DOCSLIB.ORG

HANSARD SOCIETY LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT and ACCOUNTS Year to 31 December 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HANSARD SOCIETY LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT and ACCOUNTS Year to 31 December 2019 HANSARD SOCIETY LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS Year to 31 December 2019 Company Number: 04332105 1 If our democracy is to work well, citizens must have impartial information. They need to be well informed in order to make informed choices. ………….Will my hon. Friend agree to work with the Hansard Society, which does such an excellent job, to demystify the work of MPs in this place so that our constituents understand it and can make informed decisions when they come to the ballot box? Sarah Newton MP (Con) Hansard, 26 September 2019 House of Commons debate on the Principles of Democracy and the Rights of the Electorate 2 CONTENTS Public benefit statement 4 Foreword by the Rt Hon the Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Chair) 5 ____________________________________ Brexit and Parliament 6 Research, education, events 8 • Supreme Court prorogation case • Mock elections in schools • New House of Commons Speaker election hustings Audit of Political Engagement 10 Parliamentary Affairs journal 12 Communicating impartial information 14 • BBC Parliament: the Brexit votes Hansard Scholars 16 ____________________________________ Key risks and uncertainties 18 Future plans and the pandemic 19 ____________________________________ Constitution and governance 20 Legal and administrative details 22 Statement of Trustees’ responsibilities 23 ____________________________________ Independent Auditor’s report 24 Statement of financial activities 27 Balance sheet 28 Statement of cash flows 29 Notes to the accounts 30 3 Public benefit statement Founded in 1944, the Hansard Society is the UK’s leading source of independent research and advice on Parliament and parliamentary affairs. A research and education Society The Prime Minister, the Rt dedicated to expounding the Hon Theresa May MP, principles, practices and addresses the House of challenges of parliamentary Commons during the democracy, the Hansard Society is Brexit debate on the widely recognised as the ’Meaningful Vote’. Westminster Parliament’s ‘critical The Trustees confirm they have 15 January 2019 friend’. complied with the duty in section 17 of the Charities Act 2011 to The Society’s work supports the have due regard to the Charity © UK Parliament/Mark Duffy improvement of knowledge about Commission’s guidance, ‘Charities Parliament and the development and Public Benefit’. The Trustees of reforms needed to shape our review the activities of the Charity democratic institutions for the on an ongoing basis and are 21st century. satisfied they continue to be a discount is also available for our directly related to the Society’s quarterly academic journal, Public benefit core mission and objectives. Parliamentary Affairs. The nature of the Society’s work means that The Trustees of the Charity (who Beneficiaries of the Society’s work most events are held, free of are the Directors of the Charity for to support knowledge and charge, at Westminster. company law purposes) present understanding of Parliament their annual report and the include a wide range of groups Any private benefits are incidental financial statements for Hansard drawn from across civil society as a necessary by-product of Society Limited (the Charity) for and primarily, but not solely, carrying out the Charity’s aims. the year ended 31 December based in the UK. They include Staff are employed and 2019. parliamentarians, parliamentary remunerated in order that the officials, academics, journalists, Charity’s aims are met. The Trustees confirm that the non-governmental organisations annual report and financial and the business sector, as statements of the Charity comply well as students and teachers. with the current statutory requirements, the Charity’s Most of the Society’s resources governing document, and the and publications are made freely provisions of the Statement of available via our website. Recommended Practice (SORP) ‘Accounting and Reporting by Membership of the Society is Charities’. available at a low annual fee, and 4 Foreword The Rt Hon the Baroness Taylor of Bolton Chair of the Board of Trustees The Trustees of the Charity are pleased to present the legal changes and manage the regulatory risks this annual report and the financial statements for arising from the Brexit process. The SI Tracker data the Hansard Society, showcasing our work in the generated new insights into the delegated calendar year 2019. legislation process and provided a rich vein of information that was used by MPs and Peers during We were delighted that the Rt Hon Sir Lindsay parliamentary debates and committee inquiries. Hoyle MP accepted our invitation to serve as the The data was also cited in evidence in the Supreme Society’s Co-President, following his election as Court prorogation case. Speaker of the House of Commons. Our constitutional and procedural concerns about 2019 was an eventful year, with the