A Letter from Our President
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GAO-17-343, Accessible Version, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters March 2017 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Actions Needed to Better Communicate Debt Reduction Plans and Address Billions in Unfunded Pension Liabilities Accessible Version GAO-17-343 March 2017 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Actions Needed to Better Communicate Debt Reduction Plans and Address Billions in Unfunded Pension Liabilities Highlights of GAO-17-343, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found To meet its goal to reduce debt by about $4 billion—from about $26 billion in TVA, the nation's largest public power fiscal year 2016 to about $22 billion by fiscal year 2023—the Tennessee Valley provider, is a federal electric utility with revenues of about $10.6 billion in fiscal Authority (TVA) plans to increase rates, limit the growth of operating expenses, year 2016. TVA’s mission is to provide and reduce capital expenditures. For example, TVA increased rates each fiscal affordable electricity, manage river year from 2014 through 2017 and was able to reduce operating and maintenance systems, and promote economic costs by about 18 percent from fiscal year 2013 to 2016. TVA’s plans depend on development. TVA provides electricity assumptions that future capital projects will be completed on time and within to more than 9 million customers in the budget, but TVA’s estimated capital costs may be optimistic and could increase. southeastern United States. TVA must TVA’s debt reduction plans and performance information are not reported in a finance its assets with debt and manner consistent with the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010. -
CRITICAL JUDGMENT Understanding and Preventing Canoe and Kayak Fatalities ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Co-Authors
CRITICAL JUDGMENT Understanding and Preventing Canoe and Kayak Fatalities ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Co-Authors Gordon Black, ACA Director of Safety Education & Instruction David E. Jenkins, ACA Director of Conservation & Public Policy Dr. Alison Snow Jones, PhD, Assistant Professor, Wake Forest School of Medicine Contributors Virgil Chambers, National Safe Boating Council Pam Dillon, American Canoe Association Kent Ford, ACA Safety Education and Instruction Council Laurie Gullion, ACA Instructor Trainer Leah A. Nylen, Graphic Design and Layout Cheri L. Nylen, ACA Safety Education and Instruction Program Coordinator Bruce Schmidt, US Coast Guard Office of Boating Safety Data Analyst Cover Photo Credits (Starting top left and continuing clockwise) Dan Gavere (Wave Sport) Dagger Canoe Company Fraser Baker Old Town Canoe Company Dan Gavere (Wave Sport) Tim Reese (Mad River) This project made possible through support provided by the National Safe Boating Council Charles E. Wilson, ACA President Pamela S. Dillon, Executive Director, ACA ACA BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2003 Mike Aronoff Jerold Kappel Joe Pulliam Julie Basham Robert Kauffman Paul Sanford Connie Blackwood Jeff Liebel Nita Settina Patti Carothers Greg Mallet-Provost Bill Spitzer Kent Ford Elaine Mravets Christopher Stec Kirk Havens Katherine K. Mull Greg Wolfe Chris Nielsen © 2003 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments 2 Overview Sidebar: Exposure Data About the American Accident Types Canoe Association 4 Accident Causes and Risk Factors - Occupant Movement / Weight Shift Foreword: by the National Safe -
Seismic Response Report. All of the Walkdown Team Members Successfully Completed the EPRI Developed Training on NTTF Recommendation 2.3 - Seismic Walkdown Guidance
ENCLOSURE 2 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 FUKUSHIMA NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3: SEISMIC RESPONSE REPORT SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT - UNIT 1 FUKUSHIMA NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3: SEISMIC RESPONSE REPORT 12-November-2012 WorleyParsons 633 Chestnut St. Suite 400 Chattanooga TN, 37450 Tel: 423-757-8020 Fax: 423-757-5869 www.worleyparsons.com WorleyParsons Services Pty Ltd ABN 61 001 279 812 © Copyright 2012 WorleyParsons Services Pty Ltd NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Sequoyah Unit 1 REV DESCRIPTION ORIG REVIEW WORLEY- DATE CLIENT DATE PARSONS APPROVAL APPROVAL O SQN Unit 1 Seismic 12-Nov-12 ii12 12. Walkdown Report TSimmersSP.ork E/J.Edgar Page 2 of 438 Ei I NTTF Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Response Report Sequoyah Unit 1 Table of Contents 1. Executive Sum m ary ............................................................................................................ 4 2. Seism ic Licensing Basis ..................................................................................................... 5 2.1. General Plant Description ............................................................................................ 5 2.2. G round Response Spectra ............................................................................................. 5 2.3. Structures ............................................................................................................................ 7 2.4. Equipm ent ......................................................................................................................... -
