THE DYNAMICS OF CROUCH GAIT
A DISSERTATION
SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES
OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE DEGREE OF
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
Katherine Muterspaugh Steele
July 2012
© 2012 by Katherine Muterspaugh Steele. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/
This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/ph453mr9252
ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Scott Delp, Primary Adviser
I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Thomas Andriacchi
I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Jessica Rose
Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education
This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives.
iii
iv
ABSTRACT
Individuals with cerebral palsy commonly have gait pathologies that limit their mobility and hinder activities of daily living. One of the most common gait pathologies among individuals with cerebral palsy is crouch gait. Individuals who walk in a crouch gait have excessive hip and knee flexion which makes walking difficult and metabolically inefficient. If untreated, crouch gait can lead to joint pain, bone deformities, and a loss of independent mobility. Current treatments for crouch gait involve orthopaedic surgery and therapy; however, outcomes are inconsistent.
Clinicians need a better understanding of how the complexities of the neuromuscular and musculoskeletal systems contribute to this pathologic gait pattern. The goal of this dissertation was to examine the musculoskeletal dynamics of crouch gait in individuals with cerebral palsy to better understand its biomechanical causes and improve treatment of individuals with crouch gait.
There are many proposed causes of crouch gait including excessive muscle activity from contracture or spasticity, muscle weakness, bone deformities, and impaired voluntary control. To determine which of these factors contribute to crouch gait requires an understanding of how individual muscles contribute to motion. We generated the first three-dimensional musculoskeletal simulations of crouch gait to evaluate how muscles contribute to joint and mass center acceleration. We found that individuals with crouch gait use the same muscles to support and propel the body as unimpaired gait. However, larger and more sustained muscle forces are required during crouch gait.
v
Many individuals with cerebral palsy and crouch gait also develop knee pain later in life. Since cartilage growth and maintenance is dependent upon the loads experienced during daily life, we sought to quanitfy how tibiofemoral forces change during crouch gait. We determined that the compressive tibiofemoral force increases quadratically with crouch severity and individuals who walk in a severe crouch gait experience three times the load experienced during unimpaired gait. Elevated tibiofemoral forces could compromise cartilage health and lead to knee pain.
Muscle weakness is commonly hypothesized as a cause of crouch gait and many individuals with crouch gait participate in strength training programs. We performed a meta-analysis of outcomes after strength training in individuals with cerebral palsy and crouch gait and found that although muscle strength increases after strength training, changes in gait kinematics are inconsistent. Some individuals with crouch gait had significantly more knee extension during gait after strength training; however, other individuals’ gait deteriorated. We determined that hamstring spasticity may be a contraindication for strength training among individuals with cerebral palsy and crouch gait; no individuals with hamstring spasticity had improved knee extension after strength training.
We also used musculoskeletal simulation to evaluate how much muscle strength is required to walk in a crouch gait compared to an unimpaired gait. We found that crouch gait requires more quadriceps strength than unimpaired gait but requires less hip abductor and ankle plantarflexor strength. These results suggest that weakness of the hip abductors or ankle plantarflexors may contribute to crouch gait
vi and strengthening these muscles may lead to more consistent outcomes after strength training.
This dissertation examines the dynamics of crouch gait among individuals with cerebral palsy including muscle contributions to motion, changes in joint loads, and the effects of muscle weakness. This work provides a foundation for using musculoskeletal modeling and simulation to examine complex gait pathologies and also suggests exciting future areas of research to improve the care and treatment of individuals with cerebral palsy and crouch gait.
vii
viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Over the past five years I have come to appreciate that earning a PhD is a team effort that requires incredible collaborators and a tight support network. The community is the best part of Stanford University and many people have helped to make this dissertation a reality. The acknowledgements that follow only scratch the surface and I thank the whole Stanford community for their help and encouragement.
First, I need to thank my advisor, Scott Delp and the Neuromuscular
Biomechanics Laboratory (NMBL). Dr. Delp has provided me with an excellent role model for how to enjoy research and investigate important questions. The community provided by NMBL has given me a safe place to explore the field of biomechanics, take risks, and grow as an engineer and researcher. I especially want to thank Ajay
Seth, Ayman Habib, Jennifer Hicks, Melanie Fox, and Matt DeMers for their invaluable advice, technical support, and collaboration. My day-to-day work would also not have been the same without Melinda Cromie sitting across from me to bounce ideas off of, ask questions, and pursue ideas like creating our own course.
Additionally, the lab would not function as smoothly without the constant attention and support of Carolyn Mazenko – thank you.
I have also been fortunate enough to have an amazing team of collaborators outside of NMBL. My reading committee members, Jessica Rose and Tom
Andriacchi, have been a continual source of support, critical evaluation, and clinical insight. The opportunity to work at Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital with Jessica
Rose has provided me with a weekly reminder of the patients we are trying to help. I would also like to thank Mike Schwartz from Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare
ix for not only providing an amazing source of clinical data but, more importantly, for his insights and lively discussions. I am also thankful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Marjolein van der Krogt during her visits to Stanford. Diane Damiano from the National Institutes of Health has served as a valuable clinical collaborator and mentor. I hope to continue to work with all of these individuals in the future to improve the lives of individuals with cerebral palsy.
I must also not forget to acknowledge that research requires money and a variety of sources have helped to fund this work including an NSF Graduate Research
Fellowship and NIH grants R01-HD33929, R01-HD046814, and U54-GM072970.
Outside of research I have had an incredible community of friends who have supported me and made the last five years enjoyable. A special thanks to the Barnes couples, Matt, An, Mai, and our volleyball teams for providing humor and perspective
– the last five years would not have been the same without you. In addition, Sheri
Sheppard, ME Women+, ASEE, and my WISE group have kept me sane and given me inspiration for the future.
Finally I need to thank my family for their constant love and support. Mom and
Dad, you have always been my anchor and an incredible source of inspiration and encouragement. Dan, my wonderful husband, I am so happy that we get to share our journey together as best friends. I also want to thank my extended family including
Kathleen Rand-Burke, the Saponases, the Wilhoits, and the whole Greencrest family for their support. I love you all and can’t wait to see where our adventures together lead next.
x
CONTENTS
Abstract ...... v Acknowledgements ...... ix List of Tables ...... xiii List of Figures ...... xv 1. Introduction ...... 1 1.1 Focus of the Dissertation ...... 3 1.2 Significance ...... 4 1.3 Thesis Overview ...... 8 2. Background ...... 9 2.1 Gait & Mobility ...... 10 2.2 Cerebral Palsy ...... 14 2.3 Crouch Gait ...... 15 2.4 Musculoskeletal Simulation ...... 40 3. How do muscles contribute to support and progression during crouch gait? .. 47 Abstract ...... 48 3.1 Introduction ...... 49 3.2 Methods ...... 51 3.3 Results ...... 55 3.4 Discussion ...... 60 4. How do muscle contributions to support and progression change with crouch severity? ...... 65 Abstract ...... 66 4.1 Introduction ...... 67 4.2 Methods ...... 69 4.3 Results ...... 76 4.4 Discussion ...... 80 5. How does tibiofemoral contact force change during crouch gait? ...... 85 Abstract ...... 86 5.1 Introduction ...... 87 5.2 Methods ...... 89 5.3 Results ...... 95 5.4 Discussion ...... 98
xi
6. How much muscle strength is required to walk in a crouch gait? ...... 103 Abstract ...... 104 6.1 Introduction ...... 105 6.2 Methods ...... 107 6.3 Results ...... 113 6.4 Discussion ...... 116 7. What characteristics are associated with positive outcomes after strength training for crouch gait? ...... 123 Abstract ...... 124 7.1 Introduction ...... 125 7.2 Methods ...... 127 7.3 Results ...... 131 7.4 Discussion ...... 136 8. Conclusion ...... 141 8.1 Summary ...... 142 8.2 Future Work ...... 143 References ...... 149 Appendix A: Chapter 3 Supplementary Material ...... 167 A.1 Effects of constraining EMG on muscle contributions ...... 167 A.2 Mass center and joint accelerations from all muscles ...... 171 Appendix B: Chapter 5 Supplementary Material ...... 175 B.1: Calculating joint forces in OpenSim ...... 175
xii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.1: Subject characteristics (average ± standard deviation) ...... 70
Table 5.1: Subject characteristics (average ± standard deviation) ...... 89
Table 6.1: Subject characteristics (average ± standard deviation) ...... 107
Table 6.2: Description of muscle groups ...... 113
Table 7.1: Summary of crouch subjects and training programs for all studies ...... 128
Table 7.2: Results of regression analyses for change in knee flexion angle and knee extensor strength ...... 135
xiii
xiv
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1: Kinematics during unimpaired gait (average ± one standard deviation, in degrees)...... 11
Figure 2.2: Kinetics including joint moments (Nm/kg) and powers (W/kg) during unimpaired gait (average ± one standard deviation)...... 12
Figure 2.3: Average periods when the muscles are active during unimpaired gait from electromyography data collected at Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital...... 13
Figure 2.4: Average knee flexion during mild, moderate, and severe crouch gait compared to unimpaired gait and a musculoskeletal model illustrating a typical crouch gait pattern...... 16
Figure 2.5: Anatomy of the hamstrings, iliopsoas, and ankle plantarflexors (gastrocnemius and soleus) from the University of Washington Musculoskeletal Atlas...... 18
Figure 2.6: Meta-analysis of outcomes after hamstring lengthening including change in popliteal angle, change in knee flexion angle, and change in pelvic tilt...... 25
Figure 2.7: Map of visitors to the website with the simulations and documentation presented in this dissertation from July 1, 2011 to January 1, 2012 (http://www.simtk.org/home/crouchgait/)...... 41
Figure 3.1: OpenSim model shown at different phases of single-limb stance during crouch gait. The muscles shown in red are highly activated, while those in blue have a low activation level, as determined using the computed muscle control algorithm. .... 49
Figure 3.2: Comparison of simulated and experimentally-measured joint angles. Average kinematics for pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle are shown for all 10 subjects. The gray line and shaded regions are the experimentally-measured joint angles (± 1 standard deviation) and the black line and dashed-lines are the kinematics reproduced by the simulation (± 1 standard deviation). The simulated kinematics are not provided during double support as only single-limb stance was simulated. The simulated kinematics were within 1º of experimental kinematics (RMS error) for all trials...... 55
Figure 3.3: Comparison of the simulated and experimentally-measured hip, knee, and ankle moments for all 10 subjects. The gray line and shaded regions are the experimentally-measured joint moments (± 1 standard deviation) and the blue line and dashed-lines are the moments calculated by computed by multiplying the estimated muscle forces and moment arms (± 1 standard deviation). Joint moments are only shown during single-limb stance and swing since force plate data was not available during double support...... 56
xv
Figure 3.4: Comparison of EMG and simulated activation. The EMG signal and activation were normalized to a range of 0 to 1 between the maximum and minimum values for each subject. The gray line and shaded area represents the EMG data (± 1 standard deviation) over a full gait cycle, while the simulated activations during single-limb stance are shown in blue with the dashed lines showing ± 1 standard deviation. Note that estimated muscle activations are not provided during the double support periods of the gait cycle because only single-limb stance was simulated...... 57
Figure 3.5: Average contributions ± 1 standard deviation to hip, knee, and ankle angular accelerations during single-limb stance from the major muscle groups of the stance limb. Positive and negative accelerations correspond to extension and flexion, respectively. Note that the muscles with average values close to zero made small contributions throughout single-limb stance...... 58
Figure 3.6: Contributions to mass center accelerations from the muscles providing the largest magnitude accelerations upward and downward and from gravity. Accelerations are shown for single-limb stance from opposite toe-off (OTO) to opposite heel contact (OHC). The vectors represent the average up/down and forward/backward acceleration of the mass center at each 5% of single-limb stance for all subjects. The magnitude of the accelerations in the forward/backward directions has the same scale as the up/down accelerations shown on the vertical-axis. Skeletal alignment was calculated by subtracting the accelerations due to muscles from the accelerations due to the ground reaction force...... 59
Figure 4.1: Musculoskeletal model of an individual with cerebral palsy and crouch gait. Vertical and fore-aft accelerations of the mass center were calculated by analyzing muscle-driven simulations...... 69
Figure 4.2: Average hip, knee, and ankle flexion angles and moments during unimpaired gait and mild, moderate, and severe crouch gait. The joint moments are normalized by body mass (kg)...... 72
Figure 4.3: Average ± 1 standard deviation of the EMG signal of each group (gray) and estimated muscle activations for each subject (black lines) from the quadriceps, hamstrings, gastrocnemius, and anterior tibialis during unimpaired gait and mild, moderate, and severe crouch gait. Only one individual with moderate crouch gait had EMG, thus we took the average of multiple gait cycles for comparison to the group. The magnitude of the EMG and activations were normalized from 0 to 1 based upon the minimum and maximum values during the gait cycle...... 75
Figure 4.4: The average (A) fore-aft and (B) vertical accelerations of the mass center during stance produced by each muscle and (C) the average muscle force during stance normalized by body weight (BW). Error bars are ± 1 standard error. A ‘*’ indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the student’s t-test comparing unimpaired gait and crouch gait. An arrow indicates a significant change with crouch
xvi severity (p < 0.05) from a one-way ANOVA comparing mild, moderate, and severe crouch gait...... 76
Figure 4.5: The average (A) fore-aft and (B) vertical accelerations produced per 1 newton of muscle force during stance of each muscle. Error bars are ± 1 standard error. A ‘*’ indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the student’s t-test comparing unimpaired gait and crouch gait. An arrow indicates a significant change with crouch severity (p < 0.05) from a one-way ANOVA comparing mild, moderate, and severe crouch gait...... 78
Figure 4.6: The fore-aft accelerations of the mass center produced by the vasti (gray line) and gastrocnemius (black line) during stance. The gray area shows the experimentally measured acceleration of the mass center (fore-aft ground reaction force normalized by body mass)...... 79
Figure 5.1: Tibiofemoral contact forces expressed in multiples of body weight (BW) from experimental forces measured using an instrumented total knee replacement (TKR, gray) and estimated with the computer model (black). The average ± 1 standard deviation is shown from four trials...... 93
Figure 5.2: Comparison of EMG (gray, average ± one standard deviation over all gait cycles) and muscle activations from static optimization (black line) for the six subjects with crouch gait for whom EMG data was available. EMG and activations were normalized from zero to one for each subject based upon the minimum and maximum values over the gait cycle. Note that subject “Severe 1” did not have EMG data from the gastrocnemius...... 94
Figure 5.3: (A) Average knee flexion angle, (B) average compressive tibiofemoral force, and (C) average quadriceps force expressed as multiples of body weight (BW) during one gait cycle for the subjects who walked with an unimpaired gait and mild, moderate, and severe crouch gait...... 96
Figure 5.4: Correlation of average knee flexion angle during stance with average compressive tibiofemoral force during stance (black circles), average quadriceps force during stance (dark gray squares), average hamstrings force during stance (light gray triangles), and average gastrocnemius force during stance (black outlined diamonds). Tibiofemoral force and average quadriceps force are expressed as multiples of body weight (BW). A quadratic relationship described the change in both tibiofemoral force and quadriceps force with increasing crouch...... 97
Figure 5.5: Average (A) tibiofemoral contact force, (B) quadriceps force, (C) hamstring force, and (D) gastrocnemius force during stance with the objective function shown in Eqn. 1 and weighting constants, minimizing activation with weighting constants, minimizing activation cubed with weighting constants, and minimizing activation squared with all weighting constants equal to one...... 101
xvii
Figure 6.1: Musculoskeletal models used to create dynamic simulations of gait for individuals that walked in an unimpaired gait pattern (left) and individuals with cerebral palsy who walked in mild (center) and moderate (right) crouch gait...... 109
Figure 6.2: The average hip, knee, and ankle (A) kinematics and (B) kinetics during unimpaired gait (dotted) and mild (light gray) and moderate (dark gray) crouch gait. Joint moments are normalized by body mass (kg)...... 110
Figure 6.3: Comparison of the required strength for each muscle group of the unimpaired subjects (N=3) when using torso markers for inverse kinematics and without torso markers (average ± 1 standard error)...... 111
Figure 6.4: Required strength for each muscle group that was necessary to recreate each subject’s gait pattern expressed as percent of the maximum isometric force (average ± 1 standard deviation, * p < 0.05 from Fisher’s Least Significant Difference test)...... 114
Figure 6.5: Compensatory muscle action when a particular muscle group is weakened, expressed as the average change in muscle force over the gait cycle (times body weight, BW). For each muscle group, the change in force of the weakened muscle group and the change in force of the three muscles with the greatest change in force are shown (average ± 1 standard error)...... 115
Figure 6.6: Average (A) kinematics and (B) kinetics for hip abduction and ankle plantarflexion for unimpaired children (N=82, dotted black) and individuals with cerebral palsy who walked in mild (N = 976, light gray) and moderate (N=209, dark gray) crouch gait who visited Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare. The peak hip abductor moment and ankle plantarflexor moment are smaller during mild and moderate crouch gait compared to unimpaired gait (ANOVA, p < 0.001). Joint moments are normalized by body mass (kg)...... 120
Figure 7.1: Summary of literature review and study selection...... 128
Figure 7.2: Histograms of (A) percent change in knee extensor strength and (B) change in minimum knee flexion angle during gait after completing a strength training program. Subjects from each of the three studies are shown separately – Damiano (white), Eek (gray), and Unger (black)...... 132
Figure 7.3: Average hip, knee, and ankle flexion angles for (A) all subjects, (B) the three subjects with the largest increase in knee extension (best outcomes), and (C) the three subjects with the largest increase in knee flexion (worst outcomes) before and after completing strength training program. Note that although there was no significant change in knee flexion for the group as a whole, there were subsets of subjects with significant positive and negative changes...... 133
Figure 7.4: (A) Hamstring spasticity and (B) walking speed were associated with change in minimum knee flexion angle (KFA) during stance...... 135
xviii
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1
Walking provides an efficient way to explore and interact with the world; however, it requires precise coordination of the neuromuscular and musculoskeletal systems. If this coordination is impaired, an individual’s mobility and quality of life can be compromised. When problems with movement arise, identifying the cause and appropriate treatments is challenging.
