BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 206/2008

Shri Murlidhar Trimbak Joshi , ….. Appellant Sisodiya Prestige Apartment, Opp. Bazar Peth Police Chowki, Karjat Tal. Karjat, Dist- . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Civil Court, Karjat, Tal : Karjat, Dist : Raigad..

The Appellate Authority, District Civil Court, Raigad-Alibag. District : Raigad.

Facts:- Not having been successful in obtaining information from Public Information Officer or First Appellate Authorilty, the appellant by an appeal dated 29.5.2007 has asked information regarding copies of documents submitted by Respondent in Regular Civil Suit No. 23/2004.

Interim Decision. The appeal application has been perused. There is an indication that the First Appellate Authority considered this case and gave a decision on 13.4.2007. Much time has passed since then and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days. The Public Information Officer should bring this decision to the notice of his First Appellate Authority to avoid delay. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi . Date:- 26th June, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has given the necessary information to the appellant on 22.9.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, . Date:-7th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1082/2008

Shri M.S. Shaikh, ….. Appellant. A1-702, Dharti Complex, Evershine Nagar Hotel, Near R.K. Avenue, , District : Thane.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Junior Engineer, Encroachment, Mira-Bhayander Municipal Corporation, District ; Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Municiapl Commissioner, Mira-Bhayander Municipal Corporation, District ; Thane.

Facts:-

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 22nd July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 15.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1083/2008

Shri M.S. Shaikh, ….. Appellant. A1-702, Dharti Complex, Evershine Nagar Hotel, Near R.K. Avenue, Mira Road, District : Thane.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Deputy Engineer, Encroachment, Mira-Bhayander Municipal Corporation, District ; Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Municiapl Commissioner, Mira-Bhayander Municipal Corporation, District ; Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 22nd July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 15.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1121/2008

Shri Giridhar Vishwanath Paranjpe, ….. Appellant. D-275, Khaskilwada, At, Post & Taluka : Sawantwadi, District : Sindhudurg : 416 510.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Head Master, Chaukul English School, Chaukul, Taluka ; Sawantwadi, Dist ; Sindhudurg.

The Appellate Authority, Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Sindhudurg, Sindhudurg Nagari, Oras.

Facts:-

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 06th September, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 10.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th March, 2009.

¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖӍú : êú†Ö¸ü-1183 /2008

ÁÖß.²ÖÖ²Öæ ×—Ö¯ÖÖ ³ÖÖŸÖ, ¸üÖ.úÖÃ֝Öê,ŸÖÖ.׳־ÖÓ›üß,¯ÖÖê.¾ÆüÖµÖÖ, ú»µÖÖÖ ¾ÖÖØÃÖ¤ü ¸êü»¾Öê,וֻÆüÖ-šü֝Öê. ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ, ×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ˆ¯Ö ×¾Ö³Ö֐ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÖê»ÖßÃÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ´Öã¸ü²ÖÖ›ü ×¾Ö³Ö֐Ö, וֻÆüÖ-šü֝Öê. ... ÃÖÖ´ÖÖê¾ÖÖ»Öê, . ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, †¯Ö¸ü ¯ÖÖê»ÖßÃÖ †×¬ÖÖú, šü֝Öê ÖÏÖ´ÖߝÖ,וֻÆüÖ-šü֝Öê. †ÓŸÖ׸ü´Ö †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö×»ÖµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖÖŸÖ ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»µÖÖ“Öê פüÃÖæÖ µÖêŸÖê. ŸÖ£ÖÖׯÖ, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ×֝ÖÔµÖÖÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ — ÖÖ»Öê ÖÃÖ»µÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÓÖß ú»Ö´Ö 19 (3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö ¤üÖÖ»Ö êú»Öê †ÖÆêü (¯ÖÏŸÖ ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ ÃÖӻ֐Ö). †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ¾ÖßÖãÛã֟Öߤü¿Öԍú ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“Öß ´Ö֐֝Öß êú»Öê»Öß †ÖÆêü. ´Ö»ÖÖ †ÃÖê ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê¿Öß ¯ÖãÆüÖ ‹ú¤üÖ “Ö“ÖÖÔ/×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ×¾Ö×Ö´ÖµÖ ú¹ýÖ •ÖÖßÖßŸÖ •ÖÖÃŸÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ ¯Ö쵅م êú»µÖÖÃÖ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ —ÖÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸ü †ÖµÖÖêÖ֍ú›êü µÖꝵÖ֍ú¸üߟÖÖÓ ÃÖ¾ÖÔ ¯ÖÖúÖ¸üÖÓ“ÖÖ ¾Öêôû, ¯ÖϾÖÖÃÖ Ö“ÖÔ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÖÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸üß ŸÖÃÖ¤üß ™üÖôûŸÖÖ µÖêŸÖß»Ö. µÖÖß־Ö, ´Öß Æêü †×¯Ö»Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öêú›êü ׸ü´ÖÖÓ›ü ú¸üßŸÖ †ÖÆêü. ŸµÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÖÖ ¯ÖãÆüÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰úÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö ¿ÖŒµÖŸÖÖê ¯Ö׸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥ü™üßÖËê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¸üÖ¾Öß ¾Ö •Ö¸ü ´Ö֐֝Öß êú»Öê»Öß ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ‹úÖ¯ÖêÖÖ †×¬Öú •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ·µÖÖÓ¿Öß ÃÖÓ²ÖÓ×¬ÖŸÖ †ÃÖê»Ö ŸÖ¸ü ŸµÖÖ ÃÖ¾ÖÖÕÖÖ ÃÖã- Ö־֝ÖßÃÖ ²ÖÖê»Ö¾ÖÖ¾Öê †Ö×Ö ŸµÖÖÖÓŸÖ¸ü µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖß ÃÖ´ÖµÖÖµÖߍú †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ׸üŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ýÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá †Ö¤êü¿Ö ×֐ÖÔ×´ÖŸÖ êú»Öê †ÃÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸üß ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¹ýÖ Ö¾µÖÖÖê †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, ´ÆüÖ•Öê ŸµÖÖÓ“ÖÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá“ÖÖ ×֝ÖÔµÖ †Ö¯ÖÖê†Ö¯Ö ÃÖã¬ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê êú»Ö껵ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ŸÖ£ÖÖׯÖ, •Ö¸ü ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öß †¿Öß šüÖ´Ö ¬ÖÖ¸üÖÖ †ÃÖê»Ö úß, Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß ¤êü‰úÖ úÖÓÆüß ÃÖÖ¬µÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸ü ÖÖÆüß. ŸÖ¸ü ŸµÖÖÓÖß •ÖÖê›ü»Ö껵ÖÖ †×¯Ö»Ö †•ÖÖÔŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ´Öã§êü×ÖÆüÖµÖ ÃÖ×¾Ößָü †×³Ö¯ÖÏÖµÖ 15 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ÃÖ×Æü/- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖӍú 6 •ÖÖÖê¾ÖÖ¸üßü, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü ×֝ÖÔµÖ

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤ü.26.2.2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, (Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖÓӍú 7 ´ÖÖ“ÖÔ, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1122/2008

Shri Prakash Raghoba Sawant, ….. Appellant. At & Post : Majgaon ( Harsawantwada), Taluka : Sawantwadi, District : Sindhudurg : 416 510. V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office Superintendent, (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Sindhudurg, Dist ; Sindhudurg.

The Appellate Authority, Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Sindhudurg, Sindhudurg Nagari, Oras.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 06th September, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 13.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-366/2008

Shri Dilip Mukund Patil, ….. Appellant , Bhandari Ali, Koliwada Road, Taluka & Post-Vasai, Dist-Thane-401201.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gramsevak, Saloli Grampanchayat, Girij, Tal. Vasai, Dist. Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer / Extension Officer, Panchayat Samiti Vasai, Taluka & Post-Vasai, Dist-Thane-401201.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-5th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has given the necessary information to the appellant on 19.12.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-7th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2261/2008

Shri Shahid Ahmad A. Salam Farid, ….. Appellant. 11/16, Farid House, 1st floor, Gafoor Don Chowk, Bunder Road, (W), Taluka : Kalyan, District : Thane V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Treasury Awal Karkun, Tahsil Office, Kalyan (W), Taluka: Kalyan,District : Thane..

The Appellate Authority, Resident Naib Tahsildar, Tahsil Office, Kalyan (W), Taluka: Kalyan,District : Thane..

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

The information requested is of a factual nature. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act 2005 and The First Appellate Authority gave a decision. The appellant says that he has not got all the information. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving one more hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing another reasoned order to the supercession of the earlier order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 31st July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 5.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2222/2008

Shri Nipun Mathkar, B-5, Jivdani Krupa Chawl, Ramchandra Jadhav wadi, Vijay Nagar, Nala Sopara (E), Dist : Thane.401 208. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office of the Human Rights Commission, Maharashtra State, Administrative Staff College Compound, 9,Hazarimal Somani Marg, Opp. C.S.T.(VT), Mumbai : 400 001.

The Appellate Authority, Office of the Human Rights Commission, Maharashtra State, Administrative Staff College Compound, 9,Hazarimal Somani Marg, Opp. C.S.T.(VT), Mumbai : 400 001

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision By First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 29th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 16.8.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1430/2008

Shri Mohammed Yusuf Faruk Khan ….. Appellant. B/8, Mustafa Chawl, Achanak Nagar, Mumbra] Taluka & District : Thane. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Assistant Commissioner, (Estate) Thane Municipal Corporation, Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Commissioner (Encroachment), Thane Municipal Corporation, Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

The information requested is of a factual nature. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act 2005 and The First Appellate Authority gave a decision. The appellant says that he has not got all the information. It is necessary to ascertain how for the decision of First Appellate Authority dated 30.7.2008 has been implemented for giving information to appellant. First Appellate Authority’s recommendation about penalty for delay is necessary. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving one more hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing another reasoned order to the supercession of the earlier order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date 20th August, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has given the necessary information to the appellant on 13.8.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-7th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-545/2008

Shri Suryakant Nana Waingankar, ….. Appellant 232, Janaki Niwas, Near Old Datta Mandir, Bhatimirya, Post : Tal : & Dist : Ratnagiri,

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Spl. District Welfare Officer, Ratnagiri.Dist : Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Divisional Welfare Officer, Konkan Division, Konkan Bhavan, 5th floor, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 4th July, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 30.9.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-965/2008

Shri Shahid Ahmed Abdul Salam Farid, ….. Appellant 11/16, Farid House, 1st Floor, Gafur Doun Chowk, Kalyan (West), 421 301. Tal. Kalyan, Dis.-Thane.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Talathi Saja, Chikankhar, Tal. Kalyan, Dist.-Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Circle Officer, Tahsildar Officer, Kalyan, Tal. Kalyan, Dist.-Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th July, 2008. Conclusion

The Public Information Officer has given the necessary information to the appellant on 8.8.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-7th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 854/2008

Shri Nipun Mathkar, ….. Appellant B-5, Jivdani Krupa Chawl, Ramchandra Jadhav Wadi, Vijay Nagar, Nala Sopara (E), Thane : 401 208. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Under Secretary, Law & Judiciary Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai : 400 032.

The Appellate Authority, Secretary, Law & Judiciary Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai : 400 032.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 18.8.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2194/2008

Shri Raghuvanshi Jaikumar, ….. Appellant. B.K. No. 1348, Room No. 5, Near Bank of Maharashtra, O.T. Section, : 421 004. District :Thane. .

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office of the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Office of the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision By First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 21st July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has given the necessary information to the appellant on 31.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-7th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-858/2008

Shri Nipun Mathkar, ….. Appellant B-5, Jivdani Krupa Chawl, Ramchandra Jadhav Wadi, Vijay Nagar, Nala Sopara (E), Thane : 401 208. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent State Election Commission, New Administrative Bldg., Opp. Mantralaya, Madama Cama Marg, Mumbai : 400 032.

