List of Commenters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

List of Commenters ATTACHMENT A: Public Testimony List of Commenters Comments from Agencies .................................................................................................................... 3 Montgomery County Department of Transportation ................................................................................... 4 Maryland State Highway Administration .................................................................................................... 15 Comments from Municipalities .......................................................................................................... 18 City of Rockville ........................................................................................................................................... 19 City of Rockville ........................................................................................................................................... 21 City of Takoma Park .................................................................................................................................... 26 Section 5 of the Village of Chevy Chase ...................................................................................................... 31 Town of Chevy Chase .................................................................................................................................. 32 Town of Washington Grove ........................................................................................................................ 34 Village of Friendship Heights ...................................................................................................................... 38 Comments from County Committees ................................................................................................. 40 Pedestrian Bicycle Traffic Safety Advisory Committee ............................................................................... 41 Rustic Roads Advisory Committee .............................................................................................................. 43 Shady Grove Advisory Committee .............................................................................................................. 45 Comments from Organizations ........................................................................................................... 47 American Heart Association ........................................................................................................................ 48 Fenton Village Inc ........................................................................................................................................ 50 Fenton Village Inc ........................................................................................................................................ 52 Greater Colesville Citizens Association ....................................................................................................... 55 MoBike ........................................................................................................................................................ 60 Sierra Club of Montgomery County ............................................................................................................ 62 Somerset House Condominium Community .............................................................................................. 77 Washington Area Bicyclists Association ...................................................................................................... 80 Washington Area Bicyclists Association ...................................................................................................... 83 1 List of Commenters Comments from Individuals ............................................................................................................... 84 Joan Barron ...................................................... 85 Don Malec ...................................................... 163 Paul Basken ...................................................... 86 Joe McClane ................................................... 164 Jacquelyn Bokow .............................................. 87 John McNamara ............................................. 165 Ulla Buchholz.................................................... 88 Paul Meyer ..................................................... 166 Wayne Crist ...................................................... 89 Alan Midgall ................................................... 167 Paul Daisey ....................................................... 91 Deborah Neipris Hendler ............................... 169 Robert Dalrymple ............................................. 92 John Nellis ...................................................... 170 George Deegan .............................................. 103 Alain Norman ................................................. 172 Jenny Sue Dunner .......................................... 104 Jay Nuckols ............................................. 173-174 James Everhart ............................................... 105 Dave Nuttycombe .......................................... 175 Ross Filice ....................................................... 107 Meg Pease-Fye ............................................... 176 Jonathan Genn ............................................... 108 Robert Peters ................................................. 179 Rita Gerharz ................................................... 109 Barbara Raimondo ......................................... 181 Suzanne Gilmore ............................................ 110 Ira Raskin ....................................................... 182 Robert Goodill ................................................ 112 Martin Reed ................................................... 183 Richard Hall .................................................... 115 Efrain Rueda................................................... 184 David Helms ................................................... 116 John Smith ..................................................... 185 Jamie Herr ...................................................... 136 Andy Smith ..................................................... 