Spasticity Following Spinal Cord Injury

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Spasticity Following Spinal Cord Injury Jane TC Hsieh MSc Sandra J Connolly OT Amanda McIntyre RN MSc Andrea Townson MD Christine Short MD FRCPC FACP Viet Vu DO Brooke Benton BSc RDH Dalton Wolfe PhD www.scireproject.com Version 6.0 Key Points Spasticity Outcome Measures A multidimensional test battery of Spasticity Outcome Measures is needed for understandable interpretations of and between future studies. Passive Movement-based Approaches for Reducing Spasticity Short-term reductions in spasticity may be achieved by a variety of passive movement-based approaches (hippotherapy, neural facilitation combinations, rhythmic passive movements, prolonged standing of other methods of muscle stretching, and electrical passive pedaling systems. Active Movement-based Approaches for Reducing Spasticity Active exercise interventions such as hydrotherapy and FES-assisted cycling and walking may produce short-term reductions in spasticity. Direct Muscle Stimulation for Reducing Spasticity Electrical stimulation applied to individual muscles may produce a short term decrease in spasticity. There is also some concern that long-term use of electrical stimulation may increase spasticity. Various Forms of Afferent Stimulation for Reducing Spasticity Short-term reductions in spasticity may be achieved by various forms of afferent stimulation (ongoing (TENS) transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation programs, penial vibration and rectal probe stimulation, massage, cryotherapy, helium-neon irradiation, and whole-body vibration). Direct Spinal Cord and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Short-or medium-term spasticity relief may be possible with repetitive transcarinal magnetic stimulation or spinal cord stimulation, respectively. Neuro-Surgical Interventions for Spasticity Dorsal longitudinal T-myelotomy may result in reduced spasticity. Oral Baclofen Oral baclofen reduces muscle spasticity in people with SCI. Intrathecal Baclofen Bolus or long-term intrathecal baclofen decreases spasticity and may improve functional outcomes with low complication rates and is a cost-effective intervention. Effect of Medications Other than Baclofen A variety of medications, other than baclofen, may be effective in treating SCI related spasticity (Tizanidine, Clonidine, cyproheptadine, gabapentin, orphenadrine citrate, and L-threonine). The usefulness of 4-Aminopyridine in the treatment of SCI spasticity requires confirmation through additional well-designed studies. Continued use of diazepam and dantrolene would benefit from controlled comparison studies. Cannabinoids Oral detra-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (dronabinol) and Nabilone may help to reduce spasticity. Focal Neurolysis Botulinum neurotoxin appears to improve focal muscle spasticity in people with SCI. Phenol blocks may assist in treating shoulder and hip adductor spasticity in individuals with SCI. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Definition .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Pathophysiology ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Impact............................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Determining Impact of Treatment ...................................................................................... 2 1.5 Outcome Measurement and Spasticity ............................................................................. 3 1.6 Overview of Treatments .................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Spasticity .......................................................... 5 2.1 Passive Movement or Stretching ...................................................................................... 6 2.2 Interventions Based on Active Movement (Including FES-assisted Movement) ...............15 2.3 Interventions Based on Direct Muscle Electrical Stimulation ............................................34 2.4 Interventions Based on Various Forms of Afferent Stimulation ........................................38 2.5 Interventions Based on Direct Spinal Cord ......................................................................52 2.6 Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ..................................................................56 3.0 Neuro-Surgical Interventions for Spasticity ....................................................................59 4.0 Pharmacological Treatment for Spasticity ......................................................................62 4.1 Oral Baclofen ...................................................................................................................62 4.2 Intrathecal Baclofen for Reducing Spasticity ....................................................................67 4.3 Effect of Medications Other Than Baclofen on Spasticity after SCI ..................................81 4.3.1 Tizanidine..................................................................................................................82 4.3.2 Clonidine ...................................................................................................................84 4.3.3 Fampridine (4-Aminopyridine) ...................................................................................88 4.3.5 Gabapentin ...............................................................................................................94 4.3.6 Other Anti-Spasmodics .............................................................................................95 4.4 Cannabinoids for Reducing Spasticity after SCI ............................................................. 100 4.5 Focal Neurolysis for Spasticity Management ................................................................. 105 4.5.1 Botulinum Toxin ...................................................................................................... 105 4.5.2 Phenol ..................................................................................................................... 109 5.0 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 111 References ............................................................................................................................ 119 This review has been prepared based on the scientific and professional information available in 2015. The SCIRE information (print, CD or web site www.scireproject.com) is provided for informational and educational purposes only. If you have or suspect you have a health problem, you should consult your health care provider. The SCIRE editors, contributors and supporting partners shall not be liable for any damages, claims, liabilities, costs or obligations arising from the use or misuse of this material. Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, McIntyre A, Townson AF, Short C, Mills P, Vu V, Benton B, Wolfe DL. (2016). Spasticity Following Spinal Cord Injury. In Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, Hsieh JTC, Connolly SJ, Curt A, Mehta S, Sakakibara BM, editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 6.0. www.scireproject.com Spasticity Following Spinal Cord Injury 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Definition Spasticity is traditionally defined as “[…] a motor disorder characterized by a velocity dependent increase in tonic stretch reflexes (muscle tone) with exaggerated tendon jerks, resulting from hyper-excitability of the stretch reflexes, as one component of the upper motoneuron syndrome” (Lance 1980). Spasticity is quite commonly confused with tremor, rigidity, clonus, dystonia and various movement disorders (i.e., athetoid, ballisms, and chorea). One of the earliest examples of this confusion is the term “spastic rigidity” used to refer to “excessive muscular contraction” first published in 1843 (Little WJ). Attempts to clarify this confusion have resulted in the most recent definition published by Pandyan et al. (2005) (adapted from Tardieau et al. 1954) as follows: “disordered sensori-motor control, resulting from an upper motor neuron lesion, presenting as intermittent or sustained involuntary activation of muscle”. This definition is intended to be more inclusive of clinical signs and symptoms of “spasticity” but has yet to be validated for clinical relevance. Regardless of the definitions presented, each eludes to various inter-related components of the upper motor neurone syndrome (i.e., tone, clonus, spasms, spastic dystonia and co- contractions). Therefore, a thorough clinical assessment of spasticity should always be undertaken as follows (Kheder & Nair 2012): 1) differentiate spasticity from other causes of increased tone, 2) identify potential triggers, 3) measure spasticity, 4) assess spasticity’s impact on function, and 5) gather input from patients, caregivers, therapists and other rehabilitation professionals. Spasticity is not static and therefore, assessments should be done regularly and combined with establishing goals of treatment to make decisions regarding treatment strategy (Rekand et al. 2012). 1.2 Pathophysiology Recent studies indicate that, besides changes in motoneuron activation (involuntary supraspinal descending inputs and inhibited spinal reflexes etc.), changes in muscle properties also
Recommended publications
  • Hereditary Spastic Paraparesis: a Review of New Developments

