Elasticity, Composition and Temperature of the Earth's Lower

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Elasticity, Composition and Temperature of the Earth's Lower Geophys. J. Int. (1998) 134, 291–311 Elasticity, composition and temperature of the Earth’s lower mantle: a reappraisal Ian Jackson Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Accepted 1998 February 9. Received 1998 January 23; in original form 1997 April 24 SUMMARY The interpretation of seismological models for the Earth’s lower mantle in terms of chemical composition and temperature is sensitive both to the details of the method- Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/134/1/291/632609 by guest on 01 October 2021 ology employed and also to uncertainties in key thermoelastic parameters, especially for the dominant (Mg, Fe)SiO3 perovskite phase. Here the alternative approaches— adiabatic decompression of the lower mantle for comparison at zero pressure with laboratory data, and the projection of laboratory data to lower-mantle P–T conditions for direct comparison with seismological observations—are assessed, along with the equations of state on which they are based. It is argued that adiabatic decompression of the lower mantle is best eVected by a strategy in which consistent third-order finite- strain expressions are required simultaneously to fit the strain dependence of both the seismic parameter and the density. This procedure accords due weight to the most robust seismological observations, namely the wave speeds, and reduces to an acceptable level the otherwise very strong covariance among the fitted coeYcients. It is demon- strated that this approach can readily be adapted to include the eVects of relaxation, from the Hill average to the Reuss lower bound, of the aggregate bulk modulus which governs the radial variation of density. For the projection of laboratory thermoelastic data to lower-mantle P–T conditions, the preferred equation of state is of the Mie–Gru¨neisen type, involving the addition at constant volume of the pressure along a finite-strain principal (300 K) isotherm and the thermal pressure calculated from the Debye approximation to the lattice vibrational energy. A high degree of consistency is demonstrated between these alternative equations of state. Possible departures of the lower mantle from conditions of adiabaticity and large-scale homogeneity are assessed; = ± these are negligible for the PREM model (Bullen parameter gB 0.99 0.01) but ~ ± significant for ak135 (gB 0.94 0.02), reviving the possibility of a substantially superadiabatic temperature gradient. Experimentally determined thermoelastic properties of the major (Mg, Fe)SiO3 perovskite and (Mg, Fe)O magnesiowu¨stite phases are used to constrain the equation-of-state parameters employed in the analysis of seismo- logical information, although the scarcity of information concerning the pressure and temperature dependence of the elastic moduli for the perovskite phase remains a serious impediment. Nevertheless, it is demonstrated that the combination of a pyrolite composition simplified to the three-component system (SiO2–MgO–FeO) with molar = = XPv 0.67 and XMg 0.89, and a lower-mantle adiabat with a potential temperature of 1600 K—consistent with the preferred geotherm for the upper mantle and transition zone—is compatible with the PREM seismological model, within the residual uncertain- ties of the thermoelastic parameters for the perovskite phase. In particular, such = ∂ ∂ = consistency requires values for the perovskite phase of KS∞ ( KS/ P)T and q ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ − −1 ( ln c/ ln V)T of approximately 3.8 and 2, and G/ T near 0.022 GPa K for the lower-mantle assemblage. More silicic models, which have sometimes been advocated, can also be reconciled with the seismological data, but require lower-mantle tempera- tures which are much higher—by about 700 K for pyroxene stoichiometry. However, the absence of seismological and rheological evidence for the pair of thermal boundary layers separating convection above and below, which is implied by such models, © 1998 RAS 291 292 I. Jackson remains a formidable diYculty. Under these circumstances, the simplest possible model, that of grossly uniform chemical composition throughout the mantle, is preferred. Key words: chemical composition, density, elasticity, lower mantle, seismic parameter, temperature. consistency will be demonstrated between these alternative 1 INTRODUCTION approaches, and the reasons for it will be explored. In marked contrast to the complex seismic structure of the The selection of appropriate values for the equation-of-state overlying transition zone with its generally high wave-speed– parameters for the major lower-mantle phases (Mg, Fe)SiO3 depth gradients and superimposed discontinuities, the lower perovskite and (Mg, Fe)O magnesiowu¨stite will be discussed mantle is distinguished by smooth and relatively subdued in detail. The constraints available from static compression radial (and lateral) variations of seismic wave speeds, especially (P–V –T ) and acoustic studies will be compared and contrasted, for the depth interval ~900–2600 km. That this region is and the key residual uncertainties will be identified. Within plausibly both grossly homogeneous and not too far from an this framework, alternative composition–temperature models adiabatic temperature profile was demonstrated long ago in a will be tested for compatibility with seismological observations. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/134/1/291/632609 by guest on 01 October 2021 very influential paper by Birch (1952). He also first employed finite-strain equations of state to estimate the density and = 2 − 2 2 EQUATIONS OF STATE seismic parameter w V P (4/3)V S of the (hot) adiabatically decompressed lower mantle, obtaining what have proved to be remarkably durable values of 4.0 g cm−3 and 51 km2 s−2, 2.1 Isothermal compression respectively. These values are distinctly higher than those for There is ample experimental evidence that the 300 K isothermal the common silicate minerals of the crust and upper mantle. compression of geological materials to relatively large strains Noting that only close-packed oxides such as MgO, TiO2 is adequately described by finite-strain equations of state, and Al2O3 display appropriate combinations of high density based on the Taylor expansion of the Helmholz free energy: and incompressibility, Birch boldly concluded that ‘dense = 2+ 3+ 4+ high-pressure modifications of the ferro-magnesian silicates, F ae be ce … ,(1) probably close-packed oxides … are required to explain the in powers of the Eulerian strain, high elasticity of the deeper part of the mantle’. = − 2/3 = − −2/3 That phase transformations are indeed responsible for much e [1 (r/r0) ]/2 [1 (V /V0) ]/2 , (2) of the seismic structure of the transition zone is no longer truncated at third or fourth order (Birch 1952; Mao & Bell seriously questioned (e.g. Ringwood 1975; Ita & Stixrude 1992). 1979; Jeanloz & Knittle 1986; Knittle & Jeanloz 1987). V and However, the extent of any superimposed compositional layer- r are respectively the molar volume and density; the subscript ing in the mantle has yet to be resolved unequivocally. In a 0 identifies their zero-pressure values. DiVerentiation of eq. (1) companion paper, Jackson & Rigden (1998), a broad review with respect to volume V leads to the fourth-order expression of the elasticity, composition and temperature of the Earth’s for the pressure mantle is presented. Here, it is my intention to explore in more =− ∂ =− − 5/2 + 2 + 3 detail than was appropriate for the more general review a P ( F/dV )T (1 2e) {C1e C2e /2 C3e /6} (3) range of issues bearing specifically upon the analysis of the (e.g. Davies & Dziewonski 1975). The corresponding expressions elastic properties of the lower mantle, and their interpretation for the incompressibility or bulk modulus, in terms of chemical composition and temperature. = − 5/2 + − + − 2 − 3 I will begin with a brief survey of the equations of state best K (1 2e) {C1 (C2 7C1)e (C3 9C2)e /2 11C3e /6}/3, suited to the analysis of mantle elasticity. The approach (4) favoured here and in some other recent studies (Stixrude & Bukowinski 1990; Bina & HelVrich 1992; Stixrude et al. 1992) and its pressure derivatives K∞,K◊ etc., follow by further involves the construction of a third-order Eulerian finite- diVerentiation. The more familiar third-order expressions are = strain (Birch–Murnaghan) principal isotherm (for 300 K), and retrieved by setting C3 0. The relationships between the Ci addition at constant volume of the thermal pressure given and the bulk modulus and its pressure derivatives evaluated by the simple Mie–Gru¨neisen–Debye prescription. A popular at zero pressure are as follows: alternative, in which finite-strain equations with temperature- C =3K , adjusted coeYcients are used to model compression along 1 0 V = − ∞ high-temperature isentropes (Davies & Dziewonski 1975; Du y C2 9K0(4 K0), & Anderson 1989; Rigden et al. 1991), will also be examined C =27K [K K◊−K∞ (7−K∞ )+143/9] . (5) with particular attention to the need for internal consistency 3 0 0 0 0 0 in modelling both compression and elastic moduli. In fitting Much of the considerable empirical success of the third- such equations of state to seismological models, strategies order Eulerian P(e) equation of state (Birch–Murnaghan) is 2 = − ∞ for treating the covariance among model parameters and attributable to the fact that the ratio C2e /2C1e 3(4 K0)e/2 ∞ ~ according appropriate emphasis to the most robust seismo- is very small, because K0 4 and e%1, justifying truncation logical information (wave speeds, or seismic parameter, rather at third or even second order (Birch 1952). In fitting the than density and pressure) will be presented. Approximate compressional and shear moduli to finite-strain equations of © 1998 RAS, GJI 134, 291–311 L ower-mantle elasticity, composition and temperature 293 state (see below), there is much less information concerning compression (e.g. Davies & Dziewonski 1975; DuVy& convergence of the respective expansions. Anderson 1989; Rigden et al.
