DOCSLIB.ORG

Read Full Article (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Read Full Article (PDF) 10 | IFR BUYOUTS EUROPE | April 12 2007 FEATURE As Blackstone and other big buyout firms consider listing their management companies, Robert Venes looks at 3i, one of Europe’s longest-listed private equity PLCs. LISTED FIRMS LISTED Making the list espite fevered speculation in the on how Blackstone’s decision will affect its activities and its pay structure is uncer- press as to which financial investor it and some of its big buyout firm peers’ tain, with some analysts suggesting Dwill follow Blackstone Group’s notorious affection for privacy, in partic- Schwarzman and his partners will ensure recently announced decision to go public, ular the profits it nets from its roughly the flotation is carried out in their best these are not uncharted waters for private US$55bn of investments. interests. equity firms. “There is nothing new or “They’re going to structure themselves unique about listing a private equity man- “They’re going to where the new nuances won’t be harm- agement company or fund,” says Mounir ful to their development and won’t add Guen, head of placement agent MVision. structure themselves extra layers of complexity or visibility,” Indeed, the firm’s decision not only where the new nuances says Guen. follows some amusingly timed comments 3i, which was listed in 1994, has already from Stephen Schwarzman, Blackstone won’t be harmful to their been through this in full view of the pub- co-founder and the firm’s public face, development and won’t lic gaze. regarding the public markets (“overrated” Just a few years ago, the firm was suffer- and not a viable source for capital), but add extra layers of ing from the aftermath of the dotcom also the listing in February of Fortress bubble, top-heavy with technology ven- Investment Group. complexity or visibility.” ture investments but increasingly light on That flotation itself followed Kohlberg executive talent. Known by many as the Kravis Roberts’ US$4.8bn IPO of its KPE Pri- university of venture capital, 3i had seen vate Equity Fund Investors last March, a Mounir Guen many of its staff leave for better remuner- move that Schwarzman said at SuperRe- ation elsewhere, with the most high-pro- turn in February “destroyed the market Private equity firms charge between file departures being Richard Campin, for anyone else”, suggesting his rival had 1.5% and 2% of a fund’s total in manage- Chris Graham, Hugh Richards and Tom soaked up all available liquidity. ment fees – Blackstone is understood, Sweet-Escott, who set up their own firm, KKR’s decision meant the public could like many of the bigger funds, to charge Exponent Private Equity, in early 2004. participate in private equity’s boom, approximately 1.5% – and then takes a 20% In July of that year, Philip Yea took over investing directly into a buyout fund and cut of profits in performance fees once its from Brian Larcombe as chief executive, its underlying investments. As Schwarz- exit strategy has hit its hurdle rate of the first to be recruited outside of the firm, man suggested, no private equity firm around 8%. having previously headed up Bahrain- has followed by listing a buyout fund on These terms and conditions have based Investcorp. One of Yea’s first changes the public markets since. become established over the years – with was to 3i’s pay structure, providing com- However, at around the same time, one US general partner recently quip- pensation for executives’ investments. alternative asset manager Partners Group, ping that they came over with Columbus “Historically, 3i had been criticised for not which has SFr17.3bn (€10.6bn) of under- – and have played a significant factor in being to market in terms of compensation lying private equity assets, was floated on retaining executive talent from one fund to executives relative to peers at more tra- the Swiss stock exchange, joining the to the next. ditional LP/GP models,” says Douwe Cosijn, likes of American Capital (and its London As the industry has come under further head of investor relations at 3i. “Since and Paris-based subsidiary, European