Statutory Guidance to the Police Service on the Handling of Complaints

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Statutory Guidance to the Police Service on the Handling of Complaints Statutory Guidance to the police service on the handling of complaints Amended May 2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 4 It is not possible to locally resolve Whom the guidance applies to 5 the complaint 34 How the guidance is arranged 5 6 CONDUCT MATTERS 36 Overview – the three ways into Definition of a conduct matter 36 the system 5 Recording a conduct matter 36 The Police Reform and Social Conduct matters involving Responsibility Act 2011: Changes allegations of discrimination 39 to the police complaints system 8 Conduct matters relating to people 2 PROMOTING ACCESS 12 who no longer work for the police 39 The importance of an Referral of conduct matters to accessible system 12 the IPCC 39 Providing information and access 12 7 DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY MATTERS 40 Complainants who need Definition of a DSI matter 40 additional assistance 13 Recording a DSI matter 41 Complaints made by young people under 16 14 Referral of DSI matters 41 8 3 COMPLAINTS 16 REFERRALS 42 Initial handling 16 Complaints that must be referred to the IPCC 42 Definition of a complaint 17 Conduct matters that must Who can complain? 18 be referred to the IPCC 43 Recording a complaint 19 Referral of DSI matters 43 Complaints about Mandatory referral criteria 44 discriminatory behaviour 22 Definitions of referral criteria 44 Who can be complained about? 23 Matters which the IPCC requires Decisions not to notify or record to be referred to it (‘call in’) 47 a complaint 24 Deadlines for referral 47 Deciding how to handle a complaint 24 Voluntary referrals 48 4 DISAPPLICATION 25 Referral of complaints about When can disapplication be carried direction and control 48 out by the appropriate authority? 25 Notification of referral 49 When the IPCC’s permission needs Determining whether and how to be obtained 26 a matter should be investigated 49 Grounds for disapplication 27 9 INVESTIGATIONS 51 Partial disapplication 29 Purpose of an investigation 51 Appeals against the decision to subject the complaint Appointment of a person to to disapplication 29 carry out the investigation 51 Terms of reference 53 5 LOCAL HANDLING 30 Keeping an audit trail 53 Local resolution 31 The scope of the investigation 54 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 CONTENTS CONTENTS continued Allegations involving discrimination 55 12 ACTION AFTER THE INVESTIGATION 88 Death or serious injury matters Communication with the complainant turning into conduct matters 57 and interested persons after the Special requirements 57 conclusion of the investigation 88 Severity assessments 58 Apologies 90 Notices of investigation 60 Outcomes for individuals 90 Representations to the investigator 60 Learning lessons 95 Interviews 61 Inquest proceedings 99 Power to suspend an investigation 13 APPEALS 100 or other procedure 62 Principles of appeal handling 100 Resumption of a complaint after criminal proceedings 64 Who considers the appeal 101 Suspension of officers and Appeals to the chief officer 103 special constables 65 Appeals to the IPCC 106 Providing information/communication 65 Appeal validity 107 Appeals against a failure to notify 10 DISCONTINUANCES 68 or record a complaint or to When can an investigation be determine whether it is the discontinued by the appropriate appropriate authority (non- authority 68 recording appeals) 111 When the IPCC’s permission Appeals against the decision needs to be obtained 68 to disapply 112 Requirement to obtain representations from the Appeals against the outcome of complainant 70 the local resolution of a complaint Grounds for discontinuance 70 or the outcome of a complaint Notification 72 handled otherwise than in Action to be taken following accordance with Schedule 3 a discontinuance 72 of the PRA 2002 116 Appeal against the decision Appeals against the decision to discontinue 73 to discontinue 119 Appeals against investigation 123 11 CONCLUDING THE INVESTIGATION 74 The investigation report 74 14 DATA COLLECTION Criticism 83 AND MONITORING 131 Who receives the report? 84 Responsibilities of the chief officer 131 What does the IPCC expect the Responsibilities of the local appropriate authority to do with policing body 132 the report? 84 The police complaints system Death or serious injury performance framework 133 investigation outcomes 86 15 LEGAL DEFINITIONS 134 Publication 87 Independent Police Complaints Commission Statutory Guidance - May 2015 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Section 1: INTRODUCTION Section 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) has a statutory duty to secure and maintain public confidence in the police complaints system in England and Wales. This guidance has an important part to play in this. It is one of the ways in which the IPCC assists local policing bodies and forces to comply with their legal obligations and achieve high standards in the handling of complaints, conduct and death and serious injury (DSI) matters. 1.2 The Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 introduced a number of changes to the police complaints system. These changes have been incorporated into this guidance. 1.3 This guidance also draws on good practice in complaints handling and, in particular, the Parliamentary and Health Ombudsman’s Principles of Good Complaints Handling1. These are: • getting it right • being customer focused • being open and accountable • acting fairly and proportionately • putting things right • seeking continuous improvement. 