DOCSLIB.ORG

Gravitational Waves Signal Analysis: Matched Filtering, Typical Analyses and Beyond

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gravitational Waves Signal Analysis: Matched Filtering, Typical Analyses and Beyond https://lib.uliege.be https://matheo.uliege.be Gravitational waves signal analysis: Matched filtering, typical analyses and beyond Auteur : Janquart, Justin Promoteur(s) : Cudell, Jean-Rene Faculté : Faculté des Sciences Diplôme : Master en sciences spatiales, à finalité approfondie Année académique : 2019-2020 URI/URL : https://github.com/lemnis12?tab=repositories; http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/9211 Avertissement à l'attention des usagers : Tous les documents placés en accès ouvert sur le site le site MatheO sont protégés par le droit d'auteur. Conformément aux principes énoncés par la "Budapest Open Access Initiative"(BOAI, 2002), l'utilisateur du site peut lire, télécharger, copier, transmettre, imprimer, chercher ou faire un lien vers le texte intégral de ces documents, les disséquer pour les indexer, s'en servir de données pour un logiciel, ou s'en servir à toute autre fin légale (ou prévue par la réglementation relative au droit d'auteur). Toute utilisation du document à des fins commerciales est strictement interdite. Par ailleurs, l'utilisateur s'engage à respecter les droits moraux de l'auteur, principalement le droit à l'intégrité de l'oeuvre et le droit de paternité et ce dans toute utilisation que l'utilisateur entreprend. Ainsi, à titre d'exemple, lorsqu'il reproduira un document par extrait ou dans son intégralité, l'utilisateur citera de manière complète les sources telles que mentionnées ci-dessus. Toute utilisation non explicitement autorisée ci-avant (telle que par exemple, la modification du document ou son résumé) nécessite l'autorisation préalable et expresse des auteurs ou de leurs ayants droit. Université de Liège Master thesis Gravitational waves signal analysis: Matched filtering, typical analyses and beyond JANQUART Justin In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in Space Sciences Under the supervision of: CUDELL Jean-René Academic year 2019-2020 Student is not a container you have to fill but a torch you have to light up. —Albert Einstein Ideas and Opinions, 1954 Acknowledgements I would like to express my thankfulness to all the persons that have helped me and supported me during the completion of this work. In particular, I want to thank Professor Jean-René Cudell for giving me the opportunity to enter the world of gravitational waves data analysis. I am very grateful for his counsels and the time he has dedicated to discussions about the subject. I also thanks Gregory Baltus for the discussions we had about this work, the interpretations of some results and the investigation ideas. Additionally, I would also thank Dr. Atri Bhattacharya for the numerical support brought during this year. My acknowledgements also go to the review panel: Dr. Maxime Fays, Pr. Dominique Sluse and Pr. Eric Gosset to take the time to read this (rather long) manuscript. Finally, I want to thank my family and friends for their support. Especially Amélie, Emmy-Lee, Agnès, Patrick and Sabine for their patience and encouragement in the fulfilments of my studies. I am forever grateful to Leo Ocquet to have given me the love and curiosity for sciences, as well as the counsels to find my way. Without them, this work would never have been possible. Moreover, I thank Mister Thomas Michel for his support and good mood during these years. III Contents Introduction 1 1 Theory of matched filtering 10 1.1 Importance of this technique in the detection of gravitational waves....... 10 1.2 Basic concepts of the filtering process........................ 10 1.3 Characteristic functions............................... 13 1.4 Khinchin’s theorem.................................. 13 1.5 Detection of a signal with a known form...................... 16 2 Visualization of the event present in the data 21 2.1 Introduction...................................... 21 2.2 Raw strain....................................... 22 2.2.1 Acquiring the data.............................. 22 2.2.2 Sources of noise................................ 24 2.3 First manipulation of the data............................ 25 2.4 Power spectral density................................ 27 2.4.1 Mathematical tools for the computation of the PSD: FFT, window func- tions and Welch’s method.......................... 