DOCSLIB.ORG

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Treatment Versus Monotherapy in Obesity: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Efficacy and Safety of Combination Treatment Versus Monotherapy in Obesity: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF COMBINATION TREATMENT VERSUS MONOTHERAPY IN OBESITY: A META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS Shant Krikorian, Peter Haydaw, Khaled, Bahjri and Ike de la Peña Department of Pharmaceutical and Administrative Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Loma Linda University INTRODUCTION RESULTS Table 3: Number of Adverse events Produced by Mono- vs. Combination Therapy • Obesity is a common disease that increases risk for cardiovascular diseases, cancer and other health Articles (Randomized Controlled Trial) Monotherapy Combination Treatment problems. Table 1. List of Randomized Controlled Trials included in the Meta-analysis Chirinos 2010 (Simvast. vs Simvast./Ezetimibe) 0 1 Flippatos 2005 (Orlis vs. Orlis./Fenofib.) 1 1 • Pharmacotherapy is an important treatment modality for obesity, and combination therapy has RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL REFERENCE Flippatos2 2005 (Fenofib vs. Orlis./Fenofib.) 1 1 Flippatos 2008 (Orlis. vs. Orlis./Fenofib.) - - emerged as an attractive therapeutic intervention, in view of the multifactorial etiology of the Simvastatin/Ezetimibe VS. Simvastatin Chirinos et al., 2010. Am Heart J. Flippatos2 2008 (Fenofib vs. Orlis./Fenofib.) - - disease. Naltrexone/Bupropion VS. Naltrexone or Bupropion Greenway, et. Al., 2009. J Clin Endocrinol Metab Florentin 2008 (Remonab. vs. Remonab/Fenofib) 1 1 Florentin2 2008 (Fenofib. vs. Remonab/Fenofib) 0 1 Canagliflozin/Phentermine VS. Canagliflozin or Phentermine Hollander et al., 2017. Diabetes Care • Combination therapy may increase risk of adverse events. Gadde 2007 (Zonisamide vs. Bupropion/Zonisamide) 7 10 Liraglutide/Metreleptin VS. Liraglutide Jensterle, et al., 2017. BMC Endocr. Disord • We conducted a meta-analysis to examine comparative efficacy and safety of FDA-approved Greenway 2009 (BUP vs. NB16) 24 40 Sibutramine/Orlistat VS. Sibutramine or Orlistat Kaya et al., 2004. Biomed Pharmacother Greenway2 2009 (BUP vs. NB32) 24 36 combination treatments vs. monotherapies for obesity. Greenway3 2009 (BUP vs. NB48) 24 36 Orlistat/Resveratrol VS. Orlistat or Resveratrol Paniagua, et al. 2016. Obesity Huerta 2014 (EPA vs. EPA /Lipoic acid) 0 0 Huerta2 2014 (a-Lipoic Acid vs. EPA /Lipoic acid) 0 0 Pramlintide/Metreleptin VS. Pramlintide or Metreleptin Ravussin et al., 2009. Obesity Jabbour 2018 (Exenatide vs. Exenatide/Dapaglif) - - METHODS Orlistat/Metformin VS. Orlistat Sari, 2004. Int. J. Obes. Relat Metab. Disord Jabbour2 2018 (Dapaglif. vs. Exenatide/Dapaglif) - - Jensterle 2017 (LIRA3 vs. LIRA3/MET2000) 6 8 Lorcaserin/Phentermine VS Lorcaserin Smith et al., 2017. Obesity 1- Electronic database and manual Kaya 2004 (Sibutramine vs. Orlis./Sibutramine) 14 15 Orlistat Vs. Orlistat/Fenofibrate Flippatos et al., 2005. Journal of Clinical Lipidology Kaya2 2004 (Orlis. vs. Orlis./Sibutramine) 19 15 search using the search terms: Paniagua 2016 (Orlis. vs. Orlis./Reserv.) 1 1 Remonabant or Fenobirate Vs. Remonabant/Fenofibrate Florentin et al., 2008. Expert opinion on Phar. Paniagua2 2016 (Reserv. vs. Orlis./Reserv.) 3 1 “combination therapy vs. monotherapy, Ravussin 2009 (Metrelep. vs. Metrelep/Pramlin) 35 56 Zonisamide Vs. Bupropion/Zonisamide Gadde et al., 2007. J Clin Psychiatry Ravussin2 2009 (Pramlin. vs. Metrelep.) 57 56 obesity, randomized controlled trails”, EPA or a-Lipoic Acid Vs. EPA /Lipoic acid Huerta et al., 2014. Obesity Sari 2004 (Orlis vs. Orlis./Metformin) 0 5 “combination therapy, monotherapy, Smith 2017 (LOR vs. LOR BID/Phen QD) 50 52 Exenatide or Dapagliflozin Vs. Exenatide/Dapagliflozin Jabbour et al., 2018. Diabetes Obes Metab. Smith2 2017 (LOR vs. LOR BID/Phen BID) 50 54 obesity, randomized controlled trails,” “co- Total Events 317 390 administration, monotherapy, obesity, randomized controlled trials 2- Article review and selection according Table 2: Mean weight change Produced by Mono- vs. Combination Therapy DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION to inclusion/exclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria • The meta-analysis showed a 2.04 kg (95% confidence interval 1.67-2.42) additional tytyty • Population BMI 27 • Behavioral weight loss produced by the combination treatments versus monotherapies. kg/m2, therapy/intervention s as the other • The incidence of treatment-related adverse effects was higher (58%) in the • Outcomes 3 intervention month-weight loss combination treatments vs. monotherapies (49%), but this difference did not reach in percentage, • <100 participants statistical significance. • Type of intervention • Non-RCTs only and control groups: • These data provide randomized-based trial evidence on the efficacy and safety of combination vs. • Non-published, monotherapy Non- English combination treatments for obesity. language 3- Meta-analysis and Forest Plotting, Analysis of Adverse Events • Random effects model was used to provide a summary of weight change before and after ACKNOWLEDGMENT exposure to treatments. This study is supported by research funds provided by the • Data on adverse events were extracted from each study and pooled to determine the overall Loma Linda University School of Pharmacy incidence of adverse events in combination treatment versus monotherapy .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 7: Monogenic Forms of Diabetes
    CHAPTER 7 MONOGENIC FORMS OF DIABETES Mark A. Sperling, MD, and Abhimanyu Garg, MD Dr. Mark A. Sperling is Emeritus Professor and Chair, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA. Dr. Abhimanyu Garg is Professor of Internal Medicine and Chief of the Division of Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. SUMMARY Types 1 and 2 diabetes have multiple and complex genetic influences that interact with environmental triggers, such as viral infections or nutritional excesses, to result in their respective phenotypes: young, lean, and insulin-dependence for type 1 diabetes patients or older, overweight, and often manageable by lifestyle interventions and oral medications for type 2 diabetes patients. A small subset of patients, comprising ~2%–3% of all those diagnosed with diabetes, may have characteristics of either type 1 or type 2 diabetes but have single gene defects that interfere with insulin production, secretion, or action, resulting in clinical diabetes. These types of diabetes are known as MODY, originally defined as maturity-onset diabetes of youth, and severe early-onset forms, such as neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM). Defects in genes involved in adipocyte development, differentiation, and death pathways cause lipodystrophy syndromes, which are also associated with insulin resistance and diabetes. Although these syndromes are considered rare, more awareness of these disorders and increased availability of genetic testing in clinical and research laboratories, as well as growing use of next generation, whole genome, or exome sequencing for clinically challenging phenotypes, are resulting in increased recognition. A correct diagnosis of MODY, NDM, or lipodystrophy syndromes has profound implications for treatment, genetic counseling, and prognosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Myalept® (Metreleptin)
    UnitedHealthcare Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacy Programs Program Number 2021 P 2032-11 Program Prior Authorization/Medical Necessity Medication Myalept® (metreleptin) P&T Approval Date 5/2014, 7/2014, 8/2014, 7/2015, 6/2016, 5/2017, 5/2018, 5/2019, 5/2020, 5/2021 Effective Date 8/1/2021; Oxford only: 8/1/2021 1. Background: Myalept (metreleptin) is a leptin analog indicated as an adjunct to diet as replacement therapy to treat the complications of leptin deficiency in patients with congenital or acquired generalized lipodystrophy.1 Myalept is available only through a restricted distribution program under a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), called the Myalept REMS program, because of the risks associated with the development of anti-metreleptin antibodies that neutralize endogenous leptin and the risk of lymphoma. 2. Coverage Criteria: A. Initial Authorization 1. Myalept will be approved based on all of the following criteria: a. Diagnosis of congenital or acquired generalized lipodystrophy associated with leptin deficiency -AND- b. Myalept is being used as an adjunct to diet modification -AND- c. Prescribed by an endocrinologist -AND- d. Documentation demonstrates that patient has at least one of the following: (1) Diabetes mellitus or insulin resistance with persistent hyperglycemia (HgbA1C > 7.0) despite both of the following: (a) Dietary intervention (b) Optimized insulin therapy at maximum tolerated doses © 2021 UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc. 1 -OR- (2) Persistent hypertriglyceridemia (TG > 250) despite both of the following: (a) Dietary intervention (b) Optimized therapy with at least two triglyceride-lowering agents from different classes (e.g., fibrates, statins) at maximum tolerated doses Authorization will be issued for 12 months B.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting Medications in Perspective for Chronic Weight Management
    05/06/2019 1 Donna H. Ryan, MD Professor Emerita Pennington Biomedical Research Center Baton Rouge, LA, USA The Role of Pharmacology in Weight Management: Putting Medications in Perspective for Chronic Weight Management 1 Disclosures • Consulting fee: Amgen, Gila Therapeutics, IFA Celtic, Novo Nordisk, Bausch Health, Real Appeal, Sanofi, Quintiles Novella, Paul Hastings, Simmons and Simmons, ReDesign Health, KVK Tech • Speakers bureau: Novo Nordisk, Bausch Health • Equity: Gila Therapeutics, Scientific Intake, Epitomee, ReDesign Health 2 05/06/2019 2 Objectives At the end of the session, attendees will be able to • identify when to start a weight loss medication, • identify how to choose the right one for the right patient, • identify when to combine approaches for better results and • discuss future prospects in obesity pharmacotherapy. • 3 Should we treat obesity with drugs? 4 05/06/2019 3 Should we treat obesity with drugs? No! not by themselves Yes! when patients need help • Drugs don’t work on their own. • For patients who struggle to lose They work through biology to enough weight to get health reinforce the patient’s intention to benefits, drugs can help them adhere to a dietary plan. Better better adhere to the dietary plan adherence = more weight loss. to lose more weight. Drugs also Drugs also sustain lost weight as sustain weight loss as long as they long as they are taken. are taken. 5 Rationale for Medications in Obesity Management • Food intake is biologically determined. • Weight loss is opposed and regain promoted by physiology of reduced obese state. • Medications work through biology of appetite regulation to help patients adhere to diet plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Amylin's $1 Billion Heavyweight Deal
    news Amylin’s $1 billion heavyweight deal In November, Amylin announced a $1 billion partnership with Osaka, Japan–based Takeda to codevelop and commercialize obesity treatments. Takeda paid the San Diego–based biotech $75 million upfront for Symlin/metreleptin combination as part of an agreement that could exceed $1 billion if certain development and sales-dependent milestones are hit. The deal also includes Amylin’s amylinomimetic compound davalintide, which is currently only in phase 2 studies. But, as Stephen O’Rahilly, director of the Metabolic Research Laboratories at the University of Cambridge in the UK, points out, Symlin (pramlintide) is already approved and is “used by a lot of type I diabetes patients to smooth out control and prevent the weight gain that happens when on insulin.” The agreement comes amid a surge of deals in metabolic disease, particularly for diabetes treatments that have potential weight loss benefits for the obese. For example, on December 23, Amylin Paris-based Sanofi-Aventis paid €100 ($143) million for a 19.9% stake in Zealand Pharma. This Amylin has gained a strong position in the already crowded metabolic disease marketplace. Copenhagen-based biotech is developing a peptide analog of Amylin’s Byetta (glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1)/exendin 4) for type 2 diabetes, which has also shown efficacy in promoting weight loss. In what has become a crowded market, products will likely gain a competitive edge if they can fight both metabolic disease and obesity, the latter with a potential market of 300 million people worldwide. Amylin already looks to have consolidated its position.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2017 ~ Resource #330909
    −This Clinical Resource gives subscribers additional insight related to the Recommendations published in− September 2017 ~ Resource #330909 Medications Stored in the Refrigerator (Information below comes from current U.S. and Canadian product labeling and is current as of date of publication) Proper medication storage is important to ensure medication shelf life until the manufacturer expiration date and to reduce waste. Many meds are recommended to be stored at controlled-room temperature. However, several meds require storage in the refrigerator or freezer to ensure stability. See our toolbox, Medication Storage: Maintaining the Cold Chain, for helpful storage tips and other resources. Though most meds requiring storage at temperatures colder than room temperature should be stored in the refrigerator, expect to see a few meds require storage in the freezer. Some examples of medications requiring frozen storage conditions include: anthrax immune globulin (Anthrasil [U.S. only]), carmustine wafer (Gliadel [U.S. only]), cholera (live) vaccine (Vaxchora), dinoprostone vaginal insert (Cervidil), dinoprostone vaginal suppository (Prostin E2 [U.S.]), varicella vaccine (Varivax [U.S.]; Varivax III [Canada] can be stored in the refrigerator or freezer), zoster vaccine (Zostavax [U.S.]; Zostavax II [Canada] can be stored in the refrigerator or freezer). Use the list below to help identify medications requiring refrigerator storage and become familiar with acceptable temperature excursions from recommended storage conditions. Abbreviations: RT = room temperature Abaloparatide (Tymlos [U.S.]) Aflibercept (Eylea) Amphotericin B (Abelcet, Fungizone) • Once open, may store at RT (68°F to 77°F • May store at RT (77°F [25°C]) for up to Anakinra (Kineret) [20°C to 25°C]) for up to 30 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonobese, Nonketotic Childhood Onset Diabetes: Look for Lipodystrophies Partha P
    CASE STUDIES Nonobese, Nonketotic Childhood Onset Diabetes: Look for Lipodystrophies Partha P. Chakraborty,1 Sayantan Ray,2 Subhodip Pramanik,2 Rana Bhattacharjee,2 Sujoy Ghosh,2 and Subhankar Chowdhury2 iabetes in children and youth agnosed as having type 2 diabetes (3). poses a unique diagnostic We describe here two patients with Dand therapeutic challenge. childhood-onset diabetes secondary Although type 1 and type 2 diabetes to congenital lipodystrophies and are undoubtedly the most frequently discuss their clinical and diagnostic encountered forms of diabetes, oth- features. er forms are not uncommon in this Case Presentations age-group. Many young patients with a so-called “specific types of diabetes Case 1 due to other causes” may be misdi- A 6-year-old girl born of a consan- agnosed as having type 1 or type 2 guineous union had been detected diabetes because of a lack of awareness to have diabetes while undergoing of the various diagnostic possibilities evaluation for failure to gain weight. (1). The group of patients with other She was placed on insulin by her pri- forms of diabetes constitutes <5% of mary care physician and referred to all patients diagnosed with diabetes us for unsatisfactory glycemic control before the age of 25 years and in- despite receiving a high dosage of in- cludes a variety of conditions (2). sulin (3.7 units/kg; total daily dose: Lipodystrophy, a group of disor- 52 units). She did not notice osmot- ders characterized by loss or abnormal ic symptoms and had no history of distribution of body fat, is associated hospitalization. Her birth weight was with insulin resistance and resul- 2.1 kg, and she had been unusually tant abnormal glucose homeostasis.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Formulary List of Covered Prescription Drugs
    2021 Formulary List of covered prescription drugs This drug list applies to all Individual HMO products and the following Small Group HMO products: Sharp Platinum 90 Performance HMO, Sharp Platinum 90 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Platinum 90 Premier HMO, Sharp Platinum 90 Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Gold 80 Performance HMO, Sharp Gold 80 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Gold 80 Premier HMO, Sharp Gold 80 Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 70 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 70 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 70 Premier HMO, Sharp Silver 70 Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 73 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 73 Premier HMO, Sharp Silver 87 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 87 Premier HMO, Sharp Silver 94 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 94 Premier HMO, Sharp Bronze 60 Performance HMO, Sharp Bronze 60 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Bronze 60 Premier HDHP HMO, Sharp Bronze 60 Premier HDHP HMO AI-AN, Sharp Minimum Coverage Performance HMO, Sharp $0 Cost Share Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp $0 Cost Share Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 70 Off Exchange Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 70 Off Exchange Premier HMO, Sharp Performance Platinum 90 HMO 0/15 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Platinum 90 HMO 0/20 + Child Dental, Sharp Performance Gold 80 HMO 350 /25 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Gold 80 HMO 250/35 + Child Dental, Sharp Performance Silver 70 HMO 2250/50 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Silver 70 HMO 2250/55 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Silver 70 HDHP HMO 2500/20% + Child Dental, Sharp Performance Bronze 60 HMO 6300/65 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Bronze 60 HDHP HMO
    [Show full text]
  • CDER List of Licensed Biological Products With
    Center for Drug Evaluation and Research List of Licensed Biological Products with (1) Reference Product Exclusivity and (2) Biosimilarity or Interchangeability Evaluations to Date DATE OF FIRST REFERENCE PRODUCT DATE OF LICENSURE LICENSURE EXCLUSIVITY EXPIRY DATE INTERCHANGEABLE (I)/ BLA STN PRODUCT (PROPER) NAME PROPRIETARY NAME (mo/day/yr) (mo/day/yr) (mo/day/yr) BIOSIMILAR (B) WITHDRAWN 125118 abatacept Orencia 12/23/05 NA NA 103575 abciximab ReoPro 12/22/94 NA NA Yes 125274 abobotulinumtoxinA Dysport 04/29/09 125057 adalimumab Humira 12/31/02 NA NA 761071 adalimumab-adaz Hyrimoz 10/30/18 B 761058 adalimumab-adbm Cyltezo 08/25/17 B 761118 adalimumab-afzb Abrilada 11/15/19 B 761024 adalimumab-atto Amjevita 09/23/16 B 761059 adalimumab-bwwd Hadlima 07/23/19 B 125427 ado-trastuzumab emtansine Kadcyla 02/22/13 125387 aflibercept Eylea 11/18/11 103979 agalsidase beta Fabrazyme 04/24/03 NA NA 125431 albiglutide Tanzeum 04/15/14 017835 albumin chromated CR-51 serum Chromalbin 02/23/76 103293 aldesleukin Proleukin 05/05/92 NA NA 103948 alemtuzumab Campath, Lemtrada 05/07/01 NA NA 125141 alglucosidase alfa Myozyme 04/28/06 NA NA 125291 alglucosidase alfa Lumizyme 05/24/10 125559 alirocumab Praluent 07/24/15 103172 alteplase, cathflo activase Activase 11/13/87 NA NA 103950 anakinra Kineret 11/14/01 NA NA 020304 aprotinin Trasylol 12/29/93 125513 asfotase alfa Strensiq 10/23/15 101063 asparaginase Elspar 01/10/78 NA NA 125359 asparaginase erwinia chrysanthemi Erwinaze 11/18/11 761034 atezolizumab Tecentriq 05/18/16 761049 avelumab Bavencio 03/23/17
    [Show full text]
  • WHO Drug Information Vol
    WHO Drug Information Vol. 28 No. 1, 2014 WHO Drug Information Contents Regulatory harmonization Strontium ranelate: further restrictions The International Generic Drug due to cardiovascular risks 25 Regulators Pilot 3 Methysergide-containing medicines: new WHO support for medicines regulatory restrictions 25 harmonization in Africa: focus on East African Community 11 Regulatory action and news Regulatory options in the fight against Technologies, standards and norms antimicrobial resistance 26 Standards for biological products 16 EMA and FDA collaborate on bioequivalence inspections 26 Safety and efficacy issues Tafenoquine receives FDA Breakthrough Combined hormonal contraceptives and Therapy designation 27 venous thromboembolism 21 Regulatory action against Ranbaxy’s Clobazam: serious skin reactions 21 Toansa facility 27 Amiodarone: pulmonary toxicity 21 WHO response to FDA findings at Methylphenidate: rare risk of long-lasting Ranbaxy’s Toansa site 27 erections in males 22 New partnership to strengthen regulatory Glibenclamide: risk of hypoglycaemia in systems 27 elderly and renal-impaired patients 22 Canada-US Common Electronic Subcutaneous epoetin alfa: Submissions Gateway 28 contraindicated in Singapore in chronic Updated guidance for annual strain kidney disease patients 22 change of seasonal influenza vaccines 28 Acipimox: only to be used as additional or EMA and FDA strengthen collaboration on alternative treatment 22 pharmacovigilance 28 Estradiol-containing creams: new European Medicines Agency publishes restrictions 23 first
    [Show full text]
  • List Item Applications for New Human Medicines Under Evaluation by The
    4 August 2017 EMA/506776/2017 Information Management Division Applications for new human medicines under evaluation by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use August 2017 This document lists information on applications for centralised marketing authorisation for human medicines that the European Medicines Agency has received for evaluation. It includes the international non-proprietary names (INN) and therapeutic areas for all new innovative medicines under evaluation by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). For generic and biosimilar medicines, it includes the INN (active moiety only, with no information on salt, ester or derivative) and therapeutic area. This list only includes information for medicines whose applications have been validated at the time the report was compiled. The information in this report was compiled on 4 August 2017. Information on designated orphan medicines that are being assessed for marketing authorisation is also available in the monthly reports of the Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP). Information in bold corresponds to new entries in the monthly list. Entries are removed from this list once the medicine has received a positive or negative opinion from the CHMP or when the applicant has withdrawn the application. The Agency publishes information on these opinions and withdrawn applications on its website. Information on CHMP opinions is also published in the monthly CHMP highlights. 30 Churchill Place ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 5EU ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2017 .
    [Show full text]
  • Insulin Glargine
    Insulin Glargine Special Alerts Insulin Pen Safety Alert October 2017 The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) National Medication Errors Reporting Program (MERP) has issued a safety alert regarding reports of patients incorrectly using insulin pens at home, resulting in severe cases of hyperglycemia. Patients were not removing the inner cover of a standard insulin pen needle prior to attempting to administer the insulin, and thus were not receiving insulin doses. Health care professionals should instruct patients on the proper use of insulin pens and require patient demonstration to verify understanding. They should also verify which pen needles patients will be using at home, either standard pens or pens with automatic needle retraction devices, and tailor instruction accordingly. More information can be found at http://www.ismp.org/NAN/files/NAN-20171012.pdf. Brand Names: US Basaglar KwikPen Lantus Lantus SoloStar Toujeo SoloStar Pharmacologic Category Insulin, Long-Acting Dosing: Adult Note: Insulin glargine is a long-acting insulin administered by SubQ injection. Insulin glargine is approximately equipotent to human insulin, but has a slower onset, no pronounced peak, and a longer duration of activity. Insulin requirements vary dramatically between patients and dictates frequent monitoring and close medical supervision. Diabetes mellitus, type 1: SubQ: Insulin glargine-specific dosing: Initial dose: Approximately one-third to one-half of the total daily insulin requirement administered once daily. A rapid-acting or short-acting
    [Show full text]
  • Myalepta, INN-Metreleptin
    31 May 2018 EMA/435156/2018 Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) Assessment report Myalepta International non-proprietary name: metreleptin Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/004218/0000 Note Assessment report as adopted by the CHMP with all information of a commercially confidential nature deleted. 30 Churchill Place ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 5EU ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5555 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2018. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Table of contents 1. Background information on the procedure ............................................... 8 1.1. Submission of the dossier ..................................................................................... 8 1.2. Steps taken for the assessment of the product ........................................................ 9 2. Scientific discussion ............................................................................... 11 2.1. Problem statement ............................................................................................. 11 2.1.1. Disease or condition ......................................................................................... 11 2.1.2. Epidemiology .................................................................................................. 11 2.1.3. Biologic features, aetiology and pathogenesis ...................................................... 11 2.1.4. Clinical
    [Show full text]