1.4 These principles apply to the handling of complaints in many different situations and are very relevant to dealing with complaints against police officers, special constables and police staff members. The focus should not be solely on the process involved and the issue of whether anyone is to blame. Instead, it should be on understanding that a complaint is an expression of dissatisfaction with the way a person has been treated or the service he or she has received. Such dissatisfaction needs to be taken seriously and is an important part of feedback on performance. 1.5 The police complaints system is not straightforward or easy to understand, even for practitioners. It can be even more difficult for complainants. That is why everyone involved in administering the system has a responsibility for ensuring that complainants and other parties are not disadvantaged and that they can access the information they need in a straightforward way. Accessibility is a vital part of securing public confidence. 1 www.ombudsman.org.uk Independent Police Complaints Commission Statutory Guidance - May 2015 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Section 1: INTRODUCTION Whom the guidance applies to 1.6 The guidance is issued under Section 22 of the Police Reform Act 2002. It applies to local policing bodies and all 43 Home Office police forces in England and Wales. Local policing bodies, police officers, police staff members and special constables working within those forces must all have regard to the guidance. It also applies to those agencies and non-Home Office forces that have entered into Section 26 or Section 26BA agreements with the IPCC, subject to any particular provisions contained within those agreements. 1.7 If the people listed above do not follow the guidance, they need to have a sound rationale for departing from it or risk legal challenge. A failure to have regard to the guidance is admissible in evidence in any disciplinary proceedings and any appeal proceedings following a disciplinary decision. 1.8 This guidance is written with the needs of professionals within the police service and local policing bodies in mind. It is also available to the public and other individuals and groups who have an interest in the system. In addition, the IPCC has published a range of other material to assist different audiences. How the guidance is arranged The law and IPCC guidance 1.9 The guidance follows, so far as is possible, the chronological order of events in the police complaints system. Within the main body of the document, the law is highlighted in boxed text to differentiate it from IPCC guidance. The text in these boxes paraphrases or explains the law and is not a direct quotation from the legislation. A number of flowcharts provide a visual representation of some of the more complex processes. Legal definitions 1.10 Rather than including legal definitions throughout the guidance itself, key terms and concepts are defined in section 15. As this guidance is primarily intended to be used electronically, these definitions are accessible through links to section 15. In the published version, the definitions can be found at the end of the document. Dealing with allegations of discriminatory behaviour 1.11 It is a matter of real concern to society when a person serving with the police is perceived to have acted in a discriminatory and partial way. Specific guidance on the handling of allegations of discriminatory behaviour is included in the guidance. In addition, the IPCC guidelines on dealing with allegations of discriminatory behaviour are available as a separate document on the IPCC website. Local policing bodies and persons serving with the police should have regard to that guidance when dealing with cases involving allegations of discrimination. Overview – the three ways into the system 1.12 There are three ways into the system – complaints (see section 3), conduct matters (see section 6) and DSI matters (see section 7). This guidance covers the initial handling of Independent Police Complaints Commission Statutory Guidance - May 2015 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Section 1: INTRODUCTION each of these elements separately as there are different considerations and decisions to be made.
Recommended publications
  • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
    Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta Citation: AVI v MHVB, 2020 ABQB 790 Date:20201216 Docket: FL03 55142 Registry: Edmonton Between: AVI Applicant and MHVB Respondent and Jacqueline Robinson, a.k.a. Jacquie Phoenix Third Party and Unauthorized Alleged Representative _______________________________________________________ Memorandum of Decision of the Honourable Mr. Justice Robert A. Graesser _______________________________________________________ I. Introduction [1] This is a follow-up to my decision of August 26, 2020 in AVI v MHVB, 2020 ABQB 489 [AVI #1]. That decision centred on an intermeddler to a child custody dispute. The third party, whose actual name is Jacqueline Robinson, instead self-identified as “Jacquie Phoenix, Sovereign Woman Living on the Land, Legal Beneficiary / Soul Administrator To the Trust of Page: 2 the Legal Fiction Known as Jacqueline Robinson”. I will in this decision refer to Ms. Robinson by her actual name, “Jacqueline Robinson”, rather than the legally meaningless “Strawman” legal persona she has adopted. [2] As discussed in AVI #1, Ms. Robinson is a pseudolaw promoter, or “guru”. Pseudolaw is a collection of spurious legally incorrect ideas that superficially sound like law, and purport to be real law. In Meads v Meads, 2012 ABQB 571 [“Meads”], ACJ Rooke grouped these concepts together under the term “Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments”, or “OPCA”. In layman’s terms, pseudolaw is pure nonsense. [3] Gurus are a particularly obnoxious component of the pseudolaw phenomenon. They operate as “Typhoid Marys” who spread the pseudolaw “disease of ideas” into new populations: Donald J Netolitzky, “The History of the Organized Pseudolaw Commercial Argument Phenomenon in Canada” (2016) 53:3 Alta LR 609 at 611.
