This Month's Newsletter Includes the Sections Listed Below. Click a Link to Jump to the Corresponding Section. If Your Browser D
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Things You Might Like to Know About Duplicate Bridge
♠♥♦♣ THINGS YOU MIGHT LIKE TO KNOW ABOUT DUPLICATE BRIDGE Prepared by MayHem Published by the UNIT 241 Board of Directors ♠♥♦♣ Welcome to Duplicate Bridge and the ACBL This booklet has been designed to serve as a reference tool for miscellaneous information about duplicate bridge and its governing organization, the ACBL. It is intended for the newer or less than seasoned duplicate bridge players. Most of these things that follow, while not perfectly obvious to new players, are old hat to experienced tournaments players. Table of Contents Part 1. Expected In-behavior (or things you need to know).........................3 Part 2. Alerts and Announcements (learn to live with them....we have!)................................................4 Part 3. Types of Regular Events a. Stratified Games (Pairs and Teams)..............................................12 b. IMP Pairs (Pairs)...........................................................................13 c. Bracketed KO’s (Teams)...............................................................15 d. Swiss Teams and BAM Teams (Teams).......................................16 e. Continuous Pairs (Side Games)......................................................17 f. Strategy: IMPs vs Matchpoints......................................................18 Part 4. Special ACBL-Wide Events (they cost more!)................................20 Part 5. Glossary of Terms (from the ACBL website)..................................25 Part 6. FAQ (with answers hopefully).........................................................40 Copyright © 2004 MayHem 2 Part 1. Expected In-Behavior Just as all kinds of competitive-type endeavors have their expected in- behavior, so does duplicate bridge. One important thing to keep in mind is that this is a competitive adventure.....as opposed to the social outing that you may be used to at your rubber bridge games. Now that is not to say that you can=t be sociable at the duplicate table. Of course you can.....and should.....just don=t carry it to extreme by talking during the auction or play. -
The Real Deal by Larry Cohen
BB The Real Deal by Larry Cohen too strong, you don’t make a pre - for fear that we belong in hearts. emptive bid, since partner expects No other ‘side’ issues bother me. I you to be weak when you preempt. don’t mind having an ace or a void Can you hold a side ace for a on the side, or a four-card minor. preempt? Absolutely. As long as the 4) With a six-card suit, I preempt at value of the hand is “less than an the two-level. With a seven-card opening one-bid,” it is in range for a suit, the preempt should be made at preempt. Here are my guidelines for the three-level. With an eight-card preemptive openings or overcalls: suit? You guessed it—the four level. 1) A decent suit of six cards or longer. 5) Different teachers will tell you ‘Decent’ means you have some ‘meat’ different things. If you try to listen Larry Cohen, a many-time National at the top of the suit. I would not to everyone’s rules, you will get champion, recently won the Silodor pre empt with J –8–7–5–4–3. I would confused. I’m quite comfortable and Open Pairs for a third time at the preempt with K –J–10 –8–7–6. I don’t confident about my 1) to 4) above, ACBL Spring North American recommend a strict requirement — but they are not set in stone. You Championships held in Houston. such as ‘2 of the top 3 honors.’ I do won’t get sued or kicked out of ACBL One of Larry’s favorite teaching recommend looking at vulnerability. -
4 Daily Bulletin
Monday, July 21, 2008 Volume 80, Number 4 Daily Bulletin 80th Summer North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley and Dave Smith Districts 8, 9, 23 and 24 take GNT titles District 9 repeats in GNT Championship Flight The District 9 team captained by Mike Becker led from start to finish in scoring a second straight win in the Grand National Teams, Championship Flight, knocking off Jan Jansma and Ricco Van Preeijen. the District 25 squad led by Frank Merblum 125-74. Dutch duo take LM Pairs Continued on page 5 Two players from the Netherlands who agreed to play five minutes before game time saved their Grand National Teams, Championship Continued on page 21 Flight, winners: front, David Berkowitz, Eric Rodwell, Mike Becker; rear, Larry Cohen, Jeff Meckstroth, Warren Spector. District 24 wins GNT Flight A The District 24 team captained by James Scott surged ahead in the second quarter of their match with a team from Ohio and went on to a 125-74 victory in the Grand National Teams, Flight A. The winners are Scott, Wilton CT; Harry Apfel, John Ramos and Kelley Hwang, New York City; Valentin Carciu, Steve Johnson and Mark Teaford. Continued on page 5 Tops in the Grand National Teams, Southern California pair Flight A: front, Valentin Carciu, John Ramos, James Scott; rear, Sorin claim Bruce LM Pleacoff, Kelley Hwang, Harry Apfel. Steve Johnson and Mark Teaford nearly didn’t make it out of the first day’s qualifying sessions. District 23 wins GNT Continued on page 21 Flight B District 23 won a tight match in the Flight B Grand National Teams. -
2017 Spring NABC Appeals Casebook
2017 Spring NABC Appeals Casebook Foreword The appeal hearings and commentary descriptions are now being compiled and edited by the American Contract Bridge League. They are published on the ACBL web page. This internet publication is intended to be a tool to help improve the abilities of Tournament Directors and to communicate decisions and the process to arrive at those decisions to the membership at large. A total of fourteen (14) cases were heard. Ten (10) cases were from unrestricted (by masterpoints) North American Bridge Championship Events. The names of the players involved are included. Four (4) cases were from all other events. The names of the players involved are included when the event from which the appeal came was a Flight A/X event or was the top bracket of a bracketed knockout event. When the names of the players are not used, the player’s masterpoint total is included. The cases are first presented without commentary. After the official panel of commentators has had an opportunity to provide their commentary and any corrections to the cases, the commentary is added, corrections are made, and the internet publication is finalized. Everyone involved in this process is due praise for their efforts. Special thanks to the NABC Appeals Committee and the Tournament Directors serving on the Review Panels and commentators. Without their considerable contribution of time and effort, this publication would not exist. ACBL Headquarters Horn Lake, MS Abbreviations used in this casebook: AI Authorized Information AWMW Appeal Without Merit Warning BIT Break in Tempo CoC Conditions of Contest LA Logical Alternative MI Misinformation NOS Non-Offending Side OS Offending Side PP Procedural Penalty TD Tournament Director UI Unauthorized Information Expert Panel Jeff Goldsmith is an American bridge player originally from Schenectady, NY, currently residing in California. -
University of Cincinnati News Record. Thursday, April 27, 1967. Vol. LIIII
Universi~y ,of Cincinnati N~:E'YW'S>', >R'~E'e>()RD Vol. 54. Cincinnati, Ohio, Thursday, April 27, 1967 ~- No. 25 • --.. Niegroes ..Wllk;.·'O,Ut",.On .·Ra1ci U:SSIO,O .' . _ . -..'ti1' AI'Eft ~"~Ies~" The first panel discussion on In ergroup Dlt~n1mumcatlo, at1 ~t Thursday saw a walkout of -Sunday Afternoon, $'fadium ly of the N,egro students in atten nce. ,The, w alk~,'ill " l,~ atRed' by the reading of a letter stat- ~ert~in specific gri~vanc~s. of th~ N~gro ~\u\l~~ " e University. The letter was read by Favored In- GrGduati~()n Pe]] rIC HIll, who had written-it In conju ction wItlr-l . nty five 01 The letter stated that since the Neg 0 is '·member of a society \'\'111\-JI .lCJC\,;lo:l JlB,H, He According to a recent gradua- The class of 1967, who will Up his own society. The black studen must unite in 'order to sol've their own problems. , tion .questionnaire, the majority of graduate on Thursday, June 15, The letter went onto ask several questions of the University. Why is, ·there only one 2830 UC students wish to graduate from the Stadium, basically fol- pus ipoliceman? Why is there only one' Negro resident advisor? Why is the number of on Sunday afternoon in Nippert ,lowed 'the, trend. Of 215 voters" Stadium. They also desire a social 82 voted for Sunday graduation, event before graduation,' an Ivy 99 for afternoon graduation and or Baccalaureate Day, individual 128 for the Stadium. The social The discussion, '.sponsored by presentation of diplomas, and event won 96-80, the Ivy Day lost President Langsam's Committee student speakers. -
ACBL Director's Report By
Masterpoint awards: The award charts were tweaked to correct some irregularities in April points awarded for 30-60 table games. This will mostly affect Internet games and STAC 2003 games. Published Members-only entries: Probably the most controversial motion passed was the one limiting bi- participation in NABC+ events (unlimited national championships) to ACBL members whose April 2003 monthly by District dues or service fees are paid. This will take effect later this year. In this issue: 8 of the American I have attended two board meetings now (I replaced Glenn Smith at last November's meeting Big win for Lord & Popkin Contract as he was unable to attend.) The fact that I have been able to function effectively on the Bridge Board so quickly is due to the time that Glenn Smith, our previous District 8 representative League 2002 Point Winners on the Board of Directors, spent with me before the Phoenix meeting. Glenn spent hours with Dave Carter Top 100 Editor: me in person and on the phone making sure I was prepared to attend the meeting. I cannot Mini-McKenney Karen tell you how much I appreciated this help. I owe Glenn a great debt. Ace of Clubs Walker, Juniors Champaign Glenn ably represented District 8 for nine years on the Board of Directors. Everyone I met IL had good things to say about him and told me about his contributions to the Board and to Grand National Teams -- April 5-6 ACBL. When you consider that I am only the third director for District 8 -- and the first two were Ruth McConnell and Glenn Smith (both of whom also served as ACBL president) -- you February STAC by know I have big shoes to fill if I hope to maintain their tradition of service to the district and ACBL Director's Report to the ACBL. -
CHAMPIONSHIPS W
www.WashingtonBridgeLeague.org September/October 2016 I f Is it Time to Renew? y o u s t a r t B The Washington Bridge League e d presents the y o § u r s 86th Annual u b U s c r i D.C. p t i © o n CHAMPIONSHIPS w i t L h October 6-9, 2016 t h e ª With this sectional tournament, we welcome N o our new Sectional Chair, Brad Theurer, work - v / (ing in conjunction with Sectional Coordinator , D L e c Bill Cole, and the WBL tournament commit - 2 tee headed by Carole Banks plus many other 0 ¨ 1 5 volunteers to bring you a fantastic event. i s s u E e Silver Points! , i t ’ I/N Events throughout ! Lots of team s © t i games! Eynon Trophy Swiss ! Machlin m e Sportsmanship Award presented! t T o r Well-lit, clean & convenient location ! e n 3 e § —See page 5 for the complete details.— w e g ! a S p e e I n o Mark Your Calendar p a w for the December 15th g ª o e h Holiday Party, See page 27 3 e e N S ? t n i r p n i s i h t g n i d a e r e b r e h t a r u o y d l u o W wbl ombudsman contents Any player with helpful director issues suggestion box Do you have a suggestion that including criticism or praise of the direct - might help to increase membership or ing staff may contact the Ombudsman, otherwise improve the Washington Adrienne Kuehneman and be assured Bridge League? Give any and all ideas that the source of the information will re - article page to Don Berman, 301-776-3581, main confidential. -
6 Cards Weak 2 = Landy 2 = Multi 2 ,2 =
DEFENSIVE AND COMPETITIVE BIDDING LEADS AND SIGNALS W B F CONVENTION CARD OVERCALLS (Style: Responses: 1 / 2 Level; Reopening) OPENING LEADS STYLE Natural Lead In Partner’s Suit CATEGORY: SENIOR GREEN 1NT 16-19 Suit Odd Even Odd Even NCBO: REUNION Two suits GHESTEM NT Odd Even Odd Even PLAYERS: BRESLAW Jean Marc 1♣ - Cue Bid 2♦=2 suits 5♥ - 5♠; 2SA = 5,5, 3♣ = 5 ♦ - 5 ♠ Subseq Attitude DORDHAIN Patrice Other: 1NT OVERCALL (2nd/4th Live; Responses; Reopening) LEADS SYSTEM SUMMARY In 2nd 16-19H Texas if opening 1M, Stayman and Texas if 1m Lead Vs. Suit Vs. NT In 4th 9-13 Idem or 6x4y if opponent bid two suits Ace Ask with a big Ask with a small GENERAL APPROACH AND STYLE: two over one King Odd Even Odd Even 5 cards Major Queen Ask with a small 1 NT 15-17 Jack 2♣Forcing limited JUMP OVERCALLS (Style; Responses; Unusual NT) 10 2♦ Forcing to game Preempt or GHESTEM 9 2♥-2♠ - 6 cards Weak Hi-X Two suits overcall: GHESTEM Lo-X Unserious 3NT Reopen: SIGNALS IN ORDER OF PRIORITY DIRECT & JUMP CUE BIDS (Style; Response; Reopen) Partner’s Lead Declarer’s Lead Discarding SPECIAL BIDS THAT MAY REQUIRE DEFENSE Direct GHESTEM 1 Odd Even Odd Even Direct if urgency 1NT forcing Jump to play 3NT Suit 2 Smith Gazzili 3 Overcall about 1NT 1 Ask or Odd Even Smith Direct VS. NT (vs. Strong/Weak; Reopening; PH) NT 2 Direct if urgency X = 4 Major at least 5 Minor 3 4. 2♣ = Landy Signals (including Trumps): 4 2♦ = Multi Smith: Big to confirm the lead 2♥,2♠ = 5+M - 4+m 2NT Two minors DOUBLES VS.PREEMTS (Doubles; Cue-bids; Jumps; NT Bids) TAKEOUT DOUBLES (Style; Responses; Reopening) Natural Classical VS. -
PRESIDENTIAL TOURNAMENT Non Life Master Sectional
www.WashingtonBridgeLeague.org November/December 2016 I f Is it Time to Renew? y o u s t a r t B Happy New Year! Come celebrate at the e d y 55th Annual o § u r s u PRESIDENTIAL b U s c r i OURNAMENT p T t i © o n January 5-8, 2017 w i t L h featuring: t h ¨ Experimental, relaxed & fun IMP e ª J Pairs/Teams on Friday night ¨ Panel a n / Show & New Life Master Party on Saturday F e L ¨ Team games galore and WBL Trophy b 2 Race Winners’ Presentation on Sunday ¨ 0 1 ¨ I/N events throughout ¨ Silver Points! 6 i s —See pages 5 & 6 for the complete details.— s u E e , i t ’ Then, on MARCH 23-26, 2017, s t © get ready for a i m Washington Bridge League e t o T Non Life Master r e n 3 Sectional e § w e WBL NLM Tournament Chair, Julie Marquette, ! g a is back with a 4-day WBL sectional tourna- S p e ment just for Non Life Masters! (...with less e I n ¨ p o than 500 pMoinatrsk.) YJoiunr iCn afoler nad faurn weekend a g w with lunch and refreshments included on both for the December 15th e ª o weekend days. Silver points, too! 3 h Holiday Party, See page 27 e e See page 7 for the full tournament schedule... N S ? t n i r p n i s i h t g n i d a e r e b r e h t a r u o y d l u o W WBL omBudsman contents Any player with helpful director issues suggestion Box Do you have a suggestion that including criticism or praise of the direct - might help to increase membership or ing staff may contact the Ombudsman, otherwise improve the Washington Adrienne Kuehneman and be assured Bridge League? Give any and all ideas that the source of the information will re - articLe page to Don Berman, 301-776-3581, main confidential. -
Two Over One Game Force by Max Hardy I
Two Over One Game Force By Max Hardy I. Opening Bids A. Opening Bids in Suits 1) One Level An opening bid in a suit at the one level shows approximately 12-20 HCP. In first or second seat, major suits are at least five cards. Minor suits show at least three cards, although in diamonds, four are expected. The only distribution that opens with a three card diamond holding is the pattern with four cards in both major suits and a doubleton club. Balanced hands with 4-3-3-3 distribution with only 12 HCP should not be opened unless there are three quick tricks. In third position, opening bids can be light - down to as little as 10 HCP. A good four card major suit is permitted, but four card major opening bids are never made with full opening hands. With four-four in the majors, open one heart if the hearts are of good quality. Otherwise open in a minor suit that has lead value. If you open light in a minor suit you must be prepared to pass any response, which means that you must have at least three cards in each major. If you cannot handle all auctions, do not open light in third seat. In fourth seat you may still open light if you use the "rule of fifteen." Add your HCP to the number of spades you hold. When the total of your HCP and spades is at least fifteen you may open with less than real opening bid values in fourth seat. -
Reverse Drury the Original Version of the Drury Convention Was Designed
Reverse Drury The original version of the Drury Convention was designed to eliminate two special problems that arise when a passed hand bidder needs to respond to partner's 3rd or 4th position opening bid. These problems are: (1) responder can no longer make a temporizing bid since a simple change of suit is no longer forcing, and (2) a jump response could easily get the partnership too high. Reverse Drury was designed for partnerships that insist upon opening the bidding with sub-minimum hands in 3rd and/or 4th position. If such bids are going to be made, it is important to have some method that allows the partnership to investigate for game and/or slam but still be able to stop short of game. Using the Reverse Drury method, the opener’s rebid of two of the originally-bid Major suit denies a sound opening bid. As compared to the old Drury method, which used 2♦ to deny an opening bid, it also has a slightly preemptive value thus making it harder for the opponents to enter the bidding even though they know that the opening bid could be sub-minimum. If playing Reverse Drury, the requirements for a sub-minimum third seat opening bid of one in a Major suit are (1) possession of the major suits, particularly spades and/or hearts with a tolerance for spades, (2) a disciplined system that requires sound opening bids in 1st and 2nd position, and (3) some holding that indicates a reason to bid. It should be reiterated that Reverse Drury is not necessary for those partnerships that open light in any position....it’s only recommended for those who play sound openings in first and second positions. -
Chapter VIII A
Item 131-91: Chapter VIII A. ACBL/Host Organization The following items listed in the current Codification Chapter VIII A are rescinded: CHAPTER VIII - NORTH AMERICAN BRIDGE CHAMPIONSHIPS A. ACBL / HOST ORGANIZATION NAC Fund Raising Games (832-61) See A.1.1.2 During the three years prior to hosting a NAC, sponsoring organizations shall be permitted to conduct one fund-raising event each year with the following conditions: 1. The event may be held at sites throughout the District during a one-week period as scheduled by the District and approved by Management. 2. An additional fee of $4.00 per table shall be forwarded to the NAC Fund of the District. 3. Master Point awards, based on Sectional Open Pairs rating, shall be issued for each site. 4. ACBL Sectional sanction fees shall apply and must be remitted with the report of the game. NABC Operations (883-61) See A.1.1.1 A. Once an area has been selected for an NABC, the District Organization becomes the primary host organization. The District, at its option, may delegate the responsibility to a local Unit, but the District Organization retains overall accountability. This shall apply to NABCs assigned at and after the 1988 Fall Meetings. Allotment of Hospitality Funds for NABCs (893-63) See A. 2.1 thru 2.6 1. The policies of the ACBL relating to NABCs are approved as follows: Notes to Host Organization 1. Publicity and P.R. functions ACBL will prepare all materials with input from local organization. In some cases a professional local public relations person will be hired by ACBL.