DOCSLIB.ORG

COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update July 23 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update July 23 2020 As of July 20, 2020 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet State/Country Opening Up America Gating Criteria (14 Day Declining Trend in Symptoms & Cases; No Stay At Home Order)* Step 2: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 3: CMO, the Sec of a Mil Department, or a CCDR approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 and Step 2 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the Chief Management Officer, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. * Data obtained from Center for Diseases Control, Health and Human Services, and State Health Departments Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilian between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memo on the conditions-based, phased approach to personnel movement and travel dated May 22, 2020. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 92 of 231 Installations (40%) (Met: Step 1, Step 2, & Step 3) Of the 92 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 3 reinstated travel restrictions while 5 lifted restrictions. 1 of 7 As of July 20, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Army USA - MD No ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT Army USA - AL No BAUMHOLDER H.D.SMITH BRCKS Army Germany Yes CAMP CASEY TONGDUCHON Army South Korea Yes CAMP HENRY Army South Korea Yes CAMP HUMPHREYS Army South Korea Yes CAMP ZAMA TOKYO Army Japan No CARLISLE BARRACKS Army USA - PA No DETROIT ARSENAL Army USA - MI No FORT BELVOIR Army USA - VA No FORT BENNING Army USA - GA No FORT BLISS Army USA - TX No FORT BRAGG Army USA - NC No FORT CAMPBELL Army USA - KY Yes FORT CARSON Army USA - CO Yes FORT CUSTER TRNG CTR Army USA - MI No FORT DES MOINES Army USA - IA No FORT DETRICK Army USA - MD No FORT DRUM Army USA - NY No FORT GEORGE G. MEADE Army USA - MD No FORT GORDON Army USA - GA No FORT HAMILTON Army USA - NY Yes FORT HOOD Army USA - TX No FORT HUACHUCA Army USA - AZ No FORT IRWIN Army USA - CA No FORT JACKSON Army USA - SC No FORT KNOX Army USA - KY Yes FORT LEAVENWORTH Army USA - KS No FORT LEE Army USA - VA No FORT LEONARD WOOD Army USA - MO No FORT MCCOY Army USA - WI No FORT POLK Army USA - LA No FORT RILEY Army USA - KS Yes FORT RUCKER Army USA - AL No FORT SILL Army USA - OK Yes FORT STEWART Army USA - GA No FORT WILLIAM H. HARRISON Army USA - MT No GRAFENWOHR GERMANY Army Germany Yes HOHENFELS GERMANY Army Germany Yes JOINT BASE LEWIS MCCHORD Army USA - WA Yes JOINT BASE MYER HENDERSON HALL Army USA - DC No KAISERSLAUTERN Army Germany Yes LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT Army USA - PA No LEXINGTON BLUE GRASS DEPOT Army USA - KY No LOS ALAMITOS AFRC Army USA - CA No 2 of 7 As of July 20, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted MCALESTER ARMY AMMO PLANT Army USA - OK No PICATINNY ARSENAL Army USA - NJ No PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY Army USA - CA No RED RIVER DEPOT Army USA - TX No REDSTONE ARSENAL Army USA - AL No ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL Army USA - IL No SAN JUAN FORT BUCHANAN Army Puerto Rico No SCHOFIELD BARRACKS Army USA - HI No SIERRA ARMY DEPOT Army USA - CA No STUTTGART GERMANY Army Germany Yes TOBYHANNA ARMY DEPOT Army USA - PA Yes US Army Garrison Alaska Army USA - AK No US ARMY GARRISON HAWAII Army USA - HI No US ARMY GARRISON MIAMI Army USA - FL No USA NATICK RSCH & DEV CTR Army USA - MA No VICENZA ITALY Army Italy Yes VILSECK Army Germany Yes WATERVLIET ARSENAL Army USA - NY No WEST POINT MILRES Army USA - NY Yes WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE Army USA - NM No WIESBADEN GERMANY Army Germany Yes YONGSAN KOREA Army South Korea Yes YUMA PROVING GROUND Army USA - AZ Yes DFAS CLEVELAND CENTER CMO USA - OH No DFAS COLUMBUS CENTER CMO USA - OH No DFAS HEADQUARTERS CMO USA - IN No PENTAGON BUILDING SITE CMO USA - VA Yes ANNAPOLIS NS(INCL USNA) Navy USA - MD Yes CBC GULFPORT MS Navy USA - MS No CHINA LAKE NAVWEAPCEN Navy USA - CA No COMFLEACT OKINAWA JA Navy Japan No CORONADO NAV AMPHIB BASE Navy USA - CA No CORPUS CHRISTI NAS Navy USA - TX No CRANE NAVWEAPSUPPCEN Navy USA - IN Yes FALLON NAS Navy USA - NV Yes FLEET ACTIVITIES CHINHAE KS Navy South Korea Yes FLEET ACTIVITIES SASEBO Navy Japan No INDIAN HEAD NAV ORD STA Navy USA - MD Yes JACKSONVILLE NAS Navy USA - FL No JBPHH PEARL HARBOR HAWAII Navy USA - HI No JOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING Navy USA - DC Yes KEY WEST NAS Navy USA - FL No KINGS BAY NAVSUBBASE Navy USA - GA No LEMOORE NAS Navy USA - CA No LITTLE CREEK NAV AMPHIB BASE Navy USA - VA No 3 of 7 As of July 20, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted MAYPORT NAVSTA Navy USA - FL No MERIDIAN NAS Navy USA - MS No NAF ATSUGI JA Navy Japan No NAF MISAWA JA Navy Japan No NAS JRB FT WORTH TX Navy USA - TX No NAS KINGSVILLE TX Navy USA - TX No NAS SIGONELLA SICILY Navy Italy Yes NAVAL BASE KITSAP-BREMERTON Navy USA - WA Yes NAVAL STATION EVERETT Navy USA - WA Yes NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES Navy USA - IL No NAVAL STATION GUAM Navy Guam No NAVAL STATION NEWPORT Navy USA - RI Yes NAVAL STATION ROTA SPAIN Navy Spain Yes NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY MID-SOU Navy USA - TN No NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY No MONTEREY CA Navy USA - CA NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH Navy USA - DC Yes NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITY Navy USA - FL No NAVAL TRAINING CTR ORLANDO Navy USA - FL No NAVBASE POINT LOMA Navy USA - CA No NAVBASE SAN DIEGO CA Navy USA - CA No NAVBASE VENTURA CTY Navy USA - CA No NAVMAG INDIAN ISLAND Navy USA - WA Yes NAVSTA GUANTANAMO BAY Navy Cuba No NAVSUPPACT BETHESDA MD Navy USA - MD Yes NAVSUPPACT HAMPTON ROADS VA Navy USA - VA No NAVSUPPACT MECHANICSBURG PA Navy USA - PA No NAVSUPPACT NAPLES IT Navy Italy Yes NAVSUPPFAC BEAUFORT SC Navy USA - SC No NEW LONDON NAVSUBBASE Navy USA - CT Yes NEW ORLEANS NAS JRB Navy USA - LA No NORFOLK NAV SHIPYD Navy USA - VA No NORFOLK NAVAL BASE Navy USA - VA No NSA ANDERSEN Navy Guam No NSA BAHRAIN Navy Bahrain No NSA SARATOGA SPRINGS NY Navy USA - NY Yes NSD YOKOSUKA JAPAN Navy Japan No NSY PORTSMOUTH Navy USA - NH Yes NWS EARLE NJ Navy USA - NJ No OCEANA NAS Navy USA - VA No PATUXENT RIVER NAS Navy USA - MD Yes PENSACOLA NAS Navy USA - FL No SEAL BEACH NAVWEAPSTA Navy USA - CA No WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS Navy USA - WA Yes WHITING FIELD NAS Navy USA - FL No 4 of 7 As of July 20, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted YORKTOWN NAVWEAPSTA Navy USA - VA No ALTUS AFB USAF USA - OK Yes AVIANO AB USAF Italy Yes BARKSDALE AFB USAF USA - LA Yes BEALE AFB USAF USA - CA No BUCKLEY AFB USAF USA - CO Yes CANNON AFB USAF USA - NM No COLUMBUS AFB USAF USA - MS No DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB USAF USA - AZ No DOBBINS ARB USAF USA - GA Yes DOVER AFB USAF USA - DE Yes DYESS AFB USAF USA - TX No EDWARDS AFB USAF USA - CA Yes EGLIN AFB USAF USA - FL No EIELSON AFB USAF USA - AK Yes ELLSWORTH AFB USAF USA - SD Yes F E WARREN AFB USAF USA - WY No FAIRCHILD AFB USAF USA - WA Yes GOODFELLOW AFB USAF USA - TX Yes GRAND FORKS AFB USAF USA - ND Yes GRISSOM AFB USAF USA - IN Yes HANSCOM AFB