DOCSLIB.ORG

Annex01 Table A1 References.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annex01 Table A1 References.Pdf Author manuscript, published in "Geophysical Journal International 192 (2013) 1000-1024" DOI : 10.1093/gji/ggs104 Table A1: Mesozoic and Cenozoic selected paleomagnetic poles of Asia, as sorted from a compilation of Global Paleomagnetic Database 2004 and 2005-2008 litterature following Thomson ISI web of sciences reference system. N=533 Id# Locality or Formation name Age ± dAge Site Paleopole dp / dm Paleolat. λ expected λ Δλ expected λ Δλ ResultNo References (Ma) Lat. (°) / Long. (°) Lat. (°) / Long. (°) (A95) (observed) (from Europe APWP) (°) (from East Asia APWP) (°) (GPMDB04) 1. Northeastern blocks/terranes 1.1.a: Siberia - igneous rocks - n=9 1101 Ust Bokson basalts 19.9 ± 0.2 52.1 / 100.3 69.8 / 186.5 8.4 / 10.2 49.0 55.3 ± 2.7 -6.3 ± 7.1 47.2 ± 3.1 1.8 ± 7.2 - Hankard et al. (2007) 1102 Minusinsk Volcanic Pipes 75.0 ± 7.0 55.0 / 90.3 78.3 / 271.0 8.8 / 11.3 43.3 50.6 ± 5.9 -7.3 ± 8.5 47.8 ± 3.3 -4.5 ± 7.5 8824 Bragin et al. (1999) 1103 Minusinsk Volcanic Pipes 75.0 ± 7.0 55.0 / 90.3 45.0 / 173.2 5.0 / 6.8 39.0 50.6 ± 5.9 -11.6 ± 6.2 47.8 ± 3.3 -8.8 ± 4.8 8825 Bragin et al. (1999) 1104 Transbaikalian Volcanics 119.0 ± 17.0 51.8 / 108.0 72.3 / 186.4 6.0 51.9 52.0 ± 2.4 -0.2 ± 5.2 51.7 ± 2.8 0.1 ± 5.3 9216 Metelkin et al. (2004) 1105 Bichura town 120.0 ± 25.0 50.6 / 107.6 37.0 / 70.4 15.8 / 17.5 60.3 50.8 ± 2.4 9.5 ± 12.8 50.5 ± 2.8 9.8 ± 12.8 - Cogné et al. (2005) 1106 Lower Cretaceous Andesites 123.0 ± 23.0 53.8 / 124.5 58.3 / 51.0 3.8 / 4.5 50.8 57.3 ± 2.4 -6.5 ± 3.6 56.2 ± 2.8 -5.4 ± 3.8 8325 Halim et al. (1998a) 1107 Lower Cretaceous Andesites 123.0 ± 23.0 53.8 / 124.5 52.5 / 58.6 6.8 / 8.0 51.9 57.3 ± 2.4 -5.4 ± 5.8 56.2 ± 2.8 -4.3 ± 5.9 8326 Halim et al. (1998a) 1108 Ingoda River 123.0 ± 5.0 51.2 / 112.2 58.5 / 176.8 5.2 / 6.0 53.6 52.3 ± 2.4 1.3 ± 4.6 51.8 ± 2.8 1.8 ± 4.7 - Cogné et al. (2005) 1109 Kondersky massif 132.5 ± 67.5 57.7 / 134.6 75.0 / 163.0 10.4 / 10.9 69.7 62.7 ± 2.8 7.1 ± 8.6 61.3 ± 2.4 8.5 ± 8.5 6843 Pavlov (1993) 1.1.b: Siberia - sediments - n=18 1110 Western Siberia, Russia 19.5 ± 3.5 60.0 / 83.0 70.0 / 230.0 4.7 / 6.1 42.1 61.4 ± 2.7 -19.3 ± 4.3 54.7 ± 3.1 -12.6 ± 4.5 3980 Gorbunov (1971) 1111 Gusinoe Lake, Buryatia 121.0 ± 9.0 51.2 / 106.5 77.1 / 166.5 10.5 / 11.9 56.1 51.1 ± 2.4 4.9 ± 8.6 50.9 ± 2.8 5.1 ± 8.7 7899 Kravchinsky (1995) 1112 Tchulym-Yenisei Depression 123.0 ± 23.0 56.5 / 89.5 74.0 / 135.0 10.4 / 11.2 65.3 52.8 ± 2.4 12.4 ± 8.5 53.6 ± 2.8 11.7 ± 8.6 4196 Pospelova et al. (1971) 1113 Tchulym-Yenisei Depression 123.0 ± 23.0 56.5 / 90.5 76.0 / 138.0 8.7 / 9.3 64.1 53.0 ± 2.4 11.1 ± 7.2 53.7 ± 2.8 10.4 ± 7.3 4195 Pospelova et al. (1971) 1114 Tchulym-Yenisei Depression 123.0 ± 23.0 56.0 / 88.5 69.0 / 125.0 9.0 / 9.5 69.2 52.2 ± 2.4 17.1 ± 7.5 53.0 ± 2.8 16.3 ± 7.5 4194 Pospelova et al. (1971) 1115 Tchulym-Yenisei Depression 123.0 ± 23.0 56.0 / 88.0 73.0 / 138.0 6.9 / 7.5 63.9 52.1 ± 2.4 11.8 ± 5.8 52.9 ± 2.8 11.0 ± 6.0 4193 Pospelova et al. (1971) 1116 Khatanga Depression 134.5 ± 1.5 70.5 / 98.0 73.0 / 178.0 5.3 / 5.6 66.7 65.1 ± 2.8 1.6 ± 4.8 68.1 ± 2.4 -1.4 ± 4.7 4197 Pospelova (1971) 1117 Eastern Coast of Anabar Gulf 139.0 ± 1.0 75.0 / 114.0 63.0 / 174.0 5.3 / 5.6 66.8 69.3 ± 6.0 -2.5 ± 6.4 74.2 ± 2.4 -7.4 ± 4.7 4202 Pospelova et