Return and Readmission to Albania the Experience of Selected Eu Member States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Return and Readmission to Albania the Experience of Selected Eu Member States RETURN AND READMISSION TO ALBANIA THE EXPERIENCE OF SELECTED EU MEMBER STATES Combating Irregular Migration in Albania and the wider region Targeted support to capacity building within the framework of readmission support to Albania RETURN AND READMISSION TO ALBANIA THE EXPERIENCE OF SELECTED EU MEMBER STATES August 2006 This research provides an understanding of the current bilateral return and readmission practices from 4 EU member states to Albania, notably Belgium, Greece, Italy and the UK, including a general introduction chapter on EU policy with a special focus on readmission. The research also looks at the implications of implementation of the EC/Albania Readmission Agreement for Albania, with regard to the return of Albanian and third country nationals. The purpose of the study is to provide practitioners and national experts with an overview of current practices compared to existing international standards in order to guide the decision-making process and to make this practical experience available for the smooth implementation of the EC/Albania readmission agreement as well as other readmission agreements in the future. Editor: Caroline Mackenzie Opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of IOM. IOM does not take any responsibilities for any use that may be made of the information contained therein nor for inaccuracies caused through translation. Furthermore, the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. In addition, the Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralisation of the Hellenic Republic does not take any responsibilities for the content of the report or for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. IOM is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. As an intergovernmental body, IOM acts with its partners in the international community to: assist in meeting the operational challenges of migration; advance understanding of migration issues; encourage social and economic development through migration; and uphold the human dignity and well-being of migrants. This publication was funded by the European Union and co-funded by the Ministry of Interior, Public Administration and Decentralization of the Hellenic Republic. Publisher: International Organization for Migration, Tirana Rruga Brigada e Tete Tirana Albania Tel: +355 4 257 836/7 Fax: +355 4 257 835 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.iomtirana.org.al ISBN 978 92 9068 274 5 © 2006, International Organization for Migration All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables .....................................................................................................................7 List of Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................8 Foreword ...........................................................................................................................9 I. Perspectives on the EC/Albanian Readmission Agreement .........................11 Lynellyn D. Long, with Sanja Celebic I.1. The EC Perspective on the Albanian Readmission Agreement ................................11 I.2. Definitions of Readmission and Return .....................................................................12 I.2.1. Security versus economic interests ................................................................................ 14 I.2.2. Developing an EC-wide security regime ..................................................................14 I.2.3. Growing security concerns and the readmission agreement negotiations ....................15 I.2.4. The need for return mechanisms ............................................................................17 I.2.5. Common border management ................................................................................18 I.2.6. Economic migrants ................................................................................................20 I.2.7. Continuing tensions on migration matters ................................................................21 I.3. Why Albania? A Special Case ...................................................................................23 I.4. EC Assistance for Readmission and Reform ............................................................26 I.5. Reflections on Implementation: Findings and Recommendations ............................29 I.5.1. Findings ...............................................................................................................29 I.5.2. Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 31 References ......................................................................................................................33 Interviews ........................................................................................................................38 Endnotes .........................................................................................................................38 II. The Readmission Agreement between Belgium and Albania: Policy and Practices ..................................................................................................41 Michele Rosa-Clot and Brigitte Smeyers II.1. Research Purpose, Methodology and Implementation ............................................41 II.2. Historical and legal basis ..........................................................................................41 II.2.1. Patterns of Albanian immigration in Belgium ...........................................................41 II.2.2. The bilateral readmission agreement between Belgium and Albania (BRABA) ...........42 II.2.3. Legal framework ...................................................................................................43 II.3. Profile of Albanian Immigration in Belgium ...............................................................46 