USAF USA - MA No HILL AFB USAF USA - UT No HOLLOMAN AFB USAF USA - NM Yes HOMESTEAD AFB USAF USA - FL No HURLBURT FIELD USAF USA - FL No INCIRLIK AB SITE 1 USAF Turkey Yes JB ANDREWS USAF USA - MD Yes JB CHARLESTON USAF USA - SC No JB ELMENDORF RICHARDSON USAF USA - AK Yes JB LANGLEY-EUSTIS USAF USA - VA No JB MCGUIRE DIX LAKEHURST USAF USA - NJ No JB SAN ANTONIO USAF USA - TX No KADENA AB USAF Japan No KEESLER AFB USAF USA - MS No KIRTLAND AFB USAF USA - NM No KUNSAN AB USAF South Korea Yes LAUGHLIN AFB USAF USA - TX No LITTLE ROCK AFB USAF USA - AR Yes LOS ANGELES AFB USAF USA - CA No LUKE AFB USAF USA - AZ No MACDILL AFB USAF USA - FL No MALMSTROM AFB USAF USA - MT Yes MARCH AFB USAF USA - CA No MAXWELL AFB (INCL. GUNTER) USAF USA - AL No 5 of 7 As of July 20, 2020 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted MCCONNELL AFB USAF USA - KS Yes MINN ST PAUL ARS USAF USA - MN No MINOT AFB USAF USA - ND Yes MISAWA AB USAF Japan No MOODY AFB USAF USA - GA No MOUNTAIN HOME AFB USAF USA - ID No NELLIS AFB USAF USA - NV No NIAGARA FALLS ARS USAF USA - NY Yes OFFUTT AFB USAF USA - NE Yes OSAN AIR BASE USAF South Korea Yes PATRICK AFB USAF USA - FL No PETERSON AFB USAF USA - CO Yes PGH IAP ARS USAF USA - PA Yes PITTSBURGH IAP ANG SITE 1 USAF USA - PA Yes RAF LAKENHEATH USAF United Kingdom Yes RAF MILDENHALL USAF United Kingdom Yes RAMSTEIN FRG USAF Germany No ROBINS AFB USAF USA - GA No SCHRIEVER AFB USAF USA - CO Yes SCOTT AFB USAF USA - IL Yes SEYMOUR JOHNSON AFB USAF USA - NC No SHAW AFB USAF USA - SC No SHEPPARD AFB USAF USA - TX Yes SPANGDAHLEM AB USAF Germany Yes TINKER AFB USAF USA - OK Yes TRAVIS AFB USAF USA - CA No TYNDALL AFB USAF USA - FL No USAF ACADEMY USAF USA - CO Yes VANCE AFB USAF USA - OK Yes VANDENBERG AFB USAF USA - CA No WESTOVER ARB AFB USAF USA - MA Yes WHITEMAN AFB USAF USA - MO Yes WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB USAF USA - OH No YOKOTA AB USAF Japan No YOUNGSTOWN JOINT AIR RESERVE USAF No STATION USA - OH CHERRY POINT MCAS USMC USA - NC Yes MAKIMINATO OKINAWA CP BUTLER USMC Japan No MARINE BARRACKS WASH D.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PB 34-04-4 Volume 30 Number 4 October-December 2004 STAFF: FEATURES Commanding General Major General Barbara G
    MILITARY INTELLIGENCE PB 34-04-4 Volume 30 Number 4 October-December 2004 STAFF: FEATURES Commanding General Major General Barbara G. Fast 8 Tactical Intelligence Shortcomings in Iraq: Restructuring Deputy Commanding General Battalion Intelligence to Win Brigadier General Brian A. Keller by Major Bill Benson and Captain Sean Nowlan Deputy Commandant for Futures Jerry V. Proctor Director of Training Development 16 Measuring Anti-U.S. Sentiment and Conducting Media and Support Analysis in The Republic of Korea (ROK) Colonel Eileen M. Ahearn by Major Daniel S. Burgess Deputy Director/Dean of Training Development and Support 24 Army’s MI School Faces TRADOC Accreditation Russell W. Watson, Ph.D. by John J. Craig Chief, Doctrine Division Stephen B. Leeder 25 USAIC&FH Observations, Insights, and Lessons Learned Managing Editor (OIL) Process Sterilla A. Smith by Dee K. Barnett, Command Sergeant Major (Retired) Editor Elizabeth A. McGovern 27 Brigade Combat Team (BCT) Intelligence Operations Design Director SSG Sharon K. Nieto by Michael A. Brake Associate Design Director and Administration 29 North Korean Special Operations Forces: 1996 Kangnung Specialist Angiene L. Myers Submarine Infiltration Cover Photographs: by Major Harry P. Dies, Jr. Courtesy of the U.S. Army Cover Design: 35 Deconstructing The Theory of 4th Generation Warfare Specialist Angiene L. Myers by Del Stewart, Chief Warrant Officer Three (Retired) Purpose: The U.S. Army Intelli- gence Center and Fort Huachuca (USAIC&FH) publishes the Military DEPARTMENTS Intelligence Professional Bulle- tin quarterly under provisions of AR 2 Always Out Front 58 Language Action 25-30. MIPB disseminates mate- rial designed to enhance individu- 3 CSM Forum 60 Professional Reader als’ knowledge of past, current, and emerging concepts, doctrine, materi- 4 Technical Perspective 62 MIPB 2004 Index al, training, and professional develop- ments in the MI Corps.