Individuals with cerebral palsy represent a large population of individuals with mobility problems. According to the United Cerebral Palsy Foundation, in the United
States alone nearly 800,000 individuals have cerebral palsy. Cerebral palsy is caused by an injury to the brain that affects coordination and movement. Treatments to improve mobility typically involve a combination of orthopaedic surgery and physical therapy; however, outcomes from treatment are inconsistent and often unsatisfactory.
A recent study reported that only 48% of individuals with cerebral palsy had significant improvements in gait following multi-level orthopaedic surgery (Hicks et al., 2011).
The complexity of the neuromuscular and musculoskeletal systems hinders our ability to effectively treat gait pathologies in individuals with cerebral palsy.
Identifying the causes and appropriate treatments for each individual is challenging.
Clinicians need a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms that contribute to gait pathologies to design optimal treatment strategies. For example, many orthopaedic surgeries target individual muscles; however, how individual muscles contribute to motion during pathologic gait is not well understood. Clarifying these contributions would empower clinicians and researchers to improve treatment.
2
Musculoskeletal modeling and simulation provides a powerful tool for understanding the complexities of human movement and performing studies that cannot be done experimentally. The Neuromuscular Biomechanics Laboratory at
Stanford University under the guidance of Scott Delp and researchers at other institutions have helped to develop a freely-available software package, OpenSim, that allows researchers and clinicians to study the musculoskeletal system. Using a combination of experimental data and computational methods we can examine the dynamics of human movement, including pathologic gait patterns in individuals with cerebral palsy.
This dissertation harnesses musculoskeletal modeling and simulation to improve our understanding of the dynamics of one of the most common gait pathologies among individuals with cerebral palsy, crouch gait. Crouch gait, characterized by excessive hip and knee flexion, is an inefficient gait pattern which, if left untreated, can lead to joint pain, the formation of bone deformities, and an inability to walk independently. Using musculoskeletal modeling and simulation, we can examine the contributions of individual muscles, estimate joint loads, and explore clinical hypotheses to improve our understanding and ability to treat crouch gait.
1.1 FOCUS OF THE DISSERTATION
The goal of this dissertation was to examine the dynamics of crouch gait in individuals with cerebral palsy. We created three-dimensional musculoskeletal simulations of gait that allowed us to probe how individual muscles give rise to
3
motion of the musculoskeletal system. We sought to understand important dynamic factors that occur during crouch gait, including how muscles accelerate the body, how joint loads change with crouch severity, and how muscle weakness can affect gait. We found that crouch gait uses similar muscles to accelerate the body as unimpaired gait, but requires larger and more sustained muscle forces to support the body - which contributes to the inefficiency of this gait pattern. The larger muscle forces required to support the body also contribute to increased joint loads. We determined that the compressive tibiofemoral force increases quadratically with crouch severity (i.e., knee flexion during stance) and individuals with severe crouch gait experience three-times the tibiofemoral force compared to those with unimpaired gait. Muscle weakness may also be an important contributor to crouch gait and we identified that weakness of some muscle groups, such as the quadriceps, are not likely contributors to crouch gait, while other muscle groups, such as the hip abductors and ankle plantarflexors, may contribute to crouch gait. These analyses provide a foundation to understand the mechanics of pathologic gait patterns and to guide the development of innovative treatment strategies.
1.2 SIGNIFICANCE
The research questions addressed in this dissertation make important contributions to both the biomechanics and clinical communities. Understanding the dynamics of the musculoskeletal system can guide treatment planning and illuminate the causes of pathological gait patterns; however, this endeavor requires sophisticated
4
tools to accurately examine the musculoskeletal system. This dissertation sought to address important clinical problems while also establishing and sharing the tools required. The primary contributions of the research presented in this dissertation are:
• Creating the first three-dimensional musculoskeletal simulations of
individuals with cerebral palsy. We developed the framework and processes
to create and critically analyze simulations of gait for individuals with cerebral
palsy and crouch gait. Previous studies have used musculoskeletal simulations
to examine unimpaired gait and we extended these methods to examine
important research questions for individuals with pathologic gait. These
simulations have also been made available to other researchers and clinicians
at: http://www.simtk.org/home/crouchgait/.
• Identifying the primary muscles that support and propel the body during
crouch gait. Walking requires a complex orchestration of muscle activity to
efficiently move the body from one point to another. We sought to identify
how muscle contributions to mass center acceleration change during crouch
gait. By creating musculoskeletal simulations of gait we were able to identify
that crouch gait uses similar muscle groups to support and propel the body as
unimpaired gait; however, crouch gait requires more sustained contributions
from muscles to support the body. Crouch gait also requires less gluteus
medius force to accelerate the mass center upward and greater ankle
plantarflexor force to accelerate the mass center forward.
• Quantifying the change in tibiofemoral contact force during crouch gait.
Knee pain is common among individuals with cerebral palsy; however, the 5
cause of the pain and appropriate treatments are not well understood. Increased
knee loading could compromise cartilage health and lead to knee pain. We
used musculoskeletal modeling to quantify changes in tibiofemoral force
during mild, moderate, and severe crouch gait. The magnitude of the
compressive tibiofemoral force increased quadratically with increasing crouch
severity; individuals with a severe crouch gait experienced peak loads up to six
times body weight as compared to two times body weight during unimpaired
gait.
• Examining how muscle weakness can lead to crouch gait. Muscle weakness
is commonly hypothesized as a contributor to crouch gait and is used to justify
strength training programs. However, an understanding of the mechanisms by
which muscle weakness contributes to crouch gait has not been previously
explored. Therefore, we used musculoskeletal modeling and simulation to
examine the amount of muscle strength required to walk in mild, moderate,
and severe crouch gait compared to unimpaired gait. The results of this
analysis showed that the amount of quadriceps strength required increased
quadratically with increasing crouch severity, suggesting that quadriceps
weakness does not contribute to crouch gait. However, crouch gait required
less hip abductor and ankle plantarflexor strength than unimpaired gait,
suggesting that crouch gait could be a compensatory gait pattern for weakness
of these muscle groups.
• Reviewing outcomes after strength training in individuals with crouch
gait. Over the past two decades strength training has become a popular 6
treatment strategy for individuals with cerebral palsy; however, reported
changes in muscle strength and gait after strength training are inconsistent
(Damiano et al., 2010). Previous studies included individuals with cerebral
palsy with many different gait pathologies which hindered interpretation of
their outcomes. Therefore, to examine the effects of strength training on
individuals with crouch gait, we performed a literature review, requested data
from the authors, and performed a meta-analysis of outcomes after strength
training. The results of this meta-analysis indicated that although individuals
with cerebral palsy and crouch gait were stronger after strength training,
changes in gait were inconsistent. Some subjects’ gait improved to within
normal limits after strength training while other subjects’ gait deteriorated.
• Determining that hamstring spasticity is associated with negative
outcomes after strength training in individuals with crouch gait. To
explore the subject-specific factors that could lead to inconsistent outcomes
after strength training in individuals with crouch gait, we performed regression
analyses with ten physical exam and gait characteristics that we hypothesized
could be associated with outcomes after strength training. The results of these
regression analyses identified that hamstring spasticity was associated with
negative outcomes after strength training; none of the subjects with hamstring
spasticity had improved knee extension during gait after strength training.
7
1.3 THESIS OVERVIEW
This dissertation is focused around five research studies that are presented as self-contained journal articles. After this general introduction, Chapter 2 outlines the background material related to gait, cerebral palsy, and musculoskeletal simulation that is useful for interpreting the following chapters. Chapter 3 examines how muscles contribute to joint and mass center accelerations during stance in mild crouch gait
(Steele et al., 2010, published in Journal of Biomechanics). Chapter 4 extends this study to examine how muscle contributions to support and propulsion change with crouch severity (manuscript in review). Chapter 5 quantifies tibiofemoral contact forces during crouch gait (Steele et al., 2012, published in Gait & Posture). Chapter 6 explores the mechanisms by which muscle weakness could contribute to crouch gait
(manuscript in review). Chapter 7 examines changes in muscle strength and gait after strength training in individuals with cerebral palsy and crouch gait (Steele et al., 2012, published in Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine). The final chapter of this dissertation summarizes the important findings of these studies and outlines areas for future research. The pronoun “we” is used throughout this dissertation to recognize that research is a team process that requires input and collaboration from multi- disciplinary teams. The individuals who contributed to these studies are listed at the beginning of each chapter.
8
CHAPTER 2
BACKGROUND
9
2.1 GAIT & MOBILITY
Walking gives us the freedom to interact with the world and complete the activities of daily living essential for both work and leisure. The average adult in the
United States takes approximately 6000 to 7000 steps per day (Tudor-Locke et al.,
2004). Beyond enabling mobility, walking has a direct and positive influence on public health, with demonstrated benefits that include the lowering of rates of chronic health problems, such as obesity and cardiovascular disease, and reducing medical expenditures (Lee and Buchner, 2008).
Walking is a cyclic movement that can be accurately and consistently described by kinematics (joint angles), kinetics (ground reaction forces and moments), and muscle activity (electromyography). Motion analysis provides a tool to quantify joint angles and moments during walking and can be used to analyze pathologic gait patterns. During unimpaired gait, the gait cycle is divided into two primary phases: stance, when the foot is on the ground (0-60% of the gait cycle), and swing, when the foot is off the ground (60-100% of the gait cycle). The gait cycle begins with stance at initial contact or heel strike (see Figure 2.1 for kinematics). At this point in the gait cycle, the hip is flexed, the knee is near full extension and the ankle is near neutral. In early stance, the ankle plantarflexes until the foot is in contact with the ground and the knee flexes slightly. The mass center moves over the stance limb and the hip extends during stance. The opposite foot contacts the ground at around 40-50% of the gait cycle. In terminal stance, the ankle plantarflexes to propel the body forward and the hip and knee flex until the foot is no longer in contact with the ground (at about 60% of the gait cycle). During swing, the ankle dorsiflexes to clear the ground and the hip 10
flexes to advance the limb for the next step. The knee flexes during the first half of swing and then extends to near full extension in the second half of swing to prepare for the next gait cycle.
Figure 2.1: Kinematics during unimpaired gait (average ± one standard deviation, in degrees).
The magnitude and direction of the force exerted by the foot on the ground, commonly termed the ground reaction force, can be measured using force plates and is useful for calculating the moments at each joint. Joint moments describe the net
11
moments that are produced by muscles or other passive structures across a joint.
During unimpaired gait, there is a hip extension and hip adduction moment during stance, a relatively small knee moment that fluctuates between flexion and extension, and an ankle dorsiflexion moment that increases throughout stance and peaks in terminal stance (Figure 2.2).
Figure 2.2: Kinetics including joint moments (Nm/kg) and powers (W/kg) during unimpaired gait (average ± one standard deviation).
Coordinated muscle activity is required to produce the joint moments shown above. Muscle activity can be monitored and measured during gait using electromyography (EMG). During unimpaired gait, EMG has shown that the quadriceps are active during early stance and gastrocnemius activity increases during
12
mid and terminal stance (Figure 2.3). In terminal stance and early swing, there is a burst of rectus femoris activity and the anterior tibialis activates to dorsiflex the ankle.
At the end of swing, the quadriceps and hamstring are active to prepare the limb for the next gait cycle.
Figure 2.3: Average periods when the muscles are active during unimpaired gait from EMG data collected at Lucille Packard Children’s Hospital.
Determining how muscle activity measured from EMG contributes to motion can be difficult due to the complexities of the musculoskeletal system and the inconsistencies between EMG magnitude and muscle force. Dynamic coupling describes the ability of muscles to accelerate joints they do not cross (Zajac and
Gordon, 1989). Since the human body is a system of bodies connected by joints, if a muscle generates acceleration at one joint it will produce resulting accelerations at other joints in the system. For example, during stance, activity of the ankle plantarflexors not only plantarflexes the ankle but also accelerates the knee into extension; this is commonly referred to as the plantarflexion-knee extension couple
(Gage and Schwartz, 2001; Gage and Schwartz, 2004). Musculoskeletal modeling and simulation, which will be described in more detail in section 2.4, can be used to examine how muscles contribute to these complex motions. Previous studies have
13
demonstrated that during unimpaired gait, the vasti and gluteus maximus support the body and slow forward progression in early stance, the gluteus medius helps to support the body during mid stance, and the gastrocnemius and soleus support and propel the body forward during late stance (Neptune et al., 2001; Anderson and Pandy,
2003; Liu et al., 2006). Understanding how these complicated interactions change during pathologic gait patterns such as crouch gait is one of the primary objectives of this dissertation.
2.2 CEREBRAL PALSY
Cerebral palsy is an umbrella term used to describe an injury to the brain at or near the time of birth that causes problems with movement and coordination. Common causes of brain injury include hypoxic-ischemia, infections, head injury, and jaundice.
