NORTHERN IRELAND, UNITED KINGDOM OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NORTHERN IRELAND, UNITED KINGDOM OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education NORTHERN IRELAND, UNITED KINGDOM OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment Contents in Education Chapter 1. Schooling in Northern Ireland Chapter 2. Evaluation and assessment framework Chapter 3. Student assessment NORTHERN IRELAND, Chapter 4. Teacher appraisal Chapter 5. School evaluation UNITED KINGDOM OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education Chapter 6. System evaluation Claire Shewbridge, Marian Hulshof, Deborah Nusche and Lars Stenius Staehr www.oecd.org/edu/evaluationpolicy NORTHERN IRELAND, UNITED KINGDOM UNITED IRELAND, NORTHERN Consult this publication on line at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264207707-en. This work is published on the OECD iLibrary, which gathers all OECD books, periodicals and statistical databases. Visit www.oecd-ilibrary.org for more information. ISBN 978-92-64-20769-1 91 2013 10 1 P 9HSTCQE*cahgjb+ OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom Claire Shewbridge, Marian Hulshof, Deborah Nusche and Lars Stenius Staehr This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Please cite this publication as: Shewbridge, C. et al. (2014), OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264207707-en ISBN 978-92-64-20769-1 (print) ISBN 978-92-64-20770-7 (PDF) Series: OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education ISSN 2223-0947 (print) ISSN 2223-0955 (online) The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. Photo credits: Cover © iQoncept - Fotolia.com, © AKS - Fotolia.com, © Sergej Khackimullin - Fotolia.com. Corrigenda to OECD publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/publishing/corrigenda. © OECD 2014 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of the source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d'exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at [email protected]. FOREWORD – 3 Foreword This report for Northern Ireland forms part of the OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes (see Annex A). The purpose of the Review is to explore how systems of evaluation and assessment can be used to improve the quality, equity and efficiency of school education. The Review looks at pupil assessment, teacher appraisal, school leader appraisal, school evaluation and system evaluation, and how these help to improve pupils’ learning. Northern Ireland’s involvement in the OECD Review was co-ordinated by Karen McCullough at the Standards and Improvement Team, Department of Education. Northern Ireland opted to participate in the country review strand of the international project and host a visit by an external review team. Members of the OECD review team were Claire Shewbridge (OECD Secretariat), co-ordinator of the review; Marian Hulshof (programme manager of Research and Development within the Dutch Inspectorate of Education, Netherlands); Deborah Nusche (OECD Secretariat); and Lars Stenius Staehr (Project Manager at Novo Nordisk and testing consultant for the Danish Ministry of Education, Denmark) (see Annex C). This publication is the report from the OECD review team. It provides, from an international perspective, an independent analysis of major issues facing the evaluation and assessment framework in Northern Ireland, current policy initiatives, and possible future approaches. The report serves three purposes: (1) provide insights and advice to the Northern Ireland authorities; (2) help other OECD countries understand Northern Ireland's approach; and (3) improve the international knowledge on evaluation and assessment policies. Although the final comparative report of the project was published in April 2013, evidence collected and analysis conducted during the review visit to Northern Ireland fed into the international report. An important part of Northern Ireland’s involvement was the preparation of a Country Background Report (CBR) on evaluation and assessment policy developed by Carl Savage and Dale Heaney at the Department of Education. The OECD review team is grateful to the authors and to all those who assisted them for compiling a high quality and informative report as background to the review and analysis. The CBR is an important output from the OECD project in its own right as well as an important source for the OECD review team. Unless indicated otherwise, the data for this report are taken from the Northern Ireland CBR. The CBR follows guidelines prepared by the OECD Secretariat and provides extensive information, analysis and discussion in regard to the national context, the organisation of the school system, the main features of the evaluation and assessment framework and the views of key stakeholders. In this sense, the CBR and this report complement each other and, for a more comprehensive view of evaluation and assessment in Northern Ireland, should be read in conjunction. The review visit to Northern Ireland took place between 26 February and 5 March 2013. The itinerary is provided in Annex B. The visit was designed by the OECD in collaboration with the Department of Education. During the review visit, the team held discussions with a wide range of officials within the Department of Education, including OECD REVIEWS OF EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION: NORTHERN IRELAND, UNITED KINGDOM © OECD 2014 4 – FOREWORD the Education and Training Inspectorate; the Council for Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment; school support providers; teacher educators; teacher and school principal representatives; civil society organisations; and researchers with an interest in evaluation and assessment issues. The team also visited a range of schools, interacting with representatives of the Board of Governors, school leadership, teachers, students and parents in Belfast and its surrounds and also in Derry. The intention was to provide a broad cross-section of information and opinions on evaluation and assessment policies and how their effectiveness can be improved. The OECD review team wishes to express its sincere gratitude to all those who took time to meet with us and to share their insights. Our overwhelming memory is of a warm welcome wherever we went and frank, open, constructive and stimulating discussions. We wish to thank the Department of Education for meeting our challenging demands to organise a review visit that allowed us to learn different perspectives from many different stakeholders (see Annex B). In particular, we warmly thank Karen McCullough, Katrina Godfrey, Suzanne Kingon and Paul McAllister for accompanying us at different stages of the review, making sure that everything ran like clockwork and allowing us to concentrate on learning from the people we met. The courtesy and hospitality extended to us throughout our stay in Northern Ireland made our task as a review team as pleasant and enjoyable as it was stimulating and challenging. In particular, during the OECD review, we asked all stakeholders to provide us with information and evidence on assessment and evaluation practices in Northern Ireland. We wish to extend particular thanks to all those who chose to do so and to send research and information on practices to us during and after the review visit. This vast information base formed a rich resource and helped the OECD review team to develop a deeper understanding of evaluation and assessment in Northern Ireland. While our report may not refer explicitly to some of this material, it was invaluable in underpinning our initial analysis. Any misunderstandings or misinterpretations are entirely our responsibility. The OECD review team is also grateful to Liz Zachary for editorial and publication support on this report and to Heike-Daniela Herzog for administrative support. This report is organised in six chapters. Chapter 1 provides the national context, with information on Northern Ireland’s school system, main trends and concerns, and recent developments. Chapter 2 looks at the overall evaluation and assessment framework and analyses how the different components of the framework play together and can be made more coherent to effectively improve student learning. Chapters 3 to 6 present each of the components of the evaluation and assessment framework – pupil assessment, teacher appraisal, school evaluation and
Recommended publications
  • Policing in Divided Societies: a Comparative Study Between Northern Irish and Lebanese Police Experiences
    LEBANESE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY Policing in Divided Societies: A Comparative Study between Northern Irish and Lebanese Police Experiences By Amr Khaled Yafawi A thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Affairs School of Arts and Sciences September 2013 ii ii iii iii iv iv v vi Policing in Divided Societies: A Comparative Study between Northern Irish and Lebanese Police Experiences Amr Yafawi Abstract This thesis compares models of policing in divided societies as applied in Lebanon and Northern Ireland and highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each. This is particularly significant due to the fact that both Lebanon and Northern Ireland have been challenged in their law enforcement abilities while confronted by a fragmented sectarian politics. Communal perception of law enforcement practices are typically shaped by strong sectarian biases that often undermine the effective application of the law. The thesis explores the reasons why the police force in Lebanon has not been able to gain public confidence. Comparative public opinion data from both countries are collected and analyzed. Results suggest that enhancing public confidence in Lebanese police force and strengthening positive public perception in the country‟s law enforcement agencies require strong communal interventions .Lessons drawn from the Northern Irish experience and analysis of Lebanese public opinion data suggest that in a post-conflict situation Community Oriented Policing (COP)needs to be combined with Problem Oriented Policing (POP) as a transitional approach that can strengthen community-police relations. This conclusion has been further confirmed by a series of interviews completed with chief police officers in both countries.
    [Show full text]
  • References.Pdf
    References Audit Commission (2006). Higher Standards, Better Schools for All: More Choice for Parents and Pupils [Department for Education and Skills Consultation Response January 2006) [online]. Available: http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/Products/ NATIONAL-REPORT/FC8B4B31-C278-4987-8EFA-DA0F2C20A6DB/ ACResponseHigherStandardsBetterSchoolsforAll.pdf [29 March, 2007]. Brettingham, M. (2006). ‘Hare Krishna school angers Hindus’, Times Educational Supplement, 4714, 8 December, 3. Communities and Local Government (2004). Community Cohesion Education Stan- dards for Schools [online]. Available: http://www.communities.gov.uk/pub/613/ CommunityCohesionEducationStandardsforSchools_id1502613.pdf [5 April, 2007]. Curtis, P. (2005). ‘MPs to publish alternative white paper’, Guardian Unlimited, 14 December [online]. Available: http://education.guardian.co.uk/admissions/story/ 0,,1667203,00.html [29 March, 2007]. Department for Education and Employment (2004). The Protection of School Playing Fields and Land for Academies [online]. Available: http://publications.teachernet. gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/1017-2004DOC-EN-01.doc [3 April, 2007]. Department for Education and Skills (2001). Special Educational Needs Code of Practice [online]. Available: http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/_doc/3724/SENCodeOf- Practice.pdf [5 April, 2007]. Department for Education and Skills (2005a). A Single Inspectorate for Children and Learners: the Government’s Response to Consultation [online]. Available: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/consultations/downloadableDocs/SingleInspect4Children.p df [29 March, 2007]. Department for Education and Skills (2005b). Youth Matters (Cm 6629). London: The Stationery Office. Department for Education and Skills (2006a). Johnson Announces Multi-Million Pound Package to Improve School Food and Fight Childhood Obesity (DfES Press Notice 2006/0121) [online]. Available: http://www.dfes.gov.uk/pns/DisplayPN.cgi? pn_id=2006_0121 [5 April, 2007].
    [Show full text]
  • Home to School Travel and Transport Guidance Statutory Guidance for Local Authorities
    Home to school travel and transport guidance Statutory guidance for local authorities July 2014 Contents Summary 5 Review date 5 What legislation (including statutory instruments) does this guidance refer to? 5 Who is this guidance for? 5 Main points 6 Local authorities’ statutory duties 6 Part 1 - Statutory duties 7 1.1 Sustainable school travel 7 Assessing the travel and transport needs of children and young people 7 Audit of infrastructure to support sustainable school travel 8 Strategy to develop infrastructure to support travel needs of pupils 8 Promoting sustainable travel and transport to and from school 9 Publication of Sustainable Modes of Travel Strategy 9 1.2 Provision of travel arrangements 9 1.3 Provision of travel arrangements: Eligible children 10 Statutory walking distances eligibility 10 Special educational needs, a disability or mobility problems eligibility 10 Unsafe route eligibility 11 Extended rights eligibility 11 Accompaniment 11 Assessing route safety 12 Measurement of routes 12 Timing of assessment of eligibility 12 Qualifying school 13 Travel arrangements made by the local authority or other bodies/persons 13 Suitability of arrangements 14 Part 2 - Discretionary Arrangements 16 Travel arrangements for other children 16 Religion or belief 16 Part 3 - Transport Considerations 18 2 Safeguarding requirements 18 Training and Equalities 18 Bus safety considerations 18 Poor behaviour on school buses/other modes of transport 19 Partnership 19 Part 4 – Policy Changes 20 Publication of general arrangements and policies
    [Show full text]
  • BASELINE REPORT Social Wellbeing February 2017
    BASELINE REPORT Social Wellbeing February 2017 Love Living Please Note Some of the data in this document is sourced from sample survey data. Data from a sample survey means that the whole population of Northern Ireland has not been asked. Therefore, when looking at the figures, the confidence intervals/ranges associated with the figures should be noted. A confidence interval represents the range of values in which the true population value is likely to lie. It is based on the sample estimate and the confidence level. Example: For example, the employment rate for Antrim and Newtownabbey Borough Council in 2015 was estimated to be 70.7%. This figure had a stated 95% confidence interval of +/- 5.8 percentage points. This means that we would expect that in 95% of samples, the true employment rate for 2015 for Antrim and Newtownabbey Borough Council was between 64.9% and 76.5%. Also, due to some of the small numbers presented in some of the sub-categories, some caution should be taken when interpreting the figures. Analysis by Local Government District In most of the datasets used, individual records are attributed to Local Government Districts on the basis of their postcode. However, in some cases the postcode may be missing/invalid and cannot be assigned to a Local Government District but are included in the Northern Ireland totals. As an example, in the School Leavers data (Department of Education), approximately 0.6% of pupils have incomplete or missing postcode information. Therefore, the sum of the School Leavers in each of the Local Government Districts in 2014/15 is 22,224 pupils.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulsterbus Newtownabbey & Carrickfergus Schools 163H
    Ulsterbus Newtownabbey & Carrickfergus Schools 163H Monday to Friday Ref.No.: 9091 Commencing Date: 02/09/2019 Depot Code 41 41 Crew Duty Number 41042405 Journey/ETM Nos. 15421545 Service No 163H 163H Sch CW Downshire High School Carrickfergus 15429 ...... Whitehead, Rail Station 1557 ...... Carrickfergus, Joymount ...... 1545 Greenisland, Station Road ...... 1554 Greenisland Estate ...... 1559 Circular Road ...... 1608 Belfast, Castle Junction ...... 1631 Belfast, Laganside Buscentre ...... 1633 CW - Schoolday Wednesdays Only 9 -School Bus 9 sept 2019 Ulsterbus Newtownabbey & Carrickfergus Schools 163H Monday to Friday Ref.No.: 9091 Commencing Date: 02/09/2019 Depot Code 41 41 Crew Duty Number 41074123 Journey/ETM Nos. 07550805 Service No 163H163H Sch Sch Ballycarry, Village 0755 ...... Larne Road 0757 ...... Slaughterford Road 0759 ...... Whitehead, Rail Station 08050805 Downshire High School Carrickfergus ...... 0823 Victoria Road ...... 0824 Prince Andrew Way, Victoria Road ...... 0825 North Road ...... 0827 Carrickfergus High School ...... 0828 sept 2019 Ulsterbus Newtownabbey & Carrickfergus Schools 165H Monday to Friday Ref.No.: 9091 Commencing Date: 02/09/2019 Depot Code 41 41 41 Crew Duty Number 240224022422 Journey/ETM Nos. 084008200825 Service No 165H 165H 165H Sch Sch Sch Straid Walk, Bus Stop ...... 08200825 Oakfield Drive ...... 0821 ...... Milebush Corner, Bus Stop ...... 0823 ...... North Road ...... 0824 ...... Glenfield, Estate ...... ...... 0826 Castlemeadows ...... ...... 0828 Copperwood ...... ...... 0829 Middle Road
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Government for BIA Members
    A guide to the Government for BIA members Correct as of 26 June 2020 This is a briefing for BIA members on the Government led by Boris Johnson and key ministerial appointments for our sector after the December 2019 General Election and February 2020 Cabinet reshuffle. Following the Conservative Party’s compelling victory, the Government now holds a majority of 80 seats in the House of Commons. The life sciences sector is high on the Government’s agenda and Boris Johnson has pledged to make the UK “the leading global hub for life sciences after Brexit”. With its strong majority, the Government has the power to enact the policies supportive of the sector in the Conservatives 2019 Manifesto. All in all, this indicates a positive outlook for life sciences during this Government’s tenure. Contents: Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector .......................................................................................... 2 Ministers and policy maker profiles................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector* *Please note that this guide only covers ministers and responsibilities relevant to the life sciences and will be updated as further roles and responsibilities are announced. Department Position Holder Relevant responsibility Holder in
    [Show full text]
  • Young Men's Experiences of Violence and Crime in a Society Emerging
    Young men’s experiences of violence and crime in a society emerging from conflict Walsh, C., & Schubotz, D. (Accepted/In press). Young men’s experiences of violence and crime in a society emerging from conflict. Journal of Youth Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1636012 Published in: Journal of Youth Studies Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2019 Taylor and Francis This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:02. Oct. 2021 Young men’s experiences of violence and crime in a society emerging from conflict Abstract Previous studies have consistently established young men’s over representation in the criminal justice system particularly in relation to interpersonal violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Notes for Education Committee 15 October 2014 Colin
    Briefing Notes for Education Committee 15th October 2014 Colin Knox and Vani Borooah Definitions Difference between shared education and integrated education: Shared Education Shared Education encompasses a number of different types of sharing, from projects and shared classes through to shared education models, such as those defined in the Bain report (eg: Federations/Confederations; Shared Campus and Shared Faith schools). Under Article 64 (1) of The Education Reform (NI) Order 1989, integrated education is defined as “the education together at school of Protestant and Roman Catholic pupils (Minister of Education) The Terms of Reference for the Ministerial Advisory Group on Advancing Shared Education defined Shared Education as: The organisation and delivery of education so that it: meets the needs of, and provides for the education together of, learners from all Section 75 categories and socio-economic status; involves schools and other education providers of differing ownership, sectoral identity and ethos, management type or governance arrangements; and delivers educational benefits to learners, promotes the efficient and effective use of resources, and promotes equality of opportunity, good relations, equality of identity, respect for diversity and community cohesion (MAG Report) By its nature, Shared Education involves more than one school type. This view has been endorsed by the Ministerial Advisory Group, which further refined the definition to “...involves two or more schools or other education institutions from different sectors
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Governors' Report 2018
    BOARD OF GOVERNORS’ REPORT 2018-19 _______________________________________ Belfast High School November 2019 CONTENTS Chairman’s Foreword Board of Governors’ Discharge of Function in Relation to the School Membership of the Board of Governors 2018-19 Ethos and Vision of Belfast High School Enrolment, Admissions and Attendance School Activities/Pupil Achievements Examination Results 2018-19 School Leavers’ Destinations 2018-19 Curriculum Pastoral Care, Safeguarding and SEN Security of Pupils, Staff and Premises Links with the Community Financial Statement School Development Days 2018-19 School Policies 2 Chairman’s Foreword As Chairperson of the Board of Governors of Belfast High School, it is my pleasure and privilege to introduce the school’s annual report for the academic year 2018-19. We live in a world that is constantly changing – when will Brexit happen, will Brexit happen, and what will the consequences be. Most of us use technology that even a few years ago would have seemed beyond our imagination and if we stop to think for a moment what the world will look like in 2026 when our current Year 8 pupils finish their time in Belfast High School it can become a little frightening. It is therefore more important than ever that we continue to provide our pupils with the best possible education both in the classroom and through the many and varied extra-curricular activities which Belfast High School provides, and I hope as you read this report you will be inspired as we celebrate many of the achievements of our pupils over the past year. As well as constant change all schools continue to operate under severe financial pressure and we would like to thank all the staff for their commitment to the school in these challenging times and their continuing desire to provide our pupils with the best possible opportunity for them to reach their full potential and their aspiration to instil in each pupil the determination to strive in all activities, academic and otherwise, to achieve his or her own level of excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Knows No Borders
    TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM TERRORISM KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS KNOWS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS NO BORDERS October 2019 his is a special initiative for SEFF to be associated with, it is one part of a three part overall Project which includes; the production of a Book and DVD Twhich captures the testimonies and experiences of well over 20 innocent victims and survivors of terrorism from across Great Britain and The Republic of Ireland. The Project title; ‘Terrorism knows NO Borders’ aptly illustrates the broader point that we are seeking to make through our involvement in this work, namely that in the context of Northern Ireland terrorism and criminal violence was not curtailed to Northern Ireland alone but rather that individuals, families and communities experienced its’ impacts across the United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland and beyond these islands. This Memorial Quilt Project does not claim to represent the totality of lives lost across Great Britain and The Republic of Ireland but rather seeks to provide some understanding of the sacrifices paid by communities, families and individuals who have been victimised by ‘Republican’ or ‘Loyalist’ terrorism. SEFF’s ethos means that we are not purely concerned with victims/survivors who live within south Fermanagh or indeed the broader County.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Non-Executive Director – Department for Education
    Lead Non-Executive Director – Department for Education Introduction The Department for Education’s (DfE) aim is to ensure world-class education and care that allows every child and young person to reach his or her potential, regardless of background. Over the next four years, the Department is leading an ambitious and wide-ranging programme of reform across early years, schools, 16-19, and children’s social care, building on and extending the changes of the last Parliament. We are expanding the academies and free school programme to empower professionals on the frontline, reforming the curriculum and qualifications so that they represent an international gold standard, and ensuring that young people leave school with the knowledge, skills and resilience to succeed in modern Britain. At the same time we are reforming adoption, fostering and children’s services so that they work quickly and effectively to transform the life chances of the most vulnerable and disadvantaged young people. These changes set a challenge for the organisation itself. We delivered significant organisational change in 2010-15 and halved administrative expenditure in real terms over this period. With substantial resources allocated to our priorities in the 2015 spending review, our focus for 2015-20 is on ensuring the Department has the capability and capacity it needs to implement the Government’s strategic priorities. Setting the right conditions for success in education and children’s services means becoming increasingly effective in how we deliver reform: transforming the way we go about our work in order to help leaders in the education and social care systems do likewise.
    [Show full text]
  • Spending Review 2010: List of Abbreviations
    List of Abbreviations AARG Average Annual Real Growth ACR Administrative Costs Regime ALB Arms Length Body AME Annually Managed Expenditure AV Alternative Vote BBA British Bankers’ Association BIS Department for Business, Innovation and Skills BSF Building Schools for the Future CDEL Capital Departmental Expenditure Limit CJS Criminal Justice System CLG Department for Communities and Local Government CPI Consumer Prices Index CPS Crown Prosecution Service CRB Criminal Records Bureau CRC Carbon Reduction Commitment CTC Child Tax Credit DAs Devolved Administrations DCMS Department for Culture, Media and Sport DECC Department of Energy and Climate Change DEFRA Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs DEL Departmental Expenditure Limit DFE Department for Education DFID Department for International Development DFT Department for Transport DH Department of Health DLA Disability Living Allowance DWP Department for Work and Pensions ECGD Export Credits Guarantee Department EMA Educational Maintenance Allowance ERDF European Regional Development Fund ERG Efficiency and Reform Group ESA Employment and Support Allowance EYF End Year Flexibility FCO Foreign and Commonwealth Office FE Further Education GAD Government Actuary’s Department GDP Gross Domestic Product GNI Gross National Income GP General Practitioner Spending Review 2010 101 HA Highways Agency HE Higher Education HMRC Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs IMF International Monetary Fund IPSPC Independent Public Service Pension Commission LDA London Development Agency LEPs Local Employment
    [Show full text]