The Appellate Authority, State Election Commission, New Administrative Bldg., Opp. Mantralaya, Madama Cama Marg, Mumbai : 400 032. . Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 21.8.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 855/2008

Shri Nipun Mathkar, ….. Appellant B-5, Jivdani Krupa Chawl, Ramchandra Jadhav Wadi, Vijay Nagar, Nala Sopara (E), Thane : 401 208. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Under Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai : 400 032.

The Appellate Authority, Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai : 400 032.

Facts:-

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 29.8.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2695/2008

Shri Laxman Tukaram Parab, ….. Appellant New Belapur Road, Shivaji Nagar, House No.592, Parrab Wadi, Kalwa, Thane.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent City Engineer, City Development Department, Thane Municipal Corporation, Thane

The Appellate Authority, Assistant Director, Town Planning, Thane Municipal Corporation, Thane

Facts: -

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. The information requested is of a factual nature. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act 2005 and the First Appellate Authority gave a decision. The appellant says that he has not got the information. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving one more hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing another reasoned order to the supercession of the earlier order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 22nd July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 18.12.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-658/2008

Shri Pandharinath Ramchandra Vaingankar, ….. Appellant Shriram Chowk, Room No. 164, Konkan Nagar, Majgaon Road, Ratnagiri :

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent City Survey Officer,, Ratnagiri, District : Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Superintendent, Land Records, Ratnagiri, Dist : Ratnagiri.

Facts:-

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th July, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 3.11.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-659/2008

Shri Akil Mulla, ….. Appellant At & Post : Neral Khanda, Taluka : Karjat, District : Raigad.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gram Sevak, Neral Khanda, At & Post : Neral Khanda, Taluka : Karjat, District : Raigad.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Karjat, Tal : Karjat,Dist : Raigad.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 19.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-642/2008

Shri J.D. Suryarao, ….. Appellant 323. Gokulnagar, , Tal : Bhiwandi, Dist : Thane. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Education Officer, Bhiwandi- Najampur Municipal Corporation, Education Circle, Bhiwandi, Tal :Bhaiwandi, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Municipal Corporation, Bhiwandi- Najampur Municipal Corporation, Education Circle, Bhiwandi, Tal :Bhaiwandi, District : Thane.

Facts:-

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 23.12.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-469/2008

Shri Shirishkumar Vithal Kuvalekar, ….. Appellant Flat No.201, 2nd Floor, Hill View Apartments, BehindSachinam Tower, Majiwade, Thane (West)-400 601.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Registrar, Family Court Mumbai, -Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai-400 051.

The Appellate Authority, Family Court Mumbai, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai-400 051.

Facts:-

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 5th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 2.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2531/2008

Shri Hira Krishna Patil, ….. Appellant At. Post-Kusur, Tal. Vaibhavwadi, Dist-Sindhudurg.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Jal Swarajya Project, Umbarde, Tal. Vaibhav Wadi, Dist-Sindhudurg.

The Appellate Authority, Engineering Technology, (D.F.T.), Jal Swarajya Project, Zilla Parishad Sindhudurg, Dist-Sindhudurg.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. The information requested is of a factual nature. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act 2005 and the First Appellate Authority gave a decision. The appellant says that he has not got the information. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving one more hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing another reasoned order to the supercession of the earlier order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 23rd July, 2008. Conclusion The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 7.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2026/2008

Smt. Aparna Jitendra Patil, ….. Appellant. At : Odhangi, Post : Washi, Taluka : Pen, District : Raigad.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office of the Executive Engineer, Khar Land Survey Department, Pen, Taluka : Pen, District : Raigad.

The Appellate Authority, Superintending Engineer & Project Director, Khar Land Development Circle, Pen, Taluka : Pen, District : Raigad.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 19th September, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 27.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-778/2008

Shri Ashok Balu Gawale, ….. Appellant At. Wadwali, Tal Wada, Dist-Thane.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gramsevak, Grampanchayat, Wadwali, Tal. Wada, Dist-Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Wada, Tal. Wada, Dist-Thane.

Facts:-

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 31.12.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-815/2008

Shri Kaustubh Dattatraya Gokhale, ….. Appellant Siddhivinayak Prasad, Dr. Shama Prasad Mukherji Road, Dombivali (East),-421 201, Tal. Kalyan, Dist. Thane.

V/s. Public Information Officer. … Respondent. Office of the Collector, Thane(W), Court Naka, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Resident Deputy Collector, Collector Office Thane(W), Court Naka, District : Thane.

Facts:-

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 14th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 12.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No. KR- 61/2008

Shri Kaustubha D. Gokhale, ….. Appellant Siddhivinayak Prasad, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Road, Dombivali (E), 421 201. Tal. Kalyan, Dist. Thane V/s Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Law Department, Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation, Kalyan, Dist. Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Commissioner (General Admn.) Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation, Kalyan, Dist. Thane.

Facts:-

The appellant by an application dated 16.4.2007 asked for information regarding details of action taken according to the court order dated 2.8.2006 in Public L. W. P. 10/2004. Interim Decision The appeal application has been perused. There is an indication that the First Appellate Authority considered this case and gave a decision on 23.2.2007. Much time has passed since then and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days. The Public Information Officer should bring this decision to the notice of his First Appellate Authority to avoid delay. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 18th June, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 12.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No. KR-99/2008

Shri Imptiyaj Ismail Shaikh, ….. Appellant 4, Shanti Sadan, Raj Cinema (Near) Tembhade Road, , Tal. Palghar, Dist. Thane. . V/s Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Chitnis, Collector Officer, Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Residence District Collector, Collector Officer, Thane,

Facts:-

The appellant by an application dated 7.4.2007 asked information regarding details of illegal employee in Tahsil, Talathi & Circle Officers office in Thane Districts.

Interim Decision. The appeal application has been perused. There is an indication that the First Appellate Authority considered this case and gave a decision on 10.1.2007. Much time has passed since then and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days. The Public Information Officer should bring this decision to the notice of his First Appellate Authority to avoid delay. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 19th June, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 5.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2647/2008

Shri Hemant Jyotiram Mane, ….. Appellant. 37, Yashoda Niwas, Shatrinagar, Navghar(W), Tal:Vasai, Dist:Thane: 401 202.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office of the Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Old Secretariate Bldg., 1st Floor, Fort, Mumbai:400 032.

The Appellate Authority, Office of the Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Old Secretariate Bldg., 1st Floor, Fort, Mumbai:400 032.

Facts:-

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 29nd July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 23.9.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-295/2008

Shri Shaukat Shaikh Lal Shaikh, ….. Appellant .Maple Chawl, Opp. Hawa Manzil, Mahagiri, Thane(W), Dist : Thane. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office of the.Taluka Agriculture Officer, Tal. Vashi, Dist. Osmanabad,

The Appellate Authority, Taluka Agriculture Officer, Tal. Vashi, Dist. Osmanabad,

Facts:

Not having been successful in obtaining information from Public Information Officer or First Appellate Authority, the appellant by an appeal dated 28.5.2007 has asked information regarding details of cheques distributed by Central Co.op. Bank Ltd., Terkheda in May 2005.

Interim Decision. The appeal application has been perused. The papers attached do not show that this matter has been examined and considered at the level of the First Appellate Authority. I remand this appeal to the First Appellate Authority for giving a hearing to the appellant and for giving a reasoned decision with a view to facilitate flow of maximum information to the appellant.

A compliance report should be submitted, within 45 days by the First Appellant Authority, to me. The Public Information Officer should bring this decision to the notice of his First Appellate Authority to avoid delay and penal action.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 1st July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 20.10.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 328/2008

Shri Ravi Pandurang Gaikwad, ….. Appellant C/o. Shivaji Mane, Shantaram Patil Nagar, Mohane, Tal Kalyan, Dist-Thane . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Yashodeep Vidyalaya, Mohane, Tal Kalyan, Dist-Thane

The Appellate Authority, Head Master, Yashodeep Vidyalaya, Mohane, Tal Kalyan, Dist-Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 3rd July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 26.12.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2063/2008

Shri Sahadev Mahadev Chorghe, ….. Appellant Shri Vijay Anant Joshi, At & Post : Gorhe, Taluka: Wada, Dist-Thane. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Wada, Taluka : Wada, District : Thane. . The Appellate Authority, Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Thane, District : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 4.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-777/2008

Shri Shankar Vithoba Acharekar, ….. Appellant 4/103, Vitthal Krupa Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Near Vitthal Mandir, (West), Dist-Thane 401 303.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Tahsildar Office Vasai, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Resident District Collector, Thane, Dist-Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 12.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-289/2008

Shri Prakash Laxman Jadhav, ….. Appellant At. Post. Sasane, Tal. Murbad, Dist-Thane . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office of the Taluka Agricultural Officer, Murbad, Tal. Murbad, Dist-Thane

The Appellate Authority, Taluka Agricultural Officer, Murbad, Tal. Murbad, Dist-Thane

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 2nd July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 6.8.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No. KR- 43/2008

Shri Gajanan Parshuram Mhatre ….. Appellant Ghatal Nagar, Adivasi Vasahat Umel, Tal- Vasai, Dist. Thane. V/s Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gram Sevak, Umela Grampanchayat, Tal. Vasai, Dist. Thane

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Vasai Panchayat Samiti, Tal. Vasai, Dist. Thane.

Facts:

The appellant by an application dated 4.4.2007 asked for information regarding encroachments on Government lands. Interim Decision

The appeal application has been perused. The papers attached do not show that this matter has been examined and considered at the level of the First Appellate Authority. I remand this appeal to the First Appellate Authority for giving a hearing to the appellant and for giving a reasoned decision with a view to facilitate flow of maximum information to the appellant. A compliance report should be submitted, within 45 days by the First Appellant Authority, to me. The Public Information Officer should bring this decision to the notice of his First Appellate Authority to avoid delay and penal action.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 18th June, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 9.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 281/2008

Smt. Vimal Tukaram Naik, ….. Appellant Salaiwada, Main Road, Sawantwadi, Dist. Sindhudurg. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office Superintendent, (R.P). Zilla Parishad, Dist. Sindhudurg.

The Appellate Authority, Education Officer, (Secondary). Zilla Parishad, Dist. Sindhudurg.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 2nd July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 6.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-397/2008

Shri Kiran Yashwant Bhoir, ….. Appellant At. Panaju, Post-Papadi, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane Naygaon (West)-401 207. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Village Development Officer, Gram Panchayat, Panaju, Post-Papadi, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Vasai. Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 4th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 2.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 396/2008

Shri Kiran Yashwant Bhoir, ….. Appellant At. Panaju, Post-Papadi, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane Naygaon (West)-401 207. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Village Development Officer, Gram Panchayat, Panaju, Post-Papadi, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Vasai. Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 4th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 2.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-415/2008

Shri Khalil Ahmed.Hassanmiya Vasta, ….. Appellant 132, Rajiwada, Ratnagiri-415 612.

V/s. Public Information Officer & Special Executive Officer, ….. Respondent Audit Board, (A.D.F.) Maharashtra State, Administrative Building, 3rd Floor, Abdul Gafarkhan Road, Worli, Sea Face, Mumbai.

The Appellate Authority, Office of the Commissioner,(Fisheries) Taraporwala Matsyalaya, 2nd Floor, Charni Road, Mumbai.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 5th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 21.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-418/2008

Shri Kiran Yashvant Bhoir, ….. Appellant At-Panju, Post-Papadi, Naigaon(West), Tal-Vasai,Dist-Thane-401 207.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Village Development Officer, Grampanchayat Panju, Naigaon(West), Tal-Vasai,Dist-Thane-401 207.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Vasai, Tal-Vasai,Dist-Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 5th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 2.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-435/2008

Shri Gajanan Parshuram Mhatre, ….. Appellant Umela Tribal Recidence, Ghatalnagar, Mithagar road, Post-Papadi, Taluka-Vasai, District-Thane-401 207.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gramsevak, Grampanchayat Umela, At & Post-Umela, Taluka-Vasai, District-Thane-401 207.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Vasai, Taluka-Vasai, District-Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 5th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 9.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-571/2008

Shri Nandkumar Narayan Mahajan, ….. Appellant At. Umele, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane-401 202.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Village Development Officer, Gram Panchayat, Umele, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane-401 202

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Vasai, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane-401 202

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 5th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 2.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-813/2008

Shri Prakash Namdev Khatu, ….. Appellant House No. 77, Prakash Optitions, Navadi, (Sangmeshwar), Tal : Sangmeshwar, District : Ratnagiri. : 415 611.

