DOCSLIB.ORG

(153.4 Ha) Moseley South Tract Pointe Coupée Parish, Louisiana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(153.4 Ha) Moseley South Tract Pointe Coupée Parish, Louisiana PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF THE 379 AC (153.4 HA) MOSELEY SOUTH TRACT POINTE COUPÉE PARISH, LOUISIANA FINAL REPORT SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED BY BATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS, INC. 564 LAUREL STREET 1260 MAIN STREET BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA APRIL 2015 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF THE 379 AC (153.4 HA) MOSELEY SOUTH TRACT POINTE COUPÉE PARISH, LOUISIANA DOA REPORT NO. 22-4926 FINAL REPORT PREPARED BY THURSTON H.G. HAHN III MICHAEL CARPENTER AND DONALD G. HUNTER DAVID B. KELLEY PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED BY BATON ROUGE AREA CHAMBER COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS, INC. 564 LAUREL STREET 1260 MAIN STREET BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA APRIL 2015 ABSTRACT From February to April 2015, Coastal Environments, Inc. (CEI) conducted a Phase I cultural resources survey of the Moseley South Project Area in Point Coupée Parish, Louisiana, for the Baton Rouge Area Chamber (BRAC). The survey was conducted as part of the Louisiana Economic Development Site Certification process. The BRAC project area encompasses approximately 379 ac (153.4 ha). These investigations located two new historic archaeological sites: the Alaska Sugarhouse (16PC124) and Moseley South 1 (16PC125). The Alaska Sugarhouse site (16CP124) contains in situ archaeological deposits. It is recommended that 16CP124 be avoided by future construction. If it cannot be avoided, it is recommended that the site be tested for National Register eligibility. The Moseley South 1 site (16PC125) is recommended as ineligible for inclusion on the NRHP, and no additional work is required at the site. In addition, no standing structures currently stand within the Moseley South area of potential effect (APE). TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ ii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................ ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................... x CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER 2: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .......................................................................... 5 GEOLOGY AND Geomorphology .................................................................. 5 Vegetation ................................................................................................... 10 Fauna ................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 3: CULTURAL SETTING ..................................................................................... 13 Aboriginal Cultural Setting ......................................................................... 13 Late Archaic Period, 3000–1500 B.C. .................................................. 13 Poverty Point Period, 1500–500 B.C. ................................................... 15 Tchula Period, 500 B.C.–A.D. 1 ........................................................... 16 Marksville Period, A.D. 1–400 ............................................................. 17 Baytown Period, A.D. 400–800 ............................................................ 18 Coles Creek Period, A.D. 800–1200 ..................................................... 19 Mississippi Period, A.D. 1200–1700 .................................................... 20 Historic Cultural Setting ............................................................................. 22 European Exploration, 1543 ................................................................. 22 French Colonial Period, 1682–1763 ..................................................... 23 Spanish Colonial Period, 1763–1803 .................................................... 45 American Period, 1803–DATE ............................................................. 52 The Antebellum Years, 1803–1861 ................................................ 52 Civil War, 1861–1865 ..................................................................... 61 Reconstruction and the Late Nineteenth Century, 1865–1900....................................................................................... 66 Twentieth Century and Beyond, 1900–DATE ................................ 68 Table of Contents CHAPTER 4: PREVIOUS RESEARCH ................................................................................... 76 CHAPTER 5: ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES .......................................................................... 82 Historic Ceramic Analysis .......................................................................... 82 Coarse Earthenware .............................................................................. 82 Semi-Refined Earthenwares .................................................................. 88 Refined Earthenwares ........................................................................... 83 Creamware ...................................................................................... 84 Pearlware ......................................................................................... 84 Early Whiteware ............................................................................. 85 Whiteware, Ironstone, and Ivory-Tinted Whiteware ...................... 86 Stoneware .............................................................................................. 87 Porcelain ............................................................................................... 88 Glass Analysis ............................................................................................. 89 Flat Glass .............................................................................................. 89 Non-Flat Glass ...................................................................................... 92 Metal Analysis ............................................................................................ 95 Brick Analysis ............................................................................................. 96 Common Brick ...................................................................................... 96 Firebrick ................................................................................................ 98 Curation Statement ...................................................................................... 