    [Show full text]
  • 79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793
    79 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-188-SEPT. 16, 1965 793 Public Law 89-188 AIM APT September 16, 1Q65 ^^^^^^ [H. R. 10775] To authorize certain eoiistruotion at military installations, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled^ stmction^Aia°hori- zation Act, 1966. TITLE I SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop ^""^y- military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public vv^orks, including site preparations, appurtenances, utilities and equip­ ment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, LESS ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (First Army) Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Hospital facilities and troop housing, $11,008,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Maintenance facilities, medical facilities, and troop housing, $17,948,000. Federal Office Building, Brooklyn, New York: Administrative facilities, $636,000. _ United States Military Academy, West Point, New York: Hospital facilities, troop housing and community facilities, and utilities, $18,089,000. (Second Army) Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Training facilities, and hospital facilities, $2,296,000. East Coast Radio Transmitter Station, Woodbridge, Virginia: Utilities, $211,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia: Utilities, $158,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, troop housing, and community facilities, $15,422,000. Fort Lee, Virginia: Community facilities, $700,000. Fort Meade, Maryland: Ground improvements, $550,000. Fort Monroe, Virginia: Administrative facilities, $4,950,000. Vint Hill Farms, Virginia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $1,029,000. (Third Army) Fort Benning, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $5,325,000.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Spring Daily Herald
    - 1!"rt rwiir- ij. isjmiyr' j TRAFFIC TOLL WEATHER Ckradjr, oecesietuU rate ht; 17 Injured In Big Dead, Spring Daily i Wednesday partiy eteedy Herald and warmer. Howard County, 10U VOL. 13; tiO. 295 (AP-Asao- cited Press) BIG SPRING, TEXAS, TUESDAY, MARCH 25, 1941 Eight Pages Today FINE LIVESTOCK Legislature BRITISH, GREEKS, GERMANS PREPARE TO Hearing ON EXHIBIT HERE Sets With more than 100 fat animals from five counties on On Strike Act FIGHT AS YUGOSLAVS SIGN AXIS PACT display, the fourth annual district- - club boy livestock show was off to a good start hero Tuesday morning. Committee Of Whole Judging was scheduled to begin at 1 p. m. with R. M. Mil-holle- n, House To Take Up Allies Shift C'sofu JlSISIll Soviet War San Angelo, in charge. First on tap was a special Matter Thursday BULGARIA placing for Howard county l r wi H$ii;:i: AUSTIN, March 95 MO Heed- ?:; animals. crowd. All during the morning - .VJ fctw.wii Tnw WSSBsskkw :::: n l. a r jc Materials Go largo number of people visited ing appeals for prompt action, the Troops Over A YUVJJ- TROOPS ON GREEK- - Entries were Hated from Howard, a house of representatives today set Martin, Sterling, Taylor and Glass- and after noon the place waa be- ginning to look packed. for hearing Thursday Governor W. cock counties at noon. emergency bill de- I V fcI.m li:!H!-:i:;j:j::::::- were seven calves shown Lee O'Danlfl's Into Marshall Allen, who with George There signed prevent violence Wider Front ,jsV Turkey by Martin county 4-- boys.
