DOCSLIB.ORG

Ants Performance Profiler Vs Dottrace

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ants Performance Profiler Vs Dottrace Ants performance profiler vs dottrace Continue ProsAutomatically save session profileProfiling: Exceptions, Performance, S'LServer, File I/OPossible to search by namePossible method to view traces while runningPosible to view on ThePossible thread to view all streams at oncePossible select the time area to bookmark regionPossible to create call schedules. (thumbs up) ConsNo remote app profile supportT not possible to view the total number of requestsProsAutomatically save the profile of the sessionPossible to search by namePossible method to view on threadConsdotTrace 4 Performance will not start profiling web applications, It is not possible to view the trace when you startProfiling only performance, without exception, sqlserver or I/ONot can view all streams at onceUnly can drill down the time intervalUsing Redgate memory profiles-Redgate in Ants Performance Profiler is the winner. I've been doing some RRS on tools or profilers to test the performance of one of my .NET apps. Below is a list of some of the compiled collection of .NET Profilers that I could put together. 1. JetBrains dotTrace JetBrains dotTrace is a performance and memory profile for JetBrains.NET applications. This allows you to profile the performance of .NET-oriented applications from 1.0 to 4.5, and quickly identify bottlenecks. Read more about JetBrains dotTrace know 2. The ANTS ANTS performance profile is from red gates and allows for easy .NET profiles, ASP.NET and MVC applications and allows you to optimize the performance of the .NET application quickly. Learn more about the ANTS ANTS Performance Profiler Profiler Profiler 3. EsaTEK Profiler Another good .NET Profile and comes in various versions as free, standard, professional, corporate. Learn more about the E'TEC profile and download it from the 4 E'TEC Profiler download page. Telerik Just Trace Telerik Just Trace from Telerik and helps you identify memory leaks as well as solve performance problems easily. Learn more about Telerik Just Trace on the Telerik Just Trace 5 product page. .NET Memory Profiler In Depth .NET Memory Profiling tool and allows you to find memory leaks and automate memory testing. Find out more about the .NET Memory Profiler from the .NET Memory Profiler product page above the list is only a partial one that I was able to explore and list them. If you think there are any other .NET profiles that will be included in the list above, please add them to the comments section. What profilers did you use when working with .net programs, and what would you recommend? I used JetBrains dotTrace and Redgate ANTS extensively. They are quite similar in characteristics and price. They offer useful performance profiling and fairly basic memory profiling. dotTrace integrates with Resharper, which is very handy as you can profile the performance of a test unit with one click Ide. However, dotTrace often seems to give false results (for example, say that the method took several years to run) I prefer how ANTS presents profiling results. It shows the source code and to the left of each line tells you how long it took to run. dotTrace just has a view of the tree. The E'TEC profiler is fairly basic and requires you to compile special instrumental versions of your builds, which can then be launched in the E'ATEC profiler. It is, however, free. Overall I prefer ANTS for performance profiling, although if you use Resharper then dotTrace integration is a killer feature and means that it beats ANTS in usability. Free Microsoft CLR Profiler (.Net framework 2.0 / .Net Framework 4.0) is all you need for .NET memory profiling. 2011 Update: Scitech Memory Profile has a fairly simple user interface, but a lot of useful information, including some information about inedure memory that dotTrace and ANTS lack - you may find it useful if you do COM interop, but I still don't find any profiler that makes COM memory problems easy to diagnose - you usually have to break out windb.exe. The ANTS profiler has come on the leaps and down in the last few years, and his memory profiler has some really useful features that have now pushed him ahead of dotTrace as a package in my assessment. I'm lucky enough to have a license for both, but if you're going to buy one .Net profiler for performance and memory, make it an ANTS. .NET Profilers are the developer's best friend when it comes to optimizing the performance of the app. They are especially important when running a low-level processor and optimizing memory. But did you know that there are three different types of professions? Traditional .NET profiles that track process memory usage, time spent on the line of code, and the frequency of method calls. Easy profilers or other tracking mechanisms that allow you to logically understand what your code is doing and understand performance at a high level. Application Performance Management (APM) tools designed to monitor production servers. All of them are very valuable, but serve relatively different purposes and different types of performance profiling. Let's look at different types. These tools include CLR profiler products such as Profile Visual Studio.NET, ANTS, dotTrace, SciTech and YourKit.Most likely if you use a profiler of one form or another, you have a bad day. This usually means that you are haunted by some bad problems with the processor or the use of memory. I had my fair share of multi-day marathon profiling sessions, find obscure memory leaks. These tools are the savior when you need them, but they are very resource-intensive and slow you down when using them. I would venture to guess that the vast majority of developers never or very rarely use these types of profilers. They just don't need day-to-day applications that many developers have .NET: High memory usage: Profile profiles are extremely powerful when it comes to tracking memory leaks and optimizing memory usage. CPU usage is getting out of control: If your server processor is extremely high and you have no idea why, a profiler may be your last resort to figure out why. Proactive performance adjustment: Optimizing CPU usage for some applications is endless. The standard .NET profiler works with the .NET CLR profiling interface. This allows you to profile bytecode .NET MSIL at a low level to understand every operation that the code performs. This allows them to show you the hot path in the code to see which methods use the most CPU. You can then drill even to see which line of code the processor uses in your app. This can be a huge savior when you have one of those bad days and need to urgently find a problem. We actively use Visual Studio Profiler and ANTS to customize the performance of our Windows Monitoring Agent. Our goal is to add as little overhead as possible to our customers' servers. We also had to use them to chase down some strange memory leaks. List of popular .NET ProfilersVisual Studio Performance ProfilerRed Gate ANTSdotTraceMORE: How to confuse the high .NET application processor in production with ANTS and the HackerScreenshot process from a studio visual profile showing performance to code level2. The .NET Profiler/TransactionLightweight easy transaction tracking tools are mostly focused on tracking your app's high performance. They will help you understand the total page load time, what database calls have been made, etc. These tools are designed to help developers every day. They are designed to not have a huge impact on code performance so they can always be on. There are three main tools available to .NET developers that work as ASP.NET Profilers. They all differ greatly in how they are implemented, how they work, and the types of information they can provide. Below is a real quick overview and comparison. Glimpse: Installed in your app and requires a lot of changes and nuget packages. The open source project is currently led by Microsoft. Glimpse does not use the .NET CLR profiler. Uses extension frameworks and packages to add support for different dependencies and application technologies. Some code changes are required, for example, to track database requests that need to be wrapped in a special wrapper. It only works with web applications. Installed in your app as an easy tracking tool. It does not use a .NET CLR profiler. Database calls can be tracked by changing the code to wrap connections with S'L. You can also change your code to report additional steps in the code to include in pseudo-bibles. It only works with web applications. A lot of code changes are required. Stackify Prefix: Set on on outside the app. Based on the .NET CLR profile and uses the same technology that feeds the APM Stackify product to monitor server applications. It doesn't require any code changes or confit to work! Automatically tracks the performance of 30 common .NET structures and libraries. Can be used to view exceptions, logs, and more. It can be extended to the profile of any method in your code. Also works with non-web applications. This is our tool, so naturally we are a little biased towards it. These types of profiles are more designed around individual web queries or transaction tracking. This makes them very useful for tracking how long a particular web query takes and why they take so long. They can save a lot of time compared to writing a bunch of custom logs or debugging code. They can put a lot of good information at your fingertips as soon as they are setup. Each developer should have one of these tools in their toolbox.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Programmer's Guide to C
