DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 23: Mating Signals Mating Games and Signalling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 23: Mating Signals Mating Games and Signalling Mating Games and Signalling • Searching vs signalling for mates • Hybrid mating avoidance Chapter 23: Mating Signals • Courtship control and persistance • Mechanisms of mate choice • Postcopulation signals • Role reversal BGYD45 2003:10 1 BGYD45 2003:10 2 Male mating strategies Consequences of anisogamy • Males produce large numbers of sperm, and can fertilize many females • Males compete for access to females • Sedentary males compete by sperm competition • Mobile males can either search for females, defend resources, or wait for females to encounter them BGYD45 2003:10 3 BGYD45 2003:10 4 1 Sexual selection and signalling Mobility Game • Mate attraction and courtship signalling is Search Mate Recover influenced by – The operational sex ratio – The male mating strategy – The relative importance of intrasexual (male- Simulation model: each sex minimizes cycle time in male competition) vs intersexual (female mate order to maximize fitness choice) selection Search = move until encounter mate Stategies = P(move) on each time-step (0 ≤ P ≤ 1) BGYD45 2003:10 5 BGYD45 2003:10 6 Mobility game Mate Continuous asymmetric scramble among adults with equal sex ratio. searching Each adult rotates between mate searching, gamete production, courtship, copulation, parental care, and recovery. patterns Each sex seeks strategy that minimizes its cycle time given partner behavior. Males tend to search Which sex should search and which should signal? Operational sex ratio favors sex with shortest gamete + recovery time. Females tend to search Can go either way, but males more when there is resource likely to search overall. defense since males are tied to resources Why? What conditions favour one or the Non-searching sex emits other. attraction signals Exaggerated signals are given by males due to sexual selection BGYD45 2003:10 7 BGYD45 2003:10 8 2 Mating Decisions Hybrid mating game Discrete asymmetric scramble • After finding a potential mate Mates encounter and must decide – Go through with it or not? whether or not to mate Offspring viability decreases • Mistakes usually more costly to female with level of hybrid incompatibility – Therefore sexual conflict ESS decision thresholds vary with the ratio of investment in male to female gametes, gm/gf Females become more choosy as their investment relative to a male increases and the sex ratio is male-biased Whether mating and fertilization occurs in the conflict area depends on a male’s ability to force matings and female’s ability to control fertilization after mating. BGYD45 2003:10 9 BGYD45 2003:10 10 Character displacement in Male vs Female Attraction Signals damselflies Expect species specificity of mate attraction signal when females emit the signal since they have more to lose from a hybrid mating • Lower costs for males, higher for females, of mis-matings – Female attraction signals should be more specific – Best examples of sexual character displacement are from female signalling systems BGYD45 2003:10 11 BGYD45 2003:10 12 3 BGYD45 2003:10 13 BGYD45 2003:10 14 Sexual Conflict Sexual arms race in water striders. • 2 regions in conflict zone Variation among – Stronger selection on males to mate species in relative – Stronger selection on females to reject investment of males and females • Which sex can control copulation? in “tools” to control copulation. BGYD45 2003:10 15 BGYD45 2003:10 16 4 Courtship persistence games Courtship duration patterns • Discrete courtship persistence game • Females control courtship in male resource defense – ESS1: male persists, female passive, when cost of rejecting is high for female and self-advertisement systems – ESS2: female rejects and male nonpersistent, when cost of – courtship is typically prolonged and involves many male persisting is high for male display behaviors – ESS3: male persists and female rejects: when costs of rejecting – e.g. most birds, lekking and paternal care species and persisting are both low • Sexual arms race – Females also control courtship in predatory species, e.g. – Stable ESS requires variation in arms level spiders, preying mantis, lions – Males typically win given their ability to invest in armaments (more • Males control courtship in female defense systems to spend on this because sperm is cheap) – courtship is often short or absent, females may even solicit • Sexual war-of-attrition matings to insure fertility – Females decide contest duration based on perceived value of male – some insect males mate with females before eclosion • Sexual sequential assessment game – Predicts variation in duration of courtship interactions