Gallatin Fossil Plant Bottom Ash Process Dewatering Facility Permanent Flow Management System Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment
Document Type: Supplemental EA- Administrative Record Index Field: Environmental Assessment Project Name: Bottom Ash Process Dewatering Facility SEA – Permanent Flow Management System Project Number: 2018-25 GALLATIN FOSSIL PLANT BOTTOM ASH PROCESS DEWATERING FACILITY PERMANENT FLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Sumner County, Tennessee Prepared by: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Chattanooga, Tennessee December 2019 To request further information, contact: Ashley R. Farless, PE, AICP NEPA Compliance Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402 E-mail: [email protected] This page intentionally left blank Table of Contents Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION ......................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction and Background ......................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3 Decision to be Made ...................................................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Related Environmental Reviews and Consultation Requirements ................................. 1-4 1.5 Scope of this Analysis .................................................................................................... 1-4 1.6 Public and Agency Involvement ..................................................................................... 1-5 1.7 Necessary -
TVA Labor Relation Supplements
Revised 01-31-2013 PROJECT AGREEMENT LABOR RELATIONS SUPPLEMENTS (LRSs not listed have been deleted) Number Subject Page LRS-2 Arbitrator Limitation Relative to Jurisdictional Issues ................................................................ 1 LRS-3 Call-By-Name ............................................................................................................................. 2 LRS-4 Staffing - Contractor vs. TVA ..................................................................................................... 3 LRS-5 Wage Determination .................................................................................................................. 4 LRS-16 Apprenticeship Programs ........................................................................................................... 5 LRS-17 Defined Incidental Work, Maintenance, & Office Work .............................................................. 8 LRS-21 Certified Apprenticeship Programs Approved to Receive Contributions From Contractors .... 11 LRS-24 Project Agreement Rates of Pay .............................................................................................. 13 LRS-25 Foremen Rates of Pay (Supervising Other Crafts) .................................................................. 14 LRS-26 Definition of First, Second, and Third Shifts (replaced 8/3/99 with Interpretation No. 21) ....... 15 LRS-27 Payroll Deductions for Political Action Committees ................................................................. 16 LRS-32 Injury - Pay -
We Paddle the Globe. Current Designs Borrows Its Design Influence and Techniques from Waters Across the Globe
2017 We paddle the globe. Current Designs borrows its design influence and techniques from waters across the globe. Inspired by these purpose-built kayaks and the pioneers that fueled the sport’s innovation, we’ve continued to advance the art through new techniques, materials and technologies. It’s a philosophy born from the idea that it’s not about where you take your kayak – it’s where the kayak takes you. So regardless of the destination, we invite you to begin each journey by exploring our North American, Greenland, British and new Danish style collections, in addition to a range of recreational and specialty models. Each one destined to be “a work of art, made for life” that let’s you take your passion further. 1 Makers OF movement Our international design influence and the visionaries who shape it. Long before the paddle enters the water, New England-based kayak designer Barry each kayak begins with a pen stroke. The Buchanan partnered with us on the famous product of inspiration and experience, hard chine kayak, the Caribou. And later, Nigel Current Designs develops and refines each Foster and CD brought the Greenland-styled model through collaborations with some of Rumor to the world’s waters. The newest the sport’s most celebrated designers and global collaboration can be seen in the Prana craftsmen. These partnerships have become and Sisu models, ushering in our Danish one of the hallmarks of the brand – and collection of kayaks. Celebrated Danish continue to shape its future. kayak designer Jesper Kromann-Andersen Beginning with the flagship Solstice line, has worked with our team to marry classic visionary designers have left their mark hull design with innovative twists for an on the Current Design fleet, while inspiring utra-stylish, remarkably versatile experience an entire generation of paddlers. -
2013 Catalog
WILDERNESS SYSTEMS 2013 PRODUCT GUIDE ASPIRE SERIES PAMLICO SERIES NEW NEW NEW ASPIRE 100 ASPIRE 105 pamlico 135T pamlico 145T Easy handling and maneuverability with great Sized for medium to larger sized paddlers, an This best-selling tandem offers performance for pairs. Updated to complement the Pamlico 135T, this stability, the 100 is sized perfectly to fit a female or excellent choice for paddlers looking for stability The tandem outfitting system offers upgraded redesign features a signature rounded hull that recreational small-framed paddler comfortably. and the opportunity to expand beyond flat water. seating and adjustability options for more comfort delivers swift acceleration, helping you paddle and customization than ever before! longer distance faster. Isn’t it time you look at life with a SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS Length 10' / 305 cm Weight 44 lbs. / 20 kg 10'6" / 320 cm 48 lbs. / 22 kg 13'6" / 411 cm 72 lbs. / 33 kg Length 14'6" / 442 cm Weight 73 lbs. / 33 kg new perspective? One with endless Length Weight Length Weight Width 27.5" / 70 cm Capacity 300 lbs. / 136 kg Width 29" / 74 cm Capacity 400 lbs. / 182 kg Width 31" / 79 cm Capacity 500 lbs. / 227 kg Width 31" / 79 cm Capacity 550 lbs. / 249 kg possibilities? A recreational kayak COLORS COLORS COLORS COLORS from Wilderness Systems can FEATURES FEATURES FEATURES FEATURES PHASE 3 AIRPRO PHASE 3 AIRPRO PHASE 3 AIRPRO TANDEM PHASE 3 AIRPRO TANDEM help. While stability, comfort and THIGH AND KNEE PADDING THIGH AND KNEE PADDING SLIDING BOW -
There Are Many Opportunities for Water-Based Recreation Available In
Mary W To [email protected] Morrison/R8/USDAFS cc 08/04/2011 01:52 PM bcc Subject Fw: Chattooga River Comment "Tom Dunken" <[email protected]> To <[email protected]> 08/04/2011 03:13 PM cc Subject Chattooga River Comment There are many opportunities for water-based recreation available in the northern Georgia-South Carolina-North Carolina area without making the Chattooga a playground for excitement seekers. My “vote” is to ban all boat traffic, commercial or otherwise, from the river. From my standpoint, it is disgusting to see a plastic object like a kayak violating the natural beauty of this rare stream. So, I am against any further degradation of this wild area from an expansion of the stretches where paddling is permitted. Thanks for the opportunity to have my say. Tom Dunken Food Bank of Northeast Georgia Mountain Distribution Center Manager 706.782.0780 (Wiley Office- Rabun County) [email protected] Mark Harmon To "[email protected]" <[email protected] <[email protected]> m> cc 08/04/2011 02:12 PM bcc Please respond to Mark Harmon <[email protected]> Subject comment I am writing to say I support the Forest Service's ban on kayaking on the upper section of the Chatooga River. I am fearful of the impact the increased traffic will have on the river and surrounding area. Kayakers already have many miles of access from section 2 to 4. Please leave the upper section for fishermen & hikers. Sincerely, Mark Harmon Travelers Rest, SC Brian Hill To [email protected] <[email protected]> cc 08/04/2011 07:38 PM bcc Subject Chattooga Headwaters ban on boating Hello, I am writing to support the ending of the ban on boating in the upper Chattooga. -
TVA's Toxic Legacy
TVA’s Toxic Legacy: Groundwater Contaminated by Tennessee Valley Authority Coal Ash November 2013 About the Environmental Integrity Project The Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to the enforcement of the nation’s anti-pollution laws and to the prevention of political interference with those laws. EIP provides objective analysis of how the failure to enforce or implement environmental laws increases pollution and harms public health, and helps local communities obtain the protection of environmental laws. Data Limitations EIP based its analysis of groundwater quality on publicly available data retrieved from the Tennessee Valley Authority through Freedom of Information Act Requests. The amount of information available, and the date of the most recent information available, varies by site. The range of dates for which we had information on file is described in each site-specific section of the report. EIP is committed to ensuring that the data we present are as accurate as possible. We will correct any errors that are verifiable. Questions and comments can be directed to Abel Russ at [email protected] Environmental Integrity Project – DC Office 1000 Vermont Avenue NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005 Phone (202) 296-8800 • Fax (202) 296-8822 2 Executive Summary The billion-gallon spill at the Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA’s) Kingston plant in 2008 reminded us that unregulated and poorly maintained coal ash ponds are an invitation to disaster. Although less visible, contamination below the surface of TVA’s power plants may be the more serious, long-lasting legacy from decades of mismanagement. Based on a review of documents obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests, this report shows that TVA’s ponds and landfills have contaminated groundwater under and around all eleven of the utility’s fleet of coal-fired power plants. -
Gallatin Fossil Plant
Memorandum from the Office of the Inspector General October 15, 2018 William G. Maiden, GFP 1A-GLT REQUEST FOR FINAL ACTION – EVALUATION 2018-15535 – ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS – GALLATIN FOSSIL PLANT Attached is the subject final report for your review and final action. Your written comments, which addressed your management decision and actions planned or taken, have been included in the report. Please notify us when final action is complete. In accordance with the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, the Office of the Inspector General is required to report to Congress semiannually regarding evaluations that remain unresolved after 6 months from the date of report issuance. If you have any questions or wish to discuss our findings, please contact Jamie M. Wykle, Senior Auditor, at (865) 633-7382 or Lisa H. Hammer, Director, Evaluations – Organizational Effectiveness, at (865) 633-7342. We appreciate the courtesy and cooperation received from your staff during the evaluation. David P. Wheeler Assistant Inspector General (Audits and Evaluations) WT 2C-K JMW:KDS Attachment cc (Attachment): TVA Board of Directors Janet J. Brewer, WT 7C-K Susan E. Collins, LP 6A-C Sean M. Connors, LP 2K-C Robertson D. Dickens, WT 9C-K Megan T. Flynn, LP 3A-C William D. Johnson, WT 7B-K Dwain K. Lanier, MR 6D-C Justin C. Maierhofer, WT 7B-K Jill M. Matthews, WT 2C-K Sherry A. Quirk, WT 7C-K Curtis G. Rodenhaber, CUF- 1A-CCT Wilson Taylor III, WT 7D-K Jacinda B. Woodward, BR 4D-C OIG File No. 2018-15535 Office of the Inspector General Evaluation Report To the Plant Manager, Gallatin Fossil Plant ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS – GALLATIN FOSSIL PLANT Evaluation Team Evaluation 2018-15535 Jamie M. -
2020 ECA CANOE MARATHON EUROPEAN CHAMPIONSHIPS Dear Sports Friends!
2020 ECA CANOE MARATHON EUROPEAN CHAMPIONSHIPS Dear Sports Friends! This year, Canoe Marathon returns to Győr, a venue already known and loved by many. Győr can fairly be considered as the capital of Canoe Marathon, since it has hosted three world championships in 1999, 2007 and in 2015, while this will be the second Canoe Marathon European Championships organized in the city after 2001. The Hungarian Canoe Federation has the pleasure of inviting your Federation to be represented at the ECA Canoe Marathon European Championships (Seniors short distance, and Juniors, U23 and Seniors long distance) to be held between 1-4 October 2020 in Győr. On the following pages, we walk you through the most important information that may guide you and your team on the way to Győr, from the general introduction of the city and the regatta course, the most vital and useful bits of information on the competition, participation, boat rental, visa issuance, board, lodging and training camp opportunities can also be found here. Due to the corona virus, we have decided not having the master European Cup, which normally will be organized the days before the European Championships. You can always reach the same information and then more and more as time progresses on the official website of the competition: www.gyorcanoe2020.com SEE YOU IN GYŐR ORGANISING COMMITTEE Dear Sports Friends! I warmly welcome you to Győr, the city of rivers! Located at the confluence of four rivers (Rába, Rábca, Mosoni-Danube, Marcal), the city has a long tradition of water sports, which is due not only to its geographical location, but also to the people living here, who have extraordinary passion for sports. -
Tennessee Estimated Mercury Emissions from Coal-Burning Power Plants
Tennessee estimated mercury emissions from coal-burning power plants. Estimated* Estimated** Total Mercury Mercury Released Air Pollution Plant Parent Company City 1998 (pounds) 1998 (pounds) Kingston Fossil Plant Tennessee Valley Authority Harriman, TN 840 525 Johnsonville Fossil Plant Tennessee Valley Authority New Johnsonville, 801 506 Cumberland Fossil Plant‡ Tennessee Valley Authority Cumberland City, TN 1,352 491 Gallatin Fossil Plant Tennessee Valley Authority Gallatin, TN 634 396 Bull Run Fossil Plant‡ Tennessee Valley Authority Clinton, TN 496 310 John Sevier Fossil Plant‡ Tennessee Valley Authority Rogersville, TN 300 187 Allen Fossil Plant‡ Tennessee Valley Authority Memphis, TN 204 129 State Total 4,630 2,548 * Estimated coal in mercury is calculated using plant specific coal contamination and coal consumption data. Release includes disposal in ponds and landfills as well as reuse applications such as fertilizer. ** Total stack emissions are calculated by applying total mercury released to plant specific emission modification factors. See Appendix A. ‡ Indicates plants that are under investigation by either U.S. EPA/Department of Justice or the State of New York Attorney General's Office for violations of the Clean Air Act. NRDC and a coalition of midwest groups have also served notice on many of these plants. N/A - Plants listed with N/A released mercury into the environment, however, insufficient data precludes estimation of mercury emissions from these plants. Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency databases. Plant ownership is attributed to the parent company of the plant operator as of January 1, 1999. The Environmental Working Group is a non-profit environmental research organization based in Washington, D.C.