ongoing Brexit the SI scrutiny process are rooted in years of process, the unlawful prorogation of Parliament painstaking research, tracking and monitoring more and a mid-December general election. Throughout, than a thousand SIs each parliamentary session. the Society’s staff played an invaluable role, Until recently, the problems with SIs have remained providing independent research and advice about under the political radar, and it has been difficult to the constitutional and procedural challenges facing generate interest in them among MPs and the both the government and the legislature. media. Today, however, the combination of Brexit and the pandemic has moved these concerns Our annual Audit of Political Engagement rapidly up the political agenda, and the Society is highlighted public frustrations with the state of our uniquely well-placed to influence the debate about democracy, with opinions of the system of future reform of the Statutory Instrument process. governing at their lowest point in 15-years – worse than in the aftermath of the MPs’ expenses scandal. Our Scholars programme continued to flourish, Nonetheless, despite any exasperation they may with the Spring programme attracting the highest have felt about the political process as MPs ground number of enrolments in a programme for many their way to a stalemate over Brexit, many people years. However, the Autumn programme was developed a new-found interest in the greatly disrupted by the dissolution of Parliament parliamentary proceedings. Week-by-week, viewers for the general election, which brought the in their hundreds of thousands tuned into BBC Scholars’ placements at Westminster to an abrupt Parliament to listen to the BBC’s parliamentary end. We are very grateful to those members and correspondent, Mark D’Arcy, and the Society’s supporters who helped out, at short notice, so as to Director, Ruth Fox, explain the political and provide an informative and engaging programme procedural implications of the Brexit votes, drawing of alternative election-related activities for the the parliamentary channel’s highest-ever audience Scholars for the remainder of their stay in London. ratings. In the Summer we moved our office to Millbank Our Brexit Statutory Instrument (SI) Dashboard Tower. We are now based nearer to Westminster, became the go-to resource for campaigners, in a better-appointed office, which costs less and journalists and diplomats keeping track of this provides greater flexibility. The Society’s prudent important strand of the UK’s preparations for husbanding of its financial resources means the Brexit. Alongside it, our SI Tracker subscription organisation remains on a stable footing despite service helped a wide array of organisations across the challenges now posed by the Covid-19 the corporate and civil society sectors to monitor pandemic. 5 ’Critical friend’ scrutiny of Parliament Brexit and Parliament Brexit again dominated much of the Society’s Brexit Statutory Instruments (SIs) research activity throughout the year as the Throughout the first quarter of the year a key government grappled with the legislative and question was whether the government would procedural challenges posed by the UK’s exit get all the Brexit SIs it needed onto the from the EU. statute book by ‘exit day’. On a daily basis the Society tracked the laying of Brexit SIs The ‘Meaningful Vote’ before the Westminster Parliament and Much of the research team’s work focused on published regular updates on our Brexit SI explaining the procedural implications of the Dashboard. ‘Meaningful Vote’ required under section 13 ‘Indicative Votes’ of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, how ‘business of the House’ motions As MPs struggled to reach a consensus about work, the conceptual distinction between the the UK’s future relationship with the EU, the day of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU government agreed to hold a series of (Brexit day) and ‘exit day’ in UK law, and the indicative votes to help inform the decision- process for changing ‘exit day’ by Statutory making process. However, it was clear that Instrument. different MPs had different objectives for, and expectations of, this process. Some MPs 6 The House of Commons following the wanted indicative votes to test opinion—to take the ‘Meaningful Vote’, 15 January 2019 temperature of the House—on a range of different, non- © UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor binding options. Others wanted a series of indicative votes to determine which one or more of the potential models for the future relationship with the EU might genuinely command a majority and therefore offer a way forward. To help inform this process the Society published a briefing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Government Response to the Committee's
