International Dimension of Democratization? the Influence of the European Union on the Consolidation of Democracy in Turkey 1987-2002

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

International Dimension of Democratization? the Influence of the European Union on the Consolidation of Democracy in Turkey 1987-2002 INTERNATIONAL DIMENSION OF DEMOCRATIZATION? THE INFLUENCE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ON THE CONSOLIDATION OF DEMOCRACY IN TURKEY 1987-2002 The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by ALİ RESUL USUL In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION in THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA May 2003 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and Public Administration. --------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Ergun Özbudun Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and Public Administration. --------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Ahmet Davutoğlu Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and Public Administration. --------------------------------- Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet İçduygu Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and Public Administration. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Dr. Ömer Faruk Gençkaya Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and Public Administration. --------------------------------- Assist. Prof. Dr. Ersel Aydınlı Examining Committee Member Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences --------------------------------- Prof. Dr. Kürşat Aydoğan Director ABSTRACT INTERNATIONAL DIMENSION OF DEMOCRATIZATION? THE INFLUENCE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ON THE CONSOLIDATION OF DEMOCRACY IN TURKEY 1987-2002 Usul, Ali Resul Ph.D., Department of Political Science and Public Administration Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ergun Özbudun May 2003 This thesis analyzes the European Union (EU)-Turkey relations with regard to democracy and human rights and particularly the EU’s impact on the consolidation of democracy in Turkey. Democracy in the Turkey has not been adequately consolidated. The problem of Turkish democracy is the problem of democratic consolidation in Turkey. In the thesis, I propose that the EU promotes Turkish democracy when it provides a full membership perspective to Turkey. In other words, the degree and nature EU’s influence on Turkish polity and politics is correlated with question of whether the EU gives Turkey a real membership perspective. In this respect, I have compared three significant periods of the EU-Turkey relations regarding democratic consolidation in Turkey. The EU’s impact in the first two periods was limited and quite modest in its nature. The EU has been an active leverage in the post-Helsinki period. In the post-Helsinki period, the pre-accession mechanism have made Turkey more vulnerable to the EU’s requirements and it has justified the EU’s interventions into Turkey’s domestic politics, which had been often regarded as breach of Turkey’s sovereignty in the pre-Helsinki period. Thus, domestic/international-internal/external differentiation in the context of EU-Turkey relations has become less salient within the post-Helsinki period. As far as the active leverage function of the EU is concerned, the EU’s impact had been mostly on the Constitutional level of consolidation in the period between 1987 and 2002. Keywords: Turkey, European Union, Turkey-European Union, Turkish Politics, democratization iii ÖZET DEMOKRATİKLEŞMENİN ULUSLARARASI BOYUTU? AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NİN TÜRKİYE’DE DEMOKRASİNİN PEKİŞMESİNE ETKİSİ 1987-2002 Usul, Ali Resul Doktora, Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Prof. Dr. Ergun Özbudun Mayıs 2003 Bu tez, demokrasi ve insan hakları bağlamında Avrupa Birliği (AB)-Türkiye ilişkilerini, özellikle de AB’nin Türk demokrasinin pekişmesindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Türkiye’deki demokrasi yeterinde pekişmiş değildir. Türk demokrasisinin sorunu esasen demokrasinin pekişmesi sorunudur. Bu tezde, Türkiye’ye tam üyelik perspektifi verildiği takdirde, AB’nin Türk demokrasisinin gelişmesine yardımcı olduğu iddia edilmektedir. Diğer bir ifade ile, AB’nin Türk politikasına etkisinin niteliği ve miktarı AB’nin Türkiye’ye tam üyelik perspektifi verip vermediği ile ilişkilidir. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’deki demokratik pekişmeyle ilgili olarak, AB-Türkiye ilişkilerinin üç önemli dönemi kıyaslanmıştır. AB’nin etkisi ilk iki dönemde sınırlı ve tabiatı itibarı ile oldukça mütevazidir. AB, Helsinki sonrası dönemde aktif bir manivela fonksiyonu görmüştür. Helsinki sonrası dönemde, giriş öncesi mekanizma, Türkiye’yi AB’nin istekleri konusunda daha korunmazsız hale getirirken, Helsinki öncesi dönemde, Türkiye’nin egemenliğinin ihlali olarak değerlendirilen AB’nin Türk siyasetine müdahalelerini meşrulaştırmıştır. Böylece, Helsinki sonrası dönemde, AB-Türkiye ilişkileri bağlamında iç siyaset-dış siyaset ayırımı da daha az önemli hale gelmiştir. AB’nin aktif manivela fonksiyonu söz konusu olduğunda, 1987-2002 döneminde, AB’nin etkisi pekişmenin daha fazla anayasal boyutunda olmuştur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Türkiye, Avrupa Birliği, Türkiye-Avrupa Birliği İlişkileri, Türk Siyaseti, demokratikleşme iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply grateful to many people for their invaluable encouragements and supports, without which the thesis would not have been successfully completed. In this regard, I would like to take the opportunity to thank first to my supervisor Professor Ergun Özbudun for encouraging the writing of the thesis from the start. Professor Özbudun has always supported my academic studies since I joined the graduate program of the department of Political Science, Bilkent University, in 1994. Therefore, my special gratitude goes to him. I wish in particular to express our appreciation to Ahmet Davutoğlu, Ahmet İçduydu, Ömer Faruk Gençkaya, Ersel Aydınlı and Jeremy Salt for their valuable comments and suggestions regarding the thesis that provided me very important insights particularly for my further studies in this subject. Finally, my deepest appreciation goes to my wife, Kevser, for her constant support and patience. v TABLE OF CONTENT ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………………… iii ÖZET …………………………………………………………………………………….. .iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………….. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………….. .. vi LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………...xi INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………….. ..1 The Aimed Contributions of the Thesis to the Field …………………………………….… 8 Methodology ………………………………………………………………………………. 9 CHAPTER I: DEMOCRACY AND DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION ……………... 11 1.1 The Conceptualization of Democracy ………………………………………………… 11 1.2 Democratization and Democratic Consolidation ……………………………………… 18 1.2.1 The Conceptualization of Democratic Consolidation ……………………………….. 20 1.2.1.1 Political Institutionalization ……………………………………………………….. 24 1.2.1.1.1 Stateness and Its Significance regarding Democratic Consolidation …………… 27 1.2.1.1.2 The Rule of Law and Consolidation …………………………………………….. 27 1.2.1.1.3 Party Institutionalization ………………………………………………………… 28 1.2.1.2 The Behavioural Consolidation …………………………………………………… 33 1.2.1.3.1 The Attitudinal Consolidation: Political Culture and Legitimacy ………………. 35 1.2.1.3.2 Legitimacy and Democratic Consolidation ……………………………………… 38 1.2.1.4 Civil Society and Democratic Consolidation ……………………………………… 40 1.2.1.5 Economy and Democratic Consolidation ………………………………………….. 47 1.3 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………... 50 vi CHAPTER II: INTERNATIONAL DIMENSION OF DEMOCRATIZATION ………… 53 2. 1 Democratization and International Aspect …………………………………………… 53 2.2 Unscrambling The International Context ……………………………………………... 55 2.2.1 Background Variables ………………………………………………………………. 56 2.2.2 External Actors ……………………………………………………………………… 58 2.2.2.1 Transnational Actors, INGOs, Advocate Networks, Epistemic Communities …… 59 2.2.3 Forms of External Influence …………………………………………………………62 2.3 International Impact and Domestic Response …………………………………………66 2.3.1 Conditionality and Its Effectiveness ………………………………………………... 67 2.4 Conclusion: Towards International Politics of Democratic Consolidation ……………80 CHAPTER III: THE EU’S HUMAN RIGHTS POLICIES IN ITS EXTERNAL RELATIONS AND DEMOCRATIC CONDITIONALITY ………………83 3.1 EU’s Human Rights Policies Regarding Its External Relations ………………………83 3.1.2 Human Rights And Democracy in the Main Legal Texts …………………………...84 3.1.3 EU’s Increasing Consideration Over Human Rights And Democracy in its Relation with Third Countries……………………………………………………….86 3.1.4 Human Rights Clauses in EU Legislation …………………………………………...89 3.1.5 The New Human Rights Regulations ……………………………………………….93 3.1.6 Financial Assistance ………………………………………………………………...94 3.1.7 The Other EU Instruments and Initiatives in Relations with Third Countries………95 3.2 European Union’s Democratic Conditionality and ‘Democracy by Convergence’…...97 3.3 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………106 CHAPTER IV: DEMOCRACY IN TURKEY…………………………………………..109 vii 4.1 The Basic Characteristics of Turkish Democracy …………………………………..109 4.2 Strong State Tradition ……………………………………………………………….110
Recommended publications
  • Turkey-Leyla Zana Appeal-Trial Observer-Report-2004
    INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION OF JURISTS Commission internationale de juristes - Comisión Internacional de Juristas " dedicated since 1952 to the primacy, coherence and implementation of international law and principles that advance human rights " REPORT OF THE APPEAL OF LEYLA ZANA AND THREE OTHER KURDISH FORMER PARLIAMENTARIANS Before THE COURT OF CASSATION, ANKARA on 8 July 2004 14 July 2004 October 2004 A report published by the International Commission of Jurists’ (ICJ) Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers (CIJL) Geneva, Switzerland International Commission of Jurists, 81A, avenue de Châtelaine, P.O. Box 216, 1219 Châtelaine, Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41(0) 22 979 3800 – Fax: +41(0) 22 979 3801 – Website: http://www.icj.org - E-mail: [email protected] ICJ/CIJL Report of the Appeal of Leyla Zana and Three Other Kurdish Former Parliamentarians before Ankara’s Court of Cassation TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................... 3 II. Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 5 III. Legal Framework .............................................................................................................................. 7 IV. The Appeal Hearing .......................................................................................................................... 7 (1) The Layout of the Court ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Is Turkey's Foreign Policy Moving East?
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO Senior Honors Theses Undergraduate Showcase 12-2013 Is Turkey’s Foreign Policy Moving East? James Brodie LeBlue University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/honors_theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation LeBlue, James Brodie, "Is Turkey’s Foreign Policy Moving East?" (2013). Senior Honors Theses. 50. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/honors_theses/50 This Honors Thesis-Unrestricted is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Honors Thesis-Unrestricted in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Honors Thesis-Unrestricted has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Is Turkey’s Foreign Policy Moving East? An Honors Thesis Presented to the Department of Political Science of the University of New Orleans In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts, with University Honors and Honors in Political Science by James Brodie LeBlue December 2013 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank the incredible support system of friends and family for getting me through not only the last four years of undergrad, but also the times in writing this thesis when I thought I was just moments away from ripping my hair out because of constant rewrites.
    [Show full text]
  • Could Turkey's New Parties Change the Political Balance?
    POLICY BRIEF EUROPE IN THE WORLD PROGRAMME 13 MARCH 2020 Could Turkey’s new parties Amanda Paul Senior Policy Analyst European Policy Centre change the Demir Murat Seyrek Senior Policy Advisor political balance? European Foundation for Democracy New political trends are unfolding in Turkey. Recently of these two parties, coupled with the success of the established political parties have raised hopes for change opposition in the 2019 municipal elections, shows that in the country, impacting the political balance between Turkish democracy is not dead and buried. The EU must the government and the opposition. While this is not a continue to engage with and support those that are foregone conclusion, it is a development worth watching fighting for democratic change. closely, including for the EU. The Justice and Development Party (AKP) has dominated BACKGROUND – DWINDLING AKP SUPPORT Turkish politics for over 17 years. Nevertheless, with mounting domestic headaches and a moribund economy, Just at the time when Erdoğan consolidated power the AKP seems to be running out of steam. Support for through the adoption of an executive presidential system, the party is at an all-time low, while President Recep following the 2017 constitutional referendum, he lost Tayyip Erdoğan’s popularity is also in decline. the ability to rule without alliances, due to the need for an absolute majority to be elected. That forced the AKP, which until 2017 did not need political alliances, to join forces with Devlet Bahçeli’s Nationalist Movement Party Turkish democracy is not dead and (MHP) and form the People’s Alliance. buried. The EU must continue to engage This alliance was successful in securing victory in both and support those that are fighting for the constitutional referendum and subsequent 2018 democratic change.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurdish Institute of Paris Bulletin N° 414 September 2019
    INSTITUT KURDDE PARIS E Information and liaison bulletin N° 414 SEPTEMBER 2019 The publication of this Bulletin enjoys a subsidy from the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Ministry of Culture This bulletin is issued in French and English Price per issue : France: 6 € — Abroad : 7,5 € Annual subscribtion (12 issues) France : 60 € — Elsewhere : 75 € Monthly review Directeur de la publication : Mohamad HASSAN ISBN 0761 1285 INSTITUT KURDE, 106, rue La Fayette - 75010 PARIS Tel. : 01-48 24 64 64 - Fax : 01-48 24 64 66 www.fikp.org E-mail: bulletin@fikp.org Information and liaison bulletin Kurdish Institute of Paris Bulletin N° 414 September 2019 • TURKEY: DESPITE SOME ACQUITTALS, STILL MASS CONVICTIONS.... • TURKEY: MANY DEMONSTRATIONS AFTER FURTHER DISMISSALS OF HDP MAYORS • ROJAVA: TURKEY CONTINUES ITS THREATS • IRAQ: A CONSTITUTION FOR THE KURDISTAN REGION? • IRAN: HIGHLY CONTESTED, THE REGIME IS AGAIN STEPPING UP ITS REPRESSION TURKEY: DESPITE SOME ACQUITTALS, STILL MASS CONVICTIONS.... he Turkish govern- economist. The vice-president of ten points lower than the previ- ment is increasingly the CHP, Aykut Erdoğdu, ous year, with the disagreement embarrassed by the recalled that the Istanbul rate rising from 38 to 48%. On economic situation. Chamber of Commerce had esti- 16, TurkStat published unem- T The TurkStat Statistical mated annual inflation at ployment figures for June: 13%, Institute reported on 2 22.55%. The figure of the trade up 2.8%, or 4,253,000 unem- September that production in the union Türk-İş is almost identical. ployed. For young people aged previous quarter fell by 1.5% HDP MP Garo Paylan ironically 15 to 24, it is 24.8%, an increase compared to the same period in said: “Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 'A Reign of Terror'
    ‘A Reign of Terror’ CUP Rule in Diyarbekir Province, 1913-1923 Uğur Ü. Üngör University of Amsterdam, Department of History Master’s thesis ‘Holocaust and Genocide Studies’ June 2005 ‘A Reign of Terror’ CUP Rule in Diyarbekir Province, 1913-1923 Uğur Ü. Üngör University of Amsterdam Department of History Master’s thesis ‘Holocaust and Genocide Studies’ Supervisors: Prof. Johannes Houwink ten Cate, Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies Dr. Karel Berkhoff, Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies June 2005 2 Contents Preface 4 Introduction 6 1 ‘Turkey for the Turks’, 1913-1914 10 1.1 Crises in the Ottoman Empire 10 1.2 ‘Nationalization’ of the population 17 1.3 Diyarbekir province before World War I 21 1.4 Social relations between the groups 26 2 Persecution of Christian communities, 1915 33 2.1 Mobilization and war 33 2.2 The ‘reign of terror’ begins 39 2.3 ‘Burn, destroy, kill’ 48 2.4 Center and periphery 63 2.5 Widening and narrowing scopes of persecution 73 3 Deportations of Kurds and settlement of Muslims, 1916-1917 78 3.1 Deportations of Kurds, 1916 81 3.2 Settlement of Muslims, 1917 92 3.3 The aftermath of the war, 1918 95 3.4 The Kemalists take control, 1919-1923 101 4 Conclusion 110 Bibliography 116 Appendix 1: DH.ŞFR 64/39 130 Appendix 2: DH.ŞFR 87/40 132 Appendix 3: DH.ŞFR 86/45 134 Appendix 4: Family tree of Y.A. 136 Maps 138 3 Preface A little less than two decades ago, in my childhood, I became fascinated with violence, whether it was children bullying each other in school, fathers beating up their daughters for sneaking out on a date, or the omnipresent racism that I did not understand at the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Illiberal Media and Popular Constitution-Making in Turkey
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Communication Department Faculty Publication Series Communication 2020 Illiberal Media and Popular Constitution-Making in Turkey Burcu Baykurt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/communication_faculty_pubs 1 Illiberal Media and Popular Constitution Making in Turkey 1. Introduction Popular constitution making, a process that allows for public participation as opposed to a handful of elites writing a fundamental social contract behind closed doors and imposing it on the rest of society, is tricky. It sounds like a noble idea in theory, but it is difficult to execute effectively, efficiently, and, most importantly, democratically. Even trickier are the roles of publicity and media in popular constitution making. What are the consequences of reporting during the drafting of a new constitution? In what ways could the media lend legitimacy to the process by informing the public and incorporating public opinion into the drafting of a constitution? Coupled with the rise of new media technologies, an ideal of participatory constitution making (and an active role for the media) may seem desirable, not to mention attainable, but there are myriad ways to participate, and basing a constitution on popular opinion could easily devolve into a majority of 50 percent plus one that imposes its will on the rest. The bare minimum, ideally, is to expect journalists to report on facts without bowing to political or economic pressures, but even that is easier said than done. For which audiences are these journalistic facts intended? For those leaders drafting the new constitution or the public at large? These are not easy questions to answer empirically, not only because media and communications are often neglected in studies of constitution making, but also because the relationship between the two is hard to ascertain precisely.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2, 2015 To: Prof. Dr. Ahmet Davutoğlu Prime Minister of The
    February 2, 2015 To: Prof. Dr. Ahmet Davutoğlu Prime Minister of the Republic of Turkey CC: Deputy Prime Minister Ali Babacan, Deputy Undersecretary for Turkish Treasury Cavit Dağdaş, Ambassador Feridun Sinirlioğlu, and G20 Finance Ministers RE: Implementation of G20 Commitment to Phase-out Fossil Fuel Subsidies Dear Prime Minister Davutoğlu, In the spirit of your G20 Presidency’s outreach efforts with civil society, we – representing 39 civil society organizations – are writing in support of the Turkish Presidency’s “2015 Year of Implementation.” We share the Turkish government’s concern that G20 commitments are characterized by long delayed implementation. We were very pleased to see that the Turkish G20 Presidency Priorities for 2015 included discussions on the G20’s commitment to phase out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies and for the recognition that 2015 is a crucial year for climate change with the UNFCCC negotiations set to make a global agreement in December. We strongly agree that 2015 is the time to increase action on climate change. Thus, we request the following G20 outcomes towards implementing the phase out of fossil fuel subsidies: Agree to immediately eliminate all subsidies for fossil fuel exploration. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the International Energy Agency (IEA), in order to meet the internationally agreed goal of limiting global average temperature increase to 2 degrees Celsius, at least two-thirds of already existing reserves of fossil fuels need to be left in the ground. A recent assessment found that G20 governments are spending approximately $88 billion a year on finding new oil, gas and coal reserves.1 The report shows that with rising costs for hard-to-reach reserves, and falling coal and oil prices, generous public subsidies are propping up fossil fuel exploration, which would otherwise be deemed uneconomic.
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with a Rising Power
    Dealing with a Rising Power: Turkey’s Transformation and its Implications for the EU Svante Cornell, Gerald Knaus, Manfred Scheich Dealing with a Rising Power: Turkey’s Transformation and its Implications for the EU Dealing with a Rising Power: Turkey’s Transformation and its Implications for the EU Svante Cornell, Gerald Knaus, Manfred Scheich CREDITS Centre for European Studies Cover design: RARO S.L. Layout: Victoria Agency Printed in Belgium by Drukkerij Jo Vandenbulcke Centre for European Studies Rue du Commerce 20 Brussels, BE – 1000 The Centre for European Studies (CES) is the political foundation of the European People’s Party (EPP) dedicated to the promotion of Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values. For more information please visit: www.thinkingeurope.eu This publication receives funding from the European Parliament. © Centre for European Studies 2012 Photos used in this publication: Centre for European Studies 2012 The European Parliament and the Centre for European Studies assume no responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication or their subsequent use. Sole responsibility lies on the author of this publication. 2 Dealing with a Rising Power: Turkey’s Transformation and its Implications for the EU About the CES The Centre for European Studies (CES), established in 2007, is the political foundation of the European People’s Party (EPP). The CES embodies a pan-European mindset, promoting Christian Democrat, conservative and like-minded political values. It serves as a framework for national political foundations linked to member parties of the EPP, with 25 foundations currently members. The CES takes part in the preparation of EPP political platforms and programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Discourse, Ideology and Print Media in Turkey
    e-Journal of New Media / Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergi - eJNM ISSN: 2548-0200, April 2018 Volume 2 Issue 2, p.53-62 MEDIA DISCOURSE, IDEOLOGY AND PRINT MEDIA IN TURKEY Begüm BURAK [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0071-7330 ABSTRACT This article addresses power, ideology and media context generally. .In democratic countries, the free media is regarded as the “fourth estate” besides the legislative, executive and judiciary branches. It can be said that political power has a significant role in shaping media discourse. The newspapers as the most efficient print media elements have an effective role in media discourse. Besides determining political agenda, the newspapers function as the instrument of hegemony of the political authority. The objective of this article is two-fold. The first is to analyze the role of the media discourse in the (re)production of ideologies. Within this framework, the role of the media in democratic countries will also be under scrutiny. Second,a historical overview of Turkish print media in general and the Hürriyet newspaper in particular will be provided. Bourdieu argues that, the power of the words lies not in their intrinsic qualities but in the belief that they are uttered by authorized spokespersons (Bourdieu, 1991: p.170). In this context, one of the main arguments of this article is that the Hurriyet newspaper as one of the leading voices of the mainstream media is efficient in determining the political and social agenda. The qualitative research method is used in the article. Keywords: Ideology, power, media, media discourse, print media in Turkey MEDYA SÖYLEMİ, İDEOLOJİ VE TÜRKİYE’DE YAZILI BASIN ÖZ Bu makale genel olarak güç, ideoloji ve medya söylemini irdelemektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of the 2010 Constitutional Referendum in Turkey
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Open Research Exeter College of Social Sciences and International Studies, Department of Politics The Power of the Media on Forming Public Opinion: The Analysis of the 2010 Constitutional Referendum in Turkey Submitted by Sinem Ayanoglu to the University of Exeter As a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics June 2015 This dissertation is available for library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all the material in this dissertation that is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted to or approved by this or any other university for the award of a degree. ................................................................ Signature Abstract This thesis explores the role of the media in voting behaviour in Turkey in terms of the 2010 constitutional referendum. The media is a very important tool for both providing information and entertainment for people in Turkey. Thus, it can be claimed that the media are very powerful and have a large influence on audiences. In this study, I seek to explore the media’s power over citizens’ political choices. In other words, this thesis aims to reveal the affect the media content has on voters. To achieve this goal, I have chosen to analyse the 2010 referendum because of its special characteristics, which differentiate it from other referendums and elections in Turkey. Although there are many studies which examine the media effects on voting in the literature, these generally concentrate on developed democracies.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarih Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başlangiçtan Bugüne Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Hükümetleri
    T.C. KÜLTÜR VE TURİZM BAKANLIĞI TÜRKİYE KÜLTÜR PORTALI PROJESİ TARİH TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ BAŞLANGIÇTAN BUGÜNE TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ HÜKÜMETLERİ Prof. Dr. Abdulhaluk Mehmet ÇAY 2009 ANKARA 6.8. Başlangıçtan Bugüne Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Hükümetleri Muvakkat İcra Encümeni (25 Nisan 1920-3 Mayıs 1920) İcra Vekilleri Heyeti Reisi Mustafa Kemal Paşa, TBMM Reisi Celalettin Arif Bey, Erzurum Cami Bey (Baykut), Aydın Bekir Sami Bey (Kunduh), Amasya Hamdullah Suphi Bey (Tanrıöver), Antalya Hakkı Behiç Bey (Bayiç), Denizli İsmet Bey (İnönü), Edirne I. İcra Vekilleri Heyeti “1. TBMM Hükümeti” (Mustafa Kemal Paşa) (3 Mayıs 1920-24 Ocak 1921) Bakanlığı Adı Soyadı Seçim Bölgesi İcra Vekilleri Heyeti Reisi Mustafa Kemal Paşa (Başbakan) Umuru Şeriye Vekili Mustafa Fehmi Efendi Bursa (Diyanet Bakanı) (Gerçeker) Cami Bey (Baykut) Aydın Dahiliye Umuru Vekili Hakkı Behiç Bey (Bayiç) Denizli (İçişleri Bakanı) Nazım Bey (Resmor) Tokat Refet Bey (Bele) İzmir Adliye Vekili Celalettin Arif Bey Erzurum 2 (Adalet Bakanı) Nafıa Vekili İsmail Fazıl Paşa (Cebesoy) Yozgat (Bayındırlık Bakanı) Ömer Lütfü Bey (Argeşo) Amasya Hariciye Vekili Bekir Sami Bey (Kunduh) Amasya (Dışişleri Bakanı) Sıhhiye ve Muavenet-i İçtimaiye Vekili Adnan Bey (Adıvar) İstanbul (Sağlık ve Sosyal Yardım Bakanı) İktisat Vekili Yusuf Kemal Bey (Tengirşenk) Kastamonu (Ekonomi Bakanı) Müdafaa-i Milliye Vekili Fevzi Paşa (Çakmak) Kozan (Milli Savunma Bakanı) Bakanlığı Adı Soyadı Seçim Bölgesi Erkân-ı Harbiye-i Umumiye Vekili İsmet Bey (İnönü) Edirne (Genelkurmay Başkanı) Maliye Vekili Hakkı Behiç Bey
    [Show full text]
  • Resmî Gazete T. C
    T. C. Resmî Gazete Kuruluş Tarihi : ( 7 Teşrinievvel 1336 ) — 7 Ekim 1920 Yönetim ve yazı işleri için Başbakanlık Mevzuatı Geliştirme ve 21 Aralık 1987 Sayı : 19671 Yayın Genel Müdürlüğüne Mükerrer başvurulur. PAZARTESİ YÜRÜTME VE İDARE BOLUMU Bakanlar Kurulu'nun Atanmasına Dair İşlem T. C. BAŞBAKANLIK Personel ve Prensipler 21 Aralık 1987 Genel Müdürlüğü 1/1-22112 CUMHURBAŞKANLIĞI YÜCE KATINA İLGİ : 14 Aralık 1987 tarih ve Kan.Kar. 39-08.2-87-553 sayılı yazınız. İlgi yazılarınızla kurulmasını tarafıma tevdi buyurduğunuz Bakanlar Kurulu'nda; 1 — On Devlet Bakanı'nın görevlendirilmesini ve bunlardan Bir'ine Başbakan Yardım­ cılığı görevinin verilmesini, 2 — Bakanlar Kurulu'nun bu suretle teşkilini ve ekli listede adları yazılı zevatın hizala­ rında belirtilen Bakanlıklara atanmalarını, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasasının 109 ncu maddesi uyarınca takdir ve tensiplerinize arzederim. Turgut ÖZAL Başbakan BAKANLAR KURULU LİSTESİ BAŞBAKAN Turgut ÖZAL İstanbul Milletvekili DEVLET BAKANI VE BAŞBAKAN YARDIMCISI İ. Kaya ERDEM İzmir Milletvekili DEVLET BAKANI Kâzım OKSAY Bolu Milletvekili DEVLET BAKANI Abdullah TENEKECİ Konya Milletvekili DEVLET BAKANI Veysel ATASOY Zonguldak Milletvekili Yürütme ve İdare Bölümü Sayfa : 1 Sayfa : 2 RESMÎ GAZETE 21 Aralık 1987 — Sayı : 19671 DEVLET BAKANI Ali BOZER İçel Milletvekili DEVLET BAKANI : Yusuf B. ÖZAL Malatya Milletvekili DEVLET BAKANI Adnan KAHVECİ İstanbul Milletvekili DEVLET BAKANI Mehmet YAZAR Kayseri Milletvekili DEVLET BAKANI Cemil ÇİÇEK Yozgat Milletvekili DEVLET BAKANI Nihat KİTAPÇI Erzurum Milletvekili ADALET BAKANI M. Oltan SUNGURLU Gümüşhane Milletvekili MtLLİ SAVUNMA BAKANI : Ercan VURALHAN Ankara Milletvekili İÇİŞLERİ BAKANI Mustafa KALEMLİ Kütahya Milletvekili DIŞİŞLERİ BAKANI A. Mesut YILMAZ Rize Milletvekili MALİYE VE GÜMRÜK BAKANI A.Kurtcebe ALPTEMOÇİN Bursa Milletvekili MİLLİ EĞİTİM GENÇLİK VE SPOR BAKANI : Hasan Celâl GÜZEL Gaziantep Milletvekili BAYINDIRLIK VE İSKÂN BAKANI İ.
    [Show full text]