DOCSLIB.ORG

Psychopathic Traits and Interpersonal Judgment: Examining Accuracy, Tendency, and Influence of Sex of Judge and Target

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Psychopathic Traits and Interpersonal Judgment: Examining Accuracy, Tendency, and Influence of Sex of Judge and Target Psychopathic Traits and Interpersonal Judgment: Examining Accuracy, Tendency, and Influence of Sex of Judge and Target by Sabrina L.B. Demetrioff Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia September 2013 © Copyright by Sabrina L.B. Demetrioff, 2013 Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................... viii Abstract .............................................................................................................................. ix List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used ........................................................................... x Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................. xi Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 Psychopathy ............................................................................................................... 1 Subclinical Psychopathy ............................................................................................ 2 Sex Differences in Psychopathy ................................................................................ 5 Psychopathy and Manipulation .................................................................................. 9 Vulnerability to Victimization ................................................................................. 11 Interpersonal Judgment ............................................................................................ 12 Good Judge, Bad Judge................................................................................ 15 Psychopathy and Interpersonal Judgment................................................................ 18 Emotion Judgment Accuracy ................................................................................... 23 The Current Study .................................................................................................... 27 Research Questions and Hypotheses ....................................................................... 28 Chapter 2: Methods and Procedures ................................................................................. 32 Methods for Study 1 (Pilot Study) ........................................................................... 32 Participants............................................................................................................... 32 Stimuli ...................................................................................................................... 32 Photographs.................................................................................................. 32 Personality Trait Descriptors and Adjectives. ............................................. 33 ii Measures .................................................................................................................. 33 Rating Age and Attractiveness..................................................................... 34 Rating Personality Trait Descriptions. ......................................................... 34 Rating Trait Adjectives. ............................................................................... 34 Demographic Information. ........................................................................... 34 Procedure ................................................................................................................. 34 Results: Study 1 (Pilot Study) .................................................................................. 35 Data Cleaning .......................................................................................................... 35 Creating Stimuli for Study 2 .................................................................................... 36 Pilot Ratings for Photographs. ..................................................................... 36 Pilot Ratings for Trait Adjectives. ............................................................... 37 Pilot Ratings for Groups of Personality Descriptors.................................... 37 Sex Differences in Ratings ...................................................................................... 37 Effect of Participant Ethnicity on Ratings ............................................................... 38 Methods for Study 2 (Main Study) .......................................................................... 39 Participants............................................................................................................... 39 Stimuli ...................................................................................................................... 40 Creation of Videos. ...................................................................................... 40 Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). ........................................................ 40 Rathus Assertiveness Schedule (RAS) ........................................................ 40 Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) ............................................................ 40 Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) .................................................................... 41 Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) ........................................................... 41 iii Creation of Personality Profiles. .................................................................. 42 Microexpression Videos. ............................................................................. 43 Measures .................................................................................................................. 43 Self-Report Psychopathy Scale-4 (SRP-4) .................................................. 43 Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) ..................................................... 44 Assessment of Personality Traits ................................................................. 44 Memory Task ............................................................................................... 44 Affiliation Interest ........................................................................................ 45 Vulnerability Rating..................................................................................... 45 Identifying Emotional Expressions .............................................................. 45 Demographic Questionnaire ........................................................................ 45 Procedure ................................................................................................................. 45 Chapter 3: Results ............................................................................................................. 48 Overview .................................................................................................................. 48 Descriptive Statistics................................................................................................ 