DOCSLIB.ORG

Minerals Assessment of Cape York Peninsula

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CAPE YORK PENINSULA . - LAND USE STRATEGY LAND USE PROGRAM MINERALS ASSESSMENT OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA T. J. Denaro Department of Minerals and Energy Queensland and G. R. Ewers Australian Geological Survey Organisation AGSO CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments DEPARTMENT OF MINERALS QUEENSLAND AND ENERGY MINERALS AND ENERGY REVIEW SERIES MINERAL RESOURCE : ASSESSMENT - CYPLUS DEPARTMENT OF MINERALS AND ENERGY, QUEENSLAND 1995 MINERAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT - CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY T.J. Denarol & G.R. Ewers2 1. Geological Survey of Queensland 2. Australian Geological Survey Organisation This report has been prepared as part of the National Geoscience Mapping Accord, North Queensland Project. Funding for the publication of this report has been provided by the Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy, a jointly funded initiative of the Commonwealth and Queensland Governments. DEPARTMENT OF MINERALS AND ENEROY AGSO AUSTRALIAN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ORCANIS ATION Address for correspondence: TJ Denaro Department of Minerals and Energy, Queensland GPO Box 194, Brisbane, Q. Australia, 4001 Published by the Department of Minerals and Energy, Queensland O The State of Queensland, Department of Minerals and Energy, 1995 ISSN 1039 - 5555 ISBN 0 7242 5286 1 Production editing: JW Beeston and DM Kinrnan Graphics: LM Blight Desktop publishing: SA Beeston Printed by Goprint, Vulture Street, Woolloongabba Issued June, 1995 REFERENCE: DENARO, T.J. & EWERS, G.R., 1995: Mineral resource assessment - Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy. Queensland Minerals and Energy Review Series, Department of Minerals and Energy, Queensland. Cover Photograph: Last Hit Mine, Starcke Goldfield. EXECUTIVESUMMARY .......................................................1 MINING HISTORY AND ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE ...................1 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND ASSOCIATED MINERAL RESOURCES ......2 MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL ...................................2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .....................................................5 INTRODUCTION ............................................................9 MINERAL RESOURCE INVENTORY ...................................9 GEOLOGICAL MAPPING .........................................11 GEOPHYSICS ...................................................11 REGOLITH MAPPING .............................................11 GEOCHEMISTRY .................................................11 PREVIOUS MINERAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENTS ......................12 MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL CLASSIFICATION AND METHODOLOGY ................................................17 MINING HISTORY ..........................................................21 GOLD ..........................................................21 TIN .............................................................31 TUNGSTEN AND MOLYBDENUM ...................................34 COPPER ........................................................34 ANTIMONY .....................................................35 SILICASAND ....................................................35 HEAVY MINERALS ...............................................35 BAUXITE ........................................................35 KAOLIN ........................................................36 MICA ..........................................................36 PHOSPHATE ....................................................36 CURRENT MINING ACTIVITY .................................................37 BAUXITE ........................................................37 SILICASAND ....................................................37 KAOLIN ........................................................38 GOLD ..........................................................38 BUILDING STONE ................................................38 TIN .............................................................39 RECENT EXPLORATION .....................................................39 REGIONALGEOLOGY ......................................................42 PROTEROZOIC METAMORPHIC ROCKS ............................42 PROTEROZOIC IGNEOUS ROCKS ..................................44 CAPE YORK PENINSULA BATHOLITH ...............................44 HODGKINSON PROVINCE ........................................45 NORTH QUEENSLAND VOLCANIC AND PLUTONIC PROVINCE ........47 MESOZOIC SEDIMENTARY BASINS .................................51 CAINOZOIC IGNEOUS RCZKS ....................................53 CAINOZOIC SEDIMENTS .........................................-53 GEOLOGICAL HISTORY .........................................-55 KNOWN MINERALISATION AND RESOURCES ................................! . 