifies how, through performance of ‘himself’ and the beginnings of the deployment of an alternative party narrative centred on ‘One Nation’, Ed Miliband began to revise his ‘received persona’. By using a range of rhetorical and other techniques, Miliband began to adapt the Labour narrative to the ‘personalized political’. The article sets out the theoretical framework for the analysis and returns to the implications for the theory of leadership performance in its conclusion. THERE HAVE BEEN A NUMBER OF RELATED STUDIES SINCE JOHN Corner’s identification (2000) of three modes of leadership performance (iconic, vocal and kinetic) and John Street’s 2004 article on celebrity politicians. At a developed theoretical level, this research has grown in reaction to – though, in fact, it complements – both economic and sociological approaches to the study of politics: namely, what political actors do in the political arena and how they persuade other actors and the wider public to agree or to act are crucial to how politics works and are severely under researched areas. THEORETICAL CONTEXT: RHETORIC, PERSONA AND CELEBRITY Alan Finlayson (2002) has analysed the self‐presentation of former UK Labour prime minister Tony Blair through style, appearance and language, and the creation of an imagined intimacy between Blair and his audience. Finlayson analyses a range of party broadcasts (1994–2001) indicative of what he terms New Labour’s populism, a populism displayed and mobilized through the construction of the character, Tony Blair.
    [Show full text]
  • Shades of Blue Rowenna Davis
    9 | SHADES OF BLUE Rowenna Davis The word ‘conservative’ is not one that Labour likes. But the left has always been better at knowing what it wants to reform rather than what it wants to protect. If Labour wants to win the next election, it needs to understand what it wants to preserve as well as what it wants to transform. Blue Labour offers a reminder that Labour’s history is at once more radical and more conservative than many dare to imagine. Small-c conservatism is not about blocking all change, but hon- ouring civic institutions, localities, stories and relationships. Ed Miliband may not sign up to all of Blue Labour’s agenda, but some of his most distinctive contributions – on the economy and on the state – continue to be inspired by it. ur country is conservative, and that is beautiful. Beyond Westminster and Victoria Street, the British people have a desire for order, strength, stability Oand community. People feel shaken by the downturn, and they are silently haunted by the perceived inevitability of national decline. They feel let down by the state, and hu- miliated by unemployment. Rows of terraced houses and tower blocks crave meaning, and fear a loss of identity. Managerialism doesn’t speak to them. Human rights legis- lation doesn’t feel like it belongs to them. People crave the 85 The Shape of Things to Come products of the market, but hate the debt, doubt and dis- appointment that it breeds. As a country we’ve confused aspiration with consumerism and we loathe ourselves for it.
    [Show full text]
  • One Nation: Labour's Political Renewal
    Labour’s political renewal Labour stands for big reform without big spending. This pamphlet sets out Labour’s new approach in a time of financial constraint. Labour has a history of taking a generation to recover from its political defeats. Long periods in opposition have marked our history. Ed Miliband set the Policy Review the task of powerLabour’s hope political community renewal radically rethinking what Labour stands for when there is no money to spare. The Policy Review has delivered on the task of radically updating Labour’s policy position in record time. Working across the labour movement and involving thousands of people, it has produced a substantial piece of work that will form the basis of a bold manifesto at next years election. Edited by Owen Smith and Rachel Reeves Jon Cruddas and Jonathan Rutherford ONE NATION Labour’s political renewal Jon Cruddas & Jonathan Rutherford London 2014 1 Labour stands for big reform without big spending. This pamphlet sets out Labour’s new approach in a time of financial constraint. Labour has a history of taking a generation to recover from its political defeats. Long periods in opposition have marked our history. Ed Miliband set the Policy Review the task of radically rethinking what Labour stands for when there is no money to spare. The Policy Review has delivered on the task of radically updating Labour’s policy position in record time. Working across the labour movement and involving thousands of people, it has produced a substantial piece of work that will form the basis of a bold manifesto at next years election.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideas for a New Political Economy and a More Responsible Capitalism
    EVENTS The quest for growth: ideas for a new political economy and a more responsible capitalism Date(s) 6 September 2012 Time 08:00 – 17:00 Location City of London Policy Network hosted an all day conference debating how Britain can develop policies that could support growth both in the short and long term against the background of a difficult economic and financial situation. To this end, senior practitioners and experts from Britain and other parts of Europe will debated around four different themes: • From debt crisis to growth: the return of macroeconomics? • Industrial policy: a new role for the state in economic policy? • Research, science & innovation: how to foster greater entrepreneurialism? • Labour market, skills and inequality: how do we build an economy that works for working people? A series of memos prepared by conference speakers on growth strategies and the political dilemmas they present can be accessed at http://www.policy-network.net/news/3949/The-quest- for-growth. From www.policy-network.net/event/3918/The-quest-for-growth-ideas-for-a-new-political-economy-and-a-more- responsible-capitalism 1 5 October 2012 Speakers include: Ed Miliband, leader of the Labour Party Ed Balls, shadow chancellor of the exchequer and Labour MP Larry Summers, economist and former US Secretary of the Treasury under President Clinton Karl Aiginger, director, WIFO Institute of Economic Research, Austria Marion Dewar, member of the cabinet of Maire Geoghegan-Quinn, EU commissioner for Research, Innovation & Science Richard Lambert, former
