Single Cell Transcriptomics Identifies a Signaling Network Coordinating

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Single Cell Transcriptomics Identifies a Signaling Network Coordinating ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17968-x OPEN Single cell transcriptomics identifies a signaling network coordinating endoderm and mesoderm diversification during foregut organogenesis Lu Han 1,6, Praneet Chaturvedi1,6, Keishi Kishimoto1,2,3,6, Hiroyuki Koike 4,6, Talia Nasr1, Kentaro Iwasawa4, Kirsten Giesbrecht4, Phillip C. Witcher1, Alexandra Eicher1, Lauren Haines1, Yarim Lee1, John M. Shannon5, ✉ Mitsuru Morimoto 2,3, James M. Wells 1, Takanori Takebe 4 & Aaron M. Zorn 1,3 1234567890():,; Visceral organs, such as the lungs, stomach and liver, are derived from the fetal foregut through a series of inductive interactions between the definitive endoderm (DE) and the surrounding splanchnic mesoderm (SM). While DE patterning is fairly well studied, the paracrine signaling controlling SM regionalization and how this is coordinated with epithelial identity is obscure. Here, we use single cell transcriptomics to generate a high-resolution cell state map of the embryonic mouse foregut. This identifies a diversity of SM cell types that develop in close register with the organ-specific epithelium. We infer a spatiotemporal sig- naling network of endoderm-mesoderm interactions that orchestrate foregut organogenesis. We validate key predictions with mouse genetics, showing the importance of endoderm- derived signals in mesoderm patterning. Finally, leveraging these signaling interactions, we generate different SM subtypes from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), which previously have been elusive. The single cell data can be explored at: https://research.cchmc.org/ ZornLab-singlecell. 1 Center for Stem Cell and Organoid Medicine (CuSTOM), Perinatal Institute, Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA. 2 Laboratory for Lung Development, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research (BDR), Kobe 650-0047, Japan. 3 CuSTOM-RIKEN BDR Collaborative Laboratory, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 4 CuSTOM, Division of Gastroenterology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA. 5 Division of Pulmonary Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, ✉ Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA. 6These authors contributed equally: Lu Han, Praneet Chaturvedi, Keishi Kishimoto, Hiroyuki Koike. email: Aaron.zorn@cchmc. org NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2020) 11:4158 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17968-x | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17968-x n early fetal development, between embryonic day (E) 8.5 and roadmap of the reciprocal endoderm–mesoderm inductive E9.5 in mouse, equivalent to 17–23 days of human gestation, a interactions that coordinate organogenesis. We validate key pre- I fi series of inductive tissue interactions between the de nitive dictions with mouse genetics showing that differential hedgehog endoderm (DE) and the surrounding splanchnic mesoderm (SM) signaling from the epithelium patterns the SM into gut tube progressively patterns the naive foregut tube into different pro- mesenchyme versus mesenchyme of the liver. Leveraging the genitor domains. These domains further develop into distinct signaling roadmap, we generate different subtypes of human SM visceral organs including the trachea, lung, esophagus, stomach, from hPSCs, which previously have been elusive. liver, pancreas, and proximal small intestine1,2. The DE gives rise to the epithelial lining and parenchyma of the respiratory and digestive organs, while the SM gives rise to the mesenchymal Results tissues such as smooth muscle, fibroblasts, and mesentery sur- Single-cell transcriptomes define diversity in the foregut.To rounding the visceral organs1,2. This foregut patterning defines comprehensively define lineage diversification during foregut the landscape of the thoracic and abdominal cavities, setting the organogenesis, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing relative position of different organs. Disruptions in this process (scRNA-seq) of the mouse embryonic foregut at three time points can lead to life threatening congenital birth defects. that span the period of early patterning and lineage induction: A critical inductive role for the mesenchyme in gut tube E8.5 (5–10 somites; s), E9.0 (12–15 s), and E9.5 (25–30 s) (Fig. 1a, organogenesis was first established in the 1960s, when it was b). We microdissected the foregut between the posterior pharynx shown that SM transplanted from different anterior–posterior (A- and the midgut, pooling tissue from 15 to 20 embryos for each P) regions of the embryo could instruct the adjacent epithelium to time point. At E9.5, we isolated anterior and posterior regions adopt the organ identity consistent with the original SM position3. separately, containing lung/esophagus and liver/pancreas pri- Since that time we have learned much about the mesoderm- mordia, respectively. A total of 31,268 single-cell transcriptomes derived paracrine signals in endoderm organogenesis1,2. However, passed quality control measures with an average read depth of most studies to date have focused on individual organ lineages or 3178 transcripts/cell. Cells were clustered based on the expression individual signaling pathways, and thus we still lack a compre- of highly variable genes across the population and visualized hensive understanding of the temporally dynamic combinatorial using uniform manifold approximation projection (UMAP) and signaling in the foregut microenvironment that orchestrates t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (tSNE) (Fig. 1c; organogenesis. Moreover, several fundamental questions about the Supplementary Fig. 1). This identified 24 cell clusters that could mesoderm have remained unanswered over the decades. How be grouped into nine major cell lineages based on well-known many types of SM are there, and does each fetal organ primordia marker genes: DE, SM, cardiac, other mesoderm (somatic and have its own specific mesenchyme? How are the SM and DE paraxial), endothelium, blood, ectoderm, neural, and extra- lineages coordinated during organogenesis? What role if any does embryonic (Supplementary Fig. 1). DE clusters (4448 cells) were the endoderm have in regionalization of the mesoderm? characterized by co-expression of Foxa1/2, Cdh1, and/or Epcam, Initial specification and patterning of the embryonic mesoderm whereas SM (10,097 cells) was defined by co-expression of Foxf1 and endoderm occurs during gastrulation, from E6.25 to E8.0 in (Fig. 1d), Vim, and/or Pdgfra as well as low or absent expression the mouse, as these germ layers progressively emerge from the of cardiac and other mesoderm specific transcripts. primitive streak. The lateral plate mesoderm emerges from the Focusing on lineage diversification in the DE and SM, we streak after the extra-embryonic mesoderm, and is followed by selected these cells in silico for further analysis. We defined 11 the intermediate, paraxial, and axial mesoderm4,5. Concomitantly major DE clusters consisting of 26 stage-specific sub-clusters DE cells also delaminate from the streak and migrate along the (E9.5, 12 clusters; E9.0, 8 clusters; E8.5, 6 clusters) and 13 major outer surface of the mesoderm eventually intercalating into the SM groups comprised of 36 stage-specific sub-clusters (E9.5, 17 overlaying visceral endoderm. By E8.0, morphogenetic processes clusters; E9.0, 12 clusters; E8.5, 7 clusters) (Fig. 1e, f, begin to transform the bi-layered sheet of endoderm and meso- Supplementary Figs. 2, 3, Supplementary Data 1). We annotated derm into a tube structure as the anterior DE folds over to form clusters by comparing their distinguishing genes with published the foregut diverticulum and the adjacent lateral plate mesoderm expression patterns of over 160 genes in the Mouse Genome containing cardiac progenitors migrates towards the ventral Informatics (MGI) database20. These data provide a comprehen- midline6. The lateral plate mesoderm further splits into an outer sive single-cell resolution view of early foregut organogenesis and somatic mesoderm layer next to the ectoderm which gives rise to can be explored at URL https://research.cchmc.org/ZornLab- the limbs and body wall, and an inner splanchnic mesoderm singlecell. layer, which surrounds the epithelial gut tube7,8. The first mole- Our annotations identified all the major DE organ lineages cular indication of regional identity in the SM is the differential at E9.5 including: Tbx1+ pharynx, two Nkx2-1/Foxa2+ respira- expression of Hox genes along the A-P axis of the embryo9. tory clusters (trachea and lung), two Sox2+ esophagus clusters However, in contrast to heart development, where cell diversifi- (one of which is likely dorsal based on Mnx1 expression), two cation has been well studied10–12, the molecular mechanism Sox2/Osr1+ stomach clusters, two Alb/Prox1/Afp+ hepatic governing the foregut SM regionalization are obscure, particularly clusters (c1_hepatoblasts and c10_ early hepatocytes with higher during the critical 24 h when the foregut DE subdivides into Alb/HNF4a expression), Sox17/Pdx1+ ventral hepatopancreatic distinct organ primordia. duct, Mnx1/Pdx1+ dorsal pancreas, and Cdx2+ duodenum Recently, single-cell transcriptomics have begun to examine (Fig. 1e). Consistent with our dissections we did not detect any organogenesis at an unprecedented resolution13–16, however,
Recommended publications
  • 3 Embryology and Development
    BIOL 6505 − INTRODUCTION TO FETAL MEDICINE 3. EMBRYOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT Arlet G. Kurkchubasche, M.D. INTRODUCTION Embryology – the field of study that pertains to the developing organism/human Basic embryology –usually taught in the chronologic sequence of events. These events are the basis for understanding the congenital anomalies that we encounter in the fetus, and help explain the relationships to other organ system concerns. Below is a synopsis of some of the critical steps in embryogenesis from the anatomic rather than molecular basis. These concepts will be more intuitive and evident in conjunction with diagrams and animated sequences. This text is a synopsis of material provided in Langman’s Medical Embryology, 9th ed. First week – ovulation to fertilization to implantation Fertilization restores 1) the diploid number of chromosomes, 2) determines the chromosomal sex and 3) initiates cleavage. Cleavage of the fertilized ovum results in mitotic divisions generating blastomeres that form a 16-cell morula. The dense morula develops a central cavity and now forms the blastocyst, which restructures into 2 components. The inner cell mass forms the embryoblast and outer cell mass the trophoblast. Consequences for fetal management: Variances in cleavage, i.e. splitting of the zygote at various stages/locations - leads to monozygotic twinning with various relationships of the fetal membranes. Cleavage at later weeks will lead to conjoined twinning. Second week: the week of twos – marked by bilaminar germ disc formation. Commences with blastocyst partially embedded in endometrial stroma Trophoblast forms – 1) cytotrophoblast – mitotic cells that coalesce to form 2) syncytiotrophoblast – erodes into maternal tissues, forms lacunae which are critical to development of the uteroplacental circulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Te2, Part Iii
    TERMINOLOGIA EMBRYOLOGICA Second Edition International Embryological Terminology FIPAT The Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology A programme of the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA) TE2, PART III Contents Caput V: Organogenesis Chapter 5: Organogenesis (continued) Systema respiratorium Respiratory system Systema urinarium Urinary system Systemata genitalia Genital systems Coeloma Coelom Glandulae endocrinae Endocrine glands Systema cardiovasculare Cardiovascular system Systema lymphoideum Lymphoid system Bibliographic Reference Citation: FIPAT. Terminologia Embryologica. 2nd ed. FIPAT.library.dal.ca. Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology, February 2017 Published pending approval by the General Assembly at the next Congress of IFAA (2019) Creative Commons License: The publication of Terminologia Embryologica is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) license The individual terms in this terminology are within the public domain. Statements about terms being part of this international standard terminology should use the above bibliographic reference to cite this terminology. The unaltered PDF files of this terminology may be freely copied and distributed by users. IFAA member societies are authorized to publish translations of this terminology. Authors of other works that might be considered derivative should write to the Chair of FIPAT for permission to publish a derivative work. Caput V: ORGANOGENESIS Chapter 5: ORGANOGENESIS
    [Show full text]
  • Table S1. List of Proteins in the BAHD1 Interactome
    Table S1. List of proteins in the BAHD1 interactome BAHD1 nuclear partners found in this work yeast two-hybrid screen Name Description Function Reference (a) Chromatin adapters HP1α (CBX5) chromobox homolog 5 (HP1 alpha) Binds histone H3 methylated on lysine 9 and chromatin-associated proteins (20-23) HP1β (CBX1) chromobox homolog 1 (HP1 beta) Binds histone H3 methylated on lysine 9 and chromatin-associated proteins HP1γ (CBX3) chromobox homolog 3 (HP1 gamma) Binds histone H3 methylated on lysine 9 and chromatin-associated proteins MBD1 methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1 Binds methylated CpG dinucleotide and chromatin-associated proteins (22, 24-26) Chromatin modification enzymes CHD1 chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 1 ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling activity (27-28) HDAC5 histone deacetylase 5 Histone deacetylase activity (23,29,30) SETDB1 (ESET;KMT1E) SET domain, bifurcated 1 Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase activity (31-34) Transcription factors GTF3C2 general transcription factor IIIC, polypeptide 2, beta 110kDa Required for RNA polymerase III-mediated transcription HEYL (Hey3) hairy/enhancer-of-split related with YRPW motif-like DNA-binding transcription factor with basic helix-loop-helix domain (35) KLF10 (TIEG1) Kruppel-like factor 10 DNA-binding transcription factor with C2H2 zinc finger domain (36) NR2F1 (COUP-TFI) nuclear receptor subfamily 2, group F, member 1 DNA-binding transcription factor with C4 type zinc finger domain (ligand-regulated) (36) PEG3 paternally expressed 3 DNA-binding transcription factor with
    [Show full text]
  • Defects of Embryonic Organogenesis Resulting from Targeted Disruption of the N-Myc Gene in the Mouse
    Development 117, 1445-1455 (1993) 1445 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1993 Defects of embryonic organogenesis resulting from targeted disruption of the N-myc gene in the mouse Shoji Sawai1, Akihiko Shimono1, Yoshio Wakamatsu1, Cynthia Palmes1, Kazunori Hanaoka2 and Hisato Kondoh1,* 1Department of Molecular Biology, School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-01, Japan 2Division of Animal Models for Human Disease, National Institute of Neuroscience, NCNP, Ogawahigashi, Kodaira, Tokyo 187, Japan *Author for correspondence SUMMARY The highest expression of the N-myc gene occurs during death of the embryos. Analyses indicated that the embryonic organogenesis in the mouse ontogeny, with mutant limbs failed to develop distal structures and the the peak of expression around embryonic day 9.5. development of bronchi from the trachea was defective Homozygous N-myc-deficient mice, produced by germ- in the lungs. The latter defect was largely corrected by line transmission of a disrupted allele in ES cells, devel- addition of fetal calf serum to the culture medium, sug- oped normally to day 10.5, indicating dispensability of gesting that an activity missing in the mutant lung was N-myc expression in the earlier period, but later accu- replenished by a component of the serum. The pheno- mulated organogenic abnormalities and died around type of N-myc-deficient mutant embryos indicated day 11.5. The most notable abnormalities were found in requirement of the N-myc function in many instances of the limb bud, visceral organs (lung, stomach, liver and tissue interactions in organogenesis and also in cell- heart) and the central/peripheral nervous systems, and autonomous regulation of tissue maturation.
    [Show full text]
  • Pluripotency Factors Regulate Definitive Endoderm Specification Through Eomesodermin
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 23, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Pluripotency factors regulate definitive endoderm specification through eomesodermin Adrian Kee Keong Teo,1,2 Sebastian J. Arnold,3 Matthew W.B. Trotter,1 Stephanie Brown,1 Lay Teng Ang,1 Zhenzhi Chng,1,2 Elizabeth J. Robertson,4 N. Ray Dunn,2,5 and Ludovic Vallier1,5,6 1Laboratory for Regenerative Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SZ, United Kingdom; 2Institute of Medical Biology, A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology, and Research), Singapore 138648; 3Renal Department, Centre for Clinical Research, University Medical Centre, 79106 Freiburg, Germany; 4Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom Understanding the molecular mechanisms controlling early cell fate decisions in mammals is a major objective toward the development of robust methods for the differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into clinically relevant cell types. Here, we used human embryonic stem cells and mouse epiblast stem cells to study specification of definitive endoderm in vitro. Using a combination of whole-genome expression and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) analyses, we established an hierarchy of transcription factors regulating endoderm specification. Importantly, the pluripotency factors NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2 have an essential function in this network by actively directing differentiation. Indeed, these transcription factors control the expression of EOMESODERMIN (EOMES), which marks the onset of endoderm specification. In turn, EOMES interacts with SMAD2/3 to initiate the transcriptional network governing endoderm formation. Together, these results provide for the first time a comprehensive molecular model connecting the transition from pluripotency to endoderm specification during mammalian development.
    [Show full text]
  • Watsonjn2018.Pdf (1.780Mb)
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA Edmond, Oklahoma Department of Biology Investigating Differential Gene Expression in vivo of Cardiac Birth Defects in an Avian Model of Maternal Phenylketonuria A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BIOLOGY By Jamie N. Watson Edmond, OK June 5, 2018 J. Watson/Dr. Nikki Seagraves ii J. Watson/Dr. Nikki Seagraves Acknowledgements It is difficult to articulate the amount of gratitude I have for the support and encouragement I have received throughout my master’s thesis. Many people have added value and support to my life during this time. I am thankful for the education, experience, and friendships I have gained at the University of Central Oklahoma. First, I would like to thank Dr. Nikki Seagraves for her mentorship and friendship. I lucked out when I met her. I have enjoyed working on this project and I am very thankful for her support. I would like thank Thomas Crane for his support and patience throughout my master’s degree. I would like to thank Dr. Shannon Conley for her continued mentorship and support. I would like to thank Liz Bullen and Dr. Eric Howard for their training and help on this project. I would like to thank Kristy Meyer for her friendship and help throughout graduate school. I would like to thank my committee members Dr. Robert Brennan and Dr. Lilian Chooback for their advisement on this project. Also, I would like to thank the biology faculty and staff. I would like to thank the Seagraves lab members: Jailene Canales, Kayley Pate, Mckayla Muse, Grace Thetford, Kody Harvey, Jordan Guffey, and Kayle Patatanian for their hard work and support.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-6 Weeks Old Female C57BL/6 Mice Obtained from Jackson Labs Were Used for Cell Isolation
    Methods Mice: 4-6 weeks old female C57BL/6 mice obtained from Jackson labs were used for cell isolation. Female Foxp3-IRES-GFP reporter mice (1), backcrossed to B6/C57 background for 10 generations, were used for the isolation of naïve CD4 and naïve CD8 cells for the RNAseq experiments. The mice were housed in pathogen-free animal facility in the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology and were used according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and use Committee. Preparation of cells: Subsets of thymocytes were isolated by cell sorting as previously described (2), after cell surface staining using CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD3ε (145- 2C11), CD24 (M1/69) (all from Biolegend). DP cells: CD4+CD8 int/hi; CD4 SP cells: CD4CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo; CD8 SP cells: CD8 int/hi CD4 CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo (Fig S2). Peripheral subsets were isolated after pooling spleen and lymph nodes. T cells were enriched by negative isolation using Dynabeads (Dynabeads untouched mouse T cells, 11413D, Invitrogen). After surface staining for CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD62L (MEL-14), CD25 (PC61) and CD44 (IM7), naïve CD4+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo and naïve CD8+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo were obtained by sorting (BD FACS Aria). Additionally, for the RNAseq experiments, CD4 and CD8 naïve cells were isolated by sorting T cells from the Foxp3- IRES-GFP mice: CD4+CD62LhiCD25–CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– and CD8+CD62LhiCD25– CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– (antibodies were from Biolegend). In some cases, naïve CD4 cells were cultured in vitro under Th1 or Th2 polarizing conditions (3, 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Embryology BOLK’S COMPANIONS FOR‑THE STUDY of MEDICINE
    Embryology BOLK’S COMPANIONS FOR‑THE STUDY OF MEDICINE EMBRYOLOGY Early development from a phenomenological point of view Guus van der Bie MD We would be interested to hear your opinion about this publication. You can let us know at http:// www.kingfishergroup.nl/ questionnaire/ About the Louis Bolk Institute The Louis Bolk Institute has conducted scientific research to further the development of organic and sustainable agriculture, nutrition, and health care since 1976. Its basic tenet is that nature is the source of knowledge about life. The Institute plays a pioneering role in its field through national and international collaboration by using experiential knowledge and by considering data as part of a greater whole. Through its groundbreaking research, the Institute seeks to contribute to a healthy future for people, animals, and the environment. For the Companions the Institute works together with the Kingfisher Foundation. Publication number: GVO 01 ISBN 90-74021-29-8 Price 10 € (excl. postage) KvK 41197208 Triodos Bank 212185764 IBAN: NL77 TRIO 0212185764 BIC code/Swift code: TRIONL 2U For credit card payment visit our website at www.louisbolk.nl/companions For further information: Louis Bolk Institute Hoofdstraat 24 NL 3972 LA Driebergen, Netherlands Tel: (++31) (0) 343 - 523860 Fax: (++31) (0) 343 - 515611 www.louisbolk.nl [email protected] Colofon: © Guus van der Bie MD, 2001, reprint 2011 Translation: Christa van Tellingen and Sherry Wildfeuer Design: Fingerprint.nl Cover painting: Leonardo da Vinci BOLK FOR THE STUDY OF MEDICINE Embryology ’S COMPANIONS Early Development from a Phenomenological Point of view Guus van der Bie MD About the author Guus van der Bie MD (1945) worked from 1967 to Education, a project of the Louis Bolk Instituut to 1976 as a lecturer at the Department of Medical produce a complement to the current biomedical Anatomy and Embryology at Utrecht State scientific approach of the human being.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis of KRAS Mutant Cell Lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of KRAS mutant cell lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K. Durand2,5, Kirsten L. Bryant2, Tikvah K. Hayes2, Sen Peng3, Nhan L. Tran4, Gerald C. Gooden1, David N. Buckley1, Channing J. Der2, Albert S. Baldwin2 ✉ & Bodour Salhia1 ✉ Oncogenic RAS mutations are associated with DNA methylation changes that alter gene expression to drive cancer. Recent studies suggest that DNA methylation changes may be stochastic in nature, while other groups propose distinct signaling pathways responsible for aberrant methylation. Better understanding of DNA methylation events associated with oncogenic KRAS expression could enhance therapeutic approaches. Here we analyzed the basal CpG methylation of 11 KRAS-mutant and dependent pancreatic cancer cell lines and observed strikingly similar methylation patterns. KRAS knockdown resulted in unique methylation changes with limited overlap between each cell line. In KRAS-mutant Pa16C pancreatic cancer cells, while KRAS knockdown resulted in over 8,000 diferentially methylated (DM) CpGs, treatment with the ERK1/2-selective inhibitor SCH772984 showed less than 40 DM CpGs, suggesting that ERK is not a broadly active driver of KRAS-associated DNA methylation. KRAS G12V overexpression in an isogenic lung model reveals >50,600 DM CpGs compared to non-transformed controls. In lung and pancreatic cells, gene ontology analyses of DM promoters show an enrichment for genes involved in diferentiation and development. Taken all together, KRAS-mediated DNA methylation are stochastic and independent of canonical downstream efector signaling. These epigenetically altered genes associated with KRAS expression could represent potential therapeutic targets in KRAS-driven cancer. Activating KRAS mutations can be found in nearly 25 percent of all cancers1.
    [Show full text]
  • Segmentation and Specification of the Drosophila Mesoderm
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Segmentation and specification of the Drosophila mesoderm Natalia Azpiazu, 1,3 Peter A. Lawrence, 2 Jean-Paul Vincent, 2 and Manfred Frasch 1'4 1Brookdale Center for Molecular Biology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029 USA; 2Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK Patterning of the developing mesoderm establishes primordia of the visceral, somatic, and cardiac tissues at defined anteroposterior and dorsoventral positions in each segment. Here we examine the mechanisms that locate and determine these primordia. We focus on the regulation of two mesodermal genes: bagpipe (hap), which defines the anlagen of the visceral musculature of the midgut, and serpent (srp), which marks the anlagen of the fat body. These two genes are activated in specific groups of mesodermal cells in the anterior portions of each parasegment. Other genes mark the anlagen of the cardiac and somatic mesoderm and these are expressed mainly in cells derived from posterior portions of each parasegment. Thus the parasegments appear to be subdivided, at least with respect to these genes, a subdivision that depends on pair-rule genes such as even-skipped (eve). We show with genetic mosaics that eve acts autonomously within the mesoderm. We also show that hedgehog (hh) and wingless (wg) mediate pair-rule gene functions in the mesoderm, probably partly by acting within the mesoderm and partly by inductive signaling from the ectoderm, hh is required for the normal activation of hap and srp in anterior portions of each parasegment, whereas wg is required to suppress bap and srp expression in posterior portions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesoderm Induction and the Control of Gastrulation in Xenopus Laevis:The
    Development 108, 229-238 (1990) 229 Printed in Great Britain ©The Company of Biologists Limited 1990 Mesoderm induction and the control of gastrulation in Xenopus laevis: the roles of fibronectin and integrins J. C. SMITH1, K. SYMESH, R. O. HYNES2'3 and D. DeSIMONE3* ' Laboratory of Embryogenesis, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW71AA, UK ^Howard Hughes Medical Institute and ^Center for Cancer Research, Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA * Present address: University of Virginia, Health Sciences Center, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Box 439, School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA t Present address: Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, 385 LSA, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Summary Exposure of isolated Xenopus animal pole ectoderm to diated cell migration is not required for convergent the XTC mesoderm-inducing factor (XTC-MIF) causes extension. the tissue to undergo gastrulation-like movements. In We have investigated the molecular basis of XTC- this paper, we take advantage of this observation to MIF-induced gastrulation-like movements by measuring investigate the control of various aspects of gastrulation rates of synthesis of fibronectin and of the integrin f}y in Xenopus. chain in induced and control explants. No significant Blastomcres derived from induced animal pole regions differences were observed, and this suggests that gastru- are able, like marginal zone cells, but unlike control lation is not initiated simply by control of synthesis of animal pole blastomeres, to spread and migrate on a these molecules. In future work, we intend to investigate fibronectin-coated surface.
    [Show full text]