    House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Growing back better: putting nature and net zero at the heart of the economic recovery: Government and Bank of England Responses to the Committee’s Third Report of Session 2019–21 Second Special Report of Session 2021–22 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 16 June 2021 HC 327 Published on 22 June 2021 by authority of the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee The Environmental Audit Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider to what extent the policies and programmes of government departments and non-departmental public bodies contribute to environmental protection and sustainable development; to audit their performance against such targets as may be set for them by Her Majesty’s Ministers; and to report thereon to the House. Current membership Rt Hon Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) (Chair) Duncan Baker MP (Conservative, North Norfolk) Dan Carden MP (Labour, Liverpool, Walton) Sir Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Barry Gardiner MP (Labour, Brent North) Rt Hon Robert Goodwill MP (Conservative, Scarborough and Whitby) James Gray MP (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Helen Hayes MP (Labour, Dulwich and West Norwood) Ian Levy MP (Conservative, Blyth Valley) Caroline Lucas MP (Green Party, Brighton, Pavilion) Cherilyn Mackrory MP (Conservative, Truro and Falmouth) Jerome Mayhew MP (Conservative, Broadland) John McNally MP (Scottish National Party, Falkirk) Dr Matthew Offord MP (Conservative, Hendon) Claudia Webbe MP (Independent, Leicester East) Nadia Whittome MP (Labour, Nottingham East) The following Members were also members of the Committee during this Parliament: Feryal Clark MP (Labour, Enfield North), Marco Longhi MP (Conservative, Dudley North), Kerry McCarthy MP (Labour, Bristol East), Alex Sobel MP (Leeds, North West), and Mr Shailesh Vara MP (Conservative, North West Cambridgeshire).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Diversity in Politics and Public Life
    BRIEFING PAPER CBP 01156, 22 October 2020 By Elise Uberoi and Ethnic diversity in politics Rebecca Lees and public life Contents: 1. Ethnicity in the United Kingdom 2. Parliament 3. The Government and Cabinet 4. Other elected bodies in the UK 5. Public sector organisations www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Ethnic diversity in politics and public life Contents Summary 3 1. Ethnicity in the United Kingdom 6 1.1 Categorising ethnicity 6 1.2 The population of the United Kingdom 7 2. Parliament 8 2.1 The House of Commons 8 Since the 1980s 9 Ethnic minority women in the House of Commons 13 2.2 The House of Lords 14 2.3 International comparisons 16 3. The Government and Cabinet 17 4. Other elected bodies in the UK 19 4.1 Devolved legislatures 19 4.2 Local government and the Greater London Authority 19 5. Public sector organisations 21 5.1 Armed forces 21 5.2 Civil Service 23 5.3 National Health Service 24 5.4 Police 26 5.4 Justice 27 5.5 Prison officers 28 5.6 Teachers 29 5.7 Fire and Rescue Service 30 5.8 Social workers 31 5.9 Ministerial and public appointments 33 Annex 1: Standard ethnic classifications used in the UK 34 Cover page image copyright UK Youth Parliament 2015 by UK Parliament. Licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0 / image cropped 3 Commons Library Briefing, 22 October 2020 Summary This report focuses on the proportion of people from ethnic minority backgrounds in a range of public positions across the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report Friday, 6 November 2015 CONTENTS
    Daily Report Friday, 6 November 2015 This report shows written answers and statements provided on 6 November 2015 and the information is correct at the time of publication (03:52 P.M., 06 November 2015). For the latest information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements, please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/ CONTENTS ANSWERS 4 Communities and Local ATTORNEY GENERAL 4 Government: Digital Technology 11 Law Officers' Departments: Pay 4 Communities and Local BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND Government: Freedom of SKILLS 5 Information 11 Sahaviriya Steel Industries UK: Devon and Somerset Fire and Redcar 5 Rescue Service 11 CABINET OFFICE 5 East Sussex Fire and Rescue Cabinet Office: Public Service 12 Appointments 5 Infrastructure: Government TREASURY 6 Assistance 13 Apprentices: Taxation 6 Royal Berkshire Fire and Rescue Balance of Trade 6 Service: Staff 13 Educational Institutions: CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT 14 Productivity 7 Cybercrime 14 Employee Ownership 7 DEFENCE 14 Landfill Communities Fund 8 Armed Forces: Private Education 14 Manufacturing Industries 8 Army: Resignations 17 Revenue and Customs: ICT 9 Defence: Expenditure 17 Treasury: Freedom of Iraq: Military Intervention 18 Information 9 Military Aircraft 18 Welfare Tax Credits: Telephone Military Bases: Operating Costs 19 Services 9 Ministry of Defence: Freedom COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL of Information 20 GOVERNMENT 10 Ministry of Defence: Risk Affordable Housing 10 Management 20 Air Force: Military Bases 10 2 Friday, 6 November 2015 Daily
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers of the House of Commons
