Access to Distributed Electricity and Lighting in Ethiopia (Adele) Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Access to Distributed Electricity and Lighting in Ethiopia (Adele) Project Public Disclosure Authorized ETHIOPIAN ELECTRIC UTILITY ACCESS TO DISTRIBUTED ELECTRICITY AND LIGHTING IN ETHIOPIA (ADELE) PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) FINAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized December, 2020 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Access to Distributed Electricity and Lighting in Ethiopia (ADELE) Project Ethiopian Electric Utility The World Bank Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Justification for the ESMF ........................................................................................... 3 1.3 Objective of the ESMF ................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Scope of the ESMF ...................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Approach and Methodology ....................................................................................... 6 1.5.1 Literature Review ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.5.2 Stakeholder Consultation ......................................................................................................... 7 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 11 2.1 Location ..................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Project Components .................................................................................................. 11 2.2.1 Background ............................................................................................................................11 2.2.2 Component 1: Network strengthening for improved reliability of supply in urban areas ....12 2.2.3 Component 2: Solar-hybrid Mini Grids for Rural Economic Development ............................12 2.2.4 Component 4: Standalone solar systems for health and education facilities .......................13 2.3 Institutional Framework ............................................................................................ 15 3. REVIEW OF POLICIES, STANDARDS, LEGAL &INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS ..... 19 Constitution of Ethiopia ..................................................................................................................19 3.1 National Legal Environmental Frameworks ............................................................. 19 3.1.1 Relevant Environmental, Energy & Sectoral Policies .............................................................20 3.1.2 Proclamations, Regulations &Directives ................................................................................22 3.1.3 Environmental Guidelines ......................................................................................................27 3.2 National Legislation Governing Land Administration, Acquisition, Compensation & Resettlement .................................................................................................................... 27 3.2.1 Expropriation of landholding for public purpose, payments of compensation and resettlement ...................................................................................................................28 3.2.2 Rural Land Administration and Land Use Proclamation .................................................30 3.2.3 Payment of Compensation for Property Situated on Landholdings Expropriated for Public Purposes .........................................................................................................................31 ESMF Report (Final) Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Access to Distributed Electricity and Lighting in Ethiopia (ADELE) Project Ethiopian Electric Utility The World Bank 3.3 Review of International Frameworks ........................................................................ 31 3.3.1 The World Bank Environmental and Social Framework (ESF) ...............................................31 4. DESCRIPTION OF BASELINE ENVIRONMENT .............................................................. 36 4.1 Oromia National Regional State ............................................................................... 36 4.1.1 Physical Environment .............................................................................................................36 4.1.2 Biological Environment ..........................................................................................................37 4.1.3 Socio Economic Environment ................................................................................................38 4.1.4 Baseline Environment of Selected Districts ...........................................................................39 4.1.4.1 Mada Walabu woreda ........................................................................................................ 39 4.1.4.2 Gera Woreda ....................................................................................................................... 40 4.2 Amhara National Regional State............................................................................... 41 4.2.1 Physical Environment .............................................................................................................41 4.2.2 Biological Environment ..........................................................................................................42 4.2.3 Socio Economic Environment ................................................................................................42 4.2.4 Baseline Environment of Selected District .............................................................................43 4.2.4.1 Janamora Woreda ............................................................................................................... 43 4.3 Southern Nations, Nationalities, people’s National Regional State ........................... 43 4.3.1 Physical Environment .............................................................................................................43 4.3.2 Biological Environment ..........................................................................................................44 4.3.3 Socio Economic Environment ................................................................................................45 4.3.4 Baseline Environment of Selected Districts ...........................................................................45 4.3.4.1 Dassench woreda ................................................................................................................ 45 4.3.4.2 Maji Woreda ....................................................................................................................... 46 4.4 Tigray National Regional State ................................................................................. 47 4.4.1 Physical Environment .............................................................................................................47 4.4.2 Biological Environment ..........................................................................................................47 4.4.3 Socio Economic Environment ................................................................................................48 4.4.4 Baseline Environment of Selected District .............................................................................48 4.4.4.1 Alamata woreda ................................................................................................................. 48 4.5 Benshangul Gumez National Regional State ........................................................... 50 ESMF Report (Final) Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Access to Distributed Electricity and Lighting in Ethiopia (ADELE) Project Ethiopian Electric Utility The World Bank 4.51 Physical Environment ..............................................................................................................50 4.5.2 Biological Environment ..........................................................................................................50 4.5.3 Socio Economic Environment ................................................................................................50 4.5,5 Baseline Environment of Selected District .............................................................................51 4.5.5.1Guba Woreda ....................................................................................................................... 51 4.6 Gambela National Regional State ............................................................................. 52 4.6.1 Physical Environment .............................................................................................................52 4.6.2 Biological Environment ..........................................................................................................52 4.6.3 Socio Economic Environment ................................................................................................53 4.6.4 Baseline Environment of Selected Districts ...........................................................................53
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Demography and Health
    SNNPR Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Demography and Health Aynalem Adugna, July 2014 www.EthioDemographyAndHealth.Org 2 SNNPR is one of the largest regions in Ethiopia, accounting for more than 10 percent of the country’s land area [1]. The mid-2008 population is estimated at nearly 16,000,000; almost a fifth of the country’s population. With less than one in tenth of its population (8.9%) living in urban areas in 2008 the region is overwhelmingly rural. "The region is divided into 13 administrative zones, 133 Woredas and 3512 Kebeles, and its capital is Awassa." [1] "The SNNPR is an extremely ethnically diverse region of Ethiopia, inhabited by more than 80 ethnic groups, of which over 45 (or 56 percent) are indigenous to the region (CSA 1996). These ethnic groups are distinguished by different languages, cultures, and socioeconomic organizations. Although none of the indigenous ethnic groups dominates the ethnic makeup of the national population, there is a considerable ethnic imbalance within the region. The largest ethnic groups in the SNNPR are the Sidama (17.6 percent), Wolayta (11.7 percent), Gurage (8.8 percent), Hadiya (8.4 percent), Selite (7.1 percent), Gamo (6.7 percent), Keffa (5.3 percent), Gedeo (4.4 percent), and Kembata (4.3 percent) …. While the Sidama are the largest ethnic group in the region, each ethnic group is numerically dominant in its respective administrative zone, and there are large minority ethnic groups in each zone. The languages spoken in the SNNPR can be classified into four linguistic families: Cushitic, Nilotic, Omotic, and Semitic.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia Emergency Type: Multiple Events Reporting Period: 1-31 July 2020
    HEALTH CLUSTER BULLETIN #17 July 2020 MHNT conduction consultation and examination of patients, Shebelle zone. Photo: Mercy Corps. Ethiopia Emergency type: Multiple Events Reporting period: 1-31 July 2020 10.6 MILLION 2.0 M IDP 4.5 M HOST 231 WOREDAS IN NEED TARGETED TARGETED HIGHLIGHTS HEALTH SECTOR HEALTH CLUSTER • As of 15 August, 28,894 confirmed cases 30 and 509 deaths of COVID-19 have been IMPLEMENTING PARTNERS reported in Ethiopia, from 589,694 MEDICINES DELIVERED TO HEALTH laboratory tests conducted. FACILITIES/PARTNERS 44 ASSORTED MEDICAL KITS • Cholera outbreaks continue in three regions of Somali, SNNP and Oromia. HEALTH CLUSTER ACTIVITIES West Omo zone is the latest to report cases affecting four woredas of Menit OPD CONSULTATIONS Shasha, Menit Goldiya, Surma and 223,907 Gachit. By mid August more than 3,000 cases had been treated. VACCINATION VACCINATED AGAINST 1.4 M MEASLES • The government-led national measles SIA was implemented in July with EWARS partners support and 14,410,153 CONFIRMED COVID-19, POLIO, children 9-59 months, 96% of the target 5 YELLOW FEVER, CHOLERA, were vaccinated countrywide. In MEASLES OUTBREAKS FUNDING $US addition, 88,216 children were 195 M REQUESTED vaccinated in refugee camps in 5 8% FUNDED 15.1 M regions. 179.9 M GAP Situation update Cholera outbreaks continue in three regions of Somali, SNNP and Oromia. West Omo zone is the latest to report cases affecting four woredas of Menit Shasha, Menit Goldiya, Surma and Gachit. By mid August more than 3,000 cases had been treated. These are remote woredas that are hard to reach, especially during this rainy season.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Agriculture and Crops Value Chain Analysis of Sesame the Case of Bench Maji Zone, Southwest Ethiopia Abstract 1. Intr
    Journal of Agriculture and Crops ISSN(e): 2412-6381, ISSN(p): 2413-886X Vol. 5, Issue. 11, pp: 226-236, 2019 Academic Research Publishing URL: https://arpgweb.com/journal/journal/14 Group DOI: https://doi.org/10.32861/jac.511.226.236 Original Research Open Access Value Chain Analysis of Sesame the Case of Bench Maji Zone, Southwest Ethiopia Engida Gebre Department of Agricultural Economics, Mizan-Tepi University, P. O. Box 260, Mizan Aman, Ethiopia Kusse Haile* Department of Agricultural Economics, Mizan-Tepi University, P. O. Box 260, Mizan Aman, Ethiopia Agegnehu Workye Department of Agricultural Economics, Mizan-Tepi University, P. O. Box 260, Mizan Aman, Ethiopia Abstract This study was analyzed value chain analysis of sesame in Bench Maji Zone of Southwestern, Ethiopia. It was specifically aimed to address the research gaps by, identifying the major value chain actors and mapping the value chain, and identifying major factors affecting market outlet choices of sesame producers in Meinit Goldya and Guraferda Districts. For addressing these objectives the study used both primary and secondary data obtained from field survey and desk review. Multistage random sampling technique was used to draw 270 sesame producers. Descriptive statistics and econometric method of data analysis were used to analyze the data. The major value chain actors for sesame marketing in the districts were producers, wholesalers, rural collector, cooperatives, broker/commission agents, retailers, local consumers, ECX, exporters and non-governmental organizations. The multivariate probit model results indicated that Years of experiences, Coop membership, household size, Education level, Land under sesame, Quantity supply, participating in training and distance to nearest market significantly influenced sesame producer’s choice of market outlet.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Resettlement on Vegetation Status and Rangeland Condition in Southwestern Ethiopia
    Vol. 11(7), pp. 533-542, 18 February, 2016 DOI: 10.5897/AJAR2015.10526 Article Number: AEEACDD57253 African Journal of Agricultural ISSN 1991-637X Copyright ©2016 Research Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR Full Length Research Paper Impact of resettlement on vegetation status and rangeland condition in southwestern Ethiopia Yonas Berhanu1, Lisanework Negatu2, Fekadu Beyene2 and Ayana Angassa1* 1School of Animal and Range Sciences, Hawassa University, Ethiopia. 2College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Haramaya University, Ethiopia. Received 14 October, 2015; Accepted 4 January, 2016 This study was conducted with the objectives of comparing range condition of an area under different land use practices (resettled and non-resettled) and assessing the possible effect of resettlement on range condition in Meinit-Shasha district of Bench-Maji zone, southwest Ethiopia. Two kebeles were selected purposively where vegetation and soil conditions were investigated in 40 quadrats across 20 sampling sites using 20 × 20 m (400 m2) quadrat, which was distributed along transects. The investigation included the assessment of grass composition, basal cover, litter cover; age distribution of dominant grasses, number of seedlings and soil conditions (erosion and compaction), which were investigated on 1 × 1 m (1 m2) area. Data from range vegetation survey was analyzed using SAS software. The study results showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between kebeles in terms of grass composition, basal cover, number of seedling and soil condition. The total score for range condition rating showed that the resettled kebele was in the category of poor range condition, whereas the non- resettled was in fair condition.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT Baseline Survey and Establishing Benchmarks for Project
    FINAL REPORT Baseline survey and establishing benchmarks for project evaluation in selected key – MNCH indicators for UNICEF-KOICA MNCH project in 4 intervention zones Segen, Kefa and Bench Maji of SNNP and Jimma of Oromia regions Reference number: RFP-S&L-2016-9127376 Submitted to: UNICEF Ethiopia Submitted by: ABH SERVICES PLC, AN AFFILIATE OF JIMMA UNIVERSITY DUNS: 850459757 ADDRESS Bole Road, In front of The Millennium Hall Email: [email protected] Tel.: +251116186520 Web site: www.abhethiopia.com Addis Ababa, Ethiopia CONTACT PERSONS Primary Contact Additional Contact Name Dr. Markos Feleke Dr. Mengistu Tafesse Title CEO Technical Director Email [email protected] [email protected] Telephone +251-911-511610 +251-911-217919 Fax +251-11-6-186528 +251-11-6-186528 July 10, 2017 1 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................ 5 List of tables .......................................................................................................................................... 9 List of figures .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Acronyms .............................................................................................................................. 12 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Factors Influencing Market Supply of Rice by Smallholder Farmers in Guraferda District, Southwest Ethiopia
    Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 2019; 8(5): 95-99 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/aff doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20190805.11 ISSN: 2328-563X (Print); ISSN: 2328-5648 (Online) Analysis of Factors Influencing Market Supply of Rice by Smallholder Farmers in Guraferda District, Southwest Ethiopia Agegnehu Workye 1, *, Degye Goshu 2, Bosena Tegegne 2 1Mizan-Tepi University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia 2Haramaya University, School of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Haramaya, Ethiopia Email address: *Corresponding author To cite this article: Agegnehu Workye, Degye Goshu, Bosena Tegegne. Analysis of Factors Influencing Market Supply of Rice by Smallholder Farmers in Guraferda District, Southwest Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Vol. 8, No. 5, 2019, pp. 95-99. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20190805.11 Received : March 25, 2019; Accepted : August 4, 2019; Published : October 9, 2019 Abstract: Rice is among the most important cereals grown in different parts of Ethiopia as food crop. The country is characterized with immense potentials for growing the crop. This study was aimed to identify factors determining market supply of rice by smallholder farmers in Guraferda District, Southwest Ethiopia. Primary and secondary data were used for the study. The data were collected from 120 rice producer farmers selected through three stage sampling technique. Econometric model was used for the analysis of the data. Multiple linear regression model results indicated that land under rice, family size, lagged price of rice and number of oxen significantly affects quantity of rice supplied to the market. Quantity supply of rice could be enhanced through adequate supply of improved varieties, controlling of disease and pests, important to make youth participate in to rice production and marketing activities, developing market information system and encouraged farmers to have their own oxen.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Landscape of Ethiopia: Diversity, Intermixing and the Association With
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/756536; this version posted September 5, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 The genetic landscape of Ethiopia: diversity, intermixing and the association with 2 culture 3 Authors: Saioa López1,2*, Ayele Tarekegn3*, Gavin Band4, Lucy van Dorp1,2, Tamiru Oljira5, 4 Ephrem Mekonnen6, Endashaw Bekele7, Roger Blench8,9, Mark G. Thomas1,2, Neil Bradman10, 5 Garrett Hellenthal1,2 6 7 Affiliations: 8 9 1) Research Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, University College London, 10 Darwin Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom 11 2) UCL Genetics Institute, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United 12 Kingdom 13 3) Department of Archaeology and Heritage Management, College of Social Sciences, Addis Ababa 14 University, New Classrooms (NCR) Building, Second Floor, Office No. 214, Addis Ababa 15 University, P. O. Box 1176, Ethiopia 16 4) Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom 17 5) Bioinformatics & Genomics Research Directorate (BGRD), Ethiopian Biotechnology Institute 18 (EBTi), Ethiopia 19 6) Institute of Biotechnology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 20 7) College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia 21 8) McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom 22 9) Department of History, University of Jos, Nigeria 23 10) Henry Stewart Group, London WC1A 2HN, United Kingdom 24 (* = contributed equally) 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/756536; this version posted September 5, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(6), 1-10
    ISSN: 2320-5407 Int. J. Adv. Res. 6(6), 1-10 Journal Home page: -www.journalijar.com Article DOI:10.21474/IJAR01/7180 DOI URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7180 RESEARCH ARTICLE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF FOREST RESOURCES TO SUSTAINABLE RURAL LIVELIHOODS IN BENCH MAJI ZONE, SOUTH WEST ETHIOPIA. Mulatie Chanie and Tesfaye Yirsaw. Department of Economics, Mizan Tepi University, Mizan Aman, Ethiopia. …………………………………………………………………………………………………….... Manuscript Info Abstract ……………………. ……………………………………………………………… Manuscript History This paper attempts to assess the contribution of forest resources to rural livelihoods in Bench Maji zone. To conduct this research both Received: 02 April 2018 qualitative and quantitative information was collected from four Final Accepted: 04 May 2018 woredas in Bench Maji zone through questionnaire, interview and Published: June 2018 focus group discussion from 200 rural households. Keywords:- The finding of this study shows that the impacts of forest resources to Livelihood, Rural household, Forest rural livelihood are diverse in terms of livelihood means. Forest income Resource. is the second largest source of livelihood diversification next to agriculture. In addition, rural households in the study area use trade, rent of asset, and other source of livelihood strategies. The relationship between socio-economic characters of the respondents with forest resources shows distance, sex, family size, education level and access to agricultural land are significant determinant of forest resource use. As far as natural forest resources have an important contribution in the rural livelihood means, issues on forest resource and rural livelihood should not be ignored in policy decisions and other interventions. Consequently, steps to efficiently use forest resources should be undertaken by different bodies as one of the ways of improving rural households livelihood means.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide 2000 English.Pub
    1 MAY 2008 AWASSA 2 Table of Contents Page N0 • Introduction 1 Part I Location and Administrative Division—- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 • Topography —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 • Climate —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • Soil Resource —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 • Land use and land cover —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 • Water bodies —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • Forest Resource —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 • Wild life resource —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 • Tourist Attraction and potential —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 • Population —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 • Ethnic Composition —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 • Urbanization —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 • Agriculture —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 • Livestock resource —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 • Fisher —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 • Hides and skins production and market —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 • Apiculture —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 • Industry —- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 • Education—- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • Review-Of-The-Urban-Legal-Cadastre-Of-The-Government-Of-Ethiopia-Issues-And-Policy
    Public Disclosure Authorized ETHIOPIA Public Disclosure Authorized Review of the Legal Cadastre of the Government of Ethiopia Public Disclosure Authorized ISSUES & POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT November 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Issues and Policy Recommendations Report Review of the Urban Legal Cadastre of the Government of Ethiopia Issues and Policy Recommendations Report DOCUMENT CONTROL Date Version # Author Checked by Details 18 July 2016 1 Tony Burns Kate Fairlie Draft report provided to World Bank for review 9 September 2 Tony Burns Kate Fairlie Revised draft report provided to Ministry and World 2016 Bank for circulation prior to stakeholder workshop 9 October 3 Tony Burns Kate Fairlie First version of report revised in response to 2016 stakeholder feedback and information gathered in mission 26 September to 7 October 2016 and discussions with MoUDH. 10 November 4 Tony Burns Kate Fairlie Report revised upon receipt of comments from World 2016 Bank i Review of the Urban Legal Cadastre of the Government of Ethiopia Issues and Policy Recommendations Report TABLE OF CONTENTS ANNEXES ....................................................................................................................................... III TABLE OF ACRONYMS................................................................................................................. IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................ VII 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Efficiency of Smallholder Farmers in Rice Production: the Case of Guraferda Woreda, Southern Nations Nationalities People’S Region, Ethiopia
    International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research Volume 8, Issue 2, ISSN (Online) 2319-1473 Manuscript Processing Details (dd/mm/yyyy): Received: 09/09/2019 | Accepted on: 03/10/2019 | Published: 19/10/2019 Economic Efficiency of Smallholder Farmers in Rice Production: The Case of Guraferda Woreda, Southern Nations Nationalities People’s Region, Ethiopia Tsegaye Melese 1*, Mebratu Alemu 2, Amsalu Mitiku 3 and Nesre Kedir 4 1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan-Tepi, Ethiopia. 2 Department of Economic, Arba-Minch University, Arba-Minch, Ethiopia. 3 Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Jmma University, Jimma, Ethiopia. 4 Department of Agricultural Economics, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan-Tepi, Ethiopia. Abstract – Rice is one of the major staple cereal crops in Ethiopia. High productivity and efficacy in its production is vital to improve food security, reduce the level of poverty and to maintain agricultural growth. Thus, the aim of this study was to measure the level of economic efficiency and to identify factors affecting economic efficiency level in Guraferda woreda. Two-stage random sampling technique was used to select 148 household heads and interviewed using a structured questionnaire during 2017/18 production year. Cobb-Douglas production function was fitted using stochastic production frontier approach to estimate the efficiencies level, whereas Tobit model was used to identify determinants that affect efficiency levels of sample farmers. As a result, the mean technical and allocative efficiencies were 78.5 and 80.56%, respectively. While the mean economic efficiency was 63.18%. The average technical and allocative efficiencies implies that there exists a possibility to increase rice production by 21.5% without using extra inputs and decrease cost of inputs by 19.44%, respectively.
    [Show full text]