27 2.4.2 Practical computation of the PSD...................... 32 2.5 Whitening the data.................................. 34 IV 2.6 The Q-transform................................... 37 2.6.1 Mathematical details of the Q-transform.................. 37 2.6.2 Practical computation............................ 39 3 Significance of the event 41 3.1 Preconditioning the data............................... 42 3.2 Making a template to fit the signal......................... 42 3.3 Signal to noise ratio and matched filtering..................... 46 3.4 Chi-square test.................................... 50 3.4.1 Mathematical description of the chi-square test.............. 50 3.4.2 Practical computation of the chi-square test................ 53 3.5 Down-weighting of the SNR............................. 55 3.6 Calculation of the background and significance................... 57 3.7 The false-alarm rate................................. 60 4 Finding the best fit parameters for the event 62 4.1 One detector: LIGO-Livingston........................... 62 4.2 Several detectors................................... 67 4.3 The error bars of the estimated parameters..................... 74 5 Investigation of effects leading to variations in the analysis 75 5.1 Value of the time slice in the PSD computation.................. 75 5.1.1 Shape of the PSD............................... 75 5.1.2 Value of the SNR............................... 78 5.2 Influence of the window used in Welch’s method.................. 82 V 5.2.1 Modification of shape of the PSD depending on the window used in Welch’s method................................ 83 5.2.2 Modification of the signal-to-noise ratio depending on the window taken in order to compute the PSD........................ 85 6 Dependence of the results on the signal and noise characteristics 87 6.1 Evolution of the SNR as a function of the fraction of the signal taken into account 87 6.1.1 The SNR of GW170814 as a function of the fraction of time taken into account..................................... 88 6.2 Evolution of the SNR as a function of the noise amplitude and characteristics.. 90 6.2.1 Signal swamped in gaussian white noise................... 90 6.2.2 Evolution of the SNR as a function of the amplitude of the noise present in the detectors and as a function of the amplitude of the signal..... 93 7 Neutron stars overview 96 7.1 Interest of these objects and difference with black holes.............. 96 7.2 Matched filtering for the GW170817 event..................... 99 7.3 Possibility to detect the merger early on...................... 101 7.3.1 Method of search............................... 101 7.3.2 Results..................................... 104 8 Overlapping signals 107 8.1 Injection of the signal: black hole mergers..................... 108 8.2 Overlap of two black-hole mergers.......................... 111 8.3 Overlap of a binary black hole merger and a neutron star merger......... 114 8.4 Overlap of two neutron star signals......................... 115 8.5 Remark about the overlaps.............................. 117 VI Conclusions 118 VII Introduction The theory of general relativity as it is known today has not been written in one day. It needed the evolution of ideas on a long time scale. It is also the case for gravitational waves theory. The first correct theory of gravity was proposed by Newton in his work Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica, published in 1687 [1]. In this theory, gravitation is depicted as an attractive force acting between two massive objects. The biggest problem, already raised by Newton, is that it acts instantaneously without taking into account any distance effect between the two bodies. Nevertheless, at the time, it worked well for the description of the motion of celestial objects and it was kept for the next centuries. A first theory of relativity was proposed by the French physicist Henri Poincaré in 1900, and in 1905 he proposed gravity to be mediated by waves, which he already called gravitational waves. However, it is not the theory that remained famous over the years. Nevertheless, it was probably a source of inspiration for Einstein. The latter proposed in 1905 his theory of special relativity, which led to the surprising effect of time dilation and length contraction. He completed this theory ten years later to formulate his famous theory of General Relativity, still seen today as the best theory to describe gravitation. This theory describes gravity geometrically, as the manifestation of the space-time manifold. The curvature arises when a massive object is present, as well as when it