Better the “Devil” You Know: the Motion Picture Research Council, 3-D, and the Hollywood Studio System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Better the “Devil” You Know: the Motion Picture Research Council, 3-D, and the Hollywood Studio System Dawn Fratini Better the “Devil” You Know: The Motion Picture Research Council, 3-D, and the Hollywood Studio System Abstract The Motion Picture Research Council, which operated as Hollywood’s centralized technological research and development laboratory from 1947 to 1960, represents the apex of the Hollywood studios’ conjoined techno- logical endeavors. Its very existence pleads the case for an expansion of our conception of the classical Hol- lywood studio system to include the activities of technicians both within the studio and within the larger in- dustrial cluster of motion picture technology manufacturers, service providers, and professional organizations. Using the 3-D “boom” of 1952-1954 as a window into the operations of the MPRC, this article complicates and expands upon the conventional narrative of that “boom” which depicts the success of the independent 3-D feature, Bwana Devil, as having threatened Hollywood’s market control. The MPRC’s involvement with the production, and their subsequent work toward standardizing 3-D filming and exhibition practices serves to illustrate the scope of the activities of Hollywood’s technicians in the late classical era and their interdependent position within the larger industry of motion picture technology. The low-budget, independent feature, Bwana Devil Oboler in association with the Natural Vision (Oboler, 1952) became the stuff of industry legends Corporation, a small company started by a tinkering when it premiered in two Los Angeles theaters, cinematographer, an ambitious screenwriter, and Thanksgiving weekend of 1952, and took Hollywood the writer’s ophthalmologist brother. As lore tells by complete surprise by drawing astonishing crowds. it, having been unable to interest the Hollywood Promising “A lion in your lap! A lover in your arms!” studios in licensing their system, they produced Bwana Devil was the first stereoscopic, color feature Bwana Devil outside the system to demonstrate the release to be filmed and projected using a dual-band potential of Natural Vision to the world.2 (two-camera, two-projector) system.1 The film was Bwana Devil was wildly commercially produced and directed by radio personality Arch successful in an otherwise lackluster season, despite consistently bad reviews – “a tedious, long-winded piece of claptrap,” according to The Hollywood Reporter.3 As Bosley Crowther of The New York Times put it only a few months later, “Customers lined up to see it; Hollywood producers lined up to see the customers. The producers took one look and rushed back to their studios. The 3-D frenzy was on.”4 John Rees of the Wall Street Journal called the subsequent frenzy of 3-D production “a case of geese flapping along behind goslings,” because the camera systems involved had been “developed by little known flicker folk not connected with the major studios.”5 THE SYSTEM BEYOND THE STUDIOS 31 Luci Marzola, editor, Spectator 38:2 (Fall 2018): 31-39. BETTER THE “DEVIL” YOU KNOW This characterization of the 3-D boom of interest on behalf of the studios. 1950s Hollywood—as a threat or challenge visited Using the 3-D boom of 1952-1954 as a upon an unsuspecting Hollywood from without— window into the operations of the MPRC, has been repeated in many histories of the this article complicates and expands upon the Hollywood studio system. For example, Peter Lev, conventional narrative of that boom and pleads the in The Fifties: Transforming the Screen, describes 3-D case for broadening our conception of the classical and Cinerama as having “rocked” the industry, by Hollywood studio system, to include the activities changing production, distribution, and the viewing of its technical employees (beyond individual experience. As he explains, film productions), and to consider the studios as a node within a much larger, interconnected, Since both inventions were controlled technologically-based industry. The MPRC was (at least at first) by companies outside a hub of technological activities in Hollywood for the studio system, they threatened to fin- the duration of its existence, and its inclusion in our ish the work of the Paramount anti-trust conception of the Hollywood studio system of the consent decrees that went into effect on 1950s strengthens the case made by Luci Marzola, 1 January 1950 by curtailing the market building on the paradigm established by Bordwell, power of the major and minor studios.6 Staiger, and Thompson, for a reconsideration of the studio system in which the control of technological This account is not untrue, but it is mis- innovation and standardization are central.10 leadingly incomplete as it relies upon a limited Marzola argues that Hollywood is more accurately and limiting definition of the Hollywood studio described as an industrial cluster which includes system itself, and does not account for the work of service labs, industrial manufacturers, independent technicians within the studios and within related sales firms, inventors and tinkerers, and trade service bureaus upon which the industry relied.7 organizations such as the AMPP, the American Because it involved harnessing and synchronizing Society of Cinematographers (ASC), the SMPTE, two already-existing cameras, the Natural Vision and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and system, and dual-band stereoscopy in general, was Sciences.11 not a patentable technology.8 Several Hollywood The MPRC, operating as Hollywood’s studio technicians had already experimented with centralized technological research and development dual-band cinematography in the 1930s, and the laboratory from 1947 to 1960, represents the apex techniques involved had been routinely discussed in of the Hollywood studios’ conjoined technological the pages of the Journal of the SMPTE for decades.9 endeavors. Its demise in the spring of 1960 is one Thus neither on the basis of patents nor on that of the clearest demarcations of the end of the of know-how was 3-D a technology beyond the classical Hollywood system. To fully understand the control of the studios. formation and operation of the MPRC requires a Furthermore, Hollywood’s own central research clearer and more detailed history of the operations and development team, the Motion Picture Research of the AMPP than we have at present. Here, Council (MPRC) served as technical consultants though, I focus on the MPRC’s involvement in on Bwana Devil, and thereafter continued to the 3-D Boom of 1952-1954 as a case study in the develop practices and standards for 3-D production, operations of Hollywood as an industrial cluster. The distribution, and exhibition. Incorporated, funded, endeavors of the MPRC toward the standardization and managed by the Association of Motion Picture of stereoscopic motion pictures reveals not only Producers (AMPP), an organization itself funded close cooperation among studios, but also intense and operated by the Hollywood studios, the MPRC communication and exchange with independent was not only part of the Hollywood studio system, it producers, theater owners, inventors, technological was the gatekeeper and arbiter of new technologies societies, and equipment manufacturers. Thus we for all of the major and minor studios. Essentially, can see that the “system” included and depended the MPRC allowed Natural Vision’s production upon these other entities that operated within, to serve as a test case which they monitored with among, and beyond the studios themselves. 32 FALL 2018 FRATINI The Motion Picture Research Council securely established and little activity occurred for the next few years. When the Academy underwent The roots of the MPRC stretch back to the Acad- an upheaval, reorganization, and revision of its emy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences’ first bylaws in 1934, the AMPP assumed financial and industry-wide testing and standardization endeav- managerial responsibility for the Research Council, or, the Mazda Tests of 1928, as detailed by David agreeing “to full financial and moral support Bordwell in The Classical Hollywood Cinema and for carrying on the research and cooperative more recently by Marzola in “Engineering Hol- engineering program.”15 lywood: Technology, Technicians, and the Science The history of the interplay and tensions of Building the Studio System, 1915-1930.”12 As between the Academy and the AMPP is worthy both describe, this pan-studio effort, coordinated of much closer scrutiny; in as far as the Research via the Academy, to test and develop best practices Council was concerned, however, this proved to be for use of the new tungsten lighting, paved the way a step toward a more robust program. It was also for the Academy’s much more elaborate overseeing a step toward formalizing a chain of command by of the industry’s conversion to sound. The Acad- which those performing technological research and emy’s sound programs included testing of equip- development were answerable directly to the upper ment, communicating with manufacturers, service management of all the studios as a single group, bureaus and consultants, standardization of produc- a Board of Governors. The Research Council’s tion, post-production, and exhibition procedures, board was composed of one representative from studio staff training, publication of bulletins and each of the “participating producing companies,” manuals, coordinating a course of study with the i.e. all of the “Big Five” studios, Columbia and University of Southern California, and communi- Universal.16 General membership was comprised cation with and presentations to the larger motion
Recommended publications
  • The Tragedy of 3D Cinema
    Film History, Volume 16, pp. 208–215, 2004. Copyright © John Libbey Publishing ISSN: 0892-2160. Printed in United States of America The tragedy of 3-D cinema The tragedy of 3-D cinema Rick Mitchell lmost overlooked in the bicoastal celebrations The reason most commonly given was that of the 50th anniversary of the introduction of audiences hated to wear the glasses, a necessity for ACinemaScope and the West Coast revivals of 3-D viewing by most large groups. A little research Cinerama was the third technological up- reveals that this was not totally true. According to heaval that occurred fifty years ago, the first serious articles that appeared in exhibitor magazines in attempt to add real depth to the pallet of narrative 1953, most of the objections to the glasses stemmed techniques available to filmmakers. from the initial use of cheap cardboard ones that Such attempts go back to 1915. Most used the were hard to keep on and hurt the bridge of the nose. anaglyph system, in which one eye view was dyed or Audiences were more receptive to plastic rim projected through red or orange filters and the other glasses that were like traditional eyeglasses. (The through green or blue, with the results viewed cardboard glasses are still used for anaglyph pres- through glasses with corresponding colour filters. entations.) The views were not totally discrete but depending on Another problem cited at the time and usually the quality of the filters and the original photography, blamed on the glasses was actually poor projection. this system could be quite effective.
    [Show full text]
  • The New School, Everybody Comes to Rick's
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative and selected portions of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model or to indicate particular areas that are of interest to the Endowment, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects his or her unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the Research Programs application guidelines at https://www.neh.gov/grants/research/public- scholar-program for instructions. Formatting requirements, including page limits, may have changed since this application was submitted. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Research Programs staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: Everybody Comes to Rick’s: How “Casablanca” Taught Us to Love Movies Institution: The New School Project Director: Noah Isenberg Grant Program: Public Scholar Program 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20506 P 202.606.8200 F 202.606.8204 E [email protected] www.neh.gov Everybody Comes to Rick’s: How Casablanca Taught Us to Love Movies On Thanksgiving Day 1942, the lucky ticket holders who filled the vast, opulent 1,600-seat auditorium at Warner Brothers’ Hollywood Theatre in midtown Manhattan—where today the Times Square Church stands—were treated to the world premiere of Casablanca, the studio’s highly anticipated wartime drama.
    [Show full text]
  • James Stewart: the Trouble with Urban Modernity in Verligo and Liberly Valance
    MA MAJOR RESEARCH PAPER James Stewart: The Trouble with Urban Modernity in Verligo and Liberly Valance ALEX MORRIS Supervisor: Edward Siopek The Major Research Paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Joint Graduate Program in Communication & Culture Ryerson University - York University Toronto, Ontario, Canada Sept. 21, 2009 Table of Contents Introduction: Post-War Stewart and the Dark Turn in Hollywood ...................................... 2 Chapter 1: Vertigo: An Architecture for Double Vision ..................................................... 13 Chapter 2: Liberty Valance: Masculine Anxiety in the Cinematic "Wild West" ................ 24 Works Cited and Consulted .............................................................................44 1 Introduction Legendary 20th Century Hollywood film star and American everyman James Maitland Stewart saw merit and enduring intrinsic reward more in his extensive career as a decorated military serviceman, which began a year before Pearl Harbor, well before his nation joined the fighting in the European theatre of the Second World War, and ended long after his controversial peace-time promotion to Brigadier General decades later­ than in his lifelong career as a cherished and profoundly successful screen actor. For him, as for his father and grandfather before him, who, between the two of them, saw action in three major American wars, serving the nation militarily was as good as it got. When asked by an interviewer some 50 years after the end of his wartime military service about his WWII memories, writes biographer Jonathan Coe in his book, Jimmy Stewart: A Wonderful Life, Stewart remarks that his military experience was "something that I think about almost everyday: one of the greatest experiences of my life." "Greater than being in the movies?" countered the reporter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Films of the Last Great European Director
    Macnab-05480001 macn5480001_fm May 8, 2009 9:23 INGMAR BERGMAN Macnab-05480001 macn5480001_fm May 19, 2009 11:55 Geoffrey Macnab writes on film for the Guardian, the Independent and Screen International. He is the author of The Making of Taxi Driver (2006), Key Moments in Cinema (2001), Searching for Stars: Stardom and Screenwriting in British Cinema (2000), and J. Arthur Rank and the British Film Industry (1993). Macnab-05480001 macn5480001_fm May 8, 2009 9:23 INGMAR BERGMAN The Life and Films of the Last Great European Director Geoffrey Macnab Macnab-05480001 macn5480001_fm May 8, 2009 9:23 Sheila Whitaker: Advisory Editor Published in 2009 by I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd 6 Salem Road, London W2 4BU 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 www.ibtauris.com Distributed in the United States and Canada Exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 Copyright © 2009 Geoffrey Macnab The right of Geoffrey Macnab to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. ISBN: 978 1 84885 046 0 A full CIP record for this book is available from the British Library A full CIP record is available from the Library of Congress Library of Congress
    [Show full text]
  • THE Permanent Crisis of FILM Criticism
    mattias FILM THEORY FILM THEORY the PermaNENT Crisis of IN MEDIA HISTORY IN MEDIA HISTORY film CritiCism frey the ANXiety of AUthority mattias frey Film criticism is in crisis. Dwelling on the Kingdom, and the United States to dem­ the many film journalists made redundant at onstrate that film criticism has, since its P newspapers, magazines, and other “old origins, always found itself in crisis. The erma media” in past years, commentators need to assert critical authority and have voiced existential questions about anxieties over challenges to that author­ N E the purpose and worth of the profession ity are longstanding concerns; indeed, N T in the age of WordPress blogospheres these issues have animated and choreo­ C and proclaimed the “death of the critic.” graphed the trajectory of international risis Bemoaning the current anarchy of inter­ film criticism since its origins. net amateurs and the lack of authorita­ of tive critics, many journalists and acade­ Mattias Frey is Senior Lecturer in Film at film mics claim that in the digital age, cultural the University of Kent, author of Postwall commentary has become dumbed down German Cinema: History, Film History, C and fragmented into niche markets. and Cinephilia, co­editor of Cine-Ethics: riti Arguing against these claims, this book Ethical Dimensions of Film Theory, Prac- C examines the history of film critical dis­ tice, and Spectatorship, and editor of the ism course in France, Germany, the United journal Film Studies. AUP.nl 9789089647177 9789089648167 The Permanent Crisis of Film Criticism Film Theory in Media History explores the epistemological and theoretical founda- tions of the study of film through texts by classical authors as well as anthologies and monographs on key issues and developments in film theory.
    [Show full text]
  • How I Became the Los Angeles Correspondent for Cahiers Du Cinéma
    1 How I Became the Los Angeles Correspondent for Cahiers du cinéma grew up in a small town in North Texas on the Oklahoma border. Living in a big house on the edge of town, I had access to the larger I world through radio—still in its “Golden Age”—and television: The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet (1952), which I still enjoy in reruns; I Love Lucy (1951); the many Warner Bros. television series; and countless westerns, a staple in theaters that filled the airwaves as well. Every week on Alfred Hitchcock Presents (1955), which began airing when I was ten, the maestro personally presented concentrated doses of his trademark cinema of suspense and black comedy, while Rod Serling did the same thing on The Twilight Zone (1959), a weekly series that began airing five years later, offering tales of fantasy and science fiction introduced and narrated by Serling. I first encountered Orson Welles inThe Fountain of Youth (1958), an unsold pilot that aired on CBS in 1958 and won a Peabody Award. (I would later introduce it to French audiences via the Cahiers du cinéma when Welles was receiving an honor for his life’s work in France, accompanied by an interview conducted over the telephone between Los Angeles and New York for a special issue of the Cahiers.) The fundamentals of auteurism, a theory promulgated by the Cahiers, were already being communicated to me and future friends in other parts of the country, some of whom grew up to be auteurs of cinema and television: Joe Dante, John Landis, and in a more modest way me, 3 © 2020 State University of New York Press, Albany 4 Letters from Hollywood when editor Ed Marx and I finished a film for Welles in 1994, theFour Men on a Raft section of It’s All True (1943), a three-part film he shot in Latin America in 1942 and was not permitted to finish.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (2631Kb)
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/58603 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. A Special Relationship: The British Empire in British and American Cinema, 1930-1960 Sara Rose Johnstone For Doctorate of Philosophy in Film and Television Studies University of Warwick Film and Television Studies April 2013 ii Contents List of figures iii Acknowledgments iv Declaration v Thesis Abstract vi Introduction: Imperial Film Scholarship: A Critical Review 1 1. The Jewel in the Crown in Cinema of the 1930s 34 2. The Dark Continent: The Screen Representation of Colonial Africa in the 1930s 65 3. Wartime Imperialism, Reinventing the Empire 107 4. Post-Colonial India in the New World Order 151 5. Modern Africa according to Hollywood and British Filmmakers 185 6. Hollywood, Britain and the IRA 218 Conclusion 255 Filmography 261 Bibliography 265 iii Figures 2.1 Wee Willie Winkie and Susannah of the Mounties Press Book Adverts 52 3.1 Argentinian poster, American poster, Hungarian poster and British poster for Sanders of the River 86 3.2 Paul Robeson and Elizabeth Welch arriving in Africa in Song of Freedom 92 3.3 Cedric Hardwicke and un-credited actor in Stanley and Livingstone
    [Show full text]
  • William Faulkner, Legal Commentator: Humanity and Endurance in Hollywood's Yoknapatawpha
    University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository UF Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship Summer 2008 William Faulkner, Legal Commentator: Humanity and Endurance in Hollywood's Yoknapatawpha Michael Allan Wolf University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Recommended Citation Michael Allan Wolf, William Faulkner, Legal Commentator: Humanity and Endurance in Hollywood's Yoknapatawpha, 77 Miss. L.J. 957 (2008), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/406 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UF Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WILLIAM FAULKNER, LEGAL COMMENTATOR: HUMANITY AND ENDURANCE IN HOLLYWOOD'S YOKNAPATAWPHA Michael Allan Wolf I. INTRODUCTION: FAULKNER IN FILM AND LAW William Faulkner's relationship with Hollywood and the film industry was as complex as Benjy's narrative in The Sound and the Fury and as tempestuous as a Snopes family reunion. The Nobel-prize winning novelist summed up the plight of the literary artist in Tinseltown, where he plied the trade of screenwriter for more than two decades, as nobody else could. He told the young southern writer, Shelby Foote, "'Always take the people seriously, but never take the work seriously. Hollywood is the only place on earth where you can get stabbed in the back while you're climbing a ladder."'1 Included among Faulkner's film credits are such forgettable titles as "Slave Ship" (1937)2 and "The Land of the Pharaohs" (1955), 3 and classics * Richard E.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF EPUB} the Lions of Los Angeles by Lilly Pink L.A
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} The Lions Of Los Angeles by Lilly Pink L.A. Zoo Mourns 'Inseparable' Lion Couple's Death: We're 'Touched by Their Loyal Companionship' A loving pair of zoo lions were both euthanized due to declining health. On Thursday, the Los Angeles Zoo announced that its team made the "difficult decision" to humanely euthanize two African lions, named Hubert and Kalisa, because of "age-related illnesses that diminished their quality of life." The 21-year-old animals lived at the zoo for the last six years of their lives. "Hubert and Kalisa are an iconic part of the L.A. Zoo experience, and our staff and guests have been touched by their loyal companionship," Denise Verret, CEO and zoo director of the L.A. Zoo, said in a press release. "Their longevity is truly a testament to the level of expert care our veterinary and animal care teams provide for our elderly animals." "These lions will remain a positive part of our history, and they will be greatly missed," Verret added. Hubert was born in February 1999 at the Lincoln Park Zoo, and he has since fathered 10 cubs. Kalisa, his long-time companion, was born in December 1998, and the two were moved from the Woodland Park Zoo to Los Angeles in 2014. Though Hubert and Kalisa were long-time companions, they never had cubs together. Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
    [Show full text]
  • Hollywood & Television
    Hollywood & Television Network TV in the US 1947-- Color • Differentiating the Theatrical Product • Herbert Kalmus & Technicolor • 3 Strip Technicolor 1950 Eastmancolor • Eastmancolor negative monopak film • 1967 All color films • 1969 TV full color • Chemical Eastmancolor fades • Dye transfer Technicolor prints (1934-1974) & B&W negatives do not fade Cinerama 1952-1962 • 1952 Sept THIS IS CINERAMA • 1955 CINERAMA HOLIDAY • 1962 WONDERFUL WORLD OF THE BROTHERS GRIMM • 1962 HOW THE WEST WAS WON 3D Film • 1951 BWANA DEVIL • 1953 HOUSE OF WAX • 1954 DIAL M FOR MURDER Widescreen • Anamorphic lens • CinemaScope • Aspect Ratio • 1:37 to 1 • Academy Ratio • 2.35 to 1 • 1.85 to 1 •20th Century Fox • 1953 THE ROBE 70mm Film Stereophonic Sound • 1955 Mike Todd, Todd AO • 70mm release prints • Super Panavision • Paramount’s VistaVision • Magnetic Recording • High Fidelity Stereophonic Sound Blockbusters • Frozen foreign profits • casts of 1000’s, exotic locations • Event releases • Roadshows and long runs The Production Code & Adult Content • Geoffrey Shurlock -- MPAA • 1951 The MIRACLE decision • 1953 THE MOON IS BLUE • 1955 MAN WITH A GOLDEN ARM • 1966 End of the Production Code MPAA Ratings Board • 1966 Jack Valenti 1921-2007 • Motion Picture Association of America • 1968 Ratings G, PG, R, X • 1969 MIDNIGHT COWBOY • 1972 DEEP THROAT •PG-13 • NC-17 • 2005 Dan Glickman The Youth Audience • 1953 THE WILD ONE • 1955 REBEL WITHOUT A CAUSE • 1956 BLACKBOARD JUNGLE • 1957 Elvis Presley & Hal Wallis • 1963 A HARD DAY’S NIGHT Teen Exploitation Films • American International Pictures • Roger Corman The Drive-In • 1932 First Drive-In • 1958 4000 Drive-Ins Southern California Drive-Ins • 107 So.
    [Show full text]
  • An Homage to Marcello Mastroianni Saturday, September 22, 2018 Castro Theatre, San Francisco
    Ciao, Marcello! An Homage to Marcello Mastroianni Saturday, September 22, 2018 Castro Theatre, San Francisco An overdue homage to a great star 60 years after the making of “La Dolce Vita”, featuring the works of four directors for one actor in one day. Presented in collaboration with The Leonardo da Vinci Society, The Consul General of Italy and The Italian Cultural Institute of San Francisco. With gratitude to Luce Cinecittá, Janus Films, Kino Lorber, and Paramount Pictures. Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow (1963) 119 min. BD 10:00 AM Directed by Vittorio De Sica with Sophia Loren 8½ (1963) 138 min. 35 mm 1:00 PM Directed by Federico Fellini with Claudia Cardinale, Anouk Aimèe, Sandra Milo A Special Day (1977) 106 min. 35 mm 3:30 PM Directed by Ettore Scola with Sophia Loren La Dolce Vita (1960) 173 min. DCP 6:00 PM Directed by Federico Fellini with Anita Ekberg Via Veneto Party 9:00 PM-10:30 PM Divorce Italian Style (1961) 105 min. 35 mm 10:30 PM Directed by Pietro Germi with Daniela Rocca, Stefania Sandrelli Marcello Mastroianni A more intimate Marcello, who after the 10 years in the theater under the artistic wing of Luchino Visconti, arrives to the big success of “La Dolce Vita”, never forgetting the intimate life of the average Italian of the time. He molds and changes according to the director that he works with, giving us a kaleidoscope of images of Italy of the 60s. Marcello said: “Yes! I confess, I prefer cinema to theater. Yes, I prefer it for approximation and improvisations, for its confusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Analysis: Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb Andy Dameron College of Dupage
    ESSAI Volume 4 Article 15 Spring 2006 Film Analysis: Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb Andy Dameron College of DuPage Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai Recommended Citation Dameron, Andy (2006) "Film Analysis: Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb," ESSAI: Vol. 4, Article 15. Available at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai/vol4/iss1/15 This Selection is brought to you for free and open access by the College Publications at DigitalCommons@COD. It has been accepted for inclusion in ESSAI by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@COD. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dameron: Film Analysis: <em>Dr. Strangelove</em> Film Analysis: Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb by Andy Dameron (Honors English 1135) The Assignment: Students selected a film and viewed it repeatedly and then isolated specific scenes for careful study. Research involved the reviews, creative process, and social context of the film. Their assessment of the film's effectiveness concluded the paper. any films attempt to tackle social issues, especially those dealing with the military, yet fail to discuss them in the approachable, thought provoking way that Stanley Kubrick’s movie, MDr. Strangelove or: How I learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, does. Kubrick addresses his issues with any country’s development and possession of the atomic bomb through incredible caricatures of US and national government and military officials and policies; yet he does not do it in a directly aggressive way.
    [Show full text]