DOCSLIB.ORG

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY UNITED in DIVERSITY Challenges and Approaches in Energy Transition in the EU

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY UNITED in DIVERSITY Challenges and Approaches in Energy Transition in the EU SUSTAINABLE ENERGY UNITED IN DIVERSITY Challenges and approaches in energy transition in the EU Editors L.Squintani and H.H.B.Vedder with M.Reese and B.Vanheusden EELF Book Series, Volume 1 SUSTAINABLE ENERGY UNITED IN DIVERSITY – CHALLENGES AND APPROACHES IN ENERGY TRANSITION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION L. Squintani and H. Vedder with M. Reese and B. Vanheusden (eds) EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW FORUM BOOK SERIES VOLUME 1 Sustainable Energy United in Diversity – Challenges and Approaches in Energy Transition in the European Union European Environmental Law Forum Book Series, Volume 1 (2014) Under redaction of: L. Squintani, H.H.B. Vedder with M. Reese and B. Vanheusden Cover: Anja Robbeson Layout: Justin Lindeboom © 2014 The authors This is an open source, peer-reviewed publication. The non-commercial reproduction and distribution of any part of this book are allowed provided that the authors are acknowledged. FOREWORD REBECCA HARMS Co-president of the Greens/EFA Group and member of the European Parliament This book makes an invaluable contribution to the current, highly topical, debate on the ener- gy transition, arguing the need for a more European approach to law-making in this area. The book's multidisciplinary approach, bringing together environmental and energy law allows for a comprehensive examination of the challenges and varied approaches within the European Union (EU) and its Member States in favour of a more sustainable energy system and hence a more climate-friendly economy. Given the recent Russia-Ukraine crisis and the subsequent focus on European supply security and energy dependence - as well as the ever-growing urgency of halting climate change, this book's publication comes at a very timely moment. If we want to cap average global warming at 2° C and reduce our substantial dependency on fossil fuels, the significance of progressing towards a sustainable European energy policy becomes more obvious. Yet, currently, EU Member States have - except for a few limited policies - different goals for their individual energy policies, resulting in higher costs, inefficiencies of policies and systems, and so to- gether are weak when it comes to negotiating with energy supplier countries. As the research suggests, a common EU approach on energy transition is Member States' best option for ef- fectively addressing the most pressing challenge of our time. From a practitioner´s point of view, the interdisciplinary approach of the analysis is interest- ing as in practice these areas are closely interlinked: environmental legislation is frequently directed at industry while decisions on energy have a major impact on the environment. The aims of energy sustainability are twofold, firstly limiting the harm to the environment and the climate by our voracious energy appetite, and secondly, decreasing our dependency on limited resources. Accordingly, a large proportion of the world’s fossil fuels must remain in the ground while investments in fossil energy must be re-directed towards renewables, greater energy savings and energy efficiency. Long-term objectives must be fixed, in order to be able to make the specific and sound investments that are needed. Effectively, this can only be achieved at European level – EU Member States need to build a joint pathway towards a cli- mate-friendly economy. The creation of a Green European Energy Union – based on improved energy efficiency and energy savings, the expansion of renewable energies and a massive reduction of the dirtiest fossil fuels – would set the right framework to achieve this leap. Renewable energy is not only greener and safer, it is also infinite. Furthermore, in combination with improved energy effi- iii ciency and energy savings it reduces our import dependency. A further huge benefit is that it has already created half a million new jobs in the EU and could create even more in the fu- ture. Like the European Coal and Steel Community in the formative years of the European Union, indeed - with the right comprehensive sustainable legal framework - a Green European Ener- gy Union has great potential to become the EU´s common future project for the 21st century. We have already mastered these new technologies and also have the support of citizens across the EU. What has been missing until now is a broad EU-wide political consensus in favour of sustain- ability. Let’s go for it. iv SUSTAINABLE ENERGY UNITED IN DIVERSITY – CHALLENGES AND APPROACHES IN ENERGY TRANSITION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION Table of Contents FOREWORD BY REBECCA HARMS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................. XV INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 SANDY GAINES CHAPTER 1 THE ENERGY REVOLUTION AS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1. Sustainability and the energy challenge ............................................................................. 7 2. A theoretical framework for energy sustainability ............................................................. 9 2.1. Sources of sustainable development theory ................................................................. 9 2.1.1. The Brundtland Commission definition ................................................................ 9 2.1.2. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment framework .......................................... 11 2.1.3. Social-ecological resilience theory ..................................................................... 12 2.2. Sustainable development criteria ............................................................................... 14 2.2.1. Holistic analysis .................................................................................................. 14 2.2.2. Intragenerational and intergenerational equity ................................................... 15 2.2.3. Adaptability and keeping options open ............................................................... 15 2.2.4 Multi-level governance ....................................................................................... 16 3. Applying the sustainability criteria to energy policy ........................................................ 16 3.1 Holistic analysis ......................................................................................................... 