186 Robert Hoffer ................................................. 139 Janice Snee .................................................... 188 Mary Jane Cullen ............................................ 140 Lee Sobel ........................................................ 191 Joan Johnson .................................................. 141 J Steiner ......................................................... 192 Melanie Keltz ................................................. 142 Barbara Tauben ............................................. 193 Scott Knudson ................................................ 143 Chris Wade ..................................................... 195 Maya Larson ................................................... 145 Steve Warner ................................................. 196 Daniel Leggett ................................................ 146 Marc-Henri Winter ........................................ 197 Stevan Lieberman .......................................... 147 Naomi Yount .................................................. 198 Paul Loebach .................................................. 162 General Support .............................................................................................................................. 200 2 Comments from Agencies 3 4 5 0 Agency Division Team Commenter PDF Page Comment Where distances are used (such as 2 miles from a rail station, or 2 miles from a school) consider including a 1 MCDOT DO Policy AB General footnote, endnote, reference, etc (perhaps defining it somewhere apparent) as to whether such distance is measured in a straight line (as the crow flies) or along a navigable path (as a user travels). Consider including a line somewhere stating that ROW being considered for abandonment should evaluate 2 MCDOT DO Devel Rvw RT General needs and intent in the Bicycle Master Plan. While it is likely that this would already be done, anyway, it feels like it may help reinforce this to include it in this plan. Consider including some additional reference points in the Table of Contents, particularly the Breezeway 3 MCDOT DO Policy AB General Network starting on p66. Objective 1.1 - To reiterate our Working Draft comment: Consider what other data sources might be available if the American Community Survey were to be eliminated or reduced to such a degree as to be unusable for this purpose. Consider reaching out to TPB staff to see if Household Travel Surveys may provide adequate data. 4 * MCDOT AB, JT 21 Noting the response to our working draft comment: Consider including a reference to a potential County-led data collection effort, to occur if it is found that the ACS falls short on meeting data needs. Such an effort would be included in the fiscal estimate with the same stipulation that it would only be applicable if needed. 5 MCDOT DTE Engr JT 24-28 Consider discussing the level of investment needed for each objective to be met. 2.2 - As written, the extremes at each end -- high-density urban and low-density rural -- may throw off the intended information from this metric. High-Density Urban While we recognize that bike facilities within a walkshed are important to those beyond it, in areas with a very high ratio of walkshed DUs versue
Recommended publications
  • White Flint 2 Sector Plan
    Approved and Adopted JANUARY 2018 Abstract This Plan contains the text and supporting maps for a comprehensive amendment to the approved and adopted 1992North Bethesda/Garrett Park Master Plan and the 2010 White Flint Sector Plan, as amended. It also amends The General Plan (On Wedges and Corridors) for the Physical Development of the Mary- land-Washington Regional District in Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties, as amended, the Master Plan of Highways and Transitways, as amended, and the Countywide Bikeways Functional Master Plan, as amended. This Plan focuses on land use, appropriate density and mobility options for 460 acres located be- tween three areas: the City of Rockville, the 2009 Twinbrook Sector Plan area and the 2010 White Flint Sector Plan area. Recommendations are made for zoning, urban design, public facilities and streets. Master and sector plans convey land use policy for defined geographic areas and should be interpreted together with relevant countywide functional plans and County laws and regulations. Plan recommendations provide comprehensive guidelines for the use of public and private land; and should be referred to by pub- lic officials and private individuals when making land use decisions. Public and private land use decisions that promote plan goals are essential to fulling a plan’s vision. Master and sector plans look ahead 20 years from the date of the adoption, although they are intended to be revised every 10 to 15 years. Moreover, the circumstances when a plan is adopted will change and the specifics of a plan may become less relevant over time. Plans do not specify all development possi- bilities.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of MARYLAND (Southern Division) JOHN and KIMBERLY BEAHN, Individually and A
    Case 8:20-cv-02239-GJH Document 3-1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 1 of 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Southern Division) JOHN AND KIMBERLY BEAHN, individually and as parents and next friends of P.B., M.B., AND B.B., MINORS, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al. Case No.: _______________ PLAINTIFFS, v. TRAVIS A. GAYLES, et al. DEFENDANTS. PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF TEMPORARY, PRELIMINARY, AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF On Friday evening, after business hours, and without warning, the Montgomery County Health Officer abruptly announced that all private and religious schools in Montgomery County are “prohibited from physically re-opening for in-person instruction through October 1, 2020.” This blanket order, directed only at religious and private schools, purports to effectively prevent more than 23,000 Montgomery County students from returning to school in the coming weeks. The surprise order was stunning in its abruptness and timing. It was issued on the eve of school reopening, without notice to parents, students, or schools. Families had paid tuition and made firm enrollment decisions. Most schools had spent months researching, planning and installing expensive retrofitting of their schools, following CDC and State guidelines for reopening. Since the pandemic broke in March, neither State nor County government has found it necessary to issue any order directed at religious or private schools prior to this one. And the order was not in response to any COVID-19 outbreak. In fact, there has not been a single 1 Case 8:20-cv-02239-GJH Document 3-1 Filed 08/04/20 Page 2 of 47 reported COVID-19 cases in any Montgomery County religious or private school during the pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee: Directly to Council