    Parliamentary Information List BRIEFING PAPER 04637a 21 August 2015 Speakers of the House of Commons Speaker Date Constituency Notes Peter de Montfort 1258 − William Trussell 1327 − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Styled 'Procurator' Henry Beaumont 1332 (Mar) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Sir Geoffrey Le Scrope 1332 (Sep) − Appeared as joint spokesman of Lords and Commons. Probably Chief Justice. William Trussell 1340 − William Trussell 1343 − Appeared for the Commons alone. William de Thorpe 1347-1348 − Probably Chief Justice. Baron of the Exchequer, 1352. William de Shareshull 1351-1352 − Probably Chief Justice. Sir Henry Green 1361-1363¹ − Doubtful if he acted as Speaker. All of the above were Presiding Officers rather than Speakers Sir Peter de la Mare 1376 − Sir Thomas Hungerford 1377 (Jan-Mar) Wiltshire The first to be designated Speaker. Sir Peter de la Mare 1377 (Oct-Nov) Herefordshire Sir James Pickering 1378 (Oct-Nov) Westmorland Sir John Guildesborough 1380 Essex Sir Richard Waldegrave 1381-1382 Suffolk Sir James Pickering 1383-1390 Yorkshire During these years the records are defective and this Speaker's service might not have been unbroken. Sir John Bussy 1394-1398 Lincolnshire Beheaded 1399 Sir John Cheyne 1399 (Oct) Gloucestershire Resigned after only two days in office. John Dorewood 1399 (Oct-Nov) Essex Possibly the first lawyer to become Speaker. Sir Arnold Savage 1401(Jan-Mar) Kent Sir Henry Redford 1402 (Oct-Nov) Lincolnshire Sir Arnold Savage 1404 (Jan-Apr) Kent Sir William Sturmy 1404 (Oct-Nov) Devonshire Or Esturmy Sir John Tiptoft 1406 Huntingdonshire Created Baron Tiptoft, 1426.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications
    Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications Jessica R. Adolino, Ph. D. Professor of Political Science James Madison University Draft prepared for presentation at the European Studies Association Annual Meeting May 9-12, 2019, Denver, Colorado Please do not cite or distribute without author’s permission. By almost any measure, since the immediate aftermath of the June 16, 2016 Brexit referendum, the British government has been in a state of chaos. The turmoil began with then- Prime Minister David Cameron’s resignation on June 17 and succession by Theresa May within days of the vote. Subsequently, May’s decision to call a snap election in 2017 and the resulting loss of the Conservatives’ parliamentary majority cast doubt on her leadership and further stirred up dissension in her party’s ranks. Perhaps more telling, and the subject of this paper, is the unprecedented number of ministers1—from both senior and junior ranks—that quit the May government over Brexit-related policy disagreements2. Between June 12, 2017 and April 3, 2019, the government witnessed 45 resignations, with high-profile secretaries of state and departmental ministers stepping down to return to the backbenches. Of these, 34 members of her government, including 9 serving in the Cabinet, departed over issues with some aspect of Brexit, ranging from dissatisfaction with the Prime Minister’s Withdrawal Agreement, to disagreements about the proper role of Parliament, to questions about the legitimacy of the entire Brexit process. All told, Theresa May lost more ministers, and at a more rapid pace, than any other prime minister in modern times.
    [Show full text]
  • Stapylton Final Version
    1 THE PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OF FREEDOM FROM ARREST, 1603–1629 Keith A. T. Stapylton UCL Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Page 2 DECLARATION I, Keith Anthony Thomas Stapylton, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed Page 3 ABSTRACT This thesis considers the English parliamentary privilege of freedom from arrest (and other legal processes), 1603-1629. Although it is under-represented in the historiography, the early Stuart Commons cherished this particular privilege as much as they valued freedom of speech. Previously one of the privileges requested from the monarch at the start of a parliament, by the seventeenth century freedom from arrest was increasingly claimed as an ‘ancient’, ‘undoubted’ right that secured the attendance of members, and safeguarded their honour, dignity, property, and ‘necessary’ servants. Uncertainty over the status and operation of the privilege was a major contemporary issue, and this prompted key questions for research. First, did ill definition of the constitutional relationship between the crown and its prerogatives, and parliament and its privileges, lead to tensions, increasingly polemical attitudes, and a questioning of the royal prerogative? Where did sovereignty now lie? Second, was it important to maximise the scope of the privilege, if parliament was to carry out its business properly? Did ad hoc management of individual privilege cases nevertheless have the cumulative effect of enhancing the authority and confidence of the Commons? Third, to what extent was the exploitation or abuse of privilege an unintended consequence of the strengthening of the Commons’ authority in matters of privilege? Such matters are not treated discretely, but are embedded within chapters that follow a thematic, broadly chronological approach.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 March 2012 Page 1 of 17
    Radio 4 Listings for 24 – 30 March 2012 Page 1 of 17 SATURDAY 24 MARCH 2012 SAT 06:57 Weather (b01dc94s) The Scotland Bill is currently progressing through the House of The latest weather forecast. Lords, but is it going to stop independence in its tracks? Lord SAT 00:00 Midnight News (b01dc948) Forsyth Conservative says it's unlikely Liberal Democrat Lord The latest national and international news from BBC Radio 4. Steel thinks it will. Followed by Weather. SAT 07:00 Today (b01dtd56) With John Humphrys and James Naughtie. Including Yesterday The Editor is Marie Jessel in Parliament, Sports Desk, Weather and Thought for the Day. SAT 00:30 Book of the Week (b01dnn41) Tim Winton: Land's Edge - A Coastal Memoir SAT 11:30 From Our Own Correspondent (b01dtd5j) SAT 09:00 Saturday Live (b01dtd58) Afghans enjoy New Year celebrations but Lyse Doucet finds Episode 5 Mark Miodownik, Luke Wright, literacy champion Sue they are concerned about what the months ahead may bring Chapman, saved by a Labradoodle, Chas Hodges Daytrip, Sarah by Tim Winton. Millican John James travels to the west African state of Guinea-Bissau and finds unexpected charms amidst its shadows In a specially-commissioned coda, the acclaimed author Richard Coles with materials scientist Professor Mark describes how the increasingly threatened and fragile marine Miodownik, poet Luke Wright, Sue Chapman who learned to The Burmese are finding out that recent reforms in their ecology has turned him into an environmental campaigner in read and write in her sixties, Maurice Holder whose life was country have encouraged tourists to return.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Christi College the Pelican Record
    CORPUS CHRISTI COLLEGE THE PELICAN RECORD Vol. LII December 2016 i The Pelican Record Editor: Mark Whittow Design and Printing: Lynx DPM Published by Corpus Christi College, Oxford 2016 Website: http://www.ccc.ox.ac.uk Email: [email protected] The editor would like to thank Rachel Pearson, Julian Reid, Joanna Snelling, Sara Watson and David Wilson. Front cover: Detail of the restored woodwork in the College Chapel. Back cover: The Chapel after the restoration work. Both photographs: Nicholas Read ii The Pelican Record CONTENTS President’s Report .................................................................................... 3 Carol Service 2015 Judith Maltby.................................................................................................... 12 Claymond’s Dole Mark Whittow .................................................................................................. 16 The Hallifax Bowl Richard Foster .................................................................................................. 20 Poisoning, Cannibalism and Victorian England in the Arctic: The Discovery of HMS Erebus Cheryl Randall ................................................................................................. 25 An MCR/SCR Seminar: “An Uneasy Partnership?: Science and Law” Liz Fisher .......................................................................................................... 32 Rubbage in the Garden David Leake .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020 Challenging Religious Privilege OUR MISSION the SECULAR CHARTER
    Annual Report 2020 challenging religious privilege OUR MISSION THE SECULAR CHARTER The National Secular Society The National Secular Society campaigns for a secular democracy, where: works for the separation of religion • There is no established state religion. and state and equal respect for • Everyone is equal before the law, regardless of religion, everyone’s human rights so no one is belief or non-belief. either advantaged or disadvantaged • The judicial process is not hindered or replaced by on account of their beliefs. religious codes or processes. • Freedom of expression is not restricted by religious considerations. • Religion plays no role in state-funded education, whether through religious affiliation of schools, curriculum setting, organised worship, religious instruction, pupil selection or employment practices. • The state does not express religious beliefs or preferences and does not intervene in the setting of religious doctrine. • The state does not engage in, fund or promote religious activities or practices. • There is freedom of belief, non-belief and to renounce or change religion. • Public and publicly-funded service provision does not discriminate on grounds of religion, belief or non- belief. • Individuals and groups are neither accorded privilege nor disadvantaged because of their religion, belief or non-belief. This report covers the year from October 2019 to September 2020. From the president Coronavirus has made this a challenging year, and we hope The decision-making process for new schools and school our members and those close to them are safe and well. I was reorganisations, both locally and nationally – regardless of the glad to see so many members when we held our first virtual party in power, is weighted against the non-religious majority general meeting in September, to alter our articles to permit regardless of how strongly they make their case.
    [Show full text]
  • On Parliamentary Representation)
    House of Commons Speaker's Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) Session 2008–09 Volume II Written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 21 April 2009 HC 167 -II Published on 27 May 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Speaker’s Conference (on Parliamentary Representation) The Conference secretariat will be able to make individual submissions available in large print or Braille on request. The Conference secretariat can be contacted on 020 7219 0654 or [email protected] On 12 November 2008 the House of Commons agreed to establish a new committee, to be chaired by the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Michael Martin MP and known as the Speaker's Conference. The Conference has been asked to: "Consider, and make recommendations for rectifying, the disparity between the representation of women, ethnic minorities and disabled people in the House of Commons and their representation in the UK population at large". It may also agree to consider other associated matters. The Speaker's Conference has until the end of the Parliament to conduct its inquiries. Current membership Miss Anne Begg MP (Labour, Aberdeen South) (Vice-Chairman) Ms Diane Abbott MP (Labour, Hackney North & Stoke Newington) John Bercow MP (Conservative, Buckingham) Mr David Blunkett MP (Labour, Sheffield, Brightside) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton & Honiton) Mr Ronnie Campbell MP (Labour, Blyth Valley) Mrs Ann Cryer MP (Labour, Keighley) Mr Parmjit Dhanda MP (Labour, Gloucester) Andrew George MP (Liberal Democrat, St Ives) Miss Julie Kirkbride MP (Conservative, Bromsgrove) Dr William McCrea MP (Democratic Unionist, South Antrim) David Maclean MP (Conservative, Penrith & The Border) Fiona Mactaggart MP (Labour, Slough) Mr Khalid Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham Perry Barr) Anne Main MP (Conservative, St Albans) Jo Swinson MP (Liberal Democrat, East Dunbartonshire) Mrs Betty Williams MP (Labour, Conwy) Publications The Reports and evidence of the Conference are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Departamento De Malvinas, Antártida E Islas Del Atlántico Sur
    Instituto de Relaciones Internacionales (IRI) - Anuario 2011 Departamento de Malvinas, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur Considerando que este pequeño aporte puede ser de gran ayuda para todos aquellos que tengan interés en este sector geográfico, que por otra parte integra el problema de soberanía que mantenemos con el Reino Unido, y por ende de nuestros intereses en la Antártida, retomamos – como lo habíamos hecho con anterioridad – con la transcripción textual de las noticias aparecidas en el periódico MercoPress - South Atlantic News Agency (http://mercopress.com/), abarcando todos los temas que - a criterio de la suscripta – puedan tener relación tanto con el tema antártico como con las Islas Malvinas María Elena Baquedano Departamento de Malvinas, Antártida e Islas del Atlántico Sur MERCOPRESS. Monday, January 4th 2010 - 07:56 UTC Argentina recalls events of 1833 and reiterates Malvinas claim On the 177th anniversary of the “illegitimate occupation” by the United Kingdom of the Malvinas Islands, Argentina “repudiates” events of 3 January 1833 and calls on the UK to comply with the mandate of the international community and find a peaceful solution to the conflict. Liberation monument dedicated to the British troops that recovered the Falklands in June 1982 Liberation monument dedicated to the British troops that recovered the Falklands in June 1982 1 Instituto de Relaciones Internacionales (IRI) - Anuario 2011 An official communiqué from the Foreign Affairs Ministry released Sunday in Buenos Aires states that Argentina considers “incomprehensible the British negative to address the heart of the matter and to find a peaceful and definitive solution to the sovereignty controversy”, according to the international community mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour's Last Fling on Constitutional Reform
    | THE CONSTITUTION UNIT NEWSLETTER | ISSUE 43 | SEPTEMBER 2009 | MONITOR LABOUR’S LAST FLING ON CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN THIS ISSUE Gordon Brown’s bold plans for constitutional constitutional settlement …We will work with the reform continue to be dogged by bad luck and bad British people to deliver a radical programme of PARLIAMENT 2 - 3 judgement. The bad luck came in May, when the democratic and constitutional reform”. MPs’ expenses scandal engulfed Parliament and government and dominated the headlines for a Such rhetoric also defies political reality. There is EXECUTIVE 3 month. The bad judgement came in over-reacting a strict limit on what the government can deliver to the scandal, promising wide ranging reforms before the next election. The 2009-10 legislative which have nothing to do with the original mischief, session will be at most six months long. There PARTIES AND ELECTIONS 3-4 and which have limited hope of being delivered in is a risk that even the modest proposals in the the remainder of this Parliament. Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill will not pass. It was not introduced until 20 July, DEVOLUTION 4-5 The MPs’ expenses scandal broke on 8 May. As the day before the House rose for the summer the Daily Telegraph published fresh disclosures recess. After a year’s delay, the only significant day after day for the next 25 days public anger additions are Part 3 of the bill, with the next small HUMAN RIGHTS 5 mounted. It was not enough that the whole steps on Lords reform (see page 2); and Part 7, to issue of MPs’ allowances was already being strengthen the governance of the National Audit investigated by the Committee on Standards in Office.
    [Show full text]