V/s. Public Information Officer. ….. Respondent Gram Sevak, Gram Panchayat, Navadi (Sangmeshwar), Taluka ; Sangmeshwar, Dist :Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Extension Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Sangmeshwar, (Devrukh) Taluka ; Sangmeshwar, Dist :Ratnagiri.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 14th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 12.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-822/2008

Shri Rajendra Dadasaheb More, ….. Appellant At & Post ; Uchat, Tal : Wada, District : Thane. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Chairman. Rural Water Supply & Sanitation Samiti, At & Post ; Uchat, Tal : Wada, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Extension Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Wada, Tal : Wada, Dist : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 14th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 31.12.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-660/2008

Shri Putlaji Dhondu Kadam, ….. Appellant At & Post : Waliv, Aadsingpada, Vasai (E), Tal : Vasai, Dist : Thane.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Block Devleopment Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Vasai, Tal : Vasai, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Block Devleopment Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Vasai, Tal : Vasai, Dist : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th July, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 2.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 20th March, 2009. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖӍú : êú†Ö¸ü- 1161 /2008

ÁÖß .´Ö¬Öãú¸ü ŸÖãúÖ¸üÖ´Ö ¯ÖÖ™üß»Ö, ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ 102/ êú¤üÖØ»ÖÖ úÖê-†Öò¯Ö.ÆüÖîÃÖàÖ ÃÖÖêÃÖÖµÖ™üß, ´ÖÖÆüÖê¯ÖÖ›üÖ, ŸÖÖ.ÖÖ»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, וֻÆüÖ-¸üֵ֐֛ü-410 222.

×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ˆ¯Ö úÖµÖԍúÖ¸üß †×³ÖµÖÓŸÖÖ, ... ÃÖÖ´ÖÖê¾ÖÖ»Öê ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖ™Òü ¸üÖ•µÖ ×¾ÖªãŸÖ ×¾ÖŸÖ¸üÖ Óú¯ÖÖß ×»Ö. ÃÖÓ“ÖÖ»ÖÖ ¾Ö ÃÖã¾µÖ¾ÖãÖÖ¯ÖÖ ¯ÖÖ¾Öê»Ö (ÖÏÖ´ÖߝÖ), ×¾ÖªãŸÖ ֐ָü, س֐ÖÖ¸üß, ¯ÖÖ¾Öê»Ö- 410 206.וÖ-¸üֵ֐֛ü.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, úÖµÖԍúÖ¸üß †×³ÖµÖÓŸÖÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖ™Òü ¸üÖ•µÖ ×¾ÖªãŸÖ ×¾ÖŸÖ¸üÖ Óú¯ÖÖß ×»Ö. ÃÖÓ“ÖÖ»ÖÖ ¾Ö ÃÖã¾µÖ¾ÖãÖÖ¯ÖÖ ¯ÖÖ¾Öê»Ö (ÖÏÖ´ÖߝÖ), ×¾ÖªãŸÖ ֐ָü, س֐ÖÖ¸üß, ¯ÖÖ¾Öê»Ö- 410 206.וÖ-¸üֵ֐֛ü.

†ÓŸÖ׸ü´Ö †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö×»ÖµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖÖŸÖ ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»µÖÖ“Öê פüÃÖæÖ µÖêŸÖê. ŸÖ£ÖÖׯÖ, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ×֝ÖÔµÖÖÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ —ÖÖ»Öê ÖÃÖ»µÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÓÖß ú»Ö´Ö 19 (3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö ¤üÖÖ»Ö êú»Öê †ÖÆêü (¯ÖÏŸÖ ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ ÃÖӻ֐Ö). †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ¾ÖßÖãÛã֟Öߤü¿Öԍú ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“Öß ´Ö֐֝Öß êú»Öê»Öß †ÖÆêü. ´Ö»ÖÖ †ÃÖê ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê¿Öß ¯ÖãÆüÖ ‹ú¤üÖ “Ö“ÖÖÔ/×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ×¾Ö×Ö´ÖµÖ ú¹ýÖ •ÖÖßÖßŸÖ •ÖÖÃŸÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ ¯Ö쵅م êú»µÖÖÃÖ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ —ÖÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸ü †ÖµÖÖêÖ֍ú›êü µÖꝵÖ֍ú¸üߟÖÖÓ ÃÖ¾ÖÔ ¯ÖÖúÖ¸üÖÓ“ÖÖ ¾Öêôû, ¯ÖϾÖÖÃÖ Ö“ÖÔ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÖÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸üß ŸÖÃÖ¤üß ™üÖôûŸÖÖ µÖêŸÖß»Ö. µÖÖß־Ö, ´Öß Æêü †×¯Ö»Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öêú›êü ׸ü´ÖÖÓ›ü ú¸üßŸÖ †ÖÆêü. ŸµÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÖÖ ¯ÖãÆüÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰úÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö ¿ÖŒµÖŸÖÖê ¯Ö׸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥ü™üßÖËê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¸üÖ¾Öß ¾Ö •Ö¸ü ´Ö֐֝Öß êú»Öê»Öß ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ‹úÖ ¯ÖêÖÖ †×¬Öú •ÖÖ ´Ö×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ·µÖÖÓ¿Öß ÃÖÓ²ÖÓ×¬ÖŸÖ †ÃÖê»Ö ŸÖ¸ü ÃÖ¾ÖÖÕÖÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝ÖßÃÖ ²ÖÖê»Ö¾ÖÖ¾Öê †Ö×Ö ŸµÖÖÖÓŸÖ¸ü µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖß ÃÖ´ÖµÖÖµÖߍú †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ׸üŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ýÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá †Ö¤êü¿Ö ×֐ÖÔ×´ÖŸÖ êú»Öê †ÃÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸üß ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¹ýÖ Ö¾µÖÖÖê †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, ´ÆüÖ•Öê ŸµÖÖÓ“ÖÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá“ÖÖ ×֝ÖÔµÖ †Ö¯ÖÖê†Ö¯Ö ÃÖã¬ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê êú»Ö껵ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ŸÖ£ÖÖׯÖ, •Ö¸ü ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öß †¿Öß šüÖ´Ö ¬ÖÖ¸üÖÖ †ÃÖê»Ö úß, Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß ¤êü‰úÖ úÖÓÆüß ÃÖÖ¬µÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸ü ÖÖÆüß. ŸÖ¸ü ŸµÖÖÓÖß •ÖÖê›ü»Ö껵ÖÖ †×¯Ö»Ö †•ÖÖÔŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ´Öã§êü×ÖÆüÖµÖ ÃÖ×¾Ößָü †×³Ö¯ÖÏÖµÖ 15 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ.

ÃÖ×Æü/- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פÖÖÖӍú : 29 ×›üÃÖë²Ö¸ü, 2008. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü ×֍úÂÖÔ

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤ü.25.2.2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖӍú 12 ´ÖÖ“ÖÔ, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-476/2008

Shri Dilip Mukund Patil, ….. Appellant Bhandari Ali, Koliwada Road, Post & Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane-401 201.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Secondary Registrar, Tahasil Office Building, Vasai-1, Dist-Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Additional District Registrar, Class-I, Thane (Rural) Collector Office Building, Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 5th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 5.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1924/2008

Dr. Kamlakar R. Bagal, ….. Appellant. Sai Prasad Society, Singh Estate, Road No. 2, Opp. Basra Studio, Kandivali (E), Mumbai ; 400 101.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, , Vardhavat Mansion, 2nd floor, Shivaji Path, Thane (W), Dist : Thane : 400 601.

The Appellate Authority, District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Vardhavat Mansion, 2nd floor, Shivaji Path, Thane (W), Dist : Thane : 400 601.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 17th December, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 17.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖӍú : êú†Ö¸ü-1951/2008

ÁÖß ÖÖê¯ÖßÖÖ£Ö ÖÖ¸üÖµÖÖ ¸üÖ‰úŸÖ, ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ ×•Ö¾Ö¤üÖÖß ¯Öæ•ÖÖ úÖê. †Öò. ÆüÖîØÃÖÖ ÃÖÖêÃÖÖµÖ™üß, »ÖÖêú´ÖÖµÖ ÖÖ¸ü, ú“Öê¸üß ¸üÖê›ü, ¸êü»¾Öê ¯ÖÖò¾Ö¸ü ÆüÖ‰úÃÖ •Ö¾Öôû, ¯ÖÖ»Ö‘Ö¸ü, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ ¯ÖÖ»Ö‘Ö¸ü, וֻÆüÖ : šü֝Öê. ×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ... ÃÖÖ´ÖÖê¾ÖÖ»Öê †ÖãÖÖ¯ÖÖÖ ×¾Ö³Ö֐Ö, ¯ÖÖ»Ö‘Ö¸ü ֐ָü ¯Ö׸üÂÖ¤ü, ¯ÖÖ»Ö‘Ö¸ü, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ ¯ÖÖ»Ö‘Ö¸ü, וֻÆüÖ : šü֝Öê.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, ´Ö㏵ÖÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, ¯ÖÖ»Ö‘Ö¸ü ֐ָü ¯Ö׸üÂÖ¤ü, ¯ÖÖ»Ö‘Ö¸ü, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ ¯ÖÖ»Ö‘Ö¸ü, וֻÆüÖ : šü֝Öê.

´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(1) †¾ÖµÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ¤üÖÖ»Ö êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖÖ¾Ö¸ü, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»µÖÖ“Öê Ã֍éúŸÖ¤ü¿ÖÔÖß †ÖœüôæûÖ µÖêŸÖ ÖÖÆüß. µÖÖß־Ö, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ¯Öύú¸üÖß ´Öß †ÃÖê ×Ö¤ìü¿Ö ¤êüŸÖÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰úÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ¯Ö׸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß, †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´ÖÖŸÖᯙ ŸÖ¸üŸÖã¤üßÖãÃÖÖ¸ü ˆ¯Ö»Ö²¬Ö ú¹ýÖ ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥ü™üßÖê ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖß Ã֍úÖ¸üÖ †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ýÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö (¯ÖÏŸÖ ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ ÃÖӻ֐Ö). ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê êú»Ö껵ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ.

ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ : ¾Ö¸üᯙ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê. ÃÖ×Æü/- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פÖÖÖӍú : 18 ×›üÃÖë²Ö¸ü, 2008. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü ×֍úÂÖÔ

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤ü.5.2.2009 “µÖÖ ¯Ö¡ÖÖ¾ÖµÖê ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ˆ¯Ö»Ö²¬Ö ú¹ýÖ ×¤ü»Öß †ÖÆêü.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖӍú 12 ´ÖÖ“ÖÔ, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü

¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖӍú : êú†Ö¸ü-32 /2009

ÁÖß .†Öê´Ö¯ÖύúÖ¿Ö ‹“Ö ´Ö»»ÖÖÆü, Öã•Ö¸üÖŸÖ “ÖÖôû, ¹ý.ÖÓ.7,êú¤üÖ¸üØ»ÖÖ Ã™üÖêÃÖÔ •Ö¾Öôû, †Ö•ÖÖ¤ü ֐ָü, šü֝Öê- 400 607. ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ

×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ׿ց֝ÖÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, ׿ցִ֝ÖÓ›üôû šü֝Öê ´ÖÆüÖ֐ָü ¯ÖÖ׻֍úÖ, וֻÆüÖ-šü֝Öê-7. ... ÃÖÖ´ÖÖê¾ÖÖ»Öê,

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, ˆ¯ÖÖµÖãŒŸÖ (´Ö㏵ÖÖ»ÖµÖ), šü֝Öê ´ÖÆüÖ֐ָü¯ÖÖ׻֍úÖ, וֻÆüÖ -šü֝Öê.