    Committee: Directly to Council AGENDA ITEM #5F-#5J Committee Review: N/A June 29, 2021 Staff: Nubia Medrano-Rivera, LSC/Clerk’s Office Action Montgomery Purpose: To confirm CE appointment County Council Keywords: none SUBJECT County Executive Appointments EXPECTED ATTENDEES None COUNCIL DECISION POINTS & COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION None DESCRIPTION/ISSUE Due to the significant number of County Executive appointments, and in the interest of saving resources, resumes for any of the appointees, may be accessed through IQ by going to the logs for June 16, June 22 and June 24, 2021 or the Legislative Information Services (LIS) Office. SUMMARY OF KEY DISCUSSION POINTS None This report contains: ▪ County Executive appointment(s) to the: • Board of Trustees for the Montgomery County Employee Retirement Plans, and the Board of Trustees for the Consolidated Retiree Health Benefits Trust (BIT) ©1-7 • Montgomery County Economic Development Corporation Board ©8-11 • Early Childhood Coordinating Council ©12-16 • Racial Equity and Social Justice Advisory Committee ©17-20 • Silver Spring Urban District Advisory Committee ©21-24 Alternative format requests for people with disabilities. If you need assistance accessing this report you may submit alternative format requests to the ADA Compliance Manager. The ADA Compliance Manager can also be reached at 240-777-6197 (TTY 240-777-6196) or at [email protected] OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE Marc Elrich County Executive APPOINTMENT PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY VESTED TO ME UNDER SECTION 215 OF THE CHARTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, I HEREBY APPOINT Type of Position: County C ouncil Type of Position: MCREA Christine Kelleher Deborah Snead County Council Montgomery County Retired Employees’ Assn.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Asian Pacific American Council 30Th NATIONAL
    Federal Asian Pacific American Council 30th NATIONAL LEADERSHIP TRAINING PROGRAM May 4 - 8, 2015, Hilton Rockville, Maryland th FAPAC 30 NATIONAL LEADERSHIP TRAINING PROGRAM 1 Table of Contents Message from President ................................................................................ 2 Message from Conference Chair ............................................................... 3 About FAPAC .................................................................................................. 4 Sponsors, Partners and Volunteers .............................................................. 6 Lifetime Members ........................................................................................... 7 Chapter Highlights .......................................................................................... 8 Year In Review ................................................................................................ 9 Military Awardees .........................................................................................10 Civilian Awardees .........................................................................................11 FAPAC Scholarship Endowment Fund ......................................................12 Greeting Letters ............................................................................................13 30th National Leadership Training Program Agenda ............................21 Preconference Agency Workshop ...........................................................26 Keynote and Guest Speakers
    [Show full text]
  • 22900000* Montgomery County, Maryland
    h PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED MARCH 31, 2010 NEW ISSUE – BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Fitch Ratings: AA+ Moody’s Investors Service: Standard and Poor’s: AA+ (See “Ratings”) In the opinion of Special Counsel, assuming compliance with certain covenants, the interest portion of the Purchase Installments to be made by the County as Purchaser under the Conditional Purchase Agreement and to be received by the Holders of the Certificates is excludable from gross income for Federal income tax purposes under existing statutes, regulations and decision, and under existing law the interest portion of such Purchase Installments is exempt from income taxation by the State of Maryland. No opinion is expressed as to estate or inheritance taxes, or any other Maryland taxes not levied or assessed directly on the interest on the Certificates. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. The interest portion of the Purchase Installments, for federal income tax purposes, is not includable in the alternative minimum taxable income of individuals, o buy be accepted prior to the time the Official corporations or other taxpayers as an enumerated item of tax preference or other specific adjustment and is not taken into account in determining “adjusted current earnings” for purposes of computing the alternative minimum tax on corporations; however, interest on the Purchase Installments will be subject to the branch profits tax imposed on foreign corporations engaged in a trade or business in the United States of America. e any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which suc $22,900,000* MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (Public Transportation Equipment Acquisition) Series 2010 Evidencing Proportionate Interests in a Conditional Purchase Agreement Dated: Date of Initial Delivery Due: As shown on inside front cover The Certificates are being issued to finance the acquisition of certain equipment (the “Equipment”) to be used in the public transportation program of Montgomery County, Maryland (the “County”).
