Utah Lake State Park

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Utah Lake State Park Utah Lake State Park Resource Management Plan September 2001 -i- This page intentionally left blank. -ii- Acknowledgements Utah Lake State Park Resource Management Planning Team Ron Chandler Charlene Christensen Kim Cody Bob Foote Jim Harland Bill Loy, Sr. John Pickup Scott Strong Scott Warren Facilities and Development Subcommittee Kim Cody, Planning Team Member Bob Foote, Park Manager, Utah Lake State Park Jim Harland, Northwest Region Manager, Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Courtland Nelson, Director, Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Dave Morrow, Deputy Director, Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Gary Thorson, Facilities and Construction Section Manager, Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Bill Maughan, Construction Operations Specialist, Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Jamie Dalton, Research Consultant, Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Rosalind Bahr, Parks Planner, Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Other Participants Terry Green, Planning Manager, Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Susan Zarekarizi, GIS Consultant, Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Jim Williams, Park Ranger, Utah Lake State Park Chris Miller, Park Ranger, Utah Lake State Park George Faust, Park Ranger, Utah Lake State Park Doug Sakaguchi, Regional Habitat Manager, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Scott Root, Conservation Outreach Regional Manager, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Dick Buehler, Wasatch Front Area Manager, Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands Edie Trimmer, Royalty Analyst, Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands Dr. Joel Janetski, Anthropology Department Chair, Brigham Young University Curt Allsop, Interested Citizen Vic Deauvono, Interested Citizen Kevin Smith, Interested Citizen -iii- This page intentionally left blank. -iv- Preface Utah Lake State Park is one of Utah’s most A Utah Lake State Park Resource visited State Parks. In 2000, it ranked 4th in Management Planning Team, consisting of overall visitation. With access to 96,000 community leaders, interested users, local acres of water, the park provides excellent residents and agency representatives was water-based recreation opportunities. formed to develop a vision for the park, However, flooding in 1983 destroyed and identify issues and provide managerial damaged many of the park facilities. recommendations. Restoration and replacement of these facilities was ongoing until 1991. The high The team developed a vision to guide levels of use by park visitors, combined with management actions at Utah Lake State the lingering effects of the flooding are Park. Under this vision, it was determined increasing pressure on the park and park that the primary direction of the park should staff to provide a quality recreation include the following actions and experience and to meet the needs of park components: users. 1. Develop facilities that are well-designed, Planning for this outstanding recreation park well-maintained, aesthetically pleasing is required to facilitate high levels of use and adequately meet the diverse water- while providing a quality recreation based and shoreline recreation needs of experience. It is also necessary to ensure the users to the park. efficient and effective expenditure of state and private funds. Planning also provides a 2. Provide opportunities for a wide array of unified management direction that water-based and shoreline recreation coordinates facility development, recreation activities and events. opportunity provision and community linkage. This coordinated effort is essential 3. Provide appropriate concession for the long-term protection of park opportunities to meet the needs of resources and public enjoyment of the various recreation users at the park. recreation opportunities that are available at the park. 4. Establish and maintain community linkages by providing needed facilities This Resource Management Plan (RMP) and opportunities. is required by the Utah State Legislature and the Board of the Utah Division of Parks and 5. Replace the negative stereotype Recreation to guide short and long term site previously associated with the lake and management and capital development. The the park and develop a positive image. planning process recommends limits of acceptable change or modification, and a 6. Enhance customer service by ensuring vision for the park. Specifically, the the park staff has adequate equipment, process: (1) recognizes impacts will result support and opportunities to fulfill their from use and enjoyment of the site; (2) responsibilities. questions how much and what types of impacts may be accommodated while Team recommendations were reached by providing reasonable protection of the consensus and included input from the resources for future visitors; (3) seeks public and other government agencies. sustained quality and value; and (4) seeks These recommendations will guide to determine the conditions under which management of the park over the next two this can be attained. decades. They are intended to be dynamic -v- and will evolve concurrently with park and local community development and as individual portions of the vision statement are achieved. Recommendations contained within this plan will be implemented under the direction of the Utah Division of Parks and Recreation. This plan is intended to be a useful, workable document that will guide management of the park well into the 21st century. -vi- List of Figures and Maps Figures Figure 1: Utah Lake State Park Annual Visitation 1980 – 2000 ............................................10 Figure 2: Utah Lake State Park Average Monthly Visitation.................................................10 Figure 3: Utah Lake Hydrologic Sources ...............................................................................20 Maps Plate 1: Utah Lake and Vicinity Plate 2: Utah Lake State Park, Boundary, Avigation Easement, Recommended Facility Development Plate 3: Sensitive Species In and Around Utah Lake -vii- This page intentionally left blank. -viii- Table of Contents Introduction Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................. iii Preface........................................................................................................................................v List of Figures and Maps ........................................................................................................ vii Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................1 Mission and Vision Statements.....................................................................................................5 Mission Statement......................................................................................................................5 Vision Statement........................................................................................................................5 Resource Management Plan Purpose and Process .....................................................................7 Purpose of the Plan ....................................................................................................................7 The Planning Process.................................................................................................................7 