57 GOLD ..........................................................57 ANTIMONY .....................................................73 TIN .............................................................74 TUNGSTEN ......................................................80 MOLYBDENUM ..................................................81 . BASE METALS ...................................................82 URANIUM ......................................................84 IRON ANDMANGANESE .........................................85 BAUXITE ........................................................85 KAOLIN ........................................................87 SILICASAND ....................................................88 HEAVY MINERALS ...............................................91 LIMESTONE .....................................................92 PHOSPHATE ....................................................92 GEMSTONES ....................................................93 COAL ..........................................................93 MINERAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT ...........................................97 GOLD(Au) ..................: .................................. 97 ANTlMGNY(Sb) ................................................128 BASEMETALS(Bm) .............................................129 TIN(Sn) .......................................................141 TUNGSTEN(W) .................................................161 MOLYBDENUM AND BISMUTH ....................................167 URANIUM .....................................................167 lRON(Fe) .....................................................168 BAUXlTE(Bx) ...................................................169 KAOLlN(Ko) ...................................................174 SlLICA(Si) .....................................................175 HEAVY MINERALS (Hm) .........................................180 LlMESTONE(Ls) ................................................186 GEMSTONES(Gs) ..............................................188 PHOSPHATE ...................................................189 COAL(C) .....................................................189 PETROLEUM ...................................................189 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................192 TABLES Mineral occurrence reports. CYPLUS area ...................................12 First pass geological mapping. 1 :250 000 explanatory notes series ............12 Recent geological reports. CYPLUS area ....................................13 Size classification of deposits ..............................................20 Recorded mineral production. Cape York Peninsula ........................-22 Exploration tenures. Cape York Peninsula. February 1994 .....................40 Mineral deposits with known production or resources ........................60 Mineral deposit types by age and structural province .......................66 Bauxite specifications ....................................................173 FIGURES Distribution of mineral occurrences .........................................3 Geological entities and current mines .......................................4 Known areas of major economic significance ................................6 Known and potential areas of possible major economic significance ..........................................................q... 7 Known and potential areas of minor economic significance ..................8 Location of CYPLUS study area. 1 :250 000 Sheet areas and mineral resource assessment maps .........................................10 Aeromagnetic and radiometric surveys at 400m line spacing ................14 Preliminary contours. depth to magnetic basement .........................15 Regional stream sediment geochemistry surveys (AGSO) ....................16 Levels of mineral resource potential and certainty of assessment (Toth &others. 1993) ......................................................19 Historical Mining Districts and Fields of Cape York Peninsula ..................24 Regional geology .........................................................43 Distribution of mineral deposits with known production or resources ..........58 Distribution of gold and antimony deposits .................................-59 Distribution of tin and tungsten deposits ...................................-75 Distribution of bauxite. kaolin. iron-manganese. base metal and uranium deposits ........................................................-83 Distribution of silica sand. heavy mineral. limestone. phosphate. and gemstone deposits .......................................................-89 Coal occurrences. Cape York Peninsula ...................................-94 Grade-tonnage diagram. iron-formation-hostedgold deposits ..............-98 Rose diagram. strikes of mesothermal Au-quartz veins (Coen type) ...........99
Recommended publications
  • Significance of Mineralogy in the Development of Flowsheets for Processing Uranium Ores