99 CHAPTER 6: FIELD SURVEY RESULTS .............................................................................. 102 Methodology ............................................................................................... 102 Archaeology .......................................................................................... 103 Standing Structures ............................................................................... 104 Archaeology ................................................................................................ 104 The 350-ac Survey Area ....................................................................... 104 Alaska Sugarhouse (16PC124) ....................................................... 105 Moseley South 1 (16PC125) ........................................................... 121 Spot Find 1 ...................................................................................... 126 Spot Find 2 ...................................................................................... 127 The 29-ac Survey Area ......................................................................... 127 Standing Structure Survey .......................................................................... 129 CHAPTER 7: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................... 130 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 132 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1. The Moseley South Project Area ................................................................... 2 Figure 1-2. The Moseley South Project Area ................................................................... 3 Figure 2-1. Geomorphology of the Moseley South Project Area ..................................... 6 Figure 2-2. Soil types in the Moseley South Project Area ............................................... 9 Figure 2-3. Mississippi River bankline movement in the vicinity of the Moseley South Project Area from 1851 to present ............................................................................................................ 11 Figure 3-1. Aboriginal culture sequence for south Louisiana .......................................... 14 Figure 3-2. Detail of Nicolas de Fer’s (2010) 1701 Les Costes aux Environs de la Riviere de Misisipi depicting the locations of the “Bujogoula” (Bayagoula), “Majoutacha” (Mugulasha) and “Auma” (Houma) villages at the turn of the eighteenth century ................................................. 24 Figure 3-3. Detail of Guillaume de L’Isle’s (2010) 1702 Carte de la Rivière de Mississipi depicting the locations of the “Village des Ouma” and “Village des Bayogoula” ....................................... 26 Figure 3-4. Detail of Bernard Diron Dartaguiette’s (2009) 1732 manuscript map entitled Fleuve St Louis cy devant Mississipy relevé à la boussole .....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • I. a Consideration of Tine and Labor Expenditurein the Constrijction Process at the Teotihuacan Pyramid of the Sun and the Pover
    I. A CONSIDERATION OF TINE AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRIJCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT MOUND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore 40 II. A CONSIDERATION OF TIME AND LABOR EXPENDITURE IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AT THE TEOTIHUACAN PYRAMID OF THE SUN AND THE POVERTY POINT 14)UND Stephen Aaberg and Jay Bonsignore INTRODUCT ION In considering the subject of prehistoric earthmoving and the construction of monuments associated with it, there are many variables for which some sort of control must be achieved before any feasible demographic features related to the labor involved in such construction can be derived. Many of the variables that must be considered can be given support only through certain fundamental assumptions based upon observations of related extant phenomena. Many of these observations are contained in the ethnographic record of aboriginal cultures of the world whose activities and subsistence patterns are more closely related to the prehistoric cultures of a particular area. In other instances, support can be gathered from observations of current manual labor related to earth moving since the prehistoric constructions were accomplished manually by a human labor force. The material herein will present alternative ways of arriving at the represented phenomena. What is inherently important in considering these data is the element of cultural organization involved in such activities. One need only look at sites such as the Valley of the Kings and the great pyramids of Egypt, Teotihuacan, La Venta and Chichen Itza in Mexico, the Cahokia mound group in Illinois, and other such sites to realize that considerable time, effort and organization were required.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierce Mounds Complex an Ancient Capital in Northwest Florida
    Pierce Mounds Complex An Ancient Capital in Northwest Florida Nancy Marie White Department of Anthropology University of South Florida, Tampa [email protected] Final Report to George J. Mahr, Apalachicola, Florida December 2013 ii ABSTRACT The Pierce site (8Fr14), near the mouth of the Apalachicola River in Franklin County, northwest Florida, was a major prehistoric mound center during the late Early and Middle Woodland (about A.D. 200-700) and Mississippian (about A.D. 1000-1500) periods. People lived there probably continuously during at least the last 2000 years (until right before the European invasion of Florida in the sixteenth century) and took advantage of the strategic location commanding the river and bay, as well as the abundant terrestrial and aquatic resources. Besides constructing several mounds for burial of the dead and probably support of important structures, native peoples left long midden (refuse) ridges of shells, animal bones, artifacts and blackened sandy soils, which built up a large and very significant archaeological site. Early Europeans and Americans who settled in the town of Apalachicola recognized the archaeological importance of Pierce and collected artifacts. But since the site and its spectacular findings were published by C.B. Moore in 1902, much information has been lost or misunderstood. Recent investigations by the University of South Florida were commissioned by the property owner to research and evaluate the significance of the site. There is evidence for an Early Woodland (Deptford) occupation and mound building, possibly as early as A.D. 200. Seven of the mounds form an oval, with the Middle Woodland burial mounds on the west side.