†ÓŸÖ׸ü´Ö †Ö¤êü¿Ö

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö×»ÖµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖÖŸÖ ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»µÖÖ“Öê פüÃÖæÖ µÖêŸÖê. ŸÖ£ÖÖׯÖ, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ×֝ÖÔµÖÖÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ —ÖÖ»Öê - ÖÃÖ»µÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÓÖß ú»Ö´Ö 19 (3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö ¤üÖÖ»Ö êú»Öê †ÖÆêü (¯ÖÏŸÖ ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ ÃÖӻ֐Ö). †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ¾ÖßÖãÛã֟Öߤü¿Öԍú ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“Öß ´Ö֐֝Öß êú»Öê»Öß †ÖÆêü. ´Ö»ÖÖ †ÃÖê ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê¿Öß ¯ÖãÆüÖ ‹ú¤üÖ “Ö“ÖÖÔ/×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ×¾Ö×Ö´ÖµÖ ú¹ýÖ •ÖÖßÖßŸÖ •ÖÖÃŸÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ ¯Ö쵅م êú»µÖÖÃÖ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ —ÖÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸ü †ÖµÖÖêÖ֍ú›êü µÖꝵÖ֍ú¸üߟÖÖÓ ÃÖ¾ÖÔ ¯ÖÖúÖ¸üÖÓ“ÖÖ ¾Öêôû, ¯ÖϾÖÖÃÖ Ö“ÖÔ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÖÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸üß ŸÖÃÖ¤üß ™üÖôûŸÖÖ µÖêŸÖß»Ö. µÖÖß־Ö, ´Öß Æêü †×¯Ö»Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öêú›êü ׸ü´ÖÖÓ›ü ú¸üßŸÖ †ÖÆêü. ŸµÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÖÖ ¯ÖãÆüÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰úÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö ¿ÖŒµÖŸÖÖê ¯Ö׸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥ü™üßÖËê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¸üÖ¾Öß ¾Ö •Ö¸ü ´Ö֐֝Öß êú»Öê»Öß ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ‹úÖ ¯ÖêÖÖ †×¬Öú •ÖÖ ´Ö×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ·µÖÖÓ¿Öß ÃÖÓ²ÖÓ×¬ÖŸÖ †ÃÖê»Ö ŸÖ¸ü ÃÖ¾ÖÖÕÖÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝ÖßÃÖ ²ÖÖê»Ö¾ÖÖ¾Öê †Ö×Ö ŸµÖÖÖÓŸÖ¸ü µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖß ÃÖ´ÖµÖÖµÖߍú †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ׸üŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ýÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá †Ö¤êü¿Ö ×֐ÖÔ×´ÖŸÖ êú»Öê †ÃÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸üß ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¹ýÖ Ö¾µÖÖÖê †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, ´ÆüÖ•Öê ŸµÖÖÓ“ÖÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá“ÖÖ ×֝ÖÔµÖ †Ö¯ÖÖê†Ö¯Ö ÃÖã¬ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê êú»Ö껵ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ŸÖ£ÖÖׯÖ, •Ö¸ü ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öß †¿Öß šüÖ´Ö ¬ÖÖ¸üÖÖ †ÃÖê»Ö úß, Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß ¤êü‰úÖ úÖÓÆüß ÃÖÖ¬µÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸ü ÖÖÆüß. ŸÖ¸ü ŸµÖÖÓÖß •ÖÖê›ü»Ö껵ÖÖ †×¯Ö»Ö †•ÖÖÔŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ´Öã§êü×ÖÆüÖµÖ ÃÖ×¾Ößָü †×³Ö¯ÖÏÖµÖ 15 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ÃÖ×Æü/- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פÖÖÖӍú : 14 •ÖÖÖê¾ÖÖ¸üß, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü ×֍úÂÖÔ

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤ü.27.2.2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖӍú 12 ´ÖÖ“ÖÔ, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2685/2008

Shri Manohar Kishorilal Gupta ….. Appellant Kishori Smriti, At. Post-Kaman, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Sir Karkun, Office of the Collector of Thane, Dist-Thane

The Appellate Authority, Resident Deputy Collector, Office of the Collector of Thane, Dist-Thane

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 21st July, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 4.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2293/2008

Shri Mohanraj Bhikusheth Gandhi, ….. Appellant. 860, Shivaji Nagar, Taluka & Dist : Ratnagiri.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Director,Health Services, Health Bhavan, 5th floor, St. Jorjes Hospital Compound, P.D. D’mello Road, Mumbai : 400 001.

The Appellate Authority, Director,Health Services, Health Bhavan, 5th floor, St. Jorjes Hospital Compound, P.D. D’mello Road, Mumbai : 400 001.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 01st October, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 28.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-786/2008

Shri Pandurang Sadashiv Bapat, ….. Appellant 421 Bapat Ali, Shivaji Chowk, Karad Road, Chiplun, Tal. Chiplun, Dist.-Ratnagiri.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Education Extention Officer, Panchayat Samiti Chiplun, Tal. Chiplun, Dist.-Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Chiplun, Tal. Chiplun, Dist.-Ratnagiri.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has given the necessary information to the appellant on 12.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-12th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-787/2008

Shri Pandurang Sadashiv Bapat, ….. Appellant 421 Bapat Ali, Shivaji Chowk, Karad Road, Chiplun, Tal. Chiplun, Dist.-Ratnagiri.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Head Master, Jeevan Shikshan Vidya Mandir, School No.1, Chichnaka, Chiplun, Tal. Chiplun, Dist.-Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Education Extention Officer, Panchayat Samiti Chiplun, Tal. Chiplun, Dist.-Ratnagiri.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has given the necessary information to the appellant on 12.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-12th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2265/2008

Shri Dilip Mukund Patil, … Appellant. Vasai Bhandari Ali, Koliwada Rd., Post & Taluka : Vasai, Dist : Thane : 401 201.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gram Sevak, Valiv, Gram Panchayat, Valiv, Tal : Vasai, Dist : Raigad.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Vasai, Taluka : Vasai, District ; Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision By First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 29th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 2.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 20th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2181/2008

Shri Ranjeet Madhukar Patil, ….. Appellant Sainath Nagar, Murbad Road, Near JSVV Company Colony No.3, At. Post Washind, Tal. Shahapur, Dist-Thane. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gramsevak, Gram Panchayat Biloshi, Tal. Wada, Dist-Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Village Extension Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Wada, Tal. Wada, Dist-Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 15th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 9.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2161/2008

Shri Rajendra Dadasaheb More, ….. Appellant At. Post Uchat, Tal. Wada, Dist-Thane. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gramsevak, Gram Panchayat, Uchat, Tal. Wada, Dist-Thane

The Appellate Authority, Extension Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Wada, Tal. Wada, Dist-Thane

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 15th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 31.12.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2155/2008

Shri Katthu Sambhu Patil, …. Appellant. A-10/704, Rutuanklave, Anand Nagar, Kasarvadvali, Ghod Bunder Road, Thane (W), District Thane. . V/s Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Head Master, English High School & Jr. College, Majivade, Taluka & District :Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Secretary, Rural Education Institute, Majivade, Taluka & District : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 15th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 17.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1925/2008

Shri Virendra Khanna, ….. Appellant. B-13/4 Maitri Park Co.op. Hsg., Society Ltd., Chembur, Mumbai : 400 071.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, M- Ward, 201, Konkan Bhavan, 2nd floor, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai :400 614.

The Appellate Authority, District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies (2), Eastern Suburbs, 2nd floor, Konkan Bhavan, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai :400 614.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

The information requested is of a factual nature. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act 2005 and The First Appellate Authority gave a decision. The appellant says that he has not got all the information. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving one more hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing another reasoned order to the supercession of the earlier order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 16th December, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 30.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1935/2008

Shri Arvind Pandurang Patil & Mrs. Meena A. Patil. ….. Appellant. IA-1, GKW Management Staff Quarters, Bhandup, Mumbai : 400 078.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gram Sevak, Pezari Gram Panchayat, Post : Poynad, Taluka : Alibag, District : Raigad.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Alibag, Taluka : Alibag, District : Raigad.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 18th December, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 28.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-693/2008

Shri Laxman Ravaji Sawant, ….. Appellant E-66, Khaskilwada, Sawantwadi, Taluka-Sawantwadi, District-Sindhudurg.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Commissioner and Registrar, Co-Operarive Societies, Maharashtra State,Central Building, .

The Appellate Authority, Secretary, Co-Opration and Textile Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision

Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 19.12.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1861/2008

Shri Vamanrao Dhondu Sawant, ….. Appellant A/13, Rajbhavan Grihanirman Sanstha Ltd. N. S. Phadke Marg, (East), Mumbai-400 069.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gramsevak, Gram Panchayat Pilvali C/o. Savrda, Tal. Chiplun, Dist.-Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Extention Officer, (Grampanchayat) Panchayat Samiti, Chiplun, Tal. Chiplun, Dist.-Ratnagiri

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 14th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 18.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2042/2008

Shri Bapu Shankar Chavan, ….. Appellant Shivkrupa-19, Vishnu Nagar, Naupada, Thane-(West)-400 602.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Deputy Secretary, Revenue Department, 4th Floor, Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032.

The Appellate Authority, Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 15th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 20.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009.

¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖӍú : êú†Ö¸ü- 1968/2008 ÁÖß ³Ö¸üŸÖ ÃÖã´ÖŸÖß»ÖÖ»Ö ¿ÖÆüÖ, ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ ãú×™ü¸ü êúÃÖ¸üß úÖê.†Öò¯Ö. ÆüÖîØÃÖÖ ÃÖÖêÃÖÖµÖ™üß, ÃÖß-ؾ֐Ö, ±»Öò™ü ÖÓ²Ö¸ü 206, ¤ãüÃÖ¸üÖ ´Ö•Ö»ÖÖ, †ÖÖÏÖ ¸üÖê›ü, »ÖÖ»Ö “ÖÖîúß, ú»µÖ֝Ö, וֻÆüÖ : šü֝Öê. ×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ... ÃÖÖ´ÖÖê¾ÖÖ»Öê ֐ָü ¸ü“ÖÖ֍úÖ¸ü, ú»µÖ֝Ö-›üÖëײ־ֻÖß ´ÖÆüÖ֐ָü ¯ÖÖ׻֍úÖ, ú»µÖ֝Ö, ׿־ÖÖ•Öß “ÖÖîú, ú»µÖ֝Ö, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ : ú»µÖ֝Ö, וֻÆüÖ : šü֝Öê.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, ÃÖÆüֵֵ֍ú ÃÖÓ“Öֻ֍ú, ֐ָü ¸ü“ÖÖÖü, ú»µÖ֝Ö-›üÖëײ־ֻÖß ´ÖÆüÖ֐ָü ¯ÖÖ׻֍úÖ, ú»µÖ֝Ö, ׿־ÖÖ•Öß “ÖÖîú, ú»µÖ֝Ö, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ : ú»µÖ֝Ö, וֻÆüÖ : šü֝Öê.