50 SRP-4 ........................................................................................................... 50 NPI ............................................................................................................... 51 Relationships between Key Variables ......................................................... 52 General Data Cleaning ............................................................................................. 53 Personality Trait and Emotional State Judgment Accuracy and Tendency ............. 56 Individual Trait and State Accuracy ............................................................ 56 Exploratory Analyses: Accuracy by Sex of Judge and Sex of Target ......... 57 Individual Trait and State Judgment Tendency ........................................... 59 iv Exploratory Analyses: Tendency by Sex of Judge and Sex of Target ......... 60 Judgment Tendency as a Predictor of Accuracy ...................................................... 62 Memory Accuracy ................................................................................................... 62 Overall Memory Accuracy .......................................................................... 63 High and Low Vulnerability Target Accuracy ............................................ 64 Exploratory Analyses: Accuracy by Sex of Judge and Sex of Target ......... 64 Affiliation Interest.................................................................................................... 65 Overall Affiliation Interest ........................................................................... 65 Exploratory Analyses: Affiliation Interest by Sex of Judge and Sex of Target ...................................................................................................... 66 Vulnerability Judgment Accuracy ........................................................................... 67 Overall Vulnerability Accuracy ................................................................... 67 Vulnerability Accuracy by Sex of Judge ..................................................... 68 Exploratory Analyses: Accuracy by Sex of Judge and Sex of Target ......... 69 Vulnerability Rating Tendency ................................................................................ 69 Exploratory Analyses: Tendency by Sex of Judge and Sex of Target ......... 70 Emotion Judgment ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Emotion, Seduction and Intimacy: Alternative Perspectives on Human Behaviour RIDLEY-DUFF, R
    Emotion, seduction and intimacy: alternative perspectives on human behaviour RIDLEY-DUFF, R. J. Available from Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/2619/ This document is the author deposited version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it. Published version RIDLEY-DUFF, R. J. (2010). Emotion, seduction and intimacy: alternative perspectives on human behaviour. Silent Revolution Series . Seattle, Libertary Editions. Repository use policy Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in SHURA to facilitate their private study or for non- commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive http://shura.shu.ac.uk Silent Revolution Series Emotion Seduction & Intimacy Alternative Perspectives on Human Behaviour Third Edition © Dr Rory Ridley-Duff, 2010 Edited by Dr Poonam Thapa Libertary Editions Seattle © Dr Rory Ridley‐Duff, 2010 Rory Ridley‐Duff has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Acts 1988. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution‐Noncommercial‐No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Judgmental Personality Type in Psychology
    Judgmental Personality Type In Psychology Connor callus her forehand in-house, she beshrews it purblindly. Involved Rem indict that hirings ebonizing inapplicably and enamour homeopathically. Hulking Judd empanelling or demoralised some robe-de-chambre dartingly, however Chautauqua Jerold spears eightfold or twigs. If you know you in personality type of audience This in personal boundaries that part in the types you are painful to fit her. Do you are logical reasoning towards the extent that different researchers were. Support and then, it is always do not to launch strategist, as well as best thing. Yet wanting to judgmental types in psychology than are more competent tells us. People in psychological types of judgmental people to be saved you are new problem for which hurt the battle is having sensible limits. How now we drop the baseline? To promote Sandstrom was to perpetuate in a free responsible and what seemed to naughty a combination of Moshe Dayan, General George Patton, and Admiral Hyman Rickover. You in personal freedom scales are! By type words in psychology and judgmental towards flexibility helps them back on logic, embarrassment in denial. We may see often fail to judgmental type determines the same level of judgmental type of a person who wants. While in personal. In some cases, however, one mole may people looking into mediation before bringing the table to phone other party. Thanks for judgment is judgmental person who are likely to their judgments are protected intellectual bully, we can also feel as failings of psychology. Theories concerning personality judgment focus whether the accuracy of personality judgments and the effects of personality judgments on various aspects of social interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Mobbing in Workplace on Professional Self-Esteem of Nurses
    International Journal of Caring Sciences May-August 2018 Volume 11 | Issue 2| Page 1241 Original Article The Effect of Mobbing in Workplace on Professional Self-Esteem of Nurses Mine Cengiz Ataturk University Nursing Faculty, Psychiatric Nursing Department, Erzurum / Turkey Birsel Canan Demirbag Karadeniz Teknik University Faculty Of Health Sciences, Public Health Nursing Department, Trabzon, Turkey Osman Yiıldizlar Avrasya University Faculty Of Health Sciences, Health Management Department, Trabzon, Turkey Correspondence: Mine Cengiz, Ataturk University Nursing Faculty, Psychiatric Nursing Department, Erzurum, Turkey. [email protected] Abstract This study has been conducted to investigate the effect of mobbing (psychological violence) on professional self- esteem in nurses. This study has been carried out with 188 nurses participating voluntarily in the study at Erzurum Ataturk University Yakutiye Research Hospital between 19 March and 27 July 2016. For the collection of data, an introductory information form, Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R) and Professional Self- Esteem Scale (PSES) have been used. The data were analyzed by the SPSS program with mean, standard deviation, T-test, Mann Whitney U-test. In the results of the study, it has been determined that 55.9% of nurses were under 30 years old, 74.5% were female, 51.1% were married, 40.4% had undergraduate degrees, 70.2% were service nurses, 31.4% did nursing at the institution where they had been for 3-6 years, 79.8% were working 40 hours a week. It has been seen that 40.4% of the nurses are exposed to psychological violence, exposure to negative behavior is moderate ( x̅ = 34.61±12.99) and professional self-esteem is high ( x̅ = 104.92±17.27).
    [Show full text]
  • Social Responses to Suppression 1
    SOCIAL RESPONSES TO SUPPRESSION 1 Social Responses to Expressive Suppression: The Role of Personality Judgments Allison M. Tackman Sanjay Srivastava University of Oregon In press, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Note: This is a pre-publication manuscript. The final published version may differ slightly. SOCIAL RESPONSES TO SUPPRESSION 2 Abstract Why do people who suppress their emotion-expressive behavior have difficulty forming close and supportive relationships? Previous studies have found that suppression disrupts the dynamics of social interactions and existing relationships. We evaluated a complementary hypothesis: that suppression functions as a behavioral cue that leads others to form negative personality impressions of suppressors, even at zero acquaintance. In 2 experiments, participants reported personality judgments and other impressions of targets who either suppressed or expressed their emotion-expressive behavior to amusing or sad film clips. In replicated findings, targets who suppressed either amusement or sadness were judged as less extraverted, less agreeable, and more interpersonally avoidant and anxious than targets who expressed, and participants were less interested in affiliating with suppressors compared to expressers. Effects were amplified when targets suppressed amusement (compared to sadness) and when participants knew the emotional context (compared to when they did not) and thus could form expectations about what emotions targets should be showing. Extraversion and agreeableness judgments mediated the effect of suppression on participants’ disinterest in affiliating. In Study 2, which extended Study 1 in several ways, effects were pronounced for the enthusiasm aspect of extraversion and for the compassion aspect of agreeableness. We also found evidence that judgments of suppressors do not simply fall between neutral and fully-expressing targets; rather, judgments of suppressors are qualitatively different.
    [Show full text]
  • 36692518.Pdf
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Oregon Scholars' Bank SEARCHING FOR THE OPEN BOOK: EXPLORING PREDICTORS OF TARGET READABILITY IN INTERPERSONAL ACCURACY by KARYN L. LEWIS A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Psychology and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2014 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Karyn L. Lewis Title: Searching for the Open Book: Exploring Predictors of Target Readability in Interpersonal Accuracy This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Psychology by: Sara Hodges Chairperson Sanjay Srivastava Core Member Holly Arrow Core Member Joseph Stevens Institutional Representative and Kimberly Andrews Espy Vice President for Research and Innovation; Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2014 ii © 2014 Karyn L. Lewis iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Karyn L. Lewis Doctor of Philosophy Department of Psychology June 2014 Title: Searching for the Open Book: Exploring Predictors of Target Readability in Interpersonal Accuracy Interpersonal perception research has disproportionately focused on perceivers (who make judgments), while largely ignoring targets (who are judged). This study explored the role target characteristics play as perceivers judge their thoughts, emotions, and personality traits in brief get-to-know-you interactions between unacquainted college students. Funder’s Realistic Accuracy Model suggests that in order for a target to be readable that person must emit relevant cues that are made available to perceivers; thus, individual differences that are likely to be related to cue relevance and availability were investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Approach to Assertiveness
    Psychological Thought psyct.psychopen.eu | 2193-7281 Theoretical Analyses A Historical Approach to Assertiveness Ivelina Peneva*a, Stoil Mavrodieva [a] South-West University „Neofit Rilski”, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria. Abstract A very important personal quality is to be able to advocate for yourself - your own positions, to achieve your objectives, to overcome difficulties, to be determined, but without harming the rights of others and to be able to control the aggressive impulses. The concept, which expresses these personal characteristics, is called "assertiveness". Assertiveness is a part of the personal potential. It is a prerequisite for self-actualization. The goal we set in this historical-psychological paper is to explore the genesis, development and stabilization of the term "assertiveness". In this context, we will examine, compare and analyze the positions of the leading authors on this issue. Keywords: assertive skills, assertive rights, assertiveness training, self-development Psychological Thought, 2013, Vol. 6(1), 3±26, doi:10.5964/psyct.v6i1.14 Received: 2012-04-12. Accepted: 2012-12-27. Published: 2013-04-30. *Corresponding author at: South-West University ªNeofit Rilskiº, 66, Ivan Mihailov Street, 2700 Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria. E-mail: [email protected] This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Introduction The beginning of the experimental study of assertiveness commenced in the middle of last century and it was related to clinical practice. Beck, Freeman, and Davis (2004), Lazarus (1971), Salter (2002), Ullrich and Ullrich de Muynck (1973), Wolpe (1990) and others worked in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Aggressive and Assertive