    [Show full text]
  • Islenos and Malaguenos of Louisiana Part 1
    Islenos and Malaguenos of Louisiana Part 1 Louisiana Historical Background 1761 – 1763 1761 – 1763 1761 – 1763 •Spain sides with France in the now expanded Seven Years War •The Treaty of Fontainebleau was a secret agreement of 1762 in which France ceded Louisiana (New France) to Spain. •Spain acquires Louisiana Territory from France 1763 •No troops or officials for several years •The colonists in western Louisiana did not accept the transition, and expelled the first Spanish governor in the Rebellion of 1768. Alejandro O'Reilly suppressed the rebellion and formally raised the Spanish flag in 1769. Antonio de Ulloa Alejandro O'Reilly 1763 – 1770 1763 – 1770 •France’s secret treaty contained provisions to acquire the western Louisiana from Spain in the future. •Spain didn’t really have much interest since there wasn’t any precious metal compared to the rest of the South America and Louisiana was a financial burden to the French for so long. •British obtains all of Florida, including areas north of Lake Pontchartrain, Lake Maurepas and Bayou Manchac. •British built star-shaped sixgun fort, built in 1764, to guard the northern side of Bayou Manchac. •Bayou Manchac was an alternate route to Baton Rouge from the Gulf bypassing French controlled New Orleans. •After Britain acquired eastern Louisiana, by 1770, Spain became weary of the British encroaching upon it’s new territory west of the Mississippi. •Spain needed a way to populate it’s new territory and defend it. •Since Spain was allied with France, and because of the Treaty of Allegiance in 1778, Spain found itself allied with the Americans during their independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Archaeology
    INDIANA ARCHAEOLOGY Volume 6 Number 1 2011 Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Indiana Department of Natural Resources Robert E. Carter, Jr., Director and State Historic Preservation Officer Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) James A. Glass, Ph.D., Director and Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DHPA Archaeology Staff James R. Jones III, Ph.D., State Archaeologist Amy L. Johnson, Senior Archaeologist and Archaeology Outreach Coordinator Cathy L. Draeger-Williams, Archaeologist Wade T. Tharp, Archaeologist Rachel A. Sharkey, Records Check Coordinator Editors James R. Jones III, Ph.D. Amy L. Johnson Cathy A. Carson Editorial Assistance: Cathy Draeger-Williams Publication Layout: Amy L. Johnson Additional acknowledgments: The editors wish to thank the authors of the submitted articles, as well as all of those who participated in, and contributed to, the archaeological projects which are highlighted. The U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service is gratefully acknow- ledged for their support of Indiana archaeological research as well as this volume. Cover design: The images which are featured on the cover are from several of the individual articles included in this journal. This publication has been funded in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service‘s Historic Preservation Fund administered by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology. In addition, the projects discussed in several of the articles received federal financial assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund Program for the identification, protection, and/or rehabilitation of historic properties and cultural resources in the State of Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Copy of Poverty Point Binder.Pdf
    1. Exhibit Information for Teachers Thanks for choosing to share this fascinating piece of Louisiana prehistory with your students! The new, revamped Poverty Point Classroom Exhibit is an updated and expanded version of the well-loved Poverty Point exhibit that has been in circulation since 1986. The exhibit includes one DVD and three books, as well as artifacts and activities to teach your class about the Poverty Point site and culture. The activities contained within the exhibit are designed to teach, but also to be fun. This section provides a preview of what's included, and is designed to help in planning the Poverty Point unit for your class. When the Poverty