    [Show full text]
  • This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Torrible, Clare Title: How do civil actions against the police and police complaints interact and what does this interaction reveal about police legitimacy? General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. How do civil actions against the police and police complaints interact and what does this interaction reveal about police legitimacy? Clare Torrible A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Social Sciences and law.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law and Civil Liberties ISBN 978-1-137-54503-9.Indd
    Copyrighted material – 9781137545039 Contents Preface . v Magna Carta (1215) . 1 The Bill of Rights (1688) . 2 The Act of Settlement (1700) . 5 Union with Scotland Act 1706 . 6 Official Secrets Act 1911 . 7 Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 . 8 Official Secrets Act 1920 . 10 The Statute of Westminster 1931 . 11 Public Order Act 1936 . 12 Statutory Instruments Act 1946 . 13 Crown Proceedings Act 1947 . 14 Life Peerages Act 1958 . 16 Obscene Publications Act 1959 . 17 Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967 . 19 European Communities Act 1972 . 24 Local Government Act 1972 . 26 Local Government Act 1974 . 30 House of Commons Disqualification Act 1975 . 36 Ministerial and Other Salaries Act 1975 . 38 Highways Act 1980 . 39 Senior Courts Act 1981 . 39 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 . 45 Public Order Act 1986 . 82 Official Secrets Act 1989 . 90 Security Service Act 1989 . 96 Intelligence Services Act 1994 . 97 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 . 100 Police Act 1996 . 104 Police Act 1997 . 106 Human Rights Act 1998 . 110 Scotland Act 1998 . 116 Northern Ireland Act 1998 . 121 House of Lords Act 1999 . 126 Freedom of Information Act 2000 . 126 Terrorism Act 2000 . 141 Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 . 152 Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 . 158 Police Reform Act 2002 . 159 Constitutional Reform Act 2005 . 179 Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 . 187 Equality Act 2006 . 193 Terrorism Act 2006 . 196 Government of Wales Act 2006 . 204 Serious Crime Act 2007 . 209 UK Borders Act 2007 . 212 Parliamentary Standards Act 2009 . 213 Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 . 218 European Union Act 2011 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Criminal Justice Bill 2 DECEMBER 2002 Bill 8 of 2002-03
    RESEARCH PAPER 02/72 The Criminal Justice Bill 2 DECEMBER 2002 Bill 8 of 2002-03 This paper is concerned with the Criminal Justice Bill, which is due to be considered on second reading on Wednesday 4 December. The Bill is to introduce major reforms to the criminal justice system designed to rebalance it in favour of victims, witnesses and communities. Most of the reforms are based on proposals made in two major reviews commissioned by the Government, of the legal framework of sentencing, and of the criminal courts. This paper provides a general background to the Bill and considers the provisions of the Bill relating to police powers, drug testing requirements, bail and conditional cautions. Other research papers in this series consider the provisions relating to sentencing, double jeopardy, prosecution appeals, disclosure, evidence, mode of trial and juries. Arabella Thorp and Sally Broadbridge HOME AFFAIRS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: 02/60 Unemployment by Constituency, October 2002 13.11.02 02/61 The Health (Wales) Bill [Bill 1 of 2002-03] 20.11.02 02/62 The Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Bill 21.11.02 02/63 Communications Data: Access and Retention 21.11.02 02/64 Iraq and UN Security Council Resolution 1441 21.11.02 02/65 Agriculture, Modulation and Environmental Policy 21.11.02 02/66 The Community Care (Delayed Discharges etc) Bill 22.11.02 02/67 Telecommunications and the Communications Bill [Bill 6 of 2002-03] 26.11.02 02/68 Media Ownership and the Communications Bill [Bill 6 of 2002-03]
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 and Schedule 3 to the Police Reform Act 2002
    POLICING AND CRIME BILL: KEELING SCHEDULES This document shows provisions in Part 2 of the Police Reform Act 2002 (Complaints and Misconduct) as they would be amended by the Bill. It is intended to assist the consideration of these provisions in the Bill and should not be taken a definitive statement of the law as it would have effect on the enactment of the Bill. Deletions are shown struck through and additions in italics. Provision in the Police Reform Act 2002 Page Section 9 2 Section 10 4 Section 11 7 Section 12 10 Section 15 13 Section 16 16 Section 18 18 Section 20 20 Section 21 22 Section 23 26 Section 29 29 Schedule 2 33 Schedule 3 44 1 SECTION 9 OF THE POLICE REFORM ACT 2002 Section 9: The Independent Police Complaints Commission The Office for Police Conduct (1) There shall be a body corporate to be known as the Independent Police Complaints Commission (in this Part referred to as “the Commission”). (1) The body corporate previously known as the Independent Police Complaints Commission— (a) is to continue to exist, and (b) is to be known instead as the Office for Police Conduct. (2) The Commission shall consist of— (a) a chairman appointed by Her Majesty; and (b) not less than five other members appointed by the Secretary of State. (2) The Office is to consist of— (a) a Director General appointed by Her Majesty, and (b) at least six other members. (2A) The other members must consist of— (a) persons appointed as non-executive members (see paragraph 1A of Schedule 2), and (b) persons appointed as employee members (see paragraph 1B of that Schedule), but the powers of appointment under those paragraphs must be exercised so as to secure that a majority of members of the Office (including the Director General) are non-executive members.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Reform
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Police Reform Fourth Report of Session 2004–05 Volume I Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 22 February 2005 HC 370–I Published on 10 March 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £13.50 Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies; and the administration and expenditure of the Attorney General’s Office, the Treasury Solicitor’s Department, the Crown Prosecution Service and the Serious Fraud Office (but excluding individual cases and appointments and advice given within government by Law Officers). Current membership Mr John Denham MP (Labour, Southampton, Itchen) (Chairman) Janet Anderson MP (Labour, Rossendale and Darwen) Mr James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Mrs Claire Curtis-Thomas MP (Labour, Crosby) Mrs Janet Dean MP (Labour, Burton) Mr Damian Green MP (Conservative, Ashford) Mr Gwyn Prosser MP (Labour, Dover) Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Mr Marsha Singh MP (Labour, Bradford West) Mr John Taylor MP (Conservative, Solihull) David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/homeaffairscom.
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom: Phase 2 Report on the Application of the Convention On
    DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS UNITED KINGDOM: PHASE 2 REPORT ON THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON COMBATING BRIBERY OF FOREIGN PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS AND THE 1997 RECOMMENDATION ON COMBATING BRIBERY IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS This report was approved and adopted by the Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions on 17 March 2005. TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................4 1. Nature of the on-site visit ................................................................................................4 2. General observations .......................................................................................................5 a) Observations about system of government and legal system ....................................5 b) Economic factors .......................................................................................................6 c) General observations about the United Kingdom’s implementation of the Convention and 1997 Recommendation..........................................................7 d) Developments since the Phase 1 Examination...........................................................8 (i) Phase 1 and Phase 1 bis Examinations ..................................................................8 (ii) The Draft Corruption Bill ......................................................................................9 (iii) Other Legislative
    [Show full text]
  • Police Reform Act 2002
    Status: This version of this Act contains provisions that are prospective. Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Police Reform Act 2002. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) Police Reform Act 2002 2002 CHAPTER 30 An Act to make new provision about the supervision, administration, functions and conduct of police forces, police officers and other persons serving with, or carrying out functions in relation to, the police; to amend police powers and to provide for the exercise of police powers by persons who are not police officers; to amend the law relating to anti-social behaviour orders; to amend the law relating to sex offender orders; and for connected purposes. [24th July 2002] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— PART 1 POWERS OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE 1 National Policing Plan After section 36 of the 1996 Act there shall be inserted— “36A National Policing Plan (1) It shall be the duty of the Secretary of State, before the beginning of each financial year, to prepare a National Policing Plan for that year. (2) The Secretary of State shall lay the National Policing Plan for a financial year before Parliament. (3) Subject to subsection (4), any such plan must be laid before Parliament not later than 30th November in the preceding financial year.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Safety Accreditation Scheme (CSAS) Policy And
    • Community Safety Accreditation Scheme (CSAS) Policy and Procedure Reference No. P03:2013 Implementation date 31.05.2013 Version Number 1.3 Linked documents Reference No: Name. ACPO Community Safety Accreditation Schemes (CSAS) Guidance 2012 Skills for Security Document P15:2011 ASB Policy Community Safety Accreditation Scheme South West Region P03C:2013 (Traffic) Protocols and Procedures Suitable for Publication Policy Section Yes Procedure Section Yes Protective Marking Not Protectively Marked PRINTED VERSIONS SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON. THE MOST UP TO DATE VERSION CAN BE FOUND ON THE FORCE INTRANET POLICIES SITE. Not Protected Table of Contents 1 Policy Section ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Statement of Intent – Aim and Rationale ......................................................................... 4 1.2 Our Visions and Values ................................................................................................... 4 1.3 People, Confidence and Equality ..................................................................................... 5 2 Standards .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Legal Basis ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 People, Confidence and Equality Impact Assessment ..................................................... 6 2.3