    Download from Wow! eBook <www.wowebook.com> For your convenience Apress has placed some of the front matter material after the index. Please use the Bookmarks and Contents at a Glance links to access them. Contents at a Glance Preface ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxv About the Author ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxvii About the Technical Reviewer ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxix Acknowledgments ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxxi Introduction ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� xxxiii ■■Chapter 1: C# and the .NET Runtime and Libraries �����������������������������������������������������1 ■■Chapter 2: C# QuickStart and Developing in C# ����������������������������������������������������������3 ■■Chapter 3: Classes 101 ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������11 ■■Chapter 4: Base Classes and Inheritance ������������������������������������������������������������������19 ■■Chapter 5: Exception Handling ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������33 ■■Chapter 6: Member Accessibility and Overloading ���������������������������������������������������47 ■■Chapter 7: Other Class Details �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������57
    [Show full text]
  • Solid Code Ebook
    PUBLISHED BY Microsoft Press A Division of Microsoft Corporation One Microsoft Way Redmond, Washington 98052-6399 Copyright © 2009 by Donis Marshall and John Bruno All rights reserved. No part of the contents of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of the publisher. Library of Congress Control Number: 2008940526 Printed and bound in the United States of America. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 QWT 4 3 2 1 0 9 Distributed in Canada by H.B. Fenn and Company Ltd. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Microsoft Press books are available through booksellers and distributors worldwide. For further infor mation about international editions, contact your local Microsoft Corporation office or contact Microsoft Press International directly at fax (425) 936-7329. Visit our Web site at www.microsoft.com/mspress. Send comments to [email protected]. Microsoft, Microsoft Press, Active Desktop, Active Directory, Internet Explorer, SQL Server, Win32, Windows, Windows NT, Windows PowerShell, Windows Server, and Windows Vista are either registered trademarks or trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies. Other product and company names mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. The example companies, organizations, products, domain names, e-mail addresses, logos, people, places, and events depicted herein are fictitious. No association with any real company, organization, product, domain name, e-mail address, logo, person, place, or event is intended or should be inferred. This book expresses the author’s views and opinions. The information contained in this book is provided without any express, statutory, or implied warranties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Documentation Is an Electronically‐ Submitted Vendor Response to an Advertised Solicitation from the West
    The following documentation is an electronically‐ submitted vendor response to an advertised solicitation from the West Virginia Purchasing Bulletin within the Vendor Self‐Service portal at wvOASIS.gov. As part of the State of West Virginia’s procurement process, and to maintain the transparency of the bid‐opening process, this documentation submitted online is publicly posted by the West Virginia Purchasing Division at WVPurchasing.gov with any other vendor responses to this solicitation submitted to the Purchasing Division in hard copy format. Purchasing Division State of West Virginia 2019 Washington Street East Solicitation Response Post Office Box 50130 Charleston, WV 25305-0130 Proc Folder : 702868 Solicitation Description : Addendum No 2 Supplemental Staffing for Microsoft Applicatio Proc Type : Central Contract - Fixed Amt Date issued Solicitation Closes Solicitation Response Version 2020-06-10 SR 1300 ESR06092000000007338 1 13:30:00 VENDOR VS0000020585 Cambay Consulting LLC Solicitation Number: CRFQ 1300 STO2000000002 Total Bid : $370,750.00 Response Date: 2020-06-09 Response Time: 09:51:40 Comments: FOR INFORMATION CONTACT THE BUYER Melissa Pettrey (304) 558-0094 [email protected] Signature on File FEIN # DATE All offers subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation Page : 1 FORM ID : WV-PRC-SR-001 Line Comm Ln Desc Qty Unit Issue Unit Price Ln Total Or Contract Amount 1 Temporary information technology 2000.00000 HOUR $72.170000 $144,340.00 software developers Comm Code Manufacturer Specification
    [Show full text]
  • Create Mobile Apps with HTML5, Javascript and Visual Studio
