Essenmacher, Et Al. V. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Et Al. 02-CV-10172-Class

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Essenmacher, Et Al. V. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Et Al. 02-CV-10172-Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN GEORGE ESSENMACHER, individually and No. 0 2 - 1 0 17 2 on behalf of all others similarly situated , Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE V. FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS MERRILL LYNCH & CO ., INC. and HENRY BLODGET, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. DAVID M. L AWSON '1 R! ,rem ~~`~ IF MArn~r~rW ' JU L; . BK~t.DE CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Plaintiff George Essenmacher (" Plaintiff') alleges the following based upon the investigation of counsel, which included a review of United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filings by Lycos ("Lycos," "LCOS," or the "Company"), as well as regulatory filings and reports, securities analysts' reports and advisories about Lycos issued by Merrill Lynch & Co. ("Merrill Lynch"), press releases and other public statements issued by Merrill Lynch, and media reports about Lycos. Plaintiff believes that substantial additional evidentiary support will exist for the allegations set forth herein after a reasonable op rtunity for discovery. NATURE OF THE CLAIM rn 1 . This is a federal securities class action brought by Plaintiff g pst Dendant . CD Merrill Lynch and Henry Blodget ("Blodget") on behalf ofa class (the "Class consi1g of all persons or entities who purchased Lycos securities from June 15, 1999 through May 17, 2000, inclusive (the "Class Period") . Plaintiff seeks to recover damages caused to the Class by Defendants' violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), Rule IOb-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act . 2. This action arises as a result of the manipulation by means of deceptive and -t- manipulative acts, practices devices and contrivances, of the market prices of Lycos securities with the intent, purpose and effect of creating and maintaining an artificial high market prices. Defendants accomplished the manipulation by issuing Merrill Lynch analyst reports regarding Lycos that recommended the purchase of Lycos common stock, and set price targets for Lycos common stock , which were materially false and misleading , lacked any reasonable factual basis were contrary to the actual beliefs held by the analysts. When issuing their Lycos analyst reports, Defendants failed to disclose si gnificant, material conflicts of interest which resulted from their use of Blodget's reputation and his ability to influence the actions of buyers and sellers of Internet securities by issuing favorable analyst reports, in order to cur ry favor with internet companies and thereby to obtain the their investment banking business for Merrill Lynch. Throughout the Class Period , Defendants maintained at least an "ACCUMULATE/BUY" recommendation on Lycos in order to obtain and suppo rt lucrative financial deals for Merrill Lynch. 3 . The Class Period begins on June 15, 1999 . The Class Period ends on May 17, 2000, the date of the announcement of the merger of Lycos and Terra Networks SA . 4. As demonstrated herein, Blodget's highly-publicized reputation as an analyst o f Internet companies, coupled with Defendants' positive reports and "ACCUMULATEIBUY" and "BUY/BUY" recommendations on Lycos, significantly and artificially inflated the price of Lycos securities throughout the Class Period . Defendants' recommendations of Lycos and the price targets which they set for Lycos common stock lacked a reasonable basis in fact, failed to state the true beliefs of the analysts, and were dominated and influenced by Defendants' undisclosed serious conflict of interest arising out of Merrill Lynch's desire to act as a financial advisor to Lycos, and to obtain the highest possible price for securities of Lycos held by Merrill . 5 . On April 8, 2002, the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York (the "Attorney General") filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York an Application for an Order Pursuant to [New York] General Business Law Sec . 354 (the -2- "Application"), which Application named Merrill Lynch, Blodget and other past or present officers or employees of Merrill Lynch as Respondents . In support of the Application, the Attorney General filed an Affidavit in Support of Application for an Order Pursuant to General Business Law Sec. 354. The Affidavit was sworn to by Eric Dinallo, Chief of the Investment Protection Bureau of the New York State Department of Law (the "Dinallo Affidavit" or "Dinallo Af ") . A copy of the Dinallo Affidavit is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and it is incorporated herein, in full by reference. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to Section 27 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), 15 U .S.C. §78aa, and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 . This action arises under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §78j(b) and §78t(a), and the rules and regulations promulgated there under, including SEC Rule IOb-5, 17 C .F.R. 240.1Ob-5. 7. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. §78aa) and 28 U .S.C. §1391(b) and (c). Substantial acts in furtherance of the alleged fraud and/or its effects have occurred within this District and Merrill Lynch maintains multiple offices in this District. 8. In connection with the facts and omissions alleged in this Complaint, Defendants, directly or indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including, but not limited to, the mails, interstate telephone communications, and the facilities of the national securities markets . PARTIES 9. Plaintiff George Essenmacher purchased Lycos securities, as set forth in the attached certification, and was damaged thereby. 10. Defendant Merrill Lynch has its headquarters located at 4 World Financial Center, 250 Vesey Street New York, New York . Defendant Merrill Lynch is the largest securities broke r -3- in the United States and maintains multiple offices in this District . Merrill Lynch claims to be one of the world's leading financial management and advisory companies with offices in 44 countries and total client assets of about $1 .6 trillion. As an investment bank, Merrill Lynch claims to be the top global underwriter and market maker of debt and equity securities and a leading strategic advisor to corporations, institutions, and individuals worldwide . 11 . Defendant Blodget was at all relevant times an Internet stock analyst and Firs t Vice President of Merrill Lynch. In the Fall of 2001, Merrill Lynch asked Blodget to resign by offering him a buy-out offer which would pay Blodget approximately $2 million. On November 14, 2001, it was announced that Blodget was resigning as an Internet analyst at Merrill Lynch. SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS Background 12. Since 1999, the internet research analysts (the "internet group") at Merrill Lynch have published on a regular basis ratings for internet stocks, including Lycos, that were materially false and misleading because : (1) the ratings in many cases did not reflect the analysts' true opinions of the companies ; (2) no "reduce" or "sell" recommendations were issued as a matter of undisclosed, internal policy, thereby converting a published five-point rating scale into a de facto three-point system; and (3) Merrill Lynch failed to disclose to the public that Merrill Lynch's ratings were tarnished by an undisclosed con flict of interest: the research analysts were acting as quasi-investment bankers for the companies at issue , often initiating, continuing , and/or manipulating research coverage for the purpose of attracting and keeping investment banking clients, thereby producing misleading ratings that were neither objective nor independent, contrary to Merrill Lynch's representations . 13 . There was a serious breakdown of the separation between the Merrill Lynch banking and research departments, a separation that was critical to the integrity of the recommendations issued to the public by Merrill Lynch. Merrill Lynch's stated policies reflect an understanding that this separation is crucial. -4- I. 14. The pressure put on the Merrill Lynch internet group to appease both investment bankers and potential investment banking clients led the group to ignore the bottom two categories of the five-point rating system ("reduce" and "sell") and to use only the remaining ratings ("buy", "accumulate" and "neutral") . The absence of clear guidance from Merrill Lynch management on how to resolve the conflicts created by these pressures led Blodget, the head of the internet group, in an internal Merrill Lynch e-mail, to threaten to "start calling the stocks (stocks, not companies) . .. like we see them, no matter what the ancillary business consequences are." The Internet Group 's Stock Ratings Were Misleadin g 15. Merrill Lynch and Blodget rated internet stocks, including Lycos, both for Intermediate-Term and Long-Term growth as follows : BUY/BUY (1-1), ACCUMULATE/BUY (2-1), ACCUMULATE (2-2), NEUTRALBUY (3-1) and NEUTRAL (3-2) . Although Merrill Lynch's published rating system provided for 4s (reduce) and 5s (sell), the internet group never used 4s or 5s. The list of covered internet stocks for the second quarter of 2000, for instance, lists 24 stocks, none of which was rated less favorably than a 2. From the spring of 1999 to the fall of 2001, Merrill Lynch never published a single reduce or sell rating on any stock covered by the internet group. In sworn testimony,' both Blodget and his subordinate, Kirsten Campbell, confirmed that the group never rated a stock 4 or 5 . Thus, although represented to be a five point system, it was in actuality a three-point system . 16. Defendants represented that their Ratings Criteria for the combined Intermediate- Term and Long-Term ratings on all of the Internet stocks that they rated, including Lycos, were as follows: BUY/BUY (1-1 ) • Dominant leader with a clean story in a sector with strong growth prospect s References to sworn testimony and internal Merrill Lynch a-mails are based upon testimony taken and documents received by the New York State Attorney General in connection with his investigation of Merrill Lynch.
Recommended publications
  • Computer Networks Using the Every Aspect of Modern Life
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 8, Issue 4, April-2017 ISSN 2229-5518 122 Computer Networks Using the Every Aspect Of Modern Life G.V.Vijey Kaarthic, N.V. Sakthivel, L.Manikandan Abstract: Computer netw orks run over the telephone infrastructure at relatively low cost and providing the data cost to using the connections. Netw orks enable international communication w ith suppliers and stack holders as the traffic netw orks. Challenges that arise in netw orking and particularly in the internet trend to have the millions of peoples w ill use the internet. On huge grow ing impact is the online shopping has grow n over the last 10 years to become the huge market . Wireless internet technology is development also know n as Wi-Fi has really taking over the w ay of people to access through the username and then passw ord for that connecting the Wi-Fi, w idely more popular and then very short space and the save the time. Internet connections w ill allow s the individual access the internet via a netw ork hotspots w hile travelling w ithout using the cables and w ires. Computer netw ork technology is the high-level technology it w ill maintains the developing companies are also fighting against the damaging softw are such as the attacks the malw are, virus, w orms. Keyw ords : Hotspot, Wi-fi, netw ork, Li-fi, virus, stack holders, dial-up connections. —————————— —————————— 1. INTRODUCTION Modern Life Network has a number of modern devices work on a network and then often to communicate technology, lifestyle, business, sports, and society.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 ENTREPRENEUR in the Click by Catherine Seda
    SEARCHING FOR SALES: Nacho Hernandez knows that thinking like your customers is key to successfully marketing via search engines. 60 I ENTREPRENEUR In the Click By Catherine Seda ou can’t resist the temptation. Fixated on ample, if you type a keyword into MSN Search your computer screen, you anxiously type on Microsoft’s consumer information and enter- Ykeywords relevant to your business into tainment site (www.msn.com), the Web site list- your favorite search engine. A list of search results ings displayed could be from Inktomi, Microsoft appears. You cringe as you spot several competitors, or Overture. Overture provides search results not then grumble because your company’s Web site only to MSN Search, but also to AltaVista and is nowhere to be seen. Where is it? That depends. Yahoo! Could a top site on Overture then appear Where is your search engine marketing strategy? as a top site on a distribution partner’s site? Yes. Gone are the days Unfortunately, these distribution relationships when adding keywords change frequently, making it difficult to deter- want all the right people to in meta tags to your mine exactly where results come from. site produced rankings. The challenging part, however, is figuring out how notice your business? then you Search engine marketing to land a top position in the search engines. There has evolved into a com- are two complementary yet completely different plex and competitive types of methods: optimization and advertising. need to make the most of today’s program. It’s also prof- Search engine optimization (SEO) refers to en- itable—according to a hancing your Web site design to make it more ap- March 2003 report by pealing to crawler-based search engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Informa2on Retrieval
    Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Brief (non‐technical) history . Early keyword‐based engines ca. 1995‐1997 Introducon to . Altavista, Excite, Infoseek, Inktomi, Lycos Informaon Retrieval . Paid search ranking: Goto (morphed into Overture.com → Yahoo!) CS276 . Your search ranking depended on how much you Informaon Retrieval and Web Search paid Pandu Nayak and Prabhakar Raghavan . Aucon for keywords: casino was expensive! Lecture 15: Web search basics 2 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Brief (non‐technical) history . 1998+: Link‐based ranking pioneered by Google . Blew away all early engines save Inktomi . Great user experience in search of a business model . Meanwhile Goto/Overture’s annual revenues were nearing $1 billion Paid . Result: Google added paid search “ads” to the side, Search Ads independent of search results . Yahoo followed suit, acquiring Overture (for paid placement) and Inktomi (for search) . 2005+: Google gains search share, dominang in Europe and very strong in North America . 2009: Yahoo! and Microso propose combined paid search offering Algorithmic results. 3 4 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.4.1 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Sec. 19.4.1 Web search basics User Needs . Need [Brod02, RL04] User . Informaonal – want to learn about something (~40% / 65%) . Navigaonal – want to go to that page (~25% / 15%) Web spider . Transaconal – want to do something (web‐mediated) (~35% / 20%) . Access a service . Downloads Search . Shop Indexer . Gray areas . Find a good hub . Exploratory search “see what’s there” The Web Indexes Ad indexes5 6 1 Introducon to Informaon Retrieval Introducon to Informaon Retrieval How far do people look for results? Users’ empirical evaluaon of results .
    [Show full text]
  • Last Mile Delivery
    Investors have risked billions on Webvan, Urbanfetch, and other same-day transporters. The economics, though, show they won’t deliver for long. Photographs Photographs by Brad Wilson The content business business models LastMile to 40 Nowhere Flaws & Fallacies in Internet Home-Delivery Schemes by Tim Laseter, Pat Houston, Anne Chung, Silas Byrne, Martha Turner, and Anand Devendran Tim Laseter Pat Houston Silas Byrne Anand Devendran ([email protected]) is ([email protected]), a prin- ([email protected]) is an ([email protected]) is a partner in Booz-Allen & cipal in Booz-Allen & Hamilton’s associate in Booz-Allen & a consultant in Booz-Allen & Hamilton’s Operations Practice Cleveland office and a member Hamilton’s New York office Hamilton’s New York office and serves on the firm’s of the Consumer and Health focusing on operational and focusing on operational and e-business core team. He is Group, focuses on strategic organizational issues across a growth strategies across a wide the author of Balanced Sourcing: supply-chain transformation, broad range of industries. range of industries. Cooperation and Competition in particularly as related to Supplier Relationships (Jossey- e-business issues. Martha Turner Bass, 1998). ([email protected]) is an Anne Chung associate in Booz-Allen & ([email protected]), a Hamilton’s New York office Cleveland-based principal of focusing on operations and Booz-Allen & Hamilton, focuses supply-chain management on e-business and supply-chain issues in a variety of industries, strategy as a member of the with particular emphasis on e- firm's Operations Practice. business. Amazon.com’s launch in July 1995 ushered in online sales potential; high cost of delivery; a selection– content an era with a fundamentally new value proposition to the variety trade-off; and existing, entrenched competition.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Recent Work
    UC Berkeley Recent Work Title The Internet and E-commerce Development in Mexico Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6c17b69n Authors Kenney, Martin Curry, James Contreras, Oscar Publication Date 2001-05-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Internet and E-commerce Development in Mexico BRIE Working Paper 144 January 2, 2002 ©Copyright 2001 by the authors By James Curry Profesor-Investigador El Colegio de la Frontera Norte Tijuana, Baja California, México U.S. Mail: P.O. Box L Chula Vista, CA 91912 [email protected] and Oscar Contreras Profesor-Investigador El Colegio de Sonora Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico and Martin Kenney Professor Department of Human and Community Development University of California, Davis Davis, California 95616 [email protected] & Senior Research Associate Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-2322 The authors thank the UC MEXUS-CONACYT program for the funding that is reported in this research. Generous support for production of the BRIE Working Papers Series was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Table of Contents · Summary and Findings · Introduction · Methodology · The Internet in Mexico The Early History of the Internet in Mexico Growth in Internet Usage Internet Access and Service Providers · E-Commerce in Mexico Barriers to the Growth of E-Commerce · Business-to-Consumer E-Commerce Mexico and the U.S. Hispanic and Pan-Latin American/Hispanic Markets Customization Brief Descriptions
    [Show full text]
  • Silicon Alley Media, Inc
    Beta How To Write A GREAT Business Plan Henry Blodget Co-founder, CEO & Editor-in-Chief, Business Insider Beta What We Know About Business Plans • We’ve seen a lot of business plans – 10 years on Wall Street working with growth companies – We run a business plan competition with hundreds of entrants – Startups pitch us ideas every day • We’ve been through it ourselves – Business Insider has raised several rounds of investment Beta What Makes A Business Plan GREAT? • The GREAT ones are concise and and crystal clear. They explain: – WHAT your value-proposition is – WHY you will win – HOW you will execute your plan 3 Beta Overview of Today’s Presentation • Why do you need a business plan? • What goes into a great business plan? (Step by step) • Quick guide to the elevator pitch Beta How Important Are Business Plans? 5 Beta Why Bother With A Business Plan At All? • Forces you to analyze key questions: – Market size – Existing competition – Your value-proposition – Realistic assessment of obstacles and challenges • Helps you refine idea • Helps you raise money Beta Type Of Plan Depends On Type Of Business • Capital intensive businesses: – Require abundant planning and risk management – Ex.: mining, manufacturing, food services, data centers • => Create detailed business plan Beta Type Of Plan Depends On Type Of Business • Less capital intensive – Need to be nimble and adapt strategy – Excessive planning an impediment to agility – Ex.: internet start-ups, service businesses • => Create less-detailed business plan Beta Key Elements Of Your Business
    [Show full text]
  • Multimedia, Internet, On-Line
    Section IV: Multimedia, the Internet, and On-Line Services High-End Digital Video Applications Larry Amiot Electronic and Computing Technologies Division Argonne National Laboratory The emphasis of this paper is on the high-end applications Internet and Intranet that are driving digital video. The research with which I am involved at Argonne National Laboratory is not done on dig- The packet video networks which currently support many ital video per se, but rather on how the research applications applications such as file transfer, Mbone video (talking at the laboratory drive its requirements for digital video. The heads), and World Wide Web browsing are limiting for high- paper will define what digital video is, what some of its com- quality video because of the low throughput one can achieve ponents are, and then discuss a few applications that are dri- via the Internet or intranets. Examples of national packet ving the development of these components. The focus will be switched networks developed in the last several years include on what digital video means to individuals in the research the National Science Foundation Network (NSFNet). The and education community. Department of Energy had its own network called ESNET, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Digital Video Environment (NASA) had a network as well. Recently, the NSFNet was de- commissioned, and commercial interests are now starting to In 1996, a group of people from several universities in the fill that void. Research and education communities are find- Midwest and from Argonne formed a Video Working Group. ing, however, that this new commercial Internet is too re- This body tried to define the areas of digital video of impor- stricting and does not meet their throughput requirements; it tance to their institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Choose a Search Engine Or Directory
    How to Choose a Search Engine or Directory Fields & File Types If you want to search for... Choose... Audio/Music AllTheWeb | AltaVista | Dogpile | Fazzle | FindSounds.com | Lycos Music Downloads | Lycos Multimedia Search | Singingfish Date last modified AllTheWeb Advanced Search | AltaVista Advanced Web Search | Exalead Advanced Search | Google Advanced Search | HotBot Advanced Search | Teoma Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search Domain/Site/URL AllTheWeb Advanced Search | AltaVista Advanced Web Search | AOL Advanced Search | Google Advanced Search | Lycos Advanced Search | MSN Search Search Builder | SearchEdu.com | Teoma Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search File Format AllTheWeb Advanced Web Search | AltaVista Advanced Web Search | AOL Advanced Search | Exalead Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search Geographic location Exalead Advanced Search | HotBot Advanced Search | Lycos Advanced Search | MSN Search Search Builder | Teoma Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search Images AllTheWeb | AltaVista | The Amazing Picture Machine | Ditto | Dogpile | Fazzle | Google Image Search | IceRocket | Ixquick | Mamma | Picsearch Language AllTheWeb Advanced Web Search | AOL Advanced Search | Exalead Advanced Search | Google Language Tools | HotBot Advanced Search | iBoogie Advanced Web Search | Lycos Advanced Search | MSN Search Search Builder | Teoma Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search Multimedia & video All TheWeb | AltaVista | Dogpile | Fazzle | IceRocket | Singingfish | Yahoo Video Search Page Title/URL AOL Advanced
    [Show full text]
  • CLAYTON KILE, on Behalf of Himself : and All Others Similarly Situated, : : Plaintiff, : : : MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : CLAYTON KILE, on Behalf of Himself : And All Others Similarly Situated, : : Plaintiff, : : : MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. and : HENRY BLODGET, : Defendants. : : : Plaintiff Clayton Kile (APlaintiff@) alleges the following based upon the investigation of counsel, which included a review of United States Securities and Exchange Commission (ASEC@) filings by CMGI (the ACompany@), Lycos, Inc. (ALycos@ or ALCOS@) and uBid, Inc. (AuBid@), as well as regulatory filings and reports, securities analysts= reports and advisories about CMGI, Lycos and uBid issued by Merrill Lynch & Co. (AMerrill Lynch@), press releases and other public statements issued by Merrill Lynch, and media reports about CMGI, Lycos and uBid. Plaintiff believes that substantial additional evidentiary support will exist for the allegations set forth herein after a reasonable opportunity for discovery. NATURE OF THE CLAIM 1. This is a federal securities class action brought by Plaintiff against Defendants Merrill Lynch and Henry Blodget (ABlodget@) on behalf of a class (the AClass@) consisting of all persons or entities who purchased CMGI securities from March 23, 1999 through October 6, 2000, inclusive (the AClass Period@). Plaintiff seeks to recover damages caused to the Class by Defendants= violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the AExchange Act@), Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. 1. 2. This action arises as a result of the manipulation by means of deceptive and manipulative acts, practices, devices and contrivances, of the market price of CMGI securities with the intent, purpose and effect of creating and maintaining artificially high market prices.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTROL and ASSURANCE in E-COMMERCE: PRIVACY, INTEGRITY, and SECURITY at E-BAY
    Yale ICF Working Paper No. 02-38 September 13, 2002 CONTROL AND ASSURANCE IN E-COMMERCE: PRIVACY, INTEGRITY, AND SECURITY AT e-BAY Rong-Ruey Duh National Taiwan University Karim Jamal University of Alberta at Edmonton Shyam Sunder Yale School of Management This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=350663 Control and Assurance In e-Commerce: Privacy, Integrity, and Security at eBay Rong-Ruey Duh, National Taiwan University Karim Jamal, University of Alberta Shyam Sunder, Yale University Please address correspondence to: Shyam Sunder Yale School of Management 135 Prospect Street P.O. Box 208200 New Haven, CT 06520-8200 Phone: (203) 432-5960 Fax: (203) 432-6974 September 13, 2002 An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2001 American Accounting Association annual meeting. The authors are grateful for the comments of the conference participants. Financial support provided to the first author by National Science Council, Republic of China is appreciated (NSC-90-2416-H-002-008). Copyright 2002. All rights reserved. Control and Assurance In e-Commerce: Privacy, Integrity and Security at eBay ABSTRACT Concern about privacy, integrity, and security of online transactions hampers absorption of e-commerce technologies as a normal way of doing business. To gain acceptance and trust of their participants, all organizations must achieve control or expectations equilibrium—a state where participants choose to do what others expect of them. Establishing control in e-commerce requires us to expand the traditional view of internal control to encompass the activities of customers, suppliers, and other “outside” users of their electronic platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • KNOWLEDGE@WHARTON on Building Corporate Value
    73009_FM 9/16/02 12:55 PM Page iii KNOWLEDGE@WHARTON On Building Corporate Value MUKUL PANDYA, HARBIR SINGH, ROBERT E. MITTELSTAEDT, JR., AND ERIC CLEMONS John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 73009_CH01I 9/13/02 11:45 AM Page 2 73009_FM 9/13/02 11:36 AM Page i KNOWLEDGE@WHARTON ON BUILDING CORPORATE VALUE 73009_FM 9/13/02 11:36 AM Page ii 73009_FM 9/16/02 12:55 PM Page iii KNOWLEDGE@WHARTON On Building Corporate Value MUKUL PANDYA, HARBIR SINGH, ROBERT E. MITTELSTAEDT, JR., AND ERIC CLEMONS John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 73009_FM 9/13/02 11:36 AM Page iv This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2003 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. All rights reserved. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008, e-mail: [email protected]. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiduciary Duties and the Analyst Scandals
    University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 2007 Fiduciary Duties and the Analyst Scandals Jill E. Fisch University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Economic Policy Commons, Economics Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Legal Biography Commons, Legal Studies Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Repository Citation Fisch, Jill E., "Fiduciary Duties and the Analyst Scandals" (2007). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 1058. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1058 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. File: Fisch Macro Updated Created on: 5/22/2007 2:10 PM Last Printed: 5/22/2007 2:15 PM FIDUCIARY DUTIES AND THE ANALYST SCANDALS Jill E. Fisch* I. INTRODUCTION I am delighted to be here and to deliver a lecture as part of the series honoring Daniel Meador. I am also honored to be part of the group of dis- tinguished scholars who have delivered lectures in this series. I was invited to speak about fiduciaries and, in particular, whether research analysts should be regulated as fiduciaries. Regulators, legislators, and the self regu- latory organizations—the New York Stock Exchange and the NASD—have been paying a lot of attention to analyst regulation.
    [Show full text]