The prevalence of cerebral palsy in the developed world is estimated at between 1.2 and 3.6 cases per 1000 individuals, depending on geographic region and socioeconomic status (Yeargin-Allsopp et al., 2008; Blair, 2010). The average lifetime cost for individuals with cerebral palsy was estimated at $921,000 per individual in
2003 (National Institutes of Health).
Cerebral palsy is commonly characterized by the degree of involvement and movement pattern. Cerebral palsy which affects only one side (right or left) of the body is referred to as hemiplegia. Diplegia refers to when just the lower limbs are affected and quadriplegia refers to when the arms and legs are affected. Common types of altered movement include: spastic, characterized by heightened stretch- or
14
velocity-dependent muscle activation; dystonic, characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions; ataxic, characterized by decreased muscle tone and unsteady, shaky movement; and dyskinetic, characterized by involuntary motions (also referred to as athetoid). Spastic cerebral palsy is the most common type and affects between 77 and 93% of individuals with cerebral palsy. This dissertation will focus on individuals with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy.
2.3 CROUCH GAIT
Crouch gait is one of the most common gait pathologies in individuals with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Among pediatric patients who visited one clinical gait lab, 69% had the increased knee flexion in stance characteristic of crouch gait (Wren et al., 2005). One of the first descriptions of crouch gait appeared in a manuscript in
1890 by E.H. Bradford who described a gait pattern in which “the heel is not placed upon the ground, the knee is bent, and the knee is thrown to the inner side.”
Today, crouch gait is an umbrella term for a spectrum of gait patterns that all share the common feature of excessive knee flexion during stance. Some authors (Lin et al., 2000; Chambers, 2001; Young et al., 2010) have refined the definition of crouch gait to differentiate between gait patterns such as jump gait, characterized by excessive ankle plantarflexion and knee flexion at initial contact which resolves by terminal stance; apparent equinus, characterized by excessive knee flexion throughout stance with the heel off the ground; and crouch gait, characterized by calcaneal gait (i.e., flat- footed, heel contact) and excessive knee flexion throughout stance. This dissertation
15
focuses on individuals with crouch gait who have excessive knee flexion throughout stance with the heel on the ground (Figure 2.4).
Figure 2.4: Average knee flexion during mild, moderate, and severe crouch gait compared to unimpaired gait and a musculoskeletal model illustrating a typical crouch gait pattern.
Gait pathologies such as crouch gait negatively affect mobility and are inefficient due to muscle co-contraction, altered movement patterns, and the use of assistive devices (see Waters and Mulroy, 1999, for a review). One study reported a
100% increase in the physiological cost of outdoor locomotion (Raja et al., 2007) among individuals with cerebral palsy and various gait pathologies. Individuals with cerebral palsy demonstrate slower walking speeds (Campbell and Ball, 1978; Rose et al., 1990), which makes it difficult for them to keep up with peers. Crouch gait can also contribute to pain, joint degeneration, and the formation of bone deformities
(Rosenthal and Levine, 1977; Lloyd-Roberts et al., 1985; Murphy, 2009). As individuals with cerebral palsy and crouch gait enter adulthood, knee pain, hip subluxation, osteoarthritis, lumbar spondylosis, and cervical stenosis commonly develop (Murphy, 2009). Furthermore, the gait of individuals with cerebral palsy deteriorates over time, especially without treatment (Johnson et al., 1997; Bell et al., 16
2002; Rose et al., 2010). In combination, these factors lead to reduced mobility which limits individuals’ ability to accomplish activities of daily living and negatively affects quality of life.
There are many proposed causes of crouch gait, including poor neuromuscular control, impaired balance, altered muscle physiology, and skeletal deformities.
Although cerebral palsy is caused by an injury to the brain, most treatments currently target the musculoskeletal limitations of individuals with cerebral palsy that result from the brain injury and limit mobility. The following sections outline musculoskeletal factors that may contribute to crouch gait and synthesize treatment options for crouch gait.
2.3.1 CAUSES OF CROUCH: EXCESSIVE FORCE
Excessive force from muscles or passive structures can restrict joint range of motion and contribute to crouch gait. Muscle contracture, defined as a passive resistance to stretch, and muscle spasticity, defined as a velocity-dependent resistance to stretch, are common in individuals with cerebral palsy. Contracture, spasticity, or over-activity of muscles during movement may contribute to crouch gait by limiting hip, knee, and ankle motion. Excessive force from the hamstrings, gastrocnemius, and iliopsoas are the most commonly cited potential contributors to crouch gait and are common targets for surgical and therapeutic treatments.
17
Figure 2.5: Anatomy of the hamstrings, iliopsoas, and ankle plantarflexors (gastrocnemius and soleus) from the University of Washington Musculoskeletal Atlas.
Hamstrings
Hamstrings contracture, spasticity, or over-activity is thought to contribute to crouch gait by limiting knee extension during terminal swing or stance. The bi- articular hamstrings, including the semimembranosus, semitendinousus, and biceps femoris long head have knee flexion and hip extension moment arms. The biceps femoris short head is the only uni-articular knee flexor and shares a distal tendon with the biceps femoris long head. The hamstrings are often grouped into the medial hamstrings (semimembranosus and semitendinousus) and the lateral hamstrings
(biceps femoris long head and short head), based upon their insertion points distal to the knee. The hamstrings are hypothesized to contribute to crouch gait because limited hamstring range of motion and prolonged hamstrings activity during stance have been reported among individuals with crouch gait (Hoffinger et al., 1993).
18
Determining if the hamstrings cause crouch gait is difficult due to the complexities of the musculoskeletal system. Due to dynamic coupling, bi-articular muscles, such as the hamstrings, can accelerate a joint in a direction opposite of the muscle’s moment arm. Thus, although the bi-articular hamstrings have a knee flexion moment arm, during activities such as walking, the hamstrings could contribute to knee extension due to dynamic coupling.
Musculoskeletal modeling and electrical stimulation studies have confirmed that the bi-articular hamstrings can accelerate the knee into extension through dynamic coupling if they generate sufficiently large hip extension moments. Electrical stimulation of the hamstrings in a standing posture has demonstrated that the action of the hamstrings changes from flexing the knee to extending the knee with increasing crouch (Stewart et al., 2008). Musculoskeletal simulations have shown that during unimpaired gait the hamstrings have a knee extension potential (Arnold et al., 2005) and do not contribute significantly to swing limb knee flexion (Arnold et al., 2007), although they are active in terminal swing. During crouch gait, the hamstrings have a small knee extension potential during stance (Hicks et al., 2008, see Chapter 3) and the hip and knee extension potentials of the hamstrings do not decrease like other muscles with increasing crouch severity (Hicks et al., 2008) or increasing tibial torsion (Hicks et al., 2007). These results suggest that excessive force from the hamstrings may not contribute to the excessive knee flexion characteristic of crouch gait. However, tight hamstrings due to muscle contracture may still limit knee range of motion. An experimental study using an exoskeleton built to mimic muscle contracture in unimpaired individuals found that hamstring contracture did increase knee flexion in 19
terminal swing and early stance (Matjacic and Olensek, 2007) and, therefore, hamstring contracture may contribute to crouch gait.
There are a variety of clinical exams that are commonly used to determine if the hamstrings should be treated in an individual with cerebral palsy and crouch gait.
Traditionally, passive physical exams including popliteal angle (maximum extension of the knee when the patient is supine and the hip is flexed to 90°) and straight leg raise (maximum hip flexion when the patient is supine and the knee is fully extended) have been used to measure range of motion of the hamstrings. However, the association between these measures and gait are not clear. Popliteal angle has been reported to have a poor correlation with knee flexion during walking (Thompson et al.,
2001; Desloovere et al., 2006) while straight leg raise has been reported to have a significant correlation to change in knee flexion during gait after surgery (Thometz et al., 1989). Static physical exam measures may not be ideal for determining the contribution of the hamstrings to dynamic activities such as gait.
An alternative to static exam measures is calculating musculotendon length and velocity of the hamstrings during gait using musculoskeletal modeling. Arnold et al. (2006) examined preoperative and postoperative peak musculotendon length and velocity of the semimembranosus in 152 subjects with cerebral palsy and observed a relationship between musclotendon length and velocity and surgical outcome (Delp et al., 1996; Arnold et al., 2006a; Arnold et al., 2006b). Subjects whose hamstrings peak lengths or velocities during gait remained short or slow after surgery were unlikely to have improved knee extension. These results suggest that indicators measured during a functional activity, such as musculotendon length and velocity, could provide better 20
information for surgical decision making than static exam measures. While measuring musculotendon lengths and velocities cannot determine whether short musculotendon lengths are the cause of crouch gait or a result the gait pattern, Van der Krogt et al.
(2007) reported that unimpaired individuals walking in a crouch gait did not have short or slow hamstrings; this suggests that evidence of short or slow hamstrings in individuals with cerebral palsy may indicate that the hamstrings are contributing to crouch gait.
Spasticity of the hamstrings is evaluated using a combination of the Ashworth
Scale, Tardieu Scale, and EMG patterns during gait. Excess hamstring activity during stance has been suggested to indicate spastic hamstrings (Crenna, 1998); however, the hamstrings may be active during this time to assist with hip and knee extension. The spastic velocity threshold, defined as the angular velocity of the joint at which inappropriate muscle activity is triggered, provides a more quantitative measure for assessing muscle spasticity. Spastic velocity threshold of the hamstrings has been shown to be associated with peak knee angular velocity during maximum speed walking suggesting that hamstrings spasticity could limit knee angular velocity during gait (Tuzson et al., 2003). More quantitative measures of spasticity are required to clarify how hamstring spasticity may contribute to crouch gait and to provide clinically relevant exams.
Surgical treatment for the hamstrings in individuals with crouch gait can involve lengthening, releasing, or transferring the hamstrings. Release or transfer of a muscle theoretically eliminates unwanted contributions to motion at a given joint while musculotendon lengthening reduces passive tension and may diminish the 21
spastic reflex. Little is known however about how these procedures alter muscle properties or change the force-length or force-velocity properties of muscles. A study by Granata et al. (2000) noted that although kinematics improved after musculotendon lengthening, angular velocities and muscle activations did not change significantly.
These findings may indicate that musculotendon lengthening changes the range of motion of a muscle but does not change the threshold velocity that triggers spasticity.
Hamstring lengthening has been a treatment used by orthopaedic surgeons for over a century (Bradford, 1890) and is currently the most common surgery for treating tight or spastic hamstrings. Multiple reviews recommend the use of distal hamstring lengthening for the treatment of crouch gait (Green and McDermott, 1942; Pollock,
1962; Fixsen, 1979; Gage, 1990). To evaluate the outcomes after hamstring lengthening we performed a meta-analysis of outcomes after distal hamstring lengthening. The outcomes included in this analysis were (1) change in popliteal angle, a clinical exam used to measure the passive range of motion of the hamstrings,
(2) change in knee flexion angle during gait, and (3) change in pelvic tilt during gait
(Figure 2.6). We also compared outcomes for surgeries that lengthened both the medial and lateral hamstrings versus lengthening only the medial hamstrings.
The results of this meta-analysis indicated that after distal hamstring lengthening, popliteal angle improved by an average of 19° (Fig. 3, 95% CI: 14-24); however, the range of improvement in popliteal angle varied from 4° (Gannotti et al.,
2007) to 40° (Baumann et al., 1980). There was no significant difference in the change in popliteal angle between lengthening the medial and lateral hamstrings versus the medial hamstrings alone. Knee extension during gait also improved after hamstring 22
lengthening. The average change was 12.8° more knee extension at initial contact
(95% CI: 8.9-16.7) and 10.9° more knee extension during stance (95% CI 6.6-15).
Lengthening the medial and lateral hamstrings increased knee extension at initial contact and during stance significantly more than lengthening only the medial hamstring. At initial contact, lengthening the medial and lateral hamstrings increased knee extension by 13.4° (95% CI 5.5-21.5) versus 9.5° (95% CI, 4-15, p = 0.027) for lengthening only the medial hamstrings. Knee extension during stance increased by
14.6° (95% CI 3.8-25.5) when lengthening both the medial and lateral hamstrings versus 6.5° (95% CI, 0.6-12.5, p < 0.001) for lengthening only the medial hamstrings.
Improvements in hip internal rotation (Steinwender et al., 2000; Lovejoy et al., 2007) and spasticity (Vlachou et al., 2009) have also been reported after hamstring lengthening but require further study. Despite changes in kinematics, temporal-spatial parameters have been reported to have minimal changes when normalized by height
(Thometz et al., 1989; van der Linden et al., 2003).
A variety of adverse outcomes have been reported after hamstring lengthening including increased anterior pelvic tilt, stiff-knee gait, exaggerated lumbar lordosis, genu recurvatum, and nerve palsy (Hsu and Li, 1990). From the results of the meta- analysis, the average change in pelvic tilt was 3° increased anterior pelvic tilt (95% CI,
0 – 6). The largest reported change was a 14° increase in anterior pelvic tilt (Rodda et al., 2006). There was no significant difference in the change in anterior pelvic tilt
(student’s t-test, p=0.17) between lengthening the medial and lateral hamstrings and lengthening the medial hamstrings. DeLuca et al. (1998) reported an increase in anterior pelvic tilt when pelvic tilt was within normal limits before surgery and both 23
the medial and lateral hamstrings were lengthened. Multiple studies have also noted that if anterior pelvic tilt was greater than 16° before surgery, lengthening the hamstrings did not further increase anterior pelvic tilt (DeLuca et al., 1998; van der
Linden et al., 2003).
Genu recurvatum, hyperextension of the knee during stance, developed in an average of 11% of subjects after hamstring lengthening in the studies included in the meta-analysis. Reported risk factors for genu recurvatum included a jump knee gait pattern and ankle plantarflexor spasticity (Thometz et al., 1989; Adolfsen et al., 2007).
Karol et al. (2008) reported development of nerve palsy, characterized by numbness, loss of motor function in the foot, or hypersensitivity of the foot in 9.6% of subjects who underwent hamstring lengthening. Subjects that were at higher risk for nerve palsy were older, non-ambulatory, or non-communicative. Katz et al. (2004) suggested that monitoring the evoked potential of the sciatic nerve during surgery may be an effective way to prevent nerve damage. Muscle weakness is also a common concern following musculotendon surgery; however, Damiano et al. (1999) reported that hamstring strength recovered within nine months after lengthening surgery. The possibility of adverse outcomes after distal hamstring lengthening warrant caution and judicious lengthening; however, the improvements in knee extension during stance and passive range of motion support distal hamstring lengthening for the treatment of crouch gait.
24
Figure 2.6: Meta-analysis of outcomes after hamstring lengthening including change in popliteal angle, change in knee flexion angle, and change in pelvic tilt.
25
Less common surgical treatment options for the hamstrings include proximal hamstring lengthening, hamstring transfer, and hamstring release. Proximal hamstring lengthening has been recommended if there is no knee flexion contracture but the hamstrings are still tight (Fixsen, 1979). Reimers (1974) compared proximal and distal lengthening and noted that the advantages of the proximal lengthening include a less visible scar, no plaster casts, shorter periods of immobilization, and access to other proximal muscles for treatment; however, the author recommended distal lengthening if more than 5° of knee flexion contracture is present since proximal lengthening does not affect the short head of the biceps femoris. The effects of proximal lengthening on gait have not been investigated.