About the Park ..............................................................................................................................9 Park History ...............................................................................................................................9 Physical Setting and Facilities ...................................................................................................9 Climate.......................................................................................................................................9 Park Visitation .........................................................................................................................10 Relationship to the Community and Surrounding Areas .........................................................10 Demographics and Socioeconomic Impact..............................................................................11 Resource Data...............................................................................................................................13 Geological Data .......................................................................................................................13 Biological Data ........................................................................................................................14 Cultural Data............................................................................................................................16 Water Quality Data ..................................................................................................................18 Hazards Inventory....................................................................................................................22 Visitor Survey Results .................................................................................................................25 Survey Highlights ....................................................................................................................25 Issues and Recommendations .....................................................................................................27
Recommended publications
  • Ecological Importance of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake
    Ecological Importance of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake File name: Ecological Role of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake Focus on the Keystone Taxon Chironomidae and HABs Version 1.2 Ecological Importance of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake With a Focus on the Role of the Keystone Taxon Chironomidae on HABs Progress Report January 28, 2017 By: David C. Richards, Ph. D. OreoHelix Consulting Phone: 406.580.7816 Email: [email protected] and Theron Miller, Ph.D. Jordan River Farmington Bay Water Quality Council OreoHelix Consulting 1 Ecological Importance of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Utah Lake Introduction Benthic macroinvertebrates are a critical component of the ecology and ecosystem functioning of Utah Lake. They are a major link between sediment chemistry, water column chemistry, nutrient cycling, benthic algae, phytoplankton, and Utah Lake’s food web including carp, game fish, June suckers, waterfowl, shorebirds, etc. Benthic invertebrates provide underappreciated but invaluable ecosystem services and are keystone taxa instrumental for the functioning of Utah Lake’ ecosystem. It has become clear that several dominant benthic taxa, primarily chironomids, play a key role in the timing and intensity of harmful algal blooms (HABs) in the lake. Very few studies have been conducted on the benthic invertebrate assemblages in Utah Lake (Barnes and Toole 1981, Spencer and Denton 2003, Shiozawa and Barnes 1977) and none were conducted at the level and intensity that is presently being accomplished by this group. No study has ever examined the role of benthic invertebrates on HABs in Utah Lake, this is the first. Our research is also an important element of sediment chemistry, nutrients, and food web models that are presently being conducted by us and others on Utah Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Parker Mountain Adaptive Resources Management Group
    2006 ANNUAL REPORT PARKER MOUNTAIN ADAPTIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT GROUP (PARM) Cooperators Parker Mountain Grazing Association U. S. Bureau of Land Management U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service U. S. Forest Service U.S.D.A. Farm Services Agency U.S.D.A. Natural Resource Conservation Service U.S.D.A. Wildlife Services Utah Agricultural Experiment Station Utah Department of Agriculture and Food Utah Department of Natural Resources Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Utah Farm Bureau Federation Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration Utah State University, Vice President for Research Utah State University, Vice President for Extension Wayne and Piute County Commissions Prepared by David Dahlgren, Michael Guttery, Michael Monsen, and Terry Messmer Quinney Professorship for Wildlife Conflict Management Jack H. Berryman Institute Department of Wildland Resources Utah State University, Logan Verl Bagley Utah State University Extension Service Wayne and Piute County Extension Office January 2007 -1- Table of Contents Page Introduction .......................................................................................................................3 Background ...........................................................................................................3 Objectives ...............................................................................................................3 Sage-grouse Research .......................................................................................................4 Sage-grouse Biology
    [Show full text]
  • Provo River Delta Groundbreaking June 11, 2020
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DATE: June 11, 2020 MEDIA CONTACT: Cindy Gubler at 801-971-5639 or [email protected] A decade in the making: Officials break ground on nearly 260-acre Provo River Delta project to help recover the endangered June sucker PROVO — After more than a decade of planning and coordination, Chris Keleher, Director of Species Recovery at the Utah Department of Natural Resources, climbed aboard an excavator to perform a literal groundbreaking, while other project partners joined him to usher in the construction of the nearly 260-acre Provo River Delta project. The project will restore the interface between the Lower Provo River and Utah Lake as another step in the effort to recover the endangered June sucker. The project, which is located a half mile north of Utah Lake State Park, will take about five years to complete. Crews will start by excavating a system of braided waterways and wetlands into which the last mile and a half of the Lower Provo River will be diverted. This constructed system will provide the environs for Utah Lake and Provo River flows to meet and mingle. In 2022, the northern half of Skipper Bay dike, which was initially constructed in the 1940s to disconnect land east of it from Utah Lake, will be lowered and most of the Lower Provo River’s flow will be diverted north of its current location into a new channel. The Provo River and Utah Lake will once again be interconnected through a delta, providing essential habitat for the survival of the June sucker.
    [Show full text]
  • View Our Pitch Deck
    W E L C O M E T O U T A H U T A H Utah's iconic national parks, world- renowned skiing, strong growth patterns, economic opportunities and quality of education are just a few of the reasons many are making the move to the Beehive State. As one of the nation's fastest growing areas, Salt Lake City and surrounding communities continue to grow and diversify, making it a great place for singles, professionals, families and retirees to call home. ECONOMICOUTLOOK For the past 12 years, an index of economic competitiveness titled “Rich States, Poor States,” published by the American Legislative Exchange Council has ranked Utah the top performer every year. ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS INDEX Wages are rising briskly, job growth has ranked second in the nation for the last 10 years and the state’s population growth ranks in the top three. Because Utah's economy is the fastest growing in the nation - upward mobility, better pay and more opportunity is available. ECONOMICDASHBOARD Utah's location, cost of doing business, leadership, and an educated workforce, all play a part in why Utah is one of the best states in the USA for business. J o b P o p u l a t i o n G r o w t h G r o w t h 3 . 6 % 1 6 % National 1.5% National 6.3% C o s t o f % B u d g e t S p e n t L i v i n g I n d e x o n E d u c a t i o n 1 0 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Date Ideas Grillp
    DATING & RELATIONSHIPS MEET THE CUTE GIRL P. 9 BFF GOT A BF? P. 29 Summer CHILL & DATE IDEAS GRILLP. 39 Mobile 8:01 PM 100% jobmatch Boostability, 6 487 3 Swipe right on Find out if Boostability is the right career match for you. It’s a Match! It’s a Match! It’s a Match! Lisse and Boostability have liked each other. Judy and Boostability have liked each other. Drew and Boostability have liked each other. Shared Interests (3) Shared Interests (3) Shared Interests (3) Flexible SEO & Great Growth Health, Vision, Work/Life BYU & Relaxed Work In-depth Schedule Ping Pong Co-workers Opportunity Dental, 401k Balance Foosball Environment Training "I was just looking for a job to pay the "When I started working here almost a "Boostability is awesome! I just came back bills when I rst applied at Boostability. I year ago, I was so impressed with the from bowling with our account management was immediately trained and was amazed culture. Part of my job description team and some of the executives. at how well I was treated, how easy-going included making sure I ordered a treat Recently, I attended an SLC/SEM everyone was, and how organized each month for all the employees. Are conference paid for by the company. everything was. I have progressed a lot, you kidding me? That's so great! I love Boostability fosters an environment of I really enjoy my job and look forward to working for a company that truly values growth, hard work and fun." coming to work each morning!" its employees." Drew, Lindon Ofce Lisse, Lehi Ofce Judy, Lehi Ofce boostability.com/ItsaMatch Couple your life-saving experience with a friend.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historianshistorians99 Corner
    the historianshistorians99 corner ronald W walker with dean C jessee this issue ofthe historianscornerHistorianhistorians cornersCorner prints three documents which shed lightfighthight on the first relations between the latter day saints and the native americans in the great basin the first document reports the conversation of dimick B huntington with the legendary ute chief walker the second is a letter from president brigham young answering walkers request for communication and the third records the resulting council that took place between the mormon and ute leaders together these documents introduce the reader to the personalities and themes that dominated mormon indian relations during the first years of the pioneer period when the cormonsmormons entered utah in july 1847 they chose to make their first colonies on the southeast rim of the great salt lake fifty miles north of the most prized land the fertile shoreline of the freshwaterfresh water fish laden utah or Timpanotimpanogosgos lake the cormonsmormons wisely shunned this land fearing the ute indians there known variously as the Timpanotimpanogosgos timpany or timpanawach bands these native americans had a reputation for aggressiveness with the white people who had preceded the cormonsmormons into the region within two years of the Morcormonsmormonsmons arrival in the great basin a Timpanotimpanogosgos band under the leadership of kone also known as roman nose caused serious trouble kone and his family had found the mormon cattle grazing at the southern end ofthe salt lake
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNANCE & OVERSIGHT NARRATIVE Local Authority
    GOVERNANCE & OVERSIGHT NARRATIVE Local Authority: Wasatch County Instructions: In the cells below, please provide an answer/description for each question. PLEASE CHANGE THE COLOR OF SUBSTANTIVE NEW LANGUAGE INCLUDED IN YOUR PLAN THIS YEAR! 1) Access & Eligibility for Mental Health and/or Substance Abuse Clients Who is eligible to receive mental health services within your catchment area? What services (are there different services available depending on funding)? Wasatch County Family Clinic-Wasatch Behavioral Health Special Service District (WCFC-WMH) is a comprehensive community mental health center providing mental health and substance use disorder services to the residents of Wasatch County. WCFC-WBH provides a mental health and Substance Use screening to any Wasatch County resident requesting services. Based on available resources, (funding or otherwise), prospective clients will be referred to or linked with available resources. Medicaid eligible clients will be provided access to the full array of services available. Individuals who carry commercial insurance will be seen as their benefits allow. Clients with no funding may be seen on a sliding fee scale. Who is eligible to receive substance abuse services within your catchment area? What services (are there different services available depending on funding)? Identify how you manage wait lists. How do you ensure priority populations get served? WCFC-WBH provides substance abuse services to residents of Wasatch County. Medicaid and commercial insurances are also accepted and services are provided as benefits allow. WCFC-WBH provides substance abuse services as funding allows those without insurance or ability to pay. A sliding fee scale is available for these clients. Clients accepted into the drug court also have all services available and fees are also set based on the sliding scale.
    [Show full text]
  • 1-1-19 Transcript Bulletin
    The Meads’ love of Model A cars keeps them rolling See B1 TOOELETRANSCRIPT BULLETIN TUESDAY January 1, 2019 www.TooeleOnline.com Vol. 125 No. 61 $1.00 OF PERSONS THE YEAR DANIEL PACHECO • ROBIN DOUGLAS • ROB CLAUSING • MARIA SWEETEN RICHARD MITCHELL • ERIK GUMBRECHT • BRENDA FADDIS 2018 FRANCIE AUFDEMORTE/TTB PHOTO Daniel Pacheco, Robin Douglas, Rob Clausing, Maria Sweeten, Richard Mitchell, Erik Gumbrecht and Brenda Faddis served on the Tooele County Government Study Committee. The group’s members have been awarded the Tooele Transcript Bulletin’s Person of the Year. Government study committee Study committee of different backgrounds, experiences wins Person of the Year Award comes together for change Committee’s 2,500 hours of volunteer labor gave voters the chance to STEVE HOWE shape the future of Tooele County’s form of government STAFF WRITER A year of weekly meetings working toward a com- mon goal has a way of bringing people together. TIM GILLIE Commission will become history and the county will be When seven members of the Tooele County STAFF WRITER led by a five-member part-time legislative council and an Government Study Committee gathered this past week The Tooele County Form of Government Study appointed county manager. for a photo, you could hardly tell some of them had Committee logged over 2,500 hours of volunteer labor The study committee started weekly meetings in only met in 2017. There were plenty of smiles, laughs with the estimated value of $312,500 while reviewing the February 2017 with 11 members appointed by a special — and goofing off for the camera — during the shoot.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Royal Skousen Royal Skousen
    1 CURRICULUM VITAE Royal Skousen Fundamental Scholarly Discoveries and Academic Accomplishments listed in an addendum first placed online in 2014 plus an additional statement regarding the Book of Mormon Critical Text Project from November 2014 through December 2018 13 May 2020 O in 2017-2020 in progress Royal Skousen Professor of Linguistics and English Language 4037 JFSB Brigham Young University Provo, Utah 84602 [email protected] 801-422-3482 (office, with phone mail) 801-422-0906 (fax) personal born 5 August 1945 in Cleveland, Ohio married to Sirkku Unelma Härkönen, 24 June 1968 7 children 2 education 1963 graduated from Sunset High School, Beaverton, Oregon 1969 BA (major in English, minor in mathematics), Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 1971 MA (linguistics), University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 1972 PhD (linguistics), University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois teaching positions 1970-1972 instructor of the introductory and advanced graduate courses in mathematical linguistics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 1972-1979 assistant professor of linguistics, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 1979-1981 assistant professor of English and linguistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 1981-1986 associate professor of English and linguistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 1986-2001 professor of English and linguistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah O 2001-2018 professor of linguistics and English language, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 2007-2010 associate chair,
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Beaver County, Utah Centennial County History Series
    A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley UTAH CENTENNIAL COUNTY HISTORY SERIES A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley The settlement of Beaver County began in February 1856 when fifteen families from Parowan moved by wagon thirty miles north to Beaver Valley. The county was created by the Utah legislature on 31 January 1856, a week before the Parowan group set out to make their new home. However, centuries before, prehistoric peoples lived in the area, obtaining obsidian for arrow and spear points from the Mineral Mountains. Later, the area became home to Paiute Indians. Franciscan Friars Dominguez and Escalante passed through the area in October 1776. The Mormon settlement of Beaver devel­ oped at the foot of the Tushar Mountains. In 1859 the community of Minersville was es­ tablished, and residents farmed, raised live­ stock, and mined the lead deposits there. In the last quarter of the nineteenth century the Mineral Mountains and other locations in the county saw extensive mining develop­ ment, particularly in the towns of Frisco and Newhouse. Mining activities were given a boost with the completion of the Utah South­ ern Railroad to Milford in 1880. The birth­ place of both famous western outlaw Butch Cassidy and inventor of television Philo T. Farnsworth, Beaver County is rich in history, historic buildings, and mineral treasures. ISBN: 0-913738-17-4 A HISTORY OF 'Beaver County A HISTORY OF Beaver County Martha Sonntag Bradley 1999 Utah State Historical Society Beaver County Commission Copyright © 1999 by Beaver County Commission All rights reserved ISBN 0-913738-17-4 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 98-61325 Map by Automated Geographic Reference Center—State of Utah Printed in the United States of America Utah State Historical Society 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1182 Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii GENERAL INTRODUCTION ix CHAPTER 1 Beaver County: The Places That Shape Us .
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Surveys on the Uinta & Wasatch-Cache National
    FISH SURVEYS ON THE UINTA & WASATCH-CACHE NATIONAL FORESTS 1995 By Paul K Cowley Forest Fish Biologist Uinta and Wasatch-Cache National Forest January 22, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................... i LIST OF FIGURES ....................... iii LIST OF TABLES ....................... v INTRODUCTION ........................ 1 METHODS ........................... 1 RESULTS ........................... 4 Weber River Drainage ................. 5 Ogden River ................... 5 Slate Creek ................... 8 Yellow Pine Creek ................ 10 Coop Creek .................... 10 Shingle Creek .................. 13 Great Salt Lake Drainage ............... 16 Indian Hickman Creek ............... 16 American Fork River .................. 16 American Fork River ............... 16 Provo River Drainage ................. 20 Provo Deer Creek ................. 20 Right Fork Little Hobble Creek .......... 20 Rileys Canyon .................. 22 Shingle Creek .................. 22 North Fork Provo River .............. 22 Boulder Creek .................. 22 Rock Creek .................... 24 Soapstone Creek ................. 24 Spring Canyon .................. 27 Cobble Creek ................... 27 Hobble Creek Drainage ................. 29 Right Fork Hobble Creek ............. 29 Spanish Fork River Drainage .............. 29 Bennie Creek ................... 29 Nebo Creek ................... 29 Tie Fork ..................... 32 Salt Creek Drainage .................. 32 Salt Creek .................... 32 Price River Drainage ................
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of the Rivalry Between Jesse Knight and Thomas Nicholls Taylor on Architecture in Provo, Utah: 1896-1915
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1991 The Effect of the Rivalry Between Jesse Knight and Thomas Nicholls Taylor on Architecture in Provo, Utah: 1896-1915 Stephen A. Hales Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Mormon Studies Commons, and the Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Hales, Stephen A., "The Effect of the Rivalry Between Jesse Knight and Thomas Nicholls Taylor on Architecture in Provo, Utah: 1896-1915" (1991). Theses and Dissertations. 4740. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4740 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. LZ THE EFFECT OF THE RIVALRY BETWEEN JESSE KNIGHT AND THOMAS NICHOLLS TAYLOR ON architecture IN PROVO UTAH 189619151896 1915 A thesis presented to the department of art brigham young university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of arts 0 stephen A hales 1991 by stephen A hales december 1991 this thesis by stephen A hales is accepted in its present form by the department of art of brigham young university as satisfying the thesis requirement for the degree master of arts i r rr f 1 C mark hamilton committee0amimmiweemee chilechair mark Johnjohndonjohnkonjohnmmitteekonoon committeec6mmittee
    [Show full text]