DOCSLIB.ORG

Donor to Political Party Individuals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Donor to Political Party Individuals Request for Amendment Donor to Political Party and Political Campaigners Disclosure Return – Individuals FINANCIAL YEAR 2018-19 Completing the Return: • This request for amendment should be used to amend a 2018-19 Donor to Political Party and Political Campaigners Disclosure Return - Individuals lodged with the AEC. • This request for amendment is to be completed with reference to the Financial Disclosure Guide for Donors to Political Parties and Political Campaigners. • This request for amendment will be available for public inspection from 3 February 2020 at www.aec.gov.au. • Any supporting documentation included with this request for amendment may be treated as part of a public disclosure and displayed on the AEC website. • The information on this request for amendment is collected under s319A(2) the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. NOTE: this form is for the use of individuals only. Please use the form Request for Amendment - Donor to Political Party and Political Campaigners Disclosure Return – Organisations if you are completing a return for an organisation. 2018-19 Return details Is this the first amendment Yes No How many other Request for to the return? Amendments have been lodged? Details of person who made the donation Name Postal address Suburb/town State Postcode Telephone number ( ) Fax number ( ) Email address Request and Certification I request the Electoral Commission amend the Donor to Political Party and Political Campaigners Return – Individuals as detailed in this request for amendment. I certify that the information contained in this request for amendment and its attachments is true and complete to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. I understand that submitting a false or misleading return is an offence under Division 137.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995. Signature Date Enquiries and returns Disclosure and Compliance Phone: 02 6271 4552 should be addressed to: Australian Electoral Commission Fax: 02 6293 7655 Locked Bag 4007 Email: [email protected] Canberra ACT 2601 Office use only Date received DAR_1 (07/16) – Page 1 of 6 Part 1: Donations made to a political party No change to previous information OR Provide details of changes or amendments to the information previously provided. How to complete this table: • If you are amending an existing entry, complete the ‘Original Entry’ item as it appeared on the original return and then write the amendment in full at the ‘Amended Entry’ item. • If adding a completely new entry, write N/A in the ‘Original Entry’ item and complete the ‘Amended Entry’ item in full’. • Amounts should be reported on a GST inclusive basis. Value of donation* Party details Date of donation (GST inclusive) Original Name/Party code $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Amended Name/Party code $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Original Name/Party code .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Amended Name/Party code .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Original Name/Party code $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Amended Name/Party code $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Original Name/Party code $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Amended Name/Party code $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode If insufficient space, please attach additional sheets. * In this form donation is a gift within the meaning in section 287(1) of the Electoral Act. DAR_1 (05/19) – Page 2 of 6 Part 2: Donations made to a political campaigner No change to previous information OR Provide details of changes or amendments to the information previously provided. How to complete this table: • If you are amending an existing entry, complete the ‘Original Entry’ item as it appeared on the original return and then write the amendment in full at the ‘Amended Entry’ item. • If adding a completely new entry, write N/A in the ‘Original Entry’ item and complete the ‘Amended Entry’ item in full’. • Amounts should be reported on a GST inclusive basis. Value of donation* Campaigner details Date of donation (GST inclusive) Original Name $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Amended Name $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Original Name .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Amended Name .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Original Name $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Amended Name $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Original Name $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Amended Name $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode If insufficient space, please attach additional sheets. * In this form donation is a gift within the meaning in section 287(1) of the Electoral Act. DAR_1 (05/19) – Page 3 of 6 Part 3: Donations received No change to previous information OR Provide details of changes or amendments to the information previously provided. How to complete this table: • If you are amending an existing entry, complete the ‘Original Entry’ item as it appeared on the original return and then write the amendment in full at the ‘Amended Entry’ item. • If adding a completely new entry, write N/A in the ‘Original Entry’ item and complete the ‘Amended Entry’ item in full. • Amounts should be reported on a GST inclusive basis. Value of donation* Received from Date of donation (GST inclusive) Original Name $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Amended Name $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Original Name .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Amended Name .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Original Name $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Amended Name $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Original Name $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Amended Name $ .00 Entry Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode If insufficient space, please attach additional sheets. * * In this form donation is a gift within the meaning in section 287(1) of the Electoral Act. DAR_1 (05/19) – Page 4 of 6 Registered Political Party and Branch Codes NAT-SA National Party of Australia (S.A.) Inc. CODE Party / Branch NAT-VIC National Party of Australia – Victoria NAT-NSW National Party of Australia – N.S.W. ACP-FED Australian Conservatives NAT-WA National Party of Australia (WA) Inc ACP-ACT Australian Conservatives (ACT) NAT-FED National Party of Australia ACP-NSW Australian Conservatives (NSW) LDP-FED Liberal Democratic Party ACP-NT Australian Conservatives (NT) LDP-ACT Liberal Democratic Party (ACT Branch) ACP-QLD Australian Conservatives (Qld) LDP-NSW Liberal Democratic Party (NSW Branch) ACP-SA Australian Conservatives (SA) LDP-QLD Liberal Democratic Party (QLD Branch) ACP-TAS Australian Conservatives (Tas) LDP-SA Liberal Democratic Party (SA Branch) ACP-VIC Australian Conservatives (Vic) LDP-VIC Liberal Democratic Party (Victoria Branch) ACP-WA Australian Conservatives (WA) Liberal Democratic Party (WA Branch) LDP-WA ALP-ACT Australian Labor Party (ACT Branch) SPP #Sustainable Australia ALP-NSW Australian Labor Party (N.S.W. Branch) AJP Animal Justice Party Australian Labor Party (Northern Territory ALP-NT Branch) AFP-NSW Australia First Party (NSW) Incorporated ALP-QLD Australian Labor Party (State of Queensland) AAPH Australian Affordable Housing Party Australian Labor Party (South Australian ALP-SA ABF Australian Better Families Branch) ACH Australian Christians ALP-TAS Australian Labor Party (Tasmanian Branch) CAL Australian Country Party ALP-VIC Australian Labor Party (Victorian Branch) AUD Australian Democrats Australian Labor Party (Western Australian ALP-WA Branch) APEP Australian People’s Party ALP-FED Australian Labor Party (ALP) PROG Australian Progressives CLR-NSW Country Labor Party AWP Australian Workers Party XEN Centre Alliance DLP-NSW Democratic Labour Party (DLP) NSW Branch CPP Child Protection Party Democratic Labour Party (DLP) – Queensland DLP-QLD Christian Democratic Party (Fred Nile Group) Branch CDP Democratic Labour Party (DLP) – Victorian CEC Citizens Electoral Council of Australia DLP-VIC Branch Climate Action! Immigration Action! SOL DLP-WA Democratic Labour Party (DLP) – WA Branch Accountable Politicians! DLP Democratic Labour Party (DLP) of Australia CLP-NT Country Liberals (Northern Territory) DHJP Derryn Hinch’s Justice Party Australian Greens, Australian Capital Territory GRN-ACT FRASER ANNING'S CONSERVATIVE Branch FACN NATIONAL PARTY GRN-NSW The Greens NSW GRN-NT Australian Greens, Northern Territory Branch NMP Health Australia Party GRN-QLD Queensland Greens HEM Help End Marijuana Prohibition (HEMP) Party GRN-SA Australian Greens (South Australia) ICAN Independents For Climate Action Now Involuntary Medication Objectors GRN-TAS Australian Greens, Tasmanian Branch IMO (Vaccination/Fluoride) Party GRN-VIC The Australian Greens - Victoria JLN Jacqui Lambie Network GRN-WA The Greens (WA) Inc KAP Katter’s Australian Party GRN Australian Greens LAOL Love Australia or Leave NCP Non-Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting) LIB-ACT Liberal Party of Australia – ACT Division ONA Pauline Hanson’s One Nation LIB-NSW Liberal Party of Australia, NSW Division PIR Pirate Party Australia LNP-QLD Liberal National Party of Queensland REAS Reason Australia LIB-SA Liberal Party of Australia (S.A. Division) RPA Republican Party of Australia LIB-TAS Liberal Party of Australia – Tasmanian Division RUA Rise Up Australia Party LIB-VIC Liberal Party of Australia (Victorian Division) FUT Science Party LIB-WA Liberal Party (W.A. Division) Inc. SPA Secular Party of Australia LIB-FED Liberal Party of Australia SUN Seniors United Party of Australia SFP Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party SAL Socialist Alliance SEP Socialist Equality Party ARTS The Arts Party DAR_1 (05/19) – Page 5 of 6 AMHP The Australian Mental Health Party GAP The Great Australian Party TSBP The Small Business Party TTP The Together Party TWP The Women's Party TSSA Tim Storer Independent SA UAPP United Australia Party VNS Victorian Socialists VEP Voluntary Euthanasia Party FLUX VOTEFLUX.ORG | Upgrade Democracy! WAP WESTERN AUSTRALIA PARTY ALA Yellow Vest Australia DAR_1 (05/19) – Page 6 of 6 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Donor to Political Party Return Form