    Hereditary Spastic Paraparesis: a Review of New Developments

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.69.2.150 on 1 August 2000. Downloaded from 150 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;69:150–160 REVIEW Hereditary spastic paraparesis: a review of new developments CJ McDermott, K White, K Bushby, PJ Shaw Hereditary spastic paraparesis (HSP) or the reditary spastic paraparesis will no doubt Strümpell-Lorrain syndrome is the name given provide a more useful and relevant classifi- to a heterogeneous group of inherited disorders cation. in which the main clinical feature is progressive lower limb spasticity. Before the advent of Epidemiology molecular genetic studies into these disorders, The prevalence of HSP varies in diVerent several classifications had been proposed, studies. Such variation is probably due to a based on the mode of inheritance, the age of combination of diVering diagnostic criteria, onset of symptoms, and the presence or other- variable epidemiological methodology, and wise of additional clinical features. Families geographical factors. Some studies in which with autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, similar criteria and methods were employed and X-linked inheritance have been described. found the prevalance of HSP/100 000 to be 2.7 in Molise Italy, 4.3 in Valle d’Aosta Italy, and 10–12 Historical aspects 2.0 in Portugal. These studies employed the In 1880 Strümpell published what is consid- diagnostic criteria suggested by Harding and ered to be the first clear description of HSP.He utilised all health institutions and various reported a family in which two brothers were health care professionals in ascertaining cases aVected by spastic paraplegia. The father was from the specific region.
  • Effectiveness of Myofascial Release on Spasticity and Lower Extremity

    Effectiveness of Myofascial Release on Spasticity and Lower Extremity

    hysical M f P ed l o ic a in n r e u & o R J International Journal of Kumar and Vaidya, Int J Phys Med Rehabil 2014, 3:1 l e a h n a DOI: 10.4172/2329-9096.1000253 o b i t i l a ISSN: 2329-9096i t a n r t i e o t n n I Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Research Article Open Access Effectiveness of Myofascial Release on Spasticity and Lower Extremity Function in Diplegic Cerebral Palsy: Randomized Controlled Trial Chandan Kumar1* and Snehashri N Vaidya2 1Associate Professor, Smt Kashibai Navale College of Physiotherapy, Narhe, Pune, Maharashtra, India 2MGM’S School of Physiotherapy, Aurangabad, India Abstract Purpose: To find out the effectiveness of Myofascial Release in combination with conventional physiotherapy on spasticity of calf, hamstring and adductors of hip and on lower extremity function in spastic diplegic subjects. Methodology: 30 spastic diplegic subjects of age group 2-8 years were taken by random sampling method from MGM College and other private clinics in Aurangabad. 15 subjects were assigned in each group. Group A: Myofascial release and conventional PT treatment. Group B: conventional PT treatment. Both the groups received training for 4 weeks. Baseline and Post treatment measures of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) and Gross Motor Function Test (GMFM-88) were evaluated. Results: Mean difference of MAS and R2 value of MTS in group A was more than group B, for calf, hamstring and adductors, whereas GMFM showed nearly equal improvement in both groups. Conclusion: Overall, it can be concluded from our study that the MFR along with conventional treatment reduces spasticity in calf, hamstring and adductors of hip in spastic diplegic subjects.
  • Cerebral Palsy

    Cerebral Palsy

    Cerebral Palsy Cerebral palsy encompasses a group of non-progressive and non-contagious motor conditions that cause physical disability in various facets of body movement. Cerebral palsy is one of the most common crippling conditions of childhood, dating to events and brain injury before, during or soon after birth. Cerebral palsy is a debilitating condition in which the developing brain is irreversibly damaged, resulting in loss of motor function and sometimes also cognitive function. Despite the large increase in medical intervention during pregnancy and childbirth, the incidence of cerebral palsy has remained relatively stable for the last 60 years. In Australia, a baby is born with cerebral palsy about every 15 hours, equivalent to 1 in 400 births. Presently, there is no cure for cerebral palsy. Classification Cerebral palsy is divided into four major classifications to describe different movement impairments. Movements can be uncontrolled or unpredictable, muscles can be stiff or tight and in some cases people have shaky movements or tremors. These classifications also reflect the areas of the brain that are damaged. The four major classifications are: spastic, ataxic, athetoid/dyskinetic and mixed. In most cases of cerebral palsy, the exact cause is unknown. Suggested possible causes include developmental abnormalities of the brain, brain injury to the fetus caused by low oxygen levels (asphyxia) or poor circulation, preterm birth, infection, and trauma. Spastic cerebral palsy leads to increased muscle tone and inability for muscles to relax (hypertonic). The brain injury usually stems from upper motor neuron in the brain. Spastic cerebral palsy is classified depending on the region of the body affected; these include: spastic hemiplegia; one side being affected, spastic monoplegia; a single limb being affected, spastic triplegia; three limbs being affected, spastic quadriplegia; all four limbs more or less equally affected.
  • Treatment of Spastic Foot Deformities

    Treatment of Spastic Foot Deformities

    TREATMENT OF SPASTIC FOOT DEFORMITIES penn neuro-orthopaedics service Table of Contents OVERVIEW Severe loss of movement is often the result of neurological disorders, Overview .............................................................. 1 such as stroke or brain injury. As a result, ordinary daily activities Treatment ............................................................. 2 such as walking, eating and dressing can be difficult and sometimes impossible to accomplish. Procedures ........................................................... 4 The Penn Neuro-Orthopaedics Service assists patients with Achilles Tendon Lengthening .........................................4 orthopaedic problems caused by certain neurologic disorders. Our Toe Flexor Releases .....................................................5 team successfully treats a wide range of problems affecting the limbs including foot deformities and walking problems due to abnormal Toe Flexor Transfer .......................................................6 postures of the foot. Split Anterior Tibialis Tendon Transfer (SPLATT) ...............7 This booklet focuses on the treatment of spastic foot deformities The Extensor Tendon of the Big Toe (EHL) .......................8 under the supervision of Keith Baldwin, MD, MSPT, MPH. Lengthening the Tibialis Posterior Tendon .......................9 Care After Surgery .................................................10 Notes ..................................................................12 Pre-operative right foot. Post-operative
  • Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias

    Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias

    Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias Authors: Doctors Enza Maria Valente1 and Marco Seri2 Creation date: January 2003 Update: April 2004 Scientific Editor: Doctor Franco Taroni 1Neurogenetics Istituto CSS Mendel, Viale Regina Margherita 261, 00198 Roma, Italy. e.valente@css- mendel.it 2Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Cardioangiologia ed Epatologia, Università degli studi di Bologna, Laboratorio di Genetica Medica, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.mailto:[email protected] Abstract Keywords Disease name and synonyms Definition Classification Differential diagnosis Prevalence Clinical description Management including treatment Diagnostic methods Etiology Genetic counseling Antenatal diagnosis References Abstract Hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSP) comprise a genetically and clinically heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders characterized by progressive spasticity and hyperreflexia of the lower limbs. Clinically, HSPs can be divided into two main groups: pure and complex forms. Pure HSPs are characterized by slowly progressive lower extremity spasticity and weakness, often associated with hypertonic urinary disturbances, mild reduction of lower extremity vibration sense, and, occasionally, of joint position sensation. Complex HSP forms are characterized by the presence of additional neurological or non-neurological features. Pure HSP is estimated to affect 9.6 individuals in 100.000. HSP may be inherited as an autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive or X-linked recessive trait, and multiple recessive and dominant forms exist. The majority of reported families (70-80%) displays autosomal dominant inheritance, while the remaining cases follow a recessive mode of transmission. To date, 24 different loci responsible for pure and complex HSP have been mapped. Despite the large and increasing number of HSP loci mapped, only 9 autosomal and 2 X-linked genes have been so far identified, and a clear genetic basis for most forms of HSP remains to be elucidated.
  • Cerebral Palsy

    Cerebral Palsy

    Cerebral Palsy What is Cerebral Palsy? Doctors use the term cerebral palsy to refer to any one of a number of neurological disorders that appear in infancy or early childhood and permanently affect body movement and muscle coordination but are not progressive, in other words, they do not get worse over time. • Cerebral refers to the motor area of the brain’s outer layer (called the cerebral cortex), the part of the brain that directs muscle movement. • Palsy refers to the loss or impairment of motor function. Even though cerebral palsy affects muscle movement, it is not caused by problems in the muscles or nerves. It is caused by abnormalities inside the brain that disrupt the brain’s ability to control movement and posture. In some cases of cerebral palsy, the cerebral motor cortex has not developed normally during fetal growth. In others, the damage is a result of injury to the brain either before, during, or after birth. In either case, the damage is not repairable and the disabilities that result are permanent. Patients with cerebral palsy exhibit a wide variety of symptoms, including: • Lack of muscle coordination when performing voluntary movements (ataxia); • Stiff or tight muscles and exaggerated reflexes (spasticity); • Walking with one foot or leg dragging; • Walking on the toes, a crouched gait, or a “scissored” gait; • Variations in muscle tone, either too stiff or too floppy; • Excessive drooling or difficulties swallowing or speaking; • Shaking (tremor) or random involuntary movements; and • Difficulty with precise motions, such as writing or buttoning a shirt. The symptoms of cerebral palsy differ in type and severity from one person to the next, and may even change in an individual over time.
  • The Effects of Botulinum Toxin Injections on Spasticity and Motor Performance in Chronic Stroke with Spastic Hemiplegia

    The Effects of Botulinum Toxin Injections on Spasticity and Motor Performance in Chronic Stroke with Spastic Hemiplegia

    toxins Article The Effects of Botulinum Toxin Injections on Spasticity and Motor Performance in Chronic Stroke with Spastic Hemiplegia 1,2,3, 4, 4 1,2 Yen-Ting Chen y, Chuan Zhang y, Yang Liu , Elaine Magat , Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez 1,2,5, Gerard E. Francisco 1,2, Ping Zhou 6, Yingchun Zhang 4 and Sheng Li 1,2,* 1 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA; [email protected] (Y.-T.C.); [email protected] (E.M.); [email protected] (M.V.-G.); [email protected] (G.E.F.) 2 TIRR Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA 3 Department of Health and Kinesiology, Northeastern State University, Broken Arrow, OK 74014, USA 4 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA; [email protected] (C.Z.); [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (Y.Z.) 5 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA 6 Guangdong Provincial Work Injury Rehabilitation Center, Guangzhou 510000, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-713-797-7125 Both authors contributed equally. y Received: 15 June 2020; Accepted: 27 July 2020; Published: 31 July 2020 Abstract: Spastic muscles are weak muscles. It is known that muscle weakness is linked to poor motor performance. Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections are considered as the first-line treatment for focal spasticity. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively investigate the effects of BoNT injections on force control of spastic biceps brachii muscles in stroke survivors.
  • What Polio Is Or What It Affects Or Causes: by Marny Eulberg, M.D., Director, Post Polio Clinic at What Polio Is Or What It St