II.3.1 Profi le of immigration from Albania to Belgium .........................................................46 II.3.2 Distribution in Belgium ...........................................................................................48 II.4. Practices of return ....................................................................................................49 II.4.1. Refoulement ........................................................................................................49 II.4.2. Removal ..............................................................................................................49 II.4.3. Return modalities .................................................................................................49 II.4.4. Forced returns......................................................................................................50 Operational procedures for forced returns ........................................................................50 Costs and effectiveness of forced returns ........................................................................51 Vulnerable groups .........................................................................................................53 II.4.5. Voluntary returns ..................................................................................................53 Operational procedures ..................................................................................................54 4 Costs and effectiveness of forced returns ........................................................................55 II.4.6. Impact on Belgian public opinion ............................................................................56 II.5. Gaps and Recommendations ...................................................................................57 II.5.1. Organizational ......................................................................................................57 Need for a centralized database......................................................................................57 Communication and coordination ....................................................................................57 Disaggregate statistical analysis .................................................................................... 57 II.5.2. Human aspects ....................................................................................................57 II.5.3. Prevention ...........................................................................................................58 II.6. Conclusions ..............................................................................................................58 References ......................................................................................................................60 Interviews ........................................................................................................................62 Appendix II.1 Operational Procedures for Forced Returns..............................................63 Appendix II.2 List of Institutions and Private Organizations Contacted for this Research .....64 Endnotes .........................................................................................................................65
Recommended publications
  • Insight on Rise and Fall of Pyramid Schemes in Albania, 1997
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (IJHSS) ISSN(P): 2319–393X; ISSN(E): 2319–3948 Vol. 9, Issue 2, Feb–Mar 2020; 101–118 © IASET INSIGHT ON RISE AND FALL OF PYRAMID SCHEMES IN ALBANIA, 1997 Etleva Babameto Lecturer, Albanian University, Albania ABSTRACT By the beginning of 1997, just as the world celebrated one year of peace in Bosnia, another Balkan state, Albania, plunged into crisis. Shortly after it broke up, government authority collapsed, and the state fell into anarchy as marauding gangs took control of several cities. International forces were eventually called in to help provide humanitarian assistance, control lawlessness, and prepare for new elections. This study tries to analyse how this convolution in Albania was triggered by a collapse in shady pyramid investment schemes, while its root causes were decades of economic mismanagement and political corruption. It also makes an attempt to reveal how these developments influenced Albania’s performance in terms of economic, social and political aspect, how they affected Albania’s road towards democratization and what was the role and impact of international actors in such developments. In the process of scientific research, it is used the methodology of getting familiar with different sources, from various perspectives, drawing a qualitative approach, while retaining objectivity and critical approach to come to genuine and scientific analysis, interpretations and assessments. KEYWORDS: Pyramid Schemes, Crisis, Economic and Political Development, International Actors Article History Received: 30 Oct 2019 | Revised: 29 Feb 2020 | Accepted: 20 Mar 2020 INTRODUCTION The 1990's earth-shaking changes in Eastern Europe eventually reached Albania too.
    [Show full text]
  • National Visions of Eu Defence Policy