    Create mobile apps with HTML5, JavaScript and Visual Studio DevExtreme Mobile is a single page application (SPA) framework for your next Windows Phone, iOS and Android application, ready for online publication or packaged as a store-ready native app using Apache Cordova (PhoneGap). With DevExtreme, you can target today’s most popular mobile devices with a single codebase and create interactive solutions that will amaze. Get started today… ・ Leverage your existing Visual Studio expertise. ・ Build a real app, not just a web page. ・ Deliver a native UI and experience on all supported devices. ・ Use over 30 built-in touch optimized widgets. Learn more and download your free trial devexpress.com/mobile All trademarks or registered trademarks are property of their respective owners. Untitled-4 1 10/2/13 11:58 AM APPLICATIONS & DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL GOVERNMENT ISSUE INSIDE Choose a Cloud Network for Government-Compliant magazine Applications Geo-Visualization of SPECIAL GOVERNMENT ISSUE & DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL GOVERNMENT ISSUE APPLICATIONS Government Data Sources Harness Open Data with CKAN, OData and Windows Azure Engage Communities with Open311 THE DIGITAL GOVERNMENT ISSUE Inside the tools, technologies and APIs that are changing the way government interacts with citizens. PLUS SPECIAL GOVERNMENT ISSUE APPLICATIONS & DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL GOVERNMENT ISSUE & DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL GOVERNMENT ISSUE APPLICATIONS Enhance Services with Windows Phone 8 Wallet and NFC Leverage Web Assets as Data Sources for Apps APPLICATIONS & DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL GOVERNMENT ISSUE ISSUE GOVERNMENT SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT & APPLICATIONS Untitled-1 1 10/4/13 11:40 AM CONTENTS OCTOBER 2013/SPECIAL GOVERNMENT ISSUE OCTOBER 2013/SPECIAL GOVERNMENT ISSUE magazine FEATURES MOHAMMAD AL-SABT Editorial Director/[email protected] Geo-Visualization of Government KENT SHARKEY Site Manager Data Sources MICHAEL DESMOND Editor in Chief/[email protected] Malcolm Hyson ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Python for the C# Developer
    {SDD} 2014 Software Design & Development Python for the C# developer Michael Kennedy @mkennedy http://blog.michaelckennedy.net Objectives • Introduce the basics of the Python language • Review what is awesome about C# and .NET • Explore Python's version of each C# / .NET feature DEVELOPMENTOR Michael Kennedy | @mkennedy | blog.michaelckennedy.net What is Python? • High-level programming language • Interpreted (sometimes JIT compiled) • Object-oriented (especially Python 3) • Strongly-typed with dynamic semantics • Syntax emphasizes readability • Supports modules and packages • Batteries included (large standard library [1]) DEVELOPMENTOR Michael Kennedy | @mkennedy | blog.michaelckennedy.net The ‘shape’ of a Python program • Python defines code blocks (known as suites in Python) using whitespace and colons. Things to note: def somemethod(name): • No semicolons if name == "Michael": print("Hi old friend") • Code blocks start with ‘:’ else: • Whitespace really really matters print("Nice to meet you") • There are no braces print("My name is … ") • There are no parentheses • Tabs are not your friend def main(): somemethod() Code suites DEVELOPMENTOR Michael Kennedy | @mkennedy | blog.michaelckennedy.net Python language demo DEVELOPMENTOR Michael Kennedy | @mkennedy | blog.michaelckennedy.net What's awesome about C# and .NET? System.Object: Everything is an object. LINQ IEnumerable + foreach loops Visual Studio / IDEs Class properties ( int Age {get; set;} ) Side-by-side execution (isolation) Anonymous types Iterator methods / yield return
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Talk Newsletter, 14Th May 2012
    What Counts For a DBA: Imagination Published Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:36 PM "Imagination…One little spark, of inspiration… is at the heart, of all creation." – From the song "One Little Spark", by the Sherman Brothers I have a confession to make. Despite my great enthusiasm for databases and programming, it occurs to me that every database system I've ever worked on has been, in terms of its inputs and outputs, downright dull. Most have been glorified e-spreadsheets, many replacing manual systems built on actual spreadsheets. I've created a lot of database-driven software whose main job was to "count stuff"; phone calls, web visitors, payments, donations, pieces of equipment and so on. Sometimes, instead of counting stuff, the database recorded values from other stuff, such as data from sensors or networking devices. Yee hah! So how do we, as DBAs, maintain high standards and high spirits when we realize that so much of our work would fail to raise the pulse of even the most easily excitable soul? The answer lies in our imagination. To understand what I mean by this, consider a role that, in terms of its output, offers an extreme counterpoint to that of the DBA: the Disney Imagineer. Their job is to design Disney's Theme Parks, of which I'm a huge fan. To me this has always seemed like a fascinating and exciting job. What must an Imagineer do, every day, to inspire the feats of creativity that are so clearly evident in those spectacular rides and shows? Here, if ever there was one, is a role where "dull moments" must be rare indeed, surely? I wanted to find out, and so parted with a considerable sum of money for my wife and I to have lunch with one; I reasoned that if I found one small way to apply their secrets to my own career, it would be money well spent.
    [Show full text]
  • Vcpkg, Un Outil Pour Acquérir Et Compiler Plus Simplement Les Librairies Open Source C++ Sur Windows
    043_044_204 24/01/17 21:59 Page43 microsoft 43 # 204 Vcpkg, un outil pour acquérir et compiler plus simplement les librairies open source C++ sur Windows. Eric Mittelette Acquérir une librairie open source, la compiler sur Windows et l’intégrer dans son Microsoft Corp. projet C++ reste une opération délicate, voire une galère. Pour une librairie donnée, il faut trouver les sources, les installer localement, compiler la librairie et enfin la mettre à disposition du projet dans lequel vous souhaitez l’utiliser. a phase de build est de loin la plus subtile et complexe, elle nécessi- source de la librairie. Nous voulions que cette collection de « port files » te souvent un peu d’adaptation (patch) si la librairie n’est pas encore soit open source et que la communauté des développeurs C++ puisse y Ldisponible pour la version de compilateur que vous utilisez, cette contribuer en ajoutant les librairies qu’ils maintiennent ou utilisent. adaptation nécessite encore l’usage d’incantations (sous forme de scripts, L’architecture générale en découle assez naturellement : pas de magie noire…), que seuls les grands « faiseurs » maîtrisent réelle- • Créer une liste de « port file » dans un repo Github ; ment. Nous savons par sondage et les appels au support technique de • Créer un outil en ligne de commande qui exploite cette liste et capable Microsoft que les librairies tierces restent pour plus de 30% des cas le blo- de lancer le processus de compilation au regard des instructions de queur a la migration vers les dernières versions du compilateur C++. Nous chaque « port file » ; savons également que 80% des projets C++ utilisent 2 ou 3 librairies • Installer le résultat de la compilation dans un répertoire local « « LibFolder » ; tierces en moyenne, et que la vaste majorité d’entre elles sont aujourd’hui • Permettre une intégration simple avec Visual studio, CMake ou tout des librairies open source.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagine. Create. Deploy. Inspired? So Are We
    Imagine. Create. Deploy. Inspired? So Are We. Inspiration is all around us. From beautiful screens on the web to well-designed reports. New devices push the development envelope and ask that we consider new technologies. The latest release, DevExpress 12.2, delivers the tools you need to build the multi-channel solutions you can imagine: Windows 8-inspired applications with live tiles perfect for Microsoft Surface, multi-screen iOS and Android apps. It’s all possible. Let’s see what develops. Download your 30-day trial at www.DevExpress.com Copyright 1998-2013 Developer Express, Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks are property of their respective owners. Untitled-9 1 1/8/13 2:10 PM THE MICROSOFT JOURNAL FOR DEVELOPERS FEBRUARY 2013 VOL 28 NO 2 magazine JavaScript API for Offi ce.........................20 Exploring the New JavaScript API for Offi ce COLUMNS Stephen Oliver and Eric Schmidt ........................................20 CUTTING EDGE Essential Facebook Async Causality Chain Tracking Programming: Andrew Stasyuk ...............................................................32 The JavaScript SDK Dino Esposito, page 6 Building a Simple Comet Application WINDOWS WITH C++ in the Microsoft .NET Framework Creating Desktop Apps Derrick Lau .....................................................................42 with Visual C++ 2012 Kenny Kerr, page 12 Detecting Abnormal Data Using TEST RUN k-Means Clustering Naive Bayes Classifi cation with C# ............................................................. James McCaffrey 54 James McCaffrey,
    [Show full text]
  • Adding Self-Healing Capabilities to the Common Language Runtime
    Adding Self-healing capabilities to the Common Language Runtime Rean Griffith Gail Kaiser Columbia University Columbia University [email protected] [email protected] Abstract systems can leverage to maintain high system availability is to perform repairs in a degraded mode of operation[23, 10]. Self-healing systems require that repair mechanisms are Conceptually, a self-managing system is composed of available to resolve problems that arise while the system ex- four (4) key capabilities [12]; Monitoring to collect data ecutes. Managed execution environments such as the Com- about its execution and operating environment, performing mon Language Runtime (CLR) and Java Virtual Machine Analysis over the data collected from monitoring, Planning (JVM) provide a number of application services (applica- an appropriate course of action and Executing the plan. tion isolation, security sandboxing, garbage collection and Each of the four functions participating in the Monitor- structured exception handling) which are geared primar- Analyze-Plan-Execute (MAPE) loop consumes and pro- ily at making managed applications more robust. How- duces knowledgewhich is integral to the correct functioning ever, none of these services directly enables applications of the system. Over its execution lifetime the system builds to perform repairs or consistency checks of their compo- and refines a knowledge-base of its behavior and environ- nents. From a design and implementation standpoint, the ment. Information in the knowledge-base could include preferred way to enable repair in a self-healing system is patterns of resource utilization and a “scorecard” tracking to use an externalized repair/adaptation architecture rather the success of applying specific repair actions to detected or than hardwiring adaptation logic inside the system where it predicted problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Studio 2010 Tools for Sharepoint Development
    Visual Studio 2010 for SharePoint Open XML and Content Controls COLUMNS Toolbox Visual Studio 2010 Tools for User Interfaces, Podcasts, Object-Relational Mappings SharePoint Development and More Steve Fox page 44 Scott Mitchell page 9 CLR Inside Out Profi ling the .NET Garbage- Collected Heap Subramanian Ramaswamy & Vance Morrison page 13 Event Tracing Event Tracing for Windows Basic Instincts Collection and Array Initializers in Visual Basic 2010 Generating Documents from SharePoint Using Open XML Adrian Spotty Bowles page 20 Content Controls Data Points Eric White page 52 Data Validation with Silverlight 3 and the DataForm John Papa page 30 Cutting Edge Data Binding in ASP.NET AJAX 4.0 Dino Esposito page 36 Patterns in Practice Functional Programming Core Instrumentation Events in Windows 7, Part 2 for Everyday .NET Developers MSDN Magazine Dr. Insung Park & Alex Bendetov page 60 Jeremy Miller page 68 Service Station Building RESTful Clients THIS MONTH at msdn.microsoft.com/magazine: Jon Flanders page 76 CONTRACT-FIRST WEB SERVICES: Schema-Based Development Foundations with Windows Communication Foundation Routers in the Service Bus Christian Weyer & Buddihke de Silva Juval Lowy page 82 TEST RUN: Partial Anitrandom String Testing Concurrent Affairs James McCaffrey Four Ways to Use the Concurrency TEAM SYSTEM: Customizing Work Items Runtime in Your C++ Projects Rick Molloy page 90 OCTOBER Brian A. Randell USABILITY IN PRACTICE: Getting Inside Your Users’ Heads 2009 Charles B. Kreitzberg & Ambrose Little Vol 24 No 10 Vol OCTOBER 2009 VOL 24 NO 10 OCTOBER 2009 VOLUME 24 NUMBER 10 LUCINDA ROWLEY Director EDITORIAL: [email protected] HOWARD DIERKING Editor-in-Chief WEB SITE MICHAEL RICHTER Webmaster CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Don Box, Keith Brown, Dino Esposito, Juval Lowy, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Teamcity 7.1 Documentation.Pdf
    1. TeamCity Documentation . 4 1.1 What's New in TeamCity 7.1 . 5 1.2 What's New in TeamCity 7.0 . 14 1.3 Getting Started . 26 1.4 Concepts . 30 1.4.1 Agent Home Directory . 31 1.4.2 Agent Requirements . 32 1.4.3 Agent Work Directory . 32 1.4.4 Authentication Scheme . 33 1.4.5 Build Agent . 33 1.4.6 Build Artifact . 34 1.4.7 Build Chain . 35 1.4.8 Build Checkout Directory . 36 1.4.9 Build Configuration . 37 1.4.10 Build Configuration Template . 38 1.4.11 Build Grid . 39 1.4.12 Build History . 40 1.4.13 Build Log . 40 1.4.14 Build Number . 40 1.4.15 Build Queue . 40 1.4.16 Build Runner . 41 1.4.17 Build State . 41 1.4.18 Build Tag . 42 1.4.19 Build Working Directory . 43 1.4.20 Change . 43 1.4.21 Change State . 43 1.4.22 Clean Checkout . 44 1.4.23 Clean-Up . 45 1.4.24 Code Coverage . 46 1.4.25 Code Duplicates . 47 1.4.26 Code Inspection . 47 1.4.27 Continuous Integration . 47 1.4.28 Dependent Build . 47 1.4.29 Difference Viewer . 49 1.4.30 Guest User . 50 1.4.31 History Build . 51 1.4.32 Notifier . 51 1.4.33 Personal Build . 52 1.4.34 Pinned Build . 52 1.4.35 Pre-Tested (Delayed) Commit . 52 1.4.36 Project . 53 1.4.37 Remote Run . ..
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of Hotos IX: the 9Th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems
    USENIX Association Proceedings of HotOS IX: The 9th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems Lihue, Hawaii, USA May 18–21, 2003 THE ADVANCED COMPUTING SYSTEMS ASSOCIATION © 2003 by The USENIX Association All Rights Reserved For more information about the USENIX Association: Phone: 1 510 528 8649 FAX: 1 510 548 5738 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.usenix.org Rights to individual papers remain with the author or the author's employer. Permission is granted for noncommercial reproduction of the work for educational or research purposes. This copyright notice must be included in the reproduced paper. USENIX acknowledges all trademarks herein. Magpie: online modelling and performance-aware systems Paul Barham, Rebecca Isaacs, Richard Mortier, and Dushyanth Narayanan Microsoft Research Ltd., Cambridge, UK. Abstract A B Understanding the performance of distributed systems requires correlation of thousands of interactions be- Event Tracing Event Tracing tween numerous components — a task best left to a com- puter. Today’s systems provide voluminous traces from each component but do not synthesise the data into con- cise models of system performance. Models Models Performance We argue that online performance modelling should be Queries Query Engine a ubiquitous operating system service and outline sev- The diagram shows how requests move through different soft- eral uses including performance debugging, capacity ware components across multiple machines in a distributed sys- tem. Magpie synthesizes event traces from each machine into planning, system tuning and anomaly detection. We de- models that can be queried programatically. scribe the Magpie modelling service which collates de- tailed traces from multiple machines in an e-commerce Figure 1.
    [Show full text]