Transferring the hamstrings to the femoral condyles was a popular procedure in the 1950s and 60s (Eggers, 1952; Eggers and Evans, 1963); however, this procedure is thought to cause excessive genu recurvatum, a loss of active knee flexion, decreased pelvic stability, a stiff gait, and accentuated lumbar lordosis (Pollock, 1962; Pollock and English, 1967; Roosth, 1971; Reimers, 1974; Ray and Ehrlich, 1979; Grujic and
Aparisi, 1982; Young et al., 2010). Keats and Kambin (1962) noted better results when hamstring transfer was combined with patellar advancement. These early procedures lacked gait analysis to objectively analyze surgical outcomes. More recently, Metaxiotis et al. (2004) converted the semitendinousus and gastrocnemius to monoarticular muscles by transfer to the femur and tibia, respectively, in 20 children with spastic diplegia and found improved knee extension during stance and hyperextension in 5 out of 40 limbs. These authors argued that muscle transfer may prevent muscle weakness that may occur after lengthening procedures. 26
Proximal hamstring release has also been investigated as a treatment for hamstring contracture. Although this procedure corrected knee flexion deformity and hamstring range of motion during physical exam (Seymour and Sharrard, 1968;
Drummond et al., 1974; Sharps et al., 1984; Smith and Stevens, 1989), it increased the risk of lumbar lordosis (Sharps et al., 1984) and genu recurvatum (Drummond et al.,
1974). Drummond et al. (1974) does not recommend proximal hamstring release for the treatment of crouch gait.
Femoral extension osteotomy and patellar tendon advancement have recently been proposed as an alternative to distal hamstring lengthening. Femoral extension osteotomy has been reported to improve knee flexion contractures and increase knee range of motion during gait (de Morais Filho et al., 2008; Stout et al., 2008). Stout et al. (2008) reported post-operative knee function that was within normal limits when femoral extension osteotomy was combined with patellar advancement. Hamstring length and velocity were also found to increase following femoral extension osteotomy and patellar tendon advancement without concomitant hamstring surgery
(Healy et al., 2011). Recommended indications for surgery include a persistent crouch despite treatment, a knee flexion contracture between 10 and 30°, and a quadriceps lag greater than 10° (Stout et al., 2008). Contraindications include a knee flexion contracture greater than 30°, femoral malrotation greater than 30°, or patella baja
(Novacheck et al., 2009). Further study of femoral extension osteotomy is warranted for the treatment of crouch gait.
Non-surgical treatment options for the hamstrings include neruomuscular toxins such as botulinum toxin type A and baclofen. A limited number of studies have 27
examined the effects of neuromuscular toxins on crouch gait. Thompson et al. (1998) performed a study of 10 subjects with crouch gait who were treated with isolated hamstring botulinum toxin type A injections and found a significant increase in medial hamstring length during gait, an improvement of 15° in knee extension, and increased walking speed (Thompson et al., 1998). Others have noted improved knee extension in stance following combination of multi-level botulinum toxin injection, casting, and orthoses (Corry et al., 1999; Hesse et al., 2000; Papadonikolakis et al., 2003; Scholtes et al., 2006; Scholtes et al., 2007); however, these improvements in gait may not be maintained after 12 weeks (Corry et al., 1999; Scholtes et al., 2007). Thompson et al.
(1998) recommended that botulinum toxin is most effective for individuals with spasticity rather than muscle contracture, since the neuromuscular toxin affects the neuromuscular junction and not the passive material properties of the muscle. These recommendations are supported by Sutherland et al. (1996) who found that passive range of motion of the ankle plantarflexors was not improved after treatment with botulinum toxin type A. The disadvantages of neuromuscular toxins are that the effects decrease over a period of three to six months, repeated treatments are less effective, and the toxins may have negative long-term effects on muscle physiology.
More research on the physiological effects of neuromuscular toxins and long-term follow-up studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of neuromuscular toxins for the treatment of crouch gait.
28
Hip flexors
The iliacus and psoas are the primary mono-articular hip flexors and excessive force due to contracture, spasticity, or over-activity of these muscles could contribute to excess hip flexion during crouch gait. Excess hip flexion can also contribute to excess knee flexion through the need to maintain sagittal plane balance (Young et al.,
2010) and through accelerations generated by dynamic coupling. Musculoskeletal simulations have shown that the psoas has a large knee flexion potential during stance in both unimpaired (Arnold et al., 2005) and crouch gait (Hicks et al., 2008).
Furthermore, an experimental study using an exoskeleton to mimic muscle contracture in unimpaired individuals found that hip flexion contracture increased crouch gait
(Matjacic and Olensek, 2007).
The Thomas test, prone hip extension test (Staheli test), and hamstring shift test are common physical exams used to measure hip flexion contracture and determine if the hip flexors require treatment in individuals with crouch gait. Similar to physical exams for the hamstrings, there is no correlation between passive physical exams and hip motion during gait (Lee et al., 2011). Musculotendon length and velocity can also be calculated for the hip flexors during gait. Delp et al. (1996) reported that psoas lengths were more than two standard deviations shorter in individuals with cerebral palsy and crouch gait than during unimpaired gait. However, caution needs to be taken when using psoas length to determine if the psoas should be surgically lengthened since unimpaired individuals walking in a crouch gait also have short psoas (van der Krogt et al., 2007), suggesting that psoas lengths cannot be used to differentiate between short psoas that are a cause of crouch gait or a consequence of 29
the crouch posture. Additionally, psoas lengths are sensitive to femoral anteversion
(Schutte et al., 1997) which is commonly not included in musculoskeletal models.
The most common surgical interventions for hip flexors in individuals with crouch gait are lengthening or releasing the hip flexors. Many methods of lengthening the hip flexors have been shown to reduce hip flexion contractures, including division of all hip flexors except the psoas (Roosth, 1971), psoas tenotomy (Nene et al., 1993), and psoas recession at the pelvic brim (Patrick, 1996; Sutherland et al., 1997;
Novacheck et al., 2002; Zwick et al., 2002). Roosth (1971) reported that relieving hip flexion contracture resulted in a more erect posture, reduced lumbar lordosis, and improved balance. A potential adverse outcome of these procedures is reduced active hip flexion capacity. There is conflicting evidence on the effects of psoas recession at the pelvic brim on active hip flexion; some studies have reported that subjects maintain active hip flexion after recession (Sutherland et al., 1997; Novacheck et al.,
2002), but others have reported decreased active hip flexion after surgery (Zwick et al., 2002). An increased tendency toward genu recurvatum has also been noted when psoas recession is combined with hamstring lengthening (Zwick et al., 2002; Ma et al.,
2006). DeLuca et al. (1998) recommends lengthening the psoas if hip flexion contracture is greater than 15°, while Davids et al. (2004) recommends iliopsoas recession if hip flexion contracture is greater than 30°.
30
Ankle Plantarflexors
The gastrocnemius has a knee flexion moment arm and excess force due to spasticity, contracture, or over-activity could contribute to excess knee flexion during crouch gait. The contribution of the gastrocnemius to crouch gait is complicated by the fact that it shares an insertion through the Achilles tendon with the uni-articular soleus. Musculoskeletal simulation studies have shown that these two muscles have significantly different contributions to movement. The gastrocnemius contributes to knee and hip flexion while the soleus contributes to hip and knee extension during stance in both unimpaired (Arnold et al., 2005) and crouch gait (Hicks et al., 2008 and see Chapter 3). Yet, both muscles have been shown to contribute to upward support of the mass center during crouch gait (see Chapters 3 and 4).
To determine if the gastrocnemius is contributing to crouch gait, clinicians typically measure ankle range of motion with the knee flexed and the knee extended to differentiate between soleus and gastrocnemius contracture. Baddar et al. (2002) also suggested examining the correlation between ankle and knee motion during single- limb stance; a correlation between knee extension and ankle plantarflexion in individuals with crouch gait could indicate that the gastrocnemius is restricting knee motion. Musculotendon lengths and velocities have not been used to examine gastrocnemius function during crouch gait. Spasticity of the gastrocnemius is often measured with the Ashworth Scale or by monitoring gastrocnemius EMG activity during stance (Crenna, 1998).
The most common treatment for the ankle plantarflexors is musculotendon lengthening of the gastrocnemius, soleus, or both muscles; however, the efficacy of 31
these procedures in individuals with crouch gait is a debated subject. There is conflicting evidence on the effect of gastrocnemius and soleus lengthening on crouch gait, likely due to the wide variety of surgical techniques used and the effects of concomitant surgeries. The gastrocnemius and soleus can be lengthened by a Z- lengthening, step lengthening, sliding lengthening, tenotomy or subcutaneous lengthening of the Achilles tendon. The gastrocnemius can be lengthened using the
Strayer, Baker, and Vulpius techniques which leave the soleus intact. Reported changes in crouch gait after lengthening the gastrocnemius and soleus or the gastrocnemius alone have been similar; an 8° change in knee extension at initial contact (Baddar et al., 2002; Galli et al., 2005; Galli et al., 2009), but no significant change in mid stance knee flexion (Baddar et al., 2002; Orendurff et al., 2002; Galli et al., 2005). Van der Linden et al. (2003) found that patients who did not have a gastrocnemius lengthening in conjunction with a hamstring lengthening had 6° more plantarflexion at initial contact. Musculoskeletal models have shown that tendoachilles lengthening can significantly reduce the force generating capacity of the plantarflexors
(Delp et al., 1995). Since the gastrocnemius and soleus both contribute to upward acceleration of the mass center during crouch gait (see Chapters 3 and 4), lengthening these muscles could compromise individuals’ ability to support themselves. The appropriate candidates for surgical intervention and the amount of ankle plantarflexor lengthening are important areas for further investigation.
32
Passive Structures
In addition to excessive force from muscles, excessive force from passive structures surrounding the hip and knee can also contribute to crouch gait. A fixed hip or knee flexion contracture is caused by excessive tightness of the passive structures surrounding the joint. Indicators for fixed contracture include restricted passive range of motion which persists when an individual is under anesthesia and muscles are not taut. Treatments for a fixed knee flexion contracture include knee capsulotomy, anterior femoral hemiepiphysiodesis (also known as “guided growth”), and serial casting. Knee capsulotomy combined with hamstring lengthening has been reported to improve popliteal angle by 22° (Woratanarat et al., 2009) while serial casting has been reported to reduce knee flexion contracture by 12° (Westberry et al., 2006). However, recurrence of fixed knee flexion contractures is common after both of these procedures, especially in younger patients. Anterior femoral hemiepiphysiodesis involves applying staples to the anterior surface of the femur over the growth plate, resulting in a curvature of the femur during growth. The average reported correction of knee flexion contracture is 0.9°/month, for a total correction of 12.7° (Kramer and
Stevens, 2001; Klatt and Stevens, 2008). This procedure is minimally invasive and requires no immobilization, which allows for immediate resumption of bracing and physical therapy. Klatt et al. (2008) recommended anterior femoral hemiepiphysiodesis for subjects with greater than 10° knee flexion deformity and more than 12 months of growth remaining. Changes in gait following these procedures have not been reported and represent an important area for future research.
33
2.3.1 CAUSES OF CROUCH: INADEQUATE FORCE
The inability of muscles to generate sufficient force to support and propel the body may also contribute to crouch gait. Weakness may be the result of reduced physiological cross-sectional area, lack of volitional control, previous surgeries, or altered muscle physiology. Muscle weakness is well-documented among individuals with cerebral palsy. Children with cerebral palsy have been shown to have significantly weaker quadriceps, hamstrings, hip extensors, and ankle muscles compared to their unimpaired peers (Damiano et al., 1995a; Wiley and Damiano,
1998). During crouch gait, a correlation between knee extensor strength and knee extension during stance has also been reported (Damiano et al., 1995a; Rethlefsen et al., 1999) suggesting that muscle weakness may contribute to crouch gait.
From a biomechanics perspective, individuals who walk in a crouch gait may not be able to generate the required forces and accelerations to achieve an upright gait.
During crouch gait, the hip and knee flexion moments increase dramatically during stance. Musculoskeletal simulation studies have shown that the hamstrings, gluteus maximus, vasti, and ankle plantarflexors are the primary contributors to hip and knee extension during stance in both unimpaired gait (Arnold et al., 2005) and crouch gait
(see Chapter 3). Muscle weakness in any of these muscle groups could contribute to crouch if individuals are not able to adequately extend their hips and knees or support their body weight. During swing, the primary contributors to knee extension are the hip extensors and ankle plantarflexors (Arnold et al., 2007). If these muscles are weak, knee extension at initial contact could be diminished and the subject may not be able to reach full knee extension during stance. A crouch posture also diminishes the ability 34
of lower-extremity muscles to extend the hip and knee (Hicks et al., 2007). Therefore, to create the same angular accelerations of the hip and knee in a crouch posture requires more muscle force than in an upright posture. These factors magnify the effects of muscle weakness.
Compensation for weak muscles by other muscle groups could also contribute to crouch gait. For example, Jonkers et al. (2003) showed that the gluteus maximus, plantarflexors, and hamstrings play complementary roles to control the stance limb during unimpaired gait. If one of these muscle groups is impaired, the other muscles may be recruited to compensate for weakness; however, compensation could have negative consequences during gait. For example, if gluteus maximus is weak, increased hamstring and gastrocnemius activity to support the body could increase knee flexion.
Inadequate muscle force can also be a result of previous surgical interventions, such as lengthening the Achilles tendon. Musculoskeletal modeling studies have demonstrated that over-lengthening the Achilles tendon can reduce the amount of force the ankle plantarflexors can produce (Delp et al., 1995). Adverse outcomes after
Achilles tendon lengthening include excess ankle dorsiflexion and knee flexion
(Sutherland and Cooper, 1978). Wiley et al. (1998) noted that individuals who had prior Achilles lengthening tended to have weaker plantarflexors, but the difference was not significant. The prevalence of a crouch gait pattern after lengthening the
Achilles tendon has been reported between 0 and 50% (Bernthal et al.; Craig and van
Vuren, 1976; Segal et al., 1989; Damron et al., 1993; Abel et al., 1999; Borton et al.,
2001; Dietz et al., 2006). De Morais Filho et al. (2010) reported that subjects with a 35
minimum knee flexion angle greater than 30° during stance were more likely to have had an Achilles lengthening than subjects who did not walk in a crouch gait after orthopaedic surgery; however, subjects who received an Achilles lengthening surgery may have been more severely impaired or other factors could have contributed to crouch gait. These studies indicate that musculotendon lengthening surgery can reduce the force generating capacity of a muscle and could increase the risk of crouch gait.
Altered musculoskeletal physiology due to impaired development can also contribute to crouch gait by altering the amount of force a muscle can produce in a given position. Patella alta refers to an abnormally high patella in relation to the femur and is thought to be caused by excessive tension in the patellar tendon. This condition is common in individuals with spastic cerebral palsy. Rosenthal and Levine
(1977) found patella alta in over 50% of patients with spastic cerebral palsy. The effect of patella alta on the moment generating capacity of the quadriceps is unclear;
Sutherland et al. (1978) reported that patella alta reduces the moment generating capacity of the quadriceps in all positions except extreme knee flexion, but more recent studies have indicated that patella alta increases the quadriceps’ moment generating capacity (Ward et al., 2005; Luyckx et al., 2009). Sheehan et al. (2008) examined the patellar tendon moment arm in subjects with cerebral palsy, many of whom had patella alta, and found no significant changes in the patellar tendon moment arm. If left untreated, patella alta can cause fragmentation of the distal pole of the patella as a result of excess tension (Rosenthal and Levine, 1977) or patella tendon rupture (O'Sullivan et al., 2010).
