Generic Court Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Generic Court Template BEFORE THE BOARD OF INQUIRY IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND IN THE MATTER of a Board of Inquiry appointed under s 149J of the Resource Management Act 1991 to consider the application for resource consents by Watercare Services Ltd to increase abstraction of water from the Waikato River. STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF MARTIN MOULD (WAIPA DC WATER SUPPLY) Dated 18 June 2021 Instructing Solicitor: Michelle Hawthorne [email protected] 1 INTRODUCTION Qualifications and experience 1. My full name is Martin Mould. 2. I am the Water Services Manager for Waipā District Council (Waipā DC). I have been in this role for just over one year. My role covers all matters relating to Three Waters for the Waipā District, including strategic planning, asset management, and operations. 3. I have 20 years’ experience in the water industry in New Zealand, mainly within local government roles. I worked for Hamilton City Council (HCC) for 14 years in a range of roles within the water unit, including as City Development Manager. I was the Water Services Manager at Waikato District Council for 3 years. I also worked at WSP for two years as the National Waters Project Director. 4. I hold a Postgraduate Certificate in Management Studies from the University of Waikato (2013). 5. I am authorised by Waipā DC to provide evidence in these proceedings. Code of Conduct 6. I have read the Environment Court Code of Conduct for expert witnesses contained in the Environment Court Practice Note 2014 and agree to comply with it. I confirm that the opinions expressed in this statement are within my area of expertise except where I state that I have relied on the evidence of other persons. I have not omitted to consider materials or facts known to me that might alter or detract from the opinions I have expressed. 2 Scope of evidence 7. My evidence will: (a) Explain the population and growth context of the Waipā District; (b) Describe Waipā DC’s water abstraction consent and its water supply network; (c) Describe Waipā DC’s water demand management measures; (d) Outline Waipā DC’s concerns about over-allocation of the Waikato River and the impacts that would arise if Waipā DC is unable to meet its medium and long-term growth needs; and (e) Outline the outcome that Waipā DC seeks that would ensure that Auckland’s short-term needs are met but avoiding any detriment to the interests of the Waikato River iwi and Waipā DC’s obligation to supply water to the Waipā District in the medium and long-term. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE 8. Waipā DC is currently well served in terms of water supply. It has a consented take from the Waikato River of 45,286 cubic metres per day which is due to expire in 2049, and a take of 14,000 cubic metres per day from the Mangauika Stream on Mt Pirongia which becomes restricted to 4000 cubic meters per day by 2030. 9. The allocation from the Waikato River was established in 2018 when Waipā DC ‘rationalised’ its suite of consents, and its total allocation reduced from 63,700 cubic metres per day in that process. This reduction reflected the 3 medium term needs of Waipā DC, with estimated demand indicating that Waipā DC will have sufficient water to meet demand through to the expiry of its consent. 10. However, Waipā DC considers that a long-term approach needs to be taken when considering the efficient allocation of this resource. This is particularly important given the recent NPS-UD requirements affecting Waipā DC, and the impacts of growth anticipated within the Hamilton- Waikato Metropolitan Area (metro area or MSP area), as described in the evidence of Mr O’Dwyer for HCC. 11. That growth profile will see Waipā DC’s current population of approximately 58,800 grow to up to approximately 89,000 people. Despite the capacity available to Waipā DC under its existing consents, Waipā DC will inevitably need additional water over the longer-term. 12. Waipā DC seeks a win-win-win solution for all parties, which enables Watercare’s immediate needs to be met, but which enables Waipā DC to meet its long-term needs, with the wellbeing of the river being at the forefront of decisions. 