Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement Due Diligence Report

Document stage: Draft for Consultation Project Number: 42486-018 April 2020

India: Urban Services Improvement Project - Additional Financing – Group Water Supply Scheme of towns Kantaphod and , District:

Package No: MPUSIP-3D

Prepared by Urban Development and Environment Department, Bhopal Madhya Pradesh for the Asian Development Bank.

i

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (As of April 2020) Currency unit – Indian rupee (₹) ₹1.00 = $0.013 $1.00 = ₹76.50

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB - Asian Development Bank FGD - Focus group discussion GOMP - Government of Madhya Pradesh LARR - Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement LPCD - Liter per Capita per Day MDPE - Medium Density Polyethylene pipes MFI - multilateral financial institutions MLD - Million Liter per Day MPUDC - Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company MPUSIP - Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement NOC - No Objection Certificate PMU - Program Management Unit PWD - Public works Department RWGM - Raw water gravity main SPS - Safeguard Policy Statement SPU - safeguard policy update ULBs - Urban Local Bodies WRD - Water Resource Department WSS - Water Supply Scheme WTP - Water Treatment Plant

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

Ha - Hectare KL - Kiloliter Km - Kilo meter LPCD - Liter per capita day MLD - Million liter per day M - Meter mm - Millimeter

ii

This Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement Due Diligence Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION ...... 1 A.Background ...... 1 B.Project Description ...... 1 C. Scope of the Report ...... 2 II. POLICY FRAMEWORK, AND ENTITLEMENTS ...... 3 III. SUBPROJECT DESCRIPTION ...... 3 A.Existing Water Supply System ...... 3 B.Components of Proposed Water Supply Scheme ...... 5 IV. FIELD WORK AND PUBLIC CONSULTATION ...... 9 A.Outline of Fieldwork ...... 9 B.Field work Report ...... 9 C. Public Consultation ...... 9 V. LAND AVAILABILITY AND INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS ...... 17 VI. BUDGET ...... 21 VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 22 Reason ...... 47

FIGURES

Figure 1: Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) of proposed subproject towns ...... 5 Figure 2: Key Plan of Group WSS towns Kantaphod and Loharda ...... 8 Figure 3: Location of the proposed subproject components on Google Earth Map ...... 24

TABLES

Table 1: Subproject Components ...... 2 Table 2: Details of water source and system of town Kantaphod ...... 4 Table 3: Details of water source and system of town Loharda ...... 4 Table 4: Details of proposed CWFM ...... 6 Table 5: Summary of proposed Distribution Network...... 6 Table 6: Summary of Consultation with Stakeholders ...... 11 Table 7: Involuntary Resettlement impacts due to Proposed Components under Group WSS of Town Kantaphod and Loharda ...... 18 Table 8: Budget for town Kantaphod ...... 22 Table 9: Budget for town Loharda ...... 22

iv

APPENDICES

Appendix 1: Details of Land Ownership of Proposed Components under WSS for towns Kantaphod and Loharda ...... 26 Appendix 2: Photographs of Stakeholder Consultation and List of Participants ...... 27 Appendix 3: Involuntary Resettlement Screening Checklist ...... 47 Appendix 4: Land Records (Khasra Details) of Identified Land for Proposed Subproject Components under Group WSS town Kantaphod and Loharda ...... 50 Appendix 5: Land Status Certificate on Identified Land for ...... 55 Appendix 6: Photographs of Proposed Transmission main and Distribution Network ...... 56

v

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Background

1. The Government of Madhya Pradesh (GOMP), with a sector project loan funding from Asian Development Bank (ADB), has proposed to implement Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project (MPUSIP), herein referred as ‘the Project’. Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited (MPUDC) shall be the Implementing Agency (IA) and the State Urban Development and Environment Department (UDED) shall be the Executing Agency (EA) of the Project. A project management unit (PMU) created under MPUDC is implementing the MPUSIP.

2. The Resettlement Framework for MPUSIP outlines the objectives, policy principles and procedures for land acquisition, if any, compensation and other assistance measures for Displaced Persons/Affected persons if any. This framework reflects the borrower’s law on the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013, state government policies, ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), 2009 and other social safeguard guidelines. A detailed description of compensation measures and assistance is provided in the entitlement matrix.

3. An entitlement matrix, consistent with the existing norms and guidelines of the country and the state government and ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement, has been prepared to cover losses identified in this Project. The matrix recognizes that the lack of title/customary rights recognized under law will not be a bar to entitlement and has special provisions for non-titled persons. The eligibility for compensation will be determined through a cut-off date. People moving into the sub- project area after the cut-off date will not be entitled to compensation or other assistance.

4. Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Program (MPUSIP) proposed to be funded by ADB envisages provision of sustainable water services to 128 towns in the State; out of which, provision of sewerage and storm water management services is proposed in some towns. The State Urban Development and Environment Department is the Executing Agency while the Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company (MPUDC) Limited is the implementing agency for the Program.

B. Project Description

5. MPUSIP’s physical components include (a) improvements to water in 69 project towns, and (b) sewage and storm water collection and treatment services proposed in four (4) identified towns namely Saikheda, Sanawad, Anjad and Badwaha under Phase I while in Phase II – water supply scheme in 59 subproject towns and sewage collection and treatment services proposed in eight towns namely Sanchi, Dhamnod, , , Jabalpur (part-II), Maihar, Kahjuraho and Rajnagar. The project also includes an institutional strengthening component and a project management and administrative support component. The objective of the proposed improvements in subproject town is to achieve safe and sustainable water services both in terms of services to customers, cost recovery and conservation of precious water resources. The project proposals envisage providing 100% coverage of population with continuous, pressurized and safe drinking water services and achieving progressively increasing cost recovery by expanding the coverage and increasing operating efficiency. The main objectives of the project are as follows:

• Supplying pure drinking water;

1

• Promote sustainable measures to increase potable water supply to the population; • Water supply through future sustainable source developments; • Water supply through improvements of safe yield of existing water sources; • Water supply through improvements to water treatment works; • Drinking water supply contributes towards a sustainable regional development; • To improve the current state of the water cycle of subproject through improvements; in the separate components of the water supply system in investment program.

6. The MPUSIP's physical component is presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Subproject Components Subproject Main Components Infrastructure (New of Refurbished) Water Supply Source development Intake works (for surface water sources)

Water Supply Treatment works Water treatment plant rapid gravity filtration, chlorination etc. Water Supply Water Transmission Raw water rising main (RWRM), Clear water rising main (CWRM) Water Supply Water storage Overhead tank

Water Supply Water Distribution Distribution mains and network Bulk valves and flow meters Domestic (Household) connection and Commercial Connection

C. Scope of the Report

7. This draft land acquisition and involuntary resettlement due diligence report (DDR) is prepared for the proposed water supply augmentation scheme for towns namely: Kantaphod and Loharda located in . The proposed components of the Kantaphod and Loharda group water supply subproject include construction of water intake, water treatment plant, storage reservoir, transmission mains and distribution system. The proposed subproject will provide metered water supply for domestic, institutional and commercial users, including metered connections to each household in the town. All municipal wards of the town will be covered under the project. The total population of both towns as per census 2011 is 19607 and population in the design year, 2048 projected as 31232.

8. A due diligence process was conducted to examine the land acquisition and resettlement issues in detail, in line with ADB SPS 2009. This report describes the findings and provides copies of relevant documents, resolutions, minutes of meetings and photographs. This land acquisition and resettlement due diligence report needs to be read along with the Resettlement Framework prepared for MPUSIP.

9. The involuntary resettlement impacts will be reconfirmed after completion of detailed design and detailed measurement surveys (DMS) which will be conducted by Design Build and

2

Operate (DBO) Contractor before initiation of civil works during implementation1. The executing agency will be responsible for submission of the updated social safeguard document to ADB for No Objection. The final involuntary resettlement DDR will be reviewed and disclosed on website of urban local body (ULB), MPUDC and ADB. No construction work will commence before the updated social safeguard document for the package is reviewed and approved by ADB and compensation to affected persons is made, if any. The implementation agency is responsible to hand over the project land/site to the contractor which should be free from all encumbrances.

I. POLICY FRAMEWORK, AND ENTITLEMENTS

10. The Resettlement Framework prepared for MPUSIP sets out the objectives, principles, eligibility criteria and entitlements for affected persons, based on ADB SPS, 2009 and LARR 2013 as well as the national and state laws for protection of street vendors. Until recently, all activities related to rehabilitation and resettlement in the State of Madhya Pradesh had been based on the Madhya Pradesh Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy, 2002 (MPRR) and National Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy, 2007 (NRRP-2007). GOMP adopted the LARR 2013 on 3rd October, 2014 with some specifications for operationalizing its implementation in the state. Details of policies are in the Resettlement Framework for MPUSIP.

II. SUBPROJECT DESCRIPTION

11. The subproject comprises of two towns namely Kantaphod and Loharda which are located in Dewas district, State of Madhya Pradesh.

12. Subproject town Kantaphod: This town is located about 100 kms away from the district headquarters Dewas. It is located at 220 34’ N latitude and 760 33’ E longitude. Kantaphod is a small town, the area of the town is spread over in 3930.00 Ha (3.93 Sq. Kms.) as per census of 2011. Administrative boundary of town is divided into 15 wards. Town is situated at average elevation of 335m from Mean Sea Level. Kantaphod town has population of 10405, male population is 5426 and female population is 4979. Total literacy rate of Kantaphod town is 71.81%, male literacy rate is 81.15% and female literacy rate is 61.69%. In town Kantaphod sex ratio is 918 per 1000 male persons.

13. Subproject town Loharda: This subproject town is located at a distance of around 95 Km from Dewas. Loharda is geographically located at 22035’’ North Latitude and 76035’’ East Longitude at a height of 332 m above Mean Sea Level (MSL). The Nagar Parishad is spread over 14 sq. Kms. According to Census of India 2011, Loharda town has a population of 9,202: male is 4,761 and female is 4,441. The total literacy rate of Loharda town is 67.03% which is lower than the state average (69.32%), male literacy rate is 77.26% and female literacy rate is 56.03%. In town Loharda, sex ratio is 933 per 1000 male persons.

A. Existing Water Supply System

14. Kantaphod: The town depends primarily on ground water for fulfilling water requirement. The major sources of water are bore wells, wells and hand pumps. There is no water treatment

1 Detailed measurement survey will be jointly conducted by safeguards personnel of PIU, consultants and contractors prior to implementation at each site/stretch of alignment. Report (Involuntary Resettlement Due Diligence Report / Resettlement Plan for different sites/stretches will be prepared and submitted to ADB for approval; prior payment of compensation to permanent and/or temporarily impacted persons is mandatory before start of civil work at each site/alignment stretch. Social safeguards document for the package will be updated by PMC in coordination with DBO contractor.

3

plant in town. The water is only chlorinated before supply to the town.

Table 2: Details of water source and system of town Kantaphod Sl. Ground Source Particulars Details No. 1. No. of Intake well None

2. No. of Tube wells 9 (operational)

3. No. of Hand pumps 64 (operational)

4. No. of tankers 5 (operational)

5. No. of Overhead tank (OHT) 1 with 325 KL

6. No. of Sump 1 with 70 KL (operational) 8. No. of pump 2 (15 HP, 10 HP)

9. Per Capita Supply 50 LPCD

Source: Nagar Parishad Kantaphod

15. The present demand of water supply is met primarily through wells and hand pumps. The water is being supplied to the town, after preliminary treatment of chlorination. There is one sump well and one overhead tank in Kantaphod. The capacity of OHT in Kantaphod is 325 KL through which water is supplied to 10 wards in Kantaphod. Water is stored in overhead tanks through pumping by sump well. Kantaphod Nagar Parishad supplies approximately 0.52 MLD of water per day. The duration and frequency of water supply is 1 hour in morning daily. The per capita supply of water is 50 LPCD.

16. Loharda: This subproject town is facing water shortage. The water problem becomes very acute during summer due to scanty rainfall. At present, to cater the water need of the population, 0.32 MLD per day of water is supplied through tube wells. There are 12 tube wells in the city, 6 nos. of tube well run throughout the year and rest of six tube wells water level goes down during summer season. Water is stored in overhead tank of capacity 375 KL from the sump by pumping from where water is distributed to the town. There are 10 nos working hand pumps in the Nagar Parishad.

Table 3: Details of water source and system of town Loharda Sl. No. Ground Source Details Particulars 1. No. of Intake well None

2. No. of Tube wells 12 (6 are operational and 6 are dry during summer)

3. No. of Hand pumps 10 (operational)

4. No. of tankers 6 (operational)

5. No. of OHT 2 (only 1 is operational)

4

6. No. of Sump 1 (operational)

7. No. of pump 10 (operational)

8. Per Capita 35 LPCD Consumption Source: Nagar Parishad Loharda

17. Both the towns are dependent upon ground water in the form of tube wells located in different parts of the towns. It is noticed that yield of the tube wells reduces considerably during summer. As per hydro geomorphologic map of the area prepared by National Remote Sensing Agency, Department of Space, Government of India, Hyderabad, the recharge conditions in the area is moderate to good. Rock is Deccan traps Group/Deccan Trap/Upper Cretaceous to Lower Eocene of plateau moderately dissected weathered landform. This cannot be taken as reliable source. The HGM of the area is depicted below in figure 1.

Figure 1: Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) of proposed subproject towns

B. Components of Proposed Water Supply Scheme

18. For group WSS, the most appropriate water source considered is Chandershekhar dam which is an irrigation dam built upstream of river Chandrakeshar, approximately 6 kms away from subproject town Kantaphod. The gross capacity of the dam is 30.07 MCM. The dead storage of dam is 1.59 MCM. As water demand of the town is 0.6 MCM only hence, this dam can be taken as water source for subproject towns.

19. Major subproject components are proposed are:

5

➢ Intake well cum pump house: On the bank of Chandrakeshar Dam, there is proposed R.C.C. intake well of 6 M diameter and 20 M height to collect and lift water up to treatment works. ➢ Raw Water Rising Main (RWRM): The proposed raw water rising main is 777 M long 200 mm dia. DI K9 from proposed Intake well to proposed WTP. Proposed alignment of RWRM will pass through right of way (ROW) of existing road. ➢ Raw Water Pump: Two nos. vertical turbine type pump with 100% as standby is proposed. The discharge of each pump is 28.03 LPS and head is 18.73 meter at intermediate stage year 2033. The rating of each pump is 6.53 KW (say 6.70 KW). ➢ Water Treatment Plant (WTP): There is no WTP in any one of the subproject town. A common WTP for both the towns having capacity of 2.85 MLD considering 22 Hrs. of pumping has been proposed for the ultimate year of 2048 at Hirapur village near dam. ➢ Clear Water Sump well at WTP: According to design capacity of sump well comes 100 KL at WTP for 45 minutes detention time. Hence, it is proposed to 100 KL of sump well at WTP for storing clear water after treatment from WTP. ➢ Clear Water Pump: Provision of 2 numbers centrifugal type pump having discharge 2.09 MLD or 26.39 LPS and head of 10.00 m with suitable motor is proposed with 100 percent standby (1 no. working and one stand bye) arrangement at WTP including suction pipe, control panel, cable and all accessories is made at WTP. ➢ Clear Water Feeder Main (CWFM): Proposed length of CWFM will be 11751 M long and 100-300 mm dia DI- K9 Pipes.

Table 4: Details of proposed CWFM DIAMETER (mm) LENGTH (m) PIPE MATERIAL

100 1608 DI K-9

150 72 DI K-9 200 4538 DI K-9 300 5533 DI K-9 TOTAL 11751 m Source: DPR

➢ Over Head Tanks (OHT): One 100 KL OHT is proposed at Kantaphod town for zone 2 while for zone 1, the existing OHT (325 KL) will be utilized. ➢ Distribution Network: Town Kantaphod and Loharda Nagar Parishad have been divided into 2 zones.The total length of the proposed network is around 45,560m of diameter 110mm to 250mm HDPE PN 10 pipe. The minimum size of pipeline taken is 110mm as per CPHEEO manual for population less than 50,000.

Table 5: Summary of proposed Distribution Network Dia (mm) Pipe- HDPE PN10 and Length (M) Town Kantaphod Town Loharda 110 15,738 15,654 140 2,498 4,797 160 1,435 1,979 180 1,310 - 200 959 32 250 152 1,006 Total 22,092 23,468

6

Source: DPR

20. A per capita supply at 70 LPCD has been considered for assessment of future water demand of both towns. Key plan of group WSS of the subproject towns Kantaphod and Loharda is depicted as Figure 2 while proposed components are depicted on google earth map, refer to Figure 3.

7

Figure 2: Key Plan of Group WSS towns Kantaphod and Loharda

Source: DPR

8

III. FIELD WORK AND PUBLIC CONSULTATION

21. This involuntary resettlement document is prepared in consultation with stakeholders including local residents, beneficiaries/consumer, and Urban Local Body (ULB) officials/representatives. Informal consultations and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted to seek feedback from local people and other important stakeholders on the proposed development interventions, perceived impacts and mitigation measures and their participation.

A. Outline of Fieldwork

22. During the visit, a field inspection of proposed subproject facility locations and pipeline alignments that had been identified was undertaken. These included field visit to the identified sites and alignments and stakeholder consultations. The entire land requirement for the proposed subproject component will be fulfilled by government lands. The details of selected lands for subproject components are given in the Appendix 1.

B. Field work Report

23. The concerned ULB officials, public representatives, stakeholders and prominent residents of both subproject towns were met to collect data / information for proposed subproject and various discussions/meetings held (refer to Appendix 2).

• During the meetings/discussions, information on the present situation of water supply in both the towns and the requirement of the stakeholders were gathered. Based on present water supply arrangements, gaps were identified and were well-documented. • With the Nagar Parishad authorities, all the possible water supply sources and identified locations for all subproject components of WSS were visited in both the towns. • All the options of possible water supply source such as its dependability, quality assurance, source availability, distance from the town etc. were studied in detail. • Water from the selected source was collected and tested in laboratory of Bhopal Municipal Corporation. Test report was obtained for designing purpose. • Water security is ensured in consultation with the concerned departments like WRD etc. such that best-chosen water source is made available to Nagar Parishad for the purpose of water supply scheme. • Revenue authorities were contacted to collect land ownership details of identified subproject components and ensure the land acquisition/transfers in the name of respective Nagar Parishad, Kantaphod and Loharda.

C. Public Consultation

24. Extensive consultations were undertaken with key stakeholders in line with ADB's requirements pertaining to environment and social considerations. Focus group discussion (FGD) conducted at nearby locations of Intake Well, Water Treatment Plant sites, construction of Over Head Tank proposed. The outcome of focused group discussion with stakeholders in the town and the line departments (persons involved in Infrastructure like Water Waste Water and allied services - engineers and workers of Local Body, WRD, PWD, revenue department etc.. Potential issues during and post execution of work were considered and after discussion with concerned authorities, necessary mitigation measures are considered. Tools used for consultation were stakeholder meetings, refer to Table 6. For photographs of consultation and list of participants,

9

refer to Appendix 2. The following were the outcomes of consultations:

(i) The consultations helped to identify the felt needs /concerns and apprehensions of the communities related to the project and priorities of concerned stakeholders. (ii) Consultations revealed that people are aware of the problems of the existing water supply system in the town and are willing to cooperate in the proposed project. (iii) Consultations with the key stakeholders revealed that existing water supply system is in a poor condition, so improvement is required and local inhabitants fully accept the project. (iv) The ULB Officials had apprehensions regarding the project whether it will be a financial burden to the Nagar Parishad, as it does not have capacity or resources to be party in sharing the loan repayment.

25. The major stakeholders targeted during consultations are:

(i) The municipalities, its elected members and staff who will be required to oversee the construction of the distribution networks and WTP as well as be directly responsible for the maintenance of the installations. (ii) Local residents who will take initiative to connect their houses with the water distribution line. (iii) Local business people and traders. (iv) The opinion makers, who are intimately acquainted with and well regarded by the community. They need to be enlisted in spreading environmental health awareness within the community as well as in conveying the benefits of the project.

10

Table 6: Summary of Consultation with Stakeholders Date Location No. of Participants Topics Discussed Issues Participants At Subproject Town Kantaphod 30th May At Parishad Total=28 Elected • Present drinking water • Chairman welcomed the initiative taken by the 2018 Hall, M=24 representatives, supply source and its MPUSIP for the preparation of DPR for Water Kantaphod F=04 Chairperson of condition Supply of different towns of Madhya Pradesh. ULB, Chief • Need of improvement of • The need for the project was discussed with the Municipal the present situation Chairman of the Nagar Parishad. Officer and • Briefing on project • Chairman and CMO discussed the problems in Nagar Parishad objectives probable the subproject town Kantaphod related to Staff implementation Drinking Water Supply. procedures • The socio-economic profile of the town was • Potential positive and explained by the Chairman. negative impacts due to • There is an immediate need of improving the project implementation present water works infrastructure in the town. • Land use and area to be Chairman explained the problematic areas (low covered under the project. pressure zones, Electricity supply duration) • GRM under MPUDC related to the water supply. • The prime concern and apprehension of the ULB Chairman regarding the project was whether it will be a financial burden on the Nagar Parishad. • Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and community participation; • Nagar Parishad officials gave consent of speedy allotment for required land for project from revenue department. • Briefed about GRC formation during implementation of the Project to redress any complaint.

27th June Ward -07 T=17 Local residents • Briefing on project • None of the people knew about the proposed 2018 Nazarpura, F=17 mainly women objectives probable project. On learning about the project, they Kantaphod M=0 implementation procedures expressed that they were happy that the entire • Potential positive and community would be benefited from the negative impacts due to upgraded water supply. project implementation

11

Date Location No. of Participants Topics Discussed Issues Participants • Experiences sharing on - • Slum dwellers showed willingness to take livelihood activities, water connections but demanded relaxation in Resettlement and user charges. Rehabilitation, women • People were briefed about the complaint empowerment, tribal redress mechanism. development, health, • They have shown their willingness to pay water education, convergence tariff regularly if supply of water should be with existing government consistent and regular. social security schemes • Briefed about GRC formation during etc. implementation of the Project to redress any • Grievance Redress complaint. procedures.

27th June Shopkeepers Total= 15, Local • Knowledge of project • Market shopkeepers had heard about the 2018 at Bus stand, F= 0, Shopkeepers • Present water supply proposed project and welcomed it as local Kantaphod M=15 situation: only half an hours residents are facing problem in existing water of supply alternate day supply system. • Drinking water user charge. • Some participants did not have water • GRM under MPUDC connections. Participants are happy to learn about the proposed project. • Should be possibility of exempting the poor and vulnerable from user charge payment. • Road restoration must be in time • Civil works must be done in the night to avoid any negative impact on local shopkeepers / business. • Briefed about GRC formation during implementation of the Project to redress the complaint and in case of loss, compensation will be paid as per Resettlement Framework.

12

Date Location No. of Participants Topics Discussed Issues Participants 27th June Ward -13, T=16 Local residents’ • Briefing on project • None of the people knew about the proposed 2018 Kantaphod F=9 man and objectives probable project. On learning about the project, they M=7 women both implementation procedures expressed that they were happy that the entire • Potential positive and community would be benefited from the negative impacts due to upgraded water supply. project implementation • Slum dwellers showed willingness to take • Experiences sharing on - water connections but demanded relaxation in livelihood activities, user charges. Resettlement and • People were briefed about the complaint Rehabilitation, women redress mechanism. empowerment, tribal • They have shown their willingness to pay water development, health, tariff regularly if supply of water should be education, convergence consistent and regular. with existing government • Briefed about GRC formation during social security schemes implementation of the Project to redress any etc. complaint. • Grievance Redress procedures.

At Subproject Town Loharda

30th May At the office Total=14 Elected • Present drinking water • Chairman welcomed the initiative taken by the 2018 of Chairman, M=14 representatives supply source and its MPUSIP for the preparation of DPR for Water Nagar F=0 locally called condition Supply of different towns of Madhya Pradesh. Parishad, Ward Parshad • Need of improvement of • The need for the project was discussed with the Loharda along with the present situation Chairman of the Nagar Parishad. Chairperson of • Briefing on project • Chairman and CMO discussed the problems in NP-Loharda objectives probable the subproject town Loharda related to implementation Drinking Water Supply. procedures • Road restoration must be in time

13

Date Location No. of Participants Topics Discussed Issues Participants • Potential positive and • Civil works must be done in the night to avoid negative impacts due to any negative impact on local shopkeepers / project implementation business • Land use and area to be • There is an immediate need of improving the covered under the project present water works infrastructure in the town. • GRM under MPUDC Chairman explained the problematic areas (low pressure zones, Electricity supply duration) related to the water supply. • The prime concern and apprehension of the ULB Chairman regarding the project was whether it will be a financial burden on the Nagar Parishad. • Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and community participation; • Nagar Parishad officials has given consent of speedy allotment for required land for project from revenue department. • Briefed about GRC formation during implementation of the Project to redress any complaint.

30th May Ward No. 14 T=11 Local residents • Briefing on project • All the participants welcome the proposed 2018 & 15 F=8 objectives probable water supply project. (Lalkhedi) of M=3 implementation procedures • Expressed that they were happy that the entire Nagar • Potential positive and community would be benefited from the Parishad- negative impacts due to upgraded water supply. Loharda project implementation • Women will be benefitted • Experiences sharing on - • Slum dwellers showed willingness to take livelihood activities, water connections but demanded relaxation in Resettlement and user charges. Rehabilitation, women • People were briefed about the complaint empowerment, tribal redress mechanism. development, health, • They have shown their willingness to pay water education, convergence tariff regularly if supply of water should be with existing government consistent and regular.

14

Date Location No. of Participants Topics Discussed Issues Participants social security schemes • Briefed about GRC formation during etc. implementation of the Project to redress the • Grievance Redress complaint. procedures

26th June Ward -05, T=23 Local residents • Briefing on project • All the participants welcome the proposed 2018 Loharda F=23 (all women) objectives probable water supply project. M=0 implementation procedures • Expressed that they were happy that the entire • Potential positive and community would be benefited from the negative impacts due to upgraded water supply. project implementation • Women will be benefitted • Experiences sharing on - • Slum dwellers showed willingness to take livelihood activities, water connections but demanded relaxation in Resettlement and user charges. Rehabilitation, women • People were briefed about the complaint empowerment, tribal redress mechanism. development, health, • They have shown their willingness to pay water education, convergence tariff regularly if supply of water should be with existing government consistent and regular. social security schemes • Briefed about GRC formation during etc. implementation of the Project to redress any • Grievance Redress complaint. procedures

15

Date Location No. of Participants Topics Discussed Issues Participants 27th June Shopkeepers Total= 20, Local • Knowledge of project • Market shopkeepers welcomed the proposed 2018 at Market, F=0, shopkeepers • Present water supply project it as local residents are facing problem Loharda M=20 situation: only half an in existing water supply system. hour of supply alternate • Some participants did not have water day connections. Participants are happy to learn • Drinking water user about the proposed project. charge. • Would it be possible to exempt the poor and • GRM under MPUDC vulnerable from user charge payment. • Road restoration must be in time • Civil works must be done in the night to avoid any negative impact on local shopkeepers / business. • Briefed about GRC formation during implementation of the Project to redress any complaint. Consultation at Village Jashmatpura enroute village

26th June Village Total 10 Local Residents • Briefed about proposed • Participants welcome the proposed WSS 2018 Jashmatpura Male 10 subproject Group WSS • Told that enough water is available in the dam Female 0 for town Kantaphod and • All have shown their willingness and support to Loharda proposed project as these towns are facing severe problem of water supply during summer.

16

IV. LAND AVAILABILITY AND INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT IMPACTS

26. In line with ADB’s requirements pertaining to environment and social safeguard considerations, the scope of land availability has been worked out by both the Nagar Parishad Kantaphod and Loharda and local revenue department. The government land identified for proposed subproject components is found appropriate both from technical and social safeguards perspective and is free of all encumbrances. No land acquisition or involuntary resettlement impacts are anticipated for any of the identified site for proposed civil works under group WSS town Kantaphod and Loharda. Land identified for subproject components are government land, which is reported vacant, unused, without any settlement / squatter / cultivation or other use. A letter has been obtained from chief municipal officer certifying that all site/land for proposed subproject facilities are government land, refer to Appendix 5.

27. For Loharda and Kantaphod town, raw water abstraction will be under taken from Chandrakeshar dam then treated and supplied to the towns. The Intake well is proposed on Chandrakeshar dam. Land for proposed Intake well site belongs to Water Resource Department (WRD). The intake site is vacant and unused, without any settlement/ squatter /cultivation. There is proposed R.C.C. intake well of 6m diameter and 20m height to collect and lift water up to treatment works. NOC is to be obtained from WRD to abstract water.

28. The identified land for WTP (2.85 MLD) has been in the possession of revenue department from many years and was not acquired in anticipation of ADB funded MPUSIP, as revealed through discussions with the local body and concerned revenue officer of revenue department during discussion. This is vacant land free from any encroachment/any type of cultivation or not used for other purposes. The process of land transfer to ULB is under process.

29. 100 KL capacity of clear water sump well is proposed at WTP for storing clear water after treatment from WTP. Land belongs to revenue department.

30. The proposed raw water rising main is of 777mM long 200mm dia. DI K9 from proposed Intake well to proposed WTP will be laid within the right of way (ROW) of PWD road. The clear water feeder main of total length of 11751M is proposed to be laid from WTP to Kantaphod and Kantaphod to Loharda within the right of way of PWD road and distribution line is also to be laid within ROW of road, under Nagar Parishad(s). The pipelines will not cross any private land along the alignments. Photographs of the proposed alignment has been taken, refer to Appendix 6.

31. One OHT of 100 KL capacity is proposed within the campus of government school which has been shifted to another area across the road under the Education Department. Now, the old building is not in use and enough vacant area is also available to construct the proposed OHT. No encroachment is reported over the proposed area. In this regard, no objection certificate (NOC) from the Education Department is required. The status report of local government revenue official (Patwari) is also attached in Appendix 4 with Title Certificate given by Local Revenue Official (Patwari) on identified land (proposed Khasar number 102) for OHT with image of Proposed Khasra.

32. New distribution network includes laying of 45560m pipeline. These pipelines are proposed to be laid underground within the existing public roads belonging to Nagar Parishad road ROW. Proposed pipe diameters to be laid range between 110 mm to 250 mm depending on the width of the roads that vary between 3 to 15 M. Distribution lines are proposed on one side / center of the road depending up on availability of space where road widths are small. Photographs

17

of the proposed alignment has been taken, refer to Appendix 6.

33. Pipe laying activity on roads in the most congested market areas and densely built-up areas has been carefully planned to avoid involuntary resettlement impacts including temporary economic impacts to hawkers, shops and businesses.

34. Measures will be taken to minimize excavation, disturbance to pedestrians and traffic, and avoid income loss to businesses, while minimizing road reconstruction costs. Temporary impacts to traffic and disruption of access to shops and residences due to excavation of trenches for pipe laying are possible during construction; however, these will be mitigated by ensuring access to properties through provision of pedestrian planks, provision of adequate signage, and careful traffic management. Mobile hawkers will be assisted to move to places vacant nearby or to other side of the road, to ensure their earnings are not affected. No income loss is anticipated.

35. There will be provision of house service connection tapping from a distribution main/sub- main including one tapping saddles, elbows, service pipe from tapping point to the chamber near property boundary or inside the property. The work shall include excavation and road restoration Town Kantaphod has 573 existing water supply connections (564 domestic and 9 non-domestic connections) while town Loharda has 450 domestic connections. A total of 2,955 connections (2,846 domestic and 109 non-domestic connections) are being proposed with meters.

36. The civil works in the project will include a linear excavation for laying pipes within the roads, placing pipes in the trench and refilling with the excavated soil. The trenches will be of 0.4m – 0.7m wide and 0.8m to 1m depth. Subsequent to completion of works, road reinstatement will be undertaken by the contractor as part of the civil works. Proposed distribution of pipe-laying on roads in most part of the town will not have any permanent or temporary involuntary resettlement impact.

37. Laying of transmission mains and distribution network pipelines in the project area has been carefully planned to minimize disturbance to pedestrians and traffic and avoid income loss to businesses. Potential temporary impacts to traffic/access to shops and residences due to digging and excavation for pipe laying are possible during construction; however, these will be mitigated by ensuring access to properties through provision of pedestrian planks, installation of adequate signage, and careful traffic management.

38. Details about land ownership for the proposed component are depicted as Appendix 1. No involuntary resettlement impact is envisaged due to subproject components. Land details of proposed WTP and OHTs are collected from the Local Revenue Department and annexed as Appendix 4.

Table 7: Involuntary Resettlement Impacts due to Proposed Components under Group WSS of Town Kantaphod and Loharda Components Capacity Unit (No.) Length Land ownership Involuntary Resettlement Impact 1 Intake well 2.85 1 Water Resource The Intake well cum pump MLD Department proposed on house on (WRD), Chandrakeshar dam: Chandrakeshar Government of The land for the Dam Madhya Pradesh proposed intake well site is owned by\WRD. The proposed site is

18

Components Capacity Unit (No.) Length Land ownership Involuntary Resettlement Impact vacant, unused and without any settlement/ squatter /cultivation or other use. Therefore, no involuntary resettlement impact is anticipated. Refer to Appendix -1. 2 Water 2.85 1 Revenue The land proposed for Treatment MLD Department, WTP at village Plant (WTP) Government of Jashmatpura is owned for surface Madhya Pradesh by the Revenue water. Department. The proposed site is vacant, unused and without any settlement/ squatter /cultivation or other use. Therefore, no involuntary resettlement impact anticipated. refer Appendix 1 and 4 3 Clear Water 100 KL 1 Revenue The land proposed for sump (within Department, WTP at village premises of Government of Jashmatpura is owned WTP) Madhya Pradesh by the Revenue Department. The proposed site is vacant, unused and without any settlement/ squatter /cultivation or other use. Therefore, no involuntary resettlement impact anticipated. refer Appendix 1 and 4 4 Over Head 100 KL 1 Education Proposed OHT site at Tank (OHT) Department, ward no. 14- Government of Kantaphod. The land is Madhya Pradesh owned by the Education Department. The proposed site is vacant, unused and without any settlement/ squatter/cultivation or other use. Therefore, no involuntary resettlement impact is anticipated. Refer to Appendix 1 and 4 5 Guard cum 3 Government land No involuntary operator house resettlement impact is at Intake well, anticipated. WTP and Boundary wall

19

Components Capacity Unit (No.) Length Land ownership Involuntary Resettlement Impact with gate at respective components 6 Raw Water 777 M PWD Road ROW The RWRM line will Rising Main (Public land) pass through the (RWRM) unused, vacant, and barren public land which is mainly government road ROW. No involuntary resettlement impact is anticipated. 7 Clear water 1 11751 PWD Road ROW The proposed feeder main M and Roads alignment of CWFM will belong to Nagar pass through Parishad under government road ROW. their jurisdiction No involuntary resettlement impact is anticipated. 8 Distribution 45560 Road ROW The pipelines will pass Pipeline m (Public land) through the existing HDPE pipe - belong to Nagar government road 45560 m Parishad (s) ROW. No involuntary resettlement impact is anticipated. Temporary impacts on traffic/access to shops and residences are possible in some places; but will be avoided. The contractor will provide signages of available alternate access route to minimize traffic disruptions. The contractor will ensure access to shops and residences as per EMP provisions. The mobile hawkers and vendors will be assisted to shift from and back to present location after construction completion, to ensure that they can continue their operation and there will be no economic or livelihood impact 9 Household 2,955 (2,846 - During the construction connections domestic period, access to

20

Components Capacity Unit (No.) Length Land ownership Involuntary Resettlement Impact connections residents and shops and 109 may be temporarily non- affected; but the domestic contractor will ensure connections) access as per EMP provisions to avoid any economic impact.

39. Mitigation: The sites or locations for the subproject components have been selected carefully to avoid and minimize involuntary resettlement impacts. The following mitigation measures are proposed to avoid and/or reduce the impacts during linear pipe works:

(i) Provide prior advanced notice (minimum one week) to community along the construction stretch. Distribute information on project and grievance redress mechanism, (ii) Maintain access to avoid disturbance to residents and businesses by providing planks and leaving spaces for businesses and residents to maintain access, (iii) Manage traffic flows as per traffic management plan prepared by the contractor in coordination with local authorities and communities, (iv) Limit the amount of time of open trenches, and complete works quickly, with special attention to stretches where business activities are located, (v) Avoid full street closure to the extent possible, (vi) Contractors shall provide employment opportunity to the local residents and particularly woman where possible, and (vii) Contractors shall assist vendors and hawkers in shifting to alternative locations, if required.

40. This subproject does not have any involuntary resettlement impact as there will be no physical or economic displacement. The subproject will have no adverse land acquisition impacts as the subproject components are proposed at public land which is revenue land and does not belong to tribal community. Transmission and distribution pipeline carry raw and clear water will traverse only through right of way (ROW) of the government road. Keeping in view, no involuntary resettlement impacts are envisaged, an involuntary resettlement screening checklist is prepared and attached as Appendix 3. Accordingly, the subproject is classified under ‘Category C’ for involuntary resettlement under ADB’s SPS 2009.

V. BUDGET

41. A budgetary provision is made for costs likely to be incurred during implementation of subproject.

21

Table 8: Budget for town Kantaphod Sl. Description Target group Estimated Source of No. cost fund 1 Consultation and information Subproject INR 200,000 Included in disclosure and awareness drive Area subproject cost through IEC tools 2 Connection Drive and GRM Subproject INR 75,000 Included in Area subproject cost

3 Tanker supply for areas where Subproject INR 50,000 Included in existing water supply disrupted during Area subproject cost construction 4 15% contingencies INR 47250 Included in subproject cost

Total INR 362,250

Table 9: Budget for town Loharda

Sl. Description Target group Estimated cost Source of fund No. 1 Consultation and information Persons of INR 150,000 Included in disclosure and awareness drive subproject area subproject cost through IEC tools 2 Connection drive and GRM Subproject area INR 75,000 Included in subproject cost 3 Tanker supply for areas where Subproject area INR 50,000 Included in existing water supply disrupted subproject cost during construction 4 15% contingencies INR 41250 Included in subproject cost Total INR 316,250

VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

42. No involuntary resettlement impact is anticipated at identified sites for sub-project components; as adequate vacant government land is available for the proposed facilities. The proposed sites for WTP is owned by the Revenue Department, GOMP while the proposed site for OHT is owned by theEducation Department. Land records are collected from Revenue Department, refer to Appendix 4. While other details if any, shall be appended to the updated DDR. For abstraction of water from Chandeshekhar dam, the application has been submitted by the office of CMO-Kantaphod and Loharda to get no objection certificate (NOC) for water abstraction from the proposed source. For linear components (pipe laying) or those proposed along government road ROWs, temporary disruption to road users, pedestrians and community members will be avoided in the most congested zones of both towns. Safety measures shall be

22

ensured, and temporary disruptions will be mitigated during construction by the contractor through simple measures such as provision of planks for pedestrian access to shops and traffic management. Thus, the subproject is classified as Category C for Involuntary Resettlement as per ADB SPS 2009.

43. The social safeguards personnel at PMU, MPUSIP will be responsible to undertake a review of due diligence report during project implementation and if there is any change in the alignment/site, concerned safeguard officials will carry out a due diligence investigation to document and study the social impact assessment of new alignment/site.

44. Next steps: The draft DDR needs to be updated during detailed design with the following information:

➢ Identified land for the subproject components such as Intke well, WTP and OHT at town Kantaphod and verified by the Local Revenue Department. The land records will be appended in the revised IR DDR. ➢ NOC for the proposed site owned by the government departments such as WRD (for Intake well) and Education Department (for OHT). ➢ Transfer of proposed land for the WTP and OHT to the name of the ULB. ➢ NOC is required from PWD to lay the transmission/distribution line. ➢ Consultation with local community at village Jashmatpura, and site identified for WTP at Jashmatpura, and any other en route settlements ➢ Reflection of design or site or alignment changes proposed, if any. ➢ Updated DDR needs to be submitted to ADB and a No Objection from ADB obtained, prior to start of construction.

23

Figure 3: Location of the proposed subproject components on Google Earth Map Key plan of GWSS on Google Map

24

Site location of Intake well and WTP on Google Earth Map

Site location of proposed OHT for Kantaphod at Ward No. 14

25

Appendix 1: Details of Land Ownership of Proposed Components under WSS for towns Kantaphod and Loharda Component Location Ownership of Land Detail about Status of NOC Site Proposed Plot No. (Khasra No) Intake Well Chandrakeshar Dam Water Resource Khasra No. Nagar Parishad (s) has Department (WRD), 194 (Area applied for the NOC to Government of available WRD Madhya Pradesh ….and Area Required)

WTP Near Village Hirapur Revenue Khasra No. Nagar Parishad (Jashmatpura) Department, 193 Kantaphod has applied Government of for the NOC to District Madhya Pradesh Collector-Dewas

OHT at Government School Education Khasra No. Nagar Parishad Kantaphod At Ward No. 14 Department, 102 (Area Kantaphod has applied Government of available for the NOC to District Madhya Pradesh 2000 square Collector-Dewas. feet NOC is also required from education department.

Note: Above mentioned components are proposed for WSS Kantaphod. Out of that Intake well and WTP are common and located at Kantaphod while in Loharda distribution feeder main and distribution network is proposed.

26

Appendix 2: Photographs of Stakeholder Consultation and List of Participants

Photograph of Consultation with Elected Ward Councillor and others of Nagar Parishad- Kantaphod Page 1 of 2

List of Participants durind Consultation with Elected Ward Councillors and others of Nagar Parishad-Kantaphod

27

Page 2 of 2

English Translation S.N. List of Participants Mob.number S.N List of Participants Mob.number . 1 Vijay Sharma CMO 9425086870 15 Sitaram anchale 2 Bhuri bai (president) 16 Lakiya bai 3 Salim shah 8827907283 17 Om jayaswal 9826429588 4 Ganpati newar 9754874145 18 Rekha santosh 5 Ramdulari heralal 9893236641 19 Ashok Batham 9843951751 6 Saitan nagraj 20 Jagdish soni 9893951825 7 Manju bai 9926778295 21 Anita rathor 8965882760 8 Sivprakash parmar 8878788878 22 Ekta rathor 8827907219 9 Sandhya baraya 9893155319 23 Kusum malbiy 9077860712 10 Parbin B 24 Rekha Parmar 7566728366 11 Rahesh kureshi 9009720266 25 Ambika Sharma 9179260913 12 Shakeel B 9754893970 26 Sapna sohiya 7049961606 13 Kailash varma 8462825417 27 Saidi chohan 9669853587 14 Ramprari bai 28 Manju lata dubey 8959949558

28

Photograph of Consultation with Women at Ward No. 7 (Nazarpura) of Nagar Parishad- Kantaphod

29

English Translation S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants 1 Sapna soriysa 7 Usha 13 Sona bai 2 Roshni alasiya 8 Niyaj B 14 Rajni 3 Shanty 9 Maya bai 15 Narbadi 4 Pushpa braya 10 Krishna 16 Rita 5 Hasina 11 Roopa 17 Kamla bai 6 Shima 12 Kirti 18

30

Photograph of Consultation with Shopkeepers of Market area at Bus Stand of Nagar Parishad- Kantaphod

List of Participants during Consultation with Shopkeepers of Market area at Bus Stand of Nagar Parishad-Kantaphod

31

English Translation S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants 1 Ramjan shah 9 Anand jayaswal 17 Mahesh 2 Govind 10 Gajah kallu 18 Lilat chawda 3 Rahul tiwari 11 Harjeet singh 19 Hariom 4 Suresh varma 12 Manish 20 Kedar 5 Rambakas 13 Param 21 Devlal 6 Rajesh 14 Akhilesh 22 Grish chove 7 Mukesh 15 Jodidar 23 Janak 8 Vikash 16 Vinod kumar 24 Mahesh

32

Photograph of Consultation with Local residents at ward no-13 Nagar Parishad Kantaphod

33

List of Participants during Consultation with Local residents at ward no-13 Nagar Parishad Kantaphod

English Translation S.N. List of S.N. List of S.N. List of S.N. List of Participants Participants Participants Participants 1 Hari singh 5 Manju bai 9 Bano 13 Hamed 2 Ashok 6 Usha bai 10 Bulla 14 Babu lal 3 Motilal 7 Vinod 11 Sohel 15 Ramotar 4 Anokhi lal 8 8Raje khan 12 Rakesh 16 Kasam

34

Photograph of Consultation with Elected Ward Councillor and others of Nagar Parishad-Loharda

List of Participants during Consultation with Elected Ward Councillor of Nagar Parishad-Loharda and other Stakeholders

35

English Translation S.N. List of Participants Mob. Number S.N. List of Participants Mob. Number Raish shahu 9981396084 Pahlad 9617350007 Hari patel 9753962525 Vinod 8850151301 Ganesh uike 9165322801 Ladki 9893737387 Bharat singh 7778875610 Santosh kumar 9893450097 Uma uike 8224939902 Anita Geeta bai Harsha Mahendra soni 9895950410 Rakesh

36

Photograph of Consultation with Local residents of Ward No. 14 & 15 (Lalkhedi) of Nagar Parishad-Loharda

List of Participants during Consultation with Local residents of Ward No. 14 & 15 (Lalkhedi) of Nagar Parishad-Loharda

English Translation S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants 1 Nor B 5 Shayra b 9 Vimal 2 Asmin 6 Kurwan shah 10 Sandeep 3 Intal 7 Ashlam shah 11 Syam lal 4 Anisha 8 Durga Prashad 12

37

Photograph of Consultation with women at Ward no. 5 of Nagar Parishad-Loharda

List of Participants during Consultation with women at Ward no. 5 of Nagar Parishad-Loharda

38

English Translation S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants 1 Geeta bai 9 Sagun 17 Ramniwas 2 Shanta bai 10 Kala bai 18 Nuri bai 3 Nabo bai 11 Kshama 19 Rambharose 4 Rekha bai 12 Sankar 20 Sagun bai 5 Sunder bai 13 Kishan 21 Pooja 6 Rewa 14 Nabula 22 Lakhan 7 Shobha 15 Radhesyam 23 Beby 8 Rekha 16 Kachru 24

39

Photograph of Consultation with Shopkeepers of Market area of Nagar Parishad-Loharda

List of participants during Consultation with Shopkeepers of Market area of Nagar Parishad- Loharda

40

English Translation S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants 1 Anil tiwari 8 Sabri patel 15 Ibrahim khan 2 Kamal 9 Rafik 16 Rajesh malbiye 3 Seru bhai 10 Santosh 17 Sahruk 4 jagdesh 11 Narmada Prasad 18 Sajan 5 Tamim 12 Ranbilash 19 Irfan 6 Akhelesh 13 Akram 20 Sahrook 7 Ajad 14 Salik ram 21 Dinesh

41

Photograph of Consultation with Local residents at Nagar Parishad Loharda

42

List of Participants during Consultation with Local residents at Nagar Parishad Loharda

English Translation S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants 1 Govind das 5 Amin 9 Kishan 2 Prakash 6 Rajkumar 10 Mohan lal 3 Krishna 7 Bhagwan singh 11 4 Fool singh 8 Narbada 12

43

Photograph of Consultation with Local residents at ward no-15 Nagar Parishad Loharda

44

List of Participants during Consultation with Local residents at Nagar Parishad Loharda

English Translation S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants 1 Ramniwas 6 Brajesh 11 Sudha bai 2 Seeta ram 7 Ranjeet 12 Shantu bai 3 Ramniwas 8 Syam Sharma 13 Asha bai 4 Bisnu 9 Rajesh rathor 14 Seema bai 5 Syam 10 Durga bai 15 Sunita bai

45

Consultation at enroute village Jashmatpura located between WTP and Kantaphod

List of Participants during consultation at enroute village Jashmatpura located between WTP and Kantaphod

English Translation S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants S.N. List of Participants 1 Sachin 5 Rajkumar 9 Siv prasad 2 Mahesh 6 Jaypal 10 Ramesh 3 Narayan 7 Govind 11 4 Gopal 8 Seeta 12

46

Appendix 3: Involuntary Resettlement Screening Checklist

A. Introduction

Each project/subproject/component needs to be screen for any involuntary resettlement impacts which will occur or already occurred. This screening determines the necessary action to be done by the project team.

B. Information on project/subproject/component:

a. District/ Administrative Name: Dewas b. Location: Kantaphod (89 Kms away from Dewas and Loharda (91 Kms away from Dewas) c. Civil work dates (proposed): Not yet proposed d. Technical Description: Planning and design of Group WSS for Kantaphod and Loharda. The scheme involves construction of common intake well on Chandrakeshar Dam and common WTP near Hirapur village. Pumping water from intake wells to WTP. laying of Clear water rising main from WTP to the OHTs. Construction of 1 no of Over Head Tanks of size 100 KL with 15 M staging height for Kantaphod and further distribution to end users by various distribution networks through gravitation.

C. Screening Questions for Involuntary Resettlement Impact

Below is the initial screening for involuntary resettlement impacts and due diligence exercise. Both permanent and temporary impacts must be considered and reported in the screening process.

Involuntary Resettlement Impacts Yes No Not Reason known Will the project include any physical ✓ Construction of Intake well, WTP, construction work? transmission main, OHT and distribution network pipelines proposed

Does the proposed activity include ✓ upgrading or rehabilitation of existing physical facilities? Will there be permanent land ✓ Only government land selected for acquisition? construction of subproject components. Will it require temporary land ✓ acquisition? Is the ownership status and current ✓ All sites belong to government and all usage of the land known? are vacant and unused. Are there any non-titled people who ✓ All sites are free of non-titled people. live or earn their livelihood at the site or within the corridor of impact (COI) / Right of Way (ROW)? Will there be loss of housing? ✓ Will there be loss of agricultural ✓ plots?

47

Involuntary Resettlement Impacts Yes No Not Reason known Will there be losses of crops, trees, ✓ As distribution line will be proposed and fixed assets (i.e. fences, pumps, within the government road RoWs in the etc.)? towns, no losses to crops, trees and fixed assets is anticipated. The RoWs are not found to be encroached. Will there be loss of businesses or ✓ During laying of distribution lines in enterprises? congested lanes, temporary arrangements will be made, pipeline will be located in unused government lands alongside the existing roads (within RoW) and can be constructed without causing disturbance to houses and commercial establishments. Will there be loss of incomes and ✓ Temporary loss of incomes will be livelihoods? avoided through provisions of access planks by the contractor. Will people lose access to facilities, ✓ Any disruption of public facilities or services, or natural resources? services will be taken care of during excavation. Grievance redress cell will be formed ward wise to settle the grievances soon. Will any social or economic activities ✓ be affected by land use-related changes? Will people lose access to natural ✓ resources, or common property resources, or communal facilities and/or services? If land use is changed will it have an ✓ adverse impact on social and economic activities? Will access to land and resources ✓ own communally or by the state be restricted? Are any of the affected persons (AP) ✓ from indigenous or ethnic minority groups?

D. Involuntary Resettlement Impact

After reviewing the answers above, Executing Agency / Safeguard Team confirms that the proposed subsection/ section/ subproject/component (tick as appropriate):

[ N ] Has involuntary resettlement impact, a resettlement plan (or corrective action plan) is required [ Y ] Has No Involuntary Resettlement impact, no resettlement plan is required.

48

Prepared By: : Verified by: PMU Safeguard Team, MPUSIP- Signature: Bhopal Name: Position: Signature: Name: Position:

Date: Date:

49

Appendix 4: Land Records (Khasra Details) of Identified Land for Proposed Subproject Components under Group WSS town Kantaphod and Loharda

Letter written to PM PIU-) by CMO-Kantaphod about identified site for proposed components

50

English Translation

To, Project Manager PIU-Ujjain Date: 17 07 2018 From: CMO-Kantaphod

As per your directives, we have collected information and traced map of the proposed land from concerned revenue official (Patwari). Details are submitted for your review and necessary action.

CMO-Kantaphod Nagar Parishad-Kantaphod (Dewas)

51

Trace copy of Land Records of Identified Site of Intake well (under Khasra No. 194 and WTP (under Khasra No. 193) issued by Local Revenue official (Patwari)

Note:

Khasra is land record maintained by the state government, which depicts for each land parcel, the parcel number, ownership, area and land use. The Khasra/land record is usually accompanied by a scaled map.

The above records depict that the proposed WTP site is owned by government and has an area of hectares, Khasra No of proposed Intake, WTP and OHT site is 193 & 194, 101 & 102.

52

Certificate given by Local Revenue Official (Patwari) on identified land (proposed Khasra number 102) for OHT along with Image of Proposed Khasra

Page 1 of 2

53

Page 2 of 2

English Translation:

To, CMO-Kantaphod Dated: 17 07 2018 From: Patwari Revenue Department Subject: Status and Facts about Proposed Khasra No. 102 As per record, above mentioned Khasra No. 102 comes under Thana Bujarg Halka No. 18 of Tehsil District Dewas while Khasra No. 101 is comes under road. Under Khasra No. 102, there are two sizes of plots with area 2.978 hectare (ha) and 5.948 ha which belongs to government and private2 party respectively. As per actual position and revenue record, there is an old government school building which is not currently in use in Khasra No. 102 (under government possession) and area is 2000 sq feet which is completely under possession of government education department. New building for school has been constructed across the road. Remaining land is encroached by local person namely Man Singh Gulab Singh Bhil and others. Therefore, proposed site for OHT is fully under possession of government education department but no objection certificate (NoC) is required from education department. Patwari, Halka Number 18

2 Land identified for OHT is completely government land and enough area is available. There is no claim by any private party on the identified land. No encroachment is reported on identified land which is reported free and vacant, belongs to education department. Therefore, NOC is required from education department.

54

Appendix 5: Land Status Certificate on Identified Land for Proposed Components under WSS

55

Appendix 6: Photographs of Proposed Transmission main and Distribution Network

Raw Water Pumping Main Alignment Photographs

Clear Water Feeder Main from Kantaphod to Loharda

Distriburtion Network

56

57

58