The Ramsar Convention: a New Window for Environmental Diplomacy?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
Final Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report for the Proposed 100MW Solar Independent Power Plant and 18 KM Transmission Line Project, Ganjuwa Local Government Area, Bauchi State by Nigerian Solar Capital Partners/Globeleq/ARM- Harith June 2017 100 MW Independent Solar Power Plant, Bauchi State Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Table of Contents List of Tables iii List of Figures iv List of Acronyms and Abbreviations v List of ESIA Preparers viii Executive Summary ix Chapter One: Introduction 1.1 Background 1-1 1.2 Overview 1-2 1.3 Project Scope 1-2 1.4 Project Location 1-3 1.5 Study Objectives and Terms of Reference 1-6 1.6 Report Structure 1-6 Chapter Two: Policy, Legal and Administrative Framework 2.1 Applicable National Policies 2-8 2.2 Applicable National Regulations 2-10 2.3 Institutional Framework 2-14 2.4 Applicable International Agreements and Policies 2-19 2.5 Permit Requirements 2-21 Chapter Three: Project Description 3.1 Project Overview 3-23 3.2 Project Requirements 3-23 3.3 Project Components 3-24 3.4 Operation and Maintenance 3-34 3.5 Project Activities 3-35 3.5.1 Construction 3-35 3.6 Implementation Schedule 3-35 Chapter Four: Description of the Project Environment 4.1 General 4-38 4.2 Study Area and Location 4-38 4.2.1 Reconnaissance Field Visit 4-38 4.2.2 Baseline Data Acquisition 4-38 4.2.3 Sampling Design 4-45 4.2.4 Field Sampling Methods 4-45 4.2.5 Laboratory Methods 4-47 4.3 Bio-Physical Environmental Baseline Condition 4-47 4.3.1 Climate and Meteorology 4-47 4.3.2 Ambient Air Quality 4-52 4.3.2.1 -
The Pond Manifesto
The Pond Manifesto Contents 1 About this document . 5 2 Why protect ponds? . .6 2.1 Overview . .6 2.2 The pond resource . .6 2.3 Pond biodiversity value . .8 2.4 Pond cultural and social value . .10 2.5 Pond economic value and ecosystem services . .12 3 Threats to Ponds . .14 4 Strategy for the conservation of ponds in Europe . .16 4.1 Policy and legislation . .17 4.2 Research and monitoring . .17 4.3 Communication and awareness raising . .18 4.4 Conservation of the pond resource . .19 5 Conclusion: pond conservation is an opportunity . .19 This document sets out the case for the conservation of ponds in a straightforward and convincing manner Acknowledgements Thank you to the very many people who have contributed to the Pond Manifesto, and to the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands and the MAVA Foundation for their support. Thank you also to all the photographers for the use of their images (a list of photographers is available on the EPCN website: www.europeanponds.org) © European Pond Conservation Network 2008 2 Foreword The importance of maintaining global freshwater biodiversity and ensuring its sustainable use cannot be over-emphasised. Wetland ecosystems, including the associated waterbodies, come in all shapes and sizes and all have a role to play. The larger ones, perhaps inevitably, have enjoyed the most attention – it is easy to overlook the many small waterbodies scattered across the landscape. Fortunately, over the last decade, our knowledge and attitude towards small wetlands like ponds has begun to change. We know now that they are crucial for biodiversity This and can also provide a whole range of ecosystem services. -
Mangroves for Nature, Humans and Development MOZAMBIQUE – Legal Matrix on Mangroves' Conservation and Use
Mangroves for Nature, Humans and Development MOZAMBIQUE – Legal Matrix on Mangroves' Conservation and Use International obligations Ramsar Yes. Resolution n. 45/03; 05th November 2003 World Heritage Convention Yes. Resolution n. 17/82; 13th November 1982 Convention on Biological Yes. Resolution n. 2/94; 24th August 1994 Diversity Is the State a party to any of these UNCLOS Yes. Resolution n. 21/96, 26th November 1996 conventions? UNFCCC/ Paris Agreement Yes. Resolution n. 23/17, 7th November 2017 Regional Agreements Yes. SADC Forest Protocol Yes. CITES. Resolution n. 20/81; 30/12/1981 which was then Others regulated by Decree n.34/2016; 24th August Yes, Mozambique has 02 Ramsar sites: Niassa Lake Resolution n. 67/2011, 21st December and Marromeu Are there Ramsar sites including Complex (In 2003 when Mozambique ratified RAMSAR Convention indicated that 1.2 million hectar will mangroves in the country? be proposed as a wetland of international importance under RAMSAR Convention). Are there World Heritage Sites No. including mangroves in the country? No. Althought the rationale to develop intended national determined contributions, goals, and impact and Do the Nationally Determined climate changes vulnerabilities could predict that mangrove restoration and conservation would be Contributions of the country relate to listed as an action along the National Action Plan. mangroves? However, some programs and policies listed as a contribution for mitigation contribution may concur to relate indirectly to mangroves e.g. the Decree n. 23/2018, 3rd May regarding the implementation of REDD+ Program states as one of the objective to promote the conservation and restoration of Mangroves for Nature, Humans and Development, MOZAMBIQUE – Legal Matrix on Mangroves' Conservation and Use, IUCN Environmental Law Centre, July 2019 1 degraded ecosystems and natural resources and value their ecosystem services and environmental factors. -
Phytoplankton Dynamics in the Congo River
Freshwater Biology (2016) doi:10.1111/fwb.12851 Phytoplankton dynamics in the Congo River † † † JEAN-PIERRE DESCY*, ,FRANCßOIS DARCHAMBEAU , THIBAULT LAMBERT , ‡ § † MAYA P. STOYNEVA-GAERTNER , STEVEN BOUILLON AND ALBERTO V. BORGES *Research Unit in Organismal Biology (URBE), University of Namur, Namur, Belgium † Unite d’Oceanographie Chimique, UniversitedeLiege, Liege, Belgium ‡ Department of Botany, University of Sofia St. Kl. Ohridski, Sofia, Bulgaria § Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium SUMMARY 1. We report a dataset of phytoplankton in the Congo River, acquired along a 1700-km stretch in the mainstem during high water (HW, December 2013) and falling water (FW, June 2014). Samples for phytoplankton analysis were collected in the main river, in tributaries and one lake, and various relevant environmental variables were measured. Phytoplankton biomass and composition were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of chlorophyll a (Chl a) and marker pigments and by microscopy. Primary production measurements were made using the 13C incubation technique. In addition, data are also reported from a 19-month regular sampling (bi-monthly) at a fixed station in the mainstem of the upper Congo (at the city of Kisangani). 2. Chl a concentrations differed between the two periods studied: in the mainstem, they varied À À between 0.07 and 1.77 lgL 1 in HW conditions and between 1.13 and 7.68 lgL 1 in FW conditions. The relative contribution to phytoplankton biomass from tributaries (mostly black waters) and from a few permanent lakes was low, and the main confluences resulted in phytoplankton dilution. Based on marker pigment concentration, green algae (both chlorophytes and streptophytes) dominated in the mainstem in HW, whereas diatoms dominated in FW; cryptophytes and cyanobacteria were more abundant but still relatively low in the FW period, both in the tributaries and in the main channel. -
Download From
Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2012 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htm. Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8 th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9 th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 7, 2 nd edition, as amended by COP9 Resolution IX.1 Annex B). A 3 rd edition of the Handbook, incorporating these amendments, is in preparation and will be available in 2006. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY . Evaldas Klimavičius, DD MM YY Direktorate of Dzūkija National Park and Cepkeliai State Strict Nature Reserve Marcinkonys, LT-65303 Varena distr., Lithuania Designation date Site Reference Number Tel.: +370 310 44686; Fax: +370 310 44428 [email protected] Gintautas Kibirkštis Direktorate of Dzūkija National Park and Cepkeliai State Strict Nature Reserve Marcinkonys, LT-65303 Varena distr., Lithuania Tel.: +370 310 44686; Fax: +370 310 44428 [email protected] 2. -
Types of American Grasses
z LIBRARY OF Si AS-HITCHCOCK AND AGNES'CHASE 4: SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM oL TiiC. CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE United States National Herbarium Volume XII, Part 3 TXE&3 OF AMERICAN GRASSES . / A STUDY OF THE AMERICAN SPECIES OF GRASSES DESCRIBED BY LINNAEUS, GRONOVIUS, SLOANE, SWARTZ, AND MICHAUX By A. S. HITCHCOCK z rit erV ^-C?^ 1 " WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1908 BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM Issued June 18, 1908 ii PREFACE The accompanying paper, by Prof. A. S. Hitchcock, Systematic Agrostologist of the United States Department of Agriculture, u entitled Types of American grasses: a study of the American species of grasses described by Linnaeus, Gronovius, Sloane, Swartz, and Michaux," is an important contribution to our knowledge of American grasses. It is regarded as of fundamental importance in the critical sys- tematic investigation of any group of plants that the identity of the species described by earlier authors be determined with certainty. Often this identification can be made only by examining the type specimen, the original description being inconclusive. Under the American code of botanical nomenclature, which has been followed by the author of this paper, "the nomenclatorial t}rpe of a species or subspecies is the specimen to which the describer originally applied the name in publication." The procedure indicated by the American code, namely, to appeal to the type specimen when the original description is insufficient to identify the species, has been much misunderstood by European botanists. It has been taken to mean, in the case of the Linnsean herbarium, for example, that a specimen in that herbarium bearing the same name as a species described by Linnaeus in his Species Plantarum must be taken as the type of that species regardless of all other considerations. -
Hydropolitical Vulnerability and Resilience Along International Waters: Africa Is the First of a Five-Part Series of Continental Reports
Copyright © 2005, United Nations Environment Programme ISBN: 92-807-2575-0 UNEP Job No. DEWA/0672/NA This publication is printed on chlorine and acid free paper from sustainable forests. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or nonprofit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. UNEP and the authors would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this report as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme PO Box 30552-00100, Nairobi, KENYA Tel: +254 20 7624028 Fax: +254 20 7623943/44 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.unep.org United Nations Environment Programme Division of Early Warning and Assessment–North America 47914 252nd Street, EROS Data Center, Sioux Falls, SD 57198-0001 USA Tel: 1-605-594-6117 Fax: 1-605-594-6119 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.na.unep.net www.unep.org The “Hydropolitical Vulnerability and Resilience in International River Basins” project, directed by Aaron T. Wolf and managed by Marcia F. Macomber, both of Oregon State University (OSU), USA, is a collaboration between the United Nations Environment Programme - Division of Early Warning and Assessment (UNEP-DEWA) and the Universities Partnership for Transboundary Waters. The Partnership is an international consortium of water expertise, including ten universities on five continents, seeking to promote a global water governance culture that incorporates peace, environmental protection, and human security <http://waterpartners.geo.orst.edu>. -
Sitwa Report on Infrastructure Development
SITWA PROJECT: STRENGTHENING THE INSTITUTIONS FOR TRANSBOUNDARY WATER MANAGEMENT IN AFRICA CONSULTANCY SERVICES TO ASSESS THE NEEDS AND PREPARE AN ACTION PLAN FOR SITWA/ANBO SUPPORT SERVICES IN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT IN THE AFRICAN RIVER BASIN ORGANIZATIONS SITWA REPORT ON INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union RAPPORT SITWA SUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT DES INFRASTRUCTURES DANS LES OBF AFRICAINS 3 Table des matiÈRES Table des matières ...................................................................................... 3 AbrEviations ............................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements .................................................................................... 7 Executive summary .................................................................................... 8 List of tables .............................................................................................. 9 List of figures ............................................................................................ 9 1. Background and objectives of the consultancy ........................................ 10 1.1 ANBO’s historical background and objectives ............................................................................. 10 1.2 Background and objectives of SITWA ......................................................................................... -
Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund
Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund Call for Letters of Inquiry No. 2 LARGE GRANTS Investment in the Mediterranean Basin Biodiversity Hotspot 1. Opening Date: Monday 25th June 2018 2. Submission Deadline: Friday 14th September 2018 3. Budget and Timeframe The minimum budget per project is US $20,000 and the maximum budget per project is US $150,000. Projects are expected to start on 1st March 2019 at the earliest, and must be completed by 30th May 2022. 4. General information The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the European Union, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and the World Bank. A fundamental goal is to ensure civil society is engaged in biodiversity conservation. The Mediterranean Basin Hotspot is the second largest hotspot in the world and the largest of the world’s five Mediterranean-climate regions. CEPF’s niche for investment in the Mediterranean was formulated through a participatory process that engaged civil society, donor and governmental stakeholders throughout the region. The resulting Investment Strategy (2017-2022) is documented within the Ecosystem Profile, available here. This investment strategy comprises of a series of strategic directions, broken down into investment priorities outlining the types of activities that will be eligible for CEPF funding. CEPF is inviting proposals in the form of Letters of Inquiry (LOIs) for large grants from non- governmental organizations, community groups, private enterprises, universities and other civil society organizations. Applicants are advised to read this Call for Proposals document in full and submit LOIs under the scope of this call, as described in Section 6. -
Riparian Habitat Mitigation Standards and Implementation Guidelines
Town of Sahuarita Riparian Habitat Mitigation Standards and Implementation Guidelines A supplement to Title 18, STC 18.65 of the Town of Sahuarita Zoning Code titled “Riparian Habitat Protection and Mitigation Requirements” Section One: The Ordinance 2 Overview of the Riparian Habitat Protection Ordinance Options for Treatment of Regulated Habitat In Lieu Fee Option 8 Modified Development Standards 10 Riparian Habitat Mitigation Plan Approval Section Two: Riparian Classifications, Descriptions, 12 Mitigation & Monitoring Requirements Characteristic of Habitat Onsite Mitigation Requirements Mitigation Requirements 15 Hydroriparian, Mesoriparian & Xeroriparian Mitigation Standards 17 Section Three: Components of a Mitigation Plan Submittal 20 Mitigation Plan Components Mitigation Planting Plan 23 Elements of a Monitoring Report 25 Section Four: Frequently Asked Questions 27 Appendix A: Mitigation Plan Submittal Checklists 29 Appendix B: Approved Plant List 42 Appendix C: Installation & Maintenance Requirements 56 Appendix D: Water Harvesting Guidelines 64 Appendix E: List of Noxious & Invasive Plant Species 66 & Best Management Practices Appendix F: Field Mapping & Onsite Vegetation Survey 73 Appendix G: Glossary of Terms 75 Appendix H: Standard Operating Procedure (RECON) 78 This document was prepared with permission from Pima County Regional Flood Control District and Novak Environmental, Inc. It contains reformatting and minor rewording of a document prepared by McGann and Associates, Inc. under contract to Pima County Flood Control District in July, 1994. The format is copyrighted by Novak Environmental, Inc. 2001 1 September 24, 2012 Section One: The Ordinance What is the history of this Ordinance? On April 24, 2006, the Town of Sahuarita Town Council adopted the Town of Sahuarita Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Management Code. -
Region: West Africa (14 Countries) (Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Côte D’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, Togo)
Region: West Africa (14 Countries) (Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, Togo) Project title: Emergency assistance for early detection and prevention of avian influenza in Western Africa Project number: TCP/RAF/3016 (E) Starting date: November 2005 Completion date: April 2007 Government counterpart Ministries of Agriculture responsible for project execution: FAO contribution: US$ 400 000 Signed: ..................................... Signed: ........................................ (on behalf of Government) Jacques Diouf Director-General (on behalf of FAO) Date of signature: ..................... Date of signature: ........................ I. BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION In line with the FAO/World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) Global Strategy for the Progressive Control of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI), this project has been developed to provide support to the regional grouping of West African countries to strengthen emergency preparedness against the eventuality of HPAI being introduced into this currently free area. There is growing evidence that the avian influenza, which has been responsible for serious disease outbreaks in poultry and humans in several Asian countries since 2003, is spread through a number of sources, including poor biosecurity at poultry farms, movement of poultry and poultry products and live market trade, illegal and legal trade in wild birds. Although unproven, it is also suspected that the virus could possibly be carried over long distances along the migratory bird flyways to regions previously unaffected (Table 1) is a cause of serious concern for the region. Avian influenza subtype H5N1 could be transported along these routes to densely populated areas in the South Asian Subcontinent and to the Middle East, Africa and Europe. -
Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention
Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: the role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity edited by A. J. Hails Ramsar Convention Bureau Ministry of Environment and Forest, India 1996 [1997] Published by the Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland, with the support of: • the General Directorate of Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of the Walloon Region, Belgium • the Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark • the National Forest and Nature Agency, Ministry of the Environment and Energy, Denmark • the Ministry of Environment and Forests, India • the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Sweden Copyright © Ramsar Convention Bureau, 1997. Reproduction of this publication for educational and other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior perinission from the copyright holder, providing that full acknowledgement is given. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The views of the authors expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect those of the Ramsar Convention Bureau or of the Ministry of the Environment of India. Note: the designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Ranasar Convention Bureau concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Citation: Halls, A.J. (ed.), 1997. Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: The Role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity.