Townsendia Hookeri, Asteraceae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Townsendia Hookeri, Asteraceae) GENETIC STRUCTURE AND MATING PATTERNS OF DIPLOID AND POLYPLOID EASTER DAISIES (TOWNSENDIA HOOKERI, ASTERACEAE) by STACEY LEE THOMPSON B.Sc, The University of Guelph, 1999 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Botany) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 2006 © Stacey Lee Thompson, 2006 Abstract Reproduction in the Rocky Mountain genus Townsendia involves a complex interplay of polyploidy and apomixis. Molecular markers were used to assess genetic structure in relation to patterns of mating mode and ploidy at four hierarchical levels: within the genus, within T. hookeri, within populations of this species, and among progeny from these populations. Phylogenetic analyses of rDNA repeats indicated that polyploid apomixis has evolved multiple times within the genus. Pollen studies and analyses of cpDNA demonstrated that sexual diploids of T. hookeri are found in both northern and southern unglaciated regions, polyploid apomicts have evolved at least once in the north and thrice in the south, and these polyploid apomicts have colonized the post-glacial landscape from two refugia, suggesting that glaciation and not latitude influenced the distribution of apomicts. Pollen studies, flow cytometry, and multilocus tests on AFLP marker genotypes from four Yukon standing populations of T. hookeri indicated sexuality in one male-fertile diploid population, clonality in two male-sterile tetraploid populations, and a combination of sexual and clonal reproduction in one male-sterile polyploid population. This latter population of mixed mating mode included triploids and tetraploids and showed that evidence of cryptic sex may linger in the genomes within a morphologically asexual population. Finally, a new method for mating system analysis, which jointly estimates the rates of outcrossing, selfing, automixis and apomixis, was developed and applied to dominant AFLP marker genotypes from progeny whose mothers arose from three Yukon populations of T. hookeri, one consisting of male-fertile diploids, the other two of male-sterile tetraploids. Despite indications of sexuality in some standing populations, progeny analyses revealed that apomixis is the predominant mating mode in all populations. Levels of outcrossing were moderate in the diploid population and very low in the tetraploids. Selfing/automixis was absent in the diploids and moderate in tetraploids. These findings suggest that the correlation between ploidy and apomixis is not strict when observed on a fine scale, that polyploidy alone does not induce apomixis, and perhaps it is asexuality that selects for polyploidy within this system. Table of contents Abstract ii Table of contents iii List of Tables iv List of Figures v Acknowledgements vi Dedication vii Co-authorship statement viii 1 Intoduction 1 1.1 References 8 2 Recurrent evolution of polyploid apomixis, endemism, and acaulescence in the Rocky mountain agamic complex Townsendia (Astereae, Asteraceae) 11 2.1 Introduction 11 2.2 Material and methods 14 2.3 Results 16 2.4 Discussion 19 2.5 References 24 3 Patterns of recurrent evolution and geographic parthenogenesis within apomictic polyploid Easter daises (Townsendia hookeri) 35 3.1 Introduction 35 3.2 Material and methods 36 3.3 Results 39 3.4 Discussion 42 3.5 References 48 4 Detection of clonality and sexuality in diploid and polyploid populations of the Easter daisy, Townsendia hookeri 60 4.1 Introduction 60 4.2 Material and methods 61 4.3 Results 66 4.4 Discussion 68 4.5 References 73 5 A novel mating system analysis for modes of self-oriented mating applied to diploid and polyploid arctic Easter daisies (Townsendia hookeri) 80 5.1 Introduction 80 5.2 Material and methods 81 5.3 Results 85 5.4 Discussion 87 5.5 References 91 6 Conclusions 97 IV List of Tables Table 2-1 List of accessions and DNA regions sequenced 27 Table 2-2 Summary of pairwise likelihood distances 28 Table 3-1 Designation, locality information, and pollen data for populations of Townsendia hookeri included in this chapter 53 Table 3-2 Haplotype designations based on chloroplast DNA sequences from Townsendia hookeri, showing the constituent polymorphisms at respective alignment positions 55 Table 4-1 Overrepresentation statistics for four sub-arctic populations of the Easter daisy (Townsendia hookeri) 76 Table 4-2 Association statistics, measures of identity, and estimates of effective rate of long-term sexuality and mutation within four populations of the Easter daisy, Townsendia hookeri 76 Table 5-1 Probabilities of gametes from autotetraploid parents assuming double reduction, under co-dominance and dominance, respectively 93 Table 5-2 Probabilities of tetraploid offspring genotypes with dominance and assuming no double reduction, under outcrossing, selfing, automixis and apomixis, respectively) 93 Table 5-3 Theoretical variances and correlations estimates per individual sampled when selfing rate, automixis and outcrossing rate are simultaneously estimated, for two frequencies of the recessive marker q, and three levels of sample size 93 Table 5-4 Estimates of outcrossing t, selfing s, automixis u, and apomixis a, for each of the three populations, under various hypotheses 94 V List of Figures Figure 2-1 Beamans' hypothesis of phylogenetic relationships within Townsendia with indicated characteristics for species 29 Figure 2-2 Strict consensus of 440 equally-parsimonious trees, based on the external transcribed spacer (ETS) of Townsendia 30 Figure 2-3 Strict consensus of 133 equally-parsimonious trees of 171 steps, based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of Townsendia 31 Figure 2-4 Maximum likelihood tree (-InL = 1886.22) based on the external transcribed spacer (ETS) of Townsendia with character states indicated 32 Figure 2-5 Maximum likelihood tree (-InL = 1835.73) based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of Townsendia 33 Figure 2-6 Maximum likelihood tree (-InL = 3780.71) based on the combined analysis of the external and internal transcribed spacer (ETS and ITS) of Townsendia 34 Figure 3-1 Localities of sexual diploid and apomictic polyploid Easter daisy (Townsendia hookeri) populations collected from western North America 56 Figure 3-2 Plot of mean pollen diameter by mean pollen stainability for populations of the Easter daisy (Townsendia hookeri) 57 Figure 3-3 Chloroplast haplotype variation within 3 geographically proximal populations of Easter daisies (Townsendia hookeri) 58 Figure 3-4 Intraspecific chloroplast phylogeny of sexual diploid and apomictic polyploid Easter daisies (Townsendia hookeri) 59 Figure 4-1 DNA content per 2C nucleus as determined through flow cytometry for Yukon populations of the Easter daisy, Townsendia hookeri 77 Figure 4-2 Most parsimonious trees from Yukon populations of the Easter daisy, Townsendia hookeri, based on AFLPs 78 Figure 4-3 Incompatibility distributions for four Yukon populations of the Easter daisy, Townsendia hookeri 79 Figure 5-1 Gene frequency distribution for AFLP markers from one diploid (Tantalus Butte) and two tetraploid (Mile Thirteen and Tachal Dhal) sub-arctic populations of the Easter daisy, Townsendia hookeri 95 Figure 5-2 Log-likelihoods across a range of outcrossing rate t, for other parameters (s, u, a) jointly estimated 96 VI Acknowledgements Thanks to my committee members: • Mary Berbee, Sally Otto, Kermit Ritland and Jeannette Whitton Helpful colleagues and research facilities: • Institut de recherche en biologie vegetale: Anne Bruneau, Simon Joly, Madoka Misumone • Universite de Montreal: Francois-Joseph Lapointe, and Labo LEMEE • University of Colorado at Boulder: Richard D. Noyes, Nan Lederer • University of Guelph: Paul Kron • University of California at Santa Cruz: Katrina Dlugosh • University of Lethbridge: Joanne Golden • University of British Columbia: Linda Jennings, Gina Choe, NAPS Unit, FACS Facility Supportive friends: • Doreen Haven Thompson and the Deline Clan, Jesse Dylan Thompson, Ryan Marshall Driver, Dylan Leblanc, Teika Newton and Enzo Michel Lhermitte Pirelli Collecting permits: • Jasper National Park • Banff National Park • Waterton Lakes National Park • Kluane National Park • Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park • City of Boulder Open Space • Boulder County Open Space • United States Forestry Service (Rocky Mountain Region) • Territorial Government of the Yukon Financial support: • Post-Graduate Scholarship A/B, The Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada • University Graduate Fellowship, The University of British Columbia • Challenge Grants in Biodiversity • The Alberta Conservation Association • Northern Student Training Program • Botanical Society of America • Department of Botany, The University of British Columbia • Several anonymous backers vii Dedication This thesis is dedicated to the enduring memory of Laika, the Soviet spacedog. She was the first living organism to enter orbit, launched into space inside Sputnik II on 3 November, 1957. A stray from the mean streets of Moscow, and dubbed "Muttnik" by the Americans, Laika's genetic ancestry likely comprised a Nordic breed and part terrier. Dear Laika died a few hours after launch from stress and overheating. Her coffin circled the earth 2,570 times, then incinerated upon reentering the Earth's atmosphere on 4 April, 1958. Her true cause of death was not made public until more than 40 years after the flight, with officials stating at the time that she was painlessly euthanized with poisoned food. Russian bureaucrats have since
Recommended publications
  • Evidence(For(Reproductive(Interference(Between(Sexual(And(Apomictic( Populations(Of(The(Easter(Daisy((Townsendia*Hookeri,(Asteraceae)(
    Evidence(for(reproductive(interference(between(sexual(and(apomictic( populations(of(the(Easter(Daisy((Townsendia*hookeri,(Asteraceae)( by# Alice#Garani# B.Sc.#(Hons),#The#University#of#Bologna,#2009# A#THESIS#SUBMITTED#IN#PARTIAL#FULFILLMENT#OF# THE#REQUIREMENTS#FOR#THE#DEGREE#OF# MASTER#OF#SCIENCE# in# THE#FACULTY#OF#GRADUATE#AND#POSTDOCTORAL#STUDIES# (Botany)# THE#UNIVERSITY#OF#BRITISH#COLUMBIA# (Vancouver)# September#2014# ©#Alice#Garani,#2014# Abstract( Townsendia#hookeri#(Asteraceae)#plants#can#reproduce#sexually#or#via#apomixis#(i.e.#asexual# reproduction#through#seeds),#and#the#breeding#system#is#tightly#linked#with#ploidy#level,#so#that# sexual#outcrossers#are#exclusively#diploid#while#apomictic#plants#are#polyploid.#The#species#grows# from#central#Colorado#to#British#Columbia,#with#a#disjunct#distribution#in#Yukon#Territory.#Outside# Yukon,#sexual#populations#are#restricted#to#the#southernmost#portion#of#the#range#(Colorado#and# southern#Wyoming)#and#apomictic#populations#occur#from#Wyoming#to#Canada,#a#pattern# consistent#with#geographical#parthenogenesis.# The#major#objective#of#this#study#was#to#expand#our#understanding#of#the#factors#that#have#shaped# and#maintain#this#distribution,#conferring#an#apparent#advantage#to#apomictic#lineages#over#their# sexual#progenitors.#Having#documented#that#polyploid#plants#retain#the#ability#to#produce#some# functional#pollen,#I#hypothesized#that#if#sexual#forms#spread#into#an#apomictic#population,#and#thus# receive#mostly#heterospecific#pollen,#they#would#have#reduced#reproductive#success,#because#the#
    [Show full text]
  • Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road
    Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing
    [Show full text]
  • Townsendia Condensata Parry Ex Gray Var. Anomala (Heiser) Dorn (Cushion Townsend Daisy): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Townsendia condensata Parry ex Gray var. anomala (Heiser) Dorn (cushion Townsend daisy): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project May 9, 2006 Hollis Marriott and Jennifer C. Lyman, Ph.D. Garcia and Associates 7550 Shedhorn Drive Bozeman, MT 59718 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Marriott, H. and J.C. Lyman. (2006, May 9). Townsendia condensata Parry ex Gray var. anomala (Heiser) Dorn (cushion Townsend daisy): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/townsendiacondensatavaranomala.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to several of our colleagues who have authored thorough and clearly-written technical conservation assessments, providing us with excellent examples to follow, including Bonnie Heidel (Wyoming Natural Diversity Database [WYNDD]), Joy Handley (WYNDD), Denise Culver (Colorado Natural Heritage Program), and Juanita Ladyman (JnJ Associates LLC). Beth Burkhart, Kathy Roche, and Richard Vacirca of the Species Conservation Project of the Rocky Mountain Region, USDA Forest Service, gave useful feedback on meeting the goals of the project. Field botanists Kevin and Amy Taylor, Walt Fertig, Bob Dorn, and Erwin Evert generously shared insights on the distribution, habitat requirements, and potential threats for Townsendia condensata var. anomala. Kent Houston of the Shoshone National Forest provided information regarding its conservation status and management issues. Bonnie Heidel and Tessa Dutcher (WYNDD) once again provided much needed information in a timely fashion. We thank Curator Ron Hartman and Manager Ernie Nelson of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, University of Wyoming, for their assistance and for continued access to their fine facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversidad Y Distribución De La Familia Asteraceae En México
    Taxonomía y florística Diversidad y distribución de la familia Asteraceae en México JOSÉ LUIS VILLASEÑOR Botanical Sciences 96 (2): 332-358, 2018 Resumen Antecedentes: La familia Asteraceae (o Compositae) en México ha llamado la atención de prominentes DOI: 10.17129/botsci.1872 botánicos en las últimas décadas, por lo que cuenta con una larga tradición de investigación de su riqueza Received: florística. Se cuenta, por lo tanto, con un gran acervo bibliográfico que permite hacer una síntesis y actua- October 2nd, 2017 lización de su conocimiento florístico a nivel nacional. Accepted: Pregunta: ¿Cuál es la riqueza actualmente conocida de Asteraceae en México? ¿Cómo se distribuye a lo February 18th, 2018 largo del territorio nacional? ¿Qué géneros o regiones requieren de estudios más detallados para mejorar Associated Editor: el conocimiento de la familia en el país? Guillermo Ibarra-Manríquez Área de estudio: México. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una exhaustiva revisión de literatura florística y taxonómica, así como la revi- sión de unos 200,000 ejemplares de herbario, depositados en más de 20 herbarios, tanto nacionales como del extranjero. Resultados: México registra 26 tribus, 417 géneros y 3,113 especies de Asteraceae, de las cuales 3,050 son especies nativas y 1,988 (63.9 %) son endémicas del territorio nacional. Los géneros más relevantes, tanto por el número de especies como por su componente endémico, son Ageratina (164 y 135, respecti- vamente), Verbesina (164, 138) y Stevia (116, 95). Los estados con mayor número de especies son Oaxa- ca (1,040), Jalisco (956), Durango (909), Guerrero (855) y Michoacán (837). Los biomas con la mayor riqueza de géneros y especies son el bosque templado (1,906) y el matorral xerófilo (1,254).
    [Show full text]
  • Species by Land Manager Bureau of Land Management
    Utah Rare Plant Guide 2/28/20 Species by Land Manager Bureau of Land Management Cedar City Field Office CC Astragalus concordius Astragalus oophorus var. lonchocalyx Astragalus welshii Boechera schistacea Cymopterus purpureus var. jonesii Eriogonum pharnaceoides var. cervinum Eriogonum soredium Ivesia shockleyi var. ostleri Lepidium ostleri Penstemon bracteatus Penstemon franklinii Penstemon pinorum Sclerocactus blainei Sphaeralcea caespitosa var. caespitosa Trifolium friscanum Fillmore Field Office Flmr Astragalus uncialis Atriplex canescens var. gigantea Botrychium crenulatum Cirsium ownbeyi Cryptantha compacta Cymopterus acaulis var. parvus Draba kassii Eriogonum natum Eriogonum nummulare var. ammophilum Eriogonum phoeniceum Frasera gypsicola Jamesia americana var. macrocalyx Jamesia tetrapetala Penstemon angustifolius var. dulcis Penstemon wardii Potentilla cottamii Potentilla pensylvanica var. paucijuga Primula domensis Sphaeralcea caespitosa var. caespitosa Sphaeromeria capitata Townsendia jonesii var. lutea Trifolium friscanum Grand Staircase Escalante NM GSENM Aliciella latifolia Aquilegia loriae Asclepias welshii Page 1 Utah Rare Plant Guide 2/28/20 Species by Land Manager Aster welshii Astragalus ampullarius Astragalus musiniensis Astragalus striatiflorus Camissonia atwoodii Camissonia exilis Cycladenia humilis var. jonesii Cymopterus acaulis var. higginsii Cymopterus minimus Euphorbia nephradenia Heterotheca jonesii Lupinus caudatus var. cutleri Oenothera murdockii Pediomelum epipsilum Pediomelum pariense Penstemon ammophilus
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscaping with Native Plants by Stephen L
    SHORT-SEASON, HIGH-ALTITUDE GARDENING BULLETIN 862 Landscaping with native plants by Stephen L. Love, Kathy Noble, Jo Ann Robbins, Bob Wilson, and Tony McCammon INTRODUCTION There are many reasons to consider a native plant landscape in Idaho’s short- season, high-altitude regions, including water savings, decreased mainte- nance, healthy and adapted plants, and a desire to create a local theme CONTENTS around your home. Most plants sold for landscaping are native to the eastern Introduction . 1 United States and the moist climates of Europe. They require acid soils, con- The concept of native . 3 stant moisture, and humid air to survive and remain attractive. Most also Landscaping Principles for Native Plant Gardens . 3 require a longer growing season than we have available in the harshest cli- Establishing Native Landscapes and Gardens . 4 mates of Idaho. Choosing to landscape with these unadapted plants means Designing a Dry High-Desert Landscape . 5 Designing a Modified High-Desert Landscape . 6 accepting the work and problems of constantly recreating a suitable artificial Designing a High-Elevation Mountain Landscape . 6 environment. Native plants will help create a landscape that is more “com- Designing a Northern Idaho Mountain/Valley fortable” in the climates and soils that surround us, and will reduce the Landscape . 8 resources necessary to maintain the landscape. Finding Sources of Native Plants . 21 The single major factor that influences Idaho’s short-season, high-altitude climates is limited summer moisture. Snow and rainfall are relatively abun- dant in the winter, but for 3 to 4 months beginning in June, we receive only a YOU ARE A SHORT-SEASON, few inches of rain.
    [Show full text]
  • Guenoc Water Rights Modification Project Final Environmental Impact Report
    GUENOC WATER RIGHTS MODIFICATION PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT MARCH 2009 Lead Agency: State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Rights 1001 I Street, P.O. Box 2000 Sacramento, CA 95812-2000 Prepared by: ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1801 7th Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95811 GUENOC WATER RIGHTS MODIFICATION PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT MARCH 2009 Lead Agency: State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Rights 1001 I Street, P.O. Box 2000 Sacramento, CA 95812-2000 Prepared by: ANALYTICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1801 7th Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95811 TABLE OF CONTENTS GUENOC WATER RIGHTS MODIFICATION PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 ORGANIZATION OF DOCUMENT ................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARy .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 AL TERNA TIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT DISCUSSED IN THE DRAFT EIR .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado
    Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 Rare Plant Survey of San Juan Public Lands, Colorado 2005 Prepared by Peggy Lyon and Julia Hanson Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins CO 80523 December 2005 Cover: Imperiled (G1 and G2) plants of the San Juan Public Lands, top left to bottom right: Lesquerella pruinosa, Draba graminea, Cryptantha gypsophila, Machaeranthera coloradoensis, Astragalus naturitensis, Physaria pulvinata, Ipomopsis polyantha, Townsendia glabella, Townsendia rothrockii. Executive Summary This survey was a continuation of several years of rare plant survey on San Juan Public Lands. Funding for the project was provided by San Juan National Forest and the San Juan Resource Area of the Bureau of Land Management. Previous rare plant surveys on San Juan Public Lands by CNHP were conducted in conjunction with county wide surveys of La Plata, Archuleta, San Juan and San Miguel counties, with partial funding from Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO); and in 2004, public lands only in Dolores and Montezuma counties, funded entirely by the San Juan Public Lands. Funding for 2005 was again provided by San Juan Public Lands. The primary emphases for field work in 2005 were: 1. revisit and update information on rare plant occurrences of agency sensitive species in the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) database that were last observed prior to 2000, in order to have the most current information available for informing the revision of the Resource Management Plan for the San Juan Public Lands (BLM and San Juan National Forest); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildflowers and Other Herbaceous Plants at LLELA
    Wildflowers and other herbaceous plants at LLELA Common Name Scientific Name Observed Abundance Yarrow Achillea millefolium C Prairie Agalinis Agalinis heterophylla C Mud Plaintain Alisma subcordatum U Wild Onion Allium canadense A Amaranth Amaranthus rudis U Western Ragweed Ambrosia psilostachya C Giant Ragweed Ambrosia trifida A Valley Redstem Ammannia coccinea C Broomweed Amphiachyris dracunculoides C Texas Bluestar Amsonia tabernaemontana U Tenpetal Thimbleweed Anemone berlandieri C Prickly Poppy Argemone polyanthemos R Green‐Dragon Arisaema dracontium R Texas Milkweed Asclepias texana C Butterfly Milkweed Asclepias tuberose R Green Milkweed Asclepias viridis C Drummond’s Aster Aster drummondii U Heath Aster Aster ericoides C Annual Aster Aster subulatus C Western Daisy Astranthium integrifolium R Water Fern Azolla caroliniana C Water Hyssop Bacopa monnieri U India Mustard Brassica juncea U* False Boneset Brickellia eupatorioides U Corn Gromwell Buglossoides arvensis C* Wine Cup Callirheo involucrate C Square‐bud Sundrops Calylophus berlandieri R Shepherd’s Purse Capsella bursa‐pastoris U* Nodding Thistle Carduus nutans U* Indian Paintbrush Castilleja indivisa C Basket Flower Centaurea americana C Ladybird’s Centaury Centaurium texense C Sticky Chickweed Cerastium glomeratum C Partridge Pea Chamaecrista fasciculata A Spotted Sandmat Chamaescyce maculata R Small Matted Sandmat Chamaesyce serpens U Hairy Golden Aster Chrysopsis pilosa U Horrid Thistle Cirsium horridulum U Texas Thistle Cirsium texanum C Bull Nettle Cnidoscolus texanus