†ÓŸÖ׸ü´Ö †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö×»ÖµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖÖŸÖ ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»µÖÖ“Öê פüÃÖæÖ µÖêŸÖê. ŸÖ£ÖÖׯÖ, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ×֝ÖÔµÖÖÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ —ÖÖ»Öê - ÖÃÖ»µÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÓÖß ú»Ö´Ö 19 (3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö ¤üÖÖ»Ö êú»Öê †ÖÆêü (¯ÖÏŸÖ ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ ÃÖӻ֐Ö). †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ¾ÖßÖãÛã֟Öߤü¿Öԍú ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“Öß ´Ö֐֝Öß êú»Öê»Öß †ÖÆêü. ´Ö»ÖÖ †ÃÖê ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê¿Öß ¯ÖãÆüÖ ‹ú¤üÖ “Ö“ÖÖÔ/×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ×¾Ö×Ö´ÖµÖ ú¹ýÖ •ÖÖßÖßŸÖ •ÖÖÃŸÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ ¯Ö쵅م êú»µÖÖÃÖ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ —ÖÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸ü †ÖµÖÖêÖ֍ú›êü µÖꝵÖ֍ú¸üߟÖÖÓ ÃÖ¾ÖÔ ¯ÖÖúÖ¸üÖÓ“ÖÖ ¾Öêôû, ¯ÖϾÖÖÃÖ Ö“ÖÔ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÖÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸üß ŸÖÃÖ¤üß ™üÖôûŸÖÖ µÖêŸÖß»Ö. µÖÖß־Ö, ´Öß Æêü †×¯Ö»Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öêú›êü ׸ü´ÖÖÓ›ü ú¸üßŸÖ †ÖÆêü. ŸµÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÖÖ ¯ÖãÆüÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰úÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö ¿ÖŒµÖŸÖÖê ¯Ö׸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥ü™üßÖËê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¸üÖ¾Öß ¾Ö •Ö¸ü ´Ö֐֝Öß êú»Öê»Öß ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ‹úÖ ¯ÖêÖÖ †×¬Öú •ÖÖ ´Ö×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ·µÖÖÓ¿Öß ÃÖÓ²ÖÓ×¬ÖŸÖ †ÃÖê»Ö ŸÖ¸ü ÃÖ¾ÖÖÕÖÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝ÖßÃÖ ²ÖÖê»Ö¾ÖÖ¾Öê †Ö×Ö ŸµÖÖÖÓŸÖ¸ü µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖß ÃÖ´ÖµÖÖµÖߍú †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ׸üŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ýÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá †Ö¤êü¿Ö ×֐ÖÔ×´ÖŸÖ êú»Öê †ÃÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸üß ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¹ýÖ Ö¾µÖÖÖê †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, ´ÆüÖ•Öê ŸµÖÖÓ“ÖÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá“ÖÖ ×֝ÖÔµÖ †Ö¯ÖÖê†Ö¯Ö ÃÖã¬ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê êú»Ö껵ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ŸÖ£ÖÖׯÖ, •Ö¸ü ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öß †¿Öß šüÖ´Ö ¬ÖÖ¸üÖÖ †ÃÖê»Ö úß, Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß ¤êü‰úÖ úÖÓÆüß ÃÖÖ¬µÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸ü ÖÖÆüß. ŸÖ¸ü ŸµÖÖÓÖß •ÖÖê›ü»Ö껵ÖÖ †×¯Ö»Ö †•ÖÖÔŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ´Öã§êü×ÖÆüÖµÖ ÃÖ×¾Ößָü †×³Ö¯ÖÏÖµÖ 15 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ÃÖ×Æü/- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פÖÖÖӍú : 22 ×›üÃÖë²Ö¸ü, 2008. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü ×֍úÂÖÔ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤ü.3.3.2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖӍú 12 ´ÖÖ“ÖÔ, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-807/2008

Shri Dilip Mukund Patil, ….. Appellant Vasai Bhandari Ali,Koliwada Road, Post & Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane-401 201.

V/s. Public Information Officer. Medical Officer, Public Health Centre, Navghar, Vasai Road, Taluka : Vasai, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Vasai, Taluka : Vasai, District : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 14th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 28.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 891/2008

Shri M.H. Patel, ….. Appellant 2201, Kingston Palace, Kongston, Complex, Chilncholi Bunder Road, Malad (W), Mumbai : 400 064. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Assistant Commissioner of Police, Head Quarter, Office of the Police Commissioner, Thane City, Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Head Quarter, Office of the Police Commissioner, Thane City, Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 6.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-572/2008

Shri Nipun Mathkar, ….. Appellant B-5 Jivdani Kripa Chawl, Ramchandra, Jadhavwadi, Vijay Nagar, Nala Sopara (E), Dist-Thane-401 208. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Directorate of Employment & Self Employment, 3rd Floor, (Extention), Konkan Bhavan, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai-400 614.

The Appellate Authority, Directorate of Employment & Self Employment, 3rd Floor, (Extention), Konkan Bhavan, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai-400 614.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 5th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 18.9.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 26th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2710/2008

Shri John Francis Colaso, ….. Appellant Sneh Jyoti, Behind Marry Sadan, Chulana Road, Opp. Snehal Apartment, Divanman Goan, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Khajina Aval Karkun, Tahsildar Office Vasai, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Resident Naib Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office Vasai, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. The information requested is of a factual nature. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act 2005 and the First Appellate Authority gave a decision. The appellant says that he has not got the information. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving one more hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing another reasoned order to the supercession of the earlier order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 22nd July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 13.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 26th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2351/2008

Smt. Prita Prafulla Gharat, ….. Appellant. At ; Salvad ( Gharatwadi), Taluka : Palghar, District : Thane.401 504. V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Dy. Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd Takka Vasahat, Tal : , Dist : Raigad.

The Appellate Authority, Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., Takka Vasahat, Taluka : Panvel, District : Raigad.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision By First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 22nd July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 17.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 26th March, 2009.

¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖӍú : êú†Ö¸ü-1845/2008

ÁÖß Ö»Öᯙ ÆãüÃÖêÖ ²ÖÆãü¸ü, וֻÆüÖ †¬µÖÖ, †Ö×Ö»Ö ³ÖÖ¸üŸÖßµÖ ˆ¤ãÔü ׿ց֍ú ÃÖÓ‘Ö™üÖÖ, ¿Ö֏ÖÖ úÖµÖÖÔ»ÖµÖ, Æü¸üúÖê»Ö, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ ´Ö֝֐ÖÖÓ¾Ö, וֻÆüÖ : ¸üֵ֐֛ü. ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ

×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ... ÃÖÖ´ÖÖê¾ÖÖ»Öê Ö™ü ׿ց֝ÖÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, ¯ÖÓ“ÖÖµÖŸÖ ÃÖ×´ÖŸÖß, ´Ö֝֐ÖÖÓ¾Ö, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ : ´Ö֝֐ÖÖÓ¾Ö, וֻÆüÖ ¸üֵ֐֒û

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, Ö™ü ׿ց֝ÖÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, ¯ÖÓ“ÖÖµÖŸÖ ÃÖ×´ÖŸÖß, ´Ö֝֐ÖÖÓ¾Ö, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ : ´Ö֝֐ÖÖÓ¾Ö, וֻÆüÖ ¸üֵ֐֒û

†ÓŸÖ׸ü´Ö †Ö¤êü¿Ö ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(1) †¾ÖµÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ¤üÖÖ»Ö êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖÖ¾Ö¸ü, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»µÖÖ“Öê Ã֍éúŸÖ¤ü¿ÖÔÖß †ÖœüôæûÖ µÖêŸÖ ÖÖÆüß. µÖÖß־Ö, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ¯Öύú¸üÖß ´Öß †ÃÖê ×Ö¤ìü¿Ö ¤êüŸÖÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰úÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ¯Ö׸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß, †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´ÖÖŸÖᯙ ŸÖ¸üŸÖã¤üßÖãÃÖÖ¸ü ˆ¯Ö»Ö²¬Ö ú¹ýÖ ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥ü™üßÖê ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖß Ã֍úÖ¸üÖ †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ýÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö (¯ÖÏŸÖ ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ ÃÖӻ֐Ö). ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê êú»Ö껵ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ.

ÃÖÆüß/- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö˾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פÖÖӍú : 06 ×›üÃÖë²Ö¸ü, 2008. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü ×֝ÖÔµÖ

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤ü.5.1.2008 “µÖÖ ¯Ö¡ÖÖ¾ÖµÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖÖ †Ö¾Ö¿µÖú ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¯Öã¸ü×¾Ö»Öß †ÖÆêü.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖӍú 26 ±êú²ÖÎã¾ÖÖ¸üß, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1466/2008

Shri Vegan Inc., ….. Appellant. C/o Sanjiv Poonalekar, 315, Birya House, 265, Peri Nariman Street, Fort, Mumbai : 400 001.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent City Development Officer, Bhiwandi Nijampur City Corporation, Taluka ; Bhiwandi, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Municipal Commissioner (H.Q), Bhiwandi Nijampur City Corporation, Taluka ; Bhiwandi, Dist : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 02nd September, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 30.12.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 26th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 854/2008

Shri Nipun Mathkar, ….. Appellant B-5, Jivdani Krupa Chawl, Ramchandra Jadhav Wadi, Vijay Nagar, Nala Sopara (E), Thane : 401 208. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Under Secretary, Law & Judiciary Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai : 400 032.

The Appellate Authority, Secretary, Law & Judiciary Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai : 400 032.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 18.8.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 22/2009 Shri Shivanand Ankolekar, ….. Appellant. A-8, M.I.D.C. Flatted Factory, L.B.S. Marg., Wagle Estate, Thane (W), District : Thane : 400 604. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Area Manager, MIDC, Thane Region, M.I.D.C. Office Complex Bldg., 1st floor,Wagle Estate, Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Regional Officer, MIDC, Thane Region, M.I.D.C. Office Complex Bldg., 1st floor,Wagle Estate, Thane.

Facts : A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision. It is seen that the First Appellate Authority has given a decision in this case and the appellant, not being satisfied with the same, has again come before me under Section 19 (3) for a second appeal. The nature of information sought is of a factual nature I would prefer another dialogue between the First Appellate Authority and the appellant as that would open up the possibility of giving better satisfaction to the appellant much faster without the need for both parties to spend valuable time, energy and travel expenses in coming to Commission’s office. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the R.T.I. Act, 2005 in case the information asked for is related to more than one Public Information Officer, then all the concerned Information Officer should be invited for the hearing and thereafter issue a fresh reasoned order with a view to give better satisfaction to the appellant. In case, however the First Appellate Authority be of the strong view that a second hearing would serve no purpose then he should send his detailed justification for such a view and comments on the points raised by the appellant in his appeal application. ( copy attached ) within 15 days. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 09th January, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 9.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖӍú : êú†Ö¸ü- 1171/2008

ÁÖß.ײÖΕֳÖÖÖ ²Ö•Ö¸ÓüÖß µÖÖ¤ü¾Ö, †¿ÖÖêú ֐ָü, ¯ÖÖ‡Ô¯Ö »ÖÖ‡ÔÖ, ÃÖ±êú¤ü ¯Öã»Ö, ÃÖ֍úßÖ֍úÖ, ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô- 400 072. ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ

×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ... ÃÖÖ´ÖÖê¾ÖÖ»Öê ˆ¯Ö×Ö²ÖӬ֍ú ÃÖÆüúÖ¸üß ÃÖÓãÖÖ ‹»Ö ×¾Ö³ÖÖÖ ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô µÖÖÓ“Öê úÖµÖÖÔ»ÖµÖ, úÖêúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, 3 ¸üÖ ´Ö•Ö»ÖÖ, úÖ ÖÓ.311, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô- 400 614.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, ˆ¯Ö×Ö²ÖӬ֍ú ÃÖÆüúÖ¸üß ÃÖÓãÖÖ(2) ¯Öæ¾ÖÔ ˆ¯Ö֐ָêü, 2 ¸üÖ ´Ö•Ö»ÖÖ, úÖêúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô- 400 614. †ÓŸÖ׸ü´Ö †Ö¤êü¿Ö ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(1) †¾ÖµÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ¤üÖÖ»Ö êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖÖ¾Ö¸ü, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»µÖÖ“Öê Ã֍éúŸÖ¤ü¿ÖÔÖß †ÖœüôæûÖ µÖêŸÖ ÖÖÆüß. µÖÖß־Ö, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ¯Öύú¸üÖß ´Öß †ÃÖê ×Ö¤ìü¿Ö ¤êüŸÖÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰úÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö •Ö¸ü ´Ö֐֝Öß êú»Öê»Öß ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ‹úÖ ¯ÖêÖÖ †×¬Öú •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ-µÖÖÓ¿Öß ÃÖÓ²ÖÓ×¬ÖŸÖ †ÃÖê»Ö ŸÖ¸ü ŸµÖÖ ÃÖ¾ÖÖÕÖÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝ÖßÃÖ ²ÖÖê»Ö¾ÖÖ¾Öê †Ö×Ö ŸµÖÖÖÓŸÖ¸ü †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ¯Ö׸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß, †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´ÖÖŸÖᯙ ŸÖ¸üŸÖã¤üßÖãÃÖÖ¸ü ˆ¯Ö»Ö²¬Ö ú¹ýÖ ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥ü™üßÖê ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖß Ã֍úÖ¸üÖ †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ýÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö (¯ÖÏŸÖ ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ ÃÖӻ֐Ö). ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê êú»Ö껵ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ÃÖÆüß /- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖӍú : 5 •ÖÖÖê¾ÖÖ¸üßü, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößš ×֝ÖÔµÖ

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤ü.18.2.2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, (Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖÓӍú 30 ´ÖÖ“ÖÔ, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2624/2008

Shri Nilkhanth Gokul Patil, ….. Appellant At : C/209, New Jyoti Apartment, S.T. Depot Road, Nala Sopara (W), Taluka: Vasai,Dist : Thane: 401 203.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office of the Deputy Director (Education), Brihan Mumbai Division, Bal Bhawan, Netaji Subhash Rd., Charni Road, Mumbai : 400 004.