    Significance of Mineralogy in the Development of Flowsheets for Processing Uranium Ores

    JfipwK LEACHING TIME REAGENTS TEMPERATURE FLOCCULANT CLARITY AREA COUNTER CURRENT DECANTATION It 21 21 J^^LJt TECHNICAL REPORTS SERIES No.19 6 Significance of Mineralogy in the Development of Flowsheets for Processing Uranium Ores \W# INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, 1980 SIGNIFICANCE OF MINERALOGY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF FLOWSHEETS FOR PROCESSING URANIUM ORES The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN HOLY SEE PHILIPPINES ALBANIA HUNGARY POLAND ALGERIA ICELAND PORTUGAL ARGENTINA INDIA QATAR AUSTRALIA INDONESIA ROMANIA AUSTRIA IRAN SAUDI ARABIA BANGLADESH IRAQ SENEGAL BELGIUM IRELAND SIERRA LEONE BOLIVIA ISRAEL SINGAPORE BRAZIL ITALY SOUTH AFRICA BULGARIA IVORY COAST SPAIN BURMA JAMAICA SRI LANKA BYELORUSSIAN SOVIET JAPAN SUDAN SOCIALIST REPUBLIC JORDAN SWEDEN CANADA KENYA SWITZERLAND CHILE KOREA, REPUBLIC OF SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC COLOMBIA KUWAIT THAILAND COSTA RICA LEBANON TUNISIA CUBA LIBERIA TURKEY CYPRUS LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA UGANDA CZECHOSLOVAKIA LIECHTENSTEIN UKRAINIAN SOVIET SOCIALIST DEMOCRATIC KAMPUCHEA LUXEMBOURG REPUBLIC DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S MADAGASCAR UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF KOREA MALAYSIA REPUBLICS DENMARK MALI UNITED ARAB EMIRATES DOMINICAN REPUBLIC MAURITIUS UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT ECUADOR MEXICO BRITAIN AND NORTHERN EGYPT MONACO IRELAND EL SALVADOR MONGOLIA UNITED REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA MOROCCO CAMEROON FINLAND NETHERLANDS UNITED REPUBLIC OF FRANCE NEW ZEALAND TANZANIA GABON NICARAGUA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC NIGER URUGUAY GERMANY, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA VENEZUELA GHANA NORWAY VIET NAM GREECE PAKISTAN YUGOSLAVIA GUATEMALA PANAMA ZAIRE HAITI PARAGUAY ZAMBIA PERU The Agency's Statute was approved on 23 October 1956 by the Conference on the Statute of the IAEA held at United Nations Headquarters, New York; it entered into force on 29 July 1957.
  • Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 - 2021

    Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 - 2021

    Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 - 2021 Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 – 2021 Page 1 Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 - 2021 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document was developed and produced by Cape York Natural Resource Management Ltd (Cape York NRM). Cape York NRM would like to acknowledge the following organisations and their officers for their contribution and support in developing the Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan: Cook Shire Council Northern Peninsula Area Regional Council Aurukun, Hopevale, Kowanyama Lockhart, Mapoon, Napranum, Pormpuraaw and Wujal Wujal Aboriginal Shire Councils Weipa Town Authority Rio Tinto (Alcan) Biosecurity Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage Protection Department of Natural resources and Mines Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Far North Queensland Regional Organisation of Councils Individual Cape York Peninsula Registered Native Title Body Corporates and Land Trusts Cape York Weeds and Feral Animals Incorporated Copyright 2016 Published by Cape York Natural Resource Management (Cape York NRM) Ltd. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study research, news reporting, criticism or review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgment of the source is included. Major extracts of the entire document may not be reproduced by any process without the written permission of the Chief Executive Officer, Cape York Natural Resource Management (Cape York NRM) Ltd. Please reference as: Cape York Natural Resource Management 2016, Cape York Peninsula Regional Biosecurity Plan 2016 -2021, Report prepared by the Cape York Natural Resource Management (Cape York NRM) Disclaimer: This Plan has been compiled in good faith as a basis for community and stakeholder consultation and is in draft form.
  • Laura-Normanby Catchment Management Strategy

    Laura-Normanby Catchment Management Strategy

    LAURA-NORMANBY CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGY C. Howley and K. Stephan, Environmental Consultants November 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people have been involved in the production of this report. Thank you first of all to the members of the community who have completed surveys and discussed local issues with the Project Officers (Cathy Waldron and Ian Adcock). The local knowledge and concerns of the community have provided the content and direction for this report, and the strategies to address local issues have been directly chosen by the community members. The final report producers, Christina Howley and Kim Stephan (Howley & Stephan Environmental Consultants), would also like to thank the following persons, all of whom been extremely helpful in providing information regarding resources and concerns within the Catchment: Jamie Molyneuax (CYWAFAP); Graeme Elmes; Sam Dibella, Andrew Hartwig and Barry Lyons (QPWS); Geoff Mills, Graeme Herbert, Anthony McLoughlin and Stephen Parker (DNR&M); Miles Furnas (AIMS); Stuart Hyland and John Russell (DPI&F); Peter Thompson (CYPDA); Victor Stephanson (Traditional Knowledge Recording Project) and John Farrington (Quinkan & Regional Cultural Centre). Thank you also to Michael Stephan for his generous assistance with technical matters and to Jean Stephan for editing. Finally, thank you to the members of the Laura-Normanby Catchment Management Group. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION
  • Cape York Peninsula Parks and Reserves Visitor Guide

    Cape York Peninsula Parks and Reserves Visitor Guide

    Parks and reserves Visitor guide Featuring Annan River (Yuku Baja-Muliku) National Park and Resources Reserve Black Mountain National Park Cape Melville National Park Endeavour River National Park Kutini-Payamu (Iron Range) National Park (CYPAL) Heathlands Resources Reserve Jardine River National Park Keatings Lagoon Conservation Park Mount Cook National Park Oyala Thumotang National Park (CYPAL) Rinyirru (Lakefield) National Park (CYPAL) Great state. Great opportunity. Cape York Peninsula parks and reserves Thursday Possession Island National Park Island Pajinka Bamaga Jardine River Resources Reserve Denham Group National Park Jardine River Eliot Creek Jardine River National Park Eliot Falls Heathlands Resources Reserve Captain Billy Landing Raine Island National Park (Scientific) Saunders Islands Legend National Park National park Sir Charles Hardy Group National Park Mapoon Resources reserve Piper Islands National Park (CYPAL) Wen Olive River loc Conservation park k River Wuthara Island National Park (CYPAL) Kutini-Payamu Mitirinchi Island National Park (CYPAL) Water Moreton (Iron Range) Telegraph Station National Park Chilli Beach Waterway Mission River Weipa (CYPAL) Ma’alpiku Island National Park (CYPAL) Napranum Sealed road Lockhart Lockhart River Unsealed road Scale 0 50 100 km Aurukun Archer River Oyala Thumotang Sandbanks National Park Roadhouse National Park (CYPAL) A r ch KULLA (McIlwraith Range) National Park (CYPAL) er River C o e KULLA (McIlwraith Range) Resources Reserve n River Claremont Isles National Park Coen Marpa
  • Normanby River Basin

    Normanby River Basin

    143°30'E ! 144°E 144°30'E 145°E King Island Stanley Waters in National Parks, Cape Flinders Pipon Island conservation estate Island Cape Melville Blackwood Flinders Island Island DRAFT 13 Normanby estuarine e Denham Island n waters (incl. Bizant, i l Bathurst Bay Normanby, Saltwater G Temple o Ck r and others adjacent ge e C k m Princess Charlotte Bay) ! Princess u ¬12 «¬14 l « Ebagoola Charlotte P Stewart Basin Bay «¬13 Annie R iver «¬13 Bewick Island Ba t M t e D 14 Princess Charlotte Bay r in B k a k e S n r S ' y e ' C e e C iza r r 0 r n e 0 3 e r r C 3 ° r ek 13 t C ° i 4 e «¬ e a 4 e t k 1 d 1 k R t Cape Bowen o i n v o R u e k . m a a 13 r r «¬ r W teen a Fif Mile 01 11 C «¬ «¬ B Coleman r k e Birt r h e C d e vi r k a 11 e R k «¬ y t Basin C k a e k ic e W k 11 D w r «¬ C e e o C s e r t r t H i e y Nymph Island t C h a k w r ile C lt e W c Five M reek a B o e i S k r R r k t F e k h e our M r e Cree d v ile C r a i te er y R iv 12 C ie a R ¬ « r tw e n l n n a an e H k a Sa ter Creek S e ltwa J k N ee k r k 11 C C o «¬ C e r m s le l te i i i t eek r h r a A k C Be ttie J e a n n i e B a s i n M C M e K e re s k r k n C South Five Mile Cree e n e r k e e o e e nt in C t te urpe H Port v f T n i i h e S n i cke F ig r tt ta r R R iv of Cape E e e a e n .
  • Lord Hill Quarry Town: Stoneham, Ox Ford County Base Map: Cen Ter Lovell 7.5’ Quadran Gle Con Tour in Ter Val: 20 Feet

    Lord Hill Quarry Town: Stoneham, Ox Ford County Base Map: Cen Ter Lovell 7.5’ Quadran Gle Con Tour in Ter Val: 20 Feet

    Lord Hill Quarry Town: Stoneham, Ox ford County Base map: Cen ter Lovell 7.5’ quadran gle Con tour in ter val: 20 feet Type of de posit: Gran ite peg matite. strunzite, to paz, torbernite/metatorbernite, triphylite(?), triplite, uraninite, uranophane, vivian it e, zircon (var. cyrtolite). Col lect ing sta tus: Locat ed in the White Mountai n Nati onal Forest . No perm ission is needed to collec t miner als here. How- Com ments: Lord Hill is one of the fa vor ite col lect ing sites in ever, collec ting must be non com mercia l, done with hand tools, Maine, offer ing a va riety of miner als and White Mountai n scen - and not greatly disturb the mine area. ery. The best-known finds from this local ity in clude large crys- tals of white topaz, and smoky quartz crystal s encrust ed by many Min er als ob served: albit e, almandine (garnet) , autun- small phenakite crys tals. Most col lect ing ac tiv ity ap pears to ite/meta-autun ite, beraunite, bermanite, beryllonite, bertrandite, have oc curred in the larger of the two quarry pits, al though a ma- beryl, bi o tite, bis muth, bis muthi nite, bismutite, cas sit er ite, jor pocket contai n ing smoky quartz and fluorapatite crystal s was columbite, cryptomelane, damourite, elbaite (tour maline) , opened in the floor of the smaller pit in 1991. The pieces of topaz eosphorite, fluorapatite, fluo rite, gahnite, goethite com monly found here are disti n guished by their bluish-whi te (pseudomorphic after pyrit e), goyazite, heterosite, hureaulite, color (es pe cially when wet), sin gle cleav age di rec tion, and hydroxylapatite, hydroxyl-herderite, microcline, microlite, higher den sity than sim i lar-look ing peg ma tite min er als.
  • Surface Water Resources of Cape York Peninsula

    Surface Water Resources of Cape York Peninsula

    CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY LAND USE PROGRAM SURFACE WATER RESOURCES OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA A.M. Horn Queensland Department of Primary Industries 1995 r .am1, a DEPARTMENT OF, PRIMARY 1NDUSTRIES CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY (CYPLUS) Land Use Program SURFACE WATER RESOURCES OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA A.M.Horn Queensland Department of Primary Industries CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments Recommended citation: Horn. A. M (1995). 'Surface Water Resources of Cape York Peninsula'. (Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy, Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland, Brisbane, Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra and Queensland Department of Primary Industries.) Note: Due to the timing of publication, reports on other CYPLUS projects may not be fully cited in the BIBLIOGRAPHY section. However, they should be able to be located by author, agency or subject. ISBN 0 7242 623 1 8 @ The State of Queensland and Commonwealth of Australia 1995. Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, - no part may be reproduced by any means without the prior written permission of the Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland and the Australian Government Publishing Service. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Office of the Co-ordinator General, Government of Queensland PO Box 185 BRISBANE ALBERT STREET Q 4002 The Manager, Commonwealth Information Services GPO Box 84 CANBERRA ACT 2601 CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY STAGE I PREFACE TO PROJECT REPORTS Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy (CYPLUS) is an initiative to provide a basis for public participation in planning for the ecologically sustainable development of Cape York Peninsula.
  • A Re-Examination of William Hann´S Northern Expedition of 1872 to Cape York Peninsula, Queensland

    A Re-Examination of William Hann´S Northern Expedition of 1872 to Cape York Peninsula, Queensland

    CSIRO PUBLISHING Historical Records of Australian Science, 2021, 32, 67–82 https://doi.org/10.1071/HR20014 A re-examination of William Hann’s Northern Expedition of 1872 to Cape York Peninsula, Queensland Peter Illingworth TaylorA and Nicole Huxley ACorresponding author. Email: [email protected] William Hann’s Northern Expedition set off on 26 June 1872 from Mount Surprise, a pastoral station west of Townsville, to determine the mineral and agricultural potential of Cape York Peninsula. The expedition was plagued by disharmony and there was later strong criticism of the leadership and its failure to provide any meaningful analysis of the findings. The authors (a descendent of Norman Taylor, expedition geologist, and a descendent of Jerry, Indigenous guide and translator) use documentary sources and traditional knowledge to establish the role of Jerry in the expedition. They argue that while Hann acknowledged Jerry’s assistance to the expedition, his role has been downplayed by later commentators. Keywords: botany, explorers, geology, indigenous history, palaeontology. Published online 27 November 2020 Introduction research prominence. These reinterpretations of history not only highlight the cultural complexity of exploration, but they also During the nineteenth century, exploration for minerals, grazing demonstrate the extent to which Indigenous contributions were and agricultural lands was widespread in Australia, with expedi- obscured or deliberately removed from exploration accounts.4 tions organised through private, public and/or government spon- William Hann’s Northern Expedition to Cape York Peninsula sorship. Poor leadership and conflicting aspirations were common, was not unique in experiencing conflict and failing to adequately and the ability of expedition members to cooperate with one another acknowledge the contributions made by party members, notably in the face of hardships such as food and water shortages, illness and Jerry, Aboriginal guide and interpreter.
  • Decision Notice

    Decision Notice

    24 October 2019 Enquiries: Daniel Lamond Our Ref: OP 3300/2019 (924997) Your Ref: Wujul Wujul Aboriginal Shire Council 1 Hartwig Street WUJUL WUJUL QLD 4895 Attention: John Drobec Dear Sir Operational Works for Water Main Augmentation and attachment to Bloomfield River Bridge Reference is made to the above development application. Please find attached the Decision Notice. Please quote Council’s application number OP 2019/ 3300 in all subsequent correspondence relating to this development application. Also find attached a ‘Pre-Start’ meeting template, which identifies the information that must be provided for Council approval, prior to the commencement of works. The template also provides the Consulting Engineer with a format for conducting the meeting. An invitation to attend the meeting must be sent to Council’s representative Neil Beck on telephone number 07 4099 9451, giving at least five (5) working days notification if possible. Should you require any clarification regarding this, please contact Daniel Lamond on telephone 4099 9456. Yours faithfully Paul Hoye Manager Environment and Planning encl. • Decision Notice Doc 924997 OP2019/ 3300 Page 1 of 33 DECISION NOTICE — APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS (GIVEN UNDER SECTION 63 OF THE PLANNING ACT 2016) Douglas Shire Council has assessed your application and decided it as follows: 1. Applicant’s details Name: Wujul Wujul Aboriginal Shire Council Postal Address: 1 Hartwig Street WUJUL WUJUL QLD 4895 2. Location details Street Address: Bloomfield River Bridge Real Property Description: Adjacent to Lot 12 on BK15783 Local Government Area: Douglas Shire Council 3. Details of proposed development Operational Works (Augmentation of water main) 4. Decision Date of decision: 24 October 2019 Decision details: Development Permit 5.
  • Colonial Australia and Aboriginal Resistance

    Colonial Australia and Aboriginal Resistance

    www.galaxyimrj.com Galaxy: International Multidisciplinary Research Journal ISSN 2278-9529 “The Frontier Spectrum”: Colonial Australia and Aboriginal Resistance Prasenjit Das Ph.D. Scholar Dept. of English, Ranchi University, Jharkhand, India You are the New Australians, but we are the Old Australians. We have in our arteries the blood of the original Australians, who have lived in this land for many thousands of years.—Argus as qtd. in Bourke et al 43. ...I see Indigenous peoples as having twin projects: at one level, we must understand the motivation behind the historical constructions of Aboriginality, and understand why they have had such a grip over colonizing populations; simultaneously we must continuously subvert the hegemony over our own representations, and allow our visions to create the world of meaning in which we relate to ourselves, to each other and to non-Indigenous peoples.—Dodson 33. Australian nation is predominantly ‘White’ not only in terms of society and culture, but also when viewed in the perspectives of literature, art and identity in general. There is even a claim of a ‘White Australian Nation’, from the very time when the European explorers said to have ‘discovered’ an island in the southern hemisphere, dismissed as terra nullius1, to the present day first-world capitalist situation. This was primarily achieved through a complete negation of Aboriginal existence, an utter disregard of Aboriginal identity—history, tradition, culture values, customs and mores of living. Epithets such as ‘blood thirsty’, ‘cunning’ ‘primitive’, ‘non- modern’ ‘Australian Nigger’ were often used to label and denote the Aboriginals by the colonizers. This ‘othering’ was evident in certain lopsided observations of the white colonizers: ...degraded as to divine things, almost on a level with a brute..
  • Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21

    Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21

    Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21 July 2020 This publication has been compiled by Natural Resources Divisional Support, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2020 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Summary This document lists the stream gauging stations which make up the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) surface water quality monitoring network. Data collected under this network are published on DNRME’s Water Monitoring Information Data Portal. The water quality data collected includes both logged time-series and manual water samples taken for later laboratory analysis. Other data types are also collected at stream gauging stations, including rainfall and stream height. Further information is available on the Water Monitoring Information Data Portal under each station listing.
  • 7. Locating Seven Rivers

    7. Locating Seven Rivers

    7. Locating Seven Rivers Fiona Powell 1. Introduction In December 1890, while on patrol down the west coast of northern Cape York Peninsula (NCYP), accompanied by Senior-Constable Conroy and a few native troopers of the Thursday Island Water Police, Sub-Inspector Charles Savage visited ‘the Seven Rivers’.1 From this place, the party went south to the mouth of the Batavia (now Wenlock) River. There they met the chief or mamoose of the Seven Rivers tribe,2 a man identified as Tongambulo (variations Tong-ham-blow,3 Tongamblow4 and Tong-am-bulo5) and also known as Charlie in one account.6 At the time of this meeting, Sub-Inspector Savage was seeking another candidate for induction into government policies intended ‘to civilize the Natives of Cape York Peninsula’.7 The first NCYP Aboriginal person to have had this experience was Harry, also known as King Yarra-ham-quee, and described as the ‘mamoose of the Jardine River’.8 This man had been taken to Thursday Island earlier in the year: where he underwent a course of instruction and when he had sufficiently understood what was required of him was taken back and made king, his subjects and several visitors, Natives of Prince of Wales Island, being present.9 1 ‘Conciliating the Natives’, Torres Straits Pilot, 6 December 1890, and published in The Queenslander, Saturday 27 December 1890: 1216 [hereafter ‘Conciliating the Natives’ Torres Straits Pilot]. 2 Savage, Charles 1891, Letter to the Honourable John Douglas, Government Resident Thursday Island, dated 11 February 1891, Queensland State Archives, Item D 143032, File - Reserve.