Agenda 02022016

BAKER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSION AGENDA February 2, 2016

5:00 P.M. REGULAR AGENDA

I. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance

II. Approval of Agenda

III. Approval of Consent Agenda Items 1. Approval of Minutes January 19, 2016 – Regular Meeting 2. Expense Report 3. Ag Center Fee Waiver Request

IV. Public Comments

V. Constitutional Officers

VI. Committee Reports

VII. New Business 1. Lindsay Haga, SHIP Certification FY11/12 & FY 12/13 Action Item 2. Peacock Painting – Change Order #1 – Historic Jail Renovation Action Item 3. David Richardson – EMS Matching Grant Application Action Item 4. Proclamation – “Through with Chew Week” Action Item 5. Budget Amendments Action Item 6. Robert Fletcher- TRIP Candidate Projects for FY 20/20 Action Item 7. Robert Fletcher- Request to Advertise CR 125 Resurfacing (LAP) Action Item 8. Resolution 2016-01 – CR 229 Resurfacing (SCRAP) Action Item 9. Resolution 2016-02 – Local Mitigation Strategy Plan Action Item 10. River Region – Request for HVAC upgrades Action Item 11. County Website Information Only 12. SMRMC Appointment Action Item

VIII. Old Business 1. Financial Report Information Only 2. Pending Business Information Only 3. BCDC Bond Review Information Only 4. County Manager Vacancy- Requirements/Advertisement Action Item

IX. County Manager 1. Personnel Matters- Maintenance Department Re-Organization Action Item 2. Administrative Policy 2016-01 – “Building Key Policy” Action Item

X. County Attorney

XI. Commissioner Comments

XII. Adjourn

SEE PAGE 2 FOR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

If any member of the public desires to appeal a decision made at these hearings, he or she will need a record of the proceedings and for that purpose he or she may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is transcribed, which record would include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. In accordance with the American with Disabilities Act, persons needing a special accommodation of an interpreter to participate in these proceedings should contact the County Commissioners Office at (904) 259-3613, at least 48 hours prior to the time of the hearing. BAKER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSION AGENDA February 2, 2016

6:00 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING

1. Ordinance 2016-01: Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment – (Applicant: Greg Boree) 2. Ordinance 2016-02: Boree Zoning Change

MINUTES January 19, 2016

The Baker County Board of Commissioners met in a scheduled meeting with the following members present:

Chairman, James G. Bennett Commissioner Mark Hartley Commissioner James Croft Commissioner Gordon Crews Commissioner Jimmy Anderson

Also Present: County Attorney, Rich Komando Clerk, Stacie D. Harvey Interim County Manager, Dale Williams

Note: These meeting minutes are a summarized version of the actual discussions at the meeting. These are not verbatim transcripts. For a complete audio recording of the discussion please visit www.bakercountyfl.org/board or contact Sara Little at [email protected]

REGULAR MEETING

Chairman Bennett called the meeting to order and welcomed everyone in attendance. Commissioner Mark Hartley led in the pledge and prayer.

Chairman Bennett called for approval of the agenda.

Commissioner Gordon Crews moved to approve the agenda. Commissioner Jimmy Anderson seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimous.

Chairman Bennett called for an approval of the consent agenda.

Commissioner Mark Hartley moved to approve the consent agenda items which were:

1. Approval of Minutes- January 5, 2016 – Regular Meeting 2. Expense Report

Commissioner Jimmy Anderson seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimous.

James Croft informed the Board of two vacancies on the St. Mary’s River Management Committee. The volunteers needed would be someone who owns property along the river, or one of its tributaries, as well as an at-large member. Chairman Bennett requested this item be added to the agenda for February 2, 2016.

Cheryl Rewis presented the inmate housing invoice from BCDC for the months of October, November and December 2015. Chairman Bennett expressed his concern over the increase in local inmates housed. Discussions were held regarding the amount of funds budgeted for inmate housing and the increase numbers in inmate population. Commissioner Gordon Crews moved to approve the payment of the BCDC invoice to include prepayment amount of $867,343.75 and the additional amount of $211,975 for Page 2 MINUTES- Regular Meeting January 19, 2016

additional inmate population beyond the estimated 125. Commissioner Jimmy Anderson seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimous.

Dale Williams presented a fiscal and programmatic study proposal for discussion. Mr. Williams stated that the scope was very straight forward and felt the Board would benefit from the study. The study would entail a detailed review of all county revenue and expenditures, could be done in phases and was estimated to cost $65,000. Mr. Williams stated that since he is donating his services as interim county manager, the budgeted salary for County Manager was not being used. Mr. Williams suggested that those funds could be transferred to professional services to fund the study. Commissioner Jimmy Anderson moved to approve the request. Commissioner Gordon Crews seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimous.

Robert Fletcher presented the results for RFQ 2015-02- CR125N Engineering. Mr. Fletcher stated the firms were ranked and staff recommended awarding the contract to North Florida Professional Services which ranked the highest. Commissioner Gordon Crews moved to approve the recommendation. Commissioner James Croft seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimous.

Sara Little presented the bid results for three SHIP projects as follows:

William Lewis- New Construction Demo/new construction: Southeast Windows & Trim in the amount of $51,000 Well/Septic: Dwight Jones in the amount of $10,962 Total: $61,962

Commissioner Mark Hartley moved to approve the bid. Commissioner Jimmy Anderson seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimous.

Frank & Barbara Cox- New Construction Demo/new construction: Southeast Windows & Trim in the amount of $51,000 Well/Septic: Superior Septic in the amount of $9,775 Total: $60,775

Commissioner Jimmy Anderson moved to approve the bid. Commissioner Mark Hartley seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimous.

Tommy & Darlene Johnson- New Construction Demo/new construction: Southeast Windows & Trim in the amount of $51,000 Well/Septic: Superior Septic in the amount of $8,710 Total: 59,710.

Commissioner James Croft moved to approve the bid. Commissioner Mark Hartley seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimous.

Sara Little presented an EMS matching grant application. Mrs. Little stated the grant required a match of $46,750.00 which could be budgeted for FY16/17. The grant would be used to purchase two ambulances. Commissioners questioned whether those units could be used, the type of units that were planned to be purchased and if the grant included the complete setup of the vehicle. Mrs. Little stated that Emergency Page 3 MINUTES- Regular Meeting January 19, 2016

Services Director, David Richardson could answer those questions at a later date. Commissioner Jimmy Anderson moved to approve the Chairman to authorize the grant application should the deadline be missed if delayed until February 2, 2016. If not, the item should appear before the Board on February 2nd for more discussion with Mr. Richardson present. Commissioner Gordon Crews seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimous.

Chairman Bennett notified the Board that he signed a FDLE grant application for the Sheriff’s office last week. The grant did not require any matching funds and would be used to purchase undercover and surveillance equipment for the Sheriff’s Office if awarded.

Chairman Bennett stated that the budget amendments will be held on February 2, 2016. Staff was working to ensure that all grant items would be included in the amendment. Chairman Bennett stated that he had been in contact with FDOT and would work with staff to verify all grant funds were included in the budget amendment.

Cheryl Rewis stated that there were no changes to the financial report at this time. All projects were in budget.

Dale Williams presented the pending business report. Mr. Williams stated that the only updates at this time were regarding the Shoals Timber Management plan. Staff has reached out to the State and will have more information available in the near future. Mr. Williams stated that he would begin to work on the purchasing policy and bring a draft to the Board as soon as possible.

Rich Komando stated that a meeting with the bond underwriter for BCDC would be held on Friday January 22nd and would report back at the next meeting with an update.

Chairman Bennett apologized for missing the county manager candidate interviews but had listened to the audio online. After a lengthy discussion the Board requested that Dale Williams review and revise the requirements for the County Manager position to open the requirements up a little and allow more applicants to respond. Chairman Bennett requested the item be added to the next agenda for further discussion.

Meeting adjourned.

______Stacie D. Harvey, Clerk James G. Bennett, Chairman

SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 001 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 76599 V 12/22/15 252 CONSOLIDATED DESIGN 33 55210 LIGHTS FOR BALLFIEL 0.00 −862.20 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 KNABB SPORT CMPLX 0.00 90.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 MARGARETTA PARK 0.00 45.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 VETERANS PK/ST MARY 0.00 100.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 JONESVILLE PARK−NOV 0.00 45.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 VOLLEYBALL COURTS 0.00 90.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 BOY SCOUT LANDING 0.00 90.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 TAYLOR PARK 0.00 45.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 505.00 104000 76667 01/07/16 12 AFLAC 001 218100 AFLAC ANNL DEDUCT 0.00 72.00 104000 76668 01/07/16 1446 ALICIA R LAMBORN 29 54000 A LAMBORN TRAVEL EX 0.00 100.00 104000 76669 01/07/16 43 B GORDON CREWS 11 54910 G CREWS PHONE EXP 0.00 50.00 104000 76669 01/07/16 43 B GORDON CREWS 11 54000 G CREWS TRAVEL EXP 0.00 100.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 150.00 104000 76670 01/07/16 282 FAE4HA TREASURER 29 55400 S BENNETT ANNL MEMB 0.00 145.00 104000 76672 01/07/16 1896 MICHAEL A DAVIS 29 54000 M DAVIS TRAVEL EXP 0.00 200.00 104000 76673 01/07/16 323 NITA D CRAWFORD 19 59180 JAN DRAW 0.00 31,092.82 104000 76674 01/07/16 2137 SHAINA L SPANN 29 54000 S BENNETT TRAVEL 0.00 100.00 104000 76675 01/07/16 279 STACIE D. HARVEY, C 12 59180 JAN DRAW 0.00 8,042.25 104000 76676 01/07/16 408 TIM SWEAT, PROPERTY 14 59180 JAN−MAR DRAW 0.00 149,957.37 104000 76677 01/08/16 533 HIGGINBOTHAM BROTHE 25 53100 JAN INSPECT SERV. 0.00 7,451.67 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 33 54300 RIDING ARENA LIGHTS 0.00 41.44 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 33 54300 RECREATION DEPT −OR 0.00 34.83 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 34 54300 NEW BLDG./ANIMAL CT 0.00 75.53 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 34 54300 DOG POUND 14564 SCR 0.00 129.68 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 27 54301 RESCUE TOWER −OREMC 0.00 59.42 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 33 54300 ARENA CONCESSION ST 0.00 16.44 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 39 54301 ODIS YARB RD/SHOALS 0.00 23.08 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 39 54301 SHOALS PK BATHRMS # 0.00 60.34 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 39 54301 SHOALS PARK BATHRMS 0.00 23.02 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 463.78 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 JONESVILLE PARK 0.00 45.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 VOLLEYBALL COURTS 0.00 90.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 TAYLOR PARK 0.00 45.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 BOY SCOUT LANDING 0.00 90.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 OLUSTEE PARK 0.00 45.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 KNABB SPORT CMPLX 0.00 90.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 MARGARETTA PARK 0.00 45.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 33 54400 ST MARY RIVER/VETER 0.00 100.00 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 001 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 0.00 550.00 104000 76682 01/11/16 109 CITY OF MACCLENNY 33 54300 490 NORTH BLVD W 0.00 147.56 104000 76682 01/11/16 109 CITY OF MACCLENNY 351 54307 TRANS CTR −9264 HOD 0.00 252.27 104000 76682 01/11/16 109 CITY OF MACCLENNY 32 54300 LIBRARY − 14 MCIVER 0.00 34.44 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 434.27 104000 76684 01/11/16 200 FPL 291 54301 AG CENTER − FPL 0.00 20.00 104000 76684 01/11/16 200 FPL 291 54301 AG CENTER−US HWY 90 0.00 407.11 104000 76684 01/11/16 200 FPL 27 54301 EMERGENCY OP−1190 W 0.00 500.35 104000 76684 01/11/16 200 FPL 33 54300 OLUST PK/2 SEC LIGH 0.00 53.19 104000 76684 01/11/16 200 FPL 27 54301 STORAGE BLDG/EOC 0.00 13.73 104000 76684 01/11/16 200 FPL 291 54301 AG CNTR/OUTDR LGHT 0.00 10.04 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,004.42 104000 76687 01/12/16 19 ALL−BRITE SALES COM 33 55210 REC. CLEANING SUPPL 0.00 487.90 104000 76688 01/12/16 1252 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE 001 218500 PR1/8/16 EMS UNION 0.00 105.00 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 33 55210 D COMBS UNIFORMS 0.00 5.57 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 33 55210 A HODGES UNIFORMS 0.00 7.28 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 21 55210 S WHITFIELD UNIFORM 0.00 8.11 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 21 55210 T ANDERSON UNIFORMS 0.00 9.48 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 11 55210 MATS ADMIN 0.00 9.52 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 29 55210 MATS AG CTR 12/28 0.00 26.60 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 20 55210 MATS CRTHSE 1/4/16 0.00 52.03 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 33 55210 D COMBS UNIFORM 0.00 5.57 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 33 55210 A HODGES UNIFORM 0.00 7.28 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 21 55210 S WHITFIELD UNIFORM 0.00 8.11 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 21 55210 T ANDERSON UNIFORM 0.00 9.48 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 11 55210 MATS ADMIN 1/4/16 0.00 9.52 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 158.55 104000 76691 01/12/16 50 BAKER COUNTY CHAMBE 350 53402 JAN REQUEST−CHAMBER 0.00 1,375.00 104000 76692 01/12/16 47 BAKER COUNTY COUNCI 351 58104 JAN 2016 CTY MATCH 0.00 9,750.00 104000 76694 01/12/16 523 BEN FRANKLIN FINANC 001 218900 PR1/8/16−BEN FRANKL 0.00 92.99 104000 76695 01/12/16 67 BENNETT’S FEED FARM 34 55210 HAY, FEED FOR HORSE 0.00 23.98 104000 76695 01/12/16 67 BENNETT’S FEED FARM 34 55210 HAY 6X FOR HORSE 0.00 34.50 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 58.48 104000 76697 01/12/16 1657 BIO−CYCLE LLC 27 55210 MED.WASTE 96&28 GAL 0.00 135.00 104000 76699 01/12/16 78 BSN SPORTS INC 33 55210 BASES, EQUIPMNT−REC 0.00 672.91 104000 76701 01/12/16 89 CAPITAL GUARDIAN TR 001 218700 PR1/8/16CAPITAL GUA 0.00 250.00 104000 76702 01/12/16 2346 CARPENTERS INDUSTRI 001 218500 PR1/8/16 UNION DUES 0.00 130.00 104000 76705 01/12/16 275 CHIEF/LAW ENFORCEME 27 55210 EMS UNIFORMS 0.00 359.55 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 3 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 001 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT

104000 76707 01/12/16 563 CONSOLIDATED ELECTR 33 55210 BALL FIELD LIGHTS 3 0.00 862.20 104000 76708 01/12/16 1185 COPYFAX INC 20 54600 JK0094/CLERK/OCT15 0.00 78.65 104000 76708 01/12/16 1185 COPYFAX INC 11 54600 JAN/JK1286/ADMIN 0.00 37.27 104000 76708 01/12/16 1185 COPYFAX INC 20 54600 JK0094/CLERK/DEC15 0.00 78.65 104000 76708 01/12/16 1185 COPYFAX INC 11 54600 DEC/JK1286/ADMIN 0.00 57.69 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 252.26 104000 76709 01/12/16 540 CRYSTAL SPRINGS 930 55210 JUDGE CHMBR WATER 0.00 3.12 104000 76709 01/12/16 540 CRYSTAL SPRINGS 930 55210 JUDGE WATER RENTAL 0.00 9.95 104000 76709 01/12/16 540 CRYSTAL SPRINGS 25 55210 BLDG WATER DEC 15 0.00 17.02 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 30.09 104000 76712 01/12/16 209 GENE HARVEY, TAX CO 15 59180 JAN DRAW 0.00 13,387.58 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 21 54600 DBLE PYMT INV 22688 0.00 −17.96 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 27 54600 DBLE PYMT INV 22622 0.00 −11.69 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 21 54600 DBLE PYMT INV226101 0.00 −3.23 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 21 54600 DBLE PYMT INV226865 0.00 −0.89 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 27 54600 BLNK KEY − RESCUE 0.00 1.97 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 351 54608 RAT&MOUSE TRAPS−COA 0.00 8.25 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 21 54600 BULBS, LT COVER−MAI 0.00 11.67 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 21 54600 MISC SCREWS/BOLT−MA 0.00 13.88 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 27 54600 EMS−VINL CONNT,CORD 0.00 13.97 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 33 54600 GLOSS RUST−STOP−REC 0.00 17.96 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 21 54600 BULBS,TAPE,ELBW−BEC 0.00 18.67 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 52.60 104000 76715 01/12/16 234 HOME DEPOT CREDIT S 15 54600 TX COLLTR−TOILET,PA 0.00 225.92 104000 76715 01/12/16 234 HOME DEPOT CREDIT S 21 54600 MAINT,GREASE,TRAP,P 0.00 36.39 104000 76715 01/12/16 234 HOME DEPOT CREDIT S 11 54600 ADMIN−LAUNDRY.TUB 0.00 54.98 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 317.29 104000 76716 01/12/16 864 HOME TOWN JOURNAL 34 55210 WARN TRESPASS SIGN− 0.00 16.00 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 27 55211 EMS FUEL 217 GAL 0.00 389.95 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 34 55211 AN CTRL FUEL 18 GAL 0.00 32.52 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 33 55211 REC FUEL 58 GAL 0.00 104.74 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 34 55211 AN CTRL FUEL 25 GAL 0.00 45.15 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 34 55211 AN CTRL FUEL 33 GAL 0.00 59.63 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 27 55211 EMS FUEL 280 GAL 0.00 516.88 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 21 55211 MAINT FUEL 30 GAL 0.00 53.01 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 27 55211 EMS FUEL 247 GAL 0.00 456.21 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 34 55211 AN CTRL FUEL 16.5 G 0.00 29.81 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,687.90 104000 76724 01/12/16 2067 MACCLENNY TIRE AND 26 54602 EMS TRANSPRT R−32TI 0.00 156.50 104000 76727 01/12/16 1274 MED−TECH RESOURCE I 27 55210 MEDICAL DRUGS 0.00 23.87 104000 76727 01/12/16 1274 MED−TECH RESOURCE I 27 55210 MEDICAL DRUGS 0.00 424.04 104000 76727 01/12/16 1274 MED−TECH RESOURCE I 27 55210 MEDICAL DRUGS 0.00 240.74 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 4 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 001 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 0.00 688.65 104000 76730 01/12/16 311 NATIONWIDE RETIREME 001 218700 PR1/8/16PEBSCO−DEF 0.00 228.82 104000 76731 01/12/16 317 NEW RIVER SOLID WAS 34 55210 DEAD ANIMALS −DEC 1 0.00 56.10 104000 76733 01/12/16 1103 NORTHEAST FLORIDA P 21 54600 G.HEPPNER−REPAIR MO 0.00 322.58 104000 76734 01/12/16 314 NORTHEAST FLORIDA R 17 53100 2ND QTR DUES−NEFRC 0.00 2,766.58 104000 76735 01/12/16 1326 PATRICK’S UNIFORMS 34 55210 2X EMPLYEE SHOES−AN 0.00 159.98 104000 76736 01/12/16 647 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTIO 27 55210 OXYGEN EMS 0.00 80.76 104000 76737 01/12/16 347 QUADMED INC 27 55210 MEDICAL SUPPLIES−EM 0.00 811.84 104000 76738 01/12/16 349 QUALITY INTERNET SE 40 54100 INTERNET SERV JAN 1 0.00 82.00 104000 76739 01/12/16 360 RELIASTAR LIFE INSU 001 218700 PR1/8/16NORTH LIFE 0.00 26.76 104000 76741 01/12/16 2320 RIVER REGION HUMAN 351 58105 DEC 2015 CTY MATCH 0.00 7,478.50 104000 76745 01/12/16 440 SHRED−IT USA 157 53400 SHRED/ST ATTNY DEC1 0.00 49.95 104000 76745 01/12/16 440 SHRED−IT USA 157 53400 SHRED/ST ATTNY NOV1 0.00 54.95 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 104.90 104000 76747 01/12/16 2164 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 11 55100 PENCIL LEAD−ADMIN 0.00 3.34 104000 76747 01/12/16 2164 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 11 55100 TAPE,DIVIDR TABS,AD 0.00 18.70 104000 76747 01/12/16 2164 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 27 55100 EMS OFFICE SHREDDER 0.00 83.60 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 105.64 104000 76749 01/12/16 484 TARBOX CONSULTING A 251 53100 CELL TOWER PRJT−P&Z 0.00 100.00 104000 76750 01/12/16 271 THE LAKE DOCTORS IN 33 53400 MTHLY SERV ST MARY/ 0.00 125.00 104000 76751 01/12/16 2314 TRI COUNTY PROBATIO 21 54600 GBB DEC 2015 0.00 625.00 104000 76753 01/12/16 419 VALIC 001 218700 PR1/8/16 AIG VALIC 0.00 175.00 104000 76754 01/12/16 1710 VERIZON WIRELESS 27 54100 EMS WIRELESS SERV 0.00 21.00 104000 76755 01/12/16 428 WAL−MART COMMUNITY/ 27 55100 CLNR, SPONGES, EMS 0.00 37.47 104000 76759 01/12/16 2367 ZENO OFFICE SOLUTIO 158 54603 PUB DEF COPIER MAIN 0.00 58.00 104000 76761 01/19/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 33 55210 D COMBS UNIFORMS 0.00 5.57 104000 76761 01/19/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 33 55210 A HODGES UNIFORMS 0.00 7.28 104000 76761 01/19/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 21 55210 S WHITFIELD UNIFORM 0.00 8.11 104000 76761 01/19/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 21 55210 T ANDERSON UNIFORMS 0.00 9.48 104000 76761 01/19/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 11 55210 ADMIN CLEAN MATS 0.00 9.52 104000 76761 01/19/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 29 55210 AG CTR MATS 0.00 26.60 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 66.56 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 5 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 001 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT

104000 76762 01/19/16 67 BENNETT’S FEED FARM 34 55210 HORSE PELLET &HAY 0.00 24.49 104000 76764 01/19/16 2287 CANON FINANCIAL SER 25 54400 NOV−JAN/COPIER/BLDG 0.00 240.00 104000 76765 01/19/16 2264 CANON SOLUTIONS AME 25 54600 BLDG COPIER/EZS0113 0.00 46.56 104000 76766 01/19/16 2090 CARD SERVICES 11 55210 LATE FEE & INTEREST 0.00 40.58 104000 76766 01/19/16 2090 CARD SERVICES 001 369320 TESTING SYSM BALLFI 0.00 70.00 104000 76766 01/19/16 2090 CARD SERVICES 11 54901 COUNTY MGR AD−JAXJO 0.00 99.00 104000 76766 01/19/16 2090 CARD SERVICES 11 55210 EMPLY ANNL LUNCH 0.00 343.04 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 552.62 104000 76767 01/19/16 275 CHIEF/LAW ENFORCEME 27 55210 EMS UNIFORMS 0.00 152.85 104000 76767 01/19/16 275 CHIEF/LAW ENFORCEME 26 55210 EMS TRANSPORT UNIFO 0.00 121.68 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 274.53 104000 76768 01/19/16 1185 COPYFAX INC 29 54600 J12094/COPIER/EXTEN 0.00 90.69 104000 76769 01/19/16 540 CRYSTAL SPRINGS 27 55210 EMS WATER RENT/REPL 0.00 54.12 104000 76770 01/19/16 136 DAVIDSON TITLES INC 32 56600 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 153.66 104000 76773 01/19/16 2223 EMS MANAGEMENT & CO 26 53400 EMS BILLING POSTAGE 0.00 13.20 104000 76774 01/19/16 205 GATEWAY PEST CONTRO 15 54600 TERMINTE−TAX COLLTR 0.00 350.00 104000 76775 01/19/16 1815 GILCHRIST COUNTY BD 22 55215 JAN−MAR PRO SE MILE 0.00 249.99 104000 76777 01/19/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 21 54600 MAINT−STAR DECK10X4 0.00 8.09 104000 76777 01/19/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 34 55210 LP GAS CYLINDER−ANC 0.00 34.18 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 42.27 104000 76779 01/19/16 267 L V HIERS INC 34 55211 AN CTRL FUEL 23 GAL 0.00 40.61 104000 76779 01/19/16 267 L V HIERS INC 27 55211 EMS FUEL 16 GAL 0.00 26.99 104000 76779 01/19/16 267 L V HIERS INC 33 55211 REC FUEL 23 GAL 0.00 38.80 104000 76779 01/19/16 267 L V HIERS INC 27 55211 EMS FUEL 315 GAL 0.00 550.31 104000 76779 01/19/16 267 L V HIERS INC 34 55211 AN CTRL FUEL 18 GAL 0.00 30.36 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 687.07 104000 76781 01/19/16 565 LATOYA HOLTON 291 54910 RFD RENT−L. HOLTON 0.00 267.50 104000 76782 01/19/16 598 MACCLENNY CYCLE & M 33 54600 REC−SWITCH KEY CADE 0.00 23.88 104000 76783 01/19/16 285 MACCLENNY VETERINAR 34 53100 AN CTRL DEC SERV 0.00 1,094.00 104000 76784 01/19/16 1274 MED−TECH RESOURCE I 27 55210 EMS MEDICAL SUPPLIE 0.00 112.14 104000 76784 01/19/16 1274 MED−TECH RESOURCE I 27 55210 EMS MED SUPPLIES 0.00 146.79 104000 76784 01/19/16 1274 MED−TECH RESOURCE I 27 55210 EMS MEDICAL SUPPLY 0.00 233.81 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 492.74 104000 76785 01/19/16 2354 MERIDIAN BEHAVIORAL 351 58107 BAKER ACT SERV JAN− 0.00 24,222.00 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 6 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 001 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT

104000 76787 01/19/16 2068 MICROSOFT CORPORATI 11 54100 EMAIL ACCTS 53X 0.00 424.00 104000 76788 01/19/16 1229 MORRIS PUBLISHING G 32 56600 TIMES UNION RENEW−L 0.00 452.51 104000 76791 01/19/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 39 54301 SHOALS PK BATHROOM2 0.00 63.74 104000 76792 01/19/16 647 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTIO 27 55210 OXYGEN CYLINDER EMS 0.00 80.76 104000 76792 01/19/16 647 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTIO 27 55210 OXYGEN CYLINDER EMS 0.00 59.38 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 140.14 104000 76793 V 01/19/16 347 QUADMED INC 27 55210 EMS MED. SUPPLIES 0.00 −233.96 104000 76793 V 01/19/16 347 QUADMED INC 27 55210 LIDOCAINE,ALBUTEROL 0.00 −277.60 104000 76793 V 01/19/16 347 QUADMED INC 27 55210 EMS MEDICAL SUPPLIE 0.00 −440.00 104000 76793 01/19/16 347 QUADMED INC 27 55210 EMS MED. SUPPLIES 0.00 233.96 104000 76793 01/19/16 347 QUADMED INC 27 55210 LIDOCAINE,ALBUTEROL 0.00 277.60 104000 76793 01/19/16 347 QUADMED INC 27 55210 EMS MEDICAL SUPPLIE 0.00 440.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 0.00 104000 76797 01/19/16 328 THE OFFICE MART 11 55100 CHAIRMAN BENNETT ST 0.00 26.95 104000 76797 01/19/16 328 THE OFFICE MART 11 55100 EMPLY TIME CARDS 0.00 187.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 213.95 104000 76798 01/19/16 564 THE RAWLINGS COMPAN 27 54910 OVRPYMT EMS#153139. 0.00 522.85 104000 76802 01/21/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 33 55210 D COMBS UNIFORMS 0.00 5.57 104000 76802 01/21/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 33 55210 A HODGES UNIFORMS 0.00 7.28 104000 76802 01/21/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 33 55210 A HODGES UNIFORMS 0.00 7.28 104000 76802 01/21/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 21 55210 S WHITFIELD UNIFORM 0.00 8.11 104000 76802 01/21/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 21 55210 T ANDERSON UNIFORMS 0.00 9.48 104000 76802 01/21/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 11 55210 ADMIN MATS 1/18 0.00 9.52 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 47.24 104000 76805 01/21/16 1657 BIO−CYCLE LLC 27 55210 MED.WASTE 96&28 GAL 0.00 135.00 104000 76806 01/21/16 275 CHIEF/LAW ENFORCEME 27 55210 EMS UNIFORMS 0.00 100.00 104000 76806 01/21/16 275 CHIEF/LAW ENFORCEME 26 55210 EMS TRANSPORT UNIFO 0.00 30.24 104000 76806 01/21/16 275 CHIEF/LAW ENFORCEME 27 55210 EMS UNIFORMS 0.00 100.00 104000 76806 01/21/16 275 CHIEF/LAW ENFORCEME 26 55210 EMS TRANSPORT UNIFO 0.00 21.68 104000 76806 01/21/16 275 CHIEF/LAW ENFORCEME 27 55210 EMS UNIFORMS 0.00 700.00 104000 76806 01/21/16 275 CHIEF/LAW ENFORCEME 26 55210 EMS TRANSPORT UNIFO 0.00 516.80 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,468.72 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 351 54306 OUTDOOR LGT−COA US9 0.00 22.24 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 33 54300 REC DPT−MINGER FIEL 0.00 164.48 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 351 54305 COURT SERV BLDG/209 0.00 42.33 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 33 54300 REC DP−WMN−SOFTBALL 0.00 406.83 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 20 54301 COURTHOUSE − FPL 0.00 5,008.44 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 33 54300 WOMEN SOFTBALL FLD/ 0.00 102.76 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 15 54301 TAX COLL/PA/ELECTIO 0.00 1,503.42 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 33 54300 OL−1 MINGER FIELD 0.00 11.42 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 33 54300 VOLLEYB CT−25N 8TH 0.00 44.62 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 7 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 001 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 33 54300 480 6TH ST SFTBL 0.00 61.81 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 33 54300 480 6TH ST SFTBL OL 0.00 9.92 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 15 54301 32 N 5TH/OUTDOOR LG 0.00 9.92 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 351 54305 COURT SERVICE BLDG/ 0.00 1,653.85 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 25 54301 360 E SHUEY AVE/B & 0.00 148.46 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 11 54301 ADMIN BLDG/3RD ST 0.00 575.89 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 158 54301 PUBLIC DEFENDER/3RD 0.00 182.35 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 33 54300 SEC.LIGHT/BLAIR&N B 0.00 31.17 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 351 54306 US90−COUNCIL ON AGI 0.00 30.96 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 351 54306 US90−COUNCIL ON AGI 0.00 1,121.14 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 33 54300 REC.DEPT/SCOREBD/BL 0.00 8.07 104000 76811 01/21/16 200 FPL 33 54300 REC DEPT/KNABB SPRT 0.00 64.94 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 11,205.02 104000 76812 01/21/16 2272 GEORGIA MONFORT 291 51300 JAN.16 CK OUT/CLN−A 0.00 75.00 104000 76813 01/21/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 34 55210 GAS TANKS FILLED−A. 0.00 34.18 104000 76815 01/21/16 2093 TOTALFUNDS BY HASLE 11 54200 POSTAGE IN CRTHSE 0.00 5,234.71 104000 76816 01/21/16 267 L V HIERS INC 11 55211 EXPLR FUEL 17GAL 0.00 28.16 104000 76816 01/21/16 267 L V HIERS INC 34 55211 AN CTRL FUEL 19GAL 0.00 31.46 104000 76816 01/21/16 267 L V HIERS INC 21 55211 MAINT. FUEL 30 GAL 0.00 49.68 104000 76816 01/21/16 267 L V HIERS INC 34 55211 AN CTRL FUEL 30 GAL 0.00 49.71 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 159.01 104000 76818 01/21/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 27 54602 AIR TANK LEAK − EMS 0.00 88.48 104000 76818 01/21/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 27 54602 1/4− A/C REPAIR R−3 0.00 466.74 104000 76818 01/21/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 27 54602 3/4− A/C REPAIR R−3 0.00 333.08 104000 76818 01/21/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 27 54602 2/4− A/C REPAIR R−3 0.00 304.44 104000 76818 01/21/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 27 54602 EMS#36 RADIATOR LEA 0.00 521.55 104000 76818 01/21/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 26 54602 A/C REPAIR FOR R33E 0.00 190.71 104000 76818 01/21/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 27 54602 2 TIRES ON R34 0.00 557.86 104000 76818 01/21/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 27 54600 R−34 OIL CHANGE−EMS 0.00 351.15 104000 76818 01/21/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 27 54600 R−34MASTR CYLINDR−E 0.00 277.93 104000 76818 01/21/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 27 54602 R−33 EMS BRAKE REPA 0.00 604.12 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3,696.06 104000 76820 01/21/16 647 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTIO 27 55210 EMS OXYGEN CYLINDER 0.00 59.38 104000 76820 01/21/16 647 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTIO 27 54400 CYLINDER RENTAL DEC 0.00 136.54 104000 76820 01/21/16 647 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTIO 27 55210 OXYGEN CYLINDER−EMS 0.00 100.08 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 296.00 104000 76821 01/21/16 347 QUADMED INC 27 55210 EMS−BLUNT TIP CANN 0.00 76.90 104000 76822 01/21/16 440 SHRED−IT USA 157 53400 SHRED/ST ATTNY JAN 0.00 49.95 104000 76823 01/21/16 2164 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 27 55100 EMS MESSAGE PADS, C 0.00 14.93 104000 76824 01/21/16 389 SUPPLYWORKS 20 55210 TRASH BAGS,TOILET P 0.00 397.96 104000 76828 01/21/16 1964 VIDACARE CORPORATIO 27 55210 IO BLUE−NEEDLES−EMS 0.00 560.05 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 8 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 001 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT

104000 76829 01/21/16 566 VULCAN CONSTRUCTION 33 55210 BALLFIELD CLAY 2−LO 0.00 973.29 104000 76831 01/26/16 20 AMAZON 32 56600 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 69.64 104000 76832 01/26/16 1252 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE 001 218500 PR1/22 EMS UNION 0.00 105.00 104000 76833 01/26/16 523 BEN FRANKLIN FINANC 001 218900 PR1/22 BEN FRANKLIN 0.00 92.99 104000 76834 01/26/16 89 CAPITAL GUARDIAN TR 001 218700 PR1/22 CAPITAL GUAR 0.00 250.00 104000 76835 01/26/16 2346 CARPENTERS INDUSTRI 001 218500 PR1/22 UNION DUES 0.00 130.00 104000 76836 01/26/16 311 NATIONWIDE RETIREME 001 218700 PR1/22 PEBSCO DEF’D 0.00 228.82 104000 76837 01/26/16 360 RELIASTAR LIFE INSU 001 218700 PR1/22 NORTHERN LIF 0.00 26.76 104000 76838 01/26/16 419 VALIC 001 218700 PR1/22 AIG VALIC 0.00 175.00 104000 76839 01/26/16 115 COLONIAL LIFE AND A 001 218100 NOV−JAN COLONIAL LI 0.00 179.10 104000 76841 01/26/16 278 LIBERTY NATIONAL LI 001 218100 DEC LIBERTY NAT’L 0.00 353.12 104000 76841 01/26/16 278 LIBERTY NATIONAL LI 001 218100 NOV LIBERTY NAT’L 0.00 379.04 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 732.16 104000 76845 01/27/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 20 55210 CRTHSE MATS 1/18/16 0.00 52.03 104000 76845 01/27/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 33 55210 D COMBS UNIFORMS 0.00 5.57 104000 76845 01/27/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 33 55210 A HODGES UNIFORMS 0.00 7.28 104000 76845 01/27/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 21 55210 S WHITFIELD UNIFORM 0.00 8.11 104000 76845 01/27/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 21 55210 T ANDERSON UNIFORMS 0.00 9.48 104000 76845 01/27/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 11 55210 ADMIN MATS 1/25/16 0.00 9.52 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 91.99 104000 76846 01/27/16 56 BAKER COUNTY PRESS 11 54901 11/26 AD−RECRE. BRD 0.00 23.80 104000 76846 01/27/16 56 BAKER COUNTY PRESS 11 54901 12/4 AD−RECRE. BRD 0.00 23.80 104000 76846 01/27/16 56 BAKER COUNTY PRESS 11 54901 12/10 P.T. CUSTODIA 0.00 27.00 104000 76846 01/27/16 56 BAKER COUNTY PRESS 11 54901 12/17 P.T. CUSTODIA 0.00 27.00 104000 76846 01/27/16 56 BAKER COUNTY PRESS 11 54901 11/19 AD−RECRE. BRD 0.00 28.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 129.60 104000 76847 01/27/16 67 BENNETT’S FEED FARM 34 55210 FEED & HAY HORSE 0.00 47.49 104000 76848 01/27/16 539 CATHY WILLIAMS 11 55211 ADMIN FUEL IMPALA 0.00 20.00 104000 76849 01/27/16 1911 CENTER POINT LARGE 32 56600 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 44.34 104000 76850 01/27/16 503 CINTAS CORP.− MEDIC 25 55210 FIRST AID BX−BLDG D 0.00 76.24 104000 76850 01/27/16 503 CINTAS CORP.− MEDIC 11 55210 FIRST AID BX−ADMIN 0.00 84.08 104000 76850 01/27/16 503 CINTAS CORP.− MEDIC 20 55210 FIRST AID BX−CRTHSE 0.00 89.16 104000 76850 01/27/16 503 CINTAS CORP.− MEDIC 19 54600 FIRST AID−SUPER ELE 0.00 99.60 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 349.08 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 9 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 001 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 76851 01/27/16 848 DAVID RICHARDSON/PE 27 55210 PETTY CASH REIMB.1. 0.00 27.58 104000 76852 01/27/16 140 DELL MARKETING L P 26 56400 EMS COMPTR − DELL 0.00 785.66 104000 76853 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 11 54600 ADMIN PEST CTRL 0.00 14.08 104000 76853 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 34 54600 AN. CTRL PEST CONTR 0.00 14.08 104000 76853 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 15 54600 TAX COLLTR PEST CTR 0.00 14.08 104000 76853 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 14 54600 PROPERTY APP PEST C 0.00 14.08 104000 76853 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 351 54616 CT SERV/FL PEST CTR 0.00 14.08 104000 76853 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 331 54612 HIST SOC/FL PEST CT 0.00 14.08 104000 76853 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 27 54600 EOC/FL PEST CTRL 0.00 14.08 104000 76853 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 20 54600 CRTHSE/FL PEST CTRL 0.00 14.10 104000 76853 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 291 54615 AG CTR/FL PEST CTRL 0.00 14.08 104000 76853 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 32 54600 LIBRARY/FL PEST CTR 0.00 14.10 104000 76853 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 21 54600 MAINT SHOP/FL PEST 0.00 14.08 104000 76853 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 33 54600 RECREATN/FL PEST CT 0.00 14.08 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 169.00 104000 76854 01/27/16 212 GLEN CASH STORE INC 21 55210 BROODER LAMP−MAINT 0.00 12.69 104000 76854 01/27/16 212 GLEN CASH STORE INC 21 54600 LAG SCREWS − MAINT 0.00 5.16 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 17.85 104000 76855 01/27/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 34 55210 AN CTRL FUEL/HEATER 0.00 51.27 104000 76855 01/27/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 21 55210 CLAMP LAMPS 2X−MAIN 0.00 17.08 104000 76855 01/27/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 34 54600 AN CTRL FUSES/CONNE 0.00 17.60 104000 76855 01/27/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 21 54600 MULTI.BULBS−MAINT. 0.00 16.18 104000 76855 01/27/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 20 54600 CAULK LATEX/ACRYLIC 0.00 3.85 104000 76855 01/27/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 21 54600 PIPES, SEAL 2X−MAIN 0.00 12.20 104000 76855 01/27/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 34 55210 AN CTRL FUEL HEATER 0.00 53.07 104000 76855 01/27/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 21 54600 BULB,GREASE,ROPE−MA 0.00 16.50 104000 76855 01/27/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 21 54600 MAINT−PRMR,CLNR 0.00 0.78 104000 76855 01/27/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 21 54600 MAINT−KEY CUT−ADMIN 0.00 15.76 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 204.29 104000 76858 01/27/16 244 INTERSTATE SUPPLY I 20 54600 MULTI BULBS−MAINT 0.00 318.56 104000 76860 01/27/16 2351 KOPELOUSOS,BRADLEY 16 53100 LEGAL SERV. DEC 15 0.00 4,500.00 104000 76861 01/27/16 267 L V HIERS INC 34 55211 AN CTRL FUEL 17.50G 0.00 27.77 104000 76861 01/27/16 267 L V HIERS INC 27 55211 EMS FUEL 19 GAL 0.00 30.15 104000 76861 01/27/16 267 L V HIERS INC 34 55211 AN CTRL FUEL 21 GAL 0.00 33.32 104000 76861 01/27/16 267 L V HIERS INC 27 55211 EMS FUEL 160 GAL 0.00 272.96 104000 76861 01/27/16 267 L V HIERS INC 33 55211 REC. FUEL 22.60 GAL 0.00 37.42 104000 76861 01/27/16 267 L V HIERS INC 33 55211 REC. FUEL 27 GAL 0.00 45.25 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 446.87 104000 76864 01/27/16 1334 MACCLENNY MOWER AND 21 54600 CHAINSAW GAS LINE M 0.00 60.24 104000 76865 01/27/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 27 54602 EMS #36 OIL CHANGE 0.00 281.17 104000 76865 01/27/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 26 54602 TRANSPT#32 OLF&SERV 0.00 241.24 104000 76865 01/27/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 26 54602 TRANSPT#30 REPAIR 0.00 561.55 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,083.96 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 10 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 001 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT

104000 76866 01/27/16 306 P & R ELECTRIC INC 20 54600 CRTHSE FLAG POLE.LG 0.00 180.00 104000 76867 01/27/16 647 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTIO 27 55210 CREDT TO−PJ2795048 0.00 −126.31 104000 76867 01/27/16 647 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTIO 27 55210 CYLINDR RENT11/30EM 0.00 131.67 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 5.36 104000 76869 01/27/16 347 QUADMED INC 27 55210 LIDOCAINE,PEROXDE,E 0.00 233.96 104000 76869 01/27/16 347 QUADMED INC 27 55210 EMS−CATHTERS,NEEDLE 0.00 440.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 673.96 104000 76870 01/27/16 4 RICOH USA, INC 20 54400 CLRK LEASE COPIER F 0.00 102.81 104000 76870 01/27/16 4 RICOH USA, INC 11 54400 COPIER LEASE M4002F 0.00 115.69 104000 76870 01/27/16 4 RICOH USA, INC 29 54400 COPIER LEASE MPC300 0.00 122.03 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 340.53 104000 76872 01/27/16 256 SBH MEDICAL LTD. 27 55210 ADENOSINE,CIRCUIT−E 0.00 277.60 104000 76873 01/27/16 391 SPRINT 21 54100 MAINT TABLET SERV. 0.00 5.00 104000 76873 01/27/16 391 SPRINT 21 54100 CELL SERV. − SPRINT 0.00 40.39 104000 76873 01/27/16 391 SPRINT 25 54100 RECREAT. CELL SERV− 0.00 15.39 104000 76873 01/27/16 391 SPRINT 34 54100 AN CTRL CELL−SPRINT 0.00 30.78 104000 76873 01/27/16 391 SPRINT 221 54100 GAL CELL SERV.−SPRI 0.00 74.05 104000 76873 01/27/16 391 SPRINT 930 54100 JUDGE CELL SERV − S 0.00 72.05 104000 76873 01/27/16 391 SPRINT 158 54100 PUB DEF CELL SERV.− 0.00 30.78 104000 76873 01/27/16 391 SPRINT 27 54100 EMS CELL SERV. SPRI 0.00 69.03 104000 76873 01/27/16 391 SPRINT 29 54100 EXTENTN CELL SERV−S 0.00 15.59 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 353.06 104000 76874 01/27/16 2164 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 11 55210 SOAP, FL CLNR,PAPER 0.00 44.48 104000 76875 01/27/16 2343 STATE OF FL −DEPT O 34 55210 OP. COMMERCL LIC 0.00 150.00 104000 76876 01/27/16 412 TRANE 20 54600 AC MAINT. 1/1/16−3/ 0.00 8,846.00 104000 76877 V 01/27/16 531 UNITED RIGGING 33 54600 HIGHLIFT−LGTS−REC. 0.00 −300.00 104000 76877 01/27/16 531 UNITED RIGGING 33 54600 HIGHLIFT−LGTS−REC. 0.00 300.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 0.00 104000 76878 01/27/16 428 WAL−MART COMMUNITY/ 21 54600 SPONGES,TIES,LUBRCN 0.00 30.73 104000 76878 01/27/16 428 WAL−MART COMMUNITY/ 34 55100 AN CTRL OFFC SUPPLY 0.00 140.30 104000 76878 01/27/16 428 WAL−MART COMMUNITY/ 11 55210 ADMIN CHRISTMS PART 0.00 155.47 104000 76878 01/27/16 428 WAL−MART COMMUNITY/ 36 55210 LIBRARY OFFC SUPPLY 0.00 215.41 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 541.91 104000 76880 01/27/16 2367 ZENO OFFICE SOLUTIO 158 54603 PUB DEF COPIERMAINT 0.00 58.00 104000 76881 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 11 54600 ADMIN PEST CTRL 0.00 14.08 104000 76881 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 34 54600 AN. CTRL PEST CONTR 0.00 14.08 104000 76881 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 15 54600 TAX COLLTR PEST CTR 0.00 14.08 104000 76881 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 14 54600 PROPERTY APP PEST C 0.00 14.08 104000 76881 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 351 54616 CT SERV/FL PEST CTR 0.00 14.08 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 11 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 001 − GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 76881 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 331 54612 HIST SOC/FL PEST CT 0.00 14.08 104000 76881 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 27 54600 EOC/FL PEST CTRL 0.00 14.08 104000 76881 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 20 54600 CRTHSE/FL PEST CTRL 0.00 14.10 104000 76881 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 291 54615 AG CTR/FL PEST CTRL 0.00 14.08 104000 76881 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 32 54600 LIBRARY/FL PEST CTR 0.00 14.10 104000 76881 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 21 54600 MAINT SHOP/FL PEST 0.00 14.08 104000 76881 01/27/16 2349 FLORIDA PEST CONTRO 33 54600 RECREATN/FL PEST CT 0.00 14.08 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 169.00 104000 76882 01/28/16 569 UNITED RENTALS 33 54600 HIGHLIFT−LGTS−REC. 0.00 300.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 321,211.73 TOTAL FUND 0.00 321,211.73 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 12 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 103 − ROAD & BRIDGE FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 55 54301 121 N CAUTION LGT−R 0.00 24.70 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 55 54301 ST LIGHT @ 125 N/25 0.00 13.08 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 55 54301 CAU LIGHT−BOB BURNS 0.00 25.60 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 63.38 104000 76684 01/11/16 200 FPL 55 54301 16256 US HWY 90 TF 0.00 8.19 104000 76684 01/11/16 200 FPL 55 54301 ROAD DEPARTMENT SR2 0.00 28.82 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 37.01 104000 76686 01/12/16 9 ADVANCED HYDRAULICS 55 54602 WATER PUMP #189 0.00 42.76 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 55 55210 RD DEPT UNIFORMS 1/ 0.00 85.71 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 55 55210 ROAD DEPT MATS CLEA 0.00 38.38 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 55 55210 RD DEPT UNIFORMS12/ 0.00 85.71 104000 76690 01/12/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 55 55210 RD MATS CLN 12/28/1 0.00 38.38 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 248.18 104000 76696 01/12/16 68 BERNIE’S TOOL & FAS 55 54600 BIMETAL BANDSAW BLA 0.00 276.00 104000 76700 01/12/16 75 C&W ICE, LLC 55 55210 50 10 LB BAGS OF IC 0.00 40.00 104000 76700 01/12/16 75 C&W ICE, LLC 55 55210 35 10 LB BAGS OF IC 0.00 28.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 68.00 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 55 55210 4X80LB BAGS CONCRET 0.00 16.76 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 55 55210 8X80LB BAG CONCRET− 0.00 33.52 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 55 55210 SAFETY CHAIN PIT/RO 0.00 76.17 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 55 55210 VARI BOLTS/SCREWS−R 0.00 15.45 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 55 55210 3/4 CAP THREADED/RD 0.00 2.68 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 55 55210 BUCK STARLNG RD MAR 0.00 42.31 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 186.89 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 55 55210 DIESEL FOR ROAD DEP 0.00 1,664.50 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 55 55210 DIESEL FOR ROAD DEP 0.00 2,065.14 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 55 55210 DIESEL FOR ROAD DEP 0.00 164.97 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 55 54600 2FUEL PUMP METER−TK 0.00 523.04 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 55 55210 DYED DIESEL−RD DEPT 0.00 2,331.35 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 6,749.00 104000 76723 01/12/16 284 MACCLENNY MOTOR PAR 55 54602 HEATER BLOWR TRK102 0.00 29.99 104000 76729 01/12/16 305 MURPHY COMMUNICATIO 55 54602 REPAIR GRADER384/10 0.00 732.00 104000 76732 01/12/16 318 NEXTRAN TRUCK CENTE 55 54602 REPAIR EXHAUST TRK1 0.00 685.18 104000 76740 01/12/16 2187 RING POWER SYSTEMS 55 54602 HEX BOLTS/WASHR−RD 0.00 80.52 104000 76743 01/12/16 373 SAFETY−KLEEN SYSTEM 55 55210 OIL PICK UP−RD DEPT 0.00 180.00 104000 76749 01/12/16 484 TARBOX CONSULTING A 55 53100 CLAUDE HARVEY RD AT 0.00 200.00 104000 76760 01/19/16 1218 AIRGAS USA, LLC 55 55210 ACETYLENE/OXYGEN/RO 0.00 121.07 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 13 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 103 − ROAD & BRIDGE FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 76761 01/19/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 55 55210 RD DEPT UNIFORMS CL 0.00 85.71 104000 76761 01/19/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 55 55210 RD DEPT CLEAN MAT1/ 0.00 38.38 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 124.09 104000 76763 01/19/16 75 C&W ICE, LLC 55 55210 40 10LB BAGS ICE RO 0.00 32.00 104000 76763 01/19/16 75 C&W ICE, LLC 55 55210 25X10 LB ICE BAGS−R 0.00 20.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 52.00 104000 76766 01/19/16 2090 CARD SERVICES 55 55210 ROAD DEPT LUNCHEON 0.00 76.20 104000 76772 01/19/16 164 DUVAL ASPHALT 55 55300 EZ−ST. COLD MIX TON 0.00 2,183.85 104000 76777 01/19/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 55 55300 42X80 LB BAGS CONCR 0.00 175.98 104000 76777 01/19/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 55 55300 8X80 LBS BAGS CONCR 0.00 33.52 104000 76777 01/19/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 55 55300 80LB CONCRETE−ROAD 0.00 −83.80 104000 76777 01/19/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 55 55300 REBAR HASSIE JOHNS 0.00 451.32 104000 76777 01/19/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 55 55300 LAG BOLTS SWAMP BRD 0.00 11.92 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 588.94 104000 76780 01/19/16 270 LAKE CITY INDUSTRIE 55 55300 REBAR HASSIE JOHNS 0.00 107.40 104000 76780 01/19/16 270 LAKE CITY INDUSTRIE 55 55300 REBAR HASSIE JOHNS 0.00 107.40 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 214.80 104000 76786 01/19/16 2279 METAL MASTERS OF FL 55 54602 METAL/BUCKET REPAIR 0.00 275.00 104000 76789 01/19/16 561 MYERS−SETH PUMP INC 55 54602 RED−WATER PUMP REPA 0.00 423.30 104000 76794 01/19/16 365 RING POWER CORPORAT 55 54602 GRADERS FILTER/REPA 0.00 561.50 104000 76794 01/19/16 365 RING POWER CORPORAT 55 54602 BLADE SHIMS−GRADERS 0.00 247.62 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 809.12 104000 76801 01/21/16 1218 AIRGAS USA, LLC 55 54400 TANK RENTAL 12/31−R 0.00 425.40 104000 76802 01/21/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 55 55210 UNIFORM CLEAN 1/18/ 0.00 82.07 104000 76802 01/21/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 55 55210 MATS CLN 1/18/16/RD 0.00 38.38 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 120.45 104000 76804 01/21/16 56 BAKER COUNTY PRESS 55 54901 TRUCK DRIVER AD −RO 0.00 84.00 104000 76807 01/21/16 503 CINTAS CORP.− MEDIC 55 55210 MEDICAL BOX/RD DEPT 0.00 110.09 104000 76809 01/21/16 180 DEPT OF ENVIRONMENT 55 55210 STORAGE FUEL TANK R 0.00 90.00 104000 76813 01/21/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 55 55300 1BX SHINGLES−HASIEB 0.00 24.99 104000 76813 01/21/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 55 55210 HITCH PIN/PADLOCKS/ 0.00 36.13 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 61.12 104000 76816 01/21/16 267 L V HIERS INC 55 55210 426 GAL REG GAS/ROA 0.00 658.17 104000 76816 01/21/16 267 L V HIERS INC 55 55210 2680GAL DYED DIESEL 0.00 3,312.48 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3,970.65 104000 76817 01/21/16 284 MACCLENNY MOTOR PAR 55 54602 CUPLR/ADPTR/GAUG/TR 0.00 58.06 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 14 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 103 − ROAD & BRIDGE FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT

104000 76819 01/21/16 318 NEXTRAN TRUCK CENTE 55 54602 PISTON COOLNG#197/R 0.00 512.43 104000 76825 01/21/16 2018 TD BANK, N. A. 55 57200 INT PAVNG LN−JAN 16 0.00 1,657.04 104000 76825 01/21/16 2018 TD BANK, N. A. 55 57100 PRIN PAVNG LN−JAN16 0.00 54,148.23 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 55,805.27 104000 76826 01/21/16 735 THE FLORIDA NOTARY 55 55210 NOTARY FEES M CHRJA 0.00 130.00 104000 76827 01/21/16 531 UNITED RIGGING 55 55210 6 DZN FLEX TUFF GLO 0.00 144.00 104000 76842 01/27/16 497 ADVANCED CUTTING SY 55 55210 3 CUTTER PUSH ROLLE 0.00 144.00 104000 76843 01/27/16 1218 AIRGAS USA, LLC 55 54600 REPAIR TORCH GUN HO 0.00 70.00 104000 76845 01/27/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 55 55210 MATS CLND 1/25/16−R 0.00 38.38 104000 76845 01/27/16 33 AUS CENTRAL LOCKBOX 55 55210 UNIFORMS CLEANED 1/ 0.00 82.07 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 120.45 104000 76858 01/27/16 244 INTERSTATE SUPPLY I 55 55210 PIPE FOR RAKES−ROAD 0.00 76.44 104000 76861 01/27/16 267 L V HIERS INC 55 55210 MULTI. OILS/GREASE− 0.00 453.00 104000 76862 01/27/16 928 MACCLENNY EQUIP & T 55 54602 2XOIL FILTR TRCTR#1 0.00 73.72 104000 76863 01/27/16 284 MACCLENNY MOTOR PAR 55 54602 #189FUEL/WATER PUMP 0.00 90.70 104000 76868 01/27/16 344 PRITCHETT TRUCKING 55 55300 10 LOADS LIMEROCK/R 0.00 3,361.06 104000 76871 01/27/16 373 SAFETY−KLEEN SYSTEM 55 55210 WASHER SOLVENT−ROAD 0.00 106.91 104000 76873 01/27/16 391 SPRINT 55 54100 RD DEPT CELL SERV−S 0.00 74.14 104000 76873 01/27/16 391 SPRINT 55 54100 RD DEPT CELL SERV−S 0.00 15.39 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 89.53 104000 76878 01/27/16 428 WAL−MART COMMUNITY/ 55 55210 RD DEPT CHRISTMS PA 0.00 284.82 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 80,829.38 TOTAL FUND 0.00 80,829.38 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 15 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 104 − FINE & FORFEITURE FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 76666 01/07/16 1670 BAKER CORRECTIONAL 71 58113 JAN−MAR INMATE HOUS 0.00 867,343.75 104000 76671 01/07/16 253 JOEY B DOBSON, SHER 90 59180 JAN−16 JUDICIAL SER 0.00 21,494.00 104000 76671 01/07/16 253 JOEY B DOBSON, SHER 73 59180 JAN−16 DISPATCH 0.00 23,326.00 104000 76671 01/07/16 253 JOEY B DOBSON, SHER 72 59180 JAN−16 LAW ENFORCEN 0.00 40,925.00 104000 76671 01/07/16 253 JOEY B DOBSON, SHER 69 59180 JAN−16 LAW ENFORCE 0.00 250,362.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 336,107.00 104000 76685 01/12/16 559 A. M. WHITE MORTUAR 24 53114 J BURCH TRANSPT M.E 0.00 450.00 104000 76685 01/12/16 559 A. M. WHITE MORTUAR 24 53114 M. MYERS TRANSPRT M 0.00 450.00 104000 76685 01/12/16 559 A. M. WHITE MORTUAR 24 53114 P. MYERS TRANSPT M. 0.00 450.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1,350.00 104000 76751 01/12/16 2314 TRI COUNTY PROBATIO 28 58111 DMAP DEC 15 LABOR 0.00 220.00 104000 76752 01/12/16 114 UNIVERSITY OF FL − 24 53110 ME−BAK NOV15 0.00 1,738.43 104000 76778 01/19/16 253 JOEY B DOBSON, SHER 23 59122 2016JAGC1H3070 0.00 5,361.54 104000 76803 01/21/16 1670 BAKER CORRECTIONAL 71 58113 OCT INMATE ACTUAL H 0.00 65,041.25 104000 76803 01/21/16 1670 BAKER CORRECTIONAL 71 58113 NOV INMATE ACTUAL H 0.00 70,226.25 104000 76803 01/21/16 1670 BAKER CORRECTIONAL 71 58113 DEC INMATE ACTUAL H 0.00 76,707.50 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 211,975.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 1,424,095.72 TOTAL FUND 0.00 1,424,095.72 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 16 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 105 − FIRE DEPARTMENT FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 70380 V 08/06/13 2286 WILLIAM F MURRAY (S 54 51300 FIRE RUNS/JULY/4 0.00 −45.16 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 54 54301 FIRE STA 40−SEC LIG 0.00 45.38 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 54 54301 FIRE STA #30−CUYLER 0.00 40.36 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 54 54301 BAXTER FIRE STA #60 0.00 40.91 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 54 54301 FIRE STA #40−TAYLOR 0.00 24.08 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 54 54301 FIRE STA #20−N MACC 0.00 62.87 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 213.60 104000 76682 01/11/16 109 CITY OF MACCLENNY 54 54303 FIRE ST10−4980 J ST 0.00 37.04 104000 76684 01/11/16 200 FPL 54 54301 FIRE STA#80 −OLUSTE 0.00 16.88 104000 76698 01/12/16 2235 BRADLEY J CLARK (SC 54 51300 B CLARK DEC FIRE RU 0.00 82.50 104000 76703 01/12/16 102 CHANNEL INNOVATIONS 54 54600 QTRLY QR30 TEST−FIR 0.00 910.51 104000 76704 01/12/16 2208 CHEYENNE K MURRAY ( 54 51300 C MURRAY DEC FIRE R 0.00 30.00 104000 76706 01/12/16 99 CHRISTOPHER MIRACLE 54 51300 C MIRACLE DEC FIRE 0.00 54.00 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 54 54600 GRD CRD OUTL 15A−FI 0.00 8.98 104000 76717 01/12/16 2087 JACOB DOYLE (SC) 54 51300 J DOYLE DEC FIRE RU 0.00 58.50 104000 76718 01/12/16 904 JAMES COLBERT (SC) 54 51300 J COLBERT DEC FIRE 0.00 60.00 104000 76719 01/12/16 277 JAMES MURRAY(SC) 54 51300 J MURRAY DEC FIRE R 0.00 44.00 104000 76720 01/12/16 797 JOHN T DYAL (NC) 54 51300 J DYAL DEC FIRE RUN 0.00 230.00 104000 76721 01/12/16 1061 KEVIN A CRAWFORD (S 54 51300 K CRAWFORD DEC FIRE 0.00 26.00 104000 76722 01/12/16 267 L V HIERS INC 54 55211 FIRE FUEL 22 GAL 0.00 33.88 104000 76725 01/12/16 791 MARK RENNINGER (SC) 54 51300 M RENNINGER DEC FIR 0.00 47.50 104000 76726 01/12/16 457 MATTHEW BAUGHMAN 54 51300 M BAUGHMAN DEC FIRE 0.00 104.50 104000 76728 01/12/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 54 54602 BF−1 OIL CHANGE/TIR 0.00 71.23 104000 76735 01/12/16 1326 PATRICK’S UNIFORMS 54 55210 FIRE UNIFORMS 0.00 209.44 104000 76742 01/12/16 560 RYAN RHODEN 54 51300 R RHODEN DEC FIRE R 0.00 27.50 104000 76748 01/12/16 2350 STEVE MARFONGELLA, 54 55210 WEIGHT CHRG−A−50 0.00 10.50 104000 76756 01/12/16 1108 WILLIAM F GUEST (SC 54 51300 W GUEST DEC FIRE RU 0.00 48.00 104000 76757 01/12/16 320 WILLIAM MURRAY 54 51300 W MURRAY DEC FIRE R 0.00 36.00 104000 76758 01/12/16 2181 WILLIAM PRIMO (SC) 54 51300 W PRIMO DEC FIRE RU 0.00 495.00 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 17 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 105 − FIRE DEPARTMENT FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT

104000 76766 01/19/16 2090 CARD SERVICES 54 54600 SHIP SIREN BOX −FIR 0.00 21.96 104000 76766 01/19/16 2090 CARD SERVICES 54 55210 FIRE−EMPLY SERV PIN 0.00 370.20 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 392.16 104000 76771 01/19/16 1886 DAVIS & DAVIS ENTER 54 55211 GLEN FIRE FUEL 0.00 1,160.54 104000 76776 01/19/16 215 GRAINGER 54 54600 2XAIR HOSE 100FT 0.00 203.68 104000 76814 01/21/16 223 HALL−MARK FIRE APPA 54 54602 FIRE F10 PUMP TESTI 0.00 850.00 104000 76818 01/21/16 296 MIRACLE AUTOMOTIVE 54 54602 TUNE UP/IGNITIION/B 0.00 441.96 104000 76830 01/21/16 2310 WHELEN ENGINEERING 54 54602 FIRE BF−2,BF−3 SIRE 0.00 250.00 104000 76855 01/27/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 54 54600 FIRE#2,PHNE WIRE,TE 0.00 5.38 104000 76856 01/27/16 223 HALL−MARK FIRE APPA 54 56400 REPAIR E10 PUMP−2YR 0.00 4,357.73 104000 76873 01/27/16 391 SPRINT 54 54100 FIRE CELL SERV − SP 0.00 72.05 104000 76873 01/27/16 391 SPRINT 54 54100 FIRE CELL SERV. − S 0.00 34.99 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 107.04 104000 76879 01/27/16 2286 WILLIAM F MURRAY (S 54 51300 FIRE RUN JULY4.2013 0.00 45.16 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 10,624.05 TOTAL FUND 0.00 10,624.05 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 18 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 115 − CRIME PREVENTION T.F. CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 76859 01/27/16 253 JOEY B DOBSON, SHER 68 59180 RDJ SPECL.STICKY NO 0.00 405.47 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 405.47 TOTAL FUND 0.00 405.47 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 19 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 116 − SOLID WASTE CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 GLEN ST MARY DUMP S 0.00 45.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 CUYLER DUMP SITE 0.00 45.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 228 DUMP SITE 0.00 45.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 SANDERSON DUMP SITE 0.00 45.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 OLUSTEE DUMP SITE 0.00 45.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 YARD,LIMBS SITE 0.00 45.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 BAXTER DUMP SITE 0.00 45.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 MUDLAKE DUMP SITE. 0.00 45.00 104000 76665 12/30/15 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 STEEL BRIDGE RD DUM 0.00 45.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 405.00 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 65 54301 CUYLER RECY SITE 12 0.00 41.78 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 65 54301 RECY SITE−STEELBRID 0.00 38.50 104000 76678 01/11/16 326 OKEFENOKE REMC 65 54301 125 N GLEN RECY SIT 0.00 112.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 192.28 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 GLEN ST MARY DUMP S 0.00 45.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 CUYLER DUMP SITE 0.00 45.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 SANDERSON DUMP SITE 0.00 45.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 OLUSTEE DUMP SITE 0.00 45.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 YARD,LIMBS SITE 0.00 45.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 BAXTER DUMP SITE 0.00 45.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 MUDLAKE DUMP SITE. 0.00 45.00 104000 76679 01/11/16 1743 PITSTOP PORTABLE RE 65 54400 STEEL BRIDGE RD DUM 0.00 45.00 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 360.00 104000 76684 01/11/16 200 FPL 65 54301 SR 228 − SOLID WAST 0.00 52.87 104000 76684 01/11/16 200 FPL 65 54301 OLUSTEE−SOLID WASTE 0.00 13.63 104000 76684 01/11/16 200 FPL 65 54301 SEC LGT @ OLUSTEE R 0.00 9.80 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 76.30 104000 76689 01/12/16 1077 AT&T 65 54100 OLUSTEE RECYC SITE 0.00 160.18 104000 76693 01/12/16 1784 BALER SERVICES OF F 65 54600 STL BRIDGE COMPACTO 0.00 1,100.25 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 65 55210 OLUSTEE SITE/BLEACH 0.00 36.88 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 65 55210 BUCK STARNG PIPE PO 0.00 17.18 104000 76713 01/12/16 221 HAGAN ACE HARDWARE 65 55210 CR228 SITE/BULB/WIR 0.00 67.39 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 121.45 104000 76729 01/12/16 305 MURPHY COMMUNICATIO 65 54602 TRK 447 FIX MIC&ANT 0.00 180.00 104000 76732 01/12/16 318 NEXTRAN TRUCK CENTE 65 54602 S.W.TRK255 HOOD LAT 0.00 647.06 104000 76732 01/12/16 318 NEXTRAN TRUCK CENTE 65 54602 AIR SPRING TRK255−S 0.00 45.70 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 692.76 104000 76746 01/12/16 387 SOUTHEASTERN SERVIC 65 53150 SITE ATTENDANTS 12/ 0.00 6,644.70 104000 76790 01/19/16 317 NEW RIVER SOLID WAS 65 53403 ADV.DISPOSAL DEC 15 0.00 2,830.36 104000 76790 01/19/16 317 NEW RIVER SOLID WAS 65 53403 BCOC TIPPING FEE DE 0.00 14,313.00 104000 76790 01/19/16 317 NEW RIVER SOLID WAS 65 53403 CITIZENS TIPPING DE 0.00 69.42 TOTAL CHECK 0.00 17,212.78 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 20 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 116 − SOLID WASTE CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT

104000 76795 01/19/16 387 SOUTHEASTERN SERVIC 65 53150 SITE ATTENDANTS 1/1 0.00 7,511.40 104000 76796 01/19/16 2285 SUN PROFESSIONAL SU 65 55210 PRESSURE WASHER−SW 0.00 74.95 104000 76808 01/21/16 110 CLAY ELECTRIC CORPO 65 54301 RECY ST−MUD LAKE RO 0.00 102.27 104000 76844 01/27/16 1077 AT&T 65 54100 ATT PHNE OLUSTEE SI 0.00 201.69 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 35,036.01 TOTAL FUND 0.00 35,036.01 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 21 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 119 − COURT FACILITY FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 76744 01/12/16 2127 SECURITY ENGINEERIN 922 54600 REPAIR EXTER DR−CRT 0.00 225.00 104000 76751 01/12/16 2314 TRI COUNTY PROBATIO 922 54618 GBB DEC 2015 0.00 625.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 850.00 TOTAL FUND 0.00 850.00 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 22 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 122 − SHIP FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 76734 01/12/16 314 NORTHEAST FLORIDA R 89 53400 ADMIN FEE OCT−DEC15 0.00 8,750.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 8,750.00 TOTAL FUND 0.00 8,750.00 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 23 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 166 − 12.50 SC FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 76714 01/12/16 1734 HARRIS CORPORATION− 96 54600 SOF ACCESS FEE DEC 0.00 2,380.00 104000 76857 01/27/16 1734 HARRIS CORPORATION− 96 54600 SOL ACCESS FEE JAN1 0.00 2,380.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 4,760.00 TOTAL FUND 0.00 4,760.00 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 24 DATE: 01/28/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCTPA21 TIME: 12:33:02 CHECK REGISTER − BY FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date>’20151224 00:00:00.000’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

FUND − 600 − ROAD PAVING FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT VENDOR NAME DEPT/FUND ACCNT −−−−DESCRIPTION−−−− SALES TAX AMOUNT 104000 76710 01/12/16 164 DUVAL ASPHALT 75 54627 12/1−12/15 CONCRETE 0.00 71,131.50 104000 76711 01/12/16 1875 FRED A BENNETT 75 54627 GRADE WORK−CR23D 0.00 600.00 104000 76810 01/21/16 1889 ELLIS & ASSOCIATES 75 54627 NUCLEAR DENSITY TES 0.00 198.00 104000 76840 01/26/16 1875 FRED A BENNETT 75 54627 CR23D−MILLING,PAVIN 0.00 680.00 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT 0.00 72,609.50 TOTAL FUND 0.00 72,609.50 TOTAL REPORT 0.00 1,959,171.86

H .i g h ~ c h oo l Florida Sunshine Scholarship Program, Inc. ~ ~e ~ _, High School Sweetheart Pageant fc>ageanY/ PO Box 47166 Jacksonville, FL 32247 904-803-5773 January 20, 2016

Sara Little Macclenny, Florida

Dear Mrs. Little

Thank you so much for speaking with me this past week. We are having our 2nd Annual Baker County Valentine Pageant on February 27, 2016 at the Baker County Agricultural Center.

We are a not-for-profit Scholarship Organization and having this program helps us earn more scholarship money for the young women in all our Counties that are competing for our annual High School Sweetheart Pageant in December 2016.

As you know, our goal is to mentor young women in our local High Schools; building confidence, poise, and grace while instilling skill, boosting their community service activities and providing them with scholarships to continue their education.

With helping us defray the cost of the Agricultural Center Rental we will be able to help many more young women fulfill their dreams of furthering their education at a college of their choice. *(We are aware that we do pay the $300 Cash Deposit to the Center that is required each time we use the facility.)

Thank you again, and we look forward to your continued support.

Sincerely,

Cathy B Wilensky

MEMORANDUM

DATE: January 27, 2016

TO: Baker County Board of County Commissioners

THRU: Sara Little, Administrative Assistant

FROM: Lindsay Haga, Housing Program Coordinator

RE: SHIP Annual Report: Re-Approval and Signature for FY 11-12 and 12-13

SHIP Annual Reports Close-out Fiscal Years 11-12 and 12-13

The County approved the Close out Annual Reports for FY11-12 and 12-13 last year. The Florida Housing Finance Corporation had some questions regarding the data and set asides. We’ve worked with them to address those questions which have resulted in changes to the reports. The FHFC has approved both annual reports and requests the local government re- certify the contents. A copy of the revised close-out years has been provided for your review.

Recommendation:

Staff recommends approval of the SHIP Close-out Reports for FY 11-12 and 12-13. Additionally, signing the accompanying certification for submission to the Florida Housing Finance Corporation.

From: SHIP Program To: Lindsay Haga Subject: Baker County 2011-2012 Annual Report Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 2:52:13 PM

The Baker County 2011-2012 annual report is approved.

The Corporation commends your continuing efforts to benefit the citizens of Florida through the SHIP program. If we can be of assistance to you in the administration of your SHIP Program, please don’t hesitate to contact us.

Special needs (20% of FY 13/14 allocation) funds must be encumbered by 6/30/15 and must be disbursed by 9/30/15. On 9/30/15, any funds that remain undisbursed must be transferred to the State Housing Trust Fund within the Department of Economic Opportunity. The total amount of expended and encumbered special needs must equal 20% or more of the allocation.

No extensions will be granted. Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

Title: SHIP Annual Report Report Status: Approved Baker County FY 2011/2012 Form 1

Page 1 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

SHIP Distribution Summary Homeownership Expended Encumbered Unencumbered Code Strategy Amount Units Amount Units Amount Units 4 Demolition/Reconstruction $263,800.00 4 $.00 0 3 Rehabilitation $57,469.44 2 Homeownership Totals: $321,269.44 6 $.00 0

Rentals Expended Encumbered Unencumbered Code Strategy Amount Units Amount Units Amount Units Rental Totals:

Subtotals: $321,269.44 6 $.00 0

Additional Use of Funds Use Expended Encumbered Unencumbered Administrative $35,000.00 Homeownership Counseling Admin From Program Income $392.69 Admin From Disaster Funds

ITotals: $356,662.13 6 $.00 0 $.00 Total Revenue (Actual and/or Anticipated) for Local SHIP Trust Fund Source of Funds Amount State Annual Distribution $350,000.00 Program Income (Interest) $3,926.98 Program Income (Payments) Recaptured Funds Disaster Funds Other Funds Carryover funds from previous year -$15,316.93 Total: $338,610.05 * Carry Forward to Next Year: -$18,052.08 NOTE: This carry forward amount will only be accurate when all revenue amounts and all expended, encumbered and unencumbered amounts have been added to Form 1

Form 2

Page 2 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

Rental Unit Information Description I Eff. I 1 Bed I 2 Bed I 3 Bed I 4 Bed я No rental strategies are in use

Recap of Funding Sources for Units Produced ("Leveraging") Source of Funds Produced Amount of Funds Expended to through June 30th for Units Date % of Total Value SHIP Funds Expended $321,269.44 100.00% Public Moneys Expended .00% Private Funds Expended .00% Owner Contribution .00% Total Value of All Units $321,269.44 100.00%

SHIP Program Compliance Summary - Home Ownership/Construction/Rehab FL Statute Compliance Category SHIP Funds Trust Funds % of Trust Fund Minimum % Homeownership $321,269.44 $350,000.00 91.79% 65% Construction / Rehabilitation $321,269.44 $350,000.00 91.79% 75%

Program Compliance - Income Set-Asides Income Category SHIP Funds SHIP Funds SHIP Funds Total of Total Expended Encumbered Unencumbered SHIP Funds Available Funds % *

Extremely Low $.00 .00% Very Low $187,469.44 $187,469.44 55.36% Low $133,800.00 $133,800.00 39.51% Moderate $.00 .00% Totals: $321,269.44 $.00 $.00 $321,269.44 94.88%

Project Funding for Expended Funds Only Income Category Total Funds Mortgages, Total Funds SHIP Total SHIP Total # Mortgages, Loans & SHIP Grants Grant Funds Units Loans & DPL's DPL Unit #s Unit #s Expended

Extremely Low $.00 0 Very Low $187,469.44 4 $187,469.44 4 Low $133,800.00 2 $133,800.00 2 Moderate $.00 0 Totals: $321,269.44 6 $.00 0 $321,269.44 6 Form 3

Page 3 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009 Number of Households/Units Produced List Unincorporated and Each Strategy Municipality ELI VLI Low Mod Total Rehabilitation Unincorporated 1 1 Rehabililation Macclenny 1 1 Demolition/Constructi Glen St. Mary 1 1 2 on Demolition/Constructi Sanderson 1 1 2 on Totals: 4 2 6

Characteristics/Age (Head of Household) List Unincorporated and Each Description Municipality 0 - 25 26 - 40 41 - 61 62+ Total Rehabilitation Unincorporated 1 1 Rehabililation Macclenny 1 1 Demolition/Constructi Glen St. Mary 1 1 2 on Demolition/Constructi Sanderson 2 2 on Totals: 4 2 6

Family Size List Unincorporated and Each 1 2- 4 5 + Description Municipality Person People People Total Rehabilitation Unincorporated 1 1 Rehabililation Macclenny 1 1 Demolition/Constructi Glen St. Mary 1 1 2 on Demolition/Constructi Sanderson 2 2 on Totals: 2 4 6

Race (Head of Household) List Unincorporated and Each Hisp- Amer- Description Municipality White Black anic Asian Indian Other Total Rehabilitation Unincorporated 2 2 Rehabililation Macclenny 1 1 Demolition/Constructi Glen St. Mary 2 2 on Demolition/Constructi Sanderson 1 1 on Totals: 6 6

Page 4 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009 Special Needs (Any Member of Household)

List Unincorporated Devel. and Each Farm Dis- Home- Special Special Description Municipality Worker abled less Elderly Needs Needs Total Rehabilitation Unincorporated 0 Rehabililation Macclenny 0 Demolition/Constructi Glen St. Mary 0 on Demolition/Constructi Sanderson 0 on Totals: 0

Special Target Groups for Funds Expended (i.e. teachers, nurses, law enforcement, fire fighters, etc.) Set Aside

Special Target Total # of Description Group Expended Funds Expended Units Form 4

Status of Incentive Strategies Incentive Strategy: Expedited permitting is on going. SHIP permits and inspections are prioritized.

Adopting Ordinance or Resolution Number or identify local policy: 2005-08

Implementation Schedule (Date): on going and continuous

Has the plan or strategy been implemented? If no, describe the steps that will be taken to implement the plan: yes, the incentives are continuously implemented as applications are approved

Status of Strategy - (is the strategy functioning as intended, i.e. are the time frames being met, etc.):

yes, the strategies are functioning as intended.

Support Services home ownership and budget counseling provided as part of the demo/new construction strategy

Other Accomplishments N/A

Availability for Public Inspection and Comments The annual report is public record and is available either by contacting the NEFRC or the Baker County BOCC.

Homeownership Default & Foreclosure Mortgage Foreclosures

Page 5 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

Page 6 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

A. Very low income households in foreclosure: 0 B. Low income households in foreclosure: 0 C. Moderate households in foreclosure: 0 Foreclosed Loans Life-to-date: 0 SHIP Program Foreclosure Percentage Rate Life to Date: 0

Mortgage Defaults A. Very low income households in default: 0 B. Low income households in default: 0 C. Moderate households in default: 0 Defaulted Loans Life-to-date: 0 SHIP Program Default Percentage Rate Life to Date: 0

Welfare to Work Programs

N/A

Strategies and Production Costs Strategy Average Cost demo/construction $64,575.00 rehab $28,734.72

Expended Funds

Total Unit Count: 6 Total Expended Amount: $321,269.00 Strategy Full Name Address City Zip Expended Unit Code Funds Counted Rehabilitation Curtis & 8150 Cypress Street Sanderson 32087 $30,969.44 F Amelia Philips Rehabilitation Robertson, 489 E. Shuey Macclenny 32063 $26,500.00 F Bonnie Avenue Demolition/Recons Castleberry, 7063 Andrew Street Glen St. Mary 32040 $68,000.00 F truction Harold Demolition/Recons Harrell, Jimmy 19961 Noah Sanderson 32087 $62,000.00 F truction Raulerson Road demolition/reconstr Holton, Debra 18204 Noah Sanderson 32087 $68,500.00 F uction & John Raulerson Road demolition/reconstr Rothfeldt, 7234 W Franklin Glen St. Mary 32040 $65,300.00 F uction Roxanne Street

Administrative Expenditures N/A

Sub Recipients and Consultants

Page 7 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

Page 8 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

Name Business Type Strategy Covered Responsibility Amount NEFRC Regional Council Rehabilitation 100% - Planning Agency NEFRC Regional Demo/new construction 100% Council- Planning Agency

Program Income Program Income Funds Loan Repayment: Refinance: Foreclosure: Sale of Property: Interest Earned: $3,926.98 Other (): Total: $3,926.98

Explanation of Recaptured funds Description Amount

Total: $.00

Rental Developments Development Name Owner Address City Zip Code I Baker County 2011 Closeout

Single Family Area Purchase Price The average area purchase price of single family units: I I Or ¥ Not Applicable

Page 9 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

SHIP Amount SHIP Units Compliance Additional Monitored By Notes

Page 10 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

LG Submitted Comments:

Edits made to the report by the LG resulted in report status being changed back to "Unsubmitted"

Page 11 From: SHIP Program To: Lindsay Haga Subject: Baker County 2012-2013 Annual Report Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 3:33:21 PM

The Baker County 2012-2013 annual report is approved.

No extensions will be granted. Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

Title: SHIP Annual Report Report Status: Approved Baker County FY 2012/2013 Form 1

Page 1 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

SHIP Distribution Summary Homeownership Expended Encumbered Unencumbered Code Strategy Amount Units Amount Units Amount Units 6 ER $10,800.00 2 3 Rehab $11,331.20 1 Homeownership Totals: $22,131.20 3

Rentals Expended Encumbered Unencumbered Code Strategy Amount Units Amount Units Amount Units Rental Totals:

Subtotals: $22,131.20 3

Additional Use of Funds Use Expended Encumbered Unencumbered Administrative $750.00 Homeownership Counseling Admin From Program Income Admin From Disaster Funds

ITotals: $22,881.20 3 $.00 $.00 Total Revenue (Actual and/or Anticipated) for Local SHIP Trust Fund Source of Funds Amount State Annual Distribution $25,000.00 Program Income (Interest) $.00 Program Income (Payments) $.00 Recaptured Funds $.00 Disaster Funds Other Funds Carryover funds from previous year -$18,052.08 Total: $6,947.92 * Carry Forward to Next Year: -$15,933.28 NOTE: This carry forward amount will only be accurate when all revenue amounts and all expended, encumbered and unencumbered amounts have been added to Form 1

Form 2

Page 2 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

Rental Unit Information Description I Eff. I 1 Bed I 2 Bed I 3 Bed I 4 Bed я No rental strategies are in use

Recap of Funding Sources for Units Produced ("Leveraging") Source of Funds Produced Amount of Funds Expended to through June 30th for Units Date % of Total Value SHIP Funds Expended $22,131.20 100.00% Public Moneys Expended .00% Private Funds Expended .00% Owner Contribution .00% Total Value of All Units $22,131.20 100.00%

SHIP Program Compliance Summary - Home Ownership/Construction/Rehab FL Statute Compliance Category SHIP Funds Trust Funds % of Trust Fund Minimum % Homeownership $22,131.20 $25,000.00 88.52% 65% Construction / Rehabilitation $22,131.20 $25,000.00 88.52% 75%

Program Compliance - Income Set-Asides Income Category SHIP Funds SHIP Funds SHIP Funds Total of Total Expended Encumbered Unencumbered SHIP Funds Available Funds % *

Extremely Low $.00 .00% Very Low $10,800.00 $10,800.00 155.44% Low $11,331.20 $11,331.20 163.09% Moderate $.00 .00% Totals: $22,131.20 $.00 $.00 $22,131.20 318.53%

Extremely Low $.00 0 Very Low $10,800.00 2 $10,800.00 2 Low $11,331.20 1 $11,331.20 1 Moderate $.00 0 Totals: $22,131.20 3 $.00 0 $22,131.20 3 Form 3

Page 3 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

Number of Households/Units Produced List Unincorporated and Each Strategy Municipality ELI VLI Low Mod Total ER Glen St. Mary 2 0 2 Rehab Glen St. Mary 1 1 Totals: 2 1 3

Characteristics/Age (Head of Household) List Unincorporated and Each Description Municipality 0 - 25 26 - 40 41 - 61 62+ Total ER Glen St. Mary 2 2 Rehab Glen St. Mary 1 1 Totals: 2 1 3

Family Size List Unincorporated and Each 1 2- 4 5 + Description Municipality Person People People Total ER Glen St. Mary 2 2 Rehab Glen St. Mary 1 1 Totals: 3 3

Race (Head of Household) List Unincorporated and Each Hisp- Amer- Description Municipality White Black anic Asian Indian Other Total ER Glen St. Mary 2 2 Rehab Glen St. Mary 1 1 Totals: 3 3

Special Needs (Any Member of Household)

List Unincorporated Devel. and Each Farm Dis- Home- Special Special Description Municipality Worker abled less Elderly Needs Needs Total ER Glen St. Mary 1 0 1 Rehab Glen St. Mary 0 Totals: 1 0 1

Special Target Groups for Funds Expended (i.e. teachers, nurses, law enforcement, fire fighters, etc.) Set Aside

Special Target Total # of Description Group Expended Funds Expended Units Form 4

Page 4 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

Page 5 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009 Status of Incentive Strategies Incentive Strategy: Expedited Permitting: on going. SHIP building permits and inspections are expedited as filed.

Adopting Ordinance or Resolution Number or identify local policy: Resolution 2014-09

Implementation Schedule (Date): On going and continuous

Has the plan or strategy been implemented? If no, describe the steps that will be taken to implement the plan: Yes, the incentives are continuously implemented as applications are approved for the program.

Status of Strategy - (is the strategy functioning as intended, i.e. are the time frames being met, etc.):

yes, the strategy is functioning as intended. The county has partnered with the State Environmental Health Department to further expedite septic tank permitting.

Support Services Homebuyer counseling, budgeting and ownership strategies are available to all applicants.

Other Accomplishments n/a

Availability for Public Inspection and Comments The annual report is a public document available on line through the County agenda and through public request through the Jacksonville SHIP offices

Homeownership Default & Foreclosure Mortgage Foreclosures A. Very low income households in foreclosure: 0 B. Low income households in foreclosure: 0 C. Moderate households in foreclosure: 0 Foreclosed Loans Life-to-date: 0 SHIP Program Foreclosure Percentage Rate Life to Date: 0

Welfare to Work Programs

Page 6 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

Page 7 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

n/a

Strategies and Production Costs Strategy Average Cost ER $5,400.00

Expended Funds

Total Unit Count: 3 Total Expended Amount: $22,131.00 Strategy Full Name Address City Zip Expended Unit Code Funds Counted ER Brookens, 7401 E. Ridge Glen St. Mary 32040 $4,500.00 F Robert & Lisa Estates Drive, Glen St. Mary, Fl 32040 ER Higginbotham, 7978 JD Glen St Mary 32040 $6,300.00 F Ricky Higginbotham Road Rehab Rhue, Barbara 11037 Kenneth Glen St Mary 32040 $11,331.20 F Walker

Administrative Expenditures n/a

Sub Recipients and Consultants Name Business Type Strategy Covered Responsibility Amount NEFRC Regional Agency ER 100

Program Income Program Income Funds Loan Repayment: Refinance: Foreclosure: Sale of Property: Interest Earned: Other (): Total: $.00

Explanation of Recaptured funds Description Amount

Total: $.00

Rental Developments

Page 8 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

Page 9 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

Development Name Owner Address City Zip Code

Baker County 2012 Closeout

Single Family Area Purchase Price The average area purchase price of single family units: Or ¥ Not Applicable

LG Submitted Comments:

Edits made to the report by the LG resulted in report status being changed back to "Unsubmitted"

Page 10 Form SHIP AR/2009 67-37.008(3)(f), F.A.C. Effective Date: 11/2009

SHIP Amount SHIP Units Compliance Additional Monitored By Notes

Page 11 Annual Report Certification for State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Program

On Behalf of ______(Local Government), I hereby certify that the annual reporting information submitted electronically to Florida Housing Finance Corporation for fiscal years ______(list all three fiscal years) is true and accurate.

Name of Staff Member responsible for submitting annual report: ______

______Witness Signature Date Chief Elected Official or Designee Signature Date

______Witness Printed Name Chief Elected Official or Designee Printed Name

______Witness Signature Date

______Witness Printed Name

ATTEST (Seal) ______Signature Date

420.9075 (10) Each county or eligible municipality shall submit to the corporation by September 15 of each year a report of its affordable housing programs and accomplishments through June 30 immediately preceding submittal of the report. The report shall be certified as accurate and complete by the local government's chief elected official or his or her designee.

October 2012

Certification for Regulatory Reform Implementation State Housing Initiatives Partnership (SHIP) Program

On Behalf of ______(Local Government), I hereby certify that the following information is true and accurate as of the date of this submission for the following fiscal years: ______(list all three fiscal years):

1. Permits as defined in s.163.3164 (15) and (16) for affordable housing projects are expedited to a greater degree than other projects; and

2. There is an ongoing process for review of local policies, ordinances, regulations, and plan provisions that increase the cost of housing prior to their adoption.

3. The cumulative cost per newly constructed housing per housing unit, from these actions is estimated to be $______.

4. The cumulative cost per rehabilitated housing per housing unit, from these actions is estimated to be $ ______.

______Witness Signature Date Chief Elected Official or Designee Signature Date

______Witness Printed Name Chief Elected Official or Designee Printed Name

______Witness Signature Date

______Witness Printed Name

ATTEST (Seal) ______Signature Date

163.3164 (15) of the Florida Statutes: "Development order" means any order granting, denying, or granting with conditions an application for a development permit.

163.3164(16) of the Florida Statutes: "Development permit" includes any building permit, zoning permit, subdivision approval, rezoning, certification, special exception, variance, or any other official action of local government having the effect of permitting the development of land.

October 2012

CHANGE ORDER Number 1

PROJECT: Baker County Old Jail Phase V CHANGE ORDER NO.: 1 Grant S1654 DATE: Feb 2, 2016

CONTRACT DATE: Dec. 24, 2015

TO CONTRACTOR: Peacock Painting, Inc. CONTRACT FOR: $28,800

The Contract is changed as follows:

Deduct: -$600.00 -$600.00 A second floor door. Door between Refuge Area and access entry way to second floor. Listed as Bid Alternate 1 on the proposal form.

Add: First floor: Paint five (5) cell block metal doors, one (1) metal door from interior access to first $3,300.00 $3,300.00 floor cell block, painting two (2) security grills into cells, (painting includes security bars above one door as part of the door).

Second floor: Paint medal door on cell before entering cell block, paint entry medal door to cell block.

Painting includes both sides of medal doors and security grills.

The original (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price ) was ...... $ $28,800

Net Change by previously authorized Change Orders ...... $ $0.00

The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price) prior to this Change Order was ...... $ $28,800

The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price) will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by $ $2,700.00 this Change Order in the amount of ......

The New (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Price) including this Change Order will be ...... $ $31,500.00

The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by 10 days ...... 10

The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is:31 calendar days from the Notice to Proceed. 31

Not valid until signed by the, and Contractor. and Owner

KENNETH SMITH ARCHITECTS, INC. ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR Peacock Painting Inc. OWNER: Baker County Board of County Commissioners 8301 Cypress Plaza Drive, Suite 203 ADDRESS ADDRESS 5375 Blue Hole Rd. ADDRESS Co. Admin Bldg. Jacksonville, Florida 32256 55 N. Third Street

Macclenny, Fl 32063 Macclenny, FL 32063

By: By: Signature Signature

Date: Date:

G:\Administrative\0 FORMS-LABELS\CHANGE ORDERS\CHANGE ORDER - TABLE FORMAT.doc EMS MATCHING GRANT APPLICATION

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Bureau of Emergency Medical Services

Complete all items unless instructed differently within the application Type of Grant Requested: Rural Matching ID. Code (The State Bureau of EMS will assign• the ID Code – • leave this blank) ______

1. Organization Name:

2. Grant Signer: (The applicant signatory who has authority to sign contracts, grants, and other legal documents. This individual must also sign this application) Name:

Position Title:

Address:

City: County: State: Florida Zip Code: Telephone: Fax Number: E-Mail Address:

3. Contact Person: (The individual with direct knowledge of the project on a day-to-day basis and responsibility for the implementation of the grant activities. This person may sign project reports and may request project changes. The signer and the contact person may be the same.) Name:

Position Title:

Address:

City: County: State: Florida Zip Code: Telephone: Fax Number: E-Mail Address: DH Form 1767, Rev. June 2002

1 4. Legal Status of Applicant Organization (Check only one response): (1) Private Not for Profit [Attach documentation-501 (3) ©] (2) • Private For Profit (3) • City/Municipality/Town/Village (4) • County (5) • State (6) • Other (specify): • 5. Federal Tax ID Number (Nine Digit Number). VF

6. EMS License Number: Type: Transport Non-transport Both • • • 7. Number of permitted vehicles by type: BLS ALS Transport ALS non-transport.

8. Type of Service (check one): • Rescue • Fire • Third Service (County or City Government, nonfire) • Air ambulance: • Fixed wing • Rotowing • Both • Other (specify) .

9. Medical Director of licensed EMS provider: If this project is approved, I agree by signing below that I will affirm my authority and responsibility for the use of all medical equipment and/or the provision of all continuing EMS education in this project. [No signature is needed if medical equipment and professional EMS education are not in this project.]

Signature: ______Date: ______

Print/Type: Name of Director

FL Med. Lic. No.

Note: All organizations that are not licensed EMS providers must obtain the signature of the medical director of the licensed EMS provider responsible for EMS services in their area of operation for projects that involve medical equipment and/or continuing EMS education.

If your activity is a research or evaluation project, omit Items 10, 11, 12, 13, and skip to Item Number 14. Otherwise, proceed to Item 10 and the following items.

10. Justification Summary: Provide on no more than three one sided, double spaced pages a summary addressing this project, covering each topic listed below.

A) Problem description (Provide a narrative of the problem or need); B) Present situation (Describe how the situation is being handled now); C) The proposed solution (Present your proposed solution); D) Consequences if not funded (Explain what will happen if this project is not funded); E) The geographic area to be addressed (Provide a narrative description of the geographic area); F) The proposed time frames (Provide a list of the time frame(s) for completing this project); G) Data Sources (Provide a complete description of data source(s) you cite); H) Statement attesting that the proposal is not a duplication of a previous effort (State that this project doesn’t duplicate what you’ve done on other grant projects under this grant program).

DH Form 1767, Rev. 2002

Next, only complete one of the following: Items 11, 12, or 13. Read all three and then select and complete the one that pertains the most to the preceding Justification Summary. Note that on all three, that before-after differences for emergency victim data are the highest scoring items on the Matching Grants Evaluation Worksheet used by reviewers to evaluate your application form.

11. Outcome For Projects That Provide or Effect Direct Services To Emergency Victims: This may include vehicles, medical and rescue equipment, communications, navigation, dispatch, and all other things that impact upon on-site treatment, rescue, and benefit of emergency victims at the emergency scene. Use no more than two additional one sided, double-spaced pages for your response. Include the following.

A) Quantify what the situation has been in the most recent 12 months for which you have data (include the dates). The strongest data will include numbers of deaths and injuries during this time. B) In the 12 months after this project’s resources are on-line, estimate what the numbers you provided under the preceding “(A)” should become. C) Justify and explain how you derived the numbers in (A) and (B), above. D) What other outcome of this project do you expect? Be quantitative and explain the derivation of your figures. E) How does this integrate into your agency’s five year plan?

12. Outcome For Training Projects: This includes training of all types for the public, first responders, law enforcement personnel, EMS and other healthcare staff. Use no more than two additional one sided, double-spaced pages for your response. Include the following:

A) How many people received the training this project proposes in the most recent 12 month time period for which you have data (include the dates). B) How many people do you estimate will successfully complete this training in the 12 months after training begins? C) If this training is designed to have an impact on injuries, deaths, or other emergency victim data, provide the impact data for the 12 months before the training and project what the data should be in the 12 months after the training. D) Explain the derivation of all figures. E) How does this integrate into your agency’s five year plan?

13. Outcome For Other Projects: This includes quality assurance, management, administrative, and other. Provide numeric data in your responses, if possible, that bear directly upon the project and emergency victim deaths, injuries, and/or other data. Use no more than two additional one sided, double- spaced pages for your response. Include the following.

A) What has the situation been in the most recent 12 months for which you have data (include the dates)? B) What will the situation be in the 12 months after the project services are on-line? C) If this project is designed to have an impact on injuries, deaths, or other emergency victim data, provide the impact data for the 12 months before the project and what the data should be in the 12 months after the project. D) Explain the derivation of all numbers. E) How does this integrate into your agency’s five year plan?

DH Form 1767, Rev. 2002

Skip Item 14 and go to Item 15, unless your project is research and evaluation and you have not completed the preceding Justification Summary and one outcome item.

14. Research and Evaluation Justification Summary, and Outcome: You may use no more than three additional one sided, double spaced pages for this item.

A) Justify the need for this project as it relates to EMS. B) Identify (1) location and (2) population to which this research pertains. C) Among population identified in 14(B) above, specify a past time frame, and provide the number of deaths, injuries, or other adverse conditions during this time that you estimate the practical application of this research will reduce (or positive effect that it will increase). D) (1) Provide the expected numeric change when the anticipated findings of this project are placed into practical use. (2) Explain the basis for your estimates. E) State your hypothesis. F) Provide the method and design for this project. G) Attach any questionnaires or involved documents that will be used. H) If human or other living subjects are involved in this research, provide documentation that you will comply with all applicable federal and state laws regarding research subjects. I) Describe how you will collect and analyze the data.

15. Statutory Considerations and Criteria: The following are based on s. 401.113(2)(b) and 401.117, F.S. Use no more than one additional double spaced page to complete this item. Write N/A for those things in this section that do not pertain to this project. Respond to all others.

Justify that this project will: A) Serve the requirements of the population upon which it will impact. B) Enable emergency vehicles and their staff to conform to state standards established by law or rule of the department. C) Enable the vehicles of your organization to contain at least the minimum equipment and supplies as required by law, rule or regulation of the department. D) Enable the vehicles of your organization to have, at a minimum, a direct communications linkup with the operating base and hospital designated as the primary receiving facility. E) Enable your organization to improve or expand the provision of: 1) EMS services on a county, multi county, or area wide basis. 2) Single EMS provider or coordinated methods of delivering services. 3) Coordination of all EMS communication links, with police, fire, emergency vehicles, and other related services.

DH Form 1767, Rev. 2002

16. Work activities and time frames: Indicate the major activities for completing the project (use only the space provided). Be reasonable, most projects cannot be completed in less than six months and if it is a communications project, it will take about a year. Also, if you are purchasing certain makes of ambulances, it takes at least nine months for them to be delivered after the bid is let. Work Activity Number of Months After Grant Starts ___Begin______End___ (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) Specifications for ambulance build to RFP Award date 1-1.5 Review of qualified bids 2 months 2.5 months Award Bid 2.5 months 3 months Manufactor Ambulance 4 months 12 months Receive and in service 2 weeks from delivery.

17. County Governments: If this application is being submitted by a county agency, describe in the space below why this request cannot be paid for out of funds awarded under the state EMS county grant program. Include in the explanation why any unspent county grant funds, which are now in your county accounts, cannot be allocated in whole or part for the costs herein.

DH Form 1767, Rev. 2002

18. Budget: Salaries and Benefits: For each Costs Justification: Provide a brief justification position title, provide the amount why each of the positions and the numbers of salary per hour, FICA per hour, of hours are necessary for this project. fringe benefits, and the total number of hours.

TOTAL:

Expenses: These are travel costs Costs: List the price Justification: Justify why each of the and the usual, ordinary, and and source(s) of the expense items and quantities are incidental expenditures by an price identified. necessary to this project. agency, such as, commodities and supplies of a consumable nature, excluding expenditures classified as operating capital outlay (see next category).

TOTAL: DH Form 1767, Rev. 2002

Vehicles, equipment, and other Costs: List the price Justification: State why each of the items operating capital outlay means of the item and the and quantities listed is a necessary equipment, fixtures, and other source(s) used to component of this project. tangible personal property of a identify the price. non consumable and non expendable nature, and the normal expected life of which is 1 year or more. New Ambulance $175,000.00 New ambulance purchase.

Stretcher $12,000.00 Stryker Power Pro with mounts (current type on other units)

TOTAL:

State Amount (Check applicable program)

X Matching: 75 Percent $140,250.00

Rural: 90 Percent - • Local Match Amount (Check applicable program)

X Matching: 25 Percent $46,750.00

Rural: 10 Percent - • Grand Total $187,000.00 DH Form 1767, Rev. 2002

19. Certification: My signature below certifies the following. I am aware that any omissions, falsifications, misstatements, or misrepresentations in this application may disqualify me for this grant and, if funded, may be grounds for termination at a later date. I understand that any information I give may be investigated as allowed by law. I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief all of the statements contained herein and on any attachments are true, correct, complete, and made in good faith.

I agree that any and all information submitted in this application will become a public document pursuant to Section 119.07, F.S. when received by the Florida Bureau of EMS. This includes material which the applicant might consider to be confidential or a trade secret. Any claim of confidentiality is waived by the applicant upon submission of this application pursuant to Section 119.07,F.S., effective after opening by the Florida Bureau of EMS.

I accept that in the best interests of the State, the Florida Bureau of EMS reserves the right to reject or revise any and all grant proposals or waive any minor irregularity or technicality in proposals received, and can exercise that right.

I, the undersigned, understand and accept that the Notice of Matching Grant Awards will be advertised in the Florida Administrative Weekly, and that 21 days after this advertisement is published I waive any right to challenge or protest the awards pursuant to Chapter 120, F.S.

I certify that the cash match will be expended between the beginning and ending dates of the grant and will be used in strict accordance with the content of the application and approved budget for the activities identified. In addition, the budget shall not exceed, the department, approved funds for those activities identified in the notification letter. No funds count towards satisfying this grant if the funds were also used to satisfy a matching requirement of another state grant. All cash, salaries, fringe benefits, expenses, equipment, and other expenses as listed in this application shall be committed and used for the activities approved as a part of this grant.

Acceptance of Terms and Conditions: If awarded a grant, I certify that I will comply with all of the above and also accept the attached grant terms and conditions and acknowledge this by signing below.

/ / Signature of Authorized Grant Signer MM / DD / YY (Individual Identified in Item 2) DH Form 1767, Rev. June 2002

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH EMS GRANT PROGRAM

REQUEST FOR GRANT FUND DISTRIBUTION

In accordance with the provisions of Section 401.113(2)(b), F. S., the undersigned hereby requests an EMS grant fund distribution for the improvement and expansion or continuation of pre-hospital EMS.

DOH Remit Payment To: Name of Agency: Baker County EMS

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 958

Macclenny, Florida 32063

Federal Identification Number 59-6000508

Authorized Agency Official: Signature Date

James Bennett , Chairman, Bd. Of County Comm. Type Name and Title

Sign and return this page with your application to:

Florida Department of Health BEMS Grant Program 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C18 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1738

Do not write below this line. For use by Bureau of Emergency Medical Services personnel only

Grant Amount For State To Pay: $______Grant ID Code: ______

Approved By: Signature of EMS Grant Officer Date State Fiscal Year: 2007 - 2008

Organization Code E.O. OCA Object Code 64-42-10-00-000 03 SF003 750000

Federal Tax ID: VF______

Grant Beginning Date: ______Grant Ending Date: ______

DH Form 1767P, Rev. June 2002

9 PROCLAMATION

Through With Chew Week

WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Health’s Bureau of Tobacco Free Florida and Baker County Health Department are leaders in tobacco prevention and cessation efforts; and

WHEREAS, using smokeless tobacco can lead to nicotine addiction and dependence;1

WHEREAS, smokeless tobacco products like chew and dip can contain more nicotine than cigarettes;2 and

WHEREAS, smokeless tobacco users have an 80 percent higher risk of oral cancer;3 and

WHEREAS, youth use of smokeless tobacco has fluctuated but has not decreased compared to a decade ago;4 and

WHEREAS, once adolescents start using one tobacco product, they are more likely to experiment with others;5 and

WHEREAS, many of the highest youth smokeless tobacco use rates are in rural areas;3 and

WHEREAS, Tobacco Free Florida’s 3 Free & Easy Ways to Quit can double a tobacco users chances of successfully quitting; and

NOW, THEREFORE, the County Commissioners of Baker County, do hereby proclaim February 14-20, 2016 as Through With Chew Week.

Dated this second day of February 2016. Baker County Board of Commissioners

______James G. Bennett Attest:

______Stacie D. Harvey, Clerk

1 Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts and Figures 2010. 2 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Preliminary Scientific Evaluation of the Possible Public Health Effects of Menthol Versus Nonmenthol Cigarettes, July 2013, 3 Boffetta, P, et al., “Smokeless tobacco and cancer,” The Lancet 9:667-675, 2008. 4 Florida Youth Tobacco Survey (FYTS), Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Epidemiology, 2015 5 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Parental Advisory on Flavored Tobacco Products - What You Need To Know. FDA.7 March 2011. 2016‐03

RESOLUTION

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT OF THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida, set forth the appropriations and revenue estimate for the budget amendment for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 from $23,312,422 to $32,098,650.00, by adding our current road projects.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida, that:

1. The Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Budget Amendment be adopted.

2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

Approved and Resolved this 2nd day of February 2016 by the Baker County Board of County Commissioners.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA

______

JAMES G. BENNETT, CHAIRMAN

Attest: ______

Stacie D. Harvey, Clerk to the Board SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 01/29/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REVSTA11 TIME: 14:51:47 REVENUE STATUS REPORT SELECTION CRITERIA: orgn.fund=’600’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

SORTED BY: FUND,FUND/DEPT,1ST SUBTOTAL,ACCOUNT TOTALED ON: FUND,FUND/DEPT,1ST SUBTOTAL PAGE BREAKS ON: FUND/DEPT FUND−600 ROAD PAVING FUND FUND/DEPT− TITLE NOT FOUND 1ST SUBTOTAL−330000 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE

PERIOD YEAR TO DATE AVAILABLE YTD/ ACCOUNT − − − − − TITLE − − − − − BUDGET RECEIPTS RECEIVABLES RECEIPTS BALANCE BUD 334425 CR 125N (CR127 TO CR250) 1,659,600.00 .00 .00 .00 1,659,600.00 .00 334492 SCRAP CR 229 N 550,000.00 .00 .00 .00 550,000.00 .00 334493 SCRAP CR 23D 380,000.00 .00 .00 6,130.00 373,870.00 1.61 334494 CIGP MIDPOINT PRKWY 650,000.00 .00 .00 519,942.42 130,057.58 79.99 334497 CR125−LAP, PARK TO CR127 3,045,425.00 .00 .00 366.33 3,045,058.67 .01 334630 HMGP− CR250 DRAINAGE 100,000.00 .00 .00 14,441.25 85,558.75 14.44 334631 CIGP−REID STAFFORD/GLEN 2,366,203.00 .00 .00 .00 2,366,203.00 .00 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVEN 8,751,228.00 .00 .00 540,880.00 8,210,348.00 6.18 1ST SUBTOTAL−334000 STATE GRANTS 334710 HISTORICAL GRANT/OLD JAI 35,000.00 .00 .00 8,750.00 26,250.00 25.00 TOTAL STATE GRANTS 35,000.00 .00 .00 8,750.00 26,250.00 25.00 1ST SUBTOTAL−360000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 361100 INTEREST .00 .00 .00 129.93 −129.93 .00 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES .00 .00 .00 129.93 −129.93 .00 TOTAL TITLE NOT FOUND 8,786,228.00 .00 .00 549,759.93 8,236,468.07 6.26 TOTAL ROAD PAVING FUND 8,786,228.00 .00 .00 549,759.93 8,236,468.07 6.26

TOTAL REPORT 8,786,228.00 .00 .00 549,759.93 8,236,468.07 6.26 SUNGARD PENTAMATION PAGE NUMBER: 1 DATE: 01/29/2016 BAKER CO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EXPSTA11 TIME: 14:50:40 EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT SELECTION CRITERIA: orgn.fund=’600’ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/16

SORTED BY: FUND,FUND/DEPT,1ST SUBTOTAL,ACCOUNT TOTALED ON: FUND,FUND/DEPT,1ST SUBTOTAL PAGE BREAKS ON: FUND/DEPT FUND−600 ROAD PAVING FUND FUND/DEPT−75 ROAD PAVING FUND 1ST SUBTOTAL−53000 OPERATING EXPENSES

PERIOD ENCUMBRANCES YEAR TO DATE AVAILABLE YTD/ ACCOUNT − − − − − TITLE − − − − − BUDGET EXPENDITURES OUTSTANDING EXP BALANCE BUD 53132 CR 125N (CR127 TO CR250) 1,659,600.00 .00 .00 .00 1,659,600.00 .00 53133 HMGP− CR250 DRAINAGE 100,000.00 .00 .00 4,100.00 95,900.00 4.10 53135 CIGP MIDPOINT PRKWY 650,000.00 .00 .00 .00 650,000.00 .00 53136 CR125−LAP, PARK TO CR127 3,045,425.00 .00 .00 .00 3,045,425.00 .00 54624 CIGP − REID STAFRD/GLEN 2,366,203.00 .00 .00 .00 2,366,203.00 .00 54626 SCRAP CR 229 N 550,000.00 .00 .00 .00 550,000.00 .00 54627 SCRAP CR 23D 380,000.00 72,609.50 .00 86,782.46 293,217.54 22.84 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 8,751,228.00 72,609.50 .00 90,882.46 8,660,345.54 1.04 1ST SUBTOTAL−58000 GRANTS AND AIDS 58209 HISTORICAL JAIL GRANT 35,000.00 .00 .00 3,500.00 31,500.00 10.00 TOTAL GRANTS AND AIDS 35,000.00 .00 .00 3,500.00 31,500.00 10.00 TOTAL ROAD PAVING FUND 8,786,228.00 72,609.50 .00 94,382.46 8,691,845.54 1.07 TOTAL ROAD PAVING FUND 8,786,228.00 72,609.50 .00 94,382.46 8,691,845.54 1.07

TOTAL REPORT 8,786,228.00 72,609.50 .00 94,382.46 8,691,845.54 1.07 RESOLUTION 2016-01

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A SMALL COUNTY ROAD ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AGREEMENT WITH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE RESURFACING OF CR 229 NORTH FROM 2.5 MILES SOUTH OF CR 250 TO CR 250. FINANCIAL PROJECT ID #432597-1-54-01. THE CHAIRMAN IS FURTHER AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS FOR RECEIVING ADDITIONAL FUNDS OR MODIFYING THE CONTRACT DURATION.

WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation desires the execution of a Small County Road Assistance Program Agreement for the resurfacing of CR 229 North from 2.5 miles South of CR 250 to CR 250. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED this 5th day of January, 2016 by the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida, that the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners is hereby authorized to execute the Small County Road Assistance Program Agreement between the Baker County Board of Commissioners and the Florida Department of Transportation for Financial Project ID: 432597-1-54-01.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA

______James G. Bennett, Chairman

ATTEST:

______Stacie D. Harvey, Clerk to the Board Florida Statutes: STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 850-035-02 334.044(7) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SMALL COUNTY ROAD ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT OGC-09/15 Page 1 of 12

Financial Project No.: 432597-1-54-01 Catalog of State Financial Assistance No.: 55016

This Small County Road Assistance Agreement (this "Agreement") is made this __ day of ______, 20 __ between the STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, hereinafter referred to as the "DEPARTMENT", and Baker County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY".

WITNESSETH

WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT has the authority, under Section 334.044(7), Florida Statutes, to enter into this Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the Small County Road Assistance Program has been created within the DEPARTMENT pursuant to Section 339.2816, Florida Statutes, to assist small counties in resurfacing or reconstructing county roads; and

WHEREAS, the COUNTY has certified to the DEPARTMENT that it has met the eligibility requirements of said Section 339.2816, Florida Statutes; and

WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT is willing to provide the COUNTY with financial assistance, under FM No. 432597-1-54-01, for costs directly related to the resurfacing or reconstruction of CR 229 North from 2.5 miles South of CR 250 to CR 250, hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT; and

WHEREAS, the COUNTY by Resolution No. ______dated the ___ day of ______, 20 __, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, has authorized the Chairman of its Board of Commissioners or County Manager to enter into this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises and representations contained herein, the parties agree as follows:

1. SERVICES AND PERFORMANCE

A. The COUNTY shall furnish the services with which to construct the PROJECT. Said PROJECT shall consist of the actions and services described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof. The scope of work shall clearly establish the tasks to be performed pursuant to Section 215.971, Florida Statutes.

B. The COUNTY agrees to undertake the construction of the PROJECT in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including COUNTY's standards and specifications. The COUNTY shall be responsible for obtaining clearances/permits required for the construction of the PROJECT from the appropriate permitting authorities. Upon completion of the PROJECT, the COUNTY shall certify to the DEPARTMENT that the PROJECT has been completed in accordance with the COUNTY's standards and specifications.

C. The DEPARTMENT will be entitled at all times to be advised, upon request, as to the status of work being done by the COUNTY and of the details thereof. Coordination shall be maintained by the COUNTY with representatives of the DEPARTMENT.

D. The COUNTY must certify that the consultant has been selected in accordance with the Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act (Section 287.055, Florida Statutes). Contractor must be prequalified by the DEPARTMENT pursuant to Section 337.14, Florida Statutes, and Rule Chapter 14-22, Florida Administrative Code for projects meeting the thresholds therein.

E. The COUNTY shall utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the COUNTY during the term of the contract; and shall expressly require any subcontractors performing work or providing services pursuant to the state contract to Florida Statutes: 850-035-02 334.044(7) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OGC-09/15 Page 2 of 12 likewise utilize the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify system to verify the employment eligibility of all new employees hired by the subcontractor during the contract term.

F. The COUNTY shall not sublet, assign or transfer any work under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the DEPARTMENT.

G. The COUNTY shall require quantifiable units of deliverables pursuant to Section 215.971, Florida Statutes. Each deliverable must be directly related to the scope of work and must specify the required minimum level of service to be performed and the criteria for evaluating successful completion of each deliverable. Said deliverables are described in Exhibit C, attached hereto and made a part hereof.

H. Notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be considered effective upon delivery by United States mail, facsimile, or overnight courier to the individuals listed below as follows:

TO DEPARTMENT: TO COUNTY:

Kim Evans, District Local Programs Administrator CJ Thompson, County Manager FOOT - District 2 Program Management Baker County Manager's Office 1109 South Marion Avenue 55 N. 3rd Street Lake City, Florida 32025-587 4 Macclenny, Florida 32063

2. TERM

A. The COUNTY shall commence the PROJECT activities subsequent to the execution of this Agreement and shall be performed in accordance with the following schedule:

i) Construction contract to be let on or before-'-'12=/-=-3"""'1/=2=0....:.1=6 ______ii) Construction to be completed on or before -'-'12=/-=-3"""'1/=2=0....:.1..:..7 ______

B. The COUNTY agrees to complete the PROJECT on or before 12/31/2017 If the COUNTY does not complete the PROJECT within this time period, this Agreement will expire on the last day of the scheduled completion as provided in this paragraph unless an extension of the time period is requested by the COUNTY and granted in writing by the DEPARTMENT prior to the expiration of this Agreement. Expiration of this Agreement will be considered termination of the PROJECT. The cost of any work performed after the expiration date of this Agreement will not be reimbursed by the DEPARTMENT.

C. This Agreement shall not be renewed. Any extension which shall be for no more than six (6) months shall be in writing and executed by both parties, and shall be subject to the same terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

3. COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT

A. The DEPARTMENT agrees to a maximum participation in the PROJECT [design, construction and construction engineering inspection services ("CEI")) in the amount of $550,000.00.

B. The COUNTY shall submit one invoice (3 copies) plus supporting documentation required by the DEPARTMENT to the Project Manager, at the address stated in paragraph 1G, for approval and processing:

~ monthly, or • once the PROJECT has been accepted by the COUNTY and approved by the DEPARTMENT.

C. In the event the COUNTY proceeds with the CEI of the PROJECT with its own forces, the COUNTY will only be reimbursed for direct costs (this excludes general and administrative overhead).

D. All costs charged to the PROJECT shall be supported by properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts or vouchers evidencing in proper detail the nature and propriety of the charges. Florida Statutes: 850--035-02 334.044(7) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OGC-09/15 Page 3 of 12

E. The DEPARTMENT shall have the right to retain out of any payment due the COUNTY under this Agreement an amount sufficient to satisfy any amount due and owing to the DEPARTMENT by the COUNTY on any other Agreement between the COUNTY and the DEPARTMENT.

F. The COUNTY must submit the final invoice to the DEPARTMENT within 180 days after the final acceptance of the project.

G. Payment shall be made only after receipt and approval of goods and services unless advance payments are authorized by the DEPARTMENT'S Comptroller under Section 334.044 (29), Florida Statutes. Any provisions for an advance payment are provided in Exhibit N/A , attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement.

H. Deliverables must be received and accepted in writing by the Contract Manager prior to payments.

I. Any penalty for delay in payment shall be in accordance with Section 215.422(3)(b), Florida Statutes.

J. Bills for fees or other compensation for services or expenses shall be submitted in detail sufficient for a proper preaudit and postaudit thereof.

K. Bills for travel expenses specifically authorized in this Agreement shall be submitted on the DEPARTMENT'S Travel Form No. 300-000-01 and will be paid in accordance with Section 112.061, Florida Statutes.

L. Participants providing goods and services to the DEPARTMENT should be aware of the following time frames. Upon receipt, the DEPARTMENT has 5 working days to inspect and approve the goods and services. The DEPARTMENT has 20 days to deliver a request for payment (voucher) to the Department of Financial Services. The 20 days are measured from the latter of the date the invoice is received or the goods or services are received, inspected, and approved.

M. If a payment is not available within 40 days, a separate interest penalty at a rate as established pursuant to Section 55.03(1 ), F.S., will be due and payable, in addition to the invoice amount, to the Participant. Interest penalties of less than one (1) dollar will not be enforced unless the Participant requests payment. Invoices that have to be returned to a Participant because of Participant preparation errors will result in a delay in the payment. The invoice payment requirements do not start until a properly completed invoice is provided to the DEPARTMENT.

N. A Vendor Ombudsman has been established within the Department of Financial Services. The duties of this individual include acting as an advocate for contractors/vendors who may be experiencing problems in obtaining timely payments(s) from a state Agency. The Vendor Ombudsman may be contacted at (850) 413- 5516. 0. Records of costs incurred under terms of this Agreement shall be maintained and made available upon request to the DEPARTMENT at all times during the period of this Agreement and for three years after final payment is made. Copies of these documents and records shall be furnished to the DEPARTMENT upon request. Records of costs incurred includes the COUNTY's general accounting records and the PROJECT records, together with supporting documents and records of the COUNTY and all subcontractors performing work on the PROJECT, and all other records of the COUNTY and subcontractors considered necessary by the DEPARTMENT for a proper audit of costs.

P. In the event this contract for services is in excess of $25,000.00 and a term for a period of more than one (1) year, the provisions of Section 339.135(6)(a), Florida Statutes, are hereby incorporated:

"The DEPARTMENT [Department of Transportation], during any fiscal year, shall not expend money, incur any liability, or enter into any contract which, by its terms, involves the expenditure of money in excess of the amounts budgeted as available for expenditure during such fiscal year. Any contract, verbal or written, made in violation of this subsection is null and void, and no money Florida Statutes: 850--035-02 334,044(7) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OGC-09/15 Page 4 of 12

may be paid on such contract. The DEPARTMENT shall require a statement from the Comptroller of the DEPARTMENT that funds are available prior to entering into any such contract or other binding commitment of funds. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the making of contracts for periods exceeding one year, but any contract so made shall be executory only for the value of the services to be rendered or agreed to be paid for in succeeding fiscal years; and this paragraph shall be incorporated verbatim in all contracts of the DEPARTMENT which are for an amount in excess of $25,000.00 and which have a term for a period of more than 1 year."

Q. The DEPARTMENT'S performance and obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation by the Florida Legislature.

R. A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Section 287.017, Florida Statutes, for Category Two for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list.

S. An entity or affiliate who has been placed on the discriminatory vendor list may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases of real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity.

4. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE

A. The COUNTY agrees to include the following indemnification in all contracts with contractors/subcontractors, consultants/subconsultants, who perform work in connection with this Agreement:

"The contractor/consultant shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the DEPARTMENT and all of its officers, agents or employees from all suits, actions, claims, demands, liability of any nature whatsoever arising out of, because of, or due to any negligent act or occurrence of omission or commission of the contractor, its officers, agents or employees."

B. LIABILITY INSURANCE. The COUNTY shall carry or cause its contractor/consultant to carry and keep in force during the period of this Agreement a general liability insurance policy or policies with a company or companies authorized to do business in Florida, affording public liability insurance with combined bodily injury limits of at least $100,000 per person and $300,000 each occurrence, and property damage insurance of at least $100,000 each occurrence, for the services to be rendered in accordance with this Agreement. In addition to any other forms of insurance or bonds required under the terms of the agreement, when it includes construction within the limits of a railroad right-of-way, the COUNTY must provide or cause its contractor to provide insurance coverage in accordance with Section 7-13 of the DEPARTMENT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (2010), as amended.

C. WORKER'S COMPENSATION. The COUNTY shall also carry or cause its contractor/consultant to carry and keep in force Worker's Compensation insurance as required for the State of Florida under the Worker's Compensation Law.

5. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS

A. The COUNTY shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by the COUNTY in conjunction with this Agreement. Failure by the COUNTY to grant such public access shall be grounds for immediate unilateral cancellation of this Agreement by the DEPARTMENT. Florida Statutes: 850-035-02 334.044(7) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OGC-09/15 Page 5 of 12

B. The COUNTY shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work or payment for work thereof, and shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the performance of work under this Agreement.

C. No funds received pursuant to this Agreement may be expended for lobbying the Legislature, the judicial branch, or a state agency.

D. The COUNTY and the DEPARTMENT agree that the COUNTY, its employees, and subcontractors are not agents of the DEPARTMENT as a result of this Agreement for purposes other than those set out in Section 337.274, Florida Statutes.

6. COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA SINGLE AUDIT ACT

A. The administration of resources awarded through the DEPARTMENT to the COUNTY by this Agreement may be subject to audits and/or monitoring by the DEPARTMENT. The following requirements do not limit the authority of the DEPARTMENT to conduct or arrange for the conduct of additional audits or evaluations of state financial assistance or limit the authority of any state agency inspector general, the Auditor General, or any other state official. The COUNTY shall comply with all audit and audit reporting requirements as specified below.

i. In addition to reviews of audits conducted in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, monitoring procedures to monitor the COUNTY'S use of state financial assistance may include but not be limited to on-site visits by DEPARTMENT staff and/or other procedures including, reviewing any required performance and financial reports, following up, ensuring corrective action, and issuing management decisions on weaknesses found through audits when those findings pertain to state financial assistance awarded through the DEPARTMENT by this Agreement. By entering into this Agreement, the COUNTY agrees to comply and cooperate fully with any monitoring procedures/processes deemed appropriate by the DEPARTMENT. The COUNTY further agrees to comply and cooperate with any inspections, reviews, investigations, or audits deemed necessary by the DEPARTMENT, the Department of Financial Services (DFS) or the Auditor General.

ii. The COUNTY a nonstate entity as defined by Section 215.97(2)(m), Florida Statutes, as a recipient of state financial assistance awarded by the DEPARTMENT through this Agreement is subject to the following requirements:

a. In the event the COUNTY meets the audit threshold requirements established by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the COUNTY must have a State single or project-specific audit conducted for such fiscal year in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes; applicable rules of the Department of Financial Services; and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General. Exhibit _ to this Agreement indicates state financial assistance awarded through the DEPARTMENT by this Agreement needed by the COUNTY to further comply with the requirements of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes. In determining the state financial assistance expended in a fiscal year, the COUNTY shall consider all sources of state financial assistance, including state financial assistance received from the DEPARTMENT by this Agreement, other state agencies and other nonstate entities. State financial assistance does not include Federal direct or pass-through awards and resources received by a nonstate entity for Federal program matching requirements.

b. In connection with the audit requirements, the COUNTY shall ensure that the audit complies with the requirements of Section 215.97(8), Florida Statutes. This includes submission of a financial reporting package as defined by Section 215.97(2)(e), Florida Statutes, and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General.

c. In the event the COUNTY does not meet the audit threshold requirements established by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the COUNTY is exempt for such fiscal year from the state single audit requirements of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes. However, the COUNTY must provide a single audit exemption statement to the DEPARTMENT at [email protected] no later Florida Statutes: 850--035-02 334.044(7) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OGC-09/15 Page 6 of 12

than nine months after the end of the COUNTY'S audit period for each applicable audit year. In the event the COUNTY does not meet the audit threshold requirements established by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, in a fiscal year and elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the cost of the audit must be paid from the COUNTY'S resources (i.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from the COUNTY'S resources obtained from other than State entities).

d. In accordance with Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, copies of financial reporting packages required by this Agreement shall be submitted to:

Florida Department of Transportation Office of Comptroller, MS 24 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0405 Email: [email protected]

And

State of Florida Auditor General Local Government Audits/342 111 West Madison Street, Room 401 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1450 Email: flaudgen [email protected]

e. Any copies of financial reporting packages, reports or other information required to be submitted to the DEPARTMENT shall be submitted timely in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, as applicable.

f. The COUNTY, when submitting financial reporting packages to the DEPARTMENT for audits done in accordance with Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for-profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, should indicate the date the reporting package was delivered to the COUNTY in correspondence accompanying the reporting package.

g. Upon receipt, and within six months, the DEPARTMENT will review the COUNTY'S financial reporting package, including corrective action plans and management letters, to the extent necessary to determine whether timely and appropriate corrective action on all deficiencies has been taken pertaining to the state financial assistance provided through the DEPARTMENT by this Agreement. If the COUNTY fails to have an audit conducted consistent with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the Department may take appropriate corrective action to enforce compliance.

h. As a condition of receiving state financial assistance, the COUNTY shall permit the DEPARTMENT, or its designee, DFS or the Auditor General access to the COUNTY'S records including financial statements, the independent auditor's working papers and project records as necessary. Records related to unresolved audit findings, appeals or litigation shall be retained. until the action is complete or the dispute is resolved.

iii. The COUNTY shall retain sufficient records demonstrating its compliance with the terms of this Agreement for a period of five years from the date the audit report is issued and shall allow the DEPARTMENT, or its designee, DFS or the Auditor General access to such records upon request. The COUNTY shall ensure that the audit working papers are made available to the DEPARTMENT, or its designee, DFS or the Auditor General upon request for a period of five years from the date the audit report is issued unless extended in writing by the DEPARTMENT. Florida Statutes: 850--035--02 334.044(7) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OGC-09/15 Page 7 of 12

7. TERMINATION AND DEFAULT

A. This Agreement may be canceled by the DEPARTMENT in whole or in part at any time the interest of the DEPARTMENT requires such termination. The DEPARTMENT also reserves the right to seek termination or cancellation of this Agreement in the event the COUNTY shall be placed in either voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy. The DEPARTMENT further reserves the right to terminate or cancel this Agreement in the event an assignment be made for the benefit of creditors. This Agreement may be canceled by the COUNTY upon sixty (60) days written notice to the DEPARTMENT.

B. If the DEPARTMENT determines that the performance of the COUNTY is not satisfactory, the DEPARTMENT shall have the option of (a) immediately terminating the Agreement, or (b) notifying the COUNTY of the deficiency with a requirement that the deficiency be corrected within a specified time, otherwise the Agreement will be terminated at the end of such time, or (c) take whatever action is deemed appropriate by the DEPARTMENT.

C. If the DEPARTMENT requires termination of the Agreement for reasons other than unsatisfactory performance of the COUNTY, the DEPARTMENT shall notify the COUNTY of such termination, with instructions to the effective date of termination or specify the stage of work at which the Agreement is to be terminated.

D. If the Agreement is terminated before performance is completed, the COUNTY shall be paid only for that work satisfactorily performed for which costs can be substantiated. Such payment, however, may not exceed an amount which is the same percentage of the contract price as the amount of work satisfactorily completed is a percentage of the total work called for by this Agreement.

8. MISCELLANEOUS

A. All words used herein in the singular form shall extend to and include the plural. All words used in the plural form shall extend to and include the singular. All words used in any gender shall extend to and include all genders.

B. The DEPARTMENT shall not be obligated or liable hereunder to any party other than the COUNTY.

C. In no event shall the making by the DEPARTMENT of any payment to the COUNTY constitute or be construed as a waiver by the DEPARTMENT of any breach of covenant or any default which may then exist, on the part of the COUNTY, and the making of such payment by the DEPARTMENT while any such breach or default shall exist shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to the DEPARTMENT with respect to such breach or default.

D. This document incorporates and includes all prior negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements, or understandings applicable to the matters contained herein, and the parties agree that there are no commitments, agreements or understandings concerning the subject matter of this Agreement that are not contained in this document. Accordingly, it is agreed that no deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representation or agreements whether oral or written. It is further agreed that no modification, amendment or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless contained in a written document executed with the same formality and of equal dignity herewith.

E. If any part of this Agreement shall be determined to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction or by any other legally constituted body having the jurisdiction to make such determination, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect provided that the part of this Agreement thus invalidated or declared unenforceable is not material to the intended operation of this Agreement.

F. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Venue of any judicial proceedings arising out of this Agreement shall be in Leon County, Florida. Florida Statutes: 850--035--02 334.044(7) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OGC-09/15 Page 8 of 12

G. This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by both parties and shall continue in effect and be binding on the parties until the PROJECT is completed and accepted and payment made by the DEPARTMENT.

H. The contractor/consultanUvendor agrees to comply with s.20.055 (5), Florida Statutes, and to incorporate in all subcontracts the obligation to comply with s.20.055 (5), Florida Statutes.

The remainder of this page intentionally left blank. Florida Statutes: 850-035-02 334.044(7) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OGC-09/15 Page 9 of 12

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY has caused this Agreement to be executed on its behalf this __ day of _____, __, by the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners, authorized to enter into and execute same by Resolution Number _____ of the Board on the __ day of ______, and the DEPARTMENT has executed this Agreement through its District Secretary for District Two, Florida Department of Transportation, this __ day of------~ ___

BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA

ATTEST: ______(SEAL) BY: ______CLERK CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

ATTEST: ______(SEAL) BY: ______EXECUTIVE SECRET ARY DISTRICT SECRETARY DISTRICT TWO

District Construction/Maintenance Legal Review: Engineer Approval:

Availability of Funds Approval:

(Date) Florida Statutes: 850-035-02 334.044(7) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OGC-09/15 Page 10 of 12

EXHIBIT A

STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE (FLORIDA SINGLE AUDIT ACT)

THE STATE RESOURCES AWARDED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING:

SUBJECT TO SECTION 215.97, FLORIDA STATUTES:

Awarding Agency: Florida Department of Transportation State Project Title: SMALL COUNTY ROAD ASSISTANCE PROGRAM CSFA Number: 55.016 *Award Amount: $550,000.00

*The state award amount may change with supplemental agreements

Specific project information for CSFA Number 55.016 is provided at: https://apps.fldfs.com/fsaa/searchCatalog.aspx

COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO STATE RESOURCES AWARDED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT:

State Project Compliance Requirements for CSFA Number 55.016 are provided at: https ://apps .fldfs .com/fsaa/search Compliance .aspx

The State Projects Compliance Supplement is provided at: https://apps.fldfs.com/fsaa/compliance.aspx Florida Statutes: 850--035-02 334.044(7} PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OGC-09/15 Page 11 of 12 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF SERVICES AND DELIVERABLES

The project consists of the Design, Construction and Construction Engineering Inspection for the resurfacing of CR 229 North from 2.5 miles South of CR 250 to CR 250

- Development of design plans - Bid and award - Construction - Construction Engineering and Inspection

AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES:

The Agency is required to provide a copy of the design plans for the Department's file. The Agency is required to send an Engineer's Estimate and scope of services. The Agency is required to send an email verifying that the consultant was obtain following the CCNA. The Agency is required to send a preliminary schedule from the selected contractor, once available.

If Right-of-Way activities become apparent, begin coordination with the Department at once. The Department's maximum participation is not to exceed $550,000.00

Prior to the execution of this Agreement, a project schedule of funding shall be prepared by the Agency and approved by the Department. The Agency shall maintain said schedule of funding, carry out the project, and shall incur obligations against and make disbursements of project funds only in conformity with the latest approved schedule of funding for the project. The schedule of funding may be revised by execution of a Supplemental Agreement between the Department and Agency. The Agency acknowledges and agrees that funding for this project may be reduced upon determination of the award amount and execution of the Supplemental Agreement. Florida Statutes: 850--035-02 334.044(7) PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OGC-09/15 Page 12 of 12 EXHIBITC SCHEDULE OF FUNDING

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Financial Project ID: 432597-1-54-01 The Honorable James Croft, Chair OF TRANSPORTATION Baker County Board of County Commissioners 55 N. 3rd Street SMALL COUNTY ROAD Macclenny, Florida 32063 ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SCRAP) Contract Number:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Name: CR 229 North

Termini: from 2.5 miles South of CR 250 to CR 250

Description of Work: resurfacing and reconstruction

(1) (2) (3) TYPE OF WORK TOTAL AGENCY STATE & PROJECT ESTIMATE FUNDS FEDERAL FUNDS By Fiscal Year FUNDS (100%) (0%) (100%) Design 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

Total Design Cost

Right of Way 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

Total Right of Way Cost

Construction 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 i 550,000.00 i 550,000.00 2016-2017

Total Construction Costs $ 550,000.00 $ 550,000.00

Construction Engineering and Inspection 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017

Total Construction Costs

Total Cost of Project $ 550,000.00 $ 550,000.00

The Department's fiscal year begins on July 1. The Department will notify the Agency, in writing, when funds are available. RESOLUTION 2016-02 A RESOLUTION OF BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA; ADOPTING THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY.

WHEREAS, Baker County is subject to natural hazards such as floods, hurricanes, tropical storms, sinkholes, wildfires, drought, heat waves, winter storms, tornados, etc. and these hazards affect the health and property of the citizens of Baker County as well as its economic viability; and WHEREAS, the Local Mitigation Strategy Committee worked to prepare the countywide, unified Local Mitigation Strategy to include a report detailing countywide hazards and vulnerabilities, a list of critical facilities, a list of policy recommendations and a prioritized list of hazard mitigation programs, projects and initiatives; and WHEREAS, hazard mitigation consists of actions such as structural enhancements, planning, code enforcement and responsible development, taken to permanently reduce or eliminate the long terms risks to people and property from the effects of hazards; and WHEREAS, the Local Mitigation Strategy has previously been adopted by the County and all municipalities within Baker County, Florida. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, OF BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA, hereby adopts the Local Mitigation Strategy; RESOLVED, FURTHER, that this resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED, in regular session by the Baker County Board of County Commissioners on this 2nd day of February, 2016.

BAKER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

ATTEST: ______James G. Bennett, Chairman

______Stacie D. Harvey, Clerk

Baker CoCou nty

Localoc I Mitigationi gatio Strategytrategy 202015 5

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Overview

According to Title 44 CFR §201.1, the purpose of mitigation planning is for State, local, and Indian tribal governments to identify the natural hazards that impact them, to identify actions and activities to reduce any losses from those hazards, and to establish a coordinated process to implement the plan, taking advantage of a wide range of resources. Hazard mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from hazards, Title 44 CFR §201.2. The mitigation activities may be implemented prior to, during, or after an event. It has been noted that hazard mitigation is most effective when based on an inclusive, comprehensive, long-term plan that is developed before a disaster occurs.

Baker County is threatened by a number of different types of natural hazards (i.e. flooding, wildfires, severe thunderstorms/winds, hurricanes/tropical storms, tornadoes, drought/heat wave, etc.). These hazards endanger the health and safety of the population of the county, jeopardizing its economic vitality, and imperil the quality of its environment.

The importance of avoiding or minimizing the vulnerabilities to these hazards, the county’s public and private sector interests established the Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Committee/Workgroup to develop a comprehensive planning process, risk assessment, and a strategy to mitigate with specific projects that are based on a sound planning process that account for the inherent risk and capabilities of the county’s communities.

Extensive research and analysis has been performed to identify the hazards threatening the jurisdictions of the City of Macclenny, the Town of Glen St. Mary and unincorporated Baker County to estimate the relative risks posed to the community by those hazards.

This study has been used by the Committee/Workgroup Members to assess the vulnerabilities of the facilities and jurisdictions of Baker County to the impacts of future disasters involving those hazards. With these identified, the Committee has worked to identify proposed mitigation projects that will avoid or minimize these vulnerabilities and to make the communities of Baker County much more resistant to the impacts of future disasters.

The proposed projects are aimed at reducing the impacts of future disasters and have been developed and will continue to be evaluated by the Committee/Workgroup for implementation whenever the financial resources become available.

The Local Mitigation Project or Initiative list is considered a “living document”. The project list will and

______2

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______should evolve as projects are undertaken and completed, as future disasters affect the county and new needs are identified, and as local priorities change. As the mitigation projects identified in this plan are implemented, step-by-step, Baker County will become a more “disaster resistant” community.

This document details the work of the Baker County LMS Committee over the past several years to develop the planning organization, to undertake the needed technical analyses, and to coordinate the mitigation projects that have been proposed by the participating jurisdictions and organizations.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) require that this document be adopted by the following governing bodies; City of Macclenny, the Town of Glen St. Mary, and unincorporated Baker County. Adoption of the Baker County LMS by the City and County Commissions will not have any legal affect on the Comprehensive Plan or any other legally binding documents. However, adoption of the LMS will give the county and its jurisdictions priority with respect to funding for disaster recovery and hazard mitigation from state and federal sources.

Through publication of this LMS plan, the Committee/Workgroup continues to solicit the involvement of the entire community to make the people, neighborhoods, businesses, and institutions of Baker County safer from the impacts of disaster events.

Note: Throughout the LMS plan, reference to the LMS Committee or Workgroup will be either, or both, and the LMS mitigation projects could be projects, actions or initiatives.

______3

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Baker County’s Local Mitigation Strategy Plan is organized into the following sections and appendices:

Section 1 Introduction identifies the purpose and context for the plan. Section 2 Planning Process provides the details used to develop the plan, including how it was prepared, who was involved in the process for each jurisdiction, and how the public was involved. Section 3 Geography, demographics, and current and future Land Use, which are important elements in the mitigation planning.

Section 4 Hazard Risk and Vulnerability Assessment defines the type, probability, location, vulnerability, impact and extent of the natural hazards that affect the county and its’ municipalities. Data and statistics on previous occurrences of hazard events are described. The type and number of repetitive loss properties are noted for each jurisdiction.

Section 5 Mitigation Strategy provides the blueprint for reducing the potential losses identified in the risk assessment, which are based on existing authorities, policies, programs, and resources, and its ability to expand on and improve these existing tools. The areas in this section will consist of the LMS goals, analysis of the mitigation projects, the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and compliance and implementation of the mitigation projects.

Section 6 Plan Evaluation and Maintenance will discuss the changes in development, the method and schedule of monitoring, evaluating and updating the plan. It will examine other planning mechanisms, and public participation in the plan maintenance process.

Appendix I The LMS meeting documentation over the last five years (i.e. the meeting advertisement or public notice, the agenda, the sign-in sheets, and the meeting minutes).

Attachment I The Local Mitigation Strategy Projects or Initiatives Master List (includes three lists): (Excel format) 1. Current list of the new, ongoing or deferred mitigation projects 2. Completed list of mitigation projects 3. Deleted or removed list of mitigation projects

Attachment II The Baker County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP)

______4

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Table of Contents

SECTIONS

SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION 10

SECTION 2 - PLANNING PROCESS 15

SECTION 3 - GEOGRAPHY, DEMOGRAPHICS AND LAND USE 25

SECTION 4 - HAZARD RISK AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 36

SECTION 5 - MITIGATION STRATEGY 130

SECTION 6 - PLAN EVALUATION AND MAINTENANCE 163

APPENDICES

APPENDIX I – LMS MEETING DOCUMENTATION 190

ATTACHMENT

ATTACHMENT I – THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY PROJECTS OR INITIATIVES MASTER LIST

ATTACHMENT II – THE BAKER COUNTY COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN (CWPP)

TABLES

TABLE 2.1 – PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS BY JURISDICTIONS 18

TABLE 3.1 – DEMOGRAPHICS FOR BAKER COUNTY 28

TABLE 3.2 – TOTAL NUMBER OF STRUCTURES IN BAKER COUNTY 30

TABLE 3.3 – TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS IN BAKER COUNTY 31

TABLE 3.4 – TOTAL JUST VALUE REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY 31

______5

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______TABLE 4.1 – IMPACTS ON STRUCTURES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 40

TABLE 4.2 – DISASTER DECLARATIONS FOR BAKER COUNTY 41

TABLE 4.3 – FLOOD OCCURENCES 49

TABLE 4.4 – VULNERABILITY AREAS IN BAKER COUNTY 51

TABLE 4.5 – FLOOD VULNERABILITY FOR THE POPULATION IN BAKER COUNTY 52

TABLE 4.6 – STRUCTURES LOCATED IN THE FLOODPLAIN AREA 53

TABLE 4.7 – VALUE OF STRUCTURES IN THE FLOODPLAIN AREA 53

TABLE 4.8 – COUNTY FACILITIES IN THE FLOODPLAIN AREA 53

TABLE 4.9 – VALUE OF FACILITIES IN THE FLOODPLAIN AREA 53

TABLE 4.10 – HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM OCCURRENCES 64

TABLE 4.11 – DISASTER DECLARATIONS FROM HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS 65

TABLE 4.12 – FLOOD VULNERABILITY FOR THE POPULATION IN BAKER COUNTY 67

TABLE 4.13 – STRUCTURES AFFECTED BY A CATEGORY 2 HURRICANE 68

TABLE 4.14 – VALUE OF STRUCTURES AFFECTED BY A CATEGORY 2 HURRICANE 68

TABLE 4.15 – COUNTY FACILITIES FOR CATEGORY 2 HURRICANE RETURN PERIODS 68

TABLE 4.16 – VALUE FOR FACILITIES FOR CATEGORY 2 HURRICANE RETURN PERIODS 69

TABLE 4.17 – TORNADO OCCURENCES 76

TABLE 4.18 – STRUCTURES VULNERABLE TO TORNADOES 78

TABLE 4.19 – VALUE OF STRUCTURES VULNERABLE TO TORNADOES 79

TABLE 4.20 – THUNDERSTORM/WIND OCCURRENCES 83

TABLE 4.21 – LIGHTNING OCCURRENCES 90

TABLE 4.22 – HAILSTORM OCCURRENCES 91

______6

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______TABLE 4.23 – STRUCTURES VULNERABLE TO THUNDERSTORMS 94

TABLE 4.24– VALUE OF STRUCTURES VULNERABLE TO THUNDERSTORMS 94

TABLE 4.25 – FIRES BY CAUSES 99

TABLE 4.26 – WILDFIRE OCCURRENCES 100

TABLE 4.27 – DISASTER DECLARATIONS FOR WILDFIRES IN BAKER COUNTY 101

TABLE 4.28 – CONSEQUENCES OF WILDFIRE 103

TABLE 4.29 – WILDFIRE POPULATION BY LEVEL OF CONCERN 108

TABLE 4.30 – STRUCTURES LEVEL OF CONCERN FOR WILDFIRES 109

TABLE 4.31 – VALUE OF STRUCTURES LEVEL OF CONCERN FOR WILDFIRES 109

TABLE 4.32 – COUNTY FACILITIES BY LEVEL OF CONCERN FOR WILDFIRES 110

TABLE 4.33– VALUE OF FACILITIES BY LEVEL OF CONCERNT FOR WILDFIRES 110

TABLE 4.34– STREAMFLOW FOR ST MARYS, DROUGHT CONDITIONS 117

TABLE 4.35 – PERCENTAGE POPULATION AFFECTED BY HEAT WAVE EVENTS 119

TABLE 4.36 – PERCENTAGE POPULATION AFFECTED BY WINTER STORM/FREEZE EVENTS 125

TABLE 4.37 – REPETITIVE LOSS PROPERTY STATISTICS FOR BAKER COUNTY 129

TABLE 5.1 – LMS MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 132

TABLE 5.2– NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) PARTICIPATION 135

TABLE 5.3– NFIP POLICY STATISTICS 135

TABLE 5.4– COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM 139

TABLE 5.5– COMPREHENSIVE RANGE OF THE LMS PROJECTS 143

TABLE 5.6 – BENEFIT COST RATIO 145

TABLE 5.7 – LMS PROJECTS THAT WILL BENEFIT EACH JURISDITION 146

______7

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______TABLE 5.8 – FUNDING SOURCES 149

TABLE 6.1 – COMPLETED LMS PROJECTS 166

FIGURES

FIGURE A – TRANSPORTATION NETWORK 27

FIGURE B – FUTURE LAND USE MAP CLASSIFICATION 32

FIGURE C – FUTURE LAND USE MAP 34

FIGURE D – HYDROGRAPHY MAP 44

FIGURE E – ST. MARYS RIVER NEAR MACCLENNY 45

FIGURE F – MAP CLASSIFICATION FOR BAKER COUNTY SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA 47

FIGURE G – BAKER COUNTY, FEMA SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA MAP 48

FIGURE H – SINKHOLE MAP OF FLORIDA 56

FIGURE I – SAFFIR-SIMPSON WIND SCALE 61

FIGURE J – TRACKS OF HURRICANES 63

FIGURE K – TRACKS OF TROPICAL STORMS 63

FIGURE L – MAJOR HURRICANE RETURN PERIOD 66

FIGURE M – TORNADO MAP 71

FIGURE N – ENHANCED FUJITA SCALE 74

FIGURE O – LIGHTNING MAP 89

FIGURE P – FIRE ADAPTED COMMUNITY ARTICLE 106

FIGURE Q – PERCENTAGE OF LAND IN FOREST IN BAKER COUNTY 108

FIGURE R – DROUGHT MONITOR MAP 113

______8

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______FIGURE S – KEETCH-BYRAM DROUGHT INDEX 115

FIGURE T – HEAT INDEX CHART 116

FIGURE U – ENSO PHASES, PROBABILITY FOR FREEZING TEMPERATURES 126

FIGURE V – BRIDGE #274158 164

FIGURE W – BRIDGE #274154 165

FIGURE X – BRIDGE #274156 165

______9

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Section 1 – Introduction

As stated by FEMA….”Mitigation is valuable to society in these ways:

ü It creates safer communities by reducing loss of life and property damage. For example, the rigorous building standards adopted by 20,000 communities across the country are saving the nation more than $1.1 billion a year in prevented flood damages. ü It allows individuals to minimize post-flood disaster disruptions and recover more rapidly. For example, homes built to National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) standards incur less damage from floods. When floods cause damage, flood insurance protects the homeowner's investment, as it did for the more than 200,000 Gulf Coast residents who received more than $23 billion in payments following the 2005 hurricanes. ü It lessens the financial impact on individuals, communities and society as a whole. For example, a recent study by the Multi-hazard Mitigation Council shows that each dollar spent on mitigation saves society an average of four dollars.”

Every community is exposed to some level of risk from hazards and hazards cannot be eliminated, but it is possible to determine what hazards will affect the county communities, where they are most severe, and identify projects that can be taken to reduce the severity of the hazard.

Examples of mitigation might include:

Ø land use planning techniques that limit infrastructure in high hazard areas Ø retrofitting existing structures to meet new building codes and standards

______10

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Ø acquiring structures that are in a high hazard areas

Hazards can be very costly for the entire community:

(A) Businesses in high hazard areas can suffer when damaged or isolated by storms which can result in loss of income and revenue.

ü According to the US Census data, 2007 Economic Census: Survey of Business Owners, there were 1,727 small businesses or firms operating in Baker County.

(B) And the residents who built in flood prone areas and could be subject to evacuation, damage to their homes, lower home values, and higher insurance premiums.

ü As stated by the Baker County Planning Department there are 25 residential properties in Zones A and AE.

ü There are no county-owned or public facilities located in the flood zone areas in Baker County.

The County’s critical facilities and major government buildings should not be placed in high hazard areas because the function these facilities provide are too valuable to be placed in jeopardy, especially during times of disaster. And of course, community health and safety are beyond price.

Community infrastructure such as roads, drainage structures, sewer lines, electric lines, telephone lines that are built in high hazard areas are subject to frequent damage and extremely costly repair. And, if a local government belongs to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and allows development in the floodplain without proper elevation and construction techniques, the federal government can withdraw the community's access to federal flood insurance for both public and private structures. Furthermore, a local government is responsible for as much as 12.5% of their local public cost of a federally declared disaster and 100% of any damage from smaller events that are not declared disasters. These costs can put a significant strain on the local government budget.

The goals and objectives in developing a Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) is to establish an ongoing process that will make hazard mitigation part of the daily functioning life in Baker County. It serves as a bridge between local governments’ programs, plans, and policies including but not limited to the comprehensive growth management plan, comprehensive emergency management plan, land development regulations, and relevant codes and ordinances for effective floodplain management.

Over the last 20+ years, FEMA and the United States Congress have witnessed substantial increases in

______11

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______disaster response and recovery costs; as a result, they have provided funds to communities, counties, and states to reduce impacts from natural hazards through hazard mitigation. This marked a fundamental shift in policy; rather than placing primary emphasis on response and recovery, FEMA’s focus broadened to incorporate mitigation as the foundation of emergency management.

Changes in Federal laws have resulted in pre-disaster mitigation project funding and mitigation planning requirements. Consequently, on October 30, 2000 amending the Robert T. Stafford Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) was signed into law. It states that if States and local governments do not have approved multi-hazard mitigation plans in place and a disaster occurs, they will not be entitled to Public Assistance and other FEMA funding.

Details from DMA 2000 to local governments:

Ø The Act established a requirement for local governments to have a FEMA-approved hazard mitigation plan in order to be eligible for funding from FEMA through Pre and Post-Disaster grant programs such as Pre-Disaster Mitigation Assistance (PDM) or the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). Ø All natural hazards that affect the county will need to be addressed in the risk and vulnerability assessment section of the Hazard Mitigation Plan. Ø The Act establishes November 1, 2004 as the date by which local governments and tribal organizations were required to prepare and adopt their respective plans in order to be eligible for FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance. In addition, local jurisdictions must review and revise its plan to reflect changes in development, progress in local mitigation efforts, and changes in priorities, and resubmit it for approval within 5 years from date of FEMA approval to remain eligible for the mitigation project grant funding.

This Plan encompasses the most recent process of reviewing and revising the Baker County LMS in accordance with the DMA 2000. The main goal of the local mitigation strategy is to identify and assess the risk and vulnerability to various natural disasters the County and its municipalities face, and then develop local strategies to reduce the impact of future disasters. This plan is a continuation of the 2005 efforts and is the product of the 2nd 5-year revision and update process.

The Baker County LMS Committee/Workgroup was established to make the population, neighborhoods, businesses and institutions of the community more resistant to the impacts of future disasters. This dedicated committee/workgroup has been undertaking a comprehensive, detailed evaluation of the vulnerabilities of the community to all types of future natural hazards in order to identify ways to make the county more resistant to their impacts. This document reports the results of that planning process for the current planning period.

The Baker County LMS is intended by the Committee/Workgroup to serve many purposes.

______12

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

The approach utilized by the Baker County LMS Committee/Workgroup relies on a logical approach of structured planning concepts in a methodical process to identify vulnerabilities to future disasters and to propose the mitigation projects necessary to avoid or minimize those vulnerabilities. The methods in the planning process builds upon the previous process so that there is a higher level of assurance that the mitigation projects proposed by the participants have a valid basis for both their justification and priority for implementation. It is then an important element for the LMS plan is to document that process and to present its results to the community.

The goal is to make the community as a whole more aware of the natural hazards that threaten the public health and safety, the economic vitality of businesses, and the operational capability of important institutions. The plan identifies the hazards threatening Baker County and provides an assessment of the relative level of risk they pose. It profiles the specific vulnerabilities of the neighborhoods of Baker County and many of the facilities that are important to the community’s daily life. The plan also includes a number of proposals of ways to avoid or minimize those vulnerabilities. This information will be very helpful to individuals that wish to understand how the community could become safer from the impacts of future disasters.

The LMS Plan provides information needed by the managers and leaders of local government, business and industry, community associations, and other key institutions and organizations to take actions to address vulnerabilities to future disasters. The plan provides proposals for specific projects and programs that are needed to eliminate or minimize those vulnerabilities. These mitigation projects have been justified on the basis of their economic benefits using a uniform technical analysis, as well as prioritized for implementation using a weighted criteria approach. This approach is intended to provide a decision tool for the management of participating organizations and agencies regarding why the proposed mitigation should be implemented, which should be implemented first, and the economic and public welfare benefits.

Another important component of the hazard mitigation planning process conducted by the Baker County LMS Committee/Workgroup is the analysis of the existing policy, program and regulatory basis for control of growth and development. This process involves cataloging the current mitigation-related policies of local government so that they can be compared with the hazards that threaten the jurisdiction and the relative risks they pose to the community. When the risks posed to the community by a specific hazard are not adequately addressed in the community’s policy or regulatory framework, the impacts of future disasters can be even more severe.

The planning process utilized supports a detailed comparison of the community’s policy controls to the level of risk posed by specific hazards. This comparison supports and justifies efforts to propose enhancements in the policy basis for could or should be promulgated by the involved local jurisdictions to create a more disaster-resistant future for the community.

______13

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Proposed mitigation projects are reviewed and coordinated among the participating jurisdictions within the County. Each mitigation project proposed by one jurisdiction or participating organization, when implemented, will be compatible with the interests of adjacent jurisdictions and unlikely to duplicate or interfere with mitigation projects proposed by others.

Therefore, the plan addresses mitigation projects for each participating jurisdiction. These projects can be adopted and implemented for the jurisdiction’s own purposes and on its own schedule. In this way, the format of the plan and the operational concept of the planning process ensure that proposed mitigation projects are coordinated and prioritized effectively among jurisdictions, while nonetheless allowing each jurisdiction to adopt only the proposed projects that it actually has the authority or responsibility to implement when resources are available.

The planning process discussed in Section 2 used by the LMS Committee/Workgroup meets the analysis and documentation needs of the planning process. The plan utilizes a full range of information in the technical analysis and the formulation of proposed mitigation projects for incorporation into this plan.

The Committee/Workgroup continues to seek new opportunities and ideas to provide information and education to the public regarding ways to be more protected from the impacts of future disasters. The County continues to be active in communicating with the public and engaging interested members of the community in the planning process.

______14

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Section 2 - Planning Process

Requirements: §201.6 (c) (1) - The plan shall include documentation of the planning process used to develop the plan, including how it was prepared, who was involved in the process for each jurisdiction, and how the public was involved. §201.6 (b) (2) - An opportunity for neighboring communities, local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities, and agencies that have the authority to regulate development, as well as businesses, academia and other private and non-profit interests to be involved in the planning process. §201.6 (b) (1) - An opportunity for the public to comment on the plan during the drafting stage and prior to plan approval. §201.6 (b) (3) - Review and incorporation, if appropriate, of existing plans, studies, reports, and technical information. §201.6 (c) (4) (iii) - Discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process. §201.6 (c) (4)(i) - A section describing the method and schedule of monitoring, evaluating, and updating the mitigation plan within a five-year cycle.

The Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy consists of the local community and was developed by the LMS Committee/Workgroup in 2005 and 2010 to be in compliance with the DMA 2000 requirements, and currently in 2015 for the 5-year required update.

The Baker County Department of Emergency Management initiated the LMS planning process by hiring consultants to author the updated LMS plan. Facilitated by the consultant, the EM Department and the Committee/Workgroup worked together to engage local agencies and community members in the planning process.

The Baker County LMS Committee/Workgroup is made up of a number of local government agencies, business interests, community organizations, regional agencies, and institutions. Baker County (unincorporated), the City of Macclenny, and the Town of Glen St. Mary are continuing jurisdictions and no

______15

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______new jurisdictions have been added since the last Local Mitigation Strategy plan. This section describes the organizational structure used to complete the public planning process.

The Baker County LMS Committee/Workgroup encourages participation by all interested local and neighboring jurisdictions, agencies, organizations, and individuals. Broad community representation is promoted in the Committee and at public meetings to provide ample opportunity for public commentary and consideration of the local mitigation strategy.

The organization is intended to represent a partnership between the public and private sector of the community, working together to create a disaster resistant community. The proposed mitigation or initiative projects developed by the Committee and listed in this plan, when implemented, are intended to make the entire community a safer from the impacts of future disasters, for the benefit of every individual, neighborhood, business, and institution.

The Baker County Department of Emergency Management is the lead agency in scheduling and conducting the efforts of the Local Mitigation Strategy Committee/Workgroup and is primarily responsible for updating the LMS plan.

The LMS Committee/Workgroup is responsible for:

ü Official decisions regarding the planning process; ü Determining the priority and approving the proposed mitigation project for each jurisdiction; ü Deleting projects that are no longer applicable for implementation; and ü Coordinating the technical analysis and planning activities.

These activities include conducting the hazard identification and vulnerability assessment processes, as well as receiving and coordinating the mitigation projects for incorporation into this plan.

Members of many organizations were invited to discuss the importance of participation on the Baker County LMS Committee/Workgroup. Each jurisdiction was represented in the LMS Committee (see Table 2.1). In addition, the Baker County LMS Committee/Workgroup benefited from the assistance and support of its many members.

Participation in the Committee is not limited in any manner, and all members of the community, whether representing the public or private sector, are welcome to participate. The general public and neighboring communities are encouraged to become involved with the Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy to gauge the plan effectiveness and help identify local hazards to be placed on the county project list. Participation from interested parties, including local/adjacent government representatives and citizens, is solicited via public meeting advertisements in the local County newspaper, The Baker County Press.

______16

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______There were several opportunities to include the public citizens in the LMS planning:

• LMS Meeting Notices were advertised on the EM Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/Baker-County-Sheriffs-Office-126881507380199/timeline?ref=page_internal • LMS Meeting Notices were advertised on the Baker County Sheriff’s Office Emergency Management Division: http://www.bakerso.com/My-Baker_County_Sheriffs_Office/EOC.html • LMS Meeting Notices were published in The Baker County Press: http://bakercountypress.com/ • LMS Meeting Notices were announced at the ' County Commissioner’s meetings. facebook - ~ ~ ~·

The Baker County Press newspaper attend every LMS meeting and writes articles on the LMS meetings and how the community can participate in the mitigation activities for the county’s local mitigation strategy. ··••1 . ______•-~-·°'"""' .,. __..,. __ ,,..,,. ==-===-====-.:::.. Public Involvement in the Drafting Stage of the LMS > :::..-:- ,... __... -::-::::.::::-:.: ,. ______·=---=- _-

0 _,.. ___ ...., ___ ..,_ A copy of the 2015 LMS plan will be available at the ===:=~~=-====- Emergency Management Department to give the public an opportunity to review the document “prior to the final plan approval”.

There was participation from the public (or county residents) in the LMS meetings. In addition, those member organizations listed in Table 2.1 provided a great deal of support and assistance.

______17

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Table 2.1- LMS Participating Organizations by Jurisdiction

LMS Committee/Workgroup Members

Baker County Department of Emergency Emergency Management Director Management Baker County Department of Emergency Assistant Emergency Manager/Communication Management Supervisor Florida Department of Emergency Management Regional Coordinator Manager, Region 3 Baker County Board of County Commissioners County Manager Baker County Road Department Road Superintendent Baker County Planning & Zoning Planning & Zoning Director Baker County Building Department Building Official Sanderson Pipe Corporation Corporate Safety/Environmental Coordinator Baker County School District Director of School Safety and Auxiliary Services Baker County Medical Services Director Plant Operations Florida Forest Service Wildfire Mitigation Specialist

______18

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Baker County Fire Department Fire Chief Baker County Emergency Services Director Emergency Services City of Macclenny City Manager City of Macclenny Assistant City Manager City of Maccleny Fire Department Assistant Fire Chief Town of Glen St. Mary Mayor Florida Department of Transportation District 2 Drainage Engineer Baker County Press News Editor Wal-Mart Distribution Center #6909 Representative Columbia County Emergency Management Emergency Management Director Union County Emergency Management Emergency Management Director The Management Experts Owner The Management Experts Emergency Management Planner

Summary of the Planning Process

(A) LMS Committee/Workgroup Meetings

LMS Meetings were held at the Baker County Department of Emergency Management Office, 1 Sheriff's Office Drive, Macclenny, 32063 in 2011; 2012; 2013, 2014 and 2015.

See Appendix I for the meeting notices or advertisements, agendas, attendee sign-in sheets and meeting minutes for the LMS Meetings.

The procedure used by the Baker County LMS Committee/Workgroup is based on the following important concepts:

• A multi-jurisdictional planning group establishes specific goals and objectives to address the community’s vulnerabilities to all types of hazards. • It utilizes a logical, stepwise process of hazard identification, risk evaluation and vulnerability assessment, as well as analysis of past disaster events, that is consistently applied by all participants.

______19

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______• Mitigation projects are proposed for incorporation into the plan only by those jurisdictions or organizations with the authorities and responsibilities for their implementation. • The process encourages participants to propose specific mitigation projects that are feasible to implement and clearly directed at reducing specific vulnerabilities to future disasters. • Proposed mitigation projects are characterized in a substantive manner, suitable for this level of planning, to assure their cost effectiveness and technical merit, as well as coordinated among jurisdictions to assure that conflicts or duplications are avoided.

The planning process begins with the development of the Committee/Workgroup as an organization and obtaining participation from the local government jurisdictions and key organizations. The planning work conducted to develop this document relies heavily on the expertise and authorities of the participating agencies and organizations, rather than on detailed scientific or engineering studies. The Committee/Workgroup is confident that the best judgment of the participating individuals, because of their role in the community, can achieve a level of detail in the analysis that is more than adequate for purposes of local mitigation planning.

Analyzing the need for the community and then proposing mitigation initiatives to avoid or minimize the vulnerability of the community to future disasters is an important task, and should be evaluated at least on an annual basis. Also, the goals and objectives set by the Committee need to be reviewed to determine if they meet the needs of the community.

(B) Hazard Identification and Risk Estimation

The Committee/Workgroup analyzes the natural hazards that threaten all or portions of the community. Where possible, specific geographic areas subject to the impacts of the identified hazards are delineated. Data is analyzed on previous occurrences for the natural hazards. In addition, the Committee uses general information to estimate the relative risk of the various hazards as an additional method to focus their analysis and planning efforts. They compare the likelihood or probability that a hazard will impact an area, as well as the consequences of that impact to public health and safety, property, the economy, and the environment. This comparison of the consequences of an event with its probability of occurrence is a measure of the risk posed by that hazard to the community.

Depending on the participating jurisdiction, a variety of information is obtained regarding hazard identification and risk estimation. The planners representing the jurisdiction attempt to incorporate consideration of hazard specific maps, including flood plain delineation maps, whenever applicable, and GIS-based analyses of hazard areas and the locations of critical facilities, infrastructure components and other properties located within the defined hazard areas.

Estimating the relative risk of different hazards is followed by the assessment of the vulnerabilities in the

______20

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______likely areas of impact to the types of physical or operational agents potentially resulting from a hazard event.

There are two methods available to the Committee to assess the communities’ vulnerabilities to future disasters.

Ø The first step evaluates the vulnerabilities of important facilities, systems and neighborhoods to the impacts of future disasters. The process ranks both the hazards to which the facility, system or neighborhood is most vulnerable, as well as the consequences to the community should it be disrupted or damaged by a disaster. This analysis typically results in identification of specific vulnerabilities that can be addressed by specific mitigation projects that can be proposed and incorporated into this plan.

The Committee will then review past experiences with disasters to see if those events highlighted the need for specific mitigation projects based on the type or location of damage they caused. And, these experiences can result in the formulation and characterization of specific mitigation projects for incorporation into the plan.

Ø The second procedure for assessment of community vulnerabilities involves comparison of the existing policy, program and regulatory framework promulgated by local jurisdictions to control growth, development and facility operations in a manner that minimizes vulnerability to future disasters. The Committee/Workgroup members can assess the individual jurisdictions’ existing codes, ordinances, plans, and programs to compare their provisions and requirements against the hazards posing the greatest risk to that community. If indicated, the participating jurisdiction can then propose development of additional codes, plans or policies as mitigation projects for incorporation into the Baker County LMS for future implementation when it is appropriate to do so.

As part of the planning process for the LMS plan, other existing documents were used as references and incorporated into the LMS document. These various documents were used to obtain goals, objectives, and policies that were incorporated into or referenced by the LMS document as guiding principles. The Committee/Workgroup consulted, reviewed and analyzed the following documents:

ü Baker County 2020 Comprehensive Plan ü City of Macclenny’s 2025 Comprehensive Plan ü Town of Glen St. Mary Land Development Regulations ü Baker County Emergency Management Plan ü Baker County Land Development Regulations

______21

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______ü County and Municipal Code of Ordinances ü State Comprehensive Plan ü State Hazard Mitigation Plan

The Baker County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) supplements much of the information in the LMS plan, especially concerning vulnerability analysis and risk assessment, with more specifics on all stages of the emergency management process, including preparedness, response, and recovery, as well as mitigation.

(D) Hazard Mitigation Projects

Developing hazard mitigation projects enables the Committee/Workgroup participants to highlight the most significant vulnerabilities, again to assist in prioritizing subsequent efforts to formulate and characterize specific hazard mitigation projects to eliminate or minimize those vulnerabilities.

Once the highest priorities are defined, the Committee/Workgroup members can identify specific mitigation projects for the plan that would eliminate or minimize those vulnerabilities. This procedure involves describing the project, relating it to one of the goals and objectives established by the Committee, and justifying its implementation on the basis of its economic benefits and/or protection of public health and safety, as well as valuable or irreplaceable resources.

The proposed mitigation projects are “prioritized” for implementation in a consistent manner by each participating organization using a set of the objectives criteria.

1) Contained within the Comprehensive Plan 2) Consistent with Existing Regulatory Framework 3) Community Benefit 4) Community Exposure 5) Effectiveness 6) Effective Life Expectancy 7) Public Support 8) Sponsorship 9) Funding Availability 10) Identified Funding Source 11) Environmentally Sound 12) Time Frame for Accomplishment

In characterizing a mitigation project for incorporation into the LMS plan, it is important to recognize that the level of analysis conducted by each organization involved has been intentionally designed to be appropriate for this stage in the planning process.

______22

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

In the interest of the Committee/Workgroup to have a satisfactory level of confidence that a proposed mitigation project, when it is implemented, will be cost effective, feasible to implement, acceptable to the community, and technically effective in its purpose. To do this, the technical analyses conducted, including the development of a benefit to cost ratio for each proposal, have been based on a straightforward, streamlined approach, relying largely on the informed judgment of experienced local officials.

The analyses have not been specifically designed to meet the known or anticipated requirements of any state or federal funding agency, due largely to the fact that such requirements can vary with the agency and type of proposal. Therefore, at the point when the organization proposing the project is applying for funding from any state or federal agency, or from any other public or private funding source, that organization will then address the specific informational or analytical requirements of the funding agency.

(E) Developing the Local Mitigation Strategy Plan

After the vulnerability assessment has been performed and mitigation projects are identified by the agency or organization developing the proposed mitigation project, the information used to characterize the project is submitted to the Committee/Workgroup for review and inter-jurisdictional coordination.

The Committee/Workgroup members assure that the proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives established by each jurisdiction for the planning period. Once the Committee/Workgroup has reviewed and coordinated the submitted project, it is formally considered for incorporation into the Baker County LMS. The proposed project is identified as consistent with the goals and objectives for the planning period and would be beneficial for the community as a whole if and when implemented. If so, the Committee then informally votes to incorporate the proposed project into the strategy.

At the annual or semi-annual LMS meetings, each mitigation project included in the plan is evaluated to determine the following:

ü If the project should remain as a valid and ongoing project (deferred until a later time due to funding); ü If the project is completed (all details are gathered on the hazard(s) mitigated, mitigation goals achieved, jurisdiction, funding source, total cost to complete the project, agency responsible for implementation, timeline to complete the project, and any specific details relevant to the project);

ü if the project should be removed or deleted from the mitigation project list (LMS plan); and

ü If there are any new projects that should be added to the mitigation project list (LMS plan).

______23

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______See Attachment I for additional details on the ongoing, completed, deleted or new mitigation projects for Baker County.

(F) Approval of the Current Edition of the Plan

At the end of each planning period, a plan document such as this is prepared for release to the community and for action by the governing bodies of the jurisdictions and organizations that participated in the planning process.

(G) Implementation of Approved Mitigation Projects

Once incorporated into the Baker County LMS, the agency or organization proposing the project becomes responsible for its’ implementation, if feasible, otherwise it could be assigned to another department, if the LMS Committee/Workgroup vote and all agree. This could be developing a budget for the effort, or making application to state and federal agencies for financial support for implementation.

Current Status of Participation in the Committee/Workgroup

The support staff serving the LMS Committee/Workgroup is from the Baker County Department of Emergency Management. The staff facilitated the work of the Committee/Workgroup by advertising the LMS meetings, notifying the members and general public on the upcoming meeting, preparing the meeting agenda, completing the meeting minutes, updating the LMS mitigation project list, keeping documented data on hazard events as they occur, and provide technical assistance as needed.

In order to support the participating jurisdictions in the completion of the community profiles and vulnerability assessments, the Committee/Workgroup analysis technical data, and provides training in the evaluations needed. The participating jurisdictions, organizations, and individuals in the Baker County LMS Committee/Workgroup have worked diligently to complete this plan, and will continue to do so in the future to create a truly disaster resistant community for the benefit of all its citizens.

______24

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Section 3 - Geography, Demographics, Housing and Land Use

Requirement: §201.6 (c) (2) (ii)- The plan should describe vulnerability of providing a general description of land uses and development trends within the community so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions.

Geography

Baker County is located on the NE quadrant of Florida and although it is primarily a rural county, it is included in the Jacksonville Metropolitan area. Founded in 1861, its county seat is Macclenny, Florida. The adjacent counties are Charlton and Ware Counties, Georgia to the north, and Clinch County, Georgia to the northwest. The remaining adjoining counties are located in Florida; Nassau County is northeast, Duval County is east, Clay County is southeast, Union and Bradford Counties are south, and Columbia County is west. The north central part of the county lies within the Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge, a federally protected area. The St. Marys River, which runs along the northeastern border of the County is a remote blackwater stream. The river is located in southeastern Georgia and northeastern Florida, forming the easternmost border between the two states.

Baker County is an inland county and does not suffer significantly from the coastal effects of tropical storms or hurricanes; however, these storms could cause flooding and severe wind damage, particularly to the mobile homes. Thunderstorms frequent the area with numerous storms and tornado watches and warnings. Flood plains have been identified and mapped by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and the flood plain maps are maintained in the Emergency Management Office and in the Building, Planning & Zoning Office.

The total area of Baker County is 376,960 acres, or approximately 589 square miles, of which 585 square miles is land, and 3.7 square miles is water. According to the 2012 Census of Agriculture, there are 381

______25

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______farms in the county consisting of 32,919 acres, approximately 9% of the land in the county. Also, the timber industry represents approximately 77,798 + acres, over 21% of the land in the county Baker County is ranked 51st in the State of Florida for total value of agricultural products sold with a market value in 2012 of $15,808,000 (15% was crop sales - $2,358,000 and 85% was livestock sales - $13,450,000). The top crop items (acres) are: forage-land used for all hay and haylage, grass silage, and greenchop, nursery stock crops, vegetables harvested, all, sweet corn and corn for grain. The top livestock inventory items include: pullets for laying flock replacement, cattle and calves, layers, goats all, horses and ponies. Baker County is ranked 1st in the State for pullets for laying flock replacement. Baker has two incorporated municipalities within its border, the City of Macclenny (the county seat), and the Town of Glen St. Mary. Since the 2010 plan approval, no new municipalities have been either created or disbanded. The county is served by Interstate I-10, US Route 90, State Roads 121, 125, 250, and 229. All major transportation systems in the County receive use by passenger and commercial traffic. These roadways pass through the County’s populated areas as well as environmentally sensitive lands. The major roadways serve as evacuation routes through the county.

Pursuant to Section 339.64(2), Florida Statutes, the Commission, as part of its work program review process, is required to annually assess the progress that the Florida Transportation Commission Department and its transportation partners have made in realizing the goals of economic development, improved mobility, and increased intermodal connectivity of the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS). Interstate I-10 and US Route 90 are considered Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Highways. See Figure A for the road map.

CSX Railroad operates a major East/West line through Baker County with passes through the City of Macclenny, and towns of Glen St. Mary, Sanderson and Olustee. According to information from CXS Transportation, thousands of rail tanker cars are moved through the County each year.

______26

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Figure A – Baker County Transportation Network Map

Baker County Transportation Network

t..v•nd ~ lnloqt;ates -- f(,IRoacts - USROP

~ .. .JIii_.,_ ...... C...\11.__.. ,_,.,,,l'Clf, _,. ....,_ ... """'•0--d"9o--- ,....-,.-...~e.-1,;u

t 0 3 6

Miles

Source: http://fcit.usf.edu/florida/maps/pages/12200/f12249/f12249.htm

Demographics, Housing, Land Use

Baker County has seen a slight decrease - 0.5% in population growth from 2010 to 2014, and is currently ranked 52nd out of 67 counties in Florida’s population. A projection on data trends, calculated over a number of years, and is used to forecast or project future levels, based on an assumption that that past trends are unchanged. Details in table 3.1 identify the statistical data of the county population.

______27

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Table 3.1 - Demographics for Baker County

Population Baker County is the 52nd most populous county with 0.1% of Florida’s population.

2014 Estimate 26,991 % change 2010 – 2014 - 0.5%

Estimates and Projections 2015 Projection based on 2014 estimate 27,377 % change 2010 – 2015 1%

2020 Projection based on 2014 estimate 29,326 % change 2015 – 2020 7.1%

Population % by jurisdiction (based on 2014 estimate figures), where the residents live in Baker County. Unincorporated Baker County 75% City of Macclenny 24% Town of Glen St. Mary 1%

Density – Person per Square Mile

______28

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______2010 46.3 2014 46.1

Distribution of Population by Age, percent 2013 Persons under 5 years 6.4% Persons under 18 years 25.1% Persons 65 years and over 12.5%

Mobile Homes 3,136

According to the property appraiser’s office August 2015, there are 3,136 property records identified as mobile homes located throughout Baker County, approximately 36% of the residents live in mobile homes.

Mobile Home Residents (see details below for further information) According to the US Census, American Fact Owner Renter Finder, 2009 – 2013 American Community Occupied - Occupied - Survey 5-Year Estimates the following data is 7,313 1,880 identified: Estimated total for owner and renter: 9,193

Sources: Office of Economic and Demographic Research; Baker County Property Appraiser’s Office; and the US Census

Baker County’s vision for the next 20 years is to build a quasi-limited loop road around the Macclenny and Glen St. Mary population center at a distance of about 4 to 5 miles north and south of the I-10 / US 90 corridor, with a western alignment near Sanderson and an eastern alignment near the east end of Macclenny. The northern and southern portions of this loop road are part of a regional connector system and will eventually be connected to Dunn Avenue (SR 104) on the north and Normandy Boulevard (SR 228) in the southwestern portion of Duval County.

The County anticipates up to 5 new population centers along this loop, each master-planned and funded through the development of regional impact process. The County’s vision is for each of these new centers to be concentrated mixed use developments of relatively high density surrounded with lower density development and of such scale as to absorb nearly all of the anticipated growth that will occur.

______29

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

This strategy is designed in part to take development pressure off of the remaining stretches of rural lands between the centers and at the outer boundaries of the County to preserve the visual and cultural identity of the County.

County Structures

According to the Baker County Property Appraiser’s office (August 2015), there are 12,918 structures in the County. Table 3.2 provides the type and number of structures within each jurisdiction (i.e. unincorporated Baker County, the City of Macclenny, and the Town of Glen St. Mary).

Table 3.2 – Total Number of Buildings or Structures in Baker County

Type of Structure Unincorporated Baker City of Macclenny Town of Glen County St. Mary Single Family 3,551 1,733 112 Residential Multi-Family Residential 9 121 7 Mobile Homes 2,908 176 52 Agricultural 3,471 34 5 Commercial 189 296 32 Institutional 94 65 16 Government 15 32 0

Subtotal 10,237 2,457 224 Total # of Buildings 12,918

Source: Baker County Property Appraiser and the Baker County Information Service Director, 2015

According to the Baker County Property Appraiser’s office (August 2015), there are 12,235 parcels in the County. Table 3.3 provides the type and number of structures within each jurisdiction (i.e. unincorporated Baker County, the City of Macclenny, and the Town of Glen St. Mary).

______30

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Table 3.3 – Total Number of Parcels in Baker County

Parcels Unincorporated Baker City of Macclenny Town of Glen County St. Mary Vacant Land 1,104 568 28 Single Family 2,491 1,666 101 Multi-Family 23 57 4 Mobile Home 2,108 92 41 Commercial 87 247 30 AG/Farm 2,404 29 4 Church 76 86 8 Government 519 87 5 Utility/Electricity 8 3 Mining/Gas 18 Subsurface Rt 74 Sewage/Solid Waste 2 Non AG Acres 256 7 2

Parcel Subtotal 9,170 2,842 223 Total # Parcels 12,235

Source: Baker County Property Appraiser and the Baker County Information Service Director, 2015

Real and Tangible Property Just Value

As stated by the Department of Revenue Property Tax Oversight, 01/2015, the total Just Value of the real property parcels, tangible personal property and railroad and private carlines and value information for the County is: $1,609,862,311.00, see Table 3.4 The “just value” is the fair value of property for tax purposes.

Table 3.4 – Total Just Value of the Real and Tangible Property in Baker County

Property Type # of Parcels Just Value

Single Family Residential 6,411 $580,099,850 Multi-Family Residential 50 $7,902,437 Agricultural 1,362 $212,726,633 Vacant Residential 1,745 $29,184,961 Vacant Non-Agricultural 301 $24,166,073 Commercial 337 $163,031,805

______31

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Government & Institutional 149 $13,241,534 Taxable Homestead Agricultural 1,088 $176,965,418 Government & Institutional Non- 737 $255,854,502 Taxable Total Real Property Value $1,463,173,213

Tangible Personal Property $128,994,741 Railroad and Private Carlines $17,694,357 Total Just Value $1,609,862,311

Source: State of Florida, Department of Revenue Property Tax Oversight, 01/2015

Current Land Use Patterns

The land use patterns are influenced by the waterways and road system. The primary land uses in these areas are agricultural, conservation and forest which are subject to disaster caused by weather phenomenon or wildfires, and consist of wildlife and water management areas which are ecologically sensitive. The land use patterns for the county can be identified in figure C, the Future Land Use Plan Map.

Future Land Use Plan Map or FLUM

The Future Land Use Pan Map identifies the classification areas for Baker County, see Figure B; conservation, agriculture, public facilities and grounds, residential, commercial, and industrial. The map reveals that the land use is predominately agriculture, conservation and forest area.

Figure B – Map Classification for the FLUM

Future Land Use Layer D 0 CONSERVATION • VERY LOW DENSllY RESIDENTIAL 2.5 DU/AC FLU • CONSERVATION RESOURCES • LOW DENSllY RESIDENTIAL 1 DU/AC • AGRICULTURE ZONE A INCORPORATED AREAS • MEDI UM DENSllY RESIDENTIAL .5 DU/AC * Subject to th e Ce dar Creek ORI 0 AGRICULTURE ZONE B • INDUSTRIAL • MIXEDUSE * uevelopment Order adoptred • COMMERCIAL O PUBLIC FACILITIES AND GROUNDS • HI GH DENSllY RESIDENTIAL 6 DU/AC May 1 9, 2008

With an overall population growth expected to increase at a slow rate over the next several years, and in reviewing the specifics on Baker County’s population data (the 2020 projection based on 2014 estimate,

______32

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______the % change will be approximately 7.1%), stating that the projected land use for the county will remain predominately agricultural land, conservation and forested area.

As noted in Table 3.1, approximately 75% of the population live in unincorporated Baker County and of that nearly 36% live in mobile homes. This map can be very useful when trying to evaluate the vulnerable populations of the county when a natural, technological or human made hazard event occurs.

______33

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Figure C – Baker County Future Land Use Map 2020

Urban Growth

-1'North O 1 mi 5mi

Source: Baker County Planning & Zoning Department

______34

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Economic Growth

Baker County has chosen to grow its economy by attracting overflow industrial jobs from nearby Jacksonville. It has also developed a vision of becoming a self-sustaining community that can accommodate new growth with the use of smart growth management principles while preserving its rural character. Baker County will manage the growth and build the vision primarily by allowing the new development to locate along the US-90/I-10 growth and transportation corridor.

This growth will be supported by the Comprehensive Plan development amendments in accordance with the following guidelines:

Within the Urban Growth Boundary - areas currently served or areas that can be served by logical extensions of existing transportation and utility systems.

Within the US 90/I-10 Transportation Growth Corridor - comprehensive master planned projects addressing new regional utility, transportation, education, recreation and stormwater facilities.

Baker County will not support large scale Comprehensive Plan development amendments outside of these two areas unless they can be served by logical extensions of all required infrastructure.

______35

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Section 4 - Hazard Risk and Vulnerability Assessment

Requirements: §201.6 (c) (2) (i) - A description of the type, location, and extent of all natural hazards that can affect the jurisdiction. The plan shall include information on previous occurrences of hazard events and on the probability of future hazard events. §201.6 (c) (2) (ii) - A description of the jurisdiction's vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section. This description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its impact on the community. All plans must also address NFIP insured structures that have been repetitively damaged by floods.

This section of the Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy summarizes the results of the hazard identification and vulnerability assessment processes undertaken by the LMS Committee/Workgroup members. The intent of this section is to provide a summary compilation of the information gathered about the hazards threatening Baker County, and the potential probability, location, vulnerability, extent and impact to those hazards. These assessments will allow County officials and residents to make fully informed decisions as to what threatens them, how severe the threat is, and the priority to which they should mitigate those threats.

While many of the hazards discussed in this section are relevant to Baker County and the participating jurisdictions, selected natural hazards are not listed due to the geographic location and characteristics of the planning area.

These natural hazards were considered not applicable in the last LMS plan and therefore will not be profiled in this updated LMS Plan:

• Avalanche • Coastal Erosion • Expansive Soil • Volcano

In addition, some of these hazards were profiled in the previous plan and considered a low vulnerability for the County, however, they were determined for this update plan not to be profiled:

______36

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

• Storm surge • Dam levee failure • Landslides • Earthquakes • Tsunamis

Vulnerability Assessments

As stated by FEMA…”Vulnerability to a natural hazard can be defined as to the extent to which people will experience harm and property will be damaged from that hazard.” Details will be discussed throughout section 4 on the vulnerability of the hazard’s impact on the community and its vulnerable structures.

The vulnerability assessment process begins with profiling the communities of Baker County and examining specific characteristics that contribute to the vulnerability of the structures, people, and functioning of that specific component of the community. These assessments build on the identification of hazards in the community and the risk that the hazards pose to the community.

By identifying these hazards as well as determining what areas of the county may be vulnerable to their effects will guide the LMS Committee/Workgroup decide the corresponding mitigation projects or initiatives that may be used to prevent a hazard from becoming a disaster or lessening those impacts felt by the people of Baker County. Achievement of these initiatives will go a long way towards reducing hazard related damage in the County in addition to the costs of repairing such damage.

Specifically, the vulnerability sections will provide the following details:

ü Description of all types of natural hazards that can affect the community. ü Description of the community’s vulnerability to each identified hazard. ü Description of the probability, location, extent and impact of each identified hazard that can affect the jurisdiction. ü An assessment of each jurisdictions risk where they vary from the risks facing the entire community for each identified hazard. ü POLICY: As additional data becomes available, Baker County will update the vulnerability in terms of the types and numbers of future buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities located in the identified hazard areas. ü Key issue statements which outline the assets that are vulnerable to the hazard.

______37

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Probability Assessments

Throughout the hazard section, the probability of future events will be determined for the natural hazards. The probability or “chance of occurrence” is defined using an ordinal scale.

The scale is as follows:

Low = At least 1 occurrence every 10 years Medium = At least 1 occurrence every 3 years High = At least 1 occurrence every year

Extent Assessment

Extent - Throughout the hazard section the extent statements will be determined for the hazards. The statements will be based on the range of magnitude or severity that the county could experience using a scientific scale or a quantitative measurement.

Types of scientific scales:

• Enhanced Fujita Scale for tornadoes • Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale for hurricanes/tropical storms/winds • Keetch-Byram Drought Index for droughts • Palmer Drought Severity Index for droughts • Heat Index Chart • Flood depth for floods • Acres burned for wildfires • High, medium or low based on the previous event occurrence

Impact Assessment

Impact - The impact is the consequence or effect of the hazard on the community and its assets. In evaluating the “impact” for Baker County, historical detail impacts and/or an estimate of potential losses were noted within the hazards identified. If a momentous and devastating storm decimated the entire county, then potential dollar costs would probably be based on the “just value figure” which was discussed in Section 3: $1,609,862,311

The natural hazards profiled in this section can each bring different consequences to Baker County, to its structures, infrastructure and utilities, transportation networks, its economy, and its environment. The

______38

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______degree to which the community is and further details on the specific hazard impact will be described at the end of each hazard profile. Table 4.2 shall serve as a summary to relay the impacts of the identified hazards for Baker County on various structures and infrastructure.

A direct hit by a hurricane or severe tropical storm are uncommon in Northeast Florida, but there have been numerous hurricanes that have come close to the area causing high winds within Baker County. Localized flooding also occurs from time to time along the St. Marys River and its tributaries, as well as in isolated pockets of low-lying areas.

Ø Tropical Storm Debby had a significant impact on Baker County. Mobile homes and other homes flooded and infrastructure collapsed or destroyed and needed to be rebuilt. See details in the flooding hazard profiled.

Wildfires occur each year in the County, causing damage to natural resources and requiring much effort by Federal, State and the local government to control.

Ø The Bugaboo Fire had a significant impact on the county as 123,014 acres burned in Columbia and Baker counties. See details in the wildfire hazard profiled.

Tornadoes are infrequent but due to their unpredictability, they can cause loss of life and possessions. High winds associated with these storms, or with hurricanes or tropical storms, can also cause severe property damage. Severe thunderstorms are prevalent in Baker County especially during the summer months, and lightning can occur from the thunderstorms and are known to start wildfires and sometimes even produce hail. Droughts are a common event in Baker County and can be long lasting as well as heat waves and hot temperatures are a normal occurrence during the Florida summer. Winter storms and freezes, though uncommon, can damage crops and have the potential to create other dangers associated with cold weather. All hazards analyzed are profiled throughout Section 4.

______39

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Table 4.1 - Impacts on Structures and Infrastructure from the Identified Hazards in Baker County

Impacts on Structures and

Infrastructure from

Identified Hazards All Structures Mobile Homes Poorly Constructed Homes Non -Elevated Homes Telecommunications Electrical Utilities Water / Sewer Utilities Roadways Waterways Agriculture Economic Disruption Environmental Damage Hurricanes/Tropical X X X X X X X X X X X X Storms Flooding X X X X X X X X X X X X Wildfires X X X X X X X X X X Tornadoes X X X X X X X X X X X Thunderstorm/ Wind X X X X X X Hailstorms X X X Sinkhole X X X X X X X X Drought X X X X Heat Wave X X Winter Storm X X X X X X Freeze X X X X X X

There are changes to the identified hazards from the previous LMS plan. They are as follows:

Ø Tropical Cyclone was changed to Hurricanes/Tropical Storms; Flooding will include Flash Floods and Heavy Rains; Severe Thunderstorms was changed to Thunderstorms including High Winds, Lightning and Hailstorms. The other natural hazards will remain the same in this updated LMS plan as they have an affect and impact on the county.

Quantitative measurements, information and statistics provided in the LMS update was based on the best available data and historical occurrences recorded from the following sources: St. Johns River Water

______40

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Management District (SJRWMD); the Suwannee River Water Management District (SRWMD); the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); NOAA News; the National Weather Service (NWS), the United States Geological Survey (USGS); the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP); the Florida Department of Natural Resources; the Baker County and incorporated areas Flood Insurance Study (FIS); the Florida Forest Service; the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); the State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan; the Baker County Planning and Zoning Department, and the Baker County Department of Emergency Management.

Natural Hazards

Disaster Declarations History

When a disaster strikes that overwhelms the ability of local communities to respond, the President's action authorizes the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to coordinate all disaster relief efforts which have the purpose of alleviating the hardship and suffering caused by the emergency on the local population, and to provide appropriate assistance for required emergency measures, authorized under Title V of the Stafford Act, to save lives and to protect property and public health and safety and to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe in the county. Table 4.2 lists the disaster declarations from August 2004 – August 2015 that have occurred in Baker County with the last declaration in 2012.

Table 4.2 - Disasters Declarations for Baker County (August 2004 – August 2015)

Declaration # Incident Period Hazard Event Individual Public / Date Assistance Assistance #1539 / 8/11/2004 – 8/30/2004 Hurricane Charley & Tropical X 8/13/2004 Storm Bonnie #1545 / 9/3/2004 – 10/8/2004 Hurricane Frances X X 9/4/2004 #1561 / 9/24/2004- 11/17/2004 Hurricane Jeanne X X 9/26/2004 #3220 / 8/29/2005 – 10/1/2005 Hurricane Katrina Evacuation X

______41

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______9/5/2005 #2689/ 5/7/2007 Florida Suwannee Fire Complex X 5/7/2007 #3288/ 8/18/2008 – 9/12/2008 Tropical Storm Fay X 8/21/2008 #1785/ 8/18/2008 – 9/12/2008 Tropical Storm Fay X X 8/24/2008 #4068/ 6/23/2012 - 7/26/2012 Tropical Storm Debby X X 7/3/2012

Source: FEMA - www.fema.gov/disaster

Flooding

Floods are the most common hazard in the United States and the affects can be local, impacting a neighborhood or community, or entire river basins and multiple states. A flood is an overflow of water onto normally dry land. The inundation of a normally dry area caused by rising water in an existing waterway, such as a river, stream, or drainage ditch, or the ponding of water at or near the point where the rain fell. Flooding is a longer-term event than flash flooding as it may last for days or even weeks.

Several factors determine the severity of floods, including rainfall intensity, rainfall duration, topography, ground cover, and frequency of inundation. Rainfall associated with hurricanes can vary depending on the hurricane size, the forward speed and other meteorological factors. Intense rainfall may not be directly related to high winds instead the greatest rainfall amounts occur from weaker storms that move slowly or stall over an area for extended periods of time.

______42

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______The floodplains are those areas generally associated with small natural streams or other drainage systems that naturally flood following large amounts of runoff generated by short episodes of extremely heavy rainfall or during and after a tropical cyclone event. Low lying areas and/or poorly drained land can also accumulate rainfall through ponding on the surface. Floodplains help to store water within these confined areas for eventual release after the end of the storm. In many communities, flooding can cause severe impacts and justifies the important of carrying flood insurance.

Some areas of Baker County are more flood-prone than others. The floodplain maps show those areas of Baker County and both its municipalities, which are within the 100-year and 500-year floodplain as delineated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as part of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). These are areas that have a probability of flooding once every 100-years or 500-years respectively during any given year. The classification of floodplains is due in part to the probability or return rate of a level of water; for instance, 100-year floods are calculated to be the level of flood water expected to be equal or exceeded every 100-years on average. What this means in terms of flood events is there is a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in magnitude in any single year; a 500- year floodplain has a 0.2% chance.

In Baker County floodplains are associated with the following areas:

ü St. Marys River and its tributaries of Turkey Creek, Little St. Marys River, Middle Prong St. Marys River, Cedar Creek, and Moccasin Creek, as well as the large wetlands located within the headwaters of the St. Marys River drainage basin, such as Pinhook Swamp, Okeefenokee Swamp, Big Gum Swamp, New River Swamp, and the Impassable Bay.

Numerous areas throughout the County experience repetitive flooding from heavy rainfall and damage include flooded roadways and homes as well as scouring of undersized bridges. The St. Marys River and its tributaries have broad, swampy, heavily wooded floodplains that are frequently flooded. Major floods occurred in the St. Marys River basin in 1947, 1964, and 1973. Some flooding is associated with overflows along the St. Marys River and its tributaries and some flooding is associated with ponding of water within low-lying areas.

Flooding may also inundate potential evacuation routes and prevent last minute evacuees from areas vulnerable to storm surge from reaching safety. And flooded roads and bridges can often result in fatal accidents. The flooding events can complicate evacuation procedures, limiting or disrupting traffic flow due to the impassible, submerged roadways; some dirt roads in the rural areas of the county may even be washed out. However, it is important to note that most of the affected roads that have the potential for flooding mentioned previously do not function as major evacuation routes.

Portions of the following roadways that have historically experienced periodic flooding are: Clet Harvey Road, Le Harvey Road, Claude Harvey Road, Pierce Road, Cowpen Road, Deck Mann Road, Cedar Creek

______43

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Farms Road, Reid Stafford Road, C.W. Webb Road, Chestnut Road and Camphor Road near Turkey Creek, John Mann Road, and Steel Bridge Road.

Tropical Storm Debby

Two bridges were destroyed during Tropical Storm Debby in Baker County, and new bridges have been built due to the historical river crest and flooding: Bridge #274158, located on CR 127; and Bridge #274154 located on CR 229. Figure D – Hydrography Map of Baker County

, , , , UVA

{ j

f------

,..... N Baker County --~ ...... Hydrography w• • - ______,_"°"1 • -c.,.,---- 0 ,., 3 ·------0...... ,.-,.~1 •M ,lei --- Source: http://fcit.usf.edu/florida/maps/pages/11200/f11225/f11225.htm

______44

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Figure E - St Marys River near Macclenny

ST MARYS RIVER NEAR MACCLENNY Details are from the National Weather Service Unlvonal llme (UTC) 18Z 182 18Z l BZ 182 18Z 18Z 182 182 18Z 182 Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service 13irAug 17======Aug 18 Aug 19 Aug 20 AuQ 21 Aug 22 :;-Au~~-~~~-~~~-tg 23 Aug 24 AuQ 25 Aug 26 Aug 272• Latest observed value: 8.82 ft at 1 :45 PM EDT 12 22.Aug-2015 Flo.Qd_S_ta.9._l s 12_ft 21 11 1.7 10 +"""°ll'-..UW'------+1.3 Forecasts for the St. Marys River near uf Macclenny are issued as needed during times of high water, but are not routinely available.

0.5 Flood Impacts: 0. 3

4 +-~-.-~---.-,--r-~-,-~-f-,--r-~-,-~~-,--,-~-+ 0.2 2pm 2pm 2pm 2pm 2pm 2pm 2pm 2pm 2pm 2pm 2pm Mo n Tu e We d Tou Fn Sat sun Mon Tu e Wed Tou Major Flood Stage: 20 feet - High banks on the Aug 17 Aug 18 Au9 19 Aug 20 Aug 21 Aw;i 22 Aw;i 23 Aug 24 Aug 25 Aw;i 26 Aug 27 Site llme (EDT) Florida side begin to overflow. Trailers and • • • • Graph Created (2:2CPM Aug 22, 2015) -+- Obs«vld IMACJ l (plotting HG JRG) ftGage Oft Datum: 40' I [ Qb9ervations colltesy rx US Geological Survey I houses along the river in Baker County are endangered.

Moderate Flood Stage:16 feet -Access roads on both sides of the river in Florida and Georgia are flooded. On the Florida side, the lower end of St. Marys Cove Road past the public boat ramp becomes flooded and cuts off access to 20 to 30 homes. The Stokes Road Bridge over the river is generally closed due to high water.

Flood Stage: 15 feet - Flooding begins to impact the lower end of Steel Bridge Road on the Florida side and cuts off access to the river gage as well as access to several homes.

Flood Categories (in feet)

Major Flood Stage: 19 Moderate Flood Stage: 15 Flood Stage: 12 Action Stage: 10

Historic Crests (1) 24.38 ft on 06/28/2012 (2) 23.25 ft on 09/13/1964 (3) 22.86 ft on 04/05/1973 (4) 22.29 ft on 09/25/1947

______45

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______(5) 21.97 ft on 04/03/1948 (6) 21.96 ft on 09/07/1950 (7) 21.90 ft on 09/20/1928 (8) 21.23 ft on 10/22/1950 (9) 21.14 ft on 08/24/2008 (10) 21.06 ft on 09/08/2004 Show More Historic Crests

(P): Preliminary values subject to further review.

Recent Crests (1) 11.80 ft on 12/26/2014 (2) 12.65 ft on 10/02/2014 (3) 16.36 ft on 09/11/2014 (4) 12.21 ft on 06/08/2014 (5) 11.40 ft on 05/18/2014 (6) 15.15 ft on 04/21/2014 (7) 15.35 ft on 04/10/2014 (8) 11.95 ft on 03/31/2014 (9) 14.60 ft on 03/19/2014 (10) 11.06 ft on 03/09/2014 Show More Recent Crests

(P): Preliminary values subject to further review.

Low Water Records (1) 1.09 ft on 05/27/2012 (2) 1.09 ft on 05/26/2012 (3) 1.11 ft on 05/25/2012 (4) 1.11 ft on 06/22/2011 (5) 1.12 ft on 06/20/2011 Show More Low Water Records

Flooding in Baker County is commonly associated with hurricanes, tropical storm and other significant rain events that can occur under a wide variety of conditions and can create flood conditions along Baker County’s rivers and tributary streams. According to records from the N WS ’s Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Services, the initial flooding stage for the St. Marys River begins when the river reaches a depth of 12 feet.

The extent for flooding in Baker County was recorded at a depth of over 24 feet (24.38 ft.) on 6/28/12 from Tropical Storm Debby.

______46

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)

The SFHA is the land area covered by the floodwaters of the base flood on the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) maps. The SFHA is the area where the NFIP's floodplain management regulations must be enforced and the area where the mandatory purchase of flood insurance applies. The SFHA’s in Baker County are land areas that are at high risk for flooding. The special flood hazard areas can be identified by several different types of zones varying A and V, however, Baker County has only the following zones: A and AE

Details from the Planning & Zoning Department for Baker County:

ü There are no county-owned structures or public facilities located in flood zone areas. ü There are 25 residential properties located in the unincorporated area of Baker County in Zone A and AE.

The SFHA Map Baker County is a FEMA map and was provided by the Planning & Zoning Department. The map classification (zoomed in version) outlines the classification details of the FEMA Flood Zone areas within Baker County.

Figure F – Map Classification for the Baker County SFHA

~mm D < all other values> FLD_ZONE • 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD D A tz.l AE D X

______47

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Figure G – Baker County - FEMA Special Flood Hazard Areas

Source: Baker County Planning & Zoning Department

______48

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Flood Occurrences

According to the NCDC, (8/1/1950 – 8/31/2015), there were 4 flood, 6 flash flood, and 7 heavy rain occurrences reported in Baker County with location, date, time, the type of event, if there were any deaths or injury’s, and the property and crop damage estimates.

Table 4.3 – Flood Occurrences in Baker County – (8/1/1950 – 8/31/2015)

Location or Date Time Type Dth Inj PrD CrD County Macclenny 7/31/1996 18:45 Flash Flood 0 0 5K 0.00K Macclenny 10/7/1996 6:00 Flash Flood 0 0 600K 0.00K Countywide 2/17/1998 2:35 Flash Flood 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Baker Zone 3/1/1998 00:01 Flood 0 0 2.2M 0.00K Countywide 3/30/2000 15:40 Flash Flood 0 0 2.5K 0.00K Macclenny 8/1/2002 17:00 Flood 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 10/8/2002 19:00 Flood 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Countywide 3/9/2003 11:00 Flash Flood 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Taylor 8/13/2004 8:15 Heavy Rain 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 6/29/2005 16:00 Heavy Rain 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 7/6/2006 17:00 Heavy Rain 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Evans Pines 4/6/2008 19:00 Heavy Rain 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Taylor 6/25/2012 20:32 Flood 0 0 500K 0.00K Sanderson 6/25/2012 21:44 Flash Flood 0 0 5K 0.00K Macclenny 8/23/2013 13:00 Heavy Rain 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 3/16/2014 23:00 Heavy Rain 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Eddy 5/14/2014 10:20 Heavy Rain 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Totals: Property Damage: $3,312,500

Source: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents

Key Code: Dth: Deaths; Inj: Injuries; PdD: Property Damage;vCrD: Crop Damage

Hazard Narrative

1) 10/7/1996, Macclenny – Eight to ten inches of rainfall from a strong Nor’easter and Tropical Storm Josephine caused flooding across the entire county. Dozens of roads were covered by water and bridges were washed out between Turkey Creek One and Three; both bridges at the ends of Crews Road; the paved road was undermined on 23A North near the golf course, and the road was

______49

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______out on both ends of the Southern States Nursery Road. A handful of people chose to remain while being cut off by high water. Many used boats to reach vehicles at locations like the Boy Scout Camp along the St. Marys River and the Westside Loop.

2) 3/1/1998 – 3/31/1998, Baker Zone – Several counties in Florida (Baker, St. Johns, Columbia, Nassau, Union, Suwannee, Alachua, Marion, Hamilton, Gilchrist, Flagler, Duval, Clay, Bradford and Putnam) are included in this total property damage figure of $2.2 million. The narrative states: Total flooding related to El Nino with more than 2800 homes and more than 175 businesses were destroyed.

3) 6/25/12 – 6/28/12, Begin location: Taylor, end location Sanderson - Tropical Storm Debby moved across the area from the northeast Gulf of Mexico. Deep tropical moisture combined with a stalled frontal boundary across north Florida over a period of several days caused extensive, flooding rainfall, as well as historic river flooding on the St. Marys River. A few severe storms developed each day, but the main impact was flooding rainfall and extensive river flooding which flooded homes in Baker, Charlton, Camden and Nassau counties.

Record flooding occurred in Baker County with a historic crest of the St. Marys River due to persistent heavy rainfall over NE FL and SW GA in the river’s upstream charge basin. Radar estimated that 15 to 25 inches fell in the charge basin over several days. On 6/26 at 9:32 pm, a spotter reported 3.46 inches of rainfall in the past 5 hours at a location 3 miles ESE of Sanderson. Ditches were at capacity in the area at the time of the report. At 10:25 pm that evening, the media reported 4.08 inches of rainfall since 5 pm that afternoon in Glen St. Mary. Water was crossing roads west of Glen St. Mary. At 10:30 pm, the media reported Interstate I-10 eastbound at mile marker 317 near Sanderson was closed due to flooding. At 10:44 pm, Interstate I-10 westbound at mile marker 324 near Glen St. Mary was closed due to flooding per a media report. Flooding continued through the end of the month. On 6/28 significant river flooding ensured on the St. Marys with numerous mobile homes flooded and a total loss. Other homes were also flooding. At 10:50 am, Baker County EM reported a bridge floating down the St. Marys River. At 1:06 pm, the St Road 121 bridge was flooded by the St. Marys River and was closed. The CR 127 bridge over Cedar Creek collapsed. The cost of property loss estimated was likely greatly under estimated.

Vulnerability

Vulnerability to flooding events can be defined as to the extent to which people will experience harm and property will be damaged from the natural hazard.

______50

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Table 4.4 – Vulnerability Areas in Baker County

Areas of Vulnerability – details were obtained from the FEMA FIRM’s, the Baker County Flood Insurance Study (FIS), and the FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area Map

Incorporated and Unincorporated Areas of Baker County

(Figure G identifies the FEMA Special Flood Hazard Areas that are very vulnerable to flood events) (Zones A and AE)

In Baker County floodplains are associated with the following areas:

In addition, portions of the following roadways that have historically experienced periodic flooding are: Clet Harvey Road, Le Harvey Road, Claude Harvey Road, Pierce Road, Cowpen Road, Deck Mann Road, Cedar Creek Farms Road, Reid Stafford Road, C.W. Webb Road, Chestnut Road and Camphor Road near Turkey Creek, John Mann Road, and Steel Bridge Road.

______51

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Vulnerability for the Baker County’s Population

Baker County’s growth rate from 2010 to 2015 was 27,377 residents, a 1% increase change from 2010 to 2015. The flooding vulnerability for the Baker County’s population exposure based on 2010 Census population data’s potentially at risk for riverine flooding is noted in Table 4.xxx. Based on the projected 2015 population, 54% to possibly 55% *of the county’s population are at risk to a 100-year flood event, and approximately 34.9% to possibly 35.9% * of the population is at risk to a 500-year flood event, especially the residents who live in the vicinity of bodies of water, tributary streams, and low-lying areas.

Note: The % possible increase * would be an estimated figure based on a 1% increase in population since 2010.

Table 4.5 – Flood Vulnerability for Baker County’s Population

County 100-Year 500-Year Baker 14,810 9,566 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page 3.53

Vulnerability for Baker County’s Structures and Facilities

According to the Baker County Planning & Zoning Department

ü There are no county-owned structures or public facilities located in flood zone areas. ü There are 25 residential properties located in the unincorporated area of Baker County in Zones A and AE. ü The non-elevated residential structures located in these areas are susceptible to being damaged by rising and ponding waters.

Table’s 4.6 – 4.9 summarize the following details for the Floodplain Area (100-year and 500-year) in Baker County on:

Ø the types and number of structures located by occupancy type that are vulnerable in the floodplain area; Ø the value of the structures vulnerable in the floodplain area by occupancy type; Ø the county facilities in the floodplain area (100-year only); and Ø the value of the county facilities in the floodplain area (100-year only).

______52

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Table 4.6 – Structures Located in the Floodplain Area in Baker County

Floodplain Residential Commercial Medical Industrial Agriculture Education Government 100-year 346 1 3 1 177 0 33 500-year 20 0 I 1 I 0 5 I 0 I 0 I Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.10

Table 4.7 – Values of Structures in the Floodplain Area in Baker County (in millions)

Floodplain Resident. Comm. Med. Indus. Agric. Educ. Govt. ($ million) ($ million) ($ million) ($ million) ($ million) ($ million) ($ million) 100-year 38,054.23 24.42 1,223.73 12.88 26,089.36 0.00 6,695.30 500-year 2,140.12 0.00 I 222.62 I 0.00 I 1,199.34 0.00 0.00 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.14

Table 4.8 – Baker County Facilities in the Floodplain Area

Floodplain Hospitals Fire Stations Police Stations Schools Other Total Facilities 100-year 0 0 0 0 13 13 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.19

Table 4.9 – Value of Baker County Facilities in the Floodplain Area (in millions)

Floodplain Hospitals Fire Stations Police Stations Schools Other Total ($million) ($million) ($million) ($million) ($million) Facilities ($million) 100-year 0 0 0 0 I5.20 I5.20 I Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.22

Summary details for flooding events:

Probability The probability of flooding is high (at least 1 occurrence every year).

Location The entire planning area (the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Baker County) is at high risk to flooding events.

Some areas of Baker County are more flood-prone than others. The floodplain maps show those areas of Baker County and both its municipalities, which are

______53

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______within the 100-year and 500-year floodplain as delineated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as part of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). These are areas that have a probability of flooding once every 100-years or 500-years respectively during any given year. The classification of floodplains is due in part to the probability or return rate of a level of water; for instance, 100-year floods are calculated to be the level of flood water expected to be equal or exceeded every 100-years on average. What this means in terms of flood events is there is a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in magnitude in any single year; a 500-year floodplain has a 0.2% chance.

In Baker County floodplains are associated with the following areas:

Extent Based on the quantitative measurement and referencing the flood depth for this hazard, the worse case scenario would be another severe and long duration thunderstorm, hurricane or tropical storm event accompanied with heavy rain which could cause flooding for several days, weeks to a month or longer surpassing the Tropical Storm Debby event.

The initial flooding stage for the St. Marys River begins when the river reaches a depth of 12 feet. The extent for flooding in Baker County was recorded at a depth of over 24 feet (24.38 ft.) on 6/28/12 from Tropical Storm Debby. Based on this flooding event, Baker County could expect as much as 24 feet deep for the flood waters in future events.

______54

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Impact The Baker County community, the residents, structures, infrastructure, and critical facilities, suffered from the June 2012 flood event. In addition, Interstate I-10 was closed at mile marker 317 near Sanderson and westbound at mile marker 324 near Glen St. Mary.

Ditches were at capacity in the area at the time of the report and water was crossing roads west of Glen St. Mary. Flooding continued through the end of the month.

On 6/28 significant river flooding on the St. Marys with numerous mobile homes flooded and a total loss. Other homes were also flooded. Infrastructure: A bridge floated down the St. Marys River, St Rd 121 bridge was flooded by the St. Marys River and was closed, and the CR 127 bridge over Cedar Creek collapsed. Property damage figures were grossly under estimated.

The future impact from a flood event could be on other infrastructures, such as electrical utilities, water and sewer, roadways and waterways networks. In addition, flooding can potentially have a destructive impact on the residential structures, the agriculture, the local businesses, other structures, and the transportation networks. Standing water after the flood has subsided can create ecological problems as well, including the spawning of mosquito larvae.

According to NCDC, more than 2800 homes and 175 businesses were destroyed from the 1998 flood event, however, this recorded figure on homes and businesses were from several counties and specifics for Baker County was not recorded.

______55

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Sinkhole

A sinkhole is a natural depression or hole in the Earth's surface caused by karst processes — the chemical dissolution of carbonate rocks or suffosion processes for example in sandstone. Sinkholes may vary in size from less than 1 to 600 meters (3.3 to 2,000 ft) both in diameter and depth, and vary in form from soil-lined bowls to bedrock-edged chasms. They may be formed gradually or suddenly, and are found worldwide

Sinkholes are a common feature of Florida's landscape. They are only one of many kinds of karst landforms, which include caves, disappearing streams, springs, and underground drainage systems, all of which occur in Florida. Dissolution of carbonate rocks begins when they are exposed to acidic water. Most rainwater is slightly acidic and usually becomes more acidic as it moves through decaying plant debris.

Limestone in Florida is porous, allowing the acidic water to percolate through their strata, dissolving some limestone and carrying it away in solution. Over time, this persistent erosion process has created extensive underground voids and drainage systems in much of the carbonate rocks throughout the state. Collapse of overlying sediments into the underground cavities produces sinkholes.

Figure H - Sinkhole Map of Florida

According to the Florida Department of Natural Resources, published by the Bureau of Geology, Baker County is located in Area IV. The Cover Limestone is more than 200 feet thick consisting of cohesive sediments interlayered with discontinuous carbonate beds. Sinkholes are very few, but several large EXPLA.lrfATION AJl&A L BAU:011 TIUM.Y COVtQO UME81'0Sl SWtW.i,.,.,..,...,.n, ...... wOMt. .. diameter, deep sinkholes occur. Cover-collapse ....,,,.,....,..s.lueioD..,__ ....IC sinkholes dominate. AR&A II OOV1:lRISaoTOWXH't:E'TTHJCK C.-...-W,of.....,.aAdperm19Wl.and. ~ .. ,_,.._..,., ...... ~.- ---.. .c.---- Although a sinkhole can form without warning, specific signs can signal potential development:

AJtEA I\', 00\'2& 1SNOI.BfflAN2IOOFEJ;TTIUCK

...... ~---"'- carto.'4~ btdt,.~ ~-,u 1119....,,. Ø Slumping or falling fence posts, trees or 1,w, bu(. ....r i.p ~ . dt,ep ~ OIXW, ~~ .... ~ foundations; ...,,,...... ,__.,...._...,.,..., Ø Sudden formation of small ponds; ...... -e1,,K.OO. , ,....,._,,,.Jtr. .... Ø Wilting vegetation; Ø Discolored well water; and/or Ø Structural cracks in walls, floors.

______56

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Source: Florida Department of Natural Resources, published by the Bureau of Geology

According to the SRWMD and the U.S. Geological Survey

There are many types of sinkholes, but the two occurring most often within the SRWMD are collapse and solution sinkholes.

A collapse sinkhole forms suddenly as the weight of the overlying soil suddenly becomes too great, and the earth collapses until it fills the limestone cavity. At land surface, a circular hole appears, which may or may not contain water. Factors that may contribute to the collapse include:

• Large changes in the water table caused by too much or little rain • Drilling a well into the cavity • Pumping groundwater from near the cavity • Constructing buildings above the cavity • Diverting drainage to the areas where a cavity exists.

A solution sinkhole, on the other hand, develops slowly and continuously. It forms where sand or other relatively thin materials slowly and steadily sprinkle downward to fill the cracks and joints that occur in the underground limestone layers.

As a sinkhole gets bigger, it collects more surface water and runoff, which commonly carries sand, silt and clay particles. This material can sometimes plug the sinkhole, thereby creating a lake or pond. Lakes that once were collapse sinkholes can sometimes unplug and drain into the underground aquifer. If the lake becomes polluted, this can be a health hazard to the people whose drinking water wells tap into the connected aquifer.

Sinkhole Occurrences

According to the Florida Geological Survey, Research Division of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Baker County does not have any sinkholes.

Sinkhole Study

In August 2013, the Florida Geological Survey, in conjunction with the Florida Division of Emergency Management, a federal grant to conduct a statewide assessment of sinkhole vulnerability over a three-year period with geologists conducting a one-year pilot study in selected counties. The results of the pilot study will culminate in the production of a model that will generate a map showing the relative vulnerability of

______57

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______these counties to potential sinkhole formation, and then will be used to produce a statewide map.

Ultimately, the assessment will assist planners, builders and environmental regulators for the improvement of health and safety for the populated areas as well as economic benefits. Data on the study for Baker County was not available at this time.

Vulnerability

Vulnerability to sinkhole events can be defined as to the extent to which people will experience harm and property will be damaged from the natural hazard.

There haven’t been any recorded sinkhole occurrences in Baker County due to the county is located in Area IV. The cover limestone is more than 200 feet thick consisting of cohesive sediments interlayered with discontinuous carbonate beds. Sinkholes are very few, but several large diameter, deep sinkholes could occur and cover-collapse sinkholes dominate.

Baker County does have some vulnerability and could potentially experience a deep cover-collapse sinkhole like the Brooks Sinkhole located in Bradford County. This sinkhole occurred in an Area IV portion of Bradford County. This county is located directly below Baker County.

As noted above in the Sinkhole Study, analysis will generate a map showing the relative vulnerability of the potential sinkhole formation and mitigation measures will need to be studied. A statewide map will be available to assist in creating more efficient hazard mitigation strategies. Dr. Jon Arthur, Director of Florida Geological Survey states… “It is important to understand the geological character of the ground below us and this project will provide a map of the relative vulnerability to sinkhole formation in Florida as an important hazard mitigation planning tool. There is a national interest in our innovative approach to this project, and we are excited to begin the work of developing input data layers for the model.”

Vulnerability for the Baker County’s Population

It is estimated a very small population of the Baker County residents would be affected by a sinkhole.

Vulnerability for Baker County’s Structures and Facilities

The county’s structures, facilities, infrastructure, residential and agricultural buildings have not been affected by sinkhole events. At this time it is difficult to determine the vulnerability to the structures and

______58

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______facilities.

Summary details for sinkhole events:

Probability The probability of sinkholes is low (at least 1 occurrence possibly every 10 years).

Location The entire planning area (the incorporated and unincorporated areas of Baker County) is at low risk to sinkhole events.

Extent Based on the details from Figure H, sinkholes are very few within an Area IV, Baker County’s location, that consists of cover more than 200 feet thick of cohesive sediments interlayered with discontinuous carbonate beds. If a sinkhole were to open up in Baker County, the county could expect in future events, a cover- collapse sinkhole. The magnitude could be from a few feet to hundreds of acres and from less than 1 to more than 100+ deep.

Impact While highly unlikely due to the geology of Baker County, if a sinkhole were to open in the county, it would possibly be a cover-collapse sinkhole, and as noted in the extent area, the magnitude could be considerable and have disastrous affects and impact for the community, the residents, structures, the infrastructure, and/or the critical facilities.

A future sinkhole event example - depending upon the location, if the sinkhole were to open at the Northeast Florida State Hospital in the City of Macclenny, the affects would be devastating with over 633 beds serving residents from 30 counties in the State, and over 1,100 + employees at the hospital. In addition, any residents that live close to the hospital, and even I-10, which is only approximately 3.9 miles from the hospital. This circumstance would not only affect the hospital staff and patients, but the entire community and the state transportation.

As noted, a significant sinkhole could affect roads, well water and sewer piping, telecommunication lines, electrical utilities and other infrastructure. In

______59

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______addition, homes, businesses, and other structures (i.e. churches, schools, commercial, etc.), as well as environmental impacts by providing direct access to the aquifer system for pollutants like gasoline and oil, fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides.

Long periods of drought followed by heavy rains can exacerbate the formation of sinkholes. Their formation can also be aggravated and accelerated by humans through urbanization. Development increases the use of water, altering drainage pathways, redistributing ground soil, and overloading the surface. Urbanizing areas also increases the potential for sinkholes.

Although they are can have very localized structural impacts, the destruction can have far reaching effects on ground water resources and can change the water chemistry and rates of recharge or run-off in the county.

Hurricanes/Tropical Storms

One of the most destructive natural hazards that causes considerable amounts of damages and losses in Florida are hurricanes or tropical storms. These storms are characterized by sustained high velocity winds circulating around a moving low-pressure center. They form and develop over warm water due to atmospheric instability and have the ability to impact entire regions, thus affecting the lives of thousands of people, homes, and businesses. Mitigating these hazards associated is an important and on-going endeavor for the state of Florida.

Tropical storms and tropical cyclones will be profiled within this section. A tropical storm is a tropical cyclone with maximum sustained winds of at least 39 mph. Tropical storms are given official names once they reach these wind speeds. When the wind speeds reach 74 mph or greater, a tropical storm is called a hurricane, typhoon, or cyclone based on the storm location.

A hurricane is a category of tropical cyclone characterized by thunderstorms and defined surface wind circulation. Hurricanes develop over warm waters and are caused by the atmospheric instability created by the collision of warm air with cooler air. Hurricane winds blow in a large spiral around a calm center, which can be 20-30 miles wide. When a hurricane nears land, it may cause torrential rain, high wind, storm surge, coastal flooding, inland flooding, and sometimes tornadoes. A tropical storm is classified as a hurricane once winds goes up to 74 miles per hour or higher.

The Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale is a 1 to 5 rating based on a hurricane's sustained wind speed.

______60

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______This scale estimates potential property damage. Hurricanes reaching Category 3 and higher are considered major hurricanes because of their potential for significant loss of life and damage. Category 1 and 2 storms are still dangerous, however, and require preventative measures. In the western North Pacific, the term "super typhoon" is used for tropical cyclones with sustained winds exceeding 150 mph. See Figure I the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale for specifics on a hurricane’s sustained wind speed.

Figure I: Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale

Category Sustained Winds Types of Damage Due to Hurricane Winds

Í 74-95 mph Very dangerous winds will produce some damage: Well-constructed 64-82 kt frame homes could have damage to roof, shingles, vinyl siding and gutters. 119-153 km/h Large branches of trees will snap and shallowly rooted trees may be toppled. Extensive damage to power lines and poles likely will result in power outages that could last a few to several days. 2 96-110 mph Extremely dangerous winds will cause extensive damage: Well- 83-95 kt constructed frame homes could sustain major roof and siding damage. 154-177 km/h Many shallowly rooted trees will be snapped or uprooted and block numerous roads. Near-total power loss is expected with outages that could last from several days to weeks.

______61

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______3 (major) 111-129 mph Devastating damage will occur: Well-built framed homes may incur major 96-112 kt damage or removal of roof decking and gable ends. Many trees will be 178-208 km/h snapped or uprooted, blocking numerous roads. Electricity and water will be unavailable for several days to weeks after the storm passes. 4 (major) 130-156 mph Catastrophic damage will occur: Well-built framed homes can sustain 113-136 kt severe damage with loss of most of the roof structure and/or some exterior 209-251 km/h walls. Most trees will be snapped or uprooted and power poles downed. Fallen trees and power poles will isolate residential areas. Power outages will last weeks to possibly months. Most of the area will be uninhabitable for weeks or months. 5 (major) 157 mph or higher Catastrophic damage will occur: A high percentage of framed homes will 137 kt or higher be destroyed, with total roof failure and wall collapse. Fallen trees and 252 km/h or higher power poles will isolate residential areas. Power outages will last for weeks to possibly months. Most of the area will be uninhabitable for weeks or months.

Source: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutsshws.php

Hurricanes are a seasonal occurrence, with the Atlantic Coast/Gulf of Mexico hurricane season ranging from June 1 to November 30. Although it is rare, tropical storm and hurricane systems may develop outside of the hurricane season. Hurricanes pose a significant threat to Florida, particularly those residents living along the coast. Baker County is not a coastal county, but is still subject to the wind and water damage that hurricanes can bring, although to a lesser extent than a coastal Florida county. Details in Figure J show that a H3 or Category 3 hurricane passed and made landfall in Baker County. Note: In Figure J, H1 refers to Category 1 hurricanes on the Saffir-Simpson scale and so forth.

What Makes a Hurricane Season Active

According to NOAA, Science fact sheet…”Atlantic hurricanes, also called Atlantic tropical cyclones, are intense storms that occur over the North Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico. Whether an Atlantic hurricane season is active or quiet generally depends upon the large-scale atmospheric and oceanic environment within the main development region, which spans the tropical North Atlantic Ocean and Caribbean Sea.”

______62

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Figure J – Tracks of hurricanes passing near to and making landfall over Florida 1851- 2006

The conditions, which typically are associated with an active Atlantic hurricane season - and can also produce a more intense hurricane include:

ü warmer tropical North Atlantic sea surface temperatures (SSTs); ü increased thunderstorm activity; and ü reduced vertical wind shear (changes of wind direction and/or speed with height) within the main development region, among other features.

Tropical Depression to a Tropical Storm

Figure K – Tracks of tropical depressions and tropical storms passing near to and making landfall over Florida 1851- 2006

After a group of thunderstorms for a period of time have come together under the right atmospheric conditions, they organize into a tropical depression. The wind speed near the center are between 20 - 34 knots (23 to 39 mph).

After a tropical depression has intensified to the point where its maximum sustained winds are between 35-64 knots (39-73 mph), it then becomes a tropical storm. It is at this time that it is assigned a name. During this time, the storm itself becomes more organized and begins to become more circular in shape -- resembling a hurricane. Figure K identifies numerous tropical storms that made landfall in Baker County.

______63

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Hurricane/Tropical Storm Occurrences

There were twenty-three recorded hurricane and tropical storm events reported in Baker over the last 57 years. Some of the tropical storms were the result of a hurricane event heading inward onto land. A review of records from NOAA’s Coastal Services Center Historical Hurricane Tracks from 1958 to 2008 shows that Baker County has had several close calls with tropical cyclone impacts (within 75 nautical miles), but fortunately, no direct hits. With these enormous storms though, a direct hit is not needed in order for the impacts to be felt as they bring with them and the affected area high winds, heavy rain, and spawn tornadoes.

Hurricane Charley was the most recent hurricane to impact Baker County; though not a direct hit, the county did experience heavy winds and rain. The following is a list of storms, which have threatened or impacted Baker.

Table 4.10 – Hurricane and Tropical Storm Occurrences in Baker County (1958 – 2015)

Storm Name Date (Month and Year) Category

Tropical Storm Brenda July, 1960 TS Hurricane Donna September 1960 H3 Tropical Storm Cleo August, 1964 TS Hurricane Dora September 1964 H3 Tropical Storm Alma June 1966 TS Tropical Storm Abby June 1968 TS Hurricane Gladys October 1968 H1 Hurricane David September 1979 H2 Tropical Storm Dennis August 1981 TS Tropical Storm Isidore September 1984 TS Tropical Storm Isabel October 1985 TS Tropical Storm Marco October 1990 TS Tropical Storm Allison June 1995 TS Tropical Storm Josephine October 1996 TS Tropical Storm Gordon September 2000 TS Tropical Storm Eduardo September 2002 TS Hurricane Charley August 2004 H1 Tropical Storm Jeanne September 2004 TS Tropical Storm Tammy October 2005 TS Tropical Storm Alberto June 2006 TS

______64

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Tropical Storm Barry June 2007 TS Tropical Storm Fay August 2008 TS Tropical Storm Debby June 2012 TS

The tropical storms or hurricanes that occurred and required individual and/or public assistance from FEMA over the last 11 years were the following.

Table 4.11 – Disaster Declarations due to Hurricanes and Tropical Storms for Baker County (August 2004 – July 2012)

Declaration Incident Period Hazard Event Individual Public # / Date Assistance Assistance #1539 / 8/11/2004 – Hurricane Charley & Tropical X 8/13/2004 8/30/2004 Storm Bonnie #1545 / 9/3/2004 – Hurricane Frances X X 9/4/2004 10/8/2004 #1561 / 9/24/2004- Hurricane Jeanne X X 9/26/2004 11/17/2004 #3220 / 8/29/2005 – Hurricane Katrina Evacuation X 9/5/2005 10/1/2005 #3288/ 8/18/2008 – Tropical Storm Fay X 8/21/2008 9/12/2008 #1785/ 8/18/2008 – Tropical Storm Fay X X 8/24/2008 9/12/2008 #4068/ 6/23/2012 - Tropical Storm Debby X X 7/3/2012 7/26/2012

The county was significantly impacted by the most recent of which was Tropical Storm Debby which occurred in June 2012. Tropical Storm Debby caused severe damage in the County with a historical river crest-flooding event from the St. Marys River of 24.38 ft on 6/28/12. Mobile homes were destroyed, homes were flooded, roads and interstates flooded and bridges collapsed.

Hurricane Return Periods

As stated by the National Hurricane Center…” Hurricane return periods are the frequency at which a certain intensity of hurricane can be expected within a given distance of a given location (for the below image 50 nm or 58 statute miles). In simpler terms, a return period of 20 years for a major hurricane means that on

______65

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______average during the previous 100 years, a Category 3 or greater hurricane passed within 50 nm (58 miles) of that location about five times. We would then expect, on average, an additional five Category 3 or greater hurricanes within that radius over the next 100 years.”

Figure L – Major Hurricane Return Period

100-W 7'1'W

CO'N CO'N

30'N Return Period (Years) 30'N Major Hurricane (>=96kt) • ••·22 23-32 33-52 • 53-120 • 121-290

- Coastal County :ZO-N L__,!______.!..._ ___ ======:ZO-N 10/J'W t!HW 70'W f!HW

Source: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/climo/images/return_mjrhurr.jpg

The vast majority of Atlantic Ocean tropical storms or hurricanes occur during a period of time from June 1st to November 30th each year, also known as “Hurricane Season.” As Baker County is an inland county, there is an assumption that each storm that hits the coast will probably decrease in its intensity before reaching Baker County, this making the estimated return period slightly lower. Although this didn’t seem to be the case with Tropical Storm Debby.

______66

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Vulnerability

Vulnerability to hurricane and tropical storm events can be defined as to the extent to which people will experience harm and property will be damaged from the natural hazard. As noted in the outcome from Tropical Storm Debby (which occurred in June 2012), the entire county was very vulnerable to the powerful tropical storm with concentration of heavy rains that produced extensive flooding throughout the county especially the areas near the St. Marys River.

Exposure to hurricane force winds compounded with heavy rains can be overwhelming for the community with a high concentration of mobile home residents, which account for approximately 36% of the residents (and of that figure approximately 93% live in the unincorporated areas of the county). In addition, due to the number of mobile homes, older homes, poorly constructed homes, and agribusiness structures, with considerable property damage as seen in Debby.

Vulnerability for the Baker County’s Population (resulting from flooding from a hurricane or tropical storm)

Baker County’s growth rate from 2010 to 2015 was 27,377 residents, a 1% increase change from 2010 to 2015. The flooding vulnerability for the Baker County’s population exposure based on 2010 Census population data’s potentially at risk for riverine flooding is noted in Table 4.12. Based on the projected 2015 population, 54% to possibly 55% *of the county’s population are at risk to a 100-year flood event, and approximately 34.9% to possibly 35.9% * of the population is at risk to a 500-year flood event, especially the residents who live in the vicinity of bodies of water, tributary streams, and low-lying areas.

Note: The % possible increase * would be an estimated figure based on a 1% increase in population since 2010.

Table 4.12 – Flood Vulnerability for Baker County’s Population

County 100-Year 500-Year Baker 14,810 9,566 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page 3.53

Vulnerability for the Baker County’s Population (resulting from catastrophic winds from a hurricane or tropical storm)

Deadly powerful winds could effect the entire population within Baker County. And all of the mobile home residents, which consist of 36% of the total residential homes, the poorly constructed home residents, and

______67

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______those in the unincorporated area that live near the St. Marys River could require evacuation prior to any strike in this area. Also, telecommunications and electrical utilities may be affected due to wind-borne debris.

Vulnerability for Baker County’s Structures and Facilities

Table’s 4.13 – 4.16 summarize the following details for Baker County on:

Ø the number of structures by occupancy type that would be affected by a Category 2 hurricane based on the return period; Ø the value of the structures by occupancy type that would be affected by a Category 2 hurricane based on the return period; Ø the county facilities by type that are located in the geographic areas expected to be affected every 20, 50, 100, 200 or 500 years by a Category 2 hurricane, and Ø the value of the county facilities by type that are located in the geographic areas expected to be affected every 20, 50, 100, 200 or 500 years by a Category 2 hurricane.

Table 4.13 – Structures by Occupancy Type that would be Effected by a Category 2 Hurricane in Baker County

Return Residential Commercial Medical Industrial Agriculture Education Government Period (years) 100 1,896 99 32 9 140 0 24 200 6,283 253 96 37 1,358 2 87 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.57

Table 4.14 – Values of Structures by Occupancy Type that would be Effected by a Category 2 Hurricane in Baker County (in millions)

Return Residential Commercial Medical Industrial Agriculture Education Government Period ($ million) ($ million) ($ million) ($ million) ($ million) ($ million) ($ million) (years) 100 291.54 37.43 17.57 0.49 24.27 0.00 13.48 I200 I853.02 119.08 I 51.04 I 6.01 I 219.18 0.40 30.53 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.62

Table 4.15 – Baker County Facilities for Category 2 Hurricane Return Periods

Facility Type 20-Year 50-Year 100-Year 200-Year 500-Year Fire Stations 0 0 2 2 0

______68

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Hospitals 0 0 1 2 0 Police Stations 0 0 1 1 0 Schools 0 0 1 8 0 Other Facilities 0 0 11 138 0 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.69

Table 4.16 –The Value of the Baker County Facilities for Category 2 Hurricane Return Periods (in thousands)

Facility Type 20-Year 50-Year 100-Year 200-Year 500-Year ($ thousand) ($ thousand) ($ thousand) ($ thousand) ($ thousand) Fire Stations 0 0 0 0 0 Hospitals 0 0 14,168 53,757 0 Police Stations 0 0 1,260 1,260 0 Schools 0 0 6,558 85,687 0 Other Facilities 0 0 0 0 0 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.77

Summary details for hurricane and tropical storm events:

Probability The probability of hurricane and tropical storm events is high (at least 1 occurrence every year).

Location The entire planning area (the City of Macclenny, the town of Glen St. Mary, and unincorporated areas of Baker County) is at high risk to hurricane and/or tropical storm events.

A hurricane or tropical storm, depending on the severity, could cause catastrophic damage and/or major disruptions to the critical infrastructure, critical facilities, the public and private buildings, some framed homes depending on zone location, and especially the mobile homes or poorly constructed homes in the county. The recorded data for the number of mobile homes in the county is 3,136 as of August 2015. The estimated total number of residents (owner- occupied and renter-occupied) is approximately 9,193 * that reside in a mobile home which is roughly 36%.

* The number of mobile home residents was based on data from the US Census, American Fact Finder, 2009 – 2013 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates with a margin of error of +/- 1,000 for owner occupied, and +/- 619 for renter occupied.

______69

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

In addition, the mobile homes located throughout the entire county and are particularly vulnerable to violent wind damage, which could occur from a major hurricane or tropical storm.

Extent The worse-case scenario for Baker county and what the county could expect in future events would be a direct hit from a Category 5 hurricane with winds of over 157 mph or higher, a large percentage of framed homes would be destroyed, fallen trees and power poles would isolate residential areas, and power outages would last for weeks to possibly months. Most of the county would be uninhabitable for weeks or months. Impact The Baker County community, the residents, structures, and critical facilities, the agriculture can suffer from hurricane and/or tropical storm events. The risk associated with tropical cyclone activity is high as all structures in the county are susceptible to their impacts, whether from flooding, high winds, severe thunderstorms, or tornadoes. Flooding or other water intrusion can destroy homes and make them unlivable. High winds and tornadoes can down trees, power lines, or even structures, creating debris and thus blocking roads. Wind-borne debris can also impact structures.

The impact from Tropical Storm Debby was catastrophic on the county residential and the critical infrastructure such as the SR 121 bridge that was flooded and closed, and the CR127 bridge that collapsed due to high flooding waters from the St. Marys River.

Based on previous hurricane/tropical storm events the county has experienced (especially high flood waters), the future impact could be devastating for the entire community. The economic affect or financial impact could be substantial from a large-scale hurricane/tropical storm event not only during the crisis phase, which immediately follows the event, but through the recovery and rebuilding stages.

______70

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Due to Baker County’s location, the county is more likely to be impacted by tropical depressions, tropical storms, or Category 1 to 3 storms. However, details from the Flood Insurance Study note that a large hurricane tidal surge could result in a catastrophic loss of property and life.

Tornado

Tornadoes are nature’s most violent storms. Spawned from powerful thunderstorms, tornadoes can cause fatalities and devastate a neighborhood in seconds. Tornadoes have been known to cause some of the greatest loss of life, as well as millions of dollars in property damage, due in large part to their unpredictability. A tornado appears as a rotating, funnel-shaped cloud that extends from a thunderstorm to the ground with whirling winds that can reach 300 miles per hour. Damage paths can be in excess of one mile wide and 50 miles long.

Some tornadoes are clearly visible, while rain or nearby low-hanging clouds obscure others. Occasionally, tornadoes develop so rapidly that little, if any, advance warning is possible. Before a tornado hits, the wind may die down and the air may become very still. A cloud of debris can mark the location of a tornado even if a funnel is not visible. Tornadoes generally occur near the trailing edge of a thunderstorm. It is not uncommon to see clear, sunlit skies behind a tornado.

Every state is at some risk from this hazard. Florida has the third highest number of tornadoes in the United States on an annual basis and are most prevalent in central Florida, southeast Florida and portions of the panhandle. A review of records from the National Weather Service shows that between 1882 and 1996 Baker County has had one death associated with a tornado that occurred on September 10, 1882.

Figure M – Tornado Map of the US (20-year Average, 1993 – 2012)

______71

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Source: http://www.spc.noaa.gov/wcm/20ytora.png

Facts about tornadoes:

• They may strike quickly, with little or no warning. • They may appear nearly transparent until dust and debris are picked up or a cloud forms in the funnel. • The average tornado moves Southwest to Northeast, but tornadoes have been known to move in any direction. • The average forward speed of a tornado is 30 MPH, but may vary from stationary to 70 MPH. • Tornadoes can accompany tropical storms and hurricanes as they move onto land. • Waterspouts are tornadoes that form over water. • Tornadoes are most frequently reported east of the Rocky Mountains during spring and summer months. • Peak tornado season in the southern states is March through May; in the northern states, it is late spring through early summer. • Tornadoes are most likely to occur between 3 p.m. and 9 p.m., but can occur at any time.

Source: FEMA http://www.fema.gov/hazard/tornado/index.shtm

The most common, least destructive tornadoes are warm weather tornadoes that occur between May and August. Cool season tornadoes are the most destructive, occurring between December and April. Baker County is vulnerable to these wind disasters due to a high concentration of the population residing in manufactured or mobile homes. A tornado or a series of tornadoes could affect the population if it should occur in a highly populated area. Damage has occurred from tornadoes in the county.

The possible consequences of tornadoes include: power outages, infrastructure damage (road/culvert washout), erosion, property damage/loss from wind, water and fires, fresh water flooding, evacuations (day/night, road congestion), agricultural damage/loss, economic loss, and debris.

Definition for Funnel Cloud

A condensation funnel extending from the base of a towering cumulus or Cb, associated with a rotating column of air that is not in contact with the ground (and hence different from a tornado). A condensation funnel is a tornado, not a funnel cloud, if either a) it is in contact with the ground or b) a debris cloud or dust whirl is visible beneath it.

Source: http://www.crh.noaa.gov/glossary.php?word=FUNNEL%20CLOUD

______72

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Enhanced Fujita Scale

According to NOAA’s National Weather Service, Storm Prediction Center, the Enhanced Fujita Scale was implemented February 2007. The storm events database documentation notes that the Tornado EF Scale was based on the enhanced F-Scale. Details from NOAA’s National Weather Service Storm Prediction Center on the Enhanced Fujita scale states it must continue to support and maintain the original tornado database and there must be some conformity to that of the F-Scale that is listed in the database. When using the EF-Scale to determine the tornado's EF-rating, begin with the 28 Damage Indicators (see Figure N).

ü Each one of these indicators has a description of the typical construction for that category of indicator. ü Then the next step is to find the Degree of Damage (DOD). ü Each DOD in each category is given and expected estimate of wind speed, a lower bound of wind speed and an upper bound of wind speed.

The Enhanced Fujita (EF) Scale is a set of wind estimates (not measurements) based on damage. Its uses three-second gusts estimated at the point of damage based on a judgment of 8 levels of damage to the 28 indicators listed below. These estimates vary with height and exposure. The 3 -second gusts is not the same wind as in standard surface observations. Standard measurements are taken by weather stations in open exposures, using a directly measured, and “one minute mile" speed. See Figure N, the Enhanced F- Scale for specifics on tornado damage.

______73

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Figure N – Enhanced Fujita Scale

Fujita Scale Derived EF Scale Operational EF Scale F Fastest 1/4- 3 Second EF 3 Second EF 3 Second Number mile (mph) Gust (mph) Number Gust (mph) Number Gust (mph) 0 40-72 45-78 0 65-85 0 65-85 1 73-112 79-117 1 86-109 1 86-110 2 113-157 118-161 2 110-137 2 111-135 3 158-207 162-209 3 138-167 3 136-165 4 208-260 210-261 4 168-199 4 166-200 5 261-318 262-317 5 200-234 5 Over 200

Enhanced F Scale Damage Indicators

1 Small barns, farm outbuildings SBO 2 One- or two-family residences FR12 Single-wide mobile home 3 MHSW (MHSW) 4 Double-wide mobile home MHDW Apt, condo, townhouse (3 5 ACT stories or less) 6 Motel M

______74

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______7 Masonry apt. or motel MAM 8 Small retail bldg. (fast food) SRB Small professional (doctor 9 SPB office, branch bank) 10 Strip mall SM 11 Large shopping mall LSM Large, isolated ("big box") retail 12 LIRB bldg. 13 Automobile showroom ASR 14 Automotive service building ASB School - 1-story elementary 15 ES (interior or exterior halls) 16 School - jr. or sr. high school JHSH 17 Low-rise (1-4 story) bldg. LRB 18 Mid-rise (5-20 story) bldg. MRB 19 High-rise (over 20 stories) HRB 20 Industrial bldg. (hospital, govt. IB or university) 21 Metal building system MBS 22 Service station canopy SSC 23 Warehouse (tilt-up walls or WHB heavy timber) 24 Transmission line tower TLT 25 Free-standing tower FST 26 Free standing pole (light, flag, FSP luminary) 27 Tree – hardwood TH 28 Tree – softwood TS

Tornado or Funnel Cloud Occurrences

The NCDC (8/1/1950 – 8/31/2015) information reports that for the last 65 years there have been 14 tornado and funnel cloud events in Baker County.

______75

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Table 4.17 – Tornado or Funnel Cloud Occurrences, Baker County (8/1/1950 – 8/31/2015)

Location or Date Time Type Mag Dth Inj PrD CrD County Baker County 5/29/1973 20:00 Tornado F0 0 0 2.5K 0.00K Baker County 5/12/1974 4:30 Tornado F2 0 1 250K 0.00K Baker County 3/9/1976 8:00 Tornado F0 0 0 25K 0.00K Baker County 5/26/1978 12:50 Tornado F0 0 0 0.25K 0.00K Baker County 5/16/1983 13:30 Tornado F1 0 0 25K 0.00K S of Macclenny 1/3/1994 17:09 Tornado F0 0 0 50K 0.00K Sanderson 12/10/1997 7:28 Tornado F0 0 0 1.5K 0.00K Sanderson 4/9/2003 16:00 Funnel 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Cloud Baxter 4/15/2007 6:15 Tornado EF2 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 7/14/2007 11:28 Funnel 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Cloud Knabb 2/26/2008 14:37 Tornado EF0 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Taylor 3/7/2008 10:10 Tornado EF0 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Sanderson 4/28/2008 14:15 Funnel 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Cloud Sapp 11/17/2014 13:00 Tornado EF0 0 0 15K 0.00K Totals: $369,250; 2 injured

Source: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/

Key Code: Mag: Magnitude; Dth: Deaths; Inj: Injuries; PdD: Property Damage;vCrD: Crop Damage

Hazard Narrative

1. 5/12/1974 – Baker County, an F2 tornado occurred in Baker County. Specific details were not available except that there was one injury. Property damage was estimated at $250,000. 2. 3/9/1976 – Baker County, an F0 tornado moved along a path just south of Glen St. Mary and destroyed two large mobile homes, which were unoccupied. Property damage was estimated at $25,000. 3. 5/16/1983 – Baker County, an F1 tornado moved on a west to east path demolishing several farm buildings about 3 miles south of Sanderson. Light metal roofing was blown over 100 yards. Property damage was estimated at $25,000.

______76

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______4. 1/3/1994 – South of Macclenny, an F0 tornado occurred and several houses were damaged and tops of 60-foot pine trees were twisted off along a two-mile path. Property damage was estimated at $50,000. 5. 11/17/2014 – Sapp, an EF0 tornado with strong winds of 50-80 mph a convergent track of tree damage occurred from Boyce Road to Steed Road in Glen St. Mary. Several trees were snapped and uprooted, and one shed was destroyed and damage was done to a carport. Power lines were damaged. The cost was unknown, but it was estimated for Storm Data.

Vulnerability

The vulnerability to tornado events can be defined as to the extent to which people will experience harm and property will be damaged from the natural hazard. Baker County is vulnerable to these wind disasters due to a high concentration of the population residing in mobile homes, which is approximately 36%, or 3,136 mobile homes.

The greatest area of vulnerability lies in unincorporated areas of Baker County (see tornado occurrence data) because of the difficulty in warning the residents to seek shelter due to the speed of onset and unpredictability of tornadoes. Mobile homes and poorly constructed homes are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of tornados because of their construction and based on the number of mobile homes within the county 93% of them are located in the unincorporated Baker County, Flonda Tomados- 10; Rank 61 areas within the county. These residents residing in the mobile homes could include the elderly, the sick, the special needs, and the poor.

The county has exposure to powerful winds from a tornado event and Baker County is ranked 10 out of 67 in the State of Florida from tornado occurrences over the last 63 years (1950 – 2013). As of 2015, there have been 14 recorded tornado events, 2 injuries and property damage of over $369,000 per the NCDC.

While this kind of storm could potentially occur at any time of the year, in Baker County they are usually

______77

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______associated with strong thunderstorms or hurricanes in the spring and summer months. The more common, warm-weather tornadoes, which tend to be less destructive, happen between March through June. However, cooler season tornadoes tend to create more property damage and occur during December through February.

Vulnerability for the Baker County’s Population

Baker County’s growth rate from 2010 to 2015 was 27,377 residents, a 1% increase change from 2010 to 2015. Deadly powerful winds could affect the entire population within Baker County, however, the greatest vulnerability would be for the mobile home residents (approximately 34% of the total population or 9,193). As noted earlier, 36% of the total residential inventory, live in mobile homes and of that total 93% of the mobile home residents are located in the unincorporated area.

Vulnerability for Baker County’s Structures and Facilities

In the event of a tornado, most structures will experience some harm due to debris, wind speeds, or pressure variations, especially in mobile homes and other poorly constructed homes. This potential increases with various factors, such as the proximity of the storm event to the structure, the age, and the construction quality.

The NCDC details reveal that Baker County has been vulnerable to property damage from 1950 to 2015, with the total figure of over $369.000 +. It is important to note that this figure consist of all types of property including homes, mobile homes, sheds, carports, roofing, trees and other structures. Details were limited as to exactly what property was damaged through the years.

Table’s 4.18 – 4.19 identify the structures by occupancy type and value of the structures that are vulnerable to severe thunderstorm (tornado events).

Table 4.18 – Structures by Occupancy Type that Vulnerable to a Thunderstorm (including Tornado) Hazard per Year in Baker County by the Number of Thunderstorms that Effect that Area on an Average

Thunderstorms Residential Commercial Medical Industrial Agriculture Education Government Tornadoes 17+ 5,948 251 89 37 1,148 2 84 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.92

______78

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Table 4.19 – Value of Structures by Occupancy Type that are Vulnerable to Severe Thunderstorms (including Tornadoes) per Year in Baker County (in millions)

Thunderstorms Resident. Comm. Med. Indus. Agric. Educ. Govern. Tornadoes ($million) ($million) ($million) ($million) ($million) ($million) ($million) 9.5 – 17 32.50 0.38 3.75 0 28.84 0 1.02 17+ 820.52 118.70 I 47.29 I 6.01 I 190.34 I 0.40 I 29.51 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.96

Summary details for tornado events:

Probability The probability of tornado is moderate or medium (at least 1 occurrence every 3 years).

Location The entire planning area (the City of Macclenny, the town of Glen St. Mary, and unincorporated areas of Baker County) is at high risk to tornado events.

The entire County is particularly vulnerable to tornados because of the presence of a high number of mobile homes 36% as a percentage of the housing inventory. Mobile homes are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of tornados because of their construction and are located throughout the entire county.

Extent The worse case scenario for Baker county would be a EF5 tornado and what the county could expect in future events, with destructive winds of 261 – 318 miles per hour, with complete devastation of homes leveled off foundations and swept away; trees debarked; and incredible phenomena would occur.

The largest F-Scale in Baker County was an F2 on 5/12/1974 that injured one resident and caused $250,000 in property damage.

Also, an EF0 tornado occurred on 11/17/14 with strong winds of 50-80 mph. A convergent track of tree damage occurred from Boyce Road to Steed Road in Glen St. Mary. Several trees were snapped and uprooted, and one shed was destroyed and damage was done to a carport. Power lines were damaged.

Impact The Baker County community, the residents, the structures, the critical facilities, and the infrastructure could suffer from tornado events. The impact of a tornado depends on its strength. Meteorologists use the enhanced Fujita or EF-scale to

______79

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______record the tornado activity to analyze and determine how strong the tornado is. Weak tornadoes may cause only minor damage to property, while a stronger tornado may devastate large parts of an entire town.

For future events, Baker County can expect to have strong and powerful winds from a tornado event similar to the 11/17/14 tornado, that will cause structural or residential building damage, snap trees and down power lines. While the entire county is equally susceptible to tornadoes, critical facilities, densely populated and urbanized areas, and neighborhoods comprised of manufactured or mobile homes are at the greatest risk. Also it is important to consider that damages from tornadoes could be severe in Baker County, Macclenny and Glen St. Mary due to the fact that 36% of the county’s residents reside in mobile/modular homes, which are more prone to damage from tornadoes.

The probable recurrence of tornado impacts is likely to continue in Baker County; and even though the county has not experienced the more destructive storms, there is some potential for them to occur. The prevalence of the smaller-scale storms could cause large amounts of damage as well given their greater frequency. Since this area may experience tropical cyclones, tornadoes may be additionally spawned by those storms.

In addition, the economic effect or financial impact could be devastating from a strong tornado event not only during the crisis phase, which immediately follows the event, through the recovery and rebuilding stages. Also, the effects could have an impact on

______80

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______agriculture.

The largest F-Scale in Baker County was an F2 on 5/12/1974 that caused $250,000 in property with one reported injury.

Baker County did have a tornado event that caused structural damage, snap trees and power outages, however, specifics on property damage was not available.

Thunderstorms - (includes High Winds, Lightning and Hailstorms)

Thunderstorm/Wind Events

Thunderstorms are a common occurrence in the State of Florida, especially during the hot summer months; a mid-afternoon thunderstorm is almost a daily event. Thunderstorms are created when warm, moist air rises and meets cooler air; these storms can produce lightning, high winds, hail, tornadoes, and heavy rain, which can cause flooding.

A thunderstorm is a rain shower during which you hear thunder, and since thunder comes from lightning, all thunderstorms have lightning.

There are three basic ingredients needed for thunderstorm development:

Ø moisture, Ø an unstable atmosphere, and Ø some way to start the atmosphere moving.

The moisture is necessary to produce the thunderstorm clouds and precipitation. In the summertime, most areas of the United States have sufficient moisture to generate thunderstorms if the other ingredients are present. In the wintertime, thunderstorms favor southern areas of the United States where moisture is more plentiful; however, southerly winds associated with well-developed storm systems can bring sufficient moisture northward to generate thunderstorms at any time of the year, even in the dead of winter.

The atmospheric instability plays an important role in thunderstorm development as rising air is needed to produce clouds, and rapidly rising air is needed to produce thunderstorms. For air to rise rapidly, it must become buoyant compared to the surrounding air. When the atmosphere is unstable, the air near the

______81

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______ground can become buoyant and rise rapidly through the atmosphere. And, the warmer the air is near the earth’s surface and the colder the air is aloft, the more unstable the atmosphere can be.

The third ingredient needed for thunderstorm development is something that will trigger motion in the atmosphere. This may be some sort of boundary such as a front, heating caused by the sun, or cooling aloft. Once a thunderstorm has developed, it will continue to generate boundaries that can trigger additional storms.

In the summertime, thunderstorms typically develop in the afternoon when the sun heats the air near the ground. If the atmosphere is unstable, bubbles of warm air will rise and produce clouds, precipitation, and eventually lightning.

A severe thunderstorm contains either hail one inch or greater and winds gusts in excess of 50 knots (57.5 mph), or a tornado. Thunderstorms have the potential of causing power outages and destruction or damage to buildings and can result in loss of life. Flash flooding from rainfall, fires from lightning, strong straight-line winds can knock down trees, mobile homes and tornadoes can be very destructive.

Thunderstorms facts:

• They may occur as single units, in clusters, or in lines. • Some of the most severe occur when a single thunderstorm affects one location for an extended period of time. • Thunderstorms typically produce heavy rain for a brief period, which can occur from 30 minutes to an hour, or longer. • Warm and humid conditions are highly favorable for thunderstorm development. • About 10% of thunderstorms are classified as severe—one that produces hail at least three- quarters of an inch or larger in diameter, has winds of approximately 58 miles per hour or higher, or spawns a tornado.

High Winds

High winds are very strong winds with air moving from an area of high pressure to an area of low pressure. A high wind warning is defined as 1-minute average surface winds of 35 kt (40 mph or 64 km/hr) or greater lasting for 1 hour or longer, or winds gusting to 50 kt (58 mph or 93 km/hr) or greater regardless of duration that are either expected or observed over land.

Thunderstorm Occurrences

According to the NCDC, from 8/1/1950 to 8/31/2015, there have been 92 thunderstorms/wind events

______82

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______documented in Baker County with a total property damage figure of $125,500 and one recorded injury.

Table 4.20– Thunderstorm Occurrences in Baker County (8/1/1950 – 8/31/2015)

Location Date Time Type Mag Dth Inj PrD CrD or County Baker 3/30/1961 17:50 Thunderstorm 0 kts. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Wind Baker 5/14/1969 10:00 Thunderstorm 0 kts 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Wind Baker 3/26/1971 5:30 Thunderstorm 0 kts 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Wind Baker 4/26/1975 19:30 Thunderstorm 0 kts 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Wind Baker 5/16/1975 15:15 Thunderstorm 0 kts 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Wind Baker 4/23/1983 8:20 Thunderstorm 0 kts 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Wind Baker 2/6/1986 10:00 Thunderstorm 0 kts 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Wind Baker 5/20/1986 12:15 Thunderstorm 0 kts 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Wind Baker 7/29/1989 15:30 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Wind kts Baker 4/28/1990 12:00 Thunderstorm 0 kts 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Wind Baker 5/16/1991 19:00 Thunderstorm 0 kts 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Wind Baker 6/19/1995 19:40 Thunderstorm 0 kts 0 0 1K 0.00K County Wind NIP 7/11/1995 18:15 Thunderstorm 0 kts 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind Macclenny 9/23/1995 18:06 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. Sanderson 5/19/1996 19:50 Thunderstorm 60 0 0 2.5K 0.00K Wind kts. Macclenny 7/9/1996 16:40 Thunderstorm 60 0 0 0.50K 0.00K Wind kts. Macclenny 7/31/1996 18:45 Thunderstorm 60 0 0 2K 0.00K

______83

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______- - -- Wind kts. Macclenny 5/24/1997 17:30 Thunderstorm 0 0 8K 0.00K Wind Macclenny 7/5/1997 13:00 Thunderstorm 0 0 1K 0.00K Wind Sanderson 2/17/1998 1:25 Thunderstorm 0 0 25K 0.00K Wind Macclenny 3/8/1998 21:45 Thunderstorm 0 0 2.5K 0.00K Wind Macclenny 4/19/1998 13:10 Thunderstorm 0 0 3.5K 0.00K Wind Macclenny 6/19/1998 19:00 Thunderstorm 0 0 2.5K 0.00K Wind Macclenny 6/23/1998 17:00 Thunderstorm 0 0 1.50K 0.00K Wind Macclenny 6/25/1998 16:40 Thunderstorm 0 0 1.50K 0.00K Wind Sanderson 6/29/1998 17:02 Thunderstorm 0 0 10K 0.00K Wind Glen St 1/18/1999 11:15 Thunderstorm 0 0 3.5K 0.00K Mary Wind Sanderson 7/8/1999 18:10 Thunderstorm 0 0 3K 0.00K Wind Sanderson 7/31/1999 17:00 Thunderstorm 0 0 4K 0.00K Wind Macclenny 8/2/1999 20:35 Thunderstorm 0 0 2.5K 0.00K Wind Sanderson 8/22/1999 17:30 Thunderstorm 0 0 1.5K 0.00K Wind Macclenny 1/24/2000 9:30 Thunderstorm 0 0 2.5K 0.00K Wind Sanderson 3/26/2000 16:10 Thunderstorm 0 0 1.5K 0.00K Wind Taylor 3/30/2000 14:00 Thunderstorm 0 0 0.50K 0.00K Wind Macclenny 4/24/2000 15:35 Thunderstorm 0 0 3K 0.00K Wind Macclenny 7/11/2000 18:25 Thunderstorm 0 0 5K 0.00K Wind

______84

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______- - -- Macclenny 8/19/2000 17:00 Thunderstorm 0 0 2.50K 0.00K Wind Macclenny 8/29/2000 4:15 Thunderstorm 0 0 2K 0.00K Wind Sanderson 3/29/2001 10:20 Thunderstorm 0 0 2.50K 0.00K Wind Glen St 6/16/2001 16:12 Thunderstorm 0 0 2.50K 0.00K Mary Wind Macclenny 6/16/2001 16:15 Thunderstorm 0 0 3K 0.00K Wind Taylor 7/20/2001 15:10 Thunderstorm 0 0 2.50K 0.00K Wind Glen St. 6/6/2002 15:15 Thunderstorm 0 0 1K 0.00K Mary Wind Taylor 7/3/2002 15:00 Thunderstorm 0 0 2K 0.00K Wind Olustee 7/3/2002 15:00 Thunderstorm 0 0 2K 0.00K Wind Sanderson 7/20/2002 14:00 Thunderstorm 0 0 2K 0.00K Wind Taylor 11/12/2002 12:00 Thunderstorm 0 0 10K 0.00K Wind Taylor 2/22/2003 14:35 Thunderstorm 0 0 2K 0.00K Wind Taylor 5/18/2003 16:30 Thunderstorm 55 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Countywide 6/26/2004 16:45 Thunderstorm 55 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Sanderson 7/8/2004 15:00 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Glen St. 7/11/2004 15:15 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Mary Wind kts. EG Macclenny 7/13/2004 15:00 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG

______85

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______- - -- Taylor 5/15/2006 13:00 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Glen St. 8/4/2006 19:15 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Mary Wind kts. EG Macclenny 8/4/2006 19:30 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Baxter 4/15/2007 6:30 Thunderstorm 52 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Taylor 4/15/2007 6:30 Thunderstorm 52 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Knabb 6/9/2007 17:00 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Macclenny 6/12/2007 9:00 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Taylor 7/13/2007 14:40 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Taylor 8/11/2007 20:00 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Taylor 2/26/2008 13:50 Thunderstorm 52 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Glen St. 4/5/2008 14:40 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Mary Wind kts. EG Knabb 12/11/2008 10:20 Thunderstorm 65 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Sanderson 3/1/2009 4:30 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG

______86

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______- - -- Sanderson 4/2/2009 22:15 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Taylor 7/2/2009 18:05 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Taylor 1/21/2010 12:40 Thunderstorm 55 0 0 1K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Olustee 5/23/2010 17:05 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Macclenny 6/6/2010 12:25 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Sanderson 5/14/2011 10:40 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Glen St. 5/14/2011 10:50 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Mary Wind kts. EG Macclenny 5/14/2011 11:05 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Taylor 5/14/2011 18:30 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Taylor 8/5/2011 16:05 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Knabb 7/10/2012 16:45 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Macclenny 10/7/2012 18:35 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Macclenny 6/13/2013 15:15 Thunderstorm 45 0 1 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG

______87

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______- - -- Knabb 7/22/2013 11:40 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Macclenny 1/11/2014 16:26 Thunderstorm 52 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Sanderson 6/6/2014 18:35 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Sanderson 6/6/2014 18:45 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Sanderson 6/6/2014 19:00 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Taylor 6/10/2014 17:15 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Taylor 8/19/2014 15:00 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Taylor 4/25/2015 16:24 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Glen St. 4/25/2015 16:24 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Mary Wind kts. EG Macclenny 4/25/2015 16:24 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Taylor 4/25/2015 16:24 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Taylor 8/23/2015 15:57 Thunderstorm 50 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Wind kts. EG Glen St. 8/23/2015 16:16 Thunderstorm 45 0 0 2K 0.00K Mary Wind kts. EG

______88

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Total Property Damage: $125,500

Source: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents

Lightning

Figure O – Lightning Map (2005 – 2014)

National Lightning Detection Network 2005 - 2014

VAISALA

Source: http://www.vaisala.com/VaisalaImages/Lightning/avg_fd_2005-2014_CONUS_2km_grid.png

Lightning is an electrical discharge that results from the buildup of positive and negative charges within a thunderstorm. When the buildup becomes strong enough, lightning appears as a "bolt." This flash of light usually occurs within the clouds or between the clouds and the ground. A bolt of lightning reaches a temperature approaching 50,000 degrees Fahrenheit in a split second.

Lightning is the second most common storm-related killer in the United States. It causes several billion dollars in property damage each year and kills several dozen people. It is a frequent cause of wildfires and costs airlines billions of dollars per year in extra operating expenses.

Florida has the highest frequency of lightning in the United States. There, sea breezes from the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico converge over solar-heated land. This lifts the moist air masses that host thunderstorms. Florida is has the highest number of deaths from lightning strikes. The following are facts about lightning:

______89

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

• Lightning’s unpredictability increases the risk to individuals and property. • Lightning often strikes outside of heavy rain and may occur as far as 10 miles away from any rainfall. • “Heat lightning” is actually lightning from a thunderstorm too far away for thunder to be heard, however, the storm may be moving in your direction. • Most lightning deaths and injuries occur when people are caught outdoors in the summer months during the afternoon and evening. • Your chances of being struck by lightning are estimated to be 1 in 600,000, but could be reduced even further by following safety precautions. • Lightning strike victims carry no electrical charge and should be attended to immediately.

Lightning Occurrences

As recorded by the NCDC (8/1/1950 – 8/31/2015), there were three recorded lightning events in Baker County resulting in an injury for two individuals on 4/13/2015 and 1 on 7/31/1999.

Table 4.21 – Lightning Occurrences in Baker County (8/1/1950 – 8/31/2015)

Location or Date Time Type Dth Inj PrD CrD County Sanderson 7/31/1999 17:00 Lightning 0 1 0.00K 0.00K Sanderson 9/4/2006 16:30 Lightning 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 4/13/2015 15:00 Lightning 0 2 0.00K 0.00K Totals: 3 Injured; Property Damage; N/A

Source: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents

Key Code: Dth: Deaths; Inj: Injuries; PdD: Property Damage;vCrD: Crop Damage

Hazard Narrative

1. 4/13/2015 – Macclenny, A meandering surface front over the area in concert with the sea breezes and an approaching mid-level impulse spawned scattered afternoon thunderstorms. A lightning strike injured two in Macclenny. A structure fire was also caused, however, the damage details were not available.

Note: In the previous LMS plan, it states that lightning strikes have caused approximately $124,000 in property damage over the last 15 years. This data could have been recorded due to the lightning strikes

______90

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______that occurred and resulted in fires as noted in the information below.

Fires caused by Lightning

As stated in Table 4.25 from the Florida Forest Service, Fires by Causes (1/1/2000 – 8/23/2015) data reveals that over the last 14 ½ years lightning has contributed to 137 fires burning 50,603.8 acres in Baker County, 87.34 % of the fires that burned were from lightning events.

Hailstorms

Hail is precipitation in the form of lumps of ice produced by convective clouds and typically accompanies thunderstorms. They can grow by colliding with supercooled water drops, which will freeze on contact with ice crystals, frozen raindrops, dust or some other nuclei. Thunderstorms that have a strong updraft keep lifting the hailstones up to the top of the cloud where they encounter more supercooled water and continue to grow. The hail falls when the thunderstorm's updraft can’t support the weight of the ice or the updraft weakens and the stronger the updraft the larger the hailstone can grow. Hail can damage aircraft, homes and cars, and can be deadly to livestock and people.

Hailstorm Occurrences

According to the NCDC, from 8/1/1950 to 8/31/2015, there have been 36 hailstorm events documented in Baker County with approximately 53% of the hail recorded of 1-inch or over in diameter, the size of a quarter or considered severe.

Table 4.22– Hailstorm Occurrences in Baker County (8/1/1950 –8/31/2015)

Location Date Time Type Mag Dth Inj PrD CrD or County Baker 11/13/1969 13:30 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Baker 5/25/1980 20:20 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Baker 3/13/1986 17:05 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Baker 5/20/1986 9:30 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Baker 5/20/1986 11:30 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K County Taylor 3/18/1995 17:56 Hail .75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K

______91

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______- - - Bloxham 7/11/1995 16:15 Hail .75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K NIP 7/11/1995 18:15 Hail .50 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Glen St. 5/19/1996 19:40 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Mary Sanderson 2/16/1998 20:30 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Taylor 2/16/1998 20:30 Hail 2.00 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 2/16/1998 22:35 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Taylor 2/22/1998 12:45 Hail .75 in. 0 0 1.50K 0.00K Macclenny 6/26/2001 18:00 Hail .75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Glen St. 4/2/2002 18:26 Hail .75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Mary Glen St. 4/2/2002 18:27 Hail .75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Mary Glen St. 4/2/2002 18:30 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Mary Macclenny 4/2/2002 18:37 Hail 1.50 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 4/2/2002 18:38 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Taylor 6/3/2002 15:50 Hail .75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Glen St. 3/13/2003 12:20 Hail .88 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Mary Taylor 4/9/2003 16:00 Hail .75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Olustee 4/25/2003 13:35 Hail .88 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Sanderson 7/30/2003 13:05 Hail .75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 6/20/2004 15:57 Hail .75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 6/21/2005 17:45 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 2/3/2006 20:05 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 2/3/2006 20:09 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 2/3/2006 20:30 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Knabb 6/13/2007 13:00 Hail .75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Knabb 7/4/2008 19:50 Hail .75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 1/10/2011 8:10 Hail .75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 2/25/2013 11:10 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 2/25/2013 11:15 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Macclenny 4/29/2014 14:30 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Taylor 4/25/2015 16:20 Hail .75 in. 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Totals: Property Damage: $1,500

Source: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents

______92

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Vulnerability

The vulnerability to thunderstorms, lightning and hailstorm events can be defined as to the extent to which people will experience harm and property will be damaged from the natural hazard. The entire county, the population, the structures and facilities are at risk and vulnerable to thunderstorm/wind, lightning and hailstorm events, especially the manufactured and mobile homes, which accounts for approximately 36% of the residential inventory, to wind and possibly hailstorm disasters.

A severe thunderstorm contains either hail one inch or greater and winds gusts in excess of 50 knots (57.5 mph). The thunderstorm/winds have the potential of causing power outages and destruction or damage to buildings and can result in loss of life. Flash flooding from rainfall and strong straight-line winds can knock down trees, and damage mobile homes and roofs. According to the NCDC, there were 92 thunderstorm/wind events over the last 65 years. The magnitude was not identified on approximately 34% of the thunderstorm/wind events, however, the events that did have the magnitude, over 75% were 50 kts magnitude or more, which would categorize them as severe thunderstorms.

The vulnerability from a lightning occurrence can be disastrous for the county’s agricultural land, the structures and to the population. Fires can spark and ignite from lightning and data from the Florida Forest Service over the last 14 ½ years reveal that lightning has contributed to 137 fires that have burned 50,603.8 acres of land in the County.

Thunderstorms and hailstorms are more frequent during the summer months but may be experienced year round. The county should anticipate at least one major thunderstorms and hailstorm occurrence that produce property damage every year and at least one lightning event every 10 years that might have the potential for damage.

Vulnerability for the Baker County’s Population

Baker County’s growth rate from 2010 to 2015 was 27,377 residents, a 1% increase change from 2010 to 2015. Powerful winds could affect the entire population within Baker County, however, the greatest vulnerability to severe thunderstorms and hailstorms would be for the mobile home residents (approximately 34% of the total population or 9,193). As noted earlier, 36% of the total residential inventory, live in mobile homes and of that total 93% of the mobile home residents are located in the unincorporated area.

Exposure to lightning events can affect the entire county population especially the unincorporated residential community that have experienced wildfires from lightning strikes. In addition, a lightning

______93

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______injured two in the City of Macclenny. Specific details were not available on the injury.

Vulnerability for Baker County’s Structures and Facilities

Table’s 4.23 – 4.24 identify the structures by occupancy type and value of the structures that are vulnerable to severe thunderstorm (wind and hailstorms).

Table 4.23 – Structures by Occupancy Type that Vulnerable to a Thunderstorm (including Wind and Hailstorms) Hazard per Year in Baker County by the Number of Thunderstorms that Effect that Area on an Average

Thunderstorms Residential Commercial Medical Industrial Agriculture Education Government Tornadoes 17+ 5,948 251 I 89 I 37 1,148 2 84 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.92

Table 4.24 – Value of Structures by Occupancy Type that are Vulnerable to Severe Thunderstorms (including Wind and Hailstorms) per Year in Baker County (in millions)

Thunderstorms Resident. Comm. Med. Indus. Agric. Educ. Govern. Tornadoes ($million) ($million) ($million) ($million) ($million) ($million) ($million) 9.5 – 17 32.50 0.38 3.75 0 28.84 0 1.02 17+ 820.52 I118.70 I47.29 I6.01 I190.34 I0.40 I29.51 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.96

Summary details for thunderstorm/wind, lightning and hailstorms events:

Probability The probability for thunderstorms with high winds and hailstorm events is high (at least 1 occurrence every year). The probability for lightning events is medium (at lease 1 occurrence every 3 years).

The probability for recurrence is higher for severe thunderstorms than for hailstorms as a thunderstorm may not always produce hail, but hail can occur during a thunderstorm.

Location The entire planning area (the City of Macclenny, the Town of Glen St. Mary, and unincorporated areas of Baker County) has a medium vulnerability to

______94

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______thunderstorm/wind, lightning and hailstorm events.

Each jurisdiction had documented thunderstorm/wind or hailstorm events with some property damage (i.e. unincorporated Baker, the City of Macclenny, and the Town of Glen St. Mary).

The lightning events recorded are in the unincorporated area of Baker and the City of Macclenny.

Extent According to the NCDC data, the highest recorded magnitude or worse case scenario in the county, and what Baker County could expect in future events:

• 65 kts, which is 74.80 miles per hour occurred on 12/11/2008 in Knabb for thunderstorm/wind events. • According to the light density map, see Figure O, the extent would be 4 to 8 flashes/sq. km/year for Baker County. In addition, a lightning strike, which injured two residents, occurred on 4/13/2015 in the City of Macclenny. • Hail, which measured 2 inches, the size of a hen egg occurred on 2/16/1998 in Towns of Sanderson and Taylor.

Impact The Baker County community, the residents, structures, and critical facilities, can suffer from thunderstorm/wind, or lightning and/or hailstorm events. The impacts of these events could potentially be destructive on the county residential (especially the mobile homes), the commercial and public buildings, and other structures.

The risks associated with severe thunderstorms and their impacts is moderate as they have the potential to produce tornadoes, flooding, and hail, as well as wind speeds ranging from 58 to possibly 90 mph, and lightning strikes.

______95

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Severe thunderstorms have also caused power outages, damage to property and structures, and have the potential to cause injury. Hail storms also have the potential to cause injury and damage to property as well as agricultural crops; in Baker County, the size of hail has ranged from ¾” to 2”, but with no instances of injury or damage having been reported at this time.

Impact Summary

Thunderstorm/Wind Event – The City of Macclenny reported the highest property damage figure of $25,000 on 2/17/1998, although the magnitude was not reported on the NCDC data, details reveal that a mobile home was destroyed. Also on 6/29/1998 in Sanderson, a thunderstorm wind event occurred and a mobile home was damaged, the magnitude was not reported, and the property damage was $10,000. On 11/12/2002, a thunderstorm occurred in the county. Details reveal that several large trees were blown down across roadways and power lines causing $10,000 in property damage.

The future impact that Baker County can anticipate thunderstorms with high winds of 69 mph that would cause residential (mobile home) damage, trees down and loss of power. Note: There were several occurrences in the NCDC data without the identified magnitude for the wind speed, therefore, the high wind maximum could be higher than 60 kts. Or 69 mph.

Lightning Event - lightning can be dangerous and even deadly. A lightning strike injured two in the City of Macclenny on April 13, 2015. A structure fire was also caused, however, the damage details were not available.

The future impact that the county can anticipate is a lightning event that could injure one or more of the residents from a direct lightning hit and lead to a structural fire. In addition, lightning contributed to 137 fires over a 14½ year time

______96

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______period, burning over 50,600 acres. Baker County can expect to have wildfire occurrences burning on average of 3,489 acres per year resulting from a lightning strike.

Hailstorms - Although no specifics on property damage were available according to the NCDC, large hailstorm events can produce significant damage to the structures (especially the mobiles homes) in the county. Within the last 5 years there has been recorded hail events with .75 to 1 inch in size.

The future impact and what Baker County can expect are hailstorms events that can reach 2 inches, the size of a hen egg, as noted on 2/16/1998. Structural and agricultural damage can occur although no specific detail on property damage was recorded on the NCDC data in Sanderson and Taylor. Note: Hail that is recorded of 1-inch or over in diameter, the size of a quarter, is considered severe.

In addition, the economic effect or financial impact for the agriculture or timber products could be catastrophic from a destructive and severe thunderstorm/wind, or lightning and/or hailstorm event.

Wildfire

A wildfire is any uncontrolled fire in combustible vegetation that occurs in the countryside or a wilderness area. Other names such as brush fire, bushfire, forest fire, grass fire, hill fire, peat fire, vegetation fire, veldfire and wildland fire may be used to describe the same phenomenon depending on the type of vegetation being burned.

Florida’s ecosystems are dependent on natural fire. These low intensity fires re-nourish soil, thin abundant vegetation, and provide proper conditions for reproduction and forage. However, since the early 1950’s when Floridians actively began to suppress all fires to protect newly planted forest areas and keep newly built dwellings safe, vegetative fuel has become dense and thick. Natural fires have given way to dangerous wildfires, which often damage rather than benefit natural surroundings.

Wildfires occur in Florida throughout the entire year but are perhaps most prevalent in the spring and summer months, from March to August. Typically, north Florida, including Baker County, sees the greatest number of wildfires occurring during the months of April, May and June, with June being the most active

______97

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______month due to the occurrence of “dry lightning,” or lightning without measurable precipitation.

Baker County is a predominantly rural county with a large percentage of its land area covered in forest. As a result, many areas of the County are susceptible to wildfires and may be caused by a number of reasons, such as: lightning strikes, arson, escaped yard debris burns, etc., see Table 4.11, Fires by Causes. Periods of drought or long periods of dry conditions may also increase the onset of wildfires, as well as their severity.

The growing number of people relocating to Florida adds to the wildfire problem as nearly 1,000+ people move to Florida each day. Additionally, Floridians who are tired of big-city life are moving to rural areas to “get back to nature”. Many of them choose to live in areas where natural vegetation meets homes and communities. These areas are called the Wildland-Urban Interface, and many of these new residents are unaware of the natural role of fire in Florida and therefore are unprepared. The Wildland-Urban Interface fires are fast moving fires that often require many pieces of fire fighting equipment, and suppression is a difficult and time-consuming operation. Wildfire suppression must also take on the challenge of home protection during almost every fire that is detected. The cost of these operations grows proportionally with their complexity.

Development trends in Northeast Florida for the next 20+ years also indicate that an increasing population will put pressure on existing rural land use categories to supply the necessary housing. As more homes are constructed in the wildland/urban interface, more homes will be threatened by wildfire and the potential for property loss will increase. The number of persons at risk from wildfire will also increase, as will the economic values of their structures. Both will require more funds to cover suppression costs unless effective mitigation strategies are implemented throughout the County.

This development pattern increases the risk of wildfires in two ways. First, wildfires that occur in this area have a greater chance of damaging residential structures, and second, where there are people, there is an increased risk of wildfires being started.

The Florida Forest Service has identified several areas in the County where controlled burns and/or clearing of brush and trees are needed to reduce the

______98

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______likelihood of wildfires developing or spreading. These areas are all located in the urban/rural interface in the vicinity of the City of MacClenny and the Town of Glen St. Mary.

Details from the previous LMS Plan note that Baker County experienced an average of 99 wildfires each year that burn an average of 3,913 acres. During a 20-year period, from January 1, 1985 through December 31, 2008, there were a total of 1,044 wildfires that burned 78,251 acres. However, other significant wildfire events in Baker County have occurred in 1989, 1992, 1993, 2004, and 2007. Each of these years saw over 1,000 acres burned. The Bugaboo Fire of 2007, one of the largest wildfires recorded in the Southeast, had a considerable impact on Baker County and the acreage burned that year skewed the 20-year acreage totals and average.

Historical Data Occurrences of All Types of Fires – Florida Forest Service (1/1/2000 –8/23/2015)

Table 4.25 reports statistics from the Florida Forest Service, Fires by Causes, over the last 14 ½ years reveals that 635 fires occurred burning over 57,928 acres In Baker County.

Table 4.25 – Fires by Causes Baker County (1/1/2000 – 8/23/2015)

Cause Fires Percent Acres Percent

Campfire 9 1.41 27.4 0.05 Children 17 2.66 49.6 0.09 Debris Burn * 27 4.23 164.3 0.28 Debris Burn – Authorized 16 2.50 823.4 1.42 Broadcast/Acreage Debris Burn – Authorized – 9 1.41 26.6 0.05 Piles Debris Burn – Authorized – 34 5.32 130.1 0.22 Yard Trash Debris Burn – NonAuthorized 8 1.25 40.5 0.07 Broadcast/Acreage Debris Burn – NonAuthorized 15 2.35 18.2 0.03 – Piles Debris Burn – NonAuthorized 21 3.29 22.4 0.04 – Yard Trash Equipment Use * 4 0.63 6.8 0.01 Equipment – Agriculture 4 0.63 16.5 0.03 Equipment – Logging 5 0.78 28 0.05

______99

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Equipment – Recreation 3 0.47 7.9 0.01 Equipment – Transportation 5 0.78 17.8 0.03 Incendiary 228 35.68 2,569.6 4.44 Lightning 137 21.44 50,603.8 87.34 Misc. – Breakout 4 0.63 2,893 4.99 Misc. – Electric Fence 4 0.63 17.1 0.03 Misc. – Fireworks 1 0.16 0.5 0.00 Misc. - Power Lines 14 2.19 9.3 0.02 Misc. – Structure 0 0 0.00 0.00 Misc. – Other 34 5.32 117.6 0.20 Railroad 5 0.78 2.6 0.00 Smoking 6 0.94 5.5 0.01 Unknown 29 4.54 339.3 0.59 Total 639 57,937.8

* Fire cause no longer used

Source Florida Forest Service: http://tlhforweb03.doacs.state.fl.us/PublicReports/FiresByCause.aspx

Wildfire Occurrences

According to the NCDC, there were 9 wildfire occurrences reported in Baker County with location, date, time, the type of event, if there were any deaths or injuries, and the property and crop damage estimates.

Table 4.26 – Baker County Wildfires (8/1/1950 –8/31/2015)

Location or Date Time Type Dth Inj PrD CrD County Macclenny 7/10/1998 00:01 Wildfire 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Countywide 4/21/1999 12:00 Wildfire 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Countywide 5/23/1999 23:00 Wildfire 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Countywide 5/26/1999 12:00 Wildfire 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Baker (Zone) 3/8/2004 7:00 Wildfire 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Baker (Zone) 5/8/2007 13:00 Wildfire 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Baker (Zone) 5/20/2008 15:45 Wildfire 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Baker (Zone) 9/3/2011 15:30 Wildfire 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Baker (Zone) 4/5/2012 00:00 Wildfire 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Total N/A Source: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents

______100

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Key Code: Dth: Deaths; Inj: Injuries; PdD: Property Damage; CrD: Crop Damage

Hazard Narrative

1. 9/3/2011 – Baker (Zone), a prescribed burn got out of control in the Osceola National Forest, approximately 7 miles WSW of Taylor near the Baker and Columbia county line. The fire burned about 1000 acres. 2. 4/5/2012 – Baker (Zone), the County Line wildfire, likely caused by arson, developed near the Baker and Columbia county line in the Osceola National Forest on April 5th. On April 7, the fire had burned 4,752 acres. The fire caused heavy smoke along I-10, and along SR 100 between Lake City and Lake Butler on April 8th midday. On April 10th, the fire had burned about 25,000 acres. By the 11th, the fire had burned about 35,000 acres. Smoke from the fire caused visibility restrictions below 1 mile along I-10 during the afternoon and evening between Macclenny and Jacksonville. By April 19th, the fire was 80% contained. The County Line fire in the Osceola National Forest burned about 35,000 acres from April 4th through April 19th. Significant visibility restrictions occurred from fire across NE Florida as well as poor breathing conditions.

Table 4.27 – Disaster Declaration Wildfires for Baker County (2004 – 2012)

Declaration # Incident Period Hazard Event Individual Public / Date Assistance Assistance #2689/ 5/7/2007 Florida Suwannee Fire Complex X 5/7/2007

Significant Wildfires in Florida 1981 - 2008

Bugaboo Fire in Baker and Columbia Counties, start date: 5/6/2007, final acres burned: 123,014

Details from NCDC:

Lightning strikes on Saturday night, May 5th, ignited two 11-acre and 21-acre fires on Bugaboo Island in the southern Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge (southwest of Stephen Foster State Park). On May 8th through the 10th high winds around large coastal low pressure system quickly resulted in extreme fire spread in southern Ware and Clinch counties in Southeast Georgia (The Georgia Bugaboo Scrub Fire).

The fires combined and raced southward toward Baker and Columbia counties in north Florida becoming the Florida Bugaboo Scrub Fire. Due to close proximity to large populated areas, most significantly Lake

______101

!BakerBaker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______City, Florida the fire generated large media attention and became the dominant fire between the two Bugaboo Scrub complexes. By late on the 8th Georgia State Road 94 and Florida State Road 2 (All one road with two designations) was closed from Moniac, Georgia to Fargo, Georgia due to the threat of the Bugaboo Scrub fire crossing SR 2 and poor visibility because of smoke in the area.

By 4:00 p.m. EDT 500 people were evacuated from the vicinity of Taylor, Florida in northern Baker County and others were evacuated near Moniac, Georgia. The focus the fire fighting efforts from May 8th-10th was on structure protection in the Taylor and Baxter, Florida area. Fire crews, along with private timber companies, were working along the flanks of the fire where conditions allowed, as well as, working to protect structures. Fire crews and forest industry personnel were also strengthening lines on the southwest edge of the Georgia Bugaboo Scrub near Fargo. The Southern Area Blue Team assumed responsibility of the Florida Bugaboo Scrub Fire, South of State Road 2, on May 10th at 10:00 a.m. EDT. At this point the fire had burned nearly 26,746 acres.

From May 10th through the 13th the fire burned southwest toward Deep Creek and Lake City in Columbia County causing evacuations in those areas and sporadic closings of Interstates 10 and 75 in the area. By the 13th the Florida Bugaboo Scrub Fire had burned 102,000 acres, Georgia Bugaboo had burned 131,718 acres and the totals for the two were 233,718 acres and 570 persons were forced from their homes. Smoke from these large fires produced hazy conditions as far south as Miami over the weekend.

On May 14th, About 4:00 p.m. the fire jumped containment line in the Fairview Road area east of US-441, about five miles north of the Deep Creek community but was contained overnight. At this time the fire was considered to be 50 percent contained. Tuesday, May 15th became a critical day for firefighters as winds gusted to 18 mph, with lower humidity and higher temperatures making containing the fire more difficult. The fire was located about eight miles north of Interstate-10 and 1.5 miles east of U.S. Highway 441. While no homes were damaged or destroyed, the fire burned to within a mile of the closest homes, which were located on Omar Terrace, about a mile east of U.S. 441 and the Deep Creek community. At this point there are some 300 homes evacuated, affecting approximately 1,000 people. 48 structural fire units were situated around 350 homes in the immediate area of the fire to prevent loss. By Tuesday evening, the Florida portion of the Bugaboo Fire had increased to a total of 119,501 acres and was 50% contained.

After this point the fire remained within containment with burnout operations continuing around the perimeter through the remainder of the month. Rains from Tropical Storm Barry (6/1-6/2) aided with fire control efforts.

Note: All Types of Fires by Causes from the Florida Forest Service for Baker County from (1/1/2000 – 8/23/2015) are noted in Table 4.11. In reference to Table 4.12, there are no additional wildfire occurrences noted after April 2012 on the NCDC database or specifics related to wildfires in the County on the Florida Forest Service website.

______102

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Consequences of a Wildfire A noted earlier, in table 4.25, there are many types of causes that can start a wildfire, from lightning, to incendiary, to smoking in forested areas or improperly extinguishing campfires, etc. Prevention efforts include working not only educating people on forested areas, but also working with the Florida Forest Service and having the community citizens become a firewise community for preventative measures in protection from a wildfire. Consequences for a wildfire can be the following, see Table 4.28.

Table 4.28 - Consequences of Wildfire

Infrastructure Environmental Human Vegetative Economic

power outages Erosion smoke crop damage business disruption inhalation water/gas/ wildlife personal injury timber damage property loss communication destruction lines disrupted road closures habitat loss human species economic loss evacuation endangered roadway species animal invasive species suppression cost destruction endangered evacuation increased

The Florida Forest Service encourages all Florida residents to become involved in their program areas of prevention addressing the wildfire issues in the state.

Prevention

Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP)

As stated by the Forests and Rangelands… “The Healthy Forests Restoration Act (HFRA) provided communities with a tremendous opportunity to influence where and how federal agencies implement fuel reduction projects on federal lands. A Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) is the most effective way to take . advantage of this opportunity. Additionally, communities with Community Wildfire Protection Plans in place will be given priority for funding of hazardous fuels reduction projects carried out under the auspices of the HFRA.” ( •

Completed in September 2012, Baker County completed and adopted their CWPP. Located in an

______103

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Attachment II, the plan provides the planning process, vulnerability assessment, the current wildfire protection activities, the CWPP goals and objectives, the action plan, and the implementation and maintenance for the plan.

The CWPP can consolidate knowledge and serve as a single resource for wildland fire risk and hazard mitigation information. Included are an assessment of Baker County’s wildfire vulnerability, local organizations and resources available to assist with wildfire mitigation and response, and a pre-fire action plan for reducing wildfire vulnerability throughout the county.

The CWPP addresses the challenges of fire protection in the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) through locally supported proactive solutions and activities, which facilitate the creation of Fire Adapted Communities (FAC).

In addition the CWPP addresses further details on Fire Adapted Communities, the CWPP Goals and Objectives, and the Actions for:

Ø Community Outreach and Education, Ø Firewise Communities, Building Retrofit and Landscaping Ø Policy and Regulation Recommendations and Ø Wildland Fire Response Improvements

Baker County is a Fire Adapted Community, which consist of a community that is informed and prepared with citizens planning and taking action to safety co-exist with wildland fire.

The key points are:

ü Stakeholders in a fire adapted community include residents, businesses, policy makers, land manager, responders as well as local, state, tribal and federal government; ü Cohesion among the various players is key to success; ü Every community is unique and therefore, inputs needed to become fire adapted vary from community to community; ü The more actions a community take, the more fire adapted it becomes, and ü Becoming a fire-adapted community is a continuous process that requires maintenance and adaption to ensure actions are affective.

As populations’ increase and development continues to push into the rural wildland areas, it will be necessary to take active to continue to educate the wildfire risk to the Baker County residents. Through the approved CWPP, development regulations, vegetative fuel reduction, and on-going public education programs in high-risk areas, the potential for loss of human life and property from wildfire can be greatly

______104

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______reduced.

Baker County hosted a Fire Adapted Community Seminar in November 2014. Participants included forestry representatives and some of the Baker County community residents. Details were reviewed on the significant efforts on identification and reduction to wildfire risks in the County.

The Florida Forest Service became a FAC Network hub organization one of only 17 in the nation and how they selected Baker County as a pilot community to demonstrate fire adapted community strategies.

Based on the wildland fire mitigation strategies of the 2012 Baker County CWPP, outreach activities for the future include the seminar, hazardous fuel reduction demonstration using mechanical treatments and prescribed fire, and the formation of Fire Prevention teams to engage residents.

Details from the seminar note …”The future of Baker County’s fire adapted community should involve the creation of a “Fire Adapted Coalition” to identify wildfire risks in the county and to develop and implement projects and programs that will protect the citizens.” See Figure P .

______105

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Figure P – Fire Adapted Community Article

~~FIRE ADAPTED COMMUNITIES LEARNING NETWORK

Baker County Hosts Fire Adapted Communities Seminar BY FAC NElWORK PARTICIPANT NOVEMBER 13, 2014

COMMUNICATIONS & OUTREACH. CONFERENCES/MEETINGS, NETWORK PARTICIPANT>

Wrirren by: Doc Bloodworth, Mitigation Specialist & Annaleasa ~nter, Mitigation Specialist

Baker County, Florida, one of the FAC Network's pilot communities, recently hosted a Fire Adapted Communities Seminar and luncheon at the agricultural extension office in Macclenny, Florida. Baker County has undertaken significant efforts to identify and reduce wildfire risk though out the county, and this seminar was an opportunity to engage community members in the work. In total, 46 community and forestry representatives attended the three-hour event. Baker County Fire Chief Steve Marfongella opened the presentations by welcoming attendees and introducing the speakers, Florida State Forester Jim Karels and National Forests in Florida Forest Supervisor, Julian Affuso. They explained how the Florida Forest Service Stakeholders sign in at the registration booth for became a FAC Network hub organization one of only 17 the Baker County FAC l uncheon. in the nation, and how they selected Baker County as a pilot community to demonstrate fire adapted community strategies. Nancy Oliver, Taylor Firewise Co-Chair explained, "Baker County has invested in the Firewise Communities program and made significant impaas on ru ral areas at high-risk for wildfire, such as the community of Taylor." Additionally, Oliver said, "Baker County has emphasized coordination with partners, the planning of risk reduaion activities, and outreach to community residents. All of which made the county an ideal pilot location in the Southeast."

Florida Forest Service Suwannee Forestry Center Manager Sam leNeave and Osceola National Forest Fire Management Officer Pete Myers presented a computer graphic simulation of a lighming-caused wildfire started in the Osceola National Forest and burning into the community of Sanderson. In this example, multiple homes were threatened and evacuations were required. The presenters explained that under windy and dry conditions, this scenario could happen anywhere in Baker County.

Florida Forest Service Chief of Forest Protection John Ash explained a fire adapted community is a human community consisting of informed and prepared citizens collaboratively planning and taking action to safely co exist with wildland fire. The key points of this premise are: • Because fire risk is shared by all stakeholders, a fire adapted community strategy stresses that all stakeholders share responsibiliryfor mitigating fire risk;

______106

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

• St.akeholders in a fire adapted community include residents, businesses, policy makers, land managers, responders as well as local, state, tribal and federal government; • Cohesion among the various players is key to success; • Every community is unique and therefore, inputs needed to become fire adapted vary from community to community; • The more actions a community takes, the more fire adapted it becomes; and • Becoming a fire adapted community is a continuous process that requires maintenance and adapt:ation to ensure actions are effective. The next two speakers, Steve Marfongella and retired Fi re Chief Richard Dolan. detailed the long history of wildfire in Baker County, highlighting the 2007 Bugaboo Fi re that consumed more than 120,000 acres and caused the evacuation of the community of Taylor. Not one home was lost and no injuries resulted from a potentially devastating fire because of the planning and implementation of wildfire mitigation activities that had already taken place.

Doc Bloodworth, Wildfire Mitigation Specialist with Florida Forest Service, elaborated on what we have accomplished so far and where we need to go from here. Based upon the wildland fire mitigation strategies The Bugaboo Fire, photo courtesy Steve of the 2012 Baker County Community Wildfire Marfongella. Protection Plan, outreach activities for the future indude the seminar, hazardous fuels reduction demonstrations using mechanical treatments and prescribed fire, and the formation of Rre Prevention Tearns to engage residents. The goal is to expand the Taylor Firewise Community model of wildfire hazard mitigation into other areas of the county considered highest priority for mitigation activities. Taylor Fi rewise Co-Chair, Nancy Oliver, wrapped up the seminar by explaining the roles of key community stakeholders, and why they are critical to the Baker County fire adapted community process. Essential to this process are local planners, county and city officials, business leaders, along with homeowners, and volunteer groups suc:h as the Garden Club and Master Gardeners. The future of Baker County's fire adapted community should involve the creation of a "Fire Adapted Coalition" to identify wildfire risks in the county and to develop and implement projects and programs that will protect the citizens. Local residents interested in being a part of Baker County's Fire Adapted Coalition are asked to contact Nancy Oliver at doubleOO (at) nefcom.net pr Doc Bloodworth at doc.bloodworth (at) freshfromflorida.com.

The seminar was made possible through a partnership with the Florida Forest Service, USDA Forest Service and the Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge. The FAC Learning Network provided financial support for the event.

It is hoped that other areas of northeast Florida and southeast Georgia will soon follow Baker County's leadership in fire adapted communities implementation.

______107

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Vulnerability

Figure Q – Percentage of Land in Forest – Baker County

Percentage ofland in fore t b coun . Vulnerability to wildfire events can be defined as to the extent to which people will experience harm and property will be damaged from the natural hazard. Baker County is very vulnerable to wildfires, especially under dry and drought-related conditions, due to the extent of the large forested area, the conservation, and the environmentally sensitive land, approximately 85% + of the total land use. See Figure C, the FLUM for Baker County. The impact from wildfires can affect the residential community, the buildings, the structures, and agricultural property, which can be difficult, time-consuming, and costly to suppress, depending on the size and complexity of the fire.

Typically the county sees the greatest number of wildfires occurring during the months of April, May and June. Baker County had a disaster declaration in May 2007 from the Bugaboo Wildfire, which consumed hundreds of thousands of acres in the county.

Vulnerability for the Baker County’s Population

The population at risk and vulnerable to wildfires is noted in Table 4.29.

Table 4.29 Wildfire Population by Level of Concern Category

County LOC 1 LOC 2 LOC 3 LOC 4 LOC 5 LOC 6 LOC 7 LOC 8 LOC 9 Baker 631 608 2,614 1,338 1,530 1,814 2,948 1,569 2,586 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page 3.110

From the details above, the highest vulnerability for the population would be the level of concern: 7 with 2,948 residents. The topmost risk areas for the population are in the unincorporated areas of the county for the residents in rural wooded areas, additional threats to life and property exist, therefore, requiring increased mitigation efforts. This segment of the population could include the mobile home residents which

______108

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______accounts for 36% of the residential inventory (93% of the mobile homes in the unincorporated area in the county), special needs, the sick and the elderly, and a segment of the single family home population which accounts for 41% of the unincorporated residents.

Vulnerability for Baker County’s Structures and Facilities

The Florida Forest Service GIS mapping Fire Risk Assessment System determines high-risk areas using wildfire fuel types and densities, environmental conditions, and fire history to produce a Level of Concern (LOC), which is a number on a scale that runs from 1 (low concern) to 9 (high concern).

Table’s 4.30– 4.33 summarize the following details for wildfires in Baker County on:

Ø the structures by occupancy type within each level of concern; Ø the value of structures by occupancy type within each level of concern; Ø the county facilities by their wildfire level of concern; and Ø the value of county facilities within wildfire level of concern.

Table 4.30 – Structures Level of Concern for Wildfires in Baker County

Level Single Multi- Mobile Vacant Agric. Comm. Instit./ Indust. Vacant Misc./ of Family Family Home Res. Gov. Comm./ Undef. Concern Res. Res. Indust./Inst

1 39 0 70 0 87 0 2 0 0 19 2 35 0 70 0 102 0 1 1 0 1 3 236 0 317 0 333 11 13 5 0 8 4 162 0 167 0 123 13 7 3 0 0 5 213 0 175 0 125 23 6 2 0 0 6 285 1 19 0 126 30 13 5 0 0 7 548 7 293 0 160 25 25 6 0 0 8 337 5 128 0 66 31 19 3 0 0 9 628 20 166 0 71 44 37 16 0 0 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.119

Table 4.31 – Value of Structures Level of Concern for Wildfires in Baker County (in millions)

Level Single Multi- Mobile Vacant Agric. - Comm. - Instit./ Indust. Vacant Misc./ of Family Family Home - Res. - $million $million Gov. $million Comm./ Undef. - Concern Res. - Res. - $million $million $million Indust./Inst $million $million $million - $million 1 3.79 0.01 4.27 1.23 41.56 0.00 57.40 0.03 0.00 1.90

______109

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______2 4.16 0.00 4.40 1.46 43.37 0.00 29.19 6.12 0.01 1.26 3 28.23 0.00 19.89 5.98 125.86 1.05 38.49 14.20 0.27 4.54 4 22.44 0.00 10.37 2.34 35.45 1.05 6.23 1.30 0.46 0.95 5 28.64 0.00 10.89 2.82 32.45 1.44 3.43 2.66 0.55 0.79 6 38.02 0.10 12.12 4.36 32.48 3.91 4.49 3.56 0.45 1.25 7 72.80 0.65 18.27 9.75 38.19 9.90 5.56 5.94 0.44 1.83 8 43.51 0.41 7.80 4.08 15.36 6.05 4.28 5.26 0.19 0.69 9 88.41 1.49 11.39 10.65 17.90 7.29 9.79 4.09 1.40 1.04 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.122

Table 4.32 – County Facilities by Level of Concern for Wildfires in Baker County

Facility LOC 1 LOC 2 LOC 3 LOC 4 LOC 5 LOC 6 LOC 7 LOC 8 LOC 9 Total by Type Hospitals 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Fire Stations 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Police Stations 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Other Facilities 16 22 52 0 0 6 1 5 0 102 Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.143

Table 4.33 – Value of County Facilities by Level of Concern for Wildfires in Baker County (in thousands)

Facility LOC 1 LOC 2 LOC 3 LOC 4 LOC 5 LOC 6 LOC 7 LOC 8 LOC 9 Total Value of Type $ thou. $ thou. $ thou. $ thou. $ thou. $ thou. $ thou. $ thou. $ thou. Facilities within Areas of Concern ($million) Hospitals 0 0 0 0 0 33,771 17,512 1,957 0 53.2 Fire 0 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 Stations Police 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 Stations Other 1,389 10,683 18,872 0 0 0 4,672 973 81 36.7 Facilities Source: State of Florida Enhanced Hazard Mitigation Plan, Page C.150

Prevention to Exposure

As stated above, Baker County has completed and adopted their Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). Attachment II, outlines the plan, which provides the planning process, the vulnerability assessment, the current wildfire protection activities, the goals and objectives, the action plan, and the implementation and maintenance for the plan. Having a proactive community and strong leadership, the county can plan for the future in prevention in wildfire mitigation efforts to reduce the vulnerability to the county residents and structures or buildings that reside.

______110

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Summary details for wildfire events:

Probability The probability for wildfire events is high (at least 1 occurrence every year).

Location The entire planning area (the City of Macclenny, the town of Glen St. Mary, and unincorporated areas of Baker County) could be at high risk to a wildfire event as wildfires have been known to affect both the incorporated and unincorporated areas of the County.

The Florida Forest Service has identified several areas in the County where controlled burns and/or clearing of brush and trees are needed to reduce the likelihood of wildfires developing or spreading. These areas are all located in the urban/rural interface in the vicinity of the City of MacClenny and the Town of Glen St. Mary.

Extent Based on the quantitative measurement for wildfires, the extent and worse case scenario and what Baker County could expect in future events would be the Bugaboo Fire that burned over 123,014 acres in Columbia and Baker County, the largest recorded wildfire in the State’s history.

Impact The Baker County community, the residents, and structures suffered from a wildfire event. Based on the data recorded from the “Significant Wildfires in Florida 1981 – 2008”, the impact from the Bugaboo wildfire that burned 123,014 acres in Baker and Columbia County and caused significant property damage.

The general consequences of wildfire can range from the environmental to the economic, creating water and air pollution, habitat loss, quickening erosion, as well as costs associated with suppression, property loss, and business disruption. Other damage would be on the agriculture or timber damage, endangered plant species and increase the chance to invasive species to take root; infrastructure impairment of power, water, gas, or communication lines, road closures or destruction; and also harm to humans through smoke inhalation, injury or loss of life.

Wildfires occur every year in Baker County, as the causes can be natural or man-made; taking into account fuel types and density, fire history, and dwellings within the wildland/urban interface, the probability of wildfires is high. These factors are also combined in the Florida Fire Risk Analysis System (FRAS)

______111

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______developed by the Florida Forest Survive. While it may not be possible to exactly predict when a wildfire will occur, the Keetch-Byram Fire Drought Index may help to determine the likelihood for wildfires. The index is a numeric scale between 0 (no drought) and 800 (severe drought). The higher the value, the better the conditions are for a wildfire to occur and its ability to spread over an area increases as well.

Details from NCDC during the Bugaboo Fire on Baker County

500 people were evacuated from the vicinity of Taylor, Florida in northern Baker County and others were evacuated near Moniac, Georgia. The focus the fire fighting efforts from May 8th-10th was on structure protection in the Taylor and Baxter, Florida area. Fire crews, along with private timber companies, were working along the flanks of the fire where conditions allowed, as well as, working to protect structures.

Impact

The future impact of wildfire events can be evaluated as to what the county could expect in in the future. The Bugaboo Fire that occurred in 2007 was not only the most significant wildfire in the State’s history, the impact affected the entire community with poor air quality, residential evacuations, and structural damage. This type of wildfire event could be experienced in the future for Baker County.

In addition, as stated above, wildfires occur every year, and in April 2012, Baker County experienced a large wildfire in the Osceola National Forest burning over 35,000 acres restricting visibility and spawning poor breathing conditions.

Baker County can anticipate significant wildfire events in the future and all mitigation efforts in prevention are essential in planning for the county residents

______112

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______and surrounding communities. See details in the CWPP in Attachment II for proactive measures that the county is taking to address “how to” prepare for the future for the county.

Drought - (including Heat Wave)

Drought

Drought can be defined based on rainfall amount over some period of time, vegetation conditions, agricultural productivity, soil moisture, levels in reservoirs and stream flow, or economic impacts. In basic terms, a drought is a significant deficit in moisture availability due to lower than normal rainfall. This deficiency results in a water shortage for some activity, group or environmental sector. Excessively dry and hot conditions can provoke dust storms and low visibility. Droughts occur when a long period passes without substantial rainfall.

Figure R - Drought Monitor

Although drought is a normal climatic occurrence that

U.S. Drought Monitor happens almost everywhere on the planet, its characteristics vary throughout different regions. There are different perspectives on the root causes of drought, which include those from meteorological, agricultural, societal, and hydrologic perspectives. periods of drought can affect crops, water supply, and can lead to increased hazard of wildfires.

Extended periods with little rainfall tend to occur between mid-November to late-March, coinciding with wildfire season; yet the effects of drought may not be felt for several weeks after this abnormally dry period. The spring months from April to early July tend to experience more rainfall; as the year moves into summer, the area becomes hotter and more humid. The advent of hurricane season can bring with it large amounts of rain, thus lessening the effects of drought; however, in seasons with infrequent storms, droughts conditions can propagate.

Over the past fifteen years, drought has been a fairly common event (on and off) across the State of Florida, affecting all areas of the state; the severity and length of time of drought may vary upon the time of

______113

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______year. Baker County has had a good amount of drought periods and heat waves over the years. The most severe drought conditions occurred in late 2000, early 2001, and mid 2007, when Baker County had drought declarations. The county has also experienced times of abnormally dry conditions, though not officially a drought, from September to December, 2000, from July 2001 to January 2002, mid January to May 2002, late June 2002, February through March 2007 and August 2007, and other periods before and after drought conditions. Source: US Drought Monitor Archives, May 2009

According to the National Weather Service, Climate Prediction Center (2013, 2014 and to date in 2015), there hasn’t been drought events recorded for Baker County.

All of Baker County is susceptible to drought conditions and the hazards associated with them. Drought not only has adverse effects on the environment, vegetation, and animals, but on people as well and can often be exacerbated by the human demand on the water supply. A heat wave combined with a drought is a very dangerous situation.

The drought data was derived from the Palmer Drought Severity Index from the National Weather Service, Climate Prediction Center. The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) is an indicator of the relative dryness or wetness effecting water sensitive economies. The PDSI indicates the prolonged and abnormal moisture deficiency or excess. This indicator is of general conditions and not local variations caused by isolated rain. Calculation of the PDSI is made for 350 climatic divisions in the United States and Puerto Rico. The data collected for the calculations include the weekly precipitation total and average temperature, division constants (water capacity of the soil, etc.) and previous history of the indices.

The PDSI is an important climatological tool for evaluating the scope, severity, and frequency of prolonged periods of abnormally dry or wet weather. It can be used to help delineate disaster areas and indicate the availability of irrigation water supplies, reservoir levels, range conditions, amount of stock water, and potential intensity of forest fires.

Drought Occurrences

The PDSI data for Baker County on years (2011 – May 2015) are as follows:

ü (2011) - There was a recorded period of time in the months of January, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December that had periods of moderate, severe and extreme drought.

ü (2012) -There was a recorded period of time in the months of January, February, March, April, May, and the 1st week of June that had periods of moderate, severe and extreme drought.

______114

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______ü (2013 – May 2015) - There was no drought data recorded in fiscal years 2013, 2014 and January – May 2015.

Source: http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/regional_monitoring/palmer/

In addition to the drought monitor, the county utilizes the Keetch-Byram Drought Index (KBDI), which is updated each day by the Florida Forest Service. KBDI is a good indicator of the drought/moisture conditions for agricultural purposes, and it also provides a planning tool for the risks of wildfire. This index provides a numerical scale of 1 through 800, with 800 being the driest and 1 being wettest.

Figure S - Keetch Byram Drought Index (KBDI)

The direct physical effects of drought in Baker County typically include poor crops (i.e. forage-land used for all hay and haylage, grass silage, and greenchop, nursery stock crops, vegetables harvested, all, sweet corn and corn for grain), increased fire danger, less water in the soil, streams and reservoirs, and less water available for livestock and wildlife. These lead to indirect effects such as reduced farm income and reduced revenues for vendors and retailers who serve agricultural producers and could present an impact to County.

Recorded data from the Florida Division of Forestry, now the Florida Forest Service, on the Bugaboo Wildfire, May 26, 2007 report, the KBDI at Olustee RAWS station located in Sanderson, the KDBI was recorded at 700 + (a severe drought with increased wildfire occurrence).

Source: http://flame.fl-dof.com/fire_weather/KBDI/4km_main.html

Heat Wave

Temperatures that hover 10 ° F or more above the average high temperature for the region and last for several weeks are defined as extreme heat, or those prolonged excessive heat/humidity episodes. Humid or muggy conditions, which add to the discomfort of high temperatures, occur when a "dome" of high atmospheric pressure traps hazy, damp air nears the ground.

______115

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

According to the NWS, the “Heat Index” (HI), is sometimes referred to as the “apparent temperature”. The HI, given in degrees F, is an accurate measure of how hot it really feels when relative humidity (RH) is added to the actual air temperature.

Figure T - Heat Index Chart – Air Temperature and Relative Humidity versus Apparent Temperature

To find the HI, look at the Heat Index Chart, With Prolonged Exposure Figure T. As an example, if the air temperature is an

Baker County’s hot season are the months of June to August with an average high temperature of 90°F to 92 °F. Heat wave events occurring in the hot season would be in the 100 - 102°F plus temperature range. The hottest temperature recorded in the City of Macclenny in Baker County was 103 °F in June 1985 (data from NCDC 1971- 2000). Although the relative humidity data was not available, the county is located in a humid subtropical climate zone and at the time, the humidity was probably high. In order to determine what the Heat Index might have been for this record temperature of 103°F, if the relative humidity was only 55%, the heat index would have been approximately 137°F based on the Heat Index Chart.

The heat can kill by taxing the human body beyond its abilities. In a normal year, about 175 Americans die to the demands of summer heat. In the 40-year period from 1936 through 1975, nearly 20,000 people were killed in the United States by the effects of heat and solar radiation. In the disastrous heat wave of 1980, more than 1,250 people died. Elderly persons, small children, chronic invalids, and those on certain medications or drugs, are particularly susceptible to heat reactions, especially during heat waves in areas where a moderate climate usually prevails.

Small children are incredibly susceptible to heat, especially in a vehicle as it only takes approximately 10

______116

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______minutes to heat up 19 ° F, so that it can reach lethal temperatures quickly. A child is more susceptible than adults to heat as their bodies heat up 3 to 5 times quicker and can suffer a heat stroke.

Heat Wave Occurrence

According to the NCDC, there were no recorded heat wave occurrences noted for Baker County.

Vulnerability

The vulnerability to drought and heat wave events can be defined as to the extent to which people will experience harm and property will be damaged from the natural hazard. During the onset of a drought, which can occur about once in every three years in a given area, can result in elevated fire risk and decreased crop growth, which are the primary impacts to nature.

Drought

Florida was very vulnerable in the 1998 drought resulting in extensive drought-induced fires, which burned over 475,000 acres in Florida and cost $500 million in damages. With lower than normal precipitation, and stream flow records dating to the early 1900s, the drought was one of the worst ever to effect the State. In terms of severity, this drought was comparable to the drought of 1949-1957 in duration and had record- setting low flows in several basins.

Table 4.34 – Date and Lowest Streamflow for St. Marys River near Macclenny from Drought Conditions

Site No./ Station Period of Lowest Date Lowest Date Lowest Water USGS Station Name record instanta instantane annual year No. through neous ous stream- 2004 stream- stream- flow for (water flow flow for period year) before 1998 -2002 of 1998 drought record (ft3/s) (ft3/s) (ft3/s)

20/ St Marys 1926- 12 5/22/ 9.5 6/17/2002 90 1955 022310000 river near 2004 1932 Macclenny

The drought was particularly severe over the 5-year period in the northwest, where rainfall deficits ranged from 38-40 inches below normal. Within these regions, the drought caused record-low stream flows in

______117

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______several river basins, increased freshwater withdrawals, and created hazardous conditions for wildfires, sinkhole development, and even the draining of lakes. Water table levels decline with persistent drought conditions.

The most vulnerable areas to agricultural drought within the county were non-irrigated cropland and rangeland on sandy soils, located in areas with a very high probability of seasonal crop moisture deficiency.

Baker County is ranked 51st in the State of Florida for total value of agricultural products (crops and livestock) sold with a market value in 2012 of $15,808,000.

ü Baker County is ranked #1 in the State in top livestock inventory items for the pullets for laying flock replacement with a quantity figure of 609,159 .

ü The county is ranked #10 in the State in crop items for the sweet corn.

The timber industry, which owns over 21% of the land in the county would have some vulnerability to drought conditions. As noted in Figure Q, Baker County is one of the most forested areas in the State.

The timber production companies work with the water management districts, the Agricultural Extension offices, the local fire departments, Florida Forest Service, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and other agencies in practicing sustainable forestry on the acres of forestland. The companies work with contractors on supplying businesses that produce a variety of wood, pulp and paper products that serve the needs of people worldwide.

These industry impacts would be limited to agricultural operations and fires that may occur resulting from drought conditions. It is important to note that company representatives from the timber industry continue to work with Baker County and participated in the Fire Adapted Community Seminar in the planning of risk reduction activities and community outreach.

______118

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Vulnerability for the Baker County’s Population

Baker County’s growth rate from 2010 to 2015 was 27,377 residents, a 1% increase change from 2010 to 2015.

Heat Wave

The vulnerability to heat wave events can be defined as to the extent to which people will experience harm and property will be damaged from the natural hazard. The entire population could be affected by a heat wave event (high temperatures with a high heat index), and heat exhaustion and other heat-related illnesses (HRI) are among the very vulnerable children, the sick, the elderly and the poor and can occur every year.

According to the US Census and the Office of Economic and Demographic Research, the following table identifies the % of the population that could be affected by a heat wave occurrence (based on 2013 population data – with a 1% increase).

Table 4.35 – Estimated % of the Population that could be affected by a Heat Wave Event

% of 65 years of age over 12.5% or approximately 3,422 elderly residents

% of children 5 years or 6.4%, or approximately 1752 children younger

% in poverty, all ages 18.8% or approximately 5,146 residents

% in poverty, under age 18 25.6% or approximately 7,009 residents

% in poverty, ages 5-17 in 24% or approximately 6,570 residents families in poverty

The vulnerability to heat depends on climatic factors such as the frequency of heat waves and on individual risk factors, which could include; medical, age, gender, pre-existing disease, use of certain medications, level of hydration, living alone, housing condition, the presence and use of air-conditioning in the home or

______119

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______residential institution.

It also can be said that the vulnerability to heat wave could result as a function of sensitivity to exposure, the characteristics of the population, the exposure to heat wave duration and, the measures and actions in place to reduce the loss of life.

As stated earlier, Baker County’s hot season are the months of June to August with an average high temperature of 90°F to 92 °F. Heat wave events occurring in the hot season would be in the 100 - 102°F plus temperature range. The hottest temperature recorded in the City of Macclenny in Baker County was 103 °F in June 1985 (data from NCDC 1971- 2000). The residents of the county are most vulnerable during the summer months.

Vulnerability for Baker County’s Structures and Facilities

The Baker County’s buildings, structures, facilities and infrastructure are not considered vulnerable to drought and heat wave events. It is important to note that a long-term drought event could present some vulnerability to the water wells, and the agriculture and timber industry irrigation system is the most vulnerable in the county.

Summary details for drought/heat wave events:

Probability The probability for drought or heat wave events is high (at least 1 occurrence every year).

Location The entire planning area (the City of Macclenny, the town of Glen St. Mary, and unincorporated areas of Baker County) could be at medium high risk to a drought or heat wave event.

Extent The data from Florida Division of Forestry, now the Florida Forest Service, on the Bugaboo Wildfire, May 26, 2007 report, the KBDI at Olustee RAWS station located in Sanderson, the KDBI was recorded at 700 +. Baker County could expect the KDBI for drought to be this extreme and high measurement for future events.

In addition, the quantitative measurement for a drought event would be the drought from 1998 – 2002 for the State of Florida. As stated by the USGS… “ Lower than normal precipitation caused a severe statewide drought in Florida from 1998 to 2002. Based on precipitation and stream flow records dating to the early 1900s, the drought was one of the worst ever to affect the State. In terms of

______120

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______severity, this drought was comparable to the drought of 1949-1957 in duration and had record-setting low flows in several basins. The drought was particularly severe over the 5-year period in the northwest, where rainfall deficits ranged from 38-40 inches below normal. Within these regions, the drought caused record-low stream flows in several river basins, increased freshwater withdrawals, and created hazardous conditions ripe for wildfires, sinkhole development, and even the draining of lakes.”

The heat wave data in Baker County and what the county could expect in future events, the hottest temperature noted was 103 °F in June 1985 in the City of Macclenny. Although the relative humidity data was not available, the county is located in a humid subtropical climate zone and at the time, the humidity was probably high. To determine what the heat index might have been for this record temperature of 103°F, if the relative humidity was only 55%, the heat index would have been approximately 137°F.

Impact The Baker County community and the residents could suffer from a damaging drought event. The impacts of drought can affect the local economy by damaging crops, affecting available water supplies, and lead to an increase in wildfires. Direct damage to structures is negligible. Because of these factors, there is a moderate risk associated with these hazards; while Baker County has experienced a handful of D3 and D4 droughts, the vast majority of all declarations are D0 to D2. In many cases, there were large stretches of time with no drought conditions present at all.

Drought

Based on previous data, the future impact and what Baker County could expect would be a KDBI recorded at 700+ (a severe drought with increased wildfire occurrence) to occur and affect the unincorporated forested area of the county affecting the timber and agricultural products, and any residential properties within the vicinity.

Heat Wave

The Baker County community and residents would be impacted from a heat wave with high temperatures combined with a high heat index that could result in death. Heat waves occur most frequently during the summer months from June to September with those people exposed to the heat or sun may experience

______121

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______dehydration, heat exhaustion, even heat stroke or death. Limiting one’s exposure to these hot conditions, staying hydrated, take more frequent breaks while performing physical activities outdoors, and trying to stay out of direct sunlight is imperative, especially for the older residents that reside in the county.

In the future, Baker County can expect extreme temperatures to reach at least the documented record of 103 °F resulting in a heat wave event combined with a high heat index which could affect the sick, the poor, the elderly and possibly result in death.

Winter Storms/Freezing Temperatures

Winter storms may include extreme cold temperatures (freeze), high winds, snow, and ice, all of which have the potential to impact people, structures, and infrastructure. During the winter, the North Florida region is occasionally invaded by massive cold fronts that originate far to the north and the results are carried to the Southern states. Although the temperature within these air masses rises significantly during their passage to Florida, they are capable of bringing intense cold to the State.

Florida has experienced occasional cold fronts that can bring high winds and relatively cooler temperatures for the entire state, with high temperatures that could remain into the 40s and 50s (4 to 15 °C) and lows of 20s and 30s (-7 to 4 °C) for few days in the northern and central parts of Florida, although below-freezing temperatures are very rare in the southern part of the state.

Temperatures can reach freezing levels enough to cause damage to crops and water lines/pipes. Freezing occurs when temperatures are below freezing (32o F) over a wide spread area for a significant period of time. Freezing temperatures can damage agricultural crops and burst water pipes in homes and buildings. Frost, often associated with freezes can increase damaging effects. Frost is a layer of ice crystals that is produced by the deposition of water from the air onto a surface that is at or below freezing. A freeze warning is issued to make the public and agricultural interests aware of anticipated freezing conditions over a large area. Similarly, hard freeze is issued under the same conditions as a freeze warning, but the temperatures may stay well below 28o F for a duration of four hours or more.

______122

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Not a year goes by when there is not some damage to the citrus or vegetable crop somewhere in the State. Severe freezes in the 19th and 20th centuries gradually drove the center of citrus production southward from the Orlando area to southern Polk County. Winter vegetable growers have long concentrated their production south of Lake Okeechobee, where they gamble each year that their crop will be spared a severe blow from freezes.

Baker County is not generally susceptible to winter storms, because temperatures rarely reach snow- producing levels; this does not mean that snow and winter weather is unheard of, but it is a rare occurrence. The climactic conditions for long lasting winter storms are also not favorable.

Freezing Temperature Record

The State’s record minimum temperature was set in February 1899 when Tallahassee experienced -2° F. Once cold waves move onto the peninsula the relatively warm waters of the Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico exert their influence, and the airmass’ temperature rises.

Recorded Low Temperature for the City of Macclenny

Data reveals that the record low temperature for the City of Macclenny was 7° F in January 1985.

Winter Storm/Freeze Occurrences

According to the NCDC, there was no winter storm/freeze occurrences reported in Baker County, however, additional data on winter events are noted from other resources.

Additional Winter Weather Occurrences

As stated before, winter weather and freezing temperatures are not completely unknown to Baker County, though rare. On average, there are only about 15 nights a year where temperatures are below freezing. Winter storms rarely occur; temperatures are usually not cold enough for snow to stick to the ground and accumulate in any large amount.

Much of the data for previous occurrences of winter storms and/or freezes in Baker County and Northeast Florida from 1958 to 2009 is unreliable: February, 1958, an overnight rain changed to snowfall accumulating less than 1.5 inches; March, 1980, less than a quarter-inch covered car tops and outdoor furniture; March, 1986, a half inch of snow fell overnight but melted within 30 minutes in the morning due to the sun; December, 1989, freezing rain changed to snow and totaled several inches in some locations.

(Recorded data from the following sources: NOAA News; NOAA Southern Region Headquarters; NWS and

______123

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______NCDC (not direct specific details for Baker, however, for the entire State for the Storm of the Century)

1) 2/9/1999 — One hundred years ago this week an arctic blast froze two-thirds of the nation, setting records that stand today. A blizzard paralyzed the Eastern Seaboard and for only the second time in recorded history, the Mississippi River brought ice to the Gulf of Mexico. In Florida, the centennial cold snap brought snow flurries as far south as Fort Myers, with Lake City receiving three inches. Cold swept across the state behind the storm and Tallahassee still holds the state record of 2 below zero on Feb. 13. Freezing temperatures occurred all the way to Miami, which posted a low of 29 ° F on Valentine's Day.

3) 3/13/1993 – The No Name Storm (data from NCDC) - The “Storm of the Century” roared across Florida producing a variety of severe and unusual weather conditions for a period of about 18 hours from late Friday, 3/12 to late Saturday, 3/13. A severe squall line raced eastward at 50 mph ahead of an intense low producing several tornadoes and strong downbursts as it moved through the state and directly causing fatalities. From intense storm surge and flooding on the gulf coast to a period of 8 to 12 hours of high sustained winds of up to 50 mph with gusts to 70 mph to cold air which poured in behind the intense low with up to four inches of snow falling in the panhandle to a trace to 3 inches elsewhere across north Florida. Record or near record low temperatures occurred over much of the state the following two nights. Total property damage for the State was estimated at $1.6 billion and 47 fatalities, (there was no specific property damage for Baker County statistics and the fatality data was not available).

Vulnerability

The vulnerability to winter storms or freezing temperature wave events can be defined as to the extent to which people will experience harm and property will be damaged from the natural hazard.

Extreme cold and freezing temperatures can possibly immobilize the county causing road closures due to icy roads, power outages, disruption in communication services, and no heat for several days, under the most severe circumstances. Water pipes in houses in southern climates often are more vulnerable to winter cold spells. The pipes are more likely to be located in unprotected areas outside of the building insulation, and homeowners tend to be less aware of freezing problems, which may occur only once a season thereby leaving many homes without water. In such cases, the requirement to open emergency shelters could exist.

The most vulnerable to severe winter storms or freezing temperatures would be the sick, the poor, the children, and the elderly. Although, it is important to review the data on past occurrences and evaluate the potential for a severe winter storm or a freeze event , it would depend on several factors including a region’s climatological susceptibility to the storm or freeze, the temperature, and the duration of the storm.

______124

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______The last significant winter storm to occur in Baker County was the “no name” storm of March 1993. The county experience significant wind and property damage. The total estimated damage cost is difficult to determine since this event would most likely have effected the livestock and/or agricultural products, which are covered by insurance or other government subsidy/public agricultural assistance programs.

As noted in Figure U below, Baker County is a risk for freezing temperatures during any of the Enso Phases (Neutral, El Niño or La Niña) with a probability of 90-100%. Although, the freezing temperatures would be short-lived, they can have a significant impact on the residential and agricultural community.

Vulnerability for the Baker County’s Population

Baker County’s growth rate from 2010 to 2015 was 27,377 residents, a 1% increase change from 2010 to 2015.

Each part of the county and its municipality are equally vulnerable to winter storm or freezing temperatures. Due to the widespread nature of the potential impacts of a winter storm or freezing temperature event, the entire population could potentially be effected leaving many homes without heat or water. The number of people vulnerable by these conditions could range to possibly hundreds to thousands.

According to the US Census and the Office of Economic and Demographic Research, the following table identifies the % of the population that could be affected by a winter storm or extended freeze occurrence (based on 2013 population data – with a 1% increase).

Table 4.36 – Estimated % of the Population that could be affected by a Winter Storm or Extended Freeze Event

% of 65 years of age over 12.5% or approximately 3,422 elderly residents

% of children 5 years or younger 6.4%, or approximately 1752 children

% in poverty, all ages 18.8% or approximately 5,146 residents

% in poverty, under age 18 25.6% or approximately 7,009 residents

% in poverty, ages 5-17 in families 24% or approximately 6,570 residents in poverty

______125

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______In the event that the county experiences an extended freeze or winter storm occurrence, the Emergency Operations Center and the county shelters should be prepared to deal with a possible major power outage that would affect many residents.

The agricultural industry in the county is especially vulnerable to winter storm freezing temperature occurrences as they can be particularly damaging to this crops and livestock in the county. Baker County is ranked 51st in the State of Florida for total value of agricultural products sold with a market value in 2012 of $15,808,000.

Vulnerability for Baker County’s Structures and Facilities

The Baker County’s buildings, structures, facilities and infrastructure could have some impact from winter storms or freezing temperature events. The structures would only suffer minimal structural damage, however, power interruptions can occur and backup power is recommended for the county’s critical facilities and infrastructure.

The maps in Figure U show that the probability for freezing temperatures to occur in Baker County during any of the Enso Phases (Neutral, El Niño or La Niña) is 90-100%.

Figure U – Enso Phases, Probability for Freezing Temperatures

.. . •..· ..

Source: http://agroclimate.org/tools/Freeze-Risk-Probabilities/

Summary details for winter storm/freezing events:

______126

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Probability Probability: Based on past occurrences, the probability of winter storm and freeze occurrence in Baker County, is low for winter storms to high for freezing temperatures (winter storms at least 1 occurrence every 10 years, and freezing temperatures at least 1 occurrence every year).

The freezes and freezing temperatures are likely during the months from December through February.

Location The entire planning area (the City of Macclenny, the Town of Glen St. Mary, and unincorporated areas of Baker County) is at risk to winter storms and freezing temperatures. Freezing temperatures could result in ruptured pipes in structures, electrical power outages, and increased threats to sick, elderly, and special needs residents.

Also, the location for the agricultural products for the county from freeze events that could be at considerable risk with damaging effects on the county’s top crops (i.e. forage-land used for all hay and haylage, grass silage, and greenchop, nursery stock crops, vegetables harvested, all, sweet corn and corn for grain).

Extent Based on historical data for the State of Florida, the coldest temperature was -2 ° F in February 1899. This recorded temperature would be the extreme and worst- case scenario and what Baker County could expect in the future.

Historical data reveals that the record low temperature for the City of Macclenny was 7° F in January 1985.

In addition, freezing temperatures in the 20s and 30s can last for a few days. In addition, the County suffered the effects from the Storm of the Century in March 1993. High sustained winds of up to 50 mph with gusts to 70 mph to cold air which poured in behind the intense low with up to four inches of snow falling in the panhandle to a trace to 3 inches elsewhere across north Florida.

______127

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Impact Winter storms can impede visibility, affecting driving conditions, and can have an impact on communications, electricity or other services. The risks to crops, vegetation, trees, and the general population are higher during these months than the rest of the year.

Baker County can expect freezing temperatures to occur during any of the Enso Phases (Neutral, El Niño or La Niña) at 90-100% probability. Although the freezing temperatures wouldn’t last for long periods of time, it is possible that the future impact could be considerable and affect the elderly, the sick, the poor, the children and the agricultural crops. Extended period of time of freezing temperatures further increases the risks of cold weather. Also, injuries or deaths could occur due to the presence of ice on the roadways, and thus putting drivers and utilities, such as power and communication lines, at risk. Windy conditions would also help tree limbs with ice weighing on them to fall, which could create power outages or cause injury to property or people. Another source of damages, injuries, or deaths may be related to the incorrect use of heating sources that would create fires.

In addition, the agricultural community could be impacted from a future winter storm freeze event. With over 381 farms in the county and a market value of the agricultural crop products sold of: $2,358,000 (data recorded from the 2012 Census of Agriculture), the affect could be a loss in revenue for the county, and Baker County is located in the NE portion of the State and does experience freezing temperatures in the winter months.

______128

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Repetitive Loss (RL) Property

As noted by FEMA… “A Repetitive Loss (RL) property is any insurable building for which two or more claims of more than $1,000 were paid by the NFIP within any rolling ten-year period since 1978. The property may or may not be currently insured by the NFIP. Structures that flood frequently strain the National Flood Insurance Fund and these properties are the biggest draw on the Fund.”

With the increase in NFIP’s annual losses and the need for borrowing, the repetitive loss properties drain funds needed to prepare for catastrophic events. Community leaders and the county residents are also concerned with these properties because their lives are disrupted and may be threatened by the continual flooding. The primary objective of the RL properties strategy is to eliminate or reduce the damage to property and the disruption to life caused by repeated flooding of the same properties.

There are 5 repetitive loss properties located in Baker County:

Unincorporated Baker County Ø 5 residential RL properties

Table 4.37 - Repetitive Loss Property Statistics for Baker County

County Number of Percentage of Amount Percentage of Repetitive Total State Paid Out Total State Loss Properties Payouts Properties Baker 5 0.05% $208,201.05 0.07%

Source: http://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1712-25045- 1952/analysis_of_florida_s_nfip_repetitive_loss_properties_using_ geospatial_tools_and_field_verrification_data.pdf

______129

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Section 5 – Mitigation Strategy

Requirements: §201.6 (c) (3) (i) - The hazard mitigation strategy shall include a description of mitigation goals to reduce or avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the identified hazards. §201.6 (c) (3) (ii) A section that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects being considered to reduce the effects of each hazard, with particular emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure.

§201.6 (c) (3) (ii) -The mitigation strategy must also address the jurisdiction’s participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and continued compliance with NFIP requirements, as appropriate

§201.6(c)(3)(iii): [The mitigation strategy section shall include] an action plan describing how the actions identified in section (c)(3)(ii) will be prioritized, implemented, and administered by the local jurisdiction. Prioritization shall include a special emphasis on the extent to which benefits are maximized according to a cost benefit review of the proposed projects and their associated costs.

Baker County LMS Mitigation Goals and Objectives

Baker County’s LMS Mitigation Goals and Objectives are intended to reduce or avoid the long-term vulnerability to the effects of the profiled hazards addressed in the risk assessment area in Section 4.

The purpose for developing Goals and a set of Guiding Principles is to clearly state the community's overall vision for hazard mitigation and to ensure that the community adequately addresses mitigation before and after a disaster.

The ten Baker County goals were developed by the LMS Committee/Workgroup. Baker County’s Guiding Principles were

______130

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______compiled from existing adopted Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Ordinances, which address hazard mitigation and long-term recovery. See Attachment III.

The goals that were developed by the committee and are as follows:

• Protect the citizens of Baker County from Hazards • Provide adequate health care and emergency services during and after a disaster • Provide adequate law enforcement during and after a disaster • Provide information about the availability and location of emergency supplies before and after a disaster • Protect homes and provide for personal security • Protect infrastructure during and after a disaster • Protect business activities to maintain economic strength • Protect the environment to ensure quality of life and economic well being • Regulate hazardous waste sites through site and construction criteria • Encourage private landowners to conduct annual controlled burns

The set of Guiding Principles was compiled by reviewing existing requirements in the adopted Comprehensive Plan as well as State, Regional and Local planning documents. These documents have already adopted requirements which address hazard mitigation and long-term recovery and which are already serving as the County's Adopted Guiding Principles and are organized by the hazard that they mitigate.

In the planning process the Workgroup/Committee establishes goals for the entire planning area and all of the participating jurisdictions. The following was noted for the goals and objectives that were identified in the previous approved LMS plan:

1) They reflect the updated risk assessment 2) They were analyzed and re-evaluated which lead to the current mitigation projects that will reduce the vulnerability for each jurisdiction 3) They did support to the changes made in the mitigation priority list, and 4) They provided the direction needed to reflect the current State of Florida goals for mitigating hazards within the counties

______131

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Table 5.1 - Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Mitigation Goals & Objectives

LMS Mitigation Goals & Objectives

1. Protect the citizens of Baker County and A. Base all future land use decisions its Municipalities from hazards. on the carrying capacity of evacuation routes and the ability to evacuate in a major hurricane.

2. Assure and provide the citizens of Baker County and its Municipalities with adequate health care and emergency first-aid services in a disaster and post-disaster situation.

3. Protect the citizens of Baker County and its Municipalities during a disaster and post disaster situation through available law enforcement agencies.

4. Provide the citizens of Baker County and its Municipalities with information regarding the availability and location of emergency supplies prior to a disaster, during a disaster and following a disaster.

5. Protect the homes and provide for A. Notify homebuyers that property is personal security and investment security. in the floodplain.

B. Educate residents of insurance caveats for additional benefits

______132

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______and/or monetary incentives for pre - preparing their homes for natural disasters.

6. Protect infrastructure so that it is available during and after a disaster.

7. Protect business activities so that they continue to provide economic strength to the community.

8. Protect the environment to ensure that A. Reduce or prevent storm damage quality of life and economic well being are by protecting natural systems preserved. which serve as buffers against those storms.

B. Protect the floodplain and regulate development in the remaining undisturbed areas.

C. Protect wetlands and submerged lands through regulatory measures.

9. Regulate hazardous waste sites by enforcing site and construction A. Protect natural resources of the requirements. County and its municipalities from contamination by any hazardous substances.

B. Require commercial establishments, which use, create, store, generate or transport toxic or hazardous substances to prepare a plan that identifies the materials and how

______133

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______these materials will be handled and disposed.

10. Encourage owners of large tracts of wooded land to obtain permits for control burning and to do so annually.

Summary overview of the goals and policy objectives

As Baker County’s LMS plan continues to evolve, the goals will be reviewed on an annual basis at an LMS meeting to ensure that they are applicable to meeting the unique needs of the community.

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and continued compliance with NFIP requirements

As stated by FEMA… “The NFIP is aimed at reducing the impact of flooding on private and public structures. This is achieved by providing affordable insurance for property owners and by encouraging communities to adopt and enforce floodplain management regulations. These efforts help mitigate the effects of flooding on new and improved structures. Overall, the program reduces the socio-economic impact of disasters by promoting the purchase and retention of Risk Insurance in general, and National Flood Insurance in particular.”

Source: https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program

Floodplain management is the operation of a community program of corrective and preventative measures for reducing flood damage. These measures take a variety of forms and generally include requirements for zoning, subdivision or building, and special-purpose floodplain ordinances particularly with respect to new construction. Baker County enforces a local floodplain management ordinance, Chapter 24-Land Development Regulations, Article VI. – Resource Protection Standards, Sec. 24-332. – Floodplains that provide flood loss reduction building standards for new and existing development.

Compliance with NFIP

Baker County (unincorporated) participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and has been a member in good standing since July 1991, with an emergency entry in November of 1979. The City of Macclenny originally joined the NFIP as an emergency member in June of 1980, and has been a member

______134

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______in good standing since February 1987. The Town of Glen St. Mary does not participate in the NFIP due to its small population, and as such has no policies in force with no claims or losses at this time. See details in table 5.2.

Table 5.2 - Baker participation in the NFIP

CID # Community County Init FHBM Init FIRM Curr Eff Reg- Tribal Name Identified Identified Map Date Emer Date 120419 Baker Baker 1/27/1978 7/16/1991 6/17/2008 7/16/1991 No County County 120590 City of Baker 11/24/1978 2/1/1987 6/17/2008 2/1/1987 No Macclenny County

Table 5.3 - NFIP Policy Statistics as of 6/30/2015

Community Name Policies In-Force Insurance In-force Written premium In- whole $ force

Baker County 151 $27,557,200 89,082 City of Macclenny 17 $4,318,000 7,503 Total 168 $31,875,200 96,585

Unincorporated Baker County NFIP Overview

As of 6/30/15, see table 5.3, there are currently 168 flood insurance policies in force. Current flood maps were updated and adopted June 17, 2008 and detailed floodplain studies were performed in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) by FEMA and SRWMD on the following streams were studied by detailed methods for this study: Barber Bay Tributary; a portion of South Prong St. Marys River; South Prong St. Marys River Tributary 8; Turkey Creek; Turkey Creek Tributary 1; Turkey Creek Tributary 1.1; Turkey Creek Tributary 2; and Turkey Creek Tributary 2.1 to create profiles prior to our last map revision. These profiles can be found in FIS # 12003CV000A dated June 17, 2008. Prior to that date Baker County (unincorporated) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) effective date was: July 16, 1991; the City of Macclenny’s FIRM effective date was: February 1, 1987; and Glen St. Mary was: N/A – (non-floodprone) per the FIS.

ü Baker County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 24-Land Development Regulations, Article VI. – Resource Protection Standards, Sec. 24-332. – Floodplains.

______135

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______(a) Purpose and objectives. (1) The provisions of this section are intended to promote the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by: a. Restricting or prohibiting uses that are dangerous to health, safety, and property due to water or erosion hazards, or result in damaging increases in erosion or in flood heights or velocities; b. Requiring that uses vulnerable to floods including facilities that serve such uses be protected against flood damage throughout their intended life span; c. Controlling the alteration of natural floodplains, stream channels, and natural protective barriers involved in the accommodation of floodwaters; d. Controlling filling, grading, dredging and other development that may increase erosion or flood damage; and e. Preventing or regulating the construction of flood barriers that will unnaturally divert floodwaters or increase flood hazards to other lands. (2) The objectives of this section are to: a. Protect human life and health, and to eliminate or minimize property damage; b. Minimize expenditures of public money for costly flood control projects; c. Minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding and generally undertaken at the expense of the general public; d. Minimize prolonged business interruptions; e. Minimize damage to public facilities and utilities such as water and gas mains, electric telephone and sewer lines, roadways, bridges, and culverts located in floodplains; f. Maintain a stable tax base by providing sound use and development of floodprone areas to minimize flood blighted areas; and g. Ensure that potential homebuyers are notified that when property is in a flood hazard area.

ü Chapter 24 – Land Development Regulations, Article VII. – Development Design and Improvement Standards, Sec. 24-357 – Stormwater Management. (a) Intent and objectives. This section shall govern the design and construction or alteration of all drainage systems, natural or manmade, within the unincorporated areas of the county. The following objectives are intended to protect, maintain, and enhance the immediate and the long-term health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the county while allowing landowners reasonable use of their property. Stormwater management objectives include: (1) Preventing loss of life and property due to flooding; (2) Reducing the capital expenditures associated with flood control and the installation and

______136

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______maintenance of storm drainage systems; (3)Minimizing the adverse impact of land development and related construction activities on property, environmentally sensitive areas, water and other natural resources. (b) Development permits and stormwater management. (2) Mitigating impacts. All stormwater management undertakings shall respect the rights of other landowners with regard to the quality, rate, and volume of stormwater runoff leaving a site. Further, mitigation shall be in accordance with requirements set forth by the county and other jurisdictional agencies, whichever is more stringent. The developer or contractor shall address the predicted impacts of the proposed activity on other lands through the use of a properly designed, constructed and maintained stormwater management system (SWMS). In mitigating impacts, the developer shall address: a. Impacts to adjacent and downstream collection, storage, and conveyance systems due to increased rate and volume of stormwater runoff leaving the site; b. Impacts to adjacent and upstream drainage systems that may be hydrologically or hydraulically connected to the site; c. Impacts to adjacent and downstream property due to sediment and pollutant loading that may be carried by stormwater runoff during and after construction of the site; d. Impacts to special flood hazard areas (SFHAs) due to earthwork activities associated with the site, which may result in reduced floodplain storage or conveyance capacity; e. Impacts to floodprone areas (FPAs) that are "volume sensitive" as a result of being located in either a closed basin (i.e., without a positive outfall) or a basin with limited outfall capacity. (f) Special flood hazard areas (SFHAs). (1) Compliance with FEMA, state, and local regulations. a. Sites located on property with designated special flood hazard areas (SFHAs) must be evaluated to ensure that all work within the SFHAs complies with effective FEMA regulations. b. In accordance with section 60.3 of 44 CFR, chapter 1, construction occurring in special flood hazard areas, as identified by the flood insurance rate maps (FIRMs) and/or the flood hazard boundary maps (FHBMs) shall meet the requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and shall require approval from FEMA. c. Sites in and adjacent to Zone A SFHAs shall submit proposals to FEMA to established 100-year base flood elevations (BFEs). d. Approvals from federal, state, and local jurisdictional agencies shall be provided to the county before construction may commence.

______137

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______(2) Protection of floodplain functions. a. No development shall reduce the conveyance capacity of a floodplain such that upstream or downstream water surface profile elevations are altered in excess of that allowed by FEMA, the county, or any other jurisdictional agency, whichever is more stringent. b. Filling of SFHAs and known floodprone areas (FPAs) shall be prohibited unless the responsible party can mitigate for the loss of storage volume within the effected SFHA or FPA (collectively hereinafter referred to as “floodplain”). Mitigation may be accomplished by providing compensating storage or by improving the downstream conveyance capacity within the floodplain. 2.Downstream conveyance improvement. When compensating storage cannot completely mitigate the loss of floodplain storage due to proposed fill, the responsible party may propose downstream conveyance improvements. This method of mitigation shall be considered on a case-by-case basis and shall be contingent upon the responsible party successfully designing and permitting the conveyance improvement with other jurisdictional agencies. (3) Floodways. Any work proposed within a floodway shall be contingent upon approval by FEMA. Where regulatory floodways are not established, the county may require the developer to establish one approved by FEMA. For sites adjacent to a designated floodway, the applicable BFE shall correspond to the BFE listed in the FIS's floodway data table, "with floodway" column. In such cases, the lowest finished floor elevation shall be set at least 1.0 foot above the "with floodway" BFE. (4) Finished floor elevation requirements. a. When a site is located within a SFHA where BFEs have been established (i.e., AE and VE Zones), the lowest finished floor elevation of residential and nonresidential buildings shall be elevated at least 1.0 foot above the 100-year BFE. 1.In AE Zones, the lowest finished floor elevation is measured from the top of the floor. 2.In VE Zones, the lowest finished floor elevation requirement is measured from the bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member. b. When a site is located within a SFHA where the depth of flooding is specified (i.e., AO and AH Zones), building finished floor elevations shall be elevated above the highest natural grade at least the depth of flooding indicated on the FIRM plus 1.0 foot. c. When a site is located within a SFHA where BFEs have not been established (i.e., A Zones), the lowest finished floor elevation, including the basement shall be elevated at least

______138

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______three feet above the highest adjacent natural grade prior to the placement of fill. d. The developer may complete a detailed drainage study for FEMA review and approval to establish a BFE for the site. In which case, the lowest finished floor elevations shall meet requirements applicable to the modified SFHA Zone.

Per FEMA’s CRS Communities and their Classes file, 5/1/2014, the Baker County participates in the CRS. See table 5.4. Table 5.4– Baker County Community Rating System – 5/1/2014

Community Community CRS Entry Current Current % % Status Number Name Date Effective Class Discount Discount Date for for Non- SFHA SFHA 120419 Baker 10/1/2001 10/1/2001 8 10 5 C County

Baker County participates in the CRS and currently has a rating of 8. This represents a 10% savings on flood insurance rates for the entire community. The County currently implements and gets credit for the following CRS activities:

ü Activity 310 - Elevation Certificates ü Activity 320 - Map Information Service ü Activity 330 - Outreach Projects ü Activity 350 - Flood Protection Information ü Activity 420 - Open Space Preservation ü Activity 430 – Higher Regulatory Standards ü Activity 440 - Flood Data Maintenance ü Activity 450 - Storm Water Management ü Activity 540 - Drainage System Maintenance ü Activity 630 – Dam Safety

Total points for Baker County: 1,308

Source: State CRS Summary: Florida, 01/14

Continued compliance with the NFIP is paramount to those communities that are participants in Baker County. Baker County and the City of Macclenny both currently intend to maintain their status with the

______139

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______NFIP and to be able to provide consistent flood insurance coverage to their residents and also desire to be in good standing with the NFIP.

Baker County (unincorporated) participates in the CRS and have been able to make advancements in and incentives for providing insurance coverage of its residents through certain outreach actions, such as floodplain management, and the retrofitting and/or elevating of structures that are routinely flooded. In addition, each participating jurisdiction should carry out the following efforts:

Ø Continue to enforce the adopted Floodplain Management Ordinance requirements, which include regulating all new development and substantial damage and improvements in Special Flood Hazard Areas. Ø Continue to maintain all permits pertaining to floodplain development, which shall be available for public inspection. Ø Continue to notify the public when there are proposed changes to the floodplain ordinance or Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Ø Maintain the map and Letter of Map Changes. Ø Continue to promote Flood Insurance for all properties. Ø Continue the Community Rating System (CRS) outreach programs.

City of Macclenny NFIP Overview

As noted in Table 5.2, the City of Macclenny joined the NFIP as an emergency member in June of 1980 and has been participating in the NFIP since 2/1/1987 with Community Identification Number: 120590. As of 6/30/2015, the City has issued 17 flood insurance policies and currently has no repetitive loss properties located within the City of Macclenny area.

Note: The City of Macclenny purchased three repetitive loss properties over 10+ years ago. They moved the homes and sold them to neighboring counties. In addition, in 2008, the City purchased another repetitive loss property and property lot with the goal on building a retention pond. Further details on the properties are located in the LMS Project List in Attachment I.

The City of Macclenny, Florida 2025 Comprehensive Plan which establishes Goals, Objectives, and Policies regarding nine different elements: Future Land Use; Traffic Circulation; Housing; Infrastructure; Conservation; Recreation; Intergovernmental Coordination; Capital Improvements and Public School that have been developed in response to and in accordance with the needs and directions of growth and determined levels of service requirements.

The City integrates flood plain and strormwater management into the Comprehensive Plan in the following sections:

______140

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______ü Future Land Use Element (Section A) a) A.1 Availability of Facilities and Services to Serve Existing Land Uses, Stormwater Management b) A.5 Proposed Development and Redevelopment of Flood Prone Areas c) A.7 Proposed Development and Redevelopment Based on Hazard Mitigation Reports

ü Infrastructure Element (Section D) a) D.3 Proportional Capacity of Shared Systems, Stormwater Management b) D.4 Public and Private Sanitary Sewer, Sold Waste, Stormwater Management and Potable Water Facilities

ü Conservation Element (Section E) a) E.1 Identification of Natural Resources, Rivers and Floodplains

The City of Macclenny will continue to participate in the NFIP. The following actions have been identified, analyzed, and prioritized as necessary steps to remain in compliance with the program:

ü City will emphasize the establishment of on-going drainage maintenance programs to support timely maintenance and repairs of ditches and culverts to minimize affects of flood events. ü City will continue to emphasize and promote training for Planners/Plan Reviewers for certification as Flood Plain Managers. ü Continue to maintain overlay maps of SFHA‘s to identify additional flood prone areas not identified on adopted FIRM‘s. ü Identify flood prone areas not on FIRM‘s and apply for assistance grants to include areas on maps (located in the northeast section of city). ü Continue to provide information to assist homeowner and developer guidance and measures to reduce damage related to the hazards identified in the LMS. ü Apply through grant process measures to improve or construct shelters in the event of future hazards.

Identification and Analysis of Baker County’s Mitigation Projects or Initiatives

In Baker County there are numerous areas and locations that suffer or are vulnerable to disasters such as floods, wildfires, hurricanes/tropical storms, thunderstorm/wind events, etc. The mitigation initiatives that Baker County developed began with evaluating the goals and objectives that were completed during the initial phases of the LMS process. The initiatives revolved around these goals regarding the reduction of County's vulnerability to natural and man made hazards that exist. The LMS Committee/Workgroup, comprised of a variety of people in the public and private sector, created the initiatives that reflected the needs of the community.

______141

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

The Local Mitigation Strategy consists of actions designed to minimize potential losses to natural disasters identified in the risk assessment. The strategy provides for maintaining existing protection mechanisms provided in the County and municipal government comprehensive plans, land development regulations and other implementation mechanisms. The strategy also provides for identifying future local government capital improvements, which, among other purposes, mitigate adverse impacts from natural disasters, and a public information program to educate County residents of the need to prevent and mitigate damage caused by natural disasters.

As part of its strategy, the County will maintain its NFIP and the CRS certificate. The County and its associated municipalities will also use any updated floodplain maps prepared as a result of the FEMA Floodplain Map Modernization Program and Repetitive Loss Initiative. The County and its associated municipalities, when feasible, will also use any products produced through the FEMA's on-going field and database verification projects for repetitive loss properties.

The risk assessment identifies the County is most susceptible to floods, wildfires, hurricane/tropical storm and thunderstorm/wind events. The County and its associated municipalities evaluate their comprehensive plans and land development regulations for modifications to improve mitigation measures, with special emphasis on these occurrences. Through the years, the Baker County Emergency Management Office will continue to improve its recordkeeping and statistical data with regards to natural disasters for the annual vulnerability assessment.

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Projects

Attachment I, an excel spreadsheet that contains three separate mitigation project lists (ongoing, completed and deleted). The mitigation projects or initiatives are action items for the identified hazards in Section 4, and addresses the reduction of hazards on new as well as existing buildings and infrastructure.

They are as follows:

ü the new, ongoing, and deferred mitigation projects - (the deferred projects remain active and will be pursued as funding sources are identified or priorities change due to disaster events), ü the mitigation projects that have been completed over the last five years, and ü the mitigation projects that have been removed or deleted.

Analysis of the comprehensive range of projects

Table 5.5 determines that Baker County has a “comprehensive range” of specific mitigation projects that will address the goals to reduce or avoid long-term vulnerability for each jurisdiction and was prepared after

______14 2

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______analyzing the new, ongoing and deferred mitigation project list.

Table 5.5 – Comprehensive Range of Mitigation Projects

Comprehensive Range of Mitigation Projects - Baker County

Town of Unincorporated City of Glen St. Natural Hazards Profiled Baker County Macclenny Mary Flooding X X X Sinkhole X X X Hurricanes/ Tropical Storms X X X Tornado X X X Thunderstorms/Winds/Lightning/Hailstorms X X X Wildfire X X X Drought/Heat Wave X X X All Hazards X X X X - meets the requirements

Implementation of the Mitigation Projects

All mitigation projects or initiatives were reviewed, analyzed, and revised according to the list of mitigation projects that were in the 2009-2010 LMS Plan. Attachment I contains the list of all mitigation projects for the identified hazards. As noted, the list includes actions that address the reduction of hazards on new as well as existing buildings and infrastructure, and the mitigation project status over the last 5 years, if completed, if deferred, if deleted or any new projects that have been included. And as maintenance of this document continues, these criteria will continue to be used to rank new projects that are supported by the Committee for inclusion into the LMS.

Prioritization Process

Each mitigation project chosen by the LMS Committee/Workgroup will benefit the community and preserve and protect life and property. However, each mitigation project represents a large investment of financial resources and personal resources. Due to these factors a method to prioritize each project was adopted. This prioritization method will be a guide for those using the strategy. It will tell them which projects will be first to be implemented when resources do become available.

______143

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______The Committee adopted a prioritization method early on in the LMS process. The method considered and evaluated such decision factors as:

Ø Contained within the Comprehensive Plan Ø Consistent with Existing Regulatory Framework Ø Community Benefit Ø Community Exposure Ø Effectiveness Ø Effective Life Expectancy Ø Public Support Ø Sponsorship Ø Funding Availability Ø Identified Funding Source Ø Environmentally Sound Ø Time Frame for Accomplishment

The LMS Committee/Workgroup assigns a numerical figure ranking the project based upon these criteria, from 0 to 10 points, depending upon how well the project meets the requirements. The final ranking was drawn from the sum of the numerical figures assigned by the Committee. The project prioritization list shows what projects should take precedence in Baker County when funding or other resources becomes available.

This prioritization places great importance on the amount or degree to which the project can best benefit Baker County and/or its jurisdictions as it compares to the cost of completing that project. The cost-to- benefit review also gives more weight to those projects that allow maximum benefits, whether that is measured in lives saved, injuries prevented, homes or structures protected, or the minimization of those associated costs it would take to do so. Many funding sources require that a benefit cost analysis be conducted before funding is issued to the locality for a particular project. With this tool of accountability built in to the prioritization process, non-beneficial projects are not able to consume the monetary support that should go to more effective mitigation projects.

The prioritization process developed requires the identification of projects and programs that appear to have a reduction in property damage, have technical merit, be cost-effective, and will protect the health, safety and welfare of Baker County's citizens and meet the other mitigation benefits noted. Although the prioritization process includes economic considerations, the project projects will be analyzed for benefit cost based on the guidelines set forth by the state and FEMA.

The Benefit Cost Ratio will be calculated on top tiered projects and/or projects which are included in any applications for funding to ensure that the projects are cost effective. Each action is scored individually and is based on five weighted criteria developed by the LMS Committee/Workgroup. The process to prioritize

______144

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______the mitigation actions is accomplished during meetings between LMS Working Group members and officials from the respective local governments. Using the same criteria, the City of Macclenny prioritizes their own projects before submitting them to the LMS Working Group for review.

Each of the projects were evaluated against selected criteria ranging from cost of the initiative compared with the number of people to benefit to consistency with other plans and programs.

Table 5.6 – Point System Methodology for Benefit Cost Ratio

CRITERIA 10 8 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 CATEGORY Points Points Points Points Points Points Points Point Points

Contained Incorporate Consistent with Inconsiste within the d into plan NA NA plan but not NA NA NA NA nt with or Comprehen incorporated plan sive Plan proposed Consistent with Some Inconsiste NA NA NA NA NA NA Existing Consistent inconsistencies nt Regulatory Framework Benefits small Benefits Benefits some Community portion the Entire NA NA of the NA NA NA NA of the Benefit Community community commun ity Mitigates a Mitigates a Mitigates Community hazard of hazard of a hazard high NA NA moderate NA NA NA NA of low Exposure frequency frequency and frequency and risk risk and risk Benefit/ Benefit/ Effectivene Benefit/cos Benefit/cos cost cost Benefit/co t ratio = 4.0 t ratio = 3.0 ratio = NA ratio = NA NA NA st ratio = ss or greater to 3.9 2.0 to 1.0 to < 1.0 2.9 1.9 Life Life Life Effective Life span = Life span = span = span = span = Life Up to 25 or Up to 20 NA NA NA NA Up to 15 Up to 10 Up to 5 more years years Expectancy years years years Very High Moderat Low Public High Public No Public Public e Public NA NA NA Public NA support support Support support support support Identified Sponsorshi sponsor Project has No willing to NA NA identified NA NA NA NA identified p match sponsor sponsor funds Funding Funding is Funding Funding Funding Funding currently available availabl NA availabl NA availabl NA NA Availability available within 1 e within e within e within

______145

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______- - -- year 2 years 3 years 4 years A funding Identified A funding source Funding NA NA NA source has NA NA NA NA has not Source been identified been identified Impacts Environmen Many are NA NA Some impacts NA NA NA NA impacts tally Sound negligible Accom Timeframe Accompl Accompl Accompl plishe For Accomplished ished ished ished d NA NA NA NA Accomplish within 1 year within 2 within 3 within 4 within ment years years years 5 years

In developing the prioritization procedures, it is not the intent to direct that the projects be accomplished in their prioritized order. The purpose of the ranking is to indicate the overall importance of the project to the local mitigation efforts. The accomplishment of an initiative or project will usually depend more on the availability of funds, than on how high or low it ranked compared to other initiatives.

After a natural disaster event receives a presidential declaration and Baker County was designated as a result of the disaster; the county will be eligible for the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program funding. Once the county receives the disaster designation the LMS committee or workgroup will meet to analyze the damage that was sustained. Then in respect to the current conditions in the County, changes in policy and overall mitigation needs, prioritization of projects to be funded will be reviewed for the specific declared disaster.

Table 5.7 identifies the mitigation projects that will benefit each jurisdiction, which is also located in Attachment I, the Baker County New/Ongoing/Deferred LMS Project List. For details regarding the scope of work, the agency responsible, the estimated costs, the priority, the funding source and estimated timeframe for completion, see Attachment I.

Table 5.7 – Mitigation Projects that will Benefit Each Jurisdiction

Description of the Hazards Jurisdiction Agency Responsible Mitigation Project or Mitigated (Location) for Implementation Action Retrofit several pump stations All Hazards City of Baker County in the City of Macclenny. Macclenny Emergency Management and the City of Macclenny

______146

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Improve outfall ditches on Floods Unincorporated Baker County County Road 250 from Baker County Emergency County Road 125 to the Management and the Baker County line. This area Road Department is considered a repetitive flooding location for Baker County. Purchase a generator for the All Hazards; Baker County, Baker County City of Macclenny Lift Station Hurricanes; the City of Emergency that supports the Baker Tropical Macclenny, the Management County Sheriff's Office. Storms; Town of Glen Tornadoes; St. Mary High Winds; Floods Purchase a repetitive loss Floods City of City of Macclenny property and lot located in the Macclenny City of Macclenny. Then build a retention pond to help mitigate.

Install a new well in the City All Hazards City of City of Macclenny of Macclenny located near Macclenny the Wal-Mart Distribution Center, upgrading an existing well.

Work with the Florida Forest Wildfires Baker County, Baker County Service to develop and the City of Emergency implement the countywide Macclenny, the Management Community Wildfire Town of Glen Protection Plans (CWPP). St. Mary Install several back-up All Hazards; Baker County, Baker County generators at several critical Hurricanes; the City of Emergency facilities throughout the Tropical Macclenny, the Management county. A high priority would Storms; Town of Glen be to have a back-up Tornadoes; St. Mary generator for the fire station. High Winds

______147

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Work with the Florida Forest Wildfires Baker County, Baker County Service to inform the public of the City of Emergency Firewise building and Macclenny, the Management landscape principles. Amend Town of Glen local plans and land St. Mary development regulations to provide a minimum natural vegetated buffer in accordance with firewise prevention recommendations. Utilize the Ready, Set, Go program. Work with the Florida Forest Wildfires Baker County, Baker County Service on evaluating the the City of Emergency defensible space on all the Macclenny, the Management critical facilities throughout Town of Glen the county. St. Mary Develop a Master Drainage Floods Baker County, Baker County Plan for all municipalities in the City of Emergency Baker County Macclenny, the Management and the Town of Glen City of Macclenny St. Mary Retrofit the Baker County All Hazards; City of Baker County Hospital Hospital, the Frasier Hospital, Hurricanes; Macclenny the clinic, and the nursing Tropical homes with security screens. Storms; Tornadoes; High Winds Retrofit and construction of All Hazards Baker County Baker County fire stations for shelters and Emergency the community. Management and the Fire Department Retrofit and harden the All Hazards Baker County, Baker County transportation systems the City of Emergency throughout the county Macclenny, the Management Town of Glen St. Mary Analyze and decide how and All Hazards Baker County, Baker County where the county will store the City of Emergency and back-up all the data in a Macclenny, the Management disastrous hazard event Town of Glen St. Mary

______148

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Restructure roads with Floods Baker County Baker County repetitive flooding through Emergency elevating and/or paving Management and the Road Department

Analyze and review the low All Hazards Baker County, Baker County impact development the City of Emergency ordinances Macclenny, the Management Town of Glen St. Mary Reduce repetitive losses to Floods Baker County, Baker County residences by retrofitting the City of Emergency and/or elevating Macclenny, the Management Town of Glen St. Mary Continue on the Post Hurricanes, Baker County, Baker County Disaster Redevelopment Plan Wildfires, the City of Emergency (Phases, 2, 3 and if needed - Floods, Macclenny, the Management 4). Tornados Town of Glen St. Mary

Potential Funding Sources for the Mitigation Projects

Mitigation projects implemented by the County and municipalities will be dependent on available funding. It is anticipated that the County and municipalities will seek federal, state, and local funds to assist in the implementation of action items involving capital improvements and/or additional personnel. In addition to local and county matching funds, there are hosts of funding sources available to counties of all sizes. Table 5.8 is a current list of possible funding sources that can be used for the mitigation projects.

Table 5.8 – Possible Funding Sources

Capitalization EPA awards capitalization grants to States to establish their Clean Grants for Clean Water State Revolving Funds (SRF). The States, through the SRF, Water State make loans for high priority water quality activities. As loan recipients Revolving Funds make payments back into the fund, money is available for new loans to be issued to other recipients. While traditionally used to build wastewater treatment facilities, loans are used increasingly for other water quality management activities, including: agricultural; silviculture, rural and urban runoff control; estuary improvement projects; wet

______149

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______weather flow control, including stormwater and sewer overflows; alternative wastewater treatment technologies; and nontraditional projects such as landfills and riparian buffers.

Community The Community Assistance Program –State Support Services Element Assistance (CAP-SSSE) program derives its authority from the National Flood Program State Insurance Act of 1968, as amended, the Flood Disaster Protection Act Support Services of 1973 and from 44 CFR Parts 59 and 60. This program provides Element (CAP- funding to states to provide technical assistance to communities in the SSSE) National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and to evaluate community performance in implementing NFIP floodplain management activities. In this way, CAP-SSSE helps to: Ensure that the flood loss reduction goals of the NFIP are met,

• Build state and community floodplain management expertise and capability and • Leverage state knowledge and expertise in working with their communities. Community The Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) provide for long- Development term needs, such as acquisition, rehabilitation, or reconstruction of Block Grant damaged properties and facilities and redevelopment of disaster- (CDBG) affected areas. Funds may also be used for emergency response activities, such as debris clearance and demolition, and extraordinary increases in the level of necessary public services. Eligible projects can include; Voluntary acquisition, or if appropriate, elevation of storm damaged structures; Relocation payments for displaced people and businesses; Rehabilitation or reconstruction of residential and commercial buildings; Assistance to help people buy homes, including down payment assistance and interest rate subsidies; and Improvements to public sewer and water facilities.

Conservation and Florida Forever is Florida’s premier conservation and recreation lands Recreation acquisition program, a blueprint for conserving natural resources and Lands, Florida renewing Florida’s commitment to conserve the state’s natural and Forever cultural heritage.

______150

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______County Incentive This program provides grants to counties, to improve a transportation Grant Program facility which is located on the State Highway System or which relieves traffic congestion on the State Highway System. To be eligible for consideration, projects must be consistent, to the maximum extent feasible, with local metropolitan planning organization plans and local government comprehensive plans.

Emergency The purpose of the EMPG Program is to provide federal grants to Management states to assist state, local, territorial, and tribal governments in Performance preparing for all hazards, as authorized by the Robert T. Stafford Grant (EMPG) Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 5121 et seq.) and Section 662 of the Post Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006, as amended (6 U.S.C. § 762). Title VI of the Stafford Act authorizes FEMA to make grants for the purpose of providing a system of emergency preparedness for the protection of life and property in the United States from hazards and to vest responsibility for emergency preparedness jointly in the federal government and the states and their political subdivisions. The Federal Government, through the EMPG Program, provides necessary direction, coordination, and guidance, and provides necessary assistance, as authorized in this title, to support a comprehensive all hazards emergency preparedness system.

Federal Highway The intent of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Intermodal Administration, and Statewide Programs is the expeditious development and Planning & management of high quality feasibility studies with FHA funds. Within Environment, the context of Title 23 U.S.C. or in 23 CFR guidelines, the meaning of Intermodal and feasibility has the following parts: Statewide 1. The degree to which a given alternative mode, management Programs strategy, design or location is economically justified. 2. The degree to which such an alternative is considered preferable from an environmental or social perspective. 3. The degree to which eventual construction and operation of such an alternative can be financed and managed.

Fire Prevention The Fire Prevention and Safety Grants (FP&S) are part of the and Safety Assistance to Firefighters Grants (AFG), and are administered by Grants (FP& S) the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FP&S Grants support projects that enhance the safety of the public and firefighters

______151

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______from fire and related hazards. The primary goal is to target high-risk populations and reduce injury and prevent death. Eligibility includes fire departments, national, regional, state, and local organizations, Native American tribal organizations, and/or community organizations recognized for their experience and expertise in fire prevention and safety programs and activities. Private non-profit and public organizations are also eligible.

Flood Control Through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - To reduce flood damages Projects through projects not specifically authorized by Congress.

Flood Mitigation The Flood Mitigation Assistance program (FMA) helps States and Assistance communities identify and implement measures to reduce or eliminate Program (FMA) the long-term risk of flood damage to homes and other structures insurable under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Projects may include: (1) elevation, relocation, or demolition of insured structures; acquisition of insured structures and property; (2) dry flood proofing of insured structures; (3) minor, localized structural projects that are not fundable by State or other Federal programs (e.g., erosion-control and drainage improvements), (4) beach nourishment activities such as planting of dune grass. State agencies, participating NFIP communities, or qualified local organizations.

Flood Plain Through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - To promote appropriate Management recognition of flood hazards in land and water use planning and Services development through the provision of flood and flood plain related data, technical services, and guidance.

Florida Florida Communities Trust assists communities in protecting important Communities natural resources, providing recreational opportunities and preserving Trust (FCT) Florida’s traditional working waterfronts through the competitive criteria in the Parks and Open Space Florida Forever Grant Program and the Stan Mayfield Working Waterfronts Florida Forever Grant Program. These local land acquisition grant programs provide funding to local governments and eligible non-profit organizations to acquire land for parks, open space, greenways and projects supporting Florida’s

______152

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______seafood harvesting and aquaculture industries.

Florida Hurricane The FHCF is a State of Florida reinsurance program that can reduce Catastrophe the long-term economic impacts of hurricanes by maintaining the states Fund (FHCF) property insurance capacity through providing reimbursement to participating insurers for a portion of catastrophic hurricane losses Insurers that write residential property insurance on structures and their contents are required to participate and pay a premium based on their maximum hurricane exposure. Companies can select three coverage option levels - 45, 75, or 90% of covered losses above their retention. Premiums paid by participating insurers into the fund may be included in policyholder rates the same as the expense of reinsurance. Companies must demonstrate to the Office of Insurance Regulation that there is no overlap between the FHCF premium included in their rate filing and their Acat load, covering either private reinsurance or catastrophe reserves being set aside on a taxable basis. The FHCF Zip Code is 32024, County Code is 1, Rating is 23 for Baker County.

Grants & Loans To provide financial assistance for the construction of public facilities for Public Works needed to initiate and encourage the creation or retention of permanent & Development jobs in the private sector in designated areas where economic growth is Facilities, lagging. Economic Development Administration Hazard Mitigation This program helps States and communities implement long-term Grant Program hazard mitigation measures following a major disaster declaration. The (HMGP) program‘s objectives are to prevent or reduce the loss of life and property from natural hazards, to implement State or local Mitigation Strategies, to enable mitigation measures to be implemented during immediate recovery from a disaster, and to provide funding for previously identified mitigation measures that benefit the disaster area.

Land and Water The LWCF State Assistance Program was established by the LWCF Conservation Act of 1965 (Section 6, Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of Fund (LWCF) 1965, as amended; Public Law 88-578; 16 U.S.C. 4601-4 et seq.) to Grants stimulate a nationwide action program to assist in preserving, developing, and assuring to all citizens of the United States of present and future generations such quality and quantity of outdoor recreation

______153

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______resources as may be available and are necessary and desirable for individual active participation. The program provides matching grants to States and through States to local units of government, for the acquisition and development of public outdoor recreation sites and facilities. Grant funds are also available, to States only, for fulfilling the statewide comprehensive outdoor recreation planning requirements of the program.

National The National Hurricane Program (NHP) conducts assessments and Hurricane provides tools and technical assistance to State and local agencies in Program (NHP) developing hurricane evacuation plans. The program is a multi-agency partnership, involving the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Association, the National Weather Service, the U.S. Department of Transportation, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and numerous other Federal agencies. NHP receives $5.86 million in annual funding, which consists of $2.91 million for FEMA program activities and $2.95 million for the Emergency Management Performance Grant program, which is directed into general State funds for hurricane preparedness and mitigation activities.

Pollution This grant program provides project grants to states to implement Prevention pollution prevention projects. The grant program is focused on Grants Program institutionalizing multimedia pollution (air, water, land) prevention as an environmental management priority, establishing prevention goals, providing direct technical assistance to businesses, conducting outreach, and collecting and analyzing data.

Pre-Disaster The Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) program provides funds for hazard Mitigation mitigation planning and projects on an annual basis. The PDM program Assistance was put in place to reduce overall risk to people and structures, while at Program (PDM) the same time, also reducing reliance on federal funding if an actual disaster were to occur.

Protection of Through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers -To provide bank protection Essential of highways, highway bridges, essential public works, churches, Highways and hospitals, schools, and other nonprofit public services endangered by Highway Bridges, flood caused erosion. and Public Works

______154

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Public The mission of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Assistance (PA) Public Assistance (PA) Grant Program is to provide assistance to State, Tribal and local governments, and certain types of Private Nonprofit organizations so that communities can quickly respond to and recover from major disasters or emergencies declared by the President. Through the PA Program, FEMA provides supplemental Federal disaster grant assistance for debris removal, emergency protective measures, and the repair, replacement, or restoration of disaster- damaged, publicly owned facilities and the facilities of certain Private Non-Profit (PNP) organizations. The PA Program also encourages protection of these damaged facilities from future events by providing assistance for hazard mitigation measures during the recovery process.

Public Works To provide financial assistance in the construction of public facilities for Impact Projects the purpose of providing immediate useful work to unemployed and Program (PWIP) underemployed persons in the designated project areas.

Repetitive Flood The Repetitive Flood Claims (RFC) grant program provides funding to Claims Program reduce or eliminate the long-term risk of flood damage to structures (RFC) insured under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) that have had one or more claim payments for flood damages. The long-term goal of RFC is to reduce or eliminate claims under the NFIP through mitigation activities that are in the best interest of the National Flood Insurance Fund (NFIF). RFC funds may only mitigate structures that are located within a State or community that cannot meet the cost share or management capacity requirements of the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) program.

Residential The Residential Construction Mitigation Program (RCMP) receives $7 Construction million annually from the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Trust Fund (ch. Mitigation 215.559, Florida Statutes): $2.8 million is designated for the Mobile Program Home Tie-Down Program. Based on legislative directive the Division of Emergency Management provides the funding directly to Tallahassee Community College (TCC). By statute, TCC prepares a separate report for the Governor and the Legislature on these directives $700,000 is designated for Hurricane Research to be conducted by Florida International University (FIU) to continue the development of an innovative research of a full-scale structural testing to determine inherent weakness of structures when subjected to categories 1 to 5

______155

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______hurricane-force winds and rain, leading to new technologies, designs and products. $2,467,389.00 is to be used to improve the wind resistance of residences through loans, subsidies, grants, demonstration projects, direct assistance, and cooperative programs with local and federal governments. The program is developed in coordination with Advisory Council whose members consist of representatives from the Florida Association of Counties, the Florida Department of Insurance, the Federation of Manufactured Home Owners, the Florida Manufactured Housing Association, the Florida Insurance Council, and the Florida Home Builders Association.

Self- The Self-Determination Act (SRS Act) has recently been reauthorized Determination and now includes specific language regarding the Firewise Act – Title III – Communities program. Counties seeking funding under Title III must County Funds use the funds to perform work under the Firewise Communities program. Counties applying for Title III funds to implement ,Firewise activities can assist in all aspects of a community’s recognition process, including conducting or assisting with community assessments, helping the community create an action plan, assisting with an annual Firewise Day, assisting with local wildfire mitigation projects, and communicating with the state liaison and the national program to ensure a smooth application process. Counties that previously used Title III funds for other wildfire preparation activities such as the Fire Safe Councils or similar would be able to carry out many of the same activities as they had before.

Severe Repetitive The Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL) grant program was designed to Loss Program provide funding to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk of flood (SRL) damage to severe repetitive loss (SRL) structures insured under the NFIP.

SRL Properties are residential properties: 1. That have at least four NFIP claim payments over $5,000 each, when at least two such claims have occurred within any ten-year period, and the cumulative amount of such claims payments exceeds $20,000; or 2. For which at least two separate claims payments have been made with the cumulative amount of the building portion of such claims exceeding the value of the property, when two such claims have occurred within any ten-year period.

______156

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Residential projects include: Acquisition and demolition or relocation Elevation and retrofit Mitigation reconstruction Dry flood-proofing of historical structures Minor physical flood control projects The Federal/Non-Federal cost share is 75/25 % with up to 90% Federal cost-share funding for projects approved in states, territories, and federally-recognized Indian tribes with FEMA-approved Standard or Enhanced Mitigation Plans or Indian tribal plans that include a strategy for mitigating existing and future SRL properties. Florida is an Enhanced Plan state and so receives 90% Federal cost-share.

Small County The purpose of this program is to assist small county governments in Road Assistance resurfacing and reconstructing county roads. In determining a county’s Program eligibility for assistance under this program, the department may (SCRAP) consider whether the county has attempted to keep county roads in satisfactory condition, including the amount of local option fuel tax imposed by the county. The department may also consider the extent to which the county has offered to provide a match of local funds with state funds provided under the program.

Small County The purpose of this program is to assist small county governments in Outreach repairing or rehabilitating county bridges, paving unpaved roads, Program (SCOP) addressing road-related drainage improvements, resurfacing or reconstructing county roads, constructing capacity or safety improvements to county roads. Small counties shall be eligible to compete for funds that have been designated for the Small County Outreach Program for projects on county roads. The Department shall fund 75% of the cost of projects on county roads funded under the program. Any initial bid costs or project overruns after the letting that exceed the Department‘s participation as stated, will be at the county‘s expense. This will help ensure that the funds are utilized on as many projects as possible. The county must have a population of 150,000 or less as determined by the most recent official estimate pursuant to Section 186.901, Florida Statutes. The county has attempted to keep county roads in satisfactory condition, which may be evidenced through an established pavement management plan. The county must provide

______157

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______25% of the project costs and may be in the form of matching local funds (i.e., in-kind services). Such matching funds will be deducted from the project costs as part of the county‘s contribution.

Special The Economic Adjustment Program Grants assist State and local areas Economic in the development and/or implementation of strategies designed to Development and address structural economic adjustment problems resulting from Adjustment sudden and severe economic dislocation such as plant closings, Assistance military base closures and defense contract cutbacks, and natural Program-Sudden disasters (SSED), or from long-term economic deterioration in the and Severe area‘s economy (LTED). Grants may be made to develop an Economic Economic Adjustment Strategy Grant, or to implement such strategies. Dislocation Implementation grants may be made for the construction of public (SSED) and Long facilities, business development and financing (including revolving loan Term Economic funds), technical assistance, training or any other activity that Deterioration addresses the economic adjustment problem. (LTED) State Homeland SHSP supports the implementation of state Homeland Security Security Program Strategies to address the identified planning, organization, equipment, (SHSP) training, and exercise needs to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from acts of terrorism and other catastrophic events. SHSP also provides funding to implement initiatives in the State Preparedness Report. The State Administrative Agency (SAA) is the only entity eligible to apply to FEMA for SHSP funds. The allocation methodology for FY 2012 SHSP is based on three factors: minimum amounts as legislatively mandated, DHS’ risk methodology, and anticipated effectiveness based on the strength of the Investment Justification (IJ). Each State and territory will receive a minimum allocation under SHSP using the thresholds established in the 9/11 Act. All 50 States, the District of Baker, and Puerto Rico will receive 0.35 percent of the total funds allocated for grants under Section 2003 and Section 2004 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, as amended by the 9/11 Act, for SHSP.

Transportation Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds may be used by State and Equity Act for the local governments for any roads (including the National Highway 21st Century, System) that are not functionally classified as local or rural minor Surface collectors. Each State sets aside 10% of STP funds for transportation Transportation enhancements, which can include water-related projects, such as

______158

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Program (STP) wetland mitigation and implementation of control technologies to prevent polluted highway runoff from reaching surface water bodies. Other transportation enhancements include landscaping and other scenic beautification, pedestrian and bicycle trails, archaeological planning and research, preservation of abandoned railway corridors, historic preservation, sidewalk modifications to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act, natural habitat or wetland mitigation efforts, Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) capital improvements and environmental and pollution abatement projects.

Water and Waste This program provides water and waste disposal facilities and services Disposal Loans to low income rural communities whose residents face significant health and Grants risks. Funds may be used for 100% construction costs to construct, enlarge, extend, or otherwise improve a community water or sewer system; extend service lines and connect individual residences to a system. The program allows applicants to make grants directly to individuals to extend service lines, connect resident‘s plumbing to system, pay reasonable charges and fees for connecting to system, installation of plumbing and related fixtures, and construction in dwelling of a bathroom.

Water Pollution Section 106 of the Clean Water Act authorizes EPA to provide federal Control assistance to states and interstate agencies to establish and implement ongoing water pollution control programs. Prevention and control measures supported by pollution control programs include permitting, development of water quality standards and total maximum daily loads, surveillance, ambient water quality monitoring, and enforcement; advice and assistance to local agencies; and the provision of training and public information. Increasingly, EPA and states are working together to develop basin-wide approaches to water quality management. The Water Pollution Control Program is helping to foster a watershed protection approach at the state level by looking at states' water quality problems holistically, and targeting the use of limited finances available for effective program management.

Watershed The Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations (WFPO) Program Protection and (Watershed Operations) includes the Flood Prevention Operations Flood Prevention Program authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1944 (P.L. 78-534) and

______159

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______(WFPO) the provisions of the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act of 1954 (P.L. 83-566). The Flood Control Act originally authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to install watershed improvement measures in 11 watersheds, also known as pilot watersheds, to reduce flood, sedimentation, and erosion damage; improve the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water; and advance the conservation and proper utilization of land. The Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act provides for cooperation between the Federal government and the States and their political subdivisions in a program to prevent erosion, floodwater, and sediment damage; to further the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water; and to further the conservation and proper utilization of land in authorized watersheds. The Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations (WFPO) Program provides technical and financial assistance to States, local governments and Tribes (project sponsors) to plan and implement authorized watershed project plans.

Wildland Urban This program is designed to implement the National Fire Plan and Interface assist communities at risk from catastrophic wildland fires. The program Community and provides grants, technical assistance, and training for community Rural Fire programs that develop local capability, including: assessment and Assistance, planning, mitigation activities, and community and homeowner Program 15.228 education and action; Hazardous fuels reduction activities, including the training, monitoring or maintenance associated with such hazardous fuels reduction activities, on federal land, or on adjacent nonfederal land for activities that mitigate the threat of catastrophic fire to communities and natural resources in high risk areas. Enhancement of knowledge and fire protection capability of rural fire districts through assistance in education and training, protective clothing and equipment purchase, and mitigation methods on a cost share basis.

Administration of Actions

It is anticipated that the County, municipalities within the County, and private not-for-profit corporations with actions included in the LMS, will apply for and administer grants for actions within their respective jurisdictions. The following lists of agencies are responsible for carrying out the identified mitigation projects contained in the LMS as well as the functions they provide.

______160

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Baker County Department of Emergency Management The Baker County Department of Emergency Management is the lead agency responsible to develop and maintain the LMS. This includes annual and 5-year updates and continual maintenance of the LMS mitigation project list. The department is also responsible in assisting the communities prepare for, respond to, recover from and mitigate against natural, technological and man-made hazards.

County Building, Planning & Zoning Departments Identify, develop and recommend changes to the building and zoning codes that will eliminate or lessen the impact of disasters. Assure enforcement of all existing building and land development regulations.

County and City Fire Departments Identify and recommend mitigation goals that will reduce and/or lessen the impact of wildfires within their jurisdiction. Provide education and training that will assist in accomplishing the mitigation goals and objectives.

County School Board Responsible for construction and maintenance of public schools used as emergency shelters. The School Board will be responsible for implementation of mitigation actions proposed for public school buildings.

County Road Department Provide technical assistance and advice on identifying and accomplishing mitigation actions to improve the design, construction and placement of roads, bridges, culverts, etc., that will eliminate or lessen the impact of disasters.

Florida Forest Service Provide technical assistance and advice on all aspects of wildfire issues including identification and accomplishment of mitigation actions designed to reduce the loss of life and real property.

Florida Department of Transportation Provide technical assistance and advice on identifying and accomplishing mitigation actions to improve the design, construction and placement of roads, bridges, culverts, etc., that will eliminate or lessen the impact of disasters.

Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) Provide technical assistance and funding when available; in all aspects of emergency management in order to better able the county to prepare for, respond to, recover from, and mitigate against natural, technological and man-made hazards.

St Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and the Suwannee River Water Management

______161

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______District (SRWMD) Provide technical assistance and advice on identifying and accomplishing mitigation actions to help reduce or eliminate the impact of flooding in the County.

Utility Company Review and offers recommendations in regard to City subdivision plans and requirements.

______162

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Section 6 Plan Evaluation and Maintenance

Requirements:

§201.6(c)(4)(i): The plan maintenance process shall include a section describing the method and schedule of monitoring, evaluating, and updating the mitigation plan within a five-year cycle.

§201.6(c)(4)(ii): The plan shall include a process by which local governments incorporate the requirements of the mitigation plan into other planning mechanisms such as comprehensive or capital improvement plans, when appropriate.

§201.6(c)(4)(iii): The plan maintenance process shall include a discussion on how the community will continue public participation in the plan maintenance process.

§201.6(d)(3): Was the plan revised to reflect changes in development?

Changes In Development

The Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) is an active document that must continually reflect the changing needs of the communities as the county experiences growth and changes in relation to hazard vulnerability. Changes in land use and development can affect a variety of infrastructure issues such as potable water, sewer, roads, storm water runoff patterns and ecological considerations such as water quality. For Baker County, natural hazards like flood and wildfire events continue to alter the hazard prone areas.

There have been some significant changes in development in Baker County since the last LMS plan was approved. Two of the three bridges that needed replacement are “new bridges ” due to Tropical Storm Debby. See details below.

Three new bridges have been added to the County and the vulnerability for the county has been greatly reduced to flooding events, and progress has been made due to these mitigation projects that have been completed:

______163

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Ø Bridge #274158, located on CR 127 – this bridge repair was due to Tropical Storm Debby and flooding that occurred. Ø Bridge #274154 located on CR 229 - this bridge repair was due to Tropical Storm Debby and flooding that occurred. Ø Bridge #274156 located on CR 125 – this bridge was scheduled for maintenance and repair in early 2012.

See figures V, W, and X below: Figure V - Bridge #274158 located on CR 127

Bridge No. 274158 In pec;tion Datu: 06/30/2014

NorthApp(Oaeh

______164

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Figure W - Bridge #274154

Figure X - Bridge # 274156

______165

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______All three new bridges will decrease the vulnerability for the unincorporated area of Baker County where most of the residents reside. The county LMS Plan was revised and updated to reflect changes in local mitigation efforts and priorities.

In addition, the vulnerability for the county has been reduced and progress has been made due to the mitigation projects that have been completed over the past several especially the completion of the county’s CWPP for the wildfire hazard, and the improvement of the Interoperability Communications Systems countywide with the Fire, EMS, and the City of Macclenny.

Table 6.1 are the mitigation initiatives or projects that have been completed over the last several years. Detailed specifics on the agency responsible for implementation, the estimated total cost for the project, the funding source, and timeframe for project completion are located in Attachment I, the Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Project Master List.

Table 6.1 – Mitigation Projects Completed (2010 – 2015)

Jurisdiction Mitigation Project or Hazard Scope of Work Initiative Mitigated Baker Establish an ARC 4496 All Hazards In 2009, the Family Service Center . County, the compliant pet friendly was identified and completed as a pet City of shelter facility for the shelter facility for the county. Macclenny, county. the Town of Glen St. Mary Baker Work with the Florida Wildfires Baker County completed and adopted County, the Forest Service to the CWPP plan with the Florida Forest City of develop and implement Service in September 2012. Macclenny, the countywide the Town of Community Wildfire The work on the defensible space for Glen St. Mary Protection Plans wildfires, application of ignition- (CWPP). resistant construction and hazardous fuels reduction within the plan will be considered an ongoing project for the county. Therefore, it is a considered a completed and ongoing project for the County. Baker Retrofit the Baker County All Hazards In 2009, Baker County retrofitted 6 County, the School Facilities to be an schools, the elementary, high school, City of ARC 4496 compliant and middle schools to become Macclenny, shelter. compliant as a emergency shelter for the Town of the Baker County community citizens.

______166

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Glen St. Mary The shelter can hold 10% of the citizens in the event of an emergency.

Baker Develop a Post Disaster All Hazards: In the summer of 2013, development County, the Redevelopment Plan Hurricanes, of the county PDRP was initiated to City of (PDRP) Tropical address the redevelopment efforts Macclenny, Storms/High after a destructive and severe hazard the Town of Winds, Wildfires, event. The 1st phase of the plan Glen St. Mary Floods, Tornadoes addressed adding a section the COMP which will outline what steps the county will need to take. A temporary housing site for long-term issues was identified for the displaced citizens.

In addition to proceeding through mitigation efforts after a significant storm event were discussed and evaluated for the entire county.

Phases 2, 3 and possibly 4 will need to take place. Baker Improve the All Hazards This project was completed in 2014. County, the Interoperability City of Communications Macclenny, Systems countywide with the Town of the Fire, EMS, and City Glen St. Mary of Macclenny. City of Purchase three repetitive Floods The timeframe is not exactly known, Macclenny loss homes in the City of however, over 10+ years ago, the City Macclenny of Macclenny purchased three homes that were repetitive loss properties. The City had a contract with the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) for reimbursement on the purchase, however, the City never received the reimbursement. The homes were then sold and moved to other neighboring counties by a selected company bid process several years ago.

______167

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Baker Establish the code red All Hazards This project was completed in 2014. County, the weather alert system City of Macclenny, the Town of Glen St. Mary

Plan Maintenance and Evaluation

The information contained in the LMS Plan must be evaluated and updated over time as changes within the community of Baker County affect the vulnerability and potential risks faced. This update process will require the continued participation of the public, as well as personnel within Baker County and its municipalities. As the various strategies and mitigation initiatives or projects will change within the county, Comprehensive Plans will need to be updated, and important mitigation projects will need to be completed. Changes will need to be reflected in the LMS, and new projects will also be added to the list as the life of the document develops through the years.

The Baker County Department of Emergency Management Director in conjunction with the Baker County LMS Committee/Working Group coordinates the following process for monitoring, evaluating, and revising the LMS Plan over the next five years.

Every year the LMS Committee/Working Group will meet at least once an annual basis and if necessary on a biannual timeframe to discuss the LMS plan’s effectiveness on the following topics:

• Changes to the hazard risk or vulnerability; • Discuss each mitigation project and update the status: ü if any mitigation project has been completed - provide as much detail as possible on the project, the hazard mitigated, the cost, and timeframe to complete the project, ü if any project needs to be removed or deleted, or ü if there are new mitigation projects or initiatives to added to the master list. • Review the mitigation goals and objectives to confirm that they are meeting the county’s needs; • Discuss any revision to applicable maps; • Evaluate the repetitive loss properties; and • Changes to the critical facilities list.

As a result of these efforts, any significant changes as well as information required in accordance with Florida Statute Chapter 27P-22 will be submitted to the Florida Division of Emergency Management, Mitigation Planning Section within the timeframe outlined in the statute, which is in January.

______168

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

If in the event a disaster should occur, or other type of emergency in the County, the Committee/Working Group may chose to meet early in the recovery and then redevelopment phase, soon after damage assessments are conducted. At this point, the current strategy will be reviewed and necessary changes made based on lessons learned from the response and recovery phase of the disaster. Also, new mitigation projects might be identified as a result of the disaster event and will be considered and added to the mitigation project list if deemed viable.

The Committee/Workgroup will begin the 5-year update process as close to the 18-months prior to the expiration of the LMS Plan. The update process, which includes an evaluation of the active plan, as well as public participation and to allow for proper review, should begin at least one year before the expiration of the plan. The plan update will be based on an evaluation and analysis of the risk and vulnerability assessment. The intent is to incorporate any changes in the estimate of replacement costs, new scientific data on hazards, the effects hazards have on the communities, changes in growth patterns, and if there are any reductions in vulnerability due to completion of mitigation projects.

Once the risk assessment is updated, the Committee/Working Group will utilize this information and evaluate the goals, objectives, and actions contained in the LMS to determine if they are still applicable. The most recent review and discussion on the LMS Goals and Objectives was at the October 13, 2014 meeting and selected details were updated and the remaining goals were determined that they meet the needs for the County.

Also, the Working Group will evaluate whether or not the communities have the resources available to implement current and new programs and projects. The updated LMS will also capture the planning process followed during the update of the Plan.

During the 5-year LMS evaluation and revision process, one or more public meetings will be conducted and include elected and appointed County officials, each participating municipality, and the general public, for consideration of the proposed changes. The updated LMS plan will become available online at examiner.com to give the public an opportunity to review the document prior to the final plan approval.

Upon final coordination between these groups and formal approval from FDEM, the updated Local Mitigation Strategy will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners and the governing bodies of the municipalities for their approval and adoption.

Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms

The incorporation of the LMS into other planning documents and mechanisms can help fill-in missing mitigation gaps in existing documents. The LMS can also contribute to existing mitigation strategies and by combining the LMS with other planning mechanisms, the stance of mitigation project implementation and

______169

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______awareness will be strengthened within the county and its jurisdictions. Some of the mechanisms that the LMS could be incorporated into include local and regional plans (e.g. jurisdictional Comprehensive Plans, Strategic Regional Policy Plan, Baker County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, etc.), local codes and regulations (e.g. Baker County Land Development Code, Baker County Fire Code, etc.), and programs (e.g. Firewise, Historic Preservation documents, etc.).

Over the previous 10 years, information from the LMS document was successfully incorporated into the Baker County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP). Much of the data needs were similar and so some of the information cross-checked in both documents included comparing information on hazard vulnerability assessments, vulnerable locations of hazard incidents, previous occurrences of hazard events, and overall risk assessments in the County. The most useful LMS information was transferred into the CEMP sections dealing with hazard vulnerabilities. The CEMP text referenced the Baker County LMS document for additional information on these sections.

The LMS exists mainly as a planning document that identifies potential hazards and utilizes a working group of individuals to help determine what actions can be taken, or what projects should be funded, to help strengthen the County after a disaster occurs. The 2009-2010 LMS Plan was very useful in developing the 1st Phase of the Baker County Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan (PDRP), which begins to address the post-disaster redevelopment issues and ensure long-term sustainability and guide the county through pre-disaster planning and post-disaster implementation. The information of the LMS helps to supplement the PDRP by providing the vulnerability, probability, and risk assessments. Other documents may not fully explicate the vulnerability to or the potential mitigation projects considered by the LMS Committee/Workgroup to lessen or eliminate the effects of various natural hazards.

When feasible, the local governments should incorporate the requirements of the Local Mitigation Strategy into their comprehensive plans and land development regulations. The process for amending local government comprehensive plans is specified by Florida law, Section 163.3 191, Florida Statutes, which requires local governments to prepare Evaluation and Appraisal Reports of their comprehensive plan at least once every seven years. The purpose of the process is to consider changes to comprehensive plans that reflect new information, comprehensive plan successes and failures, changing conditions and trends, as well as changes in state policy on planning and growth management which may have occurred during the prior seven years. Local governments will consider new information and policy guidance provided in the LMS in their next evaluation and appraisal report for amendments to their comprehensive plans. Amendments to local government comprehensive plans to implement recommendations contained in the reports are anticipated to be adopted by the local governments within one year of approval of their Evaluation and Appraisal Reports. Amendments to implementing regulations and ordinances necessary to implement the comprehensive plan amendments are anticipated to occur within one year after approval of the comprehensive plan amendments.

Section 163.3 177, Florida Statutes, requires local government comprehensive plans to include a capital

______170

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______improvements element and a 5-year schedule of capital improvements. Furthermore, Section 163.3 177 (3)(b), Florida Statutes, requires the capital improvements element to be reviewed and modified as necessary on an annual basis. In addition, that statue mandates that the identified improvements be consistent with the plan and that all public facilities shall be consistent with the capital improvements element. Therefore, all identified capital improvement projects contained in the LMS, which are anticipated to be implemented within the next five years should be considered for incorporation into capital improvements element on an annual basis.

The LMS is intended to provide the local communities an opportunity to implement across planning boundaries. There are a variety of ways that the LMS has incorporated elements of other planning mechanisms and programs in addition to related mechanisms and program that have integrated components of the LMS.

A. Baker County Comprehensive Plan 2020

Future Land Use Element

Policy A.1.1.1 Comply with FEMA Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance The County shall use the latest version of the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance promulgated by FEMA to determine the location of the 100-year floodplain and flood prone areas in the County. The County shall require development in the FEMA 100-year flood hazard zone to be constructed so that the lowest floor elevation is at least one foot above the base flood elevation as established by the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Dredging and filling of lands within floodplains shall not be permitted to adversely impact the natural functions of the 100-year floodplain. All proposed development shall be located on the non- floodplain portions of the site, or, for proposed development areas that lie entirely within the 100-year floodplain, all structures shall be required to be elevated. The following criteria apply to development in the 100-year flood plain: a. No reportable quantity of hazardous materials or waste shall be stored within the 100-year floodplain; b. Clearing of native vegetation shall be minimized in the 100-year floodplain by establishing the following open space ratios for the land uses identified below: Residential land use 60% open space Commercial land use 50% open space Industrial land use 45% open space c. Use of septic tanks in the 100-year floodplain shall be restricted as specified by the County Department of Health and all such sewage disposal systems shall be required to connect to central sewage systems when system collection lines are within 250 feet of subject property; and d. Any development within the 100-year flood plain shall maintain the natural topography and hydrology of the development site.

______171

IBakerBaker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Policy A.1.3.3 Protect the 100-Year Flood Plain The County shall ensure that land use categories are regulated in accordance with the Future Land Use Map and are enforced for the regulation of subdivisions and the use of land in the 100-year flood plain through implementation of the adopted Land Development Regulations. Land use in the 100-year flood plain shall be limited to low density residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) and nonresidential construction controlled by the specifications identified in Policy A.1.1.1, with the height of floor level and the use of septic tanks limited to that permitted by FEMA and County Health Department Regulations.

Policy A.1.4.16 St. Marys River Floodplain Protection The County shall, through available state and federal programs, promote the protection of floodplains along the St. Marys River to help protect and conserve natural outdoor recreational amenities, scenic vistas, wildlife habitat, and water quality.

Policy A.3.1.2 Educate to Mitigate Risk of Wildfire Damage The County shall educate the public, especially those at high risk for wildfires and raise awareness of protective steps that can be taken to mitigate wildfire damage. These steps are identified on the National Firewise Program website www.firewise.org.

Policy A.3.1.3 Use Best Practices to Avoid Wildfire Hazard The County shall consider all land uses in areas at risk from wildfire and restrict or prohibit land uses as necessary to insure the public health, safety, welfare, and the protection of property. Land uses and specific development plans for which adequate wildfire mitigation cannot be provided, or that would preclude or severely limit the use of wildfire mitigation or natural resource management options such as prescribed burns, shall not be authorized in severe wildfire hazard areas.

Policy A.3.1.4 Wildfire Hazard Mitigation Plan Requirements Any subdivision or non-residential development within high to extreme wildfire hazard areas shall complete a “Wildfire Hazard Mitigation Plan” specific to that development, and subject to review and approval by the County Fire Marshall as part of plan approval process. The wildfire mitigation plan shall address at a minimum:

• Access • Vegetation • Building construction • Utilities • Fire protection • Any additional factors, including vacant lots within the development, that present a barrier to wildfire access such as canals or ditches • Home Owner’s Association organization and ongoing education

______172

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

All of these factors can be evaluated based on NFPA 1144 Standard for Reducing Structure Ignition Hazards from Wildland Fire, 2008 Edition and NFPA 1141 Standard for Fire Protection Infrastructure for Land Development in Suburban and Rural Areas, 2008 Edition.

Policy A.3.1.5 Adopt Mitigation Standards Based on the Southern Fire Risk Assessment Model By June 30, 2011, the County shall adopt LDRs to set forth standards for development within high risk wildfire areas as identified by the Southern Fire Risk Assessment Model.

Policy A.3.1.6 Improve the Local Mitigation Strategy for Wildfire Hazard The County shall incorporate wildfire prevention, education, and mitigation strategies into the County Local Mitigation Strategy.

Housing Element

Policy C.1.1.4 Housing Criteria for Development to Receive Incentives The County shall ensure that, when private sector interests request special exemptions, favorable tax treatment, public participation in funding, or other considerations, the private sector shall set aside necessary resources to advance affordable housing sites and units for at least twenty (20%) percent of the projected units. (was Pol. C.1.3.5)

Conservation Element

Policy E.1.3.5 Enforce State Wetlands Mitigation Practices The County shall coordinate efforts with the Department of Environmental Protection and the Water Management Districts to enforce requirements of wetlands mitigation practices where State agencies allow alteration of viable jurisdictional wetlands.

Objective E.1.4 Regulate Development within the 100-year Flood Plain The County shall regulate development within the 100-year floodplain to protect its flood carrying and flood storage capacity, water purification, and habitat functions, and the health, safety, and welfare of the public through implementing the following policies.

Policy E.1.4.1 Implement the Stormwater Master Plan The County shall follow the Stormwater Master Plan to be adopted by 2012, which complies and is in agreement with Policy D.1.6.1 of the Public Facilities Element.

Policy E.1.4.2 Stormwater shall be regulated in accordance with Policy D.1.2.3 of the Public Facilities Element.

______173

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Policy E.1.4.3 Effluent from wastewater treatment facilities shall be discharged into receiving water bodies, which have adequate flow and water quality to handle effluent.

Policy E.1.4.4 Waterfront development shall be designed to ensure that stormwater runoff and erosion do not affect ambient water quality of adjacent waters.

Policy E.1.4.5 The direct or indirect discharge of pollutants to Outstanding Florida Waters in the County shall be regulated consistent with Ch. 403, Florida Statutes.

Policy E.1.4.6 Development Criteria by FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps The County shall require development in the FEMA 100-year flood hazard zone to be constructed so that the lowest floor elevation is at least one foot above the base flood elevation as established by the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps.

Dredging and filling of lands within floodplains shall not be permitted to adversely impact upon the natural functions of the 100-year floodplain. All proposed development shall be located on the non-floodplain portions of the site, or for proposed development areas that lie entirely within the 100-year floodplain, all structures shall be required to be elevated on pilings.

In addition, the following criteria apply to development in the 100-year floodplain:

a) No hazardous materials or waste shall be stored within the 100-year floodplain. b) Clearing of native vegetation shall be minimized in the 100-year floodplain by establishing the following open space ratios for the land uses identified below; Residential land uses 60% open space Commercial land use 50% open space Industrial land use 45% open space c) Use of septic tanks in flood prone areas is restricted as specified by the County Department of Health and all such sewage disposal systems shall be required to connect to central systems when system collection lines are within 200 feet of subject property; and d) Any development within a flood prone area shall maintain the natural topography and hydrology of the development site.

______174

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______B. Baker County Capital Improvements Element (Baker County Comprehensive Plan 2020)

• Serves as a means to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of Baker County’s Comprehensive Planning Program

• Goal H.1 Manage Capital Budget to Maintain Public Facilities’ Levels of Service. Maintain a financially feasible plan to enable the County to provide public facilities, recreational facilities, and paved roads for its residents concurrent with new development that meets or exceeds adopted Levels of Service (LOS). Capital projects needed to ensure support for facility and development concurrency will be evaluated annually and when financially feasible become part of the five (5) year schedule of capital expenditures in the Capital Improvement Program.

• Policy H.1.1.1 Criteria to Identify Needed Facilities Review all current deficiencies reported in the Comprehensive Plan and identify facility needs according to the criteria below:

1. Facilities to protect or to eliminate a hazard to the public health, welfare, or safety. 2. Facilities that must be upgraded to eliminate existing capacity deficits. 3. Facilities required to serve development areas that have vested development approval prior to the adoption of the plan. 4. Facilities required to serve redevelopment areas identified in the comprehensive plan. 5. Facilities needed to provide service to new development in accord with the land use element of the plan. 6. Facilities that will serve the identified needs in future plans of the St. Johns River Water Management District and other state agencies that may provide public facilities within the County.

• The Capital Improvements Element strives to remain consistent with other elements in the Comprehensive Plan, particularly the Future Land Use Element.

C. Baker County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 24 -Land Development Regulations

ARTICLE VI. - RESOURCE PROTECTION STANDARDS

Sec. 24-332. – Floodplains (a) Purpose and objectives. (1) The provisions of this section are intended to promote the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by:

______175

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______a. Restricting or prohibiting uses that are dangerous to health, safety, and property due to water or erosion hazards, or result in damaging increases in erosion or in flood heights or velocities; b. Requiring that uses vulnerable to floods including facilities that serve such uses be protected against flood damage throughout their intended life span; c. Controlling the alteration of natural floodplains, stream channels, and natural protective barriers involved in the accommodation of floodwaters; d. Controlling filling, grading, dredging and other development that may increase erosion or flood damage; and e. Preventing or regulating the construction of flood barriers that will unnaturally divert floodwaters or increase flood hazards to other lands. (2)The objectives of this section are to: a. Protect human life and health, and to eliminate or minimize property damage; b. Minimize expenditures of public money for costly flood control projects; c. Minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding and generally undertaken at the expense of the general public; d. Minimize prolonged business interruptions; e. Minimize damage to public facilities and utilities such as water and gas mains, electric telephone and sewer lines, roadways, bridges, and culverts located in floodplains; f. Maintain a stable tax base by providing sound use and development of floodprone areas to minimize flood blighted areas; and g. Ensure that potential homebuyers are notified that when property is in a flood hazard area.

Chapter 24 – Land Development Regulations ARTICLE VII. - DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS

Sec. 24-357. - Stormwater management (a)Intent and objectives. This section shall govern the design and construction or alteration of all drainage systems, natural or manmade, within the unincorporated areas of the county. The following objectives are intended to protect, maintain, and enhance the immediate and the long term health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the county while allowing landowners reasonable use of their property. Stormwater management objectives include: (1) Preventing loss of life and property due to flooding; (2) Reducing the capital expenditures associated with flood control and the installation and maintenance of storm drainage systems; (3)Minimizing the adverse impact of land development and related construction activities on

______176

!BakerBaker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______property, environmentally sensitive areas, water and other natural resources. (b) Development permits and stormwater management. (2) Mitigating impacts. All stormwater management undertakings shall respect the rights of other landowners with regard to the quality, rate, and volume of stormwater runoff leaving a site. Further, mitigation shall be in accordance with requirements set forth by the county and other jurisdictional agencies, whichever is more stringent. The developer or contractor shall address the predicted impacts of the proposed activity on other lands through the use of a properly designed, constructed and maintained stormwater management system (SWMS). In mitigating impacts, the developer shall address: a. Impacts to adjacent and downstream collection, storage, and conveyance systems due to increased rate and volume of stormwater runoff leaving the site; b. Impacts to adjacent and upstream drainage systems that may be hydrologically or hydraulically connected to the site; c. Impacts to adjacent and downstream property due to sediment and pollutant loading that may be carried by stormwater runoff during and after construction of the site; d. Impacts to special flood hazard areas (SFHAs) due to earthwork activities associated with the site which may result in reduced floodplain storage or conveyance capacity; e. Impacts to floodprone areas (FPAs) that are "volume sensitive" as a result of being located in either a closed basin (i.e., without a positive outfall) or a basin with limited outfall capacity. (f) Special flood hazard areas (SFHAs). (1) Compliance with FEMA, state, and local regulations. a. Sites located on property with designated special flood hazard areas (SFHAs) must be evaluated to ensure that all work within the SFHAs complies with effective FEMA regulations. b. In accordance with section 60.3 of 44 CFR, chapter 1, construction occurring in special flood hazard areas, as identified by the flood insurance rate maps (FIRMs) and/or the flood hazard boundary maps (FHBMs) shall meet the requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and shall require approval from FEMA. c. Sites in and adjacent to Zone A SFHAs shall submit proposals to FEMA to established 100-year base flood elevations (BFEs). d. Approvals from federal, state, and local jurisdictional agencies shall be provided to the county before construction may commence. (2) Protection of floodplain functions.

______177

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______a. No development shall reduce the conveyance capacity of a floodplain such that upstream or downstream water surface profile elevations are altered in excess of that allowed by FEMA, the county, or any other jurisdictional agency, whichever is more stringent. b. Filling of SFHAs and known floodprone areas (FPAs) shall be prohibited unless the responsible party can mitigate for the loss of storage volume within the effected SFHA or FPA (collectively hereinafter referred to as “floodplain”). Mitigation may be accomplished by providing compensating storage or by improving the downstream conveyance capacity within the floodplain. 2.Downstream conveyance improvement. When compensating storage cannot completely mitigate the loss of floodplain storage due to proposed fill, the responsible party may propose downstream conveyance improvements. This method of mitigation shall be considered on a case-by-case basis and shall be contingent upon the responsible party successfully designing and permitting the conveyance improvement with other jurisdictional agencies. (3) Floodways. Any work proposed within a floodway shall be contingent upon approval by FEMA. Where regulatory floodways are not established, the county may require the developer to establish one approved by FEMA. For sites adjacent to a designated floodway, the applicable BFE shall correspond to the BFE listed in the FIS's floodway data table, "with floodway" column. In such cases, the lowest finished floor elevation shall be set at least 1.0 foot above the "with floodway" BFE. (4) Finished floor elevation requirements. a. When a site is located within a SFHA where BFEs have been established (i.e., AE and VE Zones), the lowest finished floor elevation of residential and nonresidential buildings shall be elevated at least 1.0 foot above the 100-year BFE. 1.In AE Zones, the lowest finished floor elevation is measured from the top of the floor. 2.In VE Zones, the lowest finished floor elevation requirement is measured from the bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member. b. When a site is located within a SFHA where the depth of flooding is specified (i.e., AO and AH Zones), building finished floor elevations shall be elevated above the highest natural grade at least the depth of flooding indicated on the FIRM plus 1.0 foot. c. When a site is located within a SFHA where BFEs have not been established (i.e., A Zones), the lowest finished floor elevation, including the basement shall be elevated at least three feet above the highest adjacent natural grade prior to the placement of fill.

______178

!BakerBaker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______d. The developer may complete a detailed drainage study for FEMA review and approval to establish a BFE for the site. In which case, the lowest finished floor elevations shall meet requirements applicable to the modified SFHA Zone.

D . Baker County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 8 - BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION

ARTICLE II. - FLORIDA BUILDING CODE[ Sec. 8-22. - Wind speed lines The Florida Building Code adopted by reference herein, is hereby amended in chapter 16 as follows: 1606.1.6 Basic wind speed. The basic wind speed in miles per hour, for the development of wind loads, shall be determined from Figure 1606. Basic wind speed for the special wind regions indicated, near mountainous terrain and near gorges shall be in accordance with local jurisdiction requirements. The exact location of wind speed lines shall be established by local ordinance using recognized physical land marks such as major roads, canals, rivers, and lake shores, wherever possible.

Pursuant to Figure 1606, the 100 mph wind speed line divides the county in to one of two wind load areas: 90 or 100 mph. The 100 mph "wind speed line" is hereby designated as that line lying between (1) a southerly point located where the Baker, Bradford and Union County lines intersect one another, or more particularly defined by geographical coordinates as determined by global positioning system (GPS) as 30°14'23.59" north and 82°11'34.68" west, and (2) a northerly point located where the St. Marys River and Cedar Creek intersect one another, or more particularly defines by GPS as 30°36'03.34" north and 82°17'21.51" west.

For the purposes of complying with the structural requirements related to wind loads, all buildings and structures east of this line shall be designed for a minimum load of 100 mph and all buildings and structures west of this line shall be designed for a minimum load of 90 mph. In the event a question or controversy shall arise as to whether a building or structure lies east or west of the wind speed line as described herein, the county building official shall make the final determination by utilizing GPS.

With regard to compliance with criteria relating to protection from wind borne debris, the county is deemed to be located landward of the 120 mph wind contour line in Figure 1606 and therefore, buildings within the county are not required to have openings protected from wind borne debris except for critical facilities which voluntarily provide protection of openings from wind borne debris.

E. City of Macclenny 2025 Comprehensive Plan

______179

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Section A. Future Land Use Element

A.1 Availability of Facilities and Services to Serve Existing Land Uses, Stormwater Management

Stoonwaler Management

Stonn wa er drainage, or MKJII, is the water flowing over land as a result of a slcnn event. The faali6es involved in collection and disposal of stmmwalet MKlff are the drainage system of the area. The City's drailage system is a canbi,alion of natural feabJres as well as manmade featwes.

The natural drainage system is comprised of foLr main basins: North Branch, Turkey Creek, Waningham Brandi, and lhe South Prong of the St. Mary's River. DLl'ing lhe past ten years, the City of has made substantial inprovernents to its drainage system. Currenlly, only minor pon

The majority of lhe City is localed outside of the 100-year fl~lain. There are no obvious signs of damage to lhe natural drailage feat...es and overall, the City has not had any major flooding problems. It appears as though natural oonditions have restricted development only to a imited degree. In lhe paMandle, the least developed area, Turl

The ~i,s are generaly lound at elevations of 115 feet or less as estabished by the USGS. The 100-year ft~lain is fOIA'ld primarily in the northwest comer of the city ti mits along the North Prong and in the soiahem portiai of the City along fal

Those areas that are located in the floodplain are required to adhere to the City's ft~lain ormance (Ordinance No. 87--01). The ordinance, as part of the City's participation in the FEMA program, regulates development within the designated floodplain areas. The floodplain ordinance designares the Hood hazard areas in the City and is designed to:

a. Restrict or prohibit uses which are dangerous to health, safety and property due to water or erosion hazards, or whid, resuft in damaging increases in erosion or in flood heights or velocities;

b. Require that uses vimerable to floods, irduding fadities ..,t,ich serve such uses, be protected against Hood damage at the tme of irrial oonslNcfun; c. Caitrol the altera6m of nalllral floodplains, l:tream channels, and nalla'aJ protedive barriers ..t,ich are involved in lhe aa:ommoda6m of flood waters; d. Caitrol filing , grarfmg, dredging and other development which may increase erosion or flood damage, and; e. Prevent or regulate the construction of flood barriers which wiMLS1nawtaly divert flood waters or wtid, may increase flood hazards to other lands.

All proposed development wifhn the designated flood hazard areas RNst be reviewed by the City Manager and buit in aa:ordance with the provisions of the ftoodplains ordnance.

Based on the best avaJable data, the City's drainage fadities are functioning adequately. There are no major floodng problems in the City and nalllral drainage courses, for the most part have been left in their nalllral state. There is stil vacant land that is undeveloped, irduding uplands adjacent to the wetland areas. Both the uplands and the wetlands oonbNJe to fll,ciion as natural drainage fealllres, by allowing treatment of stormwater MKlff and the storing of ftoodwaters.

The City has never l\ad as drainage faciities analyzed which wol.kl provide infonnation regarding the design capacity, a.rent demand on the faaity capacity and the level of service for each drainage Idly in the City. However, the City is worl

______180

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______A.5 Proposed Development and Redevelopment of Flood Prone Areas

A.5 Proposed Denlopment and ,Redevelopment of Flood Prone Areas Rule 9J.5.006(2)(e). F.A.C.

The 100-year oodplai, within Macclennv is located aloog Turkey Creek and Waflingham Branch. There is also a small area of ffoodpfain located 1in lhe nor:thwest corner or 1he Crty. The Federal Emergency Manag ent Agency administers the Na1ional Flood nsurance Program ihat is se1 up protect es and property through i.mplementatioo of oodpla·n management measures M1ich requires devek>pment lo be oons1rucied above the base 8ood etevation. The City has elected to participate in the National Fiood lns1:1rance Progr.am. The City should continue to review any devel~ment proposed in these Hoodptains according to the flood hazard egufatioos written into the land developmer,, regulations to maintain 1he natural functrons of the flood ains and 1he creeks. Aooordin9 to 1he National Flood lnswance Program (MF[P), epetiti ve flood loss is defined as a faclity ot structure that has experienced two or mo ,e ·nsurance claims of at least 1,000 in any given ten-year period since 1978.

A.7 Proposed Development and Redevelopment Based on Hazard Mitigation Reports, page 1

A.7 Proposed Development and Redevelopment Based on Hazard Mitigation Reports Rufe 9J-5.006(2)(g), FAG.

The Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy (L~ S) Task Force was created in August 1996 with the responsibility o developing a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. On ay 4, 1998, the Northeas Florida Regional Planning Council contracted wilh Baker County o facilitate the development o he LMS . A Memorandum of Agreement was developed between Baker County and its incorporated municipalities, Macclenny and Glen St. Mary, that pro-vided for the City and Town to supplement the County's work ttuough the Norlheast Florida Reg ional Council in order to develop a single, unified U, S. Baker County and the City initiated development of lhe Local iligation Strategy Plan by entering into a contract with lhe Florida Department of Community Affafrs (DCA) Division of Emergency Management. The Task Force

completed a S that me lhe DCA criteria for such plans. The fina l document was prepared October 3 1 1999 . The L~ Sis intended to provide a strategy to mitigate dangers and costs associated wilh weather and manmade hazards and to provide a priority for recovery in lhe event of a hazardous event occurring in Baker County, such as Hurricane Floyd and lhe wi ldfires during recent years.

On October 10, 2000, the City Gommissfon adopted the S recognizing i is to the City's advantage to participate in the LMS. The advanlages include guidance in developing pre- and post-disaster plans, idenlifying priority projects and programs for fonding, and increasing the likelihood o state and federal funding for pre- and post-hazard miffgalion projects.

A review of historical weather data was completed to determine the past occurrence of hurricanes and tornadoes in or near lhe County. TAOS data was reviewed in order to determ ine those areas subject to wind damage from lhe di eren categories o hurricanes, No storm surge data is available since the County is inland and not subject to hurricane-rela ed storm surge. owever, FEMA flood zones were provided on the TAOS maps and areas vulnerable to localized flooding from high rafnfall even!s were idenlified , In additi on to lhose facilities vu lnerable o repetitive flooding identified by FEMA, TAOS also identified areas subf ect to high winds from storms.

______181

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______A.7 Proposed Development and Redevelopment Based on Hazard Mitigation Reports, page 2

The Division of Forestry iden tifi e<.I areas located in the urban/rural interface which are particula rly vulnerable to wildfires. Olher hazards include those faciliti es that store hazardous chemicals subject to release from a storm or accident. For each facili ty, a vulnerability zone (radius) was idenlffied adjacent to the facility and the popu lation inside and outside the facility lhat could be potentially exl)osed to th at hazard was estimated .

Base<.I on the Hazards and Vulnerab[lity Assessment contained in lhe LMS, lhe Florida Departmen t o Forestry will soon begin a program to clear bu ers around he vi cin ity of Macclenny and Glen St. Mary to minimize the potential fo r wildfi re damage to residenti al areas as well as reduc[ng the likelihood of manmade fires .

In the lasl planning period, serious wildfires have occurred in the County causing damage to natural resources and requ iring considerabte effort by federal, state and local government to control. Loca lized floo ding occurs from time to time along the S . Mary's River and i!s tributaries as we ll as in isolated pockels of low lying areas. No known incidents o' hazardous material releases have oocurred, however there is always the po enlial for th is to occu r. Direct h.il.s by hurricanes are uncommon in Macclenny, but there have been numerous hurricanes that have come close to northeas Florida causing high winds with in Baker County. Tornadoes are also uncommon but the potenti al is always there or one to oocur and to cause foss or life and prope rty. The most likely hazards al)pear to be from fiooding and wildfi res.

A majority o' the LMS mitigation initiatives are flood related items such as repai r of fl ood damage to local roads and bridges, development o a Mas er Drainage Plan, and qualifyi ng Baker County for the FEMA Community Rating System Program. Achievement of these initiatives will go a long way towards reducing hazard-related damage in the City as well as the cost to repair such damage.

Section D. Infrastructure Element

D.3 Proposed Capacity of Shared Systems

Section D: Infrastructure Eleme.nt City of Macclenny 2025 COmprehensive Plan

Stormwaler Miln

The City of Macclenny's Drainage ordinance slates lliat no one may construct any detention and retention ponds wilhout first obtaining a permit from 1he City building cfepar1ment with approval of designs, plans ancl specifications.

The design of relention or retention ponds must be in accordance with Florida Oepartmerrt of Transportation, Florida Departmenl of Environmental Protection or St. Johns River Water Management District. The criletia to be appfied sha ll be 1he most stringent of lhese 1hree agencies. Retention ponds in which 1he waler deplli is greater lhan six inches one hour after 1he design stonn ceases ot greater llian two feet in depth , musl be constructecl of oorruga!ed melal ~e and covered with earth.. The p4>e or p.1)es musl have me capacity to meet Ille desi911 storage requiremen1s, Stormwater plans must snow 1he follonig:

1. Overall drainage layout, including all drimage areas contributing to the detenlion basin; 2- Hydrographic showing in11ow, disdiarge, slotage capability, minimum/maximum design or water depm; 3. ln11ow 100-,.ear storm developed conditions; 4. Storage snail be 1hat volume necessary lo store ihe most crilica1 evenl of 1he 100-year storm.

Potable Water

The Cily has approximately 500,000 gallons of waler slorage capacily. The water is trealed initia ll y with a dilorine disinfectant and slilsequently subjected to an aeration process.

______182

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

Section E. Conservation Element,

E.1 Identification of Natural Resources

Section E: Conservation Element City of Macclenny 2025 CompRl'tensive Plan

E.1 Identification of Natural Resources Rde 9J-5.013(1)(a), F.AC.

There are no lakes, bays, estuarine marshes, rommercial[y valuabte minerals, fisheries or marine habi1ais within the city rimits.

Rivers

The Sllrface waters found in t.tacclenny include the South Prong d the St Marys River, Turkey Creek and Walhighman Branch. All of these waters are found within the St. Marys Rivet Basin. The St. Marys Rive: is the northeast border between Florida and Georgia. It is formed by the ronvergence of 1he North and Sou1h Proog and flows fD'St north and lhen ec1St inlo 1he Allan6c Ooean. The North Prong originates in the Okeefenokee Swamp in Georgia. The entire basin encompasses 1,610 square miles with 216 river reach miles in Florida. The pri,cipal inflow of walef to the sys(em is groundwater and the average flow of !he river is aboul 1,200 cfs. lhe k:Yi\'61' portion of the St. Marys River is tidally influenced and rewrse flows occur daily.

The Si. Marys Rive, with its extensive marsh sys(em generally has excellent water quality. Low pH occurs naturally in the upper reaches of the basin, especially the North Prong, due lo swampy drainage conditions. There are three areas of concern wi the basin: the South Prong (part or ;micll flows through the City), Little St Marys and the Amelia River.

The wa er quality of the City's surface waters snould continue to be moni!Ored especialty near the wastewater 1reatment plant's outfall into Turkey Creek. The City's wastewa1er treatment plant meets all existing DEP regulations for wastewa1er outfalls into streams to ensure its waters are safe for no only recreation, but fo r wirdlife habitat.

Uses in and around the creeks and streams in the City snould not be allowed lo further degrade the quality or quanlity of the surface waters. Land development regulations ~ecify whicl, uses shall be allowed near these areas in order to better conserve and preserve !he na ural resources.

Aoodplains

Floodplains are vatuable resource areas which prtM:ie a rich diversity of vegetation and wildlife. These areas are sources for groundwater recharge that filters through soils during. high water levels. The City's land devebpment regulations estabfl sh special lbod hazard dislrids and standards for reducing flood hazards in these :istricts. It is the purpose of these regulations is to promote the public health, safely and general welwe and to rni'limize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by provisions designed to:

1. Restrict or prohibil 1.1res which are dangerous lo heallh , safety and property due to water or erosron hazards, or whicfi resu in damaging increases in erosion or in llood heights or veloci'.ies; 2. Require lhat uses vu~e:able to ftoods, including fad i6es which serve such uses, be pro1ected against flood damage at the tine of initiaf construction; 3. Con!rof 1he alteration of natural lloodplains, stream channels and natural protective barriers 'Mlich are involved in the acrommodation of floodwaters; 4. Con!rol filmg, grading, dredging and othe development which may iicrease erosion or flood damage; and 5. Prevent or regulate the cooslruclion of flood barriers which unnaturally diwrl floodwalels or which may increase flood hazards to other lands.

______183

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

F. Town of Glen St. Mary Comprehensive Plan

Future Land Use Element

Policy A.1.4.1 There is no floodplain in Glen St. Mary; wetland is designated as conservation land use; ”lots of record” designated as Conservation on the Future Land Use Map shall permit only low density residential land use at a density of 1unit per 5 acres (3 units in total since the Town contain approximately 16 acres of wetlands); the permitting of septic tanks (in all areas including wetlands) is the responsibility of the County Health Department and such a permit is required by the Baker County Building Department (acting for the Town of Glen St. Mary) prior to the issuance of a building permit. The Department of Health issues septic tank permits in accordance with 10D-6.047, F.A.C., Site Evaluation Criteria and 10D-6.048, F.A.C. System Size Determination.

Policy A.1.4.3 By August 1991 the Town shall adopt a stormwater management ordinance, which will establish criteria for the quality and quantity of stormwater runoff permitted for all development. At a minimum, the ordinance will require: (a) stormwater runoff at a development site at post development shall be equal or less than the level of runoff pre-development. (b) Water quality of runoff at a development site shall, at a minimum, meet the criteria of 17-3.051, F.A.C. (c) The Building Official shall be responsible for ensuring the control of stormwater runoff at the development site.

Policy A.1.4.4 By 1993 the Town shall initiate the development of a stormwater management plan.

Public Facilities Element

Objective D.1.5 The Town shall adopt land development regulations that protect the functions of natural drainage features and provide for meeting future needs through implementing the following policies:

Policy D.1.5.1 The Town shall implement a routine maintenance program of drainage ditches, the costs of which are incorporated into the Town’s operating budget and the Comprehensive Plan amended to incorporate recommendations of the Master Plan.

______184

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Upon adoption of the Master Drainage Plan, a priority listing of drainage projects to eliminate existing deficiencies and provide for future needs will be established based upon the criteria stated in Policy D.1.1.1 and the priority listing, with associated costs, shall be incorporated into the Town’s Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan.

Policy D.1.5.2 The Town shall coordinate with the Department of Transportation to implement a maintenance program of drainage ditches along state maintained roads.

Policy D.1.5.3 The Town shall adopt Land Development Regulations, which require that new dirt roads and driveways be designed to reduce erosion due to stormwater runoff.

Policy D.1.5.4 By 1993, the town shall adopt a Master Drainage Plan that identifies all drainage facilities within the Town including responsible agent for maintenance and level of runoff capacity. In addition, the plan shall identify problems in the current drainage system and provide cost estimates for eliminating deficiencies and extending facilities to meet future needs based upon demands of development.

G. Town of Glen St. Mary Land Development Codes

ARTICLE IV Minimum Design Standards 4.1 General Requirements

Each subdivision shall contain improvements designed and constructed according to the requirements and specification of this Ordinance and the applicable policies, resolutions, regulations and ordinances of the Town of Glen St. Mary, including the Town of Glen St. Mary Comprehensive Plan and the laws of the State of Florida. All required permits shall be secured from appropriate agencies, such as the St. Johns River Water Management District, Department of Environment Protection and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers before a building permit or other development order is issued.

The land proposed for subdivision shall be suitable for development and upon completion of the drainage construction described in the drainage plan, shall not be subject to damaging floods, poor drainage, erosion or other conditions detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the public.

ARTICLE III - Procedures of Filing and Securing Approval for the Subdivision of Land

3.1 Preliminary Plat The procedure for obtaining Preliminary Plat approval is as follows:

______185

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______a. Notice to adjacent landowners shall be provided and the requirements for platting shall be met in accordance with Section 177.091, Florida Statutes. b. Submit a Preliminary Plat at a scale no less than 100 feet to one (1) inch and with designation of true north to the Town Clerk for review. At a minimum, the Preliminary Plat shall contain the following information in accordance with Chapter 177, Florida Statutes: 8. Base flood elevation data shall be provided for portions of the proposed subdivision located in a Flood Hazard Zone; 9. A detailed soil survey map of the proposed subdivision including wetland zoning or wetlands determinant information; and

Continued Public Involvement

Public Participation and Outreach to the Community

The Baker County Emergency Management Department continues to work on opportunities to get the residents involved in mitigation activities. At the LMS meetings discussion occurs on the importance of including and educating the public on mitigation. Listed below are the activities being conducted by Baker County: • Baker County Emergency Management advertises all LMS meetings in the local paper, on the Sheriff’s Office website and through their social media Facebook page. • The local county press attends mitigation meetings and events and writes articles to inform the citizens of activities being conducted. • Every other month the Sheriff or a designee conduct outreach in each community within Baker County educating the citizens on mitigation measures, disaster safety techniques and “hot” topics. • First Responders conduct “show & tell” presentations at all the schools within Baker County. • Mitigation materials are disseminated to all citizens and builders when applying for permits. • Baker County Sheriff’s Office (Emergency Management) provide mitigation and safety techniques through their social media outlet (Facebook). • First Responders present mitigation techniques at Homeowners Association Meetings. • First Responders provide materials through an outreach booth at the Baker County Farmers Market held the last weekend in May. • Building permit fees are waived for any home destroyed by a disaster.

The Baker County LMS Committee/Working Group will continue to hold scheduled meetings throughout the 5-year mitigation planning process cycle. All meetings will be public meetings as required by Article I, 24 (b)

______186

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______of the Florida Constitution and any exceptions to this law would have to be duly noted. There will be an opportunity at every meeting for the public citizens to provide comment on the Local Mitigation Strategy and planning process for updating the LMS.

A legal notice of all County LMS meetings will be advertised on the online websites and in the following printed newspaper prior to each meeting inviting the public to attend and participate:

Ø Baker County Sheriff’s Office Department of Emergency Management Facebook:

http://www.bakerso.com/My- I\AKI R COllNIY SIii RII 1·5 01 I !Cl Baker_County_Sheriffs_Office/EOC.html Joey B. Dob~on. Sheriff ,,. ______Emergency Operatlona Cent.Ir - ----.------·-,_ __ ,. .... ___,..__...,_,._f_ Ø Baker County Sheriff’s Office Department of =:==:-.:::.====---·------....------Emergency Management ""•·-~·-·---·-·------·--·---.....------http://www.bakerso.com/My- 4•· , ...... --..::-::.":=.:::...... :-- Baker_County_Sheriffs_Office/EOC.html ---- -{-~~--·---1-,_,11,_.,,,,_,... ··- •••• , -•••~l',-U~-.. ,c••~'-1- Ø The Baker County Press:

http://bakercountypress.com/; and in the - c._ - ~ - c._ ~~ printed newspaper __- _ -_____rt) _

The LMS Committee will provide an alternative method for those interested in the County mitigation efforts, and are unable to attend the LMS meetings, an opportunity to review the plan and submit formal comments. A draft LMS Plan, meeting notices, agendas, minutes, and any other relevant materials presented at the County LMS meetings will be available for review at the Baker County Department of Emergency Management office. Comments can be submitted in writing to:

Baker County Department of Emergency Management Attn: Emergency Management Director 1 Sheriff's Office Drive Macclenny, 32063

The LMS Working Group will hold at least one public meeting to solicit formal comments from the public prior to the final plan approval. After approval by the County LMS Committee, the revised plan and appropriate crosswalk will be submitted to the State for review and final approval.

______187

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Upon receiving an “approved pending adoption” letter from the State of Florida, the LMS Committee/Workgroup will present the updated plan to the County Commission as well as the Commissions of the City of Macclenny and the Town of Glen St. Mary for approval and adoption. At least one jurisdiction must adopt the updated plan within one year of receiving “approved pending adoption” letter in order to receive a final approval. All other jurisdictions must adopt the updated plan in order to be eligible for federal mitigation grant funds.

______188

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Appendices

Appendix I – Baker County’s LMS meeting documentation over the last five years including (i.e. meeting advertisement or public notice, agenda, sign-in sheets, and meeting minutes).

______189

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______Appendix I - Baker County LMS Meetings (Advertisement, Agenda, Minutes, Sign-In Sheets)

(A) Meeting Date: September 24, 2015

A1 - Advertisement

± LEGAL NOTICES

Ill 11tE CIICUIT COORT A,R&R, lnc. OF T1f£ EJ&HTK .AIDICIAL CIRctnT 11837 N SR 121 OF 11fE STATE Of FLORIDA, Macdenny, FL 32063 AKO FOR BAIWI COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION The lollowing vehicles · be sold at public auction Case No: 02-2010-CA-000154-CAAX-MX on September 18, 2015 at 10 am al A, R&R, Inc. 11837 NSR 121 , Maa:lemy, A. 32063: BANC OF AMERICA, NA Plaintiff, 2001 Nissan Maxima Vint JN1CA31021T840717 vs. 2006 Chewy Tahoe Ylnl 1GNEC13156R119716 EDWARD C. Al..fORD A/KJA EOWAOO AlfORD; THE 2007 CILE Trailer KNOWN SPOUSE OF EDWARD C. ALFORD A/IIJA Ylnl 4588C222681010079 EDWARD Al.FORD; CRYSTALS. ALFORD A/KIA CffiSTAL STAR Al.FORD; THE UM fflUSTffS, AND All OTHER Pm· G~ will meet al 11 /lM on Thursday, September SONS Ct.AIMING BY, THROOOH, utflER OR A6AJNST 24, 2015 a l the Baker County Emergency THE NAMB> DEFENDANT(S); UNKNOWN 1fNAHT Management Office. The County encourages any 11 ; UNKNC7NN TENANT #2; irteresled citizens and business owners to attend Delendant{s), and provide input. The Committee guides the ______,/ preparation of the Bakel- County LMS, which serves as a plan ID redlD! the commumy's long-term risk NOTICE OF Slli lor prolec1ing ~ and property from the affects of nahnl disasters and to build a safer and stronger Notice is hereby ijwn that, pursuarl ID a FiRd community. P1ease contad the Baker County SUmmary Judgment of foredosin entered in the Emergency Management al 904-259-0230 for above-styled cause, in lhe Cirruil Qui of Bakef more information. Comly, Florida, I wil sell the prqierty situated in 913c Baker County, Amda, described as: AftUIICDTU!CUICUT cnn Dlrtir"

______190

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______A2 - Agenda

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Meeting September 24, 2015

I Welcome

II LMS Committee Members & Guests Introduction Review committee list

III LMS Mitigation Project or Action List What is the status update or progress of the LMS mitigation projects? New Projects?

IV Public Participation

V Adjourn

______191

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______A3 – Sign-In Sheet

Baker County Sheri·ff's Office

Attendance Roster

Dm: 09 4 015 Incident Commander: ------Time: I 100 Hour,; ------PLEASE PRINT LEGI BLY Name (PRINT) & IDI 1) ~ i3 o~1'Jf: 23) ~ ,ii,:;,a:iiilicAz;; :: ======~ &$~ E------&) co t ' ! \..J ru'.\, 30) ------9) ______31) ------10) 32) ------11) 33) ------12) 34) ------13) 35) ------14) 36) ------15) 37) ------16) 38) ------17) 39) ------18) <10) ------19) 41 ) ------20) 42) ------

Integrity Care Courtesy Proffesionallsm

BC'SO flOIA

______192

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______A4 – Meeting Minutes

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Meeting Minutes September 24, 2015

I Welcome – Lt Chris Volz, LMS Chair welcomed the members and thanked them for attending the meeting.

II LMS Committee Members & Guests Introduction – Lt Volz asked that all members introduce themselves.

III LMS Mitigation Project or Action List – the committee members went through each of the projects listed, updates were captured for each project. Some of the projects were rearranged due to the importance of or funding availability. There are a few projects that require follow-up from the Chair and other committee members.

IV Public Participation – The importance of including and educating the public on mitigation was discussed. Listed below are the activities being conducted by Baker County: • Baker County Emergency Management advertises all LMS meetings in the local paper, on the Sheriff’s Office website and through their social media Facebook page. • Once a year, Sheriff Dobson hosts “National Night Out” where outreach is conducted educating the citizens on mitigation measures, disaster safety techniques and “hot” topics on community well- being. • First Responders conduct “show & tell” presentations at all the schools within Baker County. • Mitigation materials are disseminated to all citizens and builders when applying for permits. • Baker County Sheriff’s Office (Emergency Management) provide mitigation and safety techniques through their social media outlet (Facebook). • First Responders present mitigation techniques at Homeowners Association Meetings. • First Responders provide materials through an outreach booth at the Baker County Farmers Market held the last weekend in May. • Building permit fees are waived for any home destroyed by a disaster. • First Responders provide outreach materials at the Fair held every October. • The Florida Forest Service provides outreach through their Ready, Set, Go program, with Smokey going to all schools and bible schools, being present at the county fair and riding in the Christmas parade.

V Adjourn – There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.

______193

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______(B) Meeting Date: October 13, 2014

B1 - Advertisement

,.,, I uar\.CI n ,I I

B ela -· Oa'ris, .S.

NOTI CE OF PUBLIC HEAR G

______194

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______B2 – Agenda

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Meeting October 13, 2014

I Welcome and Introductions

II LMS Committee/Workgroup Members

III Review the minutes of the prior LMS meeting

III LMS Mitigation Projects or Action List What is the status update or progress on the LMS mitigation projects?

IV Yearly planning for the LMS What steps are occurring each year to meet the requirements for the next LMS annual plan update?

VI Adjourn

______195

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______B3 - Sign-In Sheet

______196

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______B4 - Meeting Minutes

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Meeting Minutes October 13, 2014

I Welcome – Lt Chris Volz welcomed the members. Since the LMS Chair was no longer employed with Baker County, an election was conducted:

Lt Chris Volz was elected as the new LMS Chair CJ Thompson was elected as the new Vice Chair

The vote was anonymous.

II LMS Committee Members & Guests Introduction – Lt Volz asked that all members introduce themselves. In addition to the committee members the local paper was present. (Official sign-in sheet is provided as an attachment to these minutes).

III LMS Mitigation Project or Action List – the committee members went through each of the projects listed, updates were captured for each project. (The updated project list is provided as an attachment to these minutes).

IV Public Participation – The importance of including and educating the public on mitigation was discussed. Listed below are the activities being conducted by Baker County: • Baker County Emergency Management advertises all LMS meetings in the local paper, on the Sheriff’s Office website and through their social media Facebook page. • Press attends mitigation meetings and events and write articles to inform the citizens of activities being conducted • Every other month Sheriff Dobson or a designee conduct outreach in each community within Baker County educating the citizens on mitigation measures, disaster safety techniques and “hot” topics on community well-being. • First Responders conduct “show & tell” presentations at all the schools within Baker County. • Mitigation materials are disseminated to all citizens and builders when applying for permits • Baker County Sheriff’s Office (Emergency Management) provide mitigation and safety techniques through their social media outlet (Facebook) • First Responders present mitigation techniques at Homeowners Association Meetings • First Responders provide materials through an outreach booth at the Baker County Farmers Market held the last weekend in May • Building permit fees are waived for any home destroyed by a disaster

V Adjourn – There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.

______197

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______(C) Meeting Date: November 18, 2013

C1 - Agenda

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) Meeting November 18, 2013

I Welcome and Introductions

II LMS Committee/Workgroup Members

III LMS Mitigation Project or Action List What is the status of the mitigation projects?

IV LMS Goals and Objectives Do they meet the needs for the County?

V Yearly planning for the LMS What steps are occurring each year to meet the requirements for the next LMS plan?

VI Adjourn

______198

(.J~

m .:ii:: -

:, >,U') ... C: Baker~ Cl) County0

;E , :.:: .... en - 0 _, Q. N - -

C: 0 C: C, >, (.) ~ C, E Local0 Mitigation~ Strategycu Plan 2015 ______C2 - Sign-In Sheet

Baker

Meeting

County

Sign-In

Local

Sheet-

Mitigation

November

Strategy

18,

(LMS)

2013

Phone

______199

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______C3 – Meeting Minutes

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group Meeting Minutes

November 18, 2013

Members Present: Bruce Scott, FDEM Robert Fletcher, BCRD James Lawrence, Sanderson Pipe Corporation Bobby Griffin, BCBD Ed Preston, BCPD Douglas Robey, BCMS Adam Faircloth, BCEM Doc Bloodworth, FFS Scott Crews, MacClenny Fire Dept. David Richardson, BCEMS Steven Marfongella, BCFD Joel Addington, BC Press

I. Welcome and Introductions – Adam Faircloth opened the meeting and thanked everyone for coming and participating. Brief introductions were conducted.

II. Overview & Purpose of the LMS Meeting – Gail Leek conducted a power point presentation for the group. Currently, Baker County is in Stage 4 of the planning process, the Monitoring Phase, determining “where are we at with the projects”.

III. LMS Projects – The working group then took the current project list and discussed every project. Updates were provided by the appropriate member and new projects were added. In addition, the ranking of some projects was adjusted as priorities have changed.

IV. Adjourn - There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.

______200

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______(D) Meeting Date: June 4, 2012

D1 – Advertisement LEGAL NOTICES±,

• Tl,( Cll&IIT aurr OFDIE ffW JIIICll IIJIXIU'~RJlllllllllD IIMJC-IIIIU £RJIT,• -RIIUllll~RJIID ll!tn S IIID'IIMllfm .Mm- lie IWer tilllbd Sdaf lmd llil ldl h CA!l lll~- = ~~=~t~~== =-,..,....;.=.::;..--mi•~ Clri&,~~1}7,l~- 16:.-,...adym-al,&~al i:-..~I!:!:::;: ...... ,, nf .. __ ii . IIKLIICSIINIJIG,ll' =~ ·-llilnaid tullR:AltllO.-- TIM • as:aam:.-- =-~~----w. - =:e~de=::=.-:. ~'t~~~~I::!~ :,: ~··.::::-..:.":tr.'!;.'t= ~~«91Btl' W.7Ukd19afDlll:111h: =ir~~~t.~~ 211.1-.ha S 11 "9ra li' W lllD .... t,ct~i;=::~:.~~~IBDl• ~1g' £,DUllld.'O~ad-- =~•pa,olailSW~,111[~,lail

AU.ISWl-,-l.OCAJtl!• IIIIII ca• r(Rllllll

IU.ARnloioo,11,Hiy - 0-uflmii:a-•----•s mtii::alm .. ____ :::i·-~---, =:....:... '!:rm"=.... .l1J'19,.2Dt1lf1UD• - °""'""'1H q m.... .,l2 JI.Fllo&JI a.GllU'IDA

~~~-~IO<>'Jl 1HE NILE • MrnD AIIODliCUMID TD men 1'"-t:..·ie:::....-...;....l::.m.~.... -=..... s.- 1I,2012ft:Jllaa.- naJUII.J. ..,_;_.,,....,, .,_ - Olll.•c. tlmllll'll.La: ""'19•1, R..mm ~~t=."!t.:.ti1l~: .... ._ ...... R.l2

A,RIR, •c. tmalllW.lMIE ""'19•1, R."""' =~:+=.~llta~R1r=..~ .... .__.,,R...... ~~~ --

Cbttkitout.., bakercountrpress.com

______201

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______D2 - Agenda

AGENDA

Baker County Local Mitigation Strategy Task Force Meeting on June 4, 2012 10:00 am

I. Introductions

II. Previous Information A. *Approval of Minutes from 3/05/12 B. Task Force Membership Update C. Current Projects Updates D. *Review Changes Made to the Scoring Sheet

III. New Information A. *New Projects 1. Additional project suggestions or ranking B. Wildfire Mitigation, County Update – Mr. Wisner C. Community Wildfire Protection Plan – Mr. Wisner / Chief Dolan D. Hazards Awareness – Impacts of Beryl E. EPA Supplemental Environmental Projects – Eric Anderson F. Annual Review Working Group

IV. Open Discussion

V. Adjournment A. Next Meeting September 3, 2012 B. Projected Meetings December 3, 2012 March 4, 2013

* Denotes action item

______202

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______(E) Meeting Date: March 5, 2012

E4 – Meeting Minutes

onheast Florldai Baker County Rettlonal Local Mitigation Strategy Task Force C.11ntll Monday, Much S, 2012 10:00 a.m.

:'.'.IIN TES

A meeting of the Balcer County Local Mitigation Strategy Task Force was held Monday, MMch 5, 2012, al 10:07 a.m., at the Balcer County Emergency Operations Center, I Sheriff's Office Dr., Macclenny, Florida. Mr. Lehman called the meeting to order with the following members:

James Lawrence - Sanderson Pipe Corporation Adam Faircloth-Balcer County Sheriff's Office and Emergency Managemem David Richardson - Balcer County Emergency Services Marty Turner -American Red Cross Maurice Postal - Balcer County Grants Department Ed Preston - Balcer County Planning and Zoning Department Robert Fletcher- Balcer County Road Department Roger Y aroorough - Cily of Macclenny Christina Nickles - Balcer County Sheriff's Office

NEFRCSTAFF: Ed Lehman

I. Introductions Mr. Lehman welcomed everyone and asked the participants to introduce themselves.

II. Previous Information A. *Appro..-al ofl\finut.. from Dectmber 12, 2011 Mr. Lehman callNf for a motion to appro,·e the December ll, 2011 minutes as writttn; a motion was mad• br Mr. Faircloth to appron th• minutu; stcondtd by !Ur. Richardson; motion carried unanimously.

B. Task Fore, l\l,mber,;hip pdates Mr. Lehman inquiRd if there were any membership updates for the Task Force. There was none and no further discussion followed.

C. Current Project Updates Mr. Richardson inquiRd as to the need for accomplishing projects that were listed Mr. Lehman responded that these were priority projects in case of an emergency and that if they were to be done with other funds that they could be removed from this list. Mr. Faircloth noted that is the County is successful in obtaining grant monies for the projects then they could be removed, but doubted that there were grants available and should be maintained on the list.

D. *Re,,jew Change-s ~lade to tht coring She-et Mr. Lehman asked if there were any changes that needed to be made to the Scoring Sheet. Mr. Richardson stated that the Sanderson By-Pass was probably not appropriately listed in that it was not a priority improvement. Mr. Fletcher agreed, noting that the proj,ct. is best listed as Fred Harvey Road, which will serve the function as the Sanderson By-Pass. Mr. Richardson then noted that part of Proj.ct # 20, Weather Radio and Building Permit/Code Red Weather Alert,

______203

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

should be modified to delete reference to Weather Radio and Building Peanit" Mr. Faircloth explained how the Cotmty handles Code Red Weather Alerts and agreed that the lust portion of this project should be eliminated from the list. Mr. Richardson noted that Project #8, Rebuild Bridges, was not appropriately listed on the sheet, Slating that the work was funded and in progress and therefore would not be a logical candidate to be addressed as an approved mitigation project.

Mr. Richardson mond that the Apprond l\litigation Projects List be modified as discnssed abon, seconded by Mr. fletcher. Motion passed unanimously.

III. New Information A. *l'iew Projects I . Additional Project Suggestions or Re-ranking Mr. Lehman asked ifthere were any additional projects or any re-ranking of projects that were listed There were oo additional projects selected and no re-ranking of projects.

B. Wildfire !\litigation, County Update Mr. Wisner was not present to give an update on the County's wildfire status. However, Mr. Richardson informed the Task Force that there was an awareness day in Taylor, and that there was a large fire in Baxter over the weekend. While lhett was potential for the fire to spread due to the high winds, it was brought under control

C. Community Wildfire Protection Plan Mr. Wisner was not present to speak on this issne.

D . Annual Redew '1'orking Group The need for an annual review working group was discussed, but it was determined not to convene a meeting of the annual working group as scheduled after the March meeting. Prior to the June meeting, the llCCd for the meeting will be determined and scheduled if needed.

E. PSIC Grant Mr. Faircloth stated that the County must be in possession of the new Mobile Command Vehicle by June I, 20 I 2. He stated that even with such a short tum around time and the limited number of vendors who could accomplish such a task, they were satisfied with the company that was awarded the bid The County is moving forward and will secure the vehicle in the applicable timeframe. The goal is to get radio frequencies for all counties programmed into the consoles.

F. Hazards Awarrorss There was discussion on the threat level is still high and getting close to the level of Honey Prairie fire. Mr. Faircloth noted that the threat level is expected to remain high until sufficient rains - however, there are no prospects of substantial rainfall on the horizon.

IY. Open Discussion Mr. Lehman opened up the floor for any Open Discussion. Mr. Faircloth expressed concern about the potential for the State to determine the level of emergency funding that can go to Baker County. Mr. Postal informed the group that while they asked for $60,000 for the pigtail project, the $30,000 that was received should be satisfactory. Discussion followed on the status of the two trailers that were purchased by the County. Mr. Richardson asked about the prospect for additional grants; Mr. Postal responded that there didn' t seem to be any on the horizon and inquiries were made as to why other grants weren't awarded Mr. Lawrence asked about SARA Title Ill Discussion followed Mr. Yarborough noted that there would be new school signals at S.R. 121 2

______204

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______

within the month, with the sidewalk nearing completion. This will assist in pedestrian cicc-Ulati.oo in this area. Mr. Fairclothinfonned the group !hat there was an extra $10 000 allocated in the legislatucefor each county, but it was not in the Senate' s budget and could be tabled. It was assumed that this could have been a place holder to maintain current funding levels.

V. *ADJOUR~!ENT There being no further business to co.nduct, Mr. Lehman stated the next meeting will be held on Monday, June 4th, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.

The meeting adjourned at 10:45 a.m.

*Denotes ac.tion item

______205

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______(F) Meeting Date: December 12, 2011

F1 - Advertisement

otices

HIGGI OTHAM IO NG & RECOVERY PUBLIC NOTICE 7611 WEST MT. VER N The quarterly meeting of the Ba er County Local GLEN ST. IIAR'fi FL 3204,0 itigation Strategy Task foo:e ·11 lake place at 10:00 Phone (904) 259-4375 • FAX (904) 259-6146 a.m. on onday, Dece er 12, 2011 , at the Baker The fol lowing eh·cle · be soJd at p !Jc auction County Emergency Operations r.enter. located at 1 December 2, 2011 at 10:00 am, at Hig ·nbotham·s Sherifs Office Dr., Macdenn , Florida. interested 1i • g & Recovery 7611 est l Vernon, Glen st. persons are · · to ruy, R.. 32040. 11 7

______206

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______(G) Meeting Date: September 12, 2011

G1: Advertisement

I www.bakercou11typress.com I IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE BGHTH .lJOICIAL

ctRCUIT IN AND FOR BAKER COUNTY1 RORIDA CIVIL ACTION CASE NO.: 02-2011-CA--000078 DIVISION

BAC HOME LOANS SEJM:ING, LP FKA COlfflRYWIDE HOME LOANS SEIMCIIIG, LP, L egalN otices ... Plaimlf,

GlfNN C. MJRPHY I et al, PUBUC HEARING NOTICE PU8UC NOTICE llefendant(s).

The ilaka' Colllty llislrict Sdlool Boaro wll hold the fol. The quarterly meeting of the Baker County Local lowing PUBllC HEARING oo Tuesmy, September 6 NOTICE OF ACTION 2011 ,althe DistrictSdlool Boanl Room localed a1 270 Miligation strategy Ta Forte will take ptaa, at 10:00 a.m. on Monday, September 12th, 2011 , al the Baker TO: GLENN C. IIJRPHY East, Macclemy, Florida, beginning Coo~ty Emergency Operations Center, kx:ated at 1 =~ LAST KNDWH ADDRESS: Sherill~ Ofla Dt, Macdenny, Aooda. All ireresled Appmyai of the llitJwilg: 11796 IIJCKLEBERRY TRAIL E penons are fflviled attend. 2011 -2012-Pl'1lgresslon Plan m MACClfNN'( R. :32063 2011•21l12 Code of student Conduct NOTICE OF SHERlff'S SALE ClllREHT ADDRESS: IIIKNOWN THE PUBLIC IS INVITED AND ENCOURAGED TD AT• TEND. NOTICE is IEfeby given that ptnmnt to a Writ DI ~:o':G~,~=r= ::~~N~T ~~M~~;:i~ Theoownentsdbeavailableurre,iewattheSuper EJecution issued i1 the Comly Coort of a.. County, NAMED INDMDUAL DEFENDAHT(S) WHO ARE NOT i1-,i'sOffice localed at 270 SOdh Bou...ro East. Florida, oo the 18111 day of August, 2011 , mthe cause KNOWN TO BE DEAD OR ALIVE, WHETHER SAID Macdemy, Florida begiMing -..sday, ~ 10, wherein, COUNTRY FEDERAL CREDIT UN ION was UNKNOWN PARTIES MAY CUIII AN INTEREST AS 201 1 (8:30 am. - 3:00 p.m•• plainlif. and DONALD FARMER. was delendant, ,being ~~IRS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES1 OR OTHER Case ~- 2006· 106-SC in sail Co..t, I, Joey B. Dob· Shenie-.00 soo, as Sherill of Baker County, Florida have levied SupemleooenlofSdlools upon all the righl title and irerest of the party named LAST KNOWH ADDRESS: UNKNOWN

NOTICE =:ril~~:.~~ ID the CIJUlElfT ADDRESS: UNKNOWN New RiYef Solid Waste Associalioo (NRSWA is request 2000 Ford Ranger Picka., Truck YOU ARE NOTIFED that an action ID loredose a mort· ing l.elleB of lmeresl and Slatements of Oualilication lor ~~ the ' °'lowing property in BAKER County, the-ng: VINI: 1ITTR10VIIYTB23713 (NOTE: Anyone mt«emd 1n , iewing 111e ,.. RFQI 11--01 Professional Accounting and hide being sold may do so 45 minutes prior LOT 8'1 , ROI.UNG MEADOWS, ACCORDING AuditingSenices to the tine of the sate. TO THE PUT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN RFQ I 11--02 Pro!Hsilnal lndependenl FNncial PLAT BOOK 3, PAGES 96, 97, 911, 99, 100 ConsulmgSenices I shall ol1ef this f>llf]efly ,,. sale, at Higginbotham, AND 101 , OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA NISWAislocaled2.5milesnor1hofRliford, R. ooState Towing & ROCuswa.Ofll ID request a copy oi thereafter; olhefwise a defut will be entered agant ceeds ID be applied as far as may be ID the payment the Request la-OuaificatiJns. Be-d that lffiWA ::.'" the relef demanded in the C..Oplaint c, peti- hasalocalveflb'prereremopoli:y. ThellEAIJUlclor ~ costs ard the salislaction of the above deocribed submittal in response ID the above fFO is September 1, exeamon. (NOlE: In aaxwdance wilh the Americans with Disal:ililies Act. penons wi1h disabilities needing 201 1, 12:00pm. e,oon . llss notice shal be pubished once eacl1 week 1.. two special acmmmodation to~ in this proceed Nl8 -N'l5 cmsecutM, weelos in the The Bakef County Press. NOTICE ing sllould oontact the Balcer County Sheriff's Office at (904 259--0245 prior to the date of the sale. COD lor Request lor Proposals (IFP WITNESS my hand ard the seal of llis Co..t oo 11is 16111 day of August, 2011 . New Ri'ler Solid Waste Associalion (NRSWA is request JOEY B. DOBSON, ing proposals fo, the fllllowing servi:es ard technical ShorilfofBake

______207

Baker County Local Mitigationitigation Strategy Plan 2015 ______(H) Meeting Date: June 7, 2010

H1: Advertisement Legal Notices

PUBLIC NOTICE All SAFE MINI STORAGE 190 SOUTH LOWDER STREET TM quarterly meeting of tile Baker County Local MACCLENNY, FLORIDA 32063 Mitigation Strategy Task F-on:e will lake place at 904-259-3565 10:30a.m. on Molllay, June 7th, 2010, at the Baker The follow ing units contain ing household items County Emergency Operations Center, located at such as furniture, appliances. etc., will be sold by 1 Stteriff's Office Dr.. Macclenny, Florida. All inter public auction at 9:00 am June 5, 2010 to salisly ested persons are iilvited to attend. back rent. The following tenants can claim the ir property back Hrent is paid tlefore this date: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, EJCHTH JUDICIAL CIR· CUil, IN AND FOR BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Name Unit t CASE NO .: O2-2010-.CA--0102 Stephaine Griffis 31 5ll7-613 IN RE: GENE HARVEY, as IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 8th JUDICIAL TAX COLLECTOR OF CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR BA«ER BAKER COUNTY, FLOR IDA COUNTY Case t: 2DO!HA--000090 Division t: NOTICEOF ACTION UN C: TO: Delinquent Taxpayer Reoeiving This Notice LSF6 en:ury REO Investments Trust Series 2008-1 YOU AREHEREBY NOTIFIED Illa! a Peti1ion fo r Vali Plaintiff, dation of Tax warrants issued for unpaid 2008. Bak er County Personal Property Taxes tm been filed by ·VS.- Gene Harvey, Baker County Tax Collector, In which you are named as a party fo r nonj)ayment of 2008 Estate of Ue Mae Wilcox, Deceased; Unknown Personal Property Taxes as assessed against you. Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, Assignees, Creditors, Upon ratification and coriirma on of the petition by Lienors and Trustees of Willie Mae Wilcox, De the Courl Ille Tax Collector shall tie authorized to ceased, and au other Persons Claiming By, Through, issue a tax warrant against you, and levy upon, selz.e Url!erand Against Ille Named Defendant(s); Brianna and seUso much of your personal property as nec Charis Wilcox; Theresa Ann WHcox; Rotlert Lee Wil essary to satisfy Ille delinquent taxes, plus costs. cox, Sf.; Virginia Reed Wilcox; Alex Wi lcox; Leo F. lnteres~ attomey's lees, and other charges. Jones, Jr.; Lonnie M. Wi lcox, J[ ; Alvin Leon Wilcox; Wimam Paul Wilcox; state of Florida, Department of YOU WILL BE DISMISSED AS A PARTY TO THIS Revenue; State of Florida Department of Reveooe ACTION WITHOUT Atf'i COURT APPEARANCE BY ChHd Support Enfortement Office; Clerk of Circuit YOU IF YOU PAY SAID DELINQUENT TAXES OWED Court, of Baker County, Florida; Unknown Parties BY YOU ANO COSTS TO THE TAX COLLECTOR AT: in Possession #1; H living, and all Unknown Parties 32 North 5th St, MACCLENNY, FLORIDA 32063, claim ing by, through, under and against the above PRIOR TO THE FI NAL HEARING SCHEDULED IN named Defenclant(s) who are not known to be dead THIS MAffiR. or alive, whether said Unknown Parties may claim an interest as Spouse, Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, or You are furthe r ootified that a Anal Hearing wm be other Claimants held in this matter on the 23rd day of June, 2010, Oefendant(s). at the Baker County Courthouse in Maoclenny, Bak er County, Florida, at 11:50 a.m. before the Honor able Phyllis M. Rosier, Ci rcuit Judge, at which time NOTICE OF SALE Yo u or YOUr attorney mav Dresent vou oblections. H

______208

Memorandum

To: Baker County Board of County Commissioners

From: Dale Williams, Interim County Manager Cheryl Rewis, Finance Director

Date: 1/29/2016

Re: River Region

River Region has moved full-time in our Court Facilities Building, behind the Administration Building. They are requesting we add heating and air condition to two additional rooms. These two rooms use to be holding cells for inmates and there are two exhaust vents in there now. A Contractor has suggested we run duct work from the current system to these exhaust vents to fulfill this request. If the Board would install this duct work, we are estimating a cost of $600-$700. These funds are not in our current budget year; therefore, we would take it out of General Fund.

Finance is suggesting we reevaluate their contract in June 2016, especially our “in-kind building lease and utility cost contribution” section; due to the fact, of one month of utility invoices have increased, whether it is in relation to the higher occupancy or not.

ACTION NEEDED: To approve or deny the County performing the maintenance to the A/C and Heat system.

1 Administrative Offices 904.899.6300 2055 Reyko Rd., Suite 101 904.899.6380 fax RIVER REGION Jacksonville, Florida 32207 www.rrhs.org Human Services, Inc.

January 14, 2016

Board of County Commissioners - Baker County

55 N 3rd Street

Macclenny, FL 32063

Board of Commissioners,

As the Community Mental Health and Substance Abuse Provider for Baker County, we serve Baker County residents who do not have private insurance or other funding. Previously, we occupied two buildings and often times we found that our clients were having difficulty understanding which building to visit. Recently, we moved our team of seven to one location; 56 N 2nd Street, Macclenny, FL to make it easier to find us. We now provide all of our services at this location.

This building is the property of Baker County and is provided as match funding to support the funding provided by the Department of Children and Families through our contract with LSF Health. Once we relocated all of the staff into one location, we have noticed increased heating and air problems. Two of the rooms which have been converted to offices are completely without heating and air. This makes it difficult for our counselors and uncomfortable for our clients during therapy sessions.

We are asking that the Board consider maintenance and alterations be made in the building to change how heat and air is circulating throughout the building so that River Region can provide the best services to the community.

Thank you for your consideration,

CEO /Executive Director BAKER COUNTY MATCH CONTRACT RIVER REGION HUMAN SERVICES, INC

ARTICLE I. SCOPE OF SERVICES

River Region Human Services, inc (RRHS), a Florida not-for-profit corporation, in a manner satisfactory to the County, shall provide, but not be limited to providing, the following mental health, and substance abuse services in fulfillment of this agreement:

Adult Mental Health: Adult Substance Abuse: Assessment Assessment Emergency Emergency Crisis Support Crisis Support Counseling Counseling Drop-in Center Residential Case Management Supported Housing

Child/Ado 1. Substance Abuse: Assessment Emergency Crisis Support Counseling Prevention

Such services shall be performed, except as otherwise specifically stated herein, by persons or instrumentalities solely under the dominion and control ofRRHS.

ARTICLE II. PERIOD OF CONTRACT

The period of contract shall be from May 1, 2013 to June 30, 2016. All such services, whether performed before or after the execution of this Agreement, shall be perfmmed by RRHS in accordance with all requirements and terms of this Agreement. ARTICLE III. CONSIDERATION AND LIMITATION OF COSTS

The County shall pay RRHS for services specified in Article I, in the amount of $371,317.

The County Match payment shall consist of the following:

CASH PAYMENT AMOUNT: a) $37,392.50 or $7,478.50 per month for the five (5) month period between May 1, 2013- September 30, 2013. b) $89,742 or $7,478.50 per month for the twelve (12) month period between October 1, 2013- September 30, 2014. c) $89,742 or $7,478.50 per month for the twelve (12) month period between October 1, 2014- September 30, 2015. d) $67,306.50 or $7,478.50 per month for the nine (9) month period between October 1, 2015- June 30, 2016.

INKIND BUILDING LEASE AND UTILITY COST CONTRIBUTION: a) $11,465 or $2,293 per month for the five (5) month period between May 1, 2013- September 30, 2013. b) $27,516 or $2,293 per month for the twelve (12) month period between October 1, 2013- September 30, 2014. c) $27,516 or $2,293 per month for the twelve (12) month period between October 1, 2014- September 30, 2015. d) $20,637 or $2,293 per month for the nine (9) month period between October 1, 2015- June 30, 2016.

ARTICLE IV. PAYMENTS

A. Payment by the County to RRHS shall be made monthly on a reimbursement basis and upon submission to the County by the RRHS of a request for payment. All requests for payment shall be submitted to the County for the preceding month.

B. Documentation of expenditures for services delivery shall accompany each request for payment. All expenditures made by RRHS for which reimbursement is requested hereunder must be fully documented and made available immediately upon request by the County for inspection or audit of the same in accordance with the provisions of Article V herein below.

ARTICLEV. MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS

A. All records ofRRHS are subject to the provisions of the Public Records Law, Chapter 119, or the Florida Statutes. RRHS shall maintain records, accounts, property records, and personnel records in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles, as are deemed necessary by the County to assure proper accounting of funds and compliance with the provisions of this agreement.

All records and contracts required by this Agreement shall be available for audit, inspections, copying during normal business hours and as often as the County may deem necessary, except for client records protected by client confidentiality rules or regulations established by State of Federal funding sources ofRRHS. The County shall have the right to obtain and inspect any audit pertaining to the performance of this Agreement made by any local, state, or federal agency. RRHS shall retain all of its records and supporting documents related to this Agreement in accordance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations; in any event, such records and supporting documents will be retained by RRHS for at least five (5) years after termination of this Agreement.

B. RRHS shall provide an independent audit of all agency records by a certified public accountant at no additional cost to the County.

ARTICLE VI. EVALUATION

RRHS shall provide the County all necessary information for monitoring and evaluating the services provided under this Agreement. The County shall have the right to access the locale of record and personally select records as pertaining to any provision of this Agreement for inspection, audit, or copying.

ARTICLE VII. COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL RULES, REGULATIONS, AND LAWS

The performance of this Agreement shall be in compliance with all applicable laws, orders, and codes of federal, state, and local governments.

ARTICLE VIII. SUBCONTRACTS

All subcontracts related to the performance of services referred to in Article I made by the RRHS shall be subject to each Article set forth in this Agreement. ARTICLE IX. AGENCY'S CONTRACT LIABILITY

The County shall not be liable to any person, firm, or corporation that contracts with or provides goods or services to RRHS in connection with the services it has agreed to perform hereunder, or for debts or claims accruing to such parties against RRHS.

ARTICLEX. CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PARTIES

The relationship of RRHS to the County shall be that of an independent contractor. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as vesting or delegating to RRHS or any of the officers, employees, personnel, agents, or subcontractors of RRHS any rights, interest, or status as an employee of the County.

ARTICLE XI. INDEMNIFICATION

RRHS shall defend, indemnify, keep, and save harmless the County, its agents, officials, and employees, against all injuries, deaths, losses, damages, claims, patent claims, suits, liabilities, judgments, costs, and expenses, which may accrue against the County arising out of the performance of or failure to perform the services required by this Agreement of the terms of this Agreement, whether or not it shall be alleged or determined that the act was caused through negligence of omission ofRRHS or its employees, or of the subcontractors or its employees, if any. RRHS shall pay all charges of attorneys and all costs and other expenses incurred in connection therewith, and if any judgment shall be rendered against the County in any such actions, RRHS shall, at its own expense, satisfy and discharge the same. RRHS expressly understands and agrees that any performance bond or insurance protection required by this Agreement, or otherwise provided by RRHS, shall in no way limit the responsibility to indemnify, keep, and save harmless and defend the County as herein provided.

The indemnity hereunder shall continue until such time as any and all claims arising out ofRRHS's performance or failure to perform under the terms of this Agreement have been finally settled, regardless of when such claims are made.

In the event that any action, suit, or proceeding is brought against the County upon liability arising out of this Agreement, the County at once shall give notice thereof in writing to RRHS at the above listed address. Upon receipt of notice, RRHS, at its own expense, shall defend against such action and take all such steps as may be necessary or proper to prevent a judgment against the County. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to affect the County's right to provide its own defense and to recover from RRHS attorney's fees and expenses associated with such representation or the rights, privileges, and immunities of the County as set forth in Florida Statute 768.28. The indemnity provided by RRHS under this article shall not apply to the following:

1. To any settlement agreement entered into by the County without the written consent ofRRHS; 2. To any claim, injury, suit, or liability to the extent that such claim, injury, suit, or liability arises out of the actions or obligations of Baker County, its employees or agents; or 3. To any claim or expense of attorney or other professional fees incurred due to the County's retaining separate counsel, in addition to counsel provided by RRHS, and the County would not require representation by separate counsel.

ARTICLE XII. NON-ASSIGNABILITY

RRHS may not assign this Agreement without prior written consent of the County.

ARTICLE XIII. DISCRIMINATION

RRHS shall conform to the following Equal Employment Opportunity Statement: "No person shall on the grounds ofrace, creed, color, handicap, national origin, sex, age, political affiliation, or beliefs be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity funded in whole or in part with funds made available by the County."

ARTICLE XIV. TERMINATION

This Agreement may be terminated by either party for cause by giving to the other party thirty (3 0) days written notice of intent to terminate. Upon any termination hereof, the County shall only be liable to reimburse RRHS for reimbursable expenses actually incurred by RRHS prior to termination.

ARTICLE XV. AMENDMENTS TO THE CONTRACT

This Agreement may not be modified, amended, or extended orally. This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement executed by the governing bides of both parties.

ARTICLE XVI. SEVERABILITY

In the event that any paragraphs of this agreement is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such adjudication shall not affect or nullify the remaining paragraphs hereof, but shall be confined solely to the paragraphs involved in such decision.

ARTICLE XVII. HEADINGS

All articles and descriptive headings of paragraphs in this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation hereof.

ARTICLE XVIII. STANDARD ADDENDUM

The Baker County Standard Addendum to All Contracts and Agreements is attached and made a part hereof.

ARTICLE IXX. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE

Each of the parties hereto covenants to the other party that it has lawful authority to enter into this Agreement and has authorized the execution of this Agreement by the party's authorized representative.

In WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed, in duplicate, by their authorized representatives. AGENCY

RIVER REGION HUMAN SERVICES, INC.

By and through its

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

By:------Tiffany Galvin-Greene

Title: C.E.O.

Date of Execution------

COUNTY

BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA

By and through its

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

By: ______Mark Hartley

Title: Chairman

Date of Execution------

ATTEST:

Al Fraser Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners Pending Business

PENDING BUSINESS ITEM PRIORITY STATUS START DATE DUE DATE % COMPLETE COMMENTS Workshop held Decemer 15, 2015. Staff will work with Courthouse HVAC conversion recommendation High In Progress 2/1/2014 4/30/2015 75% Johnson Controls. Report back at a later date. Mining: Draft ordinance underway and will be presented at - January LPA meeting. Home Occupation – Ordinance for adoption will be presented at January LPA meeting. Rural Commercial ‐ Ordinance for adoption will be presented LDR Revisions High In Progress 05/06/2014 01/01/2016 75% at January LPA meeting Draft purchasing policy distributed to BOCC for review. Tabled Purchasing Policy Revisions Normal In Progress 11/18/2014 01/31/2015 75% until further notice. Shoals Park Timber Plan High In Progress 25% Draft RFP in process for timber management. Midpoint Parkway Design High In Progress 08/31/2016 - 75% Public Hearing held on January 19, 2016. - A 2nd Public Hearing will be held at a later date before project completion

COUNTY MANAGER BAKER COUNTY, FL (Population 27,000)

THE COMMUNITY Baker County, Florida (585 sq. miles) is located between Duval County (Jacksonville) and Columbia County (Lake City) and only a short distance from the Jacksonville Beaches. The county borders the State of Georgia, is 140 miles from the Florida Capital in Tallahassee, and 45 miles from the University of Florida in Gainesville.

One of Baker County's more unique advantages is small town atmosphere with big city convenience. All of the cultural, educational, recreational, and professional opportunities of a large metropolitan area are only twenty minutes away in Jacksonville.

Baker County is a progressive county with an excellent school system, an abundance of recreational facilities with a variety of churches representing almost all denominations. The business community is knowledgeable and supportive of the County government.

DEMOGRAPHICS Current population is 20,000. Macclenny, the County Seat, has a population of 7,000. Baker County is poised for growth due to its’ prime location and the five interchanges on Interstate 10, which crosses the county from east to west.

THE GOVERNMENT In 1861 by an act of the legislature, Baker County became the 39th county in Florida. The county was named for Honorable James McNair Baker, former Judge of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Florida.

The Board of County Commissioners is a five-member board that is the legislative and governing body of the county. Each County Commissioner is elected, at-large, for a four year term of office, and represents and resides in one of the five Commission Districts.

While individually independent, they collectively set policy. It is the County Manager’s responsibility to implement policy.

Other elected officials with whom the county commissioners interface, both ancillary and in some instances operationally, include the Clerk of the Court, Property Appraiser, Public Defender, Sheriff, Supervisor of Elections, State Attorney and Tax Collector.

CURRENT ISSUES

 Budget Constraints  Transportation Improvements  Economic Development  Inmate Housing  Very cooperative congenial Board looking for a progressive individual familiar with development codes, purchasing, Human Resources and Health Insurance. Must have good people skills. Excellent staff ready to implement change necessary for improvements on all fronts.  55% of the Baker County workforce commutes to Jacksonville for employment. The Economic Development Commission and the County have a plan to expand job opportunities in the community in conjunction with the major seaport expansion in Jacksonville.  Sizeable tracks of land available for both residential and industrial development when the economy recovers.

THE POSITION

The Commissioners appoint the County Manager. The County Manager is responsible for administration and overall daily operation of the departments. These include but are not limited to:

County Administration, Public Works (Transportation, Solid Waste) Purchasing, Administrative Services, Library, Parks & Recreation, Economic Development, Animal Control, Emergency Management Services, Finance, Planning/Zoning, Grants & Veterans Services.

The County Manager’s Responsibilities and Duties:

 Administer and carry out the directives and policies of the BCC and insure the enforcement of all Orders, Resolutions, Ordinances and Regulations. Provide reports as required to the Board on the state of the county issues, and any recommendations as to actions or programs necessary for the improvement of the county.  Provide the Board and individual members thereof, upon request, with data, and advice and recommendations concerning operations and issues.

 Prepare and submit an annual operating budget, including a capital improvement program. Establishment of schedules and procedures to be followed by all county departments, in connection with the budget and operation  Develop, any necessary policies and procedures to departmental operations.  Organize the work of the county departments. Monitor the departments, administration and operation of the county and make recommendations for reorganization and procedural changes as necessary.  Select, employ and supervise all personnel and fill all vacancies, positions or employment under the jurisdiction of the Board except County Attorney.  Suspend, discharge or remove any employee under the jurisdiction of the Board.  Negotiate leases, contracts, and other agreements, including consultant services, for the county subject to the approval of the Board and make recommendations concerning the nature and location of county improvements.  Handle Union negotiations with Fire/EMS Union and the Road Department personnel on a semi annual basis.  Ensure that all terms and conditions in all leases, contracts and agreements are performed and notify the Board of any noted violation thereof.

THE IDEAL CANDIDATE

The Board is interested in someone with a deep understanding and strong commitment to local government and the services provided. The successful candidate will have the knowledge and experience to provide executive level leadership. The manager will be required to make recommendations for Board consideration. Once approved by the Board proceed with implementation.

The individual must have positive consensus building approach in challenging staff to formulate better ways of meeting goals with minimum fiscal impact. Creativity is important. The willingness to implement new ideas and streamline services is important. The Board is receptive to developing progressive solutions.

The manager must have strong personal and communication skills. The candidate must effectively communicate with the staff, the community, the media, other governmental agencies and Constitutional offices. The manager is expected to be an organized professional with the ability to balance multiple issues at any given time.

THE QUALIFICATIONS

The ideal candidate will have progressively responsible experience in senior management with a Bachelors degree from an accredited college or university in a related field. An equivalent combination of education, training and experience that would reasonably be expected for the performance of job specific duties may be accepted.

COMPENSATION

The salary range is $70,000 to $90,000 depending on qualifications. Baker County participates the State of Florida Retirement system. The County also provides a comprehensive benefits plan. This position is a contract position. The chosen candidate will perform contract negotiations with the Baker County Board of Commissioners regarding salary and benefit packages.

HOW TO APPLY

Email your resume to [email protected] by ______no later than 4:00pm. You may also mail or hand-deliver your resume to 55 North Third Street, Macclenny, FL 32063. Faxed resumes will not be considered.

Florida Public Records Law requires disclosure of applications if requested.

Memorandum

To: Baker County Board of County Commissioners

From: Dale Williams, Interim County Manager

Date: 1/29/2016

Re: Reorganization of the Maintenance Department

At this time our Custodians are reporting to the County Manager. Staff is suggesting we restructure our Maintenance Department by having Shannon Whitfield as a Director and over the 1 full-time custodian and 2 part-time custodians.

Shannon has been with the County for 15 years. He has performed duties in a couple of departments with the County; however, the past three years has solely run the Maintenance Department. Shannon has shown full dedication and enthusiasm to excel with the County. At this time, Custodians do not have a central leader to report to for day-to-day operations. The recommend restructuring of the Maintenance Department will consists of a Salary increase for Shannon with a title change to Maintenance Director and proper work attire consisting of polo shirt and cargo pants. We have included a new custodian work schedule, proposed budget amendments, and organizational chart.

Budgetary Amendment consists of moving the two part-time custodian’s salary and benefits from the Courthouse Department to the Maintenance Department. Hence, the Maintenance Department would consist of one Director, one full-time Custodian, and two part-time Custodians. The total Increase in the Budget would be $2,225.

ACTION NEEDED: To approve or deny the new Maintenance Department Structure and Budget Changes effective, February 2, 2016.

1 BAKER COUNTY Organization Chart

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

-- M - - FACILITIES MAINTENACE DEPARTMENT 2016 EXPENDITURE FINANCE REPORT AS OF JANUARY 28, 2016

Period Remaining Add Courthouse Account Account Title Budget Expenses YTD Expenses Balance Employee Proposed Budget 51200 REGULAR SALARIES/WAGES$ 57,892.00 $ ‐ $ 12,691.94 $ 45,200.06 $ 25,120.00 $ 90,912.00 I

52100 FICA TAXES $ 4,429.00 $ ‐ $ 866.07 $ 3,562.93 $ 1,922.00 $ 6,954.91 I 52200 RETIREMENT ‐ FRS $ 4,226.00 $ ‐ $ 921.46 $ 3,304.54 $ 1,834.00 $ 6,611.00 I

52300 HEALTH INSURANCE $ 22,729.00 $ ‐ $ 3,974.67 $ 18,754.33 $ ‐ $ 15,899.00 I

54100 COMMUNICATIONS $ 2,250.00 $ 45.39 $ 608.05 $ 1,641.95 $ 2,250.00 54302 WATER $ 500.00 $ ‐ $ 120.47 $ 379.53 $ 500.00 54400 RENTALS AND LEASES $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ 54600 REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE$ 15,000.00 $ 1,199.91 $ 4,456.37 $ 10,543.63 $ 15,000.00 54602 VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT. $ 500.00 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 500.00 $ 500.00 54901 ADVERTISING $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ 55210 OPERATING SUPPLIES $ 1,500.00 $ 117.72 $ 270.15 $ 1,229.85 $ 1,500.00 55211 FUEL $ 2,000.00 $ 268.56 $ 737.13 $ 1,262.87 $ 2,000.00 56400 EQUIPMENT $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 111,026.00 $ 86,379.69 $ 142,126.91 Worksheet

Change +(‐) FICA Health Ins Retirement $ 7,900.00 Shannon Whitfield 32,100.00 $ 603.91 24.6 % increase 40,000.00 3,060.00 11,347.00 2,904.00 57,311.00 $ 551.00 15% 36,916.00 2,824.00 11,347.00 2,680.00 53,767.00 $ (6,830.00) Tanya Anderson 25,792.00 1,973.00 4,552.00 1,873.00 34,190.00

$ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ Uniforms $ ‐ Currently: $ ‐ Shannon $8.11/weekly 421.72 $ ‐ Tanya $9.48/weekly (492.96) 914.68 $ ‐ Additions: $ ‐ Linda $6.00/weekly 312.00 $ ‐ Lynn $6.00/weekly 312.00 $ 2,224.91 Tanya $6.00/weekly 312.00 SAVINGS: 864.76 49.92 Baker County Board of Commissioners Maintenance Supervisor Job Description

JOB OVERVIEW Performs supervisory duties involving maintenance, repair, grounds and related systems and equipment to enhance and maintain assets at a prescribed standard.

MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Graduation from high school or possession of a GED Certificate; and Seven years of work experience in construction, maintenance, or the skilled trades; including One year of experience in a supervisory capacity. -Or- An equivalent combination of education, training and experience that would reasonably be expected to provide the job-specific competencies noted below.

CORE COMPETENCIES  Customer Commitment - Proactively seeks to understand the needs of our customers and provide the highest standards of service.  Dedication to Professionalism and Integrity - Demonstrates and promotes fair, honest, professional and ethical behaviors that establishes trust throughout the organization and with the public we serve.  Organizational Excellence - Takes ownership for excellence through one's personal effectiveness and dedication to the continuous improvement of our operations.  Success through Teamwork - Collaborates and builds partnerships through trust and the open exchange of diverse ideas and perspectives to achieve organizational goals. JOB SPECIFIC COMPETENCIES  Considerable knowledge of the rules, regulations and operational requirements of the organization to which assigned.  Working knowledge of accepted methods, practices and procedures used in the repair and maintenance of buildings, grounds and related systems and equipment.  Working knowledge of equipment, tools and materials used in the repair and maintenance of buildings, grounds and related systems and equipment.  Working knowledge of safety practices and principles related to the repair and maintenance of buildings, grounds, and related systems and equipment.  Working knowledge of record keeping requirements.  Working knowledge of laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and standard operating procedures related to the repair and maintenance of buildings, grounds, and related systems and equipment.  Working knowledge of the organization’s procurement system.  Skill in overseeing and performing routine repairs, maintenance of buildings, grounds and related systems and equipment.  Skill in the use of tools and equipment used in the maintenance of building, grounds and related systems and equipment.  Ability to communicate effectively both orally and in writing.  Ability to accurately assess maintenance and repair needs and make adjustments to maintenance crews and/or schedules as required.  Ability to collect, organize and evaluate data and develop logical conclusions.  Ability to work outside in a sub-tropical climate.  Ability to stand for extended periods of time, kneel, bend and climb in the performance of duties.  Ability to work effectively with others.  Ability to use a computer and related software.  Ability to read and interpret construction plans, specifications, blueprints, diagrams and drawings.  Ability to plan, organize and oversee the work of others.

REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES Note: The following duties are illustrative and not exhaustive. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related, or a logical assignment to the position. Depending on assigned area of responsibility, incumbents in the position may perform one or more of the activities described below.  Oversees the activities of skilled trades and maintenance personnel, including custodial staff, engaged in the repair, maintenance and cleaning of buildings, grounds and related systems and equipment.  Develops, analyzes and updates maintenance policies and procedures to ensure an efficient, effective and safe work environment.  Monitors, prioritizes, participates in, and inspects work activities to ensure compliance with plans, specifications, codes, standards, regulations, operating instructions and safety standards and to ensure operational efficiency and a safe working environment.  Plans job layouts, estimates materials, determines equipment and tools, and makes drawings or sketches necessary for maintenance personnel to properly perform work assignments.  Determines, schedules and oversees preventive maintenance activities to increase operational effectiveness and extend the lifecycle of assets.  Requisitions equipment, tools and materials in a timely manner to ensure maintenance and construction schedules are met.  Assists in developing contract specifications and overseeing the performance of contracts in assigned area to ensure construction and maintenance requirements are satisfied and services are completed in accordance with specifications.  Answers questions and provides information related to work assignments including resolving problems, handling complaints and providing technical expertise in area of assignment.  Prepares and maintains manual and computerized reports, records and logs related to the work performed, and materials, equipment and supplies used to provide an audit trail of activities.  Performs other related duties as required.  Reports to the County Manager

This classification description is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as an all inclusive list of the duties associated with a particular position. Management may require incumbents to perform job duties other than those contained in this document at any time.

Baker County Board of Commissioners Custodian Job Description

JOB OVERVIEW Performs custodial duties at County facilities and grounds. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS Completion of the sixth grade. Or An equivalent combination of education, training and experience that would reasonably be expected to provide the job-specific competencies noted below. CORE COMPETENCIES  Customer Commitment - Proactively seeks to understand the needs of our customers and provide the highest standards of service.  Dedication to Professionalism and Integrity - Demonstrates and promotes fair, honest, professional and ethical behaviors that establishes trust throughout the organization and with the public we serve.  Organizational Excellence - Takes ownership for excellence through one's personal effectiveness and dedication to the continuous improvement of our operations.  Success through Teamwork - Collaborates and builds partnerships through trust and the open exchange of diverse ideas and perspectives to achieve organizational goals. JOB SPECIFIC COMPETENCIES  Knowledge of cleaning supplies, products, and equipment.  Knowledge of safety procedures in use of cleaning supplies, products, and equipment.  Ability to prepare and maintain records, logs, lists, and reports.  Ability to effectively communicate verbally and in-writing.  Ability to lift, carry, and move supplies, equipment, and furniture. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES Note: The following duties are illustrative and not exhaustive. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related, or a logical assignment to the position. Depending on assigned area of responsibility, incumbents in the position may perform one or more of the activities described below.  Dusts, polishes, moves, and arranges furniture.  Sweeps, mops, waxes, and polishes floors.  Cleans and washes windows and mirrors.  Cleans restrooms, and replaces supplies.  Empties garbage cans and wastebaskets.  Performs minor repairs and maintenance of cleaning equipment.  Reports requirement for major repairs, adjustments, or replacements.  Inventories, orders, and replenishes paper products, cleaning supplies and related equipment.  Delivers supplies, related equipment, and runs errands, as needed.  Opens and secures facilities, common areas, and grounds, as directed.  Performs other related duties as required.  Ability to work outside in a sub-tropical climate.  Ability to stand for extended periods of time, kneel, bend and climb in the performance of duties.  Reports to the Maintenance Department Supervisor

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY 2016-01 •Building Key Policy•

The purpose of this policy is to provide optimal physical security and safety for building occupants and to protect the assets of the Baker County Board of County Commissioners. This policy applies to all buildings maintained by the Baker County Board of County Commissioners.

KEY HOLDER RESPONSIBILITIES Staff is responsible for maintaining building security. A key holder is responsible for all keys issued to them. Keys remain the property of the Baker County Board of County Commissioners. The holder of keys to any County facility assumes responsibility for the safekeeping of the key and its use. It’s understood that the key is only to be used by the holder and that they will not make it available to anyone else. In an effort to minimize loss or misuse of keys, all key holders are strongly encouraged to leave County facility keys in a secure location during non-working periods. 1. Employees will not loan or transfer their keys to any other individual. 2. Staff shall not unlock a building or room for another individual unless the individual is known by them to have a legitimate need to enter. 3. Each Department Head will be responsible for keys issued within their department. It is required that each department maintains their own internal written inventory of key holders on the provided “Key Holder Inventory” form (Attachment “A”). 4. Keys will be returned to the Department Head when an employee terminates or transfers within the County. It is the responsibility of the Department Head to retrieve all keys from departing staff. 5. Lost or stolen keys must be reported to Department Head immediately. It shall be at the Department Heads discretion to determine if re-keying is necessary

This policy shall become effective February 1, 2016.

______Dale Williams, Interim County Manager Key Holder Inventory

Facility Name: ______Department Head: ______

Employee Name Date Key Date Key Other Notes Received Returned

MEMORANDUM

DATE: November 10, 2015

TO: Baker County Land Planning Agency

FROM: Ed Preston, Planning and Zoning Director

RE: Boree 225 Acre Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Zoning Change

DESCRIPTION This 225 acre site is a portion of the former Cedar Creek Development of Regional Impact which was abandoned in 2011. It is east of Cowpen Road, straddles the private road named “Braxton” and is entirely south of King Ruise Road,

General Location BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting a large scale land use and zoning change. The COMP Plan amendment request is to change the future land use from AG A (Agricultural 1 dwelling per 10 Acres) and AG B (Agricultural 1 dwelling per 7.5 acres) to RES D (Very Low Density Residential – 1 Dwelling per Acre, net ). The 1 acre per dwelling net density will be of mixed residential lot sizes with no more than 112 - .5 acre lots, no more than 56 - 1 acre lots and no more than 56 2.5 to 5 acre lots. An asterisk on the future land use map indicates the application also will provide up to 5 acres for institutional use and another five acres for some combination of up to 2 acres commercial, institutional and recreational uses. The purpose of this applications is to allow development of residential lots.

STANDARDS OF REVIEW

• Comprehensive planning decisions are generally legislative. • AG A and AG B to Very Low Density Residential - 225 Acres

• Standard of Review: “Fairly Debatable.” • Findings of Fact—NO • • Zoning decisions are generally quasi-judicial. • Ag 10 and AG 7.5 to RC 1 225 Acres • Standard of Review: “Competent Substantial Evidence.” • Findings of Fact—Yes • Ex Parte Communications—NO

Location 2014 Aerial

Current Zoning

Subject Site 225 Acres

RC 1

Proposed Zoning

Current Future Land Use

Subject Site 225 Acres

Proposed Future Land use

Findings The applicant has indicated that the request to change the future land use and zoning designation to make it available for development into 1 acre net-density residential with conventional construction only (no mobile homes).

The applicant intends for the 1 acre net-density residential to be supported with individual wells and septic tanks.

The land is currently vacant of development. The future land use designation of the property is Agricultural A and Agricultural B.

Traffic Analysis

The County utilized the consulting services of a consulting traffic engineer to review the applicant’s submittal. Note that the applicant is not seeking a certificate of concurrency at this time.

US 90 Peak Hour Loads

I-10 Peak Hour Loads Baker County has no deficient road segments currently and none will be caused by the eventual build-out of this amendment. However, traffic loads are calculated at the time of concurrency application and conditions change with time. The projected loads on various road segments are all below 65% of capacity but one. CR 228 between I-10 and the Macclenny City limits rises to 90.8%. The amendment traffic adds 4 trips to the 1350 trip capacity.

Environmental Conditions A comprehensive review of the site was conducted in 2005 and 2006 by the Florida Department of Community Affairs and was found in compliance following an Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report 2006-01.

The site has some wetland involvement shown below. Wetlands will not be developed except for required road crossings. !}

Generalized Wetlands

FEMA 100 Year Flood Plains

Consistency with Comprehensive Plan

The application for this amendment states the following:

E. Suitability/Compatibility

The subject property is suitable for low density residential development. Wetland impacts will be avoided and minimized during the platting process pursuant to jurisdictional agency permitting requirements. It is anticipated that higher quality wetlands within the property will be preserved and impressed with a conservation easement, while impacted wetlands will be mitigated in accordance with agency permitting requirements, resulting in enhanced ecological conditions. The Applicant intends to plat and develop the property in stages, timed in accordance with market demand. Therefore, it is anticipated that significant areas will remain in silviculture prior to platting and conversion to residential use. This approach is consistent with the intent of the Baker County Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"). The proposed development is located within the County's UGA as referenced by Policies A.1.6.9, A.1.10.3 and A.4. 1.5, which call for residential urban use within the UGA to provide housing for the workforce necessary to support industrial development and business expansion in Baker County. The Cedar Creek DRI was abandoned as a result of the recession and was re designated to Agricultural at the request of the landowners in 2012 with the expectation that large lot, residential subdivisions may be forthcoming. The proposed amendment provides an appropriate level of density, given the location of the property. Properties that are farther to the east may be more suitable for higher densities that would be served by an expansion of would be This level of density serves as a transition between more urban densities on central water and sewer and more rural areas at a density of one unit per ten acres or less as planned in Baker County. The U.S. Census recognizes urban areas as developed with a population density of 1,000 persons per square mile, which the State has also recognized in its definition of Dense Urban Land Area. At the proposed density of one unit per acre, the Subject Property would be developed with roughly 1,800 persons per square mile, assuming 2.82 persons per household as reported by the 2010 U.S Census. This is nearly double the minimum density defined as urban by the U.S. Census and State of Florida. As such, the proposed amendment achieves a much more efficient use of land as contemplated by the County's UGA policies in the Comprehensive Plan, while maintaining the density well below the maximum allowed on well and septic. As such, the proposed amendment achieves an appropriate balance between urbanizing to locate housing for the workforce to support future business development, while ensuring protection of surficial and groundwater resources. The proposed density is compatible with adjacent land uses. The County's UGA strategy recognizes that urban densities at one unit per acre or higher will potentially occur adjacent to lower, rural densities occurring in Agriculture Ag A (one dwelling unit per ten acres) and Agriculture Ag B (one unit per 7.5 acres). The Very Low Density land use category provides the most suitable residential designation at the subject location, which is consistent with the high end of the density range allowed transition zone along the urban/rural fringe. In addition, the south

and central areas of the Subject Property are located adjacent to two small neighborhoods with comparable designations - very low density, low density and medium density land use designations. County Comp Plan Analysis including Compatibility

From the application

F. Discouraging Urban Sprawl

The proposed amendment is generally consistent with the County's UGA strategy which seeks to:

1. Confine urban uses within a limited distance surrounding the Macclenny/Glen St. Mary urban areas; and 2. Provide urban residential land use to support the labor needs of planned industrial development along the I-10 corridor.

On a relative scale, the UGA represents a reasonable allocation of urban land use, given the large scale of Baker County and extent of acreage devoted permanently to rural use. The County's agricultural study documents the decline in the silviculture industry as referenced in the amendments adopted based on the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report, and indicates that silviculture areas within the UGA will be planned for conversion to urban use. Although the Cedar Creek DRJ was abandoned, the Subject Property can still serve as a transition to lower densities, while providing a potential labor supply to support future industrial use, including the Wooc;lstork Park Industrial site, which was expanded through a plan amendment in 2013. The proposed density achieves a more efficient use of land as compared to the rural densities outside of the UGA. but avoids the need for extension of central water and wastewater.

Staff Finding The County’s UGA strategy also seeks: “Within the US 90 I-10 Transportation Growth Corridor - comprehensive master planned projects addressing new regional utility, transportation, education, recreation and stormwater facilities. Within the Urban Growth Boundary - areas currently served or areas that can be served by logical extensions of existing transportation and utility systems.”

From the application

Indicator #1. Designates substantial areas of the jurisdiction for low density or single use development.

The UGA limits the area where urban use may be approved in Baker County. While the proposed amendment allows for low density, residential use, it comprises a small percentage of the UGA. As such, it does not represent a substantial area of the jurisdiction. In addition, the proposed amendment achieves more efficient use of land (i.e., higher density) as compared to the existing rural development pattern.

From the application. Indicator #2. Designates significant amounts of urban development to occur in rural areas at substantial distances from existing urban areas while not using undeveloped lands that are available and suitable for development.

The proposed amendment is consistent with the urban densities planned for the UGA. While lands are included in the UGA to the east of the Subject Property, the owner of the land which formerly comprised the eastern portion of the Cedar Creek DRI sought and obtained a rural land use designation, thus not making the property available for immediate urban use. In addition, the proposed amendment will not require extension of utilities.

From the application. Indicator #3. Designates urban development in radial, strip, isolated, or ribbon patterns generally emanating from existing urban developments.

As confirmed by Policy A.1.1 0.3, the UGA is intended in part to ensure that a significant labor supply will be available to support industrial development in Baker County. The Subject Property is located midway between the Macclenny urban area and the Woodstock Park planned industrial site at Sanderson, and is well connected by the transportation network to allow reasonable access to both urban areas without impacting I-10.

From the application. Indicator #6. Fails to maximize use of existing public facilities and services.

The proposed amendment will not require public utilities. Services provided locally would be garbage collection, student bussing, police, fire and EMS that currently serve all lands within the UGA. These services will become relatively more efficient over time as the UGA urbanizes as compared to maintaining the rural density pattern. The location of the proposed amendment site will allow access to local employment and commercial uses without impacting I-10, thus maximizing the use of the local street network and regional highways maximizing the use of the local street network and regional highways

From the application.

Indicator #7. Fails to maximize use of future public facilities and services.

There are no public plans for extending utilities throughout the UGA. Services provided locally would be garbage collection, student bussing, police, fire and EMS that currently serve all lands within the UGA. These services will become relatively more efficient over time as the UGA urbanizes as compared to maintaining the rural density pattern. The location of the proposed amendment site will allow access to local employment and commercial uses without impacting I-10, thus maximizing the use of the local street network and regional highways.

Staff Finding This proposal and the historic low growth rate for the County are not of sufficient scale to utilize central utility systems in a cost effective manner. No extensions of water or sewer systems are currently planned. The net density of this amendment can be supported by State regulations on on-site sewage disposal systems (1 well and 1 septic tank per ½ acre).

From the application. Indicator #8. Allows for land use patterns or timing which disproportionately increase the Cost in time, money, and energy of providing and maintaining facilities and services, including roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, law enforcement, education, health care ,fire and emergency response, and general government.

Services provided at the Subject Property include garbage collection, student bussing, police, fire and EMS that currently serve all lands within Baker County. These services will become relatively more efficient over time as the UGA urbanizes as compared to maintaining the rural density pattern. In addition, the location of the proposed amendment allows for reasonably

Staff Finding The amendment allows for a land use pattern that will increase the cost of providing facilities and services including, roads, law enforcement, schools and fire protection. The anticipated ad valorem tax revenues from conventional construction is anticipated to offset the costs increases.

From the application. Indicator #10. Discourages or inhibits infill development or the redevelopment of existing Neighborhoods and communities.

The proposed amendment will not discourage or inhibit redevelopment or infill development within existing neighborhoods. The proposed density at one unit per acre serves a different market from the moderate density neighborhoods. In addition, the intent of the UGA is to provide urban uses at locations closer to the industrial parks planned along I-10.housing

From the Application Indicator #11. Fails to encourage a functional mix of uses.

Not Applicable. The proposed amendment is not intended to achieve mixed use on the Subject Property. However, the proposed amendment implements the UGA policy strategy in terms of providing residential uses at locations that allow for alternate routes to access existing and planned employment, shopping and recreational areas.

Staff Finding The proposed amendment proposes a functional mix (thru the Overlay 11-2) of lot sizes and limited uses with the up to 5 acres for a community center (institutional use) and another 5 acres of commercial and recreational uses.

From the application Indicator #13. Results in the loss of significant amounts of functional open space.

The proposed amendment will not result in the loss of significant amounts of functional open space. As previously determined the UGA confines urban use and will maintain substantial open space in the UGA.

Staff Finding The Urban Growth Study indicates large scale amendments within the urban growth area are required to have balanced land uses within the amendment including functional open space. The amendment proposes maintaining all on-site wetland except for road crossings and some acres for recreation, both of which will serve to provide open space.

Staff Finding

The following policies also address issues raised by this application.

Policy A.1.6.3 Comply with the Concurrency Management Plan The County shall encourage development primarily in areas where public facilities already satisfy required levels of service or are planned to meet the requirements of the County Concurrency Management Plan for potable water, sewer, solid waste, and drainage and to meet the provisions of 9J-5.0055(2)(a); for parks and recreation to meet the provisions of 9J- 5.0055(2)(b) and for roads to meet the provisions of 9J-5.0055(2)(c) FAC.

Policy A.1.6.10 Area‐wide Assessment Requirements for Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendments

Any local government comprehensive plan amendments subject to review as a large scale plan amendment under Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, and transmitted by Baker County to the Department of Community Affairs prior to the effective date of the updated plan to be adopted must include an area-wide

assessment covering the geographic area of the county where the amendment is located and shall address:

a. Protection of natural resources, including wetlands, floodplains, habitat for listed plant and animal species, river/creek shorelines, and groundwater quality; b. Protection of cultural heritage; c. Promotion of economic development; d. Promotion of emergency management, including creating shelter space, directing population concentrations away from known wildfire areas, creating shelter space (including areas for special needs citizens and animals), and implementation of appropriate parts of the Local Mitigation Strategy; e. Adequate provision of public facilities and services including transportation, water supply, wastewater treatment, parks and recreation, libraries, and schools; f. Provision of affordable housing, where appropriate; g. Inclusion of intensity standards; and a h. List of allowable uses.

Policy A.1.8.5 Implement the Urban Growth Strategy

Policy A.1.7.3 Utility Master Plan

Policy A.4.1.3 Job Development

Concurrency No concurrency agreement is being sought by the applicant at this time, nor is a concurrency analysis required at this time. A concurrency determination is required as early as the amendment and no later than a development order. Because this amendment is 225 acres and because of the County’s limited capacities, it is reasonable to examine how the eventual concurrency determinations will impact the County and the developer. Concurrency is a reservation system. Applicants meeting concurrency submission requirements can reserve capacity for services such as schools and transportation if capacity exists. If capacities to provide these services are exceeded, applicants are required to enter into proportionate fair share agreements to provide improvements to infrastructure so that capacities can be increased.

The Development Review Committee reviewed this application on Wednesday November 18, 2015.

The LPA heard this on November 19, 2015 and recommended approval.

The Board of County Commissioners will hear this on February 2, 2016.

RECOMMENDATION The Baker County Planning and Zoning Department has determined that this application is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and recommends that the Board of County Commissioners to transmit it to the Department of Economic Development.

Exhibit B

Boree Map Amendment Overlay Policy

This Overlay applies to the 225 acres included in the Boree Investments, LLC comprehensive amendment application as footnoted on the Future Land Use Map, which includes the following parcels ___ (“Subject Property”). The purpose of this Overlay policy is to provide additional development standards for the development of the Subject Property. These include:

1. The density of one unit per gross acre shall apply to the entire 225 acres, but lot arrangement and development impacts shall minimize and avoid wetland impacts. Wetlands may be included within platted lots, but wetland impacts shall be limited to road and utility crossings and passive recreational uses. An exception shall be allowed for impacting low quality, isolated wetlands of less than .5 acres. 2. Residential units shall be developed on varying lot sizes, potentially ranging from .5 acres to 5 acres, subject to the following percentages:

A. A maximum of 50% of the 225 units shall be developed at lot sizes of 1 acre or less. B. A maximum of 25% of the 225 units shall be developed on lot sizes of greater than 1 acre and up to 2.5 acres. C. A maximum of 25% of the 225 units shall be developed at lot sizes of greater than 2.5 1111acres. 3. A five acre site shall be made available for public uses. This site shall be identified and dedicated for public use during the platting of the subject property. The site shall be conveyed to Baker County for the price of $10 upon written request from Baker County. However, in the event that Baker County does not develop the site for a public use within five years following its dedication, ownership of the site shall revert to the majority land owner within the Subject Property and may be developed thenceforth in accordance with the terms of this policy. 4. A five acre site shall be reserved to form a village center, which may include commercial uses, active recreation uses and public uses. Commercial uses shall not exceed 2 acres. Active and passive recreational uses may also occur outside of the village center. Recreational or low intensity public uses shall be arranged to create a transitional land use buffer between the commercial site and residential neighborhoods within the Subject Property. 5. All residential units shall be site-built homes (i.e., not mobile homes). 6. Internal roadways within the 225 acres shall be stubbed out to connect to existing, adjoining roadways to allow for an interconnected roadway network. 7. King Ruise Road shall be paved from the access point for the Subject Property east to the adjoining pavement west of CR 139. Paving shall be initiated no later than the issuance of building permits for 75% of the lots in the final plat which provides access to King Ruise Road

and shall be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the final lot in that subdivision. 8. Two points of vehicular access shall be provided for any subdivision providing 25 or more residential lots. An unimproved secondary access point can be temporarily reserved for emergency vehicles, until such time as a second, improved access point is constructed on King Reuse Road as described above or an alternative access point is provided in accordance with County subdivision standards. 9. The Zoning Code shall be amended to recognize that this Overlay Policy authorizes the nonresidential uses as described herein, which may occur within the RC-1 Zoning District as applied to the Subject Property without need for the designation of a commercial zoning district. The commercial site required by this Overlay Policy shall be identified on the first plat filed for the Subject Property.

#4590437 v1

ORDINANCE 2016-01

AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA, MAKING A LARGE SCALE AMENDMENT TO THE BAKER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY RECLASSIFYING APPROXIMATELY 225 ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY, EAST OF COWPEN ROAD AND SOUTH OF KING RUISE ROAD, OWNED BY BOREE INVESTMENTS, INC. AND GLEN FOREST, LLC, FROM AGRICULTURAL A AND AGRICULTURAL B TO RES D ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP; PROVIDING FINDINGS BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; PROVIDING DIRECTION TO STAFF; PROVIDING DIRECTION FOR RECORDING; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act; Section 163.3161 through 163.3215, Florida Statutes, require that each local government prepare and adopt a comprehensive land use plan; and WHEREAS, Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, requires that any amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or any element or portion thereof be made by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida wishes to make a large-scale amendment to its Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed large-scale plan amendment is to approximately 225 acres of real property owned by BOREE INVESTMENTS, INC. AND GLEN FOREST, LLC; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was conducted on Thursday, November 19th, 2015, after 6:00 P.M. by the Baker County Local Planning Agency (LPA); and the LPA provided its recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida; and

Baker County Ordinance 2016-01 Page 1

WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida considered the recommendations of the LPA at a duly advertised public hearing held on Tuesday, February 2nd, 2016, after 6:00 P.M. and approved the plan amendments for the applicant; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida finds that the adoption of this ordinance and the reclassification of real property described herein is consistent with the goals objectives and policies of the Baker County Comprehensive Plan and is in the best interest of Baker County, Florida and its citizens. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida as follows: Section 1. Adoption and Incorporation of Recitals. The Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida hereby adopts the above recitals and incorporates them herein as a part of this ordinance. Section 2. Ownership and Description of Property. The real property reclassified by this ordinance is owned by BOREE INVESTMENTS, INC. AND GLEN FOREST, LLC and is more particularly described by Baker County Parcel Identification Numbers: 04-3S- 21-0000-0000-0055; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1120; 04-3S-21-0204-0000- 1130; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1140; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1300; 04-3S-21- 0204-0000-1310; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1320; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1330; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1340; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1350; 05-3S-21-0000- 0000-0120; 32-2S-21-0000-0000-0010; 32-2S-21-0181-0000-1200; 32- 2S-21-0181-0000-1250; and as described in “Exhibit 1” which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Section 3. Purpose and Authority for Ordinance. This ordinance is adopted for the purpose of reclassifying the future land use designation of the above-referenced parcels of real

Baker County Ordinance 2016-01 Page 2 property from AGRICULTURAL A (Agricultural 1 dwelling per 10 acres) and AGRICULTURAL B (Agricultural 1 dwelling per 7.5 acres) to RES D (Very Low Density Residential at 1 dwelling per acre net) on the Future Land Use Map of the Baker County Comprehensive Plan and is adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida pursuant to the authority granted by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Reclassification of Property. The Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida reclassifies the parcels of real property described in “Exhibit 1” from AGRICULTURAL A (Agricultural 1 dwelling per 10 acres) and AGRICULTURAL B (Agricultural 1 dwelling per 7.5 acres) to RES D (Very Low Density Residential at 1 dwelling per acre net) on the Future Land Use Map of the Baker County Comprehensive Plan. Section 5. Direction to Staff. A. Following the first approval of this ordinance by the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida, staff is directed to transmit a copy of this ordinance with any necessary supporting materials to the State of Florida, Department of Economic Opportunity for their comments and suggestions. B. Upon receipt of the response and comments from and by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, staff is further directed to provide careful analysis and response to the comments and suggestions made by the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and to place this matter before the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida for final approval. C. Following final approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida, staff is directed to transmit a final copy of this ordinance to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity.

Baker County Ordinance 2016-01 Page 3

Section 6. Effective Date of Ordinance. The effective date of this large-scale comprehensive plan amendment shall be 31 days after adoption by the Board of County Commissioners and after the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity notifies Baker County that this ordinance and the plan amendment package is in compliance with and in accordance with Section 163.3184(3)(C)(4), Florida Statutes. Section 7. Recording of Ordinance. This ordinance shall be recorded by the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida in the official records of Baker County.

PASSED AND TRANSMITTED TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY on first reading, with a quorum present and voting, by the Board of County Commission of Baker County, Florida, in regular session, this 2nd day of February 2016. PASSED AND ADOPTED on second reading this ____ day of

______, 2016.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA

______JAMES G. BENNETT, Chairman

ATTEST:

______STACIE D. HARVEY, Clerk to the Board

Baker County Ordinance 2016-01 Page 4

ORDINANCE 2016-02

AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE BAKER COUNTY ZONING MAP BY RECLASSIFYING APPROXIMATELY 225 ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY EAST OF COWPEN ROAD AND SOUTH OF KING RUISE ROAD, OWNED BY BOREE INVESTMENTS, INC. AND GLEN FOREST, LLC; FROM AGRICULTURAL AT 1 UNIT PER 10 ACRES (AG 10) AND AGRICULTURAL AT 1 UNIT PER 7.5 ACRES (AG 7.5) TO RESIDENTIAL CONVENTIONAL DISTRICT (RC 1) ON THE BAKER COUNTY ZONING MAP; PROVIDING FINDINGS BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; PROVIDING DIRECTION FOR RECORDING; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act; Section 163.3161, Florida Statutes, require that each local government prepare and adopt a comprehensive land use plan and zoning map and regulations; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida wishes to amend the Baker County Zoning Map; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning change is for approximately 225 acres of real property owned by BOREE INVESTMENTS, INC. AND GLEN FOREST, LLC; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was conducted on Thursday, November 19th, 2015, after 6:00 P.M. by the Baker County Local Planning Agency (LPA); and the LPA provided its recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida considered the recommendation(s) of the LPA at a duly advertised public hearing held on Tuesday, February 2nd, 2016, after 6:00 P.M. and approved the zoning change requested by the applicant; and

Baker County Ordinance 2016-02 Page 1 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida finds that the amendment to the Baker County Zoning Map and the reclassification of real property described herein is in the best interest of Baker County, Florida and its citizens. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida as follows: Section 1. Adoption and Incorporation of Recitals. The Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida hereby adopts the above recitals and incorporates them herein as a part of this ordinance. Section 2. Ownership and Description of Property. The real property reclassified by this ordinance is owned by BOREE INVESTMENTS, INC. AND GLEN FOREST, LLC and is more particularly described by Baker County Parcel Identification Numbers: 04-3S- 21-0000-0000-0055; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1120; 04-3S-21-0204-0000- 1130; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1140; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1300; 04-3S-21- 0204-0000-1310; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1320; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1330; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1340; 04-3S-21-0204-0000-1350; 05-3S-21-0000- 0000-0120; 32-2S-21-0000-0000-0010; 32-2S-21-0181-0000-1200; 32- 2S-21-0181-0000-1250; and as described in “Exhibit 1” which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Section 3. Purpose and Authority for Ordinance. This ordinance is adopted for the purpose of amending the Baker County Zoning Map and for the purpose of reclassifying the zoning designation of the above-referenced parcels of real property from AGRICULTURAL AT 1 UNIT PER 10 ACRES (AG 10) AND AGRICULTURAL AT 1 UNIT PER 7.5 ACRES (AG 7.5) TO RESIDENTIAL CONVENTIONAL DISTRICT (RC 1) on the Baker County Zoning Map and is adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida pursuant to the authority granted by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Reclassification of Property. The Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida reclassifies the parcels of

Baker County Ordinance 2016-02 Page 2 real property described in “Exhibit 1” from AGRICULTURAL AT 1 UNIT PER 10 ACRES (AG 10) AND AGRICULTURAL AT 1 UNIT PER 7.5 ACRES (AG 7.5) TO RESIDENTIAL CONVENTIONAL DISTRICT (RC 1) on the Baker County Zoning Map. Section 5. Direction to Staff. Following approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida, staff is directed to file the same in the Official Records of Baker County, Florida. Section 6. Effective Date of Ordinance. This Ordinance shall become effective upon adoption by the Board of County Commissioners of Baker County, Florida.

PASSED on first reading, with a quorum present and voting, by the Board of County Commission of Baker County, Florida, in regular session, this 2nd day of February 2016. PASSED AND ADOPTED on second reading this ____ day of

______, 2016.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA

______JAMES G. BENNETT, Chairman

ATTEST:

______STACIE D. HARVEY, Clerk to the Board

Baker County Ordinance 2016-02 Page 3