DOCSLIB.ORG

Everlasting Torment True Or False

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Study on Everlasting Torment Study to determine if there is really a place of everlasting torment in fire. By Donna Dorsey Wulfemeyer As C.S. Lewis famously said, hell is a place where the door is locked from the inside; in other words, it is a destination of our own choosing. He writes, “There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, ‘Thy will be done,’ and those to whom God says, in the end, ‘Thy will be done.'” I found this paragraph during this study and am including it here because it states what I believe: At the human level we associate excessive torture with evil tyrants and dictators, we have a difficult time reconciling such never-ending conscious punishment with the truth that “God is love”. We think that because we find the idea of conscious, perpetual punishment repulsive, it must mean that God does not plan to subject anyone to such a fate. Surely, we say to ourselves, the biblical language suggesting the reality of hell must be metaphorical, not literal. There is an error in such reasoning however because we don’t think as God does. God’s thoughts are beyond our thoughts, and his ways beyond our ways. Consequently, he is not only more merciful than we are but more just. Because we are a fallen people, our sense of compassion may be well meaning, but our sense of justice, when weighted against God’s holiness, leaves much to be desired. I found these 3 different views about Eternal Fire. Once I was finished with this study I completely agree with Traditionalism however I was hoping that Conditionalism would be my final determination. Traditionalism The traditional, majority view is commonly called "Traditionalism", and sometimes described as "Eternal, Conscious Torment". Traditionalism holds that hell, the lake of fire, involves a permanent state of conscious suffering. Conditionalism Conditionalism is short for “Conditional Immortality”, a perspective incorporating annihilation. Conditionalism agrees with Traditionalism that Hell, the lake of fire, is permanent, and that the unsaved will suffer. However, framed against the biblical metaphor of fire, Conditionalists hold that God's judgment ultimately consumes or annihilates a person. Its complete destruction, obliteration. Universalism Universalism is sometimes referred to as “Universal Restoration or Universal Reconciliation”. Universalism suggests that everybody eventually ends up reconciled to God, after a period of refinement in Hell. Universalists focus on the metaphor of fire signifying refinement and purification, burning away that which is unfit for eternal life with God. I began this study because my father died believing that after death a person returns to dust from which he came and that there is no afterlife. I found his comment interesting because he obviously believed God created us from the ground and yet he didn’t believe in Jesus or anything after this life. My goal in this study was to know if my father is currently in eternal fire or if he is unaware of anything until the Great White Throne Judgment. MY FINAL CONCLUSION ON ETERNAL TORMENT AFTER COMPLETING THIS STUDY. Although I had never heard the term Traditionalism, that definition is what I believed before and after this study. I believed that the terms Hell, Sheol and Hades all refer to the same place. It is a place where the Spirit of the unsaved dead, no longer in their physical body, go upon death prior to the White Throne Judgment and their final destination in the Lake of Fire which is another form of Hell. I never considered what the difference between hell and the Lake of Fire was. I believed the Lake of Fire is eternal, produces conscious suffering for those thrown into it in the final judgment. I believed the bodies of those throw into the lake aren’t consumed by the fire so they feel the hot fire burning them forever. Another way to explain my belief, after this study, is that I believe there is a place called Hell and a Lake of Fire. The lake burns the bodies and spirits of the unsaved in it forever and ever. The unsaved are those who choose not to believe that Jesus is the Son of God, the Messiah who died for our sins. The spirit of the unsaved goes directly to hell upon their physical death where they await the resurrection of their bodies. There is torment and fire in hell. Once their body and spirit are reunited and they are judged by God, they will be thrown into the Lake of Fire, which is a Hell for the body and spirit and they will be there in the flames forever and ever. Eternal Torment is real and I’m thankful I will not experience it. Throughout the bible God uses fire as a method of punishment to warn people that his final punishment will be extreme. In many verses the use of fire can certainly be metaphorical but in many it shows a picture of hell’s torment. I believe what the bible says and I’m thankful that God gives people a way not to experience his extreme judgment. Physical death is not the end of existence, but only a change in the state of our existence. When we physically die, our spirit temporarily leaves our body. Physical death takes a person from our visible world to the invisible world. For the believer (those saved) it is entrance into eternity with God. For the non-believer (unsaved person) it is entrance into eternal torment. The lake of fire is a term used in only a few verses near the end in the book of Revelation (Revelation 19:20; 20:10, 14, 15; 21:8). Jesus refers to Gehenna/hell several times (Matthew 10:28; Mark 9:43; Luke 12:5), as well as an “outer darkness” (Matthew 8:12; 22:13). These all seem to be different references to where no one should want to be. Hell, the lake of fire, and outer darkness are all terms describing the final destination of those who reject Christ. This study was more difficult than I anticipated. There were several things I had to study and clarify before I could state my final beliefs. 1. Is a person’s soul and spirit the same? 2. Do the unsaved have an immortal body when they are resurrected? 3. Is there a place known as Hell/Sheol/Hades where the unsaved go directly after physical death? Are they in fire there? 4. Where do saved people go directly upon their physical death? 5. After Hell, at the final judgment, there is a Lake of Fire. Are the bodies and spirits of the unsaved burned here forever? STUDY #1: Is a person’s soul and spirit the same? I still have difficulty in understanding the difference between our soul and spirit. I believe it is enough to understand that once our body physically dies, our soul and/or spirit leaves it. There is nothing in scripture that states that something different happens to our soul compared to what happens to our spirit. The bible seems to use the terms spirit and soul interchangeably to represent a person’s spiritual side as compared to the physical body. It is clear that our spirit leaves our body when we die because most of the New Testament verses use the word spirit. I don’t believe it is critical to this study to make a distinction between soul and spirit so I will refer to the spiritual part of us as spirit for the purpose of this study. Jesus said we must be born again spiritually to enter the kingdom of God. 1 Peter states when we are born again we become imperishable, meaning immortal. Therefore the moment we are born again our body, soul and spirit are judged righteous. Both our spiritual and physical body is immortal; will have eternal life with God. All verses regarding Jesus’ last words on the cross stated he yielded/committed his spirit to God. When Jesus told a dead child to get up, the verses states that it was her spirit that returned to her body. In Acts, Luke wrote about Stephen being stoned. When he was near death he saw a vision of Jesus and asked him to receive his Spirit. James also uses the word spirit when he said the body without the spirit is dead. Matthew uses the term soul when he reminds us to be afraid of God who can destroy both our soul and body in hell. Paul uses both spirit and soul along with the word body to represent our entire being. Although we see that physical bodies decay and nothing is left but bones, God will someday join our spirit with our body during the resurrection regardless of how it is disposed of upon death. This applies to the saved and unsaved. Backup Verses Matthew 10:28 And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul (Strong’s 5590). But rather fear Him who is able to destroy (Strong’s 622) both soul (Strong’s 5590) and body in hell (KJV & NKJ) Matthew 27:50 And Jesus cried out again with a loud voice, and yielded up His spirit (Strong’s 4151). Luke 8:53-55 They laughed at him, knowing she was dead. But he took her by the hand and said, “My child, get up!” Her spirit (Strong’s 4151) returned, and at once she stood up. Luke 23:46 Jesus called out with a loud voice, “Father into your hands I commit my spirit (Strong’s 4151).” Notes/Thoughts It is our Spirit that leaves the body after death.
Recommended publications
  • 06.07 Holy Saturday and Harrowing of Hell.Indd