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AGGRESSIVE AND ASSERTIVE COMMUNICATION BEHAVIORS: EXAMINATION AND SCALE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AGGRESSIVE ASSERTIVE COMMUNICATION INSTRUMENT (AACI) by VALERIE BERENICE COLES CONE (Under the Direction of Jennifer A. Samp) ABSTRACT This project considers the relationship between aggressive and assertive communication behaviors; two concepts rarely studied in tandem with one another. The goal of this project was to develop and assess the construct validity of the Aggressive Assertive Communication Instrument (AACI). In order to examine the content validity, internal consistency, and associations between the AACI and external variables, three studies were conducted. Study 1 was a pilot study designed to examine the theorized factor structure and item composition of the AACI. To assess the validity of the measure, the proposed items were correlated with individual difference variables commonly examined and associated with interpersonal conflict (i.e., agreeableness, extraversion, locus of control, and taking conflict personally). The aims of Study 2 were to further examine the factor structure and item composition of the AACI and to cross-validate the AACI with dispositional traits (i.e., agreeableness, entitlement, exploitativeness, extraversion, family communication patterns, self-esteem, and trait anger). In Study 3, convergent and divergent validity were assessed with existing aggressive and assertive measures (i.e., BAAI, BPAQ, VAS, and AI) and dispositional tendencies (i.e., conflict management style and argumentativeness). Additionally, three conditions were developed to assess how the AACI may change or differentially relate to tested variables when individuals reflected on their behavior with an acquaintance, close friend, or romantic partner. Results from these studies revealed a consistent and stable four-factor structure comprised of two assertion-related factors (i.e., direct communication and relationship orientation) and two aggression-related factors (i.e., verbal aggression and physical aggression).
    [Show full text]
  • Four Rules for Using Assertive Communication to Stand up to Bullies
    Four Rules for Using Assertive Communication to Stand Up to Bullies ✓Rule 1: Don’t go it alone. 1. A bully’s main strategy is to make a victim feel alone and powerless. 2. The best way to counter a bully’s strategy is to tell a helpful adult about what is going on and ask for that adult’s support. When a bully realizes that he/she will not be able to keep a victim isolated-that the victim is strong enough to reach out and connect with others- the bully begins to lose power. 3. Sometimes adults fail to acknowledge the seriousness of bullying, but more often, grown-ups are not aware of what is going on. 4. Telling an adult about bullying is a bold, powerful move. 5. Bullies want their victims to be too afraid to tell an adult about what is going on. That’s why they tease kids about “tattling.” See right through their game! This is just another one of the bully’s strategies for intimidating you an making you feel all alone. ✓Rule 2: Don’t wait! 1. The longer a bully has power of a victim, the stronger the hold becomes. 2. Bullying usually begins in a relatively mild form- name calling, teasing, or minor physical aggression- then becomes more serious when the bully realizes that the victim is not going to stand up for him/herself. 3. When kids ignore or do nothing about bullies, their own power slips away. ✓Rule 3: Be assertive! 1. The more bullies think they can pick on a victim without a direct response, the more they will do it.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 1: What Is Assertiveness?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ASSERT YOURSELF! ASSERT YOURSELF! Module One What is Assertiveness? What is Assertiveness 2 Myths about Assertiveness 2 The effects of being unassertive 3 How do we become unassertive 3 What stops us from being assertive? 5 How assertive are you? 6 Module summary 8 About this module 9 This information provided in this document is for information purposes only. Please refer to the full disclaimer and copyright statements available at www.cci.health.gov.au regarding the information on this website before making use of such information. entre for C linical C I nterventions Module 1: What is Assertiveness Page 1 • Psychotherapy • Research • Training --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ASSERT YOURSELF! What is Assertiveness? We have all heard people say “You need to be more assertive!” But what exactly is assertiveness? Assertiveness is a communication style. It is being able to express your feelings, thoughts, beliefs, and opinions in an open manner that doesn’t violate the rights of others. Other communication styles you may have heard of include being aggressive, which is a style that violates the rights of others, and being passive where we violate our own rights. You have probably also heard of passive-aggressive. This is where someone is essentially being aggressive but in a passive or indirect way. For example, someone may be angry but they don’t act in an overtly aggressive way by yelling or hitting, instead they may sulk or slam a door. Passive: Violates own Assertive: Respects Aggressive: Violates rights. Others needs both own needs and rights of others. Own given priority. needs of others. needs have priority.
    [Show full text]
  • Individuals Struggle to Change Their Perceived Personality in a First Impression
    Self-Gravity: Individuals Struggle to Change Their Perceived Personality in a First Impression by Ravin Alaei A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Psychology University of Toronto © Copyright by Ravin Alaei 2019 Self-Gravity: Individuals Struggle to Change their Perceived Personality in a First Impression Ravin Alaei Doctor of Philosophy Psychology University of Toronto 2019 Abstract People are motivated to change aspects of their personality traits and psychological research seems to document its regular occurrence. Nevertheless, most research has focused on whether people self-report that their personality traits have changed. Personality change is more than self- determined, however: People hope that changes to their personality are visible to others as well. Across seven studies, I therefore investigated whether people’s attempts to change their Big Five personality in a first impression are successful, focusing especially on extraversion. My work demonstrates that (i) individuals’ personality traits remain robustly visible in a first impression regardless of attempts to change, (ii) acting experience does not improve this ability, (iii) individuals’ traits can affect their evaluations more strongly than their attempts to change, and (iv) people attempting to change their personality in a first impression are largely unaware of how others truly judge them. This work therefore suggests that people struggle to control how their traits are perceived by others in a first impression. ii Acknowledgments Thank you to my supervisor, Nick Rule, for making me a better scientist and person. I am lucky to have received your mentorship and will carry your guidance with me.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5: Informal Fallacies II
    Essential Logic Ronald C. Pine Chapter 5: Informal Fallacies II Reasoning is the best guide we have to the truth....Those who offer alternatives to reason are either mere hucksters, mere claimants to the throne, or there's a case to be made for them; and of course, that is an appeal to reason. Michael Scriven, Reasoning Why don’t you ever see a headline, “Psychic wins lottery”? Internet Joke News Item, June 16, 2010: A six story statue of Jesus in Monroe city, Ohio was struck by lightning and destroyed. An adult book store across the street was untouched. Introduction In the last chapter we examined one of the major causes of poor reasoning, getting off track and not focusing on the issues related to a conclusion. In our general discussion of arguments (Chapters 1-3), however, we saw that arguments can be weak in two other ways: 1. In deductive reasoning, arguments can be valid, but have false or questionable premises, or in both deductive and inductive reasoning, arguments may involve language tricks that mislead us into presuming evidence is being offered in the premises when it is not. 2. In weak inductive arguments, arguments can have true and relevant premises but those premises can be insufficient to justify a conclusion as a reliable guide to the future. Fallacies that use deductive valid reasoning, but have premises that are questionable or are unfair in some sense in the truth claims they make, we will call fallacies of questionable premise. As a subset of fallacies of questionable premise, fallacies that use tricks in the way the premises are presented, such that there is a danger of presuming evidence has been offered when it has not, we will call fallacies of presumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Personality Annual Review Chapter 1 Personality Psychology Brent W
    Personality Annual Review Chapter 1 Personality Psychology Brent W. Robertsab & Hee J. Yoona University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaigna & Hector Institute of Education and Sciences and Psychology, University of Tübingenb Brent W. Roberts, [email protected]; ORCID: 0000-0002-3244-1164 Hee J. Yoon, [email protected]; ORCID: 0000-0002-2105-7271 Corresponding Author: Brent W. Roberts, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 603 East Daniel St, Champaign, IL 61822 We would like to thank Brent Donnellan, Simine Vazire, Jennifer Lodi-Smith, Patrick Hill, Daniel Mroczek, Julia Briskin, Daniel Briley, Will Dunlop, Suzanne Segerstrom, & R. Christopher Fraley for prior feedback on the manuscript. These individuals are in no-way responsible for any oversights, gaffes, typos or perceived mischaracterizations that may still be included. Citation: Roberts, B.W., & Yoon, H.J. (In press). Personality Psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 73. 10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114927 Personality Annual Review Chapter 2 Abstract Personality psychology, which seeks to study individual differences in thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that persist over time and place, has experienced a renaissance in the last few decades. It has also not been reviewed as a field in the Annual Review since 2001 (Funder, 2001). In this chapter, we seek to provide an update, while also providing a meta-organizational structure to the field. In particular, personality psychology has a prescribed set of four responsibilities that it implicitly or explicitly tackles as a field: (a) describe what personality is— the units of analysis in the field; (b) document how it develops; (c) explain the processes of personality and why they affect functioning; and (d) provide a framework for understanding individuals and explaining their actions, feelings, and motivations.
    [Show full text]