Cap- scrutiny, though, some have questioned Philip Yea came on board in 2004, our com- ital), Sweden’s CapMan, Paris-listed the relevance and fairness of a manage- pensation structures are to market, work- Eurazeo and mezzanine provider ICG and ment fee – Blackstone’s latest extended ing largely on a 2 and 20 basis. Everyone gets 3i in the UK as private equity PLCs. fund totals about US$20bn, resulting in a carry and stands to do well.” Like those, Blackstone is listing its man- management fee of some US$150m. Clear- According to Cosijn, compensation is agement company, a decision that some ly, this is enough to put food on the table disclosed for 3i’s board members, but the reports suggest required Schwarzman to for its partners. firm doesn’t provide details on the salaries persuade key partners as to the benefits. How transparent a listing of Black- of individual investment executives. As for Media attention has been quick to focus stone’s management company will make shareholders, third-party investors in its April 12 2007 | IFR BUYOUTS EUROPE | 11 FEATURE buyout funds (limited partners) share in capital deals there almost from day one, a period where we are not meeting those the profits alongside general partners, whereas with a traditional fundraising it objectives, we expect to have a grown up while the strength of the underlying can take 12 to 18 months, giving us com- conversation with our investors.” assets provides a better share price for petitive advantage.” Being the grown up is clearly where 3i investors in the public entity, who also More recently, 3i has also moved more sees itself in the current climate and Cosi- received dividends, such as the £800m in line with its traditionally funded peers jn is confident that private equity’s LISTED FIRMS LISTED announced in the group’s pre-close by extending the amount of third-party increasing maturity and ability to out- announcement last month. commitments to its buyout vehicle, as perform public markets will ensure that well as following the industry’s trend of others follow Blackstone onto the world’s “Permanent capital is ever-larger fund sizes. stock exchanges. what you get when you In November of last year, 3i held a final close on its fifth buyout vehicle, Euro- “Almost 700 funds become a listed vehicle. fund V, having raised €5bn, Europe’s closed last year and we So if you look at what 3i largest mid-market buyout fund. 3i is understood to have provided about 55% of dealt with 12 full can do with a balance the capital from its own balance sheet, with the remainder coming from some 62 closings. You’re not sheet of over US$10bn, institutional investors. going to see 700 firms we were able to get a “3i started raising third-party funds only in the buyout space,” adds Cosijn, “as go to the public market, team up and running in it enables us to take majority positions but you might have one India that was without having to consolidate assets on the balance sheet. That’s important as or two, most likely at established over a what it does is give flexibility, while also the large end.” relatively brisk period of enabling them and us to benefit from the strong deal flow that we generate.” time with the advantage Last month, 3i extended its faith in the Mounir Guen of 3i underwriting the public markets by floating an infrastruc- ture investment business, raising £700m, business and its albeit at the lower end of its targeted £700m to £1bn range. The firm subscribed integration.” to 325m shares, representing 46% of the “There will be more, it’s not a fad as company’s ordinary shares. public markets are clearly looking to “The fund is well aligned to shareholder access that out-performance, not just in Douwe Cosijn interests as infrastructure is by nature long private equity but also hedge funds and term and stable with 20 to 30-year con- other alternative assets,” he says. Being listed, says Cosijn, also lends the tracts,” says Cosijn. “The scrutiny of the industry will firm credence in longevity over rivals A listed firm and fund’s ability to tap the become an important theme as it moves that operate funds with 10-year life-spans capital market as an evergreen source of from a