13. In the evidence presented on behalf of HCC there are a range of planning techniques suggested to achieve this outcome, including restricting the term of the consent, requiring active steps in terms of securing alternative sources, and stepping down the take over time. Waipā DC supports this approach. WAIPĀ DISTRICT 14. The Waipā District has a population of 58,000 people. The District is predominantly rural, covering an area of 1473.47 km2. Its two principal population centres are Cambridge (20,500) and Te Awamutu (13,100). The Waipā 2050 Growth Strategy (Waipā 2050) aims to ensure that the District remains a great place to live, work and play, well into the future. Waipā 4 2050 projects that by 2050, the District will be home to an additional 25,000 people beyond those resident as at 2018. Under the NIDEA 2021 HIGH projections, that population is anticipated to be 89,707 by 2065. WAIPĀ IN THE NATIONAL CONTEXT 15. The importance of the District in the broader national context has been recognised through the creation of the Future Proof Urban Growth Partnership, which is a collaboration between all local councils in the Waikato Region, and also with the Crown and Iwi. The Future Proof Partnership was created on 15 August 2019 and also includes representatives from Auckland Council, Franklin Local Board, and Auckland/Hauraki Iwi to reflect the Crown’s commitment to the Hamilton to Auckland Corridor Plan (H2A Plan) that was completed in 2019. The Hamilton to Auckland Corridor (H2A corridor) and the H2A Plan is explained in detail in the evidence of Mr O’Dwyer. Since the reconstitution of that partnership, the focus of effort has been on implementing the H2A Plan, with emphasis on developing a Hamilton-Waikato Metropolitan Spatial Plan (MSP) and a Waikato Sub-Regional Three Waters Project. HAMILTON TO AUCKLAND CORRIDOR PLAN 16. Despite its title, the H2A corridor extends south of Hamilton City, into Cambridge to the south-east along SH1, and into Te Awamutu to the south- west along SH3. Accordingly, these population centres within the Waipā District are key components of the overall H2A corridor. HAMILTON-WAIKATO METROPOLITAN SPATIAL PLAN 17. The MSP is the first joint spatial plan for the metro area prepared by iwi, the Crown, and local government partners under the Future Proof Partnership. The metro area extends from Taupiri in the north to Te 5 Awamutu and Cambridge in the south. The MSP takes a longer view of growth in this metropolitan area and plans for a future scenario in which 500,000 people reside. The growth projections identified in Waipā 2050 are incorporated within the MSP. WAIPĀ DC’S GROWTH OBLIGATIONS 18. Under the National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 (NPS- UD), Waipā DC is a Tier 1 local authority and sits within the Tier 1 urban environment of Hamilton. In addition to the requirements placed on Hamilton to make provision for 31,900 homes by 2048, the NPS-UD requires that Waipā DC make provision for 13,900 homes by 2048. 19. The NPS-UD also requires Waipā DC to provide enough business land for the retail, commercial, and industrial sectors. The 2017 housing and business capacity assessment report found that an additional 189,000m2 of retail and 650,000m2 of industrial gross floor area would be required by 2048. GROWTH IN THE METRO SPATIAL PLAN (MSP) CONTEXT 20. The projected growth identified within the broad geographic area of the MSP extends to 500,000 people over the medium to long-term (within the next 30 to 100 years). I refer to and rely on the evidence of Mr O’Dwyer for HCC which sets out the detail relating to the MSP. 21. Access to water is critical to the growth identified in Mr O’Dwyer’s evidence. In the event that a new and separate waters entity is created in the future, access to potable water will not only be required to service growth within each district’s territorial boundary, but also beyond those boundaries to the full extent of the MSP area. In this way Waipā DC’s 6 position on water allocation and future demand is very much aligned with that of HCC. WATER SUPPLY IN WAIPĀ DISTRICT Waipā DC’s water take consent 22. In 2018, Waipā DC rationalised its existing suite of five water takes (104054, 110442, 110444, 124967 and 124968) down to three. Those existing five water takes amounted to a cumulative allocation of 63,700 cubic metres per day. As a result of that process, WRC combined water takes 104054, 110442, 110444 into a single consent, and reduced the total cumulative allocation to 45,286 cubic metres per day. Under that process, WRC granted Waipā DC a new 30-year consent to extract water from three points within the Waikato River for municipal supply (Waipā consent). The Waipā consent expires in 2049. The consent evaluation report records that: These significant reductions are commensurate with the applicant’s obligations as a municipal water supplier for the Cambridge, Pukerimu and Te Awamutu communities, embody equity principles and represent a contemporary and more efficient approach to water allocation. 23. Through this process, Waipā DC responsibly acknowledged that the existing allocation of 63,700 cubic metres per day was well beyond its short to medium-term needs, and 18,414 cubic metres per day was returned to the allocable flow of the River, to be efficiently applied elsewhere.