    06.07 Holy Saturday and Harrowing of Hell.Indd

    Association of Hebrew Catholics Lecture Series The Mystery of Israel and the Church Spring 2010 – Series 6 Themes of the Incarnation Talk #7 Holy Saturday and the Harrowing of Hell © Dr. Lawrence Feingold STD Associate Professor of Theology and Philosophy Kenrick-Glennon Seminary, Archdiocese of St. Louis, Missouri Note: This document contains the unedited text of Dr. Feingold’s talk. It will eventually undergo final editing for inclusion in the series of books being published by The Miriam Press under the series title: “The Mystery of Israel and the Church”. If you find errors of any type, please send your observations [email protected] This document may be copied and given to others. It may not be modified, sold, or placed on any web site. The actual recording of this talk, as well as the talks from all series, may be found on the AHC website at: http://www.hebrewcatholic.net/studies/mystery-of-israel-church/ Association of Hebrew Catholics • 4120 W Pine Blvd • Saint Louis MO 63108 www.hebrewcatholic.net • [email protected] Holy Saturday and the Harrowing of Hell Whereas the events of Good Friday and Easter Sunday Body as it lay in the tomb still the Body of God? Yes, are well understood by the faithful and were visible in indeed. The humanity assumed by the Son of God in the this world, the mystery of Holy Saturday is obscure to Annunciation in the womb of the Blessed Virgin is forever the faithful today, and was itself invisible to our world His. The hypostatic union was not disrupted by death.
  • The Earth and the Waters in Genesis 1 and 2: a Linguistic Investigation, by David Toshio Tsumura