boutique niche to a mainstream and a reputation that could prove invalu- funding could also prove invaluable dur- asset class. Having a peer group of listed able at a time when the industry is very ing less buoyant parts of the cycle, he adds. private equity companies should make the much under the microscope. “Investment and divestment rates are valuation debate of private equity firms “Given our history of being listed on the best left to the investment teams rather much richer and should put the broader stock exchange and fully regulated, we are than the mechanics of the portfolio,” says industry on valuations that are in line well prepared to deal with the spotlight of Cosijn. “Within the context of a 10-year with the return objectives that this indus- the public markets,” says Cosijn. “Our man- fund with a three-year investment and try has demonstrated over the medium to agement team invests a lot of time in ensur- seven-year divestment period there is long term,” says Cosijn. ing our relationship with the public clearly pressure on general partners to Guen, on the other hand, isn’t so sure, markets are open and transparent and that return assets, which is not a dynamic saying: “Almost 700 funds closed last year there is a real expectation and understand- that comes into play when you have a per- and we dealt with 12 full closings.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 8 November 2007
    3i Group plc 6 November 2008 Half-year results for the six months to 30 September 2008 Resilient performance in the face of challenging markets For the six months to 30 September 2008 2007 Business activity Investment £668m £1,234m Realisation proceeds £597m £1,044m Returns Realised profits on disposal of investments £190m £337m Gross portfolio return on opening portfolio value (1.3)% 14.3% Net portfolio return £(128)m £453m Total return £(182)m £512m Total return on opening shareholders’ funds (4.5)% 12.0% Interim dividend per ordinary share 6.3p 6.1p Portfolio and assets under management Own balance sheet £5,934m £5,130m External funds £4,019m £3.053m £9,953m £8,183m Net asset value per share (diluted) £10.19 £10.07 Commentary • Highly selective approach to new investment • Broadly balanced investment and realisations during the period • 32% growth in external funds since September 2007 3i’s Chief Executive, Philip Yea, commented: "The credit and stock markets have deteriorated since late September and the outlook for the global economy continues to weaken. Despite a resilient first six months of the year, we would expect a more challenging second half as the squeeze in credit markets persists, the economic slowdown affects portfolio earnings and M&A markets remain subdued. In such an environment our focus is on managing the portfolio, maintaining liquidity, remaining highly selective with investment and controlling costs. 3i's sector expertise, active partnership approach and close engagement with the strategy of the portfolio companies
    [Show full text]
  • Review Risk Management Institue
    NOV 2016 · VOL 3 PRIVATE EQUITY GOSS INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH MANAGEMENT LIMITED NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE REVIEW RISK MANAGEMENT INSTITUE HAITAO JIN Qianhai Fund of Fund, LLP Exploring the Business Model of China’s Private Equity/Venture Capital (PE/VC) Fund of Funds (FOF) Investments KATAHIRA MASAKI Eastasia Investment (International) Limited New Findings on Japan’s Capital Market: A Study on Japan Post Group’s Successful Transformation through Capital Market WEI CUI, MIN DAI, AND STEVEN KOU Risk Management Institute’s New Research Initiative A Pricing and Risk Management System for Chinese Bonds PRIVATE EQUITY REVIEW PRIVATE EQUITY REVIEW CONTENTS EDITORIAL BOARD Darrell Duffie, Stanford University MESSAGE FROM THE EDITORS Quanjian Gao (Editor-in-Chief), GOSS Institute of Research COVER ARTICLE Management Ltd. 01 Exploring the Business Model of Jeff Hong (Co-Editor), China’s Private Equity/Venture Capital (PE/VC) City University of Hong Kong Fund of Funds (FOF) Investments Li Jin, Haitao Jin Oxford University Steven Kou (Co-Editor), ACADEMIC INSIGHTS National University of Singapore 10 New Findings on Japan’s Capital Market: Neng Wang, A Study on Japan Post Group’s Successful Columbia University Transformation Through Capital Market Houmin Yan, Katahira Masaki City University of Hong Kong Lin Zhou, CASE STUDY Shanghai Jiao Tong University 22 Will Private Equity (PE) Firms Continue to Invest in China’s Auto Consumption and Sales Industry? Yankun Hou ADVISORY BOARD 32 Quantitative Methods for Venture Capital Investment Weijian Shan,