Recommended publications
  • Waipa Waters Programme: Project Information Form
    Sensitivity: General Waipa Waters Programme: Project Information Form Section 1: Key Information [Criteria 2 and 3] 1. Project Title: Waipa DC Waters Programme 2. Please provide your details: Organisation Name: Waipa District Council Entity Type: Local Government Contact Name and Role: Dawn Inglis GM Service Delivery Email Address: [email protected] Telephone: 027 554 2221 3. Please provide a very brief description of the infrastructure project: Brief description of the programme Waipa District Council has compiled a programme of projects in the Waters Activity which meet the requirements of the Crown Infrastructure Partners. These projects have been selected also because they are all key enablers for Waipa District Council to continue its journey towards compliance with standards and consents, which are key to achieving community well-being and protecting public health. These projects nominated are not currently funded as part of the current Waipa DC Long Term Plan (2018-2021 period) but were to be submitted for local funding as part of the development of the Waipa DC Long Term Plan (2021-2024). They are able to be accelerated readily to meet the funding criteria. Problem being addressed Whilst Waipa is working hard to address issues in the Waters Activities, many of the projects required to address the issues are currently unaffordable to our communities – either in part or complete projects being deferred. Waipa has a backlog of renewal work required and is also grappling with the level of capital investment needed to cater for increased residential and commercial growth in our communities. Key benefits being delivered Waipa is committed to the vision and strategy of the Waikato River Authority (Te Ture Whaimana o Te Awa o Waikato), which is focussed on restoring and protecting the health and wellbeing of the Waikato (and Waipa) River.
    [Show full text]
  • I HAVE I Page 1 a Great Cloud of Witnesses Cambridge Methodist Church 1867-1967
    A Great Cloud of Witnesses Cambridge Methodist Church 1867-1967 I HAVE I Page 1 A Great Cloud of Witnesses Cambridge Methodist Church 1867-1967 I HAVE CALLED YOU FRIENDS A record of this nature is never entirely the work of one person; admittedly, one person endeavours to shape a readable account from a great mass of seemingly unrelated material. But it is the supplying and gathering of that material by many helpful people, which in the end makes such a record possible. Many friends have devoted time and energy in order that the story of Cambridge Methodism might he presented in permanent form. Ministers, students, newspaper proprietors, historians, Government servants, photographers, local residents and church members. All these have played their part in various Ways. A special word of appreciation is offered to Mrs Ella Carter, Mrs Grace Hall and Mr Bernard Wood, who read the original manuscript and made several helpful suggestions. Also to Mr Req Buckingham who copied many old photos, and prepared them for publication. To one and all — SINCERE THANKS Page 2 A Great Cloud of Witnesses Cambridge Methodist Church 1867-1967 Page 3 A Great Cloud of Witnesses Cambridge Methodist Church 1867-1967 St. Paul’s, Cambridge Page 4 A Great Cloud of Witnesses Cambridge Methodist Church 1867-1967 PREFACE This is the story of Cambridge Methodist Circuit—a story which began with the coming of the Rev. Joseph Berry to the Waikato in 1867. Over the hundred years since then, a great cloud of witnesses has lived to prove the power of God’s redeeming love in Jesus Christ and to know the gracious fulfilment of His promises.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Impact Assessment of the Proposed Waikeria Prison Expansion
    Cultural Impact Assessment of the Proposed Waikeria Prison expansion Prepared by Te Onewa Consultants for Department of Corrections 6 March 2017 Prepared by Antoine Coffin, Consultant Te Onewa Consultants Limited Reference Coffin, Antoine. Cultural Impact Assessment of the Proposed Waikeria Prison expansion File name: Final Draft Waikeria Cultural Impact Assessment_v1.5_ 17032017 Address for service Boffa Miskell Ltd PO BOX 91 250 Level 3, IBM Centre 82 Wyndham Street Auckland Prepared for Boffa Miskell Ltd Ultimate client is the Department of Corrections Image front cover Waikeria Prison for WW1 objectors, c.1923 by Archives New Zealand Tokonui Blocks Copyright The right of Antoine Coffin to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright Act 1994. © Te Onewa Consultants Limited, 2016. Page 2 of 130 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Proposal and Purpose .................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Cultural Impact Assessments ........................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 8 2.0 Statutory Context .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge Community Board 3 February 2020 - Agenda