36
Quadriceps lag is another common impairment found in individuals with cerebral palsy which refers to a lack of full, active knee extension. Individuals with quadriceps lag may be able to produce sufficient strength when the knee is flexed; however, the quadriceps are weak when the knee is near full extension. No research is currently available describing the underlying mechanisms of quadriceps lag and the influence of quadriceps lag on crouch gait.
The most common treatment option for individuals with cerebral palsy and muscle weakness is strength training. Studies have shown that strength training can improve muscle strength in individuals with cerebral palsy to within normal limits
(Damiano et al., 1995b; Dodd et al., 2002; Mockford and Caulton, 2008).
Furthermore, strength training has been shown to improve walking velocity (Damiano et al., 1995a) and knee extension during gait (Damiano et al., 1995b; Unger et al.,
2006). More recently, inconsistent outcomes among subjects with crouch gait have been noted. Damiano et al. (2010) reported that after strength training of the hip and knee extensors some individuals with crouch gait had improved knee extension while others had more knee flexion during gait. Preliminary results suggest that these differences in outcome may be related to hamstring spasticity (see Chapter 7); subjects without hamstring spasticity had better outcomes. Unfortunately, most strength training studies include subjects with many different gait patterns and do not examine changes in gait before and after strength training which makes understanding the efficacy of these programs difficult. Further, more controlled studies are required to determine which individuals have positive outcomes after strength training programs.
37
Orthoses can also be used to compensate for muscle weakness. For the treatment of crouch gait, ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) have been shown to have no effect on knee extension during gait (Abel et al., 1998; Rethlefsen et al., 1999;
Wesdock and Edge, 2003; Brehm et al., 2008). Hassani et al. (2004) reported a significant improvement in minimum stance knee flexion with both hinged and dynamic AFOs; however, this study was not specific to individuals with crouch gait.
A more promising AFO for the treatment of crouch gait is the floor reaction AFO.
Several studies have noted a significant improvement in knee extension in stance with the use of floor reaction AFOs in subjects with greater than 15° of knee flexion during stance (Lucareli et al., 2007; Rogozinski et al., 2009). Brehm et al. (2008) reported that improvement in metabolic cost with AFOs was significantly correlated with minimum knee flexion angle during stance. These results suggest that AFOs that improve knee flexion could produce a more energy-efficient gait pattern for individuals with cerebral palsy.
2.3.1 CAUSES OF CROUCH: BONE DEFORMITIES
Rotational deformities of the tibia and/or femur are common in children with cerebral palsy - a consequence of altered bone loading during development. A tibial torsion deformity is an excess twisting of the tibia about its long axis and may be an internal or external rotation. Femoral anteversion deformity is an excess internal twist of the femoral neck with respect to the shaft of the femur. These deformities may contribute to crouch gait by altering the moment arms, and hence moment generating capacity, of muscles. Because the moments generated by muscles at joints can result in 38
motions at other joints due to dynamic coupling, a muscle affected by a bone deformity may result in movement abnormalities at other joints it does not cross.
Bone deformities may also alter foot ground interaction which can impact muscle function at joints throughout the body. For example, musculoskeletal modeling found that although tibial torsion has a minimal effect on the moment arms of muscles crossing the ankle joint, it has a significant adverse effect on the acceleration produced by muscles crossing the hip and knee (Hicks et al., 2007). Musculoskeletal modeling studies have demonstrated that tibial torsion significantly reduces the ability of muscles to extend the hip and knee (Hicks et al., 2007; Hicks et al., 2008) and support the mass center (Schwartz and Lakin, 2003). For example, a 30° external tibial torsion deformity reduces the capacity of major lower-limb extensors including the gluteals and soleus to extend the knee by over 10%. Hicks et al. (2007) also reported a greater incidence of crouch gait in subjects with more than 30° of tibial torsion (70% vs.
40%). No studies have been performed on the effects of femoral anteversion on the dynamic function of muscles during gait.
Distal tibial derotation osteotomies are performed at many clinical centers and have been shown to be successful in correcting alignment of the tibia with few complications (Dodgin et al., 1998; Selber et al., 2004; Ryan et al., 2005). Studies that have reviewed patient outcomes report improved gait function (Stefko et al., 1998;
Selber et al., 2004; Ryan et al., 2005); however, sagittal plane kinematics are not reported. Analyzing the effects of tibial derotation osteotomies are further complicated by the fact that the procedure is typically performed as part of multi-level orthopaedic
39
surgery, not a randomized clinical trial, which makes it difficult to isolate the effects of the tibial derotation osteotomy on gait compared to other concomitant surgeries.
Femoral derotation osteotomies have also been shown to be safe and effective in correcting femoral alignment; however, there is limited evidence connecting femoral derotation osteotomies to improvements in crouch gait. Ouunpuu et al. (2002) et al. performed a prospective analysis with 97 subjects looking at short and long term outcomes. In addition to improved hip alignment, they also reported improved mean stance knee flexion, but almost all patients had concomitant treatment, including hamstrings lengthening.
Foot deformities such as plano pes valgus are also common in individuals with cerebral palsy and crouch gait. Similar to rotational bone deformities, foot deformities could also impair the ability of muscles to extend the hip and knee; however, a direct study of the effects of foot deformities on crouch gait has not been done and is an important area for future study.
2.4 MUSCULOSKELETAL SIMULATION
The complexities of the human musculoskeletal system make it difficult to evaluate, diagnose, and treat gait pathologies in individuals with cerebral palsy.
Musculoskeletal modeling and simulation provides a tool for examining this complex system and evaluating problems with human movement. The benefits of modeling and simulation include the ability to examine the effect of individual components of
40
complex systems, to perform studies that could not be done experimentally, and to ask
‘what-if’ questions.
OpenSim is a freely-available software that allows researchers and clinicians to create musculoskeletal models of humans and animals and critically evaluate the kinematics, kinetics, muscle contributions, and other forces in the system (Delp et al.,
2007). Furthermore, OpenSim allows researchers to share models and simulations, expand the software, and critically evaluate one another’s work. All of the simulations created as part of this dissertation are provided for other researchers to download, evaluate, and use at http://www.simtk.org/home/crouchgait/ (Figure 2.7).
Figure 2.7: Map of visitors to the website with the simulations and documentation presented in this dissertation from July 1, 2011 to January 1, 2012 (http://www.simtk.org/home/crouchgait/).
The process to create a musculoskeletal simulation depends upon the specific question that is being investigated; however, the following paragraphs outline the basic steps in the process. All investigations start with the selection or creation of a
41
musculoskeletal model. For the investigations included in this dissertation, a model of the lower-limbs and torso which is based upon cadaver and physiological measurements was used (Delp et al., 1990). This model included 19 degrees of freedom including three translations and three rotations at the pelvis, a ball-and-socket joint between the pelvis and torso at approximately the third lumbar vertebrae (i.e.,
L3), a ball-and-socket joint at each hip, a planar joint with coupled translations at each knee, and revolute joints at each ankle. The muscles were modeled as line segments with multiple lines of action for muscles with broad attachments. A lumped parameter
Hill-type muscle model generated forces as a function of muscle fiber length and velocity, tendon length, and activation.
For each subject, the musculoskeletal model is scaled to the subject’s size based upon anthropometric measurements. This includes scaling segment lengths, masses, and inertias as well as muscle and tendon lengths. Experimental data from a motion capture laboratory is used to estimate the subject’s kinematics, or joint angles.
In a motion capture laboratory, subjects perform gait or other movements with reflective markers on their body that can be tracked by a camera system.
Electromyography and ground reaction forces can also be collected concurrently. In
OpenSim, this data is used to estimate the joint angles, or kinematics, by positioning the model in a position that minimizes the error between experimental markers and markers placed on the model using inverse kinematics. These kinematics can then be coupled with ground reaction forces to calculate joint moments using inverse dynamics. The kinematics and kinetics calculated from these processes can then be used to compare a subject’s gait to other individuals. 42
To create a three-dimensional musculoskeletal simulation, the final step is to determine the muscle excitations needed to produce the subject’s motion. However, due to modeling and experimental errors, the model’s motion is not dynamically consistent (Kuo, 1998) with measured ground reaction force (i.e. force ≠ mass x acceleration). To account for these inaccuracies, non-physiological forces and moments called residuals are applied to the pelvis. Since these forces are non- physiological, we minimize the magnitude of these forces using the residual reduction algorithm which makes small changes in measurements we know have error (such as joint angles and the location of the torso mass center) to reduce the magnitude of these residual forces (Delp et al., 2007).
After this step, we can then more confidently estimate muscle excitations. It is challenging to estimate muscle excitations and forces because each joint in the musculoskeletal system is crossed by more muscles than its degrees of freedom.
Therefore, we use computed muscle control which combines an optimization problem with a feedback controller to determine the set of muscle excitations that minimize the sum of muscle activations squared and tracks the subject’s measured motion (Thelen et al., 2003; Thelen and Anderson, 2006). If an estimate of the distribution of muscle forces is the primary outcome of interest in a research study, other less- computationally expensive methods can be used to estimate muscle activations and forces, such as static optimization. Static optimization estimates muscle forces by determining the set of muscle forces required to satisfy the equations of motion at each time step while minimizing an objective function (e.g., minimizing the sum of activation squared). The advantages of using computed muscle control over static 43
optimization is that it includes the activation-deactivation timing of muscles, the effects of musculotendon compliance, and does not allow muscle excitations to change instantaneously from one time step to the next; however, computed muscle control is more computationally expensive. The muscle activations or forces estimated with either of these processes can be compared to experimental electromyography and muscle excitations can be constrained to electromyography data if there are significant differences.
Determining the accelerations generated by individual muscles can be useful in many studies, including Chapters 3 and 4 of this dissertation, to understand how individual muscles contribute to motion. A perturbation or induced acceleration analysis can be used to estimate the accelerations produced by individual muscles. A perturbation analysis estimates these accelerations by applying a unit force to the muscle of interest, integrating forward a small amount in time (typically 20-30 ms), and then calculating the accelerations based upon changes in position (Liu et al.,
2006). This analysis uses a spring-damper element applied at the experimentally measured center of pressure to model foot-floor contact. An induced acceleration analysis calculates the accelerations produced by a muscle by explicitly solving the equations of motion and a constraint equation that represents contact between the foot and the ground (Zajac and Gordon, 1989; Hamner et al., 2010). An advantage of the induced acceleration analysis is that it is much more computationally efficient than a perturbation analysis; however, both analyses are dependent upon the foot-ground contact models used which may not accurately reproduce the interaction between the
44
foot and ground and is an important area for future investigation (Hamner et al., 2010;
Dorn et al., 2011).
There are limitations and challenges to using musculoskeletal modeling and simulation. Results are based upon inputs and, thus, if the models do not accurately represent the subject’s physiology or if there are errors in the experimental motion capture data, the results may not be representative of the subject. The musculoskeletal models included in this dissertation are scaled from a generic model of an adult which was created from averaged experimental data. We assume the children with cerebral palsy included in our study do not have significant bone deformities or altered muscle physiology compared to typically-developing children; however, the line of action and properties of muscles may be altered in individuals with cerebral palsy. Creating subject-specific musculoskeletal models and more quantitative measures of altered musculoskeletal physiology is an important area for future research. To check if our simulations recreate experimental data we also compare our kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity to experimental measures. These challenges in creating and evaluating simulations emphasize the importance of maintaining high standards in the analysis of musculoskeletal simulations and, whenever possible, partnering simulation studies with experimental measures.
Musculoskeletal modeling and simulation provides a platform for critically evaluating complex systems and movements. The following chapters document how this process can be used to examine the dynamics of crouch gait in individuals with cerebral palsy. This represents a foundation for future researchers and clinicians to build upon by improving models, creating new computational analyses, and 45
developing experimental tools to couple with simulation. The ultimate goal of this work is to improve not only our understanding of pathologic gait patterns, but to improve treatment and quality of life for these individuals.
46
CHAPTER 3
HOW DO MUSCLES CONTRIBUTE TO SUPPORT AND PROGRESSION DURING CROUCH GAIT?
Journal of Biomechanics (2010), vol. 43, pp. 2099-2105
Katherine M. Steele Ajay Seth Jennifer L. Hicks Michael H. Schwartz Scott L. Delp
47
ABSTRACT
Pathological movement patterns like crouch gait are characterized by abnormal kinematics and muscle activations that alter how muscles support the body weight during walking. Individual muscles are often the target of interventions to improve crouch gait, yet the roles of individual muscles during crouch gait remain unknown.
The goal of this study was to examine how muscles contribute to mass center accelerations and joint angular accelerations during single-limb stance in crouch gait and compare these contributions to unimpaired gait. Subject-specific dynamic simulations were created for ten children who walked in a mild crouch gait and had no previous surgeries. The simulations were analyzed to determine the acceleration of the mass center and angular accelerations of the hip, knee, and ankle generated by individual muscles. The results of this analysis indicate that children walking in crouch gait have less passive skeletal support of body weight and utilize substantially higher muscle forces to walk than unimpaired individuals. Crouch gait relies on the same muscles as unimpaired gait to accelerate the mass center upward, including the soleus, vasti, gastrocnemius, gluteus medius, rectus femoris, and gluteus maximus.
However, during crouch gait these muscles are active throughout single-limb stance, in contrast to the modulation of muscle forces seen during single-limb stance in unimpaired gait. Subjects walking in a crouch gait rely more on proximal muscles, including the gluteus medius and hamstrings, to accelerate the mass center forward during single-limb stance than subjects with unimpaired gait.
48
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Crouch gait, a common movement pattern among individuals with cerebral palsy, is characterized by excessive flexion of the hip, knee, and ankle during the stance phase of gait. This walking pattern is inefficient (Rose et al., 1989; Waters and
Mulroy, 1999) and if left untreated can lead to joint pain (Jahnsen et al., 2004), formation of boney deformities (Graham and Selber, 2003), and loss of independent gait (Johnson et al., 1997; Opheim et al., 2009). Clinicians try to identify muscles that can be strengthened, surgically lengthened, or otherwise treated to enable a more erect and efficient walking pattern. Little is known, however, about how individual muscles contribute to joint and mass center motions during crouch gait; thus, it is difficult to design treatment plans that target muscles most likely to improve gait dynamics.
Figure 3.1: OpenSim model shown at different phases of single-limb stance during crouch gait. The muscles shown in red are highly activated, while those in blue have a low activation level, as determined using the computed muscle control algorithm.
49
Humans have developed an efficient walking pattern to achieve forward progression while supporting body weight. Several studies (Anderson and Pandy,
2003; Neptune et al., 2004; Arnold et al., 2005; Kimmel and Schwartz, 2006; Liu et al., 2006) have examined how muscles accelerate the joints and mass center during unimpaired gait. These studies have shown that during early stance the vasti and gluteus maximus support the body and slow forward progression, while in late stance the gastrocnemius and soleus support body weight and propel the body forward
(Anderson and Pandy, 2003; Neptune et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2006). Liu et al. (2008) demonstrated that the roles of these muscles are maintained over a range of walking speeds.
Changes in joint kinematics and muscle activation patterns during crouch gait alter how muscles contribute to joint and mass center accelerations. Hicks et al. (2008) analyzed the potential of individual muscles to accelerate the hip and knee, per unit force, in crouched walking postures. This analysis revealed that a crouched posture markedly reduces the potential of several major lower-extremity muscles to generate extension accelerations of the hip and knee and increases the joint flexion accelerations from gravity. While this prior study determined the direction (i.e. flexion or extension) of the accelerations generated by important muscles, the magnitudes of the accelerations generated by muscles depend on muscle forces, which have not been estimated for subjects with crouch gait.