    [Show full text]
  • Devolution of Police Powers a Guide for Decision-Makers
    Devolution of Police Powers Law & Law Governance October A Guide for Decision-makers 2016 Devolution of Police Powers A Guide for Decision-makers This guide was compiled by a team comprising K.C. Logeswaran, V.T. Thamilmaran, Viran Corea, Niran Anketell, Galusha Wirithamulla and Vidya Nathaniel. Verité Research aims to be a leader in the provision of information and analysis for negotiations and policy making in Asia, while also promoting dialogue and education for the areas of economics, sociology, politics, law, and media, and provides services in data social development in the region. The �irm contributes actively to research and dialogue in Emailcollection, comments information to: [email protected] veri�ication, strategy development, and decision analysis. Copyright © 2016 Verité Research Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved. Intended for recipient only and not for further distribution without the consent of Verité Research Pvt Ltd. This is a republication of a study initially published in July 2013. Devolution of Police Powers Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... ii part 1: the framework ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Constitutional framework .................................................................................................. 1 1.2. The nature of powers relating to law and order
    [Show full text]
  • Police Reform Act 2002 (C
    Police Reform Act 2002 (c. 30) 1 SCHEDULE 5 – Powers exercisable by accredited persons Document Generated: 2021-08-09 Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Police Reform Act 2002. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes SCHEDULES SCHEDULE 5 Section 41 POWERS EXERCISABLE BY ACCREDITED PERSONS Power to issue fixed penalty notices 1 (1) An accredited person whose accreditation specifies that this paragraph applies to him shall have the powers specified in sub-paragraph (2) in relation to any individual who he has reason to believe has committed or is committing a relevant fixed penalty offence at a place within the relevant police area. (2) Those powers are the following powers so far as exercisable in respect of a relevant [F1fixed penalty] offence— (a) the power of a constable in uniform to give a person a fixed penalty notice under section 54 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 (c. 53) (fixed penalty notices) in respect of an offence under section 72 of the Highway Act 1835 (c. 50) (riding on a footway) committed by cycling; [F2(aa) the powers of a constable F3... to give a penalty notice under Chapter 1 of Part 1 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 (fixed penalty notices in respect of offences of disorder) F4. ;] [F5(ab) the power of a constable to give a penalty notice under section 444A of the Education Act 1996 (penalty notice in respect of failure to secure regular attendance at school of registered pupil);] [F6(ac) the power of a constable to give a penalty notice under section 105 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006 (penalty notice in respect of presence of excluded pupil in public place);] (b) F7.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming the Powers of Police Staff and Volunteers a Consultation on the Way Chief Officers Designate the Powers and Roles of Police Staff and Volunteers
    Reforming the Powers of Police Staff and Volunteers A Consultation on the way Chief Officers Designate the Powers and Roles of Police Staff and Volunteers September 2015 Reforming the way Chief Officers Designate the Powers and Roles of Police Staff and Volunteers 1. Foreword by the Home Secretary .......... 3 2. Executive Summary ............................... 4 3. Introduction and background .................. 5 4. Issues and options ................................. 7 5. Impact of proposals ................................ 12 6. Consultation questions ........................... 13 7. How to respond ...................................... 14 Annex A: List of Current Police Staff Powers ......... 15 Annex B: List of Powers Specific to PCSOs ........... 19 2 Foreword by the Home Secretary The historic office of constable is at the very heart of the policing of England and Wales. Police officers across the country carry out a wide range of duties, keeping the public safe and ensuring justice for the most vulnerable members of society. We value the essential role they play, but they cannot do this on their own. Traffic Wardens, Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs) and other designated police staff have played a key role in policing our communities in recent years and we believe that they can play a greater role in the future, bringing new skills and expertise, and freeing up police officers to concentrate on the core policing task that most requires their particular powers and experience. Volunteers also play a vital role in community safety. Since 1831, Special Constables have taken many of the same risks as full-time police officers, for no reward other than the satisfaction of playing their part in keeping their communities safe from crime.
    [Show full text]