    Cambridge Community Board 3 February 2020 - Agenda Cambridge Community Board 3 February 2020 Kaipaki Room, Waipa District Council, 23 Wilson Street, Cambridge S Milner (Chairperson), J Davies-Colley, Councillor E Andree-Wiltens, E Badger, J Goddin, A MacKay, M Montgomerie, Councillor G Webber 03 February 2021 06:00 PM Agenda Topic Page 1. Apologies 3 2. Disclosure of Members' Interests 4 3. Late Items 5 4. Confirmation of Order of Meeting 6 5. Public Forum 7 6. Confirmation of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting 8 6.1 Minutes of the Previous Meeting 9 7. Proposed Kerbside Food Scrap Collection 14 8. Quarterly Reports 18 8.1 Community Services Quarterly Report 19 8.2 Water Services Quarterly Report 33 9. Community Advisors 50 10. Treasury Report 52 11. Notice of Motion 57 12. 2021 ANZAC Day Services Budget 59 13. 2021 Sister Cities Conference 61 14. 2021 Community Boards Conference 64 15. Board Members' Reports from Meetings Attended on Behalf of the Cambridge Community 68 Board 1 Cambridge Community Board 3 February 2020 - Agenda 16. Date of Next Meeting 69 2 Cambridge Community Board 3 February 2020 - Apologies To: The Chairperson and Members of the Cambridge Community Board From: Governance Subject: Apologies A member who does not have leave of absence may tender an apology should they be absent from all or part of a meeting. The Chairperson (or acting chair) must invite apologies at the beginning of each meeting, including apologies for lateness and early departure. The meeting may accept or decline any apologies. Members may be recorded as absent on community board business where their absence is a result of a commitment made on behalf of the community board.
    [Show full text]
  • For Valour in the Waipa
    Captain Charles Heaphy, VC. Major John Carstairs McNeill, VC. included Heaphy, the Māori retreated Ōhaupo en route from Te Awamutu to FOR back to Waiari where they made a stand. Pukerimu. Just outside Ōhaupo, about where the Ōhaupo School is today, they In the ensuing engagement two British observed a Māori lying prone on the VALOUR IN soldiers were killed trying to rescue a track in front. THE WAIPA wounded corporal. Heaphy then went forward to dress the corporal’s wounds, Sensing a trap, McNeill sent Gibson when Māori fired a volley at him from Two men were awarded the Victoria back to Ōhaupo to bring up infantry. a distance of just a few feet. Five balls Cross for “conspicuous gallantry in the McNeill and Vosper then slowly went pierced his clothing and cap, wounding presence of the enemy” while serving in forward to observe the Māori from the him in three places. the Waipā during the Waikato War. top of the rise, but were immediately After dragging the corporal to safety fired on by about 50 Māori concealed in Captain Charles Heaphy of the Auckland with the help of another, Heaphy then bracken fern. Rifle Volunteers, a staff surveyor, was directed soldiers to where the Māori were awarded the Victoria Cross for bravery When they attempted to gallop from the and, despite his wounds, continued to during the engagement at Waiari, a scrub- scene, Vosper’s horse bolted, throwing attend to the injured for the remainder covered old pā site situated above the him to the ground. McNeill at once of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Awamutu Courier
    Te Awamutu Rural sales specialist Noldy Rust 027 255 3047 | rwteawamutu.co.nz YourC community newspaper for over 100 years Thursday, October 22, 2020 Rosetown Realty Ltd Licensed REAA2008 BRIEFLY Community heroes Altrusa Te Awamutu is calling 100 years young for nominations for a newly created recognition award for our local community heroes. If you know of an individual or group that you think could do with a special thank you for making a difference in the Te Awamutu community please submit your nominee and why you think they deserve a big thank you to [email protected]. Each month Altrusa will recognise a community nominee and profile them in the Te Awamutu Courier. Kihikihi Ukuleles Kihikihi Ukulele Club meets next at the Kihikihi Bowling Club on October 27 and fortnightly thereafter. Beginners class starts at 6pm, for more information contact Vanessa vanessa. [email protected] The club jam follows at 7pm, beginners are welcome to join in. For more information contact Angela, 870 2649. 2020 Light Party off The Light Party 2020 has been cancelled due to health and safety concerns of large groups gathering during the Carolyn Farrell celebrated turning 100 surrounded by fellow residents at Camellia Rest Home and one of her daughters, Karen Howard. Photo / Caitlan Johnston pandemic. Organisers will be back with a bigger Light Party for 2021 - so mark the calendars. Birthday girl shares ‘virtual’ party with family Pa¯terangi PTA quiz Caitlan Johnston reach the milestone age. school in Eastport, Maine – each day working for the Government in their Pa¯terangi school PTA is “Family who are in Chile were up crossing the border by boat across the Radar Research Lab.