based on – some sea slugs use “love darts” value (quality) of male relative to cost of resistance for female BGYD45 2003:10 17 BGYD45 2003:10 18 Mountain Zebra Przewalski’s Horse Grevy’s Zebra Wild Ass No permanent association between males Single-male harems. Little courtship. and females. Males must convince receptive females when they encounter them. BGYD45 2003:10 19 BGYD45 2003:10 20 5 Why accept or reject? Mechanisms of mate choice • Quality of potential mate • Fisherian runaway - predicts arbitrary traits – Signals? – Honesty? • Good genes - heritable • Evolution of conspicuous attraction signals • Direct benefits – non-heritable • Condition dependent indicator traits • Revealing indicator traits • Testing these models BGYD45 2003:10 21 BGYD45 2003:10 22 Direct benefits of female preferences Fisher’s Runaway process for male frequency in Australian frogs • If females exhibit preference for a male trait • And selection does not act on females • Then sons and daughters will carry genes for both the preference and the trait • This creates a genetic correlation between preference and trait • And leads to geometric increase until further increase in the male trait is opposed by natural selection BGYD45 2003:10 23 BGYD45 2003:10 24 6 Condition dependent traits Arbitrary traits Only males in good condition can make a large investment in a trait which then has less affect on their survival BGYD45 2003:10 25 BGYD45 2003:10 26 Revealing trait A couple of bizarre things All males attempt to display the trait and pay the same cost, but the effect of the trait is less in low quality males BGYD45 2003:10 27 BGYD45 2003:10 28 7 Population variation in bowers BGYD45 2003:10 29 BGYD45 2003:10 30 Postcopulation signals • Synchronizes orgasm – Humans, gibbons? • Females advertise status to other members of social group – Hammer-headed bats, chimps • Females incite competition among males – Elephant seals • Advertise mate guarding by males – Little brown bats BGYD45 2003:10 31 BGYD45 2003:10 32 8 Role-reversal • In some groups the extra investment by males (over and above gamete production) can more than balance the overall asymmetry in reproductive investment • Male parental care – Birds, fish, amphibians, insects – Usually roles are fixed BGYD45 2003:10 33 BGYD45 2003:10 34 BGYD45 2003:10 35 BGYD45 2003:10 36 9 Kawanaphila nartee Australian katydid Live in grass trees. BGYD45 2003:10 37 BGYD45 2003:10 38 Role reversal • Male choosy about mating – sing less – reject females • Females compete for access to males • Protein in spermatophore is very valuable during food shortage. Lots to eat when grasstrees are in bloom: typical sex roles At other times, severely protein-limited: role-reversed BGYD45 2003:10 39 BGYD45 2003:10 40 10.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REVIEW Physiological Dependence on Copulation in Parthenogenetic Females Can Reduce the Cost of Sex
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2004, 67, 811e822 doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.05.014 REVIEW Physiological dependence on copulation in parthenogenetic females can reduce the cost of sex M. NEIMAN Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington (Received 6 December 2002; initial acceptance 10 April 2003; final acceptance 27 May 2003; MS. number: ARV-25) Despite the two-fold reproductive advantage of asexual over sexual reproduction, the majority of eukaryotic species are sexual. Why sex is so widespread is still unknown and remains one of the most important unanswered questions in evolutionary biology. Although there are several hypothesized mechanisms for the maintenance of sex, all require assumptions that may limit their applicability. I suggest that the maintenance of sex may be aided by the detrimental retention of ancestral traits related to sexual reproduction in the asexual descendants of sexual taxa. This reasoning is based on the fact that successful reproduction in many obligately sexual species is dependent upon the behavioural, physical and physiological cues that accompany sperm delivery. More specifically, I suggest that although parthenogenetic (asexual) females have no need for sperm per se, parthenogens descended from sexual ancestors may not be able to reach their full reproductive potential in the absence of the various stimuli provided by copulatory behaviour. This mechanism is novel in assuming no intrinsic advantage to producing genetically variable offspring; rather, sex is maintained simply through phylogenetic constraint. I review and synthesize relevant literature and data showing that access to males and copulation increases reproductive output in both sexual and parthenogenetic females. These findings suggest that the current predominance of sexual reproduction, despite its well-documented drawbacks, could in part be due to the retention of physiological dependence on copulatory stimuli in parthenogenetic females.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtship & Mating Reproduction in Insects
    Reproduction Courtship & Mating in Insects • How do the sexes find each other? – Light – Swarming (male only/ female only) – Leks (male aggregations) • Defend territory against males • Court arriving females – Pheromones What do they do once they find each other? Courtship • Close range intersexual behavior that induces sexual receptivity before and during mating. • Allows mate choice among and within species. 1 Types of Courtship • Visual displays Nuptial Gifts • Ritualized movements • 3 forms • Sound production – Cannibalization of males • Tactile stimulation – Glandular product • Nuptial gifts – Nuptial gift • Prey • Salt, nutrients Evolution of nuptial feeding Sexual Cannibalization • Female advantages • Rather extreme – Nutritional benefit • Male actually does not – Mate choice (mate with good provider) willingly give himself • Male advantages up… – Helping provision/produce his offspring – Where would its potential – Female returns sperm while feeding rather than reproductive benefit be? mating with someone else • Do females have • Male costs increased reproductive – Capturing food costs energy and incurs predation success? risk – Prey can be stolen and used by another male. 2 Glandular gifts Nuptial gifts • Often part of the spermatophore (sperm transfer unit) – Occupy female while sperm is being transferred – Parental investment by male • Generally a food item (usually prey) • Also regurgitations (some flies) • But beware the Cubic Zirconia, ladies Sexual selection Types of sexual selection • Intrasexual selection – Contest competition
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Ecology & Sexual Selection
    Reproductive Ecology & Sexual Selection REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY REPRODUCTION & SEXUAL SELECTION • Asexual • Sexual – Attraction, Courtship, and Mating – Fertilization – Production of Young The Evolutionary Enigma of Benefits of Asex Sexual Reproduction • Sexual reproduction produces fewer reproductive offspring than asexual reproduction, a so-called reproductive handicap 1. Eliminate problem to locate, court, & retain suitable mate. Asexual reproduction Sexual reproduction Generation 1 2. Doubles population growth rate. Female Female 3. Avoid “cost of meiosis”: Generation 2 – genetic representation in later generations isn't reduced by half each time Male 4. Preserve gene pool adapted to local Generation 3 conditions. Generation 4 Figure 23.16 The Energetic Costs of Sexual Reproduction Benefits of Sex • Allocation of Resources 1. Reinforcement of social structure 2. Variability in face of changing environment. – why buy four lottery tickets w/ the same number on them? Relative benefits: Support from organisms both asexual in constant & sexual in changing environments – aphids have wingless female clones & winged male & female dispersers – ciliates conjugate if environment is deteriorating Heyer 1 Reproductive Ecology & Sexual Selection Simultaneous Hermaphrodites TWO SEXES • Advantageous if limited mobility and sperm dispersal and/or low population density • Guarantee that any member of your species encountered is the • Conjugation “right” sex • Self fertilization still provides some genetic variation – Ciliate protozoans with + & - mating
    [Show full text]
  • Courtship Behavior in the Dwarf Seahorse, Hippocampuszosterae
    Copeia, 1996(3), pp. 634-640 Courtship Behavior in the Dwarf Seahorse, Hippocampuszosterae HEATHER D. MASONJONESAND SARA M. LEWIS The seahorse genus Hippocampus (Syngnathidae) exhibits extreme morpho- logical specialization for paternal care, with males incubating eggs within a highly vascularized brood pouch. Dwarf seahorses, H. zosterae, form monoga- mous pairs that court early each morning until copulation takes place. Daily behavioral observations of seahorse pairs (n = 15) were made from the day of introduction through the day of copulation. Four distinct phases of seahorse courtship are marked by prominent behavioral changes, as well as by differences in the intensity of courtship. The first courtship phase occurs for one or two mornings preceding the day of copulation and is characterized by reciprocal quivering, consisting of rapid side-to-side body vibrations displayed alternately by males and females. The remaining courtship phases are restricted to the day of copulation, with the second courtship phase distinguished by females pointing, during which the head is raised upward. In the third courtship phase, males begin to point in response to female pointing. During the final phase of courtship, seahorse pairs repeatedly rise together in the water column, eventually leading to females transferring their eggs directly into the male brood pouch during a brief midwater copulation. Courtship activity level (representing the percentage of time spent in courtship) increased from relatively low levels during the first courtship phase to highly active courtship on the day of copulation. Males more actively initiated courtship on the days preceding copulation, indicating that these seahorses are not courtship-role reversed, as has previously been assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing the Diversification of Mating Behavior of Animals
    International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology ISSN: 2639-216X Factors Influencing the Diversification of Mating Behavior of Animals Afzal S1,2*, Shah SS1,2, Afzal T1, Javed RZ1, Batool F1, Salamat S1 and Review Article Raza A1 Volume 2 Issue 2 1Department of zoology, university of Narowal, Pakistan Received Date: January 28, 2019 Published Date: April 24, 2019 2Department of zoology, university of Punjab, Pakistan DOI: 10.23880/izab-16000145 *Corresponding author: Sabila Afzal, Department of zoology, University of Punjab, Pakistan, Email: [email protected] Abstract “Mating system” of a population refers to the general behavioral strategy employed in obtaining mates. In most of them one sex is more philopatric than the other. Reproductive enhancement through increased access to mates or resources and the avoidance of inbreeding are important in promoting sex differences in dispersal. In birds it is usually females which disperse more than males; in mammals it is usually males which disperse more than females. It is argued that the direction of the sex bias is a consequence of the type of mating system. Philopatry will favor the evolution of cooperative traits between members of the sedentary sex. It includes monogamy, Polygyny, polyandry and promiscuity. As an evolutionary strategy, mating systems have some “flexibility”. The existence of extra-pair copulation shows that mating systems identified on the basis of behavioral observations may not accord with actual breeding systems as determined by genetic analysis. Mating systems influence the effectiveness of the contraceptive control of pest animals. This method of control is most effective in monogamous and polygamous species.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Ritualized Submission and the Reduction of Aggression in an Invertebrate
    Current Biology 16, 2217–2221, November 21, 2006 ª2006 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.065 Report Ritualized Submission and the Reduction of Aggression in an Invertebrate Fadi A. Issa1 and Donald H. Edwards1,* the subordinate from behind with a lowered posture 1 Department of Biology and and chelipeds (claws) held close to the body and lashing Brains and Behavior Program the subordinate with its antennae [7, 9]. The dominant Georgia State University then climbed up on the subordinate and used its cheli- Atlanta, Georgia 30303 peds and walking legs to turn the subordinate over, ven- tral side up. When the subordinate accepted the domi- nant’s approach and mount, it extended its abdomen Summary and promoted its chelipeds and walking legs forward and parallel to its body in a supine posture characteristic Ritualized behaviors that signify acceptance of a dom- of female mating behavior (Figure 1B). The subordinate inance relationship and reduce aggression between became very passive as the dominant grasped the rivals are a common feature of vertebrate social behav- subordinate’s chelipeds with its own, clasped the sub- ior [1, 2]. Although some invertebrates, including cray- ordinate’s cephalothorax with its walking legs, and fish [3], lobsters [4], and ants [5], display dominance extended its abdomen parallel to and facing the sub- postures, more complex dominance rituals and their ordinate’s extended abdomen. The dominant erected effects on fitness have not been reported. We found its gonopodia and thrust them rhythmically toward the that crayfish display such a complex ritual, when two subordinate’s gonopodia, which remained motionless males engaged in pseudocopulatory behavior to sig- (see the Movies in the Supplemental Data available nify their dominance relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Morphology - Female Reproductive System 1
    INSECT MORPHOLOGY - FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM 1 * The female reproductive system in general consists of a pair of ovaries which connect with a pair of lateral oviducts. These then join to form a median oviduct which opens posteriorly into a genital chamber. Sometimes the genital chamber is closed to form a tube called the vagina. The vagina is then often modified to form a bursa copulatrix for the reception of the penis. Opening from the genital chamber there is a spermatheca for the storage of sperm, and usually a pair of accessory glands. OVARIES * The ovaries lie in the abdomen either above the gut or to the side of the gut. Each ovary consists of a number of egg-tubes, or ovarioles which are comparable to the testicular follicles in the male. Development of the oocytes takes place in the ovarioles. * The number of ovarioles is usually constant within a species, but in some insects the number of ovaries depends upon the adult development. For example, in the genus Schistocerca, individuals reared in crowded conditions have fewer ovarioles than individuals reared in isolation. The number of ovarioles can also be geographically dependent. The number of ovarioles in different species can be quite variable. Some Diptera may have only 1 or 2 ovarioles per ovary whereas queen termites may have over 2000 ovarioles per ovary. * The ovaries of Collembola are not composed of ovarioles, but rather they are sac-like with a lateral germarium from which files of oocytes are produced. The ovaries are probably not homologous with those of other insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction and Sex in Invertebrates - Alan N
    REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT BIOLOGY - Reproduction and Sex in Invertebrates - Alan N. Hodgson REPRODUCTION AND SEX IN INVERTEBRATES Alan N. Hodgson Department of Zoology & Entomology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa Keywords: Asexual reproduction, copulation, courtship, fertilization, genitalia, gonochorism, hermaphroditism, iteroparity, mate guarding, parthenogenesis, paternity assurance, semelparity, sexual conflict, spermatophores, spermatozoa Contents 1. Introduction 2. Asexual reproduction 3. Sexual reproduction 3.1. Sexuality 3.2. Environment of Fertilization 3.2.1. Broadcast Spawning and External Fertilization 3.2.2 Spermcast Mating 3.2.3. Internal Fertilization 3.2.4. Sperm Heteromorphism and Paraspermatozoa. 3.3. Copulatory Organs, Copulation and Sperm Transfer 4. Mating behaviors of internal fertilizers: pre- and postcopulatory behaviors, selection and sexual conflict. 5. Frequency of Reproduction (Iteroparity and Semelparity) Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Whilst asexual reproduction is common in many invertebrate taxa, and the sole means of producing the next generation in some, sexual reproduction is the predominant reproductive method. In the majority of sexually reproducing species the sexes are separate (gonochoristic), however, hermaphroditism occurs in many phyla and some are exclusively so. Sexual reproduction requires that haploid gametes are brought together and in speciesUNESCO that inhabit aquatic environm – entsEOLSS this can occur either outside the body of the parents (external
    [Show full text]
  • POLYGYNANDRY in the DUSKY PIPEFISH <I>
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title POLYGYNANDRY IN THE DUSKY PIPEFISH SYNGNATHUS FLORIDAE REVEALED BY MICROSATELLITE DNA MARKERS. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/14f2j0rs Journal Evolution, 51(5) ISSN 0014-3820 Authors Jones, Adam G Avise, John C Publication Date 1997-10-01 DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01484.x License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Evolution, 51(5),1997, pp. 1611-1622 POLYGYNANDRY IN THE DUSKY PIPEFISH SYNGNATHUS FLORIDAE REVEALED BY MICROSATELLITE DNA MARKERS ADAM G. JONES1 AND JOHN C. AVISE Department of Genetics, University of Georgia. Athens, Georgia 30602 Abstract.-In the dusky pipefish Syngnathus floridae, like other species in the family Syngnathidae, 'pregnant' males provide all post-zygotic care. Male pregnancy has interesting implications for sexual selection theory and the evolution of mating systems. Here, we employ microsatellite markers to describe the genetic mating system of S. floridae, compare the outcome with a previous report of genetic polyandry for the Gulf pipefish S. scovelli, and consider possible associations between the mating system and degree of sexual dimorphism in these species. Twenty-two pregnant male dusky pipefish from one locale in the northern Gulf of Mexico were analyzed genetically, together with subsamples of 42 embryos from each male's brood pouch. Adult females also were assayed. The genotypes observed in these samples document that cuckoldry by males did not occur; males often receive eggs from multiple females during the course of a pregnancy (six males had one mate each, 13 had two mates, and three had three mates); embryos from different females are segregated spatially within a male's brood pouch; and a female's clutch of eggs often is divided among more than one male.
    [Show full text]
  • Mating Behavior Differences in Monogamous and Polygamous
    Russian J. Theriol. 18(2): 67–79 © RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF THERIOLOGY, 2019 Mating behavior differences in monogamous and polygamous sympatric closely related species Mus musculus and Mus spicilegus and their role in behavioral precopulatory isolation Alexander V. Ambaryan, Vera V. Voznessenskaya & Elena V. Kotenkova* ABSTRACT. Closely related species with different mating system may be the most suitable model taxa for studies aimed to highlight the cause formation of species-specific peculiarities of sexual behavior and behavioral mechanisms of precopulatory isolation. The current study aimed to clarify the role of the mating system and lifestyle, including ecology features, in patterning of behavioral activities during mating, as well as the role of behavioral patterns in the precopulatory isolation of closely related Mus taxa. Test subjects were closely related sympatric species: polygynous/promiscuous M. musculus and presumably monogamous M. spicilegus, reproductively isolated in nature. Dyadic encounters of male and receptive female were conducted in clear chambers and the behavior was recorded by means of video camera. Sexual behavior, culminating in ejaculation, was observed in conspecific dyadic encounters only; it occurred more frequently and with longer duration in males of M. spicilegus, than in males of M. musculus. In conspecific encounters, males of M. spicilegus exhibited a higher level of affiliative behavior than females. In both species total frequency and duration of aggressive behavior was higher in females compared to males. In heterospecific dyadic encounters the behavioral pattern of males and females was strictly different from those in conspecific encounters, and the elements of aggressive behavior prevailed. We demonstrated that not only the pattern of sexual behavior is important for reproductive isolation, but also all types of behavioral interactions preceded copulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Hippocampus Zosterae) As Threatened Or Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE © Jeff Jeffords, www.divegallery.com PETITION TO LIST THE DWARF SEAHORSE (HIPPOCAMPUS ZOSTERAE) AS THREATENED OR ENDANGERED UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY NOTICE OF PETITION Mr. Gary F. Locke Secretary of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Rm. 5516 Washington, D.C. 20230 Email: [email protected] Mr. Eric Schwaab Assistant Administrator for Fisheries National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Email: [email protected] Dr. Roy E. Crabtree Administrator, Southeast Region National Marine Fisheries Service 263 13th Avenue South St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Email: [email protected] Date: this 6th day of April, 2011 Pursuant to section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b), section 553(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(e), and 50 C.F.R. § 424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”), Tierra Curry and Noah Greenwald hereby petition the Secretary of Commerce, through the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”), to list the dwarf seahorse (Hippocampus zosterae) as a threatened or endangered species under the ESA, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 et seq. The Center is a non-profit, public interest environmental organization dedicated to the protection of imperiled species and their habitats through science, policy, and environmental law. The Center has 320,000 members and online activists throughout the United States. NMFS has jurisdiction over this Petition. This Petition sets in motion a specific process, placing definite response requirements on NMFS.
    [Show full text]
  • Polyandry and Polygyny in a Social Rodent: an Integrative Perspective Based on Social Organization, Copulations, and Genetics
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 19 February 2019 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00003 Polyandry and Polygyny in a Social Rodent: An Integrative Perspective Based on Social Organization, Copulations, and Genetics John L. Hoogland 1*, Regina Trott 1 and Stephen R. Keller 2 1 Appalachian Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Frostburg, MD, United States, 2 Department of Plant Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States Animal mating systems have fascinated biologists for thousands of years. Ways to describe a mating system include determining social organization, observing copulations, or using genetics to assign parentage. Social organization can be difficult to quantify, however, documentation of copulations is often challenging, many copulations do not produce offspring, and genetic variation is sometimes minimal. Here we use data from a 7-year study of wild white-tailed prairie dogs (WTPDs, Cynomys leucurus) living in Colorado USA to estimate the frequencies of polyandry (i.e., copulation with ≥2 males) and polygyny (i.e., copulation with ≥2 females) from three independent approaches: (1) Edited by: determination of the number of males and females living in the same territory (social Heikki Helanterä, University of Oulu, Finland organization); (2) observations of copulations; and (3) genetic assignments of paternity Reviewed by: from seven polymorphic microsatellites. We predicted that our three approaches would Kazuki Tsuji, yield similar estimates of polyandry and polygyny. Because a WTPD female’s period of University of the Ryukyus, Japan Michael Griesser, sexual receptivity each spring is limited to several hours on a single day, we also predicted University of Zurich, Switzerland that frequencies of polyandry and polygyny would be lower for WTPDs than for animals Caitlin P.
    [Show full text]