al. (1968) 1118 Eastern Coast of Anabar Gulf 139.0 ± 1.0 75.0 / 114.0 64.0 / 177.0 12.2 / 13.0 66.9 69.3 ± 6.0 -2.4 ± 10.9 74.2 ± 2.4 -7.4 ± 9.9 4201 Pospelova et al. (1968) 1119 Eastern Coast of Anabar Gulf 139.0 ± 1.0 75.0 / 114.0 64.0 / 170.0 5.4 / 5.7 68.7 69.3 ± 6.0 -0.6 ± 6.5 74.2 ± 2.4 -5.6 ± 4.7 4200 Pospelova et al. (1968) 1120 Eastern Coast of Anabar Gulf 139.0 ± 1.0 75.0 / 114.0 62.0 / 174.0 5.3 / 5.6 66.0 69.3 ± 6.0 -3.3 ± 6.4 74.2 ± 2.4 -8.2 ± 4.7 4199 Pospelova et al. (1968) 1121 Gusinoe Lake, Buryatia 141.0 ± 5.0 51.2 / 106.3 62.3 / 168.6 11.0 / 12.7 55.6 48.1 ± 6.0 7.5 ± 10.0 50.9 ± 2.4 4.8 ± 9.0 7900 Kravchinsky (1995) 1122 Khatanga Depression 148.5 ± 2.5 70.5 / 98.0 54.0 / 123.0 5.5 / 5.7 70.1 72.0 ± 6.6 -1.9 ± 6.9 - - 4356 Pospelova et al. (1971) 1123 Mogzon village, Trans-Baikal 153.5 ± 7.5 51.8 / 112.0 71.3 / 152.7 9.9 / 10.8 63.5 60.0 ± 6.6 3.4 ± 9.5 - - 7917 Kuzmin et al. (1996) 1124 Trans-Baikal 153.5 ± 7.5 51.5 / 117.5 59.6 / 306.7 5.0 / 8.5 21.3 61.0 ± 6.6 -39.7 ± 6.6 - - 7910 Zhitkov et al. (1994) 1125 Trans-Baikal 153.5 ± 7.5 51.5 / 112.0 71.0 / 162.5 9.9 / 10.8 60.3 59.8 ± 6.6 0.6 ± 9.5 - - 7902 Kravchinsky (1995) 1126 Chita area 153.5 ± 7.5 51.8 / 112.0 64.4 / 161.0 6.7 / 7.3 62.1 60.0 ± 6.6 2.1 ± 7.5 - - 9148 Kravchinsky et al. (2002) 1127 Trans-Baikal 153.5 ± 7.5 51.5 / 117.5 76.9 / 14.9 7.8 / 9.7 47.0 61.0 ± 6.6 -14.0 ± 8.2 - - 7922 Kuzmin et al. (1996) 1.2.a: Amuria - igneous rocks - n=27 1201 Taatsyn Gol 3 12.7 ± 0.3 45.5 / 101.0 71.6 / 178.0 14.6 / 18.2 46.6 47.5 ± 2.0 -0.9 ± 11.8 42.7 ± 5.4 3.9 ± 11.8 - Hankard et al. (2007a) insu-00857217, version 1 - 18 Oct 2013 1202 Mongolian basalts 29.5 ± 6.5 43.5 / 104.5 70.0 / 204.0 8.3 / 11.5 37.3 47.5 ± 3.8 -10.2 ± 7.3 37.9 ± 2.8 -0.6 ± 7.0 7278 Gorshkov et al. (1991) 1203 Taatsyn Gol 1-2 29.8 ± 1.8 45.4 / 101.3 81.9 / 275.6 3.5 / 4.8 37.3 49.0 ± 3.8 -11.7 ± 4.1 39.7 ± 2.8 -2.4 ± 3.6 - Hankard et al. (2007a) 1204 Khaton Sudal basalts 39.4 ± 0.6 44.5 / 101.4 72.0 / 202.6 6.3 / 8.5 38.6 48.2 ± 3.3 -9.6 ± 5.7 35.7 ± 4.5 2.9 ± 6.2 - Hankard et al. (2007a) 1205 Bogopal Group 51.5 ± 1.5 44.0 / 135.0 78.4 / 236.7 10.3 40.6 51.7 ± 3.4 -11.1 ± 8.7 41.5 ± 5.9 -0.8 ± 9.5 8352 Otofuji et al. (1995) 1206 Khuts Uul 57.1 ± 0.8 43.2 / 104.6 69.6 / 148.0 6.3 / 7.3 55.7 43.2 ± 2.9 12.5 ± 5.5 37.1 ± 5.9 18.6 ± 6.9 - Hankard et al. (2008) 1207 Sumber Uul - Tulga 62.1 ± 5.9 42.6 / 104.0 85.2 / 92.5 3.9 / 4.9 47.3 42.5 ± 2.9 4.8 ± 3.9 35.9 ± 4.1 11.4 ± 4.5 - Hankard et al. (2008) 1208 Sijanov Group 66.0 ± 2.0 44.0 / 135.0 85.8 / 347.1 12.7 / 16.8 40.4 46.7 ± 3.2 -6.3 ± 10.5 40.5 ± 4.1 -0.1 ± 10.7 8353 Otofuji et al. (1995) 1209 Levosobolevsk Group 66.5 ± 4.5 46.5 / 138.5 68.0 / 245.0 10.3 / 14.4 36.8 49.7 ± 3.2 -12.9 ± 8.6 43.4 ± 4.1 -6.5 ± 8.9 4304 Nevolina and Sokarev (1986) 1210 Samarinsk Group 68.0 ± 3.0 46.5 / 138.5 83.0 / 20.0 12.0 / 15.5 42.8 49.7 ± 3.2 -6.9 ± 9.9 43.4 ± 4.1 -0.5 ± 10.1 4305 Nevolina and Sokarev (1986) 1211 Kisin and Sijanov Groups 72.5 ± 6.5 44.0 / 135.0 85.9 / 11.3 10.1 41.6 46.7 ± 3.2 -5.1 ± 8.5 44.1 ± 3.3 -2.5 ± 8.5 8307 Uno et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cawood 2015 Lithos Assembly
    ÔØ ÅÒÙ×Ö ÔØ Assembly of the Lhasa and Qiangtang terranes in central Tibet by divergent double subduction Di-Cheng Zhu, Shi-Min Li, Peter A. Cawood, Qing Wang, Zhi-Dan Zhao, Sheng-Ao Liu, Li-Quan Wang PII: S0024-4937(15)00232-7 DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2015.06.023 Reference: LITHOS 3632 To appear in: LITHOS Received date: 4 May 2015 Accepted date: 29 June 2015 Please cite this article as: Zhu, Di-Cheng, Li, Shi-Min, Cawood, Peter A., Wang, Qing, Zhao, Zhi-Dan, Liu, Sheng-Ao, Wang, Li-Quan, Assembly of the Lhasa and Qiang- tang terranes in central Tibet by divergent double subduction, LITHOS (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2015.06.023 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Assembly of the Lhasa and Qiangtang terranes in central Tibet by divergent double subduction Di-Cheng Zhu1,*, Shi-Min Li1, Peter A. Cawood2,3, Qing Wang1, Zhi-Dan Zhao1, Sheng-Ao Liu1, Li-Quan Wang4 1. State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, and School of Earth Science and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China 2. Department of Earth Sciences, University of St Andrews, North Street, St Andrews KY16 9AL, UK 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre‐Oxfordian (>163 Ma) Ophiolite Obduction in Central Tibet
    RESEARCH LETTER Pre‐Oxfordian (>163 Ma) Ophiolite 10.1029/2019GL086650 Obduction in Central Tibet Key Points: Anlin Ma1, Xiumian Hu1 , Paul Kapp2 , Marcelle BouDagher‐Fadel3, and Wen Lai1 • The Dongqiao Formation was deposited on top of ophiolite in 1State Key Laboratory of Mineral Deposit Research, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, subaerial to shallow marine 2 3 environments during Oxfordian to Nanjing, China, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA, Department of Earth Kimmeridgian time Sciences, University College London, London, UK • The Dongqiao Formation includes detritus from the underlying Dongqiao ophiolite and The timing of Bangong‐Nujiang suture ophiolite obduction between the Lhasa and Qiangtang ‐ fi Abstract Lhasa af nity continental crust ‐ • The Dongqiao ophiolite was terranes in central Tibet is important for understanding the closure history of the Meso Tethys but obducted onto Lhasa‐affinity remains poorly constrained. We investigated subaerial to shallow marine strata of the Dongqiao Formation continental crust by 163 Ma that sit unconformably on Bangong‐Nujiang suture ophiolites that crystallized in a supra‐subduction zone setting at 189–181 Ma. Based on foraminiferal and coral studies, the depositional age of the Dongqiao Supporting Information: • Supporting Information S1 Formation is constrained to be Oxfordian and Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic). Provenance analyses including • Data Set S1 detrital modes, geochemistry of detrital chromian spinels, and U‐Pb age populations of detrital zircons suggest the Dongqiao Formation was sourced from uplifted Bangong‐Nujiang suture ophiolites and sedimentary and metamorphic rocks of Lhasa terrane affinity to the south. We conclude that Correspondence to: Bangong‐Nujiang suture ophiolites were obducted soon after crystallization (prior to Oxfordian time; X.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 / 38 the Disappearance of a Late Jurassic Remnant Sea in the Southern Qiangtang Block 1 (Najiangco Area): Implications For
    1 The disappearance of a Late Jurassic remnant sea in the southern Qiangtang Block 2 (Najiangco area): implications for the tectonic uplift of central Tibet 3 Anlin Maa, Xiumian Hua,*, Paul Kappb, Zhong Hana, Wen Laia, Marcelle BouDagher-Fadelc 4 a State Key Laboratory of Mineral Deposit Research, School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 5 Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China. 6 b Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA. 7 c Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London WC1H 0BT, UK 8 *Corresponding author: Xiumian Hu ([email protected]) 9 Abstract 10 Located between the Bangong-Nujiang suture zone and the Qiangtang Block in central 11 Tibet, the Najiangco area (~5 km to the north of Nima-Selingco) contains an Upper Jurassic- 12 Lower Cretaceous sedimentary succession deposited during a period of marine regression. The 13 youngest marine sedimentary unit in the Najiangco area is the Upper Jurassic Shamuluo 14 Formation, which consists of sandstone, limestone, siltstone, and shale. Sedimentary facies 15 analysis shows that tidal flat and subtidal lagoonal facies characterized the northern margin of 16 the basin, while delta front and prodelta facies dominated the middle part, and carbonate shoal 17 and patch reef facies prevailed along the southern margin. Provenance analysis, including 18 petrographic modal analysis of sandstones and U-Pb dating of detrital zircons, shows that a 19 recycled orogen in the central Qiangtang to the north of Najiangco area was the source of the 20 sandstones in the Shamuluo Formation. Biostratigraphy and U-Pb zircon dating of a porphyritic 21 granitoid dike (150.8 ± 1.9 Ma) indicate that the Shamuluo Formation was deposited during 22 the Late Jurassic (Oxfordian to Kimmeridgian).
    [Show full text]
  • Jurassic Sedimentation in the South-Central Qiangtang Terrane Reveals Successive Terrane Collisions in Central Tibet
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Jurassic sedimentation in the south-central Qiangtang terrane reveals successive terrane collisions in central Tibet 1, 2 1 3 4 GEOSPHERE, v. 15, no. 2 Lin Li *, Carmala N. Garzione , Majie Fan , Xiaowei Li , and Xiangzhong Li 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019, USA 2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01649.1 3State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China 4Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710075, China 10 figures; 1 set of supplemental files CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] ABSTRACT the Tibetan Plateau, especially of its southern and central parts (England and Searle, 1986; Murphy et al., 1997; Kapp et al., 2005, 2007b). The collision be- CITATION: Li, L., Garzione, C.N., Fan, M.J., Li, X.W., Our limited knowledge of Mesozoic tectonism in the Tibetan Plateau has tween the Lhasa and Qiangtang terranes along the Bangong-Nujiang suture and Li, X.Z., 2019, Jurassic sedimentation in the south-central Qiangtang terrane reveals successive hindered understanding of its geologic evolution. This study uses zircon U-Pb (shortened to Bangong suture hereafter; Fig. 1) is one of the most prominent terrane collisions in central Tibet: Geosphere, v. 15, geochronology to refine regional chronostratigraphy and infer the Jurassic tectonic events that occurred in the Mesozoic history of the Tibetan Plateau no. 2, p. 433–449, https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01649.1.
    [Show full text]