The Plug-In Hybrid Car – Inventing the Plug-In Hybrid P1 the First Plug-In Hybrid Car in the US Was Shipped in December 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Plug-In Hybrid Car – Inventing the Plug-In Hybrid P1 the First Plug-In Hybrid Car in the US Was Shipped in December 2010 Plug-In Folly Part 4 by Pat Murphy, Plan Curtail PART 4A: The Plug-In Hybrid Car – Inventing the Plug-in Hybrid P1 The first plug-in hybrid car in the US was shipped in December 2010. Because this new type of car used both gas and electricity, both needed to be included in MPG and CO2 Emissions calculations. As with battery electric cars, claims about the fuel economy of plug in hybrids were wildly inflated which led to it becoming the darling of American politicians and advocacy groups. P2 An entirely new way to compute miles per gallon, called by the confusing name, Charging Routines, came out of the Prius conversion industry. A review of the computation methodology later exposed important misrepresentations, but Congress had already bought into the plug in hybrid. P3 A plug-in hybrid is a battery electric car with a gasoline engine that recharges the battery as the car is being driven. Such cars overcome the limited range of a battery car by using a gasoline engine as a “range extender”. P4 The Chevrolet Volt was the first production plug-in hybrid. The first shipments occurred in December 2010. November 2015 Plug-In Hybrids Page 1 of 19 Plug-In Folly Part 4 by Pat Murphy, Plan Curtail P5 The automotive world had been surprised in August 2009 when new General Motors President Fritz Henderson announced a fuel economy rating of 230 miles per gallon for the forthcoming Volt. Suddenly, the concept of a plug-in hybrid was transformed from an extended range, mostly electric car, to a vehicle that claimed to have much higher miles per gallon than a battery electric vehicle or a hybrid P6 Many scientists and members of the automotive press challenged the EPA to verify this number, arguing that such a number was simply not realistic. The EPA acknowledged that it “had not tested a Chevy Volt and therefore could not confirm the fuel economy values claimed by GM.” P7 But in the same statement the EPA praised “GM’s commitment to designing and building the car of the future – an American-made car that will save families money, significantly reduce our dependence on foreign oil and create good paying American jobs.” The EPA has long been supportive of electric cars and its praise for the Volt is not unexpected, although not necessarily accurate. P8 GM’s 230 miles-per-gallon number was obtained by first using the Department of Energy well to wheels method of determining miles-per- gallon equivalency. The Volt window sticker shows 36 kwh is used to drive 100 miles. To calculate the Volt MPG, the 100 miles is divided by 36 kwh giving 2.3 miles per kilowatt hour. This number is multiplied by 12.3 kilowatt hours per gallon giving 35 miles-per- gallon equivalent. November 2015 Plug-In Hybrids Page 2 of 19 Plug-In Folly Part 4 by Pat Murphy, Plan Curtail P9 Next GM applied a calculation from the Department of Energy’s Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ) Standard that divides the 35 miles per gallon by an arbitrary value of 0.15. This gives the approximate 230 miles- per-gallon number quoted by GM’s president. P10 This arbitrary value of 0.15 was defined in the 2000 Final Rule recorded in the U.S. Federal Register that established the DOE’s miles-per- gallon calculation method. Its purpose was to provide an incentive to automakers to include electric cars in their offerings—it was not intended to accurately represent their fuel economy. P11 The EPA published a Volt window sticker in November 2010 – 14 months after GM’s 230 MPG announcement, with a fuel economy of 60 miles-per-gallon equivalent. With the publication of this window sticker, GM agreed to stop using 230 MPG for the Volt’s miles-per-gallon value. P12 It took a surprisingly long time – over a year - to resolve the original 230 miles-per- gallon claimed by GM. But while refuting the GM claim with the November 2010 window sticker, at the same time the EPA added another questionable way of determining miles-per-gallon equivalency which it called Charging Routines. November 2015 Plug-In Hybrids Page 3 of 19 Plug-In Folly Part 4 by Pat Murphy, Plan Curtail Part 4B: The Plug-In Hybrid – MPGe – Prius Conversions P13 The new way of calculation Miles per gallon, was derived from an effort to convert conventional Priuses to so called Plug In Priuses. P14 MPG calculations for plug-in hybrid vehicles differs from both the original EPA and Department of Energy methods. The calculation method appears to have come from a movement that began in 2004 with the conversion of a standard Toyota Prius to a plug-in. P15 Felix Kramer formed CalCar Initiatives in 2002 to advocate for plug-in hybrid cars. In 2004 Kramer and Ron Gremban made a plug-in hybrid by adding lead acid batteries and a charger to a 2004 Prius. Their efforts were partially based on the work of Dr. Andrew Frank. P16 Andy Frank, at that time a member of the faculty of the University of California at Davis, is often referred to as the “Father of the Pluggable Hybrid.” He has converted more than a dozen different vehicles to plug-in hybrids over a 20-year period. November 2015 Plug-In Hybrids Page 4 of 19 Plug-In Folly Part 4 by Pat Murphy, Plan Curtail P17 One of these conversions was made to a General Motors EV1. A gasoline engine with an electric generator was added to the basic EV1 to charge the car’s batteries. This may have served as a concept model for the Volt. P18 The idea of a plug-in hybrid car had been long supported by the electric power industry, particularly by the Electric Power Research Institute, known as EPRI. P19 In 1991 EPRI formed a collaborative with General Motors, Ford, Chrysler and the Department of Energy to found the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium in order to respond to the California Air Resources Board mandate for electric cars. P20 An important concept document was published by EPRI in July 2001 with the title of “Comparing the Benefits and Impacts of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Options.” The report stated that the goal of the power industry was to pursue electric cars, including plug-in hybrids. EPRI provided financial support to some plug-in hybrid advocates. November 2015 Plug-In Hybrids Page 5 of 19 Plug-In Folly Part 4 by Pat Murphy, Plan Curtail P21 In 2005 Calcars converted a newer version of Prius to a plugin using lithium-ion batteries. CalCars adopted the logo “100 + miles per gallon” for this car. P22 CalCars miles-per-gallon claim was more than twice that of an unmodified Prius of the same model year, which had a fuel economy rating of 46 miles per gallon. P23 The early fuel economy claims for converted Priuses gave the impression of dramatic miles per gallon breakthrough. However, the claims were more of a marketing breakthrough than an engineering one. November 2015 Plug-In Hybrids Page 6 of 19 Plug-In Folly Part 4 by Pat Murphy, Plan Curtail Part 4C: The Plug In Hybrid Car – Understanding Charging Routines P24 Why were the MPG equivalent numbers for plug-ins so high? How were these numbers determined? It’s a complex and intriguing story. The EPA was involved briefly when it use the term Charging Routines to describe the method. P25 Robert Lutz, the General Motors executive behind the Volt wrote in his 2010 book Chevrolet Volt: Charging into the Future “This is not about maximizing range or computationally getting the maximum efficiency. This is about permitting the average American to drive fully electrically most of the time but with the backup of a gasoline engine.” P26 The computation method that provided such high fuel economy claims was first illustrated by Lutz, using the example of a person who charged his or her Volt once daily. Lutz said this person would get 150 miles per gallon. P27 GMs method of calculating MPGe used three terms: DIST = Distance traveled between charges MPGg = Miles per Gallon of the gasoline engine MPGd = Miles Drivable between Charge - the number of miles that could be driven with a fully charged battery. November 2015 Plug-In Hybrids Page 7 of 19 Plug-In Folly Part 4 by Pat Murphy, Plan Curtail P28 The formula for this MPGe method is the product of the Distance Traveled between charges and the miles per gallon for the gasoline engine …. P29 …divided by the difference of the Distance Traveled between charges and the electric vehicle range possible on a full charge. P30 Lutz obtained his 150 miles-per-gallon equivalent rating using 60 miles for Distance Driven, 50 miles per gallon for the gasoline engine, and an electric vehicle range of 40 miles. Solving this simple equation gives 150 miles-per-gallon equivalent. P31 It appears that the EPA used this formula in its November 2010 window sticker for the Volt in the section entitled “Examples: Charging Routines” as was previously noted. November 2015 Plug-In Hybrids Page 8 of 19 Plug-In Folly Part 4 by Pat Murphy, Plan Curtail P32 It shows how miles-per-gallon equivalent ratings differ depending on the distance traveled. P33 The numbers used are listed on the Volt window sticker and include an electric vehicle range of 35 miles and a fuel economy value for the gasoline engine of 37 miles per gallon. (These numbers are lower than Lutz’s original estimate for Volt performance because the production Volt had lower performance than Lutz’s early prototypes.
Recommended publications
  • Climate Solutions” Issue, Spring 2008 Change Our Sources of Electricity Arjun Makhijani Is an Engineer Who’S Been Thinking About Energy for More Than 35 Years
    Powerful Ideas, Climate PractIcal actIons Solutions Special Issue Stop Global yes!sPrIng 2008 Warming Bill McKibben: It’s Not Too Late to Save the World 13 Best Ideas in Clean Energy (Plus a Few Duds) How Your Family Can Get Carbon Free in 10 Years The Secret Life of Plug-in Cars Author and climate activist Bill McKibben at home in Vermont Surprise Victory for Global Fairness “One way or another, the choice will be made by our generation, but it will affect life on earth for all generations to come.” Lester Brown , Earth Policy Institute Tsewang Norbu was selected by his Himalayan village to be trained at the Barefoot College of Tilonia, India, in the installation and repair of solar photovoltaic units. All solar units were brought to the village across the 18,400- foot Khardungla Pass by yak and on villagers’ backs. photo by barefoot photographers of tilonia. copyright 2008 barefoot college, tilonia, rajastan, india, barefootcollege.org yesm a g a z i! n e www.yesmagazine.org Reprinted from the “Climate Solutions” Issue, Spring 2008 Change Our Sources of Electricity Arjun Makhijani is an engineer who’s been thinking about energy for more than 35 years. When he heard a presentation ISSUE 45 claiming we needed to go fossil-carbon free by 2050, he didn’t YES! THEME GUIDE think it could be done. X years of research later, he’s changed his mind. His book, Carbon-Free and Nuclear-Free: A Roadmap for U.S. Energy Policy, tells exactly how it can be done. Here’s how Makhijani sees the energy supply changing for buildings, CLIMATE SOLUTIONStransportation and electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • Panel 2: Plug-In Electric Vehicles: Where Are We Today?
    PLUGIN-2008/06/11-12 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES 2008: WHAT ROLE FOR WASHINGTON Washington, D.C. June 11-12, 2008 ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 PLUGIN-2008/06/11-12 JUNE 11, 2008 PANEL 2: PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES: WHERE ARE WE TODAY? Opening Remarks: MARK FIELDS President, Ford-North America Moderator: JULIET EILPERIN Correspondent, Washington Post Panelists: ALAN MADIAN Director, LECG FELIX KRAMER Founder, CalCars TOM KUHN President, Edison Electric Institute BILL REINERT National Manager, Advanced Technology Group, Toyota MARY ANN WRIGHT CEO, Johnson Controls-Saft Advanced Power Solutions ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 PLUGIN-2008/06/11-12 PANEL 2: PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES: WHERE ARE WE TODAY? MR. REICHER: Could I have everyone’s attention please? The session is about to begin. Well, there was a lot of electricity in the air during that break. I’ll tell you, people really enjoyed seeing the cars and there’s more to come, so welcome back. We now have the next session of the conference, and it’s my great pleasure to introduce Mark Fields, who is Ford’s president for the Americas. In this role, Mark is responsible for all operations involved in the development, manufacturing, marketing, and sales of Ford, Mercury, and Lincoln vehicles in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and South America. He formerly served as executive vice president, Ford of Europe and Premier Auto Group where he led all the activities for Ford’s premium vehicle business group, and for Ford brand vehicles manufactured and sold in European countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Market Penetration Scenarios
    PNNL-17441 Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Market Penetration Scenarios P. J. Balducci September 2008 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576-5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161 ph: (800) 553-6847 fax: (703) 605-6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm This document was printed on recycled paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond New Plug-Ins: Fixing Gas Guzzlers
    Beyond New Plug-Ins: Fixing Gas Guzzlers January 19, 2010 Felix Kramer, Founder The California Cars Initiative [email protected] For updated PDF of presentations: www.calcars.org/downloads 2008: First preview of a new industry Ali Emadi, Felix Kramer, Andy Grove, Andy Frank 1 Beyond New Plug-Ins Nonprofit Startup: CalCars’ successes & challenges • 2004: “no technical/business case for PHEVs—and no one wants to plug in.” • We always saw conversions as a strategy to build support & awareness: – Hybrid retrofits previewed validated, mass-produced PHEVs. – Education and coalitions crossed multiple constituencies and ideologies. – Open-source exchange germinated conversion company ecosystem. – Public and influencers pressured industry and government. Technology (demos) Advocacy (buyers) 2004 2006 2009 2 Beyond New Plug-Ins Conversions: line extensions: new: back to retrofits! …& from GROUND-UP Chevy Bright NEW DESIGNS: “Volt” “Idea” …Next: GAS-GUZZLER CONVERSIONS! 3 Beyond New Plug-Ins Link for info and to order at CalCars.org home page 2005-2009: 27+ books highlight PHEVs 4 Beyond New Plug-Ins 20+ carmakers interested; races to be first; first timetables (see CalCars Carmakers page summary) Volt 2010; Converj next; selling in China Ampera; blended PHEV SUV? 2011 first Karma 2010, Nina 2012 2012 sales to consumers 2005 prototypes if & when: 5 Beyond New Plug-Ins More @ CalCars Photos pages For CalCars, after seven years, a challenging new campaign Gore; Clinton Plug-in drivers with GM’s Tony Posawatz Google’s Brin+Page, HEVT’s Ali Emadi, CalCars’ Felix Kramer, Intel’s Andy Grove, Efficient Drivetrains’ Andy Frank 6 Beyond New Plug-Ins It’s about penetrating a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Brookings Institute and Google for Having This Conference and Thanking Them for the Opportunity to Speak with You Today
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES 2008: WHAT ROLE FOR WASHINGTON Washington, D.C. June 11-12, 2008 PLUGIN-2008/06/11-12 2 OPENING SESSION Welcome: DAVID SANDALOW Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution DAN REICHER Director, Climate Change & Energy Initiatives Google.org Remarks: JIM WOOLSEY Partner, Vantage Point Venture Partners PETER DARBEE Chair and CEO, PG&E Corporation PANEL 1: IMAGINING THE PLUG-IN FUTURE Moderator: VIJAY VAITHEESWARAN Correspondent, Economist and co-author, Zoom Panelists: SHAI AGASSI Founder and CEO, Project Better Place MARK DUVALL Program Manager, Electric Transportation, Electric Power Research Institute DERON LOVAAS Vehicles Campaign Director, Natural Resources Defense Council CHELSEA SEXTON Executive Director, Plug-In America ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 PLUGIN-2008/06/11-12 3 DAVE VIEAU CEO, A123 Systems PANEL 2: PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES: WHERE ARE WE TODAY? Opening Remarks: MARK FIELDS President, Ford-North America Moderator: JULIET EILPERIN Correspondent, Washington Post Panelists: ALAN MADIAN Director, LECG FELIX KRAMER Founder, CalCars TOM KUHN President, Edison Electric Institute BILL REINERT National Manager, Advanced Technology Group, Toyota MARY ANN WRIGHT CEO, Johnson Controls-Saft Advanced Power Solutions DINNER REMARKS THE HONORABLE LAMAR ALEXANDER (R-Tenn.) Chairman, Senate Republican Conference THE HONORABLE JOHN DINGELL (D-Mich.) Chairman, House Committee on Energy and Commerce ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 PLUGIN-2008/06/11-12 4 REMARKS AND CONVERSATION FREDERICK W. SMITH CEO and Founder, FedEx, and Co-Chair, Energy Security Leadership Council OPENING SESSION Remarks: THE HONORABLE ORRIN HATCH (R-Utah) THE HONORABLE JAY INSLEE (D-Wash.) PANEL 3: FEDERAL POLICY TOWARD PLUG-IN VEHICLES Moderator: TOM FRIEDMAN Columnist, The New York Times Panelists: ANDY KARSNER Assistant Secretary, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean, Green, and Smart
    Clean, Green and Smart — Best Practices Manual — West Coast Corridor Coalition Clean, Green and Smart Best Practices West Coast Corridor Coalition June 2009 1 Clean, Green and Smart — Best Practices Manual — West Coast Corridor Coalition Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................4 Peer Review Advisory Board Roster ............................................................ 6 1. Transportation Systems Analysis ...................7 Truck Freight Performance Measurement ................................................... 8 Bottleneck Capacity Analysis .................................................................... 9 Integrated ITS Planning for Goods Movement ............................................ 10 EPA Smart Way Supply Chain Analysis ...................................................... 12 “Green” Performance Measures for Transportation Systems .........................13 Loop Detector-Based Vehicle Tracking to Evaluate System Performance ........ 15 Deployment Strategy for Integrated Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) .......................17 “Fully Featured” Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridor Development ...................18 2. Traveler Information Integration (TII) ........20 I-5 Corridor Traveler Web Site ................................................................. 21 Freight Travel Alert Notification System .................................................... 22 Truck Smart Parking Strategy Analysis ..................................................... 23 New Mobility Hub Networks —
    [Show full text]
  • Download” Link)
    Blowing Smoke: Why the Current Government Incentive Regime Makes EVs and PHEVs a Distant Prospect—and How to Fix It Clint Cohen* Introduction ........................................................................................... 375 I. The Current Regulatory Landscape for EVs and PHEVs ................. 378 A. The History and Technology of EVs and PHEVs ....................... 378 B. Current Government Incentives for the Production and Purchase of EVs and PHEVs ...................................................... 380 II. Barriers to Consumer Adoption ...................................................... 382 A. High Purchase Price .................................................................... 383 B. Concerns Over Range and the “Plug-In” Infrastructure .............. 384 C. Competition from ICE Vehicles .................................................. 387 D. Cost of Ownership ....................................................................... 389 III. Designing Government Incentives to Accelerate Adoption........... 391 A. Consumer Education ................................................................... 392 B. Switching from a Tax Credit to a Rebate .................................... 393 C. Applying the Gas Guzzler Tax More Aggressively..................... 395 D. Focusing on Encouraging Fleet Conversions .............................. 399 E. Focusing on Electrification “Deployment Communities” ........... 400 IV. Conclusion ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Comment 1 for Plug-In Electric Hybrid Vehicles (Phev09) - 45 Day
    Comment 1 for Plug-In Electric Hybrid Vehicles (phev09) - 45 Day. First Name: Sherry Last Name: JANSEN Email Address: [email protected] Affiliation: Subject: Alternative Energy Comment: I am so pleased to see that California has initiated such an innovative plan with their partnership with Better Place. You will truely set the pace for the rest of the nation in this badly needed plan. This type projet was outlined in Jeff Wilson's new book The Manhattan Project of 2009 Energy Independence NOW. It was thrilling to see such projects already underway in America. It would cost the equivalent of 60 cents a gallon to charge and drive an electric car. The electricity to charge the car could also come from solar or wind generated electricity. If all gasoline cars, trucks, and suv’s instead had plug-in electric drive trains, the amount of electricity needed to replace gasoline is about equal to the estimated wind energy potential of the state of North Dakota. Why don't we use some of the billions in bail out money to bail us out of our dependence on foreign oil? This past year the high cost of fuel so seriously damaged our economy and society that the ripple effects will be felt for years to come. Why not invest in setting up some alternative energy projects on a national basis, create clean cheap electricity, create millions of badly needed new green collar jobs, and get out from under our dependence on foreign oil. What a win -win situation this will be. Congratulations! Attachment: Original File Name: Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-12-11 02:18:01 No Duplicates.
    [Show full text]