    [Show full text]
  • Icapital Invites Accredited Investors to Gain Broad Exposure to Private Equity Managed by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (“
    iCAPITAL KKR PRIVATE MARKETS FUND PERFORMANCE UPDATE I NOVEMBER 2020 iCapital invites accredited investors to gain broad exposure to private equity managed by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (“KKR”) via the iCapital KKR Private Markets Fund, a continuously offered registered closed-end fund.1 Investment Objective and Unique Fund Features There is no guarantee that any investment will achieve its objectives, generate profits or avoid losses. Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss in a positive or declining market. • The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation • Diversification across investment types, strategies, • Broad exposure to KKR private equity geographies and vintages • Sub-adviser, StepStone Group, provides • Lower minimum investment than traditional recommendations and sourcing advantages private equity on opportunities and portfolio construction • 1099 tax reporting and no capital calls Monthly Returns (%) iCapital KKR Private Markets Fund (08/01/15–11/30/2020) MSCI S&P 500 ACWI CLASS A Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec YTD TR YTD YTD 2020 -0.50% -2.31% -6.81% 2.14% 0.54% 2.18% 1.08% 1.15% 7.02% -0.35% 4.11% 3.64% 2.77% -1.09% 2019 2.34% 0.81% 1.54% 0.14% -1.37% 2.60% 0.29% -0.29% 0.00% 0.29% 0.58% 1.91% 9.13% 31.49% 26.60% 2018 -0.36% -0.73% 0.44% 0.44% 0.51% 2.81% 0.07% 0.21% 2.28% -2.65% -0.07% -1.06% 1.80% -4.38% -9.42% 2017 0.00% 0.75% 0.45% 0.82% 0.52% 2.68% -0.14% -0.22% 1.38% 0.00% -0.65% 2.76% 8.62% 21.83% 23.97% 2016 -2.08% -0.82% 4.54% -1.03% 0.56% 2.85% 0.23% 0.69% 2.83% 0.15%
    [Show full text]
  • Private Markets Fees Primer WHITEPAPER OCTOBER 2019
    Private Markets Fees Primer WHITEPAPER OCTOBER 2019 This primer describes the most common fee and profit sharing arrangements CONTRIBUTORS associated with private market investments. It attempts to answer common Blaze Cass Andrew Gilboard questions when considering an investment across the range of private market John Haggerty, CFA asset classes, including private equity, private debt, infrastructure, real estate, and natural resources. Most private market vehicles have the following fee and profit sharing components: I. Management fees II. Carried interest: → Preferred return → Catch-up provision → Carried interest rate The above terms will be explored throughout this primer, including definitions, common structures, and their expected impact on net returns to the Limited Partner (“Investor”). Finally, this primer will examine industry trends by investment strategy, as well as how the structuring of fees and profit sharing arrangements impacts the alignment between Investors and the General Partner (“Manager”). While there are a variety of fee and profit sharing structures found across the private markets universe, for the purposes of this primer we focus on one of the most common, the so-called “2/8/20” model that prevails for closed-end vehicles (“Funds”) executing a private equity buyout strategy. Note that, in the Appendix, common variations from this structure—seen with other strategies—are outlined. What is a management fee? A management fee is a fee paid in regular intervals (typically quarterly, semi-annually, or annually) to the Manager in order to compensate them for managing the Fund. The management fee is generally used by the Manager to cover the overhead costs associated with executing the Fund’s strategy, such as, but not limited to, salaries and benefits, office rent, and day-to-day administrative costs incurred by the Manager.
    [Show full text]
  • PWC and Elwood
    2020 Crypto Hedge Fund Report Contents Introduction to Crypto Hedge Fund Report 3 Key Takeaways 4 Survey Data 5 Investment Data 6 Strategy Insights 6 Market Analysis 7 Assets Under Management (AuM) 8 Fund performance 9 Fees 10 Cryptocurrencies 11 Derivatives and Leverage 12 Non-Investment Data 13 Team Expertise 13 Custody and Counterparty Risk 15 Governance 16 Valuation and Fund Administration 16 Liquidity and Lock-ups 17 Legal and Regulatory 18 Tax 19 Survey Respondents 20 About PwC & Elwood 21 Introduction to Crypto Hedge Fund report In this report we provide an overview of the global crypto hedge fund landscape and offer insights into both quantitative elements (such as liquidity terms, trading of cryptocurrencies and performance) and qualitative aspects, such as best practice with respect to custody and governance. By sharing these insights with the broader crypto industry, our goal is to encourage the adoption of sound practices by market participants as the ecosystem matures. The data contained in this report comes from research that was conducted in Q1 2020 across the largest global crypto hedge funds by assets under management (AuM). This report specifically focuses on crypto hedge funds and excludes data from crypto index/tracking/passive funds and crypto venture capital funds. 3 | 2020 Crypto Hedge Fund Report Key Takeaways: Size of the Market and AuM: Performance and Fees: • We estimate that the total AuM of crypto hedge funds • The median crypto hedge fund returned +30% in 2019 (vs - globally increased to over US$2 billion in 2019 from US$1 46% in 2018). billion the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • 18032 Investcorp MD&A P7-76 Tp
    INVESTCORP MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During its fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 (FY09), Investcorp has witnessed what has been, arguably,the worst period of sustained stress to world economies and financial markets in living memory.The environment has had a severe impact on Investcorp across both its client and its investment businesses, and it has been the most challenging year for Investcorp since its formation in 1982. The management team has focused on dealing with these challenges head on. It has maintained an active and open dialog with clients throughout the year and has protected the balance sheet by raising capital, reducing investment risk and mitigating re-financing risk by holding high levels of cash liquidity while de-leveraging the balance sheet at the same time. The successful completion of a preference share issue in excess of $500 million, more than double the stated minimum target, in such a difficult environment is clear evidence of confidence in Investcorp’s business model and management team. Although the length and depth of the global recession is still uncertain, management believes that the firm action taken during the fiscal year will enable Investcorp to move forward and focus on the attractive business opportunities that now present themselves. BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT The sub-prime housing crisis that started in the United States in 2007 developed in late calendar year 2008 into a major systemic financial crisis, sending economic activity in the developed world into a synchronized downward spiral.This has led the IMF to make continual downward revisions to its estimate for global growth in calendar years 2009 and 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation April 2018
    Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation April 2018 Confidential – Not for Publication or Distribution Disclaimer Statements included herein may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which may relate to future events or the future performance or financial condition of Ares Commercial Real Estate Management LLC (“ACREM”), a subsidiary of Ares Management, L.P. (“Ares LP”), Ares LP, certain of their subsidiaries and certain funds and accounts managed by ACREM, Ares LP and/or their subsidiaries, including, without limitation, Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (“ACRE”). These statements are not guarantees of future results or financial condition and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including the returns on current and future investments, rates of repayments and prepayments on ACRE’s mortgage loans, availability of investment opportunities, ACRE’s ability to originate additional investments and completion of pending investments, the availability of capital, the availability of cost financing, market trends and conditions in ACRE’s industry and the general economy, the level of lending and borrowing spreads, commercial real estate loan volumes, government-sponsored enterprise activity and other risks described from time to time in ACRE’s and ARES LP’s filings within the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Any forward- looking statement, including any contained herein, speaks only as of the time of this release and none of ACRE, ARES LP nor ACREM undertakes any duty to update any forward-looking statements made herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018 - 2019
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 - 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 - 2019 LEADING OUR PORTFOLIO COMPANIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF OUR ECONOMY. CONTENTS 1. Message from Chairman and CEO 5 2. Business model and investment strategy 9 3. Value creation starting from 4 central themes 23 4. Results and activity report 35 5. Key figures 41 6. Share and shareholders 45 7. Corporate Governance Statement 49 8. Annual Accounts 77 9. Contact 141 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO EUR 1.1 BILLION OUR 55 PORTFOLIO COMPANIES JOINTLY REALISE A TURNOVER OF MORE THAN EUR 2.75 BILLION AND EMPLOY 14 000 PROFESSIONALS FOCUS ON VALUE CREATION FROM 4 PLATFORMS CONNECTED HEALTH SMART SUSTAINABLE CONSUMER & CARE INDUSTRIES CITIES 4 OFFICES WITH MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMS: ANTWERP, PARIS, THE HAGUE, MUNICH 39 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE IN PRIVATE EQUITY OVER THE LAST 5 YEARS INVESTED IN 932 EUR MILLION 46 COMPANIES PROCEEDS FROM 1 520 EUR MILLION 48 EXITS MESSAGE FROM CHAIRMAN AND CEO1 6 ANNUAL REPORT 2018-2019 The world around us is changing at an incredible pace. Last year we were still talk- ing about an improving economy that had moved up several gears; today, barely a year later, we see this economic upswing under threat from various geopolitical and macroeconomic factors. Trade relations are more difficult, the power posi- IMPACT: MEETING CRUCIAL tions and therefore also the relationships between CHALLENGES TOGETHER the major world economic powers are shifting, as evidenced by the never-ending story of Brexit. Gimv goes looking for the market leaders of Last year, climate and the environment concerns tomorrow, together with which it can make a vi- topped the political and economic agenda, calling tal difference, year after year.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Companies 13 October 2011
    www.numiscorp.com Marketing Communication Investment Companies 13 October 2011 Research Listed Private Equity Charles Cade +44 (0)20 7260 1327 What are the True Costs? [email protected] George Crowe Transparency has improved significantly within the listed Private Equity sector in +44 (0)20 7260 1280 recent years, and valuation methodologies have become more standardised with [email protected] the adoption of fair value accounting. This has made it much easier for investors Ewan Lovett-Turner to differentiate between listed Private Equity funds (LPEs) on the basis of their +44 (0)20 7260 1299 portfolio characteristics and balance sheet risk. However, it is still far from [email protected] straight-forward to compare the costs of LPEs in terms of fees and finance Colette Ord charges. In contrast, private equity Limited Partnerships (LPs) have relatively +44 (0)20 7260 1290 standardised fee arrangements and simple balance sheets with no debt. [email protected] In part, these complications reflect the evergreen nature of most LPEs, whereby they Sales offer exposure to a range of investment vintages. As a result, management fees are James Glass typically charged on the value of assets rather than initial commitments. Listed funds +44 (0)20 7260 1369 also face additional operating costs such as directors‟ fees and administration, and often [email protected] adopt more diverse investment strategies, including directs, co-investment and funds. Chris G00k Some have feeder fund structures, with fees charged indirectly by the manager, while +44 (0)20 7260 1378 others are self-managed and pay staff costs rather than a defined management fee.
    [Show full text]
  • Structured Finance
