Client Case Partners Date

Norwegian Hull Club BAHR recently represented the Norwegian Hull Club Gjensidige Assuranseforening Tarjei Thorkildsen 07.06.2018 Gjensidige (NHC) in the Court of Appeal in a dispute regarding payment under loss of hire Assuranseforening – The Court of Appeal ruled in favour of NHC. The dispute was whether Suez Fortune Investments (SFI) was entitled to payment under the loss of hire insurance for two different incidents of damage to the Vessel MT Brillante Virtuoso. The disputed amount was approx. USD 7,000,000 in addition to interests on arrears, amounting to approx. USD 12,000,000.

Argentum BAHR successfully assisted Argentum and others to a win in the Supreme Court. Peter Hammerich 07.03.2018 Fondsinvesteringer AS The Supreme Court has this week given their decision in a case regarding tax deduction for management fee paid by private equity funds to its manager/advisor.

Arbeidsgiverforeningen BAHR successfully represented Arbeidsgiverforeningen Spekter in the Labour Court Tarjei Thorkildsen 06.03.2018 Spekter in a dispute against LO regarding whether a requirement of 20% of a full position for membership in a scheme was discriminatory towards part time employees, alternatively a breach of the collective bargaining agreement.

Nordea Norge ASA BAHR successfully represented Nordea in the Court of Appeal against a borrower Arne Tjaum 27.02.2018 who took legal action for alleged negligent consultancy in connection with a loan of Swiss francs. The Court of Appeal concluded that Nordea had given satisfactory information about the risks.

Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA BAHR successfully represented ASA and Norwegian Air Tarjei Thorkildsen 25.01.2018 (NAS) and Norwegian Air in a dispute in the Appeal Court against certain pilots and cabin crew Norway AS (NAN) members claiming to be employed by said parent and operative subsidiary company in the Norwegian group. The main question was whether the business model of the Norwegian group is based on acquisition of services or if it is based on staff hire.

#7665033/2 1 (6)

Client Case Partners Date

Nordic Trustee BAHR represented Nordic Trustee in the Court of Appeal against former directors Atle J. Skaldebø-Rød 18.01.2018 of the board and CEO of Thule Drilling, claiming compensation for loss and damage inflicted on security interests. Karstein J. Espelid

P4 and Bauer BAHR represented P4 and Bauer Media in a preliminary injunction against other Lars G. Norheim January radio channels regarding the continued broadcasting of radio shows over the FM 2018 network past the date for which all commercial FM radio broadcasting was to cease.

Color Line BAHR represents Color Line in a dispute against Nye Kystlink AS regarding a claim Gunnar Sørlie 2018 for compensation based on Color Line’s alleged breach of competition law. The Court of Appeal has submitted a separate question regarding limitation periods to Helge Stemshaug the EFTA Court for a preliminary reference.

Solveig Gas Norway AS BAHR represents three of the investors in Gassled, the infrastructure for Jan B. Jansen 2018 transportation and processing of gas on the Norwegian continental shelf, in the Supreme Court. The dispute is against the Norwegian state regarding the validity Thomas K. Svensen of tariff reductions.

Skuld BAHR currently represents Skuld in an ongoing litigation concerning the statute of Atle J. Skaldebø-Rød 2018 limitation applicable to direct actions against the insurer of an insolvent assured. The direct action claim against Skuld is brought by the charterer of a vessel for losses sustained due to a ship collision in the Far East caused by Skuld’s member (the vessel’s sub-charterer) who was in breach of the charter party’s safe port warranty.

Torghatten Nord AS BAHR represented Torghatten Nord AS in a dispute with Gdansk Shiprepair Yard Gunnar Sørlie 2018 “Remontowa” where an arbitration award was partially set aside as invalid by the District Court. The arbitration award concerned a shipyard’s liability in Geir Gustavson

#7665033/2 2 (6)

Client Case Partners Date

relation to four shipbuilding contracts.

Statoil ASA BAHR represents Statoil in a significant patent dispute against Neodrill regarding Are Stenvik 2018 oil and gas well technology. Gunnar Sørlie

Argentum BAHR successfully represented Argentum and others in the Supreme court in a Peter Hammerich 2018 Fondsinvesteringer as m.fl. case regarding tax deduction for management fee paid by private equity funds to managers/advisors.

Bergen Sentrum BAHR represented Bergen Sentrum Tomteselskap AS against Zachariasbryggen in Sam E. Harris 12.12.2017 Tomteselskap AS the Supreme Court in a case concerning the question of determining remuneration principles in ground lease contracts.

BAHR represented the Aukrust Foundation in the Supreme Court against the Are Stenvik 15.11.2017 Aukruststiftelsen Caprino Filmcenter concerning the rights to the intellectual property of the car “Il Tempo Gigante, on which the movie “Flåklypa Grand Prix” is based upon.

BAHR represented Bogstadveien 27B in the Supreme Court in a case regarding Øystein Myre 14.11.2017 Bogstadveien 27B AS annulment of first refusal in a ground lease contract. Bremseth

Sunrise Medical AS BAHR assisted Sunrise Medical in a preliminary injunction regarding a competitive Beret Sundet 07.07.2017 tender, in which Sunrise Medical was rejected.

P&I-insurer BAHR represented a P&I-insurer in an arbitration against a member claiming cover Atle J. Skaldebø-Rød 28.06.2017 for losses due to “idle fines” issued by a private port operator whilst the member’s vessel was arrested in Nigeria under suspicion of cargo on board being intended for use by a terrorist organisation, as well as costs for alleged sue and labour.

#7665033/2 3 (6)

Client Case Partners Date

Industry Client BAHR defended an industry client in arbitral proceedings against a claim in excess Atle J. Skaldebø-Rød 28.03.2017 of MNOK 100 based on revision of a SPA.

Ole Robert Reitan and BAHR successfully represented the Reitan family in the Supreme Court regarding a Øystein Myre Bremset 23.03.2017 Monica Tønnesen Reitan final settlement-dispute with a contractor, and whether the contractor was entitled to payment in excess of the price estimate.

ENGIE E&P Norge AS BAHR successfully represented ENGIE E&P Norge AS in the Court of Appeal in a Tarjei Thorkildsen 17.03.2017 dispute regarding the legality of an alteration of the employees’ pension scheme from defined benefit scheme to a defined contribution scheme.

Norsk Flygerforbund BAHR successfully represented two third party intervenors in a case regarding Tarjei Thorkildsen 02.02.2017 claim for damages for age discrimination in the Supreme Court.

Norwegian Hull Club - BAHR represents Norwegian Hull Club – Gjensidig Assuranseforening in the Court Tarjei Thorkildsen 05.01.2017 Gjensidig of Appeal against Suez Fortune Investments Ltd, which claimed payment under Assuranseforening the insurance for loss of time.

Norwegian Bank BAHR represented a Norwegian bank in arbitration proceedings regarding whether Atle J. Skaldebø-Rød 2017 a foreign bank was required to repay two subordinated loans granted by the Norwegian bank.

Westcon Yards AS BAHR represented Westcon Yards AS in a final account dispute against Prosafe Jan Einar Barbo 2017 Rigs Pte Ltd after the conversion of Prosafe’s rig “Safe Scandinavia”.

Oil major BAHR acted for an oil major in a dispute concerning the complex area of long- Thomas K. Svensen 2017 term gas sales contracts. The case was settled in December 2017.

Rainpower AS, Rainpower BAHR represented Rainpower in proceedings initiated by Andritz Hydro GmbH, Jon Christian Thaulow 12.12.2016 Norge AS and Rainpower Andritz Hydro As, Andritz AG regarding alleged breaches of the Marketing

#7665033/2 4 (6)

Client Case Partners Date

Technology AS Practices Act and compensation claims relating to Rainpower’s alleged illegal use of Andritz’ knowhow and business secrets. Rainpower was fully acquitted and awarded legal costs.

Evry Norge AS BAHR represented EVRY in the Court of Appeal in a dispute with ASA Atle J. Skaldebø-Rød 28.11.2016 regarding Entra’s obligation to support a Datacentre project in which EVRY was to be the main tenant.

Nordea Bank Finland Plc BAHR represented Nordea Bank Finland Plc in a dispute regarding whether a Arne Tjaum 15.11.2016 forward interest swap-agreement should be set aside/revised due to the bank not fulfilling its duty of information.

Shipowner BAHR represented a shipowner in arbitral proceedings against the Norwegian Was Atle J. Skaldebø-Rød 01.11.2016 Risk Insurance Company. The dispute concerned whether the insured’s loss, which was due to the detention of a vessel in Nigeria, was covered by the War Risk Insurance.

Mongstad Terminal BAHR successfully represented two companies in the Court of Appeal against the Jan B. Jansen 21.10.2016 DA/Statoil Refining tax authorities regarding the tax treatment of two production facilities at Norway AS Mongstad (a petroleum refinery plant). Frode Talmo

Pangea Property Partners BAHR successfully represented Pangea Property Partners AS in the Supreme Court Are Stenvik 27.09.2016 AS in a case regarding whether the company name violated a previous registered company name.

Building Owner BAHR represented a Norwegian builder in a eight weeks arbitration against a Øystein Myre Bremset 07.07.2016 foreign contractor in a final settlement-dispute. Jan Einar Barbo

#7665033/2 5 (6)

Client Case Partners Date

Genentech BAHR represented Genentech Inc. in an important patent dispute regarding the Are Stenvik validity of a patent application regarding a combined treatment regime for breast cancer.

Gilead BAHR represents Gilead in its claim for the revocation of a patent held by Idenix. Are Stenvik Both parties have applied for patents related to pharmaceuticals to treat the Hepatitis C virus, and have patents on compounds for its treatment.

Biogen, INC. BAHR acted for Biogen in an invalidity case concerning a therapeutic regimen for Are Stenvik the biological drug rituximab. The patent was challenged by two producers of biosimilars, Celltrion and Sandoz.

Jessheim BAHR represented two private land owners in a Supreme Court case against the Sam E. Harris Byutvikling/Veikdekke Government, in order to decide the correct legal interpretation of a provision in Industri AS the Norwegian Zoning and Building Act regarding the appreciation of property value as a result of publicly funded infrastructure works.

#7665033/2 6 (6)