Point unit is complete, please return all items in the exhibit, including the clay. If you have any questions, please call us at the Division of Archaeology (225-342-8166). We hope you enjoy these activities, and welcome your comments and suggestions! Exhibit Contents The Suitcase Artifacts Many artifacts are included in the suitcase. A complete inventory of artifacts is in the table on the next page. The artifacts can be introduced using a discovery learning or presentation technique. The Artifact Investigation Worksheet in Section 4 and the Artifact Question Cards should be used with the discovery learning technique. The Artifact Caption Cards may be displayed when using a presentation technique, or at the conclusion of the discovery learning technique. Most of the artifacts in the suitcase are 3,500 years old. Students may examine and touch them, but please take care to avoid dropping or damaging the artifacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Classroom Archaeology: an Archaeology Activity Guide For
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 393 721 SO 025 292 AUTHOR Hawkins, Nancy W. TITLE Classroom Archaeology: An Archaeology ActivityGuide for Teachers. Third Edition. INSTITUTION Louisiana State Dept.of Culture, Recreation, and Tourism, Baton Rouge.Office of Cultural Development. SPONS AGENCY National Park Service(Dept. of Interior), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 91 NOTE 117p. AVAILABLE FROMDivision of Archaeology, Office of Cultural Development, Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism, State of Louisiana, P.O. Box 44247, Baton Rouge, LA 70804. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Teaching Guides (For Teacher)(052) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC05 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Ancient History; Anthropology; *Archaeology; Community Characteristics; Cultural Background; Cultural Education; Elementary Secondary Education; *Heritage Education; Higher Education; *Local History; *Material Culture; Middle Schools; Social Studies ABSTRACT This guide describes archaeology activities appropriate for middle school students, but some activities can be used in intermediate and primary grades or high school and college classes. The activities range in length from less than one hour to 15 hours. A sequence of activities may be used together as a unit on archaeology, or individual activities may be used alone. The activities generally are arranged in the guide in order of increasing complexity. The guide is divided into five parts:(1) "Resources"; (2)"Short Activities";(3) "Games";(4) "Record a Site"; and (5) "Analyze a Site." (EH) ***********************************************************************
    [Show full text]
  • Llttroduction the Section of Louisiana
    area between the two northe111 boundaries \llhich the English had established was in dispute between the new United States and Spain, who again owned the rest of llTTRODUCTION Flo~ida - both East and West - as a result of the lat­ est Treaty of Paris. This dispute continued until 1798, when the United States waS finally put in The section of Louisiana known today as the pos~ession of the area to the thirty-first parallel "Florida Parishes" -- consisting of the eight (the lower boundary line), which waS re-established parishes of East and West Feliciana, East Baton Rouge, as the northern boundar,y of West Florida. st. Helena, Livingston, Tangipahoa, Washington, and When the United States purchased from France in St. Tammany -- was included in the area known as the 1803 the real estate west of the Mississippi River province of I1Louisiana" claimed by France until 1763· kno"m as the "Louisiana Purchase," the United States Under the terms of the Treaty of Paris which in that mad~ feeble claims on the area of West Florida re­ year ended the Seven Years War, or the French and maining to Spain. Indian Wax, this territory became English along with Meantime, several abortive attempts at all the territory east of the Mississippi River ex­ reb~llion against Spain were made within the area. cept the Isle of Orleans*. Even the Spanish province On 23 September 1810 a successful armed revolt of "Florida" (approximately the present state of OCC1.trred, and for a short time the "Republic of Florida) became English at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Povert)R Point Sta.Te Historic Site
    Povert)r Point Sta.te Historic Site uisiana STATE PARKS A Rich Culture 12 Centuries fiiefore Christ The time was eight centuries after Egyptian slaves dragged huge stones across the desert to build the Great Pyramids, and before the great Mayan pyramids were constructed. The place was a site in what is now northeastern Louisiana. The people were a highly civilized group who left behind one of the most important archaeological sites in North America. The Poverty Point inhabitants, like the ancient Mayans, set for themselves an enormous task as they built a complex array of earthen mounds and ridges overlooking the Mississippi River flood plain. This accomplishment is particularly impressive for a pre-agricultural society. The central construction consists of six rows of concentric ridges, which .fhe at one time were five feet high. five aisles and six sections of ridges form a partial octagon. The diameter of the outermost ridges measures three-quarters of a mile. It is thought that these ridges served as LOOKOW POINT-Ir front of foundations for dwellings although little evidence of structures has the Vdtor Cmter b an obseruation tower which offers a panoramic been found. However, features and midden deposits uncovered during uiew of tlte site, ircludingPouer4t excavations support this theory. Point Mound. At the base of the tow(ris a scale modpl of the mtire Eathen mounds were also built on the site. Immediately to the west of facility whlch can be sem from atop concentric ridges lies Poverty Point a spectacular bird-shaped the Mound, the tower. The model giues uisitors a mound measuring about 700 by 640 feet at its base and rising 70 feet perspectiue they are unable to gain the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Plaquemine 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, LA
    Geology of the Plaquemine 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, LA Louisiana Geological Survey Introduction, Location, and Geologic Setting The Plaquemine 7.5-minute quadrangle lies in the southeastern portion of the south Louisiana coastal plain (Figures 1, 2), situated mostly in the Holocene Mississippi River flood plain but overlapping Pleistocene uplands at its northeast corner. The axis of the deep- subsurface lower Cretaceous shelf edge (Toledo Bend flexure), which trends west-northwest to east-southeast, lies approximately 30 km (18.6 mi) to the north of the study area. The surface of Plaquemine quadrangle comprises mostly Holocene deposits associated with the most recent course of the Mississippi River, course 1. The northeast corner uplands represent strata of the Pleistocene Hammond alloformation, Prairie Allogroup. The Hammond is covered by late Pleistocene Peoria Loess that is 3–5 m (~10–16 ft) thick. The units recognized and mapped in this investigation are summarized in Figures 3 and 4. Previous Work The Plaquemine quadrangle covers portions of three parishes (Figure 1), West Baton Rouge, East Baton Rouge, and Iberville. It lies in the northeastern portion of the Baton Rouge 30 × 60 minute quadrangle, the surface geology of which was compiled at 1:100,000 scale by Heinrich and Autin (2000), originally with STATEMAP support. Prior to this compilation, Self (1980, 1986) mapped the surface geology of the uplands of all of Louisiana’s “Florida” parishes in southeastern Louisiana, though at 1:250,000 scale, and Autin and McCulloh (1991) mapped the surface geology of East Baton Rouge Parish at 1:24,000 scale. Tomaszewski et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cultural Geography. John Burkhardt Rehder Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1971 Sugar Plantation Settlements of Southern Louisiana: a Cultural Geography. John Burkhardt Rehder Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Rehder, John Burkhardt, "Sugar Plantation Settlements of Southern Louisiana: a Cultural Geography." (1971). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1944. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1944 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ) I 71-20,616 REHDER, John Burkhardt, 1942- SUGAR PLANTATION SETTLEMENTS OF SOUTHERN LOUISIANA: A CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1971 Geography University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN MICROFILMED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. SUGAR PLANTATION SETTLEMENTS OF SOUTHERN LOUISIANA: A CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by John Burkhardt Rehder M.A., Louisiana State University, 1965 January, 1971 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Although there are many persons who should be included in this tribute, there are those who deserve attention for having guided and contributed toward the completion of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 8 Summer 2016 Numbers 1-2
    TENNESSEE ARCHAEOLOGY Volume 8 Summer 2016 Numbers 1-2 EDITORIAL COORDINATORS Michael C. Moore Tennessee Division of Archaeology TENNESSEE ARCHAEOLOGY Kevin E. Smith Middle Tennessee State University VOLUME 8 Summer 2016 NUMBERS 1-2 EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1 EDITORS CORNER Paul Avery Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. 4 The Old Man and the Pleistocene: John Broster and Paleoindian Period Archaeology in the Mid-South – Jared Barrett Introduction to the Special Volume TRC Inc. D. SHANE MILLER AND JESSE W. TUNE Sierra Bow 8 A Retrospective Peek at the Career of John Bertram University of Tennessee Broster Andrew Brown MICHAEL C. MOORE, KEVIN E. SMITH, AARON DETER- University of North Texas WOLF, AND DAVID E. STUART Hannah Guidry 24 The Paleoindian and Early Archaic Record in TRC Inc. Tennessee: A Review of the Tennessee Fluted Point Survey Michaelyn Harle JESSE W. TUNE Tennessee Valley Authority 42 Quantifying Regional Variation in Terminal Phillip Hodge Pleistocene Assemblages from the Lower Tennessee Tennessee Department of Transportation River Valley Using Chert Sourcing RYAN M. PARISH AND ADAM FINN Shannon Hodge Middle Tennessee State University 59 A Preliminary Report on the Late Pleistocene and Sarah Levithol Early Holocene Archaeology of Rock Creek Mortar Tennessee Division of Archaeology Shelter, Upper Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee JAY FRANKLIN, MAUREEN HAYS, FRÉDÉRIC SURMELY, Ryan Parish ILARIA PATANIA, LUCINDA LANGSTON, AND TRAVIS BOW University of Memphis 78 Colonization after Clovis: Using the Ideal Free Tanya M. Peres Distribution to Interpret the Distribution of Late Florida State University Pleistocene and Early Holocene Archaeological Sites in the Duck River Valley, Tennessee Jesse Tune D. SHANE MILLER AND STEPHEN B.
    [Show full text]
  • GRADE 3 SOCIAL STUDIES INSTRUCTIONAL TASK Poverty Point
    GRADE 3 SOCIAL STUDIES INSTRUCTIONAL TASK Poverty Point This instructional task contains a set of primary and authentic source documents about Poverty Point settlements in and around North Louisiana. Alignment This task addresses content related to the following grade-level expectations: GLE 47: Use information in a map, table, or graph to describe the past (H-1A-E3) GLE 52: Identify and describe early settlers in Louisiana (H-1C-E1) Contents This sample task contains the following sections: • Primary and Authentic Sources • Extended-Response Task • Scoring Rubric • Scoring Notes • Additional Resources for Teachers • Printable Student Version Task Directions • Teachers may choose to use or modify this sample as part of an instructional lesson or as a formative or summative assessment. • Teachers should provide students access to the printable student version of the task, which excludes GLE alignment and scoring information. • Students should then read or review the sources and answer the question. • For specifications about the task, please see the Assessment Guidance for grade 3. GRADE 3 SOCIAL STUDIES INSTRUCTIONAL TASK Primary and Authentic Sources Ask students to read and study the following sources about Poverty Point and take notes in the space next to the documents or on page 4 of the printable student version. Students should then use the documents to answer the extended-response question on page 5 of the printable student version. Source 1: Poverty Point Tables Tools Food Other Characteristics spears fish traded at length atlatles
    [Show full text]