    NATIONAL VISIONS OF EU DEFENCE POLICY COMMON DENOMINATORS AND MISUNDERSTANDINGS Edited by FEDERICO SANTOPINTO AND MEGAN PRICE With contributions from JOANNA DOBROWOLSKA-POLAK GIOVANNI FALEG ALESSANDRO MARRONE MANUEL MUNIZ MEGAN PRICE FEDERICO SANTOPINTO CHRISTIAN WURZER COST, GRIP, CEPS CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES (CEPS) BRUSSELS The Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) is an independent policy research institute in Brussels. Its mission is to produce sound policy research leading to constructive solutions to the challenges facing Europe. GRIP (Groupe de recherche et d’information sur la paix et la sécurité) is a research and information institute based in Brussels. Set up in 1979, GRIP specialises in peace and security studies. For more information: www.grip.org This publication is supported by COST. COST is an intergovernmental framework for European Cooperation in Science and Technology, allowing the coordination of nationally funded research on a European level. COST is supported by the European Union RTD Framework Programme. © COST Office, 2013 No permission to reproduce or utilise the contents of this book by any means is necessary, other than in the case of images, diagrams or other materials from other copyright holders. In such cases, permission of the copyright holders is required. This book may be cited as: COST ACTION IS 0805 – title of the publication. The Legal notice by the COST Office: Neither the COST Office nor any person acting on its behalf is responsible for the use which might be made of the information contained in this publication. The COST Office is not responsible for the external websites referred to this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Albania and Italy Migration Policies and Their Development Relevance a Survey of Innovative and “Development- Friendly” Practices in Albania and Italy
    Working Papers 51/2008 Albania and Italy Migration policies and their development relevance A Survey of Innovative and “Development- Friendly” Practices in Albania and Italy Jonathan Chaloff December 2008 Via d’Aracoeli, 11 – 00186 Roma (Italia) – Tel. +3906 6990630 – Fax +3906 6784104 – e-mail: [email protected] - web: www.cespi.it Jonathan Chaloff is now at the International Migration Division of the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) in Paris. This paper was prepared in 2006 for a research project on “Development-Friendly” migration policies conducted by the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) on behalf of the Development Prospects Group of the World Bank. The paper was used by IOM as background for Naik A., Koehler J., and Laczko F., Migration and Development: Achieving Policy Coherence, IOM Migration Research Series (vol. 34), Geneva, 2008. See: www.iom.int/jahia/webdav/site/myjahiasite/shared/shared/mainsite/published_docs/serial_pu blications/MRS%2034_FINAL.pdf 2 CONTENTS SUMMARY................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 5 ALBANIAN MIGRATION TO ITALY ............................................................................................. 5 ITALIAN-ALBANIAN RELATIONS ............................................................................................... 6 ITALIAN
    [Show full text]
  • The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Enters Albania, 1992-1999
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2008-11-18 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Enters Albania, 1992-1999 Nathan D. Pali Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the History of Christianity Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Pali, Nathan D., "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Enters Albania, 1992-1999" (2008). Theses and Dissertations. 1584. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/1584 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS ENTERS ALBANIA, 1992-1999 by Nathan Pali A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts Department of Religious Education Brigham Young University December 2008 2 Copyright © 2008 Nathan Pali All Rights Reserved 3 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COMMITTEE APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Nathan Pali This thesis has been read by each member of the following graduate committee and by majority vote has been found to be satisfactory. Date Richard Cowan, Chair Date Reid Neilson Date Spencer Fluhman 4 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY As chair of the candidate‟s graduate committee, I have read the thesis of Nathan Pali in its final form and have found that (1) its format, citations, and bibliographical style are consistent and acceptable and fulfill university and department style requirements; (2) its illustrative materials including figures, tables, and charts are in place; and (3) the final manuscript is satisfactory to the graduate committee and is ready for submission to the university library.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kosovo Refugee Crisis
    UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS UNIT The Kosovo refugee crisis An independent evaluation of UNHCR’s emergency preparedness and response Astri Suhrke Michael Barutciski Peta Sandison EPAU/2000/001 Rick Garlock February 2000 PRE-PUBLICATION EDITION Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit UNHCR’s Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit (EPAU) is committed to the systematic examination and assessment of UNHCR projects, programmes, policies and practices. EPAU also promotes rigorous research on issues related to the work of UNHCR and encourages an active exchange of ideas and information between humanitarian practitioners, policymakers and the academic community. All of these activities are undertaken with the purpose of enhancing UNHCR’s capacity to fulfil its mandate on behalf of refugees and other people of concern to the organization. The work of the unit is guided by the principles of transparency, independence, consultation and relevance. Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Case postale 2500 CH-1211 Geneva 2 Dépôt Switzerland Tel: (41 22) 739 8249 Fax: (41 22) 739 7344 e-mail: [email protected] www.unhcr.org All EPAU evaluation reports are placed in the public domain. Electronic versions are posted on the UNHCR website and hard copies may be obtained by contacting EPAU. They may be quoted, cited and copied, provided that the source is acknowledged. The views expressed in Contents Summary of conclusions and recommendations v Abbreviations used in the report xix Introduction 1 1 The context 5 2 Preparedness 17 3 “Day One” – the initial response 31 4 Management 41 5 Assistance and co-ordination 65 6 Protection 89 7 Relations with the military 109 Appendix A 117 Table I.
    [Show full text]