    [Show full text]
  • Albuquerque Morning Journal, 11-26-1922 Journal Publishing Company
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Albuquerque Morning Journal 1908-1921 New Mexico Historical Newspapers 11-26-1922 Albuquerque Morning Journal, 11-26-1922 Journal Publishing Company Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/abq_mj_news Recommended Citation Journal Publishing Company. "Albuquerque Morning Journal, 11-26-1922." (1922). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ abq_mj_news/761 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the New Mexico Historical Newspapers at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Albuquerque Morning Journal 1908-1921 by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TP-T- A P TTA TTTCTTDeTh Trnrn ATS TVnn&TiP f at hjt JOURNAL iohia -- i mill) it; a it. New FACES TODAY IN VOL. CLXXV. No. 57. Albuquerque, Mexico, Sunday, November 26, 1922 24 TWO SUCTIONS PH1CK FIVE CUNTS, -j- n1 osE T'T" ('f! PEflSOWS I 30 MINERS ALSO INJURED 77.GQ0 SOIOiV iV WASHINGTON; TS TSI1EZING OUT ADMINISTRATION SUCCEEDS FIRST WOMAN SENATOR G l V A FIGHT INST THE PROFITEERS SHIPPING BILL' IN GAS BLAST AT MADRID, 10 TO 3 DEFEAT RATIFICATION OF PLAN OF SOUS; CAUSES HEATER 1 Y CAUSE IS 101 DETERMINED Harvard's Initiative and Re- ITER COMPACT Measures to Relieve the Fi- ISE WRANGLE source Overcome the nancial Plight of Farmers Big Blue Team; Clemen-cea- u Is Discussed With Hard- First of a Series of Public Big Guns on Both Sides Are Cots, Supplies, Nurses and Physi- Witnesses Contest ing at White House Surgical Meetings to Urge Its De- Turned Loose; Absent Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview No. 605
    University of Texas at El Paso ScholarWorks@UTEP Combined Interviews Institute of Oral History 6-1982 Interview no. 605 Joseph Magoffin Glasgow Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.utep.edu/interviews Part of the Oral History Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Interview with Joseph Magoffin Glasgowy b Sarah E. John, 1982, "Interview no. 605," Institute of Oral History, University of Texas at El Paso. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute of Oral History at ScholarWorks@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Combined Interviews by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. U!HVERS lTV OF T::::XAS .IIT EL P,~S') PISTITUTE OF '1Rfl HISTORY I,lTCRVIE;JEE: Col. Joseph Magoffin Glasgow (1898-1985) IiHERVIEUER: Sarah E. John P:~OJ[CT: Military History June-October. 1982 TER[<S OF USE: Unrestricted TAPE W).: 605 i'Rl\llSCRIPT ,'10.: 605 ':<;:11,15 C!~I !JER: Georgina Rivas and Marta l~cCarthy February-March. 1983 I;· I()(:f(I\P:1W~L svnops IS OF IiiTER\!I FlEE: (Member of pioneer El Paso family; retired Army colonel) Born September 28.1898 at the Maqoffin Homestead in E1 Paso; parents were Viilliam Jefferson Glasgow. a U.S. Cavalry officer. and Josephine Richardson Magoffin; attended elementary school in El Paso. private school in Kansas. and Viest Point; 0raduated from Viest Point in November. 1918. SU if ,MY OF WTERVIE"I: TAPE I: Biographical data; childhood recollections and early El Paso; moving around the country with his family; how he came to enter Viest Point; experiences as part of the Army of Occupation in Europe following World Viar I; brief histories of the Magoffin and Glasgow families.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, a Military Archives
    Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists Volume 9 Article 5 Number 1 Issue 1 and 2 January 1991 Short Subjects: The nitU ed States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, a Military Archives in Georgia Kathryn R. Coker United States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon Archives Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/provenance Part of the Archival Science Commons Recommended Citation Coker, Kathryn R., "Short Subjects: The nitU ed States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, a Military Archives in Georgia," Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists 9 no. 1 (1991) . Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/provenance/vol9/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Provenance, Journal of the Society of Georgia Archivists by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 66 PROVEW\NCE/Spring-Fall 1991 SHORT SUBJECTS Features The US Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, a Miiitary Archives In Georgia Kathyrn R. Coker Introduction There's a relatively new "kid" archives on the block. It's called the U.S. Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon Archives located in Augusta, Georgia. Augusta is not only the home of the Masters Golf Tournament but also the PROVENANCE, Vol. IX, Nos. 1-2, Spring-Fall 1991 67 home of the U.S. Army Signal Corps, the army's communicators since 1860. Authorization The United
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Bliss Expansion Case Study
    case study “EXECUTION OF THE FORT BLISS EXPANSION PROGRAM IS THE BEST, IN MY OPINION, OF ANY MAJOR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM IN D.O.D.” – TROY COLLINS, PE, DEPUTY DISTRICT ENGINEER FOR PROGRAMS & PROJECT MANAGEMENT, USACE FORT WORTH DISTRICT Fort Bliss Expansion BACKGROUND disciplines + services The 2005 Base Realignment and Closure • Develop and ready a 160-year-old Commission (BRAC) initiative targeted the military installation located in the jv land development engineer Army Installation of Fort Bliss, Texas, to Chihuahuan Desert for a 250 percent construction management receive an influx of nearly 30,000 troops, increase in soldiers and their families program integration (from 49,000 to 106,000), all within a ultimately totaling six new Brigade Combat design Teams. Many compared the Fort Bliss seven-year window Expansion Program to building a small city • Deliver facilities better, faster, and client from the ground up. greener – facilities that cost 15% less u.s army corps of engineers than traditional Army construction The $4.8 billion program encompassed in 30% less time, while maintaining fort worth district 4,500 acres of greenfield development, quality and sustainable design 130 projects, and 300 facilities, totaling location 11 million square feet of new buildings. • Borrowing from private sector el paso, texas This program was laid out in four land practices, the LDE team planned and development districts: East Fort Bliss, developed the site while moving from Infantry Brigade Combat team, Biggs Army a “prescriptive” to a “performance- “Team Bliss” grew Airfield, and Main Cantonment. based” approach to contracting in order to accelerate delivery. from a handful of Huitt-Zollars, as part of a Joint Venture, key personnel to was selected to be the Land Development more than 350 full- Engineer (LDE) for the Fort Bliss Expansion SOLUTION Program and was responsible for design, Huitt-Zollars, a multidisciplinary design time, part time, and program integration, and construction firm, specializes in wide-range of practice contract members management.
    [Show full text]
  • Impersonal Names Index Listing for the INSCOM Investigative Records Repository, 2010
    Description of document: US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) Impersonal Names Index Listing for the INSCOM Investigative Records Repository, 2010 Requested date: 07-August-2010 Released date: 15-August-2010 Posted date: 23-August-2010 Title of document Impersonal Names Index Listing Source of document: Commander U.S. Army Intelligence & Security Command Freedom of Information/Privacy Office ATTN: IAMG-C-FOI 4552 Pike Road Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-5995 Fax: (301) 677-2956 Note: The IMPERSONAL NAMES index represents INSCOM investigative files that are not titled with the name of a person. Each item in the IMPERSONAL NAMES index represents a file in the INSCOM Investigative Records Repository. You can ask for a copy of the file by contacting INSCOM. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms. Tamara G. Payne Deputy Garrison Commander for ASA Fort Eustis U.S
    Biography Department of the Army Ms. Tamara G. Payne Deputy Garrison Commander for ASA Fort Eustis U.S. Army Installation Management Command Joint Base Langley - Eustis, VA Ms. Tamara Payne serves as the Deputy Garrison Commander of ASA Fort Eustis, part of the Joint Base Langley- Eustis command. She is responsible for providing leadership and management of installation service delivery, performance management, business planning, and analysis on a joint base community servicing Army, Air Force and Navy servicemen and women, civilians their families and the surrounding communities. Prior to this assignment, Ms. Payne served as the IMCOM Training, Deputy Chief, Plans and Ops, Chief of Analysis and Integration and the IMCOM Central Region Installation Support lead for two of the largest installations in the Army, Fort Bliss and White Sands Missile Range, the largest Army Reserve Installation of Fort Hunter Liggett and Reserve Forces Training Area Parks. She was also dual hatted as the Chief of Plans Analysis and Integration and Transformation Office at USAG Ansbach, where she planned and led installation restructure and receipt of the Army’s first rotational aviation brigade. She has stood up and led two transformation offices, responsible for integration and planning of installation and mission initiatives in support of region-wide efforts such as the Aviation Restructure Initiative, Camp Humphreys Transformation and Yongsan Relocation Program. Throughout her civilian career she provided installation governance, transformation, strategic planning and integrated support to Soldiers, Civilians and their families at eight (8) installations across four (4) regions. She served in the United States Army as an intelligence analyst primarily focused on Persian Area studies and crypto-linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • FPCD-76-100 the Army's Test of One Station Unit Training
    DOCUMENT RESUME C0133 - [10751218] The Army's Test of One Station Unit Training: Adequacy and Value. PPCD-76-100; B-146890. February 9, 1977. Released February 15, 1977. 26 pp. Report to Rep. George H. Mahon, Chairman, House Committee on Appropriations; by Elmer B. Staats, Comptroller Genera]. Issue Area: Personnel Management and Compensation: Training and Education Programs (304). Contact: Federal Personnel and Compensation Div. Budget Function: National Defense: Department of Defense - military (except procurement & contracts) (051); National Defense: Military Assistance (052). Organization Concerned: Department of Defense; Department of the Army. Congressional Relevance: House Committee on Appropriations. A yearlong Army test of a concept for providing dasic and advanced training at one station under a single cadre was monitored. Findings/Conclusions: In order to implement the one station unit training, many current training centers would be closed and new construction costing about $300 million would be necessary. The test results show that under the cne station concept the training cycle can be reduced by tailoring the training program to what is necessary for initial entry-level skills. The test did not, however, examine whether similar reductions in the cycle would be attained if a tailored program were used for basic training at one station fol]owed ty advanced training at another station, !e army did noct attempt tc shorten the duration of the present initial entry training for .nfantry to see if adequate training could be achieved with a savings of cost and time. The training centers did not control or measure the effect of unequal treatment or uncontrolled factors, which could have biased test results.
    [Show full text]
  • Zika Activities
    Current Ongoing • Texas Association of City & County Health Officials. Letter sent to John Hellerstedt, MD, Commissioner Texas Department of State Health Services, asking consideration of the following regarding federal funding to Texas for Zika: o Adequate funding is needed at both the state and local level for vector-borne disease prevention and control. o Use established prevalence and population density to predict presence of vector- borne disease transmission. o Increase funding for laboratory testing of vector-borne diseases. o Review and update the Department of State Health Services State Response Plan. o Ensure funds are sent to local health departments for local vector control and response. Public Health Department/ Epidemiology • Distribution of Zika kits to uninsured population including pregnant women across El Paso County. Public Health Department/ Epidemiology • Zika information and referral calls from health care providers and constituents. Travelers referred for evaluation and testing. Public Health Department/ Epidemiology Program • Department of Public Health and Texas Department of State Health Services website resources updates. www.EPHealth.com TexasZika.org Public Health Department/ Public Affairs Officer • City's Vector Control Program and University of Texas at El Paso Mosquito Ecology and Surveillance Laboratory (UTEP-MESL) follow-up. Mosquito pools are being submitted to corresponding laboratories. Public Health Department/ Epidemiology/ City's Vector Control Program • City of El Paso Department of Public Health Zika Virus Campaign Activities Report February-July 2016 Department of Public Health Zika report to be uploaded to the Zika web link. Public Health Department/ Epidemiology/ Public Affairs Officer • Zika information updated on website.www.EPHealth.com Public Health Department/ Public Affairs Officer • Department of Public Health Zika Virus Response Plan Update.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Crossing at Fort Bliss Site Plan HAAN ROAD
    BLISSFULLY YOURS Outlet Shoppes at El Paso 10 Supercenter 54 375 Supercenter FORT BLISS Supercenter 601 SUNLAND Supercenter TOWN CENTER 601 SUNLAND PLAZA SUNLAND PARK MALL 62 180 Supercenter NEW MEXICO 10 FORT BLISS Supercenter 54 10 375 54 54 EL PASO CBD Supercenter Supercenter 54 LAS PALMAS JUAREZ, MEXICO MARKETPLACE 54 10 0 5 Mi 375 ASIP Lock: 31 July 2018 Fort Bliss - El Paso, TX Category Population 375 Army Military 22,91 0 Fort Bliss PCS Students Military 642 Deployed Military 1,158 Fort Bliss Other Military 1,235 Residential Total Full-Time Military 25,945 FORT BLISS TDY Students and Trainees Military 996 Transient and Rota�onal Military 3,518 Reserve Component Military 2,283 54 Total Military 32,742 Army Civilians 4,501 Contractors 2,514 *Other Civilians 5,660 Total Full-Time Civilians 12,675 TDY Students Civilians 4 Transient and Rota�onal Civilians 120 Total Civilians 12,799 Total Base Population 45,541 Military Family Members (Actual) - Not ASIP 36,765 **Retirees 3 2,951 **Retiree Family Members 3 8,885 **Survivors of Retirees 8,504 **Survivors of Active Duty 657 FORT BLISS TOTAL POPULATION SUPPORTED 163,303 *Other Civilians: FTE Other Services, Army/Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES), Non-Appropriated Biggs Army Airfield Fund (NAF), Private Organizations, Overhires--Civilian **Retiree and Survivor information pulled from the Defense Manpower Data Center and includes data from the entire state of New Mexico and the 12 west Texas counties supported by Fort Bliss. 601 601 375 BEAUMONT ARMY MEDICAL CENTER FORT BLISS FORT BLISS SITE El Paso International Airport 54 180 62 180 62 0 1 2 Mi 10 Freedom Crossing at Fort Bliss Site Plan HAAN ROAD 1,063 SF OLD FT.
    [Show full text]