Determining how muscles contribute to joint angular accelerations and mass center accelerations during crouch gait can clarify the role of muscles during this abnormal walking pattern and elucidate biomechanical consequences of treatments 50
such as surgically lengthening muscles. Thus, the goal of the present study was to quantify angular accelerations of the hip, knee, and ankle generated by stance-limb muscles during the single-limb stance phase of crouch gait by creating and analyzing the first subject-specific dynamic simulations of crouch gait. Additionally, we characterized how muscles accelerate the mass center, which provides a holistic view of how muscles contribute to motion of the body during gait. The simulations are freely available at www.simtk.org, enabling other researchers to reproduce the results of this study and to perform additional analyses.
3.2 METHODS
3.2.1 SUBJECTS
Ten subjects with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy – age: 8.1 ± 1.7 yrs, height:
1.25 ± 0.09 m, weight: 27.1 ± 9.1 kg, leg length: 0.65 ± 0.06 m (average ± standard deviation) – were selected from a database of subjects examined at Gillette Children’s
Specialty Healthcare (St. Paul, MN). Each subject included in the study: 1) walked with a mild crouch gait (minimum knee flexion 15 - 40º during stance), 2) did not walk in equinus and achieved at least 0º of dorsiflexion during his or her physical exam, 3) had no previous surgeries, and 4) had no significant torsional skeletal deformities (less than 30º of tibial torsion and femoral anteversion). All subjects and/or guardians provided informed written consent for the data collection; analyses of the data were performed in accordance with the regulations of all participating institutions.
51
Motion analysis data was collected and kinematics determined using a 12- camera system (Vicon Motion Systems, Lake Forest, CA) and a standard marker measurement protocol (Davis et al., 1991). Four force plates (AMTI, Watertown, MA) were used to record ground reaction forces and moments, which were sampled at 1080
Hz and low-pass filtered at 20 Hz. Our analysis focused on single support because a lack of consecutive force plate strikes precluded the analysis of double support.
Subjects walked at a self-selected walking speed of 0.92 ± 0.18 m/s. Surface electromyography (EMG) signals were recorded for nine of the ten subjects from the medial hamstrings, biceps femoris long head, rectus femoris, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior (Motion Lab Systems, Baton Rouge, LA). EMG was sampled at 1080
Hz, band-pass filtered between 20 and 400 Hz, rectified, and low-pass filtered at 10
Hz. EMG for each muscle was normalized from zero to one based on the minimum and maximum values of that muscle over all trials for each subject.
3.2.2 DYNAMIC SIMULATION
A generic musculoskeletal model (lower extremities from Delp et al., 1990 and torso from Anderson and Pandy, 1999) with 19 degrees of freedom and 92 musculotendon actuators was scaled to each subject according to their anthropometric measurements (Figure 3.1). The degrees of freedom included a ball-and-socket joint located at approximately the third lumbar vertebra between the pelvis and torso, ball- and-socket joints at each hip, a planar joint with coupled translations at each knee, and revolute joints at each ankle. A subject-specific simulation of the single-limb stance phase of gait was then generated using OpenSim, a freely available biomechanical 52
simulation package (Delp et al., 2007), www.simtk.org. Double support was not included in this study due to a lack of consecutive force plate strikes in the small set of subjects who met our inclusion criteria. Kinematic and ground reaction force data were imported into OpenSim, where the computed muscle control Algorithm determined the muscle excitations that generated a forward dynamic simulation that minimized the difference between the experimental and simulated gait kinematics
(Thelen et al., 2003; Thelen and Anderson, 2006). Estimated muscle activations were scaled in the same manner as the EMG signals, and compared to the experimentally- measured EMG signals to evaluate the fidelity of the simulation’s muscle activation timing.
To test the sensitivity of the results to errors in muscle activation timing, we constrained the simulated activations to match the shape and normalized magnitude of the EMG for the 10 muscles for which EMG was recorded for one subject (See
Appendix A). When there was a disagreement between the EMG and simulated activations, the normalized magnitude of the EMG was used to define maximum and minimum bounds on the magnitude of the simulated activations. Although adding these constraints changed the magnitude of the contribution of each muscle the direction (e.g., flexion/extension) did not change. Since these changes in magnitudes did not alter the conclusions drawn from analyzing this simulation, we chose not to constrain activations for other subjects.
A perturbation analysis was used to determine the joint angular accelerations and mass center accelerations generated by each muscle in the model (Liu et al.,
2006). In this analysis, one newton of additional force (the perturbation) was applied 53
to each muscle separately and the model’s equations of motion integrated forward in time by 20 ms. These parameters for the perturbation analysis were chosen based upon a sensitivity analysis and experience from previous studies (Neptune et al., 2001;
Goldberg et al., 2004). Evaluating the change in position of each joint and the mass center after 20 ms, we determined the accelerations generated by each muscle by assuming constant acceleration over this brief period. This quantity represents the potential of each muscle to accelerate each joint and the mass center per newton of force. A muscle’s contribution to joint and mass center accelerations was computed by multiplying the muscle’s potential by its estimated force from the simulation at each time step. Upward accelerations of the mass center were considered to contribute to support of the body and forward accelerations were considered to contribute to progression of the body. The contributions of each muscle to mass center accelerations in the subjects with crouch gait were compared to two age, size, and speed matched, unimpaired subjects (age: 8.6 ± 2.2 yrs; weight: 33.6 ± 10.6 kg; speed: 1.08 ± 0.1 m/s; leg length: 0.71 ± 0.08 m) for whom motion analysis data were also collected at
Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare. The simulation data for these unimpaired subjects have been previously reported (Liu et al., 2008) and are available at www.simtk.org.
54
3.3 RESULTS
The muscle-driven simulation of each subject tracked all experimental joint angles with an RMS error of less than 1° (Figure 3.2). The resultant joint moments computed by multiplying the estimated muscle forces and moment arms also matched the joint moments computed by inverse dynamics with an RMS error of less than 1
Nm (Figure 3.3).
Figure 3.2: Comparison of simulated and experimentally-measured joint angles. Average kinematics for pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle are shown for all 10 subjects. The gray line and shaded regions are the experimentally-measured joint angles (± 1 standard deviation) and the black line and dashed-lines are the kinematics reproduced by the simulation (± 1 standard deviation). The simulated kinematics are not provided during double support as only single-limb stance was simulated. The simulated kinematics were within 1º of experimental kinematics (RMS error) for all trials.
55
Figure 3.3: Comparison of the simulated and experimentally- measured hip, knee, and ankle moments for all 10 subjects. The gray line and shaded regions are the experimentally- measured joint moments (± 1 standard deviation) and the blue line and dashed-lines are the moments calculated by computed by multiplying the estimated muscle forces and moment arms (± 1 standard deviation). Joint moments are only shown during single-limb stance and swing since force plate data was not available during double support.
The normalized simulated activations and EMG showed similar on and off patterns during single-limb stance (Figure 3.4). Differences between estimated excitations and EMG included excessive rectus femoris activity during swing and reduced biceps femoris activity during terminal swing in the simulations.
56
Figure 3.4: Comparison of EMG and simulated activation. The EMG signal and activation were normalized to a range of 0 to 1 between the maximum and minimum values for each subject. The gray line and shaded area represents the EMG data (± 1 standard deviation) over a full gait cycle, while the simulated activations during single-limb stance are shown in blue with the dashed lines showing ± 1 standard deviation. Note that estimated muscle activations are not provided during the double support periods of the gait cycle because only single-limb stance was simulated.
Subjects walking in crouch gait utilized higher muscle forces than the unimpaired subjects. The average total muscle force of all stance-limb muscles during single-limb stance in crouch gait was 8.6 ± 0.6 times body weight versus 5.3 ± 0.7 times body weight in unimpaired gait. The primary contributors to hip extension were the gluteus maximus, posterior gluteus medius, and bi-articular hamstrings, while the primary contributors to knee extension were the vasti, gluteus maximus, and soleus
57
(Figure 3.5). The iliacus and psoas muscles generated substantial flexion accelerations of all three joints. The rectus femoris generated hip flexion acceleration.
30000 Hip Knee
) 20000 2 Ankle
10000 ext
0
flex -10000
Angular Acceleration (º/s Acceleration Angular -20000
Glut Max Glut Med Bi-Art Hams Rectus Vasti Iliopsoas Gastroc Soleus -30000
Figure 3.5: Average contributions ± 1 standard deviation to hip, knee, and ankle angular accelerations during single-limb stance from the major muscle groups of the stance limb. Positive and negative accelerations correspond to extension and flexion, respectively. Note that the muscles with average values close to zero made small contributions throughout single-limb stance.
The largest upward accelerations of the mass center were from the soleus, followed by the vasti, then gastrocnemius, gluteus medius, rectus femoris, and gluteus maximus (Figure 3.6). This subset of muscles provided 90% of the total upward acceleration of the mass center generated by all muscles of the stance limb during crouch gait and unimpaired gait. The ankle plantarflexors contributed more to support during crouch gait, whereas the gluteus medius provided more support during unimpaired gait. The primary muscles that accelerated the mass center downward
(Figure 3.6) included the anterior tibialis, iliopsoas, biceps femoris short head, hip adductors (adductor longus, brevis, and magnus), and medial hamstrings
(semimembranosus and semitendinosus). The downward acceleration of the mass center from gravity was larger in crouch gait as less support was provided by skeletal alignment than in unimpaired gait (Figure 3.6).
58
Gluteus Maximus Gluteus Medius Rectus Femoris 6 6 6 UP 5 Crouch Gait 5 5 ) 2 Unimpaired Gait 4 4 4 FORWARD
3 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1 Acceleration (m/s Acceleration
0 0 0 OTO OHC OTO OHC OTO OHC -1 -1 -1
Vasti Gastrocnemius Soleus 6 6 6
5 5 5 ) 2 4 4 4
3 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 1 Acceleration (m/s Acceleration
0 0 0 OTO OHC OTO OHC OTO OHC -1 -1 -1 Iliopsoas Hip Adductors Biceps Femoris Short Head OTO OHC OTO OHC OTO OHC 0 0 0 ) 2
-2 -2 -2
-4 -4 -4
-6 -6 -6
Acceleration (m/s Acceleration -8 -8 -8
-10 -10 -10 Tibialis Anterior Gravity Skeletal Alignment 5 OTO OHC OTO OHC 0 0 4 )
2 -2 -2 3
-4 -4 2
-6 -6 1
-8 -8 0
Acceleration (m/s Acceleration OTO OHC -10 -10
Figure 3.6: Contributions to mass center accelerations from the muscles providing the largest magnitude accelerations upward and downward and from gravity. Accelerations are shown for single- limb stance from opposite toe-off (OTO) to opposite heel contact (OHC). The vectors represent the average up/down and forward/backward acceleration of the mass center at each 5% of single-limb stance for all subjects. The magnitude of the accelerations in the forward/backward directions has the same scale as the up/down accelerations shown on the vertical-axis. Skeletal alignment was calculated by subtracting the accelerations due to muscles from the accelerations due to the ground reaction force. 59
Although the muscles that contributed to the vertical acceleration of the mass center were similar in crouch gait and unimpaired gait, the profile of the accelerations differed between the two groups (Figure 3.6). Accelerations of the mass center generated by muscles during unimpaired gait tended to modulate substantially over the period of single-limb stance, whereas the stance-limb muscles provided more constant contributions to mass center accelerations throughout single-limb stance in crouch gait.
The largest contributors to forward progression during the single-limb stance phase of crouch gait were the bi-articular hamstrings, gluteus medius, and gluteus maximus. The gastrocnemius, rectus femoris, vastus, iliopsoas, and hip adductors slowed forward progression. In contrast, during unimpaired gait, the vasti and soleus slowed forward progression during early single-limb stance while the gastrocnemius accelerated the mass center forward in late single-limb stance. The contributions of all stance-limb muscles to joint and mass center accelerations are provided in Appendix
A.2.
3.4 DISCUSSION
In this study we created the first muscle-actuated simulations of subjects with crouch gait, which provide insight into how individual muscles contribute to joint angular accelerations and mass center accelerations during single-limb stance.
Analysis of these simulations indicates that crouch gait is characterized by larger muscle forces than unimpaired gait to support body weight and propel the body
60
forward throughout single-limb stance. These larger forces were necessary to support the body in part due to the fact that the skeleton provided less body weight support in crouch gait, as well as the reduced capacity of muscles to extend the joints (Hicks et al., 2008) in a crouched posture.
Subjects with crouch gait utilized the same muscle groups to support the body as unimpaired gait; however, they employed a different support strategy during single- limb stance. Supporting the body in unimpaired gait requires precise orchestration of muscle activations, with dramatic modulation of muscle activity throughout single- limb stance. In contrast, during crouch gait, the support muscles were active throughout single-limb stance and generated relatively constant accelerations of the mass center. Subjects with crouch gait also used a different strategy to move the mass center forward during single-limb stance, relying more on proximal muscles than the unimpaired subjects.
These different strategies for support and progression during single-limb stance may underlie why some individuals with cerebral palsy adopt a crouch gait. Given the excessive muscle activity common in these subjects, they may adopt a support strategy where muscles are activated consistently throughout single-limb stance. Driving forward progression with more proximal muscles may also allow subjects to rely less on controlling distal leg muscles, which are often more severely effected in patients with cerebral palsy (Carr et al., 1993; Wiley and Damiano, 1998). The use of proximal muscles for forward progression and walking with slightly flexed knees are also characteristics of immature gait in unimpaired children (Farmer, 2003). This suggests
61
that some children with cerebral palsy may adopt crouch gait as a feasible gait pattern given their neurological limitations.
Understanding how individual muscles contribute to joint and mass center accelerations can help to clarify the effects of treatment. For example, the ankle plantarflexors are common targets for surgical lengthening in patients with crouch gait. The gastrocnemius is highly active in stance and has a knee-flexion moment arm, which might play a role in the excessive knee flexion associated with crouch gait. The results from our simulations indicate that although the gastrocnemius and soleus both generate ankle plantarflexion accelerations, they have different effects at the hip and knee. While the soleus contributes to hip and knee extension throughout single-limb stance, the gastrocnemius generates flexion accelerations at both joints. Despite these differences, both muscles accelerate the mass center upward and contribute to support.
The contribution of the gastrocnemius to support indicates that the muscle’s role as an extensor of the ankle is more significant to the acceleration of the mass center than its role as a flexor of the hip and knee.
Our subject-specific simulations of crouch gait demonstrate that the soleus is an important crouch-countering muscle. The soleus not only extends all three joints, but provides the largest contribution to body weight support, and thus should not be weakened in this patient population. Furthermore, our results suggest that weakening the gastrocnemius could compromise a patient’s ability to support his or her body weight and may lead to excessive dorsiflexion. While lengthening the gastrocnemius may reduce hip and knee flexion accelerations by reducing the muscle’s force, a patient may still walk in a crouched posture after a gastrocnemius lengthening if the 62
soleus and other muscles cannot compensate for the decreased contribution to support from gastrocnemius. These possible negative effects of weakening the gastrocnemius agree with studies that predicted decreased active moment-generating capacity after lengthening the gastrocnemius (Delp et al., 1995) and that demonstrated increased knee flexion after decreasing gastrocnemius activity (Sutherland et al., 1980).