17 3.2. Equity in energy ......................................................................................................... 20 3.3. Adaptability as a criterion for energy systems ........................................................... 21 3.4. Multi-level governance .............................................................................................. 22 3.5. Integration of the four criteria .................................................................................... 23 4. Concluding remarks .......................................................................................................... 23 v TABLE OF CONTENTS WYBE DOUMA CHAPTER 2 THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THE EU’S BIOBIOFUELS POLICY 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 25 2. The framework .................................................................................................................. 28 2.1. Sustainable development ........................................................................................... 28 2.1.1. Treaty provisions ................................................................................................. 28 2.1.2. Policy documents ................................................................................................ 29 2.2. Science-based and/or precautionary policy approach ................................................ 32 3. The EU’s biofuels policy .................................................................................................. 34 3.1. Directive 2003/30 on the promotion of the use of biofuels for transport .................. 34 3.2. The Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28 ................................................................ 35 3.3. The December 2010 Commission report ................................................................... 36 3.4. The October 2012 proposal: max 5 per cent conventional biofuels .......................... 37 4. Putting the EU biofuels policy to the test ......................................................................... 37 4.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 37 4.2. The RED .................................................................................................................... 38 4.3. The December 2010 report ........................................................................................ 43 4.4. The October 2012 proposal ........................................................................................ 43 5. Concluding remarks .......................................................................................................... 44 YELENA M. GORDEEVA CHAPTER 3 WOOD BIOMASS SUSTAINABILITY UNDER THE RENEWABLE ENERGY DIRECTIVE 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 47 2 The relationship between forest and biofuels ................................................................... 49 2.1. Wood biomass as a source of energy ........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Policy Relevance of the Earth Charter for Europe
    E A R T H C H A R T E R I N T E R N A T I O N A L The Policy Relevance of the Earth Charter for Europe A Paper Prepared for the Maastricht Forum on the Future of Europe 9-11 May 2007, Maastricht University The Netherlands by Johannah Bernstein Earth Charter International Center for Strategy and Communication Stockholm, Sweden NOTE: This paper reflects the views of the author and does not necessarily represent the views of Earth Charter International. The development and publication of this paper were supported by NCDO (the Netherlands Committee for Sustainable Development and International Cooperation) and Socires. a Dutch policy institute. 1 The Policy Relevance of the Earth Charter for Europe By Johannah Bernstein 1 Introduction ________________________________________________________________________ The first decade of the 21st century marks a period of profound and rapid transformation for European integration as Europe grows quickly in number and scope. These factors are enormous challenges for Europe as it strives to realise its potential beyond economic cooperation (Baykal 2004). At the same time, as other chapters in this book assert, Europe’s political role and impact on the global stage is in need of revitalization. There can be no doubt that the globalized and complex world against which Europe defines itself does not require a new hegemon. Instead, what is needed is a Union that is grounded in an ethos of multilateral cooperation and collaboration and which asserts a strong global partnership role to ensure that the benefits of globalization are spread fairly around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Brundtland Commission 1 Brundtland Commission
    Brundtland Commission 1 Brundtland Commission Formally known as the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), the Brundtland Commission's mission is to unite countries to pursue sustainable development together. The Chairman of the Commission, Gro Harlem Brundtland, was appointed by Javier Perez de Cuellar, former Secretary General of the United Nations, in December 1983. At the time, the UN General Assembly realized that there was a heavy deterioration of the human environment and natural resources. To rally countries to work and pursue sustainable development together, the UN decided to establish the Brundtland Commission. Gro Harlem Brundtland who was the former Prime Minister of Norway and was chosen due to her strong background in the sciences and public health. The Brundtland Commission officially dissolved in December 1987 after releasing the Brundtland Report in October 1987. The organization, Center for Our Common Future, was started up to take the place of the Commission. The Center for Our Common Future was officially started in April 1988. History After the 1972 Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment and the 1980 World Conservation Strategy of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, the leaders of our world realized that we needed to create an organization whose sole purpose was to raise awareness of the need for sustainable development. During this time period, people in developed countries were starting to become more aware about environmental issues stemming from industrialization and growth. Developed countries wanted to reduce the environmental impact of their growth. On the other hand, developing countries were becoming discouraged because they were not at and could not reach the higher levels of economic growth that industrialized countries had.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Aren't We There Yet?
    Why Aren’t We There Yet? Twenty years of sustainable development David Runnalls, President and CEO, IISD March 2008 © 2008, International Institute for Sustainable Development The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change and energy, measurement and assessment, and sustainable natural resources management. Through the Internet, we report on international negotiations and share knowledge gained through collaborative projects with global partners, resulting in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries and better dialogue between North and South. IISD’s vision is better living for all—sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live sustainably. IISD is registered as a charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and Environment Canada; and from the Province of Manitoba. The Institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies, foundations and the private sector. March 2008 International Institute for Sustainable Development 161 Portage Avenue East, 6th Floor Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada R3B 0Y4 Tel.: +1 (204) 958-7700 Fax: +1 (204) 958-7710 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.iisd.org 2 I remember a conversation with a journalist a few months ago in which he breathlessly told me that environment was the top-of-mind issue in Canadian polls for the first time ever, supplanting national security, unemployment, health care and the like.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brundtland Report – 20 Years On
    JljkX`eXYc\;\m\cfgd\ek`eXZk`feJljkX`eXYc\;\m\cfgd\ek`eXZk`fe Le`k\[Le`k\[EXk`fejEXk`fej:fdd`jj`fe:fdd`jj`fefeJljkX`eXYc\feJljkX`eXYc\;\m\cfgd\ek;\m\cfgd\ek GI<JJI<C<8J<s8GI@C)''-BACKGROUNDERGI<JJI<C<8J<s8GI@C)''. Framing Sustainable Development The Brundtland Report – 20 Years On “What is needed now is a new era of economic growth – growth that is forceful and at the same time socially and environmentally sustainable.” This call in the foreword of the 1987 Brundtland Report, “Our Common Future,” still rings true twenty years later. Sustainable development – defined by the Brundtland Commission asdevelopment that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs – has been enshrined in documents approved at the highest political level, but “the commitment to sustainable development has not gone much beyond environmental authorities,” says Nitin Desai, a senior adviser to the Brundtland Commission and a key draftsman of the report. Current consumption and production levels are 25 percent higher than the earth’s sustainable carrying capacity, according to the Ecological Footprint Sustainability Measure, an independent measure based on United Nations statistics. If everyone in the world were to live like an average person in the high-income countries, we would need 2.6 additional planets to support us all. A Groundbreaking Concept The World Commission on Environment and Development, chaired by former Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland, alerted the world twenty years ago to the urgency of making progress toward economic development that could be sustained without depleting natural resources or harming the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development: from Brundtland to Rio 2012
    Sustainable Development: From Brundtland to Rio 2012 Background Paper* prepared for consideration by the High Level Panel on Global Sustainability at its first meeting, 19 September 2010 September 2010 United Nations Headquarters, New York _________________________ *Prepared by John Drexhage and Deborah Murphy, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) GSP1-6 Executive Summary The term, sustainable development, was popularized in Our Common Future, a report published by the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1987. Also known as the Brundtland report, Our Common Future included the “classic” definition of sustainable development: “development which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” Acceptance of the report by the United Nations General Assembly gave the term political salience; and in 1992 leaders set out the principles of sustainable development at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. It is generally accepted that sustainable development calls for a convergence between the three pillars of economic development, social equity, and environmental protection. Sustainable development is a visionary development paradigm; and over the past 20 years governments, businesses, and civil society have accepted sustainable development as a guiding principle, made progress on sustainable development metrics, and improved business and NGO participation in the sustainable development process. Yet the concept remains elusive and implementation has proven difficult. Unsustainable trends continue and sustainable development has not found the political entry points to make real progress. As a result, climate change has become the de facto proxy for implementation of the sustainable development agenda; but the framework of the climate change negotiations are not always the appropriate forum for broader strategic discussions of sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Sustainable Development
    ENERGY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT one of the eight Millennium Development emphasize that the Bruntdland Commission’s NGoals (MDGs) adopted by the United definition of sustainable development focuses Nations in 2000 directly addressed energy, on growing assets and opening options — not although for nearly all of them — from foreclosing them. Nuclear power broadens the eradicating poverty and hunger to improving resource base by putting uranium to productive education and health — progress has use. It reduces harmful emissions and expands depended on greater access to modern energy. the supply of electricity. Nuclear power Thirteen years later, energy is being given increases the world’s stock of technological more attention. The target date for the MDGs and human capital. And finally, nuclear power is 2015, and in 2012 the UN began deliberations is ahead of other energy technologies in to develop sustainable development goals to ‘internalizing’ all external costs, from safety guide support for sustainable development to waste disposal to decommissioning. beyond 2015. The Future We Want, the outcome ‘Internalizing’ costs means that the costs of all document of the 2012 United Nations of these activities are largely already included Conference on Sustainable Development (also in the price we pay for nuclear electricity. known as Rio+20) gives energy a central role: Were the environmental costs arising from “We recognize the critical role that energy the use of fossil fuels ‘internalized’ in the price plays in the development process, as access to paid for them, the price we would pay for the sustainable modern energy services contributes electricity produced using fossil fuels would be to poverty eradication, saves lives, improves considerably higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text.Pdf (141.2Kb)
    Peter Blaze Corcoran, USA. Introduction Making the World One Peter Blaze Corcoran is Professor of Environ- t has been a generation since the World Commission on Envi- mental Studies and Environmental Education at I ronment and Development famously introduced the concept Florida Gulf Coast University, where he serves as of an integration of environment and development that is sus- Director of the Center for Environmental and tainable, “to ensure that it meets the needs of the present with- Sustainability Education. He has held academic out compromising the ability of future generations to meet their posts at College of the Atlantic, Swarthmore own needs.”1 This concept, both brilliant and problematic, has College, and Bates College in the States. He has framed a great debate of the turn of the millennium. How, and if, also been a visiting professor in Australia and The Netherlands. He we will find a path to sustainability has become the most impor- works extensively in international environmental education with tant narrative of our time. special interest in the South Pacific Island Nations. He is among the founders of the Global Higher Education for Sustainability Partnership What kind of world we will leave for the young, and what values and has recently conducted their consultations with stakeholders in will we transfer to them have become epic questions. The tragic tertiary education in many regions of the world. He is Past President of truth pointed out by the Brundtland Commission is well-known North American Association for Environmental Education. He serves but often ignored. as Senior Fellow in Education for Sustainability at University Leaders for a Sustainable Future in Washington, DC, and is Senior Advisor to We borrow environmental capital from future generations the Earth Charter Initiative in San Jose, Costa Rica.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Emerging Issues in India's Mineral
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Emerging Issues in India’s Mineral Sector Sponsored by Planning Commission Government of India May 2012 Institute for Studies in Industrial Development 4, Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Emerging Issues in India’s Mineral Sector A research study sponsored by Planning Commission Research Director Shri Nilmadhab Mohanty Research Associate Aarushi Goyal Institute for Studies in Industrial Development 4, Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi - 110 070 Phone: +91 11 2676 4600 / 2689 1111; Fax: +91 11 2612 2448 E-mail: <[email protected]> Website: <http://isid.org.in> CONTENTS Abbreviations v-ix Preface & Acknowledgements xi-xii Executive Summary xiii-xx Introduction 1–4 Section I SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND MINERAL PRODUCTION 5–34 Chapter 1: Why Sustainable Development Today? Chapter 2: Sustainable Development: Concepts, Principles and Applications Chapter 3: Sustainability and Mineral Cycle Section II INDIAN MINING INDUSTRY: BREIF PROFILE AND REGULATORY REGIME 35–82 Chapter 4: Indian Mining Industry: A Brief Profile Chapter 5: Legal Regime and Role of Government Chapter 6: Environmental Policy and Laws for Mining Sector Section III EXPERIENCE IN SUSTAINAIBILITY PRACTICES IN INDIAN MINERALS SECTOR: A FEW CASE STUDIES 83–154 Chapter 7: Odisha Chapter 8: Goa Chapter 9: Karnataka Chapter 10: Jharkand Section IV INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN SUSTAINABILITY PRACTICES IN MINING: SELECTED CASES 155–176 Chapter 11: Sustainability Practices in Canada, Australia, South Africa and Papua New
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development As a Framework for National Governance
    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 49 Issue 1 Article 3 1998 Sustainable Development as a Framework for National Governance John C. Dernbach Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation John C. Dernbach, Sustainable Development as a Framework for National Governance, 49 Case W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 1 (1998) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol49/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. CASE WESTERN RESERVE LAW REVIEW VOLUME49 FALL1998 NUMBER 1 ARTICLES SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AS A FRAMEWORK FOR NATIONAL GOVERNANCE John C. Dernbacht INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 3 I. SUSTAINABILrrY AND NATIONAL GOVERNANCE ...................... 8 A. Old Model: Development .................................................. 9 B. Failure: Environmental Degradation and Poverty ........... 14 C. New Model: Sustainable Development ............................ 17 1. Stockholm and After .................................................... 17 2. Rio and After ................................................................ 21 D. Purposes of Sustainable Development ............................ 24 1. Environmental and Development
