Soft Power, Hard Times: Russian Influence in the Post-Soviet Space

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Soft Power, Hard Times: Russian Influence in the Post-Soviet Space Soft Power, Hard Times: Russian Influence in the Post-Soviet Space during Periods of Military Conflict A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2020 Connell S. Beggs School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Contents Figures and Tables 5 Acronyms 7 Abstract 8 Declaration 9 Copyright Statement 9 Note on Translation and Transliteration 10 Acknowledgements 11 Introduction 12 Concepts and Case Studies 16 Methodology 32 Thesis Structure 43 Chapter I. Research Context: Main Cultural Organisations, Central Concepts and Key Actors 47 1.1 Introduction 47 1.2 The Russian Orthodox Church: Status and State Ties 48 1.2.1 Domestic Concepts on the Church-State Relationship: ‘Symphonia’ and ‘Spiritual Security’ 48 1.2.2 Influence and Interests in the ‘Near’ and ‘Far’ Abroad 68 1.3 Fond ‘Russkii Mir’: State Influence Abroad 72 1.3.1 Defining the ‘Russian World’ Concept 72 1.3.2 FRM – Formation, Remit and State Ties 81 1.4 Conclusion 86 Chapter II. ‘Soft Power’ or ‘Hybrid Warfare’? Defining and Assessing the Conceptual Framework 90 2.1 Introduction 90 2.2 ‘Soft Power’ 92 2.3 ‘Hybrid Warfare’ 102 2.3.1 HW: Non-Academic Literature 102 2.3.2 HW: Academic Literature 111 2 2.4 ‘Information Warfare’ 117 2.4.1 IW: Non-Academic Literature 118 2.4.2 IW: Academic Literature 125 2.5 ‘Strategic Narratives’ 129 2.6 Conclusion 131 Chapter III. Conflict Coverage on Russian Television: State-Controlled Pervyi Kanal as the Kremlin’s Mouthpiece 134 3.1 Introduction 134 3.1.1 State of the Media: Television in Russia 136 3.1.2 Russian Media in the ‘Near Abroad’ 144 3.2 Pervyi Kanal’s News Coverage of the Russo-Georgian War 147 3.2.1 Pre-Conflict Period: 8th May – 7th August 2008 151 3.2.2 During-Conflict Period: 8th – 12th August 2008 156 3.2.3 Post-Conflict Period: 13th August – 12th November 2008 160 3.3 Pervyi Kanal’s News Coverage of the Ukraine Crisis 164 3.3.1 Russian Television in Ukraine: Availability, Audience Engagement and Public Trust 165 3.3.2 An Analysis of Scholarly Literature on Pervyi Kanal’s Coverage of the Ukraine Crisis 172 3.4 Conclusion 181 Chapter IV. Conflict Representations by an Organic Cultural Organisation: The Russian Orthodox Church 186 4.1 Introduction 186 4.2 OSMP’s News Coverage of the Russo-Georgian War 190 4.2.1 Pre-Conflict Period: 1st January – 7th August 2008 195 4.2.2 During-Conflict Period: 8th – 12th August 2008 200 4.2.3 Post-Conflict Period: 13th August – 12th November 2008 203 4.3 OSMP’s News Coverage of the Ukraine Crisis 212 4.3.1 Pre-Conflict Period: 21st November 2013 – 26th February 2014 217 4.3.2 During-Conflict Period: 27th February 2014 – 23rd February 2015 222 4.3.3 Post-Conflict Period: 24th February 2015 – 31st December 2015 225 4.4 Conclusion 229 3 Chapter V. Conflict Representations by a Manufactured Cultural Organisation: Fond ‘Russkii Mir’ 233 5.1 Introduction 233 5.1.1 Sources and Method 235 5.2 RM’s News Coverage of the Russo-Georgian War 238 5.3 RM’s News Coverage of the Ukraine Crisis 240 5.3.1 Pre-Conflict Period: 21st November 2013 – 26th February 2014 241 5.3.2 During-Conflict Period: 27th February 2014 – 23rd February 2015 246 5.3.3 Post-Conflict Period: 24th February 2015 – 31st December 2015 253 5.4 Engagement from and Impact on Audiences at RM 254 5.5 Conclusion 259 Conclusion 264 Summary: The Russo-Georgian War 265 Summary: The Ukraine Crisis 266 Analysis of the Findings 268 Implications of the Research 272 Limitations of the Research 276 Suggestions for Further Research 277 Bibliography 279 Appendix I. Major Patterns and Shifts in Crisis-Related Output on OSMP 325 Appendix II. Critical Discourse Analysis of OSMP News Reports 328 Framing Techniques during the Russo-Georgian War 328 Framing Techniques during the Ukraine Crisis 334 Appendix III. Critical Discourse Analysis of RM News Reports 341 Framing Techniques during the Russo-Georgian War 341 Framing Techniques during the Ukraine Crisis 346 Word Count: 75,548 4 Figures and Tables Chapter III Figure 3.1: Breakdown of Pervyi Kanal’s News Reports on the Russo-Georgian War Coded as ‘TENSIONS’ 153 Figure 3.2: Frequency of Pervyi Kanal’s News Reports on the Russo-Georgian War (‘WAR’ and ‘(GEO)POLITICAL COMMENTARY’) 159 Figure 3.3: Frequency of Pervyi Kanal’s News Reports on the Russo-Georgian War by Theme 162 Figure 3.4: Percentage of Ukrainians Receiving Russian TV Channels through Analogue Antenna in 2016 167 Figure 3.5: Russian Analogue TV Transmitters (i.e., Triangles) and Predicted Signal Strength at Polling Stations in 2018 169 Figure 3.6: Level of Trust in Russian Television in Ukraine (%) 171 Figure 3.7: Frequency of News Coverage of Ukraine on Pervyi Kanal 172 Table 3.1: Frequency of Pervyi Kanal’s News Reports on the Russo-Georgian War 152 Chapter IV Figure 4.1: Frequency of News Reports on the Russo-Georgian War on OSMP and Pervyi Kanal 197 Figure 4.2: Frequency of OSMP’s News Reports on the Russo-Georgian War (August 2008) 204 Figure 4.3: Frequency of OSMP’s News Reports on the Russo-Georgian War (‘PEACEKEEPING’ and ‘HUMANITARIANISM’) 206 Figure 4.4: Frequency of OSMP’s News Reports on the Ukraine Crisis 219 Figure 4.5: Frequency of OSMP’s News Reports on the Ukraine Crisis (‘PEACEKEEPING’ and ‘HUMANITARIANISM’) 224 Figure 4.6: Frequency of OSMP’s News Reports on the Ukraine Crisis by 5 Theme and Time-Period 226 Figure 4.7: Frequency of OSMP’s News Reports on the Ukraine Crisis (‘HUMANITARIANISM’ and ‘PERSECUTION’) 228 Table 4.1: Frequency of OSMP’s News Reports on the Russo-Georgian War 196 Table 4.2: Frequency of OSMP’s News Reports on the Ukraine Crisis 218 Chapter V Figure 5.1: Frequency of News Reports on the Ukraine Crisis on RM and OSMP 242 Figure 5.2: Frequency of RM’s News Reports on the Ukraine Crisis (‘POLITICS’ and ‘CULTURE’) 250 Figure 5.3: Frequency of RM’s News Reports on the Ukraine Crisis (‘HUMANITARIANISM’ and ‘MMST’ + ‘MEDIA’) 252 Table 5.1: Frequency of RM’s News Reports on the Ukraine Crisis 244 Appendix I Table A1: Main Patterns and Shifts in Coverage of the Russo-Georgian War on OSMP 325 Table A2: Main Patterns and Shifts in Coverage of the Ukraine Crisis on OSMP 325 Table A3: Correlations between Variables in Coverage of the Ukraine Crisis on OSMP 326 6 Acronyms AOC Abkhazian Orthodox Church CDA Critical Discourse Analysis CEPA Center for European Policy Analysis CIS Confederation of Independent States CLA ‘compatriots living abroad’ FRM Fond ‘Russkii Mir’ FSB Federal’naya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti (Federal Security Service) GOC Georgian Orthodox Church GONGO government-organised non-governmental organisation GPW Great Patriotic War HMA Holy Metropolis of Abkhazia HW ‘hybrid war(fare)’ IW ‘information war(fare)’ KIIS Kiev International Institute of Sociology MFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation OSMP Ofitsial’nyi Sait Moskovskogo Patriarkhata (Official Website of the Moscow Patriarchate) RM Russkii Mir ROC Russian Orthodox Church ROCOR Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia UAOC Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church UGCC Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church UOC-KP Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Kiev Patriarchate) UOC-MP Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) 7 Abstract Russia’s assertive foreign policy since 2004 has caused much concern in the West. Since Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014, many Western commentators have claimed that Russia has adopted a new military strategy called ‘hybrid warfare’, in which the country’s main cultural organisations that have a presence in neighbouring post-Soviet states are mere tools at the disposal of the Russian government. In response, these cultural organisations deny such accusations, with many of Russia’s state representatives arguing that they simply engage in public and cultural diplomacy and, as a result, are agents of Russian ‘soft power’. To understand the nature of Russia’s activities on the international stage, this thesis investigates the role of two main cultural organisations, the Russian Orthodox Church and Fond ‘Russkii Mir’, in support of the Kremlin’s policies during two major cases of Russian military intervention in the so-called ‘near abroad’ – the Russo-Georgian War (2008) and the Ukraine crisis (2013–present day). To address this issue, conflict representations disseminated on the media outlets of these organisations were assessed and compared to those on the state- controlled, Kremlin-aligned television channel Pervyi Kanal. A content analysis, thematic analysis and frame analysis were conducted in order to evaluate the outlets’ narrative framing of these two military conflicts. Whilst concluding that neither the concept of ‘hybrid warfare’ nor ‘soft power’ are useful analytical tools for understanding the activities of Russia’s cultural organisations during these military conflicts, this research reveals a significant difference in the activities of the ROC and FRM. Despite organisational autonomy being restricted in times of crisis, the Russian Orthodox Church expressed significant agency, which was evident from its deviation from the Kremlin-preferred line on issues of direct relevance to its own interests. Conversely, no such deviation occurred with Fond ‘Russkii Mir’. Consequently, this thesis demonstrates that the specific agendas and agencies of Kremlin-affiliated actors within Russia are dependent on the nature of such actors’ relationships with the country’s political leadership. 8 Declaration No portion of the work referred to in the thesis has been submitted in support of an application for another degree or qualification of this or any other university or other institute of learning.
Recommended publications
  • Moscow Grand Prix 2017
    Moscow Grand Prix 2017 Moscow (Russia), DRUZHBA, Sports Complex 17-19.02.2017 Спорт вокруг. Alina Kabaeva CHAMPIONS CUP – GAZPROM (Grand Prix Qualifications – within the framework of ‘Gazprom for Children’ Program) 2017 Moscow R. G. Grand Prix 17.02.2017 - 18.02.2017 Moscow Grand Prix 2017 Qualification. START LIST 17.02.2017 19:00 20:00 1 stream 1 Filiorianu Anna Luiza Romania 20307 1 15 2 Tashkenbaeva Sabina Uzbekistan 23538 2 16 3 Gamalejeva Jelizaveta Latvia 14769 3 17 4 Ruprecht Nicol Austria 5727 4 18 5 Soldatova Aleksandra Russia 20096 5 19 6 Kabrits Laurabel Estonia 20281 6 20 7 Gergalo Rebecca Finland 22567 7 21 8 Halkina Katsiaryna Belarus 8861 8 22 9 Agagulian Iasmina Armenia 35527 9 23 10 Ormrod Zoe Australia 18356 10 24 11 Kratochwill Spela Slovenia 9540 11 25 12 Averina Dina Russia 18528 12 26 13 Veinberg Filanovsky Victoria Israel 15247 13 27 14 Sherlock Stephani Great Britain 18795 14 28 20:00 21:00 2 stream 1 Lindgren Petra Sweden 10551 1 14 2 Bravikova Yulia Russia 18532 2 15 3 Agiurgiuculese Alexandra Italy 32232 3 16 4 Nemeckova Daniela Czech Republic 29518 4 17 5 Ashram Linoy Israel 22468 5 18 6 Proncenko Veronika Lithuania 20584 6 19 7 Averina Arina Russia 18527 7 20 8 Sebkova Anna Czech Republic 10471 8 21 9 Jovenin Axelle France 29499 9 22 10 Kim Chaewoon Korea 28673 10 23 11 Vladinova Neviana Bulgaria 22769 11 24 12 Kilianova Xenia Slovakia 15177 12 25 13 Ashirbayeva Sabina Kazakhstan 18531 13 26 1 / 2 GymRytm’2000 Alina Kabaeva CHAMPIONS CUP – GAZPROM (Grand Prix Qualifications – within the framework of ‘Gazprom for Children’ Program) 2017 Moscow R.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Philadelphia Deanery Report
    Philadelphia Deanery Report Diocese of Eastern Pennsylvania Annual Assembly, 2010 I begin my second year as Dean of the Philadelphia Deanery with grateful thanks to Almighty God for all the blessings He has bestowed upon our Deanery. In my travels and visitations I have met with many Christ-loving people, both laity and clergy who all work for the glory of God’s Holy Church. Highlights this past year include, but are not limited to the following: We welcome our newest member of the Deanery, Fr. James Weremedic and Matushka Lisa who moved into the Rectory in Wilmington, DE, this fall. Fr. James replaces Fr. Andrew Anderson who is on a leave of absence. Fr. Andrew remains attached to St. Stephen’s Cathedral in Philadelphia during his leave. St. Michael’s Church in Wilmington, Delaware have put their faith in God by moving forward with the construction of a new Parish Hall. This work began under the direction of their former Rector, Fr. Andrew Anderson and continues under the competent leadership of Fr. James Weremedic. The finances for this undertaking are underwritten in a unique way by the Russian Brotherhood Organization, who secured over $500,000 at a very reasonable rate to the parish. It will be their continued faith in God that will bring them to the day when that mortgage will be burned. We pray for God’s blessing on their endeavor. A Blessing of the new hall was held on October 10, with His Beatitude, Metropolitan JONAH, and His Grace, Bishop TIKHON, along with the Rector Fr.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Holy Father RAPHAEL Was Born in Syria in 1860 to Pious Orthodox Parents, Michael Hawaweeny and His Second Wife Mariam
    In March of 1907 Saint TIKHON returned to Russia and was replaced by From his youth, Saint RAPHAEL's greatest joy was to serve the Church. When Archbishop PLATON. Once again Saint RAPHAEL was considered for episcopal he came to America, he found his people scattered abroad, and he called them to office in Syria, being nominated to succeed Patriarch GREGORY as Metropolitan of unity. Tripoli in 1908. The Holy Synod of Antioch removed Bishop RAPHAEL's name from He never neglected his flock, traveling throughout America, Canada, and the list of candidates, citing various canons which forbid a bishop being transferred Mexico in search of them so that he might care for them. He kept them from from one city to another. straying into strange pastures and spiritual harm. During 20 years of faithful On the Sunday of Orthodoxy in 1911, Bishop RAPHAEL was honored for his 15 ministry, he nurtured them and helped them to grow. years of pastoral ministry in America. Archbishop PLATON presented him with a At the time of his death, the Syro-Arab Mission had 30 parishes with more silver-covered icon of Christ and praised him for his work. In his humility, Bishop than 25,000 faithful. The Self-Ruled Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of RAPHAEL could not understand why he should be honored merely for doing his duty North America now has more than 240 U.S. and Canadian parishes. (Luke 17:10). He considered himself an "unworthy servant," yet he did perfectly Saint RAPHAEL also was a scholar and the author of several books.
    [Show full text]
  • Event ID: 16372 DIRECTIVES
    Alina Kabaeva CHAMPIONS CUP – GAZPROM (Grand Prix Qualifications – within the framework of ‘Gazprom for Children’ Program) *** 2020 Moscow R.G. Grand Prix Update 04 December 2019 (Accommodation) 7 – 9 February 2020 Update 15 January 2020 (Date of the event) Update 29 January 2020 (Accommodation) DIRECTIVES Event ID: 16372 Dear FIG affiliated Member Federation, The Russian Gymnastics Federation has the pleasure to invite your Federation to participate in the aforementioned official FIG International Event. DISCIPLINE Rhythmic Gymnastics HOSTING FEDERATION RUSSIAN GYMNASTICS FEDERATION Russian Gymnastic Federation Luzhnetskay nab., 8 119992, Moscow, Russia [email protected] www.sportgymrus.ru ORGANIZING RUSSIAN RHYTHMIC GYMNASTICS FEDERATION COMMITTEE 8 Luzhnetskaya Emb. Mocsow 119270 Russia Phone: +7 495 725 46 10 Fax: +7 495 725 46 99 e-mail: [email protected] COMPETITIONS Mrs Irina Tsareva DIRECTOR [email protected] ADMINISTRATIVE Mrs Heide Bruneder MANAGER PLACE Moscow, Russia DATES 7– 9 February 2020 VENUE IRINA VINER-USMANOVA’S GYMNASTICS PALACE in Luzhniki 24/4 Luzhnetskaya Emb., Moscow Nearest subway station: Vorobyevy Gory APPARATUS SUPPLIER SPIETH 1790290 and 1790580 Replacement Apparatus : Hoop: Pastorelli 00300FIG,”Rodeo”, 89 cm Ball: Sasaki M-207M-F Clubs: Chacott 301505-0003-98 455 mm Ribbon stick Sasaki M-781H-F (60 cm) Ribbon – Chacott 301500-0090-98 (6m) RULES The event will be organized under the following FIG rules, as valid in the year of the event, except for any deviation mentioned in these directives: • Statutes
    [Show full text]
  • 'The True Orthodox Church of Russia
    'The True Orthodox Church of Russia VLADIMIR MOSS For the last 60 years or more, the existence of the True Orthodox Church has been one of the best-kept secrets of Soviet 'reality'. The 'True Orthodox', or 'Catacomb', or 'Tikhonite' Church claims to be the direct descendant of the Russian Orthodox Church as it existed before the revolution and in the first decade after the revolution under Patriarch Tikhon and his successor, the locum tenens of the patriarchal throne, Metropolitan Petr of Krutitsy. In 1927, however, the True Orthodox argue, power in the Russian Church was usurped by one of the senior hierarchs, Metropolitan Sergi of Nizhni Novgorod, who issued a declaration in which he thanked the Soviet state for its great services to Orthodoxy, declared that the Soviet state's joys were the church's joys and its sorrows the church's sorrows, and placed himself in more or less unconditional submission to the atheist state. This declaration was rejected not only by Metropolitan Petr, the lawful head of the Russian Orthodox Church (in prison at that time), but also by most of the senior bishops of the church and a large proportion of the faithful (90 per cent of the parishes in the Urals, for example). The schism thus created was vigQlously exploited and deepened by the KGB, who sent to the camps or shot any bishop or priest who did not accept the declaration of Metropolitan Sergi, and with the active support of Sergi, who denounced his opponents as 'counter-revolutionaries' - the equiva­ lent of a death sentence in those terrible times.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Economic Crime - a Shared Responsibility!
    THIRTY-SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ECONOMIC CRIME SUNDAY 1st SEPTEMBER - SUNDAY 8th SEPTEMBER 2019 JESUS COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE Fighting economic crime - a shared responsibility! Centre of Development Studies The 37th Cambridge International Symposium on Economic Crime Fighting economic crime- a shared responsibility! The thirty-seventh international symposium on economic crime brings together, from across the globe, a unique level and depth of expertise to address one of the biggest threats facing the stability and development of all our economies. The overarching theme for the symposium is how we can better and more effectively work together in preventing, managing and combating the threat posed by economically motivated crime and abuse. The programme underlines that this is not just the responsibility of the authorities, but us all. These important and timely issues are considered in a practical, applied and relevant manner, by those who have real experience whether in law enforcement, regulation, compliance or simply protecting their own or another’s business. The symposium, albeit held in one of the world’s leading universities, is not a talking shop for those with vested interests or for that matter an academic gathering. We strive to offer a rich and deep analysis of the real issues and in particular threats to our institutions and economies presented by economic crime and abuse. Well over 700 experts from around the world will share their experience and knowledge with other participants drawn from policy makers, law enforcement, compliance, regulation, business and the professions. The programme is drawn up with the support of a number of agencies and organisations across the globe and the Organising Institutions and principal sponsors greatly value this international commitment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Montgazette | March 2021
    Pederson & Wentz “Sound of Metal” Music Programs A team in turmoil, Page 14 A film review,Page 17 And the pandemic, Page 11 a student publication FREE Issue 85 Serving Montgomery County Community College and the Surrounding Community March 2021 “Insurrection at the Capitol” Read on Page 7. Photo by Pixabay.com Page 2 THE MONTGAZETTE March 2021 The Staff Josh Young Editor-in-Chief Sufyan Davis-Arrington Michael Chiodo Emma Daubert Alaysha Gladden Amanda Hadad Daniel Johnson The unexpected positives of the COVID pandemic Nina Lima Kylah McNamee Lauren Meter Josh Young Audrey Schippnick The Montgazette Editor-in-Chief Krystyna Ursta Nicholas Young March Contributors Hello, and welcome back to to our busy schedules. Luckily, physically active. According Most importantly, however, Yaniv Aronson everyone who has returned to their this particular prediction came to a study published in the students have learned just Robin Bonner Advisors studies at Montgomery County true for me, for the most part; International Journal of how resilient they really are. Community College. I hope you however, since that letter, there Environmental Research and We, as students, have been Joshua Woodroffe Design & Layout all have a positive, successful have been many other positives Public Health that examined forced to adapt on the fly in an semester. As always, I am happy to come out of this less-than- Belgian adults, of people who environment of almost constant to extend a warm welcome to ideal situation. were classified as “low active” uncertainty, resulting in frequent students who are entering their In addition to spending (getting little to no exercise), battles with adversity, while also first semester at the College.
    [Show full text]
  • Foresight Hindsight
    Hindsight, Foresight ThinkingI Aboutnsight, Security in the Indo-Pacific EDITED BY ALEXANDER L. VUVING DANIEL K. INOUYE ASIA-PACIFIC CENTER FOR SECURITY STUDIES HINDSIGHT, INSIGHT, FORESIGHT HINDSIGHT, INSIGHT, FORESIGHT Thinking About Security in the Indo-Pacific Edited by Alexander L. Vuving Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies Hindsight, Insight, Foresight: Thinking About Security in the Indo-Pacific Published in September 2020 by the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, 2058 Maluhia Rd, Honolulu, HI 96815 (www.apcss.org) For reprint permissions, contact the editors via [email protected] Printed in the United States of America Cover Design by Nelson Gaspar and Debra Castro Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Name: Alexander L. Vuving, editor Title: Hindsight, Insight, Foresight: Thinking About Security in the Indo-Pacific / Vuving, Alexander L., editor Subjects: International Relations; Security, International---Indo-Pacific Region; Geopolitics---Indo-Pacific Region; Indo-Pacific Region JZ1242 .H563 2020 ISBN: 978-0-9773246-6-8 The Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies is a U.S. Depart- ment of Defense executive education institution that addresses regional and global security issues, inviting military and civilian representatives of the United States and Indo-Pacific nations to its comprehensive program of resident courses and workshops, both in Hawaii and throughout the Indo-Pacific region. Through these events the Center provides a focal point where military, policy-makers, and civil society can gather to educate each other on regional issues, connect with a network of committed individuals, and empower themselves to enact cooperative solutions to the region’s security challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • St Tikhon's Orthodox Theological Seminary
    ACADEMIC BULLETIN 2018-2020 St. Tikhon’s Orthodox Theological Seminary Bulletin, 2018—2020 Table of Contents Message from the Dean. .................................................................... .2 Introduction ........................................................................................... 3 The Seminary: An Overview ............................................................... 6 Admission............................................................................................... 11 Program and Courses of Study ........................................................... 19 The Master of Divinity (M. Div.) Degree Program ................. 19 Clinical Pastoral Educational Certification Program ............... 25 Continuing Education ................................................................. 25 Academic Policies ................................................................................. 27 General Policies and Information ...................................................... 42 Formation ............................................................................................... 52 Field Education ..................................................................................... 55 The Seminary Library ........................................................................... 58 Student Life ............................................................................................ 59 Financial Information ........................................................................... 71 Course Offerings
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine
    ENTERING THE GREY-ZONE: Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine civiliansinconflict.org i RECOGNIZE. PREVENT. PROTECT. AMEND. PROTECT. PREVENT. RECOGNIZE. Cover: June 4, 2013, Spartak, Ukraine: June 2021 Unexploded ordnances in Eastern Ukraine continue to cause harm to civilians. T +1 202 558 6958 E [email protected] civiliansinconflict.org ORGANIZATIONAL MISSION AND VISION Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) is an international organization dedicated to promoting the protection of civilians in conflict. CIVIC envisions a world in which no civilian is harmed in conflict. Our mission is to support communities affected by conflict in their quest for protection and strengthen the resolve and capacity of armed actors to prevent and respond to civilian harm. CIVIC was established in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a young humanitarian who advocated on behalf of civilians affected by the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Honoring Marla’s legacy, CIVIC has kept an unflinching focus on the protection of civilians in conflict. Today, CIVIC has a presence in conflict zones and key capitals throughout the world where it collaborates with civilians to bring their protection concerns directly to those in power, engages with armed actors to reduce the harm they cause to civilian populations, and advises governments and multinational bodies on how to make life-saving and lasting policy changes. CIVIC’s strength is its proven approach and record of improving protection outcomes for civilians by working directly with conflict-affected communities and armed actors. At CIVIC, we believe civilians are not “collateral damage” and civilian harm is not an unavoidable consequence of conflict—civilian harm can and must be prevented.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF 203KB
    Foreign Affairs Committee Oral evidence: FCO-DFID merger, HC 525 Tuesday 7 July 2020 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 7 July 2020. Watch the meeting Members present: Tom Tugendhat (Chair); Alicia Kearns; Stewart Malcolm McDonald; Bob Seely; Henry Smith; Royston Smith. Questions 1 - 41 Witnesses I: Tim Durrant, Associate Director, Institute for Government; and Lord Macpherson of Earl’s Court CBE, former Permanent Secretary, HM Treasury. Examination of witnesses Witnesses: Tim Durrant and Lord Macpherson. Q1 Chair: Welcome to this afternoon’s session of the Foreign Affairs Committee. Lord Macpherson and Tim Durrant, I apologise to both of you for keeping you waiting. May I ask if you would very briefly say one line about yourselves? Lord Macpherson: I was permanent secretary of the Treasury from 2005 to 2016. Tim Durrant: I am an associate director at the Institute for Government, and I have looked at machinery of government changes in the past. Q2 Chair: We are going to go through a series of questions. May I ask you to keep your answers as brief as is reasonable? If you agree with your fellow speaker, do not feel the need to repeat. If you disagree, of course feel the need to challenge. That is very welcome. We are looking at the merger of the Foreign Office and the Department for International Development. Lord Macpherson, do you agree with the rationale that the Government have set out, and the timing? Lord Macpherson: In broad terms, I can see a case for bringing the Foreign Office and Development together.
    [Show full text]