The Appellate Authority, Office of the Deputy Director (Education), Brihan Mumbai Division, Bal Bhawan, Netaji Subhash Rd., Charni Road, Mumbai : 400 004.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision By First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 22nd July, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 29.8.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1862/2008

Shri Deepak Vamanrao Sawant, ….. Appellant A/13, Rajbhavan Grihanirman Sanstha Ltd. N. S. Phadke Marg, Andheri (East), Mumbai-400 069.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gramsevak, Gram Panchayat Pilvali C/o. Savrda, Tal. Chiplun, Dist.-Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Extention Officer, (Grampanchayat) Panchayat Samiti, Chiplun, Tal. Chiplun, Dist.-Ratnagiri

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 14th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 18.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1641/2008

Shri Prakash Goma Revaskar, ….. Appellant. At & Post ; Near Chirner Maha Ganapati Mandir, Taluka : , District : Raigad.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Raigad – Alibag.

The Appellate Authority, Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Raigad – Alibag.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th September, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 26.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 875/2008

Shri Imtiyaz Ismail Shaik, ….. Appellant 4, Shanti Sadan, Near Raj Cinema, Tembhode Rd., Palghar, Tal : Palghar, Dist : Thane. . V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Chitnis, Collector’s Office, Thane, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Resident Deputy Collector, Office of the Collector, Thane, District : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has given information to the appellant on 9.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. 30th March, 2009.

¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖӍú : êú†Ö¸ü- 1754/2008

ÁÖß ÃÖÆü¤êü¾Ö ¸üÖ´Ö“ÖÓÓ¦ü —Öë›êü, ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ ¸üÖ. ³ÖÖ¸üŸÖ- ³Öß´Ö, 6264, ²Öã¬Ö¾ÖÖ¸ü ¯Öêšü, ”û¡Öê ŸÖÖ»Öß´Ö Ö»»Öß, ×´Ö¸ü•Ö : 416 410, וֻÆüÖ : ÃÖÖӐֻÖß. ×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ... ÃÖÖ´ÖÖê¾ÖÖ»Öê úÖêÂÖ֐ÖÖ¸ü †¾¾Ö»Ö úÖ¸üæúÖ, ŸÖÆü×ÃÖ»Ö úÖµÖÖÔ»ÖµÖ, ד֯ÖôæûÖ, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ : ד֯ÖôæûÖ, וֻÆüÖ : ¸üŸÖÖאָüß.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, ×Ö¾ÖÖÃÖß ÖÖµÖ²Ö ŸÖÆü×ÃÖ»Ö¤üÖ¸ü, ŸÖÆü×ÃÖ»Ö úÖµÖÖÔ»ÖµÖ, ד֯ÖôæûÖ, ŸÖÖ»ÖãúÖ : ד֯ÖôæûÖ, וֻÆüÖ : ¸üŸÖÖאָüß. †ÓŸÖ׸ü´Ö †Ö¤êü¿Ö

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö×»ÖµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖÖŸÖ ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»µÖÖ“Öê פüÃÖæÖ µÖêŸÖê. ŸÖ£ÖÖׯÖ, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ×֝ÖÔµÖÖÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ —ÖÖ»Öê - ÖÃÖ»µÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÓÖß ú»Ö´Ö 19 (3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö ¤üÖÖ»Ö êú»Öê †ÖÆêü (¯ÖÏŸÖ ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ ÃÖӻ֐Ö). †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ¾ÖßÖãÛã֟Öߤü¿Öԍú ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“Öß ´Ö֐֝Öß êú»Öê»Öß †ÖÆêü. ´Ö»ÖÖ †ÃÖê ¾ÖÖ™üŸÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê¿Öß ¯ÖãÆüÖ ‹ú¤üÖ “Ö“ÖÖÔ/×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ×¾Ö×Ö´ÖµÖ ú¹ýÖ •ÖÖßÖßŸÖ •ÖÖÃŸÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ ¯Ö쵅م êú»µÖÖÃÖ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÔ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ —ÖÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸ü †ÖµÖÖêÖ֍ú›êü µÖꝵÖ֍ú¸üߟÖÖÓ ÃÖ¾ÖÔ ¯ÖÖúÖ¸üÖÓ“ÖÖ ¾Öêôû, ¯ÖϾÖÖÃÖ Ö“ÖÔ ¾Ö ŸµÖÖ´Öãôêû ŸµÖÖÓÖÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸üß ŸÖÃÖ¤üß ™üÖôûŸÖÖ µÖêŸÖß»Ö. µÖÖß־Ö, ´Öß Æêü †×¯Ö»Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öêú›êü ׸ü´ÖÖÓ›ü ú¸üßŸÖ †ÖÆêü. ŸµÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖÖ ¯ÖãÆüÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰úÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö ¿ÖŒµÖŸÖÖê ¯Ö׸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥ü™üßÖê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¸üÖ¾Öß ¾Ö µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖß ÃÖ´ÖµÖÖµÖߍú †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ׸üŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ýÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ÃÖÓ¤ü³ÖÖÔŸÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá †Ö¤êü¿Ö ×֐ÖÔ×´ÖŸÖ êú»Öê †ÃÖ»Öê ŸÖ¸üß ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß ú¹ýÖ Ö¾µÖÖÖê †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, ´ÆüÖ•Öê ŸµÖÖÓ“ÖÖ µÖÖ¯Öã¾Öá“ÖÖ ×֝ÖÔµÖ †Ö¯ÖÖê†Ö¯Ö ÃÖã¬ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö. ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê êú»Ö껵ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ŸÖ£ÖÖׯÖ, •Ö¸ü ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ“Öß †¿Öß šüÖ´Ö ¬ÖÖ¸üÖÖ †ÃÖê»Ö úß, Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß ¤êü‰úÖ úÖÓÆüß ÃÖÖ¬µÖ ÆüÖêÖÖ¸ü ÖÖÆüß. ŸÖ¸ü ŸµÖÖÓÖß •ÖÖê›ü»Ö껵ÖÖ †×¯Ö»Ö †•ÖÖÔŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ´Öã§êü×ÖÆüÖµÖ ÃÖ×¾Ößָü †×³Ö¯ÖÏÖµÖ 15 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ÃÖÆüß /- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖӍú : 10 ×›üÃÖë²Ö¸ü, 2008. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü ×֝ÖÔµÖ

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤ü.11.2.2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, (Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖÓӍú 30 ´ÖÖ“ÖÔ, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2143/2008

Shri Mohmad Jamil Hakim, ….. Appellant Lucky Apartment, Room No. 206, Achola Road, Nala Sopara, Taluka : Vasai, Dist-Thane. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Chief Officer, Nalasopara Municipal Council, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Director, Municipal Administration Department, Government Transport Services Bldg., 3rd floor, Sir Pochkhanwala Marg., Worli, Mumbai : 400 030.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 15th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 27.11.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2671/2008

Shri Mohammad Husain Ibrahim Patel, ….. Appellant At. Post-Kudus, Tal. Wada, Dist-Thane

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gram Sevak, Gram Panchayat Kudus, Tal. Wada, Dist-Thane

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Wada, Tal. Wada, Dist-Thane

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 21st July, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 31.12.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1153/2008

Shri Sandeep Lahu Kadam, ….. Appellant. At & Post : Kandalgaon, Taluka : Malvan, Dist : Sindhudurg.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Head Master, Ozar Vidhyamandir, Kandalgaon, Taluka : Malvan, Dist : Sindhudurg.

The Appellate Authority, Education Officer, (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Sindhudurg, At : Oras, Taluka : Kudal, Dist : Sindhudurg.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 07th November, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 13.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1596/2008

Shri Vijay Govind Desai, ….. Appellant. Bazar Peth, Roha, Taluka : Roha, District : Raigad. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mangalvedha- Pandharpur, District : .

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mangalvedha- Pandharpur, District : Solapur.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 24th September, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has given information to the appellant on 21.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-434/2008

Shri Hemant Gopinath Chavan, ….. Appellant At & Post-Uran Bazarpeth, Taluka- Uran, District- Raigad.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Chairman, Mora Koliwada Machhimar Society Ltd., Mora Koliwada, Taluka-Uran, District-Raigad.

The Appellate Authority, Assistant Registrar, Office of the Assistant Director of Fisheries, Taluka-Alibag, District-Raigad.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 5th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 2.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-784/2008

Shri Ratnakar Laxman Awati, ….. Appellant Phadake Building, Ahilyabai Chowk, Kalyan, Dist-Thane.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office of the Deputy Director, Health Services, Mumbai Zone, Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Director, Health Services, Mumbai Zone, Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 4.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖӍú : êú†Ö¸ü-1987/2008

ÁÖß .†•ÖµÖ ÃÖ¤üÖÖÓ¤ü ²Ö֐ֻÖ, 80/2376, ¯ÖÓŸÖ ÖÖ¸ü, ‘ÖÖ™üúÖê¯Ö¸ü (¯Öæ), ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô- 400 075. ×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •ÖÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ... ÃÖÖ´ÖÖê¾ÖÖ»Öê ˆ¯Ö ×Ö²ÖӬ֍ú ÃÖÆüúÖ¸üß ÃÖÓãÖÖ (2), ¯Öæ¾ÖÔ ˆ¯Ö ֐ָêü, ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô µÖÖÓ“Öê úÖµÖÖÔ»ÖµÖ, ¤ãüÃÖ¸üÖ ´Ö•Ö»ÖÖ, úÖêúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, וֻÆüÖ ˆ¯Ö×Ö²ÖӬ֍ú ÃÖÆüúÖ¸üß ÃÖÓãÖÖ (2) ¯Öæ¾ÖÔ ˆ¯Ö ֐ָêü, ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô µÖÖÓ“Öê úÖµÖÖÔ»ÖµÖ, úÖêúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô. †ÓŸÖ׸ü´Ö †Ö¤êü¿Ö ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(1) †¾ÖµÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß ¤üÖÖ»Ö êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖÖ¾Ö¸ü, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»µÖÖ“Öê Ã֍éúŸÖ¤ü¿ÖÔÖß †ÖœüôæûÖ µÖêŸÖ ÖÖÆüß. µÖÖß־Ö, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ¯Öύú¸üÖß ´Öß †ÃÖê ×Ö¤ìü¿Ö ¤êüŸÖÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖÖ ÃÖãÖ־֝Öß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰úÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓÖß †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ¯Ö׸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß, †×¬Ö×ÖµÖ´ÖÖŸÖᯙ ŸÖ¸üŸÖã¤üßÖãÃÖÖ¸ü ˆ¯Ö»Ö²¬Ö ú¹ýÖ ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥ü™üßÖê ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖß Ã֍úÖ¸üÖ †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ýÖ †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖÖ ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö (¯ÖÏŸÖ ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ ÃÖӻ֐Ö). ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê êú»Ö껵ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ÃÖÆüß /- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, ( Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖӍú : 26 ×›üÃÖë²Ö¸ü, 2008. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü

×֝ÖÔµÖ

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓÖß ×¤ü.13.2.2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×֝ÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾ÖÖ, (Ö¾ÖßÖ ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖÓӍú 30 ´ÖÖ“ÖÔ, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-726/2008

Shri Prakash Namdeo Khatu, ….. Appellant House No.77, Prakash Opticians, Navadi, Sangameshwar, Tal. Sangmeshwar, Dist.-Ratnagiri-415 611.

V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gramsevak, Grampanchayat Navdi-Sangmeshwar, Devrukh, Dist.-Ratnagiri-415 804.

The Appellate Authority, Extention Officer, (Panchayat) Panchayat Samiti, Devrukh, Dist.-Ratnagiri-415 804.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 8th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has given information to the appellant on 1.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. 30th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1578/2008

Shri Fakih Sohel Mushtak, ….. Appellant. 15, Bunder Mohalla, Bhiwandi, Taluka : Bhiwandi, District : Thane.: 421 302.

V/s. Public Information Officer, …. Respondent. Deputy Engineer, (Works), Panchayat Samiti, Bhiwandi, Taluka : Bhiwandi, District : Thane.: 421 302.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Engineer, (Works), Panchayat Samiti, Bhiwandi, Taluka : Bhiwandi, District : Thane.: 421 302.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 24th September, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 4.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2265/2008

Shri Dilip Mukund Patil, … Appellant. Vasai Bhandari Ali, Koliwada Rd., Post & Taluka : Vasai, Dist : Thane : 401 201. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gram Sevak, Valiv, Gram Panchayat, Valiv, Tal : Vasai, Dist : Raigad.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Vasai, Taluka : Vasai, District ; Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision By First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 29th July, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 5.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-836/2008

Shri Dilip Mukund Patil, ….. Appellant Vasai Bhandari Ali, Koliwada Road, Post & Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane-401 201.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Rural Development Officer, Sandor Gram Panchayat, Post & Taluka : Vasai, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Vasai, Taluka : Vasai, District : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 14th July, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 5.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-660/2008

Shri Putlaji Dhondu Kadam, ….. Appellant At & Post : Waliv, Aadsingpada, Vasai (E), Tal : Vasai, Dist : Thane.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Block Devleopment Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Vasai, Tal : Vasai, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Block Devleopment Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Vasai, Tal : Vasai, Dist : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 5.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1772/2008

Shri Bhalchandra L. Mulye, ….. Appellant. Navedarvathar, At : Nivali, Bavnadi, Taluka & District : Ratnagiri : 415 612.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Sectional Officer, Zilla Parishad Works Sub Division, Ratnagiri, District : Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Ratnagiri, Dist : Ratnagiri.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 06th November, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 9.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2529/2008

Shri Veerpal Ramchandra Kashyap, ….. Appellant Dixit Niwas, Mor Bundglow, Virar (West), Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Assistant Engineer, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikar, Virar Division, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane

The Appellate Authority, Executive Engineer, Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikar, Virar Division, Tal. Vasai, Dist-Thane

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. The information requested is of a factual nature. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act 2005 and the First Appellate Authority gave a decision. The appellant says that he has not got the information. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving one more hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing another reasoned order to the supercession of the earlier order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 22nd July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 4.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-587/2008

Miss. Bharti Shyamlal Varlyani, ….. Appellant New Manohar Mahal Co.op. Hsg., Society, Flat No. 9/A, 3rd floor, Kopri Colony, . Thane (E), District : Thane. 400 603. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Assistant Commissioner of Police, Thane City, Office of the Police Commissioner, Thane,

The Appellate Authority, Office of the Police Commissioner, Thane, Dist : Thane.

Facts:- A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 4th July, 2008. Interim Decision First Appellate Authority has not yet given a decision. He agrees to give a decision within 15 days. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th February, 2009. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 20.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-745/2008

Shri Magan Kalu Aher, ….. Appellant 101/A, Ankur, Bhujbal Wadi, Rambaug Lane-2, Kalyan (West), Dist-Thane-421 301. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Upakaryawah, General Education Institute, Dadar, Mumbai-400 028.

The Appellate Authority, Karyawah, General Education Institute, Dadar, Mumbai-400 028

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 8th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 5.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2570/2008

Smt. Prita Prafulla Gharat, … Appellant. At : Salvad (Gharat Wadi), Taluka : Palghar, District : Thane : 401 504.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office of the Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.,Ltd., , At : Saravali, Taluka : Palghar, District : Thane : 401 501.

The Appellate Authority, Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co.,Ltd., Boisar, At : Saravali, Taluka : Palghar, District : Thane : 401 501.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. The information requested is of a factual nature. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act 2005 and The First Appellate Authority gave a decision. The appellant says that he has not got all the information. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving one more hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing another reasoned order to the supercession of the earlier order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 19th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 18.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1781/2008

Shri Suyog Kiran Shirgaonkar, ….. Appellant. A-8, Navswapna Srusti Apartment, Near Salasar Nagar, Patilpada, Kulgaon, Badlapur (E), Dist - Thane : 421 503.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Office of the Education Officer ( Primary), Zilla Parishad, Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Education Officer ( Primary), Zilla Parishad, Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 14th Novermber, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 26.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1791/2008

Shri Sanjay Bhabutmal Shaha, ….. Appellant. Near Gram Panchayat office, Wada, Taluka ; Wada, District : Thane.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Deputy Conservator of Forest, Sub Division, Jawhar, Taluka : Jawhar, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Chief Conservator of Forest, Thane, District ; Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision The information requested is of a factual nature. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act 2005 and The First Appellate Authority gave a decision. The appellant says that he has not got all the information. The implementation of First Appellate Authority’s order has probably not been done so far. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving one more hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing another reasoned order to the supercession of the earlier order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 14th November, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has given the necessary information to the appellant on 25.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1816/2008

Dr. Shaikh Ahmad, ….. Appellant. Javed Clinic, 11] Noorani Apartment, Near Mumbra Railway Station, Dist : Thane.:400 612.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Medical Education & Drugs, Cosmetics Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai : 400 032.

The Appellate Authority, Medical Education & Drugs Cosmetics Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai : 400 032.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 19th November, 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 13.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 326/2008

Shri Kishor Santumal Mapara , ….. Appellant BRK No.C-8, Room No.48, Behind Prabhat Talkies, Ulhasnahar, District-Thane-421 005 . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Encroachment/Town Planning Dept., Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation, Ulhasnagar, Dist-Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Additional Commissioner, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation, Ulhasnagar, Dist-Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 3rd July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 17.7.2008.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 319/2008

Shri Ganesh Babusingh Rathod, ….. Appellant At & Post : Varapgaon, Taluka : Kalyan, District : Thane. : 421 301.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Tahsil Office, Kalyan, Taluka : Kalyan, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Resident Naib Tahsildar, Kalyan, Tahsil Office, Kalyan, Taluka : Kalyan, District : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 3rd July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 27.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-262/2008

Shri Mohanraj Bhikusheth Gandhi, ….. Appellant 860, Shivajinagar, Tal.& Dist. Ratnagiri.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Administrative Officer, Regional Mental Hospital, Ratnagiri, Dist. Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Medical Supertintendent, Regional Mental Hospital, Ratnagiri, Dist. Ratnagiri.

Facts: Not having been successful in obtaining information from Public Information Officer or First Appellate Authority, the appellant by an appeal dated 15.3.2007 has asked information regarding documents related to Bill No. 4 & 5 and Bill payment voucher No. 000004 & 000005 dated 30.6.1994 of Contractor Shri Sardeshpande.

Interim Decision. The appeal application has been perused. There is an indication that the First Appellate Authority considered this case and gave a decision on 5.3.2007. Much time has passed since then and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days. The Public Information Officer should bring this decision to the notice of his First Appellate Authority to avoid delay.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 1st July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 2.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-820/2008

Shri Pandurang Sadashiv Bapat, ….. Appellant 421, Bapat Ali, Shivaji Chowk, Karad Rd., Chiplun, Taluka : Chiplun, Dist. : Ratnagiri : 415 605. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Extension Officer, (Education), Panchayat Samiti, Chiplun, Tal : Chiplun, Dist : Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Chiplun, Tal : Chiplun, Dist : Ratnagiri

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 14th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 24.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-2383/2008

Shri Avinash Anant Shelar, ….. Appellant At. Post-Sangave (Devrukh), Tal. Sangmeshwar, Dist.-Ratnagiri

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Grampanchayat, Sangve, (Devrukh), Tal. Sangmeshwar, Dist.-Ratnagiri

The Appellate Authority, Panchayat Samiti Sangmeshwar, Tal. Sangmeshwar, Dist.-Ratnagiri

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 23rd July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 12.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2420/2008 Shri Hemant Gopinath Chavan, ….. Appellant. At & Post : Uran Bazar Peth, Taluka : Uran, Dist : Raigad. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Assistant Commissioner of Police (Admn.), Office of the Commissioner of Police, Navi Mumbai, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Commissioner of Police (Admn.), Office of the Commissioner of Police, Navi Mumbai, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

Facts:- A copy of the above appeal is annexed. Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 24th November, 2008. Interim Decision Appellant is absent. Public Information Officer Shri M. S. Jadhav, Assistant Police Commissioner is present. First Appellate Authority agrees to give a reasoned decision within 8 days. Compliance report be submitted to the Commission by 20th March, 2009. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 5th March, 2009. Conclusion The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 9.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009. BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-814/2008

Shri Prakash Namdev Khatu, ….. Appellant House No. 77, Prakash Optitions, Navadi, (Sangmeshwar), Tal : Sangmeshwar, District : Ratnagiri. : 415 611. V/s. Public Information Officer. …. Respondent. Gram Sevak, Gram Panchayat, Navadi (Sangmeshwar), Taluka ; Sangmeshwar, Dist :Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Extension Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Sangmeshwar, (Devrukh) Taluka ; Sangmeshwar, Dist :Ratnagiri.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 14th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 12.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 2276/2008

Shri Vasant Baliram Mane, ….. Appellant. 409, Sai Villa, Chhatrapati Shivaji Marg, Modi Patel Cross Road, Opp. Rly. Station, Bhyandar (W), District : Thane :

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Ward Officer, Ward No. 3, Mira-Bhayandar Municipal Corporation, Bhayandar, Dist : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Dy. Municipal Commissioner, Mira-Bhayandar Municipal Corporation, Bhayandar, Dist : Thane.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision By First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 1st August , 2008.

Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 4.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-1994/2008

Shri Harischandra Joma Mhatre, ….. Appellant A-5, Lane No. 8, Sector-9, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Ward Officer, A-Ward Belapur, Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation, Sector-11, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

The Appellate Authority, Deputy Municipal Commissioner, Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation, 1st floor, Sector-11, C.B.D., Belapur, Navi Mumbai : 400 614.

Facts: A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant is present. Shri P.S.Waghmare, Ward Officer and Public Information Officer, First Appellate Authority Shri N.T. Jadhav, Deputy Municipal Commissioner ( Encroachments) are present.

The hearing is adjourned to next date after a month or so. In the meantime the First Appellate Authority has agreed to consider the representation of the appellant and others dated 15.02.2008 and 9.04.2008 in a meeting with concerned authorities. On the next date First Appellate Authority should inform the Commission about the action taken or to be taken on the issues involved. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 14th January, 2009. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 26.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1408/2008

Shri Shantaram Sitaram Mhaske, ….. Appellant. Jai Bajarangbali Society 83/3, Jai Malhar Nagar, Khandoba Tekdi, Golibar Rd., Ghatkopar (W), Mumbai: 400 086. V/s.

Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gram Development Officer, Gram Panchayat Shringrarpur, Taluka ; Sangmeshwar, Dist : Ratnagiri.

The Appellate Authority, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Devrukh] Taluka ; Sangmeshwar, Dist : Ratnagiri.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision It would be necessary to know the present status of this case. Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision By First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 07th August, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 31.1.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-856/2008

Shri Nipun Mathkar, ….. Appellant B-5, Jivdani Krupa Chawl, Ramchandra Jadhav Wadi, Vijay Nagar, Nala Sopara (E), Thane : 401 208. . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Under Secretary, Employment & Self Employment Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai : 400 032.

The Appellate Authority, Secretary, Employment & Self Employment Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai : 400 032.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 9th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 2.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-711/2008 Shri Mangesh Bhalchandra Patil, ….. Appellant Guru Prabhay, Near Naniwadekar Hospital, Mahim Road, Palghar, Dist-Thane V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Khajina Aval Karkun, Tahsildar Office, Palghar, Dist-Thane

The Appellate Authority, Niwasi Naib Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Palthar, Dist-Thane

Facts:- A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 7th July, 2008. Interim Decision

First Appellate Authority is present. He has not yet given a decision. He agrees to give a hearing before 18.2.2009. Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 12th February, 2009. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 13.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR-466/2008

Shri Ganesh Babusingh Rathod, ….. Appellant Rathod Chawl, At.& Post. Varapgaon, Tal Kalyan, Dist-Thane . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Khajina Awal Karkun, Tahsildar Office, Kalyan, Tal. Dist-Thane

The Appellate Authority, Niwasi Naib Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Kalyan, Tal. Dist-Thane

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 5th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 27.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 315/2008

Shri Bhimrao Parvata Patil, ….. Appellant 4/10, Shivshakti Chawl, Talaopada, New Shivaji Nagar, Kalwa (East) Dist-Thane . V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Gargoti Divisional Forest Office, Gargoti-416 201 Dist. .

The Appellate Authority, Forest Officer, Gargoti Disisional Office, Gargoti-416 201 Dist. Kolhapur.

Facts:

A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Much time has passed since the original application was made and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. This may be done even if the First Appellate Authority may have given an earlier decision which would automatically stand modified by the First Appellate Authority’s new decision. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 4th July, 2008. Conclusion

The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 13.3.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 30th March, 2009.

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 1627/2008 Shri Dilip Mukund Patil, ….. Appellant. Vasai Bhandari Ali, Koliwada Rd., Post & Taluka : Vasai, Dist : Thane. : 401 201. V/s. Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Treasury Awal Karkun, Tahsil Office, Vasai, Tal : Vasai, District : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Resident Naib Tahsildar, Tahsil Office, Vasai, Tal : Vasai, District : Thane.

Facts:-A copy of the above appeal is annexed.

Interim Decision Appellant filed the first appeal u/s 19 (1) of the Right To Information Act but primafacie there is no decision by First Appellate Authority. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction by issuing a reasoned order. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days by the First Appellate Authority to me.

Sd/- xxx (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 19th September, 2008. †ÓŸÖ׸ü´Ö ×­Ö˝ÖÔµÖ †×¯Ö»ÖÖ£Öá ˆ¯ÖÛã֟Ö. •Ö­Ö ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß ÁÖß ¯ÖύúÖ¿Ö ³ÖÖ. ¯ÖÖ™üß»Ö, Öו֭ÖÖ †¾¾Ö»Ö úÖ¸üæú­Ö, †Ö×Ö ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß ÁÖß. †×¾Ö­ÖÖ¿Ö úÖê™üß, ×­Ö¾ÖÖÃÖß ­ÖµÖ²Ö ŸÖÆü×ÃÖ»Ö¤üÖ¸ü, ¾ÖÃÖ‡Ô ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ †ÖÆêüŸÖ. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ­Öß ×¤ü­ÖÖӍú 6/1/2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×­ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü. ׭֝ÖÔµÖÖ­ÖÓŸÖ¸ü ¤êüÖᯙ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ˆ¯Ö»Ö²¬Ö —ÖÖ»Öß ­ÖÖÆüß †ÃÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸµÖÖÕ“Öê ´ÆüÖÖê †ÖÆêü. ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ­Öß ŸµÖÖÓ“Öê †Ö¤êü¿ÖÖÓ“µÖÖ †Ó´Ö»Ö²Ö•Ö־֝Öß²ÖÖ²ÖŸÖ“ÖÖ †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ 10 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ. ÃÖÆüß/- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾Ö­Ö, ( ­Ö¾Öß­Ö ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, ­Ö˾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פüÖÖӍú : 4 ´ÖÖ“ÖÔ, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü ׭֝ÖÔµÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ­Öß ×¤ü.6.1.2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×­ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾Ö­Ö, (­Ö¾Öß­Ö ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, ­Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פü­ÖÖÓӍú 30 ´ÖÖ“ÖÔ, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü

¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖÖêÖ, ´ÖÆüÖ¸üÖ™Òü, úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖê¸ü ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×­ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(3) †­¾ÖµÖê Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»Ö. †×¯Ö»Ö Îú´ÖÖӍú : êú†Ö¸ü- 1178/2008 ÁÖß.׾֝Öæ ÖӐÖÖ¸üÖ´Ö ³Ö›üÖӐÖê, †Öšü¾ÖÖê, úÖê»Öêú¸ü ¯ÖÖ›üÖ,ˆÓ²Ö¸üÖêšüÖ ¸üÖê›ü, ¾ÖÖ›üÖ,ŸÖÖ.¾ÖÖ›üÖ,וÖ-šü֝Öê- 421 303. ... †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ ×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü •Ö­Ö ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ¸üß, ... ÃÖÖ´Ö­Öê¾ÖÖ»Öê †¬Ö߁֍ú , ׿ց֝ÖÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß (´ÖÖ¬µÖ״֍ú), וֻÆüÖ ¯Ö׸üÂÖ¤ü šü֝Öê µÖÖÓ“Öê úÖµÖÖÔ»ÖµÖ, šü֝Öê.

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, ׿ց֝ÖÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß, וֻÆüÖ ¯Ö׸üÂÖ¤ü, šü֝Öê. †ÓŸÖ׸ü´Ö †Ö¤êü¿Ö ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß“ÖÖ †×¬ÖúÖ¸ü †×¬Ö×­ÖµÖ´Ö 2005 “Öê ú»Ö´Ö 19(1) †­¾ÖµÖê †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ­Öß ¤üÖÖ»Ö êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖÖ¾Ö¸ü, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ­Öß ×­ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»µÖÖ“Öê Ã֍éúŸÖ¤ü¿ÖÔ­Öß †Öœüôæû­Ö µÖêŸÖ ­ÖÖÆüß. µÖÖß־Ö, ÃÖ¤ü¸ü ¯Öύú¸üÖß ´Öß †ÃÖê ×­Ö¤ìü¿Ö ¤êüŸÖÖê úß, ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ­Öß †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ­ÖÖ ÃÖã­Ö־֝Öß“Öß ‹ú ÃÖÓ¬Öß ¤êü‰ú­Ö †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ­Öß Û¾¤üŸÖßµÖ †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ“ÖÖ ×¾Ö“ÖÖ¸ü ú¸üµÖÖÓŸÖ µÖÖ¾ÖÖ ¾Ö •Ö¸ü ´Ö֐֝Öß êú»Öê»Öß ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß ‹úÖ ¯ÖêÖÖ †×¬Öú •Ö­Ö ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †×¬ÖúÖ-µÖÖÓ¿Öß ÃÖÓ²ÖÓ×¬ÖŸÖ †ÃÖê»Ö ŸÖ¸ü ŸµÖÖ ÃÖ¾ÖÖÕ­ÖÖ ÃÖã­Ö־֝ÖßÃÖ ²ÖÖê»Ö¾ÖÖ¾Öê †Ö×Ö ŸµÖÖ­ÖÓŸÖ¸ü †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ­Öß †×¯Ö»ÖÖŸÖ ˆ¯ÖÛÃ£ÖŸÖ êú»Ö껵ÖÖ ´ÖãªÖÓ¾Ö¸ü ¯Ö׸ü¯ÖãÖÔ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß, †×¬Ö×­ÖµÖ´ÖÖŸÖᯙ ŸÖ¸üŸÖã¤üß­ÖãÃÖÖ¸ü ˆ¯Ö»Ö²¬Ö ú¹ý­Ö ¤êüµÖÖ“µÖÖ¥ü™üß­Öê ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ­Öß µÖÖ ¯Öύú¸üÖß Ã֍úÖ¸üÖ †Ö¤êü¿Ö ¯ÖÖ¸üßŸÖ ú¸üÖ¾ÖêŸÖ, •ÖêÖê ú¹ý­Ö †×¯Ö»ÖúŸÖÖÔ µÖÖÓ“Öê ÃÖ´ÖÖ¬ÖÖ­Ö ÆüÖê‡Ô»Ö (¯ÖÏŸÖ ÃÖÖê²ÖŸÖ ÃÖӻ֐­Ö). ˆ¯Ö¸üÖêŒŸÖ ¯ÖÏ´Ö֝Öê êú»Ö껵ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¾ÖÖÆüß“ÖÖ úÖµÖÔ¯ÖæŸÖá †Æü¾ÖÖ»Ö 45 פü¾ÖÃÖÖÓŸÖ ¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ­Öß †ÖµÖÖêÖÖÃÖ ÃÖÖ¤ü¸ü ú¸üÖ¾ÖÖ.

ÃÖÆüß/- úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾Ö­Ö, ( ­Ö¾Öß­Ö ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, ­Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô : 400 614. ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פü­ÖÖӍú : 5 •ÖÖ­Öê¾ÖÖ¸üßü, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößš ׭֝ÖÔµÖ

¯ÖÏ£Ö´Ö †×¯Ö»ÖßµÖ ¯ÖÏÖ׬֍úÖ¸üß µÖÖÓ­Öß ×¤ü.6.1.2009 ¸üÖê•Öß ×­ÖÖÔµÖ ×¤ü»ÖÖ †ÖÆêü.

úÖëúÖ ³Ö¾Ö­Ö, (­Ö¾Öß­Ö ãú´ÖÖ¸ü ) ²Öê»ÖÖ¯Öæ¸ü, ­Ö¾Öß ´ÖãÓ²Ö‡Ô ¸üÖ•µÖ ´ÖÖ×ÆüŸÖß †ÖµÖ㌟Ö, פü­ÖÖÓӍú 30 ´ÖÖ“ÖÔ, 2009. úÖëúÖ ÖÓ›ü¯Ößšü

BEFORE THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION MAHARASHTRA – KONKAN REGION Appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act 2005. Appeal No.KR- 168 /2008 Shri Bhagwan Davane, ….. Appellant Secretary, Gramin Shramik Sangh, Opp. Bhadkamkar Hospital, Neelkantha Apartment, Mahagiri Koli, Thane (W) 400 601. . V/s Public Information Officer, ….. Respondent Deputy Engineer,Zilla Parishad ( Water Supply), Sub Division, Shahapur, Dist. : Thane.

The Appellate Authority, Executive Engineer,Zilla Parishad ( Water Supply), Dist. : Thane : . Facts: The appellant by an application dated 6.6.2007 asked information regarding details of work under Rural Employment Scheme for the year 2005-06. Interim Decision. The appeal application has been perused. There is an indication that the First Appellate Authority considered this case and gave a decision on 03.10.2006. Much time has passed since then and therefore, it would be necessary to know the present status of this case. I, therefore, remand this case to the First Appellate Authority for inviting and giving a hearing to the appellant for examining the points raised by him in his appeal with a view to provide maximum information if due under the act and give appellant better satisfaction. A compliance report should be sent within 45 days. The Public Information Officer should bring this decision to the notice of his First Appellate Authority to avoid delay. Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 21st June, 2008 Interim Decision The First Appellate Authority and Public Information Officer are for some reason consistently avoiding to appear before me. Appellant is present. Though more than one year has passed information has not been given. Shri S.L. Patil, Junior Engineer is present. He undertakes to give all information except Muster and Coupon copies to the appellant on 16.2.2009 in his office and send a compliance to this Commission. First Appellate Authority should explain why he has not given a hearing to the appellant so far as per my interim decision. A copy of this decision should be sent to the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Thane. Sd/--- (Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:- 11th February, 2009.. Conclusion The First Appellate Authority has issued a decision on 16.2.2009.

(Navin Kumar) State Information Commissioner Konkan Bhavan, Konkan Region Belapur, Navi Mumbai. Date:-31st March, 2009.