Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction INTRODUCTION. SIR JAMES WHITELOCKE, the writer of the manuscript now published, occupied a prominent position in the reigns of James I. and Charles I. Eising from the middle ranks, he became a lawyer of eminence, connected himself with several families of importance, took a leading part in constitutional proceedings in parliament, sat with credit on the judicial bench, and was author of several valuable professional and antiquarian papers. Nor does our interest in his family terminate with himself. As in the previous instances of More and Bacon, and in several other eminent and well-known cases > which occur far more frequently in the law than in other professions, sir James's son, Bulstrode Whitelocke, excelled his father in all the principal points of his career. As a lawyer he was more eminent, as a statesman far more distinguished, and as an author, his works are among the most useful materials for the history of his period.a A marriage with an heiress of the De la Beches, near the end of the reign of Henry VI., first brought the Whitelockes into consider- » The recent republication of his Journal of his Swedish Embassy, under the editorship of Henry Eeeve, esq. (2 vols. 8vo. 1855), affords proof that his works still interest his- torical readers. Of his Historical Memorials it is sufficient to remark that it is scarcely pos- sible to find a book upon any incident in the reign of Charles I. which does not contain many references to it as an authority. b Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.58, on 30 Sep 2021 at 10:24:16, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2042169900003928 "ii INTRODUCTION. ation. By this marriage a John Whitelocke became possessed of the manor of Beeches, near Okingham, co. Berks. After several generations we come to a William Whitelocke, who was the first person in the family given to literature. Sent from Eton to King's College, Cambridge, in 1537, in due time he became a fellow of his college and took the degree of B.D. The church rewarded his learning with the vicarage of Prescot, a prebend in Lichfield cathedral, and the rectory of Greenford in the county of Middlesex. He wrote a continuation of Thomas Chesterfield's Chronicle of Lichfield Cathedral, published in Wharton's Anglia Sacra, vol. i. p. 444. This William Whitelocke died shortly before 15th April, 1584. Richard Whitelocke, the father of sir James Whitelocke, stands in the pedigree as the youngest brother of William Whitelocke the chronicler. " Put to London to be brought up in the trade of merchandize," he entered into his calling with spirit, and was accustomed to visit foreign countries in the way of his business. In 1570, during one of his journeys into France, he was seised with pleurisy at Bordeaux, and died there at the age of 37. As a Pro- testant, there were difficulties respecting his interment, but the English merchants resident in that city, " to the number of 100 or more, armed with shot, did carry the corpse into the vineyards, and there did honorably inter it." The young merchant who thus found a grave on the banks of the Garonne left in his native country a widow and two sons, who were increased to four within a few days after his death. The narrative which is here given of the struggles of his widow in bringing up her children, constitutes a picture of considerable interest. Her maiden name was Colte. She had a brother a merchant at Dantzick, but her paternal family was seated Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.58, on 30 Sep 2021 at 10:24:16, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2042169900003928 INTRODUCTION. iii at Little Munden, in the county of Hertford. Fearless in matri- monial speculation, her first adventure was with a London merchant named Brockhurst, " who dealt with the Italians for kersies and fine cloths." Death soon severed that companionship, her husband and a daughter, their only child, being carried off by the plague in 1563. Richard Whitelocke was her second husband, a man of gravity and prudence. After his death she married again. Her third adventure was with Thomas Price, and this time she was most unfortunate. A notable unthrift, her husband squandered the means which White- locke had bequeathed to her, and was moreover personally " unkind and insolent." Her life for many years was one of " daily miseries." In the midst of her troubles, although continually "robbed and pilled by her cruel and wasteful husband,'' she steadily persevered in the performance of her duties towards the young Whitelockes. Two things she determined to accomplish for them, and in both she was successful. Although "miserably afflicted in the law'' by her third husband's creditors, she resolved to preserve for the sons of her second husband the portions left them by their father, and, better still, she set her heart on bringing them up " in as good sort as any gentleman in England would do, as in singing, dancing, playing on the lute and other instruments, the Latin, Greek. Hebrew, and French tongues, and to write fair." Such was education in England in the time of queen Elizabeth. The struggles of this exemplary woman to secure these advantages for her children, and the pious and peaceful close of her life, after she had brought up her children to man's estate and " buried her unthrifty and unkind husband;" she herself going away "with old age even as a candle goeth out," are affectionately commemorated by her son in several passages in the present volume. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.58, on 30 Sep 2021 at 10:24:16, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2042169900003928 IV INTRODUCTION. The characters of her sons were as various as their fortunes. Edmund, the eldest, is well sketched by his lawyer brother. He was the fine gentleman of the family. Clever, witty, adventurous, well taught, well bred, a soldier, a traveller, an excellent companion, fond of " worshipful society," a pleasant, jovial fellow, uncertain in his movements, impetuous in temper, and with never a penny in his purse. He figured as " Captain Whitelocke " among the boon companions and spendthrifts of his day, and was led by high con- nections into circumstances which occasioned him to be suspected of participation in the two most notable conspiracies in our history, that of the Earl of Essex, and the Gunpowder Treason. " The brainsick meeting at Essex House" made him acquainted with the interior of Newgate, from whence he was transferred to the bar of the court of King's Bench, but the vengeance of the law had been satisfied ere the course of judicial inquiry arrived at the minor and more doubtful offenders; after a time he was committed to the free custody of his brother, the future sir James, and shortly afterwards was entirely discharged. The suspicion against him in connection with the Gunpowder Treason arose out of his dependency on the earl of Northumberland, whom the gallant captain took for his patron after the death of the earl of Essex. On this occasion captain Whitelocke was confined for a little while in the Tower, and afterwards in the Fleet, but was ultimately set at liberty and permitted to relieve with his cheerful society the long imprison- ment of his second patron. In the unhealthy summer of 1608, captain Whitelocke was attacked with the disorder ordinarily pre- valent during our fruit season. After being much reduced in strength, he "was let blood;" and under this treatment, not unnatu- rally, " went away quietly, as in a slumber." He was on a visit at Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.58, on 30 Sep 2021 at 10:24:16, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2042169900003928 INTRODUCTION. V the time to the earl of Sussex, at Newhall in Essex, and the " picked man of countries," "a fellow of infinite jest and most excellent fancy," was honourably interred by his noble friend in the resting-place of the Katcliffes. Richard, the second son, followed his father's way of life, and visited many countries in pursuit of commercial profit. Finally, he fixed himself at Elbing. His success in merchandize was various, but he married a lady of Elbing, possessed of some fortune, and had a numerous family. One of his sons came to England and claimed acquaintance with his uncle Sir James, then become a judge. Richard Whitelocke died at Elbing in 1624. William, the third son, • had no mind to learning, and was therefore bound apprentice; but he had other aspirations than those which could be satisfied behind a counter. When the drum beat for volunteers for the expedition to Portugal, young Whitelocke was carried away by the popular enthusiasm for Don Antonio. He left " master, thrift, and all," and followed the wars. On his return from that expedition he seemed at death's door. Maternal care restored him to unlooked-for health. On his recovery he joined himself to sir Francis Drake, and partook of the perils and adventures of the eminent sailor's closing years.
Recommended publications
  • Stapylton Final Version
    1 THE PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OF FREEDOM FROM ARREST, 1603–1629 Keith A. T. Stapylton UCL Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Page 2 DECLARATION I, Keith Anthony Thomas Stapylton, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed Page 3 ABSTRACT This thesis considers the English parliamentary privilege of freedom from arrest (and other legal processes), 1603-1629. Although it is under-represented in the historiography, the early Stuart Commons cherished this particular privilege as much as they valued freedom of speech. Previously one of the privileges requested from the monarch at the start of a parliament, by the seventeenth century freedom from arrest was increasingly claimed as an ‘ancient’, ‘undoubted’ right that secured the attendance of members, and safeguarded their honour, dignity, property, and ‘necessary’ servants. Uncertainty over the status and operation of the privilege was a major contemporary issue, and this prompted key questions for research. First, did ill definition of the constitutional relationship between the crown and its prerogatives, and parliament and its privileges, lead to tensions, increasingly polemical attitudes, and a questioning of the royal prerogative? Where did sovereignty now lie? Second, was it important to maximise the scope of the privilege, if parliament was to carry out its business properly? Did ad hoc management of individual privilege cases nevertheless have the cumulative effect of enhancing the authority and confidence of the Commons? Third, to what extent was the exploitation or abuse of privilege an unintended consequence of the strengthening of the Commons’ authority in matters of privilege? Such matters are not treated discretely, but are embedded within chapters that follow a thematic, broadly chronological approach.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\User1\Documents
    Date:June 3,2021 Last Web Update:September 2,2020 WHITLOCK FAMILY RESEARCH - PRINTED & ORIGINAL SOURCES R0001/20 Research by Wilfred John Whitlock - Whitlocks of Langtree, Devon to 1968 R0002/7 Whitlocks of Devon research by J.R. Powell Nov.1910 R0002A/5 Whitlocks of Warkleigh, Langtree, Parkham, Devon from Kate Johnson (nee Whitlock) June 1968 R0003/6 Photocopies of Whitelocke entries in Biographical Dictionary R0004/1 Whitlocks of Warkleigh with connection to Whitlocks of Illinois by Frank M. Whitlock 1936 R0004A/1 Whitlocks of Warkleigh descent from John Lake of Bradmore (Bodleian Library:Rawl D 287) R0004B/1 Whitlocks of Warkleigh descent from John Lake from Visitation of Devon (edit J.L. Vivian. Exeter 1895) R0005/4 Letter from M.M. Johns to Elmo Ashton re Whitlocks of Langtree, Devon R0006/2 Biography of Brand Whitlock (1869-1934) R0007/3 Whitlocks of Devon parish register extracts R0008/1 Biography of Percy Whitlock (1903-1946) from Grove's Dictionary of Music and Musicians from M.M. Johns R0009/1 Letter Dd. June 7,1906 from J. Stanley Wedlock of Stanley Bridge, P.E.I.. to John Whitlock of Holdsworthy (sic), Devon R0010/3 Whitlock extracts from Biographical Dictionaries from J.E.I. Wyatt R0011/2 Alumni Oxonienses, The Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714 by Joseph Foster from Ruth Spalding R0012/1 Biographical sketch of Thomas Whitlock (1806-1875)'s life by Rev.W.C.Beer R0013/54 Whitlocks of Berkshire descent from John Whitlock & Agnes De la Beche (M about 1454) from J. Wyatt 1969 R0014/ (renumbered) R0015/1 Newspaper clipping re 50th Wedding Anniversary of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • DORSET AS a LOCAL MAGNATE, 1624-1642. in the Previous Chapter
    CHAPTER FIVE: DORSET AS A LOCAL MAGNATE, 1624-1642. In the previous chapter, I argued that Dorset's ecclesiastical patronage is best understood as one dimension of his local influence: most of the benefices in his gift lay near his Sussex estates, and he nearly always chose local men to serve them. 1 I now want to explore more fully Dorset's career as a provincial magnate from his inheritance of the earldom to the outbreak of civil war. I will suggest that muscle in local politics and government depended on three things above all: first, the tenure of specific offices, such as the Lord Lieutenancy of a county, or the High Stewardship of a borough; second, residence in a particular district, and the local knowledge which this yielded; and third, the location of landed estates. The first three sections of this chapter analyse how these variables interacted in Sussex, where Dorset was Lord Lieutenant from 1624, and where his territorial base was concentrated. We will see that Dorset's extensive selling of land to payoff his elder brother's debts did not per se reduce his local clout, and that the office of Lord Lieutenant retained considerable power, especially in military and fiscal matters. However, the Lord Lieutenancy did not necessarily confer electoral patronage, and it seems that Dorset's ------------------------- 1. See Chapter Four, above, pp. 242-3. -260- parliamentary candidates were most consistently successful where they had a local background. In the fourth section, I will strengthen these conclusions with evidence from outside Sussex, and suggest that recent discussion of the early Stuart electorate has tended to neglect the central conflict of interest between noblemen sponsoring their men-of-business and corporations seeking representatives with local knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earl Marshal, the Heralds, and the House of Commons, 1604–1641
    P. H. HARDACRE THE EARL MARSHAL, THE HERALDS, AND THE HOUSE OF COMMONS, 1604-16411 The successful reassertion of the authority of the Court of the Earl Marshal, in the recent case of the Corporation of Manchester vs. The Manchester Palace of Varieties, Ltd., has renewed interest in this ancient institution. The court ruled that The Manchester Palace of Varieties had wrongly displayed the heraldic arms of the Corporation, contrary to the laws and customs of arms, and that the court itself, which had last sat in 1751 and which Blackstone described as having fallen into contempt and disuse, was still empowered to give relief to those who thought themselves aggrieved in such matters.2 A full account of the Court of the Earl Marshal is much to be de- sired.3 It cannot be attempted in the space of this paper, but one period 1 The author gratefully acknowledges a summer fellowship at the Folger Shake- speare Library which enabled him to do part of the research. Mr. G. D. Squibb and Mr. S. E. Thorne kindly gave advice on certain points. 2 The Times (London), 22 Dec. 1954 and 22 Jan. 1955; The Full Report of the Case of the Mayor, Aldermen and Citizens of the City of Manchester versus the Manchester Palace of Varieties Limited in the High Court of Chivalry on Tuesday, 21st December, 1954, The Heraldry Society, East Knoyle, Salisbury, 1955. 3 There is a voluminous literature on heraldry, some of which deals with the earl marshal. The best guide is Thomas Moule, Bibliotheca Heraldica Magnae Britanniae, London 1822; see also S.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Mackenzie Born 1 May 1811 Life Story by Gwyneth Wilkie Available Online At
    Edward Mackenzie Born 1 May 1811 Life story by Gwyneth Wilkie Available online at www.livesretold.co.uk Edward Mackenzie was born on May 1st 1811 and baptised at the Chapel Street Independent Chapel, Blackburn, where his parents lie buried. He was the 9th of the 10 children of Mary Roberts (1772-1828) and Alexander Mackenzie (1796- 1836), a canal contractor who accompanied Hugh Mackintosh from Scotland to begin work on cutting the Leeds-Liverpool canal.1 The Leeds Liverpool Canal, started in 1770, had 91 locks over its distance of 127 miles. Edward started work for his brother William Mackenzie (1794-1851) at the point where the latter evolved from resident engineer working on bridges and canals to railway contractor undertaking his first big venture, the construction of the Lime Street tunnel on the Liverpool & Manchester Railway between 1832 and 1835. Another assistant and pupil, David Stevenson, left a vivid account of what it was like to work for the relentless William: ‘I have spent many a weary hour and I might say night because Mackenzie, with whom I lived for some time, would often, after finishing his pipe and glass of brandy and water, instead of going off to bed, go out to one of the shafts which, as ill luck would have it, was close to his house and if, by further bad luck he found a bucket going down he would at once cry “Now then, Stevenson, let us jump in and see what these fellows are about 1 For further detail on Alexander see M Clarke, The Leeds & Liverpool Canal, 1990, p 87.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Gillotts
    Gillotts 1600s: At one stage known as Gilletts, origins as an Elizabethan farm, with small house on site, by the 1600s held by a Henry Round, possibly a tenant farmer. 1790s: Parish of Rotherfield Peppard contained eight farms, Gillotts being included, consisting of 40 acres. 1802: The farms of Highlands and Gillotts combined under a Daniel Piercy. 1823: Gillotts Farm appears on Bryants Map, part of a series of countrywide maps published by Andrew Bryant, he sending out teams to map selected locations, the company ceasing to trade in 1833. 1830s: Landowner of Gillotts William Hodges, with tenant John Sedgwick. 1837: While tenanted by the Sedgwick’s, the stable, coach house and several outbuildings were destroyed as result of a fire. There is a small report in Jacksons Oxford Journel of Saturday April 15 th 1837, which runs as follows. “On Monday evening, about eight o’clock, a fire broke out in the stables of J. Sedgwick Esq, at Gillotts near Henley, which was connected with the coach house and several other outbuildings. The horses were saved with difficulty, but so rapid was the progress of the flames that a carriage, chaise, and many other valuable articles were cremated. A hay rack, about 23 tons, and a large pile of fire woodand roots also shared the same fate. The engines of the Sun and Royal Exchange were speedily on the spot, but there being no water (except from a well) could render little assistance. The Henley Parish Engine (generally out of repair) broke down just out of the town, and impeded the progress of other vehicles going to the fire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life of Sir Edward Coke
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com | ſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſſ ſiſili THE LIFE OF SIR EDWARD COKE, LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND IN THE REIGN OF JAMES I. WITH MEMOIRS OF HIS CONTEMPORARIES BY CUTHBERT WILLIAM JOHNSON, Esq. OF GRAY'S INN, BARRISTER-AT-LAW. SECOND EDITION. VOL.11. 'V.:.\ ': " LONDON : HENRY COLBURN, PUBLISHER, GREAT MARLBOROUGH STREET. M.DCCCXLV. 1^ TO NEW YC?,K PUBLIC LIBRARY ASTOR, LENOX ANB TILDKN FOUNDATIONS CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME. CHAPTER I. 1616—1617. Coke anxious to be restored to the favour of the court — The quarrel between Secretary Winwood and the Chancellor Bacon — Proposes a marriage between his daughter Frances and Sir John Villiers. Buckingham's brother — Lady Hatton opposes the match — Carries her daughter off — Coke discovers her retreat, and recovers possession of her — Both Coke and his wife complain to the Privy Council — Memorial written for Lady Hatton — Lady Hatton a court beauty — Her conduct to Sir Edward Coke after his disgrace — Notices of them in the gossiping letters of that period — Letter of Lady Hatton to the Privy Council — Is out of favour at court — Petition to the King — Letters of Lady CONTENTS. Hatton to Buckingham — To the King — Again restored to favour at court — Ben Jonson's " Masque of Beauty" — Coke addresses a letter to Buckingham — — States the portion he intends to give his daughter and what Lady Hatton will give —Lady Hatton's letter to Buckingham.
    [Show full text]
  • Liber Famelicus
    LIBER FAMELICUS. THIS book I began to write in, the 18 April 1609, anno 7 Jacobi regni sui Anglise, et Scotise 42. In it I en tend to set downe roemorialls for my posterity of thinges most properly concerning myself and my familye. Oculis in solem, alis in coelum. Motto de cognisance.* Vive diu Whitlocke, tuis sic utere fatis Vt referent sensus alba nee atra tuos. JAMES WHITELOCKE. My father RICHARD WHITELOCK: was the fourthe sun of Richard Whitelock, and was born in the ancient seat of the Whitelocks, called Beeches, situate neer Okingham, a market towne in the countye of Barkes, whiche land hathe continued in our blud sithence the year of our Lord 1231; for it appeerethe by a deed in my cosen William f Whitelockes hand of Beches that Robert J then bishop of Salisburye, who was lord of the manor of Sunning neer Okingham, did give to William de la Beche, out of his purpres- ture§ of Bear Wood, that verye land my cosen William Whitelock now holdethe by discent from his father, and he bathe the originall • This "motto of cognisance" refers to the arms borne by the Whitelocke family, a chevron between three falcons, or, as they are called in one pedigree, three eagles, and the crest, a like bird rising out of a tower. +• My father's elder brother's son, and heir of the family ; William the eldest being ded without issue. Note by the writer of the MS. J Robert de Bingham, bishop of Salisbury 1228—1246. § Inclosure. CAMD. 8OC. B 2 LIBER FAMELICUS.
    [Show full text]
  • Fawley Court Henley-On-Thames Oxfordshire Fawley.Qxd:Layout 1 14/4/08 12:30 Page 2 Fawley.Qxd:Layout 1 14/4/08 12:30 Page 3
    Fawley.qxd:Layout 1 14/4/08 12:30 Page 1 Fawley Court Henley-on-Thames Oxfordshire Fawley.qxd:Layout 1 14/4/08 12:30 Page 2 Fawley.qxd:Layout 1 14/4/08 12:30 Page 3 Fawley Court Henley-on-Thames Oxfordshire Exceptional Residential Institutional Property with River Thames frontage set in grounds of 60 acres. Currently a Retreat & Conference Centre and suitable for continued residential institutional uses or alternative uses including residential dwelling subject to obtaining any necessary consents. Grade I Listed property designed by Sir Christopher Wren. Frontage onto the River Thames alongside Henley Royal Regatta course. Main House - 40,080 sq.ft. (3,723 sq.m) gross internal area Outbuildings – 51,688 sq.ft. (4,802 sq.m) gross internal area Land approximately 60 acres (24.29 hectares) For sale freehold with vacant possession upon completion Fawley.qxd:Layout 1 14/4/08 12:30 Page 4 Fawley.qxd:Layout 1 14/4/08 12:30 Page 5 L OCATION Fawley Court is situated off the A4155 and lies approximately 1 mile north of Henley-on-Thames town centre. Henley is well situated for communications with good access to the M4, M40 and M25 motorways and Heathrow Airport. Henley railway station provides a service to London Paddington. Henley-on-Thames town centre 1 mile, Marlow 6 miles, Reading 8 miles, Oxford 24 miles, M4 Junction 8/9 - 10 miles, M25 (Junction 15) - 20 miles, Heathrow Airport – 23 miles, Central London - 37 miles (All distances are approximate) S ITUATION Fawley Court is set in a 60 acre estate lying alongside the River Thames and within the Fawley Court Conservation Area and an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RIGHTS-BEARING ENGLISHMAN Early Statements In
    CHAPTER EIGHT THE RIGHTS-BEARING ENGLISHMAN Early Statements in Parliament In the early days of the Long Parliament, George Digby, MP for Dorset, made a passionate plea for those liberties that ‘speak us Englishmen’ and moved for a committee to consider the deplorable state into which the nation had fallen.1 Digby was both a royalist and also (at this point in time) a critic of the excesses of royalism. He would later find himself very much on King Charles’ side in the Civil War. In his original position in 1640, how- ever, he showed himself to be a very typical parliamentarian. It had become largely a matter of political consensus that inherited liberties con- stituted true Englishness and that the moderate exercise of regal power was desirable and indeed necessary for the preservation of the nation. What we witness is a process whereby Englishness becomes a key political language from about 1610 onwards, bandied about by parliamentarians and lawyers, all of whom would have considered themselves reasonably conservative and none of whom would have gone out of their way to be subversive. By 1640, the congerie of idea was well-established and Digby’s comment was nothing more – or less – than a commonplace. But the decade then beginning would transform a parliamentary commonplace into an explosive populist language used by highly-politicised laymen to argue for ends as extreme as adult masculine suffrage. How did such evo- lutions and revolutions occur? This immensely significant and varied polemic about Englishness emerged out of the conflicts about money which besmirched the reputa- tions of both the early Stuarts and did so much to sour political relations in the polity.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir James Whitelocke, Chief Justice of Chester 1620-1624
    SIR JAMES WHITELOCKE, CHIEF JUSTICE OF CHESTER 1620-1624 Damian X, Powell Upon his appointment as chief justice of Chester on 29 October 1620, the newly knighted Sir James Whitelocke observed that 'the whole course of life of a professor of the law is devided into three passages' his 'time of study', his 'time of practise' ('the fruit of his studye'), and his time of service to his countrye, and that is the discharge of his civill dutye to the commonwealthe in sutche place as he shall be called unto. So he begins philosophus in getting knoledge, goethe on oeconomus in getting meanes of livelihood, ends politicus in serving his countrye.' Whitelocke's own life is best known for his vocal opposition to impositions in the 1610 parliament, a stance which may have contributed to his imprisonment in 1613 for further challenges to Crown interests over the Earl Marshal's court and a 1609 royal commission into the navy.2 Pragmatically offering to avoid Liber Famelicus of Sir James Whitelocke, a Judge of the Court of King's Bench in the reigns of James I and Charles I, ed. J. Bruce (Camden Society, O.S., X, 1858), p. 80 [hereafter Liber Famelicus}. Liber Famelicus, pp. 32-33; D. X. Powell, 'Why did James Whitelocke go to jail in 1613? "Principle" and political dissent in Jacobean England', Proceedings of the 1993 Australasian Law in History Conference (forthcoming). For biographical details cf. Dictionary of National Biography (London, 1900), LXI, pp. 117-119; R. L. Greaves & R. ZaUer, Biographical Dictionary of British Radicals in the Seventeenth Century (3 vols; Brighton, 1982), III, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Once a Seat of English Aristocracy
    • I FA VV LEY CO U RT Fawley Court,front,1970,the sh.owingwing andthethelibraryfarm. ONCE A SEAT OF ENGLISH ARISTOCRACY WrenDesignedandbyembellishedSir Christopherover the easttheofarmercorner se~tcan afbe ~hefoundMackenZIeFawl~yf~lTIlly,Co~rt, THE restshistory?n theaf thi,sfact beauti~ulthat 1t ,,:,asmami~nbmlt which to aH mtents and purposes IS en- upon the rums af a twelfth-ar thirteenth- years ~y, a':'1_o~go~ers'.cJ~mes jQyj1}:g_aJcnaissanc!LoLsocial,-culturaL-century-castle-which-had up-until--1680c- --.~- Wyatt-(iCpupii of Ro5ert Adam, and historical glory based an a very farmed part af the White10cke estates. who remodelled the interior) famous past. It was by a stroke of luck However, the estate at Fawley was held Broomw·ch (famous for his ~all that Fawley Cou~ was acq~red in 1952 ~s security far a loan by Captain Wil- . I .. " by the Congregation af Manan Fathers, ham Freeman, a prolTIlnent merchant hangmgs), and" CapabIlity a Roman CathoHc religious order dedi- and plantation awner, which was never Brown (who landscaped the cated to education and culture. It seems repaid. A clase friend af Sir Christopher gardens) Fawley Court near that they, by their present activities, have Wren, he engaged him tOo design a resi- , .' put what was ance a stronghold of Bng- dence for his family, ,and building work Henl.ey-on-Th.ames,IS an lish aristocracy back on the map. commenced at Fawley in 1684. The architectural Jewel. One af the most prominent attributes hause was to be sited an a slight ridge of this building is the fact that it actually overlooking Ithe Thames, where stane- is one of only three private hauses which work faundations were conveniently dis- beyand doubt have been planned and covered.
    [Show full text]