Sheet 1 of 2 U.S
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
USGS Scientific Investigations Map 3394 Sheet 1
U.S. Department of the Interior Scientific Investigations Map 3394 U.S. Geological Survey Sheet 1 of 2 Pamphlet accompanies map 106°22'30" Pahlone Peak (PP) 38°30' 10800 106°15' 14 13 10800 Mount Ouray (MO) Old Monarch 106°07'30" Poncha Pass (PO) 18 Pass 17 106° 16 15 9200 Monarch Pass 10800 14 13 18 38°30' 10400 108° 106° 104° 10400 17 16 Poncha Hot 15 14 13 8800 8000 11600 10400 11600 10000 18 17 Springs 8400 40° 9600 9200 16 15 Hunter 14 13 18 17 Figure 16. Panoramic view 0 10 20 30 40 50 MILES 23 24 Porphyry Gulch Dry Lake 8800 10800 Round Mountain Gulch Wicker PikesPark Peak 10800 across crest of Whale Hill (dacitic Bonanza Tuff) 11600 Hayden Peak Creek Spring Creek 19 20 11200 Whale Hill Elkhorn resurgent dome, eastward 0 25 50 75 KILOMETERS 21 Peak (late lava flows) San Luis Valley Denver Porphyry 11200 22 Dacitic Creek 23 24 (RioRedman Grande rift) toward San Luis Valley (Rio 9600 SangreCreek de Cristo Mountains 19 Rhyolitic Porphyry Peak Bonanza Tuff 20 Creek F 10800 21 22 Grande rift), from west rim of r Bonanza Tuff 23 24 19 o 11200 20 Cleveland n Bonanza caldera. Intracaldera 21 22 23 t 11200 8000 24 19 8400 12400 Mountain 8800 20 10000 Bonanza Tuff is as much as 2.5 8400 Agate Creek Pahlone 9600 8400 Park Caldera-floor lavas c r Peak km thick, dips 45–55° on flank ni ocks Mount 12000 Creek Southeast a R 25 Peck lc a 26 12000 of resurgent dome. -
Tom Sharp's Post
19 Tom Sharp's Post Tom Sharp's Post, a log and adobe Indian trading station, built in 1870, is a familiar sight to those traveling Highway 305, in Huerfano County, between the remnants of Malachite and the top of Pass Creek Pass. The post, flbout a mile from the site of the once-thriving town called Malachite, stands near the Huerfano River crossing of the Gardner-Red Wing. road. Sharp's place was known as Buzzard Roost Ranch be cause hundreds of buzzards roosted in the cottonwood trees along the stream there. A well-traveled Ute Indian trail over the Sangre de Cristo range ran through the ranch, thence to Badito, and on to the Greenhorn Mountains. Ute Chief Ouray and his wife, Chipeta, often visited Sharp while their tribes men camped nearby. W. T. (Tom) Sharp, a native of Missouri, served with the Confederate forces at the beginning of the Civil War. His general was Sterling Price. In 1861, Sharp was paroled from the service because of wounds, and was placed in a wagon bound for the Far West. Surviving the trip across country, he joined a half-breed Indian hunter named "Old Tex,'' and for a time the two sup plied meat to mining camps in California and Oregon . Later Sharp headed eastward. With a partner, John Miller, he contracted to supply telegraph poles for the Union Pacific Railroad, then building into Wyoming. In 1867, he was a de puty sheriff in Cheyenne, Wyoming. In the autumn of 1868, Tom Sharp, John White, and John Williams, with an old prairie wagon, came into the Huerfano Valley looking for a location. -
36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) § 294.49
§ 294.49 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) subpart shall prohibit a responsible of- Line Includes ficial from further restricting activi- Colorado roadless area name upper tier No. acres ties allowed within Colorado Roadless Areas. This subpart does not compel 22 North St. Vrain ............................................ X the amendment or revision of any land 23 Rawah Adjacent Areas ............................... X 24 Square Top Mountain ................................. X management plan. 25 Troublesome ............................................... X (d) The prohibitions and restrictions 26 Vasquez Adjacent Area .............................. X established in this subpart are not sub- 27 White Pine Mountain. ject to reconsideration, revision, or re- 28 Williams Fork.............................................. X scission in subsequent project decisions Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forest or land management plan amendments 29 Agate Creek. or revisions undertaken pursuant to 36 30 American Flag Mountain. CFR part 219. 31 Baldy. (e) Nothing in this subpart waives 32 Battlements. any applicable requirements regarding 33 Beaver ........................................................ X 34 Beckwiths. site specific environmental analysis, 35 Calamity Basin. public involvement, consultation with 36 Cannibal Plateau. Tribes and other agencies, or compli- 37 Canyon Creek-Antero. 38 Canyon Creek. ance with applicable laws. 39 Carson ........................................................ X (f) If any provision in this subpart -
Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21 -
Range Fuels at 'End of Road'
1A 1A HEALTH CARE BOULDER COUNTY & WELLNESS New techniques reduce pain of back problems BUSINESS 11A Serving Boulder and Broomfield Counties REPORT$1 Volume 31 Issue 3 | Feb. 3-9, 2012 Range Fuels at ‘end of road’ BY PAULA MOORE York-based Bloomberg New Energy [email protected] Failed biofuel production plant Finance. “The problem with them was absolutely technological. Their BROOMFIELD — Range Fuels situation tells you that money doesn’t Inc., a Broomfield-based biofuels takes toll on firm in Broomfield guarantee something’s going to work.” company, appears to be out of busi- by an automated system. Its website, “Range Fuels has met the end of But Christine Shapard, executive ness with the recent foreclosure sale www.rangefuels.com, is inactive. the road,” said Kalib Kersh, an analyst director of the Colorado Cleantech of its troubled cellulosic ethanol plant Recent messages left for Range Fuels at Lux Research Inc. in Boston who Industry Association, believes the near Soperton, Georgia. CEO David Aldous in Colorado and followed the Colorado company. state’s biofuels industry overall still The company’s headquarters office company founder/investor Vinod Kho- “With Range Fuels, the issue wasn’t has plenty of potential. She singled near the Interlocken business park is sla of Khosla Ventures LLC in Menlo funding,” said Alejandro Zamorano out companies such as ZeaChem Inc. vacant, and its phone number is answered Park, California, were not returned. Cadavid, a biofuels analyst at New ➤ See End, 15A FDIC has BOULDER AND BEYOND Mile High Boulder Economic Council’s 2012 forecast event paints brighter picture Banks on short leash Bank’s capital condition ‘continues to deteriorate’ BY BETH POTTER [email protected] LONGMONT — Mile High Banks is “significantly undercapitalized,” according to a document released Jan. -
Energy Efficiency, but at What Cost?
HIGH-TECH PRINTING MARKETPLACE AND GRAPHICS App makes connecting Cool new developments to conference calls easy in large-format printing $1 6A 10A Volume 31 Issue 13 | Date June 8-21, 2012 Energy efficiency, but at what cost? BY MICHAEL DAVIDSON place to start as the city moves toward [email protected] Proposed changes to Boulder’s achieving its climate goals, said Eliza- beth Vasatka, the city’s business sus- BOULDER — As the city of Boul- tainability coordinator. der considers changes to its climate climate action plan spark concern Prior studies have shown energy action plan, businesses and commer- properties. Passing laws that would require use accounts for up to 76 percent of cial property owners are concerned Boulder is reviewing its climate buildings to be more efficient is one of Boulder’s greenhouse gas emissions, about the possibility the city will pass plan and energy strategy, and in May the options the council is considering. and nearly 83 percent of those emis- ordinances requiring them to make the Boulder City Council had a study Making commercial buildings sions come from the industrial and energy-efficiency upgrades to their session on the topic. more energy efficient is an obvious ➤ See Efficiency, 23A ORBITAL TECHNOLOGY Drug race Business is cooking at Custom Microwave Inc. in Longmont lures local companies to fast lane Pharma firms quietly studying biosimilars BY BETH POTTER [email protected] BOULDER — Merck & Co. Inc. and Amgen Inc. — two global phar- maceutical companies with opera- tions in the Boulder Valley – appear to be on the front lines of the new and often-stealthy world of researching biosimilar drugs. -
Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections. -
Sangre De Cristo Salida and San Carlos Wet Mountains San Carlos Spanish Peaks San Carlos
Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District -
Preliminary Evaluation of Potential Acecs---Royal
Preliminary Evaluation of Potential ACECs—Royal Gorge Field Office Relevance and Importance Criteria Prepared by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Royal Gorge Field Office Cañon City, CO February 2017 This page intentionally left blank Preliminary Evaluation of Potential iii ACECs—Royal Gorge Field Office Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... xi _1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 _1.1. Eastern Colorado Resource Management Plan ............................................................... 1 _1.2. Authorities ....................................................................................................................... 1 _1.3. Area of Consideration ..................................................................................................... 1 _1.4. The ACEC Designation Process ..................................................................................... 1 _2. Requirements for ACEC Designation .................................................................................... 3 _2.1. Identifying ACECs .......................................................................................................... 5 _2.2. Special Management -
THE GUNNISON RIVER BASIN a HANDBOOK for INHABITANTS from the Gunnison Basin Roundtable 2013-14
THE GUNNISON RIVER BASIN A HANDBOOK FOR INHABITANTS from the Gunnison Basin Roundtable 2013-14 hen someone says ‘water problems,’ do you tend to say, ‘Oh, that’s too complicated; I’ll leave that to the experts’? Members of the Gunnison Basin WRoundtable - citizens like you - say you can no longer afford that excuse. Colorado is launching into a multi-generational water planning process; this is a challenge with many technical aspects, but the heart of it is a ‘problem in democracy’: given the primacy of water to all life, will we help shape our own future? Those of us who love our Gunnison River Basin - the river that runs through us all - need to give this our attention. Please read on.... Photo by Luke Reschke 1 -- George Sibley, Handbook Editor People are going to continue to move to Colorado - demographers project between 3 and 5 million new people by 2050, a 60 to 100 percent increase over today’s population. They will all need water, in a state whose water resources are already stressed. So the governor this year has asked for a State Water Plan. Virtually all of the new people will move into existing urban and suburban Projected Growth areas and adjacent new developments - by River Basins and four-fifths of them are expected to <DPSDYampa-White %DVLQ Basin move to the “Front Range” metropolis Southwest Basin now stretching almost unbroken from 6RXWKZHVW %DVLQ South Platte Basin Fort Collins through the Denver region 6RXWK 3ODWWH %DVLQ Rio Grande Basin to Pueblo, along the base of the moun- 5LR *UDQGH %DVLQ tains. -
PIKE and SAN ISABEL NATIONAL FORESTS Antelope Creek (6,900 Acres)
PIKE AND SAN ISABEL NATIONAL FORESTS Antelope Creek (6,900 acres) ......................................................................................................... 3 Aspen Ridge (14,200 acres) ............................................................................................................ 4 Babcock Hole (8,900 acres) ............................................................................................................ 5 Badger Creek (12,400 acres)........................................................................................................... 7 Boreas (10,200 acres)...................................................................................................................... 8 Buffalo Peaks East (5,700 acres) .................................................................................................... 9 Buffalo Peaks South (15,300 acres) .............................................................................................. 10 Buffalo Peaks West (8,300 acres) ................................................................................................. 12 Burning Bear (19,300 acres) ......................................................................................................... 13 Chicago Ridge (5,900 acres) ......................................................................................................... 14 Chipeta (28,700 acres) .................................................................................................................. 15 Cuchara North -
The Francis Whittemore Cragin Collection
The Francis Whittemore Cragin Collection Extent: Approximately 10 cubic feet. Finding Aid Prepared By: Michelle Gay, Spring 2001. Provenance: The materials in this collection were bequeathed to the Colorado Springs Pioneers Museum in the will of Francis W. Cragin, and were received shortly after his death. If more information is needed, please see the archivist. Arrangement: Materials were divided into series according to original order and type. In all cases, priority was given to the preservation of original order. Copyright: The materials in the collection may be assumed to be copyrighted by the creator of those materials. The museum advises patrons that it is their responsibility to procure from the owner of copyright permission to reproduce, publish, or exhibit these materials. The owner of copyright is presumed to be the creator, his or her heirs, legates, or assignees. Patrons must obtain written permission from the Colorado Springs Pioneers Museum to reproduce, publish, or exhibit these materials. In all cases, the patron agrees to hold the Colorado Springs Pioneers Museum harmless and indemnify the museum for any and all claims arising from the use of the reproductions. Restrictions: The Colorado Springs Pioneers Museum reserves the right to examine proofs and captions for accuracy and sensitivity prior to publication with the right to revise, if necessary. The Colorado Springs Pioneers Museum reserves the right to refuse reproduction of its holdings and to impose such conditions as it may deem advisable in its sole and absolute discretion in the best interests of the museum. Oversized and/or fragile items will be reproduced solely at the discretion of the Archivist.