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IS NOT a ZERO-SUM GAME We Need Triple-Win Solutions © Shutterstock
    European Economic and Social Committee Employers Group SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IS NOT A ZERO-SUM GAME We need triple-win solutions © shutterstock • Sustainability is an obvious part of today’s How do enterprises see sustainability in practice? businesses, and employers want to contribute • Sustainability is part of the strategies and everyday processes proactively to sustainable development of today’s businesses • Companies apply ‘new economic models’ - such as the • Sustainability is an approach that integrates the circular economy – with the aim of simultaneously generating “three pillars” of development: economic, social economic, social and environmental benefits and environmental • Many companies see sustainability as a business opportunity, through differentiation of products and services or by • Win-win-win measures should be sought rather providing solutions to sustainability challenges than merely trade-offs between the pillars • Sustainability is also seen as part of risk management, including reputation • A sound and solid economy is the necessary • Sustainability is increasingly driven by market forces (investors, enabler of sustainable development, and financers, customers) enterprises play a crucial role as generators of • Sustainability implies that companies need to be competitive this development and profitable • The EU should pay due attention to the economic • To ensure social and environmental sustainability, companies interact actively with their stakeholders (shareholders, foundations for sustainability and provide a customers, employees, local communities) and manage their favourable business environment to meet the climate and environmental impacts challenges and seize the opportunities • Companies also report and communicate increasingly on non- financial aspects Economic foundations for sustainable development must be strengthened The EU must ensure the necessary economic foundations for sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Development
    Sustainable development ACRONYMS AREAS COUNTRIES MARINE TERMS DEFINITION Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. World Commission on Environment and Development 1987[1] KEY POINTS The term “sustainable development” dates to the 1987 Brundtland Commissions’ report “Our Common Future”. The concept was a key driver behind the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. New sustainable development goals will be developed and take effect as of 2015, as was decided during the Rio+20 summit (2012), held to review the progress of implementation of agreements taken during the first Rio Earth Summit (1992). Sustainable development is an overarching theme of the three Rio Conventions: The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Sustainable development has recently been identified as one of five key priorities by the United Nations (UN) Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon in the UN Secretary-General’s five year action agenda. INTRODUCTION Sustainable development is a core concept within global environmental policy. It provides a mechanism through which society can interact with the environment while not risking damaging the resource for the future. FIRST UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE The history of sustainable development in the UN can be traced back to 1972 with the United Nations (UN) Conference on the Human Environment (CHE), the first UN conference to focus on environmental issues. At this conference the Stockholm Declaration and Principles were developed, which incorporate the idea of sustainable development although the phrase itself was not included 2.
    [Show full text]
  • In Sustainable Development? Business Guidelines Two Decades After Brundtland
    ***** Cite as: Barkemeyer, R., Holt, D., Preuss, L. and Tsang, (2014). What happened to the development in ‘sustainable development’? Sustainable Development, 22(1): 15-32 ***** What Happened to the ‘Development’ in Sustainable Development? Business Guidelines Two Decades After Brundtland Ralf Barkemeyer, Diane Holt, Lutz Preuss and Stephen Tsang Abstract Over 20 years ago Our Common Future presented a conceptualization and explanation of the concept of sustainable development. Since then, numerous alternative definitions of the concept have been offered, of which at least some are exclusive to each other. At the same time, the role of business in the transition to sustainable development has increasingly received attention. Bringing these two trends in sustainable development together, this paper returns to the Brundtland version of the concept to examine to what extent the original principles of sustainable development are still embedded within key business guidelines, namely the UN Global Compact, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the ICC Business Charter for Sustainable Development, the CAUX Principles, the Global Sullivan Principles and the CERES Principles. The findings suggest that these business guidelines tend to emphasize environmental rather than social aspects of sustainable development, in particular to the detriment of the original Brundtland prioritization of the needs of the poorest. Furthermore, the attention to environmental aspects stresses win–win situations and has a clear managerialist focus; whereas more conceptual environmental issues concerning systems interdependencies, critical thresholds or systemic limits to growth find little attention. The normative codes and principles targeted at the private sector therefore not only add another voice to the multiple discourses on sustainable development but also contribute to a reinterpretation of the original agenda set by Brundtland towards conceptualizations of sustainable development around the needs of industrialized rather than developing countries.
    [Show full text]