    Financial Institutions U.S.A. Investcorp Bank B.S.C. Full Rating Report Ratings Key Rating Drivers Investcorp Bank B.S.C. Strong Gulf Franchise: The ratings of Investcorp B.S.C. (Investcorp, or the company) reflect Long-Term IDR BB Short-Term IDR B the company’s strong client franchise in the Gulf, established track record in private equity (PE) Viability Rating bb and commercial real estate investment, strong capital levels and solid funding profile. Rating constraints include sizable balance sheet co-investments and potential earnings volatility and Investcorp S.A. Investcorp Capital Ltd. placement risks presented by the business model, which could pressure interest coverage. Long-Term IDR BB Short-Term IDR B Gulf Institutional Owners Positive: The Positive Rating Outlook reflects franchise and Senior Unsecured Debt BB earnings benefits that may accrue to Investcorp from the 20% strategic equity stake sale to Support Rating Floor NF Mubadala Development Co. (Mubadala) in March 2017, a sovereign wealth fund of Abu Dhabi. This follows a 9.99% equity stake sale to another Gulf-based institution in 2015. Fitch Ratings Rating Outlook Positive views these transactions favorably, as the relationships may give Investcorp expanded access to potential new investors as well as a more stable equity base. 3i Business Diversifies AUM: The cash-funded acquisition of 3i Debt Management (3iDM) in March 2017 added $10.8 billion in AUM and is expected to be accretive for Investcorp, adding Financial Data stable management fee income. However, the acquired co-investment assets and ongoing risk Investcorp Bank B.S.C. retention requirements do increase Investcorp’s balance sheet risk exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • 3/29/2016 Special Meeting
    Oregon Investment Council March 29, 2016 Special Meeting 10:00 AM Oregon State Treasury 16290 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tigard, OR 97224 Katy Durant Chair John Skjervem Chief Investment Officer Ted Wheeler State Treasurer OREGON INVESTMENT COUNCIL Agenda March 29, 2016 Special Meeting 10:00 AM Oregon State Treasury Investment Division Crater Lake Conference Room 16290 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road Tigard, OR 97224 Time Action Items Presenter Tab 10:00 AM 1. Cinven Sixth Fund, L.P. – OPERF Private Equity Michael Langdon 1 Senior Investment Officer Public Comment Invited Katy Durant Rukaiyah Adams Rex Kim John Russell Ted Wheeler Steve Rodeman Chair Vice Chair Member Member State Treasurer PERS Director Cinven Fund VI, L.P. Purpose Subject to satisfactory negotiation of terms and conditions with Staff working in concert with legal counsel, Staff recommends approval of a $250 million commitment to Cinven Fund VI, L.P. (the “Fund” or “Fund VI”) for the OPERF Private Equity Portfolio. This proposed commitment represents the planned continuation of an existing general partner relationship. Background The Fund is being formed and sponsored by Cinven Limited (“Cinven” or the “Firm”), and will continue the successful sector-focused, large European buyout strategy employed in the Firm’s first five funds. Cinven was founded in 1995 when the investment management division of British Coal went independent via a management buyout. With the various British Coal pension funds as anchor investors, Cinven launched its first institutional fund in 1996, raising €1.6 billion. Over time, Cinven has raised successively larger funds, and grown from the original eleven investment professionals operating from a single office in London to 65 investment professionals operating from offices in London, Paris, Frankfurt, Milan, Madrid, and with support offices in New York and Hong Kong.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Lunch, New York – 3 March 2006
    Investor lunch, New York – 3 March 2006 1 3i team Philip Yea Simon Ball Jonathan Russell Michael Queen Jo Taylor Chris Rowlands Group Chief Executive Group Finance Director Managing Partner Managing Partner Managing Partner Head of Group Markets Buyouts Growth Capital Venture Capital Patrick Dunne Anil Ahuja Gustav Bard Graeme Sword Guy Zarzavatdjian Group Communications Managing Director, India Managing Director, Director, Oil and Gas Managing Director, Director Nordic Region France 2 Investor lunch, New York – 3 March 2006 Contents • Introduction to 3i • The private equity market • Interim results to 30 September 2005 • Investor relations • Closing remarks 3 Investor lunch, New York – 3 March 2006 Introduction to 3i 3i at a glance • A world leader in private equity and venture capital • Established 1945; IPO on London Stock Exchange 1994 (IPO at 272p) • Market capitalisation £5.0bn (as at 31 January 2006) • 3i has invested over £15bn in over 14,000 businesses • Portfolio value £4.4bn, in 1,285 businesses (as at 30 September 2005) • Network of teams located in 14 countries in Europe, Asia and the US • 3i also manages and advises third party funds totalling £1.8bn (as at 30 September 2005) • Member of the MSCI Europe, FTSE100, Eurotop 300 and DJ Stoxx indices 4 Investor lunch, New York – 3 March 2006 Introduction to 3i Our Board • Chairman Baroness Hogg • Six independent non-executive directors − Oliver Stocken (Deputy Chairman; Senior Independent Director) − Dr Peter Mihatsch − Christine Morin-Postel − Danny Rosenkranz − Sir Robert Smith
    [Show full text]