Testing the accuracy of muscle forces estimated from dynamic simulations is one of the challenges in creating subject-specific simulations. The simulations tracked the experimental kinematics and joint moments closely, but we observed some differences between EMG patterns and simulated activations. Given that maximum voluntary contractions were not available from the study subjects, we could not directly compare the magnitude of the EMG with the estimated activations. Even if the magnitude of a muscle’s force changes, the direction of its acceleration (e.g., flexion/extension) would be the same since, according to the equations of motion, direction is determined by the inertial properties of the model, muscle paths, and posture of the model. We tested the impact of constraining activations to better match the shape and normalized magnitude of the EMG and found that resulting alterations in muscle activations did not impact the conclusions of the study.
Previous investigations have tested the induced acceleration analysis technique used in this study by comparing estimated accelerations to accelerations produced when individual muscles are electrically stimulated (Stewart et al., 2007; Hernandez et al., 2008; Stewart et al., 2008; Hunter et al., 2009). These studies have shown that stimulating a muscle produces accelerations in the same direction as predicted by the induced acceleration analysis. Future studies that use electrical stimulation to examine 63
the accelerations generated by individual muscles during crouch gait could assist in further testing the results presented here.
These simulations were generated for individuals who walked flat-footed in a mild crouch gait. The results of this study may not be extensible to other crouch gait populations, such as patients with equinus, excessive dorsiflexion, or more severe knee flexion. Additionally, this study examined single-limb stance and was not able to explore double support due to a lack of force plate data. However, single-limb stance is clinically important since an inability to support the mass center during this period may contribute to crouch gait. Future studies examining double support would provide valuable information about propulsion and the transition from stance to swing.
The muscle-actuated dynamic simulations generated in this study provide insights into the support and progression strategies used in crouch gait. The differences between crouch and unimpaired gait revealed that individuals who walk in a crouch gait utilize similar muscles to support the mass center but different muscles to propel the mass center forward during single-limb stance. The results of this study can be used to identify muscles that are used to support the mass center during crouch gait for interventions such as strength training, and to inform surgical decision- making. Although we can measure muscle activity and kinematics during gait, simulation provides a tool to quantify how the activity of individual muscles contribute to movement and can lead to a deeper understanding of the biomechanics underlying crouch gait.
64
CHAPTER 4
HOW DO MUSCLE CONTRIBUTIONS TO SUPPORT AND PROGRESSION CHANGE WITH CROUCH SEVERITY?
Manuscript in review
Katherine M. Steele Ajay Seth Jennifer L. Hicks Michael H. Schwartz Scott L. Delp
65
ABSTRACT
The goals of this study were to determine if the muscle contributions to vertical and fore-aft acceleration of the mass center differ between crouch gait and unimpaired gait and if these muscle contributions change with crouch severity. Examining muscle contributions to mass center acceleration provides insight into the roles of individual muscles during gait and can provide guidance for treatment planning. We calculated vertical and fore-aft accelerations using musculoskeletal simulations of typically- developing children and children with cerebral palsy and crouch gait. Analysis of these simulations revealed that during unimpaired gait the quadriceps produce large upward and backward accelerations during early stance, whereas the ankle plantarflexors produce large upward and forward accelerations later in stance. In contrast, during crouch gait, the quadriceps and ankle plantarflexors produce large, opposing fore-aft accelerations throughout stance. The quadriceps force required to accelerate the mass center upward was significantly larger in crouch gait than in unimpaired gait and increased with crouch severity. The gluteus medius accelerated the mass center upward during mid stance in unimpaired gait; however, during crouch gait the upward acceleration produced by the gluteus medius was significantly reduced. During unimpaired gait the quadriceps and ankle plantarflexors accelerate the mass center at different times, efficiently modulating fore-aft accelerations. However, during crouch gait, the quadriceps and ankle plantarflexors produce fore-aft accelerations at the same time and the opposing fore-aft accelerations generated by these muscles contributes to the inefficiency of crouch gait.
66
4.1 INTRODUCTION
Many individuals with cerebral palsy walk in a crouch gait pattern characterized by excess hip and knee flexion (Wren et al., 2005). Walking in a crouched posture can lead to joint pain (Jahnsen et al., 2004) and bone deformities
(Graham and Selber, 2003) and is inefficient (Rose et al., 1989; Waters and Mulroy,
1999). Understanding how muscles accelerate the mass center during crouch gait may provide insight about the underlying mechanics and inefficiencies associated with this gait pattern.
Previous studies have documented how muscles accelerate the mass center during unimpaired gait (Neptune et al., 2001; Anderson and Pandy, 2003; Liu et al.,
2008) and have shown that the same muscles that accelerate the mass center upward also modulate fore-aft acceleration (Liu et al., 2006). Examining muscle contributions to mass center acceleration can provide insight into the role of individual muscles and the control strategy used during gait. During unimpaired gait, the vasti and gluteus maximus accelerate the mass center upward and backward in early stance, the gluteus medius accelerates the mass center upward in mid stance, and the ankle plantarflexors accelerate the mass center upward and forward in late stance (Neptune et al., 2001;
Anderson and Pandy, 2003; Liu et al., 2008). This coordinated muscle activity uses different muscle groups at different periods of stance to efficiently modulate vertical and fore-aft mass center acceleration.
How muscles modulate vertical and fore-aft accelerations of the mass center during crouch gait and how these accelerations change with crouch severity is not well understood. Previous work has shown that similar muscles accelerate the mass center 67
upward during the single-limb stance phase of both mild crouch gait and unimpaired gait (Steele et al., 2010). However, the role of muscles during the double support phase, when fore-aft accelerations are largest, is not known for crouch gait. The ability of muscles such as the gluteus medius and soleus to extend the hip and knee (Hicks et al., 2008) and accelerate the mass center upward (Correa et al., 2012) has been shown to decrease in a crouched posture; however, the effect of crouch severity on muscle contributions to mass center acceleration has not been investigated. Alterations in the ability of muscles to generate vertical and fore-aft accelerations of the mass center may change the strategy used to accelerate the mass center during crouch gait and contribute to the inefficiency of this gait pattern.
The goals of this study were to determine whether: (1) the magnitude and timing of muscle contributions to vertical and fore-aft accelerations differ between crouch gait and unimpaired gait, and (2) the muscle contributions to vertical and fore- aft accelerations change with crouch severity. To calculate muscle contributions to mass center accelerations we created three-dimensional musculoskeletal simulations of gait for typically-developing children and children with cerebral palsy and varying degrees of crouch gait (Figure 4.1). Examining how individual muscles contribute to vertical and fore-aft accelerations can elucidate the mechanics of crouch gait and inform treatment strategies.
68
Figure 4.1: Musculoskeletal model of an individual with cerebral palsy and crouch gait. Vertical and fore- aft accelerations of the mass center were calculated by analyzing muscle-driven simulations.
4.2 METHODS
Nine children with cerebral palsy were selected from a database of subjects who had undergone motion analysis at Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare. The selection criteria for the subjects included: (1) a diagnosis of spastic diplegic cerebral palsy, (2) a minimum knee flexion angle during stance greater than 15°, and (3) a tibial and femoral torsion deformity less than 30° (Hicks et al., 2007). We also required that the subjects did not use an assistive device during the motion analysis and had at least two consecutive force plate strikes. Nine subjects with crouch gait were divided into three groups based on minimum knee flexion angle during stance:
15 - 30° knee flexion was defined as mild crouch gait, 30 - 50° was defined as moderate crouch gait, and 50° or larger was defined as severe crouch gait (Table 4.1).
69
Table 4.1: Subject characteristics (average ± standard deviation) Age Height Weight KFA* (years) (cm) (kg) (deg) Unimpaired 10 ± 3 144 ± 16 36 ± 9 -2 ± 4 Mild Crouch 9 ± 1 124 ± 10 24 ± 4 18 ± 2 Moderate Crouch 11 ± 2 136 ± 6 43 ± 31 34 ± 2 Severe Crouch 14 ± 2 157 ± 12 41 ± 8 64 ± 20 * KFA: Minimum knee flexion angle during stance
The typically-developing children were selected from a group of subjects who also visited Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare for motion analysis and whose gait has been previously simulated (Liu et al., 2008). Previous studies demonstrated consistent contributions to vertical and fore-aft accelerations during gait in typically- developing children; thus, we chose three subjects with an age range similar to the subjects with crouch gait (Table 4.1).
Motion analysis data was collected using a 12-camera system (Vicon Motion
Systems, Lake Forest, CA) and a standard marker measurement protocol (Davis et al.,
1991). Ground reaction forces were measured with four force plates (AMTI,
Watertown, MA). All subjects walked barefoot at their self-selected speed. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded from the rectus femoris, hamstrings, gastrocnemius, and anterior tibialis (Motion Laboratory Systems, Baton Rouge, LA) for nine of the subjects. The nine subjects who had EMG data available included three typically-developing subjects, three mild crouch gait subjects, one moderate crouch gait subject, and two severe crouch gait subjects. The EMG signals were sampled at
1080 Hz, band-pass filtered between 20 and 400 Hz, rectified, and low-pass filtered at
10 Hz. The magnitude of the EMG signal was normalized for each muscle group from zero to one based on the minimum and maximum values observed during the motion
70
analysis. Since EMG was not available for all subjects, we averaged the processed
EMG signals for each group of subjects for comparison to simulated muscle activations.
To create dynamic musculoskeletal simulations of gait, we used a musculoskeletal model with 19 degrees of freedom and 92 musculotendon actuators
(lower extremities from Delp et al., 1990 and torso from Anderson and Pandy, 1999).
The degrees of freedom in the model included three translations and three rotations of the pelvis, a ball-and-socket joint between the pelvis and the torso located at the third lumbar vertebrae, ball-and-socket joints at each hip, a custom joint with coupled translations and rotations at each knee, and a revolute joint at each ankle. This model has previously been used to model typically-developing children (Liu et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2008) and children with cerebral palsy (Hicks et al., 2008; Reinbolt et al., 2008;
Steele et al., 2010). The model was scaled according to anthropometric measurements for each subject using OpenSim (Delp et al., 2007). We scaled the maximum isometric force of all muscles by height-squared (Jaric et al., 2002).
Inverse kinematics, which minimizes the difference between experimental marker trajectories and markers placed on the model, was used to calculate joint angles (Figure 4.2). Joint moments were calculated for each subject using inverse dynamics (Figure 4.2).
71
Figure 4.2: Average hip, knee, and ankle flexion angles and moments during unimpaired gait and mild, moderate, and severe crouch gait. The joint moments are normalized by body mass (kg).
72
A dynamic simulation of one gait cycle was generated for each subject. The residual reduction algorithm (RRA) was used to reduce residuals at the pelvis (Delp et al., 2007). Residuals are non-physiological forces and moments applied at the pelvis that balance dynamic inconsistencies resulting from experimental errors and modeling assumptions. RRA reduced these residuals by making small changes to measurements that may have experimental error including the position of the torso mass center
(changes were less than 2 cm in magnitude) and the kinematics (changes were less than 2° for all joint angles). Using the adjusted model and kinematics determined from
RRA, the computed muscle control algorithm (CMC) was used to estimate the muscle forces required to track each subject’s kinematics (Thelen et al., 2003; Thelen and
Anderson, 2006). At each time step, CMC determines the distribution of muscle activations, such that model accelerations match the experimental accelerations for all degrees of freedom. The algorithm accounts for muscle activation and contraction dynamics, which includes the muscle force-length-velocity relationship. The distribution of muscle activations was determined by minimizing the sum of muscle activations squared at each time step. The estimated muscle activations from CMC were qualitatively compared to the average EMG signal for each gait pattern; constraints on muscle excitations were used when the simulated muscle activity was inconsistent with the EMG signals.
An induced acceleration analysis was used to compute the contributions of individual muscles to vertical and fore-aft mass center accelerations (Zajac, 1989;
Riley and Kerrigan, 1999; Anderson and Pandy, 2003; Hamner et al., 2010) at each time point of a subject’s gait simulation. This analysis solves the model’s equations of 73
motion, including foot-floor contact constraint equations, to determine the contributions of gravity, velocity, and each muscle force to the mass center acceleration. The contact constraint equations used in this analysis enforce a rolling without slipping constraint to model the foot-floor interaction (Hamner et al., 2010).
The musculoskeletal simulations recreated the dynamics of gait for the typically-developing children and children with cerebral palsy. The average residual forces and moments applied at the mass center of the pelvis were 9.7 N and 16.5 Nm, less than 10% of body weight and body weight*height, respectively, for all subjects.
The on-off timing and magnitude of the simulated activations and electromyography were qualitatively similar (Figure 4.3); however, there were some deviations, such as decreased quadriceps activity during early swing of unimpaired gait and increased gastrocnemius activity during swing of severe crouch gait. These differences had minimal effects on muscle contributions to vertical and fore-aft accelerations of the mass center, since these accelerations are generated predominately during stance.
To determine if the muscle contributions to vertical and fore-aft accelerations differed between unimpaired gait and crouch gait, we performed a student’s t-test with a significance level of 0.05. To determine if contributions to vertical and fore-aft accelerations changed with crouch severity we used a one-way ANOVA to compare mild, moderate, and severe crouch gait with a significance level of 0.05. We used two methods to examine relative timing of muscle contributions to mass center accelerations. The first method, a covariance analysis, examined the covariance of the contributions to fore-aft accelerations of major muscle groups over the gait cycle to determine if they differed between unimpaired gait and crouch gait (using a student’s 74
t-test) or with crouch severity (using a one-way ANOVA). The second method was to calculate the area under the fore-aft acceleration versus gait cycle curves for major muscle groups to determine if they differed between unimpaired gait and crouch gait
(using the student’s t-test) or with crouch severity (using a one-way ANOVA).
Figure 4.3: Average ± 1 standard deviation of the EMG signal of each group (gray) and estimated muscle activations for each subject (black lines) from the quadriceps, hamstrings, gastrocnemius, and anterior tibialis during unimpaired gait and mild, moderate, and severe crouch gait. Only one individual with moderate crouch gait had EMG, thus we took the average of multiple gait cycles for comparison to the group. The magnitude of the EMG and activations were normalized from 0 to 1 based upon the minimum and maximum values during the gait cycle.
75
4.3 RESULTS
The vasti (p = 0.03) and rectus femoris (p = 0.03) produced greater backward acceleration of the mass center and the gastrocnemius (p = 0.02) and soleus (p = 0.05) produced greater forward acceleration of the mass center during crouch gait than unimpaired gait (Figure 4.4A). The forward acceleration produced by the soleus increased with crouch severity (p = 0.001). In contrast, the fore-aft accelerations produced by the gluteus medius (p < 0.001) and iliopsoas (p = 0.02) were significantly smaller in crouch gait than in unimpaired gait.
Figure 4.4: The average (A) fore-aft and (B) vertical accelerations of the mass center during stance produced by each muscle and (C) the average muscle force during stance normalized by body weight (BW). Error bars are ± 1 standard error. A ‘*’ indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the student’s t-test comparing unimpaired gait and crouch gait. An arrow indicates a significant change with crouch severity (p < 0.05) from a one-way ANOVA comparing mild, moderate, and severe crouch gait.
The downward acceleration of the mass center from gravity was greater (p =
0.001) during crouch gait than unimpaired gait (Figure 4.4B). In the erect posture of unimpaired gait, a larger portion of body weight is supported by skeletal alignment than in a crouched posture and, thus, the acceleration of the mass center due to gravity
76
is reduced. The contribution of the tibialis anterior to downward acceleration was greater during crouch gait than unimpaired gait; however, muscle contributions to downward acceleration of the mass center were small relative to gravity. The vasti, gastrocnemius, and soleus produced the largest upward accelerations of the mass center during crouch gait and unimpaired gait. The upward acceleration produced by the gluteus medius was significantly less during crouch gait than unimpaired gait. The upward acceleration produced by the gastrocnemius decreased with crouch severity (p
= 0.02).