has energy or momentum. Basically, this is described by Einstein’s equations which make the link between the local curvature of space and time and the energy and the momentum present in the same region of space. In more technical terms, it gives the link between the Ricci tensor, the Ricci scalar and the metric on one side and the energy-momentum tensor on the other. This equation cannot, in fact, be solved analytically in many cases and has often to be solved numerically [2]. After his theory was completed, Einstein found the possibility to have the formation of grav- itational waves. Those can be compared with the waves from the theory of electromagnetism (proposed by JC Maxwell in 1864 and published in 1865 [3]), where the acceleration of electric charges can produce electromagnetic waves. However, this analogy is not perfect. Indeed, for the latter theory, a dipolar emission is enough to obtain the wave. On the other hand, for gravity, the emission has to come from a higher order, the quadrupolar order. This result was not directly obtained by Einstein. Indeed, he first realized that because there are no positive and negative masses, the dipolar emission is not possible. In the case of electromagnetism, there are positive and negative charges. A dipole is then made of one positive and one negative charge and the emission arises from the relative motion of both charges.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Error Control for the Detection of Rare and Weak Signatures in Massive Data Céline Meillier, Florent Chatelain, Olivier Michel, H Ayasso
    Error control for the detection of rare and weak signatures in massive data Céline Meillier, Florent Chatelain, Olivier Michel, H Ayasso To cite this version: Céline Meillier, Florent Chatelain, Olivier Michel, H Ayasso. Error control for the detection of rare and weak signatures in massive data. EUSIPCO 2015 - 23th European Signal Processing Conference, Aug 2015, Nice, France. hal-01198717 HAL Id: hal-01198717 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01198717 Submitted on 14 Sep 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ERROR CONTROL FOR THE DETECTION OF RARE AND WEAK SIGNATURES IN MASSIVE DATA Celine´ Meillier, Florent Chatelain, Olivier Michel, Hacheme Ayasso GIPSA-lab, Grenoble Alpes University, France n ABSTRACT a R the intensity vector. A few coefficients ai of a are 2 In this paper, we address the general issue of detecting rare expected to be non zero, and correspond to the intensities of and weak signatures in very noisy data. Multiple hypothe- the few sources that are observed. ses testing approaches can be used to extract a list of com- Model selection procedures are widely used to tackle this ponents of the data that are likely to be contaminated by a detection problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1812.04350V2 [Gr-Qc] 16 Jan 2020 PACS Numbers: 04.70.Bw, 04.80.Nn, 95.10.Fh
    International Journal of Modern Physics D Testing dispersion of gravitational waves from eccentric extreme-mass-ratio inspirals Shu-Cheng Yang*,y , Wen-Biao Han*,y,x, Shuo Xinz and Chen Zhang*,y *Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200030, P. R. China ySchool of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, P. R. China zSchool of Physics Sciences and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, P. R. China [email protected] In general relativity, there is no dispersion in gravitational waves, while some modified gravity theories predict dispersion phenomena in the propagation of gravitational waves. In this paper, we demonstrate that this dispersion will induce an observable deviation of waveforms if the orbits have large eccentricities. The mechanism is that the waveform modes with different frequencies will be emitted at the same time due to the existence of eccentricity. During the propagation, because of the dispersion, the arrival time of different modes will be different, then produce the deviation and dephasing of wave- forms compared with general relativity. This kind of dispersion phenomena related with extreme-mass-ratio inspirals could be observed by space-borne detectors, and the con- straint on the graviton mass could be improved . Moreover, we find that the dispersion effect may also be constrained by ground detectors better than the current result if a highly eccentric intermediate-mass-ratio inspirals be observed. Keywords: Gravitational waves; extreme-mass-ratio inspirals; dispersion. arXiv:1812.04350v2 [gr-qc] 16 Jan 2020 PACS numbers: 04.70.Bw, 04.80.Nn, 95.10.Fh 1.
    [Show full text]
  • GW150914: First Results from the Search for Binary Black Hole Coalescence with Advanced LIGO
    GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Abbott, B.P.; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Abernathy, M.R.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P.; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V.B. et al. "GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO." Physical Review D 93, 122003 (June 2016): 1-21 © 2016 American Physical Society As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.122003 Publisher American Physical Society Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/110492 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. PHYSICAL REVIEW D 93, 122003 (2016) GW150914: First results from the search for binary black hole coalescence with Advanced LIGO B. P. Abbott et al.* (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (Received 9 March 2016; published 7 June 2016) On September 14, 2015, at 09∶50:45 UTC the two detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational- Wave Observatory (LIGO) simultaneously observed the binary black hole merger GW150914. We report the results of a matched-filter search using relativistic models of compact-object binaries that recovered GW150914 as the most significant event during the coincident observations between the two LIGO detectors from September 12 to October 20, 2015 GW150914 was observed with a matched-filter signal-to- noise ratio of 24 and a false alarm rate estimated to be less than 1 event per 203000 years, equivalent to a significance greater than 5.1 σ.
    [Show full text]
  • A Frequency-Domain Adaptive Matched Filter for Active Sonar Detection
    sensors Article A Frequency-Domain Adaptive Matched Filter for Active Sonar Detection Zhishan Zhao 1,2, Anbang Zhao 1,2,*, Juan Hui 1,2,*, Baochun Hou 3, Reza Sotudeh 3 and Fang Niu 1,2 1 Acoustic Science and Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China; [email protected] (Z.Z.); [email protected] (F.N.) 2 College of Underwater Acoustic Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China 3 School of Engineering and Technology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK; [email protected] (B.H.); [email protected] (R.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.Z.); [email protected] (J.H.); Tel.: +86-138-4511-7603 (A.Z.); +86-136-3364-1082 (J.H.) Received: 1 May 2017; Accepted: 29 June 2017; Published: 4 July 2017 Abstract: The most classical detector of active sonar and radar is the matched filter (MF), which is the optimal processor under ideal conditions. Aiming at the problem of active sonar detection, we propose a frequency-domain adaptive matched filter (FDAMF) with the use of a frequency-domain adaptive line enhancer (ALE). The FDAMF is an improved MF. In the simulations in this paper, the signal to noise ratio (SNR) gain of the FDAMF is about 18.6 dB higher than that of the classical MF when the input SNR is −10 dB. In order to improve the performance of the FDAMF with a low input SNR, we propose a pre-processing method, which is called frequency-domain time reversal convolution and interference suppression (TRC-IS).
    [Show full text]
  • Stringent Constraints on Neutron-Star Radii from Multimessenger Observations and Nuclear Theory
    Stringent constraints on neutron-star radii from multimessenger observations and nuclear theory Collin D. Capano1;2∗, Ingo Tews3, Stephanie M. Brown1;2, Ben Margalit4;5;6, Soumi De6;7, Sumit Kumar1;2, Duncan A. Brown6;7, Badri Krishnan1;2, Sanjay Reddy8;9 1 Albert-Einstein-Institut, Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Gravitationsphysik, Callinstraße 38, 30167 Hannover, Germany, 2 Leibniz Universitat¨ Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany, 3 Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA, 4 Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Astrophysics Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, 5 NASA Einstein Fellow 6 Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA, 7 Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse NY 13244, USA, 8 Institute for Nuclear Theory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1550, USA, 9 JINA-CEE, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA The properties of neutron stars are determined by the nature of the matter that they contain. These properties can be constrained by measurements of the star’s size. We obtain stringent constraints on neutron-star radii by combining multimessenger observations of the binary neutron-star merger GW170817 arXiv:1908.10352v3 [astro-ph.HE] 24 Mar 2020 with nuclear theory that best accounts for density-dependent uncertainties in the equation of state. We construct equations of state constrained by chi- ral effective field theory and marginalize over these using the gravitational- wave observations. Combining this with the electromagnetic observations of the merger remnant that imply the presence of a short-lived hyper-massive 1 neutron star, we find that the radius of a 1:4 M neutron star is R1:4 M = +0:9 11:0−0:6 km (90% credible interval).
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Virgo: Status of the Detector, Latest Results and Future Prospects
    universe Review Advanced Virgo: Status of the Detector, Latest Results and Future Prospects Diego Bersanetti 1,* , Barbara Patricelli 2,3 , Ornella Juliana Piccinni 4 , Francesco Piergiovanni 5,6 , Francesco Salemi 7,8 and Valeria Sequino 9,10 1 INFN, Sezione di Genova, I-16146 Genova, Italy 2 European Gravitational Observatory (EGO), Cascina, I-56021 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] 3 INFN, Sezione di Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy 4 INFN, Sezione di Roma, I-00185 Roma, Italy; [email protected] 5 Dipartimento di Scienze Pure e Applicate, Università di Urbino, I-61029 Urbino, Italy; [email protected] 6 INFN, Sezione di Firenze, I-50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy 7 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trento, Povo, I-38123 Trento, Italy; [email protected] 8 INFN, TIFPA, Povo, I-38123 Trento, Italy 9 Dipartimento di Fisica “E. Pancini”, Università di Napoli “Federico II”, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, I-80126 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] 10 INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, I-80126 Napoli, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Virgo detector, based at the EGO (European Gravitational Observatory) and located in Cascina (Pisa), played a significant role in the development of the gravitational-wave astronomy. From its first scientific run in 2007, the Virgo detector has constantly been upgraded over the years; since 2017, with the Advanced Virgo project, the detector reached a high sensitivity that allowed the detection of several classes of sources and to investigate new physics. This work reports the Citation: Bersanetti, D.; Patricelli, B.; main hardware upgrades of the detector and the main astrophysical results from the latest five years; Piccinni, O.J.; Piergiovanni, F.; future prospects for the Virgo detector are also presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Search for Gravitational Waves from High-Mass-Ratio Compact-Binary Mergers of Stellar Mass and Subsolar Mass Black Holes
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 126, 021103 (2021) Search for Gravitational Waves from High-Mass-Ratio Compact-Binary Mergers of Stellar Mass and Subsolar Mass Black Holes Alexander H. Nitz * and Yi-Fan Wang (王一帆) Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut), D-30167 Hannover, Germany and Leibniz Universität Hannover, D-30167 Hannover, Germany (Received 8 July 2020; accepted 11 December 2020; published 12 January 2021) We present the first search for gravitational waves from the coalescence of stellar mass and subsolar mass 3 black holes with masses between 20–100 M⊙ and 0.01–1 M⊙ð10–10 MJÞ, respectively. The observation of a single subsolar mass black hole would establish the existence of primordial black holes and a possible component of dark matter. We search the ∼164 day of public LIGO data from 2015–2017 when LIGO- Hanford and LIGO-Livingston were simultaneously observing. We find no significant candidate gravitational-wave signals. Using this nondetection, we place a 90% upper limit on the rate of 6 4 −3 −1 30–0.01 M⊙ and 30–0.1 M⊙ mergers at < 1.2 × 10 and < 1.6 × 10 Gpc yr , respectively. If we consider binary formation through direct gravitational-wave braking, this kind of merger would be exceedingly rare if only the lighter black hole were primordial in origin (< 10−4 Gpc−3 yr−1). If both black holes are primordial in origin, we constrain the contribution of 1ð0.1ÞM⊙ black holes to dark matter to < 0.3ð3Þ%. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.021103 Introduction.—The first gravitational wave observation known model which can produce subsolar mass black holes from the merger of black holes was detected on September by conventional formation mechanisms; the observation of 14, 2015 [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1606.03939V2 [Astro-Ph.HE] 20 Sep 2016 P0(X) and P1(X) for Its Detection Statistic X
    Draft version September 21, 2016 Preprint typeset using LATEX style AASTeX6 v. 1.0 SUPPLEMENT: THE RATE OF BINARY BLACK HOLE MERGERS INFERRED FROM ADVANCED LIGO OBSERVATIONS SURROUNDING GW150914 B. P. Abbott,1 yDeceased, May 2015. zDeceased, March 2015. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (and The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) 1LIGO, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA ABSTRACT Supplemental information for a Letter reporting the rate of binary black hole (BBH) coalescences in- ferred from 16 days of coincident Advanced LIGO observations surrounding the transient gravitational wave (GW) signal GW150914. In that work we reported various rate estimates whose 90% credible 3 1 intervals (CIs) fell in the range 2{600 Gpc− yr− . Here we give details of our method and com- putations, including information about our search pipelines, a derivation of our likelihood function for the analysis, a description of the astrophysical search trigger distribution expected from merging BBHs, details on our computational methods, a description of the effects and our model for calibration uncertainty, and an analytic method of estimating our detector sensitivity that is calibrated to our measurements. The first detection of a gravitational wave (GW) sig- a coincident counterpart in the other detector to form a nal from a merging binary black hole (BBH) system is multiple-detector likelihood ratio. described in Abbott et al.(2016d). Abbott et al.(2016g) Both pipelines rely on an empirical estimate of the reports on inference of the local BBH merger rate from search background, making the assumption that trig- surrounding Advanced LIGO observations. This Sup- gers of terrestrial origin occur independently in the two plement provides supporting material and methodolog- detectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Observations of Gravitational Waves by LIGO and Virgo Detectors
    universe Review Recent Observations of Gravitational Waves by LIGO and Virgo Detectors Andrzej Królak 1,2,* and Paritosh Verma 2 1 Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-656 Warsaw, Poland 2 National Centre for Nuclear Research, 05-400 Otwock, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In this paper we present the most recent observations of gravitational waves (GWs) by LIGO and Virgo detectors. We also discuss contributions of the recent Nobel prize winner, Sir Roger Penrose to understanding gravitational radiation and black holes (BHs). We make a short introduction to GW phenomenon in general relativity (GR) and we present main sources of detectable GW signals. We describe the laser interferometric detectors that made the first observations of GWs. We briefly discuss the first direct detection of GW signal that originated from a merger of two BHs and the first detection of GW signal form merger of two neutron stars (NSs). Finally we present in more detail the observations of GW signals made during the first half of the most recent observing run of the LIGO and Virgo projects. Finally we present prospects for future GW observations. Keywords: gravitational waves; black holes; neutron stars; laser interferometers 1. Introduction The first terrestrial direct detection of GWs on 14 September 2015, was a milestone Citation: Kro´lak, A.; Verma, P. discovery, and it opened up an entirely new window to explore the universe. The combined Recent Observations of Gravitational effort of various scientists and engineers worldwide working on the theoretical, experi- Waves by LIGO and Virgo Detectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Pycbc Live a Real-Time Search for Compact Binary Mergers in the Advanced Detector Era
    PyCBC Live A real-time search for compact binary mergers in the advanced detector era Tito Dal Canton – IJCLab 3e réunion d'animation annuelle in collaboration with GdR ondes gravitationnelles A. Nitz, M. Schäfer, B. Gadre, G. Davies, Groupe de travail “analyses de données” V. Villa, T. Dent, I. Harry, L. Xiao 30 Nov 2020 Low-latency analyses of ground-based detector data ● Astrophysics ○ Rapid discovery and characterization of transients ○ Plan and start observations in other sectors ○ Examples: GW170817, GW190521 ● Detector characterization https://emfollow.docs.ligo.org ○ See what the detector is doing on an hourly time scale ● Searches targeting generic transients ○ Identify and react to problems ○ Coherent WaveBurst as soon as possible ○ Maximize the amount of “good” data ● Searches targeting for later (archival) analyses compact binary mergers ○ Improve the detectors for future runs ○ GstLAL, MBTA, PyCBC Live, SPIIR 2 Realtime frequency-domain matched filtering Data Template waveform Signal-to-noise Threshold and Candidates ratio time series find local maxima Noise power spectral