    Donor to Political Party Disclosure Return – Individuals FINANCIAL YEAR 2014–15 The due date for lodging this return is 17 November 2015 Completing the Return: • This return is to be completed by a person who made a gift to a registered political party (or a State branch), or to another person or organisation with the intention of benefiting a registered political party. • This return is to be completed with reference to the Financial Disclosure Guide for Donors to Political Parties. • Further information is available at www.aec.gov.au. • This return will be available for public inspection from Monday 1 February 2016 at www.aec.gov.au. • Any supporting documentation included with this return may be treated as part of a public disclosure and displayed on the AEC website. • The information on this return is collected under the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. NOTE: This form is for the use of individuals only. Please use the form Political Party Disclosure Return- Organisations if you are completing a return for an organisation. Details of person that made the donation Name Postal address Suburb/Town State Postcode Telephone number ( ) Fax number ( ) Email address Certification I certify that the information contained in this return and its attachments is true and complete to the best of my knowledge information and belief. I understand that giving false or misleading information is a serious offence. Signature Date Enquiries and returns Funding and Disclosure Phone: 02 6271 4552 should be addressed to: Australian Electoral Commission Fax: 02 6293 7655 PO Box 6172 Email: [email protected] Kingston ACT 2604 Office use only Date received DAR_1_indiv.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Volume 1 the Senators, the Senate and Australia, 1901–1929 by Harry Evans, Clerk of the Senate 1988–2009
    Introduction to volume 1 The Senators, the Senate and Australia, 1901–1929 By Harry Evans, Clerk of the Senate 1988–2009 Biography may or may not be the key to history, but the biographies of those who served in institutions of government can throw great light on the workings of those institutions. These biographies of Australia’s senators are offered not only because they deal with interesting people, but because they inform an assessment of the Senate as an institution. They also provide insights into the history and identity of Australia. This first volume contains the biographies of senators who completed their service in the Senate in the period 1901 to 1929. This cut-off point involves some inconveniences, one being that it excludes senators who served in that period but who completed their service later. One such senator, George Pearce of Western Australia, was prominent and influential in the period covered but continued to be prominent and influential afterwards, and he is conspicuous by his absence from this volume. A cut-off has to be set, however, and the one chosen has considerable countervailing advantages. The period selected includes the formative years of the Senate, with the addition of a period of its operation as a going concern. The historian would readily see it as a rational first era to select. The historian would also see the era selected as falling naturally into three sub-eras, approximately corresponding to the first three decades of the twentieth century. The first of those decades would probably be called by our historian, in search of a neatly summarising title, The Founders’ Senate, 1901–1910.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives By-Elections 1901–2014
    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2017–18 5 MARCH 2018 House of Representatives by-elections: 1901–2017 Stephen Barber Statistics and Mapping Section Executive summary This paper provides details of House of Representatives by-elections, from that held for Darling Downs on 14 September 1901 to the most recent held on 16 December 2017 for Bennelong. The following observations can be made about those by-elections: • there have been 151 by-elections, an average of 3.4 per parliament • the average number of nominations has grown over the years from 2.2 per by-election to 12.0 per by- election • in only four cases was a by-election contested by just a single candidate • an increasing tendency has been for governments to avoid contesting by-elections in their opponents’ safe seats • in only ten cases have the opposition party failed to contest a by-election • seventy-six of the by-elections followed the resignation of the member, 68 members died in office, there have been six voided elections, and one MP was expelled from the House • since 1949 resignations account for almost two-thirds of by-elections and over half the resignations have occurred in safe seats • on 35 occasions the party complexion of a seat has altered at a by-election • five of the losses have been by the opposition of the day • the average two-party preferred swing against the government of the day has been 3.8 per cent • since 1949 the largest two-party swing against a government occurred against Labor in Canberra in 1995. The largest swing to a government occurred to the Coalition in McPherson in 1981.
    [Show full text]
  • The Traditionalists Are Restless, So Why Don't They Have a Party of Their Own in Australia?
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities January 2016 The traditionalists are restless, so why don't they have a party of their own in Australia? Gregory C. Melleuish University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers Recommended Citation Melleuish, Gregory C., "The traditionalists are restless, so why don't they have a party of their own in Australia?" (2016). Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers. 2490. https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/2490 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] The traditionalists are restless, so why don't they have a party of their own in Australia? Abstract In 1985, B.A. Santamaria speculated about the possibility of a new political party in Australia that would be composed of the Nationals, the traditionalist section of the Liberal Party and the "moderate and anti- extremist section of the blue-collar working class". Keywords their, own, australia, have, they, t, don, party, why, traditionalists, so, restless Publication Details Melleuish, G. (2016). The traditionalists are restless, so why don't they have a party of their own in Australia?. The Conversation, 3 August 1-3. This journal article is available at Research Online: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/2490 The traditionalists are restless, so why don't they have a party of their ... https://theconversation.com/the-traditionalists-are-restless-so-why-dont..
    [Show full text]
  • Caution on the East China Sea October 16 2014
    Caution on the East China Sea October 16 2014 Bob Carr As Australia’s Foreign Minister I had quoted several times an acute observation by Lee Kuan Yew. It was on the question of the future character of China. He said: “Peace and security in the Asia-Pacific will turn on whether China emerges as a xenophobic, chauvinistic force, bitter and hostile to the West because it tried to slow down or abort its development, or whether it is educated and involved in the ways of the world – more cosmopolitan, more internationalised and outward looking." I ceased to be Foreign Minister after the Gillard Government was defeated on September 7, 2013. I was representing Australia at the G20 in St Petersburg. As the polling booths at home closed I found myself in Piskaryovskoye Memorial Cemetery, laying flowers on a memorial to the dead of the Second World War. I found myself reflecting on those mass graves – half a million people buried here – and how trivial it was to be voted out of government in a peacetime election compared to the mighty drama that was played out in St Petersburg between 1941 and 1944. Like any politician I thought about what I would do out of government. In the spirit of that observation by Lee Kuan Yew, I committed to work on the Australia-China relationship, becoming Director of a newly established think tank, the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology, Sydney. I thought that this would be a good vantage point from which to observe this vast question being played out.
    [Show full text]
  • Donor to Political Party Amendment Form
    Request for Amendment Donor to Political Party Disclosure Return – Individuals 2017–18 FINANCIAL YEAR Completing the return: • This request for amendment should be used to amend a 2017–18 Donor to Political Party Disclosure Return - Individuals lodged with the AEC. • This request for amendment is to be completed with reference to the Financial Disclosure Guide for Donors to Political Parties. • Further information is available at http://www.aec.gov.au/Parties_and_Representatives/financial_disclosure/index.htm. • This request for amendment will be available for public inspection from Friday 1 February 2019 on the AEC website. • Any supporting documentation included with this request for amendment may be treated as part of a public disclosure and displayed on the AEC website. • The information on this request for amendment is collected under s 319A(2) the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. NOTE: this form is for the use of individuals only. Please use the form Request for Amendment – Donor to Political Party Disclosure Return – Organisations if you are completing a return for an organisation. 2017–18 return details Is this the first amendment Yes No How many other Request for to the return? Amendments have been lodged? Details of person who made the donation Name Postal address Suburb/town State Postcode Telephone number ( ) Fax number ( ) Email address Request and certification I request the Electoral Commission amend the Donor to Political Party Return – Individuals as detailed in this request for amendment. I certify that the information contained in this request for amendment and its attachments is true and complete to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
    [Show full text]
  • Soap Operas, Cenotaphs and Sacred Cows: Countrymindedness and Rural Policy Debate in Australia
    46629 Public Policy Text 6/11/06 1:44 PM Page 23 PUBLIC POLICY VOLUME 1 NUMBER 1 2006 23 – 36 Soap Operas, Cenotaphs and Sacred Cows: countrymindedness and rural policy debate in Australia Linda Courtenay Botterill Australian National University In spite of the fact that Australia is one of the most urbanised countries in the world, our national identity is closely tied to the bush. This paper discusses the pervasiveness of the agrarian myth in Australian culture and the impact this has on rural policy debate. It discusses how countrymindedness manifests itself in twenty- first century Australian culture and what this particular aspect of the national self- image means for discussion about rural policy. The paper argues that there is a reticence to criticise farmers which can insulate farm programs from the levels of scrutiny which apply to other areas of government policy. In June 2005, the National Farmers’ Federation (NFF) announced a Campaign for Australian Agriculture which it believes “through awareness-raising activities and education…can reconnect metropolitan Australians with rural Australia” (NFF 2005). The main impetus for this campaign was the perceived impact of campaigns by groups such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) and green groups which present an image of farmers as destroyers of the environment and, as portrayed by PETA, as guilty of animal cruelty. Prior to the announcement of the NFF campaign, the then-Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Warren Truss, spent a significant portion of a speech to the Rural Press Club in Victoria arguing that groups like PETA were damaging the farmer’s image and were misleading urban people about agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media in Australian Federal Elections: Comparing the 2013 And
    Social Media in Australian Federal Elections: Comparing the 2013 and 2016 Campaigns Prof. Axel Bruns, PhD (UQ) Dr. Brenda Moon, PhD (ANU) Digital Media Research Centre Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, Australia [email protected] – [email protected] The Persistent Instability of Australian Politics Australian federal politics has experienced an unprecedented level of turmoil over the past ten years. Following long periods of stable majorities for the progressive Australian Labor Party (ALP) during 1983-1996 and the conservative Coalition of the Liberal and National Parties during 1996-2007, a landslide win for Labor at the 2007 election did not result in another period of stable government under new Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, but saw him replaced by his deputy Julia Gillard within three years of taking office; Gillard narrowly won the subsequent 2010 federal election and formed a minority government. However, her increasing unpopularity motivated a new Labor leadership challenge that returned Rudd to the Prime Ministership; in this role, Rudd fought the 2013 federal election, losing decisively against populist Liberal leader Tony Abbott. A highly effective, aggressive campaigner against the Rudd/Gillard/Rudd governments, Abbott continued his divisive leadership style in government, quickly undermining his popularity and enabling the resurgence of the Labor opposition. In turn, now the Liberal Party orchestrated a leadership challenge, replacing the socially conservative Abbott with the more moderate Malcolm Turnbull in late 2015. Amid continuing recriminations between Abbott and Turnbull loyalists, Turnbull fought the 2016 election and held on to government with only a one-seat majority in Australia’s 150-seat lower house of parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Todd Farrell Thesis
    The Australian Greens: Realignment Revisited in Australia Todd Farrell Submitted in fulfilment for the requirements of the Doctorate of Philosophy Swinburne University of Technology Faculty of Health, Arts and Design School of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities 2020 ii I declare that this thesis does not incorporate without acknowledgement any material previously submitted for a degree in any university or another educational institution and to the best of my knowledge and belief it does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. iii ABSTRACT Scholars have traditionally characterised Australian politics as a stable two-party system that features high levels of partisan identity, robust democratic features and strong electoral institutions (Aitkin 1982; McAllister 2011). However, this characterisation masks substantial recent changes within the Australian party system. Growing dissatisfaction with major parties and shifting political values have altered the partisan contest, especially in the proportionally- represented Senate. This thesis re-examines partisan realignment as an explanation for party system change in Australia. It draws on realignment theory to argue that the emergence and sustained success of the Greens represents a fundamental shift in the Australian party system. Drawing from Australian and international studies on realignment and party system reform, the thesis combines an historical institutionalist analysis of the Australian party system with multiple empirical measurements of Greens partisan and voter support. The historical institutionalist approach demonstrates how the combination of subnational voting mechanisms, distinctly postmaterialist social issues, federal electoral strategy and a weakened Labor party have driven a realignment on the centre-left of Australian politics substantial enough to transform the Senate party system.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition of Australian Parliaments by Party and Gender: a Quick Guide
    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2016–17 16 MAY 2017 Composition of Australian parliaments by party and gender: a quick guide Anna Hough Politics and Public Administration This quick guide contains the most recent tables showing the composition of Australian parliaments by party and gender (see Table 1 and Table 2 below). It takes into account changes to the Commonwealth parliament and the parliaments of Western Australia, New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania since the last update was published on 20 February 2017. Commonwealth • In the Senate, Peter Georgiou (PHON, WA) replaces Rod Culleton (Ind., WA), whose election was declared void by the High Court sitting as the Court of Disputed returns. Senator Georgiou was sworn in on 27 March 2017. • Senator Lucy Gichuhi (Ind., SA) replaces Bob Day (Family First Party, SA) following Day’s resignation in November 2016. In late April 2017 the Family First Party merged with the Australian Conservatives (with the combined party to be called the Australian Conservatives). Senator Gichuhi, who was sworn in on 9 May 2017, has opted not to join the merged party. Western Australia • The figures for Western Australia reflect the results of the state general election held on 11 March 2017. New members of the Legislative Council elected on that date are included in the figures, and will take their seats on 22 May 2017. New South Wales • In New South Wales, following three by-elections on 8 April 2017: – Liesl Tesch (ALP) became the Member for Gosford, replacing Kathy Smith (ALP) – James Griffin (LP) became the Member for Manly, replacing Mike Baird (LP) and – Felicity Wilson (LP) became the Member for North Shore, replacing Jillian Skinner (LP).
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media in Australian Federal Elections.Pdf
    This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Bruns, Axel& Moon, Brenda (2018) Social media in Australian federal elections: Comparing the 2013 and 2016 campaigns. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), pp. 425-448. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/117393/ c Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018766505 Social Media in Australian Federal Elections: Comparing the 2013 and 2016 Campaigns Prof. Axel Bruns, PhD (UQ) Dr. Brenda Moon, PhD (ANU) Digital Media Research Centre Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, Australia [email protected] – [email protected] The Persistent Instability of Australian Politics Australian federal politics has experienced an unprecedented level of turmoil over the past ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition of Australian Parliaments by Party and Gender: a Quick Guide
    i~ PARLIAMENT Of AUSTRALIA OEPARfME Nl OF PARUAMENTARY SERVICES PARLIAMENTARY '- ,,u-. ,,. '" ,11u · .,. LIBRARY .. ·•· QUICK GUIDE RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2018-19 UPDATED 15 JANUARY 2019 Composition of Australian parliaments by party and gender: a quick guide Anna Hough Politics and Public Administration This quick guide contains the most recent tables showing the composition of Australian parliaments by party and gender (see Table 1 and Table 2 below). It takes into account changes to the Commonwealth, New South Wales, Victorian and South Australian parliaments since the last update was published on 10 October 2018. Commonwealth In the Senate: • Fraser Anning (Queensland) is sitting as an independent following his expulsion from Katter's Australian Party on 25 October 2018. In the House of Representatives: • Following the resignation of former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull on 31 August 2018, a by-election in the seat of Wentworth (NSW) on 20 October 2018 was won by Kerryn Phelps {IND). • Julia Banks (Chisholm, Vic.) announced on 27 November 2018 that she had resigned from the Liberal Party and would sit as an independent. New South Wales In the Legislative Council: • Jeremy Buckingham announced on 20 December 2018 that he had resigned from the Greens and would sit as an independent. In the Legislative Assembly: • Jai Rowell (LIB, Wollondilly), resigned as the member for Wollondilly on 17 December 2018. The seat will remain vacant until the New South Wales state election on 24 March 2019. ISSN 2203-5249 Victoria The figures for Victoria reflect the results of the state election held on 24 November 2018. In the Legislative Council, Catherine Cumming, who was elected as a member of Derryn Hinch's Justice Party, was disendorsed on 18 December 2018.
    [Show full text]