    [Show full text]
  • Study by County Boosts Chances for a New Multiuse Facility
    February 22, 2019 A Biweekly Newspaper February 22, 2019 • Volume XIV, Number 23 Study by County Boosts Chances for a New The Old Town Hall Bank Museum was jam-packed. Find out why on page 4. Multiuse Facility By Link Hoewing In December of last year, County Executive Marc Elrich heeded calls from local citizens and came out to a “listening session” in Poolesville. He heard numerous citizens talk about the need for a new high school and about the failure of the county to pro- vide the same level of services for citizens in this area as it does elsewhere. On January 15, Elrich announced his capital and operating budget amend- ments that will be considered by the County Council. Tucked into the memo he sent to the council was a paragraph recommending that a facil- ity planning project be undertaken to The county has begun to seriously analyze various funding streams Village Beer’s Raj Masky beams over “develop options for making county for a multiuse structure that could house a new school. the store having a big lottery winner. services more accessible to the Pooles- We have the info on page 7. ville community…” The proposal also actively considering how to modernize county government. The coalition, recommended that in doing the work Poolesville High School. led by Commissioner Jim Brown and on the project, “colocation options This is just the latest example of the including PTSA leaders Rebecca with Montgomery County Public impact the Fair Access for the Western Schools…” be considered. MCPS is County Coalition has had on the Continued on page 20.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MONTGOMERY COUNTY SENTINEL SEPTEMBER 5, 2019 EFLECTIONS the Montgomery County Sentinel, R Published Weekly by Berlyn Inc
    2015, 2016, 2017 MDDC News Organization of the Year! Celebrating more than 160 years of service! Vol. 165, No. 13 • 50¢ SINCE 1855 Thursday, September 5, 2019 INSIDE The Fight To Stop Opioid Addiction Elrich clarifies position MCPS Board Back In Session on immigration status Vestibule construction, teacher hirings and additional portable classrooms are some of the topics in the county again that central office staff discussed during the Aug. 29 Board of Educa- Officer Rick Goodale wrote in an By Kathleen Stubbs tion meeting. email to an MCP employee who han- @kathleenstubbs3 dles statistics. Page 3 ROCKVILLE – Montgomery “Rapes are 2.6% lower than last County Executive Marc Elrich re- year at the same time (Jan. 1 to Sept. cently said that the county will not 3),” Goodale wrote on Sept 4. hold people charged with crimes in “Three-hundred-thirty-one (versus) custody for more time than the judi- 340.” cial system requires to help Immi- Some rape survivors report the gration and Customs Enforcement crime years after the incident oc- (ICE). curred. Elrich wrote in a statement on “Rapes are counted toward the Aug. 27 that the county received year reported, so if rape occurred in negative comments after a man 2016 but (was) reported in 2018 then charged with second-degree rape and it would count toward 2018 stats,” ‘Eroica + for whom ICE had lodged a detainer Goodale wrote. Beethoven’ was released from jail on bond. In regards to those accused of “Recently, there have been re- being released, Elrich said that it is “Eroica + Beethoven” takes ports of concerns expressed that the judge and not the county govern- place Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Isiah Leggett, Montgomery County Executive 2006