density 3 Coincidence and multi-detector significance 1. Perform matched filtering and generate single-detector candidates 2. Find two-detector coincidences, calculate FARs via time slides 3. Choose most significant coincidence 4. Followup with remaining detectors, update FAR 4 Impact and mitigation of instrumental transients SNR time series for a simulated signal in pure Gaussian noise, ● Increased rate of non-GW candidates with a glitch and after gating the glitch ○ Signal-based vetoes to down-rank the candidates ○ Astrophysical prior for the relative arrival times, phases and amplitudes at the different detectors ● Corruption of signals ○ “Gating” – replace transient with zeroes 5 Sensitivity to binary neutron star mergers 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Anomaly Detection Based on Wavelet Domain GARCH Random Field Modeling Amir Noiboar and Israel Cohen, Senior Member, IEEE
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, VOL. 45, NO. 5, MAY 2007 1361 Anomaly Detection Based on Wavelet Domain GARCH Random Field Modeling Amir Noiboar and Israel Cohen, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract—One-dimensional Generalized Autoregressive Con- Markov noise. It is also claimed that objects in imagery create a ditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) model is widely used for response over several scales in a multiresolution representation modeling financial time series. Extending the GARCH model to of an image, and therefore, the wavelet transform can serve as multiple dimensions yields a novel clutter model which is capable of taking into account important characteristics of a wavelet-based a means for computing a feature set for input to a detector. In multiscale feature space, namely heavy-tailed distributions and [17], a multiscale wavelet representation is utilized to capture innovations clustering as well as spatial and scale correlations. We periodical patterns of various period lengths, which often ap- show that the multidimensional GARCH model generalizes the pear in natural clutter images. In [12], the orientation and scale casual Gauss Markov random field (GMRF) model, and we de- selectivity of the wavelet transform are related to the biological velop a multiscale matched subspace detector (MSD) for detecting anomalies in GARCH clutter. Experimental results demonstrate mechanisms of the human visual system and are utilized to that by using a multiscale MSD under GARCH clutter modeling, enhance mammographic features. rather than GMRF clutter modeling, a reduced false-alarm rate Statistical models for clutter and anomalies are usually can be achieved without compromising the detection rate. related to the Gaussian distribution due to its mathematical Index Terms—Anomaly detection, Gaussian Markov tractability.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of the Gravitational Waveform Created by a Binary Neutron Star (BNS) Merger
    École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay 'T EM LIGO Laboratory M1 PHYTEM Internship report Study of the gravitational waveform created by a Binary Neutron Star (BNS) merger Artist’s view of the merging of two neutron stars from [1] Diane INDELICATO Supervisor : Alan WEINSTEIN April 12 - July 27 2018 Summary 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Gravitational waves . .3 1.1.1 What are gravitational waves ? . .3 1.1.2 Detecting gravitational waves . .3 1.1.3 Analyzing the signal . .4 1.2 LIGO Laboratory and detectors . .5 1.3 Gravitational waves from a Binary Neutron Star system . .5 1.3.1 Differences from a Binary Black Hole system . .5 1.3.2 Identifying the equation of state of nuclear matter . .6 2 Work accomplished 6 2.1 Solving the TOV equations . .7 2.1.1 For a pure ideal neutron gas . .7 2.1.2 More complicated models . .8 2.2 Generating the waveform . .9 2.2.1 TaylorF2 . 10 2.2.2 IMRPhenomPv2_NRTidal . 10 2.3 Analyzing the waveform . 12 2.3.1 TaylorF2 . 12 2.3.2 IMRPhenomPv2_NRTidal . 13 2.4 Parameter estimation . 13 3 Teaching 14 3.1 Outreach . 14 3.2 Helping other interns . 15 4 Conclusion 16 2 1 Introduction . The study of gravitational waves can help us learn more about the universe. Their existence was conjectured by Henri Poincaré in 1905 [2], then predicted by Albert Einstein in 1916 as a consequence of his general theory of relativity [3], and they were later observed indirectly [4]. But their first direct observation was in September 2015 [5].
    [Show full text]