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership and the Labour Party
    PALGRAVE STUDIES IN POLITICAL LEADERSHIP SERIES Leadership and the Labour Party Narrative and Performance John Gaffney Palgrave Studies in Political Leadership Series Editors Ludger Helms Takashi Inoguchi Gillian Peele Bert Rockman Editorial Advisory Board Barbara Kellerman Anthony King R.A.W. Rhodes Palgrave Studies in Political Leadership seeks to gather some of the best work on political leadership broadly defined, stretching from classical areas such as executive, legislative and party leadership to understudied manifes- tations of political leadership beyond the state. Edited by an international board of distinguished leadership scholars from the United States, Europe and Asia, the series publishes cutting-edge Research that reaches out to a global readership. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/14602 Leadership and the Labour Party Narrative and Performance John Gaffney Professor of Politics, Aston University, Birmingham, UK Palgrave Studies in Political Leadership ISBN 978-1-137-50497-5 ISBN 978-1-137-50498-2 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-50498-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016938712 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 The author(s) has/have asserted their right(s) to be identified as the author(s) of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Rachel Reeves and Martin Mcivor, Clement Attlee and the Foundations
    Clement Attlee and the foundations of the British welfare state Rachel Reeves and Martin McIvor The early career of Clement Attlee reminds us that the welfare state was never intended to stand alone as a set of institutions. Its stability depends upon a set of ethical, economic, and political foundations. he name of Clement Attlee is indelibly associated with the great leap forward in the construction of Britain’s welfare state accomplished by the T 1945-51 Labour government: the implementation of William Beveridge’s blueprint for National Insurance, a Family Allowance, improved old age pensions, and the National Health Service. For many this moment marks the historic birth of a British welfare consensus whose contours are still clearly recognisable today, even after seventy years of social and economic change, and political controversy that has raged ever since. As the Labour Party looks to win office in 2015 so that it can build on this legacy, Clement Attlee’s government is still somewhere to go to for inspiration and guid- ance. But our focus here will not be the events of the 1940s. Rather, we argue that to fully understand that breakthrough and what made it possible, and also to gain true historical perspective on the debates and developments of today, we need to dig deeper, beneath the Acts of Parliament and civil service committees, to the social underpinnings of this administrative achievement, and look further back into Attlee’s own life, and his involvement in what we might call the Edwardian pre-his- tory of Britain’s welfare state.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming the Market: Towards a New Political Economy, Diamond Provides a Lucid and Coherent Account of the Obstacles to Long-Term Prosperity in the UK
    Transforming the Market Transforming the Market Towards a new political economy Patrick Diamond CIVITAS INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF CIVIL SOCIETY · LONDON First Published October 2013 © Civitas 2013 55 Tufton Street London SW1P 3QL email: [email protected] All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-906837-58-7 Independence: Civitas: Institute for the Study of Civil Society is a registered educational charity (No. 1085494) and a company limited by guarantee (No. 04023541). Civitas is financed from a variety of private sources to avoid over-reliance on any single or small group of donors. All publications are independently refereed. All the Institute’s publications seek to further its objective of promoting the advancement of learning. The views expressed are those of the authors, not of the Institute. Designed and typeset by Richard Kelly Printed in Great Britain by Disc to Print London ‘The difficulty lies, not in the new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones’. John Maynard Keynes, British economist ‘The conventional view serves to protect us from the painful business of thinking’. John Kenneth Galbraith, US economist ‘The sheer scale of support to the banking sector is breathtaking. In the UK, in the form of direct and guaranteed loans and equity investment, it is not far short of a trillion (that is, one thousand billion) pounds, close to two-thirds of the annual output of the entire economy. To paraphrase a great wartime leader, never in the field of financial endeavour has so much money been owed by so few to so many. And one might add, so far, with little real reform’.
    [Show full text]