    [Show full text]
  • Ageratina Thyrsiflora (E. Greene) R. King & H. Robinson, Phytologia 19:227. 1970. Kyrstenia Thyrsiflora E. Greene, Leafl. B
    Ageratina thyrsiflora (E. Greene) R. King & H. Robinson, Phytologia 19:227. 1970. Kyrstenia thyrsiflora E. Greene, Leafl. Bot. Observ. Crit. 1:9. 1903. Eupatorium thyrsiflorum (E. Greene) B.L. Robinson, Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts 43:36. 1907. TYPE: MEXICO. CHIHUAHUA: Southwestern Chihuahua, Aug 1885, E. Palmer 275 (LECTOTYPE, designated here: US, internet image!). Eupatorium arborescens M.E. Jones, Contr. West. Bot. 12:43. 1908. TYPE: MEXICO. CHIHUAHUA: Sierra Madre Mts., Guayanopa Canon, 3600 ft alt., in the Tropical Life Zone, 24 Sep 1903, M.E. Jones s.n. (LECTOTYPE, designated here: RSA-POM 41799, photocopy!; ISOLECTOTYPE: RSA-POM 41800, photocopy!). Koanophyllon palmeri (A. Gray) R. King & H. Robinson, Phytologia 22:150. 1971. Eupatorium palmeri A. Gray, Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts 21: 383. 1886. Gray did not cite a specific collection but noted “type locality, ‘shady places high up in mountains above Batopilas.’” TYPE: MEXICO. [CHIHUAHUA]: Southwestern Chihuahua, Aug–Nov 1885, Palmer 144 (LECTOTYPE, designated here: GH!; ISOLECTOTYPE: US, internet image!). Eupatorium thyrsiflorum var. holoclerum B.L. Robinson, Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts 43:36. 1907. TYPE: MEXICO. DURANGO: City of Durango and vicinity, Apr–Nov 1896, E. Palmer 755 (HOLOTYPE: GH; ISOTYPES: MO!, US, internet image!). Eupatorium solidaginifolium A. Gray, Smithsonian Contr. Knowl. 3(5) [Pl. Wright. 1]:87. 1852. TYPE: UNITED STATES: “Collected in Expedition from Western Texas to El Paso, New Mexico, May–Oct, 1849, by Charles Wright” [as on label], Wright 256 (HOLOTYPE: GH, photocopy!; ISOTYPE: GH, photocopy!). Chromolaena bigelovii (A. Gray) R. King & H. Robinson, Phytologia 20:208. 1970. Eupatorium bigelovii A. Gray in Torrey, Rep. U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2
    Appendix F Species List Appendix F: Species List F. Species List F.1 Lists The following list and three tables denote the bird, mammal, fish, and plant species known to occur in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Arctic Refuge, Refuge). F.1.1 Birds of Arctic Refuge A total of 201 bird species have been recorded on Arctic Refuge. This list describes their status and abundance. Many birds migrate outside of the Refuge in the winter, so unless otherwise noted, the information is for spring, summer, or fall. Bird names and taxonomic classification follow American Ornithologists' Union (1998). F.1.1.1 Definitions of classifications used Regions of the Refuge . Coastal Plain – The area between the coast and the Brooks Range. This area is sometimes split into coastal areas (lagoons, barrier islands, and Beaufort Sea) and inland areas (uplands near the foothills of the Brooks Range). Brooks Range – The mountains, valleys, and foothills north and south of the Continental Divide. South Side – The foothills, taiga, and boreal forest south of the Brooks Range. Status . Permanent Resident – Present throughout the year and breeds in the area. Summer Resident – Only present from May to September. Migrant – Travels through on the way to wintering or breeding areas. Breeder – Documented as a breeding species. Visitor – Present as a non-breeding species. * – Not documented. Abundance . Abundant – Very numerous in suitable habitats. Common – Very likely to be seen or heard in suitable habitats. Fairly Common – Numerous but not always present in suitable habitats. Uncommon – Occurs regularly but not always observed because of lower abundance or secretive behaviors.
    [Show full text]