    Isiah Leggett, Montgomery County Executive 2006- 2018 Served in Vietnam, January - December 1969 From January to December 1969, Isiah “Ike” Leggett served as a Captain in the United States Army during the Vietnam War, first in combat with a Military Advisory Unit attached to the Army of the Republic of Vietnam and then as a public affairs officer with the 7th Support Battalion/199th Light Infantry Brigade. He was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, the Vietnam Service and Vietnam Campaign Medals. Leggett was the first African American to be elected to the County Council. He served four terms as an At- Large Member (1986 - 2002). He also served as the Council's President three times (1991, 1998, 1999) and as its Vice-President three times (1990, 1997 and 2002). As a Council Member he also chaired the Council's Transportation and Environment Committee and served on the Education Committee. In November 2006, Leggett was elected to a four-year term as Montgomery County Executive. He was overwhelmingly reelected in 2010 and 2014. He served as President of the County Executives of America in 2013 - 2014 and as President of the Maryland Association of Counties in 2015. Born in Deweyville, Texas on July 25, 1945, Leggett was raised in small-town Alexandria, Louisiana, where he grew up as the seventh of 12 children in a four room house without in-door plumbing. His father worked at the local saw mill. His mother, he remembers, always focused on education as the way to get ahead and build a better life. While studying at Southern University, Leggett was elected student body president, commanded the university's Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) cadets, and was a campus and community leader in the struggle for civil rights.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Regional Directory Cover (COG Board, Committee Leadership, Award Winners) Row 1 William D
    Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments People Partner ship Pro gress 2014 annual report | 2015 regional DireCtory Cover (COG Board, Committee Leadership, Award Winners) Row 1 William D. Euille , CoG Board Chair (City of Alexandria) Roger Berliner , CoG Board Vice Chair and Climate Energy and Environment Policy Committee Chair (Montgomery County) Kenyan McDuffie , CoG Vice Chair (District of Columbia) Muriel Bowser , CoG President (District of Columbia) Phil Mendelson , National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chair (District of Columbia) Rashad Young (District of Columbia) G. Frederick Robinson (City of Bowie) About the Council of Governments Ken Robinson (Charles County) For more than 55 years, the Metropolitan Washington Row 2 Council of Governments has brought area leaders together Andrew M. Fellows , CoG Vice President (City of College Park) to address the region’s biggest challenges, such as restoring Randy A. McClement (City of Frederick) Jan Gardner (Frederick County) the Potomac River, ensuring the Metro system was fully Jud Ashman (City of Gaithersburg) built, and strengthening emergency preparedness after Row 3 September 11, 2001. Today, the Council of Governments’ top Emmett V. Jordan , Region Forward Chair (City of Greenbelt) priority is advancing the Region Forward vision through the Isiah Leggett (Montgomery County) Nancy Navarro (Montgomery County) work of its Board of Directors, policy boards, committees, Rushern L. Baker, III (Prince George’s County) and programs. Andrea C. Harrison (Prince George’s County) Karen R. Toles , CoG Secretary-Treasurer (Prince George’s County) Bridget Donnell Newton (City of Rockville) Our Membership Bruce R. Williams (City of Takoma Park) The Council of Governments’ membership is comprised of Row 4 300 elected officials from 22 local governments, the J.
    [Show full text]
  • Our History and Government
    Montgomery County Maryland OurOur History History and and Government Government General Richard Montgomery Montgomery County, Maryland Our History and Government A Joint Project of Montgomery County, Maryland and the Montgomery County Historical Society ————————­ Copyright © 1999 Montgomery County Government Office of Public Information Rockville, Maryland 20850 ————————— To learn more about Montgomery County, Maryland, please visit the county web site: www.co.mo.md.us or the web site of the Montgomery County Historical Society: www.montgomeryhistory.org CONTENTS Introduction............................................................................1 History of the County..........................................................3 Principal Historic Events..................................................21 Official Symbols Montgomery County Emblem ............................. 23 Coat of Arms .......................................................... 23 County Bird and Blossom .................................... 24 Flag of Montgomery County................................ 25 County Executives and Council Members, Past to Present...................26 County Demographics......................................................29 INTRODUCTION Montgomery County is proud of its history. From Indian stone quarries and trails to present day high technology centers, it has played an integral part in the develop­ ment of this country. By settling the frontier in the 1700s, supporting independence, and ceding Georgetown for the new capital, the
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama at a Glance
    ALABAMA ALABAMA AT A GLANCE ****************************** PRESIDENTIAL ****************************** Date Primaries: Tuesday, June 1 Polls Open/Close Must be open at least from 10am(ET) to 8pm (ET). Polls may open earlier or close later depending on local jurisdiction. Delegates/Method Republican Democratic 48: 27 at-large; 21 by CD Pledged: 54: 19 at-large; 35 by CD. Unpledged: 8: including 5 DNC members, and 2 members of Congress. Total: 62 Who Can Vote Open. Any voter can participate in either primary. Registered Voters 2,356,423 as of 11/02, no party registration ******************************* PAST RESULTS ****************************** Democratic Primary Gore 214,541 77%, LaRouche 15,465 6% Other 48,521 17% June 6, 2000 Turnout 278,527 Republican Primary Bush 171,077 84%, Keyes 23,394 12% Uncommitted 8,608 4% June 6, 2000 Turnout 203,079 Gen Election 2000 Bush 941,173 57%, Gore 692,611 41% Nader 18,323 1% Other 14,165, Turnout 1,666,272 Republican Primary Dole 160,097 76%, Buchanan 33,409 16%, Keyes 7,354 3%, June 4, 1996 Other 11,073 5%, Turnout 211,933 Gen Election 1996 Dole 769,044 50.1%, Clinton 662,165 43.2%, Perot 92,149 6.0%, Other 10,991, Turnout 1,534,349 1 ALABAMA ********************** CBS NEWS EXIT POLL RESULTS *********************** 6/2/92 Dem Prim Brown Clinton Uncm Total 7% 68 20 Male (49%) 9% 66 21 Female (51%) 6% 70 20 Lib (27%) 9% 76 13 Mod (48%) 7% 70 20 Cons (26%) 4% 56 31 18-29 (13%) 10% 70 16 30-44 (29%) 10% 61 24 45-59 (29%) 6% 69 21 60+ (30%) 4% 74 19 White (76%) 7% 63 24 Black (23%) 5% 86 8 Union (26%)
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 4
    ATTACHMENT 4 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE Rockville, Maryland 20850 Marc Elrich County Executive August 14, 2020 Dear Chair Anderson and members of the Planning Board, The attached document presents the Executive branch’s comments on the June 11, 2020 draft of the Thrive Montgomery 2050 proposed amendment to the General Plan. Also enclosed is my letter to the County Council asking for a six-month postponement in the General Plan review schedule. I am requesting the postponement to allow the County to focus its resources in the immediate future on the public health challenges and economic ramifications of the pandemic. Simply put, the Executive departments are otherwise focused on dealing with Covid-19 and would welcome more time to collaborate with the Planning Department to resolve the many issues they identify in the draft plan. Here are my additional comments and questions on the draft plan: I. The Process—The Purpose of the General Plan, renamed “Thrive Montgomery 2050.” The General Plan and amendments (1964, 1969, 1993) tell a story of the County’s history and growth, presenting a shared vision of the residents, Executive, and Council. The plan’s vision is inspiring, concise, and written in everyday language for any resident or member of government to read casually. Until now. Thrive Montgomery 2050 is a document for planners, weighed down by “planners’ speak,” with far too many goals, policies and actions intended for now and seemingly mandatory. It sets out what MNCPPC is going to do—not the County--with 72 references to “study, create, develop, prepare or initiate” something, all of which are initiated by MNCPPC.
    [Show full text]