Recommended publications
  • 7 Apr 2021 Thermodynamic Response Functions . L03–1 Review Of
    7 apr 2021 thermodynamic response functions . L03{1 Review of Thermodynamics. 3: Second-Order Quantities and Relationships Maxwell Relations • Idea: Each thermodynamic potential gives rise to several identities among its second derivatives, known as Maxwell relations, which express the integrability of the fundamental identity of thermodynamics for that potential, or equivalently the fact that the potential really is a thermodynamical state function. • Example: From the fundamental identity of thermodynamics written in terms of the Helmholtz free energy, dF = −S dT − p dV + :::, the fact that dF really is the differential of a state function implies that @ @F @ @F @S @p = ; or = : @V @T @T @V @V T;N @T V;N • Other Maxwell relations: From the same identity, if F = F (T; V; N) we get two more relations. Other potentials and/or pairs of variables can be used to obtain additional relations. For example, from the Gibbs free energy and the identity dG = −S dT + V dp + µ dN, we get three relations, including @ @G @ @G @S @V = ; or = − : @p @T @T @p @p T;N @T p;N • Applications: Some measurable quantities, response functions such as heat capacities and compressibilities, are second-order thermodynamical quantities (i.e., their definitions contain derivatives up to second order of thermodynamic potentials), and the Maxwell relations provide useful equations among them. Heat Capacities • Definitions: A heat capacity is a response function expressing how much a system's temperature changes when heat is transferred to it, or equivalently how much δQ is needed to obtain a given dT . The general definition is C = δQ=dT , where for any reversible transformation δQ = T dS, but the value of this quantity depends on the details of the transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eyes Have It
    news and views flow of heat and matter in the interior2. This Irifune and Isshiki1 have shown such transition to higher pressures (as can be seen flow, in turn, drives the tectonic evolution artificial separation to be misleading by in Irifune and Isshiki’s Fig. 3 on page 704), so of the surface, including the occurrence of experimentally demonstrating Mg–Fe ex- the onset of the transition in pyrolite is post- volcanism and seismicity. change between a, b, garnet and clino- poned to greater depths relative to that in Olivine, a solid solution of forsterite pyroxene. We have known5 for some time Fo89. On the other side of the phase change, b (Mg2SiO4) and fayalite (Fe2SiO4), has the that the proportions of these minerals vary does not partition Fe into garnet as strong- a b approximate composition (Mg0.89 Fe0.11)2SiO4 with depth, as shown by the bold white lines ly as does , so is not initially Mg-enriched, (called forsterite-89 or Fo89) in samples from in Fig. 1, but Irifune and Isshiki have now and the completion of the a–b transition the shallow mantle. It transforms from the measured the accompanying variations in is not postponed relative to Fo89. The net olivine (a) phase to wadsleyite (b), changing the compositions of coexisting minerals, effect of postponing onset but not co8m- again to ringwoodite (g) at greater depths shown by the colours. In isolated Fo89 pletion is to concentrate the transition into and eventually breaking down to a mixture of olivine, mineral compositions must remain a narrower range of depths, decreasing the silicate perovskite and magnesiowüstite.
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Mantle and Transition Zone
    The Upper Mantle and Transition Zone Daniel J. Frost* DOI: 10.2113/GSELEMENTS.4.3.171 he upper mantle is the source of almost all magmas. It contains major body wave velocity structure, such as PREM (preliminary reference transitions in rheological and thermal behaviour that control the character Earth model) (e.g. Dziewonski and Tof plate tectonics and the style of mantle dynamics. Essential parameters Anderson 1981). in any model to describe these phenomena are the mantle’s compositional The transition zone, between 410 and thermal structure. Most samples of the mantle come from the lithosphere. and 660 km, is an excellent region Although the composition of the underlying asthenospheric mantle can be to perform such a comparison estimated, this is made difficult by the fact that this part of the mantle partially because it is free of the complex thermal and chemical structure melts and differentiates before samples ever reach the surface. The composition imparted on the shallow mantle by and conditions in the mantle at depths significantly below the lithosphere must the lithosphere and melting be interpreted from geophysical observations combined with experimental processes. It contains a number of seismic discontinuities—sharp jumps data on mineral and rock properties. Fortunately, the transition zone, which in seismic velocity, that are gener- extends from approximately 410 to 660 km, has a number of characteristic ally accepted to arise from mineral globally observed seismic properties that should ultimately place essential phase transformations (Agee 1998). These discontinuities have certain constraints on the compositional and thermal state of the mantle. features that correlate directly with characteristics of the mineral trans- KEYWORDS: seismic discontinuity, phase transformation, pyrolite, wadsleyite, ringwoodite formations, such as the proportions of the transforming minerals and the temperature at the discontinu- INTRODUCTION ity.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Transitions in Earth's Mantle and Mantle Mineralogy
    Phase transitions in Earth’s Mantle and Mantle Mineralogy Upper Mantle Minerals: Olivine, Orthopyroxene, Clinopyroxene and Garnet ~13.5 GPa: Olivine Æ Wadsrlyite (DE) transition (ONSET TRANSITION ZONE) ~15.5 GPa: Pyroxene component gradually dissolve into garnet structure, resulting in the completion of pyroxene-majorite transformation >20 GPa: High CaO content in majorite is unfavorable at high pressure, leading to the formation of CaSiO3 perovskite ~24 GPa: Division of transition zone and lower mantle. Sharp transition silicate spinel to ferromagnesium silicate perovskite and magnesiowustite >24 GPa: Most of Al2O3 resides in majorite at transition zone pressures, a transformation from Majorite to Al-bearing orthorhombic perovskite completes at pressure higher than that of post-spinel transformation Lower Mantle Minerals: Orthorhobic perovskite, Magnesiowustite, CaSiO3 perovskite ~27 GPa: Transformation of Al and Si rich basalt to perovskite lithology with assemblage of Al-bearing perovskite, CaSiO3, stishovite and Al-phases Upper Mantle: olivine, garnet and pyroxene Transition zone: olivine (a-phase) transforms to wadsleyite (b-phase) then to spinel structure (g-phase) and finally to perovskite + magnesio-wüstite. Transformations occur at P and T conditions similar to 410, 520 and 660 km seismic discontinuities Xenoliths: (mantle fragments brought to surface in lavas) 60% Olivine + 40 % Pyroxene + some garnet Images removed due to copyright considerations. Garnet: A3B2(SiO4)3 Majorite FeSiO4, (Mg,Fe)2 SiO4 Germanates (Co-, Ni- and Fe-
    [Show full text]
  • High Temperature and High Pressure Equation of State of Gold
    Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Related content - The equation of state of B2-type NaCl High temperature and high pressure equation of S Ono - Thermodynamics in high-temperature state of gold pressure scales on example of MgO Peter I Dorogokupets To cite this article: Masanori Matsui 2010 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 215 012197 - Equation of State of Tantalum up to 133 GPa Tang Ling-Yun, Liu Lei, Liu Jing et al. View the article online for updates and enhancements. Recent citations - Equation of State for Natural Almandine, Spessartine, Pyrope Garnet: Implications for Quartz-In-Garnet Elastic Geobarometry Suzanne R. Mulligan et al - High-Pressure Equation of State of 1,3,5- triamino-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene: Insights into the Monoclinic Phase Transition, Hydrogen Bonding, and Anharmonicity Brad A. Steele et al - High-enthalpy crystalline phases of cadmium telluride Adebayo O. Adeniyi et al This content was downloaded from IP address 170.106.202.8 on 25/09/2021 at 03:55 Joint AIRAPT-22 & HPCJ-50 IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 215 (2010) 012197 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/215/1/012197 High temperature and high pressure equation of state of gold Masanori Matsui School of Science, University of Hyogo, Kouto, Kamigori, Hyogo 678–1297, Japan E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. High-temperature and high-pressure equation of state (EOS) of Au has been developed using measured data from shock compression up to 240 GPa, volume thermal expansion between 100 and 1300 K and 0 GPa, and temperature dependence of bulk modulus at 0 GPa from ultrasonic measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculation of Thermal Pressure Coefficient of Lithium Fluid by Data
    International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Physical Chemistry Volume 2012, Article ID 724230, 11 pages doi:10.5402/2012/724230 Research Article Calculation of Thermal Pressure Coefficient of Lithium Fluid by pVT Data Vahid Moeini Department of Chemistry, Payame Noor University, P.O. Box 19395-3697, Tehran, Iran Correspondence should be addressed to Vahid Moeini, v [email protected] Received 20 September 2012; Accepted 9 October 2012 Academic Editors: F. M. Cabrerizo, H. Reis, and E. B. Starikov Copyright © 2012 Vahid Moeini. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For thermodynamic performance to be optimized, particular attention must be paid to the fluid’s thermal pressure coefficients and thermodynamics properties. A new analytical expression based on the statistical mechanics is derived for thermal pressure coefficients of dense fluids using the intermolecular forces theory to be valid for liquid lithium as well. The results are used to predict the parameters of some binary mixtures at different compositions and temperatures metal-nonmetal lithium fluid which agreement with experimental data. In this paper, we have used newly presented parameters of analytical expressions based on the statistical mechanics and predicted the metal-nonmetal transition for liquid lithium. The repulsion term of the effective pair potential for lithium shows well depth at 1600 K, and the position of well depth maximum is in agreement with X-ray diffraction and small-angle X-ray scattering. 1. Introduction would be observed if each pair was isolated.
    [Show full text]
  • Pressure—Volume—Temperature Equation of State
    Pressure—Volume—Temperature Equation of State S.-H. Dan Shim (심상헌) Acknowledgement: NSF-CSEDI, NSF-FESD, NSF-EAR, NASA-NExSS, Keck Equations relating state variables (pressure, temperature, volume, or energy). • Backgrounds • Equations • Limitations • Applications Ideal Gas Law PV = nRT Ideal Gas Law • Volume increases with temperature • VolumePV decreases= nRTwith pressure • Pressure increases with temperature Stress (σ) and Strain (�) Bridgmanite in the Mantle Strain in the Mantle 20-30% P—V—T EOS Bridgmanite Energy A Few Terms to Remember • Isothermal • Isobaric • Isochoric • Isentropic • Adiabatic Energy Thermodynamic Parameters Isothermal bulk modulus Thermodynamic Parameters Isothermal bulk modulus Thermal expansion parameter Thermodynamic Parameters Isothermal bulk modulus Thermal expansion parameter Grüneisen parameter ∂P 1 ∂P γ = V = ∂U ρC ∂T ✓ ◆V V ✓ ◆V P—V—T of EOS Bridgmanite • KT • α • γ P—V—T EOS Shape of EOS Shape of EOS Ptotal Shape of EOS Pst Pth Thermal Pressure Ftot = Fst + Fb + Feec P(V, T)=Pst(V, T0)+ΔPth(V, T) Isothermal EOS dP dP K = = − d ln V d ln ρ P V = V0 exp − K 0 Assumes that K does not change with P, T Murnaghan EOS K = K0 + K00 P dP dP K = = − d ln V d ln ρ K00 ρ = ρ0 1 + P Ç K0 å However, K increases nonlinearly with pressure Birch-Murnaghan EOS 2 3 F = + bƒ + cƒ + dƒ + ... V 0 3/2 =(1 + 2ƒ ) V F : Energy (U or F) f : Eulerian finite strain Birch (1978) Second Order BM EOS 2 F = + bƒ + cƒ 3K V 7/3 V 5/3 5/2 0 0 0 P = 3K0ƒ (1 + 2ƒ ) = 2 V V ñ✓ ◆ − ✓ ◆ ô dP K V 7/3 V 5/3 0 0 0 5/2 K = V = 7 5 = K0(1 + 7ƒ )(1 + 2ƒ ) dV 2 V V − ñ ✓ ◆ − ✓ ◆ ô Birch (1978) Third Order BM EOS 2 3 F = + bƒ + cƒ + dƒ 7/3 5/3 2/3 3K0 V0 V0 V0 P = 1 ξ 1 2 V V V ñ✓ ◆ − ✓ ◆ ô® − ñ✓ ◆ − ô´ 3 ξ = (4 K00 ) 4 − Birch (1978) Truncation Problem 2 3 F = + bƒ + cƒ + dƒ + ..
    [Show full text]
  • High Pressure and Temperature Dependence of Thermodynamic Properties of Model Food Solutions Obtained from in Situ Ultrasonic Measurements
    HIGH PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE OF THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF MODEL FOOD SOLUTIONS OBTAINED FROM IN SITU ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENTS By ROGER DARROS BARBOSA A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2003 Copyright 2003 by Roger Darros Barbosa To Neila who made me feel reborn, and To my dearly loved children Marina, Carolina and especially Artur, the youngest, with whom enjoyable times were shared through this journey ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Murat Ö. Balaban and Dr. Arthur A. Teixeira for their valuable advice, help, encouragement, support and guidance throughout my graduate studies at the University of Florida. Special thanks go to Dr. Murat Ö. Balaban for giving me the opportunity to work in his lab and study the interesting subject of this research. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Gary Ihas, Dr. D. Julian McClements and Dr. Robert J. Braddock for their help, suggestions, and words of encouragement along this research. A special thank goes to Dr. D. Julian McClements for his valuable assistance and for receiving me in his lab at the University of Massachusetts. I am grateful to the Foundation for Support of Research of the State of São Paulo (FAPESP 97/07546-4) for financially supporting most part of this project. I also gratefully acknowledge the Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) Research Dean, the chair of the Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, the chair of Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at the University of Florida, and the United States Department of Agriculture (through a research grant), for financially supporting parts of this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Time-Varying Subduction and Rollback Velocities in Slab Stagnation
    Phase transformation of harzburgite and stagnant slab in the mantle transition zone Y. Zh ang 1,2, Y. Wu1, Y. Wang2, Z. Jin1, C. R. Bina3 1State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources (GPMR), China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China 2Center for Advanced Radiation Sources, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA 3Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA Subducted materials play an important role in affecting chemical composition and structure of the mantle transition zone. Harzburgite is generally accepted as an important part of subducting slabs, overlain by a layer of basalt. Seismic tomography studies have detected widespread fast anomalies in the mantle transition zone (MTZ) and lower mantle around the circum-Pacific and the Mediterranean region. These anomalies have been interpreted as stagnant oceanic lithosphere materials as these regions are closely associated with subduction zones, where the oceanic lithosphere plunges deeply into the MTZ. However, experimental studies on the phase transformations of harzburgite have been very limited, and no experimental studies have been conducted on the physical properties of harzburgite under MTZ conditions. In this study, we conducted high-temperature and high-pressure experiments, using a 1000-ton Kawai-type multi-anvil apparatus at GPMR, on a natural harzburgite at 14.1-24.2 GPa and 1473-1673 K. At 1673 K, harzburgite transformed to wadsleyite + garnet + clinopyroxene below 19 GPa and further decomposed into an assemblage of ringwoodite + garnet + stishovite above 20 GPa. Some amounts of akimotoite were produced at still higher pressures (22-23 GPa), and finally perovskite and magnesiowustite were found to coexist with garnet at 24.2 GPa.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 17 Internal Pressure and Internal Energy of Saturated and Compressed Phases Ainstitute of Physics of the Dagestan Scient
    CHAPTER 17 Internal Pressure and Internal Energy of Saturated and Compressed Phases ILMUTDIN M. ABDULAGATOV,a,b JOSEPH W. MAGEE,c NIKOLAI G. POLIKHRONIDI,a RABIYAT G. BATYROVAa aInstitute of Physics of the Dagestan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Makhachkala, Dagestan, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] bDagestan State University, Makhachkala, Dagestan, Russia cNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305 USA. E- mail: [email protected] Abstract Following a critical review of the field, a comprehensive analysis is provided of the internal pressure of fluids and fluid mixtures and its determination in a wide range of temperatures and pressures. Further, the physical meaning is discussed of the internal pressure along with its microscopic interpretation by means of calorimetric experiments. A new relation is explored between the internal pressure and the isochoric heat capacity jump along the coexistence curve near the critical point. Various methods (direct and indirect) of internal pressure determination are discussed. Relationships are studied between the internal pressure and key thermodynamic properties, namely expansion coefficient, isothermal compressibility, speed of sound, enthalpy increments, and viscosity. Loci of isothermal, isobaric, and isochoric internal pressure maxima and minima were examined in addition to the locus of zero internal pressure. Details were discussed of the new method of direct internal pressure determination by a calorimetric experiment that involves simultaneous measurement of the thermal pressure coefficient (∂P / ∂T )V , i.e. internal pressure Pint = (∂U / ∂V )T and heat capacity cV = (∂U / ∂T )V . The dependence of internal pressure on external pressure, temperature and density for pure fluids, and on concentration for binary mixtures is considered on the basis of reference (NIST REFPROP) and crossover EOS.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry
    GEOCHEMISTRY “Structure & Composition of the Earth” (M.Sc. Sem IV) Shekhar Assistant Professor Department of Geology Patna Science College Patna University E-mail: [email protected] Mob: +91-7004784271 Structure of the Earth • Earth structure and it’s composition is the essential component of Geochemistry. • Seismology is the main tool for the determination of the Earth’s interior. • Interpretation of the property is based on the behaviour of two body waves travelling within the interior. Structure of the Earth Variation in seismic body-wave paths, which in turn represents the variation in properties of the earth’s interior. Structure of the Earth Based on seismic data, Earth is broadly divided into- i. The Crust ii. The Mantle iii. The Core *Figure courtesy Geologycafe.com Density, Pressure & Temperature variation with Depth *From Bullen, An introduction to the theory of seismology. Courtesy of Cambridge Cambridge University Press *Figure courtesy Brian Mason: Principle of Geochemistry The crust • The crust is the outermost layer of the earth. • It consist 0.5-1.0 per cent of the earth’s volume and less than 1 per cent of Earth’s mass. • The average density is about “2.7 g/cm3” (average density of the earth is 5.51 g/cm³). • The crust is differentiated into- i) Oceanic crust ii) Continental crust The Oceanic crust • Covers approx. ~ 70% of the Earth’s surface area. • Average thickness ~ 6km (~4km at MOR : ~10km at volcanic plateau) • Mostly mafic in nature. • Relatively younger in age. The Oceanic crust Seismic study shows layered structural arrangement. - Seawater - Sediments - Basaltic layer - Gabbroic layer *Figure courtesy W.M.White: Geochemistry The Continental crust • Heterogeneous in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Structures of Minerals in the Lower Mantle
    6 Crystal Structures of Minerals in the Lower Mantle June K. Wicks and Thomas S. Duffy ABSTRACT The crystal structures of lower mantle minerals are vital components for interpreting geophysical observations of Earth’s deep interior and in understanding the history and composition of this complex and remote region. The expected minerals in the lower mantle have been inferred from high pressure‐temperature experiments on mantle‐relevant compositions augmented by theoretical studies and observations of inclusions in natural diamonds of deep origin. While bridgmanite, ferropericlase, and CaSiO3 perovskite are expected to make up the bulk of the mineralogy in most of the lower mantle, other phases such as SiO2 polymorphs or hydrous silicates and oxides may play an important subsidiary role or may be regionally important. Here we describe the crystal structure of the key minerals expected to be found in the deep mantle and discuss some examples of the relationship between structure and chemical and physical properties of these phases. 6.1. IntrODUCTION properties of lower mantle minerals [Duffy, 2005; Mao and Mao, 2007; Shen and Wang, 2014; Ito, 2015]. Earth’s lower mantle, which spans from 660 km depth The crystal structure is the most fundamental property to the core‐mantle boundary (CMB), encompasses nearly of a mineral and is intimately related to its major physical three quarters of the mass of the bulk silicate Earth (crust and chemical characteristics, including compressibility, and mantle). Our understanding of the mineralogy and density,
    [Show full text]