    [Show full text]
  • Te Awamutu Courier Office Will Close for 2015 at Noon on Tuesday, December 22
    Te Awamutu B S U N S I O N TI ESS LU & LIFE SO CouPublished Tuesday & Thursdayurier THURSDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2015 +64 7 872 0566 NOT YOUR TYPICAL ACCOUNTANT Community Newspaper of the Year | APN Regional Media Awards 2014 EXTRA COPIES 40c First step to secure Office hours extra water source Te Awamutu Courier office will close for 2015 at noon on Tuesday, December 22. We will re-open at 8am Waipa District Council has Monday, January 11. taken first steps to secure a new water source for Te Awamutu. Yesterday Council approved Blue Christmas spending around $1 million on a This year has not been an new bore on council-owned land easy one for many people. If at Frontier Road. The approval is Christmas is yet another stress subject to final tests, with results for whatever reason you are available in late December. invited to attend the Blue The new bore is one of three Christmas service at Te sunk by Council — including two Awamutu Methodist Church this year — in efforts to secure this Sunday at 7.30pm. more water for Te Awamutu and This is a service where we can surrounding areas during peak acknowledge our griefs and demand. The other test bores losses and struggles and sense sunk at Te Tahi and Pirongia once more hope and strength. cannot supply enough water and have been discounted. Council service Te Awamutu’s water is cur- Waipa District Council offices rently sourced from the will be closed from 3pm on Mangauika Stream on Mt Thursday, December 24 until Pirongia.
    [Show full text]
  • British Logistics in the New Zealand Wars 1845-66
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. British Logistics in the New Zealand Wars, 1845-66' A thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy . In History at Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand Richard J. Taylor 2004 Abstract While military historians freely acknowledge the importance of logistics - the function of sustaining armed forces in war and peace - the study of military history has tended to focus on other components of the military art, such as strategy, tactics or command. The historiography of the New Zealand Wars reflects this phenomenon. As a result, the impact of logistics on the Wars remains largely unexplored and misunderstood. The British superiority in numbers, materiel and technology has been one of the most consistent and enduring themes in the historiography of the New Zealand Wars. Although more recent, revisionist histories have also highlighted the impact of Maori military prowess as a factor, interpretations of the course and outcome of the Wars are still dominated by accounts which stress the numerical and technological superiority of the British Army as critical. There are several problems with this approach. At its most basic, it ignores the historical reality that small, poorly-equipped forces have occasionally defeated larger and better equipped opponents. More importantly, it fa ils to take into account wider British strategy in New Zealand, and events that took place offthe battlefield, such as the provision of the logistical services that did much to shape the outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Waipā 2021-2051 Infrastructure Strategy
    DRAFT Waipā 2021- 2051 Infrastructure Strategy June 2021 Document Set ID: 10439378 Version: 41, Version Date: 03/03/2021 WAIPĀ 2021-2051 INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY Page 2 of 90 (Draft) Doc ID.10439378 Document Set ID: 10439378 Version: 41, Version Date: 03/03/2021 CONTENTS Part 1 - Part 1 Strategic context ....................................................................... 7 1.1 .. Purpose of the Infrastructure Strategy ......................................................................... 7 1.2 .. Council’s Strategic Framework ..................................................................................... 8 1.3 .. Infrastructure Challenges and Priorities ....................................................................... 9 1.4 .. External Influences – Uncertainty and Assumptions ................................................... 12 1.4.1 Population change .................................................................................................. 12 1.4.3 National Policy and Direction ................................................................................. 16 1.4.4 Global Events .......................................................................................................... 17 1.5 .. Key partners .............................................................................................................. 18 1.5.1 Future Proof ............................................................................................................ 18 1.5.2 Government ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Treatment and Supply Activity Management Plan
    Executive Summary WATER TREATMENT AND SUPPLY ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT PLAN VERSION: 2021 – 4.0 For Audit Review Document Set ID: 10545235 Version: 2, Version Date: 20/01/2021 Revision Information Water Treatment & Supply Activity Management Plan 2021 Prepared by Waipa District Council 101 Bank Street Te Awamutu New Zealand www.waipadc.govt.nz Activity Plan Owner Name Role Martin Mould Manager – Water Services Revision History Revision Plan Author Revision Date Details 1.0 Neil Taylor Mar 2019 New template for completion 2.0 Joong Lee & James McKinnon October 2019 Version for Peer Review 3.0 Kelsi Green & Kristina Hermens September 2020 Post Peer review Updates 4.0 Kelsi Green & Kristina Hermens December 2020 For Audit Review Reviewed By Name Role Tony Hale & Martin Mould Manager – Water Services Cyril Morris Asset Management Team Leader Mark Walmsley Senior Asset Planning Engineer Neil Taylor Asset Management Planning Analyst Dawn Inglis Group Manager – Service Delivery Tonkin & Taylor External Peer Review Document Set ID: 10545235 Version: 2, Version Date: 20/01/2021 Content Revision Information ................................................................................................................. 2 Content ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 7 About This Plan............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Infrastructure
    É¿¬»® Ю±º·´» ͬ¿¬»³»²¬ Table of Contents 1 Introduction......................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose and Scope................................................................................................................1 1.2 Definitions and Abbreviations..................................................................................................1 1.3 Limitations..............................................................................................................................1 2 Current Profile.................................................................................................................2 2.1 Current Water Supply Infrastructure........................................................................................2 3 Trends and Growth..........................................................................................................5 3.1 Water Industry Trends.............................................................................................................5 3.2 Water Supply Trends and Growth............................................................................................5 4 Management Considerations..........................................................................................6 5 Strategic Opportunities and Constraints........................................................................8 5.1 Level of Service......................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement
    http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. MILITARY SE:I1TLEMENT IN THE MIDDLE WAIKATO BASIN Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of M.Phil. in Geography Peter D.H. Allen The University of Waikato 1969 Dr. Evelyn Stokes Advisor, Geography CONTElf'l.1S ACKNOWl.EDGEr-!ENTS V FIGURES AND PLATES vi ABBREVIATIONS ix .ABSTRACT X I. _ INTRODUCTION 1 The context of inquiry l The method of inquiry 3 Sources 5 II. THE LANDSCAPE OF THE MIDDLE W'AIKATO :BASilf IN THE 1850' s 10 The Setting 10 Location 10 Topography 10 Climate . 12 Vegetation Cover 13 Soils 15 Human Occupation of the Middle Waikato Basin in the 1850's 17 III. MILITARY SETTLE!,r:F.lNT: THE SCHEMN OF Sl!rl'TLID,iENT 2 3 Conflict of Races 23 Auckland and the r:iddle Waikato Basin 25 The European invasion of the Middle Waikato Basin 29 The Scheme of Military Settlement 31 Enlistment of the 'Waikato Filitary Settlers 35 Confiscation of Maori lands for military settlement 36 IV.
    [Show full text]