    What Polio Is Or What It Affects Or Causes: by Marny Eulberg, M.D., Director, Post Polio Clinic at What Polio Is Or What It St

    VOLUME 23 NUMBER 3 SUMMER 2008 IN THIS ISSUE What polio is or what it affects or causes: By Marny Eulberg, M.D., director, Post Polio Clinic at What Polio Is or What It St. Anthonys Hospital, Denver Affects or Causes . p. 1 9 Polio kills or damages the anterior horn cell(s) in the In My Opinion . p. 2 spinal cord and thus results in no information being Comorbidities & sent to the muscle fibers of any voluntary (striated) Secondary Disabilities . muscle i.e. any muscle that can be controlled by p. 4 thought such as I think Ill point at that object with my index finger; this includes the muscles of the Book Review: Living hand, arm, shoulder, neck, trunk, back, abdominal wall, With Polio by Daniel J. entire leg and foot, face including muscles used in Wilson . p. 5 chewing, and muscles used for breathing and for the initiation of swallowing (the latter are known as Martha Logan: Mother, bulbar muscles). It does not affect the cardiac Teacher, Homemaker . (heart) muscle or smooth muscle which is in the p. 7 walls of the GI tract (esophagus, stomach, The Colorado Post-Polio intestines) or the walls of the urinary bladder. Educational Conference . 9 Atrophy (wasting) of a muscle(s) or the skinny arm p. 10 or leg is a result of the muscle not getting any And By the Way . p. 12 messages from the nerve that it needs to work. Talking About Physical 9 Polio leg (the cold to the touch) happens because of Rehabilitation . p. 13 blood pooling in the weakened extremity, radiant heat loss, and some lack of blood vessel constriction that A special thanks to Oran normally happens when exposed to cold temperatures.
  • Spastic Paraplegia Type 4

    Spastic Paraplegia Type 4

    Spastic paraplegia type 4 Description Spastic paraplegia type 4 (also known as SPG4) is the most common of a group of genetic disorders known as hereditary spastic paraplegias. These disorders are characterized by progressive muscle stiffness (spasticity) in the legs and difficulty walking. Hereditary spastic paraplegias are divided into two types: pure and complex. The pure types generally involve only spasticity of the lower limbs and walking difficulties. The complex types involve more widespread problems with the nervous system; the structure or functioning of the brain; and the nerves connecting the brain and spinal cord to muscles and sensory cells that detect sensations such as touch, pain, heat, and sound (the peripheral nervous system). In complex forms, there can also be features outside of the nervous system. Spastic paraplegia type 4 is usually a pure hereditary spastic paraplegia, although a few complex cases have been reported. Like all hereditary spastic paraplegias, spastic paraplegia type 4 involves spasticity of the leg muscles and muscle weakness. People with this condition can also experience exaggerated reflexes (hyperreflexia), ankle spasms, high-arched feet (pes cavus), and reduced bladder control. Spastic paraplegia type 4 generally affects nerve and muscle function in the lower half of the body only. Frequency The prevalence of spastic paraplegia type 4 is estimated to be 2 to 6 in 100,000 people worldwide. Causes Mutations in the SPAST gene cause spastic paraplegia type 4. The SPAST gene provides instructions for producing a protein called spastin. Spastin is found throughout the body, particularly in certain nerve cells (neurons). The spastin protein plays a role in the function of microtubules, which are rigid, hollow fibers that make up the cell's structural framework (the cytoskeleton).
  • Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Review 05/31/2010

    Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Review 05/31/2010

    Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Review 05/31/2010 Copyright © 2007 – 2010 by Provider Synergies, L.L.C. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, digital scanning, or via any information storage and retrieval system without the express written consent of Provider Synergies, L.L.C. All requests for permission should be mailed to: Attention: Copyright Administrator Intellectual Property Department Provider Synergies, L.L.C 10101 Alliance Road, Suite 201 Cincinnati, Ohio 45242 The materials contained herein represent the opinions of the collective authors and editors and should not be construed to be the official representation of any professional organization or group, any state Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee, any state Medicaid Agency, or any other clinical committee. This material is not intended to be relied upon as medical advice for specific medical cases and nothing contained herein should be relied upon by any patient, medical professional or layperson seeking information about a specific course of treatment for a specific medical condition. All readers of this material are responsible for independently obtaining medical advice and guidance from their own physician and/or other medical professional in regard to the best course of treatment for their specific medical condition. This publication, inclusive of all forms contained herein, is intended
  • The Abcs of Hypertonia Management – ITB, SDR, DBS

    The Abcs of Hypertonia Management – ITB, SDR, DBS

    The ABCs of Hypertonia Management – ITB, SDR, DBS Cerebral Palsy is a disorder of muscle tone caused by a non-progressive brain insult with onset with onset from prenatal brain development through early childhood. Affecting approximately 3/1000 children, it is the most common disabling motor disorder beginning in childhood. With a wide range of etiologies, there is also significant variability in the motor presentation. Spasticity and dystonia are both common, and often there are overlapping abnormalities of tone. A common pattern is spasticity of the lower extremities, hypotonia of the trunk and axial musculature, with dystonia dominating in the upper extremities. Spasticity is velocity dependent, typically unidirectional resistance to muscle stretch with associated upper motor neuron signs. It essentially involves disinhibition of GABA-ergic cells at the spinal cord. Dystonia is hypertonia with stereotyped writhing patterned movements, often involving co-contraction of agonists and antagonists that may involve overflow to remote muscle groups. Biochemically, multiple neurotransmitters are involved through the basal ganglia and associated interconnections. Treatment of spasticity is best managed by a comprehensive team approach that includes neurology, neurosurgery, orthopedics, rehabilitation specialists and support professionals. Initial tone management typically includes rehabilitation therapy, medications, neurotoxins and orthotics. Medications (many off label) may include baclofen, gabapentin, tizanidine and benzodiazepines. More severe patients may benefit from neurosurgical options focused on reducing tone at the spinal cord level. The chemistry of dystonia is more complex, thus the pharmacologic options are more varied and less consistently successful (table 1). Figure 1: Pharmacologic options available for the management of dystonia. When pharmacologic management of tone is inadequate, neurosurgical options may be considered.
  • The Experience of Spasticity After Spinal Cord Injury: Perceived Characteristics and Impact on Daily Life

    The Experience of Spasticity After Spinal Cord Injury: Perceived Characteristics and Impact on Daily Life

    Spinal Cord (2018) 56:478–486 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-017-0038-y ARTICLE The experience of spasticity after spinal cord injury: perceived characteristics and impact on daily life 1 1,2 1,3 William Barry McKay ● William Mark Sweatman ● Edelle C. Field-Fote Received: 21 June 2017 / Revised: 9 November 2017 / Accepted: 11 November 2017 / Published online: 16 January 2018 © International Spinal Cord Society 2018 Abstract Study design Cross-sectional survey. Objectives Determine the impact of motor control characteristics attributed to spasticity, such as spasms, stiffness, and clonus on the daily life of people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting Nationwide, United States. Methods Internet-administered questionnaire, the Patient Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM) and items describing characteristics of spasticity including stiffness, spasms, clonus, and pain. Results Of the 145 respondents, 113 (78%) reported a PRISM score of at least 5/164, indicating spasticity had some impact ρ = p < 1234567890 on their daily lives. Stiffness impact was highly correlated ( 0.84; 0.01) with the PRISM negative impact on Daily Activities subscale and moderately correlated with the other PRISM subscales (ρ = 0.55–0.63; p < 0.01). Spasm presence had a negligible or low correlation with PRISM negative impact subscales (ρ = 0.29–0.47; p < 0.01). Trunk muscle stiffness and spasms had a low correlation with PRISM Need for Assistance and Daily activities (ρ = 0.42 and ρ = 0.41, p < 0.01, respectively). Anti-spasticity medications were ineffective for 58% of respondents. Pain in the legs was reported by 57% of respondents.