    The Earth and the Waters in Genesis 1 and 2: a Linguistic Investigation, by David Toshio Tsumura

    136 Journal of Biblical Literature The principal shortcoming of this book is that it does not adequately take into account the results of the current Israeli excavations at Shiloh. Schley dismisses "the claimed (emphasis mine) archaeological evidence for a massive destruction of the site during Iron I" without reviewing the evidence, and he takes refuge in the position that "Iron I extends from the end of the thirteenth century BCE to the middle of the tenth, and an Iron I destruction layer theoretically could occur at any time during this period" (p. 196). Unfortunately, the work is marred by numerous typographical errors and several inconsistencies in transliterations. Still, it is a valuable study which merits the careful attention of scholars. Carl D. Evans University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 The Earth and the Waters in Genesis 1 and 2: A Linguistic Investigation, by David Toshio Tsumura. JSOTSup 83. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1989. Pp. 201. ?22.50 ($33.50). The first two chapters of Genesis raise innumerable problems for the student of biblical literature. Not the least of these are the basic meaning and etymology of five key words (tohu, bohu, teh6m, 'ed, 'eden), the relationship between these Hebrew concepts and proposed Near Eastern parallels, and the overall issue of earth and waters in the stories of creation. These questions form the basis of David Tsumura'smonograph. As the book's sub- heading suggests, the author is interested mainly in presenting the linguistic evidence relating to these issues. Only after a thorough investigation along these lines, he believes, can biblical scholars then proceed to the larger issues of theology and mythico-religious thought.
  • Andrews University SEMINARY S1UDIES

    Andrews University SEMINARY S1UDIES

    Andrews University SEMINARY S1UDIES Volume 37 cSpring. 1999 Number 1 Andrews University Press ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES The Journal of the Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary of Andrews University, Berrien Springs, Michigan 49104, U.S.A. Editor: NANCY J. VYHMEISTER Associate Editor: JERRY MOON Book Review Editor: JERRY MOON Consulting Editors: ROBERT M. JOHNSTON, JON PAULIEN, RANDALL W. YOLTNKER Copy Editor: LEONA G. RUNNING Book Review Assistant: JOSE E. GUZMAN Circulation Manager: Jost E. GUZMAN Office Manager: KAREN K. ABRAHAMSON Editorial Assistant: KAREN K. ABRAHAMSON Editorial and Circulation Offices: Andrews University Seminary Studies, Seminary Hall, Andrews University Berrien Springs, MI 49104-1500, U.S.A. Phone: (616) 471-6023 Fax: (616) 471-6202 Electronic Mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.andrews.edu/—auss A refereed journal, ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES provides a scholarly venue, within the context of biblical faith, for the presentation of research in the area of religious and biblical studies. AUSS publishes research articles and brief notes on the following topics: biblical archaeology and history of antiquity; Hebrew Bible; New Testament; church history of all periods; historical, biblical, and systematic theology; ethics; history of religions; and missions. Selected research articles on ministry and Christian education may also be included. The opinions expressed in articles, brief notes, book reviews, etc., are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors nor those of the Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary. Subscription Information: ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES is published in the Spring and the Autumn. The subscription rates for 1999 are as follows: U.S.A.
  • The Symbolic Structure of Andrew Lytle's the Velvet Horn

    The Symbolic Structure of Andrew Lytle's the Velvet Horn

    The Kentucky Review Volume 5 | Number 1 Article 3 Fall 1983 The yS mbolic Structure of Andrew Lytle's The Velvet Horn Anne Foata Université des Sciences Humaines, France Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits oy u. Recommended Citation Foata, Anne (1983) "The yS mbolic Structure of Andrew Lytle's The Velvet Horn," The Kentucky Review: Vol. 5 : No. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review/vol5/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Kentucky Libraries at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Kentucky Review by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Symbolic Structure of Andrew Lytle's The Velvet Horn Anne Foata Implied in the very title of The Velvet Horn and emphasized throughout the narrative by the mythic allusions of its central intelligence, a network of symbolic representations, all bearing upon the central image of edenic wholeness, is intricately interwoven in the narrative structure of Andrew Lytle's noveJ.l Their purpose is to confer the authenticity and immutability of an archetypal experience on the limited events of both the main and the secondary (or "enveloping") actions of the novel (the story of Lucius Cree's initiation into manhood and of his mother and uncle's fall from innocence some twenty years earlier), to draw them out of the human time and endow them with eternal significance.
  • Babylonian Influence on the Bible

    Babylonian Influence on the Bible

    BABYLONIAN INFLUENCE ON THE BIBLE AND POPULAR BELIEFS THE CONFLICT OF MERODACH, THE GOD OF LIGHT, WITH TI.AMAT, THE DRAGON OF CHAOS (see pp. 17, 35). {From tile Or/g·inal in tlie Britislt .lllfuseum} Stubies on :fl3iblical $ubject~. No. I. BABYLONIAN INFLUENCE ON THE BIBLE AND POPULAR BELIEFS: "TEHUM AND TIAMAT," "HADES AND SATAN." A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GENESIS I. 2. BY A. SMYTHE PALMER, D.D., AUTHOR OF HA MISUNDERSTOOD MIRACLE/' "FOLK-ETYMOLOGY, "THE WORD•HUNTER~S NOTE-HOOK/' ETC. VICAR OF HOLY TRINITY, HEHMON HILL, WANSTEAD. LONDON: DAVID NUTT, 270-271, S'l'RAND. 1897. Printed by BALLANTYNE, HANSON &, Co. At the Ballantyne Press 5. 'IR. 3-n token or sincere respect an~ gratltu~e CONTENTS PAGE THE BABYLONIAN CRADLE-LAND TEHOM AND TIA.MAT 4 THE CREATION 8 THE PRIMEYAL CITAOS 10 CON~'LICT Bl<!TWEEN 'l'IAMAT AND MERODACH 14 THE SERPENT 23 DRAGONS OF THE BIBLE 37 THE SEA A REBELLIOUS POWER 41 THE WATERY HAD1'JS-TARTAROS • 48 THE DEEP AS HELL 55 PUNISHMENT OF THE REBEL HOST 62 THE ABYSS 66 Dl<JSERTS AS THE HAUNTS OF DEVILS 72 THE EUPHRATES AS A SPIRLT RIVER 76 CONCLUSION 80 APPENDIX A. PHENOMENAL DRAGONS 87 B. MERODACH .AND THE THU~DERBOL'l' 98 C. THE SOLAR CONFLICT , I06 D. THE SERPENT ORACULAR I06 E. NEPTUNE SATANIC I09 F. '' TEHOM" ro9 G. THE SPIRIT-DEEP • 109 H. OUR DEBT TO BA.BYLON IJQ TEXTS ILLUSTRATED PAGE PAGE Gen. i. 2 4 8. 24, 66 Jer. v. 22. 43 i. 21 . 33, 41 I. 34 35 Lev.
  • Sheol by Saying “Lowest” Hell

    Sheol by Saying “Lowest” Hell

    Jesus went there as well, “For thou wilt ever use a personal name. He may say, not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou “there once was a king,” or “there once FROM THE BEGINNING suffer thine Holy One to see corruption” was a man” but He never uses names. In www.creationinstruction.org (402) 756-5121 [email protected] (Ps 16:10). Yet at the same time, the this story Jesus names a real person named wicked receive punishment there: “For a Lazarus. He also names Abraham, a real, 1770 S Overland Ave – Juniata NE 68955 fire is kindled in mine anger, and shall living spirit. The “rich man” goes to the Oct-Dec 2006 VOL. 45 burn unto the lowest hell” (Deut 32:22). same place upon death that Lazarus does, Note, that this verse suggests different however, it seems that this hadee is levels of sheol by saying “lowest” hell. separated into two sections. People cannot Greetings in Christ! Our new website is up and going. It is the same address just with (See also Num 16:30; Ps 9:17 and Matt pass from the lower portion to the upper improved functionality. Please visit the forum section where you can communicate with 11:23). At the same time, the same place is portion. The lower portion, where the rich others and put any feedback you have regarding this newsletter or any other topic you desire. considered to be a place of reward for the man is, is still a place of torment since he You can win a free DVD by posting a comment.
  • 26 Sunday in Ordinary Time – Year C Luke 16:19-31 Yet

    26 Sunday in Ordinary Time – Year C Luke 16:19-31 Yet

    26th Sunday in ordinary Time – year C Luke 16:19-31 Yet another very unusual parable, which Jesus shares with the Pharisees (and us!)… What exactly does Jesus seek to reveal? Jesus contrasts great comfort with great distress: a rich man who dressed and ate well and a poor man who did not. Jesus contrasts, more deeply, self-satisfaction with yearning. Jesus contrasts a closed heart with an open heart. The two men die. The poor man dies and is immediately taken to the bosom of Abraham, the abode of bliss. The rich man dies and is simply buried, and from there, the netherworld, cries. As far as I can tell, this is not primarily a parable about heaven and hell. Jesus is speaking to the Pharisees, in relation to their beliefs (which, regarding heaven and hell, are unclear). The netherworld – Hades in Greek, Sheol in Hebrew – is not hell (which is Gehenna). The netherworld is • the abode of the dead • the unknown region • the invisible world of departed souls It is to this netherworld that Jesus, when He dies, descends to free the just. [Jesus does not descend into hell, where there is no room or receptivity.] There are other signs that the rich man is not in hell: 1. The love he exhibits for his relatives. There is no love in hell. 2. The original Greek terms that are translated “torture” or “torment”. • do not suggest the pain of definitive separation but the different pain of testing, purification, correction • have a connotation of sorrow or internal pain 3.
  • De-Demonising the Old Testament

    De-Demonising the Old Testament

    De-Demonising the Old Testament An Investigation of Azazel , Lilith , Deber , Qeteb and Reshef in the Hebrew Bible Judit M. Blair Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 2008 Declaration I declare that the present thesis has been composed by me, that it represents my own research, and that it has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. ______________________ Judit M. Blair ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people to thank and acknowledge for their support and help over the past years. Firstly I would like to thank the School of Divinity for the scholarship and the opportunity they provided me in being able to do this PhD. I would like to thank my ‘numerous’ supervisors who have given of their time, energy and knowledge in making this thesis possible: To Professor Hans Barstad for his patience, advice and guiding hand, in particular for his ‘adopting’ me as his own. For his understanding and help with German I am most grateful. To Dr Peter Hayman for giving of his own time to help me in learning Hebrew, then accepting me to study for a PhD, and in particular for his attention to detail. To Professor Nick Wyatt who supervised my Masters and PhD before his retirement for his advice and support. I would also like to thank the staff at New College Library for their assistance at all times, and Dr Jessie Paterson and Bronwen Currie for computer support. My fellow colleagues have provided feedback and helpful criticism and I would especially like to thank all members of HOTS-lite I have known over the years.
  • A Critique of Catherine Keller's Position T

    A Critique of Catherine Keller's Position T

    Emily Linthicum Boston College School of Theology and Ministry Existential Chaos: A Critique of Catherine Keller’s Position Towards Creation and Divine Omnipotence Abstract The two dominant concepts Catherine Keller examines in her study of creatio ex profundis, creation out of chaos, are the feminine tehomic language and refutation of divine omnipotence. She studies both these concepts through a feminist lens as well as with an overarching question as to why creatio ex nihilo, creation from nothing, has commandeered the thought behind Genesis exegesis and creation theology. Using various literary styles, both religious and secular, Keller attempts to deconstruct creation out of nothing and argue how a theology of becoming is more appropriate given the language of Genesis and creation as a whole. Rather than merely substitute the present masculine understandings of God and creation with the feminine, she persuades for a return to the foundation of tehomic language in an effort to reconstruct the negative feminine connotations of chaos and support a theology of becoming without a “divine dominology.” The purpose of this paper is to offer an examination of Keller’s text and counterarguments to her understanding of creatio ex nihilo and ex profundis. There are various examples of male dominant thought in theology throughout history; however, divine omnipotence, both in general and as associated with creation theology, is not an affront to the feminine and creatio ex profundis. Keller’s fault does not lie in the notion of creatio ex profundis and its validity; rather, her argument concerning the domineering power of divine omnipotence and its association with creatio ex nihilo remains insufficient.
  • What Happens After Death According to the Hymns in the LSB

    What Happens After Death According to the Hymns in the LSB

    What Happens after Death According to the Hymns in the LSB What follows is meant to be proactive, meaning that I intend it to be a guide for those who write hymn texts and for those who select hymns for publication in the future, rather than a critique of texts that have been written and published in the past. I have wanted to do a study like this ever since seminary days when I heard professor Arthur Carl Piepkorn say that the laity in our Church get their theology primarily from hymns. That struck me as true then, and I think it is still true today. If it is true, then what follows should be of interest to anyone who writes hymns texts, translates them from other languages, edits earlier translations, selects hymn texts for publication, or reviews them for doctrinal correctness, as well as to everyone who uses them in worship, mediation or prayer. In my own case, before I got to the seminary, I believed that at death believers go immediately to heaven in the full sense of the word, a belief held by many of our lay people and many pastors. This is not surprising since the Book of Concord, which we believe is a correct and authoritative interpretation of the Sacred Scriptures, states: “We grant that the angels pray for us . We also grant that the saints in heaven (in coelis, im Himmel) pray for the church in general, as they prayed for the church while they were on earth. But neither a command nor a promise nor an example can be shown from Scripture for the invocation of the saints; from this it follows that consciences cannot be sure about such invocation.” (My italics.
  • Doctrine of the Intermediate State

    Doctrine of the Intermediate State

    Doctrine of the Intermediate State Introduction The early Hebrews apparently had a concept of the soul but did not separate it from the body, although later Jewish writers developed the idea of the soul further. Biblical references to the soul are related to the concept of breath and establish no distinction between the ethereal soul and the corporeal body. Christian concepts of a body-soul dichotomy originated with the ancient Greeks and were introduced into Christian theology at an early date by St. Gregory of Nyssa and by St. Augustine. Soul, Encyclopaedia Britannica.com, accessed 9/30/19. Limbo is a Roman Catholic theological term, referring to the concept of a spiritual realm where the souls of righteous people who lived before the time of Christ could dwell until Jesus Christ made it possible for them to enter Heaven. A similar concept was used to describe the spiritual state of children who died before they could receive the sacrament of baptism, which the Church regarded as a necessary condition for entering Heaven. The Roman Catholic Church has never endorsed this concept as an official doctrine. Limbo, www.newworldencyclopedia.org, accessed 9/30/19. The Roman Church also called Limbo “the bosom of Abraham” thus changing the original meaning of Luke 16:22 to insert their doctrine into the passage. Death Ezek 18:4 Behold, all souls are Mine; the soul of the father as well as the soul of the son is Mine. The soul who sins will die. Ps 146:4 His spirit departs, he returns to the earth; In that very day his thoughts perish.
  • Bible Basics Lesson Fourteen: Heaven and Hell

    Bible Basics Lesson Fourteen: Heaven and Hell

    Bible Basics Lesson Fourteen: Heaven and Hell MEMORY VERSE: “And as it is appointed for men to die once, but after this the judgment, so Christ was offered once to bear the sins of many. To those who eagerly wait for Him He will appear a second time, apart from sin, for salvation” (Hebrews 9:27-28). INTRODUCTION An extremely anxious man went to his dentist for a root canal surgery. He was brought into the operation room and made comfortable in the reclining dental chair. The dentist injected numb- ing agent around the patient’s tooth and then left the room for a few minutes. When the dentist returned he found the patient standing by the tray of dental equipment. “What are you doing?” inquired the dentist. The patient replied, “I’m taking out the instruments I don’t like!” It seems there are a lot of people who like to “pick and choose” the parts of the Bible teachings they like and throw away or ignore those parts they don’t like. A lot of folks love the idea of heaven. In fact several polls over the past few years have shown that most Americans believe in heaven (86% in a 2007 Gallup poll). Most think they are going there, after all heaven’s going to be a great place! But on the other hand, many do not believe there is a hell. In another poll (Barna, 2009) only half of one percent (0.5%) believed they would go to hell. Hell is not a popular idea. There are even “preachers” who proclaim that a loving God would not condemn humans to hell.