The forces produced by the vasti (p = 0.04) and rectus femoris (p = 0.01) were significantly greater in crouch gait than in unimpaired gait, and vasti force increased
(p = 0.005) with crouch severity (Figure 4.4C). The change in vasti force was larger than the change in upward and backward accelerations produced by the vasti because of a diminished capacity of the vasti to accelerate the mass center in a crouch posture
(Figure 4.5). For example, vasti force during severe crouch gait increased by 340% compared to unimpaired gait, but the upward acceleration produced by the vasti only increased by 184% because the upward acceleration produced per newton of muscle force of the vasti decreased by 54% in severe crouch gait.
The relative timing and magnitude of the fore-aft accelerations generated by the vasti and gastrocnemius differed between crouch gait and unimpaired gait, as indicated by changes in the covariance and area under the fore-aft acceleration curves
(Figure 4.6). In unimpaired gait, the vasti accelerated the mass center upward and backward during early stance and the ankle plantarflexors accelerated the mass center upward and forward during late stance. The covariance of the fore-aft accelerations 77
Figure 4.5: The average (A) fore-aft and (B) vertical accelerations produced per 1 newton of muscle force during stance of each muscle. Error bars are ± 1 standard error. A ‘*’ indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the student’s t- test comparing unimpaired gait and crouch gait. An arrow indicates a significant change with crouch severity (p < 0.05) from a one-way ANOVA comparing mild, moderate, and severe crouch gait. generated by the vasti and gastrocnemius during unimpaired gait was close to zero
(-0.08 ± 0.03), indicating that these muscles were active at different times of the gait cycle. During crouch gait, the vasti and ankle plantarflexors both contributed to fore- aft accelerations throughout stance, resulting in large, opposing fore-aft accelerations.
The covariance of the fore-aft accelerations generated by the vasti and gastrocnemius was -0.71 ± 0.14 during crouch gait, significantly different than unimpaired gait (p =
0.03), indicating that these muscles were active at similar times and accelerated the mass center in opposite directions. Additionally, the areas under the fore-aft acceleration curves of the vasti (p = 0.01) and gastrocnemius (p = 0.02) were significantly greater in crouch gait than in unimpaired gait due to these muscles’ sustained contributions to fore-aft accelerations during crouch gait.
78
Figure 4.6: The fore-aft accelerations of the mass center produced by the vasti (gray line) and gastrocnemius (black line) during stance. The gray area shows the experimentally measured acceleration of the mass center (fore-aft ground reaction force normalized by body mass). 79
4.4 DISCUSSION
As in unimpaired gait, two muscle groups, the quadriceps and ankle plantarflexors, were largely responsible for accelerating the mass center upward and modulating fore-aft acceleration during crouch gait. However, unlike unimpaired gait, these muscles contributed to mass center accelerations throughout stance and produced large, opposing fore-aft accelerations. During crouch gait, the ankle plantarflexors accelerated the mass center upward and forward while the vasti accelerated the mass center upward and backward throughout stance. The coordination of quadriceps and ankle plantarflexor activity during unimpaired gait provides an efficient strategy (Liu et al., 2006) which also allows for modulation of speed by increasing or decreasing quadriceps and plantarflexor muscle force proportionally across the gait cycle (Liu et al., 2008). This system is compromised during crouch gait, and muscles are required to make more sustained contributions to vertical and fore-aft accelerations. These sustained contributions contribute to the inefficiency of crouch gait and require individuals with crouch gait to adopt a different strategy for speed modulation.
A crouched posture increases the demand on muscles to accelerate the mass center upward due to a decrease in skeletal support and an increase in the knee extensor moment. The quadriceps and ankle plantarflexors produce the greatest upward acceleration of the mass center during crouch gait, but the gluteus medius’ ability to accelerate the mass center upward is significantly reduced compared to unimpaired gait (Correa et al., 2012). During unimpaired gait, the gluteus medius accelerates the mass center upward in mid stance during the transition from quadriceps 80
to ankle plantarflexors activity. During crouch gait, the gluteus medius contribution to upward acceleration is reduced and a different strategy is needed to support the mass center in mid stance. Furthermore, the upward acceleration produced per newton of muscle force decreases with crouch severity for both the quadriceps and ankle plantarflexors (Hicks et al., 2008) and other muscles may need to be recruited to accelerate the mass center upward. Previous experimental studies have also reported increased quadriceps demand (Perry et al., 1975; Hsu et al., 1993) and prolonged ankle plantarflexor activity during crouch gait (Thomas et al., 1996).
Understanding how muscles contribute to vertical and fore-aft accelerations can assist in evaluating treatment options. Demand on the vasti and rectus femoris was greater during crouch gait and may contribute to fatigue. Strength training or other programs that improve the endurance of these muscles may improve the overall endurance of individuals with crouch gait. The ankle plantarflexors were also critical muscles for accelerating the mass center upward and forward during crouch gait and may be targets for strength training programs. Engsberg et al. (2006) reported an improvement in knee flexion during stance after strengthening the ankle plantarflexors. Similarly, ankle foot orthoses may assist the ankle plantarflexors and improve the efficiency of crouch gait (Lucareli et al., 2007; Rogozinski et al., 2009).
From a surgical perspective, weakening or reducing the force-generating capacity of the gastrocnemius or soleus by musculotendon lengthening, neuromuscular toxins, or other procedures could reduce an individual’s ability to accelerate their mass center upward or forward.
81
Simulation enables analysis of the accelerations produced by muscles; however, there are limitations to these methods. The models used in this study were scaled from adult models and may not reflect bone deformities or altered muscle physiology of individuals with cerebral palsy. We excluded subjects with significant bone deformities. However, measurements of how muscle physiology changes in individuals with cerebral palsy are needed to incorporate the effects of contracture, spasticity, and other pathologies. These changes in muscle physiology would not affect the direction of the vertical or fore-aft accelerations produced by each muscle, but could affect the relative magnitude of force produced by different muscles. To estimate muscle forces, we minimized activation squared and compared estimated activations to EMG. EMG data was available from a few muscles in a subset of the subjects and, although the estimated activations were similar to EMG during stance when muscles predominately contribute to mass center accelerations, the EMG data was noisy and varied between subjects. EMG from more muscle groups and analysis of other minimization criteria could improve simulations of individuals with cerebral palsy. This study also had a limited number of subjects and may not have had the power to detect some differences in muscle contributions to vertical and fore-aft accelerations. We have made the simulations included in this study freely available on-line for other researchers to evaluate and use for future research
(https://simtk.org/home/crouchgait).
By creating musculoskeletal simulations of individuals with cerebral palsy and crouch gait, we have determined that a different strategy is used to accelerate the mass center during crouch gait. The quadriceps and ankle plantarflexors are the primary 82
muscle groups that accelerate the mass center upward; however, sustained activity of these muscles during stance produces large, opposing fore-aft accelerations – like driving with your parking brake on. Future studies that examine the metabolic costs of crouch gait and explore why individuals adopt a crouch gait pattern will be critical for improving treatment and quality of life. Examining how individual muscles contribute to gait using musculoskeletal simulation provides a foundation for these future studies and a basis for clinicians and researchers to understand the underlying mechanics of gait pathologies.
83
84
CHAPTER 5
HOW DOES TIBIOFEMORAL CONTACT FORCE CHANGE DURING CROUCH GAIT?
Gait & Posture (2012), vol. 35, pp. 556-60
Katherine M. Steele Matt DeMers Michael H. Schwartz Scott L. Delp
85
ABSTRACT
Crouch gait, a common walking pattern in individuals with cerebral palsy, is characterized by excessive flexion of the hip and knee. Many subjects with crouch gait experience knee pain, perhaps because of elevated muscle forces and joint loading.
The goal of this study was to examine how muscle forces and compressive tibiofemoral force change with the increasing knee flexion associated with crouch gait.
Muscle forces and tibiofemoral force were estimated for three unimpaired children and nine children with cerebral palsy who walked with varying degrees of knee flexion.
We scaled a generic musculoskeletal model to each subject and used the model to estimate muscle forces and compressive tibiofemoral forces during walking. Mild crouch gait (minimum knee flexion 20-35°) produced a peak compressive tibiofemoral force similar to unimpaired walking; however, severe crouch gait (minimum knee flexion > 50°) increased the peak force to greater than 6 times body weight, more than double the load during unimpaired gait. This increase in compressive tibiofemoral force was due primarily to increases in quadriceps force during crouch gait, which increased quadratically with average stance phase knee flexion (i.e., crouch severity).
Increased quadriceps force contributes to larger tibiofemoral and patellofemoral loading which may contribute to knee pain in individuals with crouch gait.
86
5.1 INTRODUCTION
Crouch gait is a common pathological walking pattern adopted by individuals with cerebral palsy that is characterized by excessive hip and knee flexion. Walking in a crouched posture is inefficient (Rose et al., 1989; Waters and Mulroy, 1999) and can lead to joint pain and compromise an individual’s walking ability (Opheim et al.,
2009). Surgical and therapeutic treatments for crouch gait aim to produce a more upright posture to improve walking efficiency and prevent joint pain and deterioration.
Altered loads on the knee can have adverse effects on joint health. Cartilage and bone growth and maintenance depend on the loads experienced during daily life
(Carter and Wong, 1988; Wong and Carter, 2003), and abnormal loading can lead to joint pain, cartilage degeneration (Eckstein et al., 2002), and the formation of bone deformities (Graham and Selber, 2003). Joint pain can be a significant contributor to walking deterioration in adults with cerebral palsy. Jahnsen et al. (2004) found that
41% of adults with diplegic cerebral palsy reported significant knee pain.
To develop successful treatment strategies for crouch gait, surgeons and therapists need to understand how joint loads change with increasing knee flexion during crouch gait and how joint loads may change with altered knee flexion.
Treatments are aimed at reducing the excessive knee flexion associated with crouch gait, but it is unclear if changes in knee flexion will alter joint loads. Quantifying the relationship between knee flexion, muscle forces, and the compressive force on the tibia during gait could help clinicians determine if a more upright posture could reduce the risks caused by altered joint loading.
87
Perry et al., (1975) examined knee forces in a static crouched posture using a cadaver model and reported increasing compressive tibiofemoral force with increasing knee flexion. In dynamic activities, such as walking, we expect larger joint forces than in a static posture due to the additional muscle forces required to support the body weight during movement and propel the body forward (Liu et al., 2008). Compressive tibiofemoral forces during unimpaired walking have been reported in the range of 2-3 times body weight (Shelburne et al., 2005; D'Lima et al., 2006; Mundermann et al.,
2008; Kutzner et al., 2010). During crouch gait, muscle forces in the stance-limb are higher than during unimpaired walking (Steele et al., 2010). Since muscle forces are the primary contributors to joint loading (Inman, 1947; Sasaki and Neptune, 2010), we expect that compressive tibiofemoral forces are higher during crouch gait, yet the relationship between crouch gait severity and the compressive tibiofemoral force remains unknown.
The purpose of this study was to estimate the magnitude of the compressive tibiofemoral force during crouch gait and examine how this force changes with crouch severity. To achieve this goal we estimated the muscles forces and the compressive force on the tibia in unimpaired children and children with cerebral palsy who walked in varying degrees of crouch severity. We used a freely-available biomechanics software package, OpenSim (Delp et al., 2007), to scale a musculoskeletal model to each individual and estimate muscle joint loads based upon each individual’s gait dynamics.
88
5.2 METHODS
5.2.1 SUBJECTS
The subjects for this study were selected from a database of patients treated at
Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare (St. Paul, MN; Table 5.1). Nine subjects with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy were selected to cover a broad range of crouch severity and were divided evenly into three groups: mild crouch gait (minimum knee flexion angle of 20-35º), moderate crouch gait (minimum knee flexion angle of 35-50º), and severe crouch gait (minimum knee flexion angle greater than 50º). All subjects walked with excess knee and hip flexion and had at least 5º of ankle dorsiflexion during stance. We excluded subjects that had greater than 30º of femoral or tibial torsion, which can affect muscle moment arms and the ability of muscles to generate accelerations (Hicks et al., 2007).
Table 5.1: Subject characteristics (average ± standard deviation) N Age Height Weight Speed/Height Minimum (yrs) (cm) (kg) (s-1) KFA* (deg) Unimpaired 3 10.3 ± 3.4 145 ± 16 36.3 ± 8.8 0.79 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 5.5 Mild Crouch 3 8.8 ± 0.8 123 ± 7 24.2 ± 3.6 0.67 ± 0.1 19.1 ± 3.8 Moderate Crouch 3 9.2 ± 2.9 123 ± 15 43.1 ± 37 0.63 ± 0.1 36.1 ± 4.0 Severe Crouch 3 14.0 ±2.3 158 ± 12 40.1 ± 6.8 0.61 ± 0.1 58.6 ± 5.6 *KFA: knee flexion angle during walking
Three unimpaired subjects were chosen who were representative of the age and stature of the subjects with cerebral palsy. Additionally, a subject with an instrumented total knee replacement (TKR, age: 80 yrs, weight: 64 kg, walking speed/height: 0.74 s-1) was included to provide experimental measurements of the compressive tibiofemoral force for comparison with forces estimated from the musculoskeletal model. This subject was not included in subsequent comparisons
89
between unimpaired gait and crouch gait due to differences in age and stature in relation to the other subjects.
5.2.2 MOTION ANALYSIS
Motion analysis data was collected at Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare
(St. Paul, MN) using a 12-camera system (Vicon Motion Systems, Lake Forest, CA), four force plates (AMTI, Watertown, MA), and a standard marker protocol (Davis et al., 1991). Ground reaction forces and moments were sampled at 1080 Hz and low- pass filtered at 20 Hz. Electromyography (EMG) was collected for six of the crouch gait subjects from the quadriceps, hamstrings, and gastrocnemius (Motion Laboratory
Systems, Baton Rouge, LA). The EMG data was sampled at 1080 Hz, band-pass filtered between 20 and 400 Hz, rectified, and low-pass filtered at 10 Hz. All subjects walked at their self-selected speed and achieved two consecutive force plate strikes during which only one foot contacted each force plate. The motion analysis data for the subject with the instrumented TKR was obtained from www.simtk.org where it is freely available for researchers (Zhao et al., 2007).
5.2.3 MUSCULOSKELETAL MODELING
A generic musculoskeletal model based upon adult cadaver data (Delp et al.,
1990) with 19 degrees of freedom and 92 musculotendon actuators was scaled to each subject according to anthropometric measurements. This musculoskeletal model has been used for studies involving unimpaired children and children with cerebral palsy
(Hicks et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2008; Reinbolt et al., 2008). The degrees of freedom in 90
the musculoskeletal model included six degrees of freedom at the pelvis, a ball-and- socket joint at the third lumbar vertebra between the pelvis and torso, a ball-and- socket joint at each hip, a planar joint with coupled translations at each knee
(Yamaguchi and Zajac, 1989), and a revolute joint at each ankle. Joint angles during walking were calculated by minimizing the error between experimental marker trajectories and markers placed on the model at locations corresponding to the experimental markers.
Static optimization was used to calculate the muscle forces required to reproduce the joint moments of each